Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Rui Wang]

After I switched from Mac to Ubuntu, the dependency check starts to work
:)


-Rui

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:47 AM Rui Wang  wrote:

> I am Generate a report of vulnerabilities that occur among dependencies
> when running `./gradlew :dependencyCheckUpdate`, I consistently hit
>
> Unable to download meta file:
> https://nvd.nist.gov/feeds/json/cve/1.1/xxx.meta and seems the root cause
> is "unable to connect".
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen it in the past?
>
>
> -Rui
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 6:26 PM Rui Wang  wrote:
>
>> Hi community,
>>
>> Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09
>>
>>
>> -Rui
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:19 AM Alessandro Solimando <
>> alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alessandro
>>>
>>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang  wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
>>> > blockers at this moment.
>>> >
>>> > Hi Alessandro,
>>> >
>>> > I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It
>>> should
>>> > be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no
>>> objection.
>>> >
>>> > -Rui
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
>>> > alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi everyone,
>>> > > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready
>>> if
>>> > > there
>>> > > are no objections.
>>> > >
>>> > > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
>>> > > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
>>> > >
>>> > > Best regards,
>>> > > Alessandro
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <
>>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in
>>> its
>>> > > PR,
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get
>>> it
>>> > in
>>> > > > soon after the release.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a
>>> new
>>> > > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Julian
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > [1]
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>>> > > > <
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>> ppoze...@gmail.com
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Hi Xiong,
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Thank you very much.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Vladimir.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan >> > >> > > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> I have merged.
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com
>>> >>
>>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > >  Hi Xiong,
>>> > > > 
>>> > > >  I've just resolved the conflicts.
>>> > > > 
>>> > > >  Regards,
>>> > > >  Vladimir.
>>> > > > 
>>> > > >  сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan >> > > >> > > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > > Hi, Vladimir.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
>>> > > > > have
>>> > > > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Vladimir Ozerov >> ppoze...@gmail.com>>
>>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> Hi,
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Could you please also merge
>>> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got
>>> stuck
>>> > > > >> somehow,
>>> > > > >> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
>>> > create
>>> > > a
>>> > > >  copy
>>> > > > > of
>>> > > > >> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Regards,
>>> > > > >> Vladimir
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang >> > > > >:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>> Thanks Julian!
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Rui Wang]

I am Generate a report of vulnerabilities that occur among dependencies
when running `./gradlew :dependencyCheckUpdate`, I consistently hit

Unable to download meta file:
https://nvd.nist.gov/feeds/json/cve/1.1/xxx.meta and seems the root cause
is "unable to connect".



Has anyone seen it in the past?


-Rui



On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 6:26 PM Rui Wang  wrote:

> Hi community,
>
> Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0.
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:19 AM Alessandro Solimando <
> alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alessandro
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang  wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
>> > blockers at this moment.
>> >
>> > Hi Alessandro,
>> >
>> > I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It
>> should
>> > be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no
>> objection.
>> >
>> > -Rui
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
>> > alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
>> > > there
>> > > are no objections.
>> > >
>> > > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
>> > > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Alessandro
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in
>> its
>> > > PR,
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get
>> it
>> > in
>> > > > soon after the release.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
>> > > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Julian
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Hi Xiong,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thank you very much.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Vladimir.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan > > > > > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> I have merged.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com
>> >>
>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >  Hi Xiong,
>> > > > 
>> > > >  I've just resolved the conflicts.
>> > > > 
>> > > >  Regards,
>> > > >  Vladimir.
>> > > > 
>> > > >  сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan > > > > > > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
>> > > > 
>> > > > > Hi, Vladimir.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
>> > > > > have
>> > > > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Vladimir Ozerov > ppoze...@gmail.com>>
>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Hi,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Could you please also merge
>> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
>> > > > >> somehow,
>> > > > >> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
>> > create
>> > > a
>> > > >  copy
>> > > > > of
>> > > > >> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Regards,
>> > > > >> Vladimir
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang > > > > >:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Thanks Julian!
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or
>> not,
>> > > then
>> > > > >>> I
>> > > > > will
>> > > > >>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> -Rui
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
>> > > > >>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Rui Wang]

Hi community,

Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0.


