Seeing as SSPM is a private group, can we drop the topic and move onto 
something we can all share.
Merry Christmas
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Degnan" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Re: SSPM Group


> Hi Dave,
>
> Your opinion is noted... but have you really crunched the numbers you're 
> quoting as the basis for your conclusion? 100 menbers?  Is that the 
> pre-determined cut off line for what qualifies as 'stagnant'?  Really? 
> Since when, and who decided that?
>
> Just prodding your thought process a little... don't take it personally.
>
>
> John Degnan
> [email protected]
>
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: ctxmf74
>  To: [email protected]
>  Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 06:41 PM
>  Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: SSPM Group
>
>
>     Haha, Hi John, Can't get much more negative than making interested 
> modelers qualify to join a group can they?
>     The difference in advancement between a closed and an open society 
> becomes obvious if one looks around, North Korea and the USA for instance? 
> If a group has been around years with less than 100 members it's stagnant. 
> Who knows how many talented modelers have been turned off by the 
> exclusiveness and joined elsewhere? ...DaveBranum
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to