RE: Exchange 2003 backups
Really big hard drives is how we do it. Our users keep the mail they need and are encouraged to dispose of the mail they don't need. Occasionally they do. Of course, we have the luxury of having an abundance of storage space on our Exchange servers the bigger challenge is the effect those large information stores can have on backups and restores. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups I'd recommend a public folder. That way, not only do you have access to email from years ago, but all users (with correct permissions) have access, instead of only the user who has it in a PST. Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Joyce Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they considered bad ? How else can I give users access to email from 2 years ago ? yes, they do need to access these. What do other organisations do ? Matt -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups PST = Bad. themolk. -Original Message- From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 backups Hi, I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. It is a single server setup. I used to use BackupExec+Exchange agent to backup to a DLT. The stores and the individual mailboxes were backed up daily and every week I would stop the services and do a full backup. Before I rush out an pay Veritas for the license upgrade, I thought I would revue the situation. Some background info... The server has 100gb of raid5 diskspace. There is about 125 mailboxes, I expect this to continue to rise to 250 over the next few years. Mailbox sizes used to be about 70mb on 5.5, this has been increased to 100mb. Some staff do need access to archived mail, and they use pst files on the server. At the moment I do not have a well defined backup policy for this setup, I am using ntbackup for stores and state nightly. Any advice ? thanks Matthew Joyce Children's Cancer Institute Australia http://www.ccia.org.au -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue
RE: Exchange 2003 backups
Unreliable and inefficient when they get large. Difficult to manage. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Joyce Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they considered bad ? How else can I give users access to email from 2 years ago ? yes, they do need to access these. What do other organisations do ? Matt -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups PST = Bad. themolk. -Original Message- From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 backups Hi, I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. It is a single server setup. I used to use BackupExec+Exchange agent to backup to a DLT. The stores and the individual mailboxes were backed up daily and every week I would stop the services and do a full backup. Before I rush out an pay Veritas for the license upgrade, I thought I would revue the situation. Some background info... The server has 100gb of raid5 diskspace. There is about 125 mailboxes, I expect this to continue to rise to 250 over the next few years. Mailbox sizes used to be about 70mb on 5.5, this has been increased to 100mb. Some staff do need access to archived mail, and they use pst files on the server. At the moment I do not have a well defined backup policy for this setup, I am using ntbackup for stores and state nightly. Any advice ? thanks Matthew Joyce Children's Cancer Institute Australia http://www.ccia.org.au -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
You asked how you could prevent multiple users from editing the same attachment at the same time. Ed told you one way you can do it. If you don't want to deploy a document management system, or some other similar workaround, then the answer is No. -Ben- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Jason Clishe Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? Deploy a real document management system? Not only does this suggestion not asnwer the question I asked, it is completely inappropriate for my particular situation, and adds little value to this thread. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? Deploy a real document management system, one that has the capability to check out and check in documents. http://www.80-20.com is one that integrates with Exchange. There are many others that may or may not integrate with Exchange. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? When a user has a Public Folder attachment open, other users can also open the same attachment and make changes. Is there any way to prevent this? For example, to force the document to open as read-only when someone else has it open? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
How ironic, my clients (when I was in private practice) knew that too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I never asked you to modify your behavior. Do what you want. It is a GOOD thing for me that people do not have my particular views on ethics. I have won clients and I keep clients, in part, based on my ethics. My clients know that come heck or high water, I am going to be fanactically loyal to my clients and no one else, ever. And yes, I expressed concern EIGHT YEARS AGO and since then have never brought it up. It keeps being brought up by other people. Let it go. You are the only person who ever expressed any perceived conflict of interest. I am not going to modify my behavior to conform to your standards. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
And, in the interest of full disclosure, two of the three accolades in my signature line are from Microsoft, obviously the last two. The first (MTS) was bestowed by my employer. Does that mean I'm instantly biased towards my employer? I'm biased towards my employer and they didn't even give me any initials. What a gyp! -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
They were going to but the unions wouldn't allow it. (Hawaii, traditionally, is one of the most union-run states in the country. Up until his recent corruption conviction public union leader Gary Rodrigues was often referred to as the most powerful man in the state.) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I thought Hawaii banned unions? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: 17 December 2003 21:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 And, in the interest of full disclosure, two of the three accolades in my signature line are from Microsoft, obviously the last two. The first (MTS) was bestowed by my employer. Does that mean I'm instantly biased towards my employer? I'm biased towards my employer and they didn't even give me any initials. What a gyp! Have you spoke to a union about this? Shameful! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
This is the most very basic definition of conflict of interest. One cannot serve two masters. If you have been given something, and ESPECIALLY if it is something significant that can be taken away, then it presents a conflict of interest. This, from an ethical, perspective is wrong. The fundamental flaw in the logic is the assumption that the gift-giver is a master. They are not unless the gift-receiver allows them to be. argument since the beginning that this all started. This is why companies tell their employees that they must send back gifts in excess of a certain dollar amount. This is BASIC ETHICS. Some companies do. Of course, you have yet to place a dollar amount on the MVP award so there is no reason to think that a company would tell their employee to return it. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
That's true, your beliefs being on the fringe does not make them any less correct. It's the fact that you're wrong that makes them less correct. This imagined ethical crisis you've come up with simply doesn't exist. The vast majority of MVPs are interested in the best solution to the given challenge. Sometimes that solution is a Microsoft solution; sometimes it's not. I have no reservation about recommending other companies' products when that is the appropriate answer to the challenge. I am in no danger of losing my MVP status because of that position. I have openly criticized aspects of Microsoft products both in public and in private. Never has my status been in jeopardy because of that criticism. Your assumption is unfounded. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I do not hold you or anyone in contempt. I believe that your actions are wrong and hurt IT professionalism as a whole. My beliefs may be on the fringe, but that does not make them any less correct. I have never tried to offend, only to educate. I cannot help if people get offended, but it does seem immature to hold a grudge against someone only because you happen to disagree with them on a single topic. I'm sure that comment will offend some people as well. Here's some philosophy for you. Those you hold in contempt will very likely hold you in contempt. You are the only person from whom I've ever heard such an opinion. Perhaps if you were a little circumspect you might begin to see that your insulting belief is on the fringe and to continue to espouse it further marginalizes you. Here's a reason for you. You come and ask for help in a forum where there are many participants you have insulted in the past and continue to insult. Think about it. (Yeah, right.) As to rudeness, pal, you reap what you sow. Regarding your opinions on anything, sorry, but you must have confused me with someone who gives a rat's ass. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I don't recall ever claiming to not be compensated -- though I hardly call what I receive from Microsoft to be compensation in any significant understanding of the word. Furthermore this so-called compensation appears to be misplaced, since it hasn't altered my behavior. I provided support on Microsoft (and other) products before being selected as an MVP and I continue to do so today. If Microsoft decides tomorrow that I'm no longer an MVP I will continue to answer questions on Microsoft (and other) products as I have all along. The sudden absence of We Love Our MVPs Post-It pads and MSDN CD cases notwithstanding. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Well, our recollections are different. My recollection is that the MVP's swore up and down that they did not get compensated. I may have missed something in the deluge of postings and it was quite a while ago so I may not have a perfect recollection of this. To term this lying is simply intellectual dishonest. Read my earlier post. Especially the part about being circumspect. As to your claim about what MVPs said about small gifts, you are simply a liar; there's no better term for it. I have the archives, and I remember very clearly what I typed and others posted, but I choose not to go research this matter only to prove that a blowhard is wrong. You have no credibility to begin with, so why should I bother? Didn't you once use the term MVP Select or some such in your signature? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I do not believe that I have ever bashed anyone. I have expressed my opinion. Honorary titles and gifts are a conflict of interest and hence not something that professional IT people should engage in, period. You can justify it all you want to yourself but it does not change the fact that it is a conflict of interest. And I do not see why my opinion is hurtful or demeaning. If you do not agree with my opinion, then why would you be hurt and demeaned by some nut in Ohio? I find it interesting that now there are small gifts involved. When this topic came up previously all of the MVP's stated that they were not compensated in any way. Finally, it is in Microsoft's best interests to listen to their customers. They should be doing this even without having MVP's and I, for one, would rather NOT have my wants and needs filtered through anyone, including an MVP. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Pens, Post-It Pads, the occasional portfolio-pad-book thing, mouse or logo watch (I don't wear wristwatches). Nice trinkets, most of which my wife takes. Doctors and lawyers get truckloads of vendor gifts. My mother is a cancer researcher. Every coffee mug she owns has a pharmaceutical name on it. Walk around our law office; you'll see calendars, calculators, coffee mugs, pens, pads, clocks...all gifts from court reporting agencies, document management companies, banks, insurance agencies If it makes you feel any better, by the way, it's been raining here most of the last two weeks. Of course it's still 77 degrees. :) Oh, Haiku. Hawaiilawyer Images of beach, surf, sand. And lawyers. Oh well. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shotton Jolyon Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I was going to ask what form this compensation took. So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then? *Phew* Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very cold and soggy London in the dark. I love my job but I still need vitamin D. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The sudden absence of We Love Our MVPs Post-It pads and MSDN CD cases notwithstanding. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
More of a fivehead eh? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Your forehead goes to the back of your neck. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 This from the man with a really tall forehead and chicken legs... Who are you to talk? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 You and Don should not be talking about hairlines -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Good choice. The doctor has the same hairline and legs as you. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin? :p -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 The Swynk List... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We'll be flaming YOU... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Or is it... The LOVE Boat... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We're expecting YOU... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 We have a love connection!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Hi Neighbor, I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers. Traffic on 75 is horrid right now. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens. Long live the overlord! It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too. (A very wet) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Jolyon, This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very consistently inconsistant in his logic. Its raining here too Rachel -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I was going to ask what form this compensation took. So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then? *Phew* Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very cold and soggy London in the dark. I love my job but I still need vitamin D. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The sudden absence of We Love Our MVPs Post-It pads and MSDN CD cases notwithstanding. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Neither did he. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I can't be the Captain because I don't look good in shorts. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 No, you are the Capt. Don is Julie. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Are you calling me a coke addict? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin? :p -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 The Swynk List... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We'll be flaming YOU... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Or is it... The LOVE Boat... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We're expecting YOU... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 We have a love connection!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Hi Neighbor, I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers. Traffic on 75 is horrid right now. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens. Long live the overlord! It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too. (A very wet) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Jolyon, This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very consistently inconsistant in his logic. Its raining here too Rachel -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I was going to ask what form this compensation took. So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then? *Phew* Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very cold and soggy London in the dark. I love my job but I still need vitamin D. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The sudden absence of We Love Our MVPs Post-It pads and MSDN CD cases notwithstanding. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e
RE: email address
You can't. They've essentially mail-merged your address into the TO: and FROM: fields; it's a common spammer trick and there is nothing that we can do about it. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: email address how can i stop someone using my email address? I got a number of these things: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from intas.be ([24.51.160.184]) by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 20:08:56 +0100 Received: from siwinski [24.51.160.184] by intas.be with eSMTP; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:08:45 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cu.rn as much as a pr0n star! upto 500% more! Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:08:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHP Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2003 19:08:57.0089 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2587F10:01C3A62B] Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Connections Conference
Actually it ends tomorrow! g -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Connections Conference No, the conference is next week! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Connections Conference Oy.. anybody else down here in loverly Orlando?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bogus Email
Who is this Joe Job and why won't he leave our man Thomas alone? ;) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bogus Email You are being Joe Jobbed. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bogus Email I have Exchange sever 5.5., and our naming convention is first name. last name. There is some one who is emaiing porno to users and is going by [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can he do this with out using our naming convention ie.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
Ah, you want to use the White list capability. May I suggest instead you just set Junk E-mail to High and use your usual rules. That works exceptionally well for me; I get maybe 2-3 spam in my mailbox a day. I get more than 150 in the Junk e-mail folder that I never have to deal with. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 00:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters Well in outlook 2003, the junk rules are replaced with a built in filter facility, a separate entry from normal rules. The email is definintly Junk, but I'm wanting to use the safe lists that are now built in. With safe lists all emails are moved to Junk Email unless the sender is on your safe list. The problem is if you have any other rules set to move the emails it prevents the Junk Mail feature from working as it should. I have already turned off stop processing other rules. Thanks for the help though :) -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions I would guess that the junk mail filters are using rules, and you might need to set Continue Processing Rules But then if you've already filtered them are they junk? Harriet -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original
RE: Read Only Attachments
O.K., here's another suggestion: Send out an e-mail to all employees instructing them that when they receive these documents via e-mail they are to save them to their hard drive and edit them from there. Violations of this policy will not be tolerated. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Ed- If you require a technological solution then I would encourage you to look at posting the documents in Read-only network directories or in Public Folders that the users have read-only access to, rather than trying to e-mail them. Either that or be satisfied with the notion that the original, unaltered, document still resides in the Sent Items folder of the original sender. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Yes all employees are from our company. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
It's a real shame that the literary world continues to be so book and author-centric. There is no agency that enforces ethical standards among literary reviewers and so they cannot be considered true professionals. grin Sorry, couldn't resist. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A CHALLENGE to the List Send it on, I'll return it at my own expense once I am done lest one consider that I took compensation in form of a free book and tainted my review as a result. Chris Scharff 9420 Research Blvd Suite 330 Austin, TX 78759 -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:23 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: A CHALLENGE to the List Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem attacks on myself and Achieving Process Profitability: Building the IT Profit Center without ever even reading a single page of it. I have been in contact with Amazon.com so these reviews will be removed in the near future. I could take this opportunity to opine about how unprofessional, unfair, childish and cowardly this is, but instead I offer this challenge: I will send you a copy of my Achieving Process Profitability at my own expense for you to review. All that I ask in return is that you actually read Achieving Process Profitability and post an honest, impartial review of it's contents, not your personal prejudices, to Amazon.com and this list. I will only respond to indivuals that publicly accept my challenge on this list, just respond to this message and then privately email me your name and address. I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the pompous bags of gas will be exposed for what they are. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
It appears that all of the free copies have been spoken for; which is fine. It appears that you only allow for the possibility that there are fewer than 10-12 fair-minded individuals on this list; I would hope that is an underestimate. Not having read it your book I have posted no reviews of it here or elsewhere. I'm not sure what childish and cowardly attacks you're referring to; though certainly your unique and documented position on ethics in the technology field has gotten some public discussion here of late. If you do find that you have an extra copy of the book I'll be happy to take a look at it. Unfortunately Chris beat me to the observation that sending somebody a free book creates a conflict of interest in the Deckler-system which thus calls into question the ethics of the reviewer. I will attempt to remain impartial despite the obvious compensation: Ben M. Schorr Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert 1001 Bishop St., Pauahi Tower 16th Floor Honolulu, HI 96813-3480 As a suggestion, if you have an electronic copy of the manuscript you may find it easier (and cheaper) to distribute to interested reviewers in that form. At ~88 pages it would not be a burdensome .PDF file. Just a thought. Mahalo, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem attacks on myself and Achieving Process Profitability: Building the IT Profit Center without ever even reading a single page of it. I have been in contact with Amazon.com so these reviews will be removed in the near future. I could take this opportunity to opine about how unprofessional, unfair, childish and cowardly this is, but instead I offer this challenge: I will send you a copy of my Achieving Process Profitability at my own expense for you to review. All that I ask in return is that you actually read Achieving Process Profitability and post an honest, impartial review of it's contents, not your personal prejudices, to Amazon.com and this list. I will only respond to indivuals that publicly accept my challenge on this list, just respond to this message and then privately email me your name and address. I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the pompous bags of gas will be exposed for what they are. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
gasp And how many NetWare/Groupwise seats did he force you to buy? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? That would automatically make him unethical then as well. He was one of the consultants that helped migrate our mail system (not my choice to bring in consultants). Walked in wearing a Novell jacket and a Novell shirt. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:12 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
I don't know what your issue is, so I'm afraid I'd have to answer No at the moment. :) Perhaps you could elaborate? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe
RE: Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP
Why not use Public Folders? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP I need to create an automated bulletin board system using Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2000. It needs to be fairly automated with people being able to subscribe and unsubscribe. ANY direction would be appreciated. Thank you Ron PS: Users are in a W2K domain. No outside access. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
That the thing - Authors have no written code of ethics or organization that enforces those ethics and since when authors write books they get compensation for those books so obviously authors are unethical... ...oh, wait. I'm an author too. Never mind. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 19:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Oh, it's the same guy all right. http://www.infonition.com/home.shtml And his age old arguments about how unprofessional we all are are now here: http://www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml Of course he's still wrong. His counterpoint to IT people being unethical compared to doctors and lawyers is ridiculous. Do give http://www.infonition.com/docs/Briefs/The%20Importance%20of%20Ethics%20i n%20IT.pdf a read for fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? At only 88 pages, it doesn't seem like it would be the same guy. He used to have posts in this list longer than that! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Bielby Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deckler wrote a book?!? For those of you that remember the early days of the list, is this the same Deckler that used to post here? http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595289703/qid%3D1063417520/sr%3D 11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-3211233-4840161 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Thanks Andy, I needed the chuckle. g -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 18:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Oh, it's the same guy all right. http://www.infonition.com/home.shtml And his age old arguments about how unprofessional we all are are now here: http://www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml Of course he's still wrong. His counterpoint to IT people being unethical compared to doctors and lawyers is ridiculous. Do give http://www.infonition.com/docs/Briefs/The%20Importance%20of%20Ethics%20i n%20IT.pdf a read for fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? At only 88 pages, it doesn't seem like it would be the same guy. He used to have posts in this list longer than that! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Bielby Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deckler wrote a book?!? For those of you that remember the early days of the list, is this the same Deckler that used to post here? http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595289703/qid%3D1063417520/sr%3D 11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-3211233-4840161 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems moving mailboxes
Turn off the antivirus, move the mailboxes, turn the antivirus back on. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 07:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems moving mailboxes Greetings, I am in the process of manually moving mailboxes from one server to another. Both servers are Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. When moving some of the boxes I am getting a error. The error is The client operation failed. ID no: 80004005-0501-84005. I looked this up in Microsoft support and it talks about turning off virus scan product. That seems dangerous. I have turned off the size factor on the servers. Has anyone else experienced this problem? Have a great weekend. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing License key.
