RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Sorry, all out. I have one hallelujah left though ...:-) It's nearly
Christmas!

Sander 

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 11 December 2003 03:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Can I get an Amen!

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I think what is at issue here is that in the past you have spent time in
this group bashing on the major posters, a number of which are MS MVP's.
You
insult us by calling us unethical as we have accepted small gifts from
MS as
part of our MVP status. And though you may not believe it, most of us
are
not here for those gifts. The time spend working in the public groups
costs
us far more than a trinket from MS. For some reason known only to you,
our
helping others and receiving recognition for MS makes us less ethical
than
others. Please, you don't have to explain yourself again. We have heard
it a
dozen times at least. Then you come in and ask for help from essentially
those same people.

I would hope you could understand that after a large amount of bashing
by a
person, those same folks may be much less inclined to help or offer a
kind
word to you. While what you say is what you believe, you can also
understand
that others may find your opinion hurtful or demeaning. But next time
you
notice that cool new function in Exchange that people have been asking
for,
you may want to stop and wonder if that function is there because some
MVP's
listened to your wants and needs and made a suggestion to MS to add that
to
this new version.

Just my two cents.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 4:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Here's a perfect example of people picking fights just to pick fights.
Let
me break this down for you. 1. I posted a question to a community that
is
supposedly there to help one and all, a community I helped build 2. I
get a
rude reply from Ed 3. I brush this off and simply tell Ed to play nice
4. I
get another, even ruder reply 5. I post a reply back asking why the
continued rude behavior. I posted this because I honestly don't know
what
the problem is and am interested in at least achieving a civil
relationship
between Ed and I. We don't have to be buddies, but we can at least be
civil.
Yes, I have moved on from our differences of opinion, it is not anything
that I am losing sleep over, believe me. But this does not somehow mean
that
I cannot extend an offer of civility.

The real question is why wouldn't I respond to rude behavior with an
offer
of civility? I try to find some middle ground of civility and all you
want
to do is fight and nit-pick over words and try to make trouble. That's
too
bad, I guess no good deed goes unpunished.

 Why a difference of opinion on a single subject causes you to
 continually complain and be rude is beyond my ability to comprehend. I

 would prefer if you found it within yourself to get over it, move on 
 and be civil. I have.
 
 I just have one question about this. If you've moved on, then why did
 you feel the need to respond?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
 Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:55 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
 
 
 Yes, I have a fundamental, philosophical problem with the MVP program.

 Regardless of any direct compensation in the form of nik naks, etc. 
 the bestowing of honorary titles is a perk and is more valuable to 
 some than a monetary reward. Hence, in my opinion, it is a conflict of

 interest and not something that professional IT personnel should 
 engage in. At one point back around the 1996/1997 timeframe I was 
 offered MVP status and turned it down because of this.
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm

New Virus received in Details.zip

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Hi All

Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an
existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the
the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks
like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was
picked up.
The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit,
Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much
comes to a standstill after that.
We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the
latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date
with Microsoft patches too.
Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this
virus/variation of a virus.

Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers.

Regards

Sander


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Virus received in Details.zip

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Morning All

The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file
691 to pick it up.

Enjoy your weekend.

clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar 
Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip


Hi All

Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an
existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the
the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks
like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was
picked up.
The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit,
Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much
comes to a standstill after that.
We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the
latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date
with Microsoft patches too.
Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this
virus/variation of a virus.

Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers.

Regards

Sander


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store Size Question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or
stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Size Question

I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a
definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached it's 16GB limit
and, on looking at the files, we found that the Priv.edb file was only
12.4GB. Can anyone tell me how Exchange 2000 figures the 16GB for the
size of the store? Is there some explanation for the missing 3.6GB? I
appreciate your input.
 

Thanks...

Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ccul.org 


Thought for the day:
A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a
person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as
possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering.
--Freeman Dyson



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store Size Question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

That is a valid point as your streaming file does form part of that
store. Dismounting the store should be enough to get the correct size.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 11 November 2003 09:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question

Hmmm. Exchange services running but the store was dismounted. Do I need
all services stopped to get accurate size or just STORE.EXE?

What about the priv.stm file? I noticed that adding it to the EDB file
was just over 16GB. Should I be looking there also?



Thanks...Ray

Thought for the day:
A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a
person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as
possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering.
--Freeman Dyson



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question


You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or
stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Size Question

I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a
definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached it's 16GB limit
and, on looking at the files, we found that the Priv.edb file was only
12.4GB. Can anyone tell me how Exchange 2000 figures the 16GB for the
size of the store? Is there some explanation for the missing 3.6GB? I
appreciate your input.
 

Thanks...

Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ccul.org 


Thought for the day:
A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a
person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as
possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering.
--Freeman Dyson



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I also get way more then a Gig a minute when I backup using a custom
script pointing to Dev0, restores are a bit of a problem though

Sander
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 06 August 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000


A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote
agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange
server).
I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately
3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000


I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. 

-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great.  Just make sure your IS is
not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information
Stores...does brick level also.

Nick Thakkar
Network Administrator
American Medical Response
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
209-993-6974
 

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

Hello All.

What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000?  Need to do
brick levels too.  I know...management wants the brick levelstried
talking them out of it.

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
that is 
confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other
applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is 
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please
immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and
delete this
message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
reproduction 
of this message or the information contained in this message or the
taking of
any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your cooperation.

**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange upgrade

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on
the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're
still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to
do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How
many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about?

Regards, 

Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE 
Sysadmin Manager 
Korbi.net

-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange upgrade

Hi guys,
Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of
migrating my
users Exchange server to 2000.
Basically,  they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise
edition.
What i want to
do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running
windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name
of
course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that,
while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all
the
mail back to the original server

Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here.


thnx 

David


CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE
This communication contains information which is confidential and may
also
be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s).
If
you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution,
copying or use of this communication or the information in it is
strictly
prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify
us by
e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and
any
copies of it.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange upgrade

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Exchange 5.5 requires a ADC connector for linking it's mailbox accounts
to the user names. That's about the only link it has with Windows 2000.
As long as you have the three .edb files exchange 5.5 can be
re-installed in a flash (provided your security accounts are there).
I wouldn't bother with the double move. Your biggest thing is to sort
out the exchange environment before you go to Windows 2000. No mailbox
must have the same user account etc. Microsoft brought out some tools to
check your 5.5 environment to check for this type of thing.
I would worry more about doing the NT4 to Windows 2000 upgrade properly
then Exchange 5.5. Rather make the laptop a NT4.0 BDC so that you have a
set of NT4.0 user accounts for worst case scenario. I take it you have
no test environment to test and document your move on.

Regards, 

Sander 
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 31 July 2003 02:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade

Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i
want.
I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain
5.5.
I do full backups every night. 

We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to
costs.

I only have a single PDC,  and 10 clients.

Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb

Thnx again

David

 --
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Exchange upgrade
 
 All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system
on
 the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector!
You're
 still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want
to
 do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How
 many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about?
 
 Regards, 
 
 Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE 
 Sysadmin Manager 
 Korbi.net
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Exchange upgrade
 
 Hi guys,
 Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of
 migrating my
 users Exchange server to 2000.
 Basically,  they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise
 edition.
 What i want to
 do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running
 windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the
name
 of
 course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use
that,
 while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate
all
 the
 mail back to the original server
 
 Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here.
 
 
 thnx 
 
 David
 
 
 CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE
 This communication contains information which is confidential and may
 also
 be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s).
 If
 you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution,
 copying or use of this communication or the information in it is
 strictly
 prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify
 us by
 e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and
 any
 copies of it.
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
la
 ng=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE
This communication contains information which is confidential and may
also
be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s).
If
you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution,
copying or use of this communication or the information in it is
strictly
prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify
us by
e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and
any
copies of it.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode

RE: Originator

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Originator  means it's an NDR. Are you seeing a lot of activity? Mail
relay? Virus spoofing attack perhaps?

Regards, 

Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE 
Sysadmin Manager 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 15 July 2003 03:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Originator

Exchange 5.5 sp3
NT sp6

I have been getting more and more of a of this in the queue with the
originator . Can someone tell me where this is coming from? Where
should I
start with this?


Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
www.jetproducts.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Originator

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I wouldn't worry too much about it, unless volumes increase to thousands
per day:-) You should get copies of mail delivery attempts in your
administrator box. You can see which users don't or no longer exist on
your system.

Regards, 

Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE 
Sysadmin Manager 


-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 15 July 2003 03:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Originator

About 20/per day and the server in turn off for relay.

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 6:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Originator


Originator  means it's an NDR. Are you seeing a lot of activity? Mail
relay? Virus spoofing attack perhaps?

Regards, 

Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE 
Sysadmin Manager 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 15 July 2003 03:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Originator

Exchange 5.5 sp3
NT sp6

I have been getting more and more of a of this in the queue with the
originator . Can someone tell me where this is coming from? Where
should I
start with this?


Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
www.jetproducts.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mailtraq question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Hi All

In a proposal to a client I suggested an Exchange environment. The
client, after considering cost primarily, asked about Mailtraq. I must
admit I'm not familiar with the product. I have read up on the web about
it. It seems to rely on a web based client a lot, but has anybody got
any real life experience with this product? Any views? There doesn't
appear to be much info on the actual inner workings of the product, nor
any disaster recovery.

Regards, 

Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE 
Sysadmin Manager 
Korbi.net


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RUS

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Both your DCs are GCs. Good for exchange but one of the FSMO roles (the
Infrastructure Master) does not want to be on a GC. It doesn't update if
it is run on a GC. Not sure if this applies in a single domain too. 

Q1971322:
NOTE: The Infrastructure Master (IM) role should be held by a domain
controller that is not a Global Catalog server(GC). If the
Infrastructure Master runs on a Global Catalog server it will stop
updating object information because it does not contain any references
to objects that it does not hold. This is because a Global Catalog
server holds a partial replica of every object in the forest. As a
result, cross-domain object references in that domain will not be
updated and a warning to that effect will be logged on that DC's event
log.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 06 June 2003 05:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RUS

I have 2 W2K DCs and they're both are GC server. Right now there are two
RUS, one is the enterprise point to DC1 and one is the organization also
point to DC1.  Technically, I can create another RUS and point it to DC2
so the GAL gets update as well , but I read somewhere that all I have to
do is change the Enterprise RUS to DC1 and the Org RUS to DC2.  Is that
true?

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only
.loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to
.com on outgoing mail. 

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Change FQDN in Ex55

I recently reconfigured our internal network from .com to .loc in
advance of
our planned migration/upgrade to AD. We are running Ex 5.5 Sp4 on W2K
Sp3. I
have found and issue with the SMTP header that now sent out as seen
here:
Received: from challenger.creatcomp.loc (unknown[216.237.98.130]. I
have
reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's books on Exch 5.5 looking for a
way to
change this so it appears to come from an external FQDN but was unable
to
find any reference for this. I have also looked at just about every
attribute within the Ex5.5 objects especially the IMS but nothing seems
to
be applicable.

Is there any way to change this?

Thanks
-Dave Vantine

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Alerts

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Nothing may have changed on your administrative side, but something
surely changed on your user's side. Two people are editing the same
items on your server. Same job roles perhaps? New person taking over a
function from another person? I've seen this happen in a hand over
period.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 02 June 2003 03:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Alerts

That's what I thought... But why not before?   Nothing has changed
procedurally or Server wise







Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Tony Slatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Alerts


I believe it means 2 people were editing the same item at the same time.


 -Original Message-
 From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 02 June 2003 14:27
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Public Folder Alerts
 
 Environment:
 Windows 2000 SP3
 Exchange 2000 SP3
 
 All of a sudden last week I started getting conflict messages from my
 public folders   I have never gotten them before this and I was
 wondering what would make that start happening.
 
 
 Joshua
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Joshua Morgan
 Method IQ
 Senior Network Engineer
 Main: (864) 272-1145
 Mobile: (864) 449-9912
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- 
 bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Another option:
1. Full backup
2. Shut exchange server down
2. Remove small drive
3. Ghost small drive onto new big drive (on another pc if you want)
4. Replace new drive
5. Start up

No need to run any patches or Exmerge. I personally would go for the
Optimiser option, but if you are anal about a drive letter this will
work.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 25 March 2003 12:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5

Thanks for replying. I am planning to do a full backup as well as
exporting
mailboxes using ExMerge.
The problem using Optimizer is that I wll lose the current drive letter
--
somewhat discomfiting.

Jay

- Original Message -
From: Leeann McCallum
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5



I haven't had to do it, but I would probably do a full backup, shut down
the
server, add the additional drive, and then use Exchange Optimiser to
move
the databases to the new drive.

Once all services back up and running, disconnect the old drive.



-Original Message-
From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 March 2003 9:49 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5


Our drive that contains information store is near capacity. We will like
to
replace it with a larger drive. Will the following scenario work?

1. After shutting down the server, add the larger drive and bring back
the
server with all Exchange services stopped. 2. Copy the MDBData folder to
the
new drive. 3. Rename the new drive same as the old drive (E: in this
case)
in Disk Manager. 4. Start the Exchange services after running  isinteg
-patch. 5. If everything goes well, shutdown the server and remove the
old
drive and boot up.

Is there any flaw in this thinking? Please comment. Thanks.

- Jay

Jay Kulsh


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release Date: 3/17/2003


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.
It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the
subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any
information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read
this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web
page
http://www.beca.co.nz

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Is this working

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Well done Seb! You obviously don't read much on this list.

-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 02:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is this working


Test

uop Guildford IT
Tel:+44 1483 466107
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is intended for the
addressee(s) only, and may contain confidential information.  The
unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail or any information
contained within it is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the author and delete this e-mail
immediately in its entirety.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archives - Buy yours today.

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I want the Tenor Unplugged version !

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 31 January 2003 03:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archives - Buy yours today.

All the Hummert posts have been purged. Expensive process.

-- Original Message --
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:45:48 -0800

 
95!?  That's expensive!
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Szabo
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Sorry Chris, I have my own, starting from '95.

/Peter


- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: Archives - Buy yours today.


 I'm looking to make more money off of my www.swinc.com affiliate
account
so
 here's my blatant advertisement:

 The 4th Quarter 2002 SWYNK archives have been added to the archive
CD.
Now
 you too can have copies of the mailing list from 1999 - 2002. Relive
all
of
 the exciting moments when FAQ questions were asked for the _very
first
 time_. Watch in wonder as the history of Paul plays itself out.

 Get your copy of this amazing archive CD with 10s of thousands of
Exchange
 solutions lovingly prepared for your viewing pleasure.

 How much would you expect to pay for an amazing resource like this?

 $2499? No!
 $1999? No!

 The folks at Simpler-Webb have gone absolutely crazy. For a limited
time,
 you can have this amazing CD for as low as only $10 US. But hurry,
and
order
 now because supplies are limited.

 That's right. For only $10 you too can have an amazing Exchange
resource
at
 your finger tips. Just think of the pride your family will feel
knowing
that
 people aren't answering your questions with FAQ!!! or RTFM.


 So hurry, operators are standing by to take your call. So don't
delay.

 - Payment Details ---

 We will need pre-payment of $10 (US) cash or check, $11 (US) for
credit
 card.  In-state customers please add 8.25% tax.

 We WILL NOT reply to any posts to the mailing list on this topic.
 We accept Visa, MasterCard, and American Express - feel free to call
at
 512-322-0071 to order via credit card.

 The address is:

 Exchange List CD
 Simpler-Webb, Inc.
 1214 W. Sixth Street, Suite 209
 Austin, TX 78703

 If you are overseas, please be kind enough to visit
http://ircalc.usps.gov
 and add a reasonable airmail cost to your order.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Justifying text-only Internet Mail

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Here's one: Do any of your customers have Unix based email systems? Plain text will 
work 100%


Regards,
 
Sander  

-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 22 January 2003 10:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Justifying text-only Internet Mail

I'm about to have to justify my personal belief that e-mail should be
text-only and no HTML-based messages should go out from my Exchange 5.5
server.

Unfortunately I'm up against a Marketing department who want to send the
sort of message that I hate getting - one that downloads extra content from
another site.

My official reasons for opposing this, apart from my personal dislike of it,
are:

1. Security: You can execute malicious code with HTML mail whereas plain
text is simple
2. Presentation: It's better to link to a page so the user can click on the
link and open their own browser.
3. Compatibility: People who receive these messages but not in the correct
way will phone the people who sent them, who will phone me.

This seems a little wooly to me, so I'd appreciate some good coherent
arguments for text-only e-mail.


Tim



-- 
Tim Gowen  
RAF Museum
IT Dept.
 
Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you
must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone;
please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.
Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the
knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium.
We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when
e-mailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should take steps to confirm that they are
actually virus free.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using script to get header info

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Ah, he forgot to add the email addresses of the HR department to the Spam list. 
Terminal error! 

Regards,
 
Sander Van Butzelaar

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 23 January 2003 07:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using script to get header info

That's a fine way to fight Spam if you're interested in job security.
Or maybe not.  At a previous customer, there was a guy whose job it was
to take Spam complaints and add the sending domain to the block list.
While I was on the project there, he was laid off.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using script to get header info


Hi folks,

I created a public folder and asked several of our users to move their
spam into it. From there, I can open the messages, view the headers,
pluck the IP addresses of the offending mail servers, and add them to
our internal dns blacklist.

Works like a charm, but it's very labor-intensive.

I wrote some vbscript code that examines all the messages in the folder,
and returns things like Sender, Subject, etc., all of which are
basically useless to me in this case, but the practice was good. There
doesn't seem to be any property that will return the header info, no? I
don't have a good reference book handy, but searching through the online
MSDN library was helpful.

Now it looks like maybe ADO/CDOEX might be the way to go. Does anyone
have any sample code that might give me some pointers? This doesn't have
to be fandy or polished. If I can retrieve the headers, I can parse
through them and find the right received by line, and pull the address
from that line and output it to the screen. I'd greatly appreciate any
pointers at all, be it a web page, KB article, book, etc.

Thanks,
Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Installing Service Pack 4

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I have an idea it was the antivirus software that wasn't stopped while
putting on SP4 that caused the failure in the first place (although he
doesn't state that there was AV on before)
Just a hunch ..:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 21 January 2003 01:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Installing Service Pack 4

 
it basically failed

How?  Where?  Application event log messages?  service pack installation
log?

Exchange sp4 is not reversible.  It makes schema changes to the store
(which you would have read in the documentation).  

I would appreciate your views on whether I should take the STORE.EXE
and the
EMSMDB32.DLL from the SP3 and replace it on my exchange server.

I vote abso-freakin-lutely not!

I would back up and reapply sp4 as per the documentation (stop
unnecessary stuff like perfmons (local and remote), run performance
monitor after, etc)

After a failed service pack upgrade, you installed crappy antivirus
software?  Big kahunas...

William 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sebastian,
Didy
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Importance: High

All,

I recently moved my exchange server over to new hardware which had the
following specs:

NT4 Server with service pack 5
Exchange 5.5 with service pack 3

I decided to upgrade the service packs to NT4 SP6 and exchange sp 4.
SP6
installed no problem, but when I tried installing SP4, it basically
failed
although certain files were upgraded and changed.  At this point I tried
installing the Groupshield software, but that failed.  In the end I
reinstalled SP3 for exchange and successfully installed Groupshield.
Ever
since then I have noticed that the memory usage on the store has been
creeping up.  I also noticed that the store.exe is from my SP4 exchange.
I
know there is a hotfix for the store in SP4.  

I imagine that my exchange server is now a mixture of SP3 and SP4.  I
would
appreciate your views on whether I should take the STORE.EXE and the
EMSMDB32.DLL from the SP3 and replace it on my exchange server.  I hope
this
would fix my initial problem with the memory leak on the STORE.

I can then try and figure out why the SP4 did not work out.  

Thanks,
Didy
uop Guildford IT
Tel:+44 1483 466107
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is intended for the
addressee(s) only, and may contain confidential information.  The
unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail or any
information
contained within it is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. If you
are
not the intended recipient, please notify the author and delete this
e-mail
immediately in its entirety.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

My vote goes with toast then..:-(. I know of no quick recovery if all those avenues 
have been tried without success.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 18 December 2002 12:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0
Importance: High

Hi, 
I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important 
mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private 
information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current 
backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but 
marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ?

If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as 
possible ...

Thanks a lot

Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Very OT - txt handling

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I came across your address on the net??? Are you in sales or what? You
either subscribe to this list or you don't.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 11 December 2002 02:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Very OT - txt handling

Hi there, 
 
I came across your address on the net, and I would like to ask you a
quick programming question.  Could you point me out to a sort of code
that can count the number of characters and lines in a txt file and
transfer that to exell or access? 
 
I have the following example (txt)
 
45 14:53:52 ENTRANCE ARTS (2) ACCESS GRANTED KIM SCHOTANUS (16788937)
46 15:14:52 EXIT ARTS GRANTED
47 16:00:48 ENTRANCE ARTS (2) ACCESS GRANTED PROCOPIO ALB (07723137)
48 16:52:24 EXIT ARTS (3) ACCESS GRANTED BECKERS PAUL (04906723)
...
 
In this example the first line is the line number, that is reset to 00
after 99, then there is the time, the action performed -ENTRANCE ARTS
(2) ACCESS GRANTED- and the name and permission code.
Line 46 is a special command, this is when someone overrides the system
(which happens quite often)
 
after each 20 lines there is a blank line and then a line with the date
 
The idea is to find/create a little code that pushes the data in this
txt file to exell on a daily basis.
 
Do you know of any code that could do this?
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Odd ScanMail behaviour

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Haven't seen that behaviour before. The functionality definitely works
as we use it (mail to admin, sender and receiver). Maybe try
re-installing Scanmail. Your service packs up-to-date? No other problems
with mail going out, ie also getting stuck in the outbox?

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Imran Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 December 2002 03:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Odd ScanMail behaviour

I am currently in the process of evaluating Trend ScanMail v6 for
Exchange
2000 and have hit an interesting problem.  Basically I am not receiving
any notification messages when I send a test virus.  The email just sits
in the users outbox and the virus is stripped and replaced with a text
file.  I would much prefer that the message doesn't sit in the Outbox
but
is instead returned to the sender with a notification that he sent a
virus.  I am not sure if ScanMail works like this by design or I am
doing
something wrong.

I have enabled Mail to the ScanMail Administrator, Recipient  Sender in
the Virus Scan area of the notification tab.  Everything else about the
product is working fine.


Please Help


Imran Iqbal

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Well yes, after that Australian disaster with sheep Sheila ...oh aussies
originally also came from England

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 December 2002 07:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday

Yep leave it to the British to find new things to do with sheep

- Original Message - 
From: Drew Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


Actually, there was an article in one of the LockerGnome newsletters
about an... American?  Australian? artist type who painted words on Cows
last year.

So, there you are.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday


A new Haiku generator has just been invented in Britian - yet again we
show the world the way...


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2541761.stm



Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DHCP Server on Exchange Server

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I doubt you'll even see the impact at all. No problem with it. For an
ASP customer I need to run Exchange 2000 and SQL 200 on one box, now
that is a baddie. Those two apps both like mucho resources. Not
impossible, but not first prise either.

Cheers

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 December 2002 05:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DHCP Server on Exchange Server

Has anyone ever experienced any problems with running a DHCP server on
an
Exchange server?
Windows 2000, SP3; Xch 5.5, Sp4
One small local scope with 70 ip leases.

I dont see anything wrong on the surface. Any bad experiences or
knowledge?

Much Thanks!

Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: The lights went out..

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Morning all

Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just
had a full eclipse and it went pitch black.

Sander


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The lights went out..

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Could well be, but the real thing also went down...shitty UPS I s'pose.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 December 2002 09:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The lights went out..

 
Solaris crashed again?
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions


Morning all

Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just
had a full eclipse and it went pitch black.

Sander



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The lights went out..

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Exchange is way above trivial things like solar eclipses etc ...-) 
It didn't even blink.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 December 2002 09:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The lights went out..

