pgeorges, poniedziałek, 12 lutego 2007: >So, suppose shane never updates Scid : then Scid is a dead project, right ? >Suppose there are forks (any fork is insane for me in open source >world), and Shane wants to continue Scid development (in 2007 ? in 2010 >?). What can he do ? Try to catch up and merge projects with different >names, that followed different paths for months / years ? Not an human task. >My main goal, if authorized to do so by SF staff, is just to change 2004 >to 2007 on Scid web page and update downloadable files. As I said if >Shane disagrees, that's also a good thing as we will have his position.
>But if someone does not update its project for 2 years I don't see how >he could object to people trying to improve the situation. In commercial >or open source software, any app not supported or updated for 2 years is >considered as dead, even it's not fair. I agree that you have some points. But I am still against one of two forks taking Scid name. If you agree to maintain just one, I am more inclined to support using Scid's name. -- Michal Rudolf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
