Re: application using LessTif

On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 05:49:20PM -0400, Gilles J. Seguin wrote: > > TCMToolkit for Conceptual Modeling > > Homepage: http://www.cs.utwente.nl/~tcm > > Added. Thanks!

[nix@esperi.demon.co.uk: Re: Seemingly broken anon CVS :(]

just forwarding -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] > A simple attempt to checkout lesstif from there succeeds for me. > Perhaps a temporary problem only? Nope. I can tell what's broken, though. : loki:/usr/packages/lesstif/foo% cvs -z5 co lesstif : cvs-pserver server: Updating

Debugging (Re: Lesstif bug with Grace (X11 bug?))

reakpoint on exit() (if looking for X protocol errors) - run in synchronous mode (run -sync) - reproduce bug - produce a stacktrace (bt) So far it should be straightforward and easily be adopted even to "nonGNU" environments. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hungry CVS: amai : hungry/lesstif/doc/www.lesstif.org debugging.html

not X specific - mostly) and then the more advanced stuff. ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: 0.90.9

hed on 2000/02/03 (unfortunately by some "amai" but OTOH it looks like it has worked since then? :-) AFAIR we had no related changes in LTconfig* or config*. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: LessTif beginner

m -lX11 > Charles> hello.c > >Perhaps LessTif can guard against this common linking problem? E.g. the >following function will check the VendorShell for consistency: > [...] Might be an idea, however the error is just the penalty for not reading the docs :-) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Typo fixes

efintion -> definition Thanks, the bugs are fixed now. 'WRT' is no bug but if it doesn't look well I'll get rid of it. WRT 'OpenSource': at first glance the website doesn't claim it is one, but somehow this idea must have come to my mind. I remove the tm and point to their webpage instead! -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Open Motif

has put a (preliminary) statement on the webpage: http://www.lesstif.org/future.html As a very short summary: the project will continue and stay alive since the OpenGroup's license is not really "free", especially it violates the OpenSource definition. -------

Help! (Re: Debugging (Re: Lesstif bug with Grace (X11 bug?)))

1 but that necessary anyway to get it "running", there are many malloc(0) calls. Since this shouldn't cure the real problem what are remaining differences with libefence? The execution speed is lowered, but in this case and given we have -sync this doesn't seem to have any meaning. Now I'm unfortunately at the end of my knowledge and we're both open to any helpful feedback. Thanks & Bye, -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: OpenMotif (sort of)

the lists?? > I sent a subscription request to announce@, no response IIRC. There are mailinglist archives, have you checked for messages there? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: wrong link

pointing this out! (given the behaviour of the OpenGroup they shouldn't have .org but .com ...) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debugging (Re: Lesstif bug with Grace (X11 bug?))

ortedly OM doesn't show the bug ... This call is making trouble not only on Rob's system, but other people observe problems as well which are likely related. Citing from a bug report for grace: After pressing the CLEAR button in the Results window, any further regressions/fits will not have their information logged in this window. This appears to be LessTif-Related since the linux build with gcc/LessTif shows this problem, but the Solaris build with cc/Motif does not. Does anyone else see this behaviour? "Broken Build" Grace-5.1.0 GUI toolkit: @(#)GNU/LessTif Version 1.2 Release 0.89.4 This report can be confirmed by me with both grace and lesstif from CVS. Rob's system is probably just a bit more picky and decides to crash a bit earlier ;-) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

LTV5Editres.c?

Is LTV5Editres.c missing in the 0.91.0 (source) archives? As a CVS user I rarely use those packages, but just trying to build on an AIX 3 system and either I (or the machne ;-) messed up things or it's not included at all! -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LTV5Editres.c?

to use it, but I'm curious how it (LessTif) will work on the old AIX box. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The "Open" group release of Motif for Linux

t;GNU"/"OpenSource" fanatic person to understand that a license like the OM one should not be supported at all. It's just an attempt to destroy real "open source' movement, something one could have expected from another company, this with the "M" in the beginning ... ;-) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LTV5Editres.c?

m/Makefile.am and Xm-2.0/Makefile.am. Actually I think the build managed the libXm and stopped for the Xm-2.0 ... Strange, since LTV6 wasn't supposed to build here, but obviously it did! -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lesstif dumps core when using TTF fonts in text entry field

