RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IS Online Maintenance
Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server The online defrag runs daily. I see it scheduled for 1:00a.m. to 7:00a.m. every day. Is this OK? Just wondering if I should change this. What is the recommended time for Online maintenance to run and for how long? Their is a radio button for Alwaysshould it always be running? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Casey, Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I was thinking that as well, just not sure where to look and we can receive and send mail to everyone so if it's something strange with my IMS then it's my IMS having a grudge against kpafilms.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Then you've got something strange going on with your IMS. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I should say, is able to receive mail form all other domains but ours. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info Kpafilms however does receive mail from all other domains but our's -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Let's go back to the MX record: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com (This server is fine) kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com (server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so it's not going to roll over to the next server). This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru but e-mail addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is. Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all internal to their DNS stuff. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender more info I gleaned from their IT guy: Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't match, is that possibly stopping my messages from getting to them? When I look at the headers of messages they send me, the internal dns name of their sending server is being sent as: Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com ([12.155.200.200]). The 12.155.200.200 IP is actually the IP of mail.kpafilms.com, to the internet, exbdc01.kpafilms.com doesn't exist. I'm pulling at things here, I know this probably shouldn't have a bearing on whether or not I can send mail to them because I can send to them from any other account. Also, if mi.kpafilms.com is down, shouldn't mail.kpafilms.com take over it's load? I'm puzzled that since I can send mail from outlook to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the mail not sent to the second MX record since the first one is down? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Well, let me take a stab at this... Because of this: kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com Due to your MX record, all mail addressed to kpafilms.com is going to MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However, when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender OK, why would I be able to send to the mx record of the domain and not the domain itself? Example: Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sits in my queue and wont deliver But If I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it get's delivered fine Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Can we get the full headers for that NDR? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key
RE: IS Online Maintenance
No, not 'always'. The key thing is to make sure the online maint window is outside of your backup window, otherwise the backup process will halt the maintenance. 01:00 - 07:00 is ok. If the window is larger than is required by the process, multiple runs of the maintenance take place. Check your event logs to see how long the maint runs take and adjust if necessary. Neil -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 18 July 2003 13:38 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: IS Online Maintenance Subject: IS Online Maintenance Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server The online defrag runs daily. I see it scheduled for 1:00a.m. to 7:00a.m. every day. Is this OK? Just wondering if I should change this. What is the recommended time for Online maintenance to run and for how long? Their is a radio button for Alwaysshould it always be running? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However... While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this article may shed some light on the issue. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889 Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Problem is, I don't get an acutal error, just a delayed delivery report. I have to delete the message from the queue for the NDR to be spawned back to me. When I do that, I get the same results I do from the kpafilms.com domain: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: testing Sent: 7/18/2003 8:45 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 7/18/2003 9:13 AM This message was rejected due to the current administrative policy by the destination server. Please retry at a later time. If that fails, contact your system administrator. mail1.penncolor.com #4.3.2 Just out of curosity, are you using Elron Message Inspector? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However... While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this article may shed some light on the issue. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889 Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
That article fits perfectly I believe. Thanks for all of your help! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However... While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this article may shed some light on the issue. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889 Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Sounds like a DNS issue. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
DNS would be my guess too. The other week we replaced a network card in an Exchange server. During the course of this it acquired a DHCP address. This DHCP address was retained in the DNS server records even after the new network card was given the server's original address. NT4 clients could still connect to the server but Win2K and above machines were picking up the DHCP address and could not locate it. If you haven't already see if the clients can ping the Exchange server by name - and if not what address they resolve for it. -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 14:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Yes, the Exchange Server can be pinged. I haven't been able to find any problem with the DNS. - Original Message - From: Shotton Jolyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k DNS would be my guess too. The other week we replaced a network card in an Exchange server. During the course of this it acquired a DHCP address. This DHCP address was retained in the DNS server records even after the new network card was given the server's original address. NT4 clients could still connect to the server but Win2K and above machines were picking up the DHCP address and could not locate it. If you haven't already see if the clients can ping the Exchange server by name - and if not what address they resolve for it. -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 14:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Pinging doesn't necessarily mean you have no DNS issue :) Can you telnet to port 25 of your exchange server from your machine? Have you run a Traceroute from your machine to see where things might be going amiss? Has someone added a device on your network with the same IP address as your Exchange Server? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Yes, the Exchange Server can be pinged. I haven't been able to find any problem with the DNS. - Original Message - From: Shotton Jolyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k DNS would be my guess too. The other week we replaced a network card in an Exchange server. During the course of this it acquired a DHCP address. This DHCP address was retained in the DNS server records even after the new network card was given the server's original address. NT4 clients could still connect to the server but Win2K and above machines were picking up the DHCP address and could not locate it. If you haven't already see if the clients can ping the Exchange server by name - and if not what address they resolve for it. -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 14:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS Online Maintenance
No recommended time that I know of. The only thing I try to do is make sur eit runs outside of my daily backups, and before everyone starts logging in in the morning. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Bridges, Samantha Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS Online Maintenance Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server The online defrag runs daily. I see it scheduled for 1:00a.m. to 7:00a.m. every day. Is this OK? Just wondering if I should change this. What is the recommended time for Online maintenance to run and for how long? Their is a radio button for Alwaysshould it always be running? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Yes, I can telnet to the smtp port on the exchange server. tracert shows no problems. Its one hop and 10ms No there are no other devices on the vlan. - Original Message - From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Pinging doesn't necessarily mean you have no DNS issue :) Can you telnet to port 25 of your exchange server from your machine? Have you run a Traceroute from your machine to see where things might be going amiss? Has someone added a device on your network with the same IP address as your Exchange Server? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Yes, the Exchange Server can be pinged. I haven't been able to find any problem with the DNS. - Original Message - From: Shotton Jolyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k DNS would be my guess too. The other week we replaced a network card in an Exchange server. During the course of this it acquired a DHCP address. This DHCP address was retained in the DNS server records even after the new network card was given the server's original address. NT4 clients could still connect to the server but Win2K and above machines were picking up the DHCP address and could not locate it. If you haven't already see if the clients can ping the Exchange server by name - and if not what address they resolve for it. -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 14:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
My take on this is that it sounds like the minimum requirement is end to end secure connection over the Internet (as Andrey pointed out)...which does sound like a TLS candidate. The problem with using PGP or the like is that you then rely on the customer (client) to encrypt the email. If the requirement is that all transactions are encrypted then at least TLS enforces a secure transmission between two gateways. But I would also implement actual message encryption as well (again..PGP or the like). So in the best case, you have an encrypted message traveling over a secure channel (public channel that is...this doesn't address what happens to the message while it is on its way to gatewayA and what happens to the message once it leaves gatewayB). The worst case is that a client forgets to encrypt the email, but it is still transmitted over a secure channel (thus still meeting the requirement to transmit it securely over the Internet). Best regards, Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Ok I suggested it. Because from what I read, they want to always send mail to the same destination in a secure way (We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students) In order to use PKI encryption, they would have to ask the recipient to obtain a certificate first, then get the recipient's public key from a digitally signed message, then always remember to encrypt individual messages. With TLS, you set it up once and then start sending e-mail - the server does the job of encrypting the transmission every time. If I had to send encrypted mail to many different destinations, I would sure go with PKI or maybe PGP. But when you are targeting the same place all the time, why not TLS? -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm wrong but the easiest way in this instance would be to just encrypt the e-mail. Windows does provide CA and you can always get another certificate from a known source. Another way to go is to use pgp or some offshoot of that. I don't know but sometimes we (designers/administrators) get a little over excited using technology we don't really have to use. Well, just my 5 cents. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 19:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support it, TLS is an option. Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS Online Maintenance
IS Management is one of those things best left alone in MHO. Unless it is causing an issue with thing such as your backup, just leave it. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS Online Maintenance Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server The online defrag runs daily. I see it scheduled for 1:00a.m. to 7:00a.m. every day. Is this OK? Just wondering if I should change this. What is the recommended time for Online maintenance to run and for how long? Their is a radio button for Alwaysshould it always be running? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection from the DNS name to the IP Address and see if you can make a connection that way. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users managing Distribution List membership
I've got a Perl CGI script that allows users to manage distribution lists they own. Interested? -Original Message- From: Phil Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Users managing Distribution List membership Hi All, FYI: Didn't get any replies so I rang PSS to see if it's going to be resolved. Apparently not this is an informational only field strange as it appeared to work in mixed mode...but then again maybe that was using Ex 5.5. Cheers, Phil -Original Message- From: Phil Thomas Sent: Monday, 14 July 2003 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users managing Distribution List membership Hi All, Since migrating to Exchange Server 2000 SP3 Native mode any newly created mail enabled groups can't be managed by an Owner (Managed by). Q281489 has a work around but this is a little tedious as a long term solution and was hoping for a better solution if anyone has one or if this might be fixed in the next SP. Thanks in advanced, Cheers, Phil Phil Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Infrastructure Phone: (07) 38298203 Redland Shire Council Mobile: 0408 151 120 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Is NetBIOS still enabled on the LAN connection facing the clients? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection from the DNS name to the IP Address and see if you can make a connection that way. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . --- Information in this email may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please note we reserve the right to monitor all
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
I do have two servers, but all clients are on one. We moved off the other server about a year ago to this new server. - Original Message - From: Lynne July [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Address Lists
Holy crap. That script worked great. Thanks! Robert -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Address Lists I've got a script that does that: (link might wrap) http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=indexr eq=viewarticleartid=2page=1 -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Address Lists To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the SMTP addresses out of our Exchange 5.5 Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word Document/whatever file. Can this be done without exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Actually, the 4xx error is correct, as this is a recoverable error, and its being generated by his MTA not the remote one. He's resolving an MX record but failing to connect to any of the named mail exchangers at that time. Per RFC2821, 4yz replies are appropriate in cases where a retry of the same command, with no change to the sender or receiver, could result in success. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However... While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this article may shed some light on the issue. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889 Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
I take my last comment back. Successful RPC binding using these parameters: network address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx endpoint = 2256 UUID = protocol sequence = mcacn_ip_tcp Server Statistics: #Calls Received at Server = 0 #Calls Initiated by Server = 0 #Packets Received at Server = 0 #Packets Initiated by Server = 0 Ping #1 Failed With the following popups RPC call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0x6ba. The server is unavailable. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Doesn't seem to work with IP address. Hmmm - Original Message - From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection from the DNS name to the IP Address and see if you can make a connection that way. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Can you do telnet to the server's IP address on port 135? (RPC) How about ports 137 - 139 ? (NetBIOS) -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k I do have two servers, but all clients are on one. We moved off the other server about a year ago to this new server. - Original Message - From: Lynne July [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Ahh, thus my confusion. I assumed the 4xx error would come from the remote mail server. Well, Casey, did SP3 fix your problem? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Actually, the 4xx error is correct, as this is a recoverable error, and its being generated by his MTA not the remote one. He's resolving an MX record but failing to connect to any of the named mail exchangers at that time. Per RFC2821, 4yz replies are appropriate in cases where a retry of the same command, with no change to the sender or receiver, could result in success. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However... While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this article may shed some light on the issue. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889 Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Address Lists
Holy crap. I wrote that script while working, well, techically here, but while we were owned by a larger company, which had a penchant for acquiring other companies. On the order of at least one a quarter, if not more. I tend to start with it and modify it as necessary to perform various tasks. The last time I did anything with it was to build a white list for one of our legacy Internet domain names - we have a handful of valid addresses in a domain that existed for many years, and therefore receives a LOT of spam. So, a few mods and it kicks out a properly formatted virtual user table, alias file or accessDB file for sendmail. Its really quite handy, if I do say so myself -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Address Lists Holy crap. That script worked great. Thanks! Robert -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Address Lists I've got a script that does that: (link might wrap) http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Section sfile=indexr eq=viewarticleartid=2page=1 -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Address Lists To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the SMTP addresses out of our Exchange 5.5 Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word Document/whatever file. Can this be done without exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
I have to wait until Monday to apply the SP3 - you know, change management policy So, Roger, If I experience the same problem when sending to two different domains that are configured alike. Who's end is the problem on? Even though I'm getting to their servers, the problem would seem from a high level, to be on my side. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Ahh, thus my confusion. I assumed the 4xx error would come from the remote mail server. Well, Casey, did SP3 fix your problem? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Actually, the 4xx error is correct, as this is a recoverable error, and its being generated by his MTA not the remote one. He's resolving an MX record but failing to connect to any of the named mail exchangers at that time. Per RFC2821, 4yz replies are appropriate in cases where a retry of the same command, with no change to the sender or receiver, could result in success. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However... While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this article may shed some light on the issue. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889 Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
I can telnet to 135 and 139 on both servers - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Can you do telnet to the server's IP address on port 135? (RPC) How about ports 137 - 139 ? (NetBIOS) -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k I do have two servers, but all clients are on one. We moved off the other server about a year ago to this new server. - Original Message - From: Lynne July [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Nothing indicating that it is not ok. I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks Global Catalog ok ? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Nevermind this. I forgot to run the listener on the server. - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k I take my last comment back. Successful RPC binding using these parameters: network address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx endpoint = 2256 UUID = protocol sequence = mcacn_ip_tcp Server Statistics: #Calls Received at Server = 0 #Calls Initiated by Server = 0 #Packets Received at Server = 0 #Packets Initiated by Server = 0 Ping #1 Failed With the following popups RPC call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0x6ba. The server is unavailable. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Well that stinks. What happens if you try to create a new profile on a machine? Can you resolve the mailbox and server names? If not, can you enter the server's IP and get resolution? M - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: misconfigured sender
Well, there are two problems. First, their primary MX isn't accepting mail. That's their issue. Your MTA isn't attempting delivery to secondary MX records. That's your issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I have to wait until Monday to apply the SP3 - you know, change management policy So, Roger, If I experience the same problem when sending to two different domains that are configured alike. Who's end is the problem on? Even though I'm getting to their servers, the problem would seem from a high level, to be on my side. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Ahh, thus my confusion. I assumed the 4xx error would come from the remote mail server. Well, Casey, did SP3 fix your problem? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Actually, the 4xx error is correct, as this is a recoverable error, and its being generated by his MTA not the remote one. He's resolving an MX record but failing to connect to any of the named mail exchangers at that time. Per RFC2821, 4yz replies are appropriate in cases where a retry of the same command, with no change to the sender or receiver, could result in success. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However... While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this article may shed some light on the issue. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889 Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where to find out the level! -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Exchange version and SP level? Windows version and SP level? Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: misconfigured sender Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the same symptoms - it sits in the queue awaiting for a retry. This is why I wasn't so quick to place the blame. Now, how the heck do I fix this?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
corrupted calendar
Anybody know where i can download a copy of scancal thanks for your help *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Try stopping and restarting the RPC service (although I have some faint memory that there's a problem and you can't do this for some odd reason.) If that doesn't help, or you can't do it, I'd uninstall and reinstall TCP/IP from the server. - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k I take my last comment back. Successful RPC binding using these parameters: network address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx endpoint = 2256 UUID = protocol sequence = mcacn_ip_tcp Server Statistics: #Calls Received at Server = 0 #Calls Initiated by Server = 0 #Packets Received at Server = 0 #Packets Initiated by Server = 0 Ping #1 Failed With the following popups RPC call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0x6ba. The server is unavailable. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
No, neither work. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Well that stinks. What happens if you try to create a new profile on a machine? Can you resolve the mailbox and server names? If not, can you enter the server's IP and get resolution? M - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Actually RPCPING was successful. I hadn't started the listener on the other side. My bad - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:48 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Try stopping and restarting the RPC service (although I have some faint memory that there's a problem and you can't do this for some odd reason.) If that doesn't help, or you can't do it, I'd uninstall and reinstall TCP/IP from the server. - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k I take my last comment back. Successful RPC binding using these parameters: network address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx endpoint = 2256 UUID = protocol sequence = mcacn_ip_tcp Server Statistics: #Calls Received at Server = 0 #Calls Initiated by Server = 0 #Packets Received at Server = 0 #Packets Initiated by Server = 0 Ping #1 Failed With the following popups RPC call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0x6ba. The server is unavailable. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Connector erroneously entering Link Down state
We've recently worked out the what's going on with a problem we're seeing with outbound SMTP mail flow from E2K. On our live system (2 back-ends, 2 front-ends and a legacy Ex55 IMS system that we're in the process of removing) outbound mail normally flows through the FE's, but sometimes goes out via the IMS (a higher cost route that shouldn't be used) for a period of several minutes. On a test system we found we can provoke the problem at will. We took a W2K SP3 system running E2K SP3, with an SMTP connector set to route all mails to a downstream Unix system running Exim 4.20 as MTA, and it goes like this: - Exchange initiates an SMTP connection to the downstream MTA - It sends a RCPT TO with an invalid address, and the command is rejected by the MTA with a 550 - in some cases a single line message, sometimes a multi-line message - An NDR goes back to the sender - The routing engine logs a 977 event Following connector failed to connect to its target bridgehead... - A link down event is distributed round the routing group All further outbound mail is now queued on the messages for unreachable destination queue. After 15 minutes the connector attempts an SMTP connection to the downstream system, succeeds, and the link is brought up. If we change the SMTP connector configuration to Use DNS to route to each address space everything works fine. We can't use this in live service, though, since we have to have all outbound mail handled by our central hub systems. Anyone got any comments? It seems like this is one for PSS - taking a link down just because a recipient is rejected by the downstream system does not seem a sensible thing to do - actually it's a good way for users to do a DOS attack, just by mailing to non-existent addresses... Thanks Alan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
What about hardcoding the Exchange server name and IP address in the HOSTS file? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Looks like people who had Outlook open before this problem started are still able to use the exchange server. Those who try to startup Outlook and connect have the problem. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Well that stinks. What happens if you try to create a new profile on a machine? Can you resolve the mailbox and server names? If not, can you enter the server's IP and get resolution? M - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
I did try it but it doesn't seem to help. The hostname for the exchange server is resolving anyway. - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:09 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k What about hardcoding the Exchange server name and IP address in the HOSTS file? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Anything relating to the config of the VLAN and routing rules? On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Todd Boynton wrote: I did try it but it doesn't seem to help. The hostname for the exchange server is resolving anyway. - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:09 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k What about hardcoding the Exchange server name and IP address in the HOSTS file? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP Connector erroneously entering Link Down state
Your downstream MTA is supposed to accept all mail from your MTA. That's why the option says ..forward ALL mail... (emphasis added). To resolve this issue, mail for domains which this external MTA is authoritative should be sent through another connector. On 07/18/03 09:56, Phillips, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've recently worked out the what's going on with a problem we're seeing with outbound SMTP mail flow from E2K. On our live system (2 back-ends, 2 front-ends and a legacy Ex55 IMS system that we're in the process of removing) outbound mail normally flows through the FE's, but sometimes goes out via the IMS (a higher cost route that shouldn't be used) for a period of several minutes. On a test system we found we can provoke the problem at will. We took a W2K SP3 system running E2K SP3, with an SMTP connector set to route all mails to a downstream Unix system running Exim 4.20 as MTA, and it goes like this: - Exchange initiates an SMTP connection to the downstream MTA - It sends a RCPT TO with an invalid address, and the command is rejected by the MTA with a 550 - in some cases a single line message, sometimes a multi-line message - An NDR goes back to the sender - The routing engine logs a 977 event Following connector failed to connect to its target bridgehead... - A link down event is distributed round the routing group All further outbound mail is now queued on the messages for unreachable destination queue. After 15 minutes the connector attempts an SMTP connection to the downstream system, succeeds, and the link is brought up. If we change the SMTP connector configuration to Use DNS to route to each address space everything works fine. We can't use this in live service, though, since we have to have all outbound mail handled by our central hub systems. Anyone got any comments? It seems like this is one for PSS - taking a link down just because a recipient is rejected by the downstream system does not seem a sensible thing to do - actually it's a good way for users to do a DOS attack, just by mailing to non-existent addresses... Thanks Alan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Connector erroneously entering Link Down state
Your downstream MTA is supposed to accept all mail from your MTA. That's why the option says ..forward ALL mail... (emphasis added). To resolve this issue, mail for domains which this external MTA is authoritative should be sent through another connector. Aha. Yes, I see what you mean - anything that the downstream MTA can validate goes out using a connector set to use DNS, which will end up in the same MTA because the MX records will take it there, and fails here will not cause link-downing. BUT - what about the case where a user types a syntactically-invalid address? Something like [EMAIL PROTECTED],com (note the comma). That will also get a 550 response from the MTA and trigger a link down _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Doesn't seem to be. FYI: When I go look at the monitoring on the services in exchange manager the critical state is stopped, but when I drill down to the listed services, they are all running. - Original Message - From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:14 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything relating to the config of the VLAN and routing rules? On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Todd Boynton wrote: I did try it but it doesn't seem to help. The hostname for the exchange server is resolving anyway. - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:09 AM Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k What about hardcoding the Exchange server name and IP address in the HOSTS file? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers. Still have the same problem. Please give me some advice. Thanks Todd Boynton _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enabling Allow Automatic Replies
Hello, I have Exchange 2000, SP3 configured NOT to allow out of office replies. I have a user who is trying to write a rule in Outlook 2000 to get around this so she can reply to anyone who makes inquiries from off campus. She did some research and found that this rule would work if I enable Allow Automatic Replies. I am trying to find out what the consequences are of enabling this feature. Am I setting the server up for mail loops, more spam? Anyone know anything about this feature? Thanks, Pat *** Desktop Server Services Information Technology Group Keene State College Keene, NH 03435-2615 603 358-2172 You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. -- Bonnie Prudden _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2003 Antivirus
GFI says their MailSecurity product is Exchange 2003 ready but I have not personally tried it with Ex2003 yet. It works great with Exchange 2000. http://www.gfi.com/news/en/miscmsteched03.htm Greg -Original Message- From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions What antivirus solutions are available either for purchase or download or in beta? I looked at Trend, Sybari and Symantec, but didn't find any product references to Exchange 2003. I did see on Symantec site the url for the Beta for Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange. Anyone tried this yet? http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?productid=6 6 (At the very bottom of the page) Anyone else gone through this process yet? - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: corrupted calendar
Get it from PSS; that's where I got mine. It'll be free, too. Neil -Original Message- From: Joe Haines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 18 July 2003 15:49 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: corrupted calendar Subject: corrupted calendar Anybody know where i can download a copy of scancal thanks for your help *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Enabling Allow Automatic Replies
Mail loops for sure -Original Message- From: Piper, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Enabling Allow Automatic Replies Hello, I have Exchange 2000, SP3 configured NOT to allow out of office replies. I have a user who is trying to write a rule in Outlook 2000 to get around this so she can reply to anyone who makes inquiries from off campus. She did some research and found that this rule would work if I enable Allow Automatic Replies. I am trying to find out what the consequences are of enabling this feature. Am I setting the server up for mail loops, more spam? Anyone know anything about this feature? Thanks, Pat *** Desktop Server Services Information Technology Group Keene State College Keene, NH 03435-2615 603 358-2172 You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. -- Bonnie Prudden _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP Connector erroneously entering Link Down state
On 07/18/03 10:30, Phillips, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your downstream MTA is supposed to accept all mail from your MTA. That's why the option says ..forward ALL mail... (emphasis added). To resolve this issue, mail for domains which this external MTA is authoritative should be sent through another connector. Aha. Yes, I see what you mean - anything that the downstream MTA can validate goes out using a connector set to use DNS, which will end up in the same MTA because the MX records will take it there, and fails here will not cause link-downing. BUT - what about the case where a user types a syntactically-invalid address? Something like [EMAIL PROTECTED],com (note the comma). That will also get a 550 response from the MTA and trigger a link down My Outlook client won't even let me try and send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],com and when trying to route the same through Exchange using a POP3 client (SMTP) the Exchange SMTP refuses to accept it for delivery. So, I think[1] the risk is relatively low. [1] Not much thought admittedly, I'm in the process of building a new lab. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running DomainPrep in an existing Exchange Org?
Yes, Domain Prep will change all permissions to default. We did that and it worked well. Walt -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:40 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: Running DomainPrep in an existing Exchange Org? Subject: Running DomainPrep in an existing Exchange Org? I posted a message to the list a few days ago about a problem I'm having at a client. To summarize, all Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have full administrative rights in Exchange, even though those groups are NOT listed in the Exchange Delegation Wizard. Unfortunately I didn't receive any responses. So then I figured that I'd just add the Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins groups to the Exchange Delegation Wizard, and then go back and remove them, hoping that would clear out those permissions from wherever they happen to be hiding. Well that didn't work. When I attempted to add the permissions using the wizard I got the error Failed to grant permission for DOMAIN\Domain Admins on this object: /dc=com/dc=domain/cn=Configuration. When I clicked OK, I then got the same error message for the Enterprise Admins group. Obviously I'd rather not go into ADSI Edit and start monkeying with permissions manually. So my question is this...what would happen if I ran domainprep again? Would that reset all Exchange permissions back to default? What account would then have Exchange Full Admins rights? Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Andrey, I ran into this same issue shortly after we upgraded our domain to Win2k AD last summer. Funny thing was, all the lockouts were coming from Windows 98 workstations. I could never put my finger on it, and in desperation finally disabled account lockouts. However, invalid password attempts were still being logged in the event view. Shortly after moving the domain over to native mode, the problem all but disappeared. Now that the majority of our desktops are running Win2k, I'll probably re-enable the account lockout policy and monitor the event logs. Strangest thing, and to this day my must frustrating mystery. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X2003 OWA Reserved Characters
We currently run URL scan as part of the IIS Lockdown tool on our OWA 2000 servers. Users hate that this blocks opening messages with reserved characters (,%,./,.., etc) in the message subject line. However, after being hacked (from on campus users) we feel it is necessary. Question: Does OWA 2003 eliminate this issue? Does URL scan run on OWA 2003 servers? Or is it built in? Thanks, Walt Brannon University of New Orleans _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Does it happen after they change their passwords? Usually that's because they have multiple machines logged in -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
If they are logged into more than one computer with an open profile, and execute a password change on another computer, something in that other open profile could be trying to authenticate and is using the old wrong password. Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:58 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
What OS are you users running? Win 95,98 or ME? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
This happened to us here. We found out that their drive mapping were still trying to authenticate with the old passwords. So we disconnected them and then recreated the drive mappings. Problem solved -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Andrey, I ran into this same issue shortly after we upgraded our domain to Win2k AD last summer. Funny thing was, all the lockouts were coming from Windows 98 workstations. I could never put my finger on it, and in desperation finally disabled account lockouts. However, invalid password attempts were still being logged in the event view. Shortly after moving the domain over to native mode, the problem all but disappeared. Now that the majority of our desktops are running Win2k, I'll probably re-enable the account lockout policy and monitor the event logs. Strangest thing, and to this day my must frustrating mystery. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging
Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Are the machines that are getting locked out running Windows 98? If so, checkout: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;278558 The Q article numbers have changed a few times since I first encountered this error a few years ago, but this link should get you started... David -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Network Security...Hype?
Does a small to medium sized company with no particular high-sensitivity data need...encryption, authentication beyond Windows security, VLANs, ACLs on routers, etc? I agree intrusion detection is likely necessary. I wonder if the hype of vendors is driving this or actual security issues. Pls comment. TIA Orin Rehorst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store? You could also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders that are over say 2 weeks (or whatever is required). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
I believe everyone here is on Win2K Pros -Original Message- From: David Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Are the machines that are getting locked out running Windows 98? If so, checkout: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;278558 The Q article numbers have changed a few times since I first encountered this error a few years ago, but this link should get you started... David -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging
Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
No, they just log on with a correct password once and bam! - locked out -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Does it happen after they change their passwords? Usually that's because they have multiple machines logged in -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Win2K Pro on desktops -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves What OS are you users running? Win 95,98 or ME? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging
Sorry about the double post. Jesse _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
remember it looks at the cached names cache first clear that that may help From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:06:02 -0700 Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Could not hurt to verify that RPC is working correctly using something like rpings. You could also configured a client that is normally having problems to used IMAP or POP and see if it goes awaycould be the VPN having problems with RPCs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Right - but what Roger is getting at is if these people are possibly already logged in on another computer. Situation would be: User is logged on computer. Forgets he/she is logged on. Logs on to main computer and changes password. Still logged on to other computer with old password. Can successfully log on to main computer with new password, but account keeps getting locked out. It happened to me once, and it took me a couple of days to figure out which other computer I was logged in to. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves No, they just log on with a correct password once and bam! - locked out -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Does it happen after they change their passwords? Usually that's because they have multiple machines logged in -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Connector erroneously entering Link Down state
My Outlook client won't even let me try and send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],com and when trying to route the same through Exchange using a POP3 client (SMTP) the Exchange SMTP refuses to accept it for delivery. So, I think[1] the risk is relatively low. [1] Not much thought admittedly, I'm in the process of building a new lab. Yes, I think you're right with that one. I'm not sure I couldn't come up with a do-able example where the MTA really will get passed something it doesn't want to accept - it would be well within its rights to reject permanently a 100 squillibyte message! (And being a university, we have lots of people who'll want to try to find the loopholes...) But however we want to argue that, I'm not convinced that taking the connector down *is* appropriate behaviour. It depends what you define as the link - in this case there *is* SMTP connectivity; and the *retry* handler certainly regards the simple ability to make an SMTP connection as enough to mark the connector as up again. If inability to issue a RCPT command is enough to take the connector down, shouldn't a success be required to bring it up? Don't know. What would be the meaning of a message that failed with one recipient and succeeded with 10 others, for instance? The problem that we have here with this behaviour is that's it's radically different from how the Ex55 IMS did things. And isn't there an inconsistency in how things are done anyway? An error occurs which is deemed so serious that the connector must be marked down; yet the message which caused this is *not* requeued, and an NDR is generated. Isn't one layer saying Hmm, an error here but I've handled it, nothing to worry about and another saying Hey, something really really terrible is happening?. Don't know. Anyway, I'm on holiday for a week now, so my co-workers can worry about all this! Thanks for your thoughts! Alan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging
I've got a Cisco tool that can go in and scrub out the VM's. That isn't an issue. Or as you said, I could script ExMerge. The problem is, if the VM's make it to a store which has regular email, then they'll get backed up that night with the regular email, and then they're on that tape forever. Which makes them subject to discovery. Unless every single VM was scrubbed each night from the store, PRIOR to the backups, including from the dumpster, that isn't going to work. And obviously that isn't practical, because people will be on vacation, take days off, save a voice mail for a day or a week, and so on. Thus, if the VM's are in the same store as their regular emails, they will get backed up, and then we're hosed. We're nailing down specifics with the lawyers. Slippery little devils. Naturally, this entire system was approved at the Executive level without ever once talking with those of us accountable for implementing, integrating, or administering it. Any other ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
That makes sense But the problem reports that we are receiving indicate that the users were not trying to change the password. They were just logging in and trying to do work as usual. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Right - but what Roger is getting at is if these people are possibly already logged in on another computer. Situation would be: User is logged on computer. Forgets he/she is logged on. Logs on to main computer and changes password. Still logged on to other computer with old password. Can successfully log on to main computer with new password, but account keeps getting locked out. It happened to me once, and it took me a couple of days to figure out which other computer I was logged in to. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves No, they just log on with a correct password once and bam! - locked out -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Does it happen after they change their passwords? Usually that's because they have multiple machines logged in -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
Cisco won't authenticate to a PF. It requires a mailbox. -Original Message- From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store? You could also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders that are over say 2 weeks (or whatever is required). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
If you wanted to get all convoluted and all you could make hidden mailboxes that forward to the pfs. Its a lot of work and it would not be pretty..but I bet it would work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendel, Jesse Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Cisco won't authenticate to a PF. It requires a mailbox. -Original Message- From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store? You could also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders that are over say 2 weeks (or whatever is required). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Yeah, and it took 5-6 calls to me to unlock that account, if I remember correctly! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Right - but what Roger is getting at is if these people are possibly already logged in on another computer. Situation would be: User is logged on computer. Forgets he/she is logged on. Logs on to main computer and changes password. Still logged on to other computer with old password. Can successfully log on to main computer with new password, but account keeps getting locked out. It happened to me once, and it took me a couple of days to figure out which other computer I was logged in to. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves No, they just log on with a correct password once and bam! - locked out -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Does it happen after they change their passwords? Usually that's because they have multiple machines logged in -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Do you have more than one IP address on your Exchange server? Or if your server is behind NAT, then it would have an internal address and external address... Here is what I am getting at. Maybe under some circumstances Outlook is trying to get to the wrong IP address. Try the HOSTS file in this format Your.server.ip.address servername servername.yourdomain.name.com This way you will make sure that both the NetBIOS name and the FQDN of your server are pointing to the same IP. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
I guess I'm not being clear. The problem is, to make Cisco's UM work properly, the user MUST be logged in with the user account/mailbox that the voice mail is going to. Lets call that: juser-v (John User - Voice) As a consequence, if the user then composes an email, because they're primarily logged into the juser-v mailbox, the sent email would end up in the Voice mailbox's sent items folder, instead of in their juser account sent item's folder. I'm trying to figure out a way around this. We want voice mail in the voice mail mailbox (including sent items), and regular email in the regular email box (including sent items.) All mail must come from the appropriate user/email address. The user must be logged in as the voice account. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging If you wanted to get all convoluted and all you could make hidden mailboxes that forward to the pfs. Its a lot of work and it would not be pretty..but I bet it would work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendel, Jesse Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Cisco won't authenticate to a PF. It requires a mailbox. -Original Message- From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store? You could also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders that are over say 2 weeks (or whatever is required). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex?
weird logon issue with OWA
Hello again. Sorry for asking too many questions today. Our Exchange 2000 OWA is set up to use windows integrated authentication. Some users are reporting that when they go to OWA from their PC at work, they get prompted to enter their logon credentials. We have checked to make sure that their PCs were members of the windows domain - they are. The users don't have any problems logging onto the domain. What could be tripping IE to think that they need to authenticate? (we can reproduce this behavior when we log in as them on a different PC) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
Um... The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. Cisco Unity Messaging? That's EXACTLY what I do, because my email mailbox is hosted in the UK, and my voicemail mailbox is hosted in Tampa. I login to the UK one, and attach to the Tampa one. I can attach to the Cisco Softphone in this configuration as well. Are we talking about the same product? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other. I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge. So I don't know what to do. Any ideas? Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
No Gary, we are not talking about Bahama Breeze. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Um... The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. Cisco Unity Messaging? That's EXACTLY what I do, because my email mailbox is hosted in the UK, and my voicemail mailbox is hosted in Tampa. I login to the UK one, and attach to the Tampa one. I can attach to the Cisco Softphone in this configuration as well. Are we talking about the same product? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the appropriate address. And obviously people aren't going to use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent Items folder to the other.
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
See? That's why I don't try and be helpful very often any more! g -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 14:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging No Gary, we are not talking about Bahama Breeze. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Um... The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. Cisco Unity Messaging? That's EXACTLY what I do, because my email mailbox is hosted in the UK, and my voicemail mailbox is hosted in Tampa. I login to the UK one, and attach to the Tampa one. I can attach to the Cisco Softphone in this configuration as well. Are we talking about the same product? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant permissions to juser to access juser-v. Unfortunately, UM is junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication. It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account. And if I log everyone in as juser-v
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
Yes. Unity Messaging. What we've been told by Cisco and by the integration consultants, is that with secondary authentication as you just described it, and as we want to do, the Cisco Softphone won't a) turn on the light on the phone for voice mail's waiting, and b) Unity won't let you click on a voice mail icon in the secondary mailbox, then pick up the phone and listen to the message. It will playback over computer speakers. And you can pick up the phone directly and call the voice mail system from the phone. But you can't click the icon and have authentication flow into the phone and then just pick up the phone and listen. So we've been told. Is it working differently in your environment? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Um... The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. Cisco Unity Messaging? That's EXACTLY what I do, because my email mailbox is hosted in the UK, and my voicemail mailbox is hosted in Tampa. I login to the UK one, and attach to the Tampa one. I can attach to the Cisco Softphone in this configuration as well. Are we talking about the same product? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why are you making it needlessly complex? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM). I had thought of routing messaging from the UM
RE: weird logon issue with OWA
What desktop operating system are your users on? That could be your clue. Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:15 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: weird logon issue with OWA Subject: weird logon issue with OWA Hello again. Sorry for asking too many questions today. Our Exchange 2000 OWA is set up to use windows integrated authentication. Some users are reporting that when they go to OWA from their PC at work, they get prompted to enter their logon credentials. We have checked to make sure that their PCs were members of the windows domain - they are. The users don't have any problems logging onto the domain. What could be tripping IE to think that they need to authenticate? (we can reproduce this behavior when we log in as them on a different PC) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users managing Distribution List membership
Give them permission on the security tab. Walt -Original Message- From: Phil Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Sunday, July 13, 2003 5:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: Users managing Distribution List membership Subject: Users managing Distribution List membership Hi All, Since migrating to Exchange Server 2000 SP3 Native mode any newly created mail enabled groups can't be managed by an Owner (Managed by). Q281489 has a work around but this is a little tedious as a long term solution and was hoping for a better solution if anyone has one or if this might be fixed in the next SP. Thanks in advanced, Cheers, Phil Phil Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Infrastructure Phone: (07) 38298203 Redland Shire Council Mobile: 0408 151 120 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird logon issue with OWA
I tested from my Win2K Pro desktop. Logged onto windows as the user. Started OWA - got prompted. -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA What desktop operating system are your users on? That could be your clue. Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:15 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: weird logon issue with OWA Subject: weird logon issue with OWA Hello again. Sorry for asking too many questions today. Our Exchange 2000 OWA is set up to use windows integrated authentication. Some users are reporting that when they go to OWA from their PC at work, they get prompted to enter their logon credentials. We have checked to make sure that their PCs were members of the windows domain - they are. The users don't have any problems logging onto the domain. What could be tripping IE to think that they need to authenticate? (we can reproduce this behavior when we log in as them on a different PC) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird logon issue with OWA
It's a feature From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:45:24 -0400 I tested from my Win2K Pro desktop. Logged onto windows as the user. Started OWA - got prompted. -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA What desktop operating system are your users on? That could be your clue. Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:15 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: weird logon issue with OWA Subject: weird logon issue with OWA Hello again. Sorry for asking too many questions today. Our Exchange 2000 OWA is set up to use windows integrated authentication. Some users are reporting that when they go to OWA from their PC at work, they get prompted to enter their logon credentials. We have checked to make sure that their PCs were members of the windows domain - they are. The users don't have any problems logging onto the domain. What could be tripping IE to think that they need to authenticate? (we can reproduce this behavior when we log in as them on a different PC) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Network Security...Hype?
Unclear. But a security audit from a trusted firm with an understanding that any implementations of recommendations would be done by another firm might serve to provide a more unbiased answer than what one might get from a vendor directly. On 07/18/03 12:26, Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does a small to medium sized company with no particular high-sensitivity data need...encryption, authentication beyond Windows security, VLANs, ACLs on routers, etc? I agree intrusion detection is likely necessary. I wonder if the hype of vendors is driving this or actual security issues. Pls comment. TIA Orin Rehorst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging
OK, that's a slightly different set of perspectives. It doesn't work is different to certain aspects operate differently or not at all. Redlight - works fine; I use the softphone as a secondary phone, when I'm elsewhere in the building or travelling; if I get a message, my deskphone light still comes on. Click on the message - well, if I want to listen to it through the phone, I use the phone to retrieve the message. If I click it on the screen, then I expect the playback through my speakers... So, I don't have that issue. I'd argue that isn't not working, but that it's working differently. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 14:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yes. Unity Messaging. What we've been told by Cisco and by the integration consultants, is that with secondary authentication as you just described it, and as we want to do, the Cisco Softphone won't a) turn on the light on the phone for voice mail's waiting, and b) Unity won't let you click on a voice mail icon in the secondary mailbox, then pick up the phone and listen to the message. It will playback over computer speakers. And you can pick up the phone directly and call the voice mail system from the phone. But you can't click the icon and have authentication flow into the phone and then just pick up the phone and listen. So we've been told. Is it working differently in your environment? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Um... The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. Cisco Unity Messaging? That's EXACTLY what I do, because my email mailbox is hosted in the UK, and my voicemail mailbox is hosted in Tampa. I login to the UK one, and attach to the Tampa one. I can attach to the Cisco Softphone in this configuration as well. Are we talking about the same product? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox. So I'm hoping someone has another idea. Because I'm stuck. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from
RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging
Gary, k. Thanks very much for your report on how it works for you. I think I'm going to implement it like you have it, which is with the secondary account for voice. If people want to listen through the phone, they can dial into the voice mail through the phone. Thanks everyone for your help. Jesse -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging OK, that's a slightly different set of perspectives. It doesn't work is different to certain aspects operate differently or not at all. Redlight - works fine; I use the softphone as a secondary phone, when I'm elsewhere in the building or travelling; if I get a message, my deskphone light still comes on. Click on the message - well, if I want to listen to it through the phone, I use the phone to retrieve the message. If I click it on the screen, then I expect the playback through my speakers... So, I don't have that issue. I'd argue that isn't not working, but that it's working differently. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 14:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Yes. Unity Messaging. What we've been told by Cisco and by the integration consultants, is that with secondary authentication as you just described it, and as we want to do, the Cisco Softphone won't a) turn on the light on the phone for voice mail's waiting, and b) Unity won't let you click on a voice mail icon in the secondary mailbox, then pick up the phone and listen to the message. It will playback over computer speakers. And you can pick up the phone directly and call the voice mail system from the phone. But you can't click the icon and have authentication flow into the phone and then just pick up the phone and listen. So we've been told. Is it working differently in your environment? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Um... The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. Cisco Unity Messaging? That's EXACTLY what I do, because my email mailbox is hosted in the UK, and my voicemail mailbox is hosted in Tampa. I login to the UK one, and attach to the Tampa one. I can attach to the Cisco Softphone in this configuration as well. Are we talking about the same product? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then... Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent to delete all VM's older than XX days? I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Unified Messaging Roger and others, We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile. Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for disaster recovery. If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep tapes of our email. What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over voice mail during legal discovery process. Which we'd have to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email store. But if they're off in their own store, we just don't back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there isn't a problem. The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose some UM functionality. And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink based on
Off Topic: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Chris, How were you able to determine that the drive mapping was causing the problem? We have a similar problem here, and can't find anything in the event logs that pinpoints the problem. It would be easy enough to test by disconnecting drive mappings, but I'd be happier if there was something definitive to verify that the drive mapping is causing the lock out. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves This happened to us here. We found out that their drive mapping were still trying to authenticate with the old passwords. So we disconnected them and then recreated the drive mappings. Problem solved -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Andrey, I ran into this same issue shortly after we upgraded our domain to Win2k AD last summer. Funny thing was, all the lockouts were coming from Windows 98 workstations. I could never put my finger on it, and in desperation finally disabled account lockouts. However, invalid password attempts were still being logged in the event view. Shortly after moving the domain over to native mode, the problem all but disappeared. Now that the majority of our desktops are running Win2k, I'll probably re-enable the account lockout policy and monitor the event logs. Strangest thing, and to this day my must frustrating mystery. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
