[fossil-users] trouble cloning current fossil-scm.org repo with old fossil (2015)

2017-12-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hi, I haven't tracked trunk since end of 2015. Is it normal that I can't seem to clone the fossil-scm.org repo using this old version? michai@work-lap:/tmp/fold$ f ver This is fossil version 1.33 [b00e60194e] 2015-08-22 12:42:15 UTC michai@work-lap:/tmp/fold$ f clone https://www.fossil-scm.org/

Re: [fossil-users] trouble cloning current fossil-scm.org repo with old fossil (2015)

2017-12-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 10 December 2017 at 16:15, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > Is it normal that I can't seem to clone the fossil-scm.org repo using > this old version? Apparently I have been living under a rock. I also seem to be unable to open the cloned (using current trunk) fossil-scm.org repo

Re: [fossil-users] trouble cloning current fossil-scm.org repo with old fossil (2015)

2017-12-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 10 December 2017 at 17:57, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Michai Ramakers on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:21:02 +0100: > >> michai@work-lap:/tmp/f/f$ f ver >> This is fossil version 1.33 [b00e60194e] 2015-08-22 12:42:15 UTC > > Since then Fossil has had much development. I

[fossil-users] ticket-groups and creating events from commandline

2011-05-01 Thread Michai Ramakers
s, or having hierarchy of tickets (to be able to split a big ticket up into smaller ones) Michai Ramakers ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] ticket-groups and creating events from commandline

2011-05-08 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, thank you all for your suggestions. Michai Ramakers ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] checking out a single file

2011-05-19 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, if I (say) open a repository, then delete a single file out of the local directory, how can I get it back? (In other words, how do I check out a single file?) Right now I 'solve' this by using 'fossil finfo -p thefile > thefile' (in a oneliner script) Thank you, Michai __

Re: [fossil-users] checking out a single file

2011-05-19 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, >> if I (say) open a repository, then delete a single file out of the >> local directory, how can I get it back? > > fossil revert thefile thank you, can't believe I missed that :-\ Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-

[fossil-users] setting Configuration from command-line

2011-08-20 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, is it possible/easy to set what's displayed in 'Admin' --> 'Configuration' page (e.g. project-name and index-page) using the command-line interface? I would like to set this for a group of repositories/projects at once. Thank you

Re: [fossil-users] setting Configuration from command-line

2011-08-20 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hi, >> is it possible/easy to set what's displayed in 'Admin' --> >> 'Configuration' page (e.g. project-name and index-page) using the >> command-line interface? I would like to set this for a group of >> repositories/projects at once. > > Not directly, but you can use fossil config export / impor

[fossil-users] setting Configuration from command-line

2011-08-20 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hi, >>> is it possible/easy to set what's displayed in 'Admin' --> >>> 'Configuration' page (e.g. project-name and index-page) using the >>> command-line interface? I would like to set this for a group of >>> repositories/projects at once. >> >> Not directly, but you can use fossil config export /

[fossil-users] 'fossil server' fails to chroot

2013-01-07 Thread Michai Ramakers
27;/foo'), while repository is still located in the root. (I didn't try with static binary anymore.) Not urgent, but ran into this by accident. With kind regards, Michai Ramakers ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil server' fails to chroot

2013-01-08 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, I saw this was fixed right after my mail (checkin [baa1ebb7d9]) - verified it, works fine. Thank you once again for the very quick response! keep up the good work, Michai On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > Hello, > > when I open ('fossil open&

[fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, apart from the question whether cloning from localhost makes sense or not (I use this from a script to make work from localhost or remote transparent), I experienced very slow network traffic - but no hang - while cloning like thus: in shell 1: # fossil server ori.fossil in shell 2: $

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
lone is slow. It is really fast for me here on > Linux, Window8, MacOS, and Sparc-Solaris. Alright, thank you; I'll use that as a workaround. I will try this version of fossil on a 32-bit host and see what happens. Would you be interested in a repo that reproduces this (here), assumin

