Contacts
Before I start, I hold my hands up - I'm being lazy. I have a number of contacts which I have exported into a pst file which I now want as Windows 2000 contacts (ie, the E2K equivalent of custom recipients). I realise I can export these from Outlook in .csv format, then import them into W2K via the CSVDE.exe utility. However, as anyone will know who has tried this it first requires a good deal of fiddling about in Excel to make it match the required format. Not being an expert in Excel, I don't want to spend half my day figuring out which strings I need to concatenate together and more importantly, how to do it correctly! I was wondering if anyone knew of any utility that could do the hard work for me or could give me a basic description of what to do! Cheers Simon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem
I have a problem which relates to some kind of Exchange/IIS/AD issues, and I was wondering if anyone can help. Long post which might eliminate a bunch of have you tried this questions or its a security issue statements. The symptoms of the problem only appear when using OWA but I don't think that OWA/Exchange itself is at fault : hence the Subject of this mail is not OWA Problems. Exchange 2000 SP2 running on 2000 server SP2. Single domain model with multiple sites connected by a high bandwidth VPN over the internet. Here I'll call the sites Oslo, Copenhagen and Stockholm but there are more. Two DCs per site also running as GCs. Single Exchange server per site, with the exception of one site. One site has a front end Exchange server which deals with OWA for the whole company. I'll explain the evidence first. I log into the console of a DC, Exchange server or Workstation with ESM installed in Oslo or Stockholm, as Enterprise Admin, and create a user using the Users and Computers MMC. No problems at all - everything goes as you'd expect. This no-problems situation occurs at every site except one Now I log the console of a DC, Exchange server or Workstation with ESM installed in Copenhagen, as Enterprise Admin, and perform the identical procedure. Everything works just fine, *but* that user will not be able to see OWA : gets a 404 not found [more about that in a moment]. Only that error, no other problems in evidence with the user account. It matters not in which OU I create the user, or on which server I put their mailbox. If I create them using a machine sited in Copenhagen, I get the 404. I've even tried waiting a few days for the pesky replication. About the 404 error from OWA: To work around any security issues with the front end server, I have ended up directly browsing IIS on the servers where that mailbox is sited using the usual link (say) \\cph-2kex01\exhange\mailbox.name When accessing OWA for the users whose profiles work OK (created from any site other than Copenhagen), I get the anticipated password challenge. If I put in their login details, I get to see their mailbox. When accessing OWA for the Users created using machines at the Copenhagen site, I don't get the password challenge/authentication/login box or anything else. Just an almost immediate 404 not found. This does not vary from Exchange server to Exchange server i.e. If I create a user in Stockholm with a mailbox on the Stockholm mailserver from Copenhagen I get the 404. If I create a User in Stockholm with a mailbox on the Stockholm mailserver from Oslo then everything works just fine. I've tried shifting the mailboxes between servers and it doesn't fix the problem. I've tried logging in with their fully qualified usernames, and making sure that usernames/aliases/short names are varied wildly. I have checked that the affected Users have HTTP access enabled in the advanced exchange properties of the UC MMC, that they have the right permissions etc. etc. just in case. I can find no apparent differences between Users created on the Copenhagen site and those created elsewhere. Deleting the user account, recreating it from a good site and reattaching the mailbox fixes the problem. I get the same errors when accessing info through the front end server. Obviously I get the challenge/response to authenticate on the front end server, but once authenticated it passes the details to the Exchnage servers at the back end, and I get the same story. The AD domain has been in production operation for about a year. Exchange 5.5 was in a legacy domain and brought into the AD domain about six months ago. Users created before the introduction of Exchange to the AD domain have no problems with OWA wherever they were created. All users created from machines on the Copenhagen site after the introduction of Exchange get the 404. We have only just noticed this now because up 'till now we haven't been using OWA. My conclusions so far: * It is not a problem with the Exchange server(s) because the problem is only evidenced by user creation undertaken on one site. If you create the user at any other site, there are no problems with OWA at all. You get the same reults whichever Exchaneg server you use for the mailbox. * It is probably not a problem with permissions/security because users created with identical characteristics from other sites work just fine, and you can fix the problem using this route. It shouldn't be finger trouble for the same reasons. * It doesn't look like a problem with replication etc. on AD, as there are no untoward errors in any of the AD logs, or reported using dcdiag/netdiag type utilities. My questions: * Has anyone else had this problem? I've had a good look in the archives, technet etc. etc. None of the many articles relating to 404 not found or user creation issues seem to have anything to offer in this case, although I've tried a few of the
Changing location of deleted mails
I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing location of deleted mails
It is the same with sent items. This would be by design I would assume. With Sent Items, you can change the location to the other mailbox. Or at least give permission to copy items there. I have never tried this with deleted items. http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q317865 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eve Jimah Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing location of deleted mails I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
hehe - Not to mention the probability that there arent any storage limits on that folder! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Off Topic Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate access. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: List of eventIDs to watch for...
I wouldnt be too happy with a 1022 either. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: List of eventIDs to watch for... 1018 and 1019 are bad ones - Original Message - From: Edgington, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:23 PM Subject: List of eventIDs to watch for... I've been searching the MSExchange site (and some third party sites) for a list of E2K eventIDs that should be watched for. If anyone has a resource for a list of Events that should be considered critical, I would appreciate it. Thanks and have a nice day. --- Jeffrey Edgington Systems Administrator University of Missouri - Rolla Are you a Spectator or a Participant? --- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID:12002
Dear List, In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is generating every 5 Minutes. I search the Error on MS KB, but unfortunately not able to find the solution. Here is the Error: Source: MSExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Type: Error Description: Error 8004010F-8000 occurred while processing message from Name. If I am missing anything, please feel free to contact me. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
Mongo let replies out to Internet. -Original Message- From: Cohen, Bret [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments Bret Cohen Viacom Information Services and Technology mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing location of deleted mails
Q202517 -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing location of deleted mails I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
-Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 00:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule. I think we're back to closing our eyes and wishing really hard again. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing location of deleted mails
Neat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails Q202517 -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing location of deleted mails I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing location of deleted mails
You're awake? And I thought I lived in the city that never sleeps! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails Neat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails Q202517 -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing location of deleted mails I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail Limits ????
All As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just received an NDR in the postmaster account. Any ideas ??? Ex 5.5 Sp4 NT4 Sp6a *** A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 4421643 bytes exceeds server limit of 300 Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Mail Limits ????
Hi, You should check if there is an Limit on your Firewall / ISP. Frank -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2002 14:03 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: Mail Limits All As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just received an NDR in the postmaster account. Any ideas ??? Ex 5.5 Sp4 NT4 Sp6a *** A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 4421643 bytes exceeds server limit of 300 Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Limits ????
Post the entire NDR. If you dont have limits, the recipient does. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Limits All As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just received an NDR in the postmaster account. Any ideas ??? Ex 5.5 Sp4 NT4 Sp6a *** A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 4421643 bytes exceeds server limit of 300 Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID:12002
Search on 8004010F rather than the event id. This will pull up a lot more KB articles -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 13:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID:12002 Dear List, In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is generating every 5 Minutes. I search the Error on MS KB, but unfortunately not able to find the solution. Here is the Error: Source: MSExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Type: Error Description: Error 8004010F-8000 occurred while processing message from Name. If I am missing anything, please feel free to contact me. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Limits ????
them i'd wager -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Limits All As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just received an NDR in the postmaster account. Any ideas ??? Ex 5.5 Sp4 NT4 Sp6a *** A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 4421643 bytes exceeds server limit of 300 Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID:12002
Thanks for your reply. I have searched it but unfortunately non of them matching with this error. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Event ID:12002 Search on 8004010F rather than the event id. This will pull up a lot more KB articles -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 13:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID:12002 Dear List, In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is generating every 5 Minutes. I search the Error on MS KB, but unfortunately not able to find the solution. Here is the Error: Source: MSExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Type: Error Description: Error 8004010F-8000 occurred while processing message from Name. If I am missing anything, please feel free to contact me. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing location of deleted mails
I sleep during the day when it's hot. Other than that, Las Vegas also never sleeps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails You're awake? And I thought I lived in the city that never sleeps! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails Neat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails Q202517 -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing location of deleted mails I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Limits ????
The maibox you are sending to has the limit Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 13:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Limits All As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just received an NDR in the postmaster account. Any ideas ??? Ex 5.5 Sp4 NT4 Sp6a *** A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 4421643 bytes exceeds server limit of 300 Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID:12002
And at eventid.net, it's on the list of events requiring more information. :o| -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event ID:12002 Thanks for your reply. I have searched it but unfortunately non of them matching with this error. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Event ID:12002 Search on 8004010F rather than the event id. This will pull up a lot more KB articles -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 13:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID:12002 Dear List, In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is generating every 5 Minutes. I search the Error on MS KB, but unfortunately not able to find the solution. Here is the Error: Source: MSExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Type: Error Description: Error 8004010F-8000 occurred while processing message from Name. If I am missing anything, please feel free to contact me. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Exchange 5.5] X400 connector problem
Dear All, In our Exchange 5.5 network we have two messaging bridgehead servers set up to act as each others backup. All company divisions are connected to these servers with X400 connectors. The first half of the divisions have a X400 connector connected to the first server with a cost level of 1 and another X400 connector connected to the second server with a cost level of 100. The other half of the divisions (you guessed it right) has a X400 connector connected to the first server with a cost level of 100 and another X400 connector connected to the second server with a cost level of 1. When there are certain issues and a message cant be delivered with the use of the connector with the lowest cost, Exchange will try to pass the message on to the second connector (this you all know of course). In case of network problems, both connectors will be affected and messages will start to bounce between the two connectors. Each time a message will be transferred to the other connector, Exchange ads a bit of, so called, internal trace information to the message. In the end, the size of the message will exceed certain limits and this will result in the NDR listed below: Either the message size exceeds the maximum allowed for the recipient or transport, or you have exceeded the storage limit on your mailbox. Any suggestions how I can configure the X400 connectors to solve this issue? Many thanks in advance, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID:12002
Are you saying that you can't find any articles or that the articles you find are simply not relevant to your problem? I found 17 articles on the public web-site when I put that string into the KB search at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo or 18 if I just go to http://search.microsoft.com/ Organisational Forms seem to be a large cause of this error type so find out if there have been any changes to them recently. Also does the originator specified in your error message (i.e. Name) have any auto-forward/replies set up? Mark -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event ID:12002 Thanks for your reply. I have searched it but unfortunately non of them matching with this error. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Event ID:12002 Search on 8004010F rather than the event id. This will pull up a lot more KB articles -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 13:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID:12002 Dear List, In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is generating every 5 Minutes. I search the Error on MS KB, but unfortunately not able to find the solution. Here is the Error: Source: MSExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Type: Error Description: Error 8004010F-8000 occurred while processing message from Name. If I am missing anything, please feel free to contact me. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing location of deleted mails
Is that New York or Las Vegas? -- From: Andy David Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 06:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails You're awake? And I thought I lived in the city that never sleeps! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails Neat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails Q202517 -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing location of deleted mails I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
copied and pasted Create a distribution list (using Exchange Adminstrator) and a public folder (using Outlook) In Exchange Administrator set the email address for the public folder to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add the public folder as a member of the distribution list. (In Exchange Administrator, scroll to the public folder, then go to file properties distribution lists add then add the distribution list) Go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook. Give the folder default permissions contributor (Exchange 2000 set anonymous to contributor) Go to the public folder in outlook, right click on the folder and click on properties. Click the administration tab and then click on the folder assistant. Click Add rule. In the to: field, select the distribution list created in the beginning. Select reply with template and type in the reply text and subject save and close. click ok twice. Be sure to note in the body of the reply: This is an autoresponse. Please do not respond to this message. click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all incoming messages... (make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.) Publish the email address of the distribution list. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help in Deciphering . . .
Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;) Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help in Deciphering . . .
-Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help in Deciphering . . . Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;) Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500 Server can't hand off. It's a 'temporary' error telling you it can't deliver the message to the server. If it could contact the server and exchange messages with it, but the receiving server couldn't find the mailbox in the address you'd see something different. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're here. - apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe salesman. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Move
Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode. The DL replicated as universal security groups into AD, and the membership was also correct. Also, the permissions are not limited to DLs, as my account is listed separately as an owner for some of these folders. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Is the Windows 2000 domain native mode? Maybe you have a permissions issue with public folders using distribution lists for authentication? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Move I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks like right now. Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in or below a second level folder. For example: All Public Folders-| | --Org-| | ---Dept-| | ---Folder Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server so I am not sure what I am missing. Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Move
Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM? -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode. The DL replicated as universal security groups into AD, and the membership was also correct. Also, the permissions are not limited to DLs, as my account is listed separately as an owner for some of these folders. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Is the Windows 2000 domain native mode? Maybe you have a permissions issue with public folders using distribution lists for authentication? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Move I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks like right now. Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in or below a second level folder. For example: All Public Folders-| | --Org-| | ---Dept-| | ---Folder Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server so I am not sure what I am missing. Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help in Deciphering . . .
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q284204 Numerical Code: 4.4.7 Possible Cause: The message in the queue has expired. The sending server tried to relay or deliver the message but the action was not completed before the message expiration time occurred. This message can also indicate that a message header limit has been reached on a remote server or some other protocol timeout occurred while communicating with the remote server. Troubleshooting: This message usually indicates an issue on the receiving server. Check the validity of the recipient address, and determine if the receiving server is configured to receive messages correctly. It may be necessary to reduce the number of recipients in the header of the message for the host to which you are receiving this error. If you resend the message, it is placed in the queue again. If the receiving server is up, the message is delivered. Who won the bet? Paul -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help in Deciphering . . . Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;) Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500 Server can't hand off. It's a 'temporary' error telling you it can't deliver the message to the server. If it could contact the server and exchange messages with it, but the receiving server couldn't find the mailbox in the address you'd see something different. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're here. - apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe salesman. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Move
Yes. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM? -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode. The DL replicated as universal security groups into AD, and the membership was also correct. Also, the permissions are not limited to DLs, as my account is listed separately as an owner for some of these folders. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Is the Windows 2000 domain native mode? Maybe you have a permissions issue with public folders using distribution lists for authentication? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Move I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks like right now. Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in or below a second level folder. For example: All Public Folders-| | --Org-| | ---Dept-| | ---Folder Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server so I am not sure what I am missing. Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Help in Deciphering . . .
Well the code to say the server can't find an account at all is a permanent error, a 5.x.x code. 5.1.1. according to my (faulty) memory and the kb article below. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . . http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q284204 Numerical Code: 4.4.7 Possible Cause: The message in the queue has expired. The sending server tried to relay or deliver the message but the action was not completed before the message expiration time occurred. This message can also indicate that a message header limit has been reached on a remote server or some other protocol timeout occurred while communicating with the remote server. Troubleshooting: This message usually indicates an issue on the receiving server. Check the validity of the recipient address, and determine if the receiving server is configured to receive messages correctly. It may be necessary to reduce the number of recipients in the header of the message for the host to which you are receiving this error. If you resend the message, it is placed in the queue again. If the receiving server is up, the message is delivered. Who won the bet? Paul -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help in Deciphering . . . Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;) Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500 Server can't hand off. It's a 'temporary' error telling you it can't deliver the message to the server. If it could contact the server and exchange messages with it, but the receiving server couldn't find the mailbox in the address you'd see something different. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're here. - apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe salesman. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help in Deciphering . . .
I did. Cha-ching! My boss thinks it is that the recipient server cannot find the mailbox . . . Thanks for the 2 cents from everyone . . . -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . . http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q284204 Numerical Code: 4.4.7 Possible Cause: The message in the queue has expired. The sending server tried to relay or deliver the message but the action was not completed before the message expiration time occurred. This message can also indicate that a message header limit has been reached on a remote server or some other protocol timeout occurred while communicating with the remote server. Troubleshooting: This message usually indicates an issue on the receiving server. Check the validity of the recipient address, and determine if the receiving server is configured to receive messages correctly. It may be necessary to reduce the number of recipients in the header of the message for the host to which you are receiving this error. If you resend the message, it is placed in the queue again. If the receiving server is up, the message is delivered. Who won the bet? Paul -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help in Deciphering . . . Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;) Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500 Server can't hand off. It's a 'temporary' error telling you it can't deliver the message to the server. If it could contact the server and exchange messages with it, but the receiving server couldn't find the mailbox in the address you'd see something different. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're here. · apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe salesman. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem
Oh my god... it's a properly phrased technical question. Someone take a picture. No quick answer is jumping out at me, but it sounds to me like possibly a problem with the GC in the local site. I hate to resort to a standard PSS troubleshooting technique... but have you tried rerunning domainprep yet? Also, just for gits and shiggles can you double and triple check that the network settings on all of the domain controllers are correct (including especially the subnet mask). And try using RPCPing between the GCs. Ok... so it's a short term suggestion while I look more. -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem I have a problem which relates to some kind of Exchange/IIS/AD issues, and I was wondering if anyone can help. Long post which might eliminate a bunch of have you tried this questions or its a security issue statements. The symptoms of the problem only appear when using OWA but I don't think that OWA/Exchange itself is at fault : hence the Subject of this mail is not OWA Problems. Exchange 2000 SP2 running on 2000 server SP2. Single domain model with multiple sites connected by a high bandwidth VPN over the internet. Here I'll call the sites Oslo, Copenhagen and Stockholm but there are more. Two DCs per site also running as GCs. Single Exchange server per site, with the exception of one site. One site has a front end Exchange server which deals with OWA for the whole company. I'll explain the evidence first. I log into the console of a DC, Exchange server or Workstation with ESM installed in Oslo or Stockholm, as Enterprise Admin, and create a user using the Users and Computers MMC. No problems at all - everything goes as you'd expect. This no-problems situation occurs at every site except one Now I log the console of a DC, Exchange server or Workstation with ESM installed in Copenhagen, as Enterprise Admin, and perform the identical procedure. Everything works just fine, *but* that user will not be able to see OWA : gets a 404 not found [more about that in a moment]. Only that error, no other problems in evidence with the user account. It matters not in which OU I create the user, or on which server I put their mailbox. If I create them using a machine sited in Copenhagen, I get the 404. I've even tried waiting a few days for the pesky replication. About the 404 error from OWA: To work around any security issues with the front end server, I have ended up directly browsing IIS on the servers where that mailbox is sited using the usual link (say) \\cph-2kex01\exhange\mailbox.name When accessing OWA for the users whose profiles work OK (created from any site other than Copenhagen), I get the anticipated password challenge. If I put in their login details, I get to see their mailbox. When accessing OWA for the Users created using machines at the Copenhagen site, I don't get the password challenge/authentication/login box or anything else. Just an almost immediate 404 not found. This does not vary from Exchange server to Exchange server i.e. If I create a user in Stockholm with a mailbox on the Stockholm mailserver from Copenhagen I get the 404. If I create a User in Stockholm with a mailbox on the Stockholm mailserver from Oslo then everything works just fine. I've tried shifting the mailboxes between servers and it doesn't fix the problem. I've tried logging in with their fully qualified usernames, and making sure that usernames/aliases/short names are varied wildly. I have checked that the affected Users have HTTP access enabled in the advanced exchange properties of the UC MMC, that they have the right permissions etc. etc. just in case. I can find no apparent differences between Users created on the Copenhagen site and those created elsewhere. Deleting the user account, recreating it from a good site and reattaching the mailbox fixes the problem. I get the same errors when accessing info through the front end server. Obviously I get the challenge/response to authenticate on the front end server, but once authenticated it passes the details to the Exchnage servers at the back end, and I get the same story. The AD domain has been in production operation for about a year. Exchange 5.5 was in a legacy domain and brought into the AD domain about six months ago. Users created before the introduction of Exchange to the AD domain have no problems with OWA wherever they were created. All users created from machines on the Copenhagen site after the introduction of Exchange get the 404. We have only just noticed this now because up 'till now we haven't been using OWA. My conclusions so far: * It is not a problem with the Exchange server(s) because the problem is only evidenced by user creation undertaken on one site. If you create the
RE: Changing location of deleted mails
By product design and www.slipstick.com might have links to a utility which changes the behavior. -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing location of deleted mails I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my default and the other for support mails, my query is when I delete mails from the support mail box it appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox. Why is it so. And is there a setting I can modify so that such mails will appear in the delete folder of the support mailbox. Thanks Eve __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS02-028
Hello all just wanted to know what the consensus was on installing this patch on the OWA server. I did read some early reports with some problems, but there hasn't been that much input. I am assuming that you all have installed with no problems? Thank you for your input... Dave Title: Heap Overrun in HTR Chunked Encoding Could Enable Web Server Compromise (Q321599) Date: 12 June 2002 Software: Internet Information Server Impact: Run Code of Attacker's Choice Max Risk: Moderate Bulletin: MS02-028 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two Issues
Ok, I have a user who is sending out meeting request, but when he receives a confirmation from the parties he sent the request to, he receives an error stating that the request doesn't exist in his calender, also he is receiving the unable to update free/busy schedule information and I checked MS' website and the role is set to editor, yet he is still receiving the problem, what can I do to fix this, any help would be appreciated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS02-028
Do you have any business requirement for htr? Its much better IMO to simply remove it. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS02-028 Hello all just wanted to know what the consensus was on installing this patch on the OWA server. I did read some early reports with some problems, but there hasn't been that much input. I am assuming that you all have installed with no problems? Thank you for your input... Dave Title: Heap Overrun in HTR Chunked Encoding Could Enable Web Server Compromise (Q321599) Date: 12 June 2002 Software: Internet Information Server Impact: Run Code of Attacker's Choice Max Risk: Moderate Bulletin: MS02-028 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Privacy
One of our users (userA) accuses userB of attempting to read his email. The evidence is:- 1 Within Exchange admin, in the mailbox resources window, the Windows NT account is displaying userB. 2 An event log id 1016 occurred stating userB logged onto userA mailbox and is not the primary user. UserB categorically denies attempting to access the mailbox. Any reasons as to how this could happen assuming userB is telling the truth Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 *** This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and are confidential and may be privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Please note that Internet communications are not necessarily secure and may be changed, intercepted or corrupted. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us and we will not accept any liability for any such changes, interceptions or corruptions. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Copyright in this e-mail and attachments created by us belongs to Littlewoods. Littlewoods takes steps to prohibit the transmission of offensive, obscene or discriminatory material. If this message contains inappropriate material please forward the e-mail intact to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it will be investigated. Statements and opinions contained in this e-mail may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods. Please note that e-mail communication may be monitored. Registered office: Littlewoods Retail Limited, Sir John Moores Building, 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB Registered no: 421258 http://www.littlewoods.com *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two Issues
Make sure that things are not being delivered to a PST -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Two Issues Ok, I have a user who is sending out meeting request, but when he receives a confirmation from the parties he sent the request to, he receives an error stating that the request doesn't exist in his calender, also he is receiving the unable to update free/busy schedule information and I checked MS' website and the role is set to editor, yet he is still receiving the problem, what can I do to fix this, any help would be appreciated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Privacy
Yes dear god I believe that 3KB of that 4KB message is the disclaimer alone. Good thing you don't pay for bandwidth per Meg :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Privacy User B could have viewed user A's calendar to schedule a meeting or something and that would get logged... If userB has no ExAdmin rights and user A hasn't granted User B access, then user A is dreaming. And for the love of Gawd!!! What is up with that 12 page disclaimer??? -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Privacy One of our users (userA) accuses userB of attempting to read his email. The evidence is:- 1 Within Exchange admin, in the mailbox resources window, the Windows NT account is displaying userB. 2 An event log id 1016 occurred stating userB logged onto userA mailbox and is not the primary user. UserB categorically denies attempting to access the mailbox. Any reasons as to how this could happen assuming userB is telling the truth Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 *** This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and are confidential and may be privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Please note that Internet communications are not necessarily secure and may be changed, intercepted or corrupted. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us and we will not accept any liability for any such changes, interceptions or corruptions. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Copyright in this e-mail and attachments created by us belongs to Littlewoods. Littlewoods takes steps to prohibit the transmission of offensive, obscene or discriminatory material. If this message contains inappropriate material please forward the e-mail intact to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it will be investigated. Statements and opinions contained in this e-mail may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods. Please note that e-mail communication may be monitored. Registered office: Littlewoods Retail Limited, Sir John Moores Building, 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB Registered no: 421258 http://www.littlewoods.com *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Privacy
UserB checking the calendar of UserA Someone pretending to be userB -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Privacy One of our users (userA) accuses userB of attempting to read his email. The evidence is:- 1 Within Exchange admin, in the mailbox resources window, the Windows NT account is displaying userB. 2 An event log id 1016 occurred stating userB logged onto userA mailbox and is not the primary user. UserB categorically denies attempting to access the mailbox. Any reasons as to how this could happen assuming userB is telling the truth Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 *** This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and are confidential and may be privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Please note that Internet communications are not necessarily secure and may be changed, intercepted or corrupted. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us and we will not accept any liability for any such changes, interceptions or corruptions. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Copyright in this e-mail and attachments created by us belongs to Littlewoods. Littlewoods takes steps to prohibit the transmission of offensive, obscene or discriminatory material. If this message contains inappropriate material please forward the e-mail intact to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it will be investigated. Statements and opinions contained in this e-mail may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods. Please note that e-mail communication may be monitored. Registered office: Littlewoods Retail Limited, Sir John Moores Building, 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB Registered no: 421258 http://www.littlewoods.com *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off-Topic Question
Under Exchange 2000 is there a way to turn on auto-replies to the internet for a single user? Running in mixed mode with Ex5.5 at this time. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem
You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had multiple sites. Presumably this will mean that originally you had recipient policies that matched the original Site Addressing. Having domainprepped your AD domain and installed a RUS, new users will pick up whatever addresses the original Site Addressing stipulated. Did you put a RUS in every W2k site or is there only one? (BTW a RUS can not be on an FE server) Now with one Front-end OWA box, all your users will need to have at least one SMTP proxy address that matches the virtual Directory local path on that box (e.g. if it is M:\exchange.domain.com\MBX then the users must have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp address which can be primary or secondary) If you have now gone native E2k, have any of the Recipient Policies or RUS's been fiddled such that users created from Copenhagen don't get this extra smtp address? If you manually give them a matching address does it help at all? Q293368 explains it more. If I'm barking up the wrong tree and you've checked this sort of thing out, please ignore me! Regards Mark P.S. Try using DCDIAG and REPLMON from the W2K support tools to check out Chris's suggestions re: GC problems. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 15:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem Oh my god... it's a properly phrased technical question. Someone take a picture. No quick answer is jumping out at me, but it sounds to me like possibly a problem with the GC in the local site. I hate to resort to a standard PSS troubleshooting technique... but have you tried rerunning domainprep yet? Also, just for gits and shiggles can you double and triple check that the network settings on all of the domain controllers are correct (including especially the subnet mask). And try using RPCPing between the GCs. Ok... so it's a short term suggestion while I look more. -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem I have a problem which relates to some kind of Exchange/IIS/AD issues, and I was wondering if anyone can help. Long post which might eliminate a bunch of have you tried this questions or its a security issue statements. The symptoms of the problem only appear when using OWA but I don't think that OWA/Exchange itself is at fault : hence the Subject of this mail is not OWA Problems. Exchange 2000 SP2 running on 2000 server SP2. Single domain model with multiple sites connected by a high bandwidth VPN over the internet. Here I'll call the sites Oslo, Copenhagen and Stockholm but there are more. Two DCs per site also running as GCs. Single Exchange server per site, with the exception of one site. One site has a front end Exchange server which deals with OWA for the whole company. I'll explain the evidence first. I log into the console of a DC, Exchange server or Workstation with ESM installed in Oslo or Stockholm, as Enterprise Admin, and create a user using the Users and Computers MMC. No problems at all - everything goes as you'd expect. This no-problems situation occurs at every site except one Now I log the console of a DC, Exchange server or Workstation with ESM installed in Copenhagen, as Enterprise Admin, and perform the identical procedure. Everything works just fine, *but* that user will not be able to see OWA : gets a 404 not found [more about that in a moment]. Only that error, no other problems in evidence with the user account. It matters not in which OU I create the user, or on which server I put their mailbox. If I create them using a machine sited in Copenhagen, I get the 404. I've even tried waiting a few days for the pesky replication. About the 404 error from OWA: To work around any security issues with the front end server, I have ended up directly browsing IIS on the servers where that mailbox is sited using the usual link (say) \\cph-2kex01\exhange\mailbox.name When accessing OWA for the users whose profiles work OK (created from any site other than Copenhagen), I get the anticipated password challenge. If I put in their login details, I get to see their mailbox. When accessing OWA for the Users created using machines at the Copenhagen site, I don't get the password challenge/authentication/login box or anything else. Just an almost immediate 404 not found. This does not vary from Exchange server to Exchange server i.e. If I create a user in Stockholm with a mailbox on the Stockholm mailserver from Copenhagen I get the 404. If I create a User in Stockholm with a mailbox on the Stockholm mailserver from Oslo then everything works just fine. I've tried shifting the mailboxes between servers and it doesn't fix the problem. I've tried logging in with their fully
RE: Mailbox Privacy
We've seen this when people inherit old boxen and change (as opposed to deleting and creating a new one) the profile on the machine. Some hooks to the old mailbox remain and the event is generated when the user starts up Outlook. I agree with the rest of the crowd, though - turn off the disclaimer, at least when you are conversing with civili[s/z]ed folk. -- be - MOS C'mon, it's just like making love. Y'know, left, down, rotate sixty-two degrees, engage rotors -Bender -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Privacy One of our users (userA) accuses userB of attempting to read his email. The evidence is:- 1 Within Exchange admin, in the mailbox resources window, the Windows NT account is displaying userB. 2 An event log id 1016 occurred stating userB logged onto userA mailbox and is not the primary user. UserB categorically denies attempting to access the mailbox. Any reasons as to how this could happen assuming userB is telling the truth Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 ** * This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and are super-dooper and may be painted orange. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation except Santa Claus; please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system, or have a choccie. Please note that Internet communications are not necessarily secure and may be changed, intercepted or corrupted. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us and we will accept any liability for any such changes, interceptions or corruptions. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Practice safe sex. Wear sunscreen. Remember the Alamo. Cherchez la femme. Copyright in this e-mail and attachments created by us belongs to the King of Belgium. Littlewoods takes steps to transmit offensive, obscene or discriminatory material. If this message contains appropriate material please forward the e-mail intact to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it will be drooled over. Statements and opinions contained in this e-mail may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods, unless they are very good and finish their supper first. Please note that e-mail communication may be monitored. Registered office: Littlewoods Retail Limited, Sir John Moores Building, 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB, England The United Kingdom Near Europe The Western Hemisphere Earth The Sol System The Milky Way Registered no: 421258 http://www.littlewoods.com ** * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Move
Did you use ADMT to clone NT4 SIDs onto ADC-created AD account Sidhistories or did you use the ADClean method to merge separate accounts created by ADMT? Regardless I'd take a look at Q309222 and check that the msexchmasteraccountsid value is not populated for enabled users in AD. Also if you look at their mailboxes using the Exchange 55 Admin tool connected to an Exchange 55 server, ensure that the Primary Windows NT account is set to be their new AD account if they are using that AD account or the NT4 account if they are still using that one. Also check in the Permissions tab to see if the account has full User permissions since the ADC has a habit of changing it to Custom. Mark -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Yes. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM? -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode. The DL replicated as universal security groups into AD, and the membership was also correct. Also, the permissions are not limited to DLs, as my account is listed separately as an owner for some of these folders. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Move Is the Windows 2000 domain native mode? Maybe you have a permissions issue with public folders using distribution lists for authentication? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Move I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks like right now. Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in or below a second level folder. For example: All Public Folders-| | --Org-| | ---Dept-| | ---Folder Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server so I am not sure what I am missing. Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have
RE: Mailbox Privacy
Now that is a disclaimer. I think you left out the part about the destruction of sensitive documents. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Privacy User B could have viewed user A's calendar to schedule a meeting or something and that would get logged... If userB has no ExAdmin rights and user A hasn't granted User B access, then user A is dreaming. And for the love of Gawd!!! What is up with that 12 page disclaimer??? -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Privacy One of our users (userA) accuses userB of attempting to read his email. The evidence is:- 1 Within Exchange admin, in the mailbox resources window, the Windows NT account is displaying userB. 2 An event log id 1016 occurred stating userB logged onto userA mailbox and is not the primary user. UserB categorically denies attempting to access the mailbox. Any reasons as to how this could happen assuming userB is telling the truth Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 *** This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and are confidential and may be privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Please note that Internet communications are not necessarily secure and may be changed, intercepted or corrupted. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us and we will not accept any liability for any such changes, interceptions or corruptions. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Copyright in this e-mail and attachments created by us belongs to Littlewoods. Littlewoods takes steps to prohibit the transmission of offensive, obscene or discriminatory material. If this message contains inappropriate material please forward the e-mail intact to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it will be investigated. Statements and opinions contained in this e-mail may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods. Please note that e-mail communication may be monitored. Registered office: Littlewoods Retail Limited, Sir John Moores Building, 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB Registered no: 421258 http://www.littlewoods.com *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem
Mark asks: You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had snip on an FE server) Mark we created a new organisation and did a mailbox migration. The exchange orgs never knew about each other. Now with one Front-end OWA box, all your users will need to have at least one SMTP proxy address that matches the virtual Directory local path on that box (e.g. if it is M:\exchange.domain.com\MBX then the users must have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp address which can be primary or secondary) If you have now gone native E2k, have any of the Recipient Policies or RUS's been fiddled such that users created from Copenhagen don't get this extra smtp address? If you manually give them a matching address does it help at all? Q293368 explains it more. Now you're talking [spot on in fact], but you can't mean: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;JA;q293368 OFFXP: Blue Color Used Twice If Venn Diagram Uses Primary Colors Style (Q293368) ...?!?!? I will add the SMTP addresses (internal domainexternal domain name and mail addresses @internal.domain not present in user profiles in Copenhagen) and see what happens. P.S. Try using DCDIAG and REPLMON from the W2K support tools to check out Chris's suggestions re: GC problems. That I've done. All seems OK. Fingers crossed on the SMTP address front. Thanks for the help so far. All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two Issues
So that can't happen of course. But maybe . . . If somehow the replies were being managed in an out of date version of the store (running with the PST idea). Is rule moving the calendar replies to a PST folder, and then the responses being worked later, when off-line? That could create the possibility that an OST that has not been recently synched, is coughing up the error . . . -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Two Issues Ok, I have a user who is sending out meeting request, but when he receives a confirmation from the parties he sent the request to, he receives an error stating that the request doesn't exist in his calender, also he is receiving the unable to update free/busy schedule information and I checked MS' website and the role is set to editor, yet he is still receiving the problem, what can I do to fix this, any help would be appreciated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SQ - urgent
SQ = Stupid Question Hi, I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
Unless you have message tracking enabled (which is off by default), you cant. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SQ - urgent SQ = Stupid Question Hi, I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SQ - urgent
Next time have the sender set the Request Read Receipt option. - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:21 PM Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
lol... Trying to spur sales of WYB? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SQ - urgent Next time have the sender set the Request Read Receipt option. - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:21 PM Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem
Thanks for the help with this. The problem was users lacking an SMTP address corresponding to the domain name which the Exchange Server uses in its fully qualified name. With that added in, things work normally and OWA for my problem users seems to function just fine. All the best, Andy (Now wants to work out why user creation by DCs on all but one site added the correct SMTP suffix despite a recipient policy to the contrary in the OU of the User). Creuna Danmark A/S Snaregade 10 1205 København K Denmark Tel : +45 22 68 58 23 Fax : +45 70 20 72 42 -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange-related ?AD or IIS problem Mark asks: You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had snip on an FE server) Mark we created a new organisation and did a mailbox migration. The exchange orgs never knew about each other. Now with one Front-end OWA box, all your users will need to have at least one SMTP proxy address that matches the virtual Directory local path on that box (e.g. if it is M:\exchange.domain.com\MBX then the users must have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp address which can be primary or secondary) If you have now gone native E2k, have any of the Recipient Policies or RUS's been fiddled such that users created from Copenhagen don't get this extra smtp address? If you manually give them a matching address does it help at all? Q293368 explains it more. Now you're talking [spot on in fact], but you can't mean: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx? scid=kb;JA;q293368 OFFXP: Blue Color Used Twice If Venn Diagram Uses Primary Colors Style (Q293368) ...?!?!? I will add the SMTP addresses (internal domainexternal domain name and mail addresses @internal.domain not present in user profiles in Copenhagen) and see what happens. P.S. Try using DCDIAG and REPLMON from the W2K support tools to check out Chris's suggestions re: GC problems. That I've done. All seems OK. Fingers crossed on the SMTP address front. Thanks for the help so far. All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
And if I reply to the message that's on a mailing list that has thousands of readers, then I get many gift certificates!! Woo hoo! The Sojka's are going to Disneyland!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the message. Once the Exchange server hands the message off, it no longer cares about it. Unless of course you believe in the new e-mail tracking program developed by Bill Gates. If you forward this e-mail to 50 people you get a gift certificate to Disney Land. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: SQ - urgent
For MEC! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent And if I reply to the message that's on a mailing list that has thousands of readers, then I get many gift certificates!! Woo hoo! The Sojka's are going to Disneyland!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the message. Once the Exchange server hands the message off, it no longer cares about it. Unless of course you believe in the new e-mail tracking program developed by Bill Gates. If you forward this e-mail to 50 people you get a gift certificate to Disney Land. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
AD field forwardingAddress
Just wondering if this field could be used for any practical reasons in Exchange _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
ROFLMAO -- wait does this count? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the message. Once the Exchange server hands the message off, it no longer cares about it. Unless of course you believe in the new e-mail tracking program developed by Bill Gates. If you forward this e-mail to 50 people you get a gift certificate to Disney Land. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
Yo. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent For MEC! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent And if I reply to the message that's on a mailing list that has thousands of readers, then I get many gift certificates!! Woo hoo! The Sojka's are going to Disneyland!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the message. Once the Exchange server hands the message off, it no longer cares about it. Unless of course you believe in the new e-mail tracking program developed by Bill Gates. If you forward this e-mail to 50 people you get a gift certificate to Disney Land. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List
RE: SQ - urgent
They have a parade and a castle, right? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Oops, typo. Its actually a gift certificate to This Knee Land. Sorry about the confusion. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent And if I reply to the message that's on a mailing list that has thousands of readers, then I get many gift certificates!! Woo hoo! The Sojka's are going to Disneyland!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the message. Once the Exchange server hands the message off, it no longer cares about it. Unless of course you believe in the new e-mail tracking program developed by Bill Gates. If you forward this e-mail to 50 people you get a gift certificate to Disney Land. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you.
OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it. When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up: -2147467259 I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public folders. So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no errors and see the public folders When I am on site and do anything else I get those errors. (i.e. use the internal ip of the machine, or the domain name) When I am off site and go in using anything like http://mail.domainname.com/exchange I get the errors and no public folders Please help me out this is driving me nuts.. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Have you configured a virtual server for the FQDN of the server. This should be done in ESM\IIS mmc, copy the default permissions etc. Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6212 Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider Tel: +44 (0) 1344 444349 Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312 Fax: +44 (0) 207 681 1238 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/ -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it. When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up: -2147467259 I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public folders. So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no errors and see the public folders When I am on site and do anything else I get those errors. (i.e. use the internal ip of the machine, or the domain name) When I am off site and go in using anything like http://mail.domainname.com/exchange I get the errors and no public folders Please help me out this is driving me nuts.. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Reapply SP2. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it. When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up: -2147467259 I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public folders. So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no errors and see the public folders When I am on site and do anything else I get those errors. (i.e. use the internal ip of the machine, or the domain name) When I am off site and go in using anything like http://mail.domainname.com/exchange I get the errors and no public folders Please help me out this is driving me nuts.. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird NDR
I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that can send email just fine to a particular email address. But I have other users that get the following NDR when they send to the same address. This is a single Exchange2K server, sp2. Everyone is configured the same. Any ideas? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 6/24/2002 5:05 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/24/2002 5:05 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. gipper.TelPro1.com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird NDR
Can you send mail to them using raw telnet with that from address? -Original Message- From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird NDR I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that can send email just fine to a particular email address. But I have other users that get the following NDR when they send to the same address. This is a single Exchange2K server, sp2. Everyone is configured the same. Any ideas? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:test Sent: 6/24/2002 5:05 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/24/2002 5:05 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. gipper.TelPro1.com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Practice to utilize a DMZ with Exchange
I am curious as to what is the best practices to utilize a DMZ and Exchange 2000. I am trying to avoide opening up port 25 to my internal network where my exchange server is. I don't want to put the exchange server on the DMZ. So what are the most secure solutions. Should I go with a front end back end solution, or could I put a unix smtp server on the dmz that queued the mail for the exchange server? Any input would be appreciated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird NDR
Usually indicates a bad remote SMTP response to EHLO. But if the other can send it may be you are sending to a group of email servers and all are not configured the same or a firewall issue Just a guess - Original Message - From: Exchange Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:12 PM Subject: Weird NDR I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that can send email just fine to a particular email address. But I have other users that get the following NDR when they send to the same address. This is a single Exchange2K server, sp2. Everyone is configured the same. Any ideas? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 6/24/2002 5:05 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/24/2002 5:05 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. gipper.TelPro1.com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Practice to utilize a DMZ with Exchange
Put %smtp relay% wherever you'd like it to be. DMZ is fine. -Original Message- From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best Practice to utilize a DMZ with Exchange I am curious as to what is the best practices to utilize a DMZ and Exchange 2000. I am trying to avoide opening up port 25 to my internal network where my exchange server is. I don't want to put the exchange server on the DMZ. So what are the most secure solutions. Should I go with a front end back end solution, or could I put a unix smtp server on the dmz that queued the mail for the exchange server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird NDR
I am unable to send mail using raw telnet when sending from the user [EMAIL PROTECTED] if I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Mail From it works finesee below! 220 mxsmta02.inithost.com ESMTP server (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-11 106-20010523) ready Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:21:43 -0400 Helo test.company.com 500 Command unknown: HELO' HELO test.company.com 250 mxsmta02.inithost.com MAIL 500 Command unknown: 'MAIL' MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Sender address is invalid MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok Can you send mail to them using raw telnet with that from address? -Original Message- From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird NDR I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that can send email just fine to a particular email address. But I have other users that get the following NDR when they send to the same address. This is a single Exchange2K server, sp2. Everyone is configured the same. Any ideas? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:test Sent: 6/24/2002 5:05 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/24/2002 5:05 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. gipper.TelPro1.com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird NDR
Looks like that'd be the problem of whoever maintains mxsmta02.inithost.com. -Original Message- From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: weird NDR I am unable to send mail using raw telnet when sending from the user [EMAIL PROTECTED] if I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Mail From it works finesee below! 220 mxsmta02.inithost.com ESMTP server (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-11 106-20010523) ready Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:21:43 -0400 Helo test.company.com 500 Command unknown: HELO' HELO test.company.com 250 mxsmta02.inithost.com MAIL 500 Command unknown: 'MAIL' MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Sender address is invalid MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok Can you send mail to them using raw telnet with that from address? -Original Message- From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird NDR I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that can send email just fine to a particular email address. But I have other users that get the following NDR when they send to the same address. This is a single Exchange2K server, sp2. Everyone is configured the same. Any ideas? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 6/24/2002 5:05 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/24/2002 5:05 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. gipper.TelPro1.com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Recently we began our Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and an issue has come up that wasn't discovered in testing. We have several users with hidden mailboxes for one reason or another. Most just want privacy and don't want their information available. Anyhow, under Exchange 5.5 with MAPI clients (Outlook 9x/2000/XP) we were able to resolve those hidden mailboxes by using Distinguished Name in a .prf file (i.e. /o=uwgreenbay/ou=uwgb/cn=recipients/cn=kretchep). However, we are finding when trying to resolve a name to an Exchange 2000 server using Distinguished Name in a profile, it does not work if the user is hidden. Has anyone found a way to resolve hidden mailboxes in Exchange 2000 or is this an issue that can not be worked around? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD field forwardingAddress
As in forwarding address for a mail enabled contact? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 25 June 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD field forwardingAddress Just wondering if this field could be used for any practical reasons in Exchange _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Appointments.
Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - EC -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Appointments.
Exactly. And couldnt they just decline the request? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Appointments. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - EC -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Try the legacyExchnageDN. -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Recently we began our Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and an issue has come up that wasn't discovered in testing. We have several users with hidden mailboxes for one reason or another. Most just want privacy and don't want their information available. Anyhow, under Exchange 5.5 with MAPI clients (Outlook 9x/2000/XP) we were able to resolve those hidden mailboxes by using Distinguished Name in a .prf file (i.e. /o=uwgreenbay/ou=uwgb/cn=recipients/cn=kretchep). However, we are finding when trying to resolve a name to an Exchange 2000 server using Distinguished Name in a profile, it does not work if the user is hidden. Has anyone found a way to resolve hidden mailboxes in Exchange 2000 or is this an issue that can not be worked around? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Typing is bad today: legacyExchangeDN -Original Message- From: Exchange Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:27 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Try the legacyExchnageDN. -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Recently we began our Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and an issue has come up that wasn't discovered in testing. We have several users with hidden mailboxes for one reason or another. Most just want privacy and don't want their information available. Anyhow, under Exchange 5.5 with MAPI clients (Outlook 9x/2000/XP) we were able to resolve those hidden mailboxes by using Distinguished Name in a .prf file (i.e. /o=uwgreenbay/ou=uwgb/cn=recipients/cn=kretchep). However, we are finding when trying to resolve a name to an Exchange 2000 server using Distinguished Name in a profile, it does not work if the user is hidden. Has anyone found a way to resolve hidden mailboxes in Exchange 2000 or is this an issue that can not be worked around? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding. You are talking about SENDING an appointment REQUEST, aren't you? It's a request, not a mandate. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Ok, that attribute has the data I need, but how do I get the Outlook client to read it? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Typing is bad today: legacyExchangeDN -Original Message- From: Exchange Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:27 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Try the legacyExchnageDN. -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue. Recently we began our Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and an issue has come up that wasn't discovered in testing. We have several users with hidden mailboxes for one reason or another. Most just want privacy and don't want their information available. Anyhow, under Exchange 5.5 with MAPI clients (Outlook 9x/2000/XP) we were able to resolve those hidden mailboxes by using Distinguished Name in a .prf file (i.e. /o=uwgreenbay/ou=uwgb/cn=recipients/cn=kretchep). However, we are finding when trying to resolve a name to an Exchange 2000 server using Distinguished Name in a profile, it does not work if the user is hidden. Has anyone found a way to resolve hidden mailboxes in Exchange 2000 or is this an issue that can not be worked around? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
Yep, like I said, declining is the easiest approach. But if there is a solution where the calendar can not be viewed, they want to use it. They would rather have it blocked than repeatedly deny daily request. Silly? Yes. But I'm just a peon. So I must research the matter. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Appointments. Exactly. And couldnt they just decline the request? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Appointments. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - EC -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
Yep, trying to block the request. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding. You are talking about SENDING an appointment REQUEST, aren't you? It's a request, not a mandate. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
Unless you have modified the default settings on the calendar, this is not possible in the first place. The default permission settings for each users calendar is for, Default No access. So unless privileges have been granted by user a or for user a, User B cannot place an item on User A's calendar without a meeting request and User A accepting it. I don't think you can stop a meeting request from being delivered. In any case User B cannot place a meeting on User A's calendar unless User A has granted this privilege to User B. Scott -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding. You are talking about SENDING an appointment REQUEST, aren't you? It's a request, not a mandate. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
Understood sir. They just want to not even receive a request in the first place. Like I said, the easiest thing for them to do is click Deny Request, but they don't even want to see the request. Someone suggested using the rules wizard to filter it out. I'll give that a try tomorrow. It's late. Thanks! Robert -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. Unless you have modified the default settings on the calendar, this is not possible in the first place. The default permission settings for each users calendar is for, Default No access. So unless privileges have been granted by user a or for user a, User B cannot place an item on User A's calendar without a meeting request and User A accepting it. I don't think you can stop a meeting request from being delivered. In any case User B cannot place a meeting on User A's calendar unless User A has granted this privilege to User B. Scott -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding. You are talking about SENDING an appointment REQUEST, aren't you? It's a request, not a mandate. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Practice to utilize a DMZ with Exchange
I've had a lot of success with stand-alone servers in the DMZ - throw an AV scanner on it and relay inbound mail through it - throw ISA on it and publish OWA there; you can even terminate the SSL connection there if you are so inclined. - the nice thing about stand alone servers is that you don't need to open up a bunch of holes to the inside so a member server can talk to the domain - ISA doesn't need AD to publish OWA front-end back-end is only helpful if you have multiple mailbox servers and you want to provide a service like POP/IMAP/OWA externally. Front-end servers in the DMZ = exchange servers in the DMZ = member servers in the DMZ = lots-o-wholes b/t DMZ and internal network. I prefer to keep all the exchange servers inside and publish them via ISA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best Practice to utilize a DMZ with Exchange Put %smtp relay% wherever you'd like it to be. DMZ is fine. -Original Message- From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best Practice to utilize a DMZ with Exchange I am curious as to what is the best practices to utilize a DMZ and Exchange 2000. I am trying to avoide opening up port 25 to my internal network where my exchange server is. I don't want to put the exchange server on the DMZ. So what are the most secure solutions. Should I go with a front end back end solution, or could I put a unix smtp server on the dmz that queued the mail for the exchange server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
You could also set a reoccurring appointment on their calendar that goes on forever (24-7-365) and set Outlook to automatically process appointment requests and decline conflicting requests. When the meeting is requested/composed this person's free busy information will appear to always be busy and that will probably prompt a phone call/em to them (or you) which seems to be the goal of this whole exercise. Or they just want to give the impression that they are always to busy or to important to meet with anyone. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. Understood sir. They just want to not even receive a request in the first place. Like I said, the easiest thing for them to do is click Deny Request, but they don't even want to see the request. Someone suggested using the rules wizard to filter it out. I'll give that a try tomorrow. It's late. Thanks! Robert -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. Unless you have modified the default settings on the calendar, this is not possible in the first place. The default permission settings for each users calendar is for, Default No access. So unless privileges have been granted by user a or for user a, User B cannot place an item on User A's calendar without a meeting request and User A accepting it. I don't think you can stop a meeting request from being delivered. In any case User B cannot place a meeting on User A's calendar unless User A has granted this privilege to User B. Scott -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding. You are talking about SENDING an appointment REQUEST, aren't you? It's a request, not a mandate. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
Forward your request to the Exchange administrator then... Admins administrate, peons follow orders blindly. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Appointments. Yep, like I said, declining is the easiest approach. But if there is a solution where the calendar can not be viewed, they want to use it. They would rather have it blocked than repeatedly deny daily request. Silly? Yes. But I'm just a peon. So I must research the matter. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Appointments. Exactly. And couldnt they just decline the request? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Appointments. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - EC -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird NDR
It was almost certainly something very simple. Look at the time stamp. By any chance was their mail server off-line for a few minutes for an end of the day service activity? -Original Message- From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird NDR I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that can send email just fine to a particular email address. But I have other users that get the following NDR when they send to the same address. This is a single Exchange2K server, sp2. Everyone is configured the same. Any ideas? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 6/24/2002 5:05 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/24/2002 5:05 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. gipper.TelPro1.com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
You might be able to have the request deleted through a Rules Wizard rule. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
Yes, and giant rats and dogs. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent They have a parade and a castle, right? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Oops, typo. Its actually a gift certificate to This Knee Land. Sorry about the confusion. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent And if I reply to the message that's on a mailing list that has thousands of readers, then I get many gift certificates!! Woo hoo! The Sojka's are going to Disneyland!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the message. Once the Exchange server hands the message off, it no longer cares about it. Unless of course you believe in the new e-mail tracking program developed by Bill Gates. If you forward this e-mail to 50 people you get a gift certificate to Disney Land. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
Postmaster as a public folder
I have been pondering the idea of moving my postmaster mailbox from a mailbox to a public folder so I can assign age limits and such (I can easily get up to 100,000 emails of junk during a 7 day period). Are there any drawbacks to doing this (in either Exchange 5.5 or 2k)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Postmaster as a public folder
Do you read them all?? Have you looked at Added old employees email address to a blank DL so they disappear? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400 Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Postmaster as a public folder I have been pondering the idea of moving my postmaster mailbox from a mailbox to a public folder so I can assign age limits and such (I can easily get up to 100,000 emails of junk during a 7 day period). Are there any drawbacks to doing this (in either Exchange 5.5 or 2k)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Postmaster as a public folder
It is just basic postmaster junkspam...ndr's...etc. I do look through certain items (the rest is filtered with rules). -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Postmaster as a public folder Do you read them all?? Have you looked at Added old employees email address to a blank DL so they disappear? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400 Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Postmaster as a public folder I have been pondering the idea of moving my postmaster mailbox from a mailbox to a public folder so I can assign age limits and such (I can easily get up to 100,000 emails of junk during a 7 day period). Are there any drawbacks to doing this (in either Exchange 5.5 or 2k)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Postmaster as a public folder
I read them when I get bored with all of the lists I'm on... Does that count? Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Postmaster as a public folder Do you read them all?? Have you looked at Added old employees email address to a blank DL so they disappear? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400 Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Postmaster as a public folder I have been pondering the idea of moving my postmaster mailbox from a mailbox to a public folder so I can assign age limits and such (I can easily get up to 100,000 emails of junk during a 7 day period). Are there any drawbacks to doing this (in either Exchange 5.5 or 2k)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appointments.
Teach them ALL to use the Private setting for their calendar. This lets them see their calendar true and complete. It Does not let others see what they are doing, but shows them that they are not available during that period. I suppose they could set their free/busy to publish 0 (zero) months, but why not just start using a big board in the lobby that everyone writes in/out on. Outlook is a business tool. It should be used correctly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Postmaster as a public folder
I used to get about 30,000 a day.. Got that down to 1000 now. And sometimes I read those now. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Postmaster as a public folder I read them when I get bored with all of the lists I'm on... Does that count? Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Postmaster as a public folder Do you read them all?? Have you looked at Added old employees email address to a blank DL so they disappear? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400 Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Postmaster as a public folder I have been pondering the idea of moving my postmaster mailbox from a mailbox to a public folder so I can assign age limits and such (I can easily get up to 100,000 emails of junk during a 7 day period). Are there any drawbacks to doing this (in either Exchange 5.5 or 2k)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-Topic Question
What you can do, however, is enable automatic replies / forwards / oof etc. to a particular domain. Auto Replies to the world are a bad idea in general, but particularly if you are concerned about SPAM. Just think of an auto-reply as an auto-confirm to the next piece of spam you receive. Spin it that way and most users will agree that they can do without them. That said, you can often make a business case for enabling automatic replies / OOF to trusted domains such as vendors, suppliers, major customers, etc. You would do this under Global Settings | Internet message formats -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-Topic Question It's all or none. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-Topic Question Under Exchange 2000 is there a way to turn on auto-replies to the internet for a single user? Running in mixed mode with Ex5.5 at this time. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
