Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Mike Boutin
send were a > long > > time coming). > > > > Overall, it seemed to me that the Laszlo support was lacking compared to > > what I've found with Flex. > > > > Jim > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailt

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
e Laszlo support was lacking compared to > > what I've found with Flex. > > > > Jim > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike > Boutin > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:34 PM

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread jcanistrum
to > what I've found with Flex. > > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Boutin > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:34 PM > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Mike Boutin
D] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:45 AM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE The other issue i see with flex is it's ability to scale. It doesn't seem to have the ability to handle a ton of simultaneous connections very well, ala Flash Media Se

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread jcanistrum
essage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jcanistrum Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:31 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE and what about OpenLaszlo, has someone given it a try ? I saw some very good demos over

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Jim Robson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Boutin Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:34 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE Yes OpenLaszlo is a great solution. Ive used it quite a bit. They have a awesome community for help and getting started with it. jcanistrum wro

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Christian
Thanks for all the info everyone. Definitely good stuff to go read and learn more about. I just get frustrated as things get easier for those who don't work at it, while those who work at it get set packing. I'll attack things with open mind and revisit my opinions. Muzak wrote: The other

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Jim Robson
ay, May 25, 2006 12:31 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE and what about OpenLaszlo, has someone given it a try ? I saw some very good demos overthere http://www.openlaszlo.org/demos 2006/5/25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > &g

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Mike Boutin
6:45 AM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE > The other issue i see with flex is it's ability to scale. It doesn't > seem to have the ability to handle a ton of simultaneous connections > very well, ala Flash Media Server. Perhaps I

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Kevin Newman
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: Well, I think you should just stick with the tool that works for you. I´m currently using Flash 8 IDE to build the layout and assets, and, for me, it is pretty good to build forms as well. The rest I do outside Flash, in FlashDevelop and compile with MTASC ;) It´

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread jcanistrum
ng in order to deliver those files? Thank you, Frank -Original Message- From: Muzak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:45 AM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE > The other issue i see with flex is it's ability to

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Nick Weekes
c...) Or do you absolutely need to have a specific Flex server of some sort running in order to deliver those files? Thank you, Frank -Original Message- From: Muzak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:45 AM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Fle

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Merrill, Jason
Learning Technology Solutions >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:51 AM >>To: 'Flashcoders mailing list' >>Subject

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Jim Robson
TECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:51 AM To: 'Flashcoders mailing list' Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE Hi, I've been too busy developping in Flash lately to give a try to the new Flex yet, so excuse me if the following question sounds

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Dave Watts
> Flex to me has seemed to discredit a lot of the flash developers > out there buy putting advanced functionality at the finger tips > of the average user. This is the nature of programming; what was once difficult becomes simple, and what was once impossible becomes difficult! Once upon a time,

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Mike Chambers
What are you basing that on? The underlying Player, not framework handles the low level connections, so it is the same regsardless of whether the content was built in Flash Authoring or the Flex Framework. In fact, Flex was originally built and designed with scalability as a primary goal (a

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread fdeluca
t: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE > The other issue i see with flex is it's ability to scale. It doesn't > seem to have the ability to handle a ton of simultaneous connections > very well, ala Flash Media Server. Perhaps I'm off base here, but I'd > pref

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Muzak
> The other issue i see with flex is it's ability to scale. It doesn't > seem to have the ability to handle a ton of simultaneous connections very > well, ala Flash Media Server. Perhaps I'm off base > here, but I'd prefer to develop the front ends in flash and communicate back > and forth wi

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Merrill, Jason
>>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:03 AM >>To: Flashcoders mailing list >>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE >> >>>>>Obviously this may sound harsh, but because the app you wrote was >>>>>buggier or harder to build isn't a reflec

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
would say it's far from being an advantage of Flex itself, but more of the component library with MXML representation. The same thing can be done in Flash/ActionScript2. For instance the people of the ActionStep project worked on such an XML representation that could instanciate the UI. Nicolas

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Nicolas Cannasse
>>>Obviously this may sound harsh, but because the app you wrote >>>was buggier or harder to build isn't a reflection of the >>>technology in my opinion. > > > It is to me. There are a lot of things you can do with Flex in a day > that would take weeks to do in straight Flash/Actionscript. Th

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
l > Bank of America | www.bankofamerica.com > Learning & Organization Effectiveness > Technology Solutions > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug > Coning > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:4

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Merrill, Jason
ch app has. Jason Merrill Bank of America Learning Technology Solutions >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >>Of Christian >>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:44 AM >>To: Flashcoders mailin

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-25 Thread Christian
elements which also displayed metrics dashboards. Jason Merrill Bank of America | www.bankofamerica.com Learning & Organization Effectiveness Technology Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Coning Sent: Tuesday, Ma

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread judah
Adam, I hear what you're saying. It is frustrating to have to shell out money for two different products. Here's the history. The Flash IDE has had numerous workflow problems, intrinsic problems and limitations in the language (prototype based), slow engine (in comparison to fp9) and other su