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM, David Given wrote: > Michai Ramakers wrote: > [...] >> ...resulting in about 70 kB/s traffic with very rare (a minute or more >> in between - didn't time exactly) single bursts. According to top(1), >> neither server- nor cl

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > [...] > >> Would you be interested in a repo that reproduces this (here), >> assuming I can make one? > > > Yes. I can reproduce this with a 100 MB repo (first try - I guess it's not the repo then :-) I will now try to make it a bit smaller

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> in shell 1: # fossil server ori.fossil >> >> in shell 2: $ fossil clone http://michai@localhost:808

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
> - repo with around 2100 files, around 500 MB: reproduces 10/10 times make that 100 MB. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
>> - repo with around 2100 files, around 500 MB: reproduces 10/10 times > > make that 100 MB. and 461 files... slight mixup. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossi

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > [...] > > Dunno why your localhost clone is slow. It is really fast for me here on > Linux, Window8, MacOS, and Sparc-Solaris. ok, tested some more on the same machine (host A fwiw); with the 100 MB repo, issue disappears when I disable 1 o

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:02:14PM +0000, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> apart from the question whether cloning from localhost makes sense or >> not (I use this from a script to make work from localhost or remote >

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
> I didn't know the 'analyze' sqlite command, thank you. When trying (I > am assuming you meant with '-R' option to point to repo), I got > slightly more than I bargained for: > > [...] > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) Retried with newer fossil-version [c7133bd79d] from yesterday, and segfault

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger >> I didn't know the 'analyze' sqlite command, thank you. When trying (I >> am assuming you meant with '-R' option to point to repo), I got >> slightly more than I bargained for: > [snip] > > Heh, that's for drh. You said sqlite analyze works? Do

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Heh, that's for drh. You said sqlite analyze works? Does it help or not? Also... see http://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/info/85233c40c9bb05a87574cdc25402ec0d34b0b7ee : queries seem to be optimised to run without 'analyze' db info, but of

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> ah yes... forgot that :) It does not help. Note that taking 1 cpu core >> offline ('cpuctl offline 1' here) makes it fly > > > Thi

[fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-17 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, this is the first time I try Fossil on a Win32 system, so I'm guessing I do something wrong. Here is what I did, and what fails: 1) download fossil executable from fossil-scm.org; this is 1.25 [d2e07756d9] 2) in dir '\some_where\repo', clone http://michai@otherhost_on_lan/my_fossil my_foss

Re: [fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-17 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 17 June 2013 15:36, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> 3) notice the cloned repo is too small; roughly 19 MB instead of >> expected 311 MB as on the http host (this may be irrelevant - no >> idea.) > > Where are you seeing this 311MB number? See > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/stat for the current re

Re: [fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-17 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 17 June 2013 15:36, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Where are you seeing this 311MB number? See > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/stat for the current repo size on the host. > Looks like 29MB. 19MB might be a reasonable clone. Just to clarify: I am not trying to clone the Fossil source repository,

Re: [fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-17 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 17 June 2013 16:41, Eduardo Morras wrote: > > Did you rebuild after clone? Try fossil rebuild my_fossil.fossil --analyze > > Note that clone doesn't copy user information. I think, correct me if I'm > wrong, it doesn't copy information that can be rebuild from artifacts, like > indexes. Trie

Re: [fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 18 June 2013 02:15, Richard Hipp wrote: > There is a fresh build of Fossil for windows at: > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/tmp/fossil-20130614-win.zip downloaded, but the binary inside the .zip doesn't run on my win32 system. (Could it be a 64-bit binary? dependency walker hints at this). I

Re: [fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 18 June 2013 11:06, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > For the time being I will park the faulty/suspect repo somewhere, and > create a new repo to work on. Ok, did that - created new repo from scratch and added files, then tried cloning with new fossil-version on both server- and client-si

Re: [fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-19 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 19 June 2013 10:25, Edward Berner wrote: > > I'm surprised, but yeah, its looking that way. I just ran the test again > using the same fossil binary on XP and Windows 7. The clone failed on XP > but succeeded on (64 bit) Windows 7. It also succeeds on 32 bit Vista but > fails on Windows 2000

Re: [fossil-users] cloning / opening fails on WinXP SP3

2013-06-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 June 2013 03:45, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Edward Berner wrote: >> >> >> I think recv() was biting off more than it could chew. >> >> Here is the workaround: >>while( N>0 ){ >> -got = recv(iSocket, pContent, N, 0); >> +got = recv(iSocket, pConten

[fossil-users] check-in only a subset of added/changed files

2013-06-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, (iirc this came up here once, but I forgot the answer and cannot find the post anymore. ) How do people checkin/commit a subset of all added/changed files? (Scenario: changed a number of files to effectively fix 3 issues, with no in-between checkins.) Arguably my workflow is wrong, but th

Re: [fossil-users] check-in only a subset of added/changed files

2013-06-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 June 2013 17:22, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Just list the subset of files to be committed on the command-line: > > fossil commit FILE1 FILE2 > > I think it is a bad idea to do this on trunk, since you will be checking in > untested code. If you really want to do this, I would suggest

Re: [fossil-users] check-in only a subset of added/changed files

2013-06-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 June 2013 17:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > ... (A more typical scenario here is to have changed > some source-files and added some documentation without checkins in > between.) > > Actually I forgot to say I was looking for some interactive way, > perhaps along

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hi, On 24 July 2013 13:25, Stephan Beal wrote: >> >> I find this feature very useful and it is very common in clients to SVN, >> Mercurial, etc. And since fossil has embedded client, I'd really like to see >> that as well. > > That one's come up a few times - added to the list. A list member rece

Re: [fossil-users] simple Fossil For New Users intro guide

2013-08-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 8 August 2013 22:25, Chad Perrin wrote: > This "Fossil For New Users" intro to doing the basics in Fossil was a > few minutes' work, in part as a reminder for myself. I thought it might > be useful for others as well, though, so I finally decided to put it > online. > > http://blogstrappin

Re: [fossil-users] simple Fossil For New Users intro guide

2013-08-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 8 August 2013 22:25, Chad Perrin wrote: > This "Fossil For New Users" intro to doing the basics in Fossil was a > few minutes' work, in part as a reminder for myself. I thought it might > be useful for others as well, though, so I finally decided to put it > online. > > http://blogstrappin

[fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-08-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, I'm probably doing somethng strange, but has anyone ever seen this behaviour: 1) on host S: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo) 2) on host C: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo) 3) on host C: do some work, and commit changes 4) on host S, 'fossil up' 5) on host S: 'fossi

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-08-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
Oh, perhaps useful: viewing the timeline on host S using the web-interface (pointing to host S) at step (5) (or after step (6), not sure) showed the commit I was expecting to see. On 18 August 2013 17:20, Michai Ramakers wrote: > Hello, > > I'm probably doing somethng strange,

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-08-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 18 August 2013 17:43, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> 1) on host S: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo) >> 2) on host C: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo) >> 3) on host C: do some work, an

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-08-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
did any of you (Steve/Clive) by any chance try committing once more (a dummy-change or similar) on what Steve has named client A (the client whose commit is never seen by the other host)? (And if so, did both it and the missing commit show up?) Michai __

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-08-20 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 21 August 2013 05:25, Donny Ward wrote: > > I get the same problem every once in awhile. Many times actually. I consider > myself a heavy fossil user. My most active repository has 1087 checkins all > made by me. > > I once submitted a ticket about it here: > http://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/tktv

Re: [fossil-users] survey: your top 5 most-used fossil CLI commands?

2013-09-02 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 2 September 2013 18:36, Stephan Beal wrote: > i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to try > to find out which commands people use most often, and use that to help me > prioritize. one more 'addremove' fan. when: gather external docs like datasheets or code snipp

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote: > > I started a wiki page > (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing > how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made > for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, ...

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been > uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were > compiled the previous time. So please t

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013-09-11 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 11 September 2013 16:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: > On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> I started a wiki page >> (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing >> how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustm

[fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-10-14 Thread Michai Ramakers
[ following up on oldish thread from mid August this year, with the same subject ] I've just seen this issue here, albeit in slightly another form perhaps (2 systems 'S' (server, amd64 netbsd) and 'C' (client, WinXP pro). 'S' makes a repo available using CGI/inetd, and I work on 'S' locally as wel

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-10-14 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 14 October 2013 12:37, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > >> 2) update local repo on S >> 3) local repo on S doesn't show recent check-in, as per 'fossil timeline' >> 4) CGI-shared repo on S does show the ch

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-10-14 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 14 October 2013 12:38, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> >> I can make the 3 repos available for debugging (for Richard) on >> request, but I have a pretty thin uplink (but lots of space). > > How big are the rep

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-10-14 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 14 October 2013 12:37, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> 2) update local repo on S >> 3) local repo on S doesn't show recent check-in, as per 'fossil timeline' >> 4) CGI-shared repo

Re: [fossil-users] commits from host A sometimes not seen on B

2013-10-14 Thread Michai Ramakers
rephrase: On 14 October 2013 13:22, Michai Ramakers wrote: > I don't think that is it; when viewing the timeline on the server, I do see > the check-in. "when viewing the timeline on the server, using the web interface ..." Michai ___

[fossil-users] question about added, then deleted files and checkin

2013-10-28 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, when I do this: $ touch plop $ fossil addremove $ rm plop $ fossil addremove ...I see in 'fossil status' and when doing 'fossil commit' one change, namely the deleted file. When I commit, I see a resulting entry in the webpage timeline with no changes. What's the rationale for even menti

Re: [fossil-users] question about added, then deleted files and checkin

2013-10-28 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 28 October 2013 15:10, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> What's the rationale for even mentioning the deleted file at all? Just >> for my info. > > Probably (I'm guessing) what you are seeing is some kind of bug that > prevents an unmanaged file that was previous added by not yet committed from > being

[fossil-users] single-column file list output in web UI

2013-11-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, is there a simple way to display repo file contents in a single column, instead of 3, in the web UI? (or at least I see 3 columns here) My brain seems to work faster when browsing a single column. Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-user

Re: [fossil-users] single-column file list output in web UI

2013-11-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hi, On 21 November 2013 19:29, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> is there a simple way to display repo file contents in a single >> column, instead of 3, in the web UI? (or at least I see 3 columns >> here) &

Re: [fossil-users] single-column file list output in web UI

2013-11-26 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 26 November 2013 07:55, Joel Bruick wrote: > Michai Ramakers wrote: > > is there a simple way to display repo file contents in a single > column, instead of 3, in the web UI? (or at least I see 3 columns > here) > > > Sorry for being way late to this, but yo

[fossil-users] 'addremove' using specific root-dir, possible?

2013-12-28 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, I notice the 'extra' command can take a directory as argument (although this is undocumented in 1.26 - didn't check newer versions for diffs there). Afaik, the 'addremove' command cannot take a directory as argument. Which means, it will always add/remove files accross the whole repo-tree.

[fossil-users] 'ignore-glob' (wildcard) syntax

2013-12-28 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, I find myself searching for a description of the exact syntax of the 'ignore-glob' setting every time I use it - in particular, use of wildcards to specify 'a single subdir', 'a number of subdirs', and possibly grouping like sh's "{..,..}". Is this documented somewhere? Thanks, Michai ___

Re: [fossil-users] 'ignore-glob' (wildcard) syntax

2013-12-28 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 28 December 2013 14:48, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> I find myself searching for a description of the exact syntax of the >> 'ignore-glob' setting every time I use it - in particular, use of >> wi

Re: [fossil-users] 'ignore-glob' (wildcard) syntax

2013-12-28 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 28 December 2013 15:16, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > Multiple '*' work and in my case I use that: > */obj/* > > per example. > > Any subdir 'obj' in the repo will have it contents ignored. d'oh, that's useful indeed, thx. Michai ___ fossil-users mailing

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Fossil interface enhancement.

