On Tuesday 12 February 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, wp wrote:
>>> Gene,
>>> The Bobcad font is in the .FNT format if you can use it send me an
>>> email off list and I will send it to you.
>>> I have version 19 of BobCad.
>>> Wayne
>>> \
>>
>> Hu
Aram,
measuring torque on an AC servos is definitely possible.
It is not as simple as measuring current but this does give some feedback.
I don't think that the current used by the servo drivers is a measure
but you try Stan's setup that way.
There are servo drivers with force-feedback but I an
Okay, I answered my own question with a little research.
Here's one:
Documentation for "PlotFont" -
http://www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/plotutils/plotutils_27.html
Part of a larger package "PlotUtils" - (Docs) -
http://www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/plotutils/plotutils.html#SEC_Top
Source - http://www.del
It becomes a pain to keep juggling functions around to avoid this
problem. Better to declare all functions at the top of the file with a
prototype, like I suggested. Then you don't care about the order of the
functions.
Andy
Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> EMC can do PID just fine. It's steppers that can't.
Steve makes many good points, which have been gone over ad
infinitum here over the past N years.
The only comment I want to throw out is that some users actually
ARE using encoders with stepper motors. It won't
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
>>Yes, it is the "bobcad" default font, used for all drawing
>>dimensions, for instance. This is on version 16.1, anyway.
>>
>
> Is that something I could extract and use elsewhere Jon?
>
It is in file font.cad, in Bobcad file
I'm interested being they are free to use . :^)
What font utilities will read .jhf files? In either Linux or MS Windows.
If I can ultimately get them into CAD then I can go from there.
Thanks,
Chris
John Kasunich wrote:
> The Hershey fonts (public domain, as long as they aren't in one
> partic
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote:
> The first time the compiler comes across the function it doesn't know
> the prototype, so it assumes that it returns an int. Then when it comes
> across the function declaration it is different.
>
> The "type" of a function is defined by th
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 22:42 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > With the experience I have gained so far, it leads me to believe that
> > you are making choices that may make your quest more difficult. If you
> > are trying to have a CNC machine to make parts and spend as little as
> > appropriate
Does someone have suggestions on how to set up the config for a HobbyCNC
driver board?
Thanks ...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>With the experience I have gained so far, it leads me to believe that
>>you are making choices that may make your quest more difficult. If you
>>are trying to have a CNC machine to make parts and spend as little as
>>appropriate for that end, then you should consider stu
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 17:38 -0500, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> The function CRC16 is used before it is declared.
>
> Either move the definition of CRC16 to before main, or declare it separately
> prior to its use.
I moved main to the bottom of the file, and it compiled without
complaint. Thank you.
> With the experience I have gained so far, it leads me to believe that
> you are making choices that may make your quest more difficult. If you
> are trying to have a CNC machine to make parts and spend as little as
> appropriate for that end, then you should consider studying other
> machines th
The function CRC16 is used before it is declared.
Either move the definition of CRC16 to before main, or declare it separately
prior to its use.
I notice that you are using (very) old style declarations in that code.
Modern coders would write:
unsigned short CRC16(unsigned char *puchMsg, unsign
The first time the compiler comes across the function it doesn't know
the prototype, so it assumes that it returns an int. Then when it comes
across the function declaration it is different.
The "type" of a function is defined by the return type and the parameter
types which must always match w
Hi,
I you can make this work then it is clearly open
http://tulrich.com/fonts/#20070211
Dave
On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, wp wrote:
>> Gene,
>> The Bobcad font is in the .FNT format if you can use it send me an
>> email off list and I wil
At the risk of letting everyone know I am a C newbie. Oh ... you already
know?
I am getting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/emc2/Modbus$ gcc -o modbus-1c modbus-1c.c
modbus-1c.c:75: error: conflicting types for 'CRC16'
modbus-1c.c:28: error: previous implicit declaration of 'CRC16' was here
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, wp wrote:
> John personally that font is such a piece of crap I wouldn't want it
> anyway.as for copyright.. I have no idea and that thought never
> crossed my mind. I think that there are much better and "openly
> available" fonts other than in BobCad I can not
John Kasunich wrote:
>
> The Hershey fonts (public domain, as long as they aren't in one
> particular data format)
I mis-spoke, but not in a way that matters. The fonts are NOT
public domain. But they have an extremely liberal license that
will let you do pretty much anything you want with the
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, wp wrote:
>> Gene,
>> The Bobcad font is in the .FNT format if you can use it send me an
>> email off list and I will send it to you.
>> I have version 19 of BobCad.
>> Wayne
>> \
> Humm, that sounds like a potential copyright problem, so I'll sk
John personally that font is such a piece of crap I wouldn't want it
anyway.as for copyright..
I have no idea and that thought never crossed my mind. I think that
there are much better and
"openly available" fonts other than in BobCad I can not get that
font to open even with a .FNT
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, wp wrote:
>Gene,
>The Bobcad font is in the .FNT format if you can use it send me an
>email off list and I will send it to you.
>I have version 19 of BobCad.
>Wayne
>\
Humm, that sounds like a potential copyright problem, so I'll skip. I may be
able to find something
wp wrote:
> Gene,
> The Bobcad font is in the .FNT format if you can use it send me an
> email off list and I will send it to you.
> I have version 19 of BobCad.
> Wayne
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
>> Is that something I could extract and use elsew
Gene,
The Bobcad font is in the .FNT format if you can use it send me an
email off list and I will send it to you.
I have version 19 of BobCad.
Wayne
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
Is that something I could extract and use elsewhere Jon?
-
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 11 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
>>>Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
>I have used Bobcad for this. Even an old version will work
>fine. It can take any True-Type font on y
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 13:39 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a quickie.
>
> Can anyone recommend a UK supplier of stepper motors and associated drive
> electronics?
> eg just add mill, and computer running EMC.
>
> Mill is a light / middleweight Pinnacle universal job, XYZ travels are 400,
Dave
I've got motors and drivers from http://www.motioncontrolproducts.com and
was very pleased with price, service and range of choice.
Good luck
Andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a quickie.
>
> Can anyone recommend a UK supplier of stepper motors and associated drive
electronics?
> eg jus
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
>
>>Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday 11 February 2008, Jon Elson wrote:
>>>
I have used Bobcad for this. Even an old version will work
fine. It can take any True-Type font on your system and use
that. I hacked up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Stepper-Motors
>> The 180Ncm will be big enough, and at ?18.50 at the moment ...
>> The 3 Amp driver at ?28.95 each are a good option for driving them, so for
>> under ?150 you have all the grunt.
>> They will run direct off the p
> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Stepper-Motors
> The 180Ncm will be big enough, and at ?18.50 at the moment ...
> The 3 Amp driver at ?28.95 each are a good option for driving them, so for
> under ?150 you have all the grunt.
> They will run direct off the parallel port, but a simple br
> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Stepper-Motors
> The 180Ncm will be big enough, and at ?18.50 at the moment ...
> The 3 Amp driver at ?28.95 each are a good option for driving them, so for
> under ?150 you have all the grunt.
> They will run direct off the parallel port, but a simple br
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a quickie.
>
> Can anyone recommend a UK supplier of stepper motors and associated drive
> electronics?
> eg just add mill, and computer running EMC.
>
> Mill is a light / middleweight Pinnacle universal job, XYZ travels are 400,
> 180, 150 mm with
> quill head
I got mine from at the model engineer ex
http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Stepper-Motors in Leicester
and seems they have some even cheaper since I bought mine
Dave Caroline
archivist on #emc FreeNode
-
This SF.net em
Just a quickie.
Can anyone recommend a UK supplier of stepper motors and associated drive
electronics?
eg just add mill, and computer running EMC.
Mill is a light / middleweight Pinnacle universal job, XYZ travels are 400,
180, 150 mm with
quill head having separate raise / lower facility and
Hi
I think mechanical measure can not be use because limits of on torque will
be digital and it should be part of NC program that can be program. That
digital limits will be part of program and where ever cutting tool start
having problem with cutting material and as a result of which pressure of
a
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Ian W. Wright wrote:
> >>On Monday 11 February 2008, Ian W. Wright wrote:
>> >
>> >For those who were fascinated by the polygon turning have a look at this
>> >- http://tinyurl.com/2wqbvl , it achieves the same ends but without any
>> >extra power or syn
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Brian Pitt wrote:
>On Monday 11 February 2008 15:14, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 11 February 2008, Ian W. Wright wrote:
>> >For those who were fascinated by the polygon turning have a look at this
>> >- http://tinyurl.com/2wqbvl , it achieves the same ends but with
>>On Monday 11 February 2008, Ian W. Wright wrote:
> >For those who were fascinated by the polygon turning have a look at this
> >- http://tinyurl.com/2wqbvl , it achieves the same ends but without any
> >extra power or synchronisation of spindle and cutter! The video even
> >give
38 matches
Mail list logo