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Merrill, Jason
ss Technology Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Coning Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:45 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE This may be a dumb question, but has anyone ever devel

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Clint Tredway
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Watts Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:41 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE > I guess whether you think it's a crappy analogy depends on whether you > believe Form-based appli

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Haven´t used Flex Builder yet, but I must say I´m quite satisfied with the Flash 8 IDE + FlashDevelop2 + mtasc bundle right now. Flash IDE is just fine both for animations and for the building of forms IMHO. Wether I will be going to Flex2 or haXe, keep working with AS2 will depend on several fac

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Doug Coning
This may be a dumb question, but has anyone ever developed a project in Flex and towards the end decided that Flash would have been a better tool for the project? Or vice-a-versa? If so, why? I'm trying to determine if there are any pitfalls of deciding to use Flex over Flash for larger projects

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Dave Watts
> I guess whether you think it's a crappy analogy depends on > whether you believe Form-based applications are different > enough from other flash apps to warrant their own IDE. > Personally, I don't. I can already build Form-based apps > just fine in Flash 8 or with DHTML. So please explain

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Merrill, Jason
inal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Pasztory Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:22 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE But I don't have to buy 2 cars, one to get to work, and one to go away for weekends. I'm

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Robert A. Colvin
ehalf Of Adam Pasztory Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:18 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE I guess whether you think it's a crappy analogy depends on whether you believe Form-based applications are different enough from other flash apps to warrant the

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Adam Pasztory
I guess whether you think it's a crappy analogy depends on whether you believe Form-based applications are different enough from other flash apps to warrant their own IDE. Personally, I don't. I can already build Form-based apps just fine in Flash 8 or with DHTML. So please explain how Flex is

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Dave Watts
> But I don't have to buy 2 cars, one to get to work, and one > to go away for weekends. I'm fine if Adobe wants to sell > multiple versions of the IDE, like they have been doing with > Basic and Professional. That's a crappy analogy. These IDEs do DIFFERENT THINGS! A better analogy might be,

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Adam Pasztory
But I don't have to buy 2 cars, one to get to work, and one to go away for weekends. I'm fine if Adobe wants to sell multiple versions of the IDE, like they have been doing with Basic and Professional. On 5/23/06, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I am very frustrated by the IDE bein

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Dave Watts
> I am very frustrated by the IDE being split into two product > lines. Like many other Flash developers, I do both games and > animation projects and also RIA projects, so it looks like > I'm now going to have to invest two products from now on! > This is just one reason why I'm shifting more

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Merrill, Jason
>>I am very frustrated by the IDE being split into two product lines. Imagine if everyone had complained to Henry Ford about the same thing. Jason Merrill Bank of America | www.bankofamerica.com Learning & Organization Effectiveness Technology Solutions __

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Adam Pasztory
I am very frustrated by the IDE being split into two product lines. Like many other Flash developers, I do both games and animation projects and also RIA projects, so it looks like I'm now going to have to invest two products from now on! This is just one reason why I'm shifting more and more to

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Doug Coning
st > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE > > Personally I think a far more important question is how (well) Flex and > Flash will work together, because now we'll have 2 IDE's to > work with. > > For a long time there have been 2 (or more) type of Flas

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread jcanistrum
and someone have experienced the openlaszlo to give some advice about it ? it promises the same as Flex, plus outputs in SWF and DHTML, but it is free and OpenSource. www.openlaszlo.org and to get more people in trouble ( just to decide about -) there is haXe, www.haxe.org also free, also gen

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Muzak
Personally I think a far more important question is how (well) Flex and Flash will work together, because now we'll have 2 IDE's to work with. For a long time there have been 2 (or more) type of Flash users: developers and designers. And with each new (Flash) version the gap between the 2 beca

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Jorge Antonio Diaz Gutierrez
#x27;ll see the difference yourself. Bye Jorge A. Díaz Gutiérrez -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Merrill, Jason Enviado el: martes, 23 de mayo de 2006 12:01 Para: Flashcoders mailing list Asunto: RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE It'

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Merrill, Jason
It' more dependent on what kind of project you are building. Flex would not be good for an animated cartoon or highly customized sites. It takes much longer to build a business RIA in Flash... Etc. Jason Merrill Bank of America | www.bankofamerica.com Learning & Organization Effectiveness Te

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Clint Tredway
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Coning Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:29 AM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE Diddo! I'd love to hear some discussion on this... Doug Coning Senior Web Development Programmer FORUM Solutions, LLC >

Re: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread John Grden
well my initial response is: Depends on who you're talking to. I'm completely stoked about Flex2 builder in that building applications/forms etc is what it's suited for. So, when dealing with these type of projects its by far the choice IMHO. But I don't know how you compare it to the Flash IDE

RE: [Flashcoders] Flex vs. Flash IDE

2006-05-23 Thread Doug Coning
Diddo! I'd love to hear some discussion on this... Doug Coning Senior Web Development Programmer FORUM Solutions, LLC > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Newman > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 11:10 AM > To: Flashcoder