 
A rare and phenomenal experience to be treasured and respected.  The
real thing, that is.

Exchange is still humming along, I bet...

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Could well be, but the real thing also went down...shitty UPS I s'pose.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 December 2002 09:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The lights went out..

 
Solaris crashed again?
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions


Morning all

Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just
had a full eclipse and it went pitch black.

Sander



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I don't know Peter, moving all the mail to an Oracle box just doesn't do
it for me ..:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:PETER.SEITZ;cubic.com] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 07:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

.cshrc

short% more .cshrc
# @(#)cshrc 1.11 89/11/29 SMI
umask 022
if ( $?prompt ) then
set history=32
endif
#
# oracle environment variables
setenv ORACLE_HOME /apps/oracle/816
setenv HARVESTDIR /home/user3/harvest5
setenv ORACLE_BASE /apps/oracle/816
setenv ORACLE_SID HARVEST5
setenv ORACLE_TERM dtterm
setenv PATH $ORACLE_HOME/bin:$PATH
setenv ODBC_HOME /apps/caiptodbc
setenv ODBCINI $ODBC_HOME/odbc.ini
# Harvest environment variables
#setenv HARVESTHOME /apps/harvest5
setenv HARVESTHOME /home/user3/harvest5
#setenv LM_LICENSE_FILE $HARVESTHOME/license/license.dat
setenv LM_LICENSE_FILE /ca_lic
setenv PATH $HARVESTHOME/bin:$PATH
setenv PATH /apps/caiptodbc/bin:$PATH
#setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/home/user3/harvest5/lib:/usr/local/CAcrypto:/usr/pec/li
b/sun4_solaris:/usr/local/CAlib:/apps/caiptodbc/lib
setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/home/user3/harvest5/lib:/usr/local/CAcrypto:/usr/pec/lib
/sun4_solaris:/usr/local/CAlib
#
setenv DEFAULT_BROWSER hotjava
setenv HARREPHOME /apps/Harvest5/harrep
#
# FCP environment variables   #
setenv GALAXYHOME /apps/FCP/Galaxy
setenv PATH $GALAXYHOME/bin:$PATH
#set path=(/bin /usr/bin /usr/ucb /etc $HARVESTHOME/lib $ODBC_HOME/lib
$ODBC_HOM
E/bin $ORACLE_HOME/bin $ORACLE_HOME/lib .)
set path=(/bin /usr/bin /usr/ucb /etc $HARVESTHOME/lib $HARVESTHOME/bin
$ORACLE_
HOME/bin $ORACLE_HOME/lib .)
setenv OPENWINHOME /usr/openwin
short% 

 -Original Message-
 From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:26 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
 
 
 We've been forced into restricting mailboxes as everyones 
 being moved to a central server. Most users are having no 
 problems getting their mailboxes down to 25-50mb, some much 
 lower, a handful much higher. I'm finding it easiest to set 
 some limits on the IS, then override that on individual 
 mailboxes, as required, the MD for instance has a 500mb 
 mailbox, after 2 CD's worth of archiving :-O
 
 What I've been saying to users is delete everything you can, 
 anything older than 2 months that you need to keep put into a 
 subfolder, then I go round and export these folders to PSTs, 
 and dump them in their user folders on their local file 
 servers, meaning they're included in the backups on their 
 local servers, but the backup and disk space burden is 
 removed from the Exchange server. I test the PSTs before 
 deleting the originals, but I've seen nothing bigger than 
 about 4-500mb. With enforced limits user will have to keep 
 things in order, and we'll have to look at ongoing archiving 
 in the method described above.
 
 99% aren't aware of PST's, which is probably a good thing, 
 though its added to my workload
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] 
 Sent: 06 November 2002 13:01
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
 
 
 I do.  They don't know they can save them up on their home 
 folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most 
 think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;)
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of 
 Sander Van Butzelaar
 Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
 
 
 Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of 
 the PST, that's why one has a facilities department...I also 
 didn't say that I found that mail particularly important, the 
 user wants to keep it, so why not let him/her? They know not 
 to come to me regarding items in PST files.
 
 Give the user a bit of slack here David.
 
 Sander 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] 
 Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
 
 No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy.
 
 I don't back up PSTs. Period.  Either its in their mailbox or 
 it is not that important.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of 
 Sander Van Butzelaar
 Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
 
 
 I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't 
 want to delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't 
 keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be 
 aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST 
 as hard drives are prone to failure.
 
 Sander
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] 
 Sent: 06 November

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I agree with you Andy in principal, however real world limitations
(read: non-existent budgets) dictate that it is not viable to get a
near-line storage system going for a handful of users that have that
type of need.
So think of my handful of user-managed, user-backed up and user-owned
PST's as a cheap near-line storage system..:-)

Regards

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:Andy.Webb;swinc.com] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 06:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

I think you'd benefit more from something like kvault that moved the
data out to nearline or offline storage, but left it within the
Exchange environment.  It will result in far less usage of drive space,
is easily backed up and will result in fewer support calls.  There are
several Exchange Archiving products out there.  None are particularly
cheap, but then what's the total organizational cost of how you're
managing it today?

IT is supposed to be a facilitator of whatever the business does to make
money.  In general individual users do not have the skill or
regimentation to be their own librarians.  That's why in many large
companies there is one, though not in nearly enough companies.  IT
should be helping the users apply the data retention, categorization,
and retrievability policies defined by the librarian.  Any mucking about
with mailbox limits is a treatment of a symptom, not the root causes.

I do understand that servers must be maintained at a recoverable level
as defined by formal or informal SLA's.  I just don't believe that
pushing data that people deem valuable into unrecoverable and widely
dispersed storage media is the right way to maintain the SLA.


===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== ---Original
Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] 
Posted At: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:26 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Using a PST for 'overflow'
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


We've been forced into restricting mailboxes as everyones being moved to
a central server. Most users are having no problems getting their
mailboxes down to 25-50mb, some much lower, a handful much higher. I'm
finding it easiest to set some limits on the IS, then override that on
individual mailboxes, as required, the MD for instance has a 500mb
mailbox, after 2 CD's worth of archiving :-O

What I've been saying to users is delete everything you can, anything
older than 2 months that you need to keep put into a subfolder, then I
go round and export these folders to PSTs, and dump them in their user
folders on their local file servers, meaning they're included in the
backups on their local servers, but the backup and disk space burden is
removed from the Exchange server. I test the PSTs before deleting the
originals, but I've seen nothing bigger than about 4-500mb. With
enforced limits user will have to keep things in order, and we'll have
to look at ongoing archiving in the method described above.

99% aren't aware of PST's, which is probably a good thing, though its
added to my workload

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 13:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


I do.  They don't know they can save them up on their home folder. They
know
I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only can save
PSTs
on local drives ;)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST,
that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I
found
that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so why not
let
him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST files.

Give the user a bit of slack here David.

Sander 

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy.

I don't back up PSTs. Period.  Either its in their mailbox or it is not
that
important.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete
old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox
sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks

RE: somewhat OT

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

We are, we cover South Africa and some sub-Sahara African countries. You
don't want to know how many people they stick on a 64 k line on this
continent...:-) Bandwidth, oh bandwidth where art thou...

Sander
Korbi.net

-Original Message-
From: Henley, John K (Johnny), METRO [mailto:jkhenley;att.com] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 09:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: somewhat OT

Who all is left in the Hosted E2K (asp-model) game? 

USA.NET?
MI8? 
Critical Path?

others? 

j
Regards, 


John Henley


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick SMTP cluster question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Logic would dictate that it can, otherwise you would need a dedicated
server for that only. That sounds silly. I have however not tested this
in real life. 

frantically looking in some documentation Sander

-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:jwkelley;qualcomm.com] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 05:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick SMTP cluster question

Can an exchange 2000 active/passive cluster host an SMTP connector or
would the SMTP connector have to reside on a dedicated bridgehead
server?

Most of the articles I find say that SMTP protocol is supported on a
cluster but I do not know if the SMTP connector is supported.

Thanks - Jason

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their
mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a
periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 12:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'

I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned
this
phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became
full

I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can
anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter
limits
on mailbox size and would be interested in something like this.

For ongoing maintenance, is Outlooks Autoarchiving a viable solution?
i.e.
does this move mail out of the server information store and into a PST
in
the users local profile?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST,
that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I
found that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so
why not let him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST
files.

Give the user a bit of slack here David.

Sander 

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy.

I don't back up PSTs. Period.  Either its in their mailbox or it is not
that important.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their
mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a
periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 12:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'

I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned
this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes
became full

I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can
anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter
limits on mailbox size and would be interested in something like this.

For ongoing maintenance, is Outlooks Autoarchiving a viable solution?
i.e. does this move mail out of the server information store and into a
PST in the users local profile?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Permissions

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

What exactly do you mean by edit containers and what version of
Exchange are you running.

Regards

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net] 
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permissions

Hi there all,

 

Is there a way I can set permissions for specific users to be able to
edit
specific Mail containers i.e.

 

I have Recipients , Lawyers , Consultants 

 

I would like to achieve the following

 

Recipients : DOMAIN\Administrator

Lawyers :Domain\joes;Domain\Administrator etc 

 

And so on . 

 

Can anyone show me 

 

Regards,

Carlos Magalhaes

 



-
This email and any files transmitted are
confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to which
they are addressed, whose privacy
should be respected.  Any views or
opinions are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those
of the Trencor Group, or any of its
representatives, unless specifically
stated.  

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be secure, error free or without virus
contamination.  The sender therefore
accepts no liability for any errors or
omissions in the contents of this message,
nor for any virus infection that might result
from opening this message.  Trencor is not
responsible in the event of any third party
interception of this email.   

If you have received this email in error please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   For more information about
Trencor, visit www.trencor.net http://www.trencor.net

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Permissions

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Ok, if I understand you correct you want to give different user specific
rights to certain mailbox containers in your organisation.

The easiest way would be with NT4 security groups. Create an NT security
group per container. Give the group the required rights to edit the
container. Make your users part of the security group.

Each one of those users would need to run Exchange Admin.

I really wouldn't want so many people editing my exchange environment,
but your business requirements may vary.

Regards

Sander

 

-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net] 
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions

Sorry, let me be a little more specific

 

My version is :

 

OS: Windows NT4

Exch : Exchange 5.5 SP4

 

Edit containers: User must be able to add and delete e-mail
addresses/mail
boxes from that container 

 

 

 

Regards,

Carlos Magalhaes

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander;korbi.net] 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions

 

What exactly do you mean by edit containers and what version of

Exchange are you running.

 

Regards

 

Sander

 

-Original Message-

From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net] 

Sent: 25 October 2002 12:04

To: Exchange Discussions

Subject: Permissions

 

Hi there all,

 

 

 

Is there a way I can set permissions for specific users to be able to

edit

specific Mail containers i.e.

 

 

 

I have Recipients , Lawyers , Consultants 

 

 

 

I would like to achieve the following

 

 

 

Recipients : DOMAIN\Administrator

 

Lawyers :Domain\joes;Domain\Administrator etc 

 

 

 

And so on . 

 

 

 

Can anyone show me 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Carlos Magalhaes

 

 

 

 

 

-

This email and any files transmitted are

confidential and intended solely for the

use of the individual or entity to which

they are addressed, whose privacy

should be respected.  Any views or

opinions are solely those of the author

and do not necessarily represent those

of the Trencor Group, or any of its

representatives, unless specifically

stated.  

 

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed

to be secure, error free or without virus

contamination.  The sender therefore

accepts no liability for any errors or

omissions in the contents of this message,

nor for any virus infection that might result

from opening this message.  Trencor is not

responsible in the event of any third party

interception of this email.   

 

If you have received this email in error please notify

[EMAIL PROTECTED]   For more information about

Trencor, visit www.trencor.net http://www.trencor.net

 

_

List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com

Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
This email and any files transmitted are
confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to which
they are addressed, whose privacy
should be respected.  Any views or
opinions are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those
of the Trencor Group, or any of its
representatives, unless specifically
stated.  