2013-12-30 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 30 December 2013 20:12, Richard Hipp wrote: > Wouldn't it be nice to have a "tree" view of the files under control, > similar to this: > >http://www.sqlite.org/customandroid/doc/trunk/www/tree.wiki > > ... > > Please feel free to contribute design ideas or implementation suggestions. As fo

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed Fossil interface enhancement.

2013-12-30 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 30 December 2013 20:41, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> Please feel free to contribute design ideas or implementation suggestions. > > What comes to mind: > > - with a bit of JS it could be made interactive (collapsible/openable) I'm not a grey

Re: [fossil-users] Additional CSS skins [was Re: Proposed Fossil interface enhancement.]

2013-12-30 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 30 December 2013 21:56, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Michai Ramakers on Mon, 30 Dec 2013 21:16:11 +0100: > >> As for the visual appearance: what would be very useful already for me >> is a clear visual difference between a dir- and file-name (in any >> file-

[fossil-users] tree-view feature

2014-01-01 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, the new tree-view feature works very well here, thank you. Snappy enough (for me) on netbsd core2duo E4400 2 GHz: This page was generated in about 0.048s by Fossil version [daff9d2062] 2014-01-01 00:48:41 That is in the root of a repo with 450 dirs and 2269 files. Michai

[fossil-users] keep viewing snapshot of files corresponding to a tag

2014-01-04 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, sometimes I want to casually browse, through the web-UI, sourcefiles in a repo crresponding to a certain release-tag. What I do now: click on 'Tags', pick the tag I'm interested in, click on the checkin-ID (1 entry) corresponding to the tag, then click 'files' in the displayed checkin-summ

[fossil-users] general question about multiple source-trees in 1 repo, and recursive diff

2014-01-06 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, some of the bigger source-projects here consist of multiple applications, docs, and so on. Up to now I have used 1 repo per project (that is, all trees of all applications + docs + whatever into the same repo). I wonder if most of you do it like this as well, or have a finer granularity, w

[fossil-users] tree-view of files

2014-01-06 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, I noticed that when clicking on 'files' in a checkin-summary (e.g. random checkin https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/f83e0d2123), tree-view is now displayed instead of legacy flat-dir. No complaints here, but was this intentional? (Is 'tree' the new 'dir'..?) Michai __

Re: [fossil-users] tree-view of files

2014-01-06 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 6 January 2014 11:59, Michai Ramakers wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that when clicking on 'files' in a checkin-summary (e.g. > random checkin https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/f83e0d2123), > tree-view is now displayed instead of legacy flat-dir. > > N

Re: [fossil-users] general question about multiple source-trees in 1 repo, and recursive diff

2014-01-06 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 6 January 2014 12:53, Martin Gagnon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:24:53AM +0100, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> Hello, >> > [snip] >> >> Is there a better way to do this..? Alternately, when diff'ing in the >> fossil web-UI by clicking/selecting th

Re: [fossil-users] general question about multiple source-trees in 1 repo, and recursive diff

2014-01-07 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 7 January 2014 02:25, Martin Gagnon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:47:43PM +0100, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> On 6 January 2014 12:53, Martin Gagnon wrote: >> ... >> ah, is that the 'sbs=' option to vdiff? If so, what I meant was: can I >> somehow only

Re: [fossil-users] tree-view of files

2014-01-07 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 7 January 2014 00:50, Joel Bruick wrote: > Joel Bruick wrote: > > I'm going to add some javascript for expanding/collapsing directories. Then > the tree-view will be practically perfect in every way. > > And... done. For added convenience, you can also expand/collapse every > subdirectory at on

[fossil-users] curious: one/multiple repos for a source-project?

