Re: ARERR 8958 The Date Value is Invalid

2014-01-08 Thread Bryan Waters
We discovered an issue with the Application Business Time process which
would generate this error when calculating dates in 2014.  This is a known
issue/defect with ARS v 7.1.x, 7.5.x, and earlier versions of 7.6.04(see
below).  We were able to get a hotfix from BMC for ARS v7.1.  You should be
able to support a request to BMC Support and get the appropriate hotfix for
your environment.

 




KA407525
Problem


Following is a filter logging excerpt with an example of a service target
due date year that is incorrectly calculated to be 1969 rather than 2014:

 FLTR Checking
SLM:Measurement:ReqProcOverallStartTimeUpdateSLODueDateX (0)
 FLTR -- Passed -- perform actions 
 FLTR 0: Set Fields 
 FLTR Application-Bus-Time2-Assoc-Add 1386103010 2592000 1   -e 

 FLTR Exit code: 0 Value: 0 
 FLTR SVTDueDate (300364900) = 12/31/69 17:00:00

The expectation is that 30 days (2592000 seconds) will be added to 3 Dec
2013 20:36:50 UTC (1386103010) with a calculated due date of 2 Jan 2014
20:36:50 UTC (1386103010 + 2592000 = 1388695010).  Instead, the date is
calculated to 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00
 

Solution

There is a known defect with business time calculation of a date past
12/31/2013 8:00:00 UTC because of a hard limit of 31 Dec 2013 08:00:00 UTC:
please reference SW00379074.  This has been fixed in v7.6.04 SP5 and later
releases of ARServer.  There will be no backport of this fix to earlier
releases and resolution of this problem is upgrade to a version of ARServer
where the hard limit with business time calculation is no longer in effect.

Please note that the problem is with ARServer business time functions and is
not an SLM workflow issue, which simply leverages those business time
functions in workflow where service target and other SLM dates are
calculated.

The attached document describes a workaround which could help in some issues
where a hotfix is not currently available (such as in version 7.6.03)



 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ramesh Alla
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 7:14 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARERR 8958 The Date Value is Invalid

 

** 

I guess, the business time segments related to this specific support group
have invalid dates?

  _  

Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:27:46 +
From: mm3...@att.com mailto:mm3...@att.com 
Subject: Re: ARERR 8958 The Date Value is Invalid
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 

** 

Have you checked the field type to see if it is valid?

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@arslist.org] On Behalf Of uday kiran
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 1:34 PM
To: arslist@arslist.org mailto:arslist@arslist.org 
Subject: ARERR 8958 The Date Value is Invalid

 

** 

Hi Team, 

 

I am seeing ARERR 8985 The Date Value is Invalid Error while re-assigning an
incident to a specific Support Group. 

 

It is giving error only for a specific support group . 

 

CLM:Measurement:ReqProcOverallStartTime   filter is not giving the right
answer. 

 

Remedy 7.1

 

Any Ideas on how to resolve this issue?

 

Regards,

Uday 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Archive Incident Management Change Management 7.1

2013-07-15 Thread Bryan Waters
Since you are running ARS 7.1.x, I suspect you are storing CLOBs out of
row(default config) which will increase the db size drastically.  We have
gone through conversions to move the CLOBS to in-row, and it shrank the db
anywhere from 60-80%.  You can have your dba review the tables to confirm
the CLOB tables are consuming a lot of disk space or not.

 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of mahmoud mahdy
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 5:41 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Archive Incident Management Change Management 7.1

 

** 

I contacted WIPRO whom support BMC Remedy, and they told me that deleting
from DB level is better as it is a huge data and the system may not be able
to complete.
 

  _  

Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 04:19:48 -0500
From: vkulka...@columnit.com
Subject: Re: Archive Incident Management Change Management 7.1
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

** 

Delete from remedy as far as possible. 
 
Sent from my XperiaT smartphone
 
mahmoud mahdy mahmoud_ma...@live.com wrote:
 

** 

Dears,
I'd like to delete the history and keep only the last two years.
so, is it better to delete form remedy forms or DB..?
Thanks
 

  _  

Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:41:23 +0530
From: kiranpatil@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Archive Incident Management Change Management 7.1
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

** 

Hi Mahmoud,

 

You can achieve remedy archiving using some of the external tools like
rrchive, Informatica, BMC DSO

 

1. First find out business timeframe and condition for data archieving.

2. Identify main forms and related forms to archieve.

 

Use any of the above tool or similar tool to migrate data.

 

Challenge here would be data integritiy which should be impacted.

 

Good Luck !!

 

Regards

Kiran

 

 

 

 

 

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:22 PM, mahmoud mahdy mahmoud_ma...@live.com
wrote:

** 

Dears,
 
Kindly help as we have (500 GB database file) which affecting our
performance and causing system down.
is there a way to truncate the history data from the system or DB..?.
 
Thanks,
Best Regards,
 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 





 

-- 

Regards 


Kiran Patil 

Cognizant Technology Solutions

Pune, India

Mob No: +91 989 037 7125

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Permission's mismatch between User and people form

2012-03-21 Thread Bryan Waters
This is a common issue for the permissions to get out of sync between the
CTM:PeoplePermissionGroup and User form.  Here are instructions to force a
reset:

 

1) Open the CTM:People Permission Groups form in Search mode in the User
Tool

2) Make sure that the field 'z1D Action' is visible(If not, change the field
properties in Admin Tool/Dev Studio to visible). 

3) Search for the User(s) having problems (should return multiple rows)

4) Select all records, then go to 'Actions' - 'Modify All' and enter
START (without quotation marks!) in the 'z1D Action' field.

5) Save the change

6) Rehide the 'z1D Action' field(Optional)

 

Thanks,

Bryan Waters

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Sam Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:21 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Permission's mismatch between User and people form

 

** Hi All,

Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestions. :)
The issue seems to be inconsistent and many records are having this
mismatch. There are many profiles being affected by this. Like mentioned
earlier, is it possible to update all the records .

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ben Chernys
ben.cher...@softwaretoolhouse.com wrote:

** 

The form is called CTM:People Permission Groups  (memorised).  You are
correct Danny, CTM:People looks only at this form.  

 

I have seen issues with the Data Management Tool in 7.6 that imported these
records and did not cause the appropriate workflow to update the User form.
I didn't investigate but simply corrected the User records with a
Meta-Update script.

