[FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread salyavin808


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:

 MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it 
 promotes self-will and not the will of the unified field.

The unified field has a will? Far out.
   
   Isn't it just a *trip* that so many people assume 
   it does? 
  
  Actually it gives me the creeps!
  
  I mean the UF - if it exists - is simply what the universe
  is before it gets all random and foamy and *long* before
  the chaos becomes visible as the whirly subatomic stuff we 
  all know and love.
 
 As Hagelin describes the unified field, It is an ocean of Intelligence.  As 
 such, It is the Observer, the Process of Observing, and the Observed.
 
 This universe and any other universes which come out of the Unified Field 
 cannot be random and chaotic since It is Intelligence.  In particular, this 
 universe is based on Natural Laws in which the subatomic particles and 
 galaxies are subjected to.

Ha! And he calls himself a physicist! 

As I've always said, he's a card-carrying, tub thumping, religious fruitcake.

The whole *point* of 20th century physics is that we learnt that
Newton was wrong about the universe being fundamentally predictable -
it is fundamentally chaotic. All we can do is predict how likely the
random effects are. And we can do that astoundingly well.

Apart from dark energy and matter it's all done and dusted, until
someone realises there is something else we can't explain and then
we need more and bigger machines to probe ever further. And Hagelin
thinks he's already explained it all!

I'm telling you, the idea that there is an intelligence behind
the universe is a religious concept not a scientific one.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote:

 It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
 Ravi writes has a Robin feel.

I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)

There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
replying to. 

These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
bother even trying to interact with them as if they
might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
a target. 

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
 wrote:
 
Give me something Steve.
  
   You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
 
  Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
  to anyone.
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread sparaig
Dryly:

fer shure...

Let's play pretend:

Pretend that the AHA scientific statement brings about a slew of larger-scale 
studies designed the way this study was:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2693686

Where good faith attempts were made to compensate for the fact that it is 
virtually impossible to conduct a double- blind study on meditation by 
ensuring that all test subjects had the same expectations.

Let us further pretend that these hypothetical studies show roughly the same 
thing:

on stress/health issues, TM comes in first, mindfulness practices second and 
concentrative practices third.

on mindfulness-related issues, mindfulness comes in first, TM second, and 
concentrative practices third.

Let us finally pretend that a large enough number of these studies are done in 
such  way that all the reviewers who thus far have insisted that there's not 
enough good research available to make any real determination about the 
effectiveness of meditative practices on anything at all, start to agree with 
the AHA statement and conclude that in certain circumstances, TM comes out 
consistently ahead -maybe they start to endorse mindfulness for certain things 
too, but not the same things that they say TM is good for.

At THAT point, will you concede that TM  IS in any way superior to any other 
meditations out there?

L

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 I never used the word pyramid - TM has some beneficial effects and some 
 negative effects one of which is a sort of addictive quality that Curtis 
 commented on recently - for sure TM is not in any way superior to any other 
 meditations out there.
 
 
 
 
 
  From: doctordumbass@... doctordumbass@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 10:23 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace
  
 
 
   
 Can you think of another product with no value, as you seem to suggest, that 
 has been around for fifty years, simply because of the marketing geniuses 
 behind it? I can't. Has to provide some value. 
 
 As for it promising more than it delivers, again, if it were a pyramid 
 scheme, as you suggest, it would not have the longevity that it does. Do you 
 do TM?
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:
  
  
  
   Any time there is a new technology introduced, there are the naysayers 
   who proclaim it too costly, too crazy, or just plain useless. Just as 
   with electricity, the automobile, and the cell phone, TM is here to stay. 
  
  But is it as popular as the cell phone, electricity and the automobile?
  
  Meaning; how many who see the advert say I gotta get me one of
  those? And what percentage keep using it after a few months?
  
  
   I know its kind of a tough pill to swallow, recognizing that the 
   technique is not only robust, but continues to grow as well. Perhaps you 
   want to work on your attachment to these ideas of TM being bad and wrong, 
   while at the same time, recognizing its inevitable global growth.
  
  People are always after something to give them an edge, TM keeps
  getting recycled via the latest batch of celebrities and is easy to
  market because of its history. But how many keep doing it compared to
  all the other things they try? 
  
  I suspect there is a huge market of seekers who do everything once
  and finally end up seeing the blandness of the whole self-improvement 
  scene. There is precious little we can do to change ourselves and
  TM, apart from the very few self-proclaimed enlightened that walk among us, 
  promises so much but delivers so little at the end of the day. You have to 
  be honest to realise the last bit. It isn't what you expected and didn't do 
  half what it claimed - if that. 
  
  But if you promise people everything, who isn't going to want to try?
  *That* is the genius of TM marketing, the whole shpeil from the unified 
  field towards perfect health. It's damn clever and that's 
  why it's still around.
  
  
   I am not saying you have to like it, but you may as well recognize the 
   reality of it.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@ 
  wrote:
  
   A beautifully written article about TM and the race to
   inner space.
  
  Funny how she gets so many of her facts wrong, isn't it?
  You'd almost think she'd learned TM from some independent
  who'd gone *way* off the range. Among other things, 
  according to her, her teacher gave out the mantras at the
  end of the course, as a graduation ceremony, and he wore
  a robe during the 

[FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:

 Dryly:
 
 fer shure...
 
 Let's play pretend:
 
 Pretend that the AHA scientific statement brings about a 
 slew of larger-scale studies designed the way this study was:
 
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2693686
 
 Where good faith attempts were made to compensate for the 
 fact that it is virtually impossible to conduct a double- 
 blind study on meditation by ensuring that all test subjects 
 had the same expectations.
 
 Let us further pretend that these hypothetical studies show 
 roughly the same thing:
 
 on stress/health issues, TM comes in first, mindfulness 
 practices second and concentrative practices third.
 
 on mindfulness-related issues, mindfulness comes in first, 
 TM second, and concentrative practices third.
 
 Let us finally pretend that a large enough number of these 
 studies are done in such  way that all the reviewers who 
 thus far have insisted that there's not enough good research 
 available to make any real determination about the 
 effectiveness of meditative practices on anything at all, 
 start to agree with the AHA statement and conclude that 
 in certain circumstances, TM comes out consistently ahead 
 -maybe they start to endorse mindfulness for certain things 
 too, but not the same things that they say TM is good for.
 
 At THAT point, will you concede that TM  IS in any way 
 superior to any other meditations out there?

Lawson, you can play pretend all you want, but
I'm stuck back on the more fundamental issue that
this WHOLE QUESTION is based on the ego and 
attachment of TMers who are *desperate* to somehow
prove that what they were told over and over and 
over and over and over and over for decades is true. 
That is, that TM *is* superior, or the best. 

I honestly have never encountered another form of
meditation or tradition that indoctrinates its
practitioners to believe this and proselytize this, 
although in theory they might exist, if some other 
teacher or tradition is/was as ego-bound and petty 
as Maharishi. 

THE WHOLE QUESTION is meaningless, except to 
those (like yourself) who are trying to prove 
something having (IMO) to do with their *own* 
superiority in being practitioners of the best. 

So go off and play pretend on your own. Most of
the rest of us DON'T CARE.

YOU care. You care a LOT. Given your posting history
here and on other forums, this need to prove TM's
supposed superiority or bestness is a common
and consistently annoying theme, and has been as 
long as I've known you. Just sayin'...


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@ wrote:
 
  I never used the word pyramid - TM has some beneficial effects and some 
  negative effects one of which is a sort of addictive quality that Curtis 
  commented on recently - for sure TM is not in any way superior to any other 
  meditations out there.
  
  
  
  
  
   From: doctordumbass@ doctordumbass@
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 10:23 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace
   
  
  
    
  Can you think of another product with no value, as you seem to suggest, 
  that has been around for fifty years, simply because of the marketing 
  geniuses behind it? I can't. Has to provide some value. 
  
  As for it promising more than it delivers, again, if it were a pyramid 
  scheme, as you suggest, it would not have the longevity that it does. Do 
  you do TM?
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ 
  wrote:
  
   
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:
   
   
   
Any time there is a new technology introduced, there are the naysayers 
who proclaim it too costly, too crazy, or just plain useless. Just as 
with electricity, the automobile, and the cell phone, TM is here to 
stay. 
   
   But is it as popular as the cell phone, electricity and the automobile?
   
   Meaning; how many who see the advert say I gotta get me one of
   those? And what percentage keep using it after a few months?
   
   
I know its kind of a tough pill to swallow, recognizing that the 
technique is not only robust, but continues to grow as well. Perhaps 
you want to work on your attachment to these ideas of TM being bad and 
wrong, while at the same time, recognizing its inevitable global growth.
   
   People are always after something to give them an edge, TM keeps
   getting recycled via the latest batch of celebrities and is easy to
   market because of its history. But how many keep doing it compared to
   all the other things they try? 
   
   I suspect there is a huge market of seekers who do everything once
   and finally end up seeing the blandness of the whole self-improvement 
   scene. There is precious little we can do to change ourselves and
   TM, apart from the very few self-proclaimed enlightened that walk among 
   us, promises so 

[FairfieldLife] Magical Journeys – Quest for Meaning

2013-05-15 Thread martin.quickman
Here are reports from two different pilgrimages to two very different 
destinations. If you travel, this one is for you...


http://lightkeepersblog.wordpress.com/



[FairfieldLife] Coherent Times Magazine

2013-05-15 Thread merlin


Coherent Times Magazine
coherenttimes.wordpress.com/tag/tm-england/http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/tag/tm-england/

...*...
http://dev.invincibleeurope.eu/de/

***_

.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Buck
Good caution about just throwing words around.  Now me, I ain't no cultist; but 
Yes, if there is a cult here by your terms it is around the really upper level 
of TM.  However for most those of us around who are simply practitioners of the 
technique we more accurately are only part of a sect.  Yes of course, for some 
of the practitioners they are part of and devotees of a New Religious movement, 
The David Lynchers Maharishi New Religion of Meditative Sciences.   But anymore 
there are really very few real first generation devotee cultist types left in 
TM.  Look to Vedic City mostly to find them and some cultist enclaves left like 
in Vlodrop and such places too.  There's different elements to TM.  But mostly 
larger TM is a sect and not a cult, technically.  More accurately, the 
faith-based cult is around the upper echelon and has been worked that way since 
the late 70's and 1980's by that particular group.  That is different from the 
sect of larger meditating Fairfield and the larger TM meditating community.
-Buck in the Dome

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@... wrote:

 Consensus reality is probably more accurate than the word Cult which 
 actually means something like subculture. When you make statements like: 
 everyone is crazy, or everyone is in a cult - you reduce the meaning of 
 words Crazy or Cult to logical absurdities that renders them useless as 
 terms that can be used in a rational discussion. 
 
 When I ask myself questions like:Do I know anyone who is not a little 
 crazy? or Do I know anyone who doesn't participate in a cult? The answer 
 is always no  - everyone I know seems a little crazy and everyone I know 
 also identifies with some group or other. It's really just a matter of 
 perspective isn't it? I mean to a west coast Bay Area person, such as myself 
 - most people east and south of here are Obviously Insane ;-)
 
 Therefore as a practical matter, the words crazy and cult should be 
 reserved for discussions about people and groups that have behaviors and 
 ideas that are so variant with society at large that they are rendered 
 dysfunctional in a major way. (i.e., can't sustain a relationship or a job.)
 
 Having preached that - I actually do think everyone is both crazy and in a 
 cult...but you won't catch me sayin' it.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Coherent Times Magazine

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
I like this one better - the Ultimate Arrogant Bullshit TM 
My-Nose-Is-Permanently-Aimed-Toward-The-Sky-Cause-I'm-So-Much-More-Refined-Than-You
 Indulgence.

http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/

And they even include more TM vacuous supercilious claims they never back up 
with facts:

Normally cutlery is gold plated only for show. This process of gold 
plating is found to neutralize the “Ojas” enhancing effect. “Jivan Super Gold” 
is manufactured by a new, unique process to preserve and enhance 
“Ojas”. This unique process was developed by Jivan Super Products, 
together with Vedic health experts and is not commercially available. To enable 
the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new technology we can 
now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and eating 
utensils.




 From: merlin vedamer...@yahoo.de
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 6:15 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Coherent Times Magazine
 


  


Coherent Times Magazine
coherenttimes.wordpress.com/tag/tm-england/http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/tag/tm-england/

...*...
http://dev.invincibleeurope.eu/de/

***_

.


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
No no no no no! You must be wrong! After all, so many people here on FFL, when 
asked by me some time ago said that TM is superior BECAUSE of the special way 
it is taught, the special instructions.





 From: sparaig lengli...@cox.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:57 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace
 


  

You know, I never was told that my mantra was unique or special.

In fact, my teacher explicitly said: there are a limited number of TM mantras, 
and they are chosen via a simple, mechanical selection process based on the 
answers you gave in your application form.

MMY explicitly said to the press many decades ago that there is nothing special 
about TM teaching and mantras. There's no special relationship with the teacher 
-it's like a history professor recounting the progression of years in history 
-otherwise the process couldn't be called scientific.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=kRSvW9Ml9DQ#t=393s

L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
  
   Just as the author may have skewed things a little 
   to make her point, Judy skews things in her way to
   make the author seem malevolent. Anything rather
   than accept the fact that for most people, the
   author's piece strikes a resonance, and captures
   how insanely WEIRD TM and all the hoopla surrounding
   how it is taught are. Judy is so far from that exper-
   ience that she can't remember how WEIRD it all is;
   the author of this piece is not.
  
  Weird? TM teachers, in their conservative clothing, 
  speaking quietly and clearly about a simple technique, 
  attending class room-like introductory lectures, 
  attending a beautiful and settling puja as initiation 
  'ritual'...
 
 ...bearing fruit, flowers and a clean white handkerchief,
 witnessing someone chanting in a foreign language to some
 Indian guy's painting on an altar, seeing rice, fire, and
 other things clearly *offered* to this guy, then finally
 being told to *kneel down* in front of this Indian guy
 to receive your oh-so-special-and-unique mantra (which
 is neither). 
 
 You've clearly never taught TM. I have, and have had at
 least one deeply religious person (an Orthodox Jew) leave 
 the room at that point and demand their money back. 
 
 You spent *years* in an environment in which all of this
 was considered NORMAL, and everyday. It is not. The 
 author of this piece is merely commenting on how abnormal
 and non-everyday it IS. 
 
 BTW, don't try to run the pristine and unweird routine
 on someone who actually knows what the words of the puja
 actually SAY -- the number of Hindu gods named, the words
 that say I bow down to them after each offering, and
 who you're actually bowing TO at the end. You can try 
 to pretend that this is not a traditional Hindu religious
 ceremony if you want, but don't expect those of us who
 actually read the translation of the puja and kept it
 lively in our minds as we were chanting it to agree with
 you if we're not still TBs, and thus still Up Denial 
 Without A Paddle. :-)



 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread seventhray27


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

 I have run out of steam Steve. Unless you have something more - this
is
 just once again confirmations of your patterns.

Sure.  No problem Ravi.  You have revealed, in true engineer fashion
below, your template for discussion here.  I mean, it is nothing new. 
It is how you interact here, and most every other forum in which you
have participated.  It is not really conducive to any type of mutual
relationship which is sort of evident in your case.

It seems like the significant other in your life is Devi, and may I say,
that is no surprise.  She knows you and understands you, and is able to
cater to your every need.  We all should be so lucky.

Carry on Master Ravi!   There are truths to be proclaimed, and frauds to
be revealed, and you are self proclaimed yogi to do it!



   
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/343429
   
Yes - I have a special ability, insight into judging
people.
  Even
electronic medium is no barrier. An intuition right
from my
  childhood. It's
untainted by any intellectual process - so powerful is
my
intuition
  and
rarely does it go wrong. If I come after you, you bet
your
retarded
  ass it
will stick, if not I will bend over backwards to
apologize.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
MJ,

And you're basing your statement based on whose authority?  If it's you,
 why should we believe you?  Do you have the suitable credentials to 
back up your statements?

JR

Well, I didn't intend to make comparisons, but since you have waved that flag, 
I shall endeavor to compare myself with your dream of Johnny Hagelin being the 
Gabriel of the New Golden Age of TM induced saviour-hood of the world.

I am, by many parameters of greatness, genius and accomplishment, a nobody. 

I have never saved the world, I have never rescued any helpless infants from a 
burning building, I have never published learned papers in prestigious 
journals, I have not married well, nor stormed the bastions of financial 
institutions in such a way as to garner a fortune for myself. I have never 
learned to make a baked alaska, nor to further the research to end all of the 
dreaded diseases of humanity, I have not come up with a cure for the common 
cold, nor saved a drowning man by throwing him a life vest.

But for all my lack of accomplishments, I can honestly say I am very happy I am 
not a lying, bullshitting pseudo-scientist who dedicates his life to promoting 
the lies of the most successful con artist of the 20th Century, Marshy Mahesh 
Liar.

So yeah, people would be far better off listening to me instead of Bonnie 
Johnnie Hagelin.





 From: John jr_...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:19 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel 
Good, Achieve Goals  Dr. Shelley S
 


  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 
 As Hagelin describes the unified field, It is an ocean of Intelligence. 
  As such, It is the Observer, the Process of Observing, and the 
 Observed.
 
 This universe and any other universes which come out of the Unified 
 Field cannot be random and chaotic since It is Intelligence.  In 
 particular, this universe is based on Natural Laws in which the 
 subatomic particles and galaxies are subjected to.
 
 
 If Hagelin is the arbiter of reality, we really are all screwed.
 

MJ,

And you're basing your statement based on whose authority?  If it's you, why 
should we believe you?  Do you have the suitable credentials to back up your 
statements?

JR

 
 
 
  From: John jr_esq@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:09 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel 
 Good, Achieve Goals  Dr. Shelley S
 
 
 
   
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:

 MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it 
 promotes self-will and not the will of the unified field.

The unified field has a will? Far out.
   
   Isn't it just a *trip* that so many people assume 
   it does? 
  
  Actually it gives me the creeps!
  
  I mean the UF - if it exists - is simply what the universe
  is before it gets all random and foamy and *long* before
  the chaos becomes visible as the whirly subatomic stuff we 
  all know and love.
 
 As Hagelin describes the unified field, It is an ocean of Intelligence.  As 
 such, It is the Observer, the Process of Observing, and the Observed.
 
 This universe and any other universes which come out of the Unified Field 
 cannot be random and chaotic since It is Intelligence.  In particular, this 
 universe is based on Natural Laws in which the subatomic particles and 
 galaxies are subjected to.
 
  
  Ascribing intentions to it is absurd but worshipping
  it is deeply weird. I always used to wonder what the unified 
  field charts were trying to say, it was clear that they
  had an intention beyond simply informing the observer
  what the TMO thought was going on. 
  
  But of course, if you buy the mystical idea of consciousness
  then the charts make sense, on their own terms. But until
  nature demonstrates that it's something other than blind chance,
  electromagnetism and entropy I'll be giving the charts a miss.
  
  
   You don't necessarily find this assumption in main-
   stream (read, not Fundamentalist and Supremicist)
   Hinduism, or much of Buddhism, or even avant-garde
   Christianity. The belief in God (or the unified 
   field or whatever you want to call it) as having
   a Will and/or having a Plan for All Of This is
   not a given at all. 
   
   Many think as I do that if such a thing as a 
   fundamental, core level of existence as God or the
   Absolute or insert euphemism of your choice exists,
   it's just so NOT That Kinda Guy. 
   
   It has been described by the great mystics and spir-
   itual leaders of the planet as devoid of 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread seventhray27

Hey Ravi, thanks for the question.  I think Robin is a good writer.  I
think you are good writer.  I mean it's remarkable what proficiency you
have in a  language that is not your mother tongue.

But yes, I do perceive some Robin creep* in some of the expressions
you use, but more importantly, in your overall philosophy.  You know,
this notion, this perceived ability to ferret out the truth of what a
person may be unwilling to acknowledge.   This ability to know if what
they are saying is properly aligned with reality.

* creep in verb sense, not adjective sense.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

 What does this really mean Steve - clearly it's an honor to be
compared to
 Robin, especially if it is in his writing style but then we will
always be
 very different in our writing styles and I will never be emulate him
in his
 writing. You are out of your mind to even suggest that. Robin's
influence
 is in other areas, definitely an important one in my life.

 If there's any reason you think why I should be wary of him - please
 summarize so we can discuss it in a conventional way.



 On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:11 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...wrote:

  **
 
 
  It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what Ravi writes
has a
  Robin feel.
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27
steve.sundur@wrote:
   
  
 Give me something Steve.
   
You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
  
   Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
   to anyone.
  
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread seventhray27


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
 These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
 Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
 bother even trying to interact with them as if they
 might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
 and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
 a target.


I admit Barry, I find FFL rather dull without those interactions.  So I
guess I'm a pretty guilty party.

BTW, neat story about your current working assignment.




[FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread sparaig
TM is taught in a systematic way over a period of several days. It is special 
in that it is taught systematically. The same video I used to justify claiming 
that TM is special because it is taught systematically over a period of several 
days is the same video where MMY points out that mantras have no specialness 
due to a relationship between teacher and student: they are chosen in a 
systematic way -nothing mystical about them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=kRSvW9Ml9DQ#t=393s

L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 No no no no no! You must be wrong! After all, so many people here on FFL, 
 when asked by me some time ago said that TM is superior BECAUSE of the 
 special way it is taught, the special instructions.
 
 
 
 
 
  From: sparaig LEnglish5@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:57 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace
  
 
 
   
 
 You know, I never was told that my mantra was unique or special.
 
 In fact, my teacher explicitly said: there are a limited number of TM 
 mantras, and they are chosen via a simple, mechanical selection process based 
 on the answers you gave in your application form.
 
 MMY explicitly said to the press many decades ago that there is nothing 
 special about TM teaching and mantras. There's no special relationship with 
 the teacher -it's like a history professor recounting the progression of 
 years in history -otherwise the process couldn't be called scientific.
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=kRSvW9Ml9DQ#t=393s
 
 L
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
   
Just as the author may have skewed things a little 
to make her point, Judy skews things in her way to
make the author seem malevolent. Anything rather
than accept the fact that for most people, the
author's piece strikes a resonance, and captures
how insanely WEIRD TM and all the hoopla surrounding
how it is taught are. Judy is so far from that exper-
ience that she can't remember how WEIRD it all is;
the author of this piece is not.
   
   Weird? TM teachers, in their conservative clothing, 
   speaking quietly and clearly about a simple technique, 
   attending class room-like introductory lectures, 
   attending a beautiful and settling puja as initiation 
   'ritual'...
  
  ...bearing fruit, flowers and a clean white handkerchief,
  witnessing someone chanting in a foreign language to some
  Indian guy's painting on an altar, seeing rice, fire, and
  other things clearly *offered* to this guy, then finally
  being told to *kneel down* in front of this Indian guy
  to receive your oh-so-special-and-unique mantra (which
  is neither). 
  
  You've clearly never taught TM. I have, and have had at
  least one deeply religious person (an Orthodox Jew) leave 
  the room at that point and demand their money back. 
  
  You spent *years* in an environment in which all of this
  was considered NORMAL, and everyday. It is not. The 
  author of this piece is merely commenting on how abnormal
  and non-everyday it IS. 
  
  BTW, don't try to run the pristine and unweird routine
  on someone who actually knows what the words of the puja
  actually SAY -- the number of Hindu gods named, the words
  that say I bow down to them after each offering, and
  who you're actually bowing TO at the end. You can try 
  to pretend that this is not a traditional Hindu religious
  ceremony if you want, but don't expect those of us who
  actually read the translation of the puja and kept it
  lively in our minds as we were chanting it to agree with
  you if we're not still TBs, and thus still Up Denial 
  Without A Paddle. :-)
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine

2013-05-15 Thread salyavin808


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 I like this one better - the Ultimate Arrogant Bullshit TM 
 My-Nose-Is-Permanently-Aimed-Toward-The-Sky-Cause-I'm-So-Much-More-Refined-Than-You
  Indulgence.
 
 http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
 
 And they even include more TM vacuous supercilious claims they never back up 
 with facts:

A fool and his money are soon parted. All the correct buzzwords are
there though; ancient wisdom, modern science, perfect health.

Eating with the Pure Gold Spoon is said to enliven the 7 to 8 drops of Ojas 
in the heart. This increases happiness, improves digestion and has beneficial 
effects to the heart, brain and nervous system.

Chuckle. Caveat emptor and all that...

 To enable the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
 and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
 gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new technology we 
 can now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and eating 
 utensils.

So they dilute gold to 18 carat while preserving its purity?

I'm intrigued, I suspected I know the person behind it and after
a google, found out I do. He used to have a room in the same
corridor from me at HQ and used to conduct his electroplating
experiments at all hours, occasionally producing a spoon or
amrit kalash pot. I was impressed that he taught himself the 
whole thing from scratch. 

But I hope he doesn't sell any as I hate to think of people 
getting ripped off. But OTOH if you really want a gold spoon who 
am I to complain? I'd hate to deny people: youthfulness, long life, freedom 
from disease, increased physical power, strength of all the sense organs, good 
concentration, detachment from problems, freedom from psychosomatic 
disturbances and the experience of bliss! 


Here's an advert from the Grauniad:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2003/aug/31/alternativeinvestment.homesandgardens

I say advert because the author of the piece is a TM teacher.

It aint what you know, it's who you know.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: BLT RESEARCH TEAM INC.

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
Well so far I have managed to keep food off my face, but you never know what 
might happen next.  Stay tuned!  (-:





 From: Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:01 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BLT RESEARCH TEAM INC.
 


  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Me too, noozguru.  But as can be seen from my recent posts, I'm obsessing on 
 food these days (-:
 Lived on the edge today by having a dessert, creme brulee and then scarfed 
 some of my Mom's blondie too.  






 
 
 
 
 
  From: Bhairitu noozguru@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: BLT RESEARCH TEAM INC.
 
 
 
   
 And here I thought they were working on a way to make a better bacon, 
 lettuce and tomato sandwich!
 
 On 05/14/2013 02:10 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Cheers Nabby, there's some great stuff on there. UFO stones! Are
  the aliens turning our rocks into glass? Are they bending grass
  in funny ways?
 
  Seriously though, I hope something comes of it. I've always
  wanted there to be more to this world than meets the eye but
  whenever you get close to some weird phenomena it seems to
  disappear under scrutiny. Let's hope not this time...
 
 
 
 Printable Version 
 
 
  BLT RESEARCH TEAM INC.
  [www.bltresearch.com]
 
  GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
  
   UFO Stone
  Analysis  Unexplained Holes in Poland
  
  
  Correction to Delgado/Chorley Report
  
 
 
  PURPOSE: The BLT Research Team Inc.'s primary focus is crop circle
  research - the discovery, scientific documentation and evaluation of
  physical changes induced in plants, soils and other materials at crop
  circle sites by the energy (or energy system) responsible for creating
  them and to determine, if possible, from these data the specific nature
  and source of these energies. Secondly, our intent is to publish these
  research results in peer-reviewed scientific journals and to disseminate
  this information to the general public through lectures, mainstream
  articles and the internet.
 
  PERSONNEL: BLT Inc. is composed of several hundred trained
  field-sampling personnel in the U.S., Canada and Europe who collect
  plant and soil samples at crop circle sites for analyses by a number of
  scientists (see Professional Consultants
   ) in various disciplines.
 [BLT Research Team - Crop Circles and other phenomena]Fieldworkers
  in England with plant and soil samples which now must be hung up and
  dried before shipping.
  The hard work of these field teams and their careful adherence to
  field-sampling protocols has contributed enormously to the on-going
  discoveries in the laboratory and the large data-base of factual
  information which now exists. Nancy Talbott is President of BLT Research
  Team Inc.
 
 
 [BLT Research Team - Crop Circles and other phenomena]Taking
  measurements in a Canadian circle prior to plant/soil sampling.
  [BLT Research Team - Crop Circles and other phenomena]Samples dried,
  wrapped, labeled
  and ready for shipping.
 
 
  FUNDING: BLT Inc. was incorporated as a non-profit, tax-exempt U.S.
  corporation in 1999. All funding to-date has been from private-sector
  donations and gifts, which are tax-deductible. Significant advances in
  the scientific understanding of crop circle formation and related
  phenomena are heavily dependent upon such contributions -- all major
  financial gifts can be designated for specific research projects, if
  desired by the donor. Financial support in any amount is welcome.
 
 
  LECTURE/SLIDE SHOW: A 2-hour presentation is available which outlines
  the basic research and results obtained so far, highlighting individual
  crop circle case studies from a number of countries. Slides of recent
  crop circles in North America and Europe are included, as well as
  anecdotal reports of associated strange phenomena encountered by
  personnel working in the fields each summer. The lecture and slide-show
  can be shortened or expanded, as desired, and is an inspirational
  educational tool for use in schools and colleges, demonstrating both the
  value of the basic scientific method and the excitement of new
  discoveries -- in the context of an intriguing, and still unexplained,
  phenomenon. Contact Nancy Talbott
to schedule.
 
  http://www.bltresearch.com/ 
 
 
 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
I agree.




 From: seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:11 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
 


  
It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what Ravi writes has a Robin 
feel.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
 
 
   Give me something Steve.
 
  You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
 
 Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
 to anyone.


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
Yes, I wondered about that too.  It doesn't sound so familiar these days.





 From: authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:02 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@... wrote:

 Share,
 
 Red China obviously wants to trade with the USA

John, are you aware that Red China is a cold war term
that's virtually obsolete these days except among extreme
right-wingers?


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, other 
than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here with a Knapp 
update some months back.

From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how you 
do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and whom you 
feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part of the Hate 
Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 

Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.

Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the bit 
I've read the people you admonish never ask for your advice/suggestions.  
What's up with that? You trying to start your own little forum cult?

I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It seems 
to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the pronouncements of 
who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What good is it to dehumanize 
others and deem them unworthy to communicate with, putting yourself on some 
higher plane? It just promotes more us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine 
you don't. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
 
  It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
  Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
 
 I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
 and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
 used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
 understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
 have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
 class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
 Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
 cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)
 
 There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
 they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
 replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
 replying to. 
 
 These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
 Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
 bother even trying to interact with them as if they
 might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
 and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
 a target. 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
  wrote:
  
 Give me something Steve.
   
You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
  
   Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
   to anyone.
  
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
Ahh, but TM and all its adjunct junk is here for the benefit for the great 
unwashed masses.





 From: salyavin808 fintlewoodle...@mail.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:24 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine
 


  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 I like this one better - the Ultimate Arrogant Bullshit TM 
 My-Nose-Is-Permanently-Aimed-Toward-The-Sky-Cause-I'm-So-Much-More-Refined-Than-You
  Indulgence.
 
 http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
 
 And they even include more TM vacuous supercilious claims they never back up 
 with facts:

A fool and his money are soon parted. All the correct buzzwords are
there though; ancient wisdom, modern science, perfect health.

Eating with the Pure Gold Spoon is said to enliven the 7 to 8 drops of Ojas 
in the heart. This increases happiness, improves digestion and has beneficial 
effects to the heart, brain and nervous system.

Chuckle. Caveat emptor and all that...

 To enable the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
 and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
 gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new technology we 
 can now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and eating 
 utensils.

So they dilute gold to 18 carat while preserving its purity?

I'm intrigued, I suspected I know the person behind it and after
a google, found out I do. He used to have a room in the same
corridor from me at HQ and used to conduct his electroplating
experiments at all hours, occasionally producing a spoon or
amrit kalash pot. I was impressed that he taught himself the 
whole thing from scratch. 

But I hope he doesn't sell any as I hate to think of people 
getting ripped off. But OTOH if you really want a gold spoon who 
am I to complain? I'd hate to deny people: youthfulness, long life, freedom 
from disease, increased physical power, strength of all the sense organs, good 
concentration, detachment from problems, freedom from psychosomatic 
disturbances and the experience of bliss! 

Here's an advert from the Grauniad:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2003/aug/31/alternativeinvestment.homesandgardens

I say advert because the author of the piece is a TM teacher.

It aint what you know, it's who you know.


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
PS: I imagine Barry, since you most likely won't respond to me directly and if 
my limited forum observations are correct and if you choose to address anything 
I stated, you will do so in an indirect manner with a new topic and without 
naming names. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@... wrote:

 Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, other 
 than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here with a 
 Knapp update some months back.
 
 From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how you 
 do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and whom you 
 feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part of the Hate 
 Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
 
 Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
 posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
 communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
 
 Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
 regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the bit 
 I've read the people you admonish never ask for your advice/suggestions.  
 What's up with that? You trying to start your own little forum cult?
 
 I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
 seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
 pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What good is 
 it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate with, putting 
 yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more us/them camps. Not that 
 you care; I imagine you don't. 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
  
   It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
   Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
  
  I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
  and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
  used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
  understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
  have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
  class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
  Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
  cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)
  
  There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
  they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
  replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
  replying to. 
  
  These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
  Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
  bother even trying to interact with them as if they
  might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
  and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
  a target. 
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
   wrote:
   
  Give me something Steve.

 You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
   
Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
to anyone.
   
  
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
To enable the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new 
technology we can now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and 
eating 
utensils.

What bullshit, how can it be as pure as 24 ct gold if it isn't 24 ct gold? And 
the strength of the gold has been increased to the region of 18ct gold??? I'm 
sure goldsmiths all over the world are drooling with envy they didn't come up 
with the secret process that can do such a thing. Typical TM type double talk 
that promises the sun, moon and stars while delivering very little.





 From: salyavin808 fintlewoodle...@mail.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:24 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine
 


  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 I like this one better - the Ultimate Arrogant Bullshit TM 
 My-Nose-Is-Permanently-Aimed-Toward-The-Sky-Cause-I'm-So-Much-More-Refined-Than-You
  Indulgence.
 
 http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
 
 And they even include more TM vacuous supercilious claims they never back up 
 with facts:

A fool and his money are soon parted. All the correct buzzwords are
there though; ancient wisdom, modern science, perfect health.

Eating with the Pure Gold Spoon is said to enliven the 7 to 8 drops of Ojas 
in the heart. This increases happiness, improves digestion and has beneficial 
effects to the heart, brain and nervous system.

Chuckle. Caveat emptor and all that...

 To enable the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
 and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
 gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new technology we 
 can now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and eating 
 utensils.

So they dilute gold to 18 carat while preserving its purity?

I'm intrigued, I suspected I know the person behind it and after
a google, found out I do. He used to have a room in the same
corridor from me at HQ and used to conduct his electroplating
experiments at all hours, occasionally producing a spoon or
amrit kalash pot. I was impressed that he taught himself the 
whole thing from scratch. 

But I hope he doesn't sell any as I hate to think of people 
getting ripped off. But OTOH if you really want a gold spoon who 
am I to complain? I'd hate to deny people: youthfulness, long life, freedom 
from disease, increased physical power, strength of all the sense organs, good 
concentration, detachment from problems, freedom from psychosomatic 
disturbances and the experience of bliss! 

Here's an advert from the Grauniad:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2003/aug/31/alternativeinvestment.homesandgardens

I say advert because the author of the piece is a TM teacher.

It aint what you know, it's who you know.


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread Richard J. Williams

Bhairitu:
 You could enhance your understanding by looking up the subject:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China#Modern_history

So, I wonder  what the Tibetans think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet

Only five established religions are lawful in China and these five
Communist Party-sanctioned religious groups are at odds with the
atheist aspects of the official Marxist ideology. The vast majority of
Chinese residents are considered to be irreligious.

.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

 The 1978 Constitution of the People's Republic of China guarantees
 freedom of religion in Article 36.

Falun Gong is meditation, both sitting and standing, and yoga poses;
it is banned in China and is not possible to practice in large groups.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falun_Gong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falun_Gong



[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ann


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
 
  It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
  Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
 
 I can certainly see that. 

No you don't because you claim you don't read Robin or Ravi or any other 
rabble-poster here, you can't fool us BB.

Now, for the analysis that we are all waiting, ecstatically, for:

There is the same narcissism,
 and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
 used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
 understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
 have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
 class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
 Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
 cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)

Thank you for that Barry. Now, anyone else an expert on narcissism, bad writing 
and repetition? No one can demonstrate any of these qualities clearer than 
Barry while at the same time claiming they belong to everyone else. We love you 
Barry Wright!
 
 There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
 they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
 replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
 replying to. 

Do you believe there to be a fundamental difference between replying (being 
responsive) to these cretins and merely writing about them every day? 
Personally I think there is a big difference; the 'responder' at least 
possesses a modicum of backbone.
 
 These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
 Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
 bother even trying to interact with them as if they
 might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
 and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
 a target. 

Targets, targets everywhere. What's a body to do? So many targets so few darts, 
so little time.
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
  wrote:
  
 Give me something Steve.
   
You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
  
   Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
   to anyone.
  
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
John, thanks for that clarification.  I guess I assumed that Taiwan calls 
itself Taiwan rather than China.  A rose by any other name would smell as 
sweet etc.





 From: John jr_...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:25 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit
 


  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
 
  Share,
  
  Red China obviously wants to trade with the USA
 
 John, are you aware that Red China is a cold war term
 that's virtually obsolete these days except among extreme
 right-wingers?

Judy,

I'm using the term as title of convenience to differentiate mainland China from 
Taiwan, which also claims to be China.  No, I'm not an extreme right-winger as 
you may be assuming.

JR




 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
I enjoyed this explanation Xeno. Well stated about having a description for 
something previously unknown to a person so one can at least have a hand hold, 
so to speak. From there the person can get their balance. Perhaps they will 
decide later that the hand hold (the descriptions) are not definitively 
applicable to their experience, but the descriptions at least provided aid.  

I do not always grasp what people are talking about when they state they (or 
others) are enlightened. To me, it is still a nebulous term. I kind of think 
that whatever state we are in, therein we are. If we are aware of that, we are 
enlightened because we are aware of the moment. I realize that probably isn't a 
definition of enlightenment, but it works for me...at the moment.
 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
anartaxius@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
  
  We all understand what it means to say everyone is
  enlightened, Xeno. As true as it may be on one level,
  some of us think it's unhelpful and counterproductive,
  even obfuscatory, when used in an exchange like that
  quoted above. [post #343925]
 
 
 As you present this Judy, yes. But it is not ultimately unhelpful. 
 
 These kinds of statements have a purpose. They program the mind so that when 
 awakening finally occurs, the mind has something to hold on to; gives it an 
 anchor. Some people are very disoriented upon waking up because the character 
 of the experience is so different from what they expected, from what they had 
 been led to believe or what they made of what was said about it (in a 
 reasonably decent tradition, it would be the latter). 
 
 In the meantime the somewhat cryptic and seemingly irrational nature of the 
 statement can provoke a curiosity in some to just ponder what it might mean 
 because obviously the mind can only formulate an intellectual picture based 
 on imagination. This kind of pondering, contemplative thinking can also push 
 the mind to expand. Contemplative thinking seems to be less evident in the TM 
 tradition than in some others. It comes to some people more naturally than 
 others.
 
 So these kinds of statements, such as Maharishi saying 'in unity 
 consciousness nothing ever happened', or the statement 'you are already 
 enlightened', or 'if you do not see the way, you do not see it even if you 
 walk on it' (this is from the Sandokai, a foundational poem for Zen 
 Buddhism), kind of lie dormant, but they come to life when the individual 
 wakes up out of their individuality. Then the mind can say 'oh, that's what 
 that meant', and the disorientation that could have happened instead becomes 
 recognition.
 
 I wasn't trying to bamboozle Nabby. Nabby and everyone else has the full 
 value of being inside, outside, through and through. We could not discover it 
 if it were not. The only difference is if you think it is something other 
 than what you are experiencing as ordinary everyday experience, something you 
 have to look for, you do not see it.
 
 All the practices we do are just to get the mind to stop dead and give up 
 looking. It is so odd it can take such a long time to come to a truly 
 persistent standstill.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
Enjoyed this piece. For me, it's a light-hearted way to shake me up a little 
and be more aware to endeavor to hear my own heart.

I like the first comment on the blog: 
Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on April 26, 2013 - 1:42pm.
and then freedom, or awakening becomes the 'cult' ... we never escape ...

Ha!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: Integral Spiritual Practice
 [mailto:integralpractice@...] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:01 PM
 To: rick@...
 Subject: Are you in a cult?
 
  
 
 
   
 
  
 
   
 
 
 Dear Rick,
 
 Are you in a cult?
 
 Here's the short answer: You bet. And, worse, it's most likely an
 invisible cult!
 
 Okay, you're probably not a member of a new religious movement or other
 group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by the
 larger society.
 
 But you're almost certainly a member in good standing of the Public Cult of
 the World, whose beliefs and practices are bizarre and abnormal by any
 objective healthy standard. After all, as the Dalai Lama has pointed out, in
 the Cult of the World you:
 
 ...sacrifice your health in order to make money. Then you sacrifice money
 to recuperate your health. Then you are so anxious about the future that you
 don't enjoy the present: the result being that you do not live in the
 present or the future; you live as if you are never going to die, and then
 you die having never really lived.
 
 It's a totally crazy way to live, when you look directly at it! But among us
 members of the ubiquitous and invisible Cult, it seems the natural order of
 things, unremarkable and inevitable. The Cult reinforces and conceals a
 great many other unwritten rules, invisible beliefs and unexamined
 assumptions too. (One example: the Cult inculcates you day and night with
 the message that you're a separate individual who must compete to succeed
 and build up a big, impressive ego-domain, or otherwise you're a failure.)
 
 Some of the Cult's beliefs may be crazy (and make you miserable) but as soon
 as you start questioning them, you're the one who's risking madness. After
 all, you'd be departing from the Public Cult of the World's consensus
 reality (which is what defines insanity).
 
 One of the strictest rules of the Cult is the taboo against acknowledging
 that the Cult even exists. Thus, every day while you're working hard and
 focusing intelligently on your priorities, you're also being lulled back
 into being oblivious to the Cult and its bondage.
 
 You're being drawn into what consciousness researcher Charles Tart memorably
 dubbed the Consensus Trance.  He described it as a state of partly
 suspended animation, of stupor, of inability to function at [y]our maximum
 level... [dominated by] automatic and conditioned patterns of perception,
 thinking, feeling and behaving...
 
 Is there any escape from the Cult? Sure, but here's the paradox: to leave
 the Cult you'll have to risk being seen as...joining a cult! The official
 Public Cult of the World won't provide any support if you want to wake up
 from the consensus trance. And if you find someone who has in some sense
 awakened and who offers to help you wake up, or if you band together with
 others for mutual support in waking up from the trance so you can leave the
 Cultnow that's when your family might start to ask Hey, have you joined
 a cult?
 
 Maddeningly, your family (and critics) will probably be right! Most small
 groups, however healthy and intelligent their premises might be, readily
 develop groupthink dynamics that can easily become unhealthy, and even
 dangerously cultic.
 
 And yet without support and teaching, you're just going to be sucked back
 into the consensus trance and the mediocrity of the Public Cult of the
 World.
 
 What to do? 
 
 Well, you can recognize that the consensus trance and the programming of
 the Cult is everywhere and that going in and out of trance is a constant,
 on-going process. As you do, it will become obvious that waking up from the
 trance needs to happen again and again, in many little moments of choice.
 This is what I mean by practice --- that choice to live deliberately, to
 embrace a way of life that's fully alive, always evolving, spontaneously
 in-the-moment, self-aware, humorous and free. (This is the core of the
 Integral Spiritual Practice
 http://click.e.evolvingwisdom.com/?qs=25c601ea8e0de1d61695affe716d537855c77
 379117f20a921a45c29a6b5363e05cb13fd718cfdc9  I teach.)
 
 From this perspective, yes, you're in the big Cult, the one that keeps
 re-hypnotizing you back into the consensus trance. The point is this: you
 can leave the cult now --- in this very moment. May you do so, and may you
 keep leaving it, by waking up! Again and again and again --- every day, for
 the rest of your life.
 
 To your practice and awakening and freedom,
 
 Terry
 
 P.S. If you'd like to comment on this blog you can do so here
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
Thanks, Rick, I love this post.  Though have to admit that the idea of having 
to wake up moment after moment forever sounds exhausting!  Doesn't it ever get 
automatic?  





 From: Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:09 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Are you in a cult?
 


  
From:Integral Spiritual Practice [mailto:integralpract...@e.evolvingwisdom.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:01 PM
To: r...@searchsummit.com
Subject: Are you in a cult?
 
  
 
 Dear Rick,

Are you in a cult?

Here's the short answer: You bet. And, worse, it's most likely an invisible 
cult!

Okay, you're probably not a member of a new religious movement or other group 
whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by the larger 
society.

But you're almost certainly a member in good standing of the Public Cult of the 
World, whose beliefs and practices are bizarre and abnormal by any objective 
healthy standard. After all, as the Dalai Lama has pointed out, in the Cult of 
the World you:

...sacrifice your health in order to make money. Then you sacrifice money to 
recuperate your health. Then you are so anxious about the future that you don't 
enjoy the present: the result being that you do not live in the present or the 
future; you live as if you are never going to die, and then you die having 
never really lived.

It's a totally crazy way to live, when you look directly at it! But among us 
members of the ubiquitous and invisible Cult, it seems the natural order of 
things, unremarkable and inevitable. The Cult reinforces and conceals a great 
many other unwritten rules, invisible beliefs and unexamined assumptions too. 
(One example: the Cult inculcates you day and night with the message that 
you're a separate individual who must compete to succeed and build up a big, 
impressive ego-domain, or otherwise you're a failure.)

Some of the Cult's beliefs may be crazy (and make you miserable) but as soon as 
you start questioning them, you're the one who's risking madness. After all, 
you'd be departing from the Public Cult of the World's consensus reality 
(which is what defines insanity).

One of the strictest rules of the Cult is the taboo against acknowledging that 
the Cult even exists. Thus, every day while you're working hard and focusing 
intelligently on your priorities, you're also being lulled back into being 
oblivious to the Cult and its bondage.

You're being drawn into what consciousness researcher Charles Tart memorably 
dubbed the Consensus Trance.  He described it as a state of partly suspended 
animation, of stupor, of inability to function at [y]our maximum level... 
[dominated by] automatic and conditioned patterns of perception, thinking, 
feeling and behaving...

Is there any escape from the Cult? Sure, but here's the paradox: to leave the 
Cult you'll have to risk being seen as...joining a cult! The official Public 
Cult of the World won't provide any support if you want to wake up from the 
consensus trance. And if you find someone who has in some sense awakened and 
who offers to help you wake up, or if you band together with others for mutual 
support in waking up from the trance so you can leave the Cultnowthat's 
when your family might start to ask Hey, have you joined a cult?

Maddeningly, your family (and critics) will probably be right! Most small 
groups, however healthy and intelligent their premises might be, readily 
develop groupthink dynamics that can easily become unhealthy, and even 
dangerously cultic.

And yet without support and teaching, you're just going to be sucked back into 
the consensus trance and the mediocrity of the Public Cult of the World.

What to do? 

Well, you can recognize that the consensus trance and the programming of the 
Cult is everywhere and that going in and out of trance is a constant, on-going 
process. As you do, it will become obvious that waking up from the trance needs 
to happen again and again, in many little moments of choice. This is what I 
mean by practice --- that choice to live deliberately, to embrace a way of 
life that's fully alive, always evolving, spontaneously in-the-moment, 
self-aware, humorous and free. (This is the core of the Integral Spiritual 
Practice I teach.)

From this perspective, yes, you're in the big Cult, the one that keeps 
re-hypnotizing you back into the consensus trance. The point is this: you can 
leave the cult now --- in this very moment. May you do so, and may you keep 
leaving it, by waking up! Again and again and again --- every day, for the 
rest of your life.

To your practice and awakening and freedom,

Terry

P.S. If you'd like to comment on this blog you can do so here. 
 
    
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
No body gets out of here alive (-:





 From: Carol jchwe...@gmail.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:14 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
 


  
Enjoyed this piece. For me, it's a light-hearted way to shake me up a little 
and be more aware to endeavor to hear my own heart.

I like the first comment on the blog: 
Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on April 26, 2013 - 1:42pm.
and then freedom, or awakening becomes the 'cult' ... we never escape ...

Ha!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: Integral Spiritual Practice
 [mailto:integralpractice@...] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:01 PM
 To: rick@...
 Subject: Are you in a cult?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Dear Rick,
 
 Are you in a cult?
 
 Here's the short answer: You bet. And, worse, it's most likely an
 invisible cult!
 
 Okay, you're probably not a member of a new religious movement or other
 group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by the
 larger society.
 
 But you're almost certainly a member in good standing of the Public Cult of
 the World, whose beliefs and practices are bizarre and abnormal by any
 objective healthy standard. After all, as the Dalai Lama has pointed out, in
 the Cult of the World you:
 
 ...sacrifice your health in order to make money. Then you sacrifice money
 to recuperate your health. Then you are so anxious about the future that you
 don't enjoy the present: the result being that you do not live in the
 present or the future; you live as if you are never going to die, and then
 you die having never really lived.
 
 It's a totally crazy way to live, when you look directly at it! But among us
 members of the ubiquitous and invisible Cult, it seems the natural order of
 things, unremarkable and inevitable. The Cult reinforces and conceals a
 great many other unwritten rules, invisible beliefs and unexamined
 assumptions too. (One example: the Cult inculcates you day and night with
 the message that you're a separate individual who must compete to succeed
 and build up a big, impressive ego-domain, or otherwise you're a failure.)
 
 Some of the Cult's beliefs may be crazy (and make you miserable) but as soon
 as you start questioning them, you're the one who's risking madness. After
 all, you'd be departing from the Public Cult of the World's consensus
 reality (which is what defines insanity).
 
 One of the strictest rules of the Cult is the taboo against acknowledging
 that the Cult even exists. Thus, every day while you're working hard and
 focusing intelligently on your priorities, you're also being lulled back
 into being oblivious to the Cult and its bondage.
 
 You're being drawn into what consciousness researcher Charles Tart memorably
 dubbed the Consensus Trance.  He described it as a state of partly
 suspended animation, of stupor, of inability to function at [y]our maximum
 level... [dominated by] automatic and conditioned patterns of perception,
 thinking, feeling and behaving...
 
 Is there any escape from the Cult? Sure, but here's the paradox: to leave
 the Cult you'll have to risk being seen as...joining a cult! The official
 Public Cult of the World won't provide any support if you want to wake up
 from the consensus trance. And if you find someone who has in some sense
 awakened and who offers to help you wake up, or if you band together with
 others for mutual support in waking up from the trance so you can leave the
 Cultnow that's when your family might start to ask Hey, have you joined
 a cult?
 
 Maddeningly, your family (and critics) will probably be right! Most small
 groups, however healthy and intelligent their premises might be, readily
 develop groupthink dynamics that can easily become unhealthy, and even
 dangerously cultic.
 
 And yet without support and teaching, you're just going to be sucked back
 into the consensus trance and the mediocrity of the Public Cult of the
 World.
 
 What to do? 
 
 Well, you can recognize that the consensus trance and the programming of
 the Cult is everywhere and that going in and out of trance is a constant,
 on-going process. As you do, it will become obvious that waking up from the
 trance needs to happen again and again, in many little moments of choice.
 This is what I mean by practice --- that choice to live deliberately, to
 embrace a way of life that's fully alive, always evolving, spontaneously
 in-the-moment, self-aware, humorous and free. (This is the core of the
 Integral Spiritual Practice
 http://click.e.evolvingwisdom.com/?qs=25c601ea8e0de1d61695affe716d537855c77
 379117f20a921a45c29a6b5363e05cb13fd718cfdc9  I teach.)
 
 From this perspective, yes, you're in the big Cult, the one that keeps
 re-hypnotizing you back into the consensus trance. The point is this: you
 can leave the cult now --- in this very moment. May you do so, and may you
 keep leaving it, by waking up! Again and again 

[FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread Richard J. Williams


  Let's play pretend:
  
  Pretend that the AHA scientific statement brings about a 
  slew of larger-scale studies designed the way this study was:
  
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2693686
  
  Where good faith attempts were made to compensate for the 
  fact that it is virtually impossible to conduct a double- 
  blind study on meditation by ensuring that all test subjects 
  had the same expectations.
  
  Let us further pretend that these hypothetical studies show 
  roughly the same thing:
  
  on stress/health issues, TM comes in first, mindfulness 
  practices second and concentrative practices third.
  
  on mindfulness-related issues, mindfulness comes in first, 
  TM second, and concentrative practices third.
  
  Let us finally pretend that a large enough number of these 
  studies are done in such  way that all the reviewers who 
  thus far have insisted that there's not enough good research 
  available to make any real determination about the 
  effectiveness of meditative practices on anything at all, 
  start to agree with the AHA statement and conclude that 
  in certain circumstances, TM comes out consistently ahead 
  -maybe they start to endorse mindfulness for certain things 
  too, but not the same things that they say TM is good for.
  
  At THAT point, will you concede that TM  IS in any way 
  superior to any other meditations out there?
 
turquoiseb:
 Lawson, you can play pretend all you want, but
 I'm stuck back on the more fundamental issue that
 this WHOLE QUESTION is based on the ego and 
 attachment of TMers who are *desperate* to somehow
 prove that what they were told over and over and 
 over and over and over and over for decades is true. 
 That is, that TM *is* superior, or the best. 

If you seek the realms of light, the best thing to do 
is to meditate with love and the gentle aliveness. 
Meditation should not be forced. - Zen Master Rama

http://www.ramaquotes.com/html/introduction_meditation.html

 
 I honestly have never encountered another form of
 meditation or tradition that indoctrinates its
 practitioners to believe this and proselytize this, 
 although in theory they might exist, if some other 
 teacher or tradition is/was as ego-bound and petty 
 as Maharishi. 
 
 THE WHOLE QUESTION is meaningless, except to 
 those (like yourself) who are trying to prove 
 something having (IMO) to do with their *own* 
 superiority in being practitioners of the best. 
 
 So go off and play pretend on your own. Most of
 the rest of us DON'T CARE.
 
 YOU care. You care a LOT. Given your posting history
 here and on other forums, this need to prove TM's
 supposed superiority or bestness is a common
 and consistently annoying theme, and has been as 
 long as I've known you. Just sayin'...




[FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
*chuckle*

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 No body gets out of here alive (-:
 
 
 
 
 
  From: Carol jchwelch@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
  
 
 
   
 Enjoyed this piece. For me, it's a light-hearted way to shake me up a little 
 and be more aware to endeavor to hear my own heart.
 
 I like the first comment on the blog: 
 Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on April 26, 2013 - 1:42pm.
 and then freedom, or awakening becomes the 'cult' ... we never escape ...
 
 Ha!
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: Integral Spiritual Practice
  [mailto:integralpractice@] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:01 PM
  To: rick@
  Subject: Are you in a cult?
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Dear Rick,
  
  Are you in a cult?
  
  Here's the short answer: You bet. And, worse, it's most likely an
  invisible cult!
  
  Okay, you're probably not a member of a new religious movement or other
  group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by the
  larger society.
  
  But you're almost certainly a member in good standing of the Public Cult of
  the World, whose beliefs and practices are bizarre and abnormal by any
  objective healthy standard. After all, as the Dalai Lama has pointed out, in
  the Cult of the World you:
  
  ...sacrifice your health in order to make money. Then you sacrifice money
  to recuperate your health. Then you are so anxious about the future that you
  don't enjoy the present: the result being that you do not live in the
  present or the future; you live as if you are never going to die, and then
  you die having never really lived.
  
  It's a totally crazy way to live, when you look directly at it! But among us
  members of the ubiquitous and invisible Cult, it seems the natural order of
  things, unremarkable and inevitable. The Cult reinforces and conceals a
  great many other unwritten rules, invisible beliefs and unexamined
  assumptions too. (One example: the Cult inculcates you day and night with
  the message that you're a separate individual who must compete to succeed
  and build up a big, impressive ego-domain, or otherwise you're a failure.)
  
  Some of the Cult's beliefs may be crazy (and make you miserable) but as soon
  as you start questioning them, you're the one who's risking madness. After
  all, you'd be departing from the Public Cult of the World's consensus
  reality (which is what defines insanity).
  
  One of the strictest rules of the Cult is the taboo against acknowledging
  that the Cult even exists. Thus, every day while you're working hard and
  focusing intelligently on your priorities, you're also being lulled back
  into being oblivious to the Cult and its bondage.
  
  You're being drawn into what consciousness researcher Charles Tart memorably
  dubbed the Consensus Trance.  He described it as a state of partly
  suspended animation, of stupor, of inability to function at [y]our maximum
  level... [dominated by] automatic and conditioned patterns of perception,
  thinking, feeling and behaving...
  
  Is there any escape from the Cult? Sure, but here's the paradox: to leave
  the Cult you'll have to risk being seen as...joining a cult! The official
  Public Cult of the World won't provide any support if you want to wake up
  from the consensus trance. And if you find someone who has in some sense
  awakened and who offers to help you wake up, or if you band together with
  others for mutual support in waking up from the trance so you can leave the
  Cultnow that's when your family might start to ask Hey, have you joined
  a cult?
  
  Maddeningly, your family (and critics) will probably be right! Most small
  groups, however healthy and intelligent their premises might be, readily
  develop groupthink dynamics that can easily become unhealthy, and even
  dangerously cultic.
  
  And yet without support and teaching, you're just going to be sucked back
  into the consensus trance and the mediocrity of the Public Cult of the
  World.
  
  What to do? 
  
  Well, you can recognize that the consensus trance and the programming of
  the Cult is everywhere and that going in and out of trance is a constant,
  on-going process. As you do, it will become obvious that waking up from the
  trance needs to happen again and again, in many little moments of choice.
  This is what I mean by practice --- that choice to live deliberately, to
  embrace a way of life that's fully alive, always evolving, spontaneously
  in-the-moment, self-aware, humorous and free. (This is the core of the
  Integral Spiritual Practice
  http://click.e.evolvingwisdom.com/?qs=25c601ea8e0de1d61695affe716d537855c77
  379117f20a921a45c29a6b5363e05cb13fd718cfdc9  I teach.)
  
  From this perspective, yes, you're in the big Cult, the one that keeps
  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
I'm quoting but I forget who (-:





 From: Carol jchwe...@gmail.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:42 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
 


  
*chuckle*

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 No body gets out of here alive (-:
 
 
 
 
 
  From: Carol jchwelch@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
 
 
 
   
 Enjoyed this piece. For me, it's a light-hearted way to shake me up a little 
 and be more aware to endeavor to hear my own heart.
 
 I like the first comment on the blog: 
 Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on April 26, 2013 - 1:42pm.
 and then freedom, or awakening becomes the 'cult' ... we never escape ...
 
 Ha!
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: Integral Spiritual Practice
  [mailto:integralpractice@] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:01 PM
  To: rick@
  Subject: Are you in a cult?
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Dear Rick,
  
  Are you in a cult?
  
  Here's the short answer: You bet. And, worse, it's most likely an
  invisible cult!
  
  Okay, you're probably not a member of a new religious movement or other
  group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by the
  larger society.
  
  But you're almost certainly a member in good standing of the Public Cult of
  the World, whose beliefs and practices are bizarre and abnormal by any
  objective healthy standard. After all, as the Dalai Lama has pointed out, in
  the Cult of the World you:
  
  ...sacrifice your health in order to make money. Then you sacrifice money
  to recuperate your health. Then you are so anxious about the future that you
  don't enjoy the present: the result being that you do not live in the
  present or the future; you live as if you are never going to die, and then
  you die having never really lived.
  
  It's a totally crazy way to live, when you look directly at it! But among us
  members of the ubiquitous and invisible Cult, it seems the natural order of
  things, unremarkable and inevitable. The Cult reinforces and conceals a
  great many other unwritten rules, invisible beliefs and unexamined
  assumptions too. (One example: the Cult inculcates you day and night with
  the message that you're a separate individual who must compete to succeed
  and build up a big, impressive ego-domain, or otherwise you're a failure.)
  
  Some of the Cult's beliefs may be crazy (and make you miserable) but as soon
  as you start questioning them, you're the one who's risking madness. After
  all, you'd be departing from the Public Cult of the World's consensus
  reality (which is what defines insanity).
  
  One of the strictest rules of the Cult is the taboo against acknowledging
  that the Cult even exists. Thus, every day while you're working hard and
  focusing intelligently on your priorities, you're also being lulled back
  into being oblivious to the Cult and its bondage.
  
  You're being drawn into what consciousness researcher Charles Tart memorably
  dubbed the Consensus Trance.  He described it as a state of partly
  suspended animation, of stupor, of inability to function at [y]our maximum
  level... [dominated by] automatic and conditioned patterns of perception,
  thinking, feeling and behaving...
  
  Is there any escape from the Cult? Sure, but here's the paradox: to leave
  the Cult you'll have to risk being seen as...joining a cult! The official
  Public Cult of the World won't provide any support if you want to wake up
  from the consensus trance. And if you find someone who has in some sense
  awakened and who offers to help you wake up, or if you band together with
  others for mutual support in waking up from the trance so you can leave the
  Cultnow that's when your family might start to ask Hey, have you joined
  a cult?
  
  Maddeningly, your family (and critics) will probably be right! Most small
  groups, however healthy and intelligent their premises might be, readily
  develop groupthink dynamics that can easily become unhealthy, and even
  dangerously cultic.
  
  And yet without support and teaching, you're just going to be sucked back
  into the consensus trance and the mediocrity of the Public Cult of the
  World.
  
  What to do? 
  
  Well, you can recognize that the consensus trance and the programming of
  the Cult is everywhere and that going in and out of trance is a constant,
  on-going process. As you do, it will become obvious that waking up from the
  trance needs to happen again and again, in many little moments of choice.
  This is what I mean by practice --- that choice to live deliberately, to
  embrace a way of life that's fully alive, always evolving, spontaneously
  in-the-moment, self-aware, humorous and free. (This is the core of the
  Integral Spiritual 

[FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread Richard J. Williams


Michael Jackson:
 for sure TM is not in any way superior to any other
 meditations out there.
 
Well, for this to be true you would have to try ALL 
meditation techniques. There is some doubt you even 
know TM practice or basic yoga poses. Go figure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole

Or, I guess it all depends on how you can define 
'meditation'.

Based on my recent visit to Sonoma, almost the entire 
northern half of California meditates using various 
breath awareness techniques or various yoga 
techniques.

According to the dictionary, meditation means simply 
'to think things over'. If so, then everyone 
meditates. 

There's probably not a person on the planet who 
doesn't pause once or twice a day to take stock of 
their mind contents.

And, we're all transcending - even without a specific 
technique. So, the question is: do you enjoy?

 
  Can you think of another product with 
  no value, as you seem to suggest, that 
  has been around for fifty years, simply 
  because of the marketing geniuses behind 
  it? I can't. Has to provide some value. 
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
*another chuckle*

Boy, that'd cause some indigestion! ;D

**

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
 
  That made me laugh. I did a quick google search on the health benefits of 
  eating with gold cutlery. All I found was that gold cutlery isn't durable.
  
  http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-using-gold-cutlery.htm
  
  Here's an article about other metals in cutlery.
  http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/776ba1d4-93ee-11e1-baf0-00144feab49a.html#axzz2TMuHUnkS
  
  I have three gold crowns in my mouth. I always eat with them. Wonder if 
  they are enlivening my heart?
 
 Seems that they are, Carol.
 I have a few gold ones myself and I had wondered if I had swallowed a Raja or 
 two when I wasn't paying attention!
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@ wrote:
  
   I like this one better - the Ultimate Arrogant Bullshit TM 
   My-Nose-Is-Permanently-Aimed-Toward-The-Sky-Cause-I'm-So-Much-More-Refined-Than-You
Indulgence.
   
   http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
   
   And they even include more TM vacuous supercilious claims they never back 
   up with facts:
   
   Normally cutlery is gold plated only for show. This process of gold 
   plating is found to neutralize the “Ojas” enhancing effect. “Jivan 
   Super Gold” is manufactured by a new, unique process to preserve and 
   enhance 
   “Ojas”. This unique process was developed by Jivan Super Products, 
   together with Vedic health experts and is not commercially available. To 
   enable the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
   and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
   gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new technology 
   we can now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and eating 
   utensils.
   
   
   
   
From: merlin vedamerlin@
   To: 
   Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 6:15 AM
   Subject: [FairfieldLife] Coherent Times Magazine

   
   
     
   
   
   Coherent Times Magazine
   coherenttimes.wordpress.com/tag/tm-england/http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/tag/tm-england/
   
   ...*...
   http://dev.invincibleeurope.eu/de/
   
   ***_
   
   .
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
Google that quote! ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_One_Here_Gets_Out_Alive

Interesting.

**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 I'm quoting but I forget who (-:
 
 
 
 
 
  From: Carol jchwelch@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:42 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
  
 
 
   
 *chuckle*
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  No body gets out of here alive (-:
  
  
  
  
  
   From: Carol jchwelch@
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:14 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
  
  
  
    
  Enjoyed this piece. For me, it's a light-hearted way to shake me up a 
  little and be more aware to endeavor to hear my own heart.
  
  I like the first comment on the blog: 
  Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on April 26, 2013 - 1:42pm.
  and then freedom, or awakening becomes the 'cult' ... we never escape ...
  
  Ha!
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
  
   From: Integral Spiritual Practice
   [mailto:integralpractice@] 
   Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:01 PM
   To: rick@
   Subject: Are you in a cult?
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Dear Rick,
   
   Are you in a cult?
   
   Here's the short answer: You bet. And, worse, it's most likely an
   invisible cult!
   
   Okay, you're probably not a member of a new religious movement or other
   group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by the
   larger society.
   
   But you're almost certainly a member in good standing of the Public Cult 
   of
   the World, whose beliefs and practices are bizarre and abnormal by any
   objective healthy standard. After all, as the Dalai Lama has pointed out, 
   in
   the Cult of the World you:
   
   ...sacrifice your health in order to make money. Then you sacrifice money
   to recuperate your health. Then you are so anxious about the future that 
   you
   don't enjoy the present: the result being that you do not live in the
   present or the future; you live as if you are never going to die, and then
   you die having never really lived.
   
   It's a totally crazy way to live, when you look directly at it! But among 
   us
   members of the ubiquitous and invisible Cult, it seems the natural order 
   of
   things, unremarkable and inevitable. The Cult reinforces and conceals a
   great many other unwritten rules, invisible beliefs and unexamined
   assumptions too. (One example: the Cult inculcates you day and night with
   the message that you're a separate individual who must compete to 
   succeed
   and build up a big, impressive ego-domain, or otherwise you're a 
   failure.)
   
   Some of the Cult's beliefs may be crazy (and make you miserable) but as 
   soon
   as you start questioning them, you're the one who's risking madness. After
   all, you'd be departing from the Public Cult of the World's consensus
   reality (which is what defines insanity).
   
   One of the strictest rules of the Cult is the taboo against acknowledging
   that the Cult even exists. Thus, every day while you're working hard and
   focusing intelligently on your priorities, you're also being lulled back
   into being oblivious to the Cult and its bondage.
   
   You're being drawn into what consciousness researcher Charles Tart 
   memorably
   dubbed the Consensus Trance.  He described it as a state of partly
   suspended animation, of stupor, of inability to function at [y]our maximum
   level... [dominated by] automatic and conditioned patterns of perception,
   thinking, feeling and behaving...
   
   Is there any escape from the Cult? Sure, but here's the paradox: to leave
   the Cult you'll have to risk being seen as...joining a cult! The official
   Public Cult of the World won't provide any support if you want to wake up
   from the consensus trance. And if you find someone who has in some sense
   awakened and who offers to help you wake up, or if you band together with
   others for mutual support in waking up from the trance so you can leave 
   the
   Cultnow that's when your family might start to ask Hey, have you 
   joined
   a cult?
   
   Maddeningly, your family (and critics) will probably be right! Most small
   groups, however healthy and intelligent their premises might be, readily
   develop groupthink dynamics that can easily become unhealthy, and even
   dangerously cultic.
   
   And yet without support and teaching, you're just going to be sucked back
   into the consensus trance and the mediocrity of the Public Cult of the
   World.
   
   What to do? 
   
   Well, you can recognize that the consensus trance and the programming of
   the Cult is everywhere and that going in and out of trance is a constant,
   on-going process. As you do, it will become 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
More Jim Morrison:

http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Jim_Morrison/



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@... wrote:

 Google that quote! ;)
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_One_Here_Gets_Out_Alive
 
 Interesting.
 
 **
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  I'm quoting but I forget who (-:
  
  
  
  
  
   From: Carol jchwelch@
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:42 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
   
  
  
    
  *chuckle*
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
  
   No body gets out of here alive (-:
   
   
   
   
   
From: Carol jchwelch@
   To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:14 AM
   Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are you in a cult?
   
   
   
     
   Enjoyed this piece. For me, it's a light-hearted way to shake me up a 
   little and be more aware to endeavor to hear my own heart.
   
   I like the first comment on the blog: 
   Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on April 26, 2013 - 1:42pm.
   and then freedom, or awakening becomes the 'cult' ... we never escape 
   ...
   
   Ha!
   
   
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
   
From: Integral Spiritual Practice
[mailto:integralpractice@] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:01 PM
To: rick@
Subject: Are you in a cult?











Dear Rick,

Are you in a cult?

Here's the short answer: You bet. And, worse, it's most likely an
invisible cult!

Okay, you're probably not a member of a new religious movement or other
group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by 
the
larger society.

But you're almost certainly a member in good standing of the Public 
Cult of
the World, whose beliefs and practices are bizarre and abnormal by any
objective healthy standard. After all, as the Dalai Lama has pointed 
out, in
the Cult of the World you:

...sacrifice your health in order to make money. Then you sacrifice 
money
to recuperate your health. Then you are so anxious about the future 
that you
don't enjoy the present: the result being that you do not live in the
present or the future; you live as if you are never going to die, and 
then
you die having never really lived.

It's a totally crazy way to live, when you look directly at it! But 
among us
members of the ubiquitous and invisible Cult, it seems the natural 
order of
things, unremarkable and inevitable. The Cult reinforces and conceals a
great many other unwritten rules, invisible beliefs and unexamined
assumptions too. (One example: the Cult inculcates you day and night 
with
the message that you're a separate individual who must compete to 
succeed
and build up a big, impressive ego-domain, or otherwise you're a 
failure.)

Some of the Cult's beliefs may be crazy (and make you miserable) but as 
soon
as you start questioning them, you're the one who's risking madness. 
After
all, you'd be departing from the Public Cult of the World's consensus
reality (which is what defines insanity).

One of the strictest rules of the Cult is the taboo against 
acknowledging
that the Cult even exists. Thus, every day while you're working hard and
focusing intelligently on your priorities, you're also being lulled back
into being oblivious to the Cult and its bondage.

You're being drawn into what consciousness researcher Charles Tart 
memorably
dubbed the Consensus Trance.  He described it as a state of partly
suspended animation, of stupor, of inability to function at [y]our 
maximum
level... [dominated by] automatic and conditioned patterns of 
perception,
thinking, feeling and behaving...

Is there any escape from the Cult? Sure, but here's the paradox: to 
leave
the Cult you'll have to risk being seen as...joining a cult! The 
official
Public Cult of the World won't provide any support if you want to wake 
up
from the consensus trance. And if you find someone who has in some sense
awakened and who offers to help you wake up, or if you band together 
with
others for mutual support in waking up from the trance so you can leave 
the
Cultnow that's when your family might start to ask Hey, have you 
joined
a cult?

Maddeningly, your family (and critics) will probably be right! Most 
small
groups, however healthy and intelligent their premises might be, readily
develop groupthink dynamics that can easily become unhealthy, and even
dangerously cultic.

And yet without support and 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@... wrote:

 PS: I imagine Barry, since you most likely won't respond 
 to me directly and if my limited forum observations are 
 correct and if you choose to address anything I stated, 
 you will do so in an indirect manner with a new topic 
 and without naming names. 

Nonsense. I will ignore it -- and you -- completely.
Have a nice day.  :-)

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
 
  Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, other 
  than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here with a 
  Knapp update some months back.
  
  From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how 
  you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and whom 
  you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part of the 
  Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
  
  Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
  posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
  communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
  
  Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
  regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the 
  bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your 
  advice/suggestions.  What's up with that? You trying to start your own 
  little forum cult?
  
  I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
  seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
  pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What good 
  is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate with, 
  putting yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more us/them camps. 
  Not that you care; I imagine you don't. 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
   wrote:
   
It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
   
   I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
   and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
   used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
   understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
   have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
   class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
   Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
   cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)
   
   There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
   they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
   replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
   replying to. 
   
   These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
   Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
   bother even trying to interact with them as if they
   might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
   and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
   a target. 
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
wrote:

   Give me something Steve.
 
  You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.

 Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
 to anyone.

   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Carol
Oh my! He responded! ;D

Thank you Barry. I plan to have good day. You too. 

*

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
 
  PS: I imagine Barry, since you most likely won't respond 
  to me directly and if my limited forum observations are 
  correct and if you choose to address anything I stated, 
  you will do so in an indirect manner with a new topic 
  and without naming names. 
 
 Nonsense. I will ignore it -- and you -- completely.
 Have a nice day.  :-)
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
  
   Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, 
   other than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here 
   with a Knapp update some months back.
   
   From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how 
   you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and 
   whom you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part 
   of the Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
   
   Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
   posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
   communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
   
   Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
   regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the 
   bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your 
   advice/suggestions.  What's up with that? You trying to start your own 
   little forum cult?
   
   I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
   seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
   pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What 
   good is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate 
   with, putting yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more 
   us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine you don't. 
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
wrote:

 It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
 Ravi writes has a Robin feel.

I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)

There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
replying to. 

These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
bother even trying to interact with them as if they
might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
a target. 

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
 wrote:
 
Give me something Steve.
  
   You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
 
  Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
  to anyone.
 

   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine

2013-05-15 Thread salyavin808


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 To enable the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
 and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
 gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new 
 technology we can now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and 
 eating 
 utensils.
 
 What bullshit, how can it be as pure as 24 ct gold if it isn't 24 ct gold? 
 And the strength of the gold has been increased to the region of 18ct 
 gold??? I'm sure goldsmiths all over the world are drooling with envy they 
 didn't come up with the secret process that can do such a thing. Typical TM 
 type double talk that promises the sun, moon and stars while delivering very 
 little.
 

Maybe he finally found the philosophers stone?


 
  From: salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:24 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coherent Times Magazine
  
 
 
   
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@ wrote:
 
  I like this one better - the Ultimate Arrogant Bullshit TM 
  My-Nose-Is-Permanently-Aimed-Toward-The-Sky-Cause-I'm-So-Much-More-Refined-Than-You
   Indulgence.
  
  http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
  
  And they even include more TM vacuous supercilious claims they never back 
  up with facts:
 
 A fool and his money are soon parted. All the correct buzzwords are
 there though; ancient wisdom, modern science, perfect health.
 
 Eating with the Pure Gold Spoon is said to enliven the 7 to 8 drops of 
 Ojas in the heart. This increases happiness, improves digestion and has 
 beneficial effects to the heart, brain and nervous system.
 
 Chuckle. Caveat emptor and all that...
 
  To enable the cutlery to be used on a practical daily basis, the hardness 
  and strength of the gold has also been increased to the region of 18ct 
  gold, whilst retaining the purity of 24ct gold. With this new technology we 
  can now offer solid gold, or gold coated cutlery and eating 
  utensils.
 
 So they dilute gold to 18 carat while preserving its purity?
 
 I'm intrigued, I suspected I know the person behind it and after
 a google, found out I do. He used to have a room in the same
 corridor from me at HQ and used to conduct his electroplating
 experiments at all hours, occasionally producing a spoon or
 amrit kalash pot. I was impressed that he taught himself the 
 whole thing from scratch. 
 
 But I hope he doesn't sell any as I hate to think of people 
 getting ripped off. But OTOH if you really want a gold spoon who 
 am I to complain? I'd hate to deny people: youthfulness, long life, freedom 
 from disease, increased physical power, strength of all the sense organs, 
 good concentration, detachment from problems, freedom from psychosomatic 
 disturbances and the experience of bliss! 
 
 Here's an advert from the Grauniad:
 
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2003/aug/31/alternativeinvestment.homesandgardens
 
 I say advert because the author of the piece is a TM teacher.
 
 It aint what you know, it's who you know.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
  These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
  Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
  bother even trying to interact with them as if they
  might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
  and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
  a target.

 I admit Barry, I find FFL rather dull without those interactions.  So
I
 guess I'm a pretty guilty party.

You've definitely got a point there about FFL as a whole. :-)
If you're having fun interacting with these folks, by all means
continue. It stopped being even interesting for me some time ago.

 BTW, neat story about your current working assignment.

It's an interesting project. News about it arrived today, for
those (few) who might be interested:

IBM Worklight Wins SIIA CODiE Award

IBM Worklight was just announced as the winner of the 2013 CODiE Award
for Best Mobile Development Solution by the Software and Information
Industry Association (SIIA), the principal trade association for the
software and digital content industries. The SIIA CODiE Award win is a
prestigious honor as winners are reviewed and chosen by software
industry executives and SIIA member votes.

http://www.siia.net/codies/2013/winners_detail.asp?nID=480
http://www.siia.net/codies/2013/winners_detail.asp?nID=480





[FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@... wrote:
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
  
   Share,
   
   Red China obviously wants to trade with the USA
  
  John, are you aware that Red China is a cold war term
  that's virtually obsolete these days except among extreme
  right-wingers?
 
 Judy,
 
 I'm using the term as title of convenience to differentiate 
 mainland China from Taiwan, which also claims to be China.

I seriously doubt anyone would be confused. I don't think
many people assume you mean Taiwan when you say China.
(In contexts where it might be really important to make that
differentiation, you could always just use mainland China,
as you do above.)

 No, I'm not an extreme right-winger as you may be assuming.

The reason I mentioned it, John, is because I know you
*aren't* an extreme right-winger and figured you might not
want to give the impression that you are.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread doctordumbass
Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this board.

Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows to ask for 
love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap him down. Now he 
can barely tell the difference between his need and the inevitable response. At 
least a slap indicates some sort of attention for him. One sad old fuck, that 
one.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@... wrote:

 Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, other 
 than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here with a 
 Knapp update some months back.
 
 From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how you 
 do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and whom you 
 feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part of the Hate 
 Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
 
 Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
 posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
 communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
 
 Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
 regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the bit 
 I've read the people you admonish never ask for your advice/suggestions.  
 What's up with that? You trying to start your own little forum cult?
 
 I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
 seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
 pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What good is 
 it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate with, putting 
 yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more us/them camps. Not that 
 you care; I imagine you don't. 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
  
   It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
   Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
  
  I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
  and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
  used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
  understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
  have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
  class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
  Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
  cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)
  
  There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
  they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
  replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
  replying to. 
  
  These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
  Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
  bother even trying to interact with them as if they
  might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
  and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
  a target. 
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
   wrote:
   
  Give me something Steve.

 You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
   
Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
to anyone.
   
  
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread Bhairitu
On 05/15/2013 06:57 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
 Bhairitu:
 You could enhance your understanding by looking up the subject:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China#Modern_history

 So, I wonder  what the Tibetans think?

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet

I heard the other side of the story from a writer of spiritual articles 
and books who said many Tibetans didn't like paying a tax to a theocracy.


 Only five established religions are lawful in China and these five
 Communist Party-sanctioned religious groups are at odds with the
 atheist aspects of the official Marxist ideology. The vast majority of
 Chinese residents are considered to be irreligious.

 .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

I'm not into religion myself.  Are you?


 The 1978 Constitution of the People's Republic of China guarantees
 freedom of religion in Article 36.

 Falun Gong is meditation, both sitting and standing, and yoga poses;
 it is banned in China and is not possible to practice in large groups.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falun_Gong
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falun_Gong

I seem to recall the problem with Falun Gong was not the meditation but  
that it was becoming a cult movement.  So how is TM doing in China?


[FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
Eating with the Pure Gold Spoon is said to enliven the 7 to 8 drops of “Ojas” 
in the heart.

Wonder who said that? 


Maybe the guy who invented the process of goldifying the spoons borrowed one of 
Johnnie Hagelin's real extra fine shore nuff good and accurate physics ideas or 
even one of his Vedic measuring machines to measure how many drops of ojas the 
heart is excreting when gobbling vittles with a vedic gold spoon.

Wonder if eating high priced chavan prash and calling it amrit with the gold 
spoon while staring at a vedic observatory model would amp up the ojas meter to 
10 or 11? 


[FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread Jason



 ---  John jr_esq@ wrote:
 
  MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it 
  promotes self-will and not the will of the unified field.
 
 The unified field has a will? Far out.

   ---  turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
   
Isn't it just a *trip* that so many people assume 
it does? 
   
   Actually it gives me the creeps!
   
   I mean the UF - if it exists - is simply what the universe
   is before it gets all random and foamy and *long* before
   the chaos becomes visible as the whirly subatomic stuff we 
   all know and love.
  
  As Hagelin describes the unified field, It is an ocean of Intelligence.  As 
  such, It is the Observer, the Process of Observing, and the Observed.
  
  This universe and any other universes which come out of the Unified Field 
  cannot be random and chaotic since It is Intelligence.  In particular, this 
  universe is based on Natural Laws in which the subatomic particles and 
  galaxies are subjected to.
 

---  salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@... wrote:

 Ha! And he calls himself a physicist! 
 
 As I've always said, he's a card-carrying, tub thumping, religious fruitcake.

 The whole *point* of 20th century physics is that we learnt that
 Newton was wrong about the universe being fundamentally predictable -
 it is fundamentally chaotic. All we can do is predict how likely the
 random effects are. And we can do that astoundingly well.
 
 Apart from dark energy and matter it's all done and dusted, until
 someone realises there is something else we can't explain and then
 we need more and bigger machines to probe ever further. And Hagelin
 thinks he's already explained it all!
 
 I'm telling you, the idea that there is an intelligence behind
 the universe is a religious concept not a scientific one.


The Universe is balanced between order and chaos.  Newton 
wasn't exactly wrong.  Newton's theories form the bedrock 
of modern science.  Einstein refined it to the next level.

Could it be most people are in fact worshippers of Discordia 
the ancient Greek goddess of Chaos. Such a religion is 
called Discordianism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discordianism





[FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread Jason

 
  On 05/14/2013 10:25 AM, John wrote:
  With the city on the verge of bankruptcy, the participation of Chinese 
  auto industry in the area may be a welcome development.
 
  http://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-creating-auto-niche-within-012304652.html
 
 
  ---  Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 
  They US is already a wholly owned subsidiary of China.  How's your
  Mandarin?  I hear Chinese are starting to buy up houses in the US.
  Capitalism stinks.
 
  It's puzzling how a supposedly communist country of Red China can do so 
  well with capitalism here in the USA and elsewhere in the world.  Do they 
  have a secret agenda of defeating capitalism at its own game?
 
  It would be interesting to see what Red China will develop into in the 
  future.
 
---  Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:

 You're assuming that China is still Red?  It dumped a communist economic 
 system some time ago.  You might want to watch a movie called Last 
 Train Home.
 
 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1512201/
 
 It'll give you an idea of what Iife is like in China and how it is 
 different from the propaganda you've been fed about it.  No it is no 
 capitalist wonderland but not exactly a horrific police state either.  
 But they're a bit disorganized since they know their workers will want 
 to do this yearly trip back home and it is a mess.


Tell me, did the US start showing signs of 'Corporate 
Dictatorship' from the 1960's onwards.  Eisenhower predicted 
something like that much before.

China dumped the 'socialistic economic system' in 1979, but 
retained it's 'socialistic political system'.

The 'corporate dictatorship' of the US is almost as worse as 
the 'communist dictatorship' of China.  In fact, this is the 
real reason the communists hate the US.

The Norwegian model is the most futuristic model. It has 
successfully eliminated corruption.  However, they can much 
better on the economic front.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
what a joke - I have friends living in Norway, native Norwegians and they tell 
me their politicians are as corrupt as any others in Europe





 From: Jason jedi_sp...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:35 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit
 


  

 
  On 05/14/2013 10:25 AM, John wrote:
  With the city on the verge of bankruptcy, the participation of Chinese 
  auto industry in the area may be a welcome development.
 
  http://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-creating-auto-niche-within-012304652.html
 
 
  ---  Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 
  They US is already a wholly owned subsidiary of China.  How's your
  Mandarin?  I hear Chinese are starting to buy up houses in the US.
  Capitalism stinks.
 
  It's puzzling how a supposedly communist country of Red China can do so 
  well with capitalism here in the USA and elsewhere in the world.  Do they 
  have a secret agenda of defeating capitalism at its own game?
 
  It would be interesting to see what Red China will develop into in the 
  future.
 
---  Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:

 You're assuming that China is still Red?  It dumped a communist economic 
 system some time ago.  You might want to watch a movie called Last 
 Train Home.
 
 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1512201/
 
 It'll give you an idea of what Iife is like in China and how it is 
 different from the propaganda you've been fed about it.  No it is no 
 capitalist wonderland but not exactly a horrific police state either. 
 But they're a bit disorganized since they know their workers will want 
 to do this yearly trip back home and it is a mess.


Tell me, did the US start showing signs of 'Corporate 
Dictatorship' from the 1960's onwards.  Eisenhower predicted 
something like that much before.

China dumped the 'socialistic economic system' in 1979, but 
retained it's 'socialistic political system'.

The 'corporate dictatorship' of the US is almost as worse as 
the 'communist dictatorship' of China.  In fact, this is the 
real reason the communists hate the US.

The Norwegian model is the most futuristic model. It has 
successfully eliminated corruption.  However, they can much 
better on the economic front.


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread salyavin808


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@... wrote:



Newton wasn't exactly wrong.  Newton's theories form the bedrock 
of modern science.  Einstein refined it to the next level.


Newton thought that gravity was a force that attracted everything
in the universe to everything else. This would only work on things
that have mass.

Einstein showed that gravity is not a force but a dent in what
he calls space/time caused by the mass of objects.

The proof that Einstein was right is that light (which has no 
mass) always follows a straight line through space yet it bends
round massive objects like stars or galaxies. This has been
observed during eclipses when stars that should have been behind
the moon are seen next to it.

They were both geniuses but Einstein had the advantage of living
200 years after Newton and that's a lot of extra measurements 
and thinking to draw on. So Newton's equations still work for most things but 
he was wrong about the cause.

In my post though was refering to Newtons determinist idea that
the universe would be totally predictable if the starting parameters were known.

This is very wrong, quantum physics shows us that the universe
is random at its deepest known level and even Einstein hated that
idea, God does not play dice as he didn't actually say, but 
it's one of the few things we can say we know.

As for the idea that there is balance between order and chaos,
it looks like you want to break the second law of thermodynamics,
but everything is falling apart, my guess is that it only looks 
like a balance has been struck because changes take so long to 
show. 

Like the idea people have that there is a balance to nature, 
there isn't. Everything is tearing everything else to shreds, it
just looks harmonious because we don't see the extinctions and
the vast amount of lifeforms that don't reach adulthood so we
can.


 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread Bhairitu
On 05/15/2013 10:35 AM, Jason wrote:
 On 05/14/2013 10:25 AM, John wrote:
 With the city on the verge of bankruptcy, the participation of Chinese 
 auto industry in the area may be a welcome development.

 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-creating-auto-niche-within-012304652.html


 ---  Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 They US is already a wholly owned subsidiary of China.  How's your
 Mandarin?  I hear Chinese are starting to buy up houses in the US.
 Capitalism stinks.
 It's puzzling how a supposedly communist country of Red China can do so 
 well with capitalism here in the USA and elsewhere in the world.  Do they 
 have a secret agenda of defeating capitalism at its own game?

 It would be interesting to see what Red China will develop into in the 
 future.

 ---  Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:
 You're assuming that China is still Red?  It dumped a communist economic
 system some time ago.  You might want to watch a movie called Last
 Train Home.

 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1512201/

 It'll give you an idea of what Iife is like in China and how it is
 different from the propaganda you've been fed about it.  No it is no
 capitalist wonderland but not exactly a horrific police state either.
 But they're a bit disorganized since they know their workers will want
 to do this yearly trip back home and it is a mess.

 Tell me, did the US start showing signs of 'Corporate
 Dictatorship' from the 1960's onwards.  Eisenhower predicted
 something like that much before.

 China dumped the 'socialistic economic system' in 1979, but
 retained it's 'socialistic political system'.

 The 'corporate dictatorship' of the US is almost as worse as
 the 'communist dictatorship' of China.  In fact, this is the
 real reason the communists hate the US.

 The Norwegian model is the most futuristic model. It has
 successfully eliminated corruption.  However, they can much
 better on the economic front.

There's always been a war since the founding of the US between the 
wealthy who wanted their serfs back and those who wanted a path of 
democracy free from the tyranny of greedy pompous landowners.  The 
corporate dictatorship is known as neo-liberalism and the pirates of 
our economy are riding the waves high.  They've put us in check with 
their Patriot Act making people fearful of acting against them.  But we 
must act against them or live under tyranny.  We just need to be very 
smart about it and fools have put so many STEM people out of work it 
should be easy to create a smart insurgency against them.

Incidentally, I have often mentioned on FFL that Ridley Scott in his 
Blade Runner Final Cut commentary mentions that the world of Blade 
Runner is corporate communism.  I've been sitting back lately watching 
both the right and left be manipulated into such an ugly world.



RE: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons

 

  

Eating with the Pure Gold Spoon is said to enliven the 7 to 8 drops of “Ojas” 
in the heart.

 

Wonder who said that? 

 

Maybe the guy who invented the process of goldifying the spoons borrowed one of 
Johnnie Hagelin's real extra fine shore nuff good and accurate physics ideas or 
even one of his Vedic measuring machines to measure how many drops of ojas the 
heart is excreting when gobbling vittles with a vedic gold spoon.

 

Wonder if eating high priced chavan prash and calling it amrit with the gold 
spoon while staring at a vedic observatory model would amp up the ojas meter to 
10 or 11? 

 

 

Is the TMO selling gold spoons?





Re: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/

You gone git one?





 From: Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:51 PM
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons
 


  
 
From:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons
 
  
Eating with the Pure Gold Spoon is said to enliven the 7 to 8 drops of “Ojas” 
in the heart.
 
Wonder who said that? 
 
Maybe the guy who invented the process of goldifying the spoons borrowed one of 
Johnnie Hagelin's real extra fine shore nuff good and accurate physics ideas or 
even one of his Vedic measuring machines to measure how many drops of ojas the 
heart is excreting when gobbling vittles with a vedic gold spoon.
 
Wonder if eating high priced chavan prash and calling it amrit with the gold 
spoon while staring at a vedic observatory model would amp up the ojas meter to 
10 or 11? 
 
 
Is the TMO selling gold spoons?
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ravi Chivukula
Thanks Steve. This is fair enough that you think we are good writers, steadily, 
stealthily trying to ferret out the truth one's not willing to acknowledge. So 
I have nothing to be wary of Robin then - you made it seem something sinister 
by referring to Robin and I was afraid you were going to come up with one or 
more of the following - 

1) Ravi is a fundamentalist trying to use shame to control others (Share)
2) Ravi suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (Barry)
3) Ravi is processing undirected anger to make up for his emptiness (Barry)
4) Ravi is indulging in incoherent rants (Curtis)
5) Ravi indulges in word-salad indicative of disassociation (Curtis)

You, my friend are in a very better shape than I imagined - clearly in a 
better, healthier frame of mind - emotionally, psychologically than Share, 
Barry and Curtis.

Anyway I officially have a diagnosis for you - The Sports-fan Syndrome. I 
will get to that in your other email.


On May 15, 2013, at 5:11 AM, seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Hey Ravi, thanks for the question.  I think Robin is a good writer.  I think 
 you are good writer.  I mean it's remarkable what proficiency you have in a  
 language that is not your mother tongue.
 
 But yes, I do perceive some Robin creep* in some of the expressions you 
 use, but more importantly, in your overall philosophy.  You know, this 
 notion, this perceived ability to ferret out the truth of what a person may 
 be unwilling to acknowledge.   This ability to know if what they are saying 
 is properly aligned with reality.
 
 * creep in verb sense, not adjective sense.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
 
  What does this really mean Steve - clearly it's an honor to be compared to
  Robin, especially if it is in his writing style but then we will always be
  very different in our writing styles and I will never be emulate him in his
  writing. You are out of your mind to even suggest that. Robin's influence
  is in other areas, definitely an important one in my life.
  
  If there's any reason you think why I should be wary of him - please
  summarize so we can discuss it in a conventional way.
  
  
  
  On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:11 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...wrote:
  
   **
  
  
   It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what Ravi writes has a
   Robin feel.
  
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@wrote:

   
  Give me something Steve.

 You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
   
Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
to anyone.
   
  
   
  
 
 
 


RE: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:56 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons

 

  

http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/

You gone git one?

 

A whole set. I wonder if this is an official TMO site? Seems not.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ravi Chivukula
Agree with what? A summary please.

On May 15, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I agree.
 
 From: seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:11 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
 
  
 It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what Ravi writes has a 
 Robin feel.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
  
  
Give me something Steve.
  
   You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
  
  Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
  to anyone.
 
 
 
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Michael Jackson
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:56 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons
 
  
 http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
 
 You gone git one?
 
 A whole set. I wonder if this is an official TMO site? Seems not.

It's obviously some TMer's personal blog. Michael didn't 
really think it was an offficial TMO site, did he?




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
Nope - doesn't have to be - it's just more of what Marshy and his way of bs-ing 
the world creates more and more like energy - birds of a feather, like attracts 
like and all that jazz





 From: authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:22 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pure Gold spoons
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Michael Jackson
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:56 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons
 
 
 http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
 
 You gone git one?
 
 A whole set. I wonder if this is an official TMO site? Seems not.

It's obviously some TMer's personal blog. Michael didn't 
really think it was an offficial TMO site, did he?


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Chinese Taking Root in Detroit

2013-05-15 Thread merudanda
Thanks for quoting that
May be after watching the full movie at you tube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTXSFfpXtd0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTXSFfpXtd0
  some will reconsider  the postings from Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:02 pm

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/330663
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/330663

Here a IMHO better synopsis that the OMDb one: Changhua Zhang and Suqin
Chen are a couple from a rural village in China's Sichuan province.
Frustrated with their lack of employment opportunities, they traveled to
the industrial city of Guangdong and took jobs with a large textile
firm, making clothing for export. However, Changhua and Suqin were not
able to bring their two children with them, and since then the kids have
been raised by their grandparents, with their mother and father staying
in touch though occasional telephone calls. The only time they have a
chance to see their now-teenage children is during China's annual New
Year's celebration; they are among the 130 million Chinese whose work
keeps them away from their families and make the trip home during the
holiday, resulting in an overcrowded rail system as the trains struggle
to keep up with the rush. Filmmaker Lixin Fan follows Changhua and Suqin
over the course of several years in the documentary Last Train Home, as
the couple makes the long journey home (over a thousand miles) only to
find that their family is slowly falling apart -- 16-year-old Qin and
her younger brother, Yang, are all but strangers now to their parents,
and the youngsters have come to resent their parents, while Qin
considers leaving school to move to the city on her own and get a
job
Going out in the morning passing the parks full of people playing Chi
kung and Tai'Chi Cuan -can only giggle and smile about the often
discussed Falun Dafa remarks made here at the Fairy Field

adding to the friend of authors link read  American POVWhat Is the
Chinese Dream?
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/05/what-is-the-chi\
nese-dream/256929/
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/05/what-is-the-ch\
inese-dream/256929/
http://www.theatlantic.com/special-report/china-takes-off/
http://www.theatlantic.com/special-report/china-takes-off/
snip
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
  On 05/14/2013 10:25 AM, John wrote:
snip

 You're assuming that China is still Red?  It dumped a communist
economic
 system some time ago.  You might want to watch a movie called Last
 Train Home.

 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1512201/

 It'll give you an idea of what Iife is like in China and how it is
 different from the propaganda you've been fed about it.  No it is no
 capitalist wonderland but not exactly a horrific police state either.
 But they're a bit disorganized since they know their workers will want
 to do this yearly trip back home and it is a mess.




[FairfieldLife] Deepak Chopra renounced the world, teach and heal for free.

2013-05-15 Thread merudanda
Can only  reach into the mud , pulling  up a lotus flower holding  it
silently before you, its roots dripping mud and water.and copy and
paste  and highlight  the Shapiros text from Huffpost:
Many years ago, we were teaching a meditation weekend in Plymouth,
England. On the Saturday after the program was over for the day, Carole,
one of the attendees, told us she had just been with Deepak Chopra, that
he had walked out of the Body Mind Spirit Festival in London, renounced
the world, and was at the local Heart and Soul Center healing people for
free. We were amazed and intrigued as she added he was much thinner than
in the photo of him that we had in our book The Way Ahead. A mutual
friend, John Harricharan, had previously introduced us to Deepak in New
York City, who was already a well-known teacher. So when we went to the
Heart and Soul Center the next evening we were surprised to find an
Indian man with the same name but obviously not the same Deepak.

Later, we found out that the imposter Deepak had been abusing the
women he was teaching (the real Deepak later thanked us for exposing the
con man). But in the meantime, we witnessed the amazing power of faith.
Those who were convinced the pretender was the real Deepak went through
cathartic healings, transformations, and great joy... until he was
exposed as a fraud, when suddenly these same students reversed to the
distress they had had before. The power of faith was palpable.

Buddha means awaken -- awaken to one's true nature, to the essence of
reality, to radiant emptiness. It does not mean god, deity, or
celebrity. Deepak Chopra is a respected modern-day teacher, regarded by
some as a celebrity and even god-like. As such, he has a narrow path to
walk so that he doesn't invoke the blind adoration we witnessed in
Plymouth. We remember seeing a movie where the lead character shouted:
I want to be Deepak Chopra. Why would someone feel that way? Could it
be because Deepak is loved and wise, or that he embodies the real
meaning of life?


[FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread nablusoss1008


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@... wrote:

 
 
 Michael Jackson:
  for sure TM is not in any way superior to any other
  meditations out there.
  
 Well, for this to be true you would have to try ALL 
 meditation techniques. There is some doubt you even 
 know TM practice or basic yoga poses. Go figure.


Since that the poor fellow was under the influence of drugs (his own words) 
when he learned TM, IF he ever learned that is, it is likely that he never did 
TM in the correct way. 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole




[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote:

 Agree with what? A summary please.

That you're sounding more and more like Robin.

Watch it. They may be setting you up to be the next PR.



 
 On May 15, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
 
  I agree.
  
  From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@...
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:11 PM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
  
   
  It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what Ravi writes has a 
  Robin feel.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
   
   
 Give me something Steve.
   
You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
   
   Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
   to anyone.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Xenophaneros Anartaxius
Dr, that is not the way love flows. You do not ask for it. If you have it it 
flows out, and whatever it comes in contact with either accepts or deflects. I 
think it would be difficult to judge based on his interactions with the strange 
bunch that we are on FFL. We do not know much about his non-posting private 
life. He has a job; he has friends, he seems to like where he lives and works. 
Our personas here, while they may reflect 'who we are' in some way, are 
probably largely fictional and artificial compared to the way we act with real 
people, real time. This is the place where we dump our monsters of the id. This 
place is the toilet of spirituality. Barry probably has to take a dump once in 
a while, and so he comes here, briefly, to unload in kind. It is called 
reciprocity.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... no_reply@... wrote:

 Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this board.
 
 Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows to ask for 
 love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap him down. Now he 
 can barely tell the difference between his need and the inevitable response. 
 At least a slap indicates some sort of attention for him. One sad old fuck, 
 that one.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
 
  Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, other 
  than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here with a 
  Knapp update some months back.
  
  From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how 
  you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and whom 
  you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part of the 
  Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
  
  Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
  posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
  communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
  
  Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
  regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the 
  bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your 
  advice/suggestions.  What's up with that? You trying to start your own 
  little forum cult?
  
  I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
  seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
  pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What good 
  is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate with, 
  putting yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more us/them camps. 
  Not that you care; I imagine you don't. 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
   wrote:
   
It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
   
   I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
   and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
   used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
   understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
   have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
   class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
   Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
   cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)
   
   There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
   they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
   replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
   replying to. 
   
   These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
   Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
   bother even trying to interact with them as if they
   might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
   and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
   a target. 
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
wrote:

   Give me something Steve.
 
  You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.

 Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
 to anyone.

   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@ wrote:
 
  Newton wasn't exactly wrong.  Newton's theories form the 
  bedrock of modern science.  Einstein refined it to the next 
  level.
 
(snip)
 In my post though was refering to Newtons determinist idea
 that the universe would be totally predictable if the
 starting parameters were known.
 
 This is very wrong, quantum physics shows us that the universe
 is random at its deepest known level and even Einstein hated that
 idea, God does not play dice as he didn't actually say, but 
 it's one of the few things we can say we know.

Key words: deepest KNOWN level.

God does play dice, but He can calculate the odds to infinity.

Bottom line: When you're talking about God, all bets are off.

 As for the idea that there is balance between order and chaos,
 it looks like you want to break the second law of thermodynamics,
 but everything is falling apart, my guess is that it only looks 
 like a balance has been struck because changes take so long to 
 show. 
 
 Like the idea people have that there is a balance to nature, 
 there isn't. Everything is tearing everything else to shreds, it
 just looks harmonious because we don't see the extinctions and
 the vast amount of lifeforms that don't reach adulthood so we
 can.

There's more than one kind of balance.

CAVEAT: I have no idea if Hagelin is right. I just resist
on principle ruling stuff out at the God level.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
anartaxius@... wrote:

 Dr, that is not the way love flows. You do not ask for it.
 If you have it it flows out, and whatever it comes in contact
 with either accepts or deflects. I think it would be difficult
 to judge based on his interactions with the strange bunch that
 we are on FFL.

It's not at all difficult, however, to judge his interactions
with others on FFL.

 We do not know much about his non-posting private life. He has
 a job; he has friends, he seems to like where he lives and
 works.

OTOH, we also know that a significant percentage of what
he posts on FFL is a highly distorted and even blatantly
false reflection of reality. There's very little reason
to accord him any credibility when he talks about his
non-FFL life.

 Our personas here, while they may reflect 'who we are' in
 some way, are probably largely fictional and artificial
 compared to the way we act with real people, real time. This
 is the place where we dump our monsters of the id.

Speak for yourself. In any case, what's being criticized is
Barry's FFL persona.

 This place is the toilet of spirituality. Barry probably has
 to take a dump once in a while, and so he comes here, briefly,
 to unload in kind. It is called reciprocity.

But it's not once in a while, it's very frequently. And
his dumps are bigger and smellier than anyone else's. Why
would that be the case if he has such a satisfying non-FFL
life?



 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this board.
  
  Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows to ask 
  for love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap him down. 
  Now he can barely tell the difference between his need and the inevitable 
  response. At least a slap indicates some sort of attention for him. One sad 
  old fuck, that one.




[FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread Xenophaneros Anartaxius
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@ wrote:
  
   Newton wasn't exactly wrong.  Newton's theories form the 
   bedrock of modern science.  Einstein refined it to the next 
   level.
  
 (snip)
  In my post though was refering to Newtons determinist idea
  that the universe would be totally predictable if the
  starting parameters were known.
  
  This is very wrong, quantum physics shows us that the universe
  is random at its deepest known level and even Einstein hated that
  idea, God does not play dice as he didn't actually say, but 
  it's one of the few things we can say we know.
 
 Key words: deepest KNOWN level.
 
 God does play dice, but He can calculate the odds to infinity.
 
 Bottom line: When you're talking about God, all bets are off.
 
  As for the idea that there is balance between order and chaos,
  it looks like you want to break the second law of thermodynamics,
  but everything is falling apart, my guess is that it only looks 
  like a balance has been struck because changes take so long to 
  show. 
  
  Like the idea people have that there is a balance to nature, 
  there isn't. Everything is tearing everything else to shreds, it
  just looks harmonious because we don't see the extinctions and
  the vast amount of lifeforms that don't reach adulthood so we
  can.
 
 There's more than one kind of balance.
 
 CAVEAT: I have no idea if Hagelin is right. I just resist
 on principle ruling stuff out at the God level.

A story from the Sufi tradition:

Two children found a bag containing twelve marbles. They argued over how to 
divide the toys and finally went to see the Mulla. When asked to settle their 
disagreement, the Mulla asked whether the children wanted him to divide the 
marbles as a human would or as Allah would. 

The children replied, We want it to be fair. Divide the marbles as Allah 
would.

 So, the Mulla counted out the marbles and gave three to one child and nine to 
the other.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ravi Chivukula

On May 15, 2013, at 1:32 PM, authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... 
 wrote:
 
  Agree with what? A summary please.
 
 That you're sounding more and more like Robin.
 

Right - Steve has explained why he thinks he got the Robin feel, I wanted to 
hear Share say why she got the Robin feel, like Steve in a couple of lines at 
least rather than some vague, meaningless statement like I agree. I'm very 
curious.
 
 Watch it. They may be setting you up to be the next PR.
 

Yes - that's a strong possibility, doesn't look like they at this point - 
only Share, she will find herself alone in that viewpoint.
 
  On May 15, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
  
   I agree.
   
   From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@...
   To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:11 PM
   Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
   
   
   It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what Ravi writes has a 
   Robin feel.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
wrote:


  Give me something Steve.

 You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.

Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
to anyone.
 
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Xenophaneros Anartaxius
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote:
What is the lesson we can take home here? Who's right here?

Well, for starters, asking someone who you regard as clueless to answer a 
question would indicate that you do not know where to point your question.




[FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@... wrote:
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
(snip)
  God does play dice, but He can calculate the odds to infinity.
  
  Bottom line: When you're talking about God, all bets are off.
 
 I wasn't and nor was Einstein.

Well, *somebody* was, and you quoted him or her.

 I will make a bet that there isn't one though.

I wouldn't take the bet, because I *can't* calculate the odds
to infinity.

(snip)
  CAVEAT: I have no idea if Hagelin is right. I just resist
  on principle ruling stuff out at the God level.
 
 Why? Man invented god as a way of explaining things he didn't
 understand.

Sure of that, are ya?

I *will* bet you that there are a whole lot of things we
will never understand. We might as well call them God.




 Things move on, Hagelin wants to keep us in the
 bronze age because it helps sell yagyas and golden spoons.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread seventhray27

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
wrote:
 
  Agree with what? A summary please.

 That you're sounding more and more like Robin.

 Watch it. They may be setting you up to be the next PR.

Judy,  first, congratulations.  You've stretched yourself pretty well on
bringing up anything aboutPR.
Maybe the community can come up with a suitable replacement.  I think
we've pretty well milked the life out of this one.
Yes, there is the matter of the apology, that you feel, you, or Robin,
or someone is entitled to and which must be stated in such a way to meet
certain criteria you have in mind.
I think that we have moved past this as well.
I don't think you are ready to really move past it altogether, but maybe
you can stretch yourself a little more, and before you know it, it will
truly be in the past, except maybe for ceremonial occasions.
Perhaps this can be referred to as the PR period of FFL.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote:
(snip)
 Perhaps this can be referred to as the PR period of FFL.

Let's hope we will always look back on it as the lowest point
in the history of FFL.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread doctordumbass
I can only repeat what I said before. You can equivocate to the moon, but it 
doesn't change his dynamic. Comes through loud, clear and often for me.

I also don't buy your, He's only an asshole when you're looking, routine. 
Throughout my career as a hiring manager, I interviewed hundreds of people. I 
developed a saying from such interactions; the micro is the macro. Meaning 
that one significant spot of dirt during the interview, would sure as shit turn 
into a mud wallow once the person was interviewed further, or god forbid, on 
the job.

You may rationalize all you want. I am simply evaluating my aggregate 
experience of Barry. One sad old fuck, that one.
 
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
anartaxius@... wrote:

 Dr, that is not the way love flows. You do not ask for it. If you have it it 
 flows out, and whatever it comes in contact with either accepts or deflects. 
 I think it would be difficult to judge based on his interactions with the 
 strange bunch that we are on FFL. We do not know much about his non-posting 
 private life. He has a job; he has friends, he seems to like where he lives 
 and works. Our personas here, while they may reflect 'who we are' in some 
 way, are probably largely fictional and artificial compared to the way we act 
 with real people, real time. This is the place where we dump our monsters of 
 the id. This place is the toilet of spirituality. Barry probably has to take 
 a dump once in a while, and so he comes here, briefly, to unload in kind. It 
 is called reciprocity.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this board.
  
  Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows to ask 
  for love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap him down. 
  Now he can barely tell the difference between his need and the inevitable 
  response. At least a slap indicates some sort of attention for him. One sad 
  old fuck, that one.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
  
   Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, 
   other than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here 
   with a Knapp update some months back.
   
   From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how 
   you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and 
   whom you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part 
   of the Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
   
   Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
   posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
   communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
   
   Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
   regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the 
   bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your 
   advice/suggestions.  What's up with that? You trying to start your own 
   little forum cult?
   
   I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
   seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
   pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What 
   good is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate 
   with, putting yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more 
   us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine you don't. