pgeorges wrote: > Michal Rudolf a écrit : > >>I agree that you have some points. But I am still against one of two forks >>taking Scid name. If you agree to maintain just one, I am more inclined to >>support using Scid's name. >> > > > So if I understand well you propose 2 scenarios : > S1 : > Scid -> let it die > 2 forks : projects A and B > > S2 : > One unique "fork", then the name Scid can be used -> this means a mere > continuation, right ? > > Am I right ? > > If yes, I'm ok for S2.
I think given the problems between us, it would be totally impossible to manage this as one project. As such, as I see the only way forward as A and B. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
