On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 11:12:38 AM UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote: > I also personally wish there were a significantly smaller Sage core with > much less > dependencies, and which removes everything from the Sage that annoys Dima, > and much more. This is a difficult > technical challenge, since it would certainly involve changing core parts > of the library. E.g., it would be nice to have > a working Sage that doesn't depend on Maxima or GAP being present, but > still starts up and is generally useful > for the rest of what Sage does. Creating such a thing involves making > significant changes to the assumptions that > can be made in the Sage library code about what they assume is available > by default. >
Yes, this is exactly what modularization is doing. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29705 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/3ed786da-d0ea-4938-a60e-8820e6f8f561n%40googlegroups.com.