 

In the Remedy server, permissions can only be given by the User form (or an
AREA plug-in).  Adding the CTM:People Permission Groups record - through the
GUI or with a display-only field set correctly - causes an update of the
User form.   Workflow (in this case ITSM workflow), plug-ins etc can do what
they like.  Hence the CTM:People Permission Groups form.  

 

The likely cause

 

The reverse is not true.  That is: adding (or changing) the User form does
not create / delete / modify the CTM:People Permission Groups records (and
cannot: there would be some missing info).  

 

Hence, making a change to the User, and then making a change to the People
record, can cause an overwrite to the User record.

 

I would suggest also that in these cases you manually add some CTM:People
Permission Groups records (either directly or through the Data Management
Tool.

 

Cheers

Ben Chernys

Senior Software Architect
Software Tool House Inc.

Canada / Deutschland 
Mobile:  +49 171 380 2329GMT + 1 + [ DST ]
Email:mailto:Ben.Chernys_AT_softwaretoolhouse.com Ben.Chernys _AT_
softwaretoolhouse.com
Web:  http://www.softwaretoolhouse.com www.softwaretoolhouse.com

Check out Software Tool House's freebies section for 

an ITSM 7.6.04 forms and fields spreadsheet.

Meta-Update, our premium ARS Data tool, lets you automate 
your imports, migrations, in no time at all, without programming, 
without staging forms, without merge workflow. 
 http://www.softwaretoolhouse.com/ http://www.softwaretoolhouse.com/  

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Danny Kellett
Sent: March-19-12 23:14
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Permission's mismatch between User and people form

 

** 

Hi,

 

Open the people permissions form. (Sorry cant remember the actual name, not
in front of ITSM) and add the persons details there. Those tables in the
People form do not look at the User form for the group / permission info.

 

Regards

Danny

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Sam Anderson
Sent: 19 March 2012 20:27
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Permission's mismatch between User and people form

 

** Hi All,



ITSM Version:7.6
DB:SQL

What could be the possible cause for the following 
Problem:Permission found in User form are not in People form. 
EX:1.User has Incident Master permission in user form but Only Incident user
permission in people form
2.Change user present in user form but no change permission in people form.

-- 
Thanks  Regards
Sam

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_




-- 
Thanks  Regards
Sam

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: Setting up paging and using a modem

2010-08-18 Thread Bryan Waters
I've used BLAT with ITSM 7 with success.  http://www.blat.net/

If you need any pointers, you can contact me offline.

Thanks,
Bryan


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rondeau
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:07 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Setting up paging and using a modem

I have used telalert in the past.  Anyone know of any non cost solutions.

Thanks

Tim

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 5:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Setting up paging and using a modem

Tim,

We use TelAlert for our messaging processes.  It's currently on Solaris but 
I've played with the Windows version.  They are virtually the same.

We have used a traditional modem but are switching over to GSM modems.  This 
provides a lot more flexibility with sending messages to some of the service 
providers.  There are some direct dial gateways for service providers but many 
are turning them off because of the expense or they charge a fee for monthly 
use.  Along the same lines, email interfaces with some providers are being or 
have been turned off.   This is especially true in Asia Pacific as the email 
interfaces were common spam targets.
Dave
-
dave.shell...@tycoelectronics.com
(Wireless)

- Original Message -
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: What determines where field menus display?

2009-10-04 Thread Bryan Waters
Oops.  It should have stated falling.  Eyes playing tricks on me. J

 

From: Bryan Waters [mailto:bryancwat...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 10:25 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: RE: What determines where field menus display?

 

We recently had a user that had an issue with menus following off the
screen due to the display font setting being Large.  Please verify/change
the user's desktop font size to Normal and retry.

 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Benedict Brad (CI/FSR6-NA)
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:18 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: What determines where field menus display?

 

** 

I have had similar issues with individual users in the past.  It has been
resolved by deleting the user's AR System User Preference file and having it
recreated on login.  Usually, the user has adjusted some personal client
settings.

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:14 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: What determines where field menus display?

** 

Do they also have dual monitors, or just one?

 

Lisa 

 

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Lockwood, Teresa L
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 8:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: What determines where field menus display?

** 

I've got what I'm sure is a simply answered question but I'm coming up empty
this morning.  I've got a character field with a menu that displays
differently for only 2 team members.  The field menu display is set to Smart
menus but instead of cascading up so that you can see the whole list it
cascades down and off the page.  For everyone else (me included) its
cascades up so we can see all of the menu items.  As a workaround I've got
them using popup menus but they are not happy with that so I'd like to find
a resolution.  So the question is, what does Remedy look at to determine
where to display the popup menu?  (Note:  I've tried playing with their
screen resolution and it didn't matter if they were set to 800 x 600 or 1024
x 768).  Thanks in advance for any help.

 

 

AR Server: 6.3 Patch 24 on UNIX AIX 5.3

SQL - Oracle 9.2.5

ITSM v 5.6

MidTier 6.3 Patch 24 on a Windows 2003 NT server - IIS

 

 

Terri

 


This email (including any attachments) may contain information that is
private or business confidential. If you received this email in error,
please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by
reply email so that our records can be corrected. _Platinum Sponsor:
rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ _Platinum
Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers
Are_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: What determines where field menus display?

2009-10-03 Thread Bryan Waters
We recently had a user that had an issue with menus following off the
screen due to the display font setting being Large.  Please verify/change
the user's desktop font size to Normal and retry.

 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Benedict Brad (CI/FSR6-NA)
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:18 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: What determines where field menus display?

 

** 

I have had similar issues with individual users in the past.  It has been
resolved by deleting the user's AR System User Preference file and having it
recreated on login.  Usually, the user has adjusted some personal client
settings.

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:14 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: What determines where field menus display?

** 

Do they also have dual monitors, or just one?

 

Lisa 

 

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Lockwood, Teresa L
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 8:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: What determines where field menus display?

** 

I've got what I'm sure is a simply answered question but I'm coming up empty
this morning.  I've got a character field with a menu that displays
differently for only 2 team members.  The field menu display is set to Smart
menus but instead of cascading up so that you can see the whole list it
cascades down and off the page.  For everyone else (me included) its
cascades up so we can see all of the menu items.  As a workaround I've got
them using popup menus but they are not happy with that so I'd like to find
a resolution.  So the question is, what does Remedy look at to determine
where to display the popup menu?  (Note:  I've tried playing with their
screen resolution and it didn't matter if they were set to 800 x 600 or 1024
x 768).  Thanks in advance for any help.

 

 

AR Server: 6.3 Patch 24 on UNIX AIX 5.3

SQL - Oracle 9.2.5

ITSM v 5.6

MidTier 6.3 Patch 24 on a Windows 2003 NT server - IIS

 

 

Terri

 


This email (including any attachments) may contain information that is
private or business confidential. If you received this email in error,
please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by
reply email so that our records can be corrected. _Platinum Sponsor:
rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ _Platinum
Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers
Are_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: javax.mail.MessagingException: Unable to retrieve Reply To for message

2009-09-25 Thread Bryan Waters
 

Doug,

 

I had a customer with the same issue.  Basically, the email engine is unable
to extract/retrieve the reply-to email address, and the email engine would
delete the incoming message without inserting into the AR System Email
Messages form.  BMC Support gave us a hotfix for the emaildaemon.jar file.
The error is still logged in the stdout file, but the email is successfully
saved in the AR System Email Messages form.  Contact me offline for our BMC
ticket/defect # for reference if you decide to log a support request with
BMC.

 

Thanks,

Bryan Waters

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tanner, Doug
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:11 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: javax.mail.MessagingException: Unable to retrieve Reply To for
message

 

** 

ARS 7.1 (P7)

Email 7.1 (P7)

MAPI 

 

Getting the below error numerous times a day on SOME inbound
emails

 

Sep 25, 2009 12:10:36 PM com.bmc.mail.mapi.MAPINative getMessageReplyTo

SEVERE: Unable to retrieve Reply To for message 

javax.mail.MessagingException: Unable to retrieve Reply To for message

at com.bmc.mail.mapi.MAPINative.getMessageReplyTo(Native Method)

at com.bmc.mail.mapi.MAPIMessage.getHeader(MAPIMessage.java:55)

at
javax.mail.internet.MimeMessage.getAddressHeader(MimeMessage.java:679)

at
javax.mail.internet.MimeMessage.getReplyTo(MimeMessage.java:655)

at
com.bmc.arsys.emaildaemon.ReceiverModule.logMessage(ReceiverModule.java:675)

at
com.bmc.arsys.emaildaemon.ReceiverModule.doWork(ReceiverModule.java:312)

at com.bmc.arsys.emaildaemon.ThreadBase.run(ThreadBase.java:288)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

 

Thoughts?

Thanks, Doug

 

Doug Tanner

Compass Group, The Americas

Manager, Enterprise Workflow

Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)

Office  (704) 328-3178

Cell   (980) 230-8563

 mailto:doug.tan...@compass-usa.com doug.tan...@compass-usa.com

 


DISCLAIMER Important! This message is intended for the above named person(s)
only and is CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please immediately
notify the sender by return email and then delete it from your mailbox. This
message may be protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work
product doctrine. Accessing, copying, disseminating or re-using any of the
information contained in this e-mail by anyone other than the intended
recipient is strictly prohibited. Finally, you should check this email and
any attachments for the presence of viruses, as the sender accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
Thank you. 

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers
Are_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
image002.gif

Re: AW: PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT that does not attach!

2009-01-14 Thread Bryan Waters
This is a know issue/defect.  Try using a Set Fields run process:

 



 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Frex Popo
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:12 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re : AW: PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT that does not attach!

 

** 


Thanks.

 

I saw some old email with people having the same issue with set field as well 
and didnt bother trying it :-)

will try and let you know.

Many thanks for all your help

--- En date de : Mer 14.1.09, Conny Martin conny.mar...@t-systems.com a écrit 
:

De: Conny Martin conny.mar...@t-systems.com
Objet: AW: PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT that does not attach!
À: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Mercredi 14 Janvier 2009, 12h17

we have a similar workflow to add an Attachment and I ever wondered why they
turned off philter-phasing for this filter. Now I know why. 
 
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] Im Auftrag von Misi Mladoniczky
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2009 11:51
An: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Betreff: Re: PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT that does not attach!
 
Hi,
 
Try doing it in a Set-Fields action instead. The problem with Run Process is
that it runs in the wrong Filter Phase.
 
Set-Fields: CURRENT TRANSACTION
  dummyfield = $PROCESS$ PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT 103962
C:\FOTOS\$file_name$.jpg
 
I have not tried it, but you may change the Filter Phase by adding `! to the
end of the filter name (backquote+exclamationnmark).
 
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
 
Products from RRR Scandinavia:
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
* RRR|Translator - Manage and automate your language translations.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
 
 Hi everyone,
 Â
 ARS: 7.0.1 Patch04
 OS: Windows 2003 server
 Â
 Here is the command in the filter if action:
 Â
 PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT 103962
C:\FOTOS\$file_name$.jpg
 Â
 Here an extract from the filter log:
 Â
 Â Checking CTM_Images_Load_Image
 FLTR TID: 000604 RPC ID: 188890 Queue:
Fast      
 Client-RPC: 390620Â Â   USER:
 
Demo                                 
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  0: Process
 FLTR TID: 000604 RPC ID: 188890 Queue:
Fast      
 Client-RPC: 390620Â Â   USER:
 
Demo                                 
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 
PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT 103962
 C:\FOTOS\00109125.jpg
 FLTR TID: 000604 RPC ID: 188890 Queue:
Fast      
 Client-RPC: 390620Â Â   USER:
 
Demo                                 
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
  /* Wed Jan 14 2009 09:51:45.2560 */Â Â Â Â  End of filter
processing
 (phase 3) on CTM_Images - 0008164 Â As you can see the server 
 does not throw any error but the command does not work as no file is 
 attached. Permissions are set correctly in the attachment pool and the 
 attachment field. So I hope this is not a bug and may be something 
 trivial!!
 Â
 Have you had a similar problem before?
 Â
 Thanks in advance
 frex
 
 
 
 
 __
 _ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org 
 Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
 --
 This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
 
 
 
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: RMI
Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
 
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


__Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
image001.png

Re: WARNING: don't use 6.3 User tool with 7.1 Server

2009-01-13 Thread Bryan Waters
Have you logged a defect with BMC?  If so, can you please share?

Thanks,
Bryan

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:06 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: WARNING: don't use 6.3 User tool with 7.1 Server

Hey ccrashhh

Long time no parler dudecomment ca va...

I agree - we just started our UAT and TRA - we quickly discovered this
to be an issue.

Glad to see someone else out there can replicate.

Have a good one eh...


On Jan 6, 8:52 am, ccrashh ccra...@gmail.com wrote:
 They are certainly compatible (User 6.3 vs 7.1 Server)...with one
 annoying exception:  your forms and code will ALWAYS cache.  That's
 right...each and every time you open a form using User 6.3 on a 7.1
 Server installation of Remedy ARS, it will overwrite the existing arf
 and arv files.  Fun times.

 In as large an organization as I am in, it takes time to rollout
 certain tools.  We decided to upgrade the backend while the QA people
 dicked around with the 7.1 User tool.  They still haven't approved
 it for rollout, but we were assured by BMC/Remedy that things would be
 hunky-dory.  Not so much.  We have users all over the world, and many
 are now complaining that the application is so slow as to be
 unusable.

 We tested packet traffic using Wireshark and noticed that opening a
 form in Query mode with a 6.3 User tool on a 6.3 Server meant around
 10 packets with a total size of about 1900 bytes.  Opening the same
 form in the same way against a 7.3 Server had 215 packets and about
 190,000 bytes.  A factor in size of about a 100.  We then realized
 that the 6.3 User tool was forcing a constant recache of the forms/
 code.  Sigh.

 Just a heads up to any in a situation like this.  If Users are
 complaining about slow speeds with the arserver 7.1, check which
 version of the User tool they are using.



___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: Where the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Permissions after upgrade to 7.1

2008-11-25 Thread Bryan Waters
Andy,

 

Check the permission groups on the Request ID(field id 1) on the source data
form.  If I remember correctly, the 7.1 User form now has row level access.

 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mayfield, Andy L.
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:17 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Permissions after upgrade to 7.1

 

** 

I found a couple of permissions that were changed on the User Form and
corrected that, but now I still have strange behavior.

 

After doing some testing I have found a couple of things:

 

The ARRERR [333] was actually being generated by the user form. On our
trouble ticket we have a menu that searches the User form for Assigned
Techs. The ARERR [333] appeared to be referring to the status field on the
User Form and not the Trouble Ticket. I corrected the permissions and I no
longer get that error, but now I have a different problem.

 

The assigned tech field now says No entries in menu, unless you select the
Assigned Group that the current user belongs to and then he sees only
himself and not the entire group.

 

I believe it has to be a permission problem somewhere because Admin accounts
work perfectly.

 

 

 

Andy L. Mayfield 
Sr. System Operation Specialist 
Alabama Power Company 
Office: 205-226-1805 
Cell: 205-288-9140 
SoLinc: 10*19140 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Permissions after upgrade to 7.1

 

Andy,

Also since you say you have upgraded, make sure that after you have
ugpraded, the system has all the necessary environments that can run your
arcache utility, failing which the system will not be able to use that
during system restarts to regenerate the user_cache table if necessary.

I recently had that problem on one of our unix servers and it turned out to
be an environment issue.

And a happy birthday to you..

Joe

 

  _  

From: Grooms, Frederick W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:07:31 AM
Subject: Re: Permissions after upgrade to 7.1

Double check to make sure that the Group form's data is still correct. We
had an issue when upgrading there the upgrade tried to add groups to the
form and it resulted in duplicate data.  Also you may need to update the
server's user_cache for the user (Make a change to the group information for
the user so the system will update their user_cache record, and then have
the user log back in to the server).

Fred

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mayfield, Andy L.
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 8:29 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Permissions after upgrade to 7.1

We upgraded one of our servers to 7.1.00 and now some of our users are
getting a permission error.

Nothing changed on the forms that I'm aware of, but now users are getting
the ARERR [333] No access to field:7, which is the status field.

This field is supposed to be updated through workflow when a ticket is moved
from one group to another.

Is there some known issue regarding this or am I just really lucky today
since it's my birthday?

Windows Server 2003
MSSQL 2000
ARS 7.1.00

Andy L. Mayfield 
Sr. System Operation Specialist 
Alabama Power Company 
Office: 205-226-1805 
Cell: 205-288-9140 
SoLinc: 10*19140

 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers
Are html___


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Spell Checker

2008-10-21 Thread Bryan Waters
Try setting the focus to another field and back to the text field with 2 change 
field actions.

Good Luck,
Bryan

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Begosh, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 2:37 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Spell Checker

This did work thanks a lot.  The cursor still ends up at the end of the text on 
the field.  Any idea how to move it to the beginning of the field? 


Kevin Begosh, RSP
Tech Ops
Enterprise Business Services
301-791-3540 Phone
410-422-3623 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of jham36
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 1:59 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Spell Checker

What I had to do to get this to work was create a temporary Integer
field.  I called it tmpSpellCount.   After the spell check finishes, I
do  3 set fields in the active link.

1.  Set field tmpSpellCount   toLENGTH($Description$)
2   Set tmpSpellCount   to  $tmpSpellCount$ - 2   (for some reason it
only works correctly if I subtract 2 from here)
3   Set Description   to   LEFT($Description$, $tmpSpellCount$)

Hope this helps.

James Hamilton
Business Systems Manager
The NPD Group, Inc.
900 West Shore Road
Port Washington, NY 11050 USA
+ 1.516.625.2468


On Oct 21, 1:47 pm, Begosh, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And actually it looks like a carriage return that is put in. after the 
 spell check runs.

 Kevin Begosh, RSP
 Tech Ops
 Enterprise Business Services
 301-791-3540 Phone
 410-422-3623 Cell
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)

 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Worsdell
 Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 1:16 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Spell Checker

 Surely you need rtrim. The alternative is to use a substr function and 
 combine with a length calc.

 -Original Message-
 From: Begosh, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:04 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Spell Checker

 On this spell checker I am getting it to work but it appears that 
 after the spell check is done it leaves a space or possible a carriage 
 return after the work it fixed.  Has anyone else run into this or know 
 how to fix it.  I have tried LTRIM, and Replace and neither on of those 
 worked.
 It almost looks like a carriage return.

 Kevin Begosh, RSP
 Tech Ops
 Enterprise Business Services
 301-791-3540 Phone
 410-422-3623 Cell
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Subash Biswas
 Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:22 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Spell Checker

 Kevin:
 I used the OLE spell check described in Integrating with Plug-ins and 
 Third-Party Products Guide 700 pg272. It works just fine with ARS
 7.0.1p004 WUT and MS Word 2003.

 [The entire original message is not included] 
 __
 __
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.orgPlatinum
 Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: Where the Answers Are

 __
 _­ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org 
 Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: Where the Answers Are- 
 Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: 
www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee ('s) only and its contents and any 
attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, 
please contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Business Objects

2008-10-21 Thread Bryan Waters
Are all of the workstations you tried part of a corporate OS image?  If
so, is there the possibility of using a non-standard corporate OS image
to test against?