On Tue, 16 May 2000 20:09:44 +0100, C Hennessy wrote: >Alexander Mai wrote: >> >> I wasn't really happy with a fix like >> >> if Average_Width==0 >> AverageWidth=MaxWidth=MaxWidth/2 /* or Width('x') */ >> >> being added to about

LessTif 0.91.0 OS/2 binaries

0.91.0 OS/2 binaries are in: ftp://ftp.hungry.com/pub/hungry/lesstif/bindist/ A smaller binary runtime set is usually on my homepage available. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Our goal(s) - your input wanted

pensource-fanatics and others. I don't have any problems using commercial software (a lack of money perhaps ;-) but I do strongly support free software. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The "Open" group release of Motif for Linux

On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 04:04:15PM +, Carlos A M dos Santos wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2000, Alexander Mai wrote: > > > The OM FAQ indicates that perhaps/sometime in the future they might > > have another license but that's similar to the situation in the past: > >

Re: about lesstif license

housands" of add-ons to XFree86 is a good idea, but for good reasons M*tif/LessTif would be a worthwhile exception. Drawback is that release and and development style don't match, LessTif is more often updated, etc. 3) Changing the license is a difficult thing. I think you have to persuade _all_ contributors from past up to now! -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Xbae vs. Xm version problems

lve the problems. (I noticed today after switching version with 'ltversion' and a 'subtle' crash following ...) (I seem to remember having asked this ealier but anyway:) should Xbae (and Xlt) be built in two versions which can perhaps even be distinguished by the library name? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: problem buildin on solaris

gt; > Anyone else care to comment ? Comment? Yes, but not a helpful one for now ;-) Why are those tools required, is a CVS version being used? Doesn't the source distributions include ready-to-use fallbacks (i.e. C sources)? BTW, in known.html there's a reference to LEX, looks

Re: 0.88?

e you tried ftp-search? Mirrors which are out of sync with the main site could still carry it? (not to mention ftp servers with old linux distributions ;-) Byt why are you interested in a completly outdated version?? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: netscape & frames not ok with lesstif ?

some systems, etc.) but a quick test indicates that the result may actually differ. An example (though german only) is www.rmv.de The frames are separated by a small grey (background color) stripe. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NEdit freeze problem again

re welcome. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lesstif & Mozilla

rry to give such > discouraging news. :-( That is probably not a good idea. You would have to reinvent the wheel many, many times here. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

configure without test/

test/ tree. Using "--disable-tests" just seems to toggle whether the tree (better: it's content) is actually built. So if there isn't one I put in on my wishlist ... -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lesstif for IA-64?

check. However many of the simple test/ apps seem to run. IIRC there was the idea of replacing _XtWaitForSomething() in general, then one could have another look at this. Unfortunately this has been discussed before the mailinglist archive was created. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: nedit freeze fix

ow no longer valid?! Or if it is true then LTRemoveGrab() is called a bit 'too early' here (in NEdit, with the grabs not yet being removed)? %-\ OTOH if now 'all' apps are working fine perhaps one shouldn't care ... ;-) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Xbae not completely installed with "make install"

d to > /usr/local/lesstif/include/Xbae/. [...] Might be my fault when I edited some config stuff for Xbae last time. For now I added some essential headers, do we need to install all? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Compiling merely Xbae. Is there configure option?

an untouched LessTif tree there's no Xm.h, so this is taken from the system. I just ran configure w/o any argument. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Compiling merely Xbae. Is there configure option?

On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:08:59PM +1000, Andrew Lister wrote: > Alexander Mai writes > >gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I../include > >-I../../../include/Motif-1.2 -I../../../include/Motif-1.2 >-I../../../include/Motif-1.2 > >-I../../../includ

if defined(c_plusplus)

Xbae headers have C++ clauses like #if defined(__cplusplus) || defined(c_plusplus) Where does this defined(c_plusplus) come from? The first is the canonical one. Which system/compiler defines c_plusplus ? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: if defined(c_plusplus)

On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 11:43:41AM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: > Xbae headers have C++ clauses like > > #if defined(__cplusplus) || defined(c_plusplus) > > Where does this defined(c_plusplus) come from? > The first is the canonical one. Which system/compiler defines > c_pl

Re: libXm.so.2.0 - where is it?

thing for your system, you'll have to build it yourself. (in general best method anyway, but it may also cause problems, of course) Since you didn't specify your system that's all I can tell you. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fwd: Re: libXm.so.2.0 - where is it?

urself. (in general best method anyway, > but it may also cause problems, of course) > Since you didn't specify your system that's all I can tell you. > > -- > Alexander Mai > [EMAIL PROTECTED] My system is unix (solaris 1.2) and 2nd is SunOs 5.6 . I'm just begi

Re: compile errors on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0

ify another include directory? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

New Xbae version & make clean

dn't change at first. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ishmail link

On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 17:57:50 +0300 (IDT), Evgeny Stambulchik wrote: >Hello, > >Please change the Ishmail link on the "Supported software" page to >http://ishmail.sourceforge.net > Done. ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

[eugene@blackcatlinux.com: Re: compile errors on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0]

just forwarding ... -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here you go: Alexander Mai wrote: > > > >I noticed other problem. The Xm shared libraries, produced by lesstif > >(libtool?) can not be linked with almost all test examples because of > >missing symbols. If I

Re: LessTif bug (with Grace)

xpected. XmListSelectPos() doesn't seem capable to handle the requests for XmMULTIPLE_SELECT. If I understand correctly _XmListSelectPos() is called, but this does not _toggle_ state but just always selects?! It should call *TogglePos(), I'll give it a try. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NEdit iconized

d feature it is convenient to close such sessions by ALT-Q (or similar). -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: build error lesstif-0.91.0

-DLESSTIF_VERBOSE -c LTV5Editres.c -fPIC -DPIC -o LTV5Editres.lo >gcc: LTV5Editres.c: No such file or directory >gcc: No input files Hmm, this file was missing, but I thought we had fixed this ... This was based from a source archive (.tar.gz) ? ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: build error lesstif-0.91.0

ent snapshots feature the missing file. The snapshots are created in a different way than our releases (at least I think so ;-) ---------- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

0.91.3 test release issues

so we should probably still keep the 2.13 as default. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.91.3 test release issues

in nightly should it bring now in sync with make_release. What has to be done to create lesstif-current.tgz by "make dist" ? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Need help integrating XbaeMatrix into BuilderXcessory GUI builder

ly isn't here? > If you have any idea where else I might look, I will be very grateful. > > Thank you for any help, > Bruce Reid > Well, did you download the latest version and look in (lesstif/lib/)Xbae/examples/builderXcessory ? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Name for the API used in LessTif

whatever_language compiler'?! LessTif did not invent the standard and doesn't want to do so. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LessTif and Imake

ently I managed to use mxmkmf for a couple of Motif apps, though. ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

www.lesstif.org?

Hmm, what has happened to our website? I always end up on the www.hungry.com start page?! -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Hungry CVS: amai : hungry/lesstif/include/Motif-2.0/Xm TransferP.h Xm.h.in hungry/lesstif/lib/Xm-2.0 Xme.c

Probably I should have chosen a wider audience for this ... On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:26:15 +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: > >Latest addition are based on attempts with privtool and smirc. >The recent(*) versions I got for both were buggy, i.e. they >did not even build with real Motif 2.

Re: Hungry CVS: amai : hungry/lesstif/include/Motif-1.2/Xm Xm.h.in

On Thu, Jun 30, 1994 at 01:16:08AM -0700, Alexander Mai wrote: > Log: > Xm.h.in: added missing #include Xm/VirtKeys.h >(tried to build vdx ...) Before anyone gets curious: got the idea when reading usenet. However I couldn't figure out how the non-standard buil

Re: Name for the API used in LessTif

complain to > him. It was me ... But 1) this is now really off-topic and 2) as far as I can see the initial request didn't get even close to a majority here, so should consider this thread to be closed?! -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hungry CVS: amai : hungry/lesstif/include/Motif-1.2/Xm Xm.h.in

On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:41:57 +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: > >VDX is listed as 'would like to work'. Does anyone know >more about its compatibility to LessTif? Got a report. Looks like we're still on the "core dump" level :-( Will t

XmGetSecondaryResourceData() question

tical scrollHorizontal scrollLeftSide scrollTopSide cursorPositionVisible LessTif's doesn't 'say' anything. The problem may be much deeper inside LessTif than the call given above ... -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] #include #include #include #

Re: XmGetSecondaryResourceData() question

Seems I'm creating this thread totally on my own ... :-) On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 01:41:03PM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: > Can anyone comment on our XmGetSecondaryResourceData() implementation? > After I succeeded in building vdx (I had to use an old gcc; gcc 2.9.x doesn't >

Re: XmGetSecondaryResourceData() question

On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 01:41:03PM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: > Can anyone comment on our XmGetSecondaryResourceData() implementation? > After I succeeded in building vdx (I had to use an old gcc; gcc 2.9.x doesn't > work - I assume the code is not ANSI C++ compliant) I was ab

Re: XmGetSecondaryResourceData() question

On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 02:43:49PM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: > Seems I'm creating this thread totally on my own ... :-) [...] No! I missed the earlier report http://www.mail-archive.com/lesstif@hungry.com/msg00024.html Seems the mailarchive is nowadays big enough to already cont

Re: XmGetSecondaryResourceData() question

On Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:43:49 +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: >Seems I'm creating this thread totally on my own ... :-) > Ok, after each message I discover something new and really wish to wipe out/cancel the erlier ones ... Now I believe that _XmTransformSubResources() is not working in

Re: LessTif Release 0.91.4 is out

e're still fighting with some configuration issues and some packages (especially RPMs) had also still problems which we tried to address. There have also been some valuable changes in the libraries, of course. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AM_PROG_LEX revisited

clocal && autoheader && automake -a -i && autoconf Toplevel Makefile after 'touch configure.in': aclocal automake --gnu --include-deps autoconf -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

OS/2 binaries for 0.91.4

ed for now. ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Compiled resources

ts' to run configure for my Production and Debug trees but for some strange reasons I often have -O!=0 used in my Debug/ :-( -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Compiled resources

h a thing or wait for a sane fix attempt (see Mitch's last email)? I confess the only app which would for sure benefit is vdx, and we even don't know for sure that it won't crash beyond ;-) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Compiled resources

x27;re on the other side now ... ;-) (I wasn't referring to you personally WRT the fix; in fact that's a reason to propose a workaround - I do not expect anyone to spend lot of time for a quick fix). ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Compiled resources

s some >major corruption in the VendorShellExtension. Oh, you mean the "fixes" introduced we're not simple shortcomings but workarounds for more critical problems? Then fixing the vendorshell might cause new trouble :-\ ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: problem:compiling with lesstif

e also have our own FAQ at www.lesstif.org/links.html/FAQ.html The interesting part is when it comes to the details ... try looking in /usr/X11R6/lib for a file like libXt.so and add "-L/usr/X11/lib" to the linker command. cc -o h2 teach3.c -lXm -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXt -lX11 -lm -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: lesstif & ddd

cted result, otherwise it selects/highlights the rest of the text. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bad news

something else? Can anyone else confirm general problems outside test/ ? ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Bad news

On Fri, 07 Jul 2000 21:03:32 +0200 (CED), Alexander Mai wrote: >Now back at home I built current + the _XmDestroyProtocols() patch >(looks very safe?!) on OS/2. >Result is a disaster: many apps don't show up at all, nedit features a >protocol error with a tear-off, etc. :-[ >

Re: Bad news

On Fri, 07 Jul 2000 14:54:07 -0400, Mitch Miers wrote: >Alexander Mai wrote: >> >> On Fri, 07 Jul 2000 21:03:32 +0200 (CED), Alexander Mai wrote: >> >> >Now back at home I built current + the _XmDestroyProtocols() patch >> >(looks very safe?!) on OS/2. &g

Re: graphical view

ribe in deatil what "an advanced graphical view" should be? ------ Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: lesstif & ddd

s all shortcomings this is only helpful for the application itself ... -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: question about "system"

ot a msg: > >sh: -c requieres an argument > >any idea??? > >thanks in advance! > >regards, hector > This has nothing to do with LessTif. Try "man system" instead ... --- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lesstif-CVS bug: Broken pipe with Grace

ow manager stuff (I don't have an 'X' here ...) I got the following with a Motif/DU version of grace (as of CVS): XIO: fatal IO error 54 (Connection reset by peer) on X server "migdal.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de:0.0" after 9060 requests (9059 known processed) with 0 events remaining. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lesstif & ddd

ounds can be > eliminated due to better OSF/Motif compatibility. Do you have an automated testing facility to check this or just run a sample session and see what happens? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lesstif-CVS bug: Broken pipe with Grace

ing to use 'Kill' or similar from my window manger on linux. So I'm not sure what crashes here. My fvwm2 on linux usually features 'Close' and 'Kill', but in difference to a remote xmgrace/motif 'Close' is not active on those dialogs. This seems to be different with earlier versions of LessTif. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

XmTextSetHighlight patch (Re: (null))

useable than it was before. > >Thanks, >Seth Chaiken >Dept. of Computer Science >University at Albany >Albany NY 1 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] Anyone tried yet? Due to a still missing ddd on OS/2 I didn't. The patch might contain a few more #ifdef foo than desired but to get dd

Re:modal text does not expand modal correctly.

Sorry, no help yet. I just wanted to mention that the example (source slightly modified!) is now in test/Xm/text/test17. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Another VDX crash

{components = 0x0, number_of_components = 1} Not sure what exactly to fix. The bug seems to be triggered by clicking on 'Generate' in the RMB menu of an interface (load a project or interface). I guess either lesstif or vdx corrupts memory somewhere ... -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mozilla & Xfe

t some apps which recent version is no longer M*tif based ... Since we do not mention the version numbers we can probably keep the entry for a while. --- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recent BaseClass changes

e way to go (-> realize called twice) - test/Xm/misc/test5 is segfaulting here as I reported earlier. Well, initial report was from Rick. (-> http://www.mail-archive.com/lesstif-commits@hungry.com/msg00333.html) - other than that in overall stability seems to still ok!? Bye, -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ddd fix and question

any screenshot. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: leaks

bytes selectionbox/test9, textf/test8 are down to 36! -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: leaks

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 02:02:33PM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: [...] > Ok, situation has changed for me here: > as of now > command/test3 leaks by 40 bytes > selectionbox/test9, textf/test8 are down to 36! Well, on DU with Motif 1.2.4 I get this: ++ command/test3.motif leaking 9

Re: Fix the Xbae Imakefiles, please!

briefly). If someone would have a good reason to reject it you would be informed (hopefully ;-) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug: Focus problem with TextF results in many blinking cursors.

which appeared once in some dialogs within NEdit. Not sure whether the problem at this time was within Text or a more generic one? --- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

More on leaks

s per Create/Destroy > ++sepg/test2 > leaking 0 bytes per Create/Destroy > ++text/test11 > leaking 0 bytes per Create/Destroy > ++textf/test8 > leaking 36 bytes per Create/Destroy > ++togglebg/test2 > leaking 0 bytes per Create/Destroy > ++togglebutton/test7 > leaking 0 bytes per Create/Destroy > ++vendor/test3 > leaking 782 bytes per Create/Destroy -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More on leaks

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:30:15 -0400 (EDT), Rick Scott wrote: >Substantial??? They seem very resonable compared to the ones you showed for DU >:) > Sorry. My defintion of "substantial" was non-vanishing and beyond 2-3 pointers (times 4 bytes or order of magnitude). --- A

(Text) Problem within NEdit

was pressed: it positions the cursor at the end. BTW, test/Xm/text1 crashes on DU Motif IF I unselect 'cursor visible'. Other than that those examples also show the problem described above. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (Text) Problem within NEdit

On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 10:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote: > BTW, test/Xm/text1 crashes on DU Motif if I unselect > 'cursor visible'. Other than that those examples also show > the problem described above. The example is broken as it is. For better motif compatibility we

Silence ...

. Another might be that some people are in vacation, of course ;-) -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

XTHREADS again

ell). We should finally get this done, since this would help LessTif on this platform very much. If I want to test it now, I always patch Vendor.c to get the right code selected. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Memory leak in TextF

", being from version 1.1 ... Time to get rid of? --- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XTHREADS again

I don't have any R5's to check things > against...Bottom line, I don't think threads was the main issue here.. I remember something like that ... But a) it's obviously much easier to change the configure script ;-) and b) it might be useful for other purposes to have this check. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

text/test11 segfaults (Re: Memory leak in TextOut)

() from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 #8 0x8048745 in main (argc=1, argv=0xb3d0) at /u/mai/compile/lesstif/lesstif/test/Xm/text/test11.c:31 Looks like the TextOut patch was wrong? Rick, what was your proposal exactly? -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Non-standard functions

we intend to provide those stubs to eventually make legacy code link or shall we 'now' drop this? In the former case one might add the missing ones. I think we never got a report related to those ... -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Non-standard functions

7; #ifdef statements: to some extent additional stuff is helpful, but also confusing. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mxftp crashes now

getExtData(w, XmSHELL_EXTENSION); 224 if (extData == NULL) (gdb) 225 { 226 XmeWarning(w, "Can not find Vendor Shell Extention Data."); 227 return; 228 } 229 230 XtAddCallback(extData->widget, XmNfocusMovedCallback, cp, udata); -

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >