#9808: Upgrade numpy to 1.5.0 and scipy to 0.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   Reporter:  maldun                                                            
  |       Owner:  maldun                                      
       Type:  task                                                              
  |      Status:  needs_work                                  
   Priority:  major                                                             
  |   Milestone:  sage-4.6                                    
  Component:  packages                                                          
  |    Keywords:  numpy, scipy                                
     Author:  Stefan Reiterer, Francois Bissey, John Palmieri, David Kirkby     
  |    Upstream:  Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release.
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman, David Kirkby, Leif Leonhardy, Francois 
Bissey  |      Merged:                                              
Work_issues:                                                                    
  |  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Comment(by drkirkby):

 A few points.
  * I'm going to be very busy over the next week, and particularly today,
 so I don't have a lot of time to put into this.
  * I believe the pacakge should be called 1.5.0 and not 1.5.0.p0 - this
 was discussed some time ago on sage-devel.
  * I'm not sure that 'sed' command is doing what John wants. Instead of
 using 'uname' for test purposes, use 'echo'.

 {{{
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.1.4  | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\..*/\1/'
 10
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.6.0  | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\..*/\1/'
 10
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.6.0  | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\..*/\1/'
 10
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.5.1  | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\..*/\1/'
 10
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 9.5.1  | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\..*/\1/'
 9
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.4.1  | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\..*/\1/'
 10
 }}}

 That looks to be taking only the major part, and so can't distinguish from
 10.5 or 10.6, which I think is what is said is needed. If that's what's
 needed, my approach would be
  * Simulate the output of 'uname -r' (which is portable, so can be used on
 any platform, not just OS X), using 'echo'. That way you don't need to
 find different systems to test on.
  * Make sure the OS is OS X. My HP C3600 runs HP-UX 11.11 and I expect
 (though it's off so I can't check), that 'uname -r' might print 11.11
 which would not be any use here. So put this all in 'if' statemant that
 checks for OS X first.
  * If you consider the output version to be x.y.z, then I'd do something
 like this, where I split the x.y.z into individual parts, by first
 replacing the dots with a space, then printing the 1st, 2nd or 3rd part of
 the expressions using 'awk'.

 {{{
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.4.1
 10.4.1
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.4.1  | sed 's/\./ /g'
 10 4 1
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.4.1  | sed 's/\./ /g' | awk '{print $1}'
 10
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.4.1  | sed 's/\./ /g' | awk '{print $2}'
 4
 drkir...@hawk:~$ echo 10.4.1  | sed 's/\./ /g' | awk '{print $3}'
 1
 drkir...@hawk:~$
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9808#comment:267>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to