Re: [AFMUG] Looking for PMP 320 SM's

[Ryan Ray]

We have approximately 50, let me know how many you need


On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Adam Moffett  wrote:

> We have Telrad 3000, Telrad 6000, and Telrad 7000.
> Telrad 3000 is the same as PMP320 but with different firmware.
>
> I'm sure these won't work with Motorola's bridge mode, but they are Wimax
> and ought to connect.  If they would help you any, let me know.
>
>
>
> On 5/30/2018 3:51 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
>
>> Major storms rolled through our territory and took out a bunch of our PMP
>> 320 SM's. Our inventory is getting a little light. Please let me know if
>> you can part with any.
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS

[Ryan Ray]

http://www.advantec.it/wp-content/uploads/cambium/pdf/cambium_networks_PTP550_Advantec.pdf

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Joe Novak  wrote:

> I've definitely done some stupid things with PTP 5ghz. With in a few
> hundred foot I may or may not have a few micro-pops humming along with NLOS
> shots. It's definitely not a predictable layout though, you just have to
> test it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Steve Jones 
> wrote:
>
>> No ptp650 magic sauce like you may be expecting. It performs exactly as
>> ptp3/500 did in regard to that. Like anything you can get "nLOS" but you
>> pay for it with capacity/reliability
>> turning dual payload off gets you "sauce" at the expense of half your
>> capacity,  and IIRC theres another setting regarding throughput vs
>> stability. 5ghz is 5ghz in this context. you can barely penetrate a fart,
>> tree leaves are out of the question
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:16 PM, C Stanners  wrote:
>>
>>> Orthogon-based PTP650/670 have something like 256/512 subcarriers which
>>> helps NLOS. I think AF5X has 1 and AF5XHD has 8 subcarriers?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Christopher Gray <
>>> cg...@graytechsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
 I've been told the PTP650 (and 670) have some sort of magic that helps
 with NLOS links. I've always assume this was a result of the custom
 chipset. Do these radios actually perform better than others in similar
 signal NLOS environments?

 The PTP550 is based on a WiFi chipset... does it have any of the NLOS
 magic?


 In NLOS situations, would the PTP650 / PTP550 be expected to
 significantly outperform the airFiber-X hardware?

 Thank you - Chris


>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] test 1135pm pst

[Ryan Ray]

We back in it to win it?


On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:

> Where you at TJ? We're on PDT out here...
>
> Sent 2018-03-25 15:12 PDT.
>
>
> bp
> 
>
> On 3/25/2018 2:39 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] RF Calibration Failure ADI Catalina R0 chip not supported!

[Ryan Ray]

Doesn't look like it :(

https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-Known-Issues/Field-Service-Bulletin-ADI-Catalina-R1-Chip-not-supported/td-p/43211

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Andreas Wiatowski  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I’ve never seen this before…but it looks like I have a broken AP…any way
> to fix without a climb??
>
>
>
> 450 AP 2.4Ghz
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 x-600 <(866)%20727-4138>
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Making epmp connect faster/ site survey

[Ryan Ray]

Reducing the channels and bandwidth has sped it up for us immensely.
Shouldn't take that long to register, enough that you could definitely find
it in a foggy day.

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Steve Jones 
wrote:

> Im going to be asking alot of installer questions for a while btw, these
> nitwits werent bothering to learn the gear.
>
> Epmp, is it just slow? I set a low minimum snr, 4, low minimum rssi, 90. I
> pare the scan list sometimes clear down to one channel.
>
> I use monitor wireless til in connects, then tools,, align.
>
> But monitor wireless sits on scanning forever, so questionable shots or
> foggy days its a pita. Ive gotten to where i bring up google earth, put a
> pin where im testing from on the property and draw lines to any potential
> access point so i have landmarks but its just slow.
>
> Is there something im missing here?
>

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Support

[Ryan Ray]

I've also never really had issues. If you find you're not getting the
response you need out of tier 1 just ask to be escalated. I've gone through
RMA's, licensing issues, etc, always answered quickly and with proper
information.

If you're looking for help with epmp go look on the forums. There's lots of
info there, although poorly laid out (especially all the pinned topics that
are out of date, and hard to differentiate between other topics)

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Justin Wilson  wrote:

> I have had very little issue with support, but like many other companies
> these days, e-mail through support.cambiumnetworks.com web portal always
> gets answered very quickly.   Other companies prefer e-mail support as well
> these days.  I have filled out support tickets with Cambium and received
> calls back within the hour.  I try to put as much relevant information to
> minimize the back and forth as possible like Adam says.
>
> Last issue I had was some licensing issues.  Had a resolution within an
> hour of filling out the request.
>
> Justin Wilson
> j...@mtin.net
>
> www.mtin.net
> www.midwest-ix.com
>
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 9:57 PM, Adam Moffett  wrote:
>
> I've almost never needed them.
> When I did call support one time, I had the same complaint as you.  I was
> advised by someone higher up the chain to open the ticket online.  That's
> essentially what the phone answerer is doing, but they're transcribing your
> words and may be mangling them.  Fill out the online ticket request and you
> can describe the issue in your own words and get some of the dumb questions
> out of the way immediately.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Matt Hoppes" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 2/20/2018 7:31:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Support
>
> Also. How do I get American support that can solve my issue while on the
> phone?  The few times I’ve called in someone takes my info down and just
> opens a ticket.
>
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 19:26, Matt Hoppes 
> wrote:
>
> Why does Cambium Support suck so bad?
>
> Why do they not have access to my cnMaestro account?
>
> Every time I open a ticket I’m asked 10 questions that could all be
> answered if the tech had access to my cnMaestro cloud account.
>
> What firmware version?  How is it configured? Etc etc.
>
> Instead of getting solutions when I open a ticket I get question after
> question back.
>
> I’ve had nothing but issues since embarking on my Cambium adventures a
> month ago.
>
> Latest issue is a cnPilot device that was connected and working fine for
> several weeks, now it shows connected and stats but won’t let me change the
> SSID from the cloud.
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Pledge drive

[Ryan Ray]

I agree. Toss some money at him, I'm sure we can spare it

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yep... this always comes up. I think the consensus has always been that
> it's easier for those of us who are willing, to just chip in occasionally
> and keep it as is, then to mess with what's been working well.
>
> On Feb 18, 2018 1:36 PM, "Robert Andrews" <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems like this same conversation came up last year.   Folks, if you
>> don't want to pay, propose doing the work.   Seems like it's well worth 100
>> bucks for the enjoyment I get out of it.  I pay way more than that for
>> things way less enjoyable, but necessary to keep peace at home...
>>
>> On 02/18/2018 11:30 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>
>>> Then is a pledge drive needed?
>>>
>>> Blacklists are the recipients problems. Not the mailing list owners
>>> problem - as long as nothing shady is going on.
>>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 14:15, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net >> af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Those that run the list are happy to pay for not dealing with
>>>> blacklists, etc. whatever SES provides.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+In
>>>> telligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/
>>>> company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com
>>>> /company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net >>> mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>> *Sent: *Sunday, February 18, 2018 1:12:56 PM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Pledge drive
>>>>
>>>> What is SES?  Amazon?
>>>>
>>>> That seems overkill for a mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 14:09, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net >>> af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> SES
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+In
>>>> telligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/
>>>> company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com
>>>> /company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
>>>> <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>> *Sent: *Sunday, February 18, 2018 1:05:36 PM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Pledge drive
>>>>
>>>> Support of what???
>>>>
>>>> What the heck costs that much?
>>>>
>>>> Mailman takes all of 10 minutes to install and just lives after
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 13:52, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:ryan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> La

Re: [AFMUG] Pledge drive

[Ryan Ray]

Last time this was brought up the cost was $3000 for the year including
support, $1800 not including support.

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

> Can it really be more than $5
>
> How much memory, CPU, and storage can a mailing list take when virtualized?
>
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 13:20, Keefe John  wrote:
>
> Just curious, what are the monthly costs to operate this list?
>
> On February 18, 2018 11:13:54 AM CST, Chuck McCown 
> wrote:
>>
>> I notice it has been a while since we pushed a bit to help fund the
>> not-insignificant AWS expense that keeps this list alive.
>>
>> Please clean out your couch cushions and paypal the revenue created to
>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>>
>> Paul, what is the current status of our deficit?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Powering a 450d SM via 24v, need polarity crossover?

[Ryan Ray]

Can't wait for that 450b high gain version too... no more speed licenses.
Coupled with 450m's. mmm.

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks George, reversed it and all is good.
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:32 PM, George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The 450d is a standard 450SM board. Canopy POE polarity only. So yes,
>> you'll need to reverse the blues and browns at one end.
>>
>> The 450b, Force180 and Force200 are all polarity agnostic.
>>
>>
>> On 2/2/2018 3:29 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>>
>>> Is anyone else powering a 450d SM with a Netonix? I'm wondering if I
>>> need to reverse the polarity on the cable like we do with 450 SM and AP.
>>> Looking at the spec sheet it just says INPUT VOLTAGE 20 TO 32 V which makes
>>> me think it can take a straight thru cable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Powering a 450d SM via 24v, need polarity crossover?

[Ryan Ray]

Thanks George, reversed it and all is good.

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:32 PM, George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com>
wrote:

> The 450d is a standard 450SM board. Canopy POE polarity only. So yes,
> you'll need to reverse the blues and browns at one end.
>
> The 450b, Force180 and Force200 are all polarity agnostic.
>
>
> On 2/2/2018 3:29 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else powering a 450d SM with a Netonix? I'm wondering if I need
>> to reverse the polarity on the cable like we do with 450 SM and AP. Looking
>> at the spec sheet it just says INPUT VOLTAGE 20 TO 32 V which makes me
>> think it can take a straight thru cable.
>>
>>
>>
>

[AFMUG] Powering a 450d SM via 24v, need polarity crossover?

[Ryan Ray]

Is anyone else powering a 450d SM with a Netonix? I'm wondering if I need
to reverse the polarity on the cable like we do with 450 SM and AP. Looking
at the spec sheet it just says INPUT VOLTAGE 20 TO 32 V which makes me
think it can take a straight thru cable.

Re: [AFMUG] Is the list still alive?

[Ryan Ray]

Weren't we just talking about SNR here ;)

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Timothy Steele 
wrote:

> The Facebook community is a lot more alive these days..
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018, 10:44 PM CBB - Jay Fuller 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> It's not dead, Jim.
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> *From:* Colin Stanners 
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2018 9:29 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Is the list still alive?
>>
>> It's 10PM in your area Jon, I'm sure you've worked hard, relax a bit!
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Jon Langeler 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jon Langeler
>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>>>
>>>

Re: [AFMUG] OT BTC

[Ryan Ray]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOUZxG1JcGI

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:

> Yes. This is going to be a blood bath. By all means, buy and hodl,
> friends, but never buy more than you can afford to lose.
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 12, 2017 8:18 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT BTC
>
>
>
>
> Tulips!  Tulips!
>
>
>
> *From:* Lewis Bergman
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 12, 2017 5:33 AM
>
> *To:* Animal Farm
>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT BTC
>
>
>
> OMG
>
> People are taking out mortgages to buy bitcoin, says securities regulator
> Joseph Borg. Coupled with accounts of credit cards and equity loans being
> used to obtain bitcoin, it raises the possibility of risk-taking investors
> being left deeply indebted or potentially even homeless.
>

Re: [AFMUG] Sonar password requirements too strict?

[Ryan Ray]

I just realized you were talking about customer facing passwords, which
absolutely should be somewhat easy as people seem to be pretty blase' about
their password security, but anyone with a lick of tech knowledge should be
using a password manager with a random long password for every site. I use
1password which has apps for Windows, osx, ios, android and browser
extensions. Then every password is as long as the site will let me with
random characters.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:

> Oh no, admin password should be very strong. But I am just barely playing
> with this for the first time and I didn’t know they made it so you can
> change the requirements. I’m quite impressed with sonar so far. It looks
> like it will take a very long time to setup because of how many features
> there are.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Chuck McCown  wrote:
>
> Oh, for the customers.  That is a different kettle of pickles.  I agree,
> customer passwords can be less secure in my opinion.
> I thought you were talking about your admin password.
>
> *From:* Brett A Mansfield
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 25, 2017 6:50 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Sonar password requirements too strict?
>
> I can tell already that it will be a serious challenge. I have a lot of
> customers that will be calling me just to complain that they cannot get
> into their account because the password requirements are too strict and
> they forgot their password again.
>
> Should I not be able to choose my own password requirements?
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:37 PM, Mike Hammett  wrote:
>
> Absolutely not.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
>
>
> 
> --
> *From: *"Brett A Mansfield" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, October 25, 2017 7:32:07 PM
> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Sonar password requirements too strict?
>
> Anyone here that uses sonar find the password requirements to be too
> strict? 12 character requirement.
>
> When it comes to passwords, I should get to choose any password I want
> when I’m paying someone for a service. I have the same issue with Apples
> new stuff.
>
> I just spun up a new instance of sonar to try it out. I haven’t even
> passed the password change screen yet and I think I’ve already decided to
> cancel.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Wispapalooza - where's the beef?

[Ryan Ray]

Correct, still a wifi product, that's why it comes with the epmp interface
apparently. The 450i case is a good addition, still needs to get proven in
the field but it all seems real nice.

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> not complaining, force 200 is now my goto cheap link if they have a "next
> gen" cheap link, im down
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> so its epmp 3000 in ptp? still a "wifi" product though ?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's an AC chipset, it can do non-contiguous channel aggregation, it's
>>> CHEAP. Little over $1000 per link. It's weird seeing the epmp interface at
>>> wispapalooza on a "PTP" product but that's seems to be the way she goes.
>>> I'll be ordering a bunch.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> what puts tits on yet another ptp solution with the 550?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IDK the ptp550 is pretty sexy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:05 AM, John Seaman <
>>>>> john.sea...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Gino, While you didn’t miss out on any earth shattering new
>>>>>> product announcements, you did miss out on a lot of fun and an overall
>>>>>> great conference.  VERY sorry you couldn’t attend and we hope to see you
>>>>>> next year if not sooner!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A.
>>>>>> Villarini
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 6:40 AM
>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Wispapalooza - where's the beef?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn’t seen that Wispapalooza is the new gear coming out party it
>>>>>> once was? No new gear announced? Has the industry lost its shine?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing new from Mimosa
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UBNT just showing just another 5 ghz backhaul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cambium with just another backhaul too? And AC Epmp… nothing
>>>>>> spectacular either
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where is the new gear in 24 ghz? Multiband backhaul? (5,24,60), more
>>>>>> 60 ghz? SFP ports?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> President
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Wispapalooza - where's the beef?

[Ryan Ray]

It's an AC chipset, it can do non-contiguous channel aggregation, it's
CHEAP. Little over $1000 per link. It's weird seeing the epmp interface at
wispapalooza on a "PTP" product but that's seems to be the way she goes.
I'll be ordering a bunch.



On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Steve Jones 
wrote:

> what puts tits on yet another ptp solution with the 550?
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>
>> IDK the ptp550 is pretty sexy.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> 
>> Suite 1337
>> 
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> 
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:05 AM, John Seaman <
>> john.sea...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gino, While you didn’t miss out on any earth shattering new product
>>> announcements, you did miss out on a lot of fun and an overall great
>>> conference.  VERY sorry you couldn’t attend and we hope to see you next
>>> year if not sooner!
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A.
>>> Villarini
>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 6:40 AM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Wispapalooza - where's the beef?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It doesn’t seen that Wispapalooza is the new gear coming out party it
>>> once was? No new gear announced? Has the industry lost its shine?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing new from Mimosa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> UBNT just showing just another 5 ghz backhaul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cambium with just another backhaul too? And AC Epmp… nothing spectacular
>>> either
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Where is the new gear in 24 ghz? Multiband backhaul? (5,24,60), more 60
>>> ghz? SFP ports?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>>>
>>> President
>>>
>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>
>>>
>>
>

[AFMUG] MetroLinq 2.5G 60-BF-18 (120 Degree Sector)

[Ryan Ray]

Searched around and didn't see anyone talking about these. Do they work?
Can I put three of these up channels 2,3,4 and have 360 degree gigabit
coverage in 60GHz? Any gotcha's I need to know? Does frequency reuse work?
Same range as the existing point to point model?

So many applications if this is all the case.

Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device

[Ryan Ray]

Thanks Chuck! Very helpful.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

> V out = Vin x [R1/(R1+R2)]
>
> So you are giving it 5 volts full scale and you need .1 volt to represent
> full scale.
>
> V out/ V in = .1/5 or .02
>
> Pick a R1.  Normally telemetry inputs are pretty high impedance like 100K
> or 1M so the divider resistance can use 1K as one of the resistances.
>
> So if R1=1K then 1k/.02 = 1K + R2
> 50K=1K + R2
> So R2=49K.
>
> Voltage in through the 49K resistor in series with the 1K resistor then to
> ground.
>
> The telemetry would be fed from the junction between the two resistors and
> ground.
>
>
> *From:* Jesse DuPont
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:55 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring
> device
>
> So, R1 would be X Ohms and R2 would be X*.02 Ohms?
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 8/30/17 11:51 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> Forrest, quit working and come out and play with us
>
> *From:* Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:49 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring
> device
>
> But you can use a voltage divider to convert the 0-5 volt to 0-.1 volt.
> Two resistors.
>
> *From:* George Skorup
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:48 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring
> device
>
> No, the SiteMonitor shunt input is ±100mV nominal.
>
> On 8/30/2017 12:42 PM, Jesse DuPont wrote:
>
> Would these work on a SiteMonitor? They output 1-5V DC based on current
> flowing through.
>
> https://flexscada.com/product/hall-effect-current-sensor-ac-75a-dc-100a/
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 8/30/17 11:29 AM, George Skorup wrote:
>
> Yeah, about that. I wouldn't use those on 12VDC systems. Too much current.
> I've burned up a couple of the 10A shunts on Traco BCMUs that were running
> around 200W load on battery. 200/13 = 15 amps. Ungood. One site at about
> 225W, first time it went to battery, the shunt went kaput after 10-15
> minutes and the site went down.
>
> I'm hoping Forrest comes up with some Hall effect stuff or even plain 20+
> amp shunts that can be used on the SiteMonitor's existing 100mv input. Hall
> effect is nice because you don't have to be "in" the circuit. But I'll take
> what I can get.
>
> On 8/30/2017 10:26 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> Yeah, up to 10 amp.
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Chuck McCown" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 8/30/2017 11:18:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device
>
>
> I think Forrest has them on his site with the site monitors.
>
> *From:* Sam Lambie
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:15 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring
> device
>
> Parallel. Site Monitor! Now where can I get a shunt?
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:
>
>> 4 batts in series or parallel?
>> Shunt + sitemonitor would be a better way to go and you don’t have to
>> write code.
>>
>> *From:* Sam Lambie
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:06 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device
>>
>> Hey all,
>> I am getting away from using APC at a couple of our sites and right now I
>> have installed a Tripp-Lite APS750 connected to 4 Deep cycle marine
>> batteries for a total of 404 aH system. I'd like to be able to monitor the
>> discharge rate of the batteries when power is out remotely. What have you
>> guys been doing to that effect?
>>
>> I'm thinking a Pi and a shunt and some quick scripting classes on Python
>> to put it all together...
>>
>> --
>> --
>> *Sam Lambie*
>> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
>> 575-758-7598 <%28575%29%20758-7598> Office
>> www.Taosnet.com 
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Sam Lambie*
> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
> 575-758-7598 <(575)%20758-7598> Office
> www.Taosnet.com 
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device

[Ryan Ray]

How would you properly spec out a shunt given a certain number of batteries?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Adam Moffett  wrote:

> it puts out so many millivolts depending on how many amps are moving
> through it, so with a volt meter you can monitor what your load is.
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Steve Jones" 
> To: "af@afmug.com" 
> Sent: 8/30/2017 11:36:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device
>
> what does the shunt do in this case?
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Adam Moffett 
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, up to 10 amp.
>>
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Chuck McCown" 
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: 8/30/2017 11:18:36 AM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device
>>
>> I think Forrest has them on his site with the site monitors.
>>
>> *From:* Sam Lambie
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:15 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring
>> device
>>
>> Parallel. Site Monitor! Now where can I get a shunt?
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:
>>
>>> 4 batts in series or parallel?
>>> Shunt + sitemonitor would be a better way to go and you don’t have to
>>> write code.
>>>
>>> *From:* Sam Lambie
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:06 AM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device
>>>
>>> Hey all,
>>> I am getting away from using APC at a couple of our sites and right now
>>> I have installed a Tripp-Lite APS750 connected to 4 Deep cycle marine
>>> batteries for a total of 404 aH system. I'd like to be able to monitor the
>>> discharge rate of the batteries when power is out remotely. What have you
>>> guys been doing to that effect?
>>>
>>> I'm thinking a Pi and a shunt and some quick scripting classes on Python
>>> to put it all together...
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> *Sam Lambie*
>>> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
>>> 575-758-7598 <(575)%20758-7598> Office
>>> www.Taosnet.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> *Sam Lambie*
>> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
>> 575-758-7598 <(575)%20758-7598> Office
>> www.Taosnet.com 
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Metrolinq question

[Ryan Ray]

I have the same experience as Brett.

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:

> I have a 1500M link that is currently at 4 9's using the 35cm model. I get
> about 1Gb throughput including overhead.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On Aug 7, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Eric Kuhnke  wrote:
>
> Still wouldn't do it...  60 GHz with 2ft/60cm dishes is good for 900-1100
> meters max in rain zone D with high reliability where you can actually
> treat it like a fiber cable, and it won't drop out except in truly
> exceptional rainstorms. In the five nines per year statistical range.
>
> 1100 meters = 0.68 miles
>
> And definitely not in rain zone F with its higher mm/hour rates.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> Friend asking with 2 ft dishes
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2017 1:45 PM, "Eric Kuhnke"  wrote:
>>
>>> 1.9 miles 60 GHz with those tiny antennas?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't even try that distance with the Bridgewave 60 GHz product
>>> with 60cm dishes on both ends in rain zone C...  Forget F.
>>>
>>> 100 Mbps at 1.9 miles seems like a good fit for two AF5X with the
>>> smallest dishes, does it have to be 60 for some reason?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Jaime Solorza <
>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Can these 60Ghz do 100 mbps at 1.9 miles in my area? Zone F

 Jaime Solorza

>>>
>>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 6.0.6 WARNING

[Ryan Ray]

Probably to try and prevent epmp elevate?


On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> Why did they do this?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mitch Koep
> *Sent:* Friday, July 07, 2017 11:49 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 6.0.6 WARNING
>
>
>
> XM only so far
>
> I am not upgrading anything else for a long while
>
> Mitch
>
>
>
> On 7/7/2017 11:45 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> Are you seeing LAN issues on which chipset? XM,XW,XC,WA, etc?
>
> - Josh
>
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2017 4:52 AM, "Mitch Koep"  wrote:
>
> Everyone
>
> Heads up if you upgrade to 6.0.6 it will NOT allow
>
> you to down grade firmware and seems to break
>
> the LAN side of the radio.
>
> Allows POE but no data and no LAN Graph
>
> Have opened a support ticket but so far not much help
>
> Looks like truck rolls to change radios so be careful
>
> Mitch Koep
>
> 218-851-8689 cell
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap

[Ryan Ray]

That's about all I get on a 450 as well. I think it's CPU bound.

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Eric Muehleisen  wrote:

> See attached. This is a 20mb SM. Again, it will burst up to 52 mb
>
> ​
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:
>
>> What QoS settings in the SM?
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris Wright
>>
>> Network Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 1:36 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 ~50mbps cap
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes. Just yesterday tested a 450i AP (40mhz) with a 20mb 450 SM.
>> Linktests showed 137 x 58 but most we could burst to was 52 x 45. Both AP
>> and SM are on 15.1.
>>
>>
>>
>> I currently have a support ticket open for this as well as increased DFS
>> issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Colin Stanners 
>> wrote:
>>
>> We setup a customer on a very lightly loaded 5ghz PMP450 AP and SM, 20mhz
>> channel, expecting them to burst up to 70mbit speeds for download; linktest
>> is reliably 85-90d and there's effectively no other usage. But we can't
>> seem to get over 50mbit speedtests. Has anyone else seen such issues?
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] new Cambium 450 CPE's

[Ryan Ray]

So does this mean Cambium is going to release license keys to uncap all the
existing expensive ridiculous costing 450d? What's the difference between a
450d and 450b?


On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists 
wrote:

> Hey Kurt,
>
> The first of the 450b units will hit in July.  Those are the integrated
> units that are built like the Force 180.  The ones that are similar to the
> Force 200 are supposed to be available in October.
>
> Jeff Broadwick
> ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office
> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell
> jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
>
> On Jun 9, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Kurt Fankhauser 
> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know when cambium will be releasing the new CPE's for the 450
> (5ghz) that have the unlimited throuput and will work all the way down to
> 5.1ghz at the $300-$350 price range? I thought it was supposed to happen by
> end of 1st quarter this year.
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] test

[Ryan Ray]

List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,



On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 8:41 PM, dsd gfryh  wrote:

> Who do I need to contact about manual removal of email addresses from the
> list. The Mike Test can send but not receive. Others just cant send. I have
> two that can't unsubscribe.
>
> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Chuck McCown  wrote:
>
>> 599
>>
>> *From:* Colin Stanners
>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 06, 2017 9:17 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] test
>>
>> good SNR.
>>
>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Mike test 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> test
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Putty, is there any better?

[Ryan Ray]

Get yourself into quake champions. It's quite fun


On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Sterling Jacobson 
wrote:

> That sounds like fun.
>
>
>
> I’m an Overwatch player myself.
>
>
>
> I used to ladder in HOTS at Platinum level 2v2, but now StarCraft II is
> pretty much dead to me.
>
>
>
> UT, that cracks me up. I was the champion at that FPS. And Quake and Doom,
> lol.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chris Wright
> *Sent:* Friday, May 5, 2017 5:16 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putty, is there any better?
>
>
>
> LAN parties are alive and well in my town. Next LAN is in five weeks!
> Honestly, LAN party weekends beat out Thanksgiving for my favorite holiday.
>
>
>
> The atmosphere of LANs has definitely changed though. Ten years ago it was
> quite easy to get 30 nerds to play a particular game like Savage or UT
> together. Today gamer culture has become divided as genres are better
> defined.  You’ll have a few guys in one area playing Overwatch, Halo, or
> Call of Duty, more groups playing MOBAs like Dota/LoL, and then you have
> RPGs – WoW being the most popular. Gamers are no longer “Gamers.” They’re
> “RTS Gamers” or “MOBA Gamers” or “FPS Gamers”. Still, getting a bunch of
> people who abhor sunlight as much as I do for a weekend of nostalgia amidst
> a tangle of Cat5 is just as fun as it’s ever been.
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2017 6:16 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putty, is there any better?
>
>
>
> I do miss the communities and hidden adventure around BBSes, BBS
> gatherings, and LAN parties.
>
> - Josh
>
>
>
> On May 4, 2017 7:40 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>
> Kermit
>
> Dial up
>
> BBSs
>
> Floppys
>
>
>
> Nah, not really, I don’t really miss any of that.
>
>
>
> *From:* Chuck McCown
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2017 6:37 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putty, is there any better?
>
>
>
> I miss the days when all you needed was Procomm with the fuchsia and
> yellow screen.
>
>
>
> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2017 6:24 PM
>
> *To:* af
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putty, is there any better?
>
>
>
> Just noticed this thread.
>
>
>
> I use "Bitvise SSH client" for my unix terminal needs.   I use Putty and
> TeraTerm as well.
>
>
>
> I also have used SecureCRT in the past, but I have a hard time paying what
> they're asking, especially since I found Bitvise (and the fact I'm not in a
> terminal window nearly as much as I used to be).
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Steve Jones 
> wrote:
>
> I use the shit out of putty (and winSCP) I'm a GUI gimp, I will own that.
> Is there any better set of tools for the windows environment?
>
> Not Complaining at all, or looking to change, I get a ton done with these
> two applications, just curious if there are even better solutions
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>
> Tel: 406-449-3345 <(406)%20449-3345> | Address: 3577 Countryside Road,
> Helena, MT 59602
>
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>
> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/linkedin.png]
>  [image:
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/facebook.png]
>  [image:
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/twitter.png]
> 
>
> [image:
> http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_compose][image:
> http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce][image:
> http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce]
>

Re: [AFMUG] problems sending to the list

[Ryan Ray]

Nope

Sent while mobile


> On May 4, 2017, at 10:24 PM, dsd gfryh  wrote:
> 
> Has anyone had problems sending to AFMUG?
> I can see the emails in the archive but they don't send to other users. (from 
> a different address obviously.) I have checked RDNS and ensured the records 
> match. I have included the AFMUG Amazon email server in the SPF records.

Re: [AFMUG] Albuquerque

[Ryan Ray]

Chuck did say to his lawyer though that the court will make minor changes
to accommodate his condition.

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

> Here is my prediction:
> Jimmy is going to trial because he knows he can make Chuck flip out at all
> the electronics in the courtroom.
> I think Chuck will fold when presented with this possibility.
>
> Sorry, don't know of any WISPs in ABQ.
>
> -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:26 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Albuquerque
>
>
> On 4/27/17 09:51, Bill Prince wrote:
>
>> Better call him...
>>
>>
>
> I hear he skipped town for some reason.
>

Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers

[Ryan Ray]

It's on 1.1.2

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Rob Genovesi <r...@corp.coastside.net> wrote:

> What version is the G2 running?
>
> I believe there was an issue on v1.0 that was later fixed.  Read up
> here: http://community.mimosa.co/t/a5-c5-speedtest-ceiling/1793/6
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > C5 is negotiating at 1G but the router is obviously only negotiating at
> > 100Mb.
> >
> > I don't see this issue on any G2's in routed mode or any G2's in passthru
> > with a 1g client behind it.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Are the ports negotiating at 1Gbps?  I just checked the client we have
> and
> >> he has had peaks of over 40Mbps although 95% of his bandwidth is under
> >> 10Mbps.  Turn it over to tech support and see what they say.
> >>
> >> Rory
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:10 PM
> >> To: af@afmug.com
> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Weird, haven’t seen it but I only have 1 customer with his own router
> >> behind a G2. I’m checking it now.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rory
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:08 PM
> >> To: af@afmug.com
> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes. I can replicate it on multiple G2's, multiple 100Mb routers and
> >> cables and multiple site locations.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ryan, something is wrong.  Did you try a different G2 or cable?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rory
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:42 PM
> >> To: af@afmug.com
> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It was an after need. They wanted to implement a system with their own
> >> router but needed internet right away. So I left a G2 and switched it
> into
> >> passthru after they were ready.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I’m sort of confused.  Why are you using a G2 if you have your own
> router?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rory
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:04 PM
> >> To: af@afmug.com
> >> Subject: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Not sure if anyone else is deploying the Mimosa platform en-mass but
> came
> >> across a new issue today in case you're fighting with things.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The issue: Client Router receives very poor download no matter what
> signal
> >> conditions are like. Download capped around 10Mb/s. Upload was
> unaffected.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The equipment:
> >>
> >> A5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
> >>
> >> C5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
> >>
> >> G2 in passthru – 1.1.2 Version
> >>
> >> Client Router – Asus N600
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The problem:
> >>
> >> G2 has an issue with 100Mb routers. Plugging in a 1Gb client into the
> >> passthrued G2 resulted in full speed. Plugging a 100Mb router caused the
> >> download to drop to 10Mb/s levels.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The solution:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Replace G2 with regular power supply, fixed issue.
> >> In C5 change the duplex from auto to 100MF, fixed issue while still
> using
> >> G2.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers

[Ryan Ray]

C5 is negotiating at 1G but the router is obviously only negotiating at
100Mb.

