--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm hardly the only person to have made this
> observation (and I made it independently,
> before learning that others had made it as
> well, just on the strength of the similarities).
> It seems rather strange, Va
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Karma is what tradition would state, not "stress".
> > >
> > > Actually, "stress" in MMY's lingo refers to samskaras,
[restoring snipped portion]
> impressions left in the mind of past experiences (in
> this or previous l
--No need to separate out one body from another. It's a package deal.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 28, 2007, at 11:50 AM, cardemaister wrote:
>
> > > > On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > This just verifies what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> >
> > > I know that many people don't like to consider this,
> > > and find some comfort or ins
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > The word "saMskaara" is actually almost the "same" as
> > Sanskrit in, well, Sanskrit -- which is "saMskRta".
> > That word, "saM-s-kRta", consists of the perfect participle
> > of the root "kR" (to do, etc), with the
On May 28, 2007, at 11:50 AM, cardemaister wrote:
> > On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> >
> > > > This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times,
> > > > that the TM myth of physical stress release from the
> > > > physical nervous system was fallacious. Where stress is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > I know that many people don't like to consider this,
> > and find some comfort or inspiration in believing
> > that Christ was NOT human, and that he was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> >
> > > > This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times,
> > > > that the TM myth of physica
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> There are two people here: you mention Mary of Magdala,
> This is a different person than Mary Magdalene.
No, same lady. "Magdalene" means "of Magdala"
(just as "Nazarene" means "of Nazareth").
> From the New
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > > This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times,
> > > that the TM myth of physical stress release from the
> > > physical nervous system was fallacious. Wher
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that many people don't like to consider this,
> and find some comfort or inspiration in believing
> that Christ was NOT human, and that he was somehow
> "divine" and the literal Son Of God.
Actually, Christian do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert, again no disrespect intended, but you
> should get a few books on the Bible and "read
> up" before you spout off. There is not ONE
> WORD in the Bible that characterizes Mary
> Magdalene as a whore. Not one.
Thi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Robert Gimbel wrote:
> > > > Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was cons
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
> wrote:
> >
> > Robert Gimbel wrote:
> > > Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was considered to be a whore,
> > > and I'm not sure that anyone would respect a R
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert Gimbel wrote:
> > Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was considered to be a whore,
> > and I'm not sure that anyone would respect a Rabbi who
> > married a whore. You remember that in that period of
> > hist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---It's quite true that many people not doing any Sadhana are
highly
> evolved; but it's also true (imo) that they can be MORE highly
> evolved by taking up some type of meditation practice, or perhaps
> chant
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of boo_lives
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 6:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A different explanation of stress release
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldL
On May 25, 2007, at 6:36 PM, qntmpkt wrote:
---Vaj, I know you're heavily into "tradition" but there's something
called "new knowledge";
And you feel the blossoming of new knowledge isn't part of or hasn't
happened in a tradition before? There's little "new" under the sun.
Tradition is me
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was considered to be a whore, and I'm not
> > sure that anyone would respect a Rabbi who married a whore.
> > You remember that in that period of history, her fate would have
> been
> > death
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > Uh, with all due respect, the only thing Jesus
> > has ever been "accused of," and in some of the
> > Gospels excised from the Bible, no less, was
> > that h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt"
wrote:
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt"
wrote:
> > > >
> >
---It's quite true that many people not doing any Sadhana are highly
evolved; but it's also true (imo) that they can be MORE highly
evolved by taking up some type of meditation practice, or perhaps
chanting.. Your opinion differs from that of MMY - since he clearly,
at one time believe in and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps a dazzing display of Sidhis would turn such people on. What
> do you think?
Wow! I think you should consider writing a book on your various
experiences with all these paths and gurus. It might reach a great m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence
> > > that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" wrote:
> >
> > ---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence
that
> > he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his
> > disciples.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> When reading the following passage from Swami Muktananda's "Satsang
> with Baba, Volume III" (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought that
it
> was another explanation of the mechanics of stress release; that
is,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My ambition (among other things), is to find out what
> makes "ordinary" people -i.e. not on the Spiritual path - tick in
> terms of their reluctance to practice any type of Spiritual Sadhana.
> For the most part, I b
--Question below: did I stray from TM while (during the period)
Muktananda dug his fingers into my eyeballs, giving me Shaktipat?
Ans: Nope...not straying, just continuing my overall research into
various Gurus. I've always practiced TM since 1967 but wanted to
confirm if there was anything e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" wrote:
> >
> > ---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence
that
> > he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his
disciples.
>
> Ye
---Vaj, I know you're heavily into "tradition" but there's something
called "new knowledge"; but ultimately, the idea is to seek the
truth, whether from tradition, authorities, Scriptures, one's own
experience, heresay evidence;...better yet, everything together with
one's own experience at the
On May 25, 2007, at 10:25 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
"utterly fallacious and misleading"?
Methinks you doth protest too much. It's just an innoculous way of
saying the same thing to make it palatable to another audience.
Methinks thou art brainwashed.
Sorry, they are not the same thing, despite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > > This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times, that
the
> > TM
> > > myth of physical stress release from the physical nervous system
> > was
> > > fallaci
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > > This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times, that
the
> > TM
> > > myth of physical stress release from the physical nervous
system
> > was
> > > fallac
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times, that the
TM
> myth of physical stress release from the physical nervous system
was
> fallacious. Where stress is being released is in the pranic body
or
> vajra body. It is the pranic body
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 24, 2007, at 8:53 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > When reading the following passage from Swami
Muktananda's "Satsang
> > with Baba, Volume III" (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought
that it
> > was another explanat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 24, 2007, at 8:53 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > When reading the following passage from Swami
Muktananda's "Satsang
> > with Baba, Volume III" (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought
that it
> > was another explanat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence that
> he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his
> disciples.
And Bill Clinton brutally raped Juanita Broderick.
So what? Whether it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > When reading the following passage from Swami
Muktananda's "Satsang
> > with Baba, Volume III" (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought
that
> i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence that
> he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his disciples.
Yes, so I've heard. Still a nice insight, and I appreciate Shemp's
posting i
---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence that
he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his disciples.
Looks like a mismatch between speech and action!
He initiated me into "Shaktipat" in 1980. (dug his fingers into my
eyeballs and a brilliant image of himself
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> When reading the following passage from Swami Muktananda's "Satsang
> with Baba, Volume III" (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought that
it
> was another explanation of the mechanics of stress release; that
is,
44 matches
Mail list logo
