subject:"Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage"

On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 16:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 20:07 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7
> > ? 
> > we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with
> > ImageMagick7) 
> 
> No it isn't the point. More things actually use the ImageMagick *CLI*
> than use the library, and the CLI of ImageMagick 7 is very different
> from the CLI of ImageMagick 6. This is the *main* reason we do not
> just
> want to make the ImageMagick package suddenly become ImageMagick 7 -
> because IM 7 does not provide the CLI people currently expect from
> the
> package called 'ImageMagick'. It's not primarily about things which
> build against the libraries.

OK, I understood your point of view and I change my opinion to youropinion . 

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 23:15 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 
> We already have ImageMagick 6.9.3 ABI compatibility package.
> 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-20d59de2dc

I don't really see *why*. It doesn't seem to be very necessary. We've
already rebuilt everything in 25 and 26 for 6.9.9.9.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 20:07 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 
> That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7 ? 
> we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with ImageMagick7) 

No it isn't the point. More things actually use the ImageMagick *CLI*
than use the library, and the CLI of ImageMagick 7 is very different
from the CLI of ImageMagick 6. This is the *main* reason we do not just
want to make the ImageMagick package suddenly become ImageMagick 7 -
because IM 7 does not provide the CLI people currently expect from the
package called 'ImageMagick'. It's not primarily about things which
build against the libraries.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 20:07 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 17:55 +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > 
> > > We didn't specifically rule on the naming, FWIW. As far as IM7
> > > being the
> > > variant package, we mostly ruled that for F27, nothing using IM
> > > in
> > > the
> > > release blocking media may require IM7. I'm personally neutral on
> > > how the
> > > files and packages are named as long as the implementation
> > > accomplishes
> > > that goal.
> > 
> > well, okay, fine, I guess *technically* we could make ImageMagick
> > be
> > 7
> > and have ImageMagick6 and change the requirements in every single
> > package that currently requires ImageMagick. 
> 
> That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7
> ? 
> we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with ImageMagick7) 

We already have ImageMagick 6.9.3 ABI compatibility package.

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-20d59de2dc

> > But...let's not do that?
> > :)
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 17:55 +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > 
> > We didn't specifically rule on the naming, FWIW. As far as IM7
> > being the
> > variant package, we mostly ruled that for F27, nothing using IM in
> > the
> > release blocking media may require IM7. I'm personally neutral on
> > how the
> > files and packages are named as long as the implementation
> > accomplishes
> > that goal.
> 
> well, okay, fine, I guess *technically* we could make ImageMagick be
> 7
> and have ImageMagick6 and change the requirements in every single
> package that currently requires ImageMagick. 

That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7 ? 
we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with ImageMagick7) 

> But...let's not do that?
> :)


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 17:55 +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 
> We didn't specifically rule on the naming, FWIW. As far as IM7 being the
> variant package, we mostly ruled that for F27, nothing using IM in the
> release blocking media may require IM7. I'm personally neutral on how the
> files and packages are named as long as the implementation accomplishes
> that goal.

well, okay, fine, I guess *technically* we could make ImageMagick be 7
and have ImageMagick6 and change the requirements in every single
package that currently requires ImageMagick. But...let's not do that?
:)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:41 AM Adam Williamson 
wrote:

> On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 16:13 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson 
> > > wrote:
> > > So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm
> > > tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we
> > > actually
> > > do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you
> > > agree
> > > with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the
> > > required
> > > epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7
> > > in
> > > Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7
> > > was ahead of F27's 6).
> > >
> > > Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6 in
> > > F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead.
> >
> > Well if we go to have ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 in F27+ and since
> > ImageMagick7 should be the main package, in my point of view , we
> > should add ImageMagick6 package and maintain ImageMagick as is , like,
> > for example, openssl-1.1 and compat-openssl10 .
>
> Nope, that's exactly the opposite of what FESCo agreed: IM7 can only go
> in as the *variant* package, not the main one. The main one must be
> IM6.



We didn't specifically rule on the naming, FWIW. As far as IM7 being the
variant package, we mostly ruled that for F27, nothing using IM in the
release blocking media may require IM7. I'm personally neutral on how the
files and packages are named as long as the implementation accomplishes
that goal.

For F28, FESCo will consider any proposal brought to us as a Change
Proposal (complete with a plan for rebuilds and migrations).



> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 10:32 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> This could makessome sense, if these are really used and if 
> vulnerabilities can be reacted upon/fixed in the old versions.
> 
> If the latter doesn't apply, it would be better to those remove package 
> which requires these old libs from the distro.

The 6 series is still maintained upstream at present, as discussed
earlier.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 16:13 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson 
> > wrote:
> > So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm 
> > tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we
> > actually 
> > do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you
> > agree 
> > with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the
> > required 
> > epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7
> > in 
> > Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7 
> > was ahead of F27's 6). 
> > 
> > Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6 in
> > F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead.
> 
> Well if we go to have ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 in F27+ and since 
> ImageMagick7 should be the main package, in my point of view , we
> should add ImageMagick6 package and maintain ImageMagick as is , like,
> for example, openssl-1.1 and compat-openssl10 .

Nope, that's exactly the opposite of what FESCo agreed: IM7 can only go
in as the *variant* package, not the main one. The main one must be
IM6.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

Michael , I move thread to here [1] 

[1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1766

On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 16:13 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson  > g>
> > wrote:
> > So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm 
> > tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we
> > actually 
> > do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you
> > agree 
> > with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the
> > required 
> > epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7
> > in 
> > Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's
> > 7 
> > was ahead of F27's 6). 
> > 
> > Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6
> > in
> > F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead.
> 
> Well if we go to have ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 in F27+ and
> since 
> ImageMagick7 should be the main package, in my point of view , we
> should add ImageMagick6 package and maintain ImageMagick as is ,
> like,
> for example, openssl-1.1 and compat-openssl10 .
> 
> Cheers, 
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-03 Thread Sérgio Basto

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson 
> wrote:
> So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm 
> tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we
> actually 
> do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you
> agree 
> with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the
> required 
> epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7
> in 
> Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7 
> was ahead of F27's 6). 
> 
> Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6 in
> F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead.

Well if we go to have ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 in F27+ and since 
ImageMagick7 should be the main package, in my point of view , we
should add ImageMagick6 package and maintain ImageMagick as is , like,
for example, openssl-1.1 and compat-openssl10 .

Cheers, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-03 Thread Ralf Corsepius


On 09/02/2017 12:14 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

On 09/01/2017 01:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

FESCo decided at today's meeting that 7 should not go to F27 (unless it
can be made parallel installable and not used by anything release-
blocking by default), and to go into F28 there must be a system-wide
Change:


The libs are definitely parallel installable.
This could makessome sense, if these are really used and if 
vulnerabilities can be reacted upon/fixed in the old versions.


If the latter doesn't apply, it would be better to those remove package 
which requires these old libs from the distro.


The binaries share a name 
so we could use alternatives and default to version 6.
IMO, alternatives don't make any sense, here, because alternatives 
requires binaries to be call backward compatible.


Versioned binaries could make some sense if the these binaries are not 
call-compatible.


Ralf


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson  wrote:
> > So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm 
> > tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we actually 
> > do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you agree 
> > with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the required 
> > epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7 in 
> > Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7 
> > was ahead of F27's 6). 
> 
> Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6 in
> F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead.

OK, I'll do the downgrades for both, then. I'll leave you to do the IM7
package, as I'm not really interested in IM per se - I only got
involved in this mess at all because I *am* very interested in making
sure F27 and Rawhide...work :) Thanks.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson  wrote:So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm

tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we actually

do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you agree

with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the required

epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7 in

Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7

was ahead of F27's 6).
Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6 in F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead.___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 10:19 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 09/02/2017 10:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, the easy option is just to revert to 6.9.9 and not update to 7 at
> > all. It's not incumbent upon us to do so at least until upstream starts
> > making noises about killing the 6 series, and there doesn't seem to be
> > any particularly strong*reason*  to do it...
> 
> That may be the only option. I'm not convinced that version 7 is worth our 
> time and 
> I don't have a relationship with upstream to know if it should be worth our 
> time at 
> all (ever). I've opened a dialogue with ImageMagick to ask what they think.

So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm
tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we actually
do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you agree
with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the required
epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7 in
Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7
was ahead of F27's 6).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 09/02/2017 10:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

Well, the easy option is just to revert to 6.9.9 and not update to 7 at
all. It's not incumbent upon us to do so at least until upstream starts
making noises about killing the 6 series, and there doesn't seem to be
any particularly strong*reason*  to do it...


That may be the only option. I'm not convinced that version 7 is worth our time and 
I don't have a relationship with upstream to know if it should be worth our time at 
all (ever). I've opened a dialogue with ImageMagick to ask what they think.


https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2=32622=149403
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-02 Thread Sérgio Basto

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 10:34 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 09:05:02AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > Would we be keeping these separate for a long time? Alternatives
> > > are
> > > really pretty ugly and I'd hate to see that introduced just for
> > > one
> > > release.
> > 
> > After handling all the rebuilds for version 7, it is pretty rare
> > for
> > an upstream to support version 7 right now. I would strike an
> > uneducated guess at 1-2 years for upstreams to come around to
> > porting. It would not surprise me if some upstreams stay at version
> > 6 unless ImageMagick decides to stop supporting version 6. Not to
> 
> Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are
> shelling
> out? Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries?

I think is more simpler use version 7 just in F28 and we gain some
time. 
I (also) saw that API change is not easy to fix [1] , issue opened in
Jul 18, and no one provide a patch ...   

[1] 
https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot/issues/60

> > mention the dead upstreams where we will have to port ourselves or
> > our friends at  Canonical and Debian that don't even have version 7
> > (or a recent version 6) in their repos.
> 
> Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller
> 
> Fedora Project Leader
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 09:59 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 09/02/2017 09:34 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are shelling
> > out? Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries?
> > 
> 
> The rebuilds were for library linked packages. I have not touched any 
> packages that 
> shell out. A reqpoquery returns about 46 packages that may do so. It may be 
> more 
> effective to add a "7" to the newer binaries.
> 
> > Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere.
> 
> That's great, but that would be far beyond what I'm willing to work on. I 
> also don't 
> know how receptive upstreams would be to patches for that conversion. I 
> picked up 
> ImageMagick only two weeks ago to prevent a disaster from hitting stable 
> Fedora 
> releases. I am not positive I want to become a permanent maintainer of it.

Well, the easy option is just to revert to 6.9.9 and not update to 7 at
all. It's not incumbent upon us to do so at least until upstream starts
making noises about killing the 6 series, and there doesn't seem to be
any particularly strong *reason* to do it...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 10:34 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 09:05:02AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > Would we be keeping these separate for a long time? Alternatives are
> > > really pretty ugly and I'd hate to see that introduced just for one
> > > release.
> > 
> > After handling all the rebuilds for version 7, it is pretty rare for
> > an upstream to support version 7 right now. I would strike an
> > uneducated guess at 1-2 years for upstreams to come around to
> > porting. It would not surprise me if some upstreams stay at version
> > 6 unless ImageMagick decides to stop supporting version 6. Not to
> 
> Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are shelling
> out?

I don't think we looked at things which just use the CLI at all, at
least I was using a list based on library dependencies.

The list of things which at least express an explicit dependency on
ImageMagick or one of the binaries it provides is:

DVDAuthorWizard-0:1.4.6-9.fc26.noarch
ImageMagick-devel-0:7.0.6.9-4.fc27.i686
ImageMagick-devel-0:7.0.6.9-4.fc27.x86_64
a2ps-0:4.14-32.fc27.i686
a2ps-0:4.14-32.fc27.x86_64
anyremote-0:6.6.1-4.fc27.x86_64
c-graph-0:2.0-12.fc27.x86_64
caja-image-converter-0:1.18.1-4.fc27.x86_64
conky-manager-0:2.3.4-5.fc27.x86_64
dblatex-0:0.3.10-2.fc27.noarch
devedeng-0:4.8.9-1.fc27.noarch
dvd-slideshow-0:0.8.6-1.1.fc26.1.noarch
dvdrip-0:0.98.11-14.fc27.x86_64
epix-0:1.2.17-3.fc27.x86_64
fbida-0:2.09-13.fc27.x86_64
ffmulticonverter-0:1.8.0-5.fc26.noarch
freewrl-0:3.0.0-5.20170729git4f920cb.fc27.i686
freewrl-0:3.0.0-5.20170729git4f920cb.fc27.x86_64
gallery2-imagemagick-0:2.3.2-17.fc27.noarch
geeqie-0:1.3-5.fc27.x86_64
gegl03-0:0.3.20-1.fc27.i686
gegl03-0:0.3.20-1.fc27.x86_64
gnome-photos-0:3.25.91-1.fc27.x86_64
gyachi-0:1.2.11-14.fc24.x86_64
gyazo-0:1.2-3.fc27.noarch
icewm-clearlooks-0:1.3.8-14.fc27.noarch
jumpnbump-menu-0:1.60-4.fc27.noarch
latex2rtf-0:2.3.16-1.fc27.x86_64
libpst-0:0.6.71-3.fc27.x86_64
lives-0:2.8.7-2.fc27.x86_64
lyx-0:2.2.3-2.fc27.x86_64
mediawiki-0:1.29.0-2.fc27.noarch
mtpaint-0:3.40-23.fc27.x86_64
nautilus-image-converter-0:0.3.1-0.13.git430afce31.fc27.x86_64
nemo-image-converter-0:3.4.0-2.fc27.x86_64
perl-Panotools-Script-0:0.28-12.fc27.noarch
phatch-cli-0:0.2.7-28.fc27.noarch
playonlinux-0:4.2.12-3.fc27.x86_64
shutter-0:0.93.1-8.fc27.noarch
variety-0:0.6.5-1.fc27.noarch
w3m-img-0:0.5.3-34.git20170102.fc27.x86_64

These things Recommend it:

diffoscope-0:77-2.fc26.noarch
gnumed-0:1.6.7-4.fc27.noarch
gscan2pdf-0:1.8.6-1.fc27.noarch
python2-sphinx-0:1.6.3-2.fc27.noarch
python3-sphinx-0:1.6.3-2.fc27.noarch
recoverjpeg-0:2.6.1-4.fc27.x86_64
sway-0:0.14.0-2.fc27.x86_64

and these Suggest it:

abcde-0:2.8.1-4.fc27.noarch
gap-pkg-hap-0:1.11.14-3.fc27.noarch
winswitch-0:0.12.21-21.fc27.noarch

The existence of Recommends and Suggests dependencies are significant,
because it rather suggests there may be *other* things which can
optionally use IM where the maintainer previously didn't want to use a
hard Requires: - I would guess there may be cases where no-one thought
to add a Recommends or Suggests yet.

>  Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries?
> 
> > mention the dead upstreams where we will have to port ourselves or
> > our friends at  Canonical and Debian that don't even have version 7
> > (or a recent version 6) in their repos.
> 
> Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere.

Note I did try building a few things against GM but none of them 'just
worked', so this would likely be a porting effort like the IM 6 -> 7
one - probably not worth the effort without co-ordination with
upstreams.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 09/02/2017 09:34 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:

Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are shelling
out? Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries?



The rebuilds were for library linked packages. I have not touched any packages that 
shell out. A reqpoquery returns about 46 packages that may do so. It may be more 
effective to add a "7" to the newer binaries.



Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere.


That's great, but that would be far beyond what I'm willing to work on. I also don't 
know how receptive upstreams would be to patches for that conversion. I picked up 
ImageMagick only two weeks ago to prevent a disaster from hitting stable Fedora 
releases. I am not positive I want to become a permanent maintainer of it.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-02 Thread Matthew Miller

On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 09:05:02AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >Would we be keeping these separate for a long time? Alternatives are
> >really pretty ugly and I'd hate to see that introduced just for one
> >release.
> After handling all the rebuilds for version 7, it is pretty rare for
> an upstream to support version 7 right now. I would strike an
> uneducated guess at 1-2 years for upstreams to come around to
> porting. It would not surprise me if some upstreams stay at version
> 6 unless ImageMagick decides to stop supporting version 6. Not to

Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are shelling
out? Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries?

> mention the dead upstreams where we will have to port ourselves or
> our friends at  Canonical and Debian that don't even have version 7
> (or a recent version 6) in their repos.

Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 09/02/2017 08:10 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:

Would we be keeping these separate for a long time? Alternatives are
really pretty ugly and I'd hate to see that introduced just for one
release.


After handling all the rebuilds for version 7, it is pretty rare for an upstream to 
support version 7 right now. I would strike an uneducated guess at 1-2 years for 
upstreams to come around to porting. It would not surprise me if some upstreams stay 
at version 6 unless ImageMagick decides to stop supporting version 6. Not to mention 
the dead upstreams where we will have to port ourselves or our friends at  Canonical 
and Debian that don't even have version 7 (or a recent version 6) in their repos.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-02 Thread Matthew Miller

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:14:17PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >FESCo decided at today's meeting that 7 should not go to F27 (unless it
> >can be made parallel installable and not used by anything release-
> >blocking by default), and to go into F28 there must be a system-wide
> >Change:
> The libs are definitely parallel installable. The binaries share a
> name so we could use alternatives and default to version 6.
> Thoughts?

Would we be keeping these separate for a long time? Alternatives are
really pretty ugly and I'd hate to see that introduced just for one
release. 

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth


On 09/01/2017 01:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

FESCo decided at today's meeting that 7 should not go to F27 (unless it
can be made parallel installable and not used by anything release-
blocking by default), and to go into F28 there must be a system-wide
Change:


The libs are definitely parallel installable. The binaries share a name so we could 
use alternatives and default to version 6. Thoughts?

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-01 Thread Adam Williamson

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 20:39 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Rebuild status:
> * All F25/F26 packages have been rebuilt against ImageMagick 6.9.9.9
> * Most of the F27+ packages have been rebuilt with the following exceptions:
>   - cuneiform
> FTBFS since Fedora 23, last upstream release is from 2011
>   - imageinfo
> Requires porting, upstream is alive. I may come back and fix this later. 
> CC'ing maintainer.
>   - perl-Image-SubImageFind
> Requires porting, upstream is dead
>   - psiconv
> Requires porting, upstream is dead
>   - q
> Obsolete back in 2008, replaced by "Pure" language... which is not in 
> Fedora
>   - rubygem-rmagick
> Requires porting, upstream is alive, but not interested. I'll have to 
> come back to this one. CC'ing maintainer.
> 
> The rebuilt packages are using a direct support style patch and not a 
> comprehensive support patch. I'll be making comprehensive patches when I have 
> time and shipping them upstream. If anyone wants to create a patch before I 
> do please feel free. Just link the upstream git commit or report with the 
> patch.

Thanks Michael!

FESCo decided at today's meeting that 7 should not go to F27 (unless it
can be made parallel installable and not used by anything release-
blocking by default), and to go into F28 there must be a system-wide
Change:

https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1766

I'm happy to do the downgrade + rebuilds for F27 (when I'm back from
Flock), we'll have to decide precisely what to do with Rawhide.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-28 Thread Michael Cronenworth


Rebuild status:
* All F25/F26 packages have been rebuilt against ImageMagick 6.9.9.9
* Most of the F27+ packages have been rebuilt with the following exceptions:
  - cuneiform
FTBFS since Fedora 23, last upstream release is from 2011
  - imageinfo
Requires porting, upstream is alive. I may come back and fix this later. CC'ing 
maintainer.

  - perl-Image-SubImageFind
Requires porting, upstream is dead
  - psiconv
Requires porting, upstream is dead
  - q
Obsolete back in 2008, replaced by "Pure" language... which is not in Fedora
  - rubygem-rmagick
Requires porting, upstream is alive, but not interested. I'll have to come back 
to this one. CC'ing maintainer.


The rebuilt packages are using a direct support style patch and not a comprehensive 
support patch. I'll be making comprehensive patches when I have time and shipping 
them upstream. If anyone wants to create a patch before I do please feel free. Just 
link the upstream git commit or report with the patch.


Thanks,
Michael

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 17:59 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/25/2017 05:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That patch is at the least clearly not upstreamable, because it just
> > changes everything to 7-style, it would prevent emacs compiling against
> > 6. I don't think emacs would merge a patch which is*only*  compatible
> > with 7, I think they're much more likely to prefer a patch which makes
> > emacs build and work with both.
> 
> Obviously.
> 
> I'm going to have to make two passes on the rebuilds to generate upstreamable 
> patches based on my time I have available.

OK, so honestly, the more I think about this, the less convinced I am
that it's *at all* a good idea for Fedora 27 to get ImageMagick 7 very
late, and without a Change process. 6 -> 7 is a very major, disruptive
change (not just to the libraries, but to the CLI, which is *widely*
used in scripts), and I really don't think we should be just stuffing
it in there like this.

Consequently, I've filed a ticket requesting FESCo consideration:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1766

Please do chime in with your thoughts there (everyone who's interested
in this issue). Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-25 Thread Michael Cronenworth


On 08/25/2017 05:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

That patch is at the least clearly not upstreamable, because it just
changes everything to 7-style, it would prevent emacs compiling against
6. I don't think emacs would merge a patch which is*only*  compatible
with 7, I think they're much more likely to prefer a patch which makes
emacs build and work with both.


Obviously.

I'm going to have to make two passes on the rebuilds to generate upstreamable 
patches based on my time I have available.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 17:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/25/2017 05:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > I dunno what order the list you're using is in, but apparently you
> > > didn't do emacs?
> > > 
> > > Igor Gnatenko tried, for Rawhide:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=961777
> > > 
> > > but in fact what happened with that build is ImageMagick support was
> > > simply entirely disabled, see
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/emacs/25.2/8.fc28/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
> > >   :
> > > 
> > > "checking for IMAGEMAGICK... no"
> > > 
> > > there appears to be a partially working patch from January available in
> > > a mailing list thread upstream:
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-01/msg00191.html
> > 
> > There's also an emacs bug report:
> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25967
> > where a whole load of nothing much seems to be happening. Except they
> > updated the build scripts to explicitly reject version 7.
> 
> Sorry. I was following Kevin's old list, which appears to be incomplete.
> 
> I'm working on emacs now. PLD-Linux has a patch I'm using. A local mock build 
> worked 
> so I'll push my commit shortly.
> 
> http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi?p=packages/emacs.git;a=blob;f=imagemagick7.patch;h=199219b4d15ff2dbe325114192420a1241dd5522;hb=HEAD

That patch is at the least clearly not upstreamable, because it just
changes everything to 7-style, it would prevent emacs compiling against
6. I don't think emacs would merge a patch which is *only* compatible
with 7, I think they're much more likely to prefer a patch which makes
emacs build and work with both.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-25 Thread Michael Cronenworth

On 08/25/2017 05:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

I dunno what order the list you're using is in, but apparently you
didn't do emacs?

Igor Gnatenko tried, for Rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=961777

but in fact what happened with that build is ImageMagick support was
simply entirely disabled, see
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/emacs/25.2/8.fc28/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
:

"checking for IMAGEMAGICK... no"

there appears to be a partially working patch from January available in
a mailing list thread upstream:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-01/msg00191.html

There's also an emacs bug report:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25967
where a whole load of nothing much seems to be happening. Except they
updated the build scripts to explicitly reject version 7.

Sorry. I was following Kevin's old list, which appears to be incomplete.

I'm working on emacs now. PLD-Linux has a patch I'm using. A local mock build worked
so I'll push my commit shortly.

http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi?p=packages/emacs.git;a=blob;f=imagemagick7.patch;h=199219b4d15ff2dbe325114192420a1241dd5522;hb=HEAD

I don't use Emacs so I'd need someone who does to test it. Worst-case, I'd like to
leave ImageMagick at 7 and create a compat-ImageMagick-6 if Emacs breaks. Many of
these failures are with software with no active upstream and I uncovered a FTBFS[1]
that has been going on since Fedora 23 that should have been retired. I wouldn't
want to waste my time with a compat package for them.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423317
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 14:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 11:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 08/25/2017 12:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Sure, sounds sensible (assuming we actually wind up sticking with 7.x
> > > in F27+; it does seem like quite a bit of work will be needed for
> > > that).
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for your help, Adam.
> > 
> > I've gotten down to inkscape on the list for F27+. I've had to apply small 
> > patches 
> > and found one failure[1] so far.
> 
> I dunno what order the list you're using is in, but apparently you
> didn't do emacs?
> 
> Igor Gnatenko tried, for Rawhide:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=961777
> 
> but in fact what happened with that build is ImageMagick support was
> simply entirely disabled, see
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/emacs/25.2/8.fc28/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
>  :
> 
> "checking for IMAGEMAGICK... no"
> 
> there appears to be a partially working patch from January available in
> a mailing list thread upstream:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-01/msg00191.html

There's also an emacs bug report:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25967
where a whole load of nothing much seems to be happening. Except they
updated the build scripts to explicitly reject version 7.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 11:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/25/2017 12:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Sure, sounds sensible (assuming we actually wind up sticking with 7.x
> > in F27+; it does seem like quite a bit of work will be needed for
> > that).
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your help, Adam.
> 
> I've gotten down to inkscape on the list for F27+. I've had to apply small 
> patches 
> and found one failure[1] so far.

I dunno what order the list you're using is in, but apparently you
didn't do emacs?

Igor Gnatenko tried, for Rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=961777

but in fact what happened with that build is ImageMagick support was
simply entirely disabled, see
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/emacs/25.2/8.fc28/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
 :

"checking for IMAGEMAGICK... no"

there appears to be a partially working patch from January available in
a mailing list thread upstream:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-01/msg00191.html

but...I am getting increasingly sceptical about whether this 7.x bump
is a good idea at all.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 11:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/25/2017 12:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Sure, sounds sensible (assuming we actually wind up sticking with 7.x
> > in F27+; it does seem like quite a bit of work will be needed for
> > that).
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your help, Adam.
> 
> I've gotten down to inkscape on the list for F27+. I've had to apply small 
> patches 
> and found one failure[1] so far.

Cool. Have you been making sure the patches are upstreamable and
upstreaming them? I took a brief look at a few packages and found
various patches elsewhere, but they're often not upstreamable because
they just replace what's appropriate for 6 with what's appropriate for
7, causing the code not to build against 6 any more; I'd guess
upstreams are likely going to want patches that allow the code to build
against 6 and 7 (hence the patch will need to detect the version of
imagemagick and ifdef things like header locations and changed
functions...)

> > The updates have autokarma disabled; I guess Michael and I will try to
> > synchronize with you, and other major third-party repo maintainers,
> > when we're planning to push them stable. Thanks for the note!
> 
> Yes, I'll continue working on F27+ when I have time. I'll have to stop for 
> today.

Thanks for that. We do need at least key packages like emacs rebuilt
for F27 ASAP, as we're getting pretty close to the Beta dates. If we
can't get F27 cleaned up within a few days I'm going to start
advocating for a drop back to 6.9.9...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-25 Thread Michael Cronenworth


On 08/25/2017 12:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

Sure, sounds sensible (assuming we actually wind up sticking with 7.x
in F27+; it does seem like quite a bit of work will be needed for
that).



Thanks for your help, Adam.

I've gotten down to inkscape on the list for F27+. I've had to apply small patches 
and found one failure[1] so far.



The updates have autokarma disabled; I guess Michael and I will try to
synchronize with you, and other major third-party repo maintainers,
when we're planning to push them stable. Thanks for the note!


Yes, I'll continue working on F27+ when I have time. I'll have to stop for 
today.

Thanks,
Michael

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485428
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 06:59 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 25/08/2017 à 03:31, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 13:47 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
> > > > you're on this already, thanks.
> > > 
> > > I've also created updates in Bodhi. Please feel free to attach your 
> > > builds to it.
> > > 
> > > F26: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8f27031c8f
> > > F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3a568adb31
> > 
> > I have done nearly all the rebuilds and added them to the updates, just
> > waiting on inkscape for f25 to finish up, and buildroot overrides for
> > synfig to kick in so I can build synfigstudio.
> 
> Thanks for your work on this.
> 
> About php-pecl-imagick, I think we'll have to apply patch from
> 
>   https://github.com/mkoppanen/imagick/pull/186
> 
> In Fedora 25 / 26, so users will be aware of some removed methods in
> Fedora 27
> 
> Waiting for upstream feedback about this very old PR, and will try to
> manage it (probably after the current update will be in stable to not
> differ it more than needed)

Sure, sounds sensible (assuming we actually wind up sticking with 7.x
in F27+; it does seem like quite a bit of work will be needed for
that).

> 
> Remi
> 
> 
> P.S. I also need to manage update of ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 for
> users of my repository, to not break everything, and push new build at
> same time than official updates...

The updates have autokarma disabled; I guess Michael and I will try to
synchronize with you, and other major third-party repo maintainers,
when we're planning to push them stable. Thanks for the note!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

Le 25/08/2017 à 03:31, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 13:47 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
>>> you're on this already, thanks.
>>
>> I've also created updates in Bodhi. Please feel free to attach your builds 
>> to it.
>>
>> F26: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8f27031c8f
>> F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3a568adb31
> 
> I have done nearly all the rebuilds and added them to the updates, just
> waiting on inkscape for f25 to finish up, and buildroot overrides for
> synfig to kick in so I can build synfigstudio.

Thanks for your work on this.

About php-pecl-imagick, I think we'll have to apply patch from

https://github.com/mkoppanen/imagick/pull/186

In Fedora 25 / 26, so users will be aware of some removed methods in
Fedora 27

Waiting for upstream feedback about this very old PR, and will try to
manage it (probably after the current update will be in stable to not
differ it more than needed)


Remi


P.S. I also need to manage update of ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 for
users of my repository, to not break everything, and push new build at
same time than official updates...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 13:47 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
> > you're on this already, thanks.
> 
> I've also created updates in Bodhi. Please feel free to attach your builds to 
> it.
> 
> F26: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8f27031c8f
> F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3a568adb31

I have done nearly all the rebuilds and added them to the updates, just
waiting on inkscape for f25 to finish up, and buildroot overrides for
synfig to kick in so I can build synfigstudio.

Note: php-magickwand does not build with PHP 7 and no-one upstream
seems terribly inclined to fix it any time soon, so that one's just
going to have to stay broken (I doubt the current package is even
installable on F25 or F26, so this is not likely a regression) unless
someone wants to step up and do the PHP 7 port (I...do not).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 10:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/24/2017 10:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > As Remi said, the changes in 6.9.9 are far less significant than those
> > in 7.0.6. As several people pointed out, sending 7.x to stable releases
> > is clearly against the updates policy. I'd agree we definitely must
> > revert to 6.x for F25 and F26 updates; for those we should send out a
> > 6.9.9-9 update with rebuilds of all deps. I don't care if F27 and
> > Rawhide go to 6.9.9-9 or 7.0.6, but whichever, it should get done soon
> > at least for F27.
> > 
> > I'm also willing to work on this, but everyone who's interested should
> > agree on a plan first, and then we could possibly split the work up
> > (e.g. into 6.x and 7.x work).
> 
> I'll compromise with F25/26 with 6.9 and F27+ getting 7.0.
> 
> I'll get an Epoch bump started... when it completes if you want to do 
> rebuilds for 
> F25/26 I'll work on F27+.

Note, I am rebuilding ImageMagick itself again for F27 and Rawhide,
because the versioning was wrong: Moez incorrectly moved the patchlevel
from %{version} to %{release}. This is wrong because it is part of the
upstream versioning, not the downstream. Note the NEVRs listed in the
%changelog were still in the old, correct form, but the *actual* NEVRs
of the recent builds were wrong. I have reverted the relevant parts of
the spec to exactly how it was before, and corrected the changelog so
it gives the real NEVRs for each build.

This is significant to rubygem-rmagick.spec , which must specify the
exact version (including patchlevel) of ImageMagick it's built against.
So I had to go ahead and fix this in order to be able to rebuild
rubygem-rmagick correctly (I'm going to do the F27+ rebuilds of it as
well as the F25/F26 rebuilds for git consistency reasons).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 10:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> 
> I'll get an Epoch bump started... when it completes if you want to do 
> rebuilds for 
> F25/26 I'll work on F27+.

BTW, it occurred to me for F27+ it may be worth checking if each
project supports a less messy alternative, like GraphicsMagick, which I
think seems to be a rather saner option. For F25/F26 of course I won't
make such switches.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 11:28 -0700, Moez Roy wrote:
> 
> A rebuild of affected packages would be required regardless, so it made
> more sense to just update it directly to v7 which has High Dynamic Range
> Imaging by default and more Pixel channels.

The problem is that 7.x makes *more*, and more significant, API/ABI
changes than 6.9.9. It's very likely some code will rebuild without
modification against 6.9.9 but not at all against 7.x. And landing
major updates with major behaviour changes in stable releases is just
flat out against the updates policy, even if you rebuild dependent
packages.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 13:47 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
> > you're on this already, thanks.
> 
> I've also created updates in Bodhi. Please feel free to attach your builds to 
> it.
> 
> F26: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8f27031c8f
> F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3a568adb31

Roger, thanks. I'm also still working on rdma-related rebuilds for
Rawhide / F27, so I'll be kinda picking things up through the day. If
anyone else wants to help out, feel free - maybe just call out on
#fedora-devel what packages you're working on, so we don't duplicate
work.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
you're on this already, thanks.


I've also created updates in Bodhi. Please feel free to attach your builds to 
it.

F26: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8f27031c8f
F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3a568adb31
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-24 Thread Moez Roy

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Michael Cronenworth 
wrote:

> On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
>> you're on this already, thanks.
>>
>
> The build override has landed.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>

I transferred ownership of ImageMagick to you (mooninite).

I don't have the privs to rebuild affected packages as mentioned in notes,
so it is better if a proven packager owns this package.

A rebuild of affected packages would be required regardless, so it made
more sense to just update it directly to v7 which has High Dynamic Range
Imaging by default and more Pixel channels.

-Moez Roy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
you're on this already, thanks.


The build override has landed.

Thanks,
Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 08/24/2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
you're on this already, thanks.


Yes, I've issued builds. Once the buildroot override is available I'll send another 
email.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 09:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:15 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:54:12 -0500
> > Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> > 
> > > On 08/24/2017 10:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing...
> > > > Just revert the commits, etc.
> > > 
> > > I thought Koji did an NVR check? Won't let a lower version or is it
> > > only when it's been pushed?
> > 
> > koji won't let you build one NVR twice for non-scratch builds
> > 
> > bodhi has some NVR checks, but they are not blocking
> 
> Yep, +1 others, for F25/F26 we don't need to do any new build for
> imagemagick itself, just revert the commits in the repo, set up a
> buildroot override for the 6.9.9-9 package, and then get to rebuilding
> dependencies.

Sorry, of course we have to actually build 6.9.9-9. It looks like
you're on this already, thanks.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-24 Thread Kalev Lember

On 08/24/2017 06:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:15 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:54:12 -0500
>> Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/24/2017 10:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing...
 Just revert the commits, etc.
>>>
>>> I thought Koji did an NVR check? Won't let a lower version or is it
>>> only when it's been pushed?
>>
>> koji won't let you build one NVR twice for non-scratch builds
>>
>> bodhi has some NVR checks, but they are not blocking
> 
> Yep, +1 others, for F25/F26 we don't need to do any new build for
> imagemagick itself, just revert the commits in the repo, set up a
> buildroot override for the 6.9.9-9 package, and then get to rebuilding
> dependencies.

Yes, agreed. This sounds like the best course of action; latest 6.9 for
F25/F26, and 7.0 for F27/F28.

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:15 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:54:12 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> 
> > On 08/24/2017 10:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing...
> > > Just revert the commits, etc.
> > 
> > I thought Koji did an NVR check? Won't let a lower version or is it
> > only when it's been pushed?
> 
> koji won't let you build one NVR twice for non-scratch builds
> 
> bodhi has some NVR checks, but they are not blocking

Yep, +1 others, for F25/F26 we don't need to do any new build for
imagemagick itself, just revert the commits in the repo, set up a
buildroot override for the 6.9.9-9 package, and then get to rebuilding
dependencies.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-24 Thread Dan Horák

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:54:12 -0500
Michael Cronenworth  wrote:

> On 08/24/2017 10:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing...
> > Just revert the commits, etc.
> 
> I thought Koji did an NVR check? Won't let a lower version or is it
> only when it's been pushed?

koji won't let you build one NVR twice for non-scratch builds

bodhi has some NVR checks, but they are not blocking


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 08/24/2017 10:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing... Just
revert the commits, etc.


I thought Koji did an NVR check? Won't let a lower version or is it only when it's 
been pushed?

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

Le 24/08/2017 à 17:43, Michael Cronenworth a écrit :

> I'll get an Epoch bump started... when it completes if you want to do
> rebuilds for F25/26 I'll work on F27+.

I don't think epoch bump is needed
(package never go in the repo)

Remi

> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On 08/24/2017 08:43 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/24/2017 10:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> As Remi said, the changes in 6.9.9 are far less significant than those
>> in 7.0.6. As several people pointed out, sending 7.x to stable releases
>> is clearly against the updates policy. I'd agree we definitely must
>> revert to 6.x for F25 and F26 updates; for those we should send out a
>> 6.9.9-9 update with rebuilds of all deps. I don't care if F27 and
>> Rawhide go to 6.9.9-9 or 7.0.6, but whichever, it should get done soon
>> at least for F27.
>>
>> I'm also willing to work on this, but everyone who's interested should
>> agree on a plan first, and then we could possibly split the work up
>> (e.g. into 6.x and 7.x work).
> 
> I'll compromise with F25/26 with 6.9 and F27+ getting 7.0.
> 
> I'll get an Epoch bump started... when it completes if you want to do
> rebuilds for F25/26 I'll work on F27+.

Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing... Just
revert the commits, etc.

kevin




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 08/24/2017 10:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

As Remi said, the changes in 6.9.9 are far less significant than those
in 7.0.6. As several people pointed out, sending 7.x to stable releases
is clearly against the updates policy. I'd agree we definitely must
revert to 6.x for F25 and F26 updates; for those we should send out a
6.9.9-9 update with rebuilds of all deps. I don't care if F27 and
Rawhide go to 6.9.9-9 or 7.0.6, but whichever, it should get done soon
at least for F27.

I'm also willing to work on this, but everyone who's interested should
agree on a plan first, and then we could possibly split the work up
(e.g. into 6.x and 7.x work).


I'll compromise with F25/26 with 6.9 and F27+ getting 7.0.

I'll get an Epoch bump started... when it completes if you want to do rebuilds for 
F25/26 I'll work on F27+.


Thanks,
Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 09:47 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/24/2017 09:25 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> > I really think we have to revert to 6 in stable branch
> > (and perhaps even in F27, which is very close to feature freeze)
> > 
> > - soname bump
> > - lot of removed API
> > - HDRI enabled by default
> 
> The SONAME is changing in 6.9 as well so I'm not sure reverting is great 
> either 
> otherwise I would have done it.
> 
> I'm prepared to perform rebuilds and push updates to get this resolved. 
> Assuming no 
> objections in the next day I'll get it rolling. Worst case if there's 
> negative karma 
> on the updates I'll push a revert to 6.9.

As Remi said, the changes in 6.9.9 are far less significant than those
in 7.0.6. As several people pointed out, sending 7.x to stable releases
is clearly against the updates policy. I'd agree we definitely must
revert to 6.x for F25 and F26 updates; for those we should send out a
6.9.9-9 update with rebuilds of all deps. I don't care if F27 and
Rawhide go to 6.9.9-9 or 7.0.6, but whichever, it should get done soon
at least for F27.

I'm also willing to work on this, but everyone who's interested should
agree on a plan first, and then we could possibly split the work up
(e.g. into 6.x and 7.x work).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

Le 24/08/2017 à 16:47, Michael Cronenworth a écrit :
> On 08/24/2017 09:25 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
>> I really think we have to revert to 6 in stable branch
>> (and perhaps even in F27, which is very close to feature freeze)
>>
>> - soname bump
>> - lot of removed API
>> - HDRI enabled by default
> 
> The SONAME is changing in 6.9 as well so I'm not sure reverting is great
> either otherwise I would have done it.

Yes, but no removed API, and no hdri by default.

> 
> I'm prepared to perform rebuilds and push updates to get this resolved.
> Assuming no objections in the next day I'll get it rolling. Worst case
> if there's negative karma on the updates I'll push a revert to 6.9.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage


On 08/24/2017 09:25 AM, Remi Collet wrote:

I really think we have to revert to 6 in stable branch
(and perhaps even in F27, which is very close to feature freeze)

- soname bump
- lot of removed API
- HDRI enabled by default


The SONAME is changing in 6.9 as well so I'm not sure reverting is great either 
otherwise I would have done it.


I'm prepared to perform rebuilds and push updates to get this resolved. Assuming no 
objections in the next day I'll get it rolling. Worst case if there's negative karma 
on the updates I'll push a revert to 6.9.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

Le 24/08/2017 à 14:05, Dan Horák a écrit :

> so I've applied a workaround [1] to get ImageMagick built on all arches
> again until we have a proper fix, it's in Rawhide now, feel free to
> apply it to other branches as well

I really think we have to revert to 6 in stable branch
(and perhaps even in F27, which is very close to feature freeze)

- soname bump
- lot of removed API
- HDRI enabled by default



Remi.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-24 Thread Dan Horák

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:04:51 +0200
Dan Horák  wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 22:16:40 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > An ImageMagick update (6.9 => 7.0) with an SONAME bump and other
> > breakage has been pushed to F25 and higher.
> > 
> > First, the update introduces regressions on s390x and ppc64 arches.
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484578
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484579
> 
> these issues shouldn't have been solved with an ExcludeArch
> immediately as there is a risk of breaking buildroots for other
> packages and for other teams like modularity. If such problem
> happens, please contact us (the alternative-arches team) first, so we
> can plan the best action.

so I've applied a workaround [1] to get ImageMagick built on all arches
again until we have a proper fix, it's in Rawhide now, feel free to
apply it to other branches as well

It adds one more reason to run a CI on the upstream level that would
cover alternative arches, we have already something in progress.

[1]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ImageMagick/c/9d8a0e0d350a8d02ae40b76ea03f70d118798f23?branch=master


Dan

> 
> 
>   Thanks
> 
>   Dan
> 
> > Secondly, rebuilds are required for:
> > 
> >autotrace-0.31.1-44.fc26.src.rpm
> >converseen-0.9.6.2-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >dmtx-utils-0.7.4-2.fc27.src.rpm
> >drawtiming-0.7.1-20.fc26.src.rpm
> > F gtatool-2.2.0-4.fc27.src.rpm
> >imageinfo-0.05-25.fc26.src.rpm
> >inkscape-0.92.1-5.20170510bzr15686.fc27.src.rpm
> >kxstitch-1.2.0-7.fc26.src.rpm
> >perl-Image-SubImageFind-0.03-11.fc27.src.rpm
> >pfstools-2.0.6-1.fc27.src.rpm
> > F php-magickwand-1.0.9.2-9.fc24.src.rpm
> > F php-pecl-imagick-3.4.3-0.3.RC1.fc26.src.rpm
> >psiconv-0.9.8-20.fc26.src.rpm
> >q-7.11-27.fc27.src.rpm
> >ripright-0.11-3.fc26.src.rpm
> >rss-glx-0.9.1.p-29.fc26.src.rpm
> > F rubygem-rmagick-2.16.0-3.fc26.src.rpm
> > F synfig-1.2.0-5.fc27.src.rpm
> >(boost issues)
> > F synfigstudio-1.1.10-0.20160706gitd4e547.fc25.src.rpm
> >(needs synfig)
> >vdr-scraper2vdr-1.0.5-2.20170611git254122b.fc27.src.rpm
> >vips-8.5.6-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >WindowMaker-0.95.8-1.fc27.src.rpm
> > F cuneiform
> >(some c++ blowup)
> >k3d
> > 
> > The ones with F have possible compile issues.
> > 
> > Thirdly, two updates have been created. I've disabled autopush on
> > them.
> > - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0a1f3de4eb
> > - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c276ee400a
> > 
> > It is really late here and I don't have the time to investigate the
> > arch issues right now. I'll investigate when I can.
> > ___ devel mailing list
> > -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to
> > devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-08-24 Thread Dan Horák

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 22:16:40 -0500
Michael Cronenworth  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> An ImageMagick update (6.9 => 7.0) with an SONAME bump and other
> breakage has been pushed to F25 and higher.
> 
> First, the update introduces regressions on s390x and ppc64 arches.
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484578
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484579

these issues shouldn't have been solved with an ExcludeArch immediately
as there is a risk of breaking buildroots for other packages and
for other teams like modularity. If such problem happens, please contact
us (the alternative-arches team) first, so we can plan the best action.


Thanks

Dan

> Secondly, rebuilds are required for:
> 
>autotrace-0.31.1-44.fc26.src.rpm
>converseen-0.9.6.2-1.fc27.src.rpm
>dmtx-utils-0.7.4-2.fc27.src.rpm
>drawtiming-0.7.1-20.fc26.src.rpm
> F gtatool-2.2.0-4.fc27.src.rpm
>imageinfo-0.05-25.fc26.src.rpm
>inkscape-0.92.1-5.20170510bzr15686.fc27.src.rpm
>kxstitch-1.2.0-7.fc26.src.rpm
>perl-Image-SubImageFind-0.03-11.fc27.src.rpm
>pfstools-2.0.6-1.fc27.src.rpm
> F php-magickwand-1.0.9.2-9.fc24.src.rpm
> F php-pecl-imagick-3.4.3-0.3.RC1.fc26.src.rpm
>psiconv-0.9.8-20.fc26.src.rpm
>q-7.11-27.fc27.src.rpm
>ripright-0.11-3.fc26.src.rpm
>rss-glx-0.9.1.p-29.fc26.src.rpm
> F rubygem-rmagick-2.16.0-3.fc26.src.rpm
> F synfig-1.2.0-5.fc27.src.rpm
>(boost issues)
> F synfigstudio-1.1.10-0.20160706gitd4e547.fc25.src.rpm
>(needs synfig)
>vdr-scraper2vdr-1.0.5-2.20170611git254122b.fc27.src.rpm
>vips-8.5.6-1.fc27.src.rpm
>WindowMaker-0.95.8-1.fc27.src.rpm
> F cuneiform
>(some c++ blowup)
>k3d
> 
> The ones with F have possible compile issues.
> 
> Thirdly, two updates have been created. I've disabled autopush on
> them.
> - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0a1f3de4eb
> - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c276ee400a
> 
> It is really late here and I don't have the time to investigate the
> arch issues right now. I'll investigate when I can.
> ___ devel mailing list --
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to
> devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage