Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at Sun.COM> writes: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:27:42PM -0800, Danek Duvall wrote: > >> > rtichk checks that every bug in the comment has an associated RTI. >> > You'd like the reverse (if any of those RTIs mention bugs/ARC cases >> > that the comments don't, it should also see that as a failing?) >> >> That's a check I hadn't conceived of, but yes, that'd be a good one to >> have. > > (Trying to keep the discussion in one place ...) > > Yes, I had *not* thought of that check. > > Let's see if I can explain what I wanted comchk to do. > > The comment is a list of bugids and ARC cases, each of which has an > associated synopsis (or case title). > > For each bugid, I want to make sure that the synopsis in the comment > matches the synopsis for that bugid the bug database has for it.
Which we do already. > For each ARC case id, I want to make sure that the title in the comment > matches the title for that case id the ARC database has for it. Which we do. > I don't think that the RTI tool should be doing these checks, I think it > should be done in wx/cdm. Right, and it *is* > Am I being any clearer? Or am I just missing the thrust of your argument? No, you're missing the fact we do this already. And I had assumed you were asking for something new, I think. -- Rich
