Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at sun.com> writes: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:29:16PM -0500, Richard Lowe wrote: > >> #274 need consistency checks between ARC/bug database and RTI >> http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274 >> >> You're suggesting that the putback comments match both the bug/ARC >> case, and the RTI also matches both of those, no? > > The set of bugs in the RTI should match the set of bugs in the comment. > But the RTI should probably just keep track of the bugids, and expand the > synopses on display. Perhaps the disconnect is that I no longer think of > an RTI as a static, archived document, so that the synopses it contains are > more or less irrelevant.
Ah, ok. I get it now, I think. rtichk checks that every bug in the comment has an associated RTI. You'd like the reverse (if any of those RTIs mention bugs/ARC cases that the comments don't, it should also see that as a failing?) -- Rich