I've never tried it but my understanding is that you should just be able to install the licensed version over the eval version. Of course, you'll want to do a full backup of your system first, as always. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 18:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing License key. Is it possible to change the license key from evaluation to fully supported or do you have to do a complete re-install? Is it the same for upgrading from Standard server to enterprise? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients
Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are running. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files (Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued. When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it. It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done? Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Hi folks, I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says: The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF. This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients
Have you done the usual client/server troubleshooting? Checked to see if you can ping the Exchange server by name and so forth? Can your Exchange server contact a GC in your domain? Anything at all in the Event Viewer? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives and sends mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external e-mail, and if I send an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external e-mail, so the server is working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into the mailboxes. I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a bit desperate here... Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are running. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files (Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued. When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it. It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done? Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Hi folks, I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says: The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF. This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Filtering
Maybe it's just late but I don't understand how @ew01.com would also block the subdomains of that domain. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Mike, I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com ~Jim P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company block list. Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Jim, Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it. I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I used ew01.com and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have blocked this junk mail? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Roger, I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it: Paul Robichaux's Managing MS Exchange Server, Chapter 8, pg 294, bottom of the page: @foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain [EMAIL PROTECTED] - reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com So Nate's response was spot on. Jim Blunt E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Hmm - I have no problem with you saying it works that way (haven't been able to try it) but that's not the way I would expect it to work - I would expect it to be more restrictive in how it blocks, so @ivy.com only blocks @ivy.com. That's pretty standard practice in other MTA's I've used over the years, which is why it seems a little out of whack. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Then can you explain why I can enter @fr or @biz and the server blocks anything that ends with .fr or .biz. Doesn't this qualify as blocking any domain or subdomain that ends with these? It seems to me that it does. -- From: Roger Seielstad Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Message Filtering Actually, that doesn't support what you're saying. To prevent all users in a specific domain from delivering messages to your site, type the domain name in the following format: @domainname.com Ivy.com and mail.ivy.com are two, distinct domains, and therefore blocking @ivy.com should not implicitly block @mail.ivy.com. I'd be interested to know that it blocks subdomains that it is not explicitly told to block, though. That's quite a bug. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Check out Q245465 for Exchange 5.5. It backs up what I said earlier. I have used this successfully on the Exchange 5.5 setups I have managed. Nate Couch EDS messaging -- From: Roger Seielstad Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Message Filtering You'd have to block it as 'ivy.net', not '@ivy.net' -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering My understanding of reading through the help file is that if you block @ivy.net all of the subdomains are blocked as well. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Filtering Two stars (**) would be an overkill -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
RE: Outlook to auto resolve ONLY names in Global Address List
I suppose you could go to Tools | Services and edit the Outlook Address Book service so that only the GAL is listed. (Remove Contacts, etc.) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mark Eldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook to auto resolve ONLY names in Global Address List Users are inadvertently sending to outside addresses when the email was intended for internal use only. Can Outlook or Exchange 2000 be set so the Outlook client ONLY automatically resolves names from the Global Address List - although the other local contacts list will be accessible? How can this be set automatically? Policy? Registry entry? Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working
Is the IMC configured to not allow automatic forwards to the Internet now? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 16:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working Dear all, Basically a lot of staff are forwarding their email to another account for reading it out of hours or when travelling. Both the out of office assistant and the rules wizard are used for this purpose by different staff For unknown reason for a months now, this email forwarding feature no longer works and no obvious errors found. Exchange MailBox Server = Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4 level runs on NT4 member server with OS SP6a Exchange Internet Mail Service server = Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4 level BUT runs on Windows 2000 member server with OS SP3 Client version = MS Outlook XP The only difference is we have upgraded the Exchange IMC Server OS from NT4.0 to Windows 2000 last month. Can someone give me some hints where the problems could be? Thanks in advanced. Regards, BY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
Isn't that the new theaters down at the mall? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 20:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Could you please show us what a googleplex is? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution 1000 0 Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution What's a google? From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:25:43 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Search on Google. I have seen products like that before. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar anomalies.
Shall we assume you've checked the usual suspects -- clock, time zones, etc.? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 12:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar anomalies. Here's an odd one, suddenly all of my clients calendar entries are 2 hours earlier. Almost as if the system clock was changed from Central to Pacific. Has anyone seen this? I am runnign EX2K SP3 on Win2KSP3 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
Yeah, but they're still never showing anything good and the popcorn is overpriced. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 05:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution It's one followed by a 100 googles worth of zeros -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Isn't that the new theaters down at the mall? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 20:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Could you please show us what a googleplex is? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution 1000 0 Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution What's a google? From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:25:43 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Search on Google. I have seen products like that before. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Entourage
An amazing soy substitute! -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 18:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage It's not Outlook, but an incredible simulation! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Entourage Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange aware, you mean 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and and automatic configuration of address book and other account settings to support Exchange qualifies, then maybe. From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New Entourage I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be Exchange-aware if it was, right? When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18 months ago we had to settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had to switch between OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to open up IMAP or POP3 for him. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Methods?
Why not AutoArchive? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archiving Methods? What is the best Archiving tool for Exchange 2000 mailboxes that are over 2 Gig? Needs to archived in a PST by date. Either Client or Server based. Thanks, Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accessing Exchange Server 5.5 Via the web
OWA is the way I would go. Otherwise if you want a workaround I guess you could autoforward all the mail to Hotmail/Yahoo accounts and let the users access it that way. Not a very ideal way to do it but if you're dead-set against using OWA I guess it would work. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 5:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Accessing Exchange Server 5.5 Via the web It is quite expensive to get mail via dialup, especially when the user has to visit outside countries. We want to make use of some technique which can help us get the e-mail via web browser. Please note that we dont wannt to / can't use the OWA and Dial up. Has anyone tried any programming techniques to do so? I'll appreciate any input on this grave issue... Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box?
Good idea. We also like to tier different A/V products so that we hopefully get some overlap. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 10:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box? I do it exactly the same way as you do but with a different A/V engine on the gateway. I've never been one to trust a single AV vendor and then take the flack if an infected email hit a client... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: 13 July 2003 19:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box? I've always configured my Exchange bridghead servers to forward outbound mail to the SMTP gateway / Antivirus box that sits in the DMZ. Recently I talked to another engineer that says he always configures his Exchange bridgeheads to go straight out to the Internet, bypassing the SMTP gateway. His logic was that since A/V is already running on the Exchange mailbox servers, no sense in putting more load on the A/V box in the DMZ by having it scan all outbound mail again. I don't particularly like that approach. Just curious how others do it. Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Why am I not surprised that these are attorneys? :-) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 06:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I'll suggest that! Maybe something self-executing with a company theme song. Announce your presence with authority! :) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Heck, why stop there. Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email! - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I guess. I advised against it, but as usual the PHB's don't want to hear it. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Oy. Because Email has to be made the *exact* equivalent of paper messages, right? -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? -Original Message- From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the logo? Gill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Hello Everyone, Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server) (Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2) Thanks Raj ** ** ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Monitor Email content
You'd be best off consulting an attorney for your jurisdiction before you go with that idea. In some jurisdictions that approach could get you in a lot of trouble. Trust me (see sig block). Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Public Folders chat now
http://communities2.microsoft.com/home/chatroom.aspx?siteid=3415 http://communities2.microsoft.com/home/chatroom.aspx?siteid=3415 -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
Seems like that disclaimer (I do not give permission to forward) would be unnecessary. If the law requires express permission then the absence of any disclaimer wouldn't constitute permission and thus unless the message specifically said I *DO* give permission to forward it would be illegal to forward it. I'll be curious to know how many people they actually get prosecuted under this law. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 13:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Scott, and others, I totally get your point, and to some degree agree. An interesting addition... The Australian federal govt recently (last year) passed legislation to say that it is illegal to forward and e-mail without the authors express permission. Thus, a whole NEW addition to the disclaimer in Australia is popping up, saying that the author DOES NOT give permission for the e-mail to be forwarded. I think, whether we like it or not, the disclaimer is here to stay... It is how we as Admins manage it. My additional $0.02 (inc GST). themolk. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Well I am not a legal speagle by any means, but the disclaimer issue it bad joke. The true responsibility of who the message went to is in the hands of the sender. If the message was addressed correctly then the need for disclaimers would be a non-issue. Sorry I watched this thread long enough that I had to put my two cents in there. I find it hard that anyone should accept the burden of responsibility for receiving an electronic message that was sent to them by mistake. And those disclaimers that try to shift the burden of responiblity from the shoulders of the sender to the reciever are a sad attempt at just that. -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers What about Klingon and Elvish? Google is available in both, so people must speak it. Should we not then make disclaimers available in these languages too? themolk. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 12:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers About a billion people on this planet speak Chinese ... going to included that as well ? I like the fact you are going to add Dutch to the disclaimer, but around 99% of the Dutch population speaks and understands English very well. ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Yup, Greek and Double-Dutch are in the list of languages that need to be covered. Web links are unacceptable since there is no way of checking whether the recipient clicked the link, or they might not be online when they read the message. We thought of using Latin since most of the legal team know that. Esperanto is a bit too leading edge. -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers *Has* anyone tested email disclaimers in the courts in the UK, EU or US? I'm not aware of any cases. I do find it ironic that lawyers, who knowingly write in a way that most people do not find clear, should be concerned that the disclaimer should be written so as to be understood by any recipient. It's all Greek to me. Or double-Dutch. Perhaps your disclaimer could consist of Legal disclaimer - you must read this in every relevant language, each linked to a web page which contains the text in that language. Or write it in Esperanto. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 14:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups
RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
Jason, I'm going to bet that you installed the Business Contact Manager for Outlook. One of the side effects is that it tends to remove Archive from the menu bar. Reset the menu bar in View | Toolbars | Customize and it should be back. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 7:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command? Here, see for yourselves: http://www.tyvin.com/files/clip.jpg JC -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions No, no import/export command either (that's another thing that's been bugging me) I'm in the main OL window, and I've been doing from every folder (Contacts, Inbox, OL Today, etc) and I get the same options each time. And no Archive command. JC -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Something's missing. Do you have an import/export command? Are you in the main OL window and not looking at the File menu that you get when a message is open? -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Nope, no Adaptive menu's. My File menu reads: New - Open - Close All Items - Save As Save Attachments - - Folder - - Data File Management - Page Setup - Print Preview Print - Exit JC -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled? What happens when you click on the double-chevron at the bottom of the menu? -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Previous versions of Outlook had an Archive command on the File menu that would allow you to initiate an immediate archive, and you could override folder-specific archive settings and instead archive all items in all folders older than a given date. Where'd that go? My File menu does not have an Archive command, no matter which folder I happen to be in. The Outlook 11 help seems to indicate that there should in fact be an Archive command on the File menu, but I sure can't find it. JC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: How do I make sure my exchange server is not acting as an Ope n Relay?
