Michal Rudolf a écrit : > I agree that you have some points. But I am still against one of two forks > taking Scid name. If you agree to maintain just one, I am more inclined to > support using Scid's name. >
So if I understand well you propose 2 scenarios : S1 : Scid -> let it die 2 forks : projects A and B S2 : One unique "fork", then the name Scid can be used -> this means a mere continuation, right ? Am I right ? If yes, I'm ok for S2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