2014-01-08 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, w.r.t. a recent question, I'm (still) curious how other people do this: for a single source-project consisting perhaps of multiple applications (each resulting in an executable binary, say) with perhaps documentation, reference-material and other non-source-stuff, do you typically use 1 bi

Re: [fossil-users] fossil cut first charracter of the filename

2014-01-09 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, On 9 January 2014 09:43, shtine wrote: > Hello, >> >> Perhaps the error is a bit misleading... Should it be possible to add >> files that are above the root of the open fossil repository? > > This would be a nice feature to have. I want to use fossil to manage changes > on linux based V

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > >Everybody: Please download, compile, and test the branch above. If there >are no issues reported, it will become the official 1.28 release. for my info, when you say 'please test', do you mean 'run the test-suite from the build a

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 10 January 2014 13:25, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >>Everybody: Please download, compile, and test the branch above. If there >>are no issues reported, it will become the official 1.28 release. >

[fossil-users] markdown embedded docs

2014-01-12 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, no question, just the urge to vent my enthousiasm (about 1/2 year too late perhaps): this weekend was the 1st time I looked at Markdown in generel as a quick markup-language, and I like it very much. Fossil integration works very nicely - thank you for the effort, all involved. Michai ___

[fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org: permuted documentation index, useful?

2014-01-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, a comment not on Fossil, but on the www.fossil-scm.org page contents itself - I've wanted to post something about this on here for a long time, but didn't. A quick google-search for posts about this on this list did't give quick results, so... Do people really use the 'permuted index' on t

[fossil-users] web UI: recursive diff (like 'vdiff&sbs=0') starting in subtree of repo?

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, is this possible in trunk atm: display a recursive diff like what 'vdiff&sbs=0' provides, but starting in a subdir of the repo instead of its root? (imagine 'vdiff' having a 'dir=' argument) Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@list

Re: [fossil-users] web UI: recursive diff (like 'vdiff&sbs=0') starting in subtree of repo?

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello Stephan, On 21 January 2014 18:39, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> is this possible in trunk atm: display a recursive diff like what >> 'vdiff&sbs=0' provides, but starting in a subdir of the repo

Re: [fossil-users] web UI: recursive diff (like 'vdiff&sbs=0') starting in subtree of repo?

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 21 January 2014 19:53, Stephan Beal wrote: > > @Michai: please try something like this URL using that branch: > > /vdiff?from=7e9633a9b3f086c5&to=2864db30806fc5e3&glob=*.h > /vdiff?from=7e9633a9b3f086c5&to=2864db30806fc5e3&glob=test/* that works really well, thank you both for the quick action

Re: [fossil-users] web UI: recursive diff (like 'vdiff&sbs=0') starting in subtree of repo?

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 21 January 2014 20:13, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > Would be nice to have this kind of feature to the timeline page (or a > new page)... Showing the checkins that affect at least one file inside > a subdir. > > This could give an history of checkins per subdir. This would be useful > for big repo

Re: [fossil-users] web UI: recursive diff (like 'vdiff&sbs=0') starting in subtree of repo?

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 21 January 2014 20:41, Stephan Beal wrote: > > BTW: just checked in: the glob parameter now propagates via the various > toggle buttons and a button has been added to clear the glob. propagation seems to work well, thx very much. I'll try to look at the SQL magic tomorrow in more detail. Mic

[fossil-users] possible flaw/feature in vdiff file-list

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, file-list in 'vdiff' page perhaps seems to 'shadow' (...) a checkin of type 'modified' when a checkin of type 'added' also exists in the timespan displayed in the page: $ f timeline -n 3 === 2014-01-21 === 21:55:07 [3eb2d01ba6] *CURRENT* added R (user: michai tags: trunk) 21:54:14 [cabc73a

Re: [fossil-users] possible flaw/feature in vdiff file-list

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 21 January 2014 23:12, Michai Ramakers wrote: > Hello, > > file-list in 'vdiff' page perhaps seems to 'shadow' (...) a checkin of > type 'modified' when a checkin of type 'added' also exists in the > timespan displayed in the page: act

Re: [fossil-users] possible flaw/feature in vdiff file-list

2014-01-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 January 2014 00:39, Michai Ramakers wrote: > On 21 January 2014 23:12, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> Hello, >> >> file-list in 'vdiff' page perhaps seems to 'shadow' (...) a checkin of >> type 'modified' when a checkin of type &#x

Re: [fossil-users] possible flaw/feature in vdiff file-list

2014-01-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 January 2014 12:23, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> michai@lime:~/src/068-lighting_fundamentals_sls$ f timeline -n 4 >> === 2014-01-22 === >> 07:34:13 [0a6b833945] *CURRENT* added Y (user: michai tags: trunk) >> 07:33:27 [fb73686d55] changed X (user: michai tags: trunk) >> 07:32:56 [84ef6

Re: [fossil-users] possible flaw/feature in vdiff file-list

2014-01-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 January 2014 12:55, Richard Hipp wrote: > ... >> http://myhost/myrepo/vdiff?from=2014-01-22T07:30&to=tip&sbs=1 > > The URL you supplied is requesting the aggregate diff of check-ins > [84ef6a7729], [fb73686d55], and [0a6b833945]. Those are the check-ins that > occur after time 2014-01-22T

Re: [fossil-users] possible flaw/feature in vdiff file-list

2014-01-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 January 2014 14:31, Richard Hipp wrote: > A diff (or /vdiff) is between two versions. The diff does not try to take > into account intermediate versions in between the two endpoints. > > So if a file exists in the later version and does not exist in the earlier > version, then in the diff i

Re: [fossil-users] looking for interesting new fossil skins

2014-02-11 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 11 February 2014 16:35, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> (http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/libfossil/index.cgi/dir?ci=tip&type=tree) > > i don't notice anything wrong with that particular link (but i'm new to the > new tree view), but i did

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil www interface: looking for ideas

2014-02-17 Thread Michai Ramakers
opinion polls are always fun, because everyone has one. On 17 February 2014 18:33, Stephan Beal wrote: > what are the top 5 (or so) pages you all use in the Fossil WWW UI (the > fossil 'ui' command, or the page shown by a fossil server/CGI)? in this order: - /timeline - /tree of trunk or partic

[fossil-users] documentation-link on project-site front page

2014-02-27 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, is there a reason the 'Documentation index' link on the main fossil-scm project page points to http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/permutedindex.wiki#pindex (emphasis on '#pindex', i.e. the Permuted Index)? With the target being the '#pindex' anchor, the 'Primary Documents' may no

[fossil-users] glob-parameter for 'fileage' page?

2014-02-27 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, a 'glob' parameter like vdiff now has, would IMHO be really useful for the 'fileage' page. (Alternatively, if anyone knows how I can see the ages and effectively activity-log for a subset of the file-tree, I'm all ears :-) Michai ___ fossil-user

Re: [fossil-users] glob-parameter for 'fileage' page?

2014-02-27 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 27 February 2014 15:27, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> a 'glob' parameter like vdiff now has, would IMHO be really useful for >> the 'fileage' page. > > Good idea. i'll take a loo

[fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-13 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, perhaps 'Available pages' on https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help would be better named somethign else - for a user it's not clear 'pages' is seen in context of CGI/html of fossil instead of, say, available doc-/wiki-pages of http://fossil-scm.org/ itself. Bye, Michai ___

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread Michai Ramakers
thanks; this is indeed much clearer (anything indicating that the things are in question are generated by the user's own fossil would do, IMHO) Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bi

[fossil-users] 'checkout' vs 'update'

2014-03-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, reality check: if I have no local changes and want to repeatedly switch local tree to points in history, 'checkout' and 'update' are functionally equivalent, or not? (I noticed 'checkout' is much slower than 'update' in this particular case.) (There is a Stackoverflow post on this - http:/

Re: [fossil-users] 'checkout' vs 'update'

2014-03-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 18 March 2014 17:26, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> reality check: if I have no local changes and want to repeatedly >> switch local tree to points in history, 'checkout' and 'update' are &g

Re: [fossil-users] 'checkout' vs 'update'

2014-03-18 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 18 March 2014 17:46, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> ...however, after some more toying using 'update', I see that some >> directories that did not exist at the time of the checkout/tag (as >> r

  1   2   3   4   >