[1]
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09


-Rui

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:19 AM Alessandro Solimando <
alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang  wrote:
>
> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
> > blockers at this moment.
> >
> > Hi Alessandro,
> >
> > I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It
> should
> > be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no
> objection.
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
> > alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
> > > there
> > > are no objections.
> > >
> > > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
> > > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alessandro
> > >
> > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in
> its
> > > PR,
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it
> > in
> > > > soon after the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> > > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> > > > >
> > > > > Julian
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov  > > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Xiong,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you very much.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Vladimir.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan  >  > > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I have merged.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>>
> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> > > > >>>
> > > >  Hi Xiong,
> > > > 
> > > >  I've just resolved the conflicts.
> > > > 
> > > >  Regards,
> > > >  Vladimir.
> > > > 
> > > >  сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan  > >  > > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi, Vladimir.
> > > > >
> > > > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > > > > have
> > > > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com
> >>
> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Could you please also merge
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> > > > >> somehow,
> > > > >> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
> > create
> > > a
> > > >  copy
> > > > > of
> > > > >> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Vladimir
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang  > > > >:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Thanks Julian!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not,
> > > then
> > > > >>> I
> > > > > will
> > > > >>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> -Rui
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > > >>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com 
> > > > >
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > >  Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > > 
> > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <
> amaliu...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > > >
> > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Alessandro Solimando]

Hello everyone,
I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.

Best regards,
Alessandro

On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang  wrote:

> Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
> blockers at this moment.
>
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It should
> be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no objection.
>
> -Rui
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
> alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
> > there
> > are no objections.
> >
> > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
> > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alessandro
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> > >
> > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its
> > PR,
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it
> in
> > > soon after the release.
> > > >
> > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> > > >
> > > > Julian
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov  > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Xiong,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you very much.
> > > >>
> > > >> Vladimir.
> > > >>
> > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan   > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have merged.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>>
> > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> > > >>>
> > >  Hi Xiong,
> > > 
> > >  I've just resolved the conflicts.
> > > 
> > >  Regards,
> > >  Vladimir.
> > > 
> > >  сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan  >  > > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> > > 
> > > > Hi, Vladimir.
> > > >
> > > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > > > have
> > > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > > >
> > > > Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>>
> > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Could you please also merge
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> > > >> somehow,
> > > >> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
> create
> > a
> > >  copy
> > > > of
> > > >> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Vladimir
> > > >>
> > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang  > > >:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thanks Julian!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not,
> > then
> > > >>> I
> > > > will
> > > >>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -Rui
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > >>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > >  Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > 
> > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > >
> > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > >
> > > > -Rui
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu 
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > > >> currently.
> > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> ZheHu
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini >
> > > > wrote：
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> > >  review.
> > > > I
> > >  believe
> > > >> 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Rui Wang]

Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
blockers at this moment.

Hi Alessandro,

I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It should
be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no objection.

-Rui

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
> there
> are no objections.
>
> Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
> causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde  wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> >
> > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its
> PR,
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in
> > soon after the release.
> > >
> > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > > [1]
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > <
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov  > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Xiong,
> > >>
> > >> Thank you very much.
> > >>
> > >> Vladimir.
> > >>
> > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan  > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Vladimir,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have merged.
> > >>>
> > >>> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>>
> > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> > >>>
> >  Hi Xiong,
> > 
> >  I've just resolved the conflicts.
> > 
> >  Regards,
> >  Vladimir.
> > 
> >  сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan   > nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> > 
> > > Hi, Vladimir.
> > >
> > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > > have
> > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > >
> > > Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>>
> > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Could you please also merge
> > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> > >> somehow,
> > >> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create
> a
> >  copy
> > > of
> > >> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Vladimir
> > >>
> > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang  > >:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks Julian!
> > >>>
> > >>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not,
> then
> > >>> I
> > > will
> > >>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -Rui
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> > >>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com 
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > 
> > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Zhe.
> > >
> > > Hi Francesco,
> > >
> > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu 
> > >>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Rui.
> > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > >> currently.
> > >> Thanks for your work!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> ZheHu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini
> > > wrote：
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> >  review.
> > > I
> >  believe
> > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > > anything.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> >  jacq...@apache.org>
> >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > >> CALCITE-4898
> >  and
> > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> > >>> amaliu...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> For the 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Alessandro Solimando]

Hi everyone,
I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if there
are no objections.

Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.

Best regards,
Alessandro

On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde  wrote:

> Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
>
> > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
> >
> > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR,
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in
> soon after the release.
> >
> > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1]
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> <
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov  > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Xiong,
> >>
> >> Thank you very much.
> >>
> >> Vladimir.
> >>
> >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan  nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> >>
> >>> Hi Vladimir,
> >>>
> >>> I have merged.
> >>>
> >>> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>>
> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> >>>
>  Hi Xiong,
> 
>  I've just resolved the conflicts.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Vladimir.
> 
>  сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan  nobigo...@gmail.com>>:
> 
> > Hi, Vladimir.
> >
> > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > have
> > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> >
> > Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>>
> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Could you please also merge
> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> >> somehow,
> >> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
>  copy
> > of
> >> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang  >:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Julian!
> >>>
> >>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
> >>> I
> > will
> >>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Rui
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> >>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com 
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> 
> > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Zhe.
> >
> > Hi Francesco,
> >
> > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu 
> >>> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Rui.
> >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> >> currently.
> >> Thanks for your work!
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> ZheHu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini
> > wrote：
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
>  review.
> > I
>  believe
> >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > anything.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
>  jacq...@apache.org>
>  wrote:
> >>
> >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> >> CALCITE-4898
>  and
> >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> >>> amaliu...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
> >>> as
> >>> resolved
> >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
> >>> not
> > all
> >> those
> >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Rui
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
> >>> been
> >> merged.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ruben
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> > jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Julian Hyde]

Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 
. 

> On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> 
> I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR, 
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 
> . I promise we’ll get it in soon 
> after the release.
> 
> In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new CVE[1]. 
> Let’s get that in.
> 
> Julian
> 
> [1] 
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>  
> 
> 
>> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Xiong,
>> 
>> Thank you very much.
>> 
>> Vladimir.
>> 
>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan > >:
>> 
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>> 
>>> I have merged.
>>> 
>>> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>> 
>>> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>>> 
 Hi Xiong,
 
 I've just resolved the conflicts.
 
 Regards,
 Vladimir.
 
 сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan >>> >:
 
> Hi, Vladimir.
> 
> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 
> ] looks good. If you
> have
> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> 
> Vladimir Ozerov mailto:ppoze...@gmail.com>> 
> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Could you please also merge
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 
>>  ? I guess it got stuck
>> somehow,
>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
 copy
> of
>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Vladimir
>> 
>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang > >:
>> 
>>> Thanks Julian!
>>> 
>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
>>> I
> will
>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Rui
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
>>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com 
> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
 
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang 
> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Zhe.
> 
> Hi Francesco,
> 
> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> 
> -Rui
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu 
>>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi, Rui.
>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
>> currently.
>> Thanks for your work!
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> ZheHu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini
> wrote：
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
 review.
> I
 believe
>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> anything.
>> 
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
 jacq...@apache.org>
 wrote:
>> 
>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
>> CALCITE-4898
 and
>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
>>> amaliu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>> 
>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
>>> as
>>> resolved
>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
>>> not
> all
>> those
>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>> 
>> 
>> -Rui
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L >>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
>>> been
>> merged.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ruben
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
>>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Rui,
>> 
>> Even though
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
>> fixed,
>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
 X.
>> That
>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>> 
>> I’m working on getting
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>>  done
 today.
>> 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Julian Hyde]

I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR, 
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 
. I promise we’ll get it in soon 
after the release.

In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new CVE[1]. 
Let’s get that in.

Julian

[1] 
https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html

> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov  wrote:
> 
> Hi Xiong,
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> Vladimir.
> 
> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan :
> 
>> Hi Vladimir,
>> 
>> I have merged.
>> 
>> Vladimir Ozerov  于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>> 
>>> Hi Xiong,
>>> 
>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Vladimir.
>>> 
>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan :
>>> 
 Hi, Vladimir.
 
 The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
 have
 free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
 
 Vladimir Ozerov  于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
 
> Hi,
> 
> Could you please also merge
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> somehow,
> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
>>> copy
 of
> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> 
> Regards,
> Vladimir
> 
> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang :
> 
>> Thanks Julian!
>> 
>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
>> I
 will
>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>> 
>> 
>> -Rui
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>>> 
 On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang 
 wrote:
 
 Thanks Zhe.
 
 Hi Francesco,
 
 I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
 
 -Rui
 
 On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu 
>> wrote:
 
> Hi, Rui.
> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> currently.
> Thanks for your work!
> 
> 
> Best,
> ZheHu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini
 wrote：
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
>>> review.
 I
>>> believe
> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
 anything.
> 
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
>>> jacq...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
> 
> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> CALCITE-4898
>>> and
> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
>> amaliu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
> 
> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
>> as
>> resolved
> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
>> not
 all
> those
> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> 
> 
> -Rui
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L >> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
>> been
> merged.
> 
> Regards,
> Ruben
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
 jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
>> 
> wrote:
> 
> Rui,
> 
> Even though
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
>>> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> fixed,
> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
>>> X.
> That
> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> 
> I’m working on getting
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>  done
>>> today.
> Please
> wait for that.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> refactoring
> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
 going
> to
> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> 
> I also see the following as open or in progress and
>> fix-in-1.29:
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
>>> Noble)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
>>> Koo)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Hi Xiong,

Thank you very much.

Vladimir.

Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan :

> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I have merged.
>
> Vladimir Ozerov  于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>
> > Hi Xiong,
> >
> > I've just resolved the conflicts.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vladimir.
> >
> > сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan :
> >
> > > Hi, Vladimir.
> > >
> > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
> > > have
> > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > >
> > > Vladimir Ozerov  于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could you please also merge
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> > > > somehow,
> > > > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
> > copy
> > > of
> > > > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Vladimir
> > > >
> > > > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang :
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Julian!
> > > > >
> > > > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
> I
> > > will
> > > > > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Rui
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu 
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > > > currently.
> > > > > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > >> ZheHu
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini
> > > wrote：
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> > review.
> > > I
> > > > > > believe
> > > > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > > anything.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> > jacq...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > > > CALCITE-4898
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> amaliu...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
> as
> > > > > resolved
> > > > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
> not
> > > all
> > > > > > >> those
> > > > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> -Rui
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Hello,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
> been
> > > > > > >> merged.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > >> Ruben
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Rui,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Even though
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
> > <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> > > > fixed,
> > > > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
> > X.
> > > > > > >> That
> > > > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > > > >>  done
> > today.
> > > > > > >> Please
> > > > > > >> wait for that.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > > > > >> refactoring
> > > > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> > > going
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and
> fix-in-1.29:
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
> > Noble)
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
> > Koo)
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > > > >> 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Hi Xiong,

I've just resolved the conflicts.

Regards,
Vladimir.

сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan :

> Hi, Vladimir.
>
> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
> have
> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>
> Vladimir Ozerov  于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you please also merge
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> > somehow,
> > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy
> of
> > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vladimir
> >
> > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang :
> >
> > > Thanks Julian!
> > >
> > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I
> will
> > > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > > >
> > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > currently.
> > > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> ZheHu
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini
> wrote：
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review.
> I
> > > > believe
> > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> anything.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > CALCITE-4898
> > > > and
> > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> > > resolved
> > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not
> all
> > > > >> those
> > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Rui
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L 
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hello,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > > > >> merged.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Ruben
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Rui,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> > fixed,
> > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> > > > >> That
> > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > >>  done today.
> > > > >> Please
> > > > >> wait for that.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > > >> refactoring
> > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> going
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> Rebele)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
> Duan
> > > > >> Xiong)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco
> > Gini)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What’s the status on those?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Julian
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> tradition
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[xiong duan]

Hi, Vladimir.

The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you have
free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.

Vladimir Ozerov  于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：

> Hi,
>
> Could you please also merge
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> somehow,
> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy of
> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang :
>
> > Thanks Julian!
> >
> > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will
> > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> >
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > >
> > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > >
> > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > >
> > > > -Rui
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu  wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> currently.
> > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> ZheHu
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini wrote：
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I
> > > believe
> > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> CALCITE-4898
> > > and
> > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang 
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> > resolved
> > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> > > >> those
> > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -Rui
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L 
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello,
> > > >>
> > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > > >> merged.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Ruben
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde  >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Rui,
> > > >>
> > > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> fixed,
> > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> > > >> That
> > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > >>
> > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > >>  done today.
> > > >> Please
> > > >> wait for that.
> > > >>
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > >> refactoring
> > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> > > >> to
> > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > >>
> > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > > >> Xiong)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco
> Gini)
> > > >>
> > > >> What’s the status on those?
> > > >>
> > > >> Julian
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > >>
> > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> > > >> the
> > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang 
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi community,
> > > >>
> > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> > > >> JIRA
> > > >> list
> > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > > >> open/in
> > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > > >> merged.
> > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Hi,

Could you please also merge
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck somehow,
as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy of
the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.

Regards,
Vladimir

Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang :

> Thanks Julian!
>
> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will
> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
>
> > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> >
> > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Zhe.
> > >
> > > Hi Francesco,
> > >
> > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Rui.
> > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
> > >> Thanks for your work!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> ZheHu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini wrote：
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I
> > believe
> > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898
> > and
> > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> resolved
> > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> > >> those
> > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Rui
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > >> merged.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Ruben
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Rui,
> > >>
> > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> > >> That
> > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > >>
> > >> I’m working on getting
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > >>  done today.
> > >> Please
> > >> wait for that.
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > >> refactoring
> > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> > >> to
> > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > >>
> > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > >> Xiong)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> > >>
> > >> What’s the status on those?
> > >>
> > >> Julian
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > >>
> > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> > >> the
> > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi community,
> > >>
> > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> > >> JIRA
> > >> list
> > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > >> open/in
> > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > >> merged.
> > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> > >> be
> > >> released.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> > >> the
> > >> end
> > >> of this week.
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > >>
> > >> [1]:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Rui

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Rui Wang]

Thanks Julian!

Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will
lock the main branch and start the release process.


-Rui

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:

> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>
> > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Zhe.
> >
> > Hi Francesco,
> >
> > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Rui.
> >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
> >> Thanks for your work!
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> ZheHu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini wrote：
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I
> believe
> >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898
> and
> >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang  wrote:
> >>
> >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> >> those
> >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Rui
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> >> merged.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ruben
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Rui,
> >>
> >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> >> That
> >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> >>
> >> I’m working on getting
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> >>  done today.
> >> Please
> >> wait for that.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> >> refactoring
> >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> >> to
> >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> >>
> >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> >> Xiong)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> >>
> >> What’s the status on those?
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> >>
> >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> >> the
> >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi community,
> >>
> >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> >> JIRA
> >> list
> >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> >> open/in
> >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> >> merged.
> >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> >> be
> >> released.
> >>
> >>
> >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> >> the
> >> end
> >> of this week.
> >>
> >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >>
> >> [1]:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> >>
> >>
> >> -Rui
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Francesco Gini
> >>
>
>

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Julian Hyde]

Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.

> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Zhe.
> 
> Hi Francesco,
> 
> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> 
> -Rui
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu  wrote:
> 
>> Hi, Rui.
>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
>> Thanks for your work!
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> ZheHu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini wrote：
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
>> 
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau  wrote:
>> 
>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang  wrote:
>> 
>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
>> those
>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>> 
>> 
>> -Rui
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
>> merged.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ruben
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Rui,
>> 
>> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
>> That
>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>> 
>> I’m working on getting
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>>  done today.
>> Please
>> wait for that.
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
>> refactoring
>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
>> to
>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>> 
>> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
>> Xiong)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
>> 
>> What’s the status on those?
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>> 
>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
>> the
>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi community,
>> 
>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
>> JIRA
>> list
>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
>> open/in
>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
>> merged.
>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
>> be
>> released.
>> 
>> 
>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
>> the
>> end
>> of this week.
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> 
>> [1]:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>> 
>> 
>> -Rui
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Francesco Gini
>> 

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Rui Wang]

Thanks Zhe.

Hi Francesco,

I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?

-Rui

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu  wrote:

> Hi, Rui.
> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
> Thanks for your work!
>
>
> Best,
> ZheHu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini wrote：
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
>
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau  wrote:
>
> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang  wrote:
>
> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> those
> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> merged.
>
> Regards,
> Ruben
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
>
> Rui,
>
> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> That
> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>
> I’m working on getting
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>  done today.
> Please
> wait for that.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> refactoring
> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> to
> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>
> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> Xiong)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
>
> What’s the status on those?
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>
> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> the
> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang 
> wrote:
>
> Hi community,
>
> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> JIRA
> list
> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> open/in
> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> merged.
> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> be
> released.
>
>
> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> the
> end
> of this week.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> [1]:
>
>
>
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>
>
> -Rui
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Francesco Gini
>

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Zhe Hu]

Hi, Rui.
CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
Thanks for your work!


Best,
ZheHu






On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini wrote：
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau  wrote:

I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
maven repositories and category x licenses.

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang  wrote:

For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
those
will make the 1.29.0 release.


-Rui

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:

Hello,

FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
merged.

Regards,
Ruben


On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
wrote:

Rui,

Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
That
needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].

I’m working on getting
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
 done today.
Please
wait for that.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
refactoring
and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
to
happen. Don’t wait for it.

I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
Xiong)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)

What’s the status on those?

Julian

[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>

PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
the
email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.


On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang 
wrote:

Hi community,

To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
JIRA
list
[1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
open/in
progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
merged.
Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
be
released.


My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
the
end
of this week.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

[1]:




https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0


-Rui







--
Francesco Gini

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Francesco Gini]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau  wrote:

> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang  wrote:
>
> > For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> > since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> those
> > will make the 1.29.0 release.
> >
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> merged.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ruben
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rui,
> > > >
> > > > Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > > > there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> That
> > > > needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > >
> > > > I’m working on getting
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > >  done today.
> > Please
> > > > wait for that.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > refactoring
> > > > and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> to
> > > > happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > >
> > > > I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > > Xiong)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> > > >
> > > > What’s the status on those?
> > > >
> > > > Julian
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > >
> > > > PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> > the
> > > > email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi community,
> > > > >
> > > > > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> JIRA
> > > > list
> > > > > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > > > open/in
> > > > > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > merged.
> > > > > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> > be
> > > > > released.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> > the
> > > > end
> > > > > of this week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Francesco Gini

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Jacques Nadeau]

I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
maven repositories and category x licenses.

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang  wrote:

> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all those
> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been merged.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ruben
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rui,
> > >
> > > Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > > there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That
> > > needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > >
> > > I’m working on getting
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > >  done today.
> Please
> > > wait for that.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> refactoring
> > > and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to
> > > happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > >
> > > I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > Xiong)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> > >
> > > What’s the status on those?
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > >
> > > PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> the
> > > email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi community,
> > > >
> > > > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA
> > > list
> > > > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > > open/in
> > > > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> merged.
> > > > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> be
> > > > released.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> the
> > > end
> > > > of this week.
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > >
> > > > [1]:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Rui
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Rui Wang]

For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all those
will make the 1.29.0 release.


-Rui

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been merged.
>
> Regards,
> Ruben
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde 
> wrote:
>
> > Rui,
> >
> > Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That
> > needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> >
> > I’m working on getting
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> >  done today. Please
> > wait for that.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big refactoring
> > and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to
> > happen. Don’t wait for it.
> >
> > I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> Xiong)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> >
> > What’s the status on those?
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> >
> > PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition the
> > email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi community,
> > >
> > > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA
> > list
> > > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > open/in
> > > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged.
> > > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be
> > > released.
> > >
> > >
> > > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the
> > end
> > > of this week.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > >
> > >
> > > -Rui
> >
> >
>

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Ruben Q L]

Hello,

FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been merged.

Regards,
Ruben


On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:

> Rui,
>
> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That
> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>
> I’m working on getting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>  done today. Please
> wait for that.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big refactoring
> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to
> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>
> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan Xiong)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
>
> What’s the status on those?
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>
> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition the
> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> >
> > Hi community,
> >
> > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA
> list
> > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> open/in
> > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged.
> > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be
> > released.
> >
> >
> > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the
> end
> > of this week.
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> >
> >
> > -Rui
>
>

Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release

[Julian Hyde]

Rui,

Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 
 is marked fixed, there’s 
some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That needs to be 
sorted out before RC0. See [1].

I’m working on getting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 
 done today. Please wait 
for that.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 
 is a big refactoring and, 
though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to happen. 
Don’t wait for it.

I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 
 (Will Noble)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 
 (Woonsan Koo)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 
 (Stamatis)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 
 (Thomas Rebele)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 
 (Zhe Hu / Duan Xiong)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 
 (Francesco Gini)

What’s the status on those?

Julian

[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 
 

PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition the email 
subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.


> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang  wrote:
> 
> Hi community,
> 
> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA list
> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains open/in
> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged.
> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be
> released.
> 
> 
> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the end
> of this week.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> [1]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> 
> 
> -Rui