Hi,
These days I code for Mozilla.
Then iron out the IE incompatibilities.
mike 2k:)2
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
a
Hanni,
IE4 isn't a complete horror story though if you don't support Netscape v4.7 why
support I.E.?
Personally I supply style sheets to I.E. but not to Netscape 4.7 it's too buggy.
Though I would find it acceptable to not give I.E. a style sheet.
mike 2k:)2
*
Aussie uni students and staff members may be interested in the Web
Accessibility Network for Australian Universities (WANAU)
http://www.monash.edu.au/groups/accessibility/
WANAU is open to anyone who works or studies at an Australian university
and would like to get involved in promoting accessi
http://www.itweek.co.uk/News/1155868 :
Ubizen has advised computer users to switch to alternative web
browsers like Netscape or Mozilla for the moment.
I think the main problem with switching browsers is visible right there
on the page. The header breaks in non IE browsers. If the user is to
I guess it depends on the kinds of sites you visit (and perhaps what
you feed your dog) - I come across very few these days that don't look
ok in Firefox. And I don't just visit the sites of web standards
advocates, honest! Even all four of the internet banking applications
I use work fine in Firef
Title: XHTML Transitional -> Strict
Hello all,
I was hoping one of you could tell me, or know any url's that would be helpful on moving from XHTML Transitional to Strict.
What are the main things to look out for when moving over? What is allowed in Transitional that has to be removed for str
El jue, 17-06-2004 a las 11:00, Jamie Mason escribió:
> Hello all,
> I was hoping one of you could tell me, or know any url's that would be
> helpful on moving from XHTML Transitional to Strict.
>
This is quite relevant :)
http://www.7nights.com/asterisk/archives/xhtml_10_strict_not_ready_for_p
Guess the best thing to do would be to change the doctype of one of you current
sites, run it through the 1.0 Strick Validator and then see where you have gone
wrong...
I do almost all my sites in 1.0 STRICK so feel free to look at a few of them
www.phunky.co.uk/2004/
www.phunky.co.uk/2003/
www.
Title: XHTML Transitional -> Strict
Strict isnt much different from Trrans
no
theres a _javascript_ replacement.
other than theres a cuopkle of things but W3C will
tell you about them.
Simple.
Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz
- Original Message -
From:
Jamie Mason
To: '[EMAIL PR
On 17/06/2004, at 7:00 PM, Jamie Mason wrote:
Hello all,
I was hoping one of you could tell me, or know any url's that would be
helpful on moving from XHTML Transitional to Strict.
What are the main things to look out for when moving over? What is
allowed in Transitional that has to be removed
Most people I believe are unaware that there are multiple browsers. If
this warning hits the network news, it may raise some awareness among
the average computer user.
Most people have no idea what web standards are.
Nancy Johnson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
Nancy Johnson spoke the following wise words on 17/06/2004 10:26 PM EST:
Most people have no idea what web standards are.
And why should they? How much of the POP or HTTP standard does a user
need to know?
I believe it is our job to use and spread web standards for the
bettering of the web for *
Nancy Johnson wrote:
Most people I believe are unaware that there are multiple browsers.
I think most people have at least heard of Netscape. How much beyond
that. it's hard to say.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See htt
Hello,
I need help from more experienced hands. :-/
I viewed http://www.chopstix.com/ from a client's place today and the
right-hand column appeared underneath the middle column. The browser was
Windows IE6.0 and the screen resolution was 1280x1024. I changed the screen
resolution to 1024x768 but
Tim Lucas wrote:
Nancy Johnson spoke the following wise words on 17/06/2004 10:26 PM EST:
Most people have no idea what web standards are.
And why should they? How much of the POP or HTTP standard does a user
need to know?
While it can be helpful for users to know what they are and what they
are
I have a two column fluid design with header and footer. On one short page
after closing the #main div I want to center a picture across the page
under
both the nav and main div.
On previous pages I have a class "clear" after the main div and before the
footer so I placed the image between
Again, IE does it wrong. text-align:center is only supposed to align text, but IE uses
it to align everyting the style is set to.
Try adding this to the styles for the div that controls the image:
width: 650px;
margin: 0 auto;
That should align it.
>
> From: "Maureen Beattie" <[EMAI
Ian Fenn wrote:
I changed the screen resolution to 1024x768 but no change.
It's ill advised to design for a particular resolution, especially a
high one.
Any ideas on what may be the cause of the problem?
I haven't looked for a solution yet, but I did find another problem.
While it looks f
I have not looked into in detail but I can confirm that on my Laptop
(IBM A31p) the behaviour exists. I can also tell you that I am using
larger fonts (which impacts EVERY web page I go to). I am on
1280x1024 and using IE.
On Firebird/fox (0.6.1) on the same machine it works properly.
Unless yo
Mordechai Peller wrote:
> It's ill advised to design for a particular resolution, especially a
> high one.
I changed the resolution as I was aware that I had tested the design in a
variety of resolutions up to 1024x768 and I wanted to see if the increased
resolution was the cause of the problem.
