The Sn42_Conspiracy is not run the same way. I had no problem becoming a member of that group, and remained a member for years until it became obvious that nothing was going on. Look at the number of posts and you'll see what I mean. I've been a member of private groups. It's impossible to submit a membership request. You have to be invited. As far as your infantile attitude goes, don't be too hard on yourself John. We love you anyway. Ed Kozlowsky Sanford, Maine
>________________________________ >From: John Degnan <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 3:59 AM >Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Re: SSPM Group > > > >FYI, Ed (and everyone), the SSPM does NOT "claim to be" a public group. It is >NOT a public group, which explains why it cannot be located using the Yahoo >group search feature. I already have stated this fact before. Therefore, this >group is not being run poorly... it is sticking to it's guns (regardless of >all the negative banter about how it is run). I don't hear all you folks >raising cane about the Sn42_Conspiracy_Group which is run basicall the same >way! So what gives? Is this just the latest flogging horse?!? > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sn42_Conspiracy_Group > >Had I not posted about the existence of the SSPM group (not realizing when I >did that it was mean to be a private group), all you folks would still not >know of it's existence... so what, then, would everyone now be bemoaning >instead? Oh, I know... it would be the operational rules of the second of TWO >private groups that I know of. Yes, Virginia... there IS yet another, PRIVATE >group that cannot be found using the Yahoo group search feature... one that I >have been asked by its creator NOT to publicise. I'd LOVE to be able to reveal >the name of this group because it is tailor made (even in name) for those who >are now making such a fuss over the operation of the SSPM. > >And as another FYI to set the FACTS (as opposed to speculative opinions) out >for review... there was NO "pride" of any kind in ANY of the posts I've made >in an effort to explain to everyone some of the various, POSSIBLE reasons why >their applications may not be getting answered soon enough to satisfy them (as >if the groups membership policy should be amended to satisfy each person's >personal preferences). If I'm gonna be judges so harshly for trying to offer >some suggestions, then let your gavels fall... then dismiss your courts. I can >take it... AND dish it right back out. > >And I am most definitely NOT ashamed of myself for abiding by the guidelines >of ANY group I am a member of... regardless of whether anyone else likes those >rules. So lets do without the infantile, personal remarks. > >John Degnan >[email protected] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
