t to support
certain wishes of certain desktop users
2. that desktop usage is possibly not a primary goal and therefore
should not detract from development in the other areas
i think it is always an excellent idea to "talk hardware vendors into
providing better specs so better drivers can be
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:11:25 -0700
Chad Perrin wrote:
> His manner of expressing his feelings seems to be to try to crush
> others' beneath his heel. Try examining the definition of the word
> "fair" before you use it in the future.
>
ok, chad, here's what you find on dictionary.com that are re
erated graphics support. My mind
boggles at the protestations I see against improving such support.
Refusing to support such things will not make FreeBSD better: it will
only make FreeBSD more limited. Can we stop trying to dissuade people
from improving FreeBSD, and from advocating for impr
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:24:19PM -0800, prad wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:12:19 -0700
> Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > Please stop trolling.
> >
> chad, i don't think this is fair to wojciech. he is expressing his
> feelings and considerable knowledge about an os that he doesn't want to
> go the w
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 04:23:03PM -0500, michael wrote:
> I agree. nothing wrong with his posts. the mailing list was never
> described as a warm, social gather. you want answers, and you get them
> here. i for one would rather him be abrupt and short. no need for the
> pomp and circumstance.
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:44:06 -0800, prad wrote:
> may be the mac people can use your line here in one of their
> commercials :D
But only if Mac OS X supports 8.3 filenames. :-)
> > You give them computing power not imaginable 10 years ago, and
> > they treat their system like a worse typewrite
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:46:36PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>instead. This function sets in configure by program author and when you
> >>working with ports you can play this options
> >
> >I'd love to drop GNOME and KDE support for OO.o, but on my laptop I
> >really don't have the resources
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:03:24 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> In Germany, we have the term "eierlegende Wollmilchsau" (egg-
> laying wool-milk-sow)
>
that is indeed a great term!
> MICROS~1's customers want bugs, they get bugs because they paid
> for them. :-)
>
:D
may be the mac people can use your l
Julien Cigar said the following on 2008-12-11 14:40:
- Altough ports are fantastic, building things like OpenOffice or ... is
just inhuman, especially when you cannot use -j for building ports (but
it's being resolved I think).
Of course you can use -j to build ports.
Just cd to/your/port make
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:06:35 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> in linux:
>
> man command
>
> this manual is no longer maintained. try info, google or wiki. maybe you
> will find your documentation, maybe not.
Or try this with third party software on FreeBSD, for example
with KDE and its a
things changing. Because I have to administer and to program
on FreeBSD, I enjoy (!) the excellent documentation. Everything
is there, from system binaries, configuration files, maintenance
procedures, system calls and kernel interfaces. Just look into
i fully agree with you
the Linux world -
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:03:13 -0800, prad wrote:
> well i thought the 3.9 fish was kinda cute, but beastie is still much
> better!
Yes, it is. =^_^= ---> http://www.spilth.org/pictures/girls/ceren/
--
Polytropon
>From Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa,
Let me jump in again here.
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:46:22 -0800, prad wrote:
> so performance, networking (and presumably serving), storage,
> administration
> and
> documentation
> would seem to be major matters of concern.
That's a valid point. I definitely don't want to see these
things changin
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:30:32 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> for whom? ;) it's just overadvertised nothing more,
>
ya well i'm not trying to do their advertising :D :D
i merely copied it from their page.
we did use openbsd for 1 yr for our servers and it was ok though some
of the default s
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:20:23 -0800
Charlie Kester wrote:
> Goals are one thing. How much progress you've made toward meeting
> your goals is another. This thread has been about some things
> FreeBSD still needs to do in order to meet what do seem to be, after
> all, some of its goals.
>
true,
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:12:19 -0700
Chad Perrin wrote:
> Please stop trolling.
>
chad, i don't think this is fair to wojciech. he is expressing his
feelings and considerable knowledge about an os that he doesn't want to
go the way of certain others. i find he writes concisely and backs up
his stat
Thursday, 11 December 2008 at 12:28:00 +0100, Wojciech Puchar said:
> >
> >The possibility here is the bells and whistles strangely enough DO work
> >in tune and without sore lips... FreeBSD could be THAT good.
>
> in bells and whistles windows is best. for those who require it paying a
> bit for
tocracy -- those with the skills share
their work with others with the skills. It is bound together by the respect
we have for each other, and there's not much name-calling going on. The
product is technically sound, has better hardware support than other *ixes (I
run OpenBSD on servers
now, it's a meritocracy -- those with the skills share
their work with others with the skills. It is bound together by the respect
we have for each other, and there's not much name-calling going on. The
product is technically sound, has better hardware support than other *ixes (I
run OpenB
On Thu 11 Dec 2008 at 11:32:57 PST prad wrote:
charlie, i think the point of that page is indicated here:
"Here are some examples of the environments in which FreeBSD is used"
these are examples of freebsd's versatility, which is not the same as
saying freebsd is ubiquitously versatile.
admit
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:32:20PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >Please stop trolling.
> having different opinion than yours isn't trolling.
> and i WILL NOT stop writing my opinions just because your is different.
It's not just that you have a different opinion than me -- it's that
every t
instead. This function sets in configure by program author and when you
working with ports you can play this options
I'd love to drop GNOME and KDE support for OO.o, but on my laptop I
really don't have the resources to spare for compiling OO.o, so I live
with whatever's in the package. Such is
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:38:30PM +0300, Ole wrote:
> Also you can use portupgrade -PP
>
>-PP
> --use-packages-onlyNever use the port even if a package is not avail-
> able either locally or remotely, although you
> still have t
Please stop trolling.
having different opinion than yours isn't trolling.
and i WILL NOT stop writing my opinions just because your is different.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
While OpenBSD has a great reputation as a "server" operating system, it
for whom? ;) it's just overadvertised nothing more, having no adventage
over FreeBSD in any point.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:09:51 -0800
Charlie Kester wrote:
> The impression I get from the website is that FreeBSD is indeed trying
> to be all things to all people. Did I miss something?
>
charlie, i think the point of that page is indicated here:
"Here are some examples of the environments in wh
remember having even worse problems
with the hardware interface to the optical disk drive in a ThinkPad T43
at one point when using Debian GNU/Linux, so I suppose it's not
unprecedented. I suspect it's an issue with some nonstandard hardware
interface that hasn't been resolved yet.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:28:00PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >The possibility here is the bells and whistles strangely enough DO work
> >in tune and without sore lips... FreeBSD could be THAT good.
>
> in bells and whistles windows is best. for those who require it paying a
> bit for wi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >that's the most narrow minded post i've seen here since i'm on this group
>
> or your narrow mail reading .
> >As if the only work that can be considered real work is the work you do...
> >
> >The reason why I CAN'T do any ser
On Thu 11 Dec 2008 at 10:37:42 PST prad wrote:
while i agree with you as far as having suitable driver accessibility,
i don't see why one system needs to try to be all things to all people.
I agree. But if FreeBSD isn't trying to be all things to all people,
the implication is that it IS tryin
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:51:22 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> The possibility here is the bells and whistles strangely enough DO
> work in tune and without sore lips... FreeBSD could be THAT good.
>
i'm not so sure that is really "THAT good". bells and whistles if not
carefully thought out and implemented
use I like the music for success after finishing the burn. ;)
It works on all my different machines, even a cheapy acer laptop with dvdrw.
As I said, I've not seen it NOT work on any and all cheap hardware in
a long, long time. I guess maybe I'm just lucky.
ed
P.S. The only thing th
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:23:04 +0100, Julien Cigar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you may pkg_add from ftp repository
>
> of course .. too bad that there is no pkg_upgrade
You can use:
portupgrade -PP "pkgname"
This will only use pre-compiled packages to upgrade.
___
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:10 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > "except when i forgot to unmount" -> yep, the problem lies here, it's so
> > natural to just unplug an USB device
>
> it's so natural to unmount device before removing. at least in unix...
>
true too .. :)
___
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:09:39 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well - solaris is not that bad. it's unix, you can work on it
> "normally", it's just slow etc...
Considering the things the system is doing for me it certainly is not
slow. It's a rock-solid UNIX but like sendm
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:10:18 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "except when i forgot to unmount" -> yep, the problem lies here,
> > it's so natural to just unplug an USB device
>
> it's so natural to unmount device before removing. at least in unix...
On a modern UNIX (l
"except when i forgot to unmount" -> yep, the problem lies here, it's so
natural to just unplug an USB device
it's so natural to unmount device before removing. at least in unix...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
for multiple OSes, but offers official support for only some of
them. If having vendor support is a deal-breaker - either for
operational or contractual reasons - and the only alternative to
Solaris is Windows
well - solaris is not that bad. it's unix, you can work on it "normally",
it's
Wojciech Puchar writes:
> > At work, FreeBSD and Solaris are present. For some fields of
> > use, I would not FreeBSD instead of Solaris. However, I found
>
> isn't the reason to using solaris just the need to run
> solaris-only binary software?
I believe there are cases where the
Also you can use portupgrade -PP
-PP
--use-packages-onlyNever use the port even if a package is not avail-
able either locally or remotely, although you
still have to keep your ports tree up-to-date so
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 15:56 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > - on almost all my machines I have problems with CD/DVD drives, mostly
> > things like READ_BIG timeout, etc. I tried almost everything (disabling
> > ACPI, DMA, upgrading the drive BIOS, etc), disabling DMA resolved some
> > problems, b
- on almost all my machines I have problems with CD/DVD drives, mostly
things like READ_BIG timeout, etc. I tried almost everything (disabling
ACPI, DMA, upgrading the drive BIOS, etc), disabling DMA resolved some
problems, but it's still impossible to burn a DVD for example.
i don't have. i use
As in many other topics, this is only my very individual point
of view.
I do see "FreeBSD's problems" in most cases where hardware
support isn't up to date, but that's mainly a thing of the
hardware manufactureres that (a) build black boxes or (b)
do not use existing
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:46:49PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 08:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
>
>
> > IMHO, before FreeBSD can make a significant market share improvement,
> > it has to improve its hardware support. NVidia, for one, has expressed
> &g
x27;Actual Work'? What you are referring to is that it meets your
> > criteria. Everyone's work platform might not be so narrow.
>
> ometimes, "actual work" may be entertainment, gaming, or
> programming obscure hardware platforms. :-)
>
>
> > I use F
hardware device this job
come to nothing.
On Thursday 11 December 2008 15:36:32 Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:19:14 -0500, Jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Define: 'Actual Work'? What you are referring to is that it meets your
> > criteria. Everyone&
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:19:14 -0500, Jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Define: 'Actual Work'? What you are referring to is that it meets your
> criteria. Everyone's work platform might not be so narrow.
ometimes, "actual work" may be entertainment, ga
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:28:00 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>in bells and whistles windows is best. for those who require it paying
>a bit for windows is not a problem.
>
>Those who need to do actual work, we have FreeBSD for example
Define: 'Actual Work'? What you are ref
that's the most narrow minded post i've seen here since i'm on this group
or your narrow mail reading .
As if the only work that can be considered real work is the work you do...
The reason why I CAN'T do any serious work on FreeBSD is because it lacks
the NVidia drivers (i'm in the film/comm
On 11 dec 2008, at 12:28, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The possibility here is the bells and whistles strangely enough DO
work
in tune and without sore lips... FreeBSD could be THAT good.
in bells and whistles windows is best. for those who require it
paying a bit for windows is not a problem
The possibility here is the bells and whistles strangely enough DO work
in tune and without sore lips... FreeBSD could be THAT good.
in bells and whistles windows is best. for those who require it paying a
bit for windows is not a problem.
Those who need to do actual work, we have FreeBSD fo
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 12:14 -0800, prad wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:35:17 +0100
> Uwe Laverenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Who is "most freebsd users"?
> >
> i would think most are interested in running servers or routers or
> possible scientific applications or engaged in os study and ap
Da Rock wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 08:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
>
>
>
>> IMHO, before FreeBSD can make a significant market share improvement,
>> it has to improve its hardware support. NVidia, for one, has expressed
>> a desire to support FreeBSD; however, it
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 08:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> IMHO, before FreeBSD can make a significant market share improvement,
> it has to improve its hardware support. NVidia, for one, has expressed
> a desire to support FreeBSD; however, it needs the FreeBSD organization
> to impro
Paul B. Mahol writes:
> Simple solution:
> Pay them or someone to do it for you, or hack it yourself, or
> wait for it little longer.
Given nVidia has offered to write and maintain a driver ... if
we're going this route, the correct solution is to pay someone to
make the changes nVidi
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:35:17 +0100
Uwe Laverenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who is "most freebsd users"?
>
i would think most are interested in running servers or routers or
possible scientific applications or engaged in os study and appreciate
its simplicity and consistency.
i don't think it can
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 07:18:08PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >Does anyone know of any recent progress on a 64bit Nvidia Driver?
> >there is mention of progress on this page
> >http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41545&page=24
>
> most freebsd users don't need 3D at all, or don't
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 07:18:08PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> most freebsd users don't need 3D at all, or don't need super-high-speed
> 3D.