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be secure, error free or without virus
contamination.  The sender therefore
accepts no liability for any errors or
omissions in the contents of this message,
nor for any virus infection that might result
from opening this message.  Trencor is not
responsible in the event of any third party
interception of this email.   

If you have received this email in error please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   For more information about
Trencor, visit www.trencor.net http://www.trencor.net

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Permissions

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

You basically want to delegate specific tasks down to certain users.
Sure, in a larger organisation, that makes perfect sense (as long as
those delegates know what they are doing)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net] 
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions

Ahhh but I won't give them Exchange admin, I have created an application
that they required to log in. Once logged in it filters only the
containers
they have permissions for and shows them in a drop down box. They can
select
that container then the appropriate objects are shown and they are
allowed
to administer the email addresses.

 

When you have a big company with a lot of containers for different
requirements and you short staffed on people. You can give the managers
of
each department who are responsible for the containers this permission
and
application. Don't you agree?

 

Thanks for info and tips though I will use them!

 

Regards,

Carlos Magalhaes

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander;korbi.net] 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions

 

Ok, if I understand you correct you want to give different user specific

rights to certain mailbox containers in your organisation.

 

The easiest way would be with NT4 security groups. Create an NT security

group per container. Give the group the required rights to edit the

container. Make your users part of the security group.

 

Each one of those users would need to run Exchange Admin.

 

I really wouldn't want so many people editing my exchange environment,

but your business requirements may vary.

 

Regards

 

Sander

 

 

 

-Original Message-

From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net] 

Sent: 25 October 2002 12:30

To: Exchange Discussions

Subject: RE: Permissions

 

Sorry, let me be a little more specific

 

 

 

My version is :

 

 

 

OS: Windows NT4

 

Exch : Exchange 5.5 SP4

 

 

 

Edit containers: User must be able to add and delete e-mail

addresses/mail

boxes from that container 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Carlos Magalhaes

 

 

 

 

 

-Original Message-

From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander;korbi.net] 

Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:21 PM

To: Exchange Discussions

Subject: RE: Permissions

 

 

 

What exactly do you mean by edit containers and what version of

 

Exchange are you running.

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

 

Sander

 

 

 

-Original Message-

 

From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net] 

 

Sent: 25 October 2002 12:04

 

To: Exchange Discussions

 

Subject: Permissions

 

 

 

Hi there all,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is there a way I can set permissions for specific users to be able to

 

edit

 

specific Mail containers i.e.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have Recipients , Lawyers , Consultants 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I would like to achieve the following

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recipients : DOMAIN\Administrator

 

 

 

Lawyers :Domain\joes;Domain\Administrator etc 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And so on . 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can anyone show me 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Carlos Magalhaes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

This email and any files transmitted are

 

confidential and intended solely for the

 

use of the individual or entity to which

 

they are addressed, whose privacy

 

should be respected.  Any views or

 

opinions are solely those of the author

 

and do not necessarily represent those

 

of the Trencor Group, or any of its

 

representatives, unless specifically

 

stated.  

 

 

 

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed

 

to be secure, error free or without virus

 

contamination.  The sender therefore

 

accepts no liability for any errors or

 

omissions in the contents of this message,

 

nor for any virus infection that might result

 

from opening this message.  Trencor is not

 

responsible in the event of any third party

 

interception of this email.   

 

 

 

If you have received this email in error please notify

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]   For more information about

 

Trencor, visit www.trencor.net http://www.trencor.net

 

 

 

_

 

List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

 

Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

 

To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com

 

Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

-

This email and any files transmitted are

confidential and intended solely for the

use of the individual or entity to which

they are addressed, whose privacy

should be respected.  Any views or

opinions are solely those of the author

and do not necessarily represent those

RE: RBL's

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-)

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1035442040/
sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance 

(Link wraps)

Cheers

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: 24 October 2002 08:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's

The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you
to actually run a real google search, such as rbl email definition?
Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher.  See?
You want to throw shit around on the list?  There's plenty of folk that
can come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker.

For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the
universe and everything is.  You?  Other than being one of the current
poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is
your function in the messaging universe?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Yea I really didn't think we were talking about:
RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE
RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a
web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of
romance. ... 
Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links.
Category: Arts  Literature  Genres  Romance
www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages 

I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


www.google.com?

 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: RBL's
 
 
 Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: RBL's
 
 
 Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a
 spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place 
 last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to 
 and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a 
 critical sales order or customer service request based on their say 
 so?
 
 An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more
 than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to 
 have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who 
 knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't 
 completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive 
 effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: RBL's
  
  
  Ok please explain.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
 Chris Scharff
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: RBL's
  
  
  97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL
  actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on
 3rd parties
  to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to
 join you
  in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their
  company business.
  
  --
  Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
  EMS Sales Engineer
  MessageOne
  512.652.4500 x-244
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: RBL's
   
   
   Still 3rd party.  I was at a meeting at MS on Monday
 night and the
   current stance on that is that they're thinking about possibly
   including RBL support in a future release.
   
   Darcy
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RBL's
   
   
   Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party?
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: RBL's

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Lol!

Oh, by the way, for more info on your Goatse follow the link below. But
you really shouldn't have posted this to the list. You could have send
it direct if you feel that strong about it.

http://www.dangerz.net/gatasa/article.shtml

Anyway, we all live and learn.

Cheers

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: 24 October 2002 08:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's

Why would anyone need to win friends over the internet. Oh no my
interweb feelings are hurt, oh dear god my interweb life is ruined

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-)

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1035442040/
sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance 

(Link wraps)

Cheers

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: 24 October 2002 08:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's

The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you
to actually run a real google search, such as rbl email definition?
Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher.  See? You
want to throw shit around on the list?  There's plenty of folk that can
come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker.

For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the
universe and everything is.  You?  Other than being one of the current
poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is
your function in the messaging universe?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Yea I really didn't think we were talking about:
RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE
RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a
web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of
romance. ... 
Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links.
Category: Arts  Literature  Genres  Romance
www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages 

I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


www.google.com?

 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: RBL's
 
 
 Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: RBL's
 
 
 Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a

 spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place 
 last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to 
 and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a 
 critical sales order or customer service request based on their say 
 so?
 
 An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more

 than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to 
 have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who 
 knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't 
 completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive 
 effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: RBL's
  
  
  Ok please explain.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
 Chris Scharff
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: RBL's
  
  
  97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL 
  actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on
 3rd parties
  to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to
 join you
  in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their 
  company business.
  
  --
  Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
  EMS Sales Engineer
  MessageOne
  512.652.4500 x-244
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Darcy

RE: SMTP retry queues

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Waiting for a time out perhaps?

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 October 2002 03:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP retry queues

Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain
to me why Exchange 2000 is keeping messages in the retry queues if there
are no DNS records for the messages' destination domains?

For example if I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can
see a retry queue for boguscrapdoesnotexist.com, and it is marked
unable to bind to the destination server in DNS

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Exchange Server

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Lol!

-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 October 2002 11:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server

If you were referring to me, I'll show you my willy...

Regards
_MR._ Andrea Coppini

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 October 2002 7:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller.  Her theory
is right.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


Andrea,

Please let me disagree.

All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will
create a temp page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this
with my hardware guys). Then when time allows, the replacement drive can
be added and the page file moved to it, with all the necessary reboots.

I also disagree about the 0% downtime according to your scenario #2.
Based on my experience, as soon as RAID failed on the page file volume,
the server did a blue screen of death. So much for 0% downtime. *In
theory* the server *should* have kept running. But it did not. So screw
it. If it is going to crash anyway I am not going to spend extra money
on it.

-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


Picture this:

Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system
crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive
(system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since
Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You
partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE
disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange.

If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive.
But now let's look at RAID1 swap:

One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running
on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out 
You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to
get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You
insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild
the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime.


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit
of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I
would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate
RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array
bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or
SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect
it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of
perceived reliability.

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop
working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every
time?

Robert Moir
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue  0
0 rows returned 

 -Original Message-
 From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
 
 
 Do you need me to explain it all in small details?
 
 I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. 
 RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file 
 on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have

 had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I 
 was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a 
 separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance.
 
 Ok now? Can I go?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
 
 
 What does that have to do with Exchange?
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
 Technical Consultant
 hp Services
 There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
 problems.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey 
 Fyodorov
 Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
 
 
 Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not 
 save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about 
 that for reliability?
 

RE: support for developers

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

MSDN is your friend! (until you actually find that the specific thing
you need to know how to get around isn't in there...:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26 September 2002 09:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: support for developers

You might try here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mscollaboration/

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: support for developers


I know there is PSS for help from MS, but is there another number for
assistance for programming of Exchange 2K. I have a developer tyring to
create a OWA forwarding feature for users that he is stuggling with. Or
better yet, I'm buying if someone has already created one.

- Jon Q Jr.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ADC vs. Exmerge

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important
this is for you.
M pie, it's nearly lunch time here...

Sander 

-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge

Hi,
 
We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange
5.5
SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5.
We
are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we
are
going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about
migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to
get
your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of
our
staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean
Exchange
2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should
exmerge
all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our
settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have
any
thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole?
 
Thanks,
 
Aaron




This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during
transmission from Washington Trust Bank. 


NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and
is
intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review,
copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other
person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named
recipient,
or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the
sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ADC vs. Exmerge

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I once heaved a couple of hundred users between two exchange servers
(both 5.5 though). I have not used Exmerge with a 5.5 and 2000
combination. How are you planning to link your accounts with your
mailboxes, Exchange 2000 is radically different than NT4.0 with Exchange
5.5

What are your objections against ADC? I moved my organization (three
different sites) over from NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5 to Windows 2000 with
Exchange 2000. I got to know the ADSI editor pretty well after that, but
hey it worked in the end ...:-)

Sander



-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge

Not too important. We only have 1 site. If I exmerge, do I not get all
the
rich Exchange info tacked onto the user accounts?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge


For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important
this is for you.
M pie, it's nearly lunch time here...

Sander 

-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge

Hi,
 
We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange
5.5
SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5.
We
are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we
are
going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about
migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to
get
your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of
our
staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean
Exchange
2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should
exmerge
all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our
settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have
any
thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole?
 
Thanks,
 
Aaron




This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during
transmission from Washington Trust Bank. 


NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and
is
intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review,
copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other
person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named
recipient,
or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the
sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during
transmission from Washington Trust Bank. 


NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and
is
intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review,
copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other
person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named
recipient,
or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the
sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: urgent backup problem

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Hi Chris

Just curious why you say that. I backup to different removable hard
drives Monday to Thursday and to tape on Friday (keep one tape off-site)
I find this solution not too bad and have found hard drive restores
faster and more reliable than tape restores (I detest a CRC error on the
tape...:-)).

Regards

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 09 September 2002 06:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem

In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine
with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job
to
do an Exchange backup to the disk.  Installing the admin program makes
NT
Backup Exchange aware

Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and
easier and more reliable than copying the files manually

Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: urgent backup problem


hi all, 
can anyone help me with the following scenario:

sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4
tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it.
However,
as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is
knackered
and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent
backup
of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning
and
also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no
tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy
the
relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive.  However, I
don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but
haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had
error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy
or
should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my
programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non
existent...
Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thank you very much Rob

Support Analyst
T.K.C. Sales Ltd.
5 Ashmead Industrial Estate
Keynsham
Bristol
BS31 1TZ
UK
Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302



intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: urgent backup problem

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Lol, thanks

Sander
SysAdmin Manager
Korbitec  Korbi.net

-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 10 September 2002 01:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem

Sander - I only say this because the disk is non-removable, so it is not
as
secure as an off-site tape, and I only have space for one backup.  I am
putting together a case for new hardware to go to my management, so
maybe I
can slip in a few removable disks without them spotting it!  The answer
I
usually get, however, is that the public come to see the fish, not the
computers!

BTW We recently were hit by complaints from PETA because we serve fish
in
our restaurant (but not in tacos!)

Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 09:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem


Hi Chris

Just curious why you say that. I backup to different removable hard
drives Monday to Thursday and to tape on Friday (keep one tape off-site)
I find this solution not too bad and have found hard drive restores
faster and more reliable than tape restores (I detest a CRC error on the
tape...:-)).

Regards

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 09 September 2002 06:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem

In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine
with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job
to
do an Exchange backup to the disk.  Installing the admin program makes
NT
Backup Exchange aware

Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and
easier and more reliable than copying the files manually

Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: urgent backup problem


hi all, 
can anyone help me with the following scenario:

sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4
tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it.
However,
as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is
knackered
and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent
backup
of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning
and
also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no
tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy
the
relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive.  However, I
don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but
haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had
error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy
or
should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my
programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non
existent...
Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thank you very much Rob

Support Analyst
T.K.C. Sales Ltd.
5 Ashmead Industrial Estate
Keynsham
Bristol
BS31 1TZ
UK
Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302



intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 02/08/02
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: need ammo

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Well for one, who is going to accept 15MB on the incoming side? I
definitely wouldn't. Without attachments 15MB is a hell of a lot of
typing ..:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 05 September 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: need ammo

Hi all.

I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on
SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment.

Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to
send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for
SMTP message?

Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP
messages crashed the servers.

I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send
large messages.

Thanks!

Andrey Fyodorov

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Maybe Swink has been bought out by the Post Office:-)

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 September 2002 01:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday

Well, I sent it on Friday

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


Time blurred, what day this?
I mean, haikus are nice, but...
This is not Friday.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


Long weekend on call
Hospitals always awake
Tourists please go home.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday


Long weekend is here
No work, no users, no phone
Just relax - and sleep.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Without being funny, read the material available on Microsoft's site
about Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 and test, test, test.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 28 August 2002 08:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000

I will be creating a brand new domain in our organization and installing
Exchange 2000 on a fresh server within that domain.  We have an old
Exchange 5.5 server that is also an NT4.0 BDC.  I want to export the
user
mailbox data from that server to the new Exchange 2000 server.  What is
the easiest way to go about doing this?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange Workflow Designer - Exchange 2000

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Hi All

I'm needing to strip some files (and save them locally) of emails that
go to a specific public folder. I'm only interested in the attachments,
not the actual emails. I thought of using the Exchange Workflow
Designer. There doesn't seem to be too much help on this tool.
Has any one used this tool before and knows where to get more info, or
am I just being daft to try to use this tool to accomplish my goal? Is
there an easier way? The samples that are available from Microsoft seem
to be bits out of a bigger total, but the bigger picture isn't really
discussed completely.

Thanks

Sander 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Workflow Designer - Exchange 2000

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Thanks Chris

CDOLive has code for Exchange 5.5 for this, called Attachement
Extraction Folder Script. Needless to say Exchange 2000 is somewhat
different...:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 21 August 2002 04:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Workflow Designer - Exchange 2000

This can be done using CDO... www.cdolive.com might have some code
samples
to aid you in the task.

 -Original Message-
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:35 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Exchange Workflow Designer - Exchange 2000
 
 
 Hi All
 
 I'm needing to strip some files (and save them locally) of 
 emails that go to a specific public folder. I'm only 
 interested in the attachments, not the actual emails. I 
 thought of using the Exchange Workflow Designer. There 
 doesn't seem to be too much help on this tool. Has any one 
 used this tool before and knows where to get more info, or am 
 I just being daft to try to use this tool to accomplish my 
 goal? Is there an easier way? The samples that are available 
 from Microsoft seem to be bits out of a bigger total, but the 
 bigger picture isn't really discussed completely.
 
 Thanks
 
 Sander 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Listserve Recommendations

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I subscribe to this one, does that qualify? ...:-)

Happy searching!

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 03:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Listserve Recommendations


So it seems I'm soliciting opinions on list serve software..

Gimme the good  bad.

My sole criterion in this request is that you have some experience with
the
software you mention.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Interesting spam filtering technology

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

This has been discussed before (all the different types of spam
filtering) and I think one of the drawbacks from this type anti-spam was
that other people decide for you what is spam.

Cheers

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August 2002 11:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Interesting spam filtering technology


That should be:

http://www.cloudmark.com

As opposed to could-mark...

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon 
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Interesting spam filtering technology



While this is not meant to be an endorsement of any kind, I have found a
kind of interesting web site I thought y'all might be interested in...

www.couldmark.com

On the positive side, it so far has not deleted anything that isn't
spam.  On the negative side, plenty of spam still gets through, and it
doesn't play terribly well with Pocket PCs.  It's kind of a neat concept
though, where each user gets to be a node in a neural network deciding
whether the messages they receive are spam.

/Gordon















___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information
intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or
disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received
this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information
in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the
Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in
this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing
client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information
intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or
disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received
this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information
in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the
Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in
this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing
client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

What about the aditional overhead (cost) of Windows 2000 server as he
will need an AD. I would say rather stick with NT4.0 and Exchange 5.5

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 05:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K


Since you won't have to worry about the Exchange 5.5/2K coexistence
phase, then by all means implement Exchange 2K.  It's a much better
product.  It's more scaleable, more logical, has much better web
interface, etc.  Yes, there is a learning curve to learn the new
administrative interfaces, but without an installed base of Exchange
5.5, the implementation of Exchange 2K is very straightforward.  
 
Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA
Senior Network Engineer
PowerTV, Inc.  

-Original Message- 
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Mon 8/12/2002 2:44 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K



no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future.

Then no Exchange2000.

Looks like you'll be happy with 5.5 for awhile.

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric
Fors, II
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K


I've recently come into the need to implement Exchange server
for my new
employer.  I have been blissfully ignorant of all things related
to
Exchange for nearly a year and a half now, but alas that is at
an end.
I've had substantial experience with Exchange with my previous
employer,
but when I was hired on here they already had some other e-mail
product
and were not interested in switching to Exchange.  Now they are
and I am
needing to catch up.  My experience with Exchange goes back to
the RC
for Exchange 4.0 and runs up to EX55 SP3.  EX2K was only just
starting
to be implemented widely by the more adventurous members of this
list at
the time I changed jobs.

With that lengthy pre-amble, here's my question:  I have
seen
some of the recent posts with scary stories about what to expect
when
upgrading EX55 to EX2K and read some other things about AD
implementations gone awry.
These cause me to wonder if it is worth it to install EX2K?  We
already
own EX55 and our Windows networking is run strictly on a
domains
model, (no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future.)
Our
implementation will be rather small, one site, one server, about
50
users, and a handful of remote users.  What if any advantages
would
there be to me to implement EX2K over EX55?

Thanx,
Eric Fors, II

BTW - I'm glad to see that the Ed's and Missy K. are still on
the list.
Your posts in the archives have pulled my proverbial bacon out
of the
fire more than a few times.


_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


.
rí½¶à³‘zrmyzruvi
ŠËi¢Ëbž
@Bm§ÿðÃ0Šw¢oëzÊ.­Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ŸÿÃ
,Ã)är‰¿²+^±æ«rìyªÜ…«)N‹§²æìr¸›zf¢–Ú%y«Þ{!jx–Ë0Êy¢a1r§ââ²Öš)åŠËZvh§³§‘Ê

RE: Changing Reply To address

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Correct, I modify the email domain name and exchange accepts for that
new domain.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 August 2002 04:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changing Reply To address


a header rewrite per domain?  So, that would mean everything in
mydomain.com
would go to the exchange box?

Wendy
- Original Message -
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 1:59 AM
Subject: RE: Changing Reply To address


 I also use a Unix box with Exim (world facing), I prefer a header
 rewrite per domain vs. a .forward This gives me a single rule on Unix
 and I do the rest of the admin on Exchange 2000.

 Sander

 -Original Message-
 From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 07 August 2002 10:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Changing Reply To address


 Harriet,
 Yes, a .forward is inefficient, however, it gives us some
functionality
 we
 need in integration with our billing system.  :-)  Thanks for helping.

 Wendy
 - Original Message -
 From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 10:28 AM
 Subject: RE: Changing Reply To address


  Wendy,
  See http://www.exim.org/
  But it may be overkill and you'd be better sorting it out on
exchange.
  Depends why the mail comes via the unix box anyway and what else it
 does
  etc. A .forward must be inefficient though?
  Harriet
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 07 August 2002 15:13
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Changing Reply To address
 
 
  Harriet,
 
  All the mail comes in through the unix box, yes.  It is then
forwarded
 with
  a .forward (can't find another way) to the exchange server for those
 users
  that have exchange boxes.  When the mail is sent out from the
exchange
  server, though, it goes off using the smtp on that server,  thus
does
 not
  go back through the unix box (I think I could set it up to do so,
 using
 the
  smarthost, though this is just theory as the dang-blasted thing
 doesn't
 seem
  to do anything it's supposed to).  How do you have your mail going
 back
  through the unix box for this removing of exch?  My boss says yes,
 he
  thinks it is possible to change the address on the way out (though
he
 didn't
  look too confident in saying so), if I could get the mail to go
 through
 the
  unix box. Sorry if I sound neurotic, ever have one of those days
 nothing
  works as the manual/book/help documents say it is supposed to work?
 I've
  been having 3 days like that  I'm going a bit bonkers. Thanks
 
  Wendy
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 10:00 AM
  Subject: RE: Changing Reply To address
 
 
   Wendy,
   Yes all our mail is relayed by the Unix boxes. It translates both
   ways. We
  use Exim but the functionality must be pretty general. I just
assumed
 all
  your mail comes in via the unix box maybe I misunderstood. If not
this
 is
  probably a red herring.
  
   Harriet
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 07 August 2002 14:27
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: Changing Reply To address
  
  
   Harriet,
  
   How is your setup?  Do you use the Unix box as the outgoing SMTP
   server,
  then?  I haven't decided yet whether I'll use our Unix box or allow
 Exchange
  to do outbound.  Seems less overhead to just let Exchange server do
 the
  outbound.  But, if Unix is stripping the exch, then you're routing
 the
  mail from exchange through unix?  Using - smart host? or something
 else?
 Can
  you instead of removing the exch could you change the
 exch.mydomain.com
  to my2nddomain.com as well? The person that manages the unix box
is
 about
  10 feet behind me, I don't think they'd mind changing that for me.
  
   Thanks, any additional info would be great.  Im new at all
this...
  
   Wendy
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 9:18 AM
   Subject: RE: Changing Reply To address
  
  
We do something very similar, I don't have a second exchange
address, the
   Unix machine runs EXIM, and it removes the exch. part from
Address on the way out.
Do you manage the Unix server? If not talk to who does about
their
mailer.
   
Harriet
   
-Original Message-
From: Wendy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 August 2002 21:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing Reply To address
   
   
hello. :-)
I am setting up exchange 2000 for my company  have a bit of a
problem. Out mail is currently sent to mydomain.com, a unix
 machine.
The way it is
   set up

RE: None Exchange related

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Hey, if I can get that type of speed out of it, it can be a Persian for
all I care...:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


What sort of cat? Domestic shorthair, Devon Rex, or one of those new
Munchkins?

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Lol, we are plugged directly into their cat. It's a 10Mbits/s
link:-)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 02:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Since you have an access card, can you plug our connection into a faster
port, preferably one that is closer to the Internet? :0


-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same building as UUNET and
I
have a special access card to the Data Centre. We have our own cabinets
in
the Data Centre to keep our toys in.

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 02:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that.  I wanted the
systems
to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others
involved.  What type of SLA do you have with UUNET?

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no
sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


We use the controls in our AC units.  The room is on its own loop with 4
units running.  If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system
calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call
person
to alert them of the problem.  We over did the room by one unit, and we
doubled up the outside units.  The only single point of failure we have
is
if someone cuts the chilled water lines.  We are using all Leibert
equipment
in our computer room.  These units are also on our circuit with the
backup
generator.  When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very
close
attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: None Exchange related


Hi ALL

I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I
have
been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the
computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down?
Can
some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to
know
if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me.  THANK EVERYONE 

Tony



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged

RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

You might have a rights issue. I think if you have the three edb files
you could probably get quite far, untill some validation of the account
with admin rights occurs. Worth a try though! Pity one can't add a BDC
to the SBS system and promote that one to PDC afterwards, so that you
get the correct accounts across.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 09:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server


Mark,

Are you not able to do the 'move server' method (IE just like a restore
set
up a exchnage system with the same names etc but using the EDB from the
sbs
system and recreate the Directory?

