RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Greg, Ever go to a trade show and get something from a vendor table? Maybe fill out one of those mailers to get a free shirt, or perhaps a free book from Cisco. My office is full of them, I get every shirt I can lay my hands on as my wife likes to use them to sleep in or when the children are playing in paint. I have a really cool shirt that looks like a bear bottle I got at Tech-Ed this year, I couldn't even tell you who the vendor is on it as I have never looked, but that shirt is setting on the top of my book shelf here in the office. Shoot I even have free gifts from vendors that I can promise you I would never use or recommend to anyone, but they are cool gifts, and hey they are free. Your argument is flawed in saying that anyone who has X (coffee cup, T-Shirt, ball, backpack, mints in tin, pen's, calendar, notepad, hat, poster,.. or any 1 of a million free gifts) is, has, might, or could one day act unethically because it might cause them to favor that vendor over another. By your example any one in the food service business who samples the free food at the grocery store is suffering from a real or perceived conflict of interest. Maybe they were just having a snack craving! That's the problem with your never ending mantra about gifts and your issue about weather or not this is a conflict of interest. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 7:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 People mis-characterize and read things into my posts that are not there. This one I have to do in-line. First of all, I've seen plenty of statements by people who accurately depict reasons that your opinion is bunk. You've either not read or not comprehended them. No one in 8 years has proven the statement flawed or illogical that when you work in an industry and accept gifts from vendors in that industry that it presents a real or perceived conflict of interest. This has been the point since day one, is the point today and will be the point tomorrow and the next day and the next. I've seen your comments repeatedly over the years, and continue to disagree with them. Its also painfully obvious to a casual observer that you're using incorrect statements in defense of your position. And ethics are not passed as laws. There is no law that a company's employees cannot accept gifts. The ethics that lawyers and doctors follow are also not laws. While this is technically accurate, in fact it is inaccurate. Both these professions require licenses to practice. Lawyers who decide to cross a relatively arbitrary line involving a conflict of interest can and have been disbarred - in other words, their license to practice law is revoked. Doctors, too, can have their medical license suspended or revoked. In either case, they are not allowed to practice their profession without that license. Ergo, those professions' codes of ethics *are*, if somewhat indirect, law. Yes, I understand and know all that, but that was not the point. Ethics go far, far beyond mere laws. Lawyers can be disbarred for ethics violations but not face any criminal prosecution. Yes, they can also be disbarred AND face criminal prosecution, but the point was made in response to an argument that indicated that ALL ethics must be legislated. Don't take things out of context. Your most asinine statements, however, are your explicit statements that being awarded a vendor sponsored honor automatically removes any and all objectivity for those on whom the honor is bestowed. The fact that you repeatedly use that argument shows me how weak your argument really is, especially since you can't show a single instance of where this actually has happened. I don't say this. I say that it is a real or perceived conflict of interest and hence a violation of basic ethics. I have stated repeatedly that MVP's may well NEVER cause anyone to ACT unethically. And guess what? It is irrelevant, it is still a real or perceived conflict of interest. What part of this are you missing? Because the MVP community is both under NDA's to Microsoft and also has private community newsgroups, you don't see that MVP's as a group are some of the most critical of Microsoft's products and policies. But none of that matters to you, because we're all just in Microsoft's pockets anyways. Its not like 12 of the 24 servers I've deployed this year run non-Microsoft OS's or anything.[1] Again, it does not matter if MVP is the greatest thing since sliced bread, results in world peace and gives every starving kid a home. None of that changes that it is a real or perceived conflict of interest. Again, it matters not one bit if MVP's act unethically or not, it is a conflict of interest plain and simple. I would be willing to bet that most if not all of the MVP's do NOT act unethically because of the title. Guess what? Doesn't matter. Still an violation of
RE: Error -567
This would probably point to a bad/corrupted transaction log. Were there any other error's in the log right before the store stopped? -Original Message- From: Keith Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error -567 Our information store stopped unexpectedly. When we reboot the server it tries to mount the IS and we get this Event: Event Type: Information Event Source: ESE Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 301 Date: 12/18/2003 Time: 8:55:30 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL2 Description: Information Store (3040) 24fb7dbd-f6c6-4884-9e50-995f9523a0dc: The database engine has begun replaying logfile D:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\E0006F77.log. The next event is this: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 454 Date: 12/18/2003 Time: 8:55:43 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL2 Description: Information Store (3040) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -567. What can we do to fix this problem? Thanks in Advance, Keith Mann Network Assistant The Farmers Merchants State Bank _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error -567
Take a look at this MS page: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q266361 Here is the 567 info: #define JET_errDbTimeTooNew -567 /* dbtime on page in advence of the dbtimeBefore in record */ Any more info you can provide would help us help you. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error -567 This would probably point to a bad/corrupted transaction log. Were there any other error's in the log right before the store stopped? -Original Message- From: Keith Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error -567 Our information store stopped unexpectedly. When we reboot the server it tries to mount the IS and we get this Event: Event Type: Information Event Source: ESE Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 301 Date: 12/18/2003 Time: 8:55:30 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL2 Description: Information Store (3040) 24fb7dbd-f6c6-4884-9e50-995f9523a0dc: The database engine has begun replaying logfile D:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\E0006F77.log. The next event is this: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 454 Date: 12/18/2003 Time: 8:55:43 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL2 Description: Information Store (3040) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -567. What can we do to fix this problem? Thanks in Advance, Keith Mann Network Assistant The Farmers Merchants State Bank _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sources of outages
Thankfully (knocking on wood) not here. Why not figure in the desktop's into this calculation? In the last 12 months here, we have had about the following: Comm line/svs 85% (12% scheduled) (most caused by a mass outage due to that little thing called Isable) Servers (mid-range and windows) 2% (all but one outage was scheduled) Routers / Switches 6% (4% scheduled) Desktop (customer service centers) 5% Strange bumps in the night 1% (we don't know, well it wasn't working before I called you type of things, my favorite) -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sources of outages Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate. Agree? Communication lines and services 80 percent Servers 14 percent Routers and switches 1 percent Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
I just saw this Andy, you are so true that is what the legal group would say. I did however turn this around here, we are subject to FOIA, I was able to make the argument against .pst's under that in that we could never show due diligence to giving FOIA access if we had 600 pst files running around. HIPAA helped drive the nail in the .pst coffin. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server 1. making the evidence 10 times more expensive for someone to discover /kidding These things always seem to come from legal. But what's worse? Having one set of Exchange backup tapes subpoenaed or 5000 PC hard drives? It's interesting to see how the timeframe has changed over the years. It seems like in the past everyone was trying to delete everything after 30 days, and now it's 60 days. This is an example of people not understanding what an information economy is. A very sad example I suppose. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server Give me one business (I was going to say good, but that's not possible) reason for this, and I'll give you ten times that many technical reason why the PST solution is a bad one. I hope you went down kicking and screaming on this one. I for one would also be polishing up my resume and kicking down some doors as well. This is only going to get ugly for you from this point out. Good Luck.. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server They are still good for the calendar and contacts, which are exempt from the 60 day limit. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server You might as well retire all your Exchange servers and replace them with something cheaper. Woohoo! Save some money, maybe they will give it back to you as a bonus! Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk
Or this could be a good time to schedule some weekend work and test your D/R procedures. If ease and lack of any downtime is your number one concern and this box is going to stay around for a while, I would look at getting an external drive cage. This would allow you to setup your new raid drive set, then you can just move the db's to your new drive set. If you setup the new box on a separate channel of the controller you could also do some drive performance tuning by looking at the placement of your db's, logs files and page file in reference to the number of physical arms you would have. The external box could also grow into your next server so it would not be a lost investment to your company. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk Put server on bench hang new drives off to side on systems and use optimizer to move! -Original Message- From: Jees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 8:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk No MB, I don't have two spare slots. I want remove the current 3 disks (each 18gb) and replace with either 2/3 new 36gb hd. I have breifly stopped putting in the two 36hd, because, its important to have raid 5. So i have placed an order for another 36gb hd. Will update you later on --- Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have 2 spare slots to put those drives in? If so do that. Then use the performance optimizer to move the stores. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk Hi guys, Will be gratefull if you can contribute to this please. I have an Exchange 5.5, sp4 server on win 2k with sp4. In my Dell Power Edge 2400, i have two scsi disks (01) within this exchange server. Disk 1 has 3 18g hds with a logical drive of G. G contains Exchsrvr folder which hosts priv.edb and pub.edb. its like g:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ and the two edb files. Now, G is near capacity and would like to upgrade it to bigger space. I have purchased two 36gb hd from Dell (based on Dell's advise), and ready to be backing up the G drive and the rest. I would like you to feel free to suggest any tips and tricks that u know off, or any advise. Thanking you __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
Give me one business (I was going to say good, but that's not possible) reason for this, and I'll give you ten times that many technical reason why the PST solution is a bad one. I hope you went down kicking and screaming on this one. I for one would also be polishing up my resume and kicking down some doors as well. This is only going to get ugly for you from this point out. Good Luck.. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server They are still good for the calendar and contacts, which are exempt from the 60 day limit. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server You might as well retire all your Exchange servers and replace them with something cheaper. Woohoo! Save some money, maybe they will give it back to you as a bonus! Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating Exchange 5.5 with PSS cut off
Speaking their names has to be bad luck! Why would you temp the exchange God's that way? Although their posts did add some comic relief when it was greatly needed! -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Migrating Exchange 5.5 with PSS cut off Tener, Avi Smith-Rapaport and Mark Hanji do no longer post here nor have I seen anything from them in the last 6 months. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Boyd, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:47 PM Subject: RE: Migrating Exchange 5.5 with PSS cut off Sorry Eric, when you have spent over 3 years on this list, different aliases, you will appreciate that some of the new contributors' posts can be a little irritating. Talking of irritating contributors what happened to Richard Tenner? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating Exchange 5.5 with PSS cut off It was meant to be a joke, a funny, a juxaposition of disprate ideas used to make spontaneous contractions of the lower abdominal muscles. I was suggesting that we (the list) would be glad to offer our support during his transition, for a nominal fee. This is of course absurd because offering our support for free is what we do anyways. You really should get out more often! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating Exchange 5.5 with PSS cut off You mean as opposed to PSS? What benefits could you provide that Microsoft can not? Will you offer full support for less than $245, and if all fails send a team of engineers on site? Or are you suggesting this is not a relevant discussion item for this list? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating Exchange 5.5 with PSS cut off I'm sure that this discussion list would be glad to provide support for you during you transition, for a nominal fee, of course! ;-) Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migrating Exchange 5.5 with PSS cut off I am a fellow Exchange 5.5 customer who is thinking about migrating to 2000 or 2003 next year. The question is related to Microsoft ceasing support of 5.5 at the end of next year, and how others are managing their migrations because of it. We have a native 2000 AD network with a half dozen or so 5.5 servers. The databases are stored on the SAN, we have 2000 user accounts, OWA and Public folders are fully utilized. The issue is we are time constrained with a more important project that does not end until August next year (I'm sure that sounds familiar to many of you). Currently that project is all encompassing and we do not plan to invest time in the mail migration until the other project is fully completed. Ideally I would have the Exchange migration already completed before the time we are currently planning to start it. My concern is we need a decent cushion of time before 5.5 support ends, incase of interoperability problems, I envisage a mixed 5.5 2k/2k3 migration. It may be that in a mixed 5.5 2k/2k3 environment MS would provide support while we fully move to a support Exchange, even after the PSS cut off time. Any thoughts would be appreciated, am I being over concerned, or should I be pushing to make this more important? E-mail is as important a component to our organization as most people, just the other project is moving our main premises to a new location, including datacenter. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To
OT: ADMT and Computer Migration Fun....
I have tossed this out on the NT list, but wanted to ask over here just in case any of you had ran into this. I have googled it, and have an open question on the newsgroups as well. I am running ADMT and trying to migrate my computer, and every time I get an access is denied to the a registry key, so ADMT can't get what operating system I am running. This is what the log file is giving me: 2003-10-24 12:13:32 Created account input file for remote agents: DCTCache.009 2003-10-24 12:13:32 Installing agent on 1 servers 2003-10-24 12:13:32 The Active Directory Migration Tool Agent will be installed on \\ 2003-10-24 12:13:32 WRN1:7290 Processor architecture for machine \\ is unknown, Error accessing registry key SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Environment rc=5 Access is denied. 2003-10-24 12:13:32 ERR2:7006 Failed to install agent on \\, rc=5 Access is denied. 2003-10-24 12:13:32 ERR2:7005 Failed to launch agent on \\, hr=80070005 Access is denied. 2003-10-24 12:13:33 All agents are installed. The dispatcher is finished. I have checked, and double checked the following; a) Permissions on that key, have even gone as far as giving current domain\administrator full control of that key. b) Verified on the current domain: 1) administrator is a member of the administrators domain admins groups 2) that target domain/domain admins is a member of administrators group c) Verified on the target domain 1) source domain\domain admins is a member of the administrators group I am running ADMT logged onto the target domain as current domain\administrator, I have successfully migrated another XP system this morning without any problems. I can attach to the admin shares without any problems. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Time Stamp issue
We have sort of the same problem here due to daylight savings time and our AS/400's. The time is set correctly on each of them, the zones are the same, however our Windows systems use DST and the 400's could give a rip about that. So what happens is that the systems that support DST offset the time that is coming from the 400's. You could be having the same problem. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Time Stamp issue That's what I think it is but my bosses won't just believe my feelings. I have to prove it... it's a whole OT post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Sure its just not something screwy within whatever app is generating those emails? As an example, in Veritas Backup Exec, the job status email notifications are sometimes off by an hour. Its a bug within BE itself. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: RE: Time Stamp issue And that's what's not making sense. Like I said all other external email is normal just from this sender. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hmmm.. Didn't catch that. The inside time stamp (ie the one embedded in the message) definitely is but the received envelope stamp is based on the mail server's time, adjusted by the client's timezone setting. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Time Stamp issue Both locations are set by the mainframe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Time is set by the sender side. Your mainframe's clock and/or timezone are set incorrectly. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Time Stamp issue We seem to be having an issue with Outlook in all versions. We get emails from our mainframe in the middle of the night. When we receive them in Outlook the pointer in the inbox shows for example, 12am. When we open the message it shows sent as being 1am. This is the only emails that we are getting where the time is messed up. All other emails internal and Internet are correct. Any idea's? I have verified that the time on the machines is correct and checked the time zones but like I said its only from this one sender. Also where do both of those time stamps come from? The pointer and the sent inside the message? Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mail relay
This is the very reason the hey you idiot you sent me a virus messages don't work. Now if we could only get those automated messages turned off. We to have been fighting this with SOBIG, I spent over 8 hours trying to convince a user who only has is a custom recipient on our system that his e-mail account here was not infected with a virus. All because of those stupid messages. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mail relay The way some of the Digital Viruii of the New Frontier work, This will happen. Lets say you and XYZ corp communicate via Email, and you are in his addressbook. They are hit with one of the digital predators(Virus). for every email that virus sends, it will pull two names out of the infected one's address book. one address is the sender, and the other is the reciepient. We've seen this as well. Not alot you can do. I think I got the above right. Anyone have anything to add? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mail relay I have a few users that are being used as a mail relay. They get returned mail from sites and other domains that the message they sent has an virus or they get an NDR message.They have never emailed these people nor do they have any idea why they are getting mail from other sites stating that they sent them. I have looked at all settings on the Exchange server 5.5.. I have the IMC not to relay SMTP. Does anyone have any ideas what i can do. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sobig.F alert
I don't, I am glad that at 3pm on Friday it is an anti-climactic virus event. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert This is the most anti climactic virus ever. I want my money back -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Looks like my upstream has killed routes the all of theseway to go ISP. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert 68.38.159.161 and 65.95.193.138 seem to be the last two standing unless ICMP is turned off on some of the other servers/pc's. Because that really wouldn't matter, the theory is that the infect machines are going to get their instructions from these 20 masters servers and then launch a distributed attack on the root DNS servers..1 minute left -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert well's that where My q came inChris even put up a piece which said they new about 20 servers ..18 OFFL, 2 ONL so then they have ID'd these things right? why not publish the IP and/or the domain names ..so people could block these too... it just say's about UDP port ..couldnt that also change on the fly? bill -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert wouldve been nice for them to publish the IP list so we could block it from our firewalls. Incoming and outgoing. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert If only Arnold wasn't running for governor. We could send him back in time to stop Skynet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert As if we all didn't have enough to do? -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert T-minus 10 minutes . Its the end of the world run for your lives... -Original Message- From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Yes it is. Since we are not sure what the payload is, we patched for the new MDAC security patch. Hey, who knows? Better to be safe than sorry. T-minus 20 minutes. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Oh crap, I didn't think that anyone actually hooked Skynet up to the internet. T-Minus 30 minutes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=1211e=1u=/nm/200308 22 /tc_nm/tech_internet_virus_dcsid=95573372 -Original Message- From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sobig.F alert FYI... http://www.f-secure.com/news/items/news_2003082200.shtml _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5
1st, why not skip Ex2K and go right to E2K3, while your at it go ahead and install Win2K3 2nd, get some books fast 3rd, Exchange 5.5 will run on Win2K or NT4.0 Exchange 2K will run on Win2K take a look at http://support.microsoft.com/?id=810591 for more information. Have fun -Original Message- From: Frank Kenavan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 I currently have an exchange server running v5.5. I have the media to upgrade to v2k. Do I need to upgrade my NT4 boxes to 2k also? Any drawbacks if I don't? Also, I would like to set up a global customer contact list. Is that possible? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.
Running fine for us in a mixed nt/2k/xp area. We have about 800 users on a PIII-450 Xeon with 1gig of ram and 3 arms. No performance problems for any of the users. Have you checked your DNS and WINS setting on the XP systems, how does name resolution to your exchange server work from the cmd prompt. Ping times, etc... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age. Until recently, our Exchange 5.5 Server has been running smoothly. Lately however, it has been running S..L..O..W on occasions. Our server is older (Dell 6300 with Dual 400 MHZ processors and 1.5 GB of memory. 700 users). The only thing that's changed is we have recently started upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP workstations. Almost all those users receive the following message the first time they logon Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server Exchange. You can cancel the request or minimize this message to the Windows taskbar until Outlook closes the message automatically. Some of them receive the message more frequently. Maybe the two issues aren't related, but I thought I'd start here, since it's the only thing that's changed recently. Is anybody else having issues using XP Professional with Exchange 5.5? Thanks. Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers
Simple really, NO. Why would you need it? All that a software inventory, management, etc. tool is going to do is add overhead to a central resource. Have you had problems in the past with strange software just showing up on your servers? We do an annual inventory check of all our core systems. We do use EZ-Audit as a quick check point type of software for our desktop systems and I have gone as far as setting up a system variable on all our servers as a standard, this variable allows us to specifically exclude our servers from that package when someone in IT log's on the systems. I would have to ask management what they are hoping to achieve by doing software inventory/metering on a dedicated production system, then go on record explaining why that is such a bad idea. -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers Hi, Management is looking at placing LanDesk software inventory/metering on all production clusters, Exchange servers, SQL DBs, etc. across our company. I have worked in companies that implement software inventory solutions targeting desktops/clients but not to core service IT systems. My question is: What does your company do? How would you 'resolve' this issue? If your company does not use software inventory on core systems do they or you 'work around' the software inventory issue on core systems? I know how I inventoried core IT systems in my previous experiences but I am interested in what others do/have done. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers
Nope your right, I'm not. If we ran our inventory package to only read from the add/remove program list, then your right it has no system impact. However I really want to know what is installed on the system, so we expand that search to look for executables on all local hard drives. By doing that I know what the user has added that is outside or our system standard. Any program that does that type of search is going to have a disk I/O impact thus have a overall system impact. If I worked in your environment I might change my mind, however I have worked for both large and small organizations and have never felt the need to do software inventory on my production servers. That's just how I choose to do it, not how it has to be done. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers You're not working for a software development company, are you? Aside from IT managed resources, we have a lot of other users running a lot of applications that are not completely under our control. When you run as many servers as we do (150+) with a handful of admins, having the centralized license compliance reporting is really, REALLY handy. With an implementation like this, we only have to go to one place to find and understand exactly what our license burden is. If you're using an inventory package that puts a noticable load on the machine its inventorying, you bought the wrong package. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers Simple really, NO. Why would you need it? All that a software inventory, management, etc. tool is going to do is add overhead to a central resource. Have you had problems in the past with strange software just showing up on your servers? We do an annual inventory check of all our core systems. We do use EZ-Audit as a quick check point type of software for our desktop systems and I have gone as far as setting up a system variable on all our servers as a standard, this variable allows us to specifically exclude our servers from that package when someone in IT log's on the systems. I would have to ask management what they are hoping to achieve by doing software inventory/metering on a dedicated production system, then go on record explaining why that is such a bad idea. -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers Hi, Management is looking at placing LanDesk software inventory/metering on all production clusters, Exchange servers, SQL DBs, etc. across our company. I have worked in companies that implement software inventory solutions targeting desktops/clients but not to core service IT systems. My question is: What does your company do? How would you 'resolve' this issue? If your company does not use software inventory on core systems do they or you 'work around' the software inventory issue on core systems? I know how I inventoried core IT systems in my previous experiences but I am interested in what others do/have done. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
RE: Watch Out - New Virus
is anyone else getting the update source not found error? -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Watch Out - New Virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB LAST.A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Watch Out - New Virus
thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active update from the scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 or so tries I got the update downloaded to my system. Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus It wraps add LAST.A to the end From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700 Aye -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus is anyone else getting the update source not found error? -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Watch Out - New Virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB LAST.A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Thanks, I go there and get our select keys all the time, just never had seen, or paid any attention to the download link. This is great as I am testing this all in the lab and was waiting on this little devil. -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Actually you can unless you are under an open license. If you are on open, you have to order the media kit. Here is the link for select and enterprise. Note you will need your contract info to register for access. Select and Enterprise licenses: https://licensing.microsoft.com/eLicense/L1033/default.asp Once logged in click on the downloads link on the left hand frame. Then you can search for the iso by product. --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 that's what I kind'a figured..but since there was that post about there being one.. but little detail given..I figured Id at least try and see... my poor rep... thanks martin bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 There is no site on MS that you can do that. MSDN maybe, but that's not what you want. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FYI: I contacted my MS rep for the URL and they gave me the eopen.microsoft.com which appears to be basically useless to download.. and While I like my MS rep he had no clue on any of this so IF anyone else could shed some light that would be appreciated thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site where you can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products. You can contact your MS rep to get the URL. You'll need to be added as a user to the site, so contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have this done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add
Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
They also changed the licensing in W2k3 terminal server, not sure I like their reason for doing that little change. I figured their reason was for sites doing an in-place upgrade, but not yet ready to make the exchange conversion, however I'm doing a parallel conversion so I was just wondering if the ADC was needed. I have checked the documentation, and am in the process of doing it again, but only to see if I really need it at all. I know it will work through the trust relationship as I have it running in the lab with out the ADC and my AD users have accounts on the 4.0/5.5 server. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd Those were probably Microsoft's original plans but then for some reason they invented ADC. Must have been a good reason. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
Thanks, our plan is to do a single Saturday migration, however in light of Murphy I'll probably go ahead and do the connector just as a cma procedure. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd If you need to co-exist with some users on 5.5 and some on 2003 then the ADC keeps the Exchange 5.5 directory and your new Active Directory synchronised and ensures that you can route mail between the two. If you can migrate in a single hit then you don't need it. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 12:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Hopefully we all noted that on the wonderful evaluation forms (my evil coworker got cash for doing one of those things, I've been each year since 97 and on his first trip he gets money). I will be the bad guy, I am very pleased that they have joined MEC and Tech-Ed together, working for a government agency I am not able to swing 2 big conferences a year. I was getting ready to start swapping each year, now I don't have to. While the rooms were packed I thought the content was very good, how did it compare to the content of the past MEC's. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact opposite. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. Oh well. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Thanks Martin, got the new definition but learned something strange at the same time Using Trend 3.52 with Ex5.5 SP4, NT4.0 SP6a and have the update set to every hour and it has been working great. I just checked to see what version we were on and all should have been well but we were on 355 not 357, ran the update manually and then checked the logs. By looking in the logs it seems that trend stopped updating at 10pm on the 30th, even the manual update is not showing up in the logs. I am going to Trends site now, but was wondering if any of you other users had seen this in the past. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachments and the Priv
SIS = only one copy until everyone deletes it. -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachments and the Priv Hi, I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out. Is there a link on MS about this or in a book somewhere. I have not been able to find it. As an Exchange Admin I should know this - argh. When an email with attachment gets sent to 'N' people does that attachment stay in the store as one file or is it stored as 'N' files? TIA, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trend 3.51 and Ex 5.5
I have submitted this to Trend, however I didn't know if anyone here had experienced this before. We are running Trend 3.51 and have the autoupdates set to hourly. They stopped working on the 30th, I can still do the manual update but it doesn't show up in the log's. The log has 2000 events in it. Does anyone know how to clear the log file, under log maintenance it is grayed out. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How do I make sure my exchange server is not acting as an Ope n Relay?
Is not talking to AOL a bad thing? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How do I make sure my exchange server is not acting as an Open Relay? I checked, and didn't see that you are running as an open relay. Perhaps the problem you are having is Reverse DNS? I know that AOL requires a Reverse DNS record if you want to talk to it. I had to add it into my records before they would talk to me :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Romeo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How do I make sure my exchange server is not acting as an Open Relay? When ever a recipient from my site trying to send an email to a recipient @aol.com. He/she will receive a message saying Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. Then a few days later he/she will receive another message saying The following recipient(s) could not be reached: I finally talked to technical support at AOL and they are telling me that I have been put on the block domain list because AOL automatically check any IP that sends email to their domain and my IP is acting as An open relay, or also known as third-party relay. How do I stop this? What is the fix? Any comments or suggestion is truly appreciated. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Underground MEC ED List Ev ent
Done, will we get a confermation e-mail, or just show up and drink? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Underground MEC ED List Event One last reminder... RSVP soon if you plan to attend. -Original Message- Please pardon the non-technical nature of the following announcement: Windows .Net is teaming up with MessageOne to sponsor the List Party at next month's TechEd 2003 in Dallas. The List Party will take over the Dallas SpeedZone for this private event - featuring unlimited beer, food and the chance for you to take the wheel of a 300 horsepower dragster or grand prix style race car and test your skill against peers and friends. When: June 1, 2003 Time: 9pm-12am Where: SpeedZone You MUST RSVP to attend this party. Go to the following link: http://www.messageone.com/thelist and use this reservation code: TE-M1EMS-UN The 2003 TechEd List Party Brought to you by MessageOne and Windows .NET Magazine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HIdden Mailboxes
Public Folder -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HIdden Mailboxes Exchange 5.5 - SP4 W2K - SP3 I guess it's not possible to hide a mailbox and still be able to access it by another user?? How do you handle a situation where, for example, you are replacing an employee so you are going to have a mailbox set up to receive responses to an advertisement. But you don't want that mailbox to be visible to the rest of the users since they will most likely figure out what's going on?? Thanks, John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move MSX2000 server and keep the same name
Sounds like it's time for you to test your DR procedure. I haven't done this for 2K however this was my standard for 5.5 server upgrades. -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move MSX2000 server and keep the same name Hi all Does anyone know if this method work? to move an exchange2000 to a new hardware and keep the same name http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289 any comments? thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption
The problem with all of this is that a large encryption infrastructure that covers multiple vendors is a nightmare that I don't even want to start working with. Having some very high level experience with encryption this is a big game, and there is no real way to work it out for this situation. Our 1st response was across the board e-mail encryption, however you have to ask yourself, does this really protect PHI. If you share your encryption with all of your external users, not all of whom are PHI related sites, then your user selects the wrong recipient presto you now have a HIPPA violation. All the policies in the world will not prevent this. So then you have to start asking yourself, how do I cover this. One of the options that I asked about was if we had an internal policy (it's government, they love policy) that prohibited the external transmission of PHI via e-mail. The angry comments I got from our personnel was just amazing, but after hearing them some were valid. So the next step was that all PHI e-mail transfers would be done as attachments, utilizing strong file level encryption (not self-decrypting) and strong passwords. Next step how do you work out the transfer of passwords, who makes the passwords, who controls the passwords. This is not going to be easy. Do we need HIPPA, well probably we do, however most of what HIPPA covers from a technical standpoint is just in keeping with best practices. The one thing HIPPA is not going to beat is human nature, and human nature is why we have the HIPPA violations to begin with. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, at 9:33am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sounds like they're pushing for 100% encryption of all email, which is well beyond my understanding of the expectation under the law. While I don't know about this particular case, I've seen such reactions before in similar, non-HIPPA cases. It goes something like this: Security becomes a concern. Of course, you cannot have security without a good security policy that defines your information assets, risks, threats, counter-measures, and so on. Nor can you have security without user understanding and education. So the IT guys tell the PHBs that their existing policy of driving blindly through the fog is a bad idea. The PHBs react by coming up with crap ideas like everything must be encrypted (without even knowing what encryption actually *is*). Actually fixing their management structure would cost too much. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HIPPA and mail relaying
Since HIPPA is the thread of the day. We are running 5.5 sp3 and I have the Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail tab selected in the Routing tab of the IMS selected. The magic tool that the consultant used, and I don't know what it is, and the CFI LANguard scanner I just used is reporting that the server is an open mail relay. Now the consultant is telling us that he doesn't usually get a false hit on this. So for you exchange guru's out there, have any of you ran into this before, or am I just being a bonehead and missing something. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HIPPA and mail relaying
Sorry, bad day we are using sp4 on the server. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HIPPA and mail relaying Since HIPPA is the thread of the day. We are running 5.5 sp3 and I have the Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail tab selected in the Routing tab of the IMS selected. The magic tool that the consultant used, and I don't know what it is, and the CFI LANguard scanner I just used is reporting that the server is an open mail relay. Now the consultant is telling us that he doesn't usually get a false hit on this. So for you exchange guru's out there, have any of you ran into this before, or am I just being a bonehead and missing something. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HIPPA and mail relaying
It's a great tool, it says the site is an open relay. What it does not say is how it came to the decision or what it's using as its proof. We are co.hanover.va.us and I have done a telnet to port 25 and gotten the 550 error. I'm so confused. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HIPPA and mail relaying Exactly what does the tool say? What is your domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HIPPA and mail relaying Since HIPPA is the thread of the day. We are running 5.5 sp3 and I have the Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail tab selected in the Routing tab of the IMS selected. The magic tool that the consultant used, and I don't know what it is, and the CFI LANguard scanner I just used is reporting that the server is an open mail relay. Now the consultant is telling us that he doesn't usually get a false hit on this. So for you exchange guru's out there, have any of you ran into this before, or am I just being a bonehead and missing something. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HIPPA and mail relaying
Thanks Ed. I don't know what he was looking for, but am just letting all the powers that be know that we are not a relay site. Thanks again Jeff -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HIPPA and mail relaying You're relay secure. Some tools are too good. They test scenarios where Exchange will accept a message for delivery but not relay it. That is, not all such scenarios generate a 550 error, but Exchange doesn't relay them and that's what really matters. I think your tool is reporting a false positive. If the tool was great it would tell you what it was doing and what passed and what failed. If all you're getting is a pass/fail, then the tool leaves something to be desired. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HIPPA and mail relaying It's a great tool, it says the site is an open relay. What it does not say is how it came to the decision or what it's using as its proof. We are co.hanover.va.us and I have done a telnet to port 25 and gotten the 550 error. I'm so confused. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HIPPA and mail relaying Exactly what does the tool say? What is your domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HIPPA and mail relaying Since HIPPA is the thread of the day. We are running 5.5 sp3 and I have the Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail tab selected in the Routing tab of the IMS selected. The magic tool that the consultant used, and I don't know what it is, and the CFI LANguard scanner I just used is reporting that the server is an open mail relay. Now the consultant is telling us that he doesn't usually get a false hit on this. So for you exchange guru's out there, have any of you ran into this before, or am I just being a bonehead and missing something. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server
I am running XP SP1 and having no problems what so ever. Can you resolve the exchange server from the command prompt? A side note, 1st thing I always do to any new system, dump the OEM configuration and put our configs on the systems. I have found this to solve more than one or two problems along the way. Jeff -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server I have a customer who has been connecting to our Exchange servers just fine with MAPI Outlook, across the Internet. They have been receiving new PCs from Dell that are already preconfigured with Windows XP SP1. And for some reason users on those PCs cannot connect to Exchange anymore. I asked him to check the XP's built-in firewall. He says it is disabled. I did an RPC Ping test with him. From old PCs RPC Ping worked fine. But it failed on the new XP SP1 PCs. What else could there be wrong with XP SP1 that would kill RPCs? Thanks for any ideas! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption
Well, we have just started our internal HIPAA audit with the help of an outside counsel and engineer's. Encryption was brought up as an addressable but was strongly stressed as being pushed up in our schedule. Hope you are having just as much fun as we are. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well last info I got from compliance yesterday was we got an extension til Oct 13, 2003. I hope you have better info than I do. :-) -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Actually, Mike, the finalized HIPAA security rule says that email encryption is one of the addressables. They removed it from the required section. Be that as it may, we too, are looking into email encryption. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well, basically, any information transmitted outside of our company through a public channel (internet included) has to be encrypted. Neither the specific type of, nor level of is explicitly stated. What I basically want to do is this. If anyone sends email outside of our company, I want it to be grabbed and encrypted. Decryption I would guess would have to happen at the client on the other side. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption You could have a look at MailMarshal Secure which is an email encryption and decryption gateway. It's an add-on to MailMarshal which provides content filtering, virus checking etc. Are you looking specifically at e-mail encryption or would something like transport layer encryption be sufficient? What does your security policy say? Leeann -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:25 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Exchange server level encryption
Not yet, we did tell him that was on our plan, right after our AD conversion which I hope I can complete by the end of the year. He said it wasn't a requirement, however it was stressed to the point that it should be a requirement. We are now doing the internal network scan for what's wrong with all the servers etc. As far as e-mail he suggested looking at PGP 1st. I want to know how you got off with one day, I am going to be hippa-tized for the rest of the week. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Yeah, tell me about it. I just got hipaa-tized yesterday... It is going to be fun. Have you guys found anything remotely plausible? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well, we have just started our internal HIPAA audit with the help of an outside counsel and engineer's. Encryption was brought up as an addressable but was strongly stressed as being pushed up in our schedule. Hope you are having just as much fun as we are. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well last info I got from compliance yesterday was we got an extension til Oct 13, 2003. I hope you have better info than I do. :-) ***SNIP** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption
Remember we are dealing with a Government regulation here. Yes it does, and that is probably what they want. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption I would think so. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption Doesn't PGP suffer from the same problem, where the recipients need to have a PGP key set up? Erick - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 12:38 PM Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption I'll assume you are talking about SMIME encryption here. What you want to do is not possible in the general sense. You need the recipient's public key in order to encrypt their mail. You would have to have a predefined list of all possible recipients and their public keys. Even if you had this list, I know of no products that implement this (but then again, I've never looked) You could probably rig something up using PGP on a unix box as an outbound gateway. But then all your recipients would need PGP to read the mail. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Properties Export
I was wondering if there is a good way to export all the mailbox properties for users. I have ran the export, however it does not contain all the mailbox information. I am looking for an easy way to get the limits page of the mailbox properties. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Properties Export
Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Properties Export Use header.exe to build an export file which contains the field data you want. On 2/21/03 8:59, Waters, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if there is a good way to export all the mailbox properties for users. I have ran the export, however it does not contain all the mailbox information. I am looking for an easy way to get the limits page of the mailbox properties. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Blackberry Server
Question, as we are a BlackBerry site, and I just saw this wonderful Goodlink. If it is a mirror sync, what happens to mail after the device gets to 8meg's? Can you set a folder to not be synced, so the users could move mail to that folder to keep for archive? Not that I wouldn't love to have the users stay at 8meg's on the store, but I know the users that are using these here, and that would never happen. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server I have to agree with that. We signed up with Cingular running BBE 2.5 to start with and it works fine, but after seeing Goodlink on the handhelds along with the free upgrade to Gl 1.5 we haven't looked back. Goodlink is one sweet platform. 100% sync every ware. My only gripe is that it does not sync a copy of the GAL to the handheld, you have to copy users into your personal contacts list. Miles --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server Sorry just curious about the BB server. Yes with Good technologies Server, it talks directly to my exchange server for the users, The Good server then goes out to Good's main server which is connected to the Mobitex network. So yes my users have a direct extension of their outlook/exchange account right on their 957, real time. Inbox, Contacts, Calendar, Task, Todo 100% sync. No Drafts, Delete Items. So my users Never have to cradle. Note: I don't allow my users Personal Address Books, PST's... (why would you really need them?), keep it all in Contacts on the exchange server etc At the time we looked into this the BB server enterprise(1.5) could not do all this, Im not sure but I dont think even the new ver. of the BB server does all this yet... For curiosity you can find it at www.good.com the service provider is Cingular... my sales guy love it to death bill -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server What about access to Personal Address Books? If you are not using any client desktop manager for your BB, then you are connecting via the Lan directly to the exchange servers, verses, connecting to Outlook on the desktop. So what you are saying is that all I actually need is the Enterprise Software (which I have from BB). Regrister the clients PIM number on the servers side and it will stayed sync'd? Ron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server If you have the BB server why would you sync with a cradle? I run the Good link server for my BB 957 users and once it's setup nobody has to cradle it sync's real time... OK I do have to cradle for software/firm updates to the 957 or charge it...but thats it bill -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server OK. How does sync into the unit suspose to work? When a user places his BB in the cradle it should auto sync with his Outlook (or exchange mailbox. So how does a users get all his unread mail? Ron -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server That's the way it works - you don't get old mail forwarded to it, you can only sync it into the unit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server Have installed the desktop redirector, set redirector rules as follows: Redirect incoming messages to users handheld. Under filter settings, I forward all To BCC and CC to the handheld. Checked forward messages to the handheld. Under advanced, I have folder redirection to inbox only. Under Intellisync, I have sync now setup to reconcile email and sync PIM. Under Configure email, I have sync moves and deletes and handheld wins. I put BB in cradle and have reconcile email and sysnc PIM auto-started. Only get any new incoming email from that point. Ron
RE: New Blackberry Server
thanks for the quick answer, that's what I needed to know, I am thinking about trying to sell this as a BB alternative, just need to think some more. Jeff -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server that's a good Q so far my experience has been that the fact the the new 957's are 8MB doesnt matter. My users are set to 50MB limit on their Exch-MB. Ive found most of the space used is attachments, the attachmnet is NOT downloaded to the 957 until the user selects it, then the system downloads the attachment to the 957, it looks like in pieces too.. also if you do have say multiple folders under inbox you must tell the device to sync them (if you want) SO I have NOT had a space issues on the unit yet..though I guess if a user had huge attachment it might be a problem, then again the download time would stink... For my sales guy's the sync with their inbox and contacts is critical, everything else is nice to have... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server Question, as we are a BlackBerry site, and I just saw this wonderful Goodlink. If it is a mirror sync, what happens to mail after the device gets to 8meg's? Can you set a folder to not be synced, so the users could move mail to that folder to keep for archive? Not that I wouldn't love to have the users stay at 8meg's on the store, but I know the users that are using these here, and that would never happen. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server I have to agree with that. We signed up with Cingular running BBE 2.5 to start with and it works fine, but after seeing Goodlink on the handhelds along with the free upgrade to Gl 1.5 we haven't looked back. Goodlink is one sweet platform. 100% sync every ware. My only gripe is that it does not sync a copy of the GAL to the handheld, you have to copy users into your personal contacts list. Miles --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server Sorry just curious about the BB server. Yes with Good technologies Server, it talks directly to my exchange server for the users, The Good server then goes out to Good's main server which is connected to the Mobitex network. So yes my users have a direct extension of their outlook/exchange account right on their 957, real time. Inbox, Contacts, Calendar, Task, Todo 100% sync. No Drafts, Delete Items. So my users Never have to cradle. Note: I don't allow my users Personal Address Books, PST's... (why would you really need them?), keep it all in Contacts on the exchange server etc At the time we looked into this the BB server enterprise(1.5) could not do all this, Im not sure but I dont think even the new ver. of the BB server does all this yet... For curiosity you can find it at www.good.com the service provider is Cingular... my sales guy love it to death bill -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server What about access to Personal Address Books? If you are not using any client desktop manager for your BB, then you are connecting via the Lan directly to the exchange servers, verses, connecting to Outlook on the desktop. So what you are saying is that all I actually need is the Enterprise Software (which I have from BB). Regrister the clients PIM number on the servers side and it will stayed sync'd? Ron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server If you have the BB server why would you sync with a cradle? I run the Good link server for my BB 957 users and once it's setup nobody has to cradle it sync's real time... OK I do have to cradle for software/firm updates to the 957 or charge it...but thats it bill -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server OK. How does sync into the unit suspose to work? When a user places his BB in the cradle it should auto sync with his Outlook (or exchange mailbox. So how does a users get all his unread
DNS Question
I know this is kind of off exchange, however since I trust ya'all on this list I have a quick question. Are any of you running IBM DNS for your AD infrastructure? We are running it and getting ready for our AD lab and roll out, however I just found something that is troubling me. IBM does not issue TTL's, so unless the client or DHCP (which we are not using) does the delete the record never goes away. So now I have duplicate records where if you ping client.us.gov you get xxx.yyy.zzz.111 and if your ping client1.us.gov you get xxx.yyy.zzz.111. Now client1 has the right address, and client has been off the network for about 6 months. If anyone has ran into this before or is using IBM I would love to hear about any problems or success you have had. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Recovery Assistance PLEASE!
It will be the original site when you get the DR done. Take a look at the DR white papers on the MS site, they will walk you right through this. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server Recovery Assistance PLEASE! Follow-on to the below. I have found MS Article 155216 which pretty much describes what I think I need to do. However, I'm still not clear on the new site thing. If I create a new site with the same org and site name, copy the priv, pub, dir to their correct locations, how does the server rejoin the original site? Thanks again. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server Recovery Assistance PLEASE! Greetings: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows NT4 SP6 SRP Just for fun, my server decided to give me a no boot device found error when I started it up this morning. I ensured the RAIDs were all good, then called Dell tech support. He had me boot from a 2000 CD and examine the C drive which has empty except for a couple of dirs. He suggested I try a repair or parallel install. Hindsight, what I was actually looking at was the D: partition, but I've already reinstalled the OS so it doesn't really matter now. The question. I have my priv and pub still intact and would like to reinstall Exchange and simply move these DBs back to their original locations. Is this possible? I found an article from Rich Matheison on how to do this, but he has the server built in a new site with the same org and site name. How would I get it back to the original site? Should I delete the old server name from the site then install exchange and move the DBs? I'm stuck and the clock is ticking! Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How did I receive this?
as already stated, bcc. The other side, is that by the subject I am assuming this is one of the mighty send me your bank account number and I'll send you my money. We have been getting about a dozen of these a week. I can also say that for the ones we are getting I have been working with our local law enforcement as there is an ongoing investigation about these. It seems that more than one or two lucky individuals have actually given up their account numbers. You may want to check and see if your local contact wants a record of these or not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrivera;elnuevodia.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How did I receive this? I just received an email (and possibly others in my company) but it did not have a 'To:' (receipient). I am attaching all of the information I could gather from the email. How is it possible for an email without a destination recipient to be delivered? Thanks! Raul -- Received: from Webshield (10.1.9.90 [10.1.9.90]) by end_mail.elnuevodia.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id WM4JL53Q; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:40:17 -0400 Received: from unknown(10.1.9.10) by Webshield via csmap id 18092; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:36:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from node-c-3eb5.a2000.nl ([62.194.62.181]) by endfirewall.elnuevodia.com via smtpd (for [10.1.9.90]) with SMTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:49:30 -0400 From: MRS M. SESE SEKO [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 06:38:28 -0800 Subject: BUSINESS ASSISTANCE X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
We have a formal Comp Time policy, it's a 1 for 1 and we can pool up to 80 hours. I have also worked in places that were not so formal, that was more of a give/take type deal. Usually unless it's 2 or more hours I'm not turning it in, it all works out after you add in lunches, leaving 10min early, getting in 10min late etc... -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Viruses via email
I'm sure there are a few (ok more than a few) but the question would be why would you want to. Even in the best managed desktop environment you can't ensure that all the desktops are at the latest definition level, or that you user hasn't chosen to turn off the protection, or worse yet an admin turned it off to update a program and in a rush doesn't turn it back on. With the e-mail you have a limited number, can update at will, scan the mail and at least feel that you are doing the best job possible to keep the little critters out of your world. And the plus is you have control over the process, and yes I am a control nut. just as an FYI we run Trend on the server, and yes I Love It and will pay the price increase, and we run NAV on the desktop with the OL hook, that way the users who are also popping with the client (yes that's another topic!) can't bring one in on the other side. I am very pleased, the A/V along with blocking attachments has served us very well. Jeff -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Getting Close to my final configuration
I think you should use raid 1 with the 9gig drives x 2. One arm for the OS and one arm for the logs. Even at 400 users I could see the performance increase by putting the logs on a different arm. Why would this save you money? Even if you put the Logs and OS on the same Channel but different arms you would be better off. OS = Raid1 Logs = Raid1 Store = Raid5 -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Getting Close to my final configuration Based on your suggestion about properly configuring my new Exchange 2000 box, I have one other question. To save money and time what do you think about using a RAID5 with 9 gig drives for my OS and Logs and use a RAID5 with 36gig drive for my Information Store? Also, is there a document out there that describes how to setup Exchange with multiple drives? It seems pretty straight forward using ESM. Thanks to all. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Any time, I don't know if you have a server, or are going to be getting a new one. If you are getting a new one be sure to take a look at the EXP line of expansion boxes. I also know they are recreating the X line of servers again, and of course they can't leave the good systems in place. The 342 close to the one you have now, and has a good price. The 350 is a great system if you can still find one. Also take a look at the ServeRAID-4H card, it will double your Cache Memory, has a 266 over a 100 Microprocessor, and is a 4 channel card so you can have up to 4 independent disk arms (always a good thing). Happy Server Building! -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Thanks for all of your information. I think we are going to build a new server the proper way and migrate everyone over. I don't think that our CIO would want to risk us doing a DR situation if we don't have to even if it involves more work. Reason being that we have been so busy that no one has ever let us come up with a strategy. This environment has been here for about a year and a half and still no time for us to complete one. That's a whole nother story. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization If you are a single channel RAID5 yes. You would need to crack open the box and disconnect the NETBAY3 from the current channel and connect it to the 2nd channel on the controller. This would break the established RAID. Then you would build the box from the ground up, starting with the IBM Raid CD so you can recreate your drives. If you do this I would recommend you do the OS/Log as a RAID1 (with 2 logical drives) and enroll the 3rd drive as a spare. Then do the 2nd as a RAID5. Think of it as a way to test your DR plans. The good news is if you do it this way and still don't get the performance you are looking for, when you add the EXP you will only have to tell exchange to move your log files to the new drives. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization We have Netbay3. Am I going to have to rebuild the box to do all this? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Do you have the Netfinity NETBAY3 so that you can use up to 6 drives? If you don't, and you aren't using something like the EXP300 external bay then you are physically limited to 3 drives and one arm. If you have the NETBAY3 you can run up to 6 drives with 3 on each channel, or with all 6 on one channel. To go beyond that you are going to be looking at something like the EXP300 or 500 expansion bays. If you don't have the NETBAY3 I would get one, and then get the store on a different arm/channel. Here are your choices as I see them from the top of my head. using a NETBAY3; 1 channel and 3 raid 1 drives, then you could do os, logs, and store on separate drives however you are still going to take a performance hit because they are all on the same channel. 2 channels 1- Raid1 drive and 2 logical drives on 1 channel for the OS and Logs 1- Raid1 drive with 1 logical drive for the store. Not the optimum, however you will at least get your logs and store on separate drive arms. I had this for a couple of years and it worked fine. Get yourself an EXP unit; 1-Raid 1 in the server for the OS 1-Raid 1 in the EXP for the logs 1-Raid 5 in the EXP for the stores The EXP is a duel channel bus, this would put your OS, Logs and Store all on separate channels and give you the best performance. What I have done for our severs is run both the NETBAY3 and an EXP500, this allows me to run two channels within the servers, and split the EXP between two servers. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Oh it's a 86565RY. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Sorry brain dead, I missed the netfinity part. What server are you running this in? If you have the IBM raid manager loaded you can run that within windows, otherwise you either run the config or open the box up. Your server configuration is going to determine how the drives are setup. If you get me the model of IBM server you have I can give more information. I know the 4M card very well as we have a few of them here. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
I don't, however that's not saying a lot because as a rule I will not use any type of Ghost or H/D image for servers. I am still from the old school that a server should be built and installed from scratch each and every time. It's hard to teach an old dog a new trick. Sorry -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Hey you don't by chance know of anything that would Ghost these servers would you. Symantec and Server Image both say they wont work. They said it wouldn't work with Compaq's either but it does. I know that it doesn't with these though. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Any time, I don't know if you have a server, or are going to be getting a new one. If you are getting a new one be sure to take a look at the EXP line of expansion boxes. I also know they are recreating the X line of servers again, and of course they can't leave the good systems in place. The 342 close to the one you have now, and has a good price. The 350 is a great system if you can still find one. Also take a look at the ServeRAID-4H card, it will double your Cache Memory, has a 266 over a 100 Microprocessor, and is a 4 channel card so you can have up to 4 independent disk arms (always a good thing). Happy Server Building! -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Thanks for all of your information. I think we are going to build a new server the proper way and migrate everyone over. I don't think that our CIO would want to risk us doing a DR situation if we don't have to even if it involves more work. Reason being that we have been so busy that no one has ever let us come up with a strategy. This environment has been here for about a year and a half and still no time for us to complete one. That's a whole nother story. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization If you are a single channel RAID5 yes. You would need to crack open the box and disconnect the NETBAY3 from the current channel and connect it to the 2nd channel on the controller. This would break the established RAID. Then you would build the box from the ground up, starting with the IBM Raid CD so you can recreate your drives. If you do this I would recommend you do the OS/Log as a RAID1 (with 2 logical drives) and enroll the 3rd drive as a spare. Then do the 2nd as a RAID5. Think of it as a way to test your DR plans. The good news is if you do it this way and still don't get the performance you are looking for, when you add the EXP you will only have to tell exchange to move your log files to the new drives. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization We have Netbay3. Am I going to have to rebuild the box to do all this? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Do you have the Netfinity NETBAY3 so that you can use up to 6 drives? If you don't, and you aren't using something like the EXP300 external bay then you are physically limited to 3 drives and one arm. If you have the NETBAY3 you can run up to 6 drives with 3 on each channel, or with all 6 on one channel. To go beyond that you are going to be looking at something like the EXP300 or 500 expansion bays. If you don't have the NETBAY3 I would get one, and then get the store on a different arm/channel. Here are your choices as I see them from the top of my head. using a NETBAY3; 1 channel and 3 raid 1 drives, then you could do os, logs, and store on separate drives however you are still going to take a performance hit because they are all on the same channel. 2 channels 1- Raid1 drive and 2 logical drives on 1 channel for the OS and Logs 1- Raid1 drive with 1 logical drive for the store. Not the optimum, however you will at least get your logs and store on separate drive arms. I had this for a couple of years and it worked fine. Get yourself an EXP unit; 1-Raid 1 in the server for the OS 1-Raid 1 in the EXP for the logs 1-Raid 5 in the EXP for the stores The EXP is a duel channel bus, this would put your OS, Logs and Store all on separate channels and give you the best performance. What I have done for our severs is run both the NETBAY3 and an EXP500, this allows me to run two channels within the servers, and split the EXP between two servers
RE: Backup Hardware
just jumping in late here but why not play this the other way, ask him for permission to run a DR drill using the take home drive. Invite him to play, then when it fails you can start talking about a real DR backup plan. You know its crap, we know its crap, the secret is to show the idiot this without saying look you idiot this is not going to work. Just my .02 Jeff -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware See I already knew the backup strategy was crap. Yet my boss thought it was a great idea. So the easiest way to win the argument was to show the failure of the physical device instead of talking strategy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 9:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware I quite agree, you seem to be missing the point that the backup strategy is crap, and it's not due to hard disk transportation issues. I think you have the ammo you were after, now use it! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Get off that angle. He's not dragging it home from the bumper, he's giving it a ride on a nice upholstered seat in his Lexus. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:20 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Backup Hardware Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Still wouldn't all the vibration and shocks that the HD will suffer from transport eventually lead to corruption or bad sectors? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware And if that is the case, he could be transporting a blank hot spare back and forth. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Must be a RAID1 (2 drives) + one hot spare. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Which is what I was thinking too. But my boss swears that there's 3 drives in there connected to that controller. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Only one drive out of the RAID5? Maybe I did not read that correctly but he only has bits of part of the data. What can he accomplish with that one drive in case of disaster? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
yes/no What is your hardware config? We have about 750 on one PII 450 Xeon system and are not having any performance issues at all. What else is running on this box. Need input. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hard Drive Utilization Does anyone else with a fairly large environment (+500 on one Server) have slowness issues related to hard drive utilization? By that I mean speed not actually how large. Are box runs very slow and the hard drives look peaked. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Do you have it set so that the OS,Logs, store are all on the same disk arm? In a optimum environment you would want it so that the OS and logs are on two separate Raid1 arms, and the store would be on a Raid5 arm. If this is one big arm with multiple drives that is why you are getting killed. Jeff -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Netfinity Ultra 160 4M. RAID 5 -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization What is your hard drive config? What type of SCSI controller are you using? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization We have about 850 people on a dual 933 pIII with 2GB of ram. There is 140GB of storage on RAID5 and Gigabit Ethernet. I ran a perfmon on the hard drives and they run at close to 100% all the time. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization yes/no What is your hardware config? We have about 750 on one PII 450 Xeon system and are not having any performance issues at all. What else is running on this box. Need input. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hard Drive Utilization Does anyone else with a fairly large environment (+500 on one Server) have slowness issues related to hard drive utilization? By that I mean speed not actually how large. Are box runs very slow and the hard drives look peaked. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
sorry I missed the other post. That is your problem, you really, really, really need to get a multi-channel Raid card, the put the OS, Logs, and store on separate arms. Until then you performance is only going to get worse. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization No everything is on the same RAID. We have Blackberry Server edition but that barely does anything we only 5 people using it. Also we have Norton AV but I have shut that off and it still runs hot. Only the drives though the processor only runs at like 20% -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Are logs and db on same raid 5 set? Logs should always be on Raid 1 and db on raid 5 (in an ideal environment). Logs are sequential I/O's where DB's are random I/O's. Are there other applications other than exchange running on the server? Are backups taking place at the same time (i.e. peak business hours)? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Netfinity Ultra 160 4M. RAID 5 -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization What is your hard drive config? What type of SCSI controller are you using? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization We have about 850 people on a dual 933 pIII with 2GB of ram. There is 140GB of storage on RAID5 and Gigabit Ethernet. I ran a perfmon on the hard drives and they run at close to 100% all the time. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization yes/no What is your hardware config? We have about 750 on one PII 450 Xeon system and are not having any performance issues at all. What else is running on this box. Need input. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hard Drive Utilization Does anyone else with a fairly large environment (+500 on one Server) have slowness issues related to hard drive utilization? By that I mean speed not actually how large. Are box runs very slow and the hard drives look peaked. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Sorry brain dead, I missed the netfinity part. What server are you running this in? If you have the IBM raid manager loaded you can run that within windows, otherwise you either run the config or open the box up. Your server configuration is going to determine how the drives are setup. If you get me the model of IBM server you have I can give more information. I know the 4M card very well as we have a few of them here. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization well we have a multi channel card but how do I do this now that everything is configured this way? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization sorry I missed the other post. That is your problem, you really, really, really need to get a multi-channel Raid card, the put the OS, Logs, and store on separate arms. Until then you performance is only going to get worse. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization No everything is on the same RAID. We have Blackberry Server edition but that barely does anything we only 5 people using it. Also we have Norton AV but I have shut that off and it still runs hot. Only the drives though the processor only runs at like 20% -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Are logs and db on same raid 5 set? Logs should always be on Raid 1 and db on raid 5 (in an ideal environment). Logs are sequential I/O's where DB's are random I/O's. Are there other applications other than exchange running on the server? Are backups taking place at the same time (i.e. peak business hours)? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Netfinity Ultra 160 4M. RAID 5 -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization What is your hard drive config? What type of SCSI controller are you using? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization We have about 850 people on a dual 933 pIII with 2GB of ram. There is 140GB of storage on RAID5 and Gigabit Ethernet. I ran a perfmon on the hard drives and they run at close to 100% all the time. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization yes/no What is your hardware config? We have about 750 on one PII 450 Xeon system and are not having any performance issues at all. What else is running on this box. Need input. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hard Drive Utilization Does anyone else with a fairly large environment (+500 on one Server) have slowness issues related to hard drive utilization? By that I mean speed not actually how large. Are box runs very slow and the hard drives look peaked. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
Do you have the Netfinity NETBAY3 so that you can use up to 6 drives? If you don't, and you aren't using something like the EXP300 external bay then you are physically limited to 3 drives and one arm. If you have the NETBAY3 you can run up to 6 drives with 3 on each channel, or with all 6 on one channel. To go beyond that you are going to be looking at something like the EXP300 or 500 expansion bays. If you don't have the NETBAY3 I would get one, and then get the store on a different arm/channel. Here are your choices as I see them from the top of my head. using a NETBAY3; 1 channel and 3 raid 1 drives, then you could do os, logs, and store on separate drives however you are still going to take a performance hit because they are all on the same channel. 2 channels 1- Raid1 drive and 2 logical drives on 1 channel for the OS and Logs 1- Raid1 drive with 1 logical drive for the store. Not the optimum, however you will at least get your logs and store on separate drive arms. I had this for a couple of years and it worked fine. Get yourself an EXP unit; 1-Raid 1 in the server for the OS 1-Raid 1 in the EXP for the logs 1-Raid 5 in the EXP for the stores The EXP is a duel channel bus, this would put your OS, Logs and Store all on separate channels and give you the best performance. What I have done for our severs is run both the NETBAY3 and an EXP500, this allows me to run two channels within the servers, and split the EXP between two servers. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Oh it's a 86565RY. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Sorry brain dead, I missed the netfinity part. What server are you running this in? If you have the IBM raid manager loaded you can run that within windows, otherwise you either run the config or open the box up. Your server configuration is going to determine how the drives are setup. If you get me the model of IBM server you have I can give more information. I know the 4M card very well as we have a few of them here. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization well we have a multi channel card but how do I do this now that everything is configured this way? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization sorry I missed the other post. That is your problem, you really, really, really need to get a multi-channel Raid card, the put the OS, Logs, and store on separate arms. Until then you performance is only going to get worse. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization No everything is on the same RAID. We have Blackberry Server edition but that barely does anything we only 5 people using it. Also we have Norton AV but I have shut that off and it still runs hot. Only the drives though the processor only runs at like 20% -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Are logs and db on same raid 5 set? Logs should always be on Raid 1 and db on raid 5 (in an ideal environment). Logs are sequential I/O's where DB's are random I/O's. Are there other applications other than exchange running on the server? Are backups taking place at the same time (i.e. peak business hours)? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Netfinity Ultra 160 4M. RAID 5 -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization What is your hard drive config? What type of SCSI controller are you using? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization We have about 850 people on a dual 933 pIII with 2GB of ram. There is 140GB of storage on RAID5 and Gigabit Ethernet. I ran a perfmon on the hard drives and they run at close to 100% all the time. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization yes/no What is your hardware config? We have about
RE: Hard Drive Utilization
If you are a single channel RAID5 yes. You would need to crack open the box and disconnect the NETBAY3 from the current channel and connect it to the 2nd channel on the controller. This would break the established RAID. Then you would build the box from the ground up, starting with the IBM Raid CD so you can recreate your drives. If you do this I would recommend you do the OS/Log as a RAID1 (with 2 logical drives) and enroll the 3rd drive as a spare. Then do the 2nd as a RAID5. Think of it as a way to test your DR plans. The good news is if you do it this way and still don't get the performance you are looking for, when you add the EXP you will only have to tell exchange to move your log files to the new drives. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization We have Netbay3. Am I going to have to rebuild the box to do all this? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Do you have the Netfinity NETBAY3 so that you can use up to 6 drives? If you don't, and you aren't using something like the EXP300 external bay then you are physically limited to 3 drives and one arm. If you have the NETBAY3 you can run up to 6 drives with 3 on each channel, or with all 6 on one channel. To go beyond that you are going to be looking at something like the EXP300 or 500 expansion bays. If you don't have the NETBAY3 I would get one, and then get the store on a different arm/channel. Here are your choices as I see them from the top of my head. using a NETBAY3; 1 channel and 3 raid 1 drives, then you could do os, logs, and store on separate drives however you are still going to take a performance hit because they are all on the same channel. 2 channels 1- Raid1 drive and 2 logical drives on 1 channel for the OS and Logs 1- Raid1 drive with 1 logical drive for the store. Not the optimum, however you will at least get your logs and store on separate drive arms. I had this for a couple of years and it worked fine. Get yourself an EXP unit; 1-Raid 1 in the server for the OS 1-Raid 1 in the EXP for the logs 1-Raid 5 in the EXP for the stores The EXP is a duel channel bus, this would put your OS, Logs and Store all on separate channels and give you the best performance. What I have done for our severs is run both the NETBAY3 and an EXP500, this allows me to run two channels within the servers, and split the EXP between two servers. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Oh it's a 86565RY. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Sorry brain dead, I missed the netfinity part. What server are you running this in? If you have the IBM raid manager loaded you can run that within windows, otherwise you either run the config or open the box up. Your server configuration is going to determine how the drives are setup. If you get me the model of IBM server you have I can give more information. I know the 4M card very well as we have a few of them here. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization well we have a multi channel card but how do I do this now that everything is configured this way? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization sorry I missed the other post. That is your problem, you really, really, really need to get a multi-channel Raid card, the put the OS, Logs, and store on separate arms. Until then you performance is only going to get worse. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization No everything is on the same RAID. We have Blackberry Server edition but that barely does anything we only 5 people using it. Also we have Norton AV but I have shut that off and it still runs hot. Only the drives though the processor only runs at like 20% -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hard Drive Utilization Are logs and db on same raid 5 set? Logs should always be on Raid 1 and db on raid 5 (in an ideal environment). Logs are sequential I/O's where DB's are random I/O's. Are there other applications other than exchange running
RE: TEST - Answer
os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
only if you will hum the theme song -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers with the other parties stating the question... So far Jeff Waters has a 100point for the right question to the answer... will he risk it and go for the bonus? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracing Computers making repeated Logon Requests
If you can't do a ping systemname and you are running wins, they are probably going to be coming from the UNIX system. These will not be registered in your WINS database. Have you tried to ping using the FQDN? -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tracing Computers making repeated Logon Requests Okay, here is all that I know about my infrastructure besides what I mentioned. Its all UNIX based and I have not access to any of it. The routers and switches (and the fiber optic backbone) is all controlled by a different department. My W2K servers do not run DNS or DHCP, however I do have a WINS server (it just struck me that I should look to see if the workstations registered there when they attempted to log on to those servers). I don't know how to setup a workstation o update the DNS so I can't answer your first part. I do know that I am half Windows XP and half Windows 2000. Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tracing Computers making repeated Logon Requests Chuck, You didn't mention much about your infrastructure; but *if* the workstations in question are Win2k (and are set to update the DNS), you can do an nslookup on the hostname. If you provide DHCP to them, you might be able to find the IP that the DHCP server gave out to the hostname. (Even the MS DHCP server provides some basic logging) Not sure what brand of network gear you have; but [even] on our Nortel switches, I can do a lookup of the MAC address, and find out what port it is on on the switch in question we are fully switched, and have implemented VLANs, so I know by IP Address what switch to look on) HTH Arron === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Tracing Computers making repeated Logon Requests Hey all, This is really off topic, but I am having problems find a solution. There are a number of workstations that are repeatedly trying to hack my admin password on two of my subnets. I can see when they try their password attempts and they are using basic Microsoft Authentication. However the Event Viewer only gives me the workstation name (and the domain/work group name which is the same as the workstation name). Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I could pin down an IP address. The nature of these attempts (and timing) could point out that some student either has been hacked or is purposely running these. As such, if I can discern an IP address I can put an end to them. Thanks, Chuck _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 8.6 - Open File Option
Just to ask, are you only going to use this for exchange? If so then just like everyone has said. However if you are going to be doing other backups with this software then the OFO is worth the cash. We currently run 8.6 with the OFO, Exchange, and SQL options installed, however we run 3 drives at once and use it for our enterprise backups as well, thus the OFO. Jeff -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 6:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 8.6 - Open File Option You just need the Exchange option. He is a salesman - he wants your money (and his cut), that is why he wants you to buy the OFO. There is absolutely no need for it on an Exchange server. The open file option attempts to back up your database (which is open), which the Exchange option does in a sensible way. This is a pointless waste of tape and will not do anything to help you in any way, shape or form. And yes, anything with an O, F or M: in Exchange is BAD Tris - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 August 2002 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 8.6 - Open File Option 1.) From the FAQ I only see: 4.4 Q: ...OpenFile Agent...? A: Open File Agent = BAD. with no explanation... However, I tend to believe the Exchange community over what a salesperson tells me. He was going on and on and on about how much I need this option without really saying why. OFO = Open File Option, OOF = Out Of OFfice? Huh? Did I mention anything about it? Or just all permutations of O's and F's = BAD? AW On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, you wrote: 1.) FAQ -OFO, OOF = BAD 2.) I Believe you need the exchange agent NOT the OFO -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 8.6 - Open File Option Hello, I am thinking about purchasing Backup Exec to backup Exchange 2000, and the sales rep asked me if I want the Open File Option. Since I will be making online backups of the server at night when no one is ever logged on, do I really need to pay the extra 441 Euro for this option? AW _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
We use the controls in our AC units. The room is on its own loop with 4 units running. If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call person to alert them of the problem. We over did the room by one unit, and we doubled up the outside units. The only single point of failure we have is if someone cuts the chilled water lines. We are using all Leibert equipment in our computer room. These units are also on our circuit with the backup generator. When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very close attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: None Exchange related Hi ALL I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I have been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down? Can some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to know if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me. THANK EVERYONE Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that. I wanted the systems to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others involved. What type of SLA do you have with UUNET? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related We use the controls in our AC units. The room is on its own loop with 4 units running. If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call person to alert them of the problem. We over did the room by one unit, and we doubled up the outside units. The only single point of failure we have is if someone cuts the chilled water lines. We are using all Leibert equipment in our computer room. These units are also on our circuit with the backup generator. When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very close attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: None Exchange related Hi ALL I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I have been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down? Can some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to know if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me. THANK EVERYONE Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
Isn't that cheating? Although if I had that kind of setup, I would probably use it as well. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same building as UUNET and I have a special access card to the Data Centre. We have our own cabinets in the Data Centre to keep our toys in. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 July 2002 02:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that. I wanted the systems to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others involved. What type of SLA do you have with UUNET? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related We use the controls in our AC units. The room is on its own loop with 4 units running. If the temp or humidity goes out of spec then the system calls our facilities guys who in turn fix it or contact our on call person to alert them of the problem. We over did the room by one unit, and we doubled up the outside units. The only single point of failure we have is if someone cuts the chilled water lines. We are using all Leibert equipment in our computer room. These units are also on our circuit with the backup generator. When we upgraded our computer room last year, we paid very close attention to the HVAC systems and how they were being hooked up. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: None Exchange related Hi ALL I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I have been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down? Can some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to know if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me. THANK EVERYONE Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: access to multiple mailboxes
PF I use about a dozen of them here. -Original Message- From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: access to multiple mailboxes I have individuals using their own email. No problem. Now we have a dummy user that receives specific mail from our website. Several people need access to this mailbox. So I add them as users allowed to 'send as' and give them rights to the mailbox. Then I set up outlook so the users can open their own or the other mailbox. This works fine for power users but restricted users cannot open the common mailbox. How do I work around this?? -- Reed L. O'Brien VisionOnline, Inc. 10511 Braddock Road, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22032 703-425-4800 703-425-6885 fax www.visiononline.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --last line of the author's message-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: access to multiple mailboxes
Have you looked at using public folders for this? They are easy to setup, easy to maintain, never require a visit to the users desktop, etc. -Original Message- From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: access to multiple mailboxes That's how I had it set up before, but it caused people to be redundant. Here's the idea. Part of our core business is IT staffing. So we receive a lot of resumes. Different people go in and review them. If they match certain criterion they are entered into our database. If several people receive each they will each process the same thing. Whereas if they access the same box anything already done will be gone...Aside from keeping 5 or 6 copies of each resume sent in different mailboxes takes up space. -Original Message- From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: access to multiple mailboxes We have our mail from our website go to distribution lists and we just add user's to that list and they get the mail in their own Inbox. -Original Message- From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: access to multiple mailboxes I have individuals using their own email. No problem. Now we have a dummy user that receives specific mail from our website. Several people need access to this mailbox. So I add them as users allowed to 'send as' and give them rights to the mailbox. Then I set up outlook so the users can open their own or the other mailbox. This works fine for power users but restricted users cannot open the common mailbox. How do I work around this?? -- Reed L. O'Brien VisionOnline, Inc. 10511 Braddock Road, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22032 703-425-4800 703-425-6885 fax www.visiononline.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --last line of the author's message-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: access to multiple mailboxes
without any problems at all. I have about a dozen of them setup as mailbox's for our departments that get mail and attachments all the time. Our more creative departments have a file structure within them that they use to track their work flow. When you setup the folder you decide what type of items it will contain and then just setup the permissions from there. The user can add it to their outlook bar, or use the folder list to view the contents of them. If you haven't played with them I would create one as a test. Do you have your mail from this list sent to your inbox, if so create a public folder and subscribe it to this list. You can then set your personnel account so that you don't receive any messages. Jeff -Original Message- From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: access to multiple mailboxes Hey thanks for the help. I went to find out what the exact error wording was and poof it was working fine. Wouldn't work on Friday even with logoff. I guess maybe it needed reboot to alter registry or something. As a question though Jeff can I dump mail (or attachments) into a public folder? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: access to multiple mailboxes Have you looked at using public folders for this? They are easy to setup, easy to maintain, never require a visit to the users desktop, etc. -Original Message- From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: access to multiple mailboxes That's how I had it set up before, but it caused people to be redundant. Here's the idea. Part of our core business is IT staffing. So we receive a lot of resumes. Different people go in and review them. If they match certain criterion they are entered into our database. If several people receive each they will each process the same thing. Whereas if they access the same box anything already done will be gone...Aside from keeping 5 or 6 copies of each resume sent in different mailboxes takes up space. -Original Message- From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: access to multiple mailboxes We have our mail from our website go to distribution lists and we just add user's to that list and they get the mail in their own Inbox. -Original Message- From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: access to multiple mailboxes I have individuals using their own email. No problem. Now we have a dummy user that receives specific mail from our website. Several people need access to this mailbox. So I add them as users allowed to 'send as' and give them rights to the mailbox. Then I set up outlook so the users can open their own or the other mailbox. This works fine for power users but restricted users cannot open the common mailbox. How do I work around this?? -- Reed L. O'Brien VisionOnline, Inc. 10511 Braddock Road, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22032 703-425-4800 703-425-6885 fax www.visiononline.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --last line of the author's message-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: URGENT HELP for Exchange 5.5
is subadmin the service account? -Original Message- From: Subbi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 2:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT HELP for Exchange 5.5 hi, I am using Exchange 5.5 and is running sucveffuly for last 4 years, now due to security reason I have to change the username. We had created a user called subadmin which is also my NT domain Admin. Exchange is installed in a member server and we loging in as subadmin there. Now can i run the exchange server from local admin of the Server _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SQ - urgent
ROFLMAO -- wait does this count? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the message. Once the Exchange server hands the message off, it no longer cares about it. Unless of course you believe in the new e-mail tracking program developed by Bill Gates. If you forward this e-mail to 50 people you get a gift certificate to Disney Land. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't know anything anymore... also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date? gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent Well, let us know how it goes. We are all on the edge of our seats. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent found it, it doesn't seem to work in general, but a date specific search does function... -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus Sent: 25 June, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent That doesn't do anything... -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get. A -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SQ - urgent I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent out... where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into it...) Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh? All the best, Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages
yep, and a new network guy... hey we should be running this, after all it's a Fixup! -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages My money says yes and they have the SMTP Fixup Enabled -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages are you behind a PIX Firewall? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Receiving Duplicate Messages Hello All, I have a W2k box with Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user who is getting duplicate messages from 1 specific person. This person says she is able to send email to other people and they are not getting duplicates. I really think that there is a problem on their side, but I will investigate things here. Do you have ideas as to why MY email server would be duplicating email messages for one user only? Here comes the newbie questionIs there a way I can monitor or check if a piece of email is being duplicated by exchange? Thanks for any help. I don't know the person sending the mail, so I have no information on their setup. I will be trying to call their LAN administrator and figure it all out. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages
It's the nature of the beast, it can affect 1, 2, 10, or all of your e-mail. Also you might only have one person complaining. Go to you networking group and ask them to put the no fixup protocol smtp 25 command into the config for the box. SMTP fixup is the mail guard feature of the pix, and this is a known problem with it. Jeff -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages Why would only one person in our company be getting duplicates? I'll be honest. I have no idea what SMTP Fixup even is. Ya gotta learn somewhere. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages My money says yes and they have the SMTP Fixup Enabled -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Receiving Duplicate Messages are you behind a PIX Firewall? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Receiving Duplicate Messages Hello All, I have a W2k box with Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user who is getting duplicate messages from 1 specific person. This person says she is able to send email to other people and they are not getting duplicates. I really think that there is a problem on their side, but I will investigate things here. Do you have ideas as to why MY email server would be duplicating email messages for one user only? Here comes the newbie questionIs there a way I can monitor or check if a piece of email is being duplicated by exchange? Thanks for any help. I don't know the person sending the mail, so I have no information on their setup. I will be trying to call their LAN administrator and figure it all out. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wal-Mart
Not even going to talk about the Bass Fish'n. Can you say Table Rock. See I knew you could. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Say it with me: Ozark mountains. Sounds pretty cool, eh? Rides pretty hot. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart I thought Arkansas was flat and straight. Did they make the twisty roads to cheer themselves up? -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Any ExAdmin that's also a motorcyclist would be more than happy to commute on Arkansas twisties. Arkansas two-lanes may be the best-kept secret in cycledom. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Doesn't decent pay in Arkansas equate to being enough to afford the Learjet to commute home to a real state every night? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago. The pay was decent...but it's still in Arkansas. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone else worked there and what they thought about the working environment. They are switching from 5.5 to 2000. - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure. Juuust curious. :-) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Wal-Mart Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Exchange Administrator...Tools...Track Message. Welcome to exchange, get yourself a few good books, I would recommend Exchange Server 5.5 Unleashed as a good starting point. The online help is great as well. Read the FAQ's here. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Get a refund! -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Let me rephrase that: Lets see you've been out of college for 3 months and have your MCSENext or Let see you've been out of college for 3 months and have your CCIENext See the difference.. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
So because you had a paper MCSE, and a very little experience, you chose to say that they were lazy because they didn't have their MCSE? Don't follow the logic. Jeff -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question They had very little experience, and I asked them what the last book they read and neither could name a book- would you hire them? But you are right, I could use some education, no denying that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So to you the lack of a MCSE means they werent interested in educating themselves? Sheesh. Sounds like you need some education yourself. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Cerification question
Thank You! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my first exchange book just yesterday by a friend. Have not had the time to read them. Yet I have worked with installs as large 30,000 users in exchange, As a hired consultant. Yesterday I added a few new T1's to a few of the 100's of routers the company I work for, as a day job, owns. I am solely responsible for all of those routers as well the rest of the network and a 5,000 user install of Exchange. Books and paper mean very little... Would you hire a paper MCSE over me? Would you hire someone who could Quote the OSI model over me? Why memorize what I have one the wall and in Text files. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question They had very little experience, and I asked them what the last book they read and neither could name a book- would you hire them? But you are right, I could use some education, no denying that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So to you the lack of a MCSE means they werent interested in educating themselves? Sheesh. Sounds like you need some education yourself. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you.
RE: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email
Are you using a PIX Firewall, if so have your network administrator turn off the smtp fixup protocol. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email Hello, We are using TrendMicro Interscan 3.52 to deliver internet email. I have had sporadic complaints from our staff that clients are getting multiple copies of the same email - upto 15. I have talked to Trend about it and they say that it is not a problem with their software. Any ideas on how I can correct this problem greatly appreciated. Thanks, Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil /d
As granddad once said, if it ain't broke don't fix it! -Original Message- From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eseutil /d I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation (offline) should be done as routine maintenance. I don't share this opinion, but I am having a hard time finding evidence to support my belief. Does anyone know of any links that support the theory that eseutil should not be used for regular maintenance or am I wrong and should it be part of regular maintenance? Exchange 5.5 environment. Thanks for any help anyone can provide. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil /d
True, however I didn't do the service pac's because I thought it would reduce my white space, or even decrease my backup times. I (as most of us?) did/do the upgrades, service pac's, hot fixes, etc. for very specific reasons. I get the should we be doing (insert your utility here) on a schedule? every now and then, usually right after someone has read a book, or went to a class. Some we should and do, however some, such as eseutil /d have no business being used as a scheduled maintenance utility. Just my .02, your mileage may very. Jeff -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil /d I do not totally agree with that statement though. Granddad or Jim McBee. Otherwise, I would still be on Exchange5.5 sp2 (or WinGate or Postfix on BSD) instead of Exchange2000 sp2. It's like the technical solutions / behavioral problems quote. We use it when it fits. That said, I am too lazy to search the archives for the 300+ times Daniel, Ed, etc discussed how ineffective and unnecessary running this utility beyond the few times it is actually needed. William -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil /d Try reading Jim McBee's book - Exchange 247. It talks about this very issue. Basically, it comes down to the view, from my reading, that if it ain't broke - leave it alone. If you aren't seeing any errors in the Event logs that clue you into a problem with the databases don't go begging for trouble - you are likely to find it. All the best in your battle with your coworkers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: paragon400 Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: eseutil /d I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation (offline) should be done as routine maintenance. I don't share this opinion, but I am having a hard time finding evidence to support my belief. Does anyone know of any links that support the theory that eseutil should not be used for regular maintenance or am I wrong and should it be part of regular maintenance? Exchange 5.5 environment. Thanks for any help anyone can provide. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ
So are you moving your entire exchange deployment to the DMZ? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Exchange 5.5 SP3. I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts. We can get in from our private network with no problems. The issue I'm seeing is trying to change the password of an account. We have the WINS in the private network pulling from the Wins in the DMZ. If I point to the WINS in the private which is aware of the WINS in the DMZ, I still cannot change the password. Do I have to open up a specific port for the WINS in the DMZ to the private? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ
Questions. What DC is in the DMZ, the Primary or the Backup? What ports do you have open through your firewall? Tell us again why you are doing this? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ The domain controller, Wins Server, and Exchange server are all in the DMZ. I can go over in the DMZ access the test account and I can change the password. If I go back over into the private network 10.n.n.n and get into the same account, then I cannot change the corresponding password. -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Agreed, but if he CAN authenticate the test users, then the job of locating the DC is fulfilled. There is no more ties of WINS to Password any more. I guess I wasn't clear when I made that second comment. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:04 PM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ The second question is easy - WINS is needed to find the Domain controllers so you CAN change the password -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Are you saying that your Exchange server in the DMZ are in the same domain as your corporate? Also, I am a little baffled. Since when does WINS have anything to do with Password change? Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:26 AM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Subject: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Exchange 5.5 SP3. I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts. We can get in from our private network with no problems. The issue I'm seeing is trying to change the password of an account. We have the WINS in the private network pulling from the Wins in the DMZ. If I point to the WINS in the private which is aware of the WINS in the DMZ, I still cannot change the password. Do I have to open up a specific port for the WINS in the DMZ to the private? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export Import permissions?
I have found it better to manage these as PF's over a mailbox. It removes the need to have a dedicated account for each resource, and rights are easy to setup. Jeff -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export Import permissions? I'm not sure what you are asking for. We have many mailboxes (400 or so) for things like shared mailboxes, rooms, projectors, etc. Most of these have a human owner's NT account plugged into the primary NT account. Many have additional permissions assigned. Since this don't fly in E2K, we want to create unique NT user IDs for these mailboxes and make the new ID the primary NT account for the mailbox. I then need a way to give the original account permission on the mailbox. We use no public folders (should we is another question, but the fact is we don't currently). -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export Import permissions? Since I am the if its not a human, its a PF type of admin. Can I ask why you are doing this? -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export Import permissions? In preparation for moving to E2K, we want to change all of our non-human objects (shared mailboxes, conf rooms, etc.) so that they have their own NT user ID. I can export, create the NT4 user ID and re-import with the newly created ID as the primary windows account, BUT I then need some way to give the previous primary NT account (the human responsible) permissions. Near as I can tell export/import doesn't do permissions, at least I couldn't find a field for it in the header.exe tool. I may have to try LDAP... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Export Import permissions? What are you trying to accomplish? Is there any way to export and import MSX 5.5 object permissions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Retiring Employess
I would tell him it is his e-mail, and if he really wants it he could create a rule to forward all the messages and run it. Other wise after he leaves the mail goes poof! What is it Ed says...??? Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Retiring Employess How would you go about forwarding selected e-mail to a users home. All the e-mail is now currently residing on the Exchange Serve (5.5). The user does NOT want to go thru each message and forward it to his home e-mail account. 2nd question how do you unload his Outlook Contact folder and send it to his home via e-mail? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server
DMZ? WHY? -Original Message- From: MJN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server We've had MAJOR problems! We are running Exchange 2000 Sp1 on Win2k SP2. Our Exchange Server sits in the DMZ. We are running BES on a regular Win2K pro machine sitting Nat'd behind our corporate network. We piloted the software because our CEO wanted to deploy it company wide and it worked fine when we had just him on it. We added 3 more people and the server started getting hung worker threads every 4-6 hours, which effectively stopped the server from doing its job (all blackberries stopped working) and required a reboot. I've been in constant contact with RIM tech support about this and we've already ruled out any firewalling issues or config issues. The frustrating part is they ask me to change or patch this and that almost once a day and it never helps. The users are getting ticked and they are all 24x7 people so Im getting calls at home to reboot the BES server...Bottom line is, its a bug in their stuff. They gave me a (beta) Service Pack 3 for the BES software to apply yesterday and it seemed to stay up longer than before. I noticed this morning that the server was writing blocked worker thread errors to the app event log AGAIN. PLUS, their SP3 introduced a new problem -- all blackberry users defined on the BES server now receive TWO calendar appointment items In Outlook whenever someone sends a meeting request to them. We're about to throw the whole pile of software and handhelds out the window unless RIM coughs up a fix and FAST! Michael Natale [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding
Blackberry Enterprise software takes about 10min to get setup and running, or he could install it on his own system. If its on his system, it will only work when it is on, which makes it a bad idea in my book. Have fun Jeff -Original Message- From: Wolf, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding I should have been more explicit. We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 SP6. One of my colleagues wants to forward mail to a Blackberry supposedly, however that works and wants the mail sent off of the Exchange box as I understand it. Alan L. Wolf MCSE, MCP, MCP + I PO Box B Bldg 458 Frederick, Maryland 21702 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301-846-5479 (V) 301-846-6886 (F) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forwarding Emailed enabled contacts for E2K - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: RE: Forwarding Custom recipients? -Original Message- From: Wolf, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding Is there a way to forward messages in Exchange, similar to the .forward file in the Unix world? Thanks. Alan L. Wolf MCSE, MCP, MCP + I PO Box B Bldg 458 Frederick, Maryland 21702 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301-846-5479 (V) 301-846-6886 (F) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help please
Time to crank out the check book and get you some IP's Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other sites will go down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0 IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1 IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example: Using one IP you can setup several different redirects static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip1) www netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) ftp (internal_ip2) ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 443 (internal_ip1) 443 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) 90 (internal_ip3) 90 netmask 255.255.255.255 -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT there is no tcp or www in my static statement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand if you were behind a proxy server but this is not the case. I'm assuming your using some type of access-list entry like: access-list 100 permit tcp any host (external_ip) eq www and then a corresponding conduit (or static) command for your internal server (proxy) static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask 255.255.255.255 Simply change the internal_ip to your owa server so that we can RULE out the proxy server. Make sure you do a write mem then retest. However, make sure your followed my previous advise on the host headers and ip info. Thx. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please No lockout That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go to it first. That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection. Im setting up the pix syslog serve now. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get locked out with the bad login attempts? D May you have the foresight to know where you're going, the hindsight to know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far. -Irish Toast -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Sh xlate returns Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work. Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically defined Pub address that points to your priv address. D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip 208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the 172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route a
RE: New Virus outbreak
177 (977) Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak What is the latest Trend Pattern? -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:10 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: New Virus outbreak Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak We are here, and EXE, and PIF, and VBS and so on If they want it, they have to talk to me first. POWER! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak We are all blocking .SCR files anyway...right kids? -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus outbreak Please note that there is a new Email virus out with an attachment Gone.scr Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony UK. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where do I disable OOAR from going to the internet
5.5 admin internet mail service, internet mail, advance options. Have fun Jeff Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where do I disable OOAR from going to the internet I think I am losing my mind... Where is the menu located in Exchange 5.5 where I can disable this out of office from replying to the internet... Thanks. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Badtrans and SirCam
Because Toto we are not in Kansas any more. Go Cyclones! Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Badtrans and SirCam In case the list is completely peppered with the basketball illiterate... this is a reference to one of the greatest basketball coaches who ever lived and not an insult to the residents of Lawrence (which is quite a lovely little basketball hamlet). Not knowing about Exchange is one thing... but how could anyone on this list possibly not know everything there is to know about Jayhawk basketball? Go read the FAQ for goodness sakes. http://www.kuathletics.com/mensbasketball/history/century_stories_naismith.h tml -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Badtrans and SirCam Puh-leeze. It's Lawrence Kansas... Do your users really know how to do anything other than misspell Phog? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Kelly Fallon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Badtrans and SirCam No kidding. The **last** thing I am going to do give users local admin or allow them to update their OS from a vendor over the internet. -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Badtrans and SirCam Corporate policies may or may not allow all users to access WindowsUpdate, or if they are using WinNT / 2000 / XP they might not have local admin rights. Not quite as simple as your glib assertion would have it. Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick question
Thanks, Sorry I usually check the archive, this was just one of those got me hot under the collar things. I wanted to stop it before it started. Thanks again. Jeff -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick question Yesterday someone posted a link to a website that states that this doesn't work. Look in the archives. -Original Message- From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick question Stupid question of the day. I have a user who has been given instructions to place a !000 address in her address book to stop all worm's from spreading in via her outlook client. Beyond the fact that I told her this was insane, and oh by the way we have not been infected by a worm virus since we got the I Love You (great way to get A/V funds), she now has her department convinced that this is the way to go and wants to have this put in all their address books. I know that this won't hurt anything, however now they want it added to the GAL and I am saying no, no, no! They want proof this won't work. I said prove it will work, they need more grease in their wheels, so now I am stuck proving it won't work. I can't find this on any of the web sites and am hoping that someone might know of a good link. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FU Friday
ya but, would you want him there when you were trying to fix it. I prefer the it broke at 8 and I fixed it at 9. No I didn't need to call you. Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: FU Friday That's actually pretty good, my boss has bounced out the office early this whole week. When the web server went down I was the one here till 9pm, I'm the one who was in on Sunday. (Not to sound bitter or anything) -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FU Friday Anyone want to start an FU friday list. We can send out an FU to people who made their week that much harder. For example send an FU out to my boss because he made me create 250 dls at 430 on firday and then he left for the day. Give it some thought it would be fun. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: today's admin backwards virus
Jennifer, Most everyone has already hit on the obvious, most of us use the auto-update feature from the A/V product of our choosing. Then we go the extra step and use some sort of filtering, be it at the fire wall or just simple attachment blocking in our e-mail server A/V product. Here I block .exe;.vbs;.eml;.shs;.lnk attachments from even getting through the e-mail server. Take what has happened to your site up the ladder as a reason to put all this stuff in place! You might get some resistance, and even some complaints, however every time one of these things happens the efforts you have made will be seen and will be appreciated. TrueSecure www.trusecure.com has some good white papers on what types of attachments you should be, or at least thinking about blocking. Oh, the other thing we did was, well we threw IIS right out the window!! Good Luck Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: today's admin backwards virus I was just noticing that most of the gurus of the list had plenty of time to respond to the list regarding various questions. Am I missing something? I have been updating virus software, scanning mailboxes, patching iis/owa servers etc. all night. We were hit externally, but we only had to restore one webserver (although it was similiar to a slightly compressed support.microsoft.com). Is there some secret to this sh*t that you are keeping from me regarding quick draw administration or is this something you pawn off to others? I will compensate for information. (Depending on validity.) I'm not jealous or bitter, btw...not. Jennifer Baker Fluke Corporation http://www.fluke.com http://www.flukenetworks.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: today's admin backwards virus
My users don't use OWA right now, that is something we are not even talking about until Exchange 2000, but then we will be back in the business of running IIS in patch and run mode as we did before we got rid of it. I have very strong feelings about admins that run servers and don't keep them up-to-date on security, getting a server compromised by a fix that was out months ago is no longer the servers fault, now its the admins fault. My attachment blocking was not well received when it first started, and has even added some more admin work as we now have to get real .exe files and pass them on, however that added work load (about 10 times a month) is well worth it. Jeff Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus Oh, the other thing we did was, well we threw IIS right out the window!! so how are you hosting? do your users miss owa? dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus / Worm ??
I started blocking them about a month ago. We had a user receive one, then when it was opened up it had an .exe in it as an attachment. I decided to block them as I did not want this used as a conduit to bypass our .exe blocking. The good news is that it has worked, I have blocked about 6 or 7 of them today, however I have not seen any instance of readme.exe trying to get through. Oh the fun! Jeff Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? has anybody seen anything Official about the .eml files? I've just heard anecdotal evidence about them. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Why do they put pictures of criminals up in the Post Office? What are we supposed to do . . . write to these men? Why don't they just put their pictures on the postage stamps so the mailmen could look for them while they delivered the mail? - -Original Message- From: Daniel Deward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? If you block EXE's there is no need to wait for updates. For more information, visit http://www.cmsconnect.com Dan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? Yes, NAI released an extra.dat Still waiting for trend to put out an update. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? Does anyone have any more info on this?? Does NAI have an update? I can't get through to them. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: John Bricher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? On the servers that were infected at our company, we found a mmc.exe that was running in c:\winnt. This appeared to be regenerating the readme.eml files. We killed the process, deleted the file, and deleted the .eml files. This appears to have worked for now. Not sure how to stop it from happening again. John Bricher Windows NT Engineer Cybear, Inc. 561-999-3549 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
