Hi Dave,

Your opinion is noted... but have you really crunched the numbers you're 
quoting as the basis for your conclusion? 100 menbers?  Is that the 
pre-determined cut off line for what qualifies as 'stagnant'?  Really?  Since 
when, and who decided that?

Just prodding your thought process a little... don't take it personally.


John Degnan
[email protected]

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ctxmf74 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 06:41 PM
  Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: SSPM Group


     Haha, Hi John, Can't get much more negative than making interested 
modelers qualify to join a group can they? 
     The difference in advancement between a closed and an open society becomes 
obvious if one looks around, North Korea and the USA for instance? If a group 
has been around years with less than 100 members it's stagnant. Who knows how 
many talented modelers have been turned off by the exclusiveness and joined 
elsewhere? ...DaveBranum

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to