Gary Menzel wrote:
> I have not looked into in detail but I can confirm that on my Laptop
> (IBM A31p) the behaviour exists. I can also tell you that I am using
> larger fonts (which impacts EVERY web page I go to). I am on
> 1280x1024 and using IE.
Gary, that would make perfect sense - my clie
Ian Fenn wrote:
I need help from more experienced hands. :-/
I'm not sure I qualify, and I've only been able to give the code a brief
look, but I think I can at least put you on the right path.
For starters, it's a lot easier to debug code which is properly
indented. You want to condense it to s
"" Hmmm... I fixed the above simply by re-ordering the css...
Some days CSS just gets me ""
There might be something in that, you know. I'm a novice, myself, and have so much to
learn,
especially when it comes to the in's and out's of CSS.
Opera seems to be the most dependent on order, or so I
i'm not sure if this little nuggest is of relevance in this case for the
site check, but while on the topic of css specificity...
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#specificity
/d
RC Pierce wrote:
"" Hmmm... I fixed the above simply by re-ordering the css...
Some days CSS just gets me ""
The
I would appreciate feedback on the following (personal) site (please
disregard previous posting):
http://www.bureke.com.au/ (temporary address)
The main CSS page is at:
http://www.bureke.com.au/styles/global.css
The site is valid XHTML 1.0 and CSS.
I have checked on WIN IE 5.0 and 6, Safari 1.2.
This question is not really very easily Googlable so I'm posting it
here.
I vaguely remember reading that the order in which a state styles
appeared in a stylesheet was important.
I made a rough memory recall thingy: LoVe HAte (not an acronym but must
have some official name) to stand for:
a:
> Does the order matter?
Yes! read here:
http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/css_tutorial/selectors/p_class_s
electors.html
> If so why and is my order above correct?
Yes, your order was correct
> Do we need to have all states styled?
No you do not need to style all states
Russ
The
Yes, to the best of my knowledge that is correct: order does matter
(although only in some browsers I think) and that is the correct order. And
I think that if you don't style everything, it takes the value for the last
one in the order (e.g. if you don't style active, it will assume the
properties
I don't think this has been posted yet - but for those that don't know,
FireFox 0.9 is now officially out.
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/g
Sarah I checked on WinIE6 and everything looks to be sitting where it
should.
I only looked at the first page so far and from what I have seen it is a
beautiful site with a simplicity of style that really stands out from the
rest. A real advertisement for using standards - congratulations.
Maure
I recommend downloading the Web Developer extension for firefox. How
did I ever live without it!
Marz.
Craig Stump wrote:
I don't think this has been posted yet - but for those that don't know,
FireFox 0.9 is now officially out.
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
*
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:44:35 +1000, Craig Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this has been posted yet - but for those that don't know,
> FireFox 0.9 is now officially out.
Make sure you completely uninstall any previous versions first - and
some people are reporting that it doesn't w
On 6/17/04 8:24 PM "Kay Smoljak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:44:35 +1000, Craig Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think this has been posted yet - but for those that don't know,
>> FireFox 0.9 is now officially out.
>
> Make sure you completely uninstall
Kay Smoljak wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:44:35 +1000, Craig Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think this has been posted yet - but for those that don't know,
FireFox 0.9 is now officially out.
Make sure you completely uninstall any previous versions first - and
some people are repor
Yes uninstall all previous versions and then install the new 0.9 in std mode
and then add on chris' web developer extension. Works fine.
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kay Smoljak
Sent: Friday, 1
I am enjoying quality time out of the office. I will be back on 28 June 2004. If you
need any assistance please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail is solely for the named addressee and may be confidential.
You should only read, disclose, transmit, copy, distribute, act in reliance
on or c
> I've installed it on XP and Win2K with no bother. A mate of mine lost
> his bookmarks during the upgrade but the key seems to be to make sure
> Firefox is shut down before attempting the upgrade.
The release notes actually say you have to uninstall any previous
versions first, as the profile dir
Apologies to the list for this (slightly)
OT post but the Brisbane organisers were hoping that (we think) "Rudy"
from the Gold Coast could get in touch with us regarding the presentation
he has volunteered for next months meeting.
Reponses directly to me - from Rudy
(or anyone that knows him that
People,
Discussion of installation of Firefox is for http://www.mozillazine.org,
rather than here. Discussion of browser support for your pages is fine.
If you'd like to put the Web Developer extension (and similar) up on the
wsg site resources section then go for it.
Cheers
James
*
Thanks for the reply Justin.
I must have been mistaken about that forced inheritance thing. Would
have been nice to have it, though.
Tim
On Thursday, Jun 17, 2004, at 14:33 Asia/Kuala_Lumpur, Justin French
wrote:
On 17/06/2004, at 1:11 PM, Tim Yang wrote:
I remember reading about a syntax that
Amidst all the hubhub about Standards and Validation, some people are
arguing that they use XHTML served correctly as application/xhtml+xml
to ensure that their documents validate. Their reasoning is: if I make
a mistake in my code, browsers will fail to render the documents. This
is partially
41 matches
Mail list logo