You could start here: http://www.abuse.net/relay.html -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Romeo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How do I make sure my exchange server is not acting as an Open Relay? When ever a recipient from my site trying to send an email to a recipient @aol.com. He/she will receive a message saying Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. Then a few days later he/she will receive another message saying The following recipient(s) could not be reached: I finally talked to technical support at AOL and they are telling me that I have been put on the block domain list because AOL automatically check any IP that sends email to their domain and my IP is acting as An open relay, or also known as third-party relay. How do I stop this? What is the fix? Any comments or suggestion is truly appreciated. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
Actually cache mode works fine with Exchange 5.5 (I'm using it that way home and office) and Exchange 2000. You just are restricted to Full Items sync when you do it that way. Exchange 2003 is required to support drizzle mode (Headers and then Full Items). Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 13:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Being a home and road office worker with DSL, I've really come to love Outlook 11 and Exchange 2003, both of which, by the way, are required to make the cache mode (Use local copy) work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith If the user is working offline consistently and synchronizing periodically, I don't see why you'd have an issue. I've set up large numbers of users to work this way in the past. While Outlook 11 does offer some enhancements, working offline with an OST is a pretty common scenario. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:34 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Im guessing then that the main disadvantage with current Offline Folder is the fact that when emails come in you are working from the Mailbox, so you open a large email and its not held in your Offline Folders until you synchronise, that means downloading the email again. Also, what would happen if emails got deleted off the server and people synchronise? The synchronise folders will delete the missing emails from themselves? So as it stands, Offline Folders are not really a viable solution for small bandwidth sites as they leave you working from the mailboxes. By sounds of things, the best use for Offline Folders would be a 15 minute synch interval, but once you have a synch of an email are you working from the synch folder or from the Mailbox when you read them and you are Online? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Have the boss just set the reminder flag for Follow up on the e-mail with the date/time for 20 minutes hence. It should pop up if the other guy is using Outlook. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this
RE: OneNote Help
It's on the inside right flap of the kit; in fairly small type. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: OneNote Help Sorry for the off-topic . . . anyone that went to Tech Ed . . . they gave out Office 2003 beta kits in the ask the experts area. Tall orange/yellow kits that also has the OneNote beta. I lost the cd key for the OneNote beta which is different from the Office 2003 beta key Anyone have the kit that could shoot me the key? much thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Data this old I wouldn't even have around. We rotate our backup tapes frequently and destroy old tapes that we're not going to use anymore. I'll grant that some specific industries may require longer e-mail retention, but thankfully ours isn't one of them. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Data this old, I wouldn't put it anywhere NEAR my production environment. You can use a spare desktop machine for this type of work. Build a new server, and restore your data to that. If I were you, I'd keep it off the same LAN as your production servers, also. Through it on a test-lab VLAN, if you have one. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
I'm here, but I don't see you anywhere!? :-)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S ^jZ�2G(L\xfyb) )
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
Hmmma 60 year old Japanese woman named Matthew. I certainly didn't
expect that!
;-)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TechEd
Look behind you.
(sorry, couldn't resist)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TechEd
I'm here, but I don't see you anywhere!? :-)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S ^jZ�2G(L\xfyb)
)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-rrW{jx�m^zx%S ^jZ 2G(L\x�fyb) )
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Background Cleanup
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q271984gssnb=1 -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Background Cleanup See this error message in my logs everyday. Does anyone have any ideas what this is or how I can fix this? Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: Background Cleanup Event ID: 1101 Description: Error 0x8004010f occurred on message 1-14FBCE during a background cleanup on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outside company mail
I agree with Andy. Somebody like Sig could probably write an event sink that does this, but by the 3rd day I doubt many users would pay any attention to it; it would just be annoying to them. Sounds more like a user-education issue to me. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 6:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outside company mail And this will somehow prevent someone from sending a confidential or inappropriate email to an external recipient? How long do you think it will take before your users just ignore this warning box and hit yes just to get the email out? I suppose you could hire someone to write you some elaborate server code, but I don't see the point frankly. -Original Message- From: Whitlock, James A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outside company mail There are to many clients to think about an outlook solution. If there is a solution it would be better at the server side. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outside company mail I think this would more appropriately be an Outlook question since it is the client handling the email. You may want to check out www.slipstick.com, but I personally have never heard of anything like this. -Original Message- From: Whitlock, James A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have a request from management to setup the exchange servers so that when a email is going outside the company (non-internal email) that it prompts the user, and warns them that they are about to reply or send outside the company. If any email address in the reply,reply to all or just sending is going external to the company. IS this possible? Any help would be appreciated. James _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook, very slow opening new messages
Lots of questions... 1) What's your infrastructure? WAN? LAN? 2) How's your utilization? LAN traffic? Server overburdened? 3) Using a client-side anti-virus software? 4) Anything special about those client machines? Problem happens on OL97 and OL2K or just one or the other? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Hiatt, Jack (MARC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions We are running Exchange 5.5 on NT4.0 with a mix of Outlook 97 Outlook 2000 clients, recently several of the client machines are experiencing very slow opening of new messages in the inbox. Once a message has been read it opens rapidly. Opening the mailbox from another user also results in slow opening of messages. Anyone have any ideas or hints on this one? Jack Hiatt Munich American Reassurance Co Atlanta Ga. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
What error messages, if any, do you get? Did it ever work? Are they on the same network or are you connecting via LAN? Anything in your event logs? Do you have other Outlook clients that can connect to that server successfully? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Outlook fails to connect to exchange 2000 after applying patches and recreating new profiles also. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST Problem
Not to seem obvious but, have you clicked tbe link they provided and done all of the things suggested there? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Importance: High User's laptop won't sync. Have deleted the OST, ran Office repair, all to no avail. User has 550 mails in inbox. Only 49 sync. Any suggestions? TIA Regards, Orin 9:43:41 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Tom Kornegay' 9:43:41 Synchronizing Hierarchy 9:43:41 Synchronizing Favorites 9:43:41 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox' 9:43:49 12 item(s) added to offline folder 9:43:49 Error synchronizing folder 9:43:49[80004005-501-0-550] 9:43:49The client operation failed. 9:43:49Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store 9:43:49For more information on this failure, click the URL below: 9:43:49 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8 0004 005-501-0-550 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox' 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items' 9:43:54 Error synchronizing folder 9:43:54[80004005-501-0-550] 9:43:54The client operation failed. 9:43:54Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store 9:43:54For more information on this failure, click the URL below: 9:43:54 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8 0004 005-501-0-550 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar' 9:43:55 1 item(s) added to offline folder 9:43:55 1 item(s) updated in offline folder 9:43:55 1 item(s) deleted in offline folder 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts' 9:44:15 252 item(s) added to offline folder 9:44:15 Error synchronizing folder 9:44:15[80004005-501-0-550] 9:44:15The client operation failed. 9:44:15Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store 9:44:15For more information on this failure, click the URL below: 9:44:15 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8 0004 005-501-0-550 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts' 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal' 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes' 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks' 9:44:15 3 item(s) updated in offline folder 9:44:15 Synchronizing Views 9:44:16 Synchronizing Forms 9:44:16 Done 9:44:17 Microsoft Exchange offline address book 9:44:17 Download successful _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST Issue
The user probably has their profile configured to deliver their messages in a Personal Folder File (.PST) instead of their server mailbox. Check that other workstation and you'll probably find a .PST file with their messages on it. .OST files do not remove messages from the server. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, Actually, it is happening. People log on at another system, not using roaming profiles, and all their email goes away from the server. They go back to their 'normal' laptop or workstation and there is nothing in the email client. With that said, being new here, I am researching why this is happening. The user, when logging on, gets a message about creating an OST or a PST file. They usually click 'OK' or 'Yes' After that, the user gets their email dumped locally on the host they are logged onto. Is this due to POP? I have never seen this before... Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OST Issue OST files don't remove mail from the server. Care to clarify? On 3/17/03 12:42, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some thoughts: - 1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO redirection. Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their client - this is an anomaly however. 2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected. 3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another system other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the Exchange server. The redirection downloads their email into an OST file on the file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the Exchange server. I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does not have an OST file created for the user. With the creation of the OST file the users email is now off of the server. Help Desk personnel have to reimport the email into the server. - What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen? Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Are they trying to tell me something?
Sounds to me like the domain doesn't recognize you. Have you tried rebooting and carefully typing in your username/password at the login? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 I am receiving the following error messages when trying to access a inbox or calendar using File; Open ; Other user's folders... Unable to display the folder. Cannot open the mailbox for this user because the user does not have a server mailbox. I cannot even open my mailbox. I am an eMAIL administrator. Other people can open folders using the same commands just fine. I looked in the DB and didn't find a hit. Please help me.. Thanks Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Are they trying to tell me something?