Who is "most freebsd users"? I agree that there are more important
things to worry about than nvidia/amd64 support, but: if you want to buy
a computer
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 08:29:32AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
>
> IMHO, before FreeBSD can make a significant market share improvement,
> it has to improve its hardware support. NVidia, for one, has expressed
> a desire to support FreeBSD; however, it needs the FreeBSD organization
>
On 12/7/08, Ole Vole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If only 3D or "super-high-speed" has been affected by this driver.
> Regrettably
> most application simple is not usable, like video-players, google-earth,
> KDE4 - all of that on my desktop station with > 4Gb of RAM is
> looks&works
> like nigh
If only 3D or "super-high-speed" has been affected by this driver. Regrettably
most application simple is not usable, like video-players, google-earth,
KDE4 - all of that on my desktop station with > 4Gb of RAM is looks&works
like nightmare in vesa (xorg nv)-driver. And me too a very long ti
Does anyone know of any recent progress on a 64bit Nvidia Driver?
there is mention of progress on this page
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41545&page=24
most freebsd users don't need 3D at all, or don't need super-high-speed
3D.
so simply don't use nvidia/ati
___
> NVidia, for one, has expressed
> a desire to support FreeBSD; however, it needs the FreeBSD organization
> to improve its basic product, especially in the 64-bit systems, which
> are the future of computing.
Does anyone know of any recent progress on a 64bit Nvidia Driver?
there is mention of pr
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:40:46 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> manufacturers of hardware. More recently there were times when
>> anybody from
>
>because managers/bosses concentrate on majority, not minority of users.
That is plain good business sen
manufacturers of hardware. More recently there were times when anybody from
because managers/bosses concentrate on majority, not minority of users.
manufacturers did not notice Linux. However now it is possible to find a few
given out "put normal OS - their list is at us on a site and
Hello !
It would be desirable to learn from experienced users OS - why FreeBSD does
not concern the category serious systems at the overwhelming majority of
manufacturers of hardware. More recently there were times when anybody from
manufacturers did not notice Linux. However now it is possible to
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:04:51 -0500
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
2. Do an SMB mount of remote directories onto the desktop or your
home directory. Open any application and access files in that
directory as easily as when they are on the loca
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:04:51 -0500
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob McConnell wrote:
> > 2. Do an SMB mount of remote directories onto the desktop or your
> > home directory. Open any application and access files in that
> > directory as easily as when they are on the local drive.
[...]
> a
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:23:49PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >This is why I can easily justify teaching my elders FreeBSD -- they
> >unquestionably have more to learn, but they only learn it once, so the
> >investment pays off.
> but most people don't like to learn. even once.
You need to
Tyson Boellstorff wrote:
Once you fix basic problems like these, then we can talk about how to
redefine ease of use.
Bob McConnell
ease of use is always relative to the person using.
Ease of use is also relative to the training investment. In X, a moderate
investment some 20-o
This is why I can easily justify teaching my elders FreeBSD -- they
unquestionably have more to learn, but they only learn it once, so the
investment pays off.
but most people don't like to learn. even once.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
> > Once you fix basic problems like these, then we can talk about how to
> > redefine ease of use.
> >
> > Bob McConnell
>
> ease of use is always relative to the person using.
>
Ease of use is also relative to the training investment. In X, a moderate
investment some 20-odd years ago still pays
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
> On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
> >> On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
> >>
> >> On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
> they
> >> can match Microsoft'
Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
they
can match Microsoft's ease of use on the GUI. I believe the best
Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
they
can match Microsoft's ease of use on the GUI. I believe the best
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
>>
>> On the other hand, both Unix and Linux have a long way to go before
they
>> can match Microsoft's ease of use on the GUI. I believe the best way
>> to attack that problem is
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 07:39:39PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> unix is not windows replacements. all of these GUI overlays for which that
> much noise is heard are not just overlays, but are poorly designed even
> more poorly than windows.
>
> Windows is poorly designed too but at least i
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:25:24PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
> On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
>
> > While I agree that, without some kind of supporting argument, the
> > statement that Linux systems are "low end" Unix replacements are kind
> of
> > spurious sounding, I don't think that market share is
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:39:39 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is no sense of buying Sun hardware. they make excellent
> hardware but with more than "excellent" price
You are right about that. The quality is very high; prices are too.
> an
This
shows more than a marginal increase in "market share". It suggests that
Sun and others have good reason to be nervous about their future
prospects,
and need to find new ways to make money.
there is no sense of buying Sun hardware. they make excellent hardware but
with more than
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 04:53:03PM +,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Your assertion that "linux is both low end unix and low end windows
>> replacement" is factually wrong: As a high end unix I think it's
>> earned it's stripes, currently dominating the top 500 superco
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 04:53:03PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> (Forgive the top-posting)
Why?
>
> Your assertion that "linux is both low end unix and low end windows
> replacement" is factually wrong: As a high end unix I think it's earned it's
> stripes, currently dominating the top
nt via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:18:13
To: Zbigniew Szalbot<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and hardware??
>> usage or need.
>
> You
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:40:09 +0100, Manfred Usselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a small example, how limited Windows really is: Even today it is
> not possible to configure the standard interface of Windows XP (Luna)
> in any other color than blue, olive green and silver. LOL.
Not to menti
After having been burned with an AMD cpu/mobo combination that wouldn't run
6.x reliabably which I consequently had to sell, I'm going to ask first.
My search of the archives (questions and hardware) came up empty, but that
seems likely given that both say their archive index was la
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:14 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think the fundamental problem with the Windows UI is that it's
> > trying to cater for both advanced (e.g Shutdown, Restart, Sleep,
> > Hibernate or
>
> well funny - that being able to restart is being advan
I think the fundamental problem with the Windows UI is that it's trying
to cater for both advanced (e.g Shutdown, Restart, Sleep, Hibernate or
well funny - that being able to restart is being advanced user. good to
know.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:40:09 +0100
Manfred Usselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:18:13 +0100 (CET)
> Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> usage or need.
> > >
> > > You seem to be reserving FBSD only for the experts. I wouldn't be
> > > here
> >
> > is some
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:10:48 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cygwin is an atrocity,
Why's that?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
ot only can they not put anything else on the hardware that the OEM
build, but that they have to put their OS on EVERY piece of hardware
that they make, then it is like MS.It isn't as if MS made computers
and put their own stuff on every machine, which would be similar to the
Kodak iss
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 08:22:56PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >Time to forget this.It is a semantic and religious battle
> >playing hair splitting games with words.It is not a MS clone
> >but it is an MS replacement. If you overwrite your MS-Win with
> >FreeBSD, it completely rep
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 08:26:36PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>are happy to find that to be true.Give them a hand rather than
> >>a kick in the face.
> >
> >Amen to that! This is something I am also asking for. Wojciech you
> >often help others here. Let's keep it this way. Please?!
>
>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:37:21PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> The same applies to the X Window System. It sucks. It is laden with
> various and sundry big problems; annoyances and poor design decisions
> litter the X Window System. The drawbacks of Luna, Aqua, and Aero are
> all even worse t
Chad Perrin writes:
> > I read once that: "The difference between the lab and the real
> > world is that, in the lab, there is no difference." I wish I
> > had noted the source.
>
> The way I'd heard that sentiment was slightly different:
>
>"In theory, theory and practice are the s
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:13:40AM -0600, Andrew Gould wrote:
>
> I read once that: "The difference between the lab and the real world is
> that, in the lab, there is no difference." I wish I had noted the source.
The way I'd heard that sentiment was slightly different:
"In theory, theory an
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:42:26AM -0500, Dan wrote:
> Wojciech Puchar([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.11.18 12:23:24 +0100:
> > FreeBSD is very good in hardware support now, with most of drivers being
> > very stable and high performance.
> >
> > for now there is no such thi
Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:18:13PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>>> By constantly repeating that UNIX is no Windows replacement you are
>>>
>> and i will repeat it because it's true. it's every other unix replacement.
>>
>
> It did a quite admirable job of rep
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:10:48AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Manfred Usselmann wrote:
>
> I have a lot of reasons for loathing X. A *lot*. I've spent a lot of
> time (and even money; anyone remember AccelX back in the 90s? Yep, I
> bought it) tryi
so why it have a much smaller market share?
Because MS wrote restrictive contracts with companies trying to
sell PCs saying that if they wanted to put MS on any of their
Apple produces it's own computers. Actually a branded PCs now.
what a problem?
the problem is that Apple works the same way
are happy to find that to be true.Give them a hand rather than
a kick in the face.
Amen to that! This is something I am also asking for. Wojciech you
often help others here. Let's keep it this way. Please?!
i will do exactly what i'm doing now. no more no less.
helping those who ask quest
501 - 600 of 1793 matches
Mail list logo