Thanks,
Bryan

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sokol, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 2:59 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Business Objects

I have tried from many workstations and all get the same
error. I have also tried several printers from my workstation. 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.T. Shyman
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 2:54 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Business Objects

I wonder if the printer driver has something to do with it?

Have you tried changing the default printer on the workstation where you
are running the report to something like the Microsoft Document Writer?

--- J.T. Shyman


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sokol, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 2:33 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Business Objects

Can anyone offer a suggestion? I have tkts open with BMC and BO but I am
not getting anywhere. I can pull up a report but get a generic error
when I try to print it. I can not even find any kind of error to check.
It simply says an error has occurred on the server would you like to
view the error information? If I click Yes it just opens another copy of
the report.

I have been trying to get this resolved for weeks and have run out of
ideas.

-Original Message-
From: Sokol, Brian
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:44 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: RE: Business Objects

This saga continues with BMC saying this is a Business Objects problem
and BO saying it is a BMC problem. By default we are using the DHTML
viewer. You are forced to use an activex print control. That is what is
failing. The BO server is using SSL and BMC feels that may be causing a
problem. The BO support folks were involved in a webex yesterday and
here are their thoughts:

We just had a call with BO support. Their first reaction was that, since
BMC is using their own viewer that's deployed during the installation,
they will not support. 
BO uses the following directory to view the reports
D:\BOEIXR2\common\3.5\crystalreportviewer115.

During the webex demo they were able to successfully view and print the
same PO report through BO Infoview.  


Anyone out there have any ideas? Here is our environment. Does anyone
have a similar setup? BMC claims that all their customers are using BO
11.5. Not sure if that is a true statement.
BO Server: Windows server 2003/BO Enterprise 11.5/IIS and New Atlanta.
They are using SSL on this server
MidTier: Windows Server 2003/MidTier 7.1/IIS and New Atlanta


Brian

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Harris
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:27 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Business Objects

Hi Brian,
 
You are having quite a saga with this. I don't have the server in front
of me right now. I didn't copy everything - just that directory. Sorry I
didn't read all of your email. I just saw the error message and jumped
in. You have dealt with this message.
 
Maybe try this. I'm using the dynamic HTML viewer and it works well. I
don't think it has an activex print function. If you switch your BO
system to another viewer maybe this will help. For me changing my viewer
preferences does nothing. I think it takes the default from within the
BO system itself.
 
Rod
 


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Sokol,
Brian
Sent: Fri 26/09/2008 1:13 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Business Objects



Hi Rod,

Yes that is what I did as well. My report would not even load on screen.
Now since I copied reportadd.exe over to the C drive the report loads
OK. My problem now is it will not print. When you click on the print
icon in the report it loads an active x print control and then throws
that same error. I think it is still looking in the wrong directory. BMC
is saying I should copy the entire BO directory to the C drive.

Did you copy all the folders to the C drive? I just copied the one exe
and two related DLLs.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Harris
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:03 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Business Objects

Hi Brian,

Have you got the program C:\Program Files\Business
Objects\BusinessObjects Enterprise
11\win32_x86\plugins\desktop\CrystalEnterprise.Report\ReportAdd.exe

installed at the location specified? In my case we had BO installed on
the D drive so it didn't work and threw the same error you have (from
memory). 

ARS v7.1 Patch 5 Release

2008-10-07 Thread Bryan Waters
FYI

 

Thanks,

Bryan Waters 

 


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee ('s) only and its contents and any 
attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, 
please contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Email engine not sending mail

2008-08-17 Thread Bryan Waters
Suggest you test the SMTP connection by using telnet(details below).

KM-5157
Using telnet to test the SMTP gateway

telnet  SMTP Gateway  25 


For example:

telnet smtpserv 25

Connected to smtpserv.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 smtpserv.remedy.com Sendmail SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 ready at Thu, 12 Aug
1999 13
:40:24 -0700 


There will be some information about the SMTP protocol, or the fact that

you get connected means the this is running the protocol.

help - lists available commands
vrfy - verify a user

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AR_User
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 8:40 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email engine not sending mail

Thanks for your reply,

I am running email engine on IBM AIX platform and there is no firewall
or
virus scanner on the system.

And I am trying to set a SMTP account.

Thanks  Regards,
Ajit

Mario Roehr wrote:
 
 Ajit,
 
 do you have a virus scanner or firewall installed on the machine where
 email engine is running?
 Maybe there are any blocking rules for smtp connections. We had the
same
 issue but after disabeling the blocking rule for aremaild all was
running
 fine.
 
 hth
 Mario
 
 
 


  AR_User

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  MAIL.COM
To 
  Sent by: Action  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

  Request System
cc 
  discussion

  list(ARSList)
Subject 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email engine not sending mail

  ORG





  17.08.2008 12:11





  Please respond to

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 RG





 
 
 
 
 ** Hello All, I am trying to send mail using email engine. I've
properly
 configured mailbox. But whenever I try to send mail it is giving me
 following error Unknown SMTP host: smtpout.secureserver.net
 javax.mail.MessagingException: Unknown SMTP host:
 smtpout.secureserver.net;
 nested exception is: java.net.UnknownHostException:
 smtpout.secureserver.net at
 com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPTransport.openServer(SMTPTransport.java: 1280)
at
 com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPTransport.protocolConnect(SMTPTransport.java:
370)
 at
 javax.mail.Service.connect(Service.java:275) at

com.bmc.arsys.emaildaemon.SenderModule.openTransport(SenderModule.java:
 424) at
com.bmc.arsys.emaildaemon.SenderModule.doWork(SenderModule.java:
 197) at com.bmc.arsys.emaildaemon.ThreadBase.run(ThreadBase.java:288)
at
 java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:810) My outgoing server does not
require
 SSL. Also I am using proxy server for internet connections and I've
done
 all the settings for proxy in the AR System. I am on: IBM AIX 5.3 AR
 Server
 7.1 Mid-tier 7.1 JDK 1.5 Does anyone know how to resolve this problem?
 Thanks  Regards, Ajit
 View this message in context: Email engine not sending mail
 Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.
 __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
 html___
 


___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
 
 

-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Email-engine-not-sending-mail-tp19018811p19019675.
html
Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached 
files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please 
contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ARS v7.1.0 patch 4 released

2008-07-30 Thread Bryan Waters
FYI:  v7.1.0 patch 4 was released yesterday.

 

Cheers,

Bryan


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached 
files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please 
contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT from a filter

2008-02-22 Thread Bryan Waters
I've experienced this same issue with v7.0.1 patch4.  This is a known
defect.  Supposedly, it's fixed with v7.0.1 patch6.

 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.T. Shyman
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 5:13 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT from a filter

 

** 

Ok, is there any restriction on it?

 

I've got a simple filter that fires on modify and attempts to put a file
into an attachment field. However, when it runs it finishes
successfully, returns a status of 0, but doesn't put the file in the
attachment field. In fact, if there is a file there already it will
clear it out. 

 

This is what the filter log looks like if I use a set fields action:

 

FLTR TID: 0027933600 RPC ID: 000956 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
 /* Fri Feb 22 2008 16:02:40.2354 */ Checking NCC:SCC:External
Process Report_Add Attachment (500)

FLTR TID: 0027933600 RPC ID: 000956 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
-- Passed -- perform actions

FLTR TID: 0027933600 RPC ID: 000956 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
 0: Set Fields

FLTR TID: 0027933600 RPC ID: 000956 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
   PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT 536880912
net-snmp_license.txt

FLTR TID: 0027933600 RPC ID: 000956 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
   Exit code: 0  Value: 0

FLTR TID: 0027933600 RPC ID: 000956 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
   Short Description (8) = 0

 

This is what the filter log looks like if I use a process action:

 

FLTR TID: 0121088928 RPC ID: 000931 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
 /* Fri Feb 22 2008 16:02:13.0647 */ Checking NCC:SCC:External
Process Report_Add Attachment

FLTR TID: 0121088928 RPC ID: 000931 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
 0: Process

FLTR TID: 0121088928 RPC ID: 000931 Queue: Fast  
Client-RPC: 390620USER: Demo
   $PROCESS$ PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT 536880912
net-snmp_license.txt

 

But neither actually sets the file in the attachment field. 

 

The file net-snmp_license.txt exists in the Remedy installation's bin
folder...which is where PERFORM-ACTION-SAVE-ATTACHMENT puts files if you
don't specify a path so I figured it would grab from there to. However,
it behaves the same even if I point the ADD process to a full path and
file.

 

--- J.T. Shyman

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 5:04 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT from a filter

 

** Yes it can.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:54 PM, J.T. Shyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

** 

Does anyone know if PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT can be used in a
filter to attach a file from the server? AR 7.0.1 Patch 5 on Linux.

 

--- J.T. Shyman

 

 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___ 


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___ 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___ 


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee ('s) only and its contents and any 
attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, 
please contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Delays after user tool sits idle

2008-01-09 Thread Bryan Waters
In addition, there is a Microsoft Tech Note stating this registry entry
is *NOT* present to the registry , and the default value is 2 hours.
This explains why the failure point of the delay occurred between 1 and
2 hours of being idle.

 

http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/af2e0d81-50cc-430
d-80e1-a2ccebfc68f21033.mspx?mfr=true

 


KeepAliveTime


Updated: March 28, 2003

HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters 

Data type

Range

Default value

REG_DWORD

0x1-0x (milliseconds)

0x6DDD00 (7,200,000 milliseconds = 2 hours)


Description


Specifies how often TCP sends keep-alive transmissions. TCP sends
keep-alive transmissions to verify that an idle connection is still
active.

This entry is used when the remote system is responding to TCP.
Otherwise, the interval between transmissions is determined by the value
of the Parameters\KeepAliveInterval
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/734570a2-06d6-45
0e-b765-ccfa7530af491033.mspx  entry.

By default, keep-alive transmissions are not sent. The TCP keep-alive
feature must be enabled by a program (such as Telnet), or by an Internet
browser (such as Internet Explorer).

Note

* Windows Server 2003 does not add this entry to the registry. You can
add it by using the registry editor Regedit.exe.



 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Worthington
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:47 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delays after user tool sits idle

 

** 
Wow... Matt.  Thanks for the information!  I'm going to have to pass
this along to our network folks.  This might also fix our issues with
our load-balancers not being able to track sessions that aren't
persistent with a keep-alive (Remedy.)

Thanks again!

Tony 


-- 
Tony Worthington
Sr. Technical Analyst
Kohl's Department Stores
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911 



Matt Reinfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 

01/09/2008 11:04 AM 

Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

To

arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 

cc


Subject

Re: Delays after user tool sits idle

 






** 
Tony, 
  
Bryan Waters and I have been working with the escalation engineers on
this, and we've seen the following fix resolve the issue: 
  
Apply the below Registry settings, if in a Windows environment, to each
Windows server that hosts an AR Server.  If the AR Server is on
Linux/UNIX, see this note: 
It is depend on the server platform. If it is Windows, I think the
steps are same for server and client. If it is Linux, run 
  
echo 300 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time 
(default is 7200, 2 hours) 
  
To confirm it works, use WireShark for Windows and tcpdump for Linux to
monitor the connection between client and server. On every
keepalive_time, server should send out an acknowledge packet to client
and client sends reply back. In this way, connection is alive for
another keepalive_time interval. 
  

Open your registry and find the key below. 

Create new DWORD value named KeepAliveTime and set it to equal the
number of milliseconds to wait before sending keep alive packets (the
default is 2 hours - 7,200,000 milliseconds). 

Also create a new DWORD value called KeepAliveInterval and set it to
equal the time in milliseconds between retransmissions of keepalives,
once the KeepAliveTime has expired (the default is 1 second - 1000
milliseconds). 

Restart Windows for the change to take effect. 
  
  
Registry Settings 
System Key:
http://www.pctools.com/guides/help/registry-settings.php#system_key
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters]
Value Name:
http://www.pctools.com/guides/help/registry-settings.php#value_name
KeepAliveTime, KeepAliveInterval
Data Type:
http://www.pctools.com/guides/help/registry-settings.php#data_type
REG_DWORD (DWORD Value) 
  
The KeepAliveTime would be set to 30 for our test (5 minutes).  If
the Registry changes resolve the issue for you, we could export the
settings from the dev server's Registry and simply import them to the
production machines before rebooting them. 
KeepAliveTime set to 30 
KeepAliveInterval set to 5000 
  
Anyway, long story short, it appears that some network device is killing
the idle TCP connection after n-minutes (value depends on the device
settings).  So, the solution is to send a keep alive signal from the
server more often than the default 2 hours, or identify the device
causing the problems and change its settings. 
  
Hope that helps you with your issue.  BTW: we've requested that a KB get
written up for this, but I don't know when/if that will happen. 
  
Matt Reinfeldt 
  

 




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Worthington
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:05 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delays after user tool

Re: Problem with Group Notification Workflow

2007-12-31 Thread Bryan Waters
Mike,

 

The Assigned Group ID on the Incident form is not the same value as the
Group ID from the Group form.  It is the CTM:Support Group ID.  You will
need to create some workflow to get the *real* group name/id from the
Group form for your assignment group.  You will need to search against
the 'Long Group Name' on the Group form.  The 'Long Group Name' format
is stored as Support Company - Support Organization - Support Group
Name.  For example, ACME - HR - Payroll would be your search string.
In your workflow, you can use either the 'Group Name' or 'Group ID'
value since they are the same.

 

Cheers,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 1:37 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Problem with Group Notification Workflow

 

** 

George,

 

I tried your suggestion with no luck. Now the message just appears with
the Support Group ID in the Address. I also tried using the InstanceId
from the CTM:Support Group form but that didn't work either. 

 

I'm going to try and dig around the Incident Management filters to see
what it is passing in since that is working on our server.

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

Mike Pugh

Software Engineer


13990 Parkeast Circle
Chantilly, VA 20151
www.AmericanSystems.com http://www.americansystems.com/ 

phone: (703) 968-5265
mobile: (203) 434-5082
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Contractor of the Year - 5th Annual Greater Washington Government
Contractor Awards

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Payne, George
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:11 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Problem with Group Notification Workflow

 

** 

Mike,

 

The Send To field is resolved in a very strict way.  From the Online
Manual:

Note: AR System resolves the contents of the User Name field by first
checking for a matching request in the User form. If found, the
notification is sent to that user. If not found, the server checks for a
matching request in the Group form. If the name corresponds to a group
name, the notification is sent to all members of that group. If no User
or Group definition is found, the contents of the User Name field are
used as is and treated as a guest user of the system.

This all made pretty good sense before 7.0...now the Group Name that
it's referring to here is going to be the GROUPID (eg: 100089) and
not the actual name as you and I would LIKE it to be.

 

I would suggest that you try sending your email to the Assigned Group ID
instead of the name.

 

Hope that helps,

Gp

 

George Payne

Corporate Applications Developer

Electric Reliability Council of Texas

(512) 248-3940

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 10:17 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Problem with Group Notification Workflow

 

I've created an escalation that should bring in a support group's name
into a Notify action so that it e-mails all members of the group. For
some reason it's not resolving the group name so it's not pushing the
notification out to all of the group's members.

 

I've double checked the group name several times and it's fine. Incident
Management is able to send a group notification without a problem.

 

I'm passing in $Assigned Group$ to the User Name property of the Notify
action. It comes from a form I created and, for example, the form
contains Enterprise Systems in that field, and I have an Enterprise
Systems Support Group defined.

 

I'm running ARS 7.1 and ITSM 7.0.02 patch 6. 

 

Does anyone have any clues?

 

Thanks!

 



Mike Pugh

Software Engineer


13990 Parkeast Circle
Chantilly, VA 20151
www.AmericanSystems.com http://www.americansystems.com/ 

phone: (703) 968-5265
mobile: (203) 434-5082
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Contractor of the Year - 5th Annual Greater Washington Government
Contractor Awards

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The information in this email is confidential and may
be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access
to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful.

 

 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed 

Re: Change Management email

2007-12-15 Thread Bryan Waters
Mary,

Did you check to see if the CHG Mgmt notifications were enabled in the
SYS:Notification Messages form?

Thanks,
Bryan

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Dollus
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 1:24 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Change Management email

Hi everyone,,,

Bumping this issue to the top... sorry... 

We're still are having this issue and can't find any Config issues.  I
also
don't see any defects listed for this.

I also forgot to add what versions we're on.

ARS 7.0.01 patch 4
App is on 7.0.02 no patches yet we do plan to patch to 006 asap
however.

I've checked NTE:Notifier Log form and the System Default alerts have
been
going out,,, just not the emails.

Thanks so much for reading!! :) and any ideas are so appreciated!! 


Mary Dollus

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Dollus
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Change Management email

Hi All,

This is a very weird thing at least I haven't encountered it before.

The email engine is running and emails are going out for Incident
Management; however they aren't for Change Management.  I tested with my
account to be sure all settings are correct. I'm set to receive email as
my
default.. I set up email notifications for them instead of alert with
the
default as email.  I should be getting notified if I'm assigned to
Change
Manager, Change Assignee or Implementer. and also for Manager and
Assignee
if it completes.

Has anyone else experienced this?

Thanks.  a ton!!!

Mary Dollus



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee ('s) only and its contents and any 
attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, 
please contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: How many attachments?

2007-12-14 Thread Bryan Waters
Kevin,

 

I would recommend that you store attachments in a separate centralized
data table.  This will provide 3 main benefits:

 

1)  The load time of a ticket will be less since the attachments do
not have to be fetched when querying.

2)  You are not bound to a finite number of attachments.  Use a GUID
value to relate the data ticket to the attachment records.  This will
allow a n number of attachments.

3)  You can reuse the centralized attachment form for other
applications

 

Cheers,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amen, Kevin
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 11:26 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: How many attachments?

 

** 

 

Are there any gotchas with having 20 attachment fields in an
attachment pool? 

 

Kevin Amen 
Novartis Vaccines  Diagnostics
Information Technology
510.923.3691 (Office) / 510.520.4060 (Cell) 

 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee ('s) only and its contents and any 
attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, 
please contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Delays after user tool sits idle

2007-09-26 Thread Bryan Waters
We are facing a similar issue after the Remedy User Tool or driver
program is idle more than 1 hour where it takes anywhere from 1-2 mins
for an operation to complete.  After the initial delay, everything
responds quickly.  We've seen this issue with v6.3 patch 22 as well as
7.0.1 patch 4.  However, no delay is experience when running the driver
program directly on the server.  Below are the results of using the
driver program on a user's workstation.  The first call took 100+
seconds to complete while the next API call took less than 1 second to
complete.  In addition, this is not related to threads being too busy as
the maximum number of threads are not being utilized, and we even tested
using a private thread with the same results.  Lastly, the API and SQL
logs do not show the 100+ seconds it took to complete the GE API call.
It seems to be an issue with the network connection as it only happens
with remote clients.  We have a ticket logged with BMC on this issue as
well.

 

1st GE API Call After 1 hour delay:

2nd GE API Call immediately the initial delay

   ARGetEntry results

Return Code: OK

Field Value List: 2 items

   Field Value Struct:

  Field Id: 1

  Value: (char) HD27513

   Field Value Struct:

  Field Id: 7

  Value: (enumerated) 3

Status List: 0 items

Start Time:1189801277.64 (Fri Sep 14 2007 16:21:18)

Finish Time:   1189801378.562000 (Fri Sep 14 2007 16:22:59)

Elapsed Time:  100.922000

   ARGetEntry results

Return Code: OK

Field Value List: 2 items

   Field Value Struct:

  Field Id: 1

  Value: (char) HD27513

   Field Value Struct:

  Field Id: 7

  Value: (enumerated) 3

Status List: 0 items

Start Time:1189801475.50 (Fri Sep 14 2007 16:24:35)

Finish Time:   1189801475.593000 (Fri Sep 14 2007 16:24:36)

Elapsed Time:  0.093000

 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Worthington
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 10:46 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delays after user tool sits idle

 

** 
Yea... patch four broke the horizontal navigation bars on the left in
our ITSM7 stuff, so we rolled back to three.  People here see this in
p3, p4 and 7.1.  :-( 

I was hoping 7.1 fixed this slowness thing, but evidently not. 

I'm beginning to think it's something unique to our xp images here
(arg.) 


-- 
Tony Worthington
Sr. Technical Analyst
Kohl's Department Stores
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911 



Rick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 

09/26/2007 09:42 AM 

Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

To

arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 

cc


Subject

Re: Delays after user tool sits idle

 






** 
Tony, 7.0.1 p4 should be subtitled We're really sorry about patch 3.
The patch 4 release notes mention that patch 4 fixes some errors that
were introduced in patch 3 - perhaps this is one of them?  Of course, as
you have seen on other threads, patch 4 is no day at the beach, either. 
  
Rick

On 9/26/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
** 
All - 

Has anyone experienced the issue of the User Tool taking an extremely
long time to perform any action after sitting idle for a few minutes?
Click, wait a minute, then poof everything is back to normal. 

We have 7.0.1p3 delpoyed, and I also see the same issue using the 7.1
tool.  I'm going to open a ticket with support, but I was hoping for
some me too's or tips.  :-) 

(Nothing in client-side logging other than a gap where the tool is
frozen.) 

Thanks, 
Tony 

ITSM7.0.2p4/win2kr3/10gr2 


-- 
Tony Worthington
Sr. Technical Analyst
Kohl's Department Stores
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
262-703-5911 
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached 
files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please 
contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: User Tool 7.0.01 and Modify All

2007-09-07 Thread Bryan Waters
John,

 

I ran across a similar issue recently.  Make sure there is no workflow
setting the field to NULL or an empty string on triggers such as lose
focus, menu choice, etc..  For some reason, the Modify All operation was
pushing an empty/NULL value even though I had not directly updated the
field.

 

HTH,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kovalcik
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 9:50 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: User Tool 7.0.01 and Modify All

 

** 
Listers, 

I have run in to a problem doing a Modify all on the 7.0.01 user
tool.  When doing a modify all on CHG:Task, if the first record has a
blank assignee, then it will NULL out all assignee's in the following
records.  Has anyone seen this issue ?  It doesn't do it in the 6.x
usertool.   



 Thanks,
   John M. Kovalcik
   Service Management Sr. Analyst
  ITIL Foundations Certified
   Global Information Technology
   Kennametal Inc.
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached 
files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please 
contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


ARS v7.0.1 Patch 4: New server drop is available

2007-08-31 Thread Bryan Waters
Hello,

 

I wanted to inform everyone that BMC released a new drop for the server
component of v7.0.1 patch 4.  Don't kill the messenger. J  Have a great
holiday weekend!

 

Thanks,

Bryan Waters


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached 
files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, please 
contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ARS v7.0.1 Patch 4: New server drop is available

2007-08-31 Thread Bryan Waters
 

 

Look at the timestamps on the files.  Not the timestamps on the
directories.

 

Thanks,

Bryan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:50 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS v7.0.1 Patch 4: New server drop is available

 

** 

I don't see it on the patch page - it still shows the one from 8/21,
which is the same date as the other executables in that patch.

 

Rick 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan Waters
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:59 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARS v7.0.1 Patch 4: New server drop is available

** 

Hello,

 

I wanted to inform everyone that BMC released a new drop for the server
component of v7.0.1 patch 4.  Don't kill the messenger. J  Have a great
holiday weekend!

 

Thanks,

Bryan Waters

http://www.turingsmi.com/local/images/userworld2007.jpg 

Email Disclaimer  
This email has been sent from the TuringSMI Group 

This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its
subsidiaries or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not
secure and therefore the TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal
responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions
expressed are those of the author.  This message is intended for the
addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached files are strictly
confidential. If you have received it in error, please contact the
sender on the number above.

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are
image001.png

Re: Prefetch ITSM to mid-tier

2007-05-23 Thread Bryan Waters
The pre-fetch fails to work when using a non-ARS admin account with a
Preference Server specified in the Mid-Tier Config tool.  If you remove
the Preference Server setting, the process works with a non-ARS Admin
account.  BMC has created defect SW00261809 for the issue with a non-ARS
admin and a Preference Server setting.

 

ARS v7.0.1 patch 1

Mid-Tier v7.0.1 patch 1

 

Thanks,

Bryan Waters

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 5:43 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Prefetch ITSM to mid-tier

 

** 

Several months ago, Axton mentioned that a perl script to prefetch the
forms and applications to the Mid-Tier server was included in the
Mid-Tier 7 installation.  I found the sample script (prefetchConfig.xml)
in the C:Program Files\AR System\Mid-Tier\WEB-INF\classes directory, and
I have made the modifications I believe to be necessary to prefetch the
applications and forms I want, but what I don't see is how to execute
the script.

 

It's probably easy for you Perl divers out there - care to help me out?

 

Rick Cook

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 


This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual 
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its subsidiaries 
or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the 
TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.  This 
message is intended for the addressee ('s) only and its contents and any 
attached files are strictly confidential. If you have received it in error, 
please contact the sender on the number above.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are