Re: Revival

2003-10-27 Thread Nick Chalko
Of course everything at the wiki is still up for discussion. That is what this list is for. Nick Chalko wrote: See http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Requirements smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Revival

2003-10-27 Thread Nick Chalko
See http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Requirements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Other Repository Questions: 1) Should there be metadata or is none required to host, access and manage the repository? Should be metadata but not required. 2) Repository format? Compromise URI ht

Re: Revival

2003-10-27 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So, a quick question. A 'repository effort' is not just about code, it's > mainly about keeping the repository up to date and accessible, and this > (from what I can tell) isn't covered by Ruper or Version, is it? Agreed, however with sufficient automation tools around

Re: Revival

2003-10-26 Thread dion
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/10/2003 05:08:56 PM: > > I didn't think we needed something to keep a repository automatically up > > to date, and that mirroring would take care of that. > > It's just a naming thing. What Ruper does is to update the local > repository with t

RE: Revival

2003-10-24 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Is anyone interested in reviving this project? Yes. --- Noel

RE: Revival

2003-10-24 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> We must cater for all projects, not only Maven-enabled ones. And not just Java ones, either. The system can be written in Java, but it should cater to all needs. --- Noel

Re: Revival

2003-10-24 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/10/2003 07:38:13 PM: ... http://www.krysalis.org/version/ http://www.krysalis.org/ruper/ (draft site) Just one note: the two primary Ruper2 and Version authors are Adam Jack and Anou Manavalan. A

Re: Revival

2003-10-24 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/10/2003 07:38:13 PM: ... http://www.krysalis.org/version/ http://www.krysalis.org/ruper/ (draft site) As I see it, these two projects are in a more advanced state than the Maven code, so I would propose that we build on th

Re: Revival

2003-10-24 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's also the code in maven-new/fetch. Correct, that has to be taken into account too. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---

Re: Revival

2003-10-24 Thread dion
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/10/2003 07:38:13 PM: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Is anyone interested in reviving this project? > > Yes :-) > > Last time this list stopped at the last proposal of how to implement the > repository for Apache, and IIRC it was about pl

Re: Revival

2003-10-24 Thread dion
There's also the code in maven-new/fetch. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/10/2003 11:24:59 PM: > > Leo Simons wrote: > > > As

Re: Revival

2003-10-23 Thread Leo Simons
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: As for code, well, personally, not really. Maven worksforme :D. But it could be a good idea nevertheless. We must cater for all projects, not only Maven-enabled ones. Yes, it's possible to take away the code from Maven and make that indipendent, but again I propose to sta

Re: Revival

2003-10-23 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Leo Simons wrote: As for standards, I like the concensus we arrived at (and I would be highly against changing that again now as its just a major pain in the to move 100s of files around). From my site, I totally agree. As for code, well, personally, not really. Maven worksforme :D. But it cou

Re: Revival

2003-10-23 Thread Erik Abele
On 23/10/2003, at 08:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone interested in reviving this project? Although I won't be of any great help when it comes to Java specifics, I'll be lurking here and perhaps might be able to lend a hand when questions concerning our mirroring system crop up... Cheers, Eri

Re: Revival

2003-10-23 Thread Leo Simons
As for standards, I like the concensus we arrived at (and I would be highly against changing that again now as its just a major pain in the to move 100s of files around). As for code, well, personally, not really. Maven worksforme :D. But it could be a good idea nevertheless. cheers, - Leo [EM

Re: Revival

2003-10-23 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone interested in reviving this project? Yes :-) Last time this list stopped at the last proposal of how to implement the repository for Apache, and IIRC it was about placing jars in the current dist space, that can thus be mirrored. As for codebase, I have seen th