Sorry, I didn't read your original message clearly enough. Some of our users, especially on older OS like Win98, would see similar behavior if they mistyped their password the first time they tried to log in; it rejected and asked them to reenter so they'd reenter their password correctly the second time and everything would log in fine. Except Outlook would give errors similar to (but not the same as) what you saw -- as if it was caching the first, incorrectly typed, password for some reason. A logout/login and careful typing of the password the first time resolved the issue. John's suggestion about hidden mailboxes is an interesting one. Did I read your message correctly that you're not even able to open your own mailbox? I didn't notice if you answered Ed's message - did you try recreating the profile? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions yes. I have booted.. An I know I entered my password and UID correct because I have access to the system. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Are they trying to tell me something? Sounds to me like the domain doesn't recognize you. Have you tried rebooting and carefully typing in your username/password at the login? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 I am receiving the following error messages when trying to access a inbox or calendar using File; Open ; Other user's folders... Unable to display the folder. Cannot open the mailbox for this user because the user does not have a server mailbox. I cannot even open my mailbox. I am an eMAIL administrator. Other people can open folders using the same commands just fine. I looked in the DB and didn't find a hit. Please help me.. Thanks Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I'm not sure that 2Gigs is much of a limit is it? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point about mail box limits cool thanks bill -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a delegate than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary reply to every message rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged unique messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. Darcy -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's Gold List of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? Thx for ideas... byron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: export from outlook/exchange to netscape
You can export to a delimited text file. I assume Netscape will import that. Check your text file and make sure that all of the relevent data, especially the dates, appear before you proceed. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions A customer asks me if it is possible to export outlook mail (connected with a exchange server) with ldif or something else so it can be imported in netscape. You have to know that netscape is not my kind of friend, but the customer is king Many thanks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's Gold List of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? Thx for ideas... byron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Option to send OoO to the internet
You might try turning it on for everybody, then disabling it for the groups you don't want to have it using distribution groups. Just a thought. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) Hi guys, I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet for certain Distribution groups in our org. ( not my choice, directive from the directors). I do not want to enable this for everyone so I am not checking the Allow out of office responses in Global Settings. But it does not seem to be working if you just enable OOO using exchange Advanced tab for distribution groups. If I turn on the global setting, it works for everyone, but that is not desirable. Any comments or ideas? Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook contacts
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions First, is Sue Mosher's Outlook list still operating? Yes, I think so. Go to http://www.slipstick.com and you may find some info on it. Second, my CEO's contact folder has come down with a bug -- it wants to mark every contact private, no matter whether it's entered on his machine or by one of his assistants. Even after they're unmarked, they revert to private within a day or so. I suspect the cause may be a misconfigured PC phone he just got, but he accesses Outlook and syncs his phone at several locations around the country - so it may take awhile to track down the cause. Anyone know of a registry hack that might keep a contact from being marked private at all? Unless you've installed Small Business Contact Manager I'd bet it is the sync with the phone that's causing it. I don't know of any Reg key to fix it but you could create a macro that goes through his folder and turns it off. See this article for help: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;255914 -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook contacts
Whoops, sorry, I was looking at the wrong KB. Thanks to Martin for posting the correct link. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hmmm, don't suppose you could mail me the text of that? I'm not signed up as an MVP. No, I found the SBCM reference in Technet, and we've not no instances of that running. Given that, that's my best guess too. Thanks, David -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook contacts -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions First, is Sue Mosher's Outlook list still operating? Yes, I think so. Go to http://www.slipstick.com and you may find some info on it. Second, my CEO's contact folder has come down with a bug -- it wants to mark every contact private, no matter whether it's entered on his machine or by one of his assistants. Even after they're unmarked, they revert to private within a day or so. I suspect the cause may be a misconfigured PC phone he just got, but he accesses Outlook and syncs his phone at several locations around the country - so it may take awhile to track down the cause. Anyone know of a registry hack that might keep a contact from being marked private at all? Unless you've installed Small Business Contact Manager I'd bet it is the sync with the phone that's causing it. I don't know of any Reg key to fix it but you could create a macro that goes through his folder and turns it off. See this article for help: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;255914 -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook contacts
Not again!?!? wink -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions You blew your NDA!! -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Whoops, sorry, I was looking at the wrong KB. Thanks to Martin for posting the correct link. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hmmm, don't suppose you could mail me the text of that? I'm not signed up as an MVP. No, I found the SBCM reference in Technet, and we've not no instances of that running. Given that, that's my best guess too. Thanks, David -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook contacts -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions First, is Sue Mosher's Outlook list still operating? Yes, I think so. Go to http://www.slipstick.com and you may find some info on it. Second, my CEO's contact folder has come down with a bug -- it wants to mark every contact private, no matter whether it's entered on his machine or by one of his assistants. Even after they're unmarked, they revert to private within a day or so. I suspect the cause may be a misconfigured PC phone he just got, but he accesses Outlook and syncs his phone at several locations around the country - so it may take awhile to track down the cause. Anyone know of a registry hack that might keep a contact from being marked private at all? Unless you've installed Small Business Contact Manager I'd bet it is the sync with the phone that's causing it. I don't know of any Reg key to fix it but you could create a macro that goes through his folder and turns it off. See this article for help: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;255914 -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
We've offered encrypted e-mail to all of our clients; thus far very few, if any, have agreed to do it. They think it's too much of a hassle. sigh -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions And I used to work for the third largest insurance adjusting company in the country, and information security was NEVER a priority for our customers. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT I work for a Insurance company. One of our biggest priorities is the protection of patient information. Don't generalize a whole industry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies involved in health care, patient information is not a priority. Nice that it is in your organization, but yours is the exception rather than the rule I assure you. Think insurance companies care about patient confidentiality? Hell, they don't even care about patients. Security second to the pentagon? Perhaps taking a page from their book and setting up public and private networks initially would have solved these types of issues. If protecting patient data had been a priority from the get go, I'd expect this would already be in place. Instead, maintaining that confidentiality was an idea given lip service to while measures were put in place which were known to trade off security for expediency. As noble as your organization's intentions are, a thimble full of wine in a barrel of sewer water, still gets you a barrel of sewer water. That's why extremely restrictive regulations were enacted. On 2/26/03 7:19, Chinnery, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I take exception to your comments in your second paragraph that the reality is that companies don't really care about protecting patient data. I work in a hospital and have met many people from other hospitals through seminars, meetings, etc. To say that we don't care is patently false. Patient confidentiality is a priority, second only to patient care. Our hospital has zero tolerance for PHI disclosure. A nurse blabs to someone about a patient and boom! she's fired. I know, I've seen it happen. The trouble with HIPAA is that they seem to want hospitals and healthcare organizations to be almost as secure as the Pentagon. Our administration hired a big name outfit to give their recomendations. I had to read through 23 documents from them. And some of them, the suggestions, were insane. One suggested (although it said it was optional) searching all purses and bags that patients or visitors to the hospital. I guess they're afraid someone would sneak in a floppy to be used to copy patient data. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT Not an expert on the science behind this essay http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224=easterbrook022403 http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403 , but the idea of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the water is the only byproduct argument a bit disingenuous. Course as I said, I'm not an expert on the subject so I'm certainly open to knowing where the levels of hydrogen needed for such a thing would come from. Perhaps instead of replacing HIPPA, those companies subject to its regulations need to rethink how and why patient data would need to leave their environment and design secure systems (which e-mail aint) to facilitate that transmittal. Course the reality is companies aren't really interested in protecting patient data, just in being compliant with the various regulatory agencies which govern them. So, following the cheapest route to compliance they encounter the reality that cheap aint easy. On 2/25/03 16:06, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew somewhere we were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I should have said Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I
RE: a bit OT: no disk space
It shouldn't have a problem with HW RAID. With HW RAID all the Raid stuff is done at the hardware level (of course) and the OS/software don't know or care anything about it. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Your 2nd point was my D'oh-Factor. NTFS-DOS (the $$ one) does provide rwx. I'm almost certain it wouldn't work with SW raid, but maybe with HW raid. I've never been in a position to try. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: a bit OT: no disk space thanks, I was thinking about that too. I thought that ntfs-dos was read-only but now I am finding some versions that allow read/write still, if it is an NT software RAID, will ntfs-dos recognize the data? -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: a bit OT: no disk space What about booting into it with ntfs-dos or some other such tool, and making some space? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: a bit OT: no disk space How does he know that it is out of disk space. I have a friend who has a client that runs WinNT/Exchange 5.5 server. The client provides very few details (because he does not know squat), except that the server does not boot due to lack of disk space. And the server has RAID5 (client does not know if it is hardware or software RAID5). I have not seen this system yet, it is miles away from me and I am not sure if I want to see it. I have a feeling that they are using NT software RAID5. (I also have a feeling that they were not doing any backups and choked on the transaction logs) I am pretty sure I can boot this machine by sticking an IDE drive into it and installing a second copy of NT on it. BUT... I am trying to think logically... it this is a software RAID5... will another copy of NT be able to see the data on the RAID5 that was created by a different installation of NT? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-Outlook 11 in Exchange 2003 Beta 2 download
Yes, they temporarily posted it, accidentally, and yanked it a short while later. A few people managed to get it downloaded in the brief window that it was up. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions This is from today's Wininfo Daily: * MICROSOFT RELEASES OFFICE 2003 BETA 2 TO MSDN Yesterday, Microsoft temporarily posted on the MSDN Subscriber Downloads Web site several Microsoft Office 2003 (formerly code-named Office 11) Beta 2 downloads, including the suite's primary components--Microsoft Access, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint, and Word; OneNote 2003 (code-named Scribbler); InfoPath 2003 (code-named XDocs); FrontPage 2003; Publisher 2003; and SharePoint Portal Server 2003. However, the post appears to have been premature: After making the products available for a few hours, Microsoft pulled the downloads, stating that the company wasn't yet ready to release Office 2003 Beta 2. One problem is that Office 2003 beta testers hadn't yet received the Office 2003 Beta 2 code, which Microsoft finalized more than a week ago. We want to make sure we have all the materials ready, so that people have the best experience with the beta, a Microsoft spokesperson said. The company will widely distribute Office 2003 Beta 2 and will eventually provide the product through a public preview program. As first reported in WinInfo Daily UPDATE, Microsoft will market Office 2003 products as part of its so-called iWave campaign, which targets information workers. I'll provide an extensive review of Office 2003 Beta 2 in the coming weeks, but a cursory look at all the currently available beta 2 applications reveals that they've matured since the beta 1 release. Microsoft has dramatically improved toolbar icons and overall fit-and-finish, giving each of the products a more polished look. New Permissions functionality ties Office documents and email to Microsoft Windows Rights Management (Windows RM) system, letting document makers determine how recipients can use their creations. For example, you can send a protected email that recipients can't forward, copy to the clipboard, or print. Outlook includes new spam-filtering functionality, although it appears to have no effect on IMAP or Web-based email accounts, which is unfortunate. And OneNote is now stable enough to use regularly, so I'll start giving it a workout during the regular note-taking sessions that dominate much of my time. If you have questions about Office 2003, please fire away. Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Outlook 11 in Exchange 2003 Beta 2 download You have to order the CD to get OL11 -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions I just downloaded Exchange 2003 Beta 2 and was interested in checking out Outlook 11 first. I read on slipstick that it is part of the download. I am unable to find it. Does anyone know if Outlook 11 Beta 1 is in the Exchange download? Do I have fully install Exchange 2003?  Thanks for the help.  -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535  _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2000 to a new server
Missy is absolutely right (and a better pool player than I am) -- it isn't worth the hassle to try and keep the same name. If your old server was Mail just make the new server NewMail, CorpMail, Mail2K, Beverly or something like that. Save yourself the headache. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Don't bother keeping the same server name. Really. Trust me. Check out the Exchange FAQs at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm for more info. Missy Koslosky Exchange MVP - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:14 PM Subject: Exchange2000 to a new server MSX2000+SP3 1forest,1Org We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current exchange2000 server. Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000 restore over it..to make it operational in the new box? any other considerations? thanks, =er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook problem with recurring group meetings
Interesting. What version of Outlook and what version of Exchange are you using? Does this only happen with recurring meetings or does it also happen with single-instance meetings? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Users began using Outlook's schedule feature to schedule recurring group meetings. They have problems when one instance of the meeting is changed. Meeting participants claim to not being notified of the changes. They also can look for a meeting and not find it to reschedule, and can have two instances of the same meeting, the old and the new, on the calendar at the same time. Please advise. TIA Orin Rehorst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry still (partially) down?
Are those folks on Bell South? We have a user who just contacted me this morning to tell me her Blackberry isn't receiving; I'm pretty sure she's a Bell South connected customer. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving messages. Mine started working last night at about 8:00pm. A few were fixed today by doing a master reset (paperclip in the hole in the back) and then going to options/network settings and clicking the wheel and choosing register now. There are still 2 units that have messages pending. Aether tech support claims that some are still backlogged and we should just wait a while. They cannot even receive APB's or pin to pin messages (in addition to not receiving messages from the blackberry enterprise server). Maybe these two will fix themselves by Monday... Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Big time. You should have been in the room with the Outlook MVPs and the Outlook Dev guys last Summit talking about the new security features. I feared lives would be lost. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions No kidding. Until you have sat in a room with 10 MVP's and some MS development people, you have no idea. Martin Blackstone Microsoft MVP. M MVP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects lol Thanks for the good laugh. I have found that the harshest critics of Microsoft products are the MVPS themselves. Andy David Microsoft MVP. There, is that better? - Original Message - From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast aspersions as to people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is biased in one way or another. I believe that this is really systemic with regards to the problems of the IT industry as a whole. The entire industry is vendor and tool focused and that is a huge problem in IT. It tends to polarize people such that everyone is grouped into two categories, people that hate a particular vendor or tool and people that love a particular vendor or tool. This is just plain stupid. The IT industry has some fundamental problems. Microsoft, as part of that industry suffers from some of the same problems as well as some of their own unique deficiencies. Novell has their own unique issues, so does IBM and so does every other vendor in this space. But it seems that you cannot point out these deficiencies without people categorizing and stereotyping you in one way or another. I reject that. I hate all vendors of software tools equally. I find this an absolute requirement to provide true, unbiased consulting services. If you were to follow my posts on a GroupWise board or a Notes board, you would see me make similar arguments regarding the deficiencies of their products and company. However, since I make most of my revenue from Microsoft products and Exchange, I tend to be more active in that area. And the other thing that REALLY chaps me is people that cast aspersions on others without fessing up to their own biases. MVP's are the worst of this lot. They secretly get direct compensation from Microsoft and then try to pass themselves off as unbiased. But you look at their posts and it is obvious that they are simply paid advocates for Microsoft and part of their responsibility is to vilify anyone that says anything negative with regards to Microsoft. And these are the same people that list every last certification and other acronym that they can paste onto the end of their sig, but you never see Microsoft MVP. I wonder why? Microsoft asked me to become an MVP and I told them to go jump in a lake. More people need to take this approach and be true consultants, not advocates. Are you saying that your own interpretation of your own attitude is unbiased? Or that your own evaluation of whether or not your paranioa about how Microsoft are out to get you is unbiased? Rob Also an MVP by the way. Want to throw some mud at me too? -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: 07 February 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects =20 =20 And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft MVP,=20 so whose interpretation is unbiased, mine or yours? =20 I continue to believe my interpretation of your attitude is more=20 accurate than your defense thereof. =20 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Indeed. I didn't know what an MVP was when they first contacted me and asked if I wanted to be one. I thought maybe somebody had finally taken notice of my solid glove work at 3rd base. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions ...and some of us worked hard and got it without knowing of its existence. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Oh please. I have things from vendors all over my desk. F5, Zones, Quest, Printer Ribbons Plus, MS, Dell, Compaq, Jack in the Box, etc. None of this stuff had nothing to do with being an MVP. I also don't do business with all those vendors. If you think I am going to be influenced by a 2.00 stuffed animal with a logo on it when I go to spend $10K or more, you are insane. People work hard to get that MVP and they work hard to keep it. We give of our own free time to help others who may not have the skill level or the knowledge to help themselves yet. Its help and training for them. If I can help someone shut down their open relay or stop virus's, I am helping myself in the long run. It is also VERY educational. My company reaps those rewards and encourages me to continue doing what I do. I'm not sure where you work, but where I work I am treated as a professional. It wasn't always like that here. I was shunned when I first started here because of their experience with past IT people. I earned their trust every step of the way. Now I am consulted on all levels and my work carries heavy weight here. One reason is because I am ethical. I stand by word and my word is golden. The other reason is because I am a professional. I give them honest, insightful an thoughtful opinions and responses. I also listen. I am open to ideas of others. I work for an MS centric shop. It was like that before I got here and it will be like that long after I am gone. But you cant do everything on MS products. If there is something that cant be done via MS, we find other products that may do the job. It doesn't have to be The MS way or the highway regardless of what you may think. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic toys, anything and even the TITLE of MVP. If you receive ANY FORM OF COMPENSATION, it is a conflict of interest. Plain and simple. Ask any lawyer if they are allowed to accept ANYTHING for free. The answer is absolutely not. In IT, it is a different story and the difference is because IT is a trade and lawyers are professionals. As long as we in IT continue to operate in this mode, we will be seen as trades-people, the air-conditioning repair guy or plumber, not professionals. The MVP program is a horrible, horrible insidious device that will help keep IT at the trade level. Plus, once you accept the title, you are now the property of the vendor. You will consciously or unconsciously have a bias toward that vendor and keeping that title. This means that you will not tell it like it is in public and instead voice concerns in private to your vendor. If you all want to be trades-people instead of professionals, then keep on with your MVP program. I tend to believe that the entire IT industry is irrevocably broken. Compare it to engineers, lawyers and other professionals and it does not stack up well. And that is sad, because we could be professional, but we have no ethics. I'm very interested to know what secret compensation he is speaking of. Deckler, care to elaborate? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Yeah. You should see the developers run whenever Chris starts walking towards them. Andy, you forgot to tell me about that direct compensation you get for being an MVP. Unless he's talking about that t-shirt? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects lol Thanks for the good laugh. I have found that
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
That proves no point, Greg, most of my discussions take place in private. MVPs are publicly critical of Microsoft all the time; if you can't see that then perhaps it's because you won't. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions This proves my point. These discussions take place in private, not public. Big time. You should have been in the room with the Outlook MVPs and the Outlook Dev guys last Summit talking about the new security features. I feared lives would be lost. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions No kidding. Until you have sat in a room with 10 MVP's and some MS development people, you have no idea. Martin Blackstone Microsoft MVP. M MVP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects lol Thanks for the good laugh. I have found that the harshest critics of Microsoft products are the MVPS themselves. Andy David Microsoft MVP. There, is that better? - Original Message - From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast aspersions as to people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is biased in one way or another. I believe that this is really systemic with regards to the problems of the IT industry as a whole. The entire industry is vendor and tool focused and that is a huge problem in IT. It tends to polarize people such that everyone is grouped into two categories, people that hate a particular vendor or tool and people that love a particular vendor or tool. This is just plain stupid. The IT industry has some fundamental problems. Microsoft, as part of that industry suffers from some of the same problems as well as some of their own unique deficiencies. Novell has their own unique issues, so does IBM and so does every other vendor in this space. But it seems that you cannot point out these deficiencies without people categorizing and stereotyping you in one way or another. I reject that. I hate all vendors of software tools equally. I find this an absolute requirement to provide true, unbiased consulting services. If you were to follow my posts on a GroupWise board or a Notes board, you would see me make similar arguments regarding the deficiencies of their products and company. However, since I make most of my revenue from Microsoft products and Exchange, I tend to be more active in that area. And the other thing that REALLY chaps me is people that cast aspersions on others without fessing up to their own biases. MVP's are the worst of this lot. They secretly get direct compensation from Microsoft and then try to pass themselves off as unbiased. But you look at their posts and it is obvious that they are simply paid advocates for Microsoft and part of their responsibility is to vilify anyone that says anything negative with regards to Microsoft. And these are the same people that list every last certification and other acronym that they can paste onto the end of their sig, but you never see Microsoft MVP. I wonder why? Microsoft asked me to become an MVP and I told them to go jump in a lake. More people need to take this approach and be true consultants, not advocates. Are you saying that your own interpretation of your own attitude is unbiased? Or that your own evaluation of whether or not your paranioa about how Microsoft are out to get you is unbiased? Rob Also an MVP by the way. Want to throw some mud at me too? -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: 07 February 2003 11:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects =20 =20 And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft MVP,=20 so whose interpretation is unbiased, mine or yours? =20 I continue to believe my interpretation of your attitude is more=20 accurate than your
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
We work with lawyers all the time. So do I. We even host partner companies on our Exchange server for free. The lawyers that we work with FORCE us to bill them because they cannot ethically accept this service for free. It creates a conflict of interest for them. Our IT partners have no such ethical constraints. That's because your IT partners aren't paid to be advocates. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
-Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions I am not and have never said that what MVP's do or do not do is a problem. MVP's are the worst of this lot. They secretly get direct compensation from Microsoft and then try to pass themselves off as unbiased. But you look at their posts and it is obvious that they are simply paid advocates for Microsoft and part of their responsibility is to vilify anyone that says anything negative with regards to Microsoft. -Greg Deckler- Don't lie to me Greg, I have more technology than patience. The granting of the title MVP and any rewards/compensation that go with it is itself the problem. It seems to only be a problem for you. Yes, some MVP's have posted some critical comments. Who cares? The problem is the fact that MVP's exist in the first place. Clearly it upsets you greatly. Here it is again: - The IT industry is vendor focused In the words of Plato: Duh. Having or not having MVPs won't change that. - As long as the IT industry is vendor focused it will never be a profession on par with doctors, lawyers, etc. The IT profession is not the same kind of profession as law, to use your oft-cited example. In fact it's not nearly so clear-cut as you make it out to be. - MVP status is in and of itself a conflict of interest Whatever. interest. When a conflict of interest exists, it exists regardless of whether people act inappropriately because of that conflict of interest. Well, you certainly are quite agitated about this perceived conflict of interest problem. Good luck with that. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange to Outlook latency
Three letters: R P C. What is between your Exchange server and your Outlook workstation? Routers? Firewall? Something is blocking RPC from getting from the Exchange server to the Outlook workstation properly. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions I had posted this sometime ago and got a bunch of responses about opening ports. But I think that is because I explained it improperly. Here it is: W2k server with Exch2K sp3 behind an ISA. Several W2K and XP pro workstations of various sps each using outlook 2k (most with no sp, some with sp2), one using the outlook 11 beta. When a client sends and email it sits in his outbox until another action is taken in outlook (switching to another folder within the inbox), also if outlook is not used for a period of time new emails do not show up in the inbox. I could send an email and not touch my outlook for a week. At the point that I click on my in box the email is sent and a weeks worth of messages populate my inbox and various other folders. Free busy reminders also do not arrive unless you are tolling around in outlook. I got responses about opening ports on the ISA box but outlook clients do not pass through ISA to get to the exch box. No other directory or name/ip resolutions issues exist. Our clients get dhcp info that includes a router ip that is the internal nic of our ISA (for secure NAT). I have changed that to the ip of the exchange server thinking the previously referenced ports were an ISA filter of some sort, but the problem continued. Does anyone have any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Prevent forward/copy/print
Occasionally. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions But you can recall messages with Outlook! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print Bypassing that 'prevention' is trivial. No such attempt has been made in Exchange. It would be the brunt of further jokes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions This feature is available in Lotus Notes (Go to delivery option, select Prevent copying). It prevent forwarding of Email and even copying the content of the email. It works in a Lotus Note environment. We have MS Exchange 5.5 and I was wondering if Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000 include this feature. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Prevent forward/copy/print
Well, without even investing 10 seconds worth of thought I can get around that -- just print screen shots of the document. With 10+ seconds, and any kind of budget, I could probably do better. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions You have to have the full version of Adobe Acrobat. Not the Reader -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Putley Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print How? -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print You must have meant PDF files. You can set the restriction of not being able to print/copy/modify pdf files. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Prevent forward/copy/print I would like to disable forward/copy/print of an attachment that I email to somebody. In doing so, the recipient of the Email will not be able to forward/copy/print the attachment. This feature is available in Lotus Notes. Does anyone know if MS Exchange - MS Outlook allow you to do that. Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT (slightly) : Message Class
You can configure Exchange to only send plain text messages to that domain. (that's what I do with some of the mailing lists I'm on to get around this same problem) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions This is the segment of code I'm using to send the email: MAPIMessages1.SessionID = MAPISession1.SessionID MAPIMessages1.Compose MAPIMessages1.RecipDisplayName = Mr X MAPIMessages1.AddressResolveUI = True MAPIMessages1.RecipAddress = smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MAPIMessages1.MsgSubject = Test MAPIMessages1.MsgNoteText = Test message MAPIMessages1.MsgType = IPM.MailMessage.Note MAPIMessages1.Send False Sending an email from my Outlook profile works fine, so surely it's something to do with the code above (?) I'm a little reluctant to change anything in Exchange incase it's breaks something that's currently working fine. For example, other users in the company may need to send HTML or RTF messages, so I don't want to change the way Exchange sends all messages. Does this info help ? Tim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 17 December 2002 7:02 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT (slightly) : Message Class Where are you getting this recipient address? Are you just entering an SMTP address and letting it resolve? More information from you is required. If the tool you're using defaults to rich text, choose a different tool. If you're sending through Exchange, you might be able to tinker with the Internet Mail Service or SMTP Connector to inhibit this behavior. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim John Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT (slightly) : Message Class Do you know how, or what too ? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 16 December 2002 5:26 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT (slightly) : Message Class Try changing the properties of the recipient object you're selecting to not send rich text mail. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim John Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT (slightly) : Message Class Hiya ! I'm experiencing some difficulties with a small VB application I've written that sends plain text email. I've created a program that polls a database, selects the email address and, using MAPI and the current Outlook session, creates an email and sends it. Out of the hundreds and possibly thousands of emails that are send this way, one customer has come back saying the message is never received. The bounced message I get back is: A message that you sent has been rejected because : It contained a Microsoft TNEF file attachment. I can't seem to get around this. I've just upgraded to Office 2000 SP3 (which apparently should fix it), but the problem seems to be the way VB builds the message. I'm setting the MAPISessions1.MsgType to IPM.Note, but with no effect. Any ideas people ? Cheers, Tim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 15 December 2002 8:43 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: calendar attende no information Of course, that is in Outlook. The default is 3 months, I believe. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can customize that in the Office Custom Installation Wizard, but that applies to new installations only. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: calendar attende no information Tools/Options/Calendar options. Set Free/Busy - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: RE: calendar attende no information Hi all, How can I change the free/busy to something different to 0 , what is the default? Outlook97, outlook 2000 and OutlookXP all same problem just seeing calendars for some mailboxes Thanks, -er -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange
RE: MEC2003
Have you tried telling them that if they don't send you that you're going to show their wives the logs of what web sites they've been visiting at work? ;-) More seriously -- I recently got my firm to approve airfare to a mainland conference by presenting it as a training opportunity and pointing out that our training budget has been practically non-existant and so $400 in 13 months is hardly an exhorbitant request. They understand (even if reluctantly) how important training is (especially in the IT field) so they could not but agree that it was a reasonable request. Now if you've been going to expensive training events every month perhaps that won't work for you. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions What kind of reasons have you guys usually given management to get them to send you to conferences like these? I'd really like to go but I have to come up with some very good justifications for going, thats why I am asking -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17. joulukuuta 2002 8:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Depends on what you call the first MEC. The first conference called MEC was San Diego '98. The Austin '97 conference, which I call the first MEC, was actually called the Microsoft Exchange Deployment Conference. Isn't that what your shirt says?! But some might argue that there were earlier conferences in Bellevue, Washington. I didn't go to any of them, so I don't consider them to be the first MEC. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC2003 Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? Bill Klosa Network Analyst PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 FAX: 773-381-4810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC Electric Company Chicago, IL USA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC2003
Oh, sorry, the airfare was $400. The rest of the conference was paid for by the conference hosts; except for miscellaneous stuff like a sandwich at the airport while waiting to change planes and such like that. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Alexander Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions You flew to and from the mainland, stayed there, and attended a conference for $400?!?! Wow! That's quite a bargain! Alex Ben Schorr wrote: Have you tried telling them that if they don't send you that you're going to show their wives the logs of what web sites they've been visiting at work? ;-) More seriously -- I recently got my firm to approve airfare to a mainland conference by presenting it as a training opportunity and pointing out that our training budget has been practically non-existant and so $400 in 13 months is hardly an exhorbitant request. They understand (even if reluctantly) how important training is (especially in the IT field) so they could not but agree that it was a reasonable request. Now if you've been going to expensive training events every month perhaps that won't work for you. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions What kind of reasons have you guys usually given management to get them to send you to conferences like these? I'd really like to go but I have to come up with some very good justifications for going, thats why I am asking -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17. joulukuuta 2002 8:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Depends on what you call the first MEC. The first conference called MEC was San Diego '98. The Austin '97 conference, which I call the first MEC, was actually called the Microsoft Exchange Deployment Conference. Isn't that what your shirt says?! But some might argue that there were earlier conferences in Bellevue, Washington. I didn't go to any of them, so I don't consider them to be the first MEC. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC2003 Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? Bill Klosa Network Analyst PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 FAX: 773-381-4810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC Electric Company Chicago, IL USA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Haiku Friday?
I think he means you're da bomb which I'm told is a compliment. Groovy. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions I didn't understand. But I don't live on that language's street. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnny Martinez Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday? Beef? That was a compliment. I'm sure he understood. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday? What's your beef with Ed?!! -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday? Are we still doing this? HP has a man His full name is Ed Crowley He pimps Exchange out! Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eoo.log files
What kind of backup are you doing? What backup software are you using? Any online backup using Exchange-aware backup software will delete the log files. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have been to these. They say that the file will delete after a backup. the server is backed up every night, and the files are not deleting like they are suppose to. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eoo.log files Please refer to the FAQ listed in the footer of this and every message. -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:42 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: eseutil Subject: eoo.log files My exchange server is creating a series of log files in the MDBData dir. These files are 5mg files and are taking up a lot of space on the server. I know that I can delete these file and exchange will still work. I cannot find a way to make exchange stop logging this series on files. any help would be nice. Example log file name: EA3E.log Thanks, Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eoo.log files
Ah, disregard my previous question. Did you set the log file handling options in ArcServe? They're supposed to default to deleting the files, but that could have been changed. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions I use Achserve exchange agent to backup this server but it is not clearing out these files, as i type there are 12 gig of these files. I know that I can set exchange to send this files to bigger drive. But they are not going away, like they are suppose to. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eoo.log files Holy Cow! Don't delete these files! Use NTBACKUP to backup Exchange and the files with *automagically* disappear. -Kevin -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:42 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: eseutil Subject: eoo.log files My exchange server is creating a series of log files in the MDBData dir. These files are 5mg files and are taking up a lot of space on the server. I know that I can delete these file and exchange will still work. I cannot find a way to make exchange stop logging this series on files. any help would be nice. Example log file name: EA3E.log Thanks, Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disclaimers
Well...how effective they are depends upon the context in which you're intending to use them. If you have a disclaimer on the message that says This message is confidential then the other party deliberately forwards that message along to somebody else causing some kind of damages, you've got a CYA in that you can point to the disclaimer and say Hey, it's right there on the message telling them it was confidential. It's that guy's fault. Will that stand up in court? Maybe. As far as I know it hasn't been tested yet. I doubt the disclaimers, at this stage, have much of a deterrent or preventative effect. Too boilerplate and most people ignore them. So they probably won't prevent any damages from occuring. Where they may have some value is if the matter ever goes to litigation and the issue of determining liability comes into play. You can point to your disclaimer and claim it's not your fault and that is a legally plausible argument. That's the theory, anyhow. Remains to be seen how well it will work in practice. It's actually a good question; maybe we'll do an article on it for our website. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 7:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions A recurring topic seems to be about adding disclaimers to outgoing messages and I have seem various recommendations about software to do this. But I would like to know how effective are disclaimers? Do they actually have any legal standing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Exch2k to a new server
Well, Ed has already offered my next suggestion. Check the install log on the C: drive and see what it says. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mike Winfrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Nope...nothing in the event logs...The install starts and gives a very quick message on the progress bars saying that setup is finished and then the big successfully completed splash comes up. It's like there are components installed on the server already, it detects them, updates what it thinks needed updating, and finishes. There is an entry in the Add/Remove programs for exchange. I've tried to remove it but it won't remove. So, I found a KB article on manually removing exchange, did that but there's really nothing to remove. There's not even an exchange folder on the server. Please remember that I already have a production server in the same domain. Thanks for your help... --Mike Subject: RE: Move Exch2k to a new server From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:43:12 -1000 X-Message-Number: 90 Anything in the Event logs? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mike Winfrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am moving exchange 2k to a new server and am using the procedures found at http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm. Anyway, I'm on step 6 which says Install Exchange 2000 and bring it up to the same service pack and hotfix level as the existing server. At this point I've installed active directory and let the replication finish. This new server is installed in the same tree as the production server. I start the exchange installation, answer the questions, and the installation starts and finishes without error but Exchange is not installed on this computer. Any ideas why Exchange won't install? Thank you, Mike Winfrey _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000
http://www.microsoft.com/usa/presentations/Exchange5.5_to_Exchange2000_Migra tion.ppt http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=22252 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/migrate_mb.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutio ns/guide/planhl.asp Webcast: http://support.microsoft.com/servicedesks/webcasts/wc092801/wcblurb092801.as p http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/exchange/exchange2000/deploy/depovg/sixsteps.asp Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Can someone direct me to a good website or give me a detailed explanation (if possible and have some extra time to kill) as to how I can upgrade my Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000? Ours is a single domain and nothing extra-ordinary. I do like to install Exchange 2000 on a new box and use EXEMERGE to get all the mail boxes back in to the new box (???). Or what is the best way to do this since most of you experts have completed this task in your environment and I am looking for some good advice. Please HELP! Any advice is welcome! rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Oh, and make absolutely sure that your internal DNS is working properly before you even try to install Ex2K. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions http://www.microsoft.com/usa/presentations/Exchange5.5_to_Exch ange2000_Migra tion.ppt http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=22252 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/migrate_mb.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutio ns/guide/planhl.asp Webcast: http://support.microsoft.com/servicedesks/webcasts/wc092801/wcblurb092801.as p http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/exchange/exchange2000/deploy/depovg/sixsteps.asp Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Can someone direct me to a good website or give me a detailed explanation (if possible and have some extra time to kill) as to how I can upgrade my Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000? Ours is a single domain and nothing extra-ordinary. I do like to install Exchange 2000 on a new box and use EXEMERGE to get all the mail boxes back in to the new box (???). Or what is the best way to do this since most of you experts have completed this task in your environment and I am looking for some good advice. Please HELP! Any advice is welcome! rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Exch2k to a new server
Anything in the Event logs? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Mike Winfrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am moving exchange 2k to a new server and am using the procedures found at http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm. Anyway, I'm on step 6 which says Install Exchange 2000 and bring it up to the same service pack and hotfix level as the existing server. At this point I've installed active directory and let the replication finish. This new server is installed in the same tree as the production server. I start the exchange installation, answer the questions, and the installation starts and finishes without error but Exchange is not installed on this computer. Any ideas why Exchange won't install? Thank you, Mike Winfrey _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating Outlook forms
What application are the forms in now? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, I have a couple of forms that I want to convert to Outlook forms but have never done this. Can you point me to any online resources for this? Ex. I have a new hire notification form that goes out to certain people (in paper form.) I would like to make this an Outlook form and have it use Exchange (eliminating the paper.) Thanks in advance! Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating Outlook forms
I could be wrong, but I don't think there's any way to convert them. I think you'll have to create new forms in Outlook and just try to duplicate the look feel. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Some in Word others in Excel. J -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Creating Outlook forms What application are the forms in now? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, I have a couple of forms that I want to convert to Outlook forms but have never done this. Can you point me to any online resources for this? Ex. I have a new hire notification form that goes out to certain people (in paper form.) I would like to make this an Outlook form and have it use Exchange (eliminating the paper.) Thanks in advance! Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating Outlook forms
Tons. Start here: http://www.slipstick.com/dev/forms.htm -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Yes but I have never done this. Hence my original email :) Does anyone know of any resources for programming Outlook forms? Johnny -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Creating Outlook forms I could be wrong, but I don't think there's any way to convert them. I think you'll have to create new forms in Outlook and just try to duplicate the look feel. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Some in Word others in Excel. J -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Creating Outlook forms What application are the forms in now? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, I have a couple of forms that I want to convert to Outlook forms but have never done this. Can you point me to any online resources for this? Ex. I have a new hire notification form that goes out to certain people (in paper form.) I would like to make this an Outlook form and have it use Exchange (eliminating the paper.) Thanks in advance! Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP
That's how we do it. Costs us $19.95 a month for an ATT WorldNet account with POPs in every state our travelling users just connect up to the local ATT POP and VPN into our network. Works great. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Sounds a VPN solution would make more sense. National coverage is easy these days. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP Because we don't want people dialing up more than once. We have about 800 users and only 40 lines. If I use Outlook it will dial ever X minutes. Also people travel with these laptops and use outlook while they are not connected to a phone line. I don't want Outlook trying to perform a sr all day long while people are trying to work. We are also using custom forms in Outlook so its pretty much open all day while they are working and disconnected. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Why not leave outlook open and use the accounts tab to schedule send and receives. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP So that users don't have to initiate the send/receive. Currently it takes user intervention to perform the function and we are looking for a way to automate it. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions What is the design goal? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook? Or is there any third party software that would do this. Remember this is Outlook XP and the security is different. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