I don't see this issue on any G2's in routed mode or any G2's in passthru
with a 1g client behind it.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:

> Are the ports negotiating at 1Gbps?  I just checked the client we have and
> he has had peaks of over 40Mbps although 95% of his bandwidth is under
> 10Mbps.  Turn it over to tech support and see what they say.
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:10 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>
>
>
> Weird, haven’t seen it but I only have 1 customer with his own router
> behind a G2. I’m checking it now.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:08 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>
>
>
> Yes. I can replicate it on multiple G2's, multiple 100Mb routers and
> cables and multiple site locations.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> Ryan, something is wrong.  Did you try a different G2 or cable?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:42 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>
>
>
> It was an after need. They wanted to implement a system with their own
> router but needed internet right away. So I left a G2 and switched it into
> passthru after they were ready.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> I’m sort of confused.  Why are you using a G2 if you have your own router?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:04 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>
>
>
> Not sure if anyone else is deploying the Mimosa platform en-mass but came
> across a new issue today in case you're fighting with things.
>
>
>
> The issue: Client Router receives very poor download no matter what signal
> conditions are like. Download capped around 10Mb/s. Upload was unaffected.
>
>
>
> The equipment:
>
> A5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>
> C5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>
> G2 in passthru – 1.1.2 Version
>
> Client Router – Asus N600
>
>
>
> The problem:
>
> G2 has an issue with 100Mb routers. Plugging in a 1Gb client into the
> passthrued G2 resulted in full speed. Plugging a 100Mb router caused the
> download to drop to 10Mb/s levels.
>
>
>
>
>
> The solution:
>
>
>
>1. Replace G2 with regular power supply, fixed issue.
>2. In C5 change the duplex from auto to 100MF, fixed issue while still
>using G2.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers

[Ryan Ray]

Yes. I can replicate it on multiple G2's, multiple 100Mb routers and cables
and multiple site locations.


On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:

> Ryan, something is wrong.  Did you try a different G2 or cable?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:42 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>
>
>
> It was an after need. They wanted to implement a system with their own
> router but needed internet right away. So I left a G2 and switched it into
> passthru after they were ready.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> I’m sort of confused.  Why are you using a G2 if you have your own router?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:04 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>
>
>
> Not sure if anyone else is deploying the Mimosa platform en-mass but came
> across a new issue today in case you're fighting with things.
>
>
>
> The issue: Client Router receives very poor download no matter what signal
> conditions are like. Download capped around 10Mb/s. Upload was unaffected.
>
>
>
> The equipment:
>
> A5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>
> C5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>
> G2 in passthru – 1.1.2 Version
>
> Client Router – Asus N600
>
>
>
> The problem:
>
> G2 has an issue with 100Mb routers. Plugging in a 1Gb client into the
> passthrued G2 resulted in full speed. Plugging a 100Mb router caused the
> download to drop to 10Mb/s levels.
>
>
>
>
>
> The solution:
>
>
>
>1. Replace G2 with regular power supply, fixed issue.
>2. In C5 change the duplex from auto to 100MF, fixed issue while still
>using G2.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers

[Ryan Ray]

It was an after need. They wanted to implement a system with their own
router but needed internet right away. So I left a G2 and switched it into
passthru after they were ready.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:

> I’m sort of confused.  Why are you using a G2 if you have your own router?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:04 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>
>
>
> Not sure if anyone else is deploying the Mimosa platform en-mass but came
> across a new issue today in case you're fighting with things.
>
>
>
> The issue: Client Router receives very poor download no matter what signal
> conditions are like. Download capped around 10Mb/s. Upload was unaffected.
>
>
>
> The equipment:
>
> A5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>
> C5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>
> G2 in passthru – 1.1.2 Version
>
> Client Router – Asus N600
>
>
>
> The problem:
>
> G2 has an issue with 100Mb routers. Plugging in a 1Gb client into the
> passthrued G2 resulted in full speed. Plugging a 100Mb router caused the
> download to drop to 10Mb/s levels.
>
>
>
>
>
> The solution:
>
>
>
>1. Replace G2 with regular power supply, fixed issue.
>2. In C5 change the duplex from auto to 100MF, fixed issue while still
>using G2.
>
>
>

[AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers

[Ryan Ray]

Not sure if anyone else is deploying the Mimosa platform en-mass but came
across a new issue today in case you're fighting with things.

The issue: Client Router receives very poor download no matter what signal
conditions are like. Download capped around 10Mb/s. Upload was unaffected.



The equipment:

A5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced

C5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced

G2 in passthru – 1.1.2 Version

Client Router – Asus N600



The problem:

G2 has an issue with 100Mb routers. Plugging in a 1Gb client into the
passthrued G2 resulted in full speed. Plugging a 100Mb router caused the
download to drop to 10Mb/s levels.





The solution:



   1. Replace G2 with regular power supply, fixed issue.
   2. In C5 change the duplex from auto to 100MF, fixed issue while still
   using G2.

Re: [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP non-businessrelated discussions

[Ryan Ray]

I use rule in the loosest of ways. I think everyone who posts here can self
police and it's not like we need a moderator to sift thru posts and finger
wag people who are breaking "the rules". Politics tear people apart,
doesn't seem to be any different here.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> I don’t like rules and I don’t want to be bothered with more filter
> strings in the subject, but a POL filter would be nice.   Or should that be
> [POL]?
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:19 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP
> non-businessrelated discussions
>
> I've been a quiet member of this list for almost 10 years now and I like
> the OT stuff, except for the trump/politics. Would anyone be up for a hard
> and fast rule of no trump / politics talk? That seems to be where the
> majority of the garbage was from these last few weeks.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I  am giving up Trump posts for LentI am thinking of showing up at
>> Animal Farm Promise no weapons on my person ...Just have to move stuff
>> around..
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2017 12:44 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>> And I do have to say thank you to Paul for keeping this thing alive.
>> Without him it would have died.
>>
>> *From:* Chuck McCown
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:37 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP
>> non-businessrelated discussions
>>
>> I agree, it gets out of hand.
>> Sometimes I say something but most of the time I let the self policing
>> nature of the list do what nature does.
>>
>> For many of us, this list is as close to social media we want to go.
>> Many of us have been on here since it was part-15.  15 years or so.
>>
>> Personally I don’t have any desire for the list to grow or shrink or
>> change other than to remain a place where we can hang out.  This list is
>> most certainly not a “safe place” and you will not see trigger warnings
>> unless you see the occasional literal “trigger warning”.  It is kinda like
>> a friendly bar that I can hang out in without my Mormon neighbors seeing me
>> parked out front.
>>
>> Once upon a time Doug Clark was a semi offical list daddy.  That lasted
>> until Doug got pissed about something.
>>
>> As always ALL opinions will be more-or-less welcomed.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Paul McCall
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:25 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP non-business
>> related discussions
>>
>>
>> I shared this with Chuck McCown, and he suggested I share this with the
>> list directly, so here goes.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Just FYI, in my normal business conversations with WISPs,  I get one or
>> two people a week tell me they no longer look at the list because of all
>> the BS, politics, etc.  I also don’t use AFMUG nearly as much as I used to
>> because of that.  *
>>
>>
>>
>> *While it costs me $$ for every email sent (I have never complained), AWS
>> is very solid and reliable, so it was a great choice.  That’s not the point
>> of my comment.*
>>
>>
>>
>> *People need to take that junk to some other venue, so we can focus on
>> important technology and business needs, IMO.  *
>>
>>
>>
>> *It probably won’t change but it’s my 2 cents.*
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul McCall, President
>>
>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>>
>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>>
>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>>
>> 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800>
>>
>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>>
>> www.pdmnet.com
>>
>> www.floridabroadband.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP non-businessrelated discussions

[Ryan Ray]

Also I'm super open to throwing money at Paul for the list if he wants.
There's lots of valuable info and people here.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been a quiet member of this list for almost 10 years now and I like
> the OT stuff, except for the trump/politics. Would anyone be up for a hard
> and fast rule of no trump / politics talk? That seems to be where the
> majority of the garbage was from these last few weeks.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I  am giving up Trump posts for LentI am thinking of showing up at
>> Animal Farm Promise no weapons on my person ...Just have to move stuff
>> around..
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2017 12:44 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>> And I do have to say thank you to Paul for keeping this thing alive.
>> Without him it would have died.
>>
>> *From:* Chuck McCown
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:37 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP
>> non-businessrelated discussions
>>
>> I agree, it gets out of hand.
>> Sometimes I say something but most of the time I let the self policing
>> nature of the list do what nature does.
>>
>> For many of us, this list is as close to social media we want to go.
>> Many of us have been on here since it was part-15.  15 years or so.
>>
>> Personally I don’t have any desire for the list to grow or shrink or
>> change other than to remain a place where we can hang out.  This list is
>> most certainly not a “safe place” and you will not see trigger warnings
>> unless you see the occasional literal “trigger warning”.  It is kinda like
>> a friendly bar that I can hang out in without my Mormon neighbors seeing me
>> parked out front.
>>
>> Once upon a time Doug Clark was a semi offical list daddy.  That lasted
>> until Doug got pissed about something.
>>
>> As always ALL opinions will be more-or-less welcomed.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Paul McCall
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:25 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP non-business
>> related discussions
>>
>>
>> I shared this with Chuck McCown, and he suggested I share this with the
>> list directly, so here goes.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Just FYI, in my normal business conversations with WISPs,  I get one or
>> two people a week tell me they no longer look at the list because of all
>> the BS, politics, etc.  I also don’t use AFMUG nearly as much as I used to
>> because of that.  *
>>
>>
>>
>> *While it costs me $$ for every email sent (I have never complained), AWS
>> is very solid and reliable, so it was a great choice.  That’s not the point
>> of my comment.*
>>
>>
>>
>> *People need to take that junk to some other venue, so we can focus on
>> important technology and business needs, IMO.  *
>>
>>
>>
>> *It probably won’t change but it’s my 2 cents.*
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul McCall, President
>>
>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>>
>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>>
>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>>
>> 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800>
>>
>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>>
>> www.pdmnet.com
>>
>> www.floridabroadband.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP non-businessrelated discussions

[Ryan Ray]

I've been a quiet member of this list for almost 10 years now and I like
the OT stuff, except for the trump/politics. Would anyone be up for a hard
and fast rule of no trump / politics talk? That seems to be where the
majority of the garbage was from these last few weeks.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> I  am giving up Trump posts for LentI am thinking of showing up at
> Animal Farm Promise no weapons on my person ...Just have to move stuff
> around..
>
> On Mar 1, 2017 12:44 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>
> And I do have to say thank you to Paul for keeping this thing alive.
> Without him it would have died.
>
> *From:* Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:37 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP
> non-businessrelated discussions
>
> I agree, it gets out of hand.
> Sometimes I say something but most of the time I let the self policing
> nature of the list do what nature does.
>
> For many of us, this list is as close to social media we want to go.
> Many of us have been on here since it was part-15.  15 years or so.
>
> Personally I don’t have any desire for the list to grow or shrink or
> change other than to remain a place where we can hang out.  This list is
> most certainly not a “safe place” and you will not see trigger warnings
> unless you see the occasional literal “trigger warning”.  It is kinda like
> a friendly bar that I can hang out in without my Mormon neighbors seeing me
> parked out front.
>
> Once upon a time Doug Clark was a semi offical list daddy.  That lasted
> until Doug got pissed about something.
>
> As always ALL opinions will be more-or-less welcomed.
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul McCall
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:25 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] List topics and verboseness of non-WISP non-business
> related discussions
>
>
> I shared this with Chuck McCown, and he suggested I share this with the
> list directly, so here goes.
>
>
>
> *Just FYI, in my normal business conversations with WISPs,  I get one or
> two people a week tell me they no longer look at the list because of all
> the BS, politics, etc.  I also don’t use AFMUG nearly as much as I used to
> because of that.  *
>
>
>
> *While it costs me $$ for every email sent (I have never complained), AWS
> is very solid and reliable, so it was a great choice.  That’s not the point
> of my comment.*
>
>
>
> *People need to take that junk to some other venue, so we can focus on
> important technology and business needs, IMO.  *
>
>
>
> *It probably won’t change but it’s my 2 cents.*
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> Paul McCall, President
>
> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>
> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>
> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>
> 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800>
>
> pa...@pdmnet.net
>
> www.pdmnet.com
>
> www.floridabroadband.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT: NAS for VMware ?

[Ryan Ray]

Nimble, pure storage, netapp. Lots do pure ssd now depending on features needed.

Sent while mobile


> On Feb 21, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Gino Villarini  wrote:
> 
> Looking for a fast, preferably SSD based NAS for a Vmware cluster,
> 
> Thanks! 
>  
> 
> Gino Villarini
> 
> President
> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
> 

Re: [AFMUG] Issues turning up Cambium 820S

[Ryan Ray]

Are you getting a rx signal?

Sent while mobile


> On Jan 28, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Gino Villarini  wrote:
> 
> 
> I cant get the Radio interface UP
> 
> Radio Interface operational status: Down 
> 
> Any ideas?
>  
> 
> Gino Villarini
> 
> President
> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
> 

Re: [AFMUG] Windows 10 DHCP bug still?

[Ryan Ray]

I'm running into a bunch of this with Win10 devices, yep. Especially
people's machines that got the update that broke it but can't update the
fix for whatever reason.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:

> Yeah, that was the other fix I saw suggested.  There was speculation it
> had to do with the sequence or speed that Windows was doing DHCP at
> bootup.  My customer call today had a Netgear router so it’s not specific
> to Mikrotik.  In fact, my laptop did this a couple weeks ago at the office
> and that was on the UVerse gateway WiFi.
>
>
>
>
> When mine did it, I think I reflexively tried ipconfig/release first and
> it refused since you can’t release an autoconfig address.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Nate Burke
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 27, 2016 2:10 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Windows 10 DHCP bug still?
>
>
>
> Note sure, my customer was fixed just by doing an ipconfig /renew,  A
> restart didn't fix it.
>
> On 12/27/2016 2:07 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>
> im wondering if it didnt boil down to them pulling an apple and forcing
> old encryptions to go away. i get a kick out of it, it freaks out like
> jesus has cancer if you have wpa or wep but its cool with connecting to
> random open wifi
>
> microsoft should stop trying to be like apple, not being like apple is the
> last thing microsoft has going for them to not suck as bad as apple
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Nate Burke  wrote:
>
> The first time i ran into this, it just happened I had a 951 at the
> cutomers house, so I could see the device connect via Wifi, but never
> obtain an IP Address.  Weird thing was the customer said that it was worked
> fine on his office wifi, so it must be something with the way the mikrotik
> router is handing out DHCP?  Maybe only a handful of routers/PC
> combinations have the issue?
>
>
>
> On 12/27/2016 1:59 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> This stuff makes me want to be a jerk and eliminate tech support.  I'd
> install an SS as a demarc and if they think internet doesn't work, swing by
> and plug laptop into the demarc.  If it works for me then I don't really
> care what windows/iOS/Linksys problem they're having.
>
>
>
> On other days I feel more altruistic.
>
>
>
> Sorry, Ken no I have no constructive input on the problem. :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
>
> From: "Ken Hohhof" 
>
> To: af@afmug.com
>
> Sent: 12/27/2016 2:46:49 PM
>
> Subject: [AFMUG] Windows 10 DHCP bug still?
>
>
>
> Is anyone still running into customers with Windows 10 computers that boot
> up with an autoconfiguration address but will get a valid address if you
> Restart them?  I got yet another call today about this.  Of course,
> customers think it’s our problem because the symptom is “no Internet” on
> the affected computer.
>
>
>
> I would have thought all computers would have the patch by now.  But I
> guess if the symptom is “no Internet”, the computer might not get the
> update.
>
>
>
> Annoying that this has not been better publicized.  Somewhere customers
> actually read, not this:
>
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/12/microsoft-
> windows-10-dhcp-broken-update/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Ptp820 and Cnut?

[Ryan Ray]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QW9gY8-rjE

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nope, has to be done by FTP... ugh
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Did I see somewhere that CNUT can be used to update PTP820?
>>
>> Jon Langeler
>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Ptp820 and Cnut?

[Ryan Ray]

Nope, has to be done by FTP... ugh


On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Jon Langeler 
wrote:

> Did I see somewhere that CNUT can be used to update PTP820?
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] wisp hanging on by a thread

[Ryan Ray]

Could you negotiate with their upstream yourself if you did decide to buy
them? Then it wouldn't take any time to get back online assuming the old
provider would continue to provide services. Is the failing WISP just in
arrears to their provider?

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Mathew Howard 
wrote:

> Yeah... all you really need (or probably even want) is their actual
> network (tower rentals, the gear on said towers, and CPE, if they own
> those) and the customer list... if there's no real alternative, I suspect
> you'd get the majority of the customers if you can get them back up within
> a month or so.
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:44 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> still waiting to hear any preliminaries but if they only took the "head
>> end" and the tower rentals are just that - rentals - well, i don't need
>> their head end
>>
>> but yes, need a lot more information before i can make any educated
>> decisions.
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> *From:* Josh Luthman 
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 14, 2016 2:02 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] wisp hanging on by a thread
>>
>> Normally it's as simple as: How much does it cost?  How much can you
>> make?
>>
>> In this case...can they sell?  Bank took everything, what assets can they
>> sell to you?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:58 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So there is a WISP near us who we recently started coordinating with on
>>> frequencies, etc.
>>>
>>> Last Friday, the reached out and asked if we'd like to buy them.
>>>
>>> Then later that day they stated they were in a contract negotiation with
>>> their bandwidth provider and didn't see a solution.
>>>
>>> Over the weekend I spoke with someone else who had been affiliated with
>>> this company and basically their NOC has been
>>> repossessed by the bank.
>>>
>>> Monday they reached out and asked if we might sell them bandwidth.  I
>>> told them we'd discuss it internally.
>>>
>>> Today I see on their facebook page their fiber is down - so this is day
>>> one of their going away, I'd assume.
>>>
>>> There is likely no time left for vetting or due diligence on reviewing
>>> this ISP for purchase so at this point it is likely a long shot.
>>>
>>> My question - I assume you would all advise run run run as fast as you
>>> can.
>>>
>>> From the time a WISP loses their bandwidth (and thus can't provide
>>> service) what is the rate of customer exodus?
>>> If we came to an agreement and resumed services say - just in time for
>>> Christmas - what percentage would you all guess
>>> the customer base would have departed?
>>>
>>> I am told they have 250 + or -
>>>
>>> I don't know if they're in an area where they are losing to the
>>> incumbent phone provider or cable provider.
>>> (I know they are in centurylink territory)
>>>
>>> I know our closest tower to them is 18 miles - but they're probably six
>>> hops from our head end.
>>>
>>> Merry Christmas. :)
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Wiring porn

[Ryan Ray]

Is that bigfoot?


On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> Ready for delivery after we add marker stickers
>
> On Dec 8, 2016 6:39 AM, "Jaime Solorza"  wrote:
>
> Only on the analog cables.. gray coat with black,clear and shield
> wire...labeling is crucial for us..insures correct landings and trouble
> shooting especially months or years later...
>
> On Dec 7, 2016 8:01 PM, "Ken Hohhof"  wrote:
>
>> You must own stock in a company that makes finger duct.
>>
>>
>>
>> I do applaud your meticulous labeling, I seem to always do a half-assed
>> job of that, and then regret it later, especially  if the wires are in duct.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t see any ferrules though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 7, 2016 8:18 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Wiring porn
>>
>>
>>
>> Speeds not a big issue for most of our SCADA projects.   When we have a
>> waste water or booster site with multiple cameras we might need more speed
>> but on three locations with 6 to 12 cameras, be TS have been working well.
>> Here is pic of two completed panels we tested today.  One more and we will
>> clean this up for mounting on enclosures and site install.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2016 10:39 PM, "Trey Scarborough"  wrote:
>>
>> Most issues have been to poor speed issues do to a crap switch chipset. I
>> doubt that you are going to run into that in an install like this.
>>
>> On 12/6/2016 7:39 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>
>> We use industrial switches allot from various vendors but we use TS-5
>> for Ubiquiti radios... honestly few problems
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2016 6:04 PM, "Mike Hammett" > > wrote:
>>
>> The one inside my house powering cameras that are only inside my
>> house...  crapped out.
>>
>> They're universally known as being junk.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> > telligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>> company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> > /company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" > >
>> *To: *"Animal Farm" >
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 6, 2016 7:03:19 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Wiring porn
>>
>> We have no issues with quite a few installations.   We have very few
>> lightning strike issueswe have very few RF issuesmaybe we
>> are doing something right.
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2016 5:58 PM, "Mike Hammett" > > wrote:
>>
>> Correct, why Tough Switch? Put politely, they're not very good.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> > telligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>> company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> > /company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" > >
>> *To: *"Animal Farm" >
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 6, 2016 6:54:28 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Wiring porn
>>
>> Y what? Tough switch... Ubiquiti 5Ghz radios and cameras..
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2016 5:35 PM, "Mike Hammett" > > wrote:
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> > telligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>> 

Re: [AFMUG] Netonix DC voltage alarms

[Ryan Ray]

I read mine from SNMP then alert off that.

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:22 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:

> It sends e-mail alerts on port changes automatically. Haven't had any
> power issues to test if it e-mails on ow voltage.
>
> 2016-12-07 8:01 GMT-05:00 Stefan Englhardt :
>
>> Cant you configure email alerts ?
>>
>>
>>  Ursprüngliche Nachricht 
>> Von: Josh Baird 
>> Datum: 07.12.16 13:58 (GMT+01:00)
>> An: af@afmug.com
>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix DC voltage alarms
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] What is VoWiFi and is it key to Freedom Mobile's future? |MobileSyrup.com

[Ryan Ray]

Mine too. It's a great feature I love it. I'm in many places with 50Mb wifi
but no cell service so this helps me stay in connection.


On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> Yes my phone has it.
>
> On Dec 4, 2016 9:44 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:
>
> this has been a feature on tmobile for a very long time.. .
>
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Sunday, December 4, 2016 11:24:28 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] What is VoWiFi and is it key to Freedom
> Mobile'sfuture? |MobileSyrup.com
>
> I have already taken support calls from customers using this instead of a
> femtocell.  I think it was Sprint and the app was flaky, incoming calls
> went to voicemail.  And it means the customer has crappy cellular coverage
> at their house so they use WiFi calling but they have crappy WiFi, and
> whose fault is all this?  Their ISP, of course.  Just like when your smart
> fridge doesn’t tell Amazon you’re out of eggs, who you gonna call?  Your
> ISP.  It’s always our fault.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 4, 2016 10:18 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What is VoWiFi and is it key to Freedom Mobile's
> future? |MobileSyrup.com
>
>
>
> AT is doing this with their WiFi calling. I believe that Verizon is also
> doing a roll-out of something similar. Once implemented, it will be the end
> of femtocells.
>
>
>
> bp
>
> 
>
>
>
> On 12/4/2016 7:44 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> Key to the cell industry saving money...
>
>
>
> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 04, 2016 8:36 AM
>
> *To:* Animal Farm
>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] What is VoWiFi and is it key to Freedom Mobile's
> future? |MobileSyrup.com
>
>
>
> http://mobilesyrup.com/2016/12/03/what-is-vowifi-and-is-it-
> key-to-freedom-mobiles-future/
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450m

[Ryan Ray]

I don't even care so much about the AP cost. The SM is still a killer.
Especially in Canada when it's $400 capped to 10Mb? Come on.


On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:

> But with that one PMP450M AP, you'll use only one channel. Define
> expensive. Expensive money-wise? Sure. Expensive spectrum-wise? Quite the
> opposite.
>
>
> bp
> 
>
>
> On 11/2/2016 8:53 AM, Stefan Englhardt wrote:
>
> A sector Rocket AC Prism with AC Sector Antenna is $350.  Nanobeam AC 19
> is $70.
>
> Loading Sector with 20 Users you are at $1750 for AP and CPEs. (With
> Litebeam CPEs you’re even cheaper).
>
>
>
> With used PMP450 you are at $4950 with limited CPEs.
>
>
>
> UBNT AC does TDMA (Mimosa does not) both do no GPS Sync (Dont know who
> does when but this is how it is now).
>
>
>
> With UBNT AC you can dare to do 20 CPEs / AP and will see very good
> results. I would not scale it to > 30 now but looking at the price of APs
> this is not neccesary. As it is .ac it might get an 802.11ax upgrade in the
> future. UBNT-802.11n products have an upgradepath which might not be
> perfect but it is not dead end like PMP320/FSK.
>
>
>
> So yes PMP450 is expensive.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *Im
> Auftrag von *Kurt Fankhauser
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 2. November 2016 15:38
> *An:* af@afmug.com
> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450m
>
>
>
> I can buy a used PMP450 AP for $1200.00. Add KP Omni for $250 so
> $1,400.00. The mimosa A5-18 Omni lists for $999.00 so the PMP450 is not
> that much more. I've seen used 450 SM's go for $175 for 20mbps ones. I
> think the Jury is still out on how well the Mimosa is going to scale. It
> probably will take years before we know for sure. I definitely would deploy
> Mimosa over UBNT AC right now. Sounds like Mimosa will have sync and
> anything without sync these days is basically un-scalable.
>
>
>
> Now on the PMP450 being expensive, yes if you add up the initial expenses
> upfront costs are more. But you really have an asset with the 450 because
> it holds re-sale value very well compared to 802.11 radios. I just sold
> some old FSK SM's over the weekend for 35% of what i paid for them 10 years
> ago. Assuming the 450 will still have 50-60% of its value 5 years form now,
> and the ability to re-coup that money out of the equipment, does it really
> costs more? I think factoring the re-sale value down the road that it costs
> less
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Mike Hammett  wrote:
>
> For sure frame utilization is important. My thoughts are that if you're
> loading up that many clients on an AP, maybe you ought to be offering
> faster plans or removing other restrictions instead of loading up more on
> an AP.
>
> Then again, I don't deploy 450, so I don't have high AP costs to be
> worried about.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> [image: http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]
> [image:
> http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]
> [image:
> http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]
> [image:
> http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png] 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> [image: http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]
> [image:
> http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]
> [image:
> http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> [image: http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]
> [image:
> http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]
>
>
> 
> --
>
> *From: *"Kurt Fankhauser" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, November 2, 2016 9:13:06 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450m
>
> As long as your downlink and uplink frame utilization is not maxing out on
> the 450 you can definitely load 100 subs on an AP. With the 30mhz channel
> width and soon to be 40mhz channel width option with the 450 that will just
> help get more subs on per AP. I personally have had 50 subs on an old FSK
> 2.4AP as recent as 1 year ago. that AP was capping out at 10mbps on the
> downlink side. I have no doubt that with a 40mhz channel width 450 AP which
> would net about 175-200mbps downlink on average depending on how many subs
> you have running 6x-8x connections and how busy they are that you could
> easily fit 100+subs on that AP. With Medusa and the ability to push
> 300-400mbps per AP I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing some people
> get close to 

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450m

[Ryan Ray]

Now get the SM costs down so it's worthwhile to buy this thing


Sent while mobile


> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:30 AM, George Skorup  wrote:
> 
> The data that Matt showed us at HQ a few weeks ago where an operator (not in 
> the US) with over 100 SMs! on a single 450 sector proved that a performance 
> boost of 3-3.5x is possible simply by swapping to a 450m sector. And that's 
> still using only that single 20MHz channel in 90 degrees. They created this 
> thing for a reason. And that right there is it. Nuckin futs.
> 
>> On 11/1/2016 9:17 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>> Rise Broadband
>> ?
>> �
>> From: Matt Mangriotis
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 8:08 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450m
>> �
>> I will say that we have a [very large] customer that will remain nameless, 
>> which has ~1100 active customers across more than 12 sectors of 450m.� 
>> They are very pleased with the performance.
>> �
>> There are several others that are putting up their first sectors now as 
>> well.� If you run into issues, we are escalating support cases to our team 
>> that has a lot of experience in deploying this model.
>> �
>> Matt
>> �
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
>> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:34 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450m
>> �
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphonse_and_Gaston#/media/File:Alphonsegaston.jpg
>> �
>> �
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband
>> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:39 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450m
>> �
>> Our first 450m should arrive this week.� We plan to replace an existing 
>> 450 AP that has 66 customers for our first deployment.
>> �
>> However, I do not want to do this until I have heard that there are some 
>> installed and working.
>> �
>> Does anyone have 450m up and running.� Would you please share your 
>> experiences and results.
>> �
>> Thanks
>> �
>> Adam
>> �
>> �
> 

Re: [AFMUG] Weird results from a SA

[Ryan Ray]

Canada

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote:

> On 10/18/16 11:04, Ryan Ray wrote:
>
>> 3600-3622 is another company. The 3650-3700 is totally clean when my
>> AP's are off.
>>
>
>
> How is someone legally using below 3.65 right now without the SAS database
> in place?
>
> ~Seth
>

Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset

[Ryan Ray]

I tried 14.2.1 same issue 

Sent while mobile


> On Oct 11, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
> 
> 14.2.1 was just released but I haven't tried it yet.
> 
> We are also seeing watchdog resets on 14.2
> 
> -Sean
> 
> 
>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just upgraded an AP to test 14.2 and I'm also getting watchdog resets. 
>> I've rolled everything back to 14.1.2 and it's all gravy.
>> 
>> Was also getting some SM's that just wouldn't connect. Wouldn't see the AP 
>> anymore after going onto 14.2. I would stay away from this one everyone.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Chris Wright <ch...@velociter.net> wrote:
>>> Handling this off list from here. Will let you all know what comes of it.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Chris Wright
>>> 
>>> Network Administrator
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chitrang Srivastava
>>> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 8:49 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> This isn't complete.
>>> Please share cnut capture or engineering.cgi output.
>>> 
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Chris Wright 
>>> <ch...@velociter.net>
>>> Sent: 04 October 2016 00:29:49
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>>>  
>>> 
>>> **System Startup** 
>>> System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset 
>>> Software Version : CANOPY 14.2 (Build 30) AP-None
>>> Board Type : P12
>>> Boot Bank : 1
>>> Board Temperature : 19 C / 66 F
>>> Device Setting : 5.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-**-**-** 5480.0 
>>> MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 208 - 2.5 ms - North America/United States
>>> FPGA Version : 061516
>>> FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
>>> 10/03/2016 : 04:58:53 PST : :Time Set
>>> 10/03/2016 : 04:59:06 PST : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Chris Wright
>>> 
>>> Network Administrator
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chitrang Srivastava
>>> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 11:18 AM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Hi Chris,
>>> Please share Event logs.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chitrang
>>> 
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Chris Wright 
>>> <ch...@velociter.net>
>>> Sent: 03 October 2016 23:12:01
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Is the watchdog reset bug still a thing? I thought it was resolved a long 
>>> time ago but I just had an AP on 14.2 (build 30) reboot on me.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Chris Wright
>>> 
>>> Network Administrator
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>> 

Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset

[Ryan Ray]

I just upgraded an AP to test 14.2 and I'm also getting watchdog resets.
I've rolled everything back to 14.1.2 and it's all gravy.

Was also getting some SM's that just wouldn't connect. Wouldn't see the AP
anymore after going onto 14.2. I would stay away from this one everyone.




On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:

> Handling this off list from here. Will let you all know what comes of it.
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chitrang
> Srivastava
> *Sent:* Monday, October 03, 2016 8:49 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>
>
>
> This isn't complete.
> Please share cnut capture or engineering.cgi output.
> --
>
> *From:* Af  on behalf of Chris Wright <
> ch...@velociter.net>
> *Sent:* 04 October 2016 00:29:49
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>
>
>
> **System Startup**
> System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset
> Software Version : CANOPY 14.2 (Build 30) AP-None
> Board Type : P12
> Boot Bank : 1
> Board Temperature : 19 C / 66 F
> Device Setting : 5.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-**-**-**
> 5480.0 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 208 - 2.5 ms - North America/United States
> FPGA Version : 061516
> FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
> 10/03/2016 : 04:58:53 PST : :Time Set
> 10/03/2016 : 04:59:06 PST : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Chitrang Srivastava
> *Sent:* Monday, October 03, 2016 11:18 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>
>
>
> Hi Chris,
> Please share Event logs.
>
> Thanks,
> Chitrang
> --
>
> *From:* Af  on behalf of Chris Wright <
> ch...@velociter.net>
> *Sent:* 03 October 2016 23:12:01
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450 AP Watchdog Reset
>
>
>
> Is the watchdog reset bug still a thing? I thought it was resolved a long
> time ago but I just had an AP on 14.2 (build 30) reboot on me.
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] 24GHz Radio

[Ryan Ray]

Definitely need over 100Mb. Looks like the SAF only has 100Mb port on it. My 
biggest concern is hardware failure. While it's possible to replace a dead 
radio on one end its going to be a nice chunk of change to do it. Id rather 
spend that money up front now on the radio side instead of a year down the line 
when and if it dies and pay to the tower company to climb.


Sent while mobile


> On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> 
> How much throughput and how challenging is the RF path?  It sounds like you 
> are looking for rock solid hardware and software, as opposed to the most 
> throughput and the least rain fade on a long link?  Also it sounds like it 
> can’t be too expensive.
>  
> Maybe look at SAF CFIP 106 or Freemile.  Not sure how Lumina/Integra compare 
> on price.  But I have a 24 GHz CFIP 106 that’s been up for something like 5 
> years, I’ve never touched it, I’m not sure I even remember how to log into 
> it.  Only comment would be put some anti-seize on the stainless threads.
>  
> That said, for shorter links, the new Trango radios look interesting – at 
> least on paper.
>  
>  
> From: Ryan Ray
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 8:37 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 24GHz Radio
>  
> That's what I was thinking as well. I'm super hesitant to put up an airfiber 
> with some of the stuff I've seen online.
> 
> Sent while mobile
>  
> 
>> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Trango probably
>>  
>>  
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>  
>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you were to pick the most RELIABLE 24GHz radio which one would it be? 
>>> I've got a site it needs to go on but very un accessible location without 
>>> lots of money involved. 
>>>  
>>> Thanks.

Re: [AFMUG] 24GHz Radio

[Ryan Ray]

Lol josh I remember when that was a thing. I'm hoping the AF is past that at 
this point.

Sent while mobile


> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:54 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> 
> What if the radome falls off?
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> 
>> On Aug 12, 2016 9:49 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>> Any of them should be solid at that distance.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: "Ryan Ray" <ryan...@gmail.com>
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 8:45:11 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 24GHz Radio
>> 
>> 1.2km link
>> 
>> Sent while mobile
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote:
>> 
>> AF24 is solid. Don't use 24GHz like its a much lower frequency...
>> 
>> Jon Langeler
>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>> 
>> On Aug 12, 2016, at 9:37 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> That's what I was thinking as well. I'm super hesitant to put up an airfiber 
>> with some of the stuff I've seen online.
>> 
>> Sent while mobile
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Trango probably
>> 
>> 
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> 
>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you were to pick the most RELIABLE 24GHz radio which one would it be? 
>>> I've got a site it needs to go on but very un accessible location without 
>>> lots of money involved. 
>>> 
>>> Thanks.

Re: [AFMUG] 24GHz Radio

[Ryan Ray]

1.2km link

Sent while mobile


> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote:
> 
> AF24 is solid. Don't use 24GHz like its a much lower frequency...
> 
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> 
>> On Aug 12, 2016, at 9:37 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> That's what I was thinking as well. I'm super hesitant to put up an airfiber 
>> with some of the stuff I've seen online.
>> 
>> Sent while mobile
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Trango probably
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If you were to pick the most RELIABLE 24GHz radio which one would it be? 
>>>> I've got a site it needs to go on but very un accessible location without 
>>>> lots of money involved. 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>> 

Re: [AFMUG] 24GHz Radio

[Ryan Ray]

That's what I was thinking as well. I'm super hesitant to put up an airfiber 
with some of the stuff I've seen online.

Sent while mobile


> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> 
> Trango probably
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If you were to pick the most RELIABLE 24GHz radio which one would it be? 
>> I've got a site it needs to go on but very un accessible location without 
>> lots of money involved. 
>> 
>> Thanks.
> 

[AFMUG] 24GHz Radio

[Ryan Ray]

If you were to pick the most RELIABLE 24GHz radio which one would it be?
I've got a site it needs to go on but very un accessible location without
lots of money involved.

Thanks.

Re: [AFMUG] Remote security camera

[Ryan Ray]

This is in Canada so it might change the dynamics of usage a bit. The
closest thing that I can find to a system that can somewhat do this already
is this.

http://www.spypoint.com/EN/products/cellular-trail-camera/product-LINK-3G.html

The only problems I see are mostly related to cost.

- $550 for the camera.
- No solar so you're replacing batteries / or still require a solar panel
and battery.
- $25 monthly fee per camera
- Portable (Easy theft target?)

$1650 onetime cost, $75 monthly (12 month contract)

Whereas with the unifi and router
 - $150 for the camera
 - solar and battery still required
 - $100 for the box to hold everything
 - $50 map
 - $20 monthly (add cell wifi device to existing data plan )

$850 one time cost, $20 monthly.

Almost half the cost for a self built system and $55 less a month. I'll
definitely present the trail cam as an option but it seems silly to not
roll your own as long as it's stable.





On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co> wrote:

> I would not make it so complicated and just get some of the Game cameras
> that do this already...
>
>
> On 7/27/2016 2:49 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> Mikrotik is an excellent choice for an eth/wlan port and VPN, yes.  If
>> you get network access to the site with whatever device you can just use
>> a MAP, which is super super light duty and exactly what you need.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:ryan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So there's a nice rash of thefts around the area lately and I've had
>> a few calls now asking for help with security cams at sites. However
>> these sites are pretty remote. On the fringe of cell service, no
>> power, no internet and have to be mobile to they can move them to
>> other sites.
>>
>> Customers are requesting a picture to their email on motion, the
>> ability to live view the camera and needs to be all powered via
>> solar + battery.
>>
>> I think this can all be accomplished with a cell phone wireless hub,
>> some unifi video cameras, solar panels, battery and the part I'm
>> stuck on is the VPN. Seeing as this will be running off battery for
>> extended periods of time I am needing something that won't suck back
>> a huge amount of power and can VPN back into my NOC. Not going to be
>> a huge amount of traffic since it will be running off a 3g cell
>> network and I've said that live view will be possible but limited as
>> the data plans are an extreme cost.
>>
>> My first thought is to use Mikrotik routerboard. I currently don't
>> use any Mikrotik in my network, typically for VPN's I've been using
>> an ASA5506 at client sites but I feel that is too expensive and
>> overkill power wise for something that has the potential to be
>> vandalized / stolen anyways.
>>
>> Does Mikrotik sound like the right solution to this and if so I
>> would need to have the ability for the router to join the cell hub
>> wireless network and then route the camera traffic back into my
>> network. What routerboard would accomplish that while being light on
>> the power suck?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

[AFMUG] Remote security camera

[Ryan Ray]

So there's a nice rash of thefts around the area lately and I've had a few
calls now asking for help with security cams at sites. However these sites
are pretty remote. On the fringe of cell service, no power, no internet and
have to be mobile to they can move them to other sites.

Customers are requesting a picture to their email on motion, the ability to
live view the camera and needs to be all powered via solar + battery.

I think this can all be accomplished with a cell phone wireless hub, some
unifi video cameras, solar panels, battery and the part I'm stuck on is the
VPN. Seeing as this will be running off battery for extended periods of
time I am needing something that won't suck back a huge amount of power and
can VPN back into my NOC. Not going to be a huge amount of traffic since it
will be running off a 3g cell network and I've said that live view will be
possible but limited as the data plans are an extreme cost.

My first thought is to use Mikrotik routerboard. I currently don't use any
Mikrotik in my network, typically for VPN's I've been using an ASA5506 at
client sites but I feel that is too expensive and overkill power wise for
something that has the potential to be vandalized / stolen anyways.

Does Mikrotik sound like the right solution to this and if so I would need
to have the ability for the router to join the cell hub wireless network
and then route the camera traffic back into my network. What routerboard
would accomplish that while being light on the power suck?

Re: [AFMUG] server for VMware cluster

[Ryan Ray]

Those don't sound like super heavy requirements. Do you have a vCenter
installed? I would look at that and view the performance metrics for your
current VM's then adjust specs on your boxes accordingly based on future
growth.

Are you needing storage or do you have a SAN?

I've got IBM, HP, Dell servers and I prefer Dell. Just easier to deal with,
better driver support.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Gino Villarini  wrote:

> Hello all
>
> We are soon going to replace our 4 server cluster running vmware. our
> server are dells we bought used about 4 years ago, they have served us well
> but is time now to upgrade to something with a little more punch.
>
> Looking for used 1 year old gear, what woudl be the recommeded specs?
>
> We run VMs for Exchange, platypus, DNS and Web server, Intemapper
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Moved web server from physical to ESXi

[Ryan Ray]

Was there anything else in that log? I've seen that error before but
there's usually more after it

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> [Wed Jul 13 11:32:08 2016] [error] SSL Library Error: 218710120
> error:0D094068:asn1 encoding routines:d2i_ASN1_SET:bad tag
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Josh Baird  wrote:
>
>> What error was Apache throwing?
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well the old certs worked up until today (or technically until
>>> Septemberish) but the new certs with old CSR stopped Apache from starting.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Paul Stewart 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Not hardware dependant .. just move your SSL files over and it’ll work
 fine … done it many times..


 On Jul 13, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Josh Luthman 
 wrote:

 Has anyone done this with SSL certificates?  For some reason this year
 the renewal broke Apache and it wouldn't start.  I had to generate a new
 CSR and rekey it which solved the issue.  I was under the impression the
 keys are simply self signed and not hardware dependent.

 I did a bit of a different method of migrating the machine, the tldr is
 I use `nc` to copy / to the new machine. Method here:
 http://ram.iam8up.com/?p=36

 Hopefully someone else has gone through this and can verify my theory.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Moved web server from physical to ESXi

[Ryan Ray]

Definitely not hardware dependent. I'm wondering if you were using a SHA1
or something though and an updated version of apache refused to start using
an outdated hash? Is that a thing?


On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Paul Stewart  wrote:

> Not hardware dependant .. just move your SSL files over and it’ll work
> fine … done it many times..
>
>
> On Jul 13, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
>
> Has anyone done this with SSL certificates?  For some reason this year the
> renewal broke Apache and it wouldn't start.  I had to generate a new CSR
> and rekey it which solved the issue.  I was under the impression the keys
> are simply self signed and not hardware dependent.
>
> I did a bit of a different method of migrating the machine, the tldr is I
> use `nc` to copy / to the new machine. Method here:
> http://ram.iam8up.com/?p=36
>
> Hopefully someone else has gone through this and can verify my theory.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] easy logging server

[Ryan Ray]

I use http://www.kiwisyslog.com/

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:53 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> isnt the dude router only now no server installation?
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Jesse DuPont <
> jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote:
>
>> I've found The Dude (from MikroTik) be a decent quick and dirty syslog
>> server. You can setup log rotation, use REGEX strings to have certain log
>> entries go to different files, even receive TXT or email messages when
>> certain critical words show up log entries.
>>
>> For example, whenever an SM connects to an AP, that's getting logged to
>> an "SM Auths" log file. Likewise, PPPoE authentications are getting logged
>> to their own log file. OSPF and router logins are each their own file. That
>> leaves the default log file as the catch all. Certain OSPF events warrant a
>> text message and the Dude can do that.
>>
>> Caveat: I have seen where the dude doesn't always save all the Syslog
>> rules during reboots. I keep a screen shot of the rules as a backup. Lame,
>> I know, but I don't have to reboot it much so it's only mildly inconvenient.
>>
>> There other platforms that are more flexible. Everything you can do on
>> the Dude can be done with rsyslog on Linux, just no click GUI to set it up.
>> I'd say Splunk is maybe one of the king daddy log processors, but the fancy
>> stuff costs money.
>>
>> *Jesse DuPont*
>>
>> Network Architect
>> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
>> Celerity Networks LLC
>>
>> Celerity Broadband LLC
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>>
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
>> On 6/14/16 9:06 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>>
>> what is an easy server to set up and get reports from for catching logs.
>> I set everything on centOS and dont know how to write simple scripts.
>> Looking for something I can point the 60 billion devices we only need to
>> look at logs on once every el nino and otherwise will forget about. If
>> there is a good webmin based module that would just tickle me like a fresh
>> kitten
>>
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Re: [AFMUG] Urgently need Exchange DB Guru

[Ryan Ray]

If you do choose the ESEutil route and it does repair the DB you will have
to move all the mailboxes to a new DB or you will be unsupported from
Microsoft.

Also get up to 2013 / 2016 if possible. Lots of new changes to make your
life a whole lot easier.

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you have backups Gino? You'll need to restore a DB backup and then
> replay the transaction logs into the DB. Or try your luck with ESEutil.
> Depending on how big your DB is it could take a while.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback.  Ist Exchange 2010, we had a powerdown event on
>> the server, the DB got corrupted
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Andreas Wiatowski <
>> andr...@silowireless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Gino,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What are you running…server SBS 2003?  If you have a database size over
>>> 7GB it will not mount once it reaches that level… if you make a few
>>> registry changes…all will be well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> __
>>>
>>> Andreas Wiatowski | CEO
>>>
>>> Silo Wireless Inc.
>>>
>>> Email  andr...@silowireless.com
>>>
>>> 19 Sage Court
>>>
>>> Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
>>>
>>> Tel +1.519.449.5656  Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
>>> +1.866.727.4138
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 1, 2016 1:32 PM
>>> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Urgently need Exchange DB Guru
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We have a issue with our Exchange server.  The database does not mount.
>>> Any recommendations for a Exchange Professional?
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Urgently need Exchange DB Guru

[Ryan Ray]

Do you have backups Gino? You'll need to restore a DB backup and then
replay the transaction logs into the DB. Or try your luck with ESEutil.
Depending on how big your DB is it could take a while.

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Gino Villarini  wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback.  Ist Exchange 2010, we had a powerdown event on
> the server, the DB got corrupted
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Andreas Wiatowski <
> andr...@silowireless.com> wrote:
>
>> Gino,
>>
>>
>>
>> What are you running…server SBS 2003?  If you have a database size over
>> 7GB it will not mount once it reaches that level… if you make a few
>> registry changes…all will be well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> __
>>
>> Andreas Wiatowski | CEO
>>
>> Silo Wireless Inc.
>>
>> Email  andr...@silowireless.com
>>
>> 19 Sage Court
>>
>> Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
>>
>> Tel +1.519.449.5656  Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
>> +1.866.727.4138
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 1, 2016 1:32 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Urgently need Exchange DB Guru
>>
>>
>>
>> We have a issue with our Exchange server.  The database does not mount.
>> Any recommendations for a Exchange Professional?
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Urgently need Exchange DB Guru

[Ryan Ray]

Server 2003 8 year old software. In addition it was small business
server (which was discontinued 4 years ago) which had the limitation.



On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> What a piece of shit...how can you have that kind of limitation...
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Andreas Wiatowski <
> andr...@silowireless.com> wrote:
>
>> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/aa998066(v=exchg.65).aspx
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> __
>>
>> Andreas Wiatowski | CEO
>>
>> Silo Wireless Inc.
>>
>> Email  andr...@silowireless.com
>>
>> 19 Sage Court
>>
>> Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
>>
>> Tel +1.519.449.5656  Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
>> +1.866.727.4138
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 1, 2016 1:32 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Urgently need Exchange DB Guru
>>
>>
>>
>> We have a issue with our Exchange server.  The database does not mount.
>> Any recommendations for a Exchange Professional?
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Urgently need Exchange DB Guru

[Ryan Ray]

Quite the comment Josh. I designed and support a 20,000 mailbox Exchange
2013 spanned between two datacenters with instant failover and over 30TB of
mailbox data and everything is hunky dory. I don't know what kind of issues
you have with Exchange but not sure why you would blame the software?

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Josh Reynolds  wrote:

> [1] Good luck with getting it fixed
>
> [2] Get the fuck off exchange
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Gino Villarini 
> wrote:
> > thanks!
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> Keith Willis with Progent
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Gino Villarini 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We have a issue with our Exchange server.  The database does not mount.
> >>> Any recommendations for a Exchange Professional?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
> >
> >
>

[AFMUG] WTB: PTP650 Links

[Ryan Ray]

Anyone have any for sale?

Re: [AFMUG] OT I screwed myself

[Ryan Ray]

I use 1password. Great little program. Also share out the database with
dropbox but what really makes this is the cross platform compatibility.
iOS, Android, OSX, Windows whatever. All the clients work the same.

Every so often they will have a deal on the bundle for every client which
brings the high cost down to a reasonable number.



On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:

> I've been using lastpass with multifactor authentication for a while now.
> Pretty happy with it for the most part.
>
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Eric Kuhnke  wrote:
>
>> Keepass is a local storage based solution. There's a multitude of keepass
>> clients that exist for windows, linux and OSX, it's an open source standard
>> key file format.
>>
>> You can run keepass on a computer with no network connectivity at all.
>>
>> Where you keep your keepass file is up to you - the default would be
>> local storage on your laptop or desktop, or you can have things like NFS
>> mounts, SMB/CIFS, or if you're (in my opinion) reckless you can keep your
>> keepass key file in a folder that is backed up by dropbox, microsoft
>> onedrive, backblaze, etc.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KeePass
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:
>>
>>> If Keepass backs up to the cloud, the spreadsheet might be more secure.
>>>
>>>
>>> bp
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/25/2016 3:24 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>
>>> Now is that better than a spreadsheet?
>>>
>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:22 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT I screwed myself
>>>
>>>
>>> Keepass
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On May 25, 2016 6:18 PM, "Joshaven Mailing Lists" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Try making it longer rather than strange.  Make your password long not
 cryptic.  For good measure to pass stupid password tests put in a capital
 and number but that doesn’t make it harder to crack.  They are still going
 try every combination including those characters just in case.


 b7^w3@   ( 400 ms )
 P@s5wor! ( 9 hours )
 P@ssw0rd ( Still 9 hours )
 thisisalongbutsimplepassword   ( 3 SEXTILLION YEARS )
 cottoncandyman ( 51 Years )

 https://howsecureismypassword.net/

 See if he can crack something long but easy for you to type




 Sincerely,
 Joshaven Potter
 Google Hangouts: j...@g2wireless.co
 Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
 supp...@joshaven.com




 On May 25, 2016, at 4:36 PM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

 My oldest son is a computer security specialist / forensic guy.

 He was telling my my super complicated password was not so secure.
 He cracked it pretty easy.  He suggested I add an alt code.

 So I did.  Now, neither one of us can open the file.
 Guess alt codes in passwords for some Office products cause big
 problems.

 Arrgh.



>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] strange customer speedtest

[Ryan Ray]

In addition this person seems to be using Windows XP which wouldn't
surprise me if the computer was so old / filled with so much shit that it
would cause issues like this. 15 year old OS still being used it's pretty
scary.


On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:

> I got nowhere explaining Chicago-Atlanta is 1400 miles roundtrip and just
> based on speed of light, a 1 ms ping was not possible, so the test results
> were suspect.
>
> Plus he probably doesn’t understand that lower ping time is better.
>
> Life may get interesting when ISPs start publishing their FCC nutrition
> labels.  Some people with nothing better to do will be running speedtests
> all day and filing complaints.  Cheaper than playing the penny slots or
> video poker.
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:51 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] strange customer speedtest
>
>
> Sir can you try any other Speedtest site besides this one and report back?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Apr 13, 2016 9:47 AM, "Ken Hohhof"  wrote:
>
>> Customer sent these to me complaining about his speed.  (don't you love
>> people who take screenshots with their cellphone camera)
>>
>> The 0.10/0.10 speed may be low, but 1 ms latency from Chicago to Atlanta
>> is excellent!  Call the high frequency trading guys.  Oops, the next
>> speedtest shows 2656 ms.  It's also puzzling this speedtest site chooses
>> the Atlanta server rather than the Chicago server.
>>
>> I'm assuming the speedtest just failed and showed bogus numbers rather
>> than an error message.  Try and explain that to a non technical customer
>> who tries to blame all his problems on slow Internet.  This is the guy
>> putting up Ring doorbells all around his property, he's up to 3 of them
>> now.  I don't think he uses the Internet for anything other than watch his
>> Ring doorbells and run speedtests.
>
>

[AFMUG] Anyone from JAB read the list?

[Ryan Ray]

Someone on Reddit is looking for some support 

https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/4cc06o/anyone_on_jab_wireless_that_could_test_something/


Sent while mobile

Re: [AFMUG] 450M

[Ryan Ray]

So am I reading this right? Say you have an aggregate of 40Mb/s AP
capacity. Throw in a 450M and all of a sudden you have 160Mb/s without
changing SM's?




On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists 
wrote:

> Beta testing this summer.  Fall for general release.
>
> Jeff Broadwick
> ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
> 312-205-2519 Office
> 574-220-7826 Cell
> jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
>
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:
>
> Chuck, you’re a little early. April Fools isn’t for another sixteen days.
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
> Velociter Wireless
>
> 209-838-1221 x115
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:45 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M
>
>
>
> I think this summer,not certain.
>
>
>
> *From:* Craig Schmaderer 
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:29 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M
>
>
>
> when did they say the 450M access point was coming out, i plan on buying 8
> 450i radios next week   my guess is don't hold my breath
> right?
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* Af  on behalf of George Skorup <
> geo...@cbcast.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:59 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M
>
>
>
> How about this ass-umption. 4x4 MIMO? How about beam steering?
>
> On 3/16/2016 10:54 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
>
> That would be an incorrect assumption…
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:53 AM
> *To:* Animal Farm mailto:af@afmug.com 
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M
>
>
>
> So im assuming 4 streams @ 256qam 125 Mbps = 500 Mbps
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>
> 450m increases AP capacity by letting the AP talk to multiple SMs at the
> same time.  I don’t think it increases throughput to an individual SM, that
> is the same as now (but note 30 and 40 MHz channels coming on 450).  450m
> is a new AP and antenna, it will work with existing 450 and 450i SMs.
>
>
>
> *From:* Craig Schmaderer 
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:09 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M
>
>
>
> Have they said anything about a new cheaper sm that does the entire 5ghz
> band and gb ethernet, otherwise a 450i is still going to be needed to take
> advantage of that 500mb, even mu-mimo on 2 sms can only do 200mb? not 500mb
> right?  I think aaron gave a hint a few weeks back about a new sm.
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* Af  on behalf of Chuck McCown <
> ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:45 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M
>
>
>
> Right but you can do +100 Mbps aggregate to a 450 SM.
>
>
>
> *From:* Gino Villarini 
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:02 AM
>
> *To:* Animal Farm 
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M
>
>
>
> 500 aggregated in the AP, not to SMs... ?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Adam Moffett  wrote:
>
> ouch.
>
>
>
> On 3/16/2016 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
>
> Just like FSK?
>
> On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> Backwards compatibility.
> With existing 450
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] 2.4GHz OFDM antenna recommendations

[Ryan Ray]

Spectrum would be available

Sent while mobile


> On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:18 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Depends primarily on the spectrum
> 
>> On Mar 15, 2016 11:12 PM, "Ryan Ray" <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi there. I've got a site with three 450 2.4ghz 60deg Cambium antennas and I 
>> need to add two more access points in the same direction to get more 
>> bandwidth. Would you replace the antenna with a 30 degree and add two more 
>> to cover the same area or just a couple more 60deg on different frequencies?
>> 
>> Is there a good 30 degree sector out there?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 

[AFMUG] 2.4GHz OFDM antenna recommendations

[Ryan Ray]

Hi there. I've got a site with three 450 2.4ghz 60deg Cambium antennas and I 
need to add two more access points in the same direction to get more bandwidth. 
Would you replace the antenna with a 30 degree and add two more to cover the 
same area or just a couple more 60deg on different frequencies?

Is there a good 30 degree sector out there? 

Thanks

Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 lite to regular key

[Ryan Ray]

Big thank you to Cambium who emailed me directly and got me a key. Super
helpful. Days like this remind me of why I've always bought Cambium and
will continue to do so.

Also the people who offered to help on the list. This is a great place,
proud to be here for the last 8 years or so.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Sam Lambie <samtaos...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What frequency? I have a million 5.2 SM's that I could send you one for
> the price of shipping.
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We have done a floating and permanent in the past. This is our last
>> pmp100 on the network and they are desperate but all I have are lite sm's
>>
>> Sent while mobile
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 25, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Did such a key ever exist?  I thought they were floating keys
>> distributed through Prism.
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 2/25/2016 2:15 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>> >> Hey everyone,
>> >>
>> >> I know it's a long shot but does anyone have an entitlement key for a
>> lite to 7Mb/s SM. It's an urgent request but I don't have any keys on hand.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Ryan
>> >>
>> >> Sent while mobile
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Sam Lambie*
> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
> 575-758-7598 Office
> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com>
>

Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 lite to regular key

[Ryan Ray]

We have done a floating and permanent in the past. This is our last pmp100 on 
the network and they are desperate but all I have are lite sm's

Sent while mobile


> On Feb 25, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Did such a key ever exist?  I thought they were floating keys distributed 
> through Prism.
> 
> 
>> On 2/25/2016 2:15 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>> 
>> I know it's a long shot but does anyone have an entitlement key for a lite 
>> to 7Mb/s SM. It's an urgent request but I don't have any keys on hand.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Ryan
>> 
>> Sent while mobile
> 

[AFMUG] PMP100 lite to regular key

[Ryan Ray]

Hey everyone,

I know it's a long shot but does anyone have an entitlement key for a lite to 
7Mb/s SM. It's an urgent request but I don't have any keys on hand.

Thanks
Ryan

Sent while mobile

Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Time Management Fee

[Ryan Ray]

Realistically if you shut me off I would switch to a new provider within a
day. I don't know what kind of person would stick around on a ban no matter
what the length of time is.


On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Jeremy  wrote:

> For those of you who actually do some sort of enforcement, what amount of
> time do you ban them for?  I figure even at 90 days they will get a new
> provider.  So I was just going to go with one year.  Is that excessive?
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Justin Wilson  wrote:
>
>> You designate an “agent” within your company.  I typical register the
>> CEO, operations, or someone like that that as the agent.  You would have no
>> issue registering yourself as the agent.  I would recommend you create a
>> copyright@ e-mail address and use that as the designated e-mail
>> contact.  That way you know a request to copyright@ is most likely
>> someone following protocol.
>>
>> It’s like CALEA.  Their just needs to be the proper person on file to
>> contact, and server due process should it come to that.
>>
>> Justin Wilson
>> j...@mtin.net
>>
>> ---
>> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
>> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
>>
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
>>
>> On Feb 2, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Jeremy  wrote:
>>
>> I really have no idea about that.  So I need to hire an agent, and then
>> ignore all but the requests that come to me from that agent?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Justin Wilson  wrote:
>>
>>> The biggest thing I use in a determination is did they send it to the
>>> Registered Copyright Agent on file? You do have one correct? :-)
>>> http://copyright.gov/onlinesp/
>>>
>>> If you have one, and it’s not sent to that agent, it’s not a real
>>> request IMHO.
>>>
>>>
>>> Justin Wilson
>>> j...@mtin.net
>>>
>>> ---
>>> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
>>> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
>>>
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
>>>
>>> On Feb 2, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Josh Reynolds  wrote:
>>>
>>> It can't charge the copyright holder, but could it charge to company
>>> sending out the notices if they aren't the CRH? :)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Keefe John 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This has been discussed before, the DMCA safe harbor doesn't allow the
>>> provider to charge the copyright holder for this.
>>>
>>> On 2/2/2016 12:03 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> That's going to end up in a big mess of a lawsuit eventually.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Sterling Jacobson >> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Haha!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If it’s against your AUP, make sure you have a clause in there that says
>>> you
>>> charge per incident.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Then go ahead and charge the customer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds like if you are just going to kick them off eventually, might as
>>> well
>>> try to keep them, but make it costly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If they don’t pay it, then they are off.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing legally wrong with it if its in your policy I think.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf
>>> Of That One Guy /sarcasm
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 10:57 AM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Time Management Fee
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh wow, youre seriously looking for a fight with customers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jeremy  wrote:
>>>
>>> What do you thing about charging a fee every time that a customer gets a
>>> DMCA takedown notice.  These notices take time to track down and follow
>>> up
>>> on.  If we charged $20 every time it would make it not really worth it to
>>> pirate that $10 movie.  I would think that it should be legal, so long as
>>> we
>>> add it to our customer agreement.  Anyone ever thought about this?  Right
>>> now we pass on 5 of them and then make them find a new provider.  It
>>> seems
>>> like they would be less likely to hit 5 if they had to pay $20 for each
>>> one.
>>> We really don't want these guys on our network anyway, so no sweat if
>>> they
>>> just cancel.  Is anyone out there charging customers a fee for these?  I
>>> know most of you just ignore them, but we like passing them on, as it
>>> lowers
>>> our overall usage.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as
>>> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

[AFMUG] I love DSL reports.

[Ryan Ray]

[image: Inline image 1]

Re: [AFMUG] pmp450

[Ryan Ray]

Is your sector dual polarity? 

Sent while mobile


> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ryan Mano  wrote:
> 
> It registers 12 feet in front of the AP at 8x/1x…if I point at it 1 mile down 
> the road it will not link just says scanning
>  
> I only enable the  freq that the ap is using and unchecked all the rest…this 
> is what I meant by isolating
> AP eval shows nothing at 1 mile mark but close up it shows
>  
> So from what you guys are saying the first 8x means what the sm is capable of 
> doing and the second number 1x is actual speed?
>  
> So if it registers at 1x…12feet in from the of ap then it would make sense 
> that it would not see anything if I try it at a mile
> Guess I will have to pass traffic through it to see if it works from what you 
> guys are telling me
>  
> I know for a fact that the sector antenna works because I attached a pmp100 
> AP to it and that registered without any issues…do you think me plugging a 
> pmp100 into the sector antenna would cause this?
>  
>  
>  
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 5:09 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450
>  
> OK, then it's not what I was thinking. If you had software on them older than 
> 13.2 I believe, and you also had an AP where the factory reversed the 
> pigtails internally, your beacons would end up on horizontal instead of 
> vertical and the SM probably wouldn't hear it.
> 
> You say you're getting 8X/1X but it's also not registering. That does not 
> compute. As other have suggested, try locking down the SM's scan list to the 
> exact frequency and channel bandwidth that the AP is on. Tone alignment 
> helps. If you can get a laptop, tablet, phone, etc. and look at the Tools > 
> AP Eval page on the SM, does anything show up there? That's one of the first 
> things our techs are supposed to do when troubleshooting on-site. If it's 
> obviously not an alignment issue, log in and look at the AP eval.
> 
> On 2/1/2016 3:46 PM, Ryan Mano wrote:
> Running 5.7 software ver 14.1.1
>  
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 4:42 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450
>  
> There still seems to be some misconception on this. 8X/1X means that it's 8X 
> capable / 1X current. It's always going to show 8X capable (or 2X for FSK, 3X 
> for 430). After the / is what you need to pay attention to. Also, the uplink 
> and downlink are independent. On the AP session status page (power tab), 
> that's the downlink rate to that SM. On the SM main page, link status, etc., 
> that's the uplink rate to the AP.
> 
> What band is this? 2.4, 3.6, 5.4 or 5.7? And what software version do you 
> have on the radios? It'd be best to stick with 13.2.1 for now.
> 
> For the longest time I too thought this was backwards. I assure you it's 
> correct.
> 
> On 2/1/2016 2:26 PM, Ryan Mano wrote:
> 8x down 1x up
>  
> this is the first sm am trying to install on it
> ​
>  
> the freq am on is very clean not sure what the problem isunless am 
> missing a setting?
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: Af  on behalf of Josh Luthman 
> 
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 3:17 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450
>  
> Signals on each side?
>  
> 8x down 1x up?  Could be an uplink path issue or heavy interference at the AP 
> side.  Have you changed frequencies?  Spectrum analysis?  Is this the first 
> SM on the AP?
> 
>  
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>  
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Ryan Mano  wrote:
> am new to the pmp450 looks straight forward but am having issues registering 
> it from a distance​
>  
> when I point the sm  which is 12 feet in front of the ap it syncs 8x by 1x 
> ...but if I go 1mile down the road it doesn't register at all
>  
> not sure what am doing wrong...has anyone had this similar issue like this?
>  
> thanks
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  

Re: [AFMUG] Starry Internet - Ex Aereo WISP - Announced

[Ryan Ray]

But Adam! Didn't you watch the video. Just plunk the receiver in your
window and bingo bango bongo their $350 router will magically pull spectrum
from the sky! WOAHH

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Adam Moffett  wrote:

> 30ghz NLOS.  I wonder how much venture capital goes into their office
> cocaine fund.
>
>
> On 1/27/2016 12:25 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
>
>>
>> Here you go…
>>
>>
>>
>> http://techcrunch.com/2016/01/27/starry-internet-is-aereo-founder-chet-kanojias-latest-salvo-in-the-war-on-isps/
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Bucket truck or vans

[Ryan Ray]

For a quick site survey I have been making use of a Phantom 3. Nice and
easy to launch it and zip above the tree line to see what's what. Cheaper
than a bucket truck!

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:

> Years ago, I would use a guy for contract install work who had a bucket
> truck.  But the bucket rarely seemed to fit or open the right way.  It’s
> one thing if you are working on the front of a building, like tuckpointing
> or installing a sign.  But if you want to put something on a sloped roof,
> the bucket never seemed to go where you could work without getting out of
> it, and the door always seemed to be in the wrong spot to get out onto the
> roof.
>
> For putting a dish on a utility pole or something like that, a bucket
> truck is great.  Or for a quick site survey to see if a small tower would
> get LOS.
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman 
> *Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 12:12 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Bucket truck or vans
>
> What happens if you need to get to that equipment *NOW*.  I'd be afraid
> you need to rent it and won't arrive until tomorrow...or worse...
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Nate Burke  wrote:
>
>> We have a local rental shop that rent's a 60' tow behind bucket for
>> $300/day.  We've used it for a couple business installs when it's needed.
>> Especially usefull for hauling ballast to a roof.  Cheaper than buying a
>> bucket truck.
>>
>> That said, there are some times when just having a bucket would be nice.
>>
>> On 1/18/2016 12:05 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>
>> Might work good for wireless installs around there, I've had limited use
>> of mine for that purpose due to the likelihood of it leaving ruts in
>> customer's yards.
>>
>> On Monday, January 18, 2016, Jaime Solorza 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> YesI resisted buying one when I had ISG but that was long ago in a
>>> galaxy far far away I hit myself for that I can always rent one I
>>> guess.
>>> On Jan 18, 2016 10:55 AM, "Josh Luthman" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 22k for both is a great deal!

 Just keep in mind any install that you do with a bucket truck will
 probably require a bucket truck.  If the thing breaks you may not be able
 to reach some things.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jaime Solorza <
 losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Considering buying a bucket truck or van as I get older.  That fall on
> ice in Amarillo made me realize body no longer wants me to have lightning
> quick cat like reflexes.  My rotator cuff is still sore...my son in law 
> has
> a sign business with a 36 ft boom on van and 60 ft on diesel truck.  He
> paid 22k for both!!! here is van ...what you guys think?  Great for camera
> installs and even cutting tree branches.
>


>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Looking to swap DNS VMs

[Ryan Ray]

Could you sync bind with Route53?

https://www.netguru.co/blog/ci-your-dns-setup


> On Jan 6, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Eric Kuhnke  wrote:
> 
> geographic diversity and uplink diversity is a good thing for your 
> non-recursive authoritative nameservers...  my NS1, NS2 and NS3 (not 
> recursive!) are in three different cities.
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Sterling Jacobson  
>> wrote:
>> Maybe, I’m not sure what the advantage is we are offering each other?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 8:01 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Looking to swap DNS VMs
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anybody want to host a simple DNS VM in exchange for the same?  Just a 
>> little easier than hosting something like that on AWS.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul McCall, Pres.
>> 
>> PDMNet / Florida Broadband
>> 
>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>> 
>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>> 
>> 772-564-6800 office
>> 
>> 772-473-0352 cell
>> 
>> www.pdmnet.com
>> 
>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 

Re: [AFMUG] OT: DJI Phantom 3 Pro, wireless protocol?

[Ryan Ray]

I can check and take a screenshot when I get home.

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe it should have, but I didn't see anything that might have tipped us
> off.
>
> Any idea what kind of channel it uses, and why it doesn't show on the
> sniffer? Is it using 10 MHz or 40 MHz channel, or some proprietary protocol?
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 12/28/2015 5:02 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>
> It should have warned you too that there was interference in the area and
> to be careful. You can also go into the app and choose channels.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The intent was to hover it a low level over his back yard. All the
>> high-voltage lines, phone lines, and cable lines were street-side, so the
>> air was clear over his back yard. Should have been easy.
>>
>> However, when I started up my sniffer, I was getting at least 30 WiFi
>> hotspots in the area (on all the available 2.4 GHz channels).
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 12/27/2015 10:37 AM, Joe Novak wrote:
>>
>> No other high voltage lines or anything like that right? It makes them
>> act up too. If it wasn't so windy today it'd be a good day to go fly.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Bill Prince < <part15...@gmail.com>
>> part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> They call it "auto-home". When you start it up, you calibrate the
>>> compass, and it records the starting point. Then you're supposed to just
>>> push the "Home" button, and it is supposed to fly back to that position and
>>> hover.
>>>
>>> When it started flying off into the distance, he pushed the home button,
>>> and it cam back, but it was off by 20 feet or so, and it tried to land in a
>>> tree. Not optimal. he was able to push the "up" control to prevent it from
>>> actually landing in the tree. However, he was not able to maneuver it to
>>> the appropriate landing spot.
>>>
>>> As I and his other uncle were diving to avoid being hit by the thing, he
>>> was able to land it on the roof of his house without damaging it.
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/27/2015 10:26 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>
>>> Saw a thing on the interwebs yesterday about how to not crash your drone
>>> the first time you use it.
>>> Apparently they have something similar to an E Stop button that turns on
>>> the autopilot and flies them back to the starting poitn.
>>>
>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2015 11:23 AM
>>> *To:* <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: DJI Phantom 3 Pro, wireless protocol?
>>>
>>>
>>> FHSS maybe?  Or possibly small channel size since it needs distance, not
>>> throughput.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Dec 27, 2015 1:18 PM, "Bill Prince" < <part15...@gmail.com>
>>> part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> My nephew got a new DJI Phantom 3 Pro model drone, and in the process
>>>> of setting it up, I was trying to find the WiFi frequencies/protocols it
>>>> was using to communicate between the controller and drone. Nothing showed
>>>> up in my sniffer, so I wonder if it's using 802.11 at all.
>>>>
>>>> The specs ( <http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php/Phantom_3_Professional>
>>>> http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php/Phantom_3_Professional) say it's
>>>> using 2400-2483 MHz, but is only 100 mW EIRP. They claim 2 KM range, but he
>>>> lost control of it in his admittedly WiFi congested neighborhood.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] VMWare Etc

[Ryan Ray]

If you think you are going to spend more time learning ESXi vs any other
product I think you'll be surprised.

The rest of those things like dedupe, compression, design storage etc apply
to any virtualization in general and has nothing to do with the product you
use.

Just to give a frame of reference I manage about 100 ESXi nodes, 8 vCenters
across 4 data centers almost 20TB of ram in everything. On top of that we
run a 2000 seat VDI environment using View. The time I've spent with Prox,
Xen, Hyper-v has always lead me back to VMware as long as you have the
money.

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
wrote:

> You make this statement like there aren't things to learn about
> non-open-source products, which is a pretty silly argument IMO.
>
> Knowing when to dedupe, what compression to use, design storage
> strategy, optimizing IO for throughput vs latency vs price, vs bulk
> storage, best performance settings for different types of hosts /
> services... similar things to learn between products.
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > See, this is always my problem when these types of threads come up. Sure,
> > Xen is free, as long as you spend the hours and hours it takes to learn
> the
> > system and maintain it. Your time isn't free. I don't know how much time
> you
> > have to dink around with your hypervisor but my time can definitely be
> > better spent anywhere else. Large companies use this technology because
> with
> > their team of engineers on staff to maintain and evolve it it gets them
> the
> > flexibility they need to run their services. Your small business running
> 6
> > vm's doesn't need this.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is just my opinion: Disregard VMWare and use a Linux based
> hypervisor
> >> with Xen. You can use either PV (paravirtualized) or HVM (hardware
> >> virtualized) guests on the same hypervisor.
> >>
> >> My typical hypervisor setup is Debian Jessie AMD64 and the latest Xen.
> >>
> >> Xen is what powers Amazon EC2 and a bunch of other services. It has a
> >> learning curve but is very much worth it. Everything is free, whether
> GPL,
> >> Apache or BSD licensed.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is there a free version of VMWare?  What are limitations vs paid?  How
> >>> do you manage containers?  Does it support software raid?  Does it
> >>> have scheduled backup capabilities?  How does it compare to Proxmox?
> >>>
> >>> I have a few linux centos servers: directadmin, email, DNS, speedtest,
> >>> mysql database and box running lots of perl scripts to monitor my
> >>> network.  Would like to move them all to data center on one box and a
> >>> second box there to shove backups on.
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: [AFMUG] VMWare Etc

[Ryan Ray]

Honestly. If you don't want to spend the time dealing with open source
issues and vendor compatibility just use ESXi. I guarantee it will
basically be a set and forget system for you. If you spend ~$300 you can
get a vsphere essentials kit which would include vcenter licensing
(centralized management of all ESXi hosts), 6 cpu sockets and support for a
year.

Your time has to be worth more than $300 setting up an open source solution
like proxmox, ovirt, xenserver, etc. etc.


On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Vlad Sedov  wrote:

> oVirt is another alternative.
> Completely open source, and backed by Redhat. Arguably more mature
> development-wise than proxmox.. no freemium stuff, and can be controlled
> via shell and web interface. It has remote vm console, backup, clustering
> and all the other junk a decent hypervisor should have.
>
> I've been running a mix of linux and windows vm's for a few months, and
> haven't run into too much trouble.
>
> Vlad
>
> On 12/28/2015 10:32 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> See, this is why I run proxmox though. Debian host, zfs, PV and hvm, plus
> just about every feature I need in my environment... With a webUI. Do I
> have to have the webUI?  Absolutely not, but it is efficient for my needs.
> On Dec 28, 2015 10:29 PM, "Eric Kuhnke"  wrote:
>
>> This is just my opinion: Disregard VMWare and use a Linux based
>> hypervisor with Xen. You can use either PV (paravirtualized) or HVM
>> (hardware virtualized) guests on the same hypervisor.
>>
>> My typical hypervisor setup is Debian Jessie AMD64 and the latest Xen.
>>
>> Xen is what powers Amazon EC2 and a bunch of other services. It has a
>> learning curve but is very much worth it. Everything is free, whether GPL,
>> Apache or BSD licensed.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Matt 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a free version of VMWare?  What are limitations vs paid?  How
>>> do you manage containers?  Does it support software raid?  Does it
>>> have scheduled backup capabilities?  How does it compare to Proxmox?
>>>
>>> I have a few linux centos servers: directadmin, email, DNS, speedtest,
>>> mysql database and box running lots of perl scripts to monitor my
>>> network.  Would like to move them all to data center on one box and a
>>> second box there to shove backups on.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT: DJI Phantom 3 Pro, wireless protocol?

[Ryan Ray]

It should have warned you too that there was interference in the area and
to be careful. You can also go into the app and choose channels.


On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Bill Prince  wrote:

> The intent was to hover it a low level over his back yard. All the
> high-voltage lines, phone lines, and cable lines were street-side, so the
> air was clear over his back yard. Should have been easy.
>
> However, when I started up my sniffer, I was getting at least 30 WiFi
> hotspots in the area (on all the available 2.4 GHz channels).
>
> bp
> 
>
>
> On 12/27/2015 10:37 AM, Joe Novak wrote:
>
> No other high voltage lines or anything like that right? It makes them act
> up too. If it wasn't so windy today it'd be a good day to go fly.
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:
>
>> They call it "auto-home". When you start it up, you calibrate the
>> compass, and it records the starting point. Then you're supposed to just
>> push the "Home" button, and it is supposed to fly back to that position and
>> hover.
>>
>> When it started flying off into the distance, he pushed the home button,
>> and it cam back, but it was off by 20 feet or so, and it tried to land in a
>> tree. Not optimal. he was able to push the "up" control to prevent it from
>> actually landing in the tree. However, he was not able to maneuver it to
>> the appropriate landing spot.
>>
>> As I and his other uncle were diving to avoid being hit by the thing, he
>> was able to land it on the roof of his house without damaging it.
>>
>> bp
>> 
>>
>>
>> On 12/27/2015 10:26 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>> Saw a thing on the interwebs yesterday about how to not crash your drone
>> the first time you use it.
>> Apparently they have something similar to an E Stop button that turns on
>> the autopilot and flies them back to the starting poitn.
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman 
>> *Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2015 11:23 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: DJI Phantom 3 Pro, wireless protocol?
>>
>>
>> FHSS maybe?  Or possibly small channel size since it needs distance, not
>> throughput.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Dec 27, 2015 1:18 PM, "Bill Prince" < 
>> part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> My nephew got a new DJI Phantom 3 Pro model drone, and in the process of
>>> setting it up, I was trying to find the WiFi frequencies/protocols it was
>>> using to communicate between the controller and drone. Nothing showed up in
>>> my sniffer, so I wonder if it's using 802.11 at all.
>>>
>>> The specs (http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php/Phantom_3_Professional) say
>>> it's using 2400-2483 MHz, but is only 100 mW EIRP. They claim 2 KM range,
>>> but he lost control of it in his admittedly WiFi congested neighborhood.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> bp
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Password management

[Ryan Ray]

Secret Server can store all your stuff and give you the ability to share it
out to other people who may also forget the passwords

http://thycotic.com/products/secret-server/

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> There's an android client too.  Again Dropbox to sync the file for me.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Dec 15, 2015 1:08 PM, "Eric Kuhnke"  wrote:
>
>> Keepass. It's probably the most widely used *standalone *(not cloud
>> based, not a service, but something you run yourself) software package for
>> password management.  Fully open source.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KeePass
>>
>> KeepassX on OSX
>>
>> kpcli on linux command line systems.
>>
>>
>> the crypto behind it has been examined to a decent degree of scrutiny.
>> There are some major ISPs that use it for sensitive things that require
>> fixed passwords.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Tushar Patel  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As we connect to more sites and more software, it is getting harder and
>>> harder to remember all password. I used to rotate few but lately with
>>> strict requirements it is hard. What is happening is every time I try to
>>> login I have to reset the password.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I was looking at few password management software. Like laspass. Anybody
>>> uses this? Pro con? Any other suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Tushar
>>>
>>
>>

[AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

[Ryan Ray]

"We've been testing PMP450i 900MHz for almost a month now and we're really
impressed with it. I have a 1.5 mile shot through multiple evergreen and
deciduous trees, along with heavy interference in an urban environment
(pager /scada noise spikes at around -65dBm across every channel). I get
about 25mbps down and 2mbps up on speed tests using a 10MHz channel width.
Latency/jitter is good enough for VoIP and gaming. I believe distributors
will be shipping radios just after thanksgiving."

I found this on DSL reports. Anyone else had any experience with this
equipment? How's it looking? Is there any word on pricing or ship times
yet?

Re: [AFMUG] cacti graph template for Frame util

[Ryan Ray]

Stripped


On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Steve Utick  wrote:

> Assuming the list doesn't strip it, it's should be attached.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:47 AM, David  wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have a cacti template for graphing frame utilization for 13.4
>> PMP450 APs?
>>
>> --
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Best laptop for battery and price

[Ryan Ray]

I agree with you Justin. I've had Macbooks now going back about 8 years. I
feel like they are the best laptop on the market hands down. No ethernet is
annoying cause you have to carry around a thunderbolt adapter but other
than that I have no complaints..

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Justin Wilson - MTIN  wrote:

> Many folks look at the Apple line as expensive.  I have a 2008 Macbook pro
> that has been my daily laptop since I bought it.  Has been at tower sites,
> etc. Mine is a full size 15” MacBook Pro.  If you are looking for a field
> laptop I would suggest a macbook air.
>
> Not to get in a “holy war” but I am running the latest Operating system on
> a computer almost 8 years old.  In all fairness it has had a motherboard
> swap because the keyboard would no longer work.  A replacement keyboard did
> not do the trick so I took it in and the diagnosis had faults on the
> board.  For $400 I sent it back to Apple and they replaced the motherboard,
> replaced my failing DVD drive, replaced the top case, and something else
> (can’t remember).
>
> I run VMware fusion for Windows stuff.  A mac isn’t for everyone. You have
> to put forth effort to learn it, just like anything else.
>
> Justin Wilson
> j...@mtin.net
>
> ---
> http://www.mtin.net
> 
> Owner/CEO
> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
>
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
> 
>  COO/Chairman
> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
>
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 9:44 AM, D. Ryan Spott  wrote:
>
> +1 and the location manager to flip between ip settings is the best.
>
> TCO is so low it's not even funny.
>
> ryan
>
> --
> D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc
> broadband | telco | colo | communities
> PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294
> 425-939-0047
>
> On Oct 31, 2015, at 12:10, Sean Heskett  wrote:
>
> We use MacBook Pro.
>
> We still have one in service from 2009 ;)
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 30, 2015, Jay Weekley 
> wrote:
>
>> Looks like it's time for a new field piece.  I'm looking for a smallish
>> netbook/laptop with an ethernet port but more importantly I need a good
>> battery.
>>
>
>

[AFMUG] Interesting article about a small town creating their own network

[Ryan Ray]

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/11/how-a-group-of-neighbors-created-their-own-internet-service/

Re: [AFMUG] Client can't connect since UBNT 5.6.2 Firmware upgrade

[Ryan Ray]

Cut down some trees


On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:

> -89 is not a "usable" power level IMO.
>
> bp
> 
>
>
> On 10/7/2015 12:57 PM, Justin Marshall wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> �
>
> �
>
> I recently updated a UBNT Rocket M5 to 5.6.2 from 5.5.4. Since this
> update, one of the clients will not connect.
>
> �
>
> This AP originally had 6 SM�s connected at 5490.� After the upgrade
> from 5.5.4 to 5.6.2, 2 of the SM�s didn�t come back. �These 2 were
> not at the best signal (-86 and -89).� If I swapped frequencies to 5740
> the 1 connected at -86 popped back up at an -88 and the other SM�s are
> ~-2 db.� But still no sign of the one that was at -89.
>
> �
>
> This led me to believe UBNT probably lowered the output power for DFS
> frequencies somewhere between 5.5.4 and 5.6.2�
>
> �
>
> One would think that downgrading the SM�s and AP back down to 5.5.4
> would put things back the way they were but that doesn�t seem to be the
> case.
>
> �
>
> I even sent a tech onsite to swap out the unreachable SM with one that had
> 5.5.4 on it.� He said the one with 5.5.4 and the one with 5.6.2 both see
> the AP at -89 under �Site survey� but won�t register to the AP.
>
> �
>
> I�m at a loss here� Does anyone have any suggestions of things to try,
> or a magic firmware version (folks on the UBNT forums say 5.5.4 is best for
> DFS frequencies) that might make this AP act the way it did prior to
> upgrading to 5.6.2?
>
> I�ve already tried every other 5 Ghz Frequency available (with a mix of
> different country codes), most with worse results.
>
> �
>
> Thanks,
>
> Justin
>
> just...@pdmnet.net
>
> �
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Consumer routers?

[Ryan Ray]

I've had the best experience with Asus (N66U) garbage with dlink and
netgear. Good luck as well with the apple routers.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:

> I've had very bad luck with Belkin, D-Link, Asus (the worst), linksys, and
> low end netgear. I've had great success with the higher end netgear and the
> 3rd through 5th gen Apple AirPort Extreme. Prior to the 3rd gen and the 6th
> gen (latest) airports are junk. So I'm with you, pretty much every consumer
> grade router is trash now.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Glen Waldrop  wrote:
>
> Are there any consumer routers that don't suck these days?
>
> I used to recommend Linksys/Cisco, but since the Belkin buyout quality
> seems to be going down. They jink with teh firewall and I can't block
> specific outgoing traffic, can't remote admin anymore, etc...
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Need 100 seris CAPs :)

[Ryan Ray]

How much for 200 PMP100's? lol


On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> The radios are worth a few bucks.  Look at the value of your 3 year old
> smart phonejack squat.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Its sad about the only value these things have now is the cups
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:52 PM, David  wrote:
>>
>>> Let me check my stash in the back..
>>> �you have to take the whole shell though :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/30/2015 02:46 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
>>>
>>> That�s above my skillset J
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Keefe John
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:13 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Need 100 seris CAPs :)
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>> 3d print them
>>>
>>> On 9/30/2015 2:05 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
>>>
>>> We are in need of a couple hundred end caps for Canopy cases.
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>> If you have some, (only need caps), I can send a label for pickup.
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>> Muchas gracias !
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>> Pablo
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>> Paul McCall, Pres.
>>>
>>> PDMNet / Florida Broadband
>>>
>>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>>>
>>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>>>
>>> 772-564-6800 office
>>>
>>> 772-473-0352 cell
>>>
>>> www.pdmnet.com
>>>
>>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>> �
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Powercode feature request - Charge processing fee for credit/debit card

[Ryan Ray]

+1

Don't charge your customers for using a credit card or they will pull your
merchant agreement. For good reason. I hate companies that do this.


On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Westlake <
simon.westl...@digitalgunfire.com> wrote:

> Darin,
>
> Not a lawyer, but be careful - I'm pretty sure it's against most of the CC
> issuer policies to do this.
>
>
> http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/credit-card-convenience-fees-cost-surcharges-1280.php
>
>
> On 9/18/2015 1:30 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> If some of you with Powercode would be interested in this feature, can you
> please vote for it on the feature request link below?
>
> Basically, this feature would automatically apply a fixed or percentage
> based fee to the bill for all credit or debit card payments. It would also
> warn the customer of this charge before they setup auto pay or submit
> manual payment. We would continue to allow ACH or eCheck withdrawal for
> free but charge for customers to use credit/debit payment method as those
> costs are 2-4% of the total customer bill, which we don't want to eat the
> cost of.
>
> Please vote for this feature if you think you might be even a little
> interested in this so it is available when you are.
>
> Thank you
>
>
> http://community.powercode.com/forums/309535-feature-requests/suggestions/9130852-payment-processing-fee-for-credit-cards
>
>
> --
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> www.mnwifi.com
> 507-634-WiFi
>  Like us on Facebook
> 
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 13.4 Watchdog Reset

[Ryan Ray]

Ditto.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Eric Muehleisen  wrote:

> +1 Same here. About 20 AP's and 300 SM's all on 13.4. No issues.
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Bill Prince  wrote:
>
>> FWIW, we have 13.4 on everything now; FSK, PMP430, and PMP450. We're not
>> seeing the watchdog resets.
>>
>> bp
>> 
>>
>>
>> On 9/4/2015 9:55 AM, Sam Lambie wrote:
>>
>> Damn that sucks about it not being a fix. I too read the release notes
>> too fast. FWIW, installing 13.4 has made for a bit more stable network on
>> our 450's.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Brian Sullivan <
>> installe...@foxvalley.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I probably read the Release Notes too fast and assumed that it was a
>>> fix.  I just re-read them and I only see what you do.  So it appears that
>>> there was no 'bug fix' for this issue.  In the Cambium forum, Matt M noted
>>> that there may be a Maintenance release to address this.  He did not state
>>> an ETA.  I would assume that us submitting support tickets  would
>>> help them get closer to squashing the bug.
>>>
>>> On 9/4/2015 10:57 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>
 Brian, is it your understanding that 13.4 was supposed to cure or help
 the watchdog resets?  I don't see anything in the release notes other than
 the log entry for user initiated resets.

 I wish I could detect a pattern or cause-effect relationship which APs
 exhibit this and which rarely or never do.


 -Original Message- From: Brian Sullivan
 Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 10:47 AM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 13.4 Watchdog Reset

 For us, we rolled back the affected AP's to 13.2 and they are back to
 their normal routine (once in a while reboots).  I replaced one of them
 and brought back here to test.  I'll know more after we collect graph
 data and submit a ticket with Cambium.

 On 9/4/2015 9:05 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

> So what's the current status on this?  Is it better to upgrade to
> 13.4, or stay on 13.2?  And do you have to upgrade both APs and SMs?
>
> And was 13.4 supposed to fix a watchdog reset problem?  Or just create
> a different event log entry for user initiated reboots?
>
> Watchdog resets are a big problem, it used to be just gamers and VoIP
> users, but now everyone bitches if their video stream buffers.  Or their
> smartphone switches to using mobile data, or their webcam has gaps.  And
> it's worse with DFS or LBT.
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Mark Radabaugh
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 9:54 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 13.4 Watchdog Reset
>
> We have been seeing this across 200+ AP's
>
> It's getting truly annoying.   Cambium tech support has helpful
> suggestions like'just put them in free run'.   Um Thanks for the help,
> but no.
>
> Mark Radabaugh
> Amplex
> 27800 Lemoyne, Ste F
> Millbury, OH 43447
> 419-261-5996
>
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Brian Sullivan <
>> installe...@foxvalley.net> wrote:
>>
>> Last week we rolled out 13.4 to 450 AP's after testing in-house for a
>> while.  While running 13.2 we would see an AP here or there reboot on
>> occasion by itself.  The only message in the Event Log mentions Watchdog
>> Reset.  This is one of the bugs that Cambium noted was fixed in the 13.4
>> release notes.
>>
>> Since we upgraded the network to 13.4 we are now seeing at least 4
>> AP's out there rebooting several times per day.  On one of these AP's we
>> are also seeing SM's (all 17 registered) reboot along with the AP.  The
>> site has UPS backup so I know it's not a power grid problem.  I am 
>> planning
>> to roll the affected AP's back to 13.2 this evening.
>>
>> Anyone else having Watchdog issues with the 13.4 release?
>>
>> **System Startup**
>> System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset
>> Software Version : CANOPY 13.4 AP-DES
>> Board Type : P12
>> Device Setting : 5.7GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-a0-08-e5
>> - 5760.0 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 85 - 2.5 ms
>> FPGA Version : 040715
>> FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
>> 08/28/2015 : 14:11:42 CST : :Time Set
>> 08/28/2015 : 14:11:58 CST : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port.
>>
>>
>>
>


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> *Sam Lambie*
>> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
>> 575-758-7598 Office
>> www.Taosnet.com 
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 13.4 Watchdog Reset

[Ryan Ray]

Can you post more of the log where it watchdog resets? You should see a
percentage beside the components so you can see more info as to why it
reset.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Brian Sullivan installe...@foxvalley.net
wrote:

 Last week we rolled out 13.4 to 450 AP's after testing in-house for a
 while.  While running 13.2 we would see an AP here or there reboot on
 occasion by itself.  The only message in the Event Log mentions Watchdog
 Reset.  This is one of the bugs that Cambium noted was fixed in the 13.4
 release notes.

 Since we upgraded the network to 13.4 we are now seeing at least 4 AP's
 out there rebooting several times per day.  On one of these AP's we are
 also seeing SM's (all 17 registered) reboot along with the AP.  The site
 has UPS backup so I know it's not a power grid problem.  I am planning to
 roll the affected AP's back to 13.2 this evening.

 Anyone else having Watchdog issues with the 13.4 release?

 **System Startup**
 System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset
 Software Version : CANOPY 13.4 AP-DES
 Board Type : P12
 Device Setting : 5.7GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-a0-08-e5 -
 5760.0 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 85 - 2.5 ms
 FPGA Version : 040715
 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
 08/28/2015 : 14:11:42 CST : :Time Set
 08/28/2015 : 14:11:58 CST : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port.

Re: [AFMUG] Pre-terminated fiber in Canada

[Ryan Ray]

Thanks Paul!

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote:

 Nexicom Systems or Power Tel come to mind … both based in Canada…





 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ray
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:35 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Pre-terminated fiber in Canada



 Anyone have a source for pre-terminated direct burial multimode lc fiber
 that ships to Canada? Having a hell of a time finding anyone.



 Thanks

[AFMUG] Pre-terminated fiber in Canada

[Ryan Ray]

Anyone have a source for pre-terminated direct burial multimode lc fiber
that ships to Canada? Having a hell of a time finding anyone.

Thanks

Re: [AFMUG] What to do when the Internet is down...

[Ryan Ray]

They had that problem at another wildfire in bc near Kamloops. Drone flying and 
brought down all the fire fighting equipment in the area. Really annoying at 
drone pilots sometimes.



Sent while mobile


 On Aug 17, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Steve D bigd...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 The particular fires are in southern BC along the US/Canada border from 
 Osoyoos over to Rock Creek/Kettle Valley area.
 
 We've got a temporary service in place relayed from a neighboring WISP now.  
 It's not a lot, but it's something.  Another community north of there is 
 completely in the dark due to the fires to the south... no phone lines, no 
 power, not even cell.  Logistically, there's nothing we can do for this 
 community right now either.  Reports indicate the power company is setting up 
 a generator.
 
 30 homes were lost in Rock Creek so far, and then there's an effin' idiot 
 flying a drone which has caused the air support for the fire to be grounded 
 yesterday.  Now *THERE* is someone I hope the black suits find...
 
 -Steve D
 
 On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:30 AM, D. Ryan Spott rsp...@ngc457.com wrote:
 Where are you at Steve?
 
 ryan
 
 -- 
 D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc
 broadband | telco | colo | communities
 PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294
 425-939-0047
 
 On Aug 16, 2015, at 12:52, Steve D bigd...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 We had a bad situation this week where wildfire took out our upstream's 
 fiber in one valley which we relay wirelessly over to another valley.  We 
 had calls from people angry that we weren't driving through the roadblocks 
 to fix it.
 
 :(
 
 -Steve D
 
 On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
 The last row are me during a thunderstorm.
  
 From: D. Ryan Spott
 Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 2:07 PM
 To: af@afmug.com ; memb...@wispa.org
 Subject: [AFMUG] What to do when the Internet is  down...
  
 Normally these comics are just humor. The 'complain to your local 
 congressman' is what got me to send it to this group.
 
 ryan
 
 eijjfgai.png
 -- 
 D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc
 broadband | telco | colo | communities
 PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294
 425-939-0047
 

Re: [AFMUG] What to do when the Internet is down...

[Ryan Ray]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/drone-operators-blast-irresponsible-and-selfish-flight-that-grounded-firefighters-1.3193540

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:

 Surprising people would mess with firefighters.

 I remember seeing a VW beetle someone parked in front of a fire hydrant,
 and there was a house fire.  The firefighters bashed out windows on both
 sides and ran a firehose through his car.  No doubt they could have picked
 it up and moved it, or called police to have it towed, but this was quicker
 and hopefully taught him a lesson.


 *From:* Steve D bigd...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Monday, August 17, 2015 11:56 AM
 *To:* af af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What to do when the Internet is down...

 The particular fires are in southern BC along the US/Canada border from
 Osoyoos over to Rock Creek/Kettle Valley area.

 We've got a temporary service in place relayed from a neighboring WISP
 now.  It's not a lot, but it's something.  Another community north of there
 is completely in the dark due to the fires to the south... no phone lines,
 no power, not even cell.  Logistically, there's nothing we can do for this
 community right now either.  Reports indicate the power company is setting
 up a generator.

 30 homes were lost in Rock Creek so far, and then there's an effin' idiot
 flying a drone which has caused the air support for the fire to be grounded
 yesterday.  Now *THERE* is someone I hope the black suits find...

 -Steve D

 On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:30 AM, D. Ryan Spott rsp...@ngc457.com wrote:

 Where are you at Steve?

 ryan

 --
 D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc
 broadband | telco | colo | communities
 PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294
 425-939-0047

 On Aug 16, 2015, at 12:52, Steve D bigd...@gmail.com wrote:

 We had a bad situation this week where wildfire took out our upstream's
 fiber in one valley which we relay wirelessly over to another valley.  We
 had calls from people angry that we weren't driving through the roadblocks
 to fix it.

 :(

 -Steve D

 On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:

 The last row are me during a thunderstorm.

 *From:* D. Ryan Spott rsp...@ngc457.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, August 16, 2015 2:07 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com ; memb...@wispa.org
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] What to do when the Internet is down...

 Normally these comics are just humor. The 'complain to your local
 congressman' is what got me to send it to this group.

 ryan

 eijjfgai.png

 --
 D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc
 broadband | telco | colo | communities
 PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294425-939-0047

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Enable Remote Desktop on Windows 7 Home Premium.

[Ryan Ray]

This was posted by a vmware engineer over the weekend. I haven't had a
chance to play with it yet but it looks promising


DevNull posted:
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?goto=postpostid=448994740#post448994740

https://labs.vmware.com/flings/vnc-...-and-vnc-client
https://labs.vmware.com/flings/vnc-server-and-vnc-client

OK, now I can talk about it.

Probably boring to most people, but a lot of us use this for working
remotely. I spend the last week in Seattle connected to my linux desktop in
Palo Alto with it, and work from home with it all the time as well. I've
also use it to play Skyrim over a hotel wireless during a convention with
shitty networking. It was showing some artifacts with the compress during
that, but still pretty impressive. It works really well with low bandwidth.
It's the same VNC code that your VMRC connection uses now. There was a
bunch of politics that kept this from launching for 7 months, so we already
have a bunch of plans for another release. The main thing we want to add is
a UI, and support for a Mac client.


On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Jay Weekley par...@cyberbroadband.net
wrote:

 I found that one and was wondering about it.

 Josh Luthman wrote:


 Nice patch tool!!!

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Aug 17, 2015 11:19 AM, Vlad Sedov v...@atlasok.com mailto:
 v...@atlasok.com wrote:


 https://www.raymond.cc/blog/enable-remote-desktop-connection-in-windows-7-home-premium/
 This works the best. Just re-apply the patch if an update wipes it
 out.


 Vlad

 On 8/17/2015 10:18 AM, Jay Weekley wrote:

 I need a hack/work around to enable remote desktop access to a
 computer with Windows 7 Home Premium.  I've seen a few in my
 research but not sure which is best.