#6449: Additive abelian groups
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: joyner
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: group_theory | Keywords: abelian group
Author: David Loeffler | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Cremona, Jim Stankewicz | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Comment(by cremona):
OK, did sage -ba and then a complete test (this is with the big folded
patch but not the ones-that-got-away) and found only these:
{{{
sage -t devel/sage-6449/sage/all.py # 0 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-6449/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py # 4 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-6449/sage/modular/modsym/space.py # 3 doctests
failed
}}}
of which the first can be ignored, the second and third are treated by
ones-that-got-away.
But applying the ones-that-got-away fails as follows:
{{{
applying trac_6449_ones_that_got_away.patch
patching file sage/modular/modsym/space.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2203
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2213
Hunk #3 FAILED at 2226
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
sage/modular/modsym/space.py.rej
}}}
which is odd. Still, we are nearly there.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6449#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