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 31 July 2002 21:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fwd: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server


We have outgrown our Small Business Server (4.5 with Exchange 5.5) and 
want/need to move exchange off to a newer faster box.  The SBS version
of 
exchange however seems substantially crippled, no site connector or
directory connector. This, I believe, means that there is no
posssibility to
install 
another Exchange Server into the site and use the move server wizard and
then 
remove the old machine. Shifting all the other apps ot the sbs machine
is
not an option right now.. There are way too many legacy apps (in
same
cas= es the guru who installed em and knew how they worked is looong
gone).

From what I have read there is no easy / automated  method of moving
exchange to a new box with a different name or is there?

It seems that exporting all mailboxes and reimporting the data is my
only
option... please say it aint so joe  :-)

---


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may
be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited
without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in
this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony
or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom
Limited.
(04)

***


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NT2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

It's Windows 2000 without the AD ...:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3


pedant
What's NT2000?
/pedant

Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend  Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!


-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 01 August 2002 04:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3


Has anyone installed NT2000 SP3 on a machine using Exchange SP3? Any
problems?

Arch Willingham

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.


The information in this communication and any attachments is
confidential
and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
If
you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If
you
have received this communication in error please notify us immediately
on
0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. 

Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do
not
relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend  Gilbert are
neither
given nor endorsed by the firm. 



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.


The information in this communication and any attachments is
confidential
and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
If
you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If
you
have received this communication in error please notify us immediately
on
0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. 

Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do
not
relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend  Gilbert are
neither
given nor endorsed by the firm. 



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I think it's the unique SID of the account that is the problem on the
new box. I'm sure if you could synchronize the SID's you would be well
away. I'm not sure if Microsoft would approve of this though.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 11:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server


What about setting it in a small protect network that everyone (and his
dog)
is a service account then on the new system with the new NT reset the
service account to secure account.

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server


You might have a rights issue. I think if you have the three edb files
you
could probably get quite far, untill some validation of the account with
admin rights occurs. Worth a try though! Pity one can't add a BDC to the
SBS
system and promote that one to PDC afterwards, so that you get the
correct
accounts across.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 09:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server


Mark,

Are you not able to do the 'move server' method (IE just like a restore
set
up a exchnage system with the same names etc but using the EDB from the
sbs
system and recreate the Directory?

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 31 July 2002 21:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fwd: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server


We have outgrown our Small Business Server (4.5 with Exchange 5.5) and 
want/need to move exchange off to a newer faster box.  The SBS version
of 
exchange however seems substantially crippled, no site connector or
directory connector. This, I believe, means that there is no
posssibility to
install 
another Exchange Server into the site and use the move server wizard and
then 
remove the old machine. Shifting all the other apps ot the sbs machine
is
not an option right now.. There are way too many legacy apps (in
same
cas= es the guru who installed em and knew how they worked is looong
gone).

From what I have read there is no easy / automated  method of moving
exchange to a new box with a different name or is there?

It seems that exporting all mailboxes and reimporting the data is my
only
option... please say it aint so joe  :-)

---


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may
be
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).
Any
disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of
this
communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of
the
sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual
and
not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email
is
for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom
Limited.
(04)

***


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: W2k Sp3 is out

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

So how did you find this David? ...:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 04:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2k Sp3 is out





Nothing mentioned on the Microsoft pages, but

http://download.microsoft.com/download/win2000platform/SP/SP3/NT5/EN-US/
w2ksp3.exe




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: None Exchange related

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


We use the controls in our AC units.  The room is on its own loop with 4
units running.  If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system
calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call
person
to alert them of the problem.  We over did the room by one unit, and we
doubled up the outside units.  The only single point of failure we have
is
if someone cuts the chilled water lines.  We are using all Leibert
equipment
in our computer room.  These units are also on our circuit with the
backup
generator.  When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very
close
attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: None Exchange related


Hi ALL

I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I
have
been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the
computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down?
Can
some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to
know
if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me.  THANK EVERYONE 

Tony



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: None Exchange related

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Lol! You can't have everything you know 

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


and sleepless nights about bankruptcy?


-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


We use the controls in our AC units.  The room is on its own loop with 4
units running.  If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system
calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call
person
to alert them of the problem.  We over did the room by one unit, and we
doubled up the outside units.  The only single point of failure we have
is
if someone cuts the chilled water lines.  We are using all Leibert
equipment
in our computer room.  These units are also on our circuit with the
backup
generator.  When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very
close
attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: None Exchange related


Hi ALL

I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I
have
been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the
computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down?
Can
some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to
know
if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me.  THANK EVERYONE 

Tony



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: None Exchange related

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same building as UUNET and
I have a special access card to the Data Centre. We have our own
cabinets in the Data Centre to keep our toys in.

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 02:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that.  I wanted the
systems
to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others
involved.  What type of SLA do you have with UUNET?

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


We use the controls in our AC units.  The room is on its own loop with 4
units running.  If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system
calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call
person
to alert them of the problem.  We over did the room by one unit, and we
doubled up the outside units.  The only single point of failure we have
is
if someone cuts the chilled water lines.  We are using all Leibert
equipment
in our computer room.  These units are also on our circuit with the
backup
generator.  When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very
close
attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: None Exchange related


Hi ALL

I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I
have
been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the
computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down?
Can
some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to
know
if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me.  THANK EVERYONE 

Tony



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: None Exchange related

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Lol, we are plugged directly into their cat. It's a 10Mbits/s
link:-)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 02:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Since you have an access card, can you plug our connection into a faster
port, preferably one that is closer to the Internet? :0


-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same building as UUNET and
I have a special access card to the Data Centre. We have our own
cabinets in the Data Centre to keep our toys in.

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 02:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that.  I wanted the
systems
to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others
involved.  What type of SLA do you have with UUNET?

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


We use the controls in our AC units.  The room is on its own loop with 4
units running.  If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system
calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call
person
to alert them of the problem.  We over did the room by one unit, and we
doubled up the outside units.  The only single point of failure we have
is
if someone cuts the chilled water lines.  We are using all Leibert
equipment
in our computer room.  These units are also on our circuit with the
backup
generator.  When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very
close
attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: None Exchange related


Hi ALL

I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I
have
been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the
computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down?
Can
some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to
know
if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me.  THANK EVERYONE 

Tony



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you

RE: None Exchange related

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Well yes, why try and invent the wheel when there is a big super duper
one standing right next to you. 

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 03:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Isn't that cheating?  Although if I had that kind of setup, I would
probably
use it as well.

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same building as UUNET and
I have a special access card to the Data Centre. We have our own
cabinets in the Data Centre to keep our toys in.

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 02:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that.  I wanted the
systems
to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others
involved.  What type of SLA do you have with UUNET?

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related


We use the controls in our AC units.  The room is on its own loop with 4
units running.  If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system
calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call
person
to alert them of the problem.  We over did the room by one unit, and we
doubled up the outside units.  The only single point of failure we have
is
if someone cuts the chilled water lines.  We are using all Leibert
equipment
in our computer room.  These units are also on our circuit with the
backup
generator.  When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very
close
attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: None Exchange related


Hi ALL

I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I
have
been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the
computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down?
Can
some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to
know
if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me.  THANK EVERYONE 

Tony



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: question about attachments

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I don't think that there is something like that coded in, but you could
probably use a script.

Sander 

-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 July 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: question about attachments


Dear All

Just a quick question...

Is it possible that when an email comes in with an attachment  to a
specific
email account , is it possible for Exchange to capture that attachment
and
save only the attachment to a specific folder on the computer (folder -
windows folder not outlook folder)

Use Exchange 5.5 on an NT4 server.

Thanks for your time and advice


Vas

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Unlimited Quotas

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Fair enough, he did however say he had 25 users:-) He would need to
keep the 16 GB limit in mind. Curbing the attachments will help to
stretch the amount of actual mail you can have.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 2002 03:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas


I believe this applies to E2K as well as 5.5 - keep in mind if you don't
have the Enterprise version of Exchange, you do have a software limit as
to
how big your IS can get (16g) - disk space won't help you with that.  We
hit
this on our server several weeks ago - it is not pretty.  

John J. Steniger


 -Original Message-
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:36 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
 
 
 It's mostly a business call. Hard drive space is cheap and there are
 various backup systems that cater for large mail stores. The admin job
 is to provide your users with the best possible email system, 
 so if they
 need to go back all the time to old mails you may find yourself in hot
 water if you put restrictions on. Of coarse money also plays a role. I
 would let management make the call to go cheap and small or large and
 expensive, let them live with it as there are benefits to both ways.
 
 Sander
 
 -Original Message-
 From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 05 July 2002 03:18
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Unlimited Quotas
 
 
 I am being asked to justify why I have set quotas for users on our E2K
 server
 with 25 users.  Things that come to mind are that if we give users
 unlimited
 stores, we will have to buy more disk space in time.  Also we have a
 single
 processor server with 512 ram.  So I would make a WAG and say that we
 will be
 looking at a second processor and more RAM.  I am already looking at
 more RAM
 since our server is paging quite a bit.  And as we implement archiving
 and
 journaling this will impact disk space as well as the backup (time,
 number of
 tapes).  I also realize that allowing unlimited space leads to users
 never
 managing their e-mail.  
 
 So besides these reasons are there any other reasons that I should be
 thinking about?  Thanks.
 
 Jim Liddil
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Public Folder Send As

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I suspect a Murphy rather than a real bug, but I'm unable to send as
a public folder (nor a Distribution List). The error in outlook states:
You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the
user. I do have the send as box ticked. I have checked and double
checked the rights, replication of DC's etc. I have gone through the
archives and Microsoft TechNet and some 3rd party web sites, but to no
avail. I'm running Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 SP2 box. No
errors in the Event Log.

Microsoft has a very short article on the matter, stating basically tick
the send as box in the properties and off you go. I'm trying to
replicate the problem on my test environment, but I thought I'd ask if
anybody has ever run into anything like this before.

Thanks

Sander

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Send As

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Thanks! That solved the Public Folder send as, but not the
Distribution List (which was visible).

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 11:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Send As


You did unhide the PF, do you ?
Heiko

-- 
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph  x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY

 -Original Message-
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:39 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Public Folder Send As
 
 
 
 I suspect a Murphy rather than a real bug, but I'm unable 
 to send as
 a public folder (nor a Distribution List). The error in 
 outlook states:
 You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the
 user. I do have the send as box ticked. I have checked and double
 checked the rights, replication of DC's etc. I have gone through the
 archives and Microsoft TechNet and some 3rd party web sites, but to no
 avail. I'm running Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 SP2 box. No
 errors in the Event Log.
 
 Microsoft has a very short article on the matter, stating 
 basically tick
 the send as box in the properties and off you go. I'm trying to
 replicate the problem on my test environment, but I thought I'd ask if
 anybody has ever run into anything like this before.
 
 Thanks
 
 Sander
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Send As

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Thanks. I actually was on this site this morning, but must have missed
this article.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 01:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Send As


More info on this can be found at
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4855

-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Send As


You did unhide the PF, do you ?
Heiko

-- 
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph  x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY

 -Original Message-
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:39 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Public Folder Send As
 
 
 
 I suspect a Murphy rather than a real bug, but I'm unable
 to send as
 a public folder (nor a Distribution List). The error in 
 outlook states:
 You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the
 user. I do have the send as box ticked. I have checked and double
 checked the rights, replication of DC's etc. I have gone through the
 archives and Microsoft TechNet and some 3rd party web sites, but to no
 avail. I'm running Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 SP2 box. No
 errors in the Event Log.
 
 Microsoft has a very short article on the matter, stating
 basically tick
 the send as box in the properties and off you go. I'm trying to
 replicate the problem on my test environment, but I thought I'd ask if
 anybody has ever run into anything like this before.
 
 Thanks
 
 Sander
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fix reverse DNS (?)

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Make sure you have a ptr record for your mail server in your DNS.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 08:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fix reverse DNS (?)


Dear All,

Some of our customers do receive the following NDR when sending messages
to one of the domains residing in our Exchange organisation.

Your message has encountered delivery problems to the following
recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery failed
550 5.7.1 Fix reverse DNS for [IP-address of our Mailsweeper system],or
use your ISP server
Sent:MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received:550 5.7.1 Fix reverse DNS for [IP-address of our Mailsweeper
system],or use your ISP server

Does anyone know how we can solve this issue?

Many thanks in advance,

Olivier

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB corruption

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Good morning all

Exchange 2000 SP1. I had a corruption on one of my EDB files and had to
recreate the STM file. At the time it looked like no mail was lost, but
alas, this was not true. Outlook now still reports mail items that can't
be opened. Error: Can not open this item Checked Event logs - no
errors. I had a look at the Eseutil options and MDB Viewer. I really
hope that this is a database cleanup action, rather than an individual
mail item deletion. I checked the Archives, Microsoft Support site and
TechNet. I must say it's quite an art to get the keywords right to get a
meaningful search...:-)

My question is: How to get rid of those items in the EDB file. A
consistency check says the file is consistent. Any answers welcome, even
if you feel I must research more, that's great too, but plse point me in
the right direction. 

Regards

Sander

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB corruption

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Thank you Jeffrey

I guessed that it were valid pointers pointing to a missing item, just
didn't know how to get rid of them. Will run this tonight, as I can't
take the production system down during the day.

Regards

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 June 2002 08:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB
corruption


You have logical corruption now because all of the pointers in the EDB
file that were pointing to the STM are no longer valid.  Run isinteg to
fix logical corruption.  Run it until you get 0 errors, 0 warnings, and
0 fixes or the same results twice.

Isinteg -s servername -fix -test alltests

Jeff Beckham

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:49 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Email Problems
Subject: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB
corruption

Good morning all

Exchange 2000 SP1. I had a corruption on one of my EDB files and had to
recreate the STM file. At the time it looked like no mail was lost, but
alas, this was not true. Outlook now still reports mail items that can't
be opened. Error: Can not open this item Checked Event logs - no
errors. I had a look at the Eseutil options and MDB Viewer. I really
hope that this is a database cleanup action, rather than an individual
mail item deletion. I checked the Archives, Microsoft Support site and
TechNet. I must say it's quite an art to get the keywords right to get a
meaningful search...:-)

My question is: How to get rid of those items in the EDB file. A
consistency check says the file is consistent. Any answers welcome, even
if you feel I must research more, that's great too, but plse point me in
the right direction. 

Regards

Sander

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDBcorruption

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Not really an option as the corruption (and I don't know how long ago
that started as Exchange appeared to be working fine until the STM
disappeared) that came with the disappearance of the STM file occurred a
month ago or so. Only very recently people noticed that some old
messages would not open. We have come to terms with that and now just
want to clean up the pointers that have no entries in the new STM file.
Hence Jeff's recommendation to run isinteg against the EDB file, rather
than to go back in time with a restore.

Tks

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 June 2002 06:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and
EDBcorruption


Restore from backup.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB
corruption


Good morning all

Exchange 2000 SP1. I had a corruption on one of my EDB files and had to
recreate the STM file. At the time it looked like no mail was lost, but
alas, this was not true. Outlook now still reports mail items that can't
be opened. Error: Can not open this item Checked Event logs - no
errors. I had a look at the Eseutil options and MDB Viewer. I really
hope that this is a database cleanup action, rather than an individual
mail item deletion. I checked the Archives, Microsoft Support site and
TechNet. I must say it's quite an art to get the keywords right to get a
meaningful search...:-)

My question is: How to get rid of those items in the EDB file. A
consistency check says the file is consistent. Any answers welcome, even
if you feel I must research more, that's great too, but plse point me in
the right direction. 

Regards

Sander

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Usefull OOF !

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

How nice, messaging support according to this OOF from Colin Camilleri.
I hope Alan knows what's coming his way!...:-)

Hi,

I am no longer working for HP. Please contact Alan Fraser for any Mail
and Messaging issues.

thanks and regards,
Colin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange engineer needed!!!

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

How much you are needed? How much work you really need to do or how many
$$$'s they think you are worth:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2002 09:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange engineer needed!!!


how much?

-Original Message-
From: Christine Lani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange engineer needed!!!


I am looking for a 2nd to 3rd level exchange engineer to work in the
Parsippany, NJ area.  If you are interested or know anyone that is
please
contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thanks, Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Where is everyone?

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Stuur drop asb!...:-)

Sander - Kaapstad

-Original Message-
From: Willigen, Maarten van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 12:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


I am in Amsterdam Holland

Maarten

-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?

I think Italy...

England messed up their chances over the weekend...

Stu
ExPat Brit

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?



Mmm... World Cup.  Sleepless nights...

Lot of people think Argentina will get this one.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


Off celebrating the World Cup?

Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary,
and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my
goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Where is everyone?


Where is everyone?  Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I
wasn't invited to?  Or is everyone hung over from the weekend?  Or am I
getting the silent treatment yet again?

Sigh!

-Felicity

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Where is everyone?

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat
concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a
1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2002 05:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


Milwauke..the dullest tech place in the world.  

And sleep is over rated.  After all...I don't find anything so grate
about my three hours a night...or day

chuck

-Original Message-
From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


Maui, Hawaii here. It's hot!

Gotta go home now and have a nice swim in the ocean. ;-)

Aloha
Don

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


I found _Mulholland Drive_ pretty darn interesting, although I think
there may be laws about shipping that sort of movie overseas.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:13 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Where is everyone?
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


Rented K-PAX the other day.  I liked it.  Can't send it to you though.
Had to return it to Bockbluster.

Ed

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Where is everyone?


B,

freezing my tender portions off here in Australia :(

Send warmthoh and some decent movies to watch :)

Glenn.

- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


 me too LI, NY

 -Original Message-
 From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:08 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


 Wonderful Long Island, NY here...

 ...back to lurking



 -Original Message-
 From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:48 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


 Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm?

 -Felicity
  Mmm... World Cup.  Sleepless nights...
 
  Lot of people think Argentina will get this one.
 
  Serdar Soysal
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
 
 
  Off celebrating the World Cup?
 
  Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment.
 
  John Matteson; Exchange Manager
  Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
  (404) 239 - 2981
 
  Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has
  been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely 
  temporary,
and
  its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my
goal.
  Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a
  path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Where is everyone?
 
 
  Where is everyone?  Is there some party going for Exchange admins
  that I wasn't invited to?  Or is everyone hung over from the 
  weekend?  Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again?
 
  Sigh!
 
  -Felicity
 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

STM Question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Morning Admins

I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my
Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor
can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store
(2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I
searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet
site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I
tried it but no joy.

Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do
if I can't get this resolved soon.

Thanks

Sander



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: STM Question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Thank you Jeffrey!! 

It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file.
Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap!

Tks

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question


Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: STM Question
Subject: STM Question


Morning Admins

I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my
Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor
can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store
(2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I
searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet
site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I
tried it but no joy.

Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do
if I can't get this resolved soon.

Thanks

Sander



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: STM Question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being
held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb file, al be it somewhat
corrupt..:-)What could have been lost, as some of my other stm files are
about a Gig or so? They opened attachments and all seemed to be there.

Tks

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question


Did you lose any mail?

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question


Thank you Jeffrey!! 

It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file.
Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap!

Tks

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question


Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: STM Question
Subject: STM Question


Morning Admins

I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my
Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor
can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store
(2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I
searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet
site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I
tried it but no joy.

Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do
if I can't get this resolved soon.

Thanks

Sander



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: STM Question

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Ok, and since the Store was not mounted, no new content could be added.
I think I was lucky and that wasn't by design ...:-) Live and learn!

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 03:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question


If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood
you
have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to
the
STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file.
Only
new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been
opened
by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well.

Mark

 -Original Message-
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: STM Question
 
 
 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that 
 was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb 
 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been 
 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? 
 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there.
 
 Tks
 
 Sander
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: STM Question
 
 
 Did you lose any mail?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: STM Question
 
 
 Thank you Jeffrey!! 
 
 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new 
 stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of 
 beers are on my tap!
 
 Tks
 
 Sander
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: STM Question
 
 
 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM
 Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
 Conversation: STM Question
 Subject: STM Question
 
 
 Morning Admins
 
 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for 
 one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store 
 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get 
 an error: Information Store
 (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error 
 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see 
 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can 
 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy.
 
 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, 
 which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon.
 
 Thanks
 
 Sander
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do
not use,
copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it
and notify
the sender immediately. 
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent
or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: any news on sp3?

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

September... any takers yes, no...Sold to the gent with the funny
hat...Oh, sorry mam...

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 02:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


August

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:44 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: any news on sp3?
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for the
service pack.

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Without sounding too nasty:Why do people care when it comes out? Unless
you have a serious problem and than you should talk to PPS anyway

climbing off my soap box. Sander

-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 09:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: any news on sp3?


Rumours are that it will be released this Millenium.

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--

- Original Message - 
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:05 PM
Subject: any news on sp3?


 Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for
the
 service pack.
 
 Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?
 
 Thanks.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Yeah, but the latest drug might make you more sick as the side effects
aren't known yet ...:-)


-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 09:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: any news on sp3?


I think it is a 'men thing'. We want the biggest car, fastest computer
and
the newest service packs.

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--

- Original Message -
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


Without sounding too nasty:Why do people care when it comes out? Unless
you have a serious problem and than you should talk to PPS anyway

climbing off my soap box. Sander

-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 09:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: any news on sp3?


Rumours are that it will be released this Millenium.

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--

- Original Message -
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:05 PM
Subject: any news on sp3?


 Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for
the
 service pack.

 Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

 Thanks.

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: iis 5

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

May they need to be paid?

-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 03:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5


upgrade isp services.. is there a wizard for that ? :-}

-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 14:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5


if your isp blocks inbound access to port 80 run your web on a different
port, or upgrade isp services.

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5


No

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5


Can you telnet to port 80 on the machine from the outside?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5


Im not in front of the computer now however I was basically giving all
the
rights possible and nothing worked yet.  I dont have my router hooked up
to
the pc anymore.  Also Im not sure if I binded the website to the ip
address
and will check the Anonymous-user permissions when i get home.  Thanks
for
the input.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SV: iis 5


Hi !

Have You bind the Website to an IP-address ? You must. Anonymous-user
must
have read/execut on the website. User like IUSR_MACHINE.

ROnny

-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Pa vegne av Tom Meunier
Sendt: 23. april 2002 23:22
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: iis 5


The best website for immediate use is http://localhost/iisHelp

In this case I'm gonna guess that it's NAT that's causing your problem.

 -Original Message-
 From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 04:15 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: iis 5
 Subject: iis 5


 Does anyone know of a good website besides (Technet) that explains how

 to set permissions in iis 5 for outside users to see the web page.  I 
 was tryin to set up a web page on windows xp pro and for some reason 
 it works at home but when you go outside the page cannot be displayed.

 sorry this is so off topic but it is killing me and I never set up iis

 before.

 Thanks
 Rich


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: best practice

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I like keeping Exchange logs at least until I run a full backup ...:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 09:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: best practice


Hi, 

looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs, 
* how long do most of you keep your logs
* how do you keep them (tape, CD, on the server)
...

thanks, 
Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Database and Drives size

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Will depend on your local environment. Possible - yes. Acceptable -
depends. I prefer a Raid set up, but again for 5 users IDE will do etc
etc.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Database and Drives size


Is it acceptable to put Exchange 2000 information stores on a set of
mirrored 72 GB drives?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Why?

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Human Electric? Cool, so the Matrix is true! Humans running on
electricity sorry got carried away here. So what was the question
again?

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why?


Hi have been sending questions to the list but I have not seen my
question
nor the answer.
What's going on?


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Emmanuel Adebayo (MCSE NT/2000, CCNP)
Network Administrator
Human Electric, Gilling House, Maris Lane,
Trumpington Cambridge, CB2 2LE
Tel :+44 (0)1223 477530
Mobile:+44 (0)7960 186035
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange getting bounced

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

So what happens to the new emails when the real server is down, does the
test server except them? This would result in a loss of emails when the
real server comes back onb I agree with Louis here, get the test
server on a different physical network.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced


The two servers are not identical then. The test server should be on a
test/dummy network and have the identical name/site/org of the
production
server. Your backup has info on it that concerns the server you backed
up
from. 

You really shouldn't have a test server on the same network as the
production box. 

Have you read the DR white papers?

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 March 2002 17:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced


Same site, same org, different name.
This can't be done this way?

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange getting bounced


That's because you can't have two servers with the same name on the same
network. A restore server should be on it's own network with a copy of
the
production domain's DC.

- Original Message -
From: Seitz, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced


 Let me clarify, when I do a restore on the test server,
 the original backed up server goes offline.

 -Original Message-
 From: Seitz, Peter
 Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:34 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Exchange getting bounced


 This is an Exchange 5.5, sp4, one of two in our domain.
 When I take a backup from this system using ntbackup,
 and try to restore it to our test server, it goes down with the
 Information store offline. When I do the restore, it'll ask me
 what server to restore to, and I give it the test servers name.
 Now, I have done this in the past with no problems, just the
 last couple of times on this server has been giving me problems.
 This test server was created with the same site and org name,
 but I didn't joing the group. I hope this helps.

 Peter Seitz
 Operating Systems Analyst
 Cubic Corporation
 San Diego, Ca. 92021
 (858) 505-2724


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Auto Responder

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Yep, make the original incoming address a D/L and one recipient of the
D/L is a contact (you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon, so it will get a copy of the incoming email)

Have fun

Sander Van Butzelaar,  MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let a human do the work of a machine - The Matrix


-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder


Okay, Is their a way that I can forward mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
particular machine like I have a machine on which Mdeamon is running,
can't I do that.


Regards,
 -Original Message-
From:   Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder

Outlook? www.slipstick.com  or www.cdolive.com

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 March 2002 11:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Auto Responder


Dear List,

Our Publicity department wants that when ever someone mail to their
department email address  an auto respond should be generated and that
auto
respond should attach a file( some rates sheet file) and send it to the
recipient. Is there a way to do that.

Thanks and Regards.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Auto Responder

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

They only way Exchange is going to forward anything is through SMTP. So
what do you mean by locally? You do not need an internet presence to be
a mail server, one can relay/Pat/Nat whatever you want. I take it the
two servers can talk TCP/IP to each other?

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder


Thanks for your reply.

you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon.

But my Mdeamon is not acting as an active mail server (no internet
presence). I want that  my exchange 2000 server forward it locally, Is
their a way to that.

Regards,

 -Original Message-
From:   Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, March 15, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder

Yep, make the original incoming address a D/L and one recipient of the
D/L is a contact (you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon, so it will get a copy of the incoming email)

Have fun

Sander Van Butzelaar,  MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let a human do the work of a machine - The Matrix


-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder


Okay, Is their a way that I can forward mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
particular machine like I have a machine on which Mdeamon is running,
can't I do that.


Regards,
 -Original Message-
From:   Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder

Outlook? www.slipstick.com  or www.cdolive.com

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 March 2002 11:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Auto Responder


Dear List,

Our Publicity department wants that when ever someone mail to their
department email address  an auto respond should be generated and that
auto
respond should attach a file( some rates sheet file) and send it to the
recipient. Is there a way to do that.

Thanks and Regards.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Auto Responder

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Firstly - The Exchange box is world facing and gets real mail.
Secondly - The Mdaemon is a box on your network which, once it receives
a mail, will mail out a response (relaying using the Exchange box) back
to the original sender.
Right?

So to do this you will need to set up the following:
1. Incoming address on Exchange
2. Contact on exchange (with [EMAIL PROTECTED])
3. Local DNS Zone for Mdaemon mail domain (does not have to be real
world), MX0 being the Mdaemon box.
4. You do not need an additional SMTP connector.
5. Hi Sherry!
6. Allow relaying for the Mdaemon box/domain on the Exchange box.
7. Fish Taco's on Friday?
8. Have a beer.


Sander 

-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder


Definitely.

To make it clear.

Create a User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create a Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enable forwarding on [EMAIL PROTECTED] by adding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
contact
Create smtp connector and type the IP address of the Mdeamon machine.
At the address space tab enter the domain @mdeamon.com

I think these are the steps I have to take.

Thanks 


 -Original Message-
From:   Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, March 15, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder

They only way Exchange is going to forward anything is through SMTP. So
what do you mean by locally? You do not need an internet presence to be
a mail server, one can relay/Pat/Nat whatever you want. I take it the
two servers can talk TCP/IP to each other?

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder


Thanks for your reply.

you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon.

But my Mdeamon is not acting as an active mail server (no internet
presence). I want that  my exchange 2000 server forward it locally, Is
their a way to that.

Regards,

 -Original Message-
From:   Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, March 15, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder

Yep, make the original incoming address a D/L and one recipient of the
D/L is a contact (you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon, so it will get a copy of the incoming email)

Have fun

Sander Van Butzelaar,  MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let a human do the work of a machine - The Matrix


-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder


Okay, Is their a way that I can forward mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
particular machine like I have a machine on which Mdeamon is running,
can't I do that.


Regards,
 -Original Message-
From:   Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder

Outlook? www.slipstick.com  or www.cdolive.com

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 March 2002 11:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Auto Responder


Dear List,

Our Publicity department wants that when ever someone mail to their
department email address  an auto respond should be generated and that
auto
respond should attach a file( some rates sheet file) and send it to the
recipient. Is there a way to do that.

Thanks and Regards.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http

RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Ah Barry, but a little bit further it says:

Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your
power to do so. Proverbs 3:27

So let the man have his messages, I think they are good:-)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief


From your website: Luke 19:10 
For the Son of Man has come to  seek and to save that which was lost.

:)
Follow the SWYNK link at the bottom...

Barry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief


i keep getting these messeges please remove me from your 
mailing.


 Original message 
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:45:02 -
From: Alister [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief  
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Guys.

I'm new to this forum, so if you've covered this sorry to 
drag it up again.

When trying to install a second exchange server, with 
Exchange 2000 on it.
Our Existing server has 5.5.

I've run the ADC (I think correctly). There is Exchange 
stuff in the Schema,
but when I run Exchange 2000 setup (on a different server), 
and come to the
part about entering Service Account Information both the 
User Name and
Domain and greyed out Only the password field is 
available for entry

Anybody any thoughts???

Thanks

Ali

Network Engineer
bango.net



_
List posting FAQ:   
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

LOL! (s'pose that means I'm in, otherwise I would be out, right?)

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002


I'll be IN the office all next week, 'coz my mother-in-law is coming to
visit.

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 March 2002 17:30
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: exchange digest: March 07, 2002
Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002


Let's all have a big welcome back party for Janelle when she comes back.

By the way, I'll be out of the office next week, 'coz my mom's coming to
visit.  Just thought all 4,000 of you would like to know.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: Friday, March 08, 2002 11:17 AM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: exchange digest: March 07, 2002
 Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002
 
 
 Janelle Kessler is out of the office until 3/11/02.  If you
 need an immediate response or action today, please forward 
 your email to Rosa Esquivel or call her @ (415) 554-5408.  
 Rosa's email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Thank You.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

Ahhh yeah, in active/active with your boxes heavely loaded,ie high
memory usage on each of your nodes, you may find that they don't fail
over to each other. This may have been fixed by now, I'm not running a
cluster anymore (Yes Ed, I know ) so I haven't kept track on cluster
fixes.

Regards

Sander Van Butzelaar,  MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let a human do the work of a machine - The Matrix

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange


I'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/active
cluster.   I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.
Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers.  We have
7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers.   We
never have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at all
times.  What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv pub,
SMtp logs, etc...)

I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to a
Compaq MA6000 storageworks unit.

We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.

Any suggestion would be appreciated.


Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ports

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

netbios-ns  137/tcpnbname  #NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns  137/udpnbname  #NETBIOS Name Service

137/UDP -- NetBIOS Name Server 
The network basic input/output system (NetBIOS) Name Server (NBNS)
protocol, which is part of the NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NetBT) family of
protocols, provides a means for hostname and address mapping on a
NetBIOS-aware network. 

As per Q289241


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ports


hi, 

what does port 137 do?

Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DSAdiag

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

I got it from our TAM a while back when I was looking for it, so I
presume you would contact your local PPS and they will post it to you.
All documentation points to the resource kit for Exchange 2000, but I
have never been able to find it in there-(

Sander



-Original Message-
From: Andrew Pike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DSAdiag


Hi all,

Does anybody know where I can get my hands on DSAdiag now
www.exinternals.com is no more.

Regards

Andrew Pike 


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: CC:

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

In Exchange 2000 you can limit the number of recipients on the
Properties/Messages page of your virtual SMTP connector. That would mean
the total number of recipients per message, not per TO: and per CC:

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: TO:CC:


Dear List,

Does someone know a way to restrict users to add email addresses in TO
or CC field not more than, lets say 15 addresses.

Regards,
Irfan.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 70-224 Study Materials

[Sander Van Butzelaar]

That is why it looks so silly when a person puts the alphabet soup (esp.
MCSE) after his/her name and asks the group why you need an MX record,
why Exchange 5.5 Admin will not run on his Windows 98 workstation and my
personal favorite, can I delete all these funny log files that take up
so much space.

Sander

Oh I nearly forgot - MCSE NT4  MCSE Windows 2000 ...:-)

-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials


Well if I were posting questions on the site I wouldn't be using my real
name either, given the NDA.  I took 70-215 and also thought it was a bit
silly that I could probably get a passing score and avoid a couple of
weeks
of solid study, simply by familiarising myself with the questions.  Then
again, doing so is taking a bit of a risk, and isn't particularly
satisfying.

 -Original Message-
 From: Lefkovics, William [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:16 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: 70-224 Study Materials
 
 The same way that alt.binaries.transcender.exams does I guess? 
 
 I don't see many people using their real name or email address in this
 forum.  I would rather trust the fine folks in this forum with some
 questions.  Some of the people here were involved in writing the
questions
 and testing the betas for the exam.  Who are you going to trust?  Some
guy
 named 'darthvader2'?
 
 The link 'submit a dump' does make me laugh...
 
 William  
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:13 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials
 
 
 So how does a site like that stay active?  I would think Microsoft or
 someone would be able to shut them down.  It seems like it devalues
 certification.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
 William
 Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:00 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials
 
 Of course, posting questions there from the exam would be in direct
 violation of the NDA signed (clicked) at the time of taking the exam.

 
 William
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:19 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials
 
 
 And don't forget to browse thru 90% of the actual test
questions/answers
 at http://www.mcsebraindumps.com/ (sad to say this).
   
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
 Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:05 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials
 
 When I read the Sybex 70-224 book last year, I noticed quite a few
 errors.  Not all massive errors, but some confusing ones nonetheless.
 Sybex themselves couldn't even get a response from the author!  You
 might like to check out their web site and look under the Errata
section
 for that book, as hopefully they might have updated things by now.
 
 Personally I quite like the MS Press books for both 70-224 and 225.
 
 Neil
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: 18 January 2002 19:42
 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
 Conversation: 70-224 Study Materials
 Subject: 70-224 Study Materials
 
 
 I intend to certify on Exchange 2000 later this year.  I have already
 purchased the Sybex Study Guide (ISBN 078212898X).  If it is as good
as
 the Exchange 5.5 Study Guide was, then that may be all I really need.
 However, I wondered if anyone might point me toward anything else they
 found exceptionally beneficial.  I am keenly interested in something
 which, although geared toward the exam, will provide total knowledge
and
 be a valuable resource afterwards.  I have no interest in a paper
 certification (like one might get using Exam Cram type materials).
 
 Thank you.
 
 Steven A. Christensen
 Network Engineer
 MCSE on Windows 2000
 MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
 Server+, i-Net+, Network+, A+
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 **
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
 Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
 not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
 subsidiary companies.
 If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
 Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED