Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review
MoviePass makes you send a photo of your ticket now. From: CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 9:20 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review Saw Hotel Artemis last night I felt it needed another hour of storyline. Have not made it to Ocean's 8 yet... my MoviePass is getting a good workout though Sent from my smartphone - Reply message - From: "Jaime Solorza" To: "Animal Farm" Subject: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review Date: Sat, Jun 9, 2018 8:10 PM We watched Death Wish with Bruce Willis at homeit's okay Jaime Solorza On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 7:02 PM Chuck McCown wrote: Oceans 8 Meh OK, Movie Pass made me not regret paying for it. Just was not funny like the other Ocean movies.
[AFMUG] OT Movie Review
Oceans 8 Meh OK, Movie Pass made me not regret paying for it. Just was not funny like the other Ocean movies.
Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik / Mimosa Ethernet Errors
Surge suppressors can certainly cause this. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 9, 2018, at 2:58 PM, George Skorup wrote: > > What suppressors? > >> On 6/9/2018 3:23 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: >> I have a A5C that is giving me grief. I'm getting hundreds of Rx FCS errors >> on the Mikrotik when I'm running gigabit, if I force it to 100 fdx, the Rx >> FCS errors stop, but Rx Code errors start incrementing instead. I've always >> gotten some amount of Rx FCS errors from Mimosa A5/A5C units, but not nearly >> this many. It's starting to have an effect on service on the sector. >> >> Any ideas what I should look at? Some people were claiming that putting >> something like a Netonix in between the Mimosa and the Mikrotik solved their >> issues, but I'm wondering if the surge suppressors are creating an issue as >> well. >> >> -Jason >
Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific
I should say, slowly shipping small quantities to beta test customers. From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 2:02 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific I already have that. We are slowly shipping small quantities. Ramping up. Adding the single pol and adding the Andrew valuline adapter. From: Jeff Broadwick - Lists Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 1:53 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific So you won’t have a dual pol adapter? Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com On Jun 9, 2018, at 3:02 PM, wrote: Working on REMEC rectangular to AF11X adapters today. Only one polarization will be used. But at least the antenna can get reused. From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 12:58 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific Que pasa , calabasa? Jaime Solorza On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 12:01 PM wrote: Received one minute before you sent it. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 11:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific Received here about 1pm central. On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 12:57 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific
I already have that. We are slowly shipping small quantities. Ramping up. Adding the single pol and adding the Andrew valuline adapter. From: Jeff Broadwick - Lists Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 1:53 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific So you won’t have a dual pol adapter? Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com On Jun 9, 2018, at 3:02 PM, wrote: Working on REMEC rectangular to AF11X adapters today. Only one polarization will be used. But at least the antenna can get reused. From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 12:58 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific Que pasa , calabasa? Jaime Solorza On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 12:01 PM wrote: Received one minute before you sent it. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 11:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific Received here about 1pm central. On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 12:57 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific
Working on REMEC rectangular to AF11X adapters today. Only one polarization will be used. But at least the antenna can get reused. From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 12:58 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific Que pasa , calabasa? Jaime Solorza On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 12:01 PM wrote: Received one minute before you sent it. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 11:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific Received here about 1pm central. On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 12:57 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific
Received one minute before you sent it. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2018 11:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test 6/9 @ 11:00 Pacific Received here about 1pm central. On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 12:57 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey
Oh, input on 900, yes. Get the guys in Devon to roll a PTP600 in a 900 MHz version. From: Brian Sullivan Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:08 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey A neat product (which we couldn't use around here) would be a 5G 450 AP with 900MHz OFDM PTP built in. Although you would have to use all the available 900Mhz spectrum to make it worthwhile. Perhaps a nLOS 3.65 or LTE PTP combined with 450 AP would work in some areas. On 6/8/2018 12:03 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Yeah, "under the canopy" doesn't really happen around here, but getting into the middle of the trees does work in some cases... if we can get a point-to-point link working to one house in the middle of a subdivision, you can often get LOS to several other houses and nLOS will sometimes even work with 5ghz at that kind of range. On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Steve D wrote: And in bands outside of 5GHz as well. I don't think there is such a thing as "under the canopy" around here. When you're in the trees, you're in the trees. 900 in a lite configuration would be ideal for us. -Steve D On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:05 AM Matt wrote: Why not just make a PMP450i lite connectorized AP? On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > Very good question George… > > > > I am trying to gauge interest. Some folks would prefer that they are using > the same equipment throughout the network, and we don’t really have an > option right now for a lower priced (shorter range) but high throughput > extension of the network, but still a 450. Same SMs, etc… > > > > Really wondering if many folks can’t complete a certain percentage of > installs due to obstructions (foliage) using 5 GHz, but could utilize an > “under the canopy” type of solution to light up a neighborhood. Is that a > really common situation? How common? > > > > Any feedback is welcome, and I value your guys’ opinions (more than some > others)… > > > > Matt > > > > From: Af On Behalf Of George Skorup > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:48 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [ External ] Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > > > Ok, I guess I have to be the one to say this. Why would we want a 450-based > micro-POP product when we have ePMP? Just askin'. > > On 6/7/2018 10:29 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > > I would really like to get your opinions on this topic� would a 450 device > like this help you in your network? > > � > > Now�s you chance to comment and help direct us! > > � > > Please fill out the short survey and add any other info you�d like.� > It�s only 16 questions. > > � > > Matt > > � > > From: Af On Behalf Of Ray Savich > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:08 AM > To: 'af@afmug.com' > Subject [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > � > > Add your input to the Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey. > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CambiumMicroPOP > > � > > � > > Join the Conversation > > Cambium Networks Community Forum > > � > >
Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey
I wonder how much speed you could get from a 900 radio that uses the whole 20 MHz. If that was the output of the micropop and you kept distances short and antenna gains up it would hammer through almost anything. Say 512 QAM. You could deliver 100 Mbps. Of course you would be claiming a monopoly on the whole band. Perhaps OFDM might be a better way to go. Use the orthogon method to occupy as much as you can find. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:03 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey Yeah, "under the canopy" doesn't really happen around here, but getting into the middle of the trees does work in some cases... if we can get a point-to-point link working to one house in the middle of a subdivision, you can often get LOS to several other houses and nLOS will sometimes even work with 5ghz at that kind of range. On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Steve D wrote: And in bands outside of 5GHz as well. I don't think there is such a thing as "under the canopy" around here. When you're in the trees, you're in the trees. 900 in a lite configuration would be ideal for us. -Steve D On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:05 AM Matt wrote: Why not just make a PMP450i lite connectorized AP? On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > Very good question George… > > > > I am trying to gauge interest. Some folks would prefer that they are using > the same equipment throughout the network, and we don’t really have an > option right now for a lower priced (shorter range) but high throughput > extension of the network, but still a 450. Same SMs, etc… > > > > Really wondering if many folks can’t complete a certain percentage of > installs due to obstructions (foliage) using 5 GHz, but could utilize an > “under the canopy” type of solution to light up a neighborhood. Is that a > really common situation? How common? > > > > Any feedback is welcome, and I value your guys’ opinions (more than some > others)… > > > > Matt > > > > From: Af On Behalf Of George Skorup > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:48 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [ External ] Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > > > Ok, I guess I have to be the one to say this. Why would we want a 450-based > micro-POP product when we have ePMP? Just askin'. > > On 6/7/2018 10:29 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > > I would really like to get your opinions on this topic� would a 450 device > like this help you in your network? > > � > > Now�s you chance to comment and help direct us! > > � > > Please fill out the short survey and add any other info you�d like.� > It�s only 16 questions. > > � > > Matt > > � > > From: Af On Behalf Of Ray Savich > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:08 AM > To: 'af@afmug.com' > Subject [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > � > > Add your input to the Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey. > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CambiumMicroPOP > > � > > � > > Join the Conversation > > Cambium Networks Community Forum > > � > >
Re: [AFMUG] this list
Not sure. Since the domain has not transferred yet I cannot even get into the back end of the new list server. Not sure how many knobs it has. From: Steve Jones Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 10:44 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] this list if there is a mechanism to sign up manually, it might be best to share in the event it doesnt migrate well so the info is already out there out of curiousity, is the new list going to be publicly searchable like the aws list? On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:10 AM wrote: I should be able to automatically sign everyone up. I have the list. I believe there is a bulk import. It may send you a note asking you to verify. I would hope it will. From: Carl Peterson Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 9:07 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] this list So before it dies, is there a process for us to sign up for the new list? On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:55 AM, wrote: It is gonna die any day now. I gave GoDaddy the magic Tucows key to steal it away from them. I have mailman hired to host. I keep checking on the status of the domain transfer and it just says “in process” or something like that. -- Carl Peterson PORT NETWORKS 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 637-3707
Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey
A 450 translator would be a cool device. 5G in and some other frequency out. Essentially an SM and AP in one box. SM circuit for the backhaul, AP for the micropop. Maintains timing etc. From: Carl Peterson Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 10:43 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey Because you have a few thousand 450 subs and don't wan't to have to stock your vans with something new. Because you want to unload some of your sectors without re-installing customers, just a repoint. Being able to move 20-30 subs off a sector to a micropop is huge. Because you want consistency for your back office and support staff. Because you need to pay a lineman to put it up on a pole above the Electrical space and don't want to touch it for 5-8 years. (I have no idea what ePMP reliability looks like but have had plenty FSK etc gear up for 10+ years) For me, the perfect 450 micropop would be an omni 450M with Direct DC input, an SFP, a copper port, and an integrated GPS receiver. 1A 48V POE out would be nice too. Something in the 1-1.5K price range to support 20-30 subs with a form factor like the A5-19. I could power it and a Siklu with a two 48V runs up the pole, or just it with fiber and DC up the pole. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Ok, I guess I have to be the one to say this. Why would we want a 450-based micro-POP product when we have ePMP? Just askin'. On 6/7/2018 10:29 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: I would really like to get your opinions on this topic� would a 450 device like this help you in your network? � Now�s you chance to comment and help direct us! � Please fill out the short survey and add any other info you�d like.� It�s only 16 questions. � Matt � From: Af mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com On Behalf Of Ray Savich Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:08 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' mailto:af@afmug.com Subject [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey � Add your input to the Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CambiumMicroPOP � � Join the Conversation Cambium Networks Community Forum � -- Carl Peterson PORT NETWORKS 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 637-3707
Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed
Pop the cover on the AF5x, there is a tiny screwdriver adjustment marked “freq”. Just tweak it up to 6 GHz and you are good to go. Saves lots of money that way. From: Jeremy Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 10:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed I have an AF5X on 3' UBNT dishes (x-pol modified) that does 300x100 at 19 miles. It is about to be swapped for 6GHz though. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: Mimosa B5c can pull 500Mbps to 1Gbps on that type of link depending on how much spectrum you want to use. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 2:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Well, that explains everything. From: Chris Fabien Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:28 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed 3ft... Jirous on one side and one of the WB Optic on the other actually! On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 5:17 PM wrote: Wow, what size dishes? From: Chris Fabien Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Chuck we just did a 13 mile link using AF5XHD, getting about 350mbps in both directions using 60mhz and 50/50 ratio. On Jun 6, 2018 2:42 PM, "Mathew Howard" wrote: Yeah, if you go with 3' dishes you might be getting close to $1500 in cost, but that'll easily cover it with 2 footers. The only parts involved are going to be the dishes and the radios, so it's pretty simple to price... well, I suppose mounts and surge suppressors too, but I assume you know where to get those... On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:14 PM, wrote: Thanks, that is what I am looking for. Actually not sure yet what up down ratio the customer will be buying yet. If I tell the owners $1500 for parts then I should be good to go? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 11:47 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed That's because airfibers use a fixed up/down ratio (75/25, in this case). If you needed 50/50, this link would only be get you somewhere around 140Mbps each way. Signal is just a little too low to get 8X (256qam) on this case, but I probably could if I changed them to the new HD version, since they can get a little higher power at any given modulation, and they can achieve higher modulations at lower signal levels... it might even be able to do 1024qam (it probably could with 3' dishes anyway). going to a 50mhz channel would also add some 20% capacity (50mhz is the max for the standard af-5x, but the hd can go up to 100mhz if you have lots of spectrum to burn). An entire link with 2' dishes should come to router around $1000. I haven't priced the 3' dishes recently, but they are quite a bit pricier. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM, wrote: Is the 65 Mbps a limitation of the link or system settings or ?? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:16 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Here's an example of a 25km AF-5x link using 2' dishes. I'd probably use AF-5xHD radios these days, and I'd use the airFiber dishes (the only difference between them and the RocketDish LW is that they're slant vs H/V). Error! Filename not specified. On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Which is better, Rocket 5AC + RocketDish LW or AF5X + AF-5G34-S45 ? Or some other brand. Hauling out PTP to a customer. Like to keep the bandwidth up but they are not currently asking for more than 100 Mbps.
Re: [AFMUG] this list
I should be able to automatically sign everyone up. I have the list. I believe there is a bulk import. It may send you a note asking you to verify. I would hope it will. From: Carl Peterson Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 9:07 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] this list So before it dies, is there a process for us to sign up for the new list? On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:55 AM, wrote: It is gonna die any day now. I gave GoDaddy the magic Tucows key to steal it away from them. I have mailman hired to host. I keep checking on the status of the domain transfer and it just says “in process” or something like that. -- Carl Peterson PORT NETWORKS 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 637-3707
[AFMUG] this list
It is gonna die any day now. I gave GoDaddy the magic Tucows key to steal it away from them. I have mailman hired to host. I keep checking on the status of the domain transfer and it just says “in process” or something like that.
Re: [AFMUG] OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?
Yeah, nightmare... From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 6:33 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OSPF - How large can a flat network grow? He's talking about having all routers in OSPF area 0, not a truly flat L2 broadcast-domain nightmare. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: To me, flat network means all MACs are in the same broadcast domain. That is what I did with my first Canopy system. Did not even know what a VLAN was back then. From: Gino A. Villarini Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 5:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OSPF - How large can a flat network grow? Our network by all means is flat as all services converge into our core. We started by using vlans and qinq but later migrated to mpls/vpls. Now watching evpn as the next step.. From: Af on behalf of Lewis Bergman Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" Date: Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 3:09 PM To: "af@afmug.com" Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OSPF - How large can a flat network grow? Gino would probably be your best source for advice as I'll bet he has one of the largest networks of similar construction. I think he went MPLS to deal with a variety of issues he was having, including OSPF. But maybe Gino can speak up on the issue. Typically, if you didn't want to do anything else, you would consider iBGP and break the OSPF domains up in some logical way. The big determining factor for me for such things is the occurrence route flapping and how often it happens. Route flapping will be the big indicator that you are to big and OSPF can't keep up. You can do some tweaking but at some point it just all falls apart. The bad part about waiting till that happens is you will loose a lot of customers trying to make things stable again. I would think Denis also would have a much better informed path to take and I'll bet he would be happy to contract to help you. Probably money well spent. Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:40 PM Brough Turner wrote: We're an urban WISP with a dense mesh of wireless links and a router per building. I am concerned that, without paying attention, we have grown to 600+ routers and ~2550 routes in one OSPF domain. This network has a diverse mix of routers from CCR1036s down to RB750UPs. We're not having any OSPF problems at this time and I have plenty of other things to worry about, but I'd hate to hit some limit and have the whole thing blow up. Does anyone have experience (positive or negative) with large flat OSPF networks? And, if you have had problems, what were the problems? Thanks, Brough Brough Turner netBlazr Inc. – Free your Broadband! Mobile: 617-285-0433 Skype: brough netBlazr Inc. | Google+ | Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Blog | Personal website
Re: [AFMUG] OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?
To me, flat network means all MACs are in the same broadcast domain. That is what I did with my first Canopy system. Did not even know what a VLAN was back then. From: Gino A. Villarini Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 5:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OSPF - How large can a flat network grow? Our network by all means is flat as all services converge into our core. We started by using vlans and qinq but later migrated to mpls/vpls. Now watching evpn as the next step.. From: Af on behalf of Lewis Bergman Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" Date: Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 3:09 PM To: "af@afmug.com" Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OSPF - How large can a flat network grow? Gino would probably be your best source for advice as I'll bet he has one of the largest networks of similar construction. I think he went MPLS to deal with a variety of issues he was having, including OSPF. But maybe Gino can speak up on the issue. Typically, if you didn't want to do anything else, you would consider iBGP and break the OSPF domains up in some logical way. The big determining factor for me for such things is the occurrence route flapping and how often it happens. Route flapping will be the big indicator that you are to big and OSPF can't keep up. You can do some tweaking but at some point it just all falls apart. The bad part about waiting till that happens is you will loose a lot of customers trying to make things stable again. I would think Denis also would have a much better informed path to take and I'll bet he would be happy to contract to help you. Probably money well spent. Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:40 PM Brough Turner wrote: We're an urban WISP with a dense mesh of wireless links and a router per building. I am concerned that, without paying attention, we have grown to 600+ routers and ~2550 routes in one OSPF domain. This network has a diverse mix of routers from CCR1036s down to RB750UPs. We're not having any OSPF problems at this time and I have plenty of other things to worry about, but I'd hate to hit some limit and have the whole thing blow up. Does anyone have experience (positive or negative) with large flat OSPF networks? And, if you have had problems, what were the problems? Thanks, Brough Brough Turner netBlazr Inc. – Free your Broadband! Mobile: 617-285-0433 Skype: brough netBlazr Inc. | Google+ | Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Blog | Personal website
Re: [AFMUG] from Paul - List hosting
He did die. Couple of years ago. Wife # 7(?) and an unethical estate attorney carried on the fight (along with about a dozen other attorneys). Aided of course by all the 30 something middle managers that were slid into the positions vacated after the massacre 4.5 years ago. I say she is unethical because she was recently sanctioned by the Utah Supreme Court for being unethical. So not gonna worry about putting that out there... 'tis neither slander nor libel. -Original Message- From: Robert Andrews Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 2:04 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] from Paul - List hosting When the bastard dies On 06/07/2018 01:01 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 6/6/18 12:10, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: That storm cloud that followed me for 1366 days has been gone for a few months now. I am under a confidentiality agreement and a non disparagement agreement so not going to say too much. Does it have an expiration so you can write a tell all exposé then sell the movie rights for big money?
Re: [AFMUG] from Paul - List hosting
No expiration. But I am sure there would not be big money either... -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 2:01 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] from Paul - List hosting On 6/6/18 12:10, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: That storm cloud that followed me for 1366 days has been gone for a few months now. I am under a confidentiality agreement and a non disparagement agreement so not going to say too much. Does it have an expiration so you can write a tell all exposé then sell the movie rights for big money?
Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25
I have found that the more you start a sentence with “can you help me” the better it is. From: David Sovereen Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 12:00 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 I agree that those are the items to focus on with OSHA. Item 1: "The employer did not require a competent person to inspect." Except that is incorrect. The person who fell WAS a competent person. He held a “Competent Climber” certification card from CITCA. A significant portion of that training includes assessing if a tower is safe to climb in accordance with OSHAs rules. A competent person is not a structural engineer. A competent person is someone who has been trained on assessing if a tower is safe to climb in accordance with OSHAs rules. Item 2: "...the employer did not ensure complete personal fall arrest systems were properly used". A policy was in place. The person knew how to use it properly and was required by company policy to follow it. Our Employee Handbook states under “Guidelines for Conduct” that “The following kinds of conduct are absolutely prohibited: … Violation of any and all safety rules.” At some point, there needs to be personal accountability. I agree that being humble and asking for help and guidance is the best approach, so I’ll show them what we’ve done up til now and see what they suggest for improvement. David Sovereen Mercury Network Corporation 2719 Ashman Street, Midland, MI 48640 989.837.3790 x151 office | 888.866.4638 toll free | 989.837.3780 fax Telephone | Internet | Security Alarm Monitoring david.sover...@mercury.net www.mercury.net On Jun 6, 2018, at 8:43 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: In reading this citation there are two phrases which I think get to the meat of what the person writing the citation intended: Item 1: "The employer did not require a competent person to inspect." Item 2: "...the employer did not ensure complete personal fall arrest systems were properly used". I've bolded what I consider the two most relevant words. The question I'd be asking is what policies were actually in place at the time of the accident, and what was the ramifications to the employee if they didn't follow them. Evidently providing safety gear isn't enough, the employer is responsible to make sure that employees actually use them. If you had policies in place that required the use of the gear, and took affirmative action when an employee was caught violating the policies, and have now re-verified that the gear met the requirements, I'd go back to OSHA and ask them, what you could have done differently considering you've done everything correctly. Go into it with the mindset that if you screwed up you're going to have to pay these fines (or at least what you can negotiate them down to), and that you really want to learn what you did to screw up. If the answer is that you did everything right, it will be hard for them to continue with the fines. If they find you did something wrong then talk to them about how to fix it. I've heard story after story like this (fortunately never had to deal with it myself), and it seems that a learning/compliant attitude goes a long way toward them being willing to drop or decrease the fines. I'm not saying to not correct incorrect information (such as the rohn 25 load rating), but instead to take what they say and try to understand whether or not you needed to make a correction. Be mindful that the people who work for OSHA have the job to make the workplace safer, and I'm sure that after a workplace death they feel like there should be something that could have been done differently. Hopefully they'll come to the realization that you were doing everything you should have been doing, and that you've also learned a couple things which you can do above and beyond that, and as a result, the fine is dropped or reduced significantly. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:10 AM, David Sovereen wrote: Hi All, A little background: We had an employee die late last year. He climbed a Rohn 25 tower at a residential customer location and did not use his fall protection gear. He went through safe climb training at CITCA, his fall protection gear was in his truck, and a co-worker with him told him to put his harness on, but he exercised poor judgement and climbed without it anyway. He slipped, fell approximately 30 feet, and was pronounced dead about an hour later at the hospital. We received two OSHA Citations today. I’ve attached them. I spoke with the OSHA representative handling our matter on Friday. He tells me that Rohn 25s have not been tested by the manufacturer to support 5,000 lbs and therefore are not a suitable anchor point for securing oneself. He says all work on Rohn 25s must be done from a lift. I think they are just trying to come up with reasons to fine us. When I went
Re: [AFMUG] List
To drink or not to drink. Pros and cons Pros Buzz Cons Dick stops working, even the next day Ugly women look good to you You hit on ugly women You can fu*k up your ability to get insurance or a drivers license Hangovers Puke mouth Kissing a puke mouth Beer goggles Beer gut Puking Cleaning up Puke Screwing your buddies wife Waking up in jail for no apparent reason Waking up in your car not knowing where you are Waking up not knowing where you are Discovering you bought many rounds for the whole bar on your credit card Waking up with a new girlfriend that you don’t know. Learning you were making out with a totally fugly girl that is old enough to be your mother. Puking in public venues before thousands of people Waking up face down in a bathtub thinking you are dead because all you can see is white. Did I mention that your dick stops working... So I have been told... From: Steve Jones Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 3:40 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] List i havent been drinking, so its ok thats a lie though i have been drinking and its not ok On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: Good to hear, I'm having withdrawals. On Wednesday, June 6, 2018, wrote: I am in the process of moving it. AWS or whatever is running on the AWS is getting progressively more and more flakey. So, I have put it off long enough. Domain will move to GoDaddy and the list will move to mailmanhost.com Will probably take a few days. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:10 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] List Is this list just done? Seems to be off as much as on anymore. Unless everyone is just outside as opposed to in front of a computer like me.
Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25
Yeah, just like school "cooperate and graduate" never paid to correct the error of the teacher. -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 4:58 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 On 6/6/18 9:10 AM, David Sovereen wrote: I spoke with the OSHA representative handling our matter on Friday. He tells me that Rohn 25s have not been tested by the manufacturer to support 5,000 lbs and therefore are not a suitable anchor point for securing oneself. He says all work on Rohn 25s must be done from a lift. I think they are just trying to come up with reasons to fine us. So now that Rohn has proven this is a totally false statement, have you passed that along to OSHA or has Rohn indicated they would be interested in talking to OSHA? I don't think the OSHA guys are going to like being told they are wrong. ~Seth
Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed
Well, that explains everything. From: Chris Fabien Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:28 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed 3ft... Jirous on one side and one of the WB Optic on the other actually! On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 5:17 PM wrote: Wow, what size dishes? From: Chris Fabien Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Chuck we just did a 13 mile link using AF5XHD, getting about 350mbps in both directions using 60mhz and 50/50 ratio. On Jun 6, 2018 2:42 PM, "Mathew Howard" wrote: Yeah, if you go with 3' dishes you might be getting close to $1500 in cost, but that'll easily cover it with 2 footers. The only parts involved are going to be the dishes and the radios, so it's pretty simple to price... well, I suppose mounts and surge suppressors too, but I assume you know where to get those... On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:14 PM, wrote: Thanks, that is what I am looking for. Actually not sure yet what up down ratio the customer will be buying yet. If I tell the owners $1500 for parts then I should be good to go? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 11:47 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed That's because airfibers use a fixed up/down ratio (75/25, in this case). If you needed 50/50, this link would only be get you somewhere around 140Mbps each way. Signal is just a little too low to get 8X (256qam) on this case, but I probably could if I changed them to the new HD version, since they can get a little higher power at any given modulation, and they can achieve higher modulations at lower signal levels... it might even be able to do 1024qam (it probably could with 3' dishes anyway). going to a 50mhz channel would also add some 20% capacity (50mhz is the max for the standard af-5x, but the hd can go up to 100mhz if you have lots of spectrum to burn). An entire link with 2' dishes should come to router around $1000. I haven't priced the 3' dishes recently, but they are quite a bit pricier. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM, wrote: Is the 65 Mbps a limitation of the link or system settings or ?? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:16 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Here's an example of a 25km AF-5x link using 2' dishes. I'd probably use AF-5xHD radios these days, and I'd use the airFiber dishes (the only difference between them and the RocketDish LW is that they're slant vs H/V). On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Which is better, Rocket 5AC + RocketDish LW or AF5X + AF-5G34-S45 ? Or some other brand. Hauling out PTP to a customer. Like to keep the bandwidth up but they are not currently asking for more than 100 Mbps.
Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed
Wow, what size dishes? From: Chris Fabien Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Chuck we just did a 13 mile link using AF5XHD, getting about 350mbps in both directions using 60mhz and 50/50 ratio. On Jun 6, 2018 2:42 PM, "Mathew Howard" wrote: Yeah, if you go with 3' dishes you might be getting close to $1500 in cost, but that'll easily cover it with 2 footers. The only parts involved are going to be the dishes and the radios, so it's pretty simple to price... well, I suppose mounts and surge suppressors too, but I assume you know where to get those... On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:14 PM, wrote: Thanks, that is what I am looking for. Actually not sure yet what up down ratio the customer will be buying yet. If I tell the owners $1500 for parts then I should be good to go? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 11:47 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed That's because airfibers use a fixed up/down ratio (75/25, in this case). If you needed 50/50, this link would only be get you somewhere around 140Mbps each way. Signal is just a little too low to get 8X (256qam) on this case, but I probably could if I changed them to the new HD version, since they can get a little higher power at any given modulation, and they can achieve higher modulations at lower signal levels... it might even be able to do 1024qam (it probably could with 3' dishes anyway). going to a 50mhz channel would also add some 20% capacity (50mhz is the max for the standard af-5x, but the hd can go up to 100mhz if you have lots of spectrum to burn). An entire link with 2' dishes should come to router around $1000. I haven't priced the 3' dishes recently, but they are quite a bit pricier. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM, wrote: Is the 65 Mbps a limitation of the link or system settings or ?? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:16 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Here's an example of a 25km AF-5x link using 2' dishes. I'd probably use AF-5xHD radios these days, and I'd use the airFiber dishes (the only difference between them and the RocketDish LW is that they're slant vs H/V). On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Which is better, Rocket 5AC + RocketDish LW or AF5X + AF-5G34-S45 ? Or some other brand. Hauling out PTP to a customer. Like to keep the bandwidth up but they are not currently asking for more than 100 Mbps.
Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25
+1000 From: Lewis Bergman Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 1:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 First, I would think Rohn would have a legitimate "3rd party" interest in your citation. I would definitely see if they would like to be involved. I think you can still be contrite and interested in correcting your procedures while searching for the truth and the right way to do things. Probably how you communicate the information might be as important, in this case, as what you communicate. Maybe Rohn would be interested in taking up the main role to educate the OSHA guy so you can be unscathed by it. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 9:01 AM wrote: Oh, yeah, position lanyard, not the shock arrest lanyard. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:45 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 I'm assuming he means you need to have a shorter lanyard than normal well, a position lanyard shouldn't be stretching anyway, should it? On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:39 PM, wrote: Aren’t most lanyards designed to stretch out to the 6 foot mark when falling? In other words, even if you had it positioned right in front of your face, you will still drop 6 feet, right? From: Sean Heskett Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. ROHN 25 is **not** compliant for the 5,000lb drop from 6' but it is from 3' so you always have to have a 3' position lanyard holding you, even while you climb. I would contact CITCA (or we use https://www.safetyoneinc.com ) or any other trainer to give you documentation about the ROHN 25. -Sean On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:10 AM, David Sovereen wrote: Hi All, A little background: We had an employee die late last year. He climbed a Rohn 25 tower at a residential customer location and did not use his fall protection gear. He went through safe climb training at CITCA, his fall protection gear was in his truck, and a co-worker with him told him to put his harness on, but he exercised poor judgement and climbed without it anyway. He slipped, fell approximately 30 feet, and was pronounced dead about an hour later at the hospital. We received two OSHA Citations today. I’ve attached them. I spoke with the OSHA representative handling our matter on Friday. He tells me that Rohn 25s have not been tested by the manufacturer to support 5,000 lbs and therefore are not a suitable anchor point for securing oneself. He says all work on Rohn 25s must be done from a lift. I think they are just trying to come up with reasons to fine us. When I went through safe tower climbing, *I* became the competent person to identify where suitable anchor points, using the 5,000 lb estimation, were. When my employees go through the training, they become competent in determining where suitable anchor points are, do they not? If an employee is given instruction on the use of fall protection gear, told to always use it, and exercises bad judgement and refuses to use it, am I responsible? One of my employees was there and told him to put his harness on and he refused. Consequently, that employee has gone through a lot of turmoil putting himself through “what if” scenarios. Just looking for thoughts on this. Fight it, and if so what approach? Pay it and make it go away? Something else? Thanks, David Sovereen Mercury Network Corporation 2719 Ashman Street, Midland, MI 48640 989.837.3790 x151 office | 888.866.4638 toll free | 989.837.3780 fax Telephone | Internet | Security Alarm Monitoring david.sover...@mercury.net www.mercury.net
Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25
Oh, yeah, position lanyard, not the shock arrest lanyard. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:45 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 I'm assuming he means you need to have a shorter lanyard than normal well, a position lanyard shouldn't be stretching anyway, should it? On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:39 PM, wrote: Aren’t most lanyards designed to stretch out to the 6 foot mark when falling? In other words, even if you had it positioned right in front of your face, you will still drop 6 feet, right? From: Sean Heskett Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. ROHN 25 is **not** compliant for the 5,000lb drop from 6' but it is from 3' so you always have to have a 3' position lanyard holding you, even while you climb. I would contact CITCA (or we use https://www.safetyoneinc.com ) or any other trainer to give you documentation about the ROHN 25. -Sean On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:10 AM, David Sovereen wrote: Hi All, A little background: We had an employee die late last year. He climbed a Rohn 25 tower at a residential customer location and did not use his fall protection gear. He went through safe climb training at CITCA, his fall protection gear was in his truck, and a co-worker with him told him to put his harness on, but he exercised poor judgement and climbed without it anyway. He slipped, fell approximately 30 feet, and was pronounced dead about an hour later at the hospital. We received two OSHA Citations today. I’ve attached them. I spoke with the OSHA representative handling our matter on Friday. He tells me that Rohn 25s have not been tested by the manufacturer to support 5,000 lbs and therefore are not a suitable anchor point for securing oneself. He says all work on Rohn 25s must be done from a lift. I think they are just trying to come up with reasons to fine us. When I went through safe tower climbing, *I* became the competent person to identify where suitable anchor points, using the 5,000 lb estimation, were. When my employees go through the training, they become competent in determining where suitable anchor points are, do they not? If an employee is given instruction on the use of fall protection gear, told to always use it, and exercises bad judgement and refuses to use it, am I responsible? One of my employees was there and told him to put his harness on and he refused. Consequently, that employee has gone through a lot of turmoil putting himself through “what if” scenarios. Just looking for thoughts on this. Fight it, and if so what approach? Pay it and make it go away? Something else? Thanks, David Sovereen Mercury Network Corporation 2719 Ashman Street, Midland, MI 48640 989.837.3790 x151 office | 888.866.4638 toll free | 989.837.3780 fax Telephone | Internet | Security Alarm Monitoring david.sover...@mercury.net www.mercury.net
Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25
Aren’t most lanyards designed to stretch out to the 6 foot mark when falling? In other words, even if you had it positioned right in front of your face, you will still drop 6 feet, right? From: Sean Heskett Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. ROHN 25 is **not** compliant for the 5,000lb drop from 6' but it is from 3' so you always have to have a 3' position lanyard holding you, even while you climb. I would contact CITCA (or we use https://www.safetyoneinc.com ) or any other trainer to give you documentation about the ROHN 25. -Sean On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:10 AM, David Sovereen wrote: Hi All, A little background: We had an employee die late last year. He climbed a Rohn 25 tower at a residential customer location and did not use his fall protection gear. He went through safe climb training at CITCA, his fall protection gear was in his truck, and a co-worker with him told him to put his harness on, but he exercised poor judgement and climbed without it anyway. He slipped, fell approximately 30 feet, and was pronounced dead about an hour later at the hospital. We received two OSHA Citations today. I’ve attached them. I spoke with the OSHA representative handling our matter on Friday. He tells me that Rohn 25s have not been tested by the manufacturer to support 5,000 lbs and therefore are not a suitable anchor point for securing oneself. He says all work on Rohn 25s must be done from a lift. I think they are just trying to come up with reasons to fine us. When I went through safe tower climbing, *I* became the competent person to identify where suitable anchor points, using the 5,000 lb estimation, were. When my employees go through the training, they become competent in determining where suitable anchor points are, do they not? If an employee is given instruction on the use of fall protection gear, told to always use it, and exercises bad judgement and refuses to use it, am I responsible? One of my employees was there and told him to put his harness on and he refused. Consequently, that employee has gone through a lot of turmoil putting himself through “what if” scenarios. Just looking for thoughts on this. Fight it, and if so what approach? Pay it and make it go away? Something else? Thanks, David Sovereen Mercury Network Corporation 2719 Ashman Street, Midland, MI 48640 989.837.3790 x151 office | 888.866.4638 toll free | 989.837.3780 fax Telephone | Internet | Security Alarm Monitoring david.sover...@mercury.net www.mercury.net
Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed
Thanks, that is what I am looking for. Actually not sure yet what up down ratio the customer will be buying yet. If I tell the owners $1500 for parts then I should be good to go? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 11:47 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed That's because airfibers use a fixed up/down ratio (75/25, in this case). If you needed 50/50, this link would only be get you somewhere around 140Mbps each way. Signal is just a little too low to get 8X (256qam) on this case, but I probably could if I changed them to the new HD version, since they can get a little higher power at any given modulation, and they can achieve higher modulations at lower signal levels... it might even be able to do 1024qam (it probably could with 3' dishes anyway). going to a 50mhz channel would also add some 20% capacity (50mhz is the max for the standard af-5x, but the hd can go up to 100mhz if you have lots of spectrum to burn). An entire link with 2' dishes should come to router around $1000. I haven't priced the 3' dishes recently, but they are quite a bit pricier. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM, wrote: Is the 65 Mbps a limitation of the link or system settings or ?? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:16 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Here's an example of a 25km AF-5x link using 2' dishes. I'd probably use AF-5xHD radios these days, and I'd use the airFiber dishes (the only difference between them and the RocketDish LW is that they're slant vs H/V). On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Which is better, Rocket 5AC + RocketDish LW or AF5X + AF-5G34-S45 ? Or some other brand. Hauling out PTP to a customer. Like to keep the bandwidth up but they are not currently asking for more than 100 Mbps.
Re: [AFMUG] changes to this list
Problems. It is on AWS. Who knows. Worked great for almost 5 years. But since it is just maintenance by a committee of volunteers, I figured it best to just move it over to folks that specialize in running lists for others. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:04 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] changes to this list Amazon problems? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:36 PM, wrote: I think we will be able to do this without any re-subscribing. -Original Message- From: Christopher Tyler Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 11:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] changes to this list Are you moving the accounts or will we need to subscribe again? -- Christopher Tyler MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE Total Highspeed Internet Services 417.851.1107 - Original Message - From: ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:00:10 PM Subject: [AFMUG] changes to this list Once it is up and running, to post will most likely be a...@af.afmug.com They need a sub domain.
Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018
wrote: Last topic I see on this was from 2014. So maybe it’s time to review and ask again? What are you guys using for fiber mapping, now in 2018? In 2014 I read: Craig was doing google earth and excel sheets. Chuck Hogg was using Manifold (kinda), and some Google Maps Engine. Mike H was using ArcMap for his clients. A few other google sheets. What’s changed, what’s new, what’re you using today? Same as before? Something different? Why? -c
Re: [AFMUG] changes to this list
I think we will be able to do this without any re-subscribing. -Original Message- From: Christopher Tyler Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 11:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] changes to this list Are you moving the accounts or will we need to subscribe again? -- Christopher Tyler MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE Total Highspeed Internet Services 417.851.1107 - Original Message - From: ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 12:00:10 PM Subject: [AFMUG] changes to this list Once it is up and running, to post will most likely be a...@af.afmug.com They need a sub domain.
[AFMUG] changes to this list
Once it is up and running, to post will most likely be a...@af.afmug.com They need a sub domain.
Re: [AFMUG] Rohn 25
First, let me say that I am so sorry that your employee caused so much grief for all involved. I am rabid about seat belt use. I lost a son, who was wearing a seatbelt in a wreck. My wife was driving. She was saved by her seat belt so I am thankful for that. I was an EMT for a while and have seen people walk away from horrific accidents because they simply buckled up. Same car dead people came out of the windshield. There is only so much you can do. If the other employee did not have the authority to fire the guy, he did everything he could do. He shouldn’t beat himself up because someone else chose to be stupid. Seconds, astounding about the Rohn anchor point strength. Have you told Rohn. I got an OSHA citation once. I went in with the whole company, set through a session where they chewed my ass for about an hour. Then another hour of training, then we were on probation for a while with periodic visits. They reduced my $25K find to $2500. The main take-away from the experience is that you need to show a “ compliant attitude”. Fall all over yourself showing them that you need to learn how to do things better and you need their help to learn better methods etc. Kiss their ass, treat them as gods, and in the process you may actually learn valuable things. But that whole showing a “broken heart and contrite spirit” thing is key to getting the fine reduced. Just lay on the floor and say “beat me master, I have sinned, please show me a better way” type of thing. From: David Sovereen Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:10 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Rohn 25 Hi All, A little background: We had an employee die late last year. He climbed a Rohn 25 tower at a residential customer location and did not use his fall protection gear. He went through safe climb training at CITCA, his fall protection gear was in his truck, and a co-worker with him told him to put his harness on, but he exercised poor judgement and climbed without it anyway. He slipped, fell approximately 30 feet, and was pronounced dead about an hour later at the hospital. We received two OSHA Citations today. I’ve attached them. I spoke with the OSHA representative handling our matter on Friday. He tells me that Rohn 25s have not been tested by the manufacturer to support 5,000 lbs and therefore are not a suitable anchor point for securing oneself. He says all work on Rohn 25s must be done from a lift. I think they are just trying to come up with reasons to fine us. When I went through safe tower climbing, *I* became the competent person to identify where suitable anchor points, using the 5,000 lb estimation, were. When my employees go through the training, they become competent in determining where suitable anchor points are, do they not? If an employee is given instruction on the use of fall protection gear, told to always use it, and exercises bad judgement and refuses to use it, am I responsible? One of my employees was there and told him to put his harness on and he refused. Consequently, that employee has gone through a lot of turmoil putting himself through “what if” scenarios. Just looking for thoughts on this. Fight it, and if so what approach? Pay it and make it go away? Something else? Thanks, David Sovereen Mercury Network Corporation 2719 Ashman Street, Midland, MI 48640 989.837.3790 x151 office | 888.866.4638 toll free | 989.837.3780 fax Telephone | Internet | Security Alarm Monitoring david.sover...@mercury.net www.mercury.net Hi All, A little background: We had an employee die late last year. He climbed a Rohn 25 tower at a residential customer location and did not use his fall protection gear. He went through safe climb training at CITCA, his fall protection gear was in his truck, and a co-worker with him told him to put his harness on, but he exercised poor judgement and climbed without it anyway. He slipped, fell approximately 30 feet, and was pronounced dead about an hour later at the hospital. We received two OSHA Citations today. I’ve attached them. I spoke with the OSHA representative handling our matter on Friday. He tells me that Rohn 25s have not been tested by the manufacturer to support 5,000 lbs and therefore are not a suitable anchor point for securing oneself. He says all work on Rohn 25s must be done from a lift. I think they are just trying to come up with reasons to fine us. When I went through safe tower climbing, *I* became the competent person to identify where suitable anchor points, using the 5,000 lb estimation, were. When my employees go through the training, they become competent in determining where suitable anchor points are, do they
Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed
Is the 65 Mbps a limitation of the link or system settings or ?? From: Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:16 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed Here's an example of a 25km AF-5x link using 2' dishes. I'd probably use AF-5xHD radios these days, and I'd use the airFiber dishes (the only difference between them and the RocketDish LW is that they're slant vs H/V). On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Which is better, Rocket 5AC + RocketDish LW or AF5X + AF-5G34-S45 ? Or some other brand. Hauling out PTP to a customer. Like to keep the bandwidth up but they are not currently asking for more than 100 Mbps.
Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed
Excellent, thanks for the advice. What does a whole system cost? From: Darin Steffl Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:15 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed First, I'd recommend the new AF5XHD which is a huge upgrade over the AF5x. You can then use that radio with either the 30db or 34db dish you listed. At 15 miles, I would recommend the 34db dish as that is quite the long haul. If the customer is paying any decent amount of money, you'll recoup your costs quickly. With 34db dishes and clean 20mhz spectrum, you can easily move about 240 Mbps aggregate through the link with 10x modulation and you can decide duty cycle like 50/50 for 120 Mbps each way or 75/25, etc. On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Which is better, Rocket 5AC + RocketDish LW or AF5X + AF-5G34-S45 ? Or some other brand. Hauling out PTP to a customer. Like to keep the bandwidth up but they are not currently asking for more than 100 Mbps. -- Darin Steffl Minnesota WiFi www.mnwifi.com 507-634-WiFi Like us on Facebook
Re: [AFMUG] List
I am in the process of moving it. AWS or whatever is running on the AWS is getting progressively more and more flakey. So, I have put it off long enough. Domain will move to GoDaddy and the list will move to mailmanhost.com Will probably take a few days. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:10 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] List Is this list just done? Seems to be off as much as on anymore. Unless everyone is just outside as opposed to in front of a computer like me.
Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018
I like the systems that allow you to click on a fiber and have it open a detail report of what the strands are being used for. Same with with splice cases, some systems can show what is spliced to what. From: Dennis Burgess Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 11:07 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018 You can use TowerCoverage.com to map your fiber as well as use our “End User Submission” system to match potential users to the fiber mapping. Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com From: Af On Behalf Of Paul Stewart Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2018 6:31 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018 We utilize Patch Manager - https://patchmanager.com It started as a great way to DCIM – data center racks across many locations etc but with their GIS mapping add-on and other features we’re looking to utilize it for fiber builds and should work pretty nicely …. Paul From: Af on behalf of Brian Webster Reply-To: Date: Friday, June 1, 2018 at 10:46 PM To: Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018 Yes QGIS is a great program and since it is open source you will find a lot of support and how to articles. Not as simple as Google Earth Pro but it has a lot more power. A real professional GIS platform. The key to its flexibility are the plugins you can download. Plan on spending some time reading through each of those descriptions to see if there are features you want. It certainly has a learning curve as does any mapping program. On the higher level you can actually connect to most database platforms so if you plan on managing your plant with more than spreadsheets you can keep both the mapping and database tied together as one. Thank You, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 5:12 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018 QGIS is very useful and open source (as in free). Nothing specific for fiber mapping in it but it could pretty easily be used for it if I was ambitious enough to put all the info in. Mark On Jun 1, 2018, at 5:06 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: For basic needs, the advantage of doing mapping using Google Earth Pro is that most "serious" GIS packages support import and export to/from the XML format Google Earth uses. A line on the map on Google Earth or a multi-segmented line is just a collection of vector placemarks in a XML file with lat/long coordinates, with metadata describing the thickness of the line, the color of the line, how many intermediate points are on the line, and so forth. The best organizational advice I can give is to use folders and subfolders in Google Earth Pro appropriately to sort projects, so that you don't end up with a single folder that contains 500 unnamed lines. Might look fine when viewed on a map but can become an organization nightmare. On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: Last topic I see on this was from 2014. So maybe it’s time to review and ask again? What are you guys using for fiber mapping, now in 2018? In 2014 I read: Craig was doing google earth and excel sheets. Chuck Hogg was using Manifold (kinda), and some Google Maps Engine. Mike H was using ArcMap for his clients. A few other google sheets. What’s changed, what’s new, what’re you using today? Same as before? Something different? Why? -c
Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018
Cost? Looks like the list may have come back again... From: Leroy Koglin Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 10:58 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018 We started using VETROFiberMap about 6 months ago. Very happy with them. http://vetrofibermap.com/ On 6/1/2018 4:34 PM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: Last topic I see on this was from 2014. So maybe it’s time to review and ask again? What are you guys using for fiber mapping, now in 2018? In 2014 I read: Craig was doing google earth and excel sheets. Chuck Hogg was using Manifold (kinda), and some Google Maps Engine. Mike H was using ArcMap for his clients. A few other google sheets. What’s changed, what’s new, what’re you using today? Same as before? Something different? Why? -c
[AFMUG] Zumacom
Anyone know Zumacom in Cortez Colorado?
[AFMUG] 25 kM unlicensed
Which is better, Rocket 5AC + RocketDish LW or AF5X + AF-5G34-S45 ? Or some other brand. Hauling out PTP to a customer. Like to keep the bandwidth up but they are not currently asking for more than 100 Mbps.
Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018
Price? From: Mitch Koep Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 6:21 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018 https://www.ospinsight.com/desktop-overview On 6/1/2018 4:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: QGIS is very useful and open source (as in free). Nothing specific for fiber mapping in it but it could pretty easily be used for it if I was ambitious enough to put all the info in. Mark On Jun 1, 2018, at 5:06 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: For basic needs, the advantage of doing mapping using Google Earth Pro is that most "serious" GIS packages support import and export to/from the XML format Google Earth uses. A line on the map on Google Earth or a multi-segmented line is just a collection of vector placemarks in a XML file with lat/long coordinates, with metadata describing the thickness of the line, the color of the line, how many intermediate points are on the line, and so forth. The best organizational advice I can give is to use folders and subfolders in Google Earth Pro appropriately to sort projects, so that you don't end up with a single folder that contains 500 unnamed lines. Might look fine when viewed on a map but can become an organization nightmare. On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: Last topic I see on this was from 2014. So maybe it’s time to review and ask again? What are you guys using for fiber mapping, now in 2018? In 2014 I read: Craig was doing google earth and excel sheets. Chuck Hogg was using Manifold (kinda), and some Google Maps Engine. Mike H was using ArcMap for his clients. A few other google sheets. What’s changed, what’s new, what’re you using today? Same as before? Something different? Why? -c
[AFMUG] OT TV Show
American Chopper is back. Mondays. Watched the first two episodes tonight. Philo. $16/month
Re: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018
I have given up on Mapcom M4. AutoCad for staking sheets and if you want to combine it with a database it can do much more. I prefer to do everything in Google Earth, but would like to add the database functions to it. The State of Utah rolled their own and it is really nice. Google Earth based. From: Cassidy B. Larson Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 2:34 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Fiber Mapping - 2018 Last topic I see on this was from 2014. So maybe it’s time to review and ask again? What are you guys using for fiber mapping, now in 2018? In 2014 I read: Craig was doing google earth and excel sheets. Chuck Hogg was using Manifold (kinda), and some Google Maps Engine. Mike H was using ArcMap for his clients. A few other google sheets. What’s changed, what’s new, what’re you using today? Same as before? Something different? Why? -c
Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design
No poop. I would give each pad a sewer connection. From: Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 1:58 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design Lake Shelbyville is run by the corpse of engineers, managed by park services, really nice joint if you're in Illinois. Unlike private run ones, the poop is off the bathroom walls by noon. You like cleaning poop chuck? Cause that's also how you get to clean poop. On Thu, May 31, 2018, 10:57 AM Bill Prince wrote: Yeah. We like to "boondock" on BLM or national forrest. A lot of those are free (zero facilities, but the privacy is at maximum). Forrest service campgrounds are generally well maintained and very competitive price-wise. bp On 5/31/2018 8:53 AM, Larry Smith wrote: > We have a 32 foot Jayco travel trailer that we pull > all over the place (mostly central and west Tennessee, > some Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas). > > Prices where we have stayed range from $5 with nothing > but a place to park to $41.50 with pad, water, sewage, electric. > > There are much more expensive ones, but we don't stay there >
Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier
I didn’t read the complaint very carefully. Is that what it was? I presumed it was an unintentional radiator issue, not wifi. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 12:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590,380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier It is pretty weird they would choose a noncompliant 2.4/5 GHz wifi module for their products, when plenty of fully compliant packaged modules are available from manufacturers in China. They were either ignorant, stupid, or trying to save 18 cents per manufactured unit. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Tim Hardy wrote: Well, it was little more than just the humidifier but the fines ramp up if you continue to violate the rules even after you have been made aware of the violation. Think this one is an F you, strong message to follow! FCC-18-67A1.pdf
Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier
I am curious, where is the lower frequency limit for part 15? Or do all electronics sold in the retail space need to be tested for emi etc? From: Tim Hardy Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 11:20 AM To: Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590,380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier Well, it was little more than just the humidifier but the fines ramp up if you continue to violate the rules even after you have been made aware of the violation. Think this one is an F you, strong message to follow! FCC-18-67A1.pdf
Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design
What does a traveler expect to pay to park in one of these places? I have about 10 acres next to I-80 with water, power and sewer already installed. I could lay down some gravel and put up a sign. From: Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 9:39 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design industrial vending machine selling routers. Im trying to get the one we are doing to finger conduit to each site post for future use, whether fiber or copper On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Cameron Crum wrote: You'd be surprised. A lot of them travel with their own cable modems and wifi routers. But you could always rent them one, or set up each ONT with a small wifi router already and give them a choice. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Jason McKemie wrote: Probably zero. On Thursday, May 31, 2018, wrote: How many RV travelers are set up for ethernet vs WiFi? From: Jason McKemie Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 6:42 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design I'd do fiber as well, seems like that many long-run cat5/6 connections could be problematic. On Wednesday, May 30, 2018, Cameron Crum wrote: Why run ethernet? This seems ideal for fiber. Put a small box for the ONT on the same pole as the electrical hookup with about 20 ft of ethernet cable so they can drag it through a window and call it a day. Rent them a cheap router if they want wifi or mount a small loco ac or something running as a low powered AP and alternate frequencies every 3 or 4 spaces. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: Be careful of selling service over Wi-FI... customers buy "signal boosters" that run their own DHCP server, or they see a very strong signal to their booster and complain that their service sucks (don't understand that the signal from the booster to your network is low). And there's interference from mobile hotspots etc I would do like Adam says, run ethernet lines everywhere with outdoor-grade ethernet connection boxes (make sure to have a surge protector on each line as it returns to your switch). You can try offering some service over wifi but tell customers that if they want reliable speeds they need to hardwire. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:07 PM, castarritt wrote: We were approached by a current subscriber who is building an RV park with around ~100 pads, and he wants us to offer service to his tenants. This isn't the typical situation where we would sell service to the RV park, and they handle distributing it to their customers. He wants to avoid providing wi-fi himself, and will instead let us charge every client that wants service separately. Also, this isn't a campground; his shortest lease term will be monthly. While the park is under construction, he is willing to let us lay conduit, so we could provide wired service to each pad if we wanted to. Alternatively, we could just setup a bunch of wi-fi APs. One potential complication is that we have a fairly busy cluster of 5g PMP450s a couple hundred yards from this RV park, so while wired service could be more reliable for the park tenants, the potential for 100 customer wi-fi routers we can't control operating within sight of our PMP450 POP sounds like the stuff of nightmares. We are leaning more towards a wi-fi option due to better control over spectrum, as well as avoiding maintenance of 100 outdoor ethernet ports that the customers would be plugging into, but we are open to suggestions. Also, assuming wi-fi is the correct answer, does anyone have any equipment recommendations? The park is about 400' by 900'. I was looking at either doing a whole bunch of low end APs, or maybe ~8 sectors. We haven't used any of the Cambium wi-fi gear yet, but the cnPilot E501S looks interesting. Thank you, Chris Starritt Western Broadband supp...@ecpi.com 512-257-1077
Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design
How many RV travelers are set up for ethernet vs WiFi? From: Jason McKemie Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 6:42 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design I'd do fiber as well, seems like that many long-run cat5/6 connections could be problematic. On Wednesday, May 30, 2018, Cameron Crum wrote: Why run ethernet? This seems ideal for fiber. Put a small box for the ONT on the same pole as the electrical hookup with about 20 ft of ethernet cable so they can drag it through a window and call it a day. Rent them a cheap router if they want wifi or mount a small loco ac or something running as a low powered AP and alternate frequencies every 3 or 4 spaces. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: Be careful of selling service over Wi-FI... customers buy "signal boosters" that run their own DHCP server, or they see a very strong signal to their booster and complain that their service sucks (don't understand that the signal from the booster to your network is low). And there's interference from mobile hotspots etc I would do like Adam says, run ethernet lines everywhere with outdoor-grade ethernet connection boxes (make sure to have a surge protector on each line as it returns to your switch). You can try offering some service over wifi but tell customers that if they want reliable speeds they need to hardwire. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:07 PM, castarritt wrote: We were approached by a current subscriber who is building an RV park with around ~100 pads, and he wants us to offer service to his tenants. This isn't the typical situation where we would sell service to the RV park, and they handle distributing it to their customers. He wants to avoid providing wi-fi himself, and will instead let us charge every client that wants service separately. Also, this isn't a campground; his shortest lease term will be monthly. While the park is under construction, he is willing to let us lay conduit, so we could provide wired service to each pad if we wanted to. Alternatively, we could just setup a bunch of wi-fi APs. One potential complication is that we have a fairly busy cluster of 5g PMP450s a couple hundred yards from this RV park, so while wired service could be more reliable for the park tenants, the potential for 100 customer wi-fi routers we can't control operating within sight of our PMP450 POP sounds like the stuff of nightmares. We are leaning more towards a wi-fi option due to better control over spectrum, as well as avoiding maintenance of 100 outdoor ethernet ports that the customers would be plugging into, but we are open to suggestions. Also, assuming wi-fi is the correct answer, does anyone have any equipment recommendations? The park is about 400' by 900'. I was looking at either doing a whole bunch of low end APs, or maybe ~8 sectors. We haven't used any of the Cambium wi-fi gear yet, but the cnPilot E501S looks interesting. Thank you, Chris Starritt Western Broadband supp...@ecpi.com 512-257-1077
Re: [AFMUG] tower assembly in Northern WI
I know what you mean. I had a flight instructor think I was an idiot during autorotation practice in a helicopter. From my point of view I took the rotor speed right up to the red line. But since he was in the left seat parallax error made it look like I was overspeeding the rotor and he would violently punch the cyclic forward each time. Many years ago and I still wake up mad about it. I kinda hope I run into him in a Starbucks someday, him taking orders behind the counter... From: Lewis Bergman Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 4:58 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] tower assembly in Northern WI Yeah, it happened 25 years ago and it still pisses off. On Wed, May 30, 2018, 4:10 PM Mathew Howard wrote: Somebody oughtta go to prison for a thing like that... although union hall catching fire does sound like a pretty good compromise... On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:07 PM, wrote: I think that would be a good case for RICO. Perhaps get some kind of prosecutor to attempt to raise hell with the union. Funny, union hall might catch fire too... From: Robert Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 1:57 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] tower assembly in Northern WI Darn, ( using polite word ) I have friends that would stack again and sit by, armed, just looking for the opportunity to "discuss"... That pissed off about private property trespassing out here in NV... On 5/30/18 12:52 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: I think it was Wisconsin in winter where we stacked a 485 foot tower. Next day we came to the site to finish cleanup and it had been cut down. They were kind enough to leave a sign on the fence as to which union local we should contact if we wanted to build it again. Thugs. The moral of the story, Hire at least one union guy in a union state. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:31 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: I would recommend joining the largest Facebook tower industry specific groups (search groups for tower climbing, tower, etc). There's about four of them that are really active, and between the groups probably 30,000 members in total. Put out a message that you're looking for a contractor and see what you get back. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Brandon Yuchasz wrote: I am looking for someone to stack two Rohn 65 towers in Northern WI. Towers are 140’ and the site will be completely prepped ahead of time. Concrete work will all be done and the towers will be on site waiting. We have talked to one company from Lower WI so far but they are doing a lot of large cellular constructions this summer and priced these two in a similar range. I took the quotes as they didn’t want to be doing these small of jobs. If anyone knows of someone of if anyone on the list is interested in this they can hit me off list for more details. If you are out of the area and willing to travel up give me a shout as well might be able to make it work. Thanks, Brandon
Re: [AFMUG] tower assembly in Northern WI
FBI might. Racketeering against interstate commerce. From: Lewis Bergman Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:50 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] tower assembly in Northern WI Whom would you sue? No actual proof who did it. The sheriff in that heavily Union area wasn't hot on even coming out, much less prosecuting. On Wed, May 30, 2018, 3:17 PM Adam Moffett wrote: I should think that would be actionable. I've never sued anybody, but I think I would over that. On 5/30/2018 3:57 PM, Robert wrote: Darn, ( using polite word ) I have friends that would stack again and sit by, armed, just looking for the opportunity to "discuss"... That pissed off about private property trespassing out here in NV... On 5/30/18 12:52 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: I think it was Wisconsin in winter where we stacked a 485 foot tower. Next day we came to the site to finish cleanup and it had been cut down. They were kind enough to leave a sign on the fence as to which union local we should contact if we wanted to build it again. Thugs. The moral of the story, Hire at least one union guy in a union state. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:31 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: I would recommend joining the largest Facebook tower industry specific groups (search groups for tower climbing, tower, etc). There's about four of them that are really active, and between the groups probably 30,000 members in total. Put out a message that you're looking for a contractor and see what you get back. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Brandon Yuchasz wrote: I am looking for someone to stack two Rohn 65 towers in Northern WI. Towers are 140’ and the site will be completely prepped ahead of time. Concrete work will all be done and the towers will be on site waiting. We have talked to one company from Lower WI so far but they are doing a lot of large cellular constructions this summer and priced these two in a similar range. I took the quotes as they didn’t want to be doing these small of jobs. If anyone knows of someone of if anyone on the list is interested in this they can hit me off list for more details. If you are out of the area and willing to travel up give me a shout as well might be able to make it work. Thanks, Brandon
Re: [AFMUG] tower assembly in Northern WI
I think that would be a good case for RICO. Perhaps get some kind of prosecutor to attempt to raise hell with the union. Funny, union hall might catch fire too... From: Robert Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 1:57 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] tower assembly in Northern WI Darn, ( using polite word ) I have friends that would stack again and sit by, armed, just looking for the opportunity to "discuss"... That pissed off about private property trespassing out here in NV... On 5/30/18 12:52 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: I think it was Wisconsin in winter where we stacked a 485 foot tower. Next day we came to the site to finish cleanup and it had been cut down. They were kind enough to leave a sign on the fence as to which union local we should contact if we wanted to build it again. Thugs. The moral of the story, Hire at least one union guy in a union state. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:31 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: I would recommend joining the largest Facebook tower industry specific groups (search groups for tower climbing, tower, etc). There's about four of them that are really active, and between the groups probably 30,000 members in total. Put out a message that you're looking for a contractor and see what you get back. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Brandon Yuchasz wrote: I am looking for someone to stack two Rohn 65 towers in Northern WI. Towers are 140’ and the site will be completely prepped ahead of time. Concrete work will all be done and the towers will be on site waiting. We have talked to one company from Lower WI so far but they are doing a lot of large cellular constructions this summer and priced these two in a similar range. I took the quotes as they didn’t want to be doing these small of jobs. If anyone knows of someone of if anyone on the list is interested in this they can hit me off list for more details. If you are out of the area and willing to travel up give me a shout as well might be able to make it work. Thanks, Brandon
Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design
lynksees router in a rubbermaid container and lots of rtv. Zip tie to power pole. From: Dennis Burgess Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 1:45 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RV park network design We do this all of the time, design, sell you hardware, help you with configuration, etc, everything. Give us a call 314-735-0270… Dennis From: Af On Behalf Of castarritt Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 1:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] RV park network design We were approached by a current subscriber who is building an RV park with around ~100 pads, and he wants us to offer service to his tenants. This isn't the typical situation where we would sell service to the RV park, and they handle distributing it to their customers. He wants to avoid providing wi-fi himself, and will instead let us charge every client that wants service separately. Also, this isn't a campground; his shortest lease term will be monthly. While the park is under construction, he is willing to let us lay conduit, so we could provide wired service to each pad if we wanted to. Alternatively, we could just setup a bunch of wi-fi APs. One potential complication is that we have a fairly busy cluster of 5g PMP450s a couple hundred yards from this RV park, so while wired service could be more reliable for the park tenants, the potential for 100 customer wi-fi routers we can't control operating within sight of our PMP450 POP sounds like the stuff of nightmares. We are leaning more towards a wi-fi option due to better control over spectrum, as well as avoiding maintenance of 100 outdoor ethernet ports that the customers would be plugging into, but we are open to suggestions. Also, assuming wi-fi is the correct answer, does anyone have any equipment recommendations? The park is about 400' by 900'. I was looking at either doing a whole bunch of low end APs, or maybe ~8 sectors. We haven't used any of the Cambium wi-fi gear yet, but the cnPilot E501S looks interesting. Thank you, Chris Starritt Western Broadband supp...@ecpi.com 512-257-1077
Re: [AFMUG] Power over LMR400
It is rated for 16 kW but that may be dielectric breakdown voltage limitation. But we know it will at least do that. So sqrt(16k/50)=17.88 amps From: Carl Peterson Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 12:40 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Power over LMR400 How many AMPs can I safely push over LMR-400 at 48V? Around 175'. I would like to power a Netonix IDC switch off of my DC plant using 10-15A but I'm not sure what LMR is rated for.
[AFMUG] test
Sent 12:27 MDT
Re: [AFMUG] Bad surge card symptoms between MT and Rocket
Surge protectors get wounded when they are doing their jobs. They can only take so many hits before they start causing trouble. No good way to test them. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 12:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Bad surge card symptoms between MT and Rocket Ultimately I'm wondering if a line replacement is pointless or a good idea. We had a Rocket that just all of a sudden would negotiate at 10 meg (instead of 100). It passed a few kbps but nothing really. Should be passing 50+ Meg. I go to the site and try 100 full static on both sides. No link. Replaced card and POE and it started working. Chugging fine now but I wasn't sure what the collective does. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
Re: [AFMUG] N-connector Patch
Looks like the list might be back. They rebooted the VM that it was on. From: Jason Wilson Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 10:29 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] N-connector Patch Make your own. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:47 PM Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: Agreed, but the way their warehouse fees work it’s best to order them in quantity or with other gear. Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com On May 25, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: Kp performance On May 25, 2018 4:50 PM, "Matt" wrote: What is everyone using for a source of N-connector patch cables? 18 inch to 24 inch range for connecting say a Cambium PTP450 to dish etc.
[AFMUG] OT Movie Solo
I liked it. Critics are panning it but I thought it was as fun as most Star Wars movies. Somebody should have gotten shot under the table though.
Re: [AFMUG] Multiple cable wall pass-through
Plasma or acetylene. From: Steve Jones Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 9:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Multiple cable wall pass-through you want six cables in one hole or 6 holes? 1/2 inch glands is what i use on single cables, available at any hardware store, they have like 3/4" thread, so the lock nut would affix. Theyre cheaper in bulk than a hardware store, like 6 for 30 bucks at hardware store or 50 for 100 bucks in bulk online On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Bill Prince wrote: A 1" conduit bulkhead connector will do the trick. Attach a short length of conduit on the outside with a sweep. If the nipple on the bulkhead connector is not long enough, you can get longer nipples at any hardware store (1" though 3 or 4 inches). bp On 5/25/2018 1:43 PM, Mike Davis wrote: Any suggestions on where to get a cable wall pass-through for a 1/2" steel plate? I am out of ideas of where to try. I need to get 6 cat cables from the inside of a water tower to the outside at the top of the tower. -- Mike Davis General Manager Office: 260-349-1799 Email: mikeda...@allianceinternet.net Alliance Internet Communications | www.allianceinternet.net PO Box 1100 | 1220 South Wayne Street | Angola, IN | 46703 | 260-349-1799
Re: [AFMUG] cambium POE brick
always use protection... yeah, good advice... From: Dave Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 9:37 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] cambium POE brick Bump, the answer is no it does not and be sure to use additional surge protection Thank you cambium for the answer :) On 05/25/2018 08:30 AM, Dave wrote: I am curious about the POE brick for the epmp units to see if they have some layer of surge protection in them. Does anyone know if the PN:N000900L001B POE injector has this? -- --
Re: [AFMUG] AF11x to Remec/APEX etc adapters
Noted. From: Adam Moffett Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 4:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x to Remec/APEX etc adapters Interested -- Original Message -- From: ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: 5/23/2018 2:55:36 PM Subject: [AFMUG] AF11x to Remec/APEX etc adapters If you have asked me for this product please let me know. We are getting some beta quantities going now and I never kept really good track of those that want to be on the list. So a list now exists and there is even a person managing the list that will expedite fulfillment. Too many irons in the fire
[AFMUG] AF11x to Remec/APEX etc adapters
If you have asked me for this product please let me know. We are getting some beta quantities going now and I never kept really good track of those that want to be on the list. So a list now exists and there is even a person managing the list that will expedite fulfillment. Too many irons in the fire
Re: [AFMUG] netonix guy
tnx From: Josh Baird Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 9:06 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] netonix guy His name is Chris Sisler - ch...@netonix.com. On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:36 AM,wrote: Anyone have contact for the Netonix owner/developer guy? I probably do have his email but I cannot remember his name.
[AFMUG] netonix guy
Anyone have contact for the Netonix owner/developer guy? I probably do have his email but I cannot remember his name.
Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC
CAT IIIC even does automatic braking too. So you end up stopped on the centerline. Totally hands off. Almost as good as a Tesla. From: Ron M. Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 9:16 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC Correct, we were in a CR7, not Cat IIIc capable. I think those things are only rated to Cat II. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: In the case of SLC, you cannot blame the airport or the weather. The airport was upgraded for the Olympics to CAT-IIIC which means you can land as long as you have good enough visibility to taxi. It is full auto land capable. But the aircraft and crew must also be capable and not all are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gthcuZV8agI From: Ron M. Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 9:05 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC Actually, I almost had one of those a couple months ago, ceilings and fog in SLC just barely lifted above minimums enough to let us get in. Otherwise it would have been a DEN-PVU-SLC trip. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: That is one long flight! From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 9:10 PM To: af Subject: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC Never been on a flight with this segment before. ..
Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC
In the case of SLC, you cannot blame the airport or the weather. The airport was upgraded for the Olympics to CAT-IIIC which means you can land as long as you have good enough visibility to taxi. It is full auto land capable. But the aircraft and crew must also be capable and not all are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gthcuZV8agI From: Ron M. Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 9:05 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC Actually, I almost had one of those a couple months ago, ceilings and fog in SLC just barely lifted above minimums enough to let us get in. Otherwise it would have been a DEN-PVU-SLC trip. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: That is one long flight! From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 9:10 PM To: af Subject: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC Never been on a flight with this segment before. ..
Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC
That is one long flight! From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 9:10 PM To: af Subject: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC Never been on a flight with this segment before. ..
Re: [AFMUG] 8 mile link
Maybe leapfrog with some back to back rockets or picos or whatever is cheap at the treeline. Solar powered. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 12:49 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 8 mile link Yeah... but that only works if you have property access. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: 700’ of cable and use as high capacity radios as you want. It really is not that far if you have property access. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 11:46 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 8 mile link Probably worth getting a spectrum analyzer that has 900 in its range, and a 900 yagi, before spending the $2700+ on a 450i 900 AP and antenna. For the original poster's problem I would try, if possible, moving up to 3' dishes on both ends, and ac based radios. And using a 10 MHz channel. Might have a better chance of getting a signal like -61 (not -71) and through "some" trees. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: The problem with 900mhz, is that you never know if it's actually going to work in any given area until you try it. If there are 900mhz smart meters around, don't even bother... but even if there aren't, 900mhz can be pretty unpredictable in my experience. If you do go 900mhz, PTP450 is definitely the best option. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Erich Kaiser <er...@northcentraltower.com> wrote: 900 PTP 450 with KP Performance Antennas, I run mine 3 miles completely NLOS on 7 MHZ and it runs fine to my house. During heavy rain and through heavy foliage (Currently) this is what I am getting On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Dave <dmilho...@wletc.com> wrote: Yeah, The 450i 900 system would definately do the trick How much bandwidth do you need? The 900 on a 10Mhz channel we see around 35Mbs in a noisy environment on 8x/4xmimoB rate. If your doing ptp with it then open it up to 20Mhz wide and bang on. On 05/21/2018 10:49 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: Ok. I'll give those a try and see what happens. Thanks. Travis On 5/21/2018 9:37 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: You could very likely get a bit more speed out of that by going to the new AC radios... my guess is that the airFibers would be even better, but I haven't used any of those in the 2.4ghz variety. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Travis Johnson <t...@ida.net> wrote: The current signal level is -71. I have a 2ft dish on each side. Travis On 5/21/2018 9:15 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: Yeah... 900mhz PTP 450 is probably the best option. What kind of signal level do you get with the 2.4ghz radios? you could probably get a bit more out of it by going to airFiber 2x or Rocket 2AC radios... and maybe a bigger dish. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <jeffl...@att.net> wrote: 900 PTP 450 from Cambium Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com > On May 21, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Travis Johnson <t...@ida.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for suggestions for an 8 mile link that will be shooting through a single wall of trees about 1/8 mile from one end of the link. Currently using 2.4ghz Ubnt radios. Works great during the winter, but once the trees fill back in, the link drops to about 5Mbps actual throughput. Would be nice to get 20Mbps. > > Any suggestions? The trees are 80ft tall, so putting up a 100ft tower at a residence is not really an option. The other side is on top of a 1000ft tall hill. > > Travis > --
Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice
208 x 30 = 6240 watts. That is like having 4 portable electric heaters plugged in inside your rack. Obviously they have to have HVAC capable of pumping that out of the building. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 11:50 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice In some older carrier hotel and IX sites it can be totally common to run out of power and air conditioning capacity in a suite before you run out of physical space. Or run into a power system bottleneck like needing a $70,000 NRC to upgrade new air conditioning and riser power capacity before you can add any more new 208V 20A or 208V 30A circuits. At a certain point it makes very logical operating-cost sense to consolidate a bunch of older 1RU servers down onto one, newer, physical much more powerful 1RU system (such as a dual socket, 32-cores of Xeon with 128GB of RAM) running xen, kvm or esxi. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Paul Stewartwrote: We utilize a combination of blade systems and 1U/2U servers …. Wouldn’t say blade systems are going away. Basically the biggest sell point for them is space/power (footprint). If space/power is at a premium (ie. 3rd party data center) and you need to put many servers into it then it can make sense …. In our case this is exactly why we continue to deploy Cisco ACS blade systems in particular – they work well and footprint is small. In areas where we have abundant space/power then 1U servers are preferred Paul From: Af on behalf of Josh Luthman Reply-To: Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 4:04 PM To: Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice Servers for what? Blades are kind of a thing of the past, I think. It's way easier and cheaper to do something like HA with ESXi. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:03 PM, wrote: I need a pair of servers, prefer DC powered but not absolutely stuck on that. Like to have nice blade server system with hot standby etc. Been some time since I spec’d out servers. Any suggestions?
Re: [AFMUG] 8 mile link
700’ of cable and use as high capacity radios as you want. It really is not that far if you have property access. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 11:46 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 8 mile link Probably worth getting a spectrum analyzer that has 900 in its range, and a 900 yagi, before spending the $2700+ on a 450i 900 AP and antenna. For the original poster's problem I would try, if possible, moving up to 3' dishes on both ends, and ac based radios. And using a 10 MHz channel. Might have a better chance of getting a signal like -61 (not -71) and through "some" trees. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Mathew Howardwrote: The problem with 900mhz, is that you never know if it's actually going to work in any given area until you try it. If there are 900mhz smart meters around, don't even bother... but even if there aren't, 900mhz can be pretty unpredictable in my experience. If you do go 900mhz, PTP450 is definitely the best option. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Erich Kaiser wrote: 900 PTP 450 with KP Performance Antennas, I run mine 3 miles completely NLOS on 7 MHZ and it runs fine to my house. During heavy rain and through heavy foliage (Currently) this is what I am getting On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Dave wrote: Yeah, The 450i 900 system would definately do the trick How much bandwidth do you need? The 900 on a 10Mhz channel we see around 35Mbs in a noisy environment on 8x/4xmimoB rate. If your doing ptp with it then open it up to 20Mhz wide and bang on. On 05/21/2018 10:49 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: Ok. I'll give those a try and see what happens. Thanks. Travis On 5/21/2018 9:37 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: You could very likely get a bit more speed out of that by going to the new AC radios... my guess is that the airFibers would be even better, but I haven't used any of those in the 2.4ghz variety. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: The current signal level is -71. I have a 2ft dish on each side. Travis On 5/21/2018 9:15 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: Yeah... 900mhz PTP 450 is probably the best option. What kind of signal level do you get with the 2.4ghz radios? you could probably get a bit more out of it by going to airFiber 2x or Rocket 2AC radios... and maybe a bigger dish. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: 900 PTP 450 from Cambium Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com > On May 21, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for suggestions for an 8 mile link that will be shooting through a single wall of trees about 1/8 mile from one end of the link. Currently using 2.4ghz Ubnt radios. Works great during the winter, but once the trees fill back in, the link drops to about 5Mbps actual throughput. Would be nice to get 20Mbps. > > Any suggestions? The trees are 80ft tall, so putting up a 100ft tower at a residence is not really an option. The other side is on top of a 1000ft tall hill. > > Travis > --
Re: [AFMUG] 8 mile link
Put down a quarter mile of fiber or CAT5 until you are on the other side of the trees. -Original Message- From: Travis Johnson Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 9:05 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] 8 mile link Hi, I'm looking for suggestions for an 8 mile link that will be shooting through a single wall of trees about 1/8 mile from one end of the link. Currently using 2.4ghz Ubnt radios. Works great during the winter, but once the trees fill back in, the link drops to about 5Mbps actual throughput. Would be nice to get 20Mbps. Any suggestions? The trees are 80ft tall, so putting up a 100ft tower at a residence is not really an option. The other side is on top of a 1000ft tall hill. Travis
Re: [AFMUG] spectrum customer calls me to fix their DVR
You could have posed as a spectrum CRS and told the guy he was too stupid to own a DVR and hung up the phone. Or said we don’t support DVRs, only the WISPs do... or or From: Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 7:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] spectrum customer calls me to fix their DVR I had a person call me and just start telling me how their DVR wasn't working on their remote view app anymore, finally figured out they had Spectrum internet service and not my WISP service. I told him that since spectrum is a competitor i Wouldn't be able to help him with that and told him if he had service through me that I would definitely be able to help him with that. He got pissed and said he's not switching and hung up the phone. SMH
Re: [AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft
For those parents trying to delay the onset of their kids gratuitous use of the F word for as long as possible, fair warning, it is probably said 15,000 times in this movie. No boobs or sex scenes though. All my kids are in their 20s and 30s and I still have a difficult time watching that kind of content with them. Has Morena Baccarin, oh man From: Steve Jones Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 9:44 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft Use onedrive, less bulky, and Microsoft doesn't shut it off On Sat, May 19, 2018, 9:53 AM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: It also completely trashes RDP. I had to replace the new RDP exe and DLL files with older versions to get my programs to work. On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 9:45 AM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: File Stream sucks. Tried it. Backup N Sync is not going away. But the conventional google drive will. You have two options, file stream or backup n sync. Backup n sync is almost identical to legacy google drive. From: Jesse Dupont Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 7:10 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft That’s going away anyway. You need to switch to Google‘s Drive File Stream desktop client. From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 7:34:15 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft Latest windows update turns off Google Drive Sync! Arrgh!
Re: [AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft
File Stream sucks. Tried it. Backup N Sync is not going away. But the conventional google drive will. You have two options, file stream or backup n sync. Backup n sync is almost identical to legacy google drive. From: Jesse Dupont Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 7:10 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft That’s going away anyway. You need to switch to Google‘s Drive File Stream desktop client. From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 7:34:15 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft Latest windows update turns off Google Drive Sync! Arrgh!
[AFMUG] OT f**king microsoft
Latest windows update turns off Google Drive Sync! Arrgh!
[AFMUG] OT Movie Review
Deadpool2 It was good. Almost as good as the first one. If you liked the first one you will like this one too. Pseudo cameo by Stan Lee was not obvious to me when watching. I looked it up. Now I want to see it again just so I can see if I can spot it.
Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney
If you take the bark off so the cable eating beetles will not have a home you should be OK. From: Dave Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 10:57 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney So long as they dont use pine logs should be ok :) On 05/15/2018 07:04 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: Stick a piece of PVC down the chimney and use spray foam to hold it in place. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 5:28 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney Do the unistrut conduit clamps hold the conduit tightly enough to mount it vertically? I thought they were intended for horizontal runs. On Tuesday, May 15, 2018, Sam Lambiewrote: Unistrut, clamps and EMT. Done On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: It's just a wood box covered in vinyl. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: The chimney has vinyl? I assume it's brick behind it? If you have to get it from the local hardware store, go there and see what all can work. I'd probably look for the best tool rather than limit myself to that one store, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: Anyone have any advice as to what hardware I can use to attach a 6' section of 1.5" emt to a chimney? It's the vinyl siding covered type. I was thinking of just drilling it and running lags straight through, but a bracket of some type, possibly utilizing pipe clamps, would be preferred. I'll need to source it from a local hardware store. -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com --
Re: [AFMUG] AF11x
Unless you can’t get the license for MIMO. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 9:15 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x Yeah, we're talking about doing two radios in SISO on one antenna... that's going to be pretty much the same as one radio in MIMO. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Bill Princewrote: No. Both chains. SISO would be about half that, but still full duplex. bp On 5/17/2018 8:03 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: 750Mbps on a single chain? -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Prince" To: af@afmug.com Sent: 5/17/2018 11:00:47 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x I don't know about that. A single AF11X can do close to 750 Mbps full dux. Two of them with different frequencies would be in the neighborhood of 1.5 Gbps. Not too shabby for around $4500 of hardware. bp On 5/17/2018 7:47 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: Buying 2 AF11x should be a lot cheaper... it should still be under $4k for the hardware. They wouldn't get as much throughput as a more expensive 2+0 system though... On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: So is it less expensive to buy 2 AF11x or to buy one more expensive 2+0 system? -- Original Message -- From: "Mathew Howard" To: "af" Sent: 5/16/2018 10:07:43 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x Well, you could use two radios in SISO mode on each end... but then you'd have to deal with having separate ethernet ports and mounting the second radio (not to mention some extra cost). On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:36 PM, wrote: Any way to make the V run in different frequencies?
[AFMUG] AF11x
Any way to make the V run in different frequencies?
Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney
Sometimes I live under a bridge... From: Adam Moffett Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 9:56 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney Well maybe he knew something about spray foam that I didn't :P -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Prince"To: af@afmug.com Sent: 5/16/2018 11:13:45 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney Chucks tongue was so far into his cheek with that statement, I could see it from California. ;-) bp On 5/16/2018 7:04 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: I'm unclear on whether that's a serious suggestion. -- Original Message -- From: "Jason McKemie" To: mailto:af@afmug.com Sent: 5/15/2018 10:52:42 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney I'll give that a whirl, thanks everyone. Backup plan will be Chuck's PVC/spray foam idea. On Tuesday, May 15, 2018, TJ Trout wrote: Yes, we use unistrut for various tower mounts (home made) they defiantly can hold a mast with plenty of strength On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:04 PM, wrote: Stick a piece of PVC down the chimney and use spray foam to hold it in place. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 5:28 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney Do the unistrut conduit clamps hold the conduit tightly enough to mount it vertically? I thought they were intended for horizontal runs. On Tuesday, May 15, 2018, Sam Lambie wrote: Unistrut, clamps and EMT. Done On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: It's just a wood box covered in vinyl. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: The chimney has vinyl? I assume it's brick behind it? If you have to get it from the local hardware store, go there and see what all can work. I'd probably look for the best tool rather than limit myself to that one store, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: Anyone have any advice as to what hardware I can use to attach a 6' section of 1.5" emt to a chimney? It's the vinyl siding covered type. I was thinking of just drilling it and running lags straight through, but a bracket of some type, possibly utilizing pipe clamps, would be preferred. I'll need to source it from a local hardware store. -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com
Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice
I appreciate the comments. For now, we have plenty of rack space. From: Adam Moffett Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 8:03 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice Yeah I was going to mention that. When it comes down to remodeling the building or buying blades, then blades are a clear winner. -- Original Message -- From: "Paul Stewart"To: af@afmug.com Sent: 5/16/2018 8:47:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice We utilize a combination of blade systems and 1U/2U servers …. Wouldn’t say blade systems are going away. Basically the biggest sell point for them is space/power (footprint). If space/power is at a premium (ie. 3rd party data center) and you need to put many servers into it then it can make sense …. In our case this is exactly why we continue to deploy Cisco ACS blade systems in particular – they work well and footprint is small. In areas where we have abundant space/power then 1U servers are preferred Paul From: Af on behalf of Josh Luthman Reply-To: Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 4:04 PM To: Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice Servers for what? Blades are kind of a thing of the past, I think. It's way easier and cheaper to do something like HA with ESXi. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:03 PM, wrote: I need a pair of servers, prefer DC powered but not absolutely stuck on that. Like to have nice blade server system with hot standby etc. Been some time since I spec’d out servers. Any suggestions?
Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney
Stick a piece of PVC down the chimney and use spray foam to hold it in place. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 5:28 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney Do the unistrut conduit clamps hold the conduit tightly enough to mount it vertically? I thought they were intended for horizontal runs. On Tuesday, May 15, 2018, Sam Lambiewrote: Unistrut, clamps and EMT. Done On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: It's just a wood box covered in vinyl. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: The chimney has vinyl? I assume it's brick behind it? If you have to get it from the local hardware store, go there and see what all can work. I'd probably look for the best tool rather than limit myself to that one store, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: Anyone have any advice as to what hardware I can use to attach a 6' section of 1.5" emt to a chimney? It's the vinyl siding covered type. I was thinking of just drilling it and running lags straight through, but a bracket of some type, possibly utilizing pipe clamps, would be preferred. I'll need to source it from a local hardware store. -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com
Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice
I am singing... BTW you would probably be the guy that would end up maintaining them... From: Dennis Burgess Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 2:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice BTW, I have a bunch of 1855 blade centers sitting, quad power supplies, dual switches, 10 blades most have dual dual core Xeons around 2.0 – 2.4 ghz. 10 blades each. I can sell you for a song! From: AfOn Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 3:18 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice Thus the question. 10 years ago blade servers were all the rage. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 2:04 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice Servers for what? Blades are kind of a thing of the past, I think. It's way easier and cheaper to do something like HA with ESXi. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:03 PM, wrote: I need a pair of servers, prefer DC powered but not absolutely stuck on that. Like to have nice blade server system with hot standby etc. Been some time since I spec’d out servers. Any suggestions?
Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney
Most chimneys have a large central hole that you can stick a large pipe down... From: Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 2:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Attaching pole to Chimney The chimney has vinyl? I assume it's brick behind it? If you have to get it from the local hardware store, go there and see what all can work. I'd probably look for the best tool rather than limit myself to that one store, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jason McKemiewrote: Anyone have any advice as to what hardware I can use to attach a 6' section of 1.5" emt to a chimney? It's the vinyl siding covered type. I was thinking of just drilling it and running lags straight through, but a bracket of some type, possibly utilizing pipe clamps, would be preferred. I'll need to source it from a local hardware store.
Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice
Thus the question. 10 years ago blade servers were all the rage. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 2:04 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT NOC server choice Servers for what? Blades are kind of a thing of the past, I think. It's way easier and cheaper to do something like HA with ESXi. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:03 PM,wrote: I need a pair of servers, prefer DC powered but not absolutely stuck on that. Like to have nice blade server system with hot standby etc. Been some time since I spec’d out servers. Any suggestions?
[AFMUG] OT NOC server choice
I need a pair of servers, prefer DC powered but not absolutely stuck on that. Like to have nice blade server system with hot standby etc. Been some time since I spec’d out servers. Any suggestions?
Re: [AFMUG] Custom CNUT - snmp tools for mass changes?
Many years ago, did it all the time. From: Gino A. Villarini Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 10:00 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Custom CNUT - snmp tools for mass changes? Anyone has experience doing mass changes in CNUT? Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
Re: [AFMUG] Flat Drop Aerial
I have run many spans of stuff called Rural C wire down country roads. It is about the same size as flat fiber drop. You do want to put twists in the span to keep it from dancing in the wind. I cannot think of a reason for a 3 span limit. I know of no limit unless it has to do with the way the strength member distributes the stresses. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 6:14 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Flat Drop Aerial I'm looking at running flat drop down a country road, possibly on poles. The specs I've read say not to run more than 3 spans for some reason. Has anyone done this? Is their better attachment hardware than wedge clamps for this application? Thanks. Jason
Re: [AFMUG] DWDM SFPs in a CWDM system
Hmmm. I wonder if DWDM mux equipment has filters or something in it. From: Chris Fabien Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 4:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DWDM SFPs in a CWDM system You can, but we ran into compatability issues with 10G DWDM SFPs where the CWDM version worked fine, with fiberstore generic SFPs in mikrotik and Planet equipment. On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: Why could you not use DWDM SFPs into a CWDM mux if you spaced them out? They are about $150 cheaper.
[AFMUG] DWDM SFPs in a CWDM system
Why could you not use DWDM SFPs into a CWDM mux if you spaced them out? They are about $150 cheaper.
Re: [AFMUG] PTP800 ODU
No, you have to convert rectangular to square and then square to circular to do a rectangular to circular transition. If the nose of the dish had a rectangular hole, then it would mate right up without problems. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2f7/23c37af9951dfa018248f24e586323556ee1.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4O_GXXAQYI -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 11:43 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP800 ODU I guess I just don't know enough about the slight differences since I've never seen a PTP800 ODU interface. But that's exactly what a Trango ODU (just Remec OEM) does. The port on the ODU is rectangular and mates up directly with the circular port on the dish. Is there a gap or something for matching? On 5/13/2018 12:29 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: If you butt a rectangular waveguide to a circular waveguide will have some return loss mismatch issues. It would work to a certain extent but you will not have as much tx power as you should and you will have RX loss. Yes, everything else is the same. I would give it a try. It will probably work in a pinch but best to fix it right for the long term. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 11:07 AM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] PTP800 ODU Anybody know if an 11GHz PTP800 ODU will mate with a Trango dish? I know the PTP800 ODUs are Remec rectangular, but the Trango dish is Remec circular. But aren't the physical interface dimensions the same? The Trango dish is just a round hole, so no plate to rotate to change polarity. Got a dead ODU on an ApexPlus-11 and I think I can get my hands on a PTP800 ODU-B. I know Cambium/Ceragon has single and dual pol IP20/PTP820 Remec adapters now, so we're debating whether to fix the one end with this or just swap to PTP820's.
Re: [AFMUG] PTP800 ODU
If you butt a rectangular waveguide to a circular waveguide will have some return loss mismatch issues. It would work to a certain extent but you will not have as much tx power as you should and you will have RX loss. Yes, everything else is the same. I would give it a try. It will probably work in a pinch but best to fix it right for the long term. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 11:07 AM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] PTP800 ODU Anybody know if an 11GHz PTP800 ODU will mate with a Trango dish? I know the PTP800 ODUs are Remec rectangular, but the Trango dish is Remec circular. But aren't the physical interface dimensions the same? The Trango dish is just a round hole, so no plate to rotate to change polarity. Got a dead ODU on an ApexPlus-11 and I think I can get my hands on a PTP800 ODU-B. I know Cambium/Ceragon has single and dual pol IP20/PTP820 Remec adapters now, so we're debating whether to fix the one end with this or just swap to PTP820's.
Re: [AFMUG] 48 vdc Inverteres for Data Room 6kw ?
That is why I like exeltech. If an inverter dies, you only lose 1000 watts of capacity. So you put in enough modules for your load plus an extra module. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 12:14 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 48 vdc Inverteres for Data Room 6kw ? No, I mean you can parallel as many -48VDC input sides as you want, off a bus bar or battery setup, assuming that the wiring is set up right. The 120VAC outputs would of course be totally independent. Depending on your requirements it could be a better solution to a 1+0 "all eggs in one basket" large inverter setup, where if the inverter dies, all AC loads go down. In the sort of arrangement I mentioned the AC loads for things with dual power supplies could be built as 1+1. On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:30 AM,wrote: When you say you can parallel as many as you want, but then say to limit the load on individual units, that does not sound like all the outputs are combined to me. Do you actually combine the outputs in parallel? If so you really cannot limit current to individual units, the load will divide across the inverters based on internal and external impedances. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 8:10 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 48 vdc Inverteres for Data Room 6kw ? You could also look into individual 1500W meanwell true sine wave inverters, running in parallel off your 48vdc battery bus. You can parallel as many as you need. Don't load any individual one with more than 1300W constant. Wire up the output from each meanwell to 120vac PDUs with amperage meter inline and distribute from there. On Tue, May 8, 2018, 12:58 PM Gino A. Villarini wrote: Looking for 48 vdc inverters for data room applications in the range of 6-8 kw Can be a all in one system ( charger plus Inverter) , must be always online Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
Re: [AFMUG] OT do I have courage
Now, if only TSLA would get back down to $200 I would buy some of them again. From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 2:52 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT do I have courage I did it. 400 shares... From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 2:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT do I have courage HMNY (MoviePass) is trading at 61 cents today. Off its peak of $38.86. I wonder if I have the guts to buy any.
Re: [AFMUG] OT do I have courage
I did it. 400 shares... From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 2:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT do I have courage HMNY (MoviePass) is trading at 61 cents today. Off its peak of $38.86. I wonder if I have the guts to buy any.
[AFMUG] OT do I have courage
HMNY (MoviePass) is trading at 61 cents today. Off its peak of $38.86. I wonder if I have the guts to buy any.
Re: [AFMUG] 48 vdc Inverteres for Data Room 6kw ?
When you say you can parallel as many as you want, but then say to limit the load on individual units, that does not sound like all the outputs are combined to me. Do you actually combine the outputs in parallel? If so you really cannot limit current to individual units, the load will divide across the inverters based on internal and external impedances. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 8:10 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 48 vdc Inverteres for Data Room 6kw ? You could also look into individual 1500W meanwell true sine wave inverters, running in parallel off your 48vdc battery bus. You can parallel as many as you need. Don't load any individual one with more than 1300W constant. Wire up the output from each meanwell to 120vac PDUs with amperage meter inline and distribute from there. On Tue, May 8, 2018, 12:58 PM Gino A. Villariniwrote: Looking for 48 vdc inverters for data room applications in the range of 6-8 kw Can be a all in one system ( charger plus Inverter) , must be always online Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
[AFMUG] OT such a deal
My #2 son just got accepted to grad school, government will pay for school and keep his payroll running while he is in school. (He is an EE at Hill Air force Base). Such a good deal. I am proud and jealous all at the same time.
Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100'
Not really sure as we did most of it ourself. Probably $2000 for the foundation and another $1500 for erection. From: James Howard Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 12:44 PM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' What did you end up spending to install it? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 1:40 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' $5,721.00 + Tax and shipping $7,889.00 From: James Howard Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:40 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' What did it end up costing? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:43 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Rohn SSV. From: James Howard Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 10:30 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Dredging up an old thread here. What did you end up going with Chuck? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Needs to be self supporting. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 1:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Found a 96 footer Titan from Tessco for about $4600. Any better deals or stronger towers for a similar price? Total Control Panel Login To: ja...@litewire.net From: 0100015f029f9688-b97f5514-f4a3-44e2-afb0-4ce5742bde41-000...@amazonses.com Remove amazonses.com from my allow list You received this message because the domain amazonses.com is on your allow list. Total Control Panel Login To: ja...@litewire.net From: 0100016345c8ae87-4e13431d-1e1f-4e35-9d4f-89ba40586d4a-000...@amazonses.com Remove amazonses.com from my allow list You received this message because the domain amazonses.com is on your allow list. Total Control Panel Login To: ja...@litewire.net From: 0100016346345def-4b133aeb-735f-4c91-9f34-e24be51cff2f-000...@amazonses.com Remove amazonses.com from my allow list You received this message because the domain amazonses.com is on your allow list.
Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100'
$5,721.00 + Tax and shipping $7,889.00 From: James Howard Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:40 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' What did it end up costing? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:43 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Rohn SSV. From: James Howard Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 10:30 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Dredging up an old thread here. What did you end up going with Chuck? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Needs to be self supporting. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 1:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Found a 96 footer Titan from Tessco for about $4600. Any better deals or stronger towers for a similar price? Total Control Panel Login To: ja...@litewire.net From: 0100015f029f9688-b97f5514-f4a3-44e2-afb0-4ce5742bde41-000...@amazonses.com Remove amazonses.com from my allow list You received this message because the domain amazonses.com is on your allow list. Total Control Panel Login To: ja...@litewire.net From: 0100016345c8ae87-4e13431d-1e1f-4e35-9d4f-89ba40586d4a-000...@amazonses.com Remove amazonses.com from my allow list You received this message because the domain amazonses.com is on your allow list.
Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100'
Rohn SSV. From: James Howard Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 10:30 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Dredging up an old thread here. What did you end up going with Chuck? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Needs to be self supporting. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 1:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Good tower for 100' Found a 96 footer Titan from Tessco for about $4600. Any better deals or stronger towers for a similar price? Total Control Panel Login To: ja...@litewire.net From: 0100015f029f9688-b97f5514-f4a3-44e2-afb0-4ce5742bde41-000...@amazonses.com Remove amazonses.com from my allow list You received this message because the domain amazonses.com is on your allow list.
Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech rack mount surge suppressor with Medusa
They are light sensitive if they are made out of glass. Not so much with the ceramics. The mixture of gasses set the breakdown voltage. The ones I use fire at about 90 volts. I remember working at sites where the gas tubes were filled with radioactive gases. From: Adam Moffett Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 10:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech rack mount surge suppressor with Medusa I thought it took hundreds of volts to trigger a gas tube. Aren't some of them light sensitive? What if the APC chassis was near a window and getting direct sunlight? -- Original Message -- From: ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: 5/9/2018 12:00:20 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech rack mount surge suppressor with Medusa Funny, the product is so simple. Jacks. Tubes. Electrodes with gas between them from the Ethernet lines to ground. The only way the tubes can affect the circuit is if they are ionized, which means a high voltage coming from somewhere. could be coming from a ground loop or ??? Or a tube could be bad, or there could be a solder bridge but the test and inspection procedure should have caught that. From: Sam Lambie Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 9:56 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech rack mount surge suppressor with Medusa FYI, I installed the gas tube version on a gigabit Packetflux Powered Medusa the other week and no go. The radio boots up for about 25 seconds, and then shuts down. On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:54 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: I am going to chase this down. Only certain types of products have the issue it seems. I am going to try to add solid state to the gas tubes using a different design that eliminates the steering diodes. Seems like the steering diodes are causing the problem in some situations. From: George Skorup Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 9:50 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech rack mount surge suppressor with Medusa No diodes, just gas-tube for large surge event suppression. Obviously not as much protection though. I'm seeing more CRC errors than I'm comfortable with on the cards with diodes. Rev G is definitely better though. I've broken the shield at various sites while testing to rule out any potential ground loop issues. Ran on battery. Etc. It's weird. Noise or something, I don't know. On 5/9/2018 10:32 AM, Steve Jones wrote: What's this gas tube product placement? I want to see these On Wed, May 9, 2018, 9:51 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: Thanks, yeah nothing fit well next to the thin pcbs. Odd, got some test results back from George yesterday. Some types of equipment has CRC errors with some of our surge suppressors. Trying to identify the bad combinations. Good thing is that our gas tube only products seem to be flawless with everything that people have tried them on. -Original Message- From: Matt Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 8:08 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech rack mount surge suppressor with Medusa Chuck, Like form factor of new arrestors much better. Thicker PCB and RJ45 not as tall. They do not fit well next to your last thin pcb version though. Did not care for the thin pcb and tall RJ45 at all. Swapped out 4 PxP450i APC arrestors to these 17 hours ago. So far flawless even at 1000base. No errors at all. This is with RackInjector, Cambium Sync and very long cat-5 runs. Time will tell but looks good so far. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:29 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Matt, > > I sent you a note off-list. I would like to send you the gas tube version > to see if that fixes the issue. > > Inquiring minds want to know... > > -Original Message- From: Matt > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:08 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mccowntech rack mount surge suppressor with Medusa > >> OK, so grounds are related to the problem. >> >> There may be something unusual with timing pulses on the power that is >> causing the surge suppressor to fire. >> Forrest would know much more than I about that. >> >> I honestly don’t know if anyone has tried my product with a Medusa >> before. >> I have a 100% gas tube version that may solve the problem. > > > I am still having some troubles with PTP450i holding 1gbit ethernet > even with Cambium sync. Not near as bad with Cambium Sync though. > Will these gas tube versions work any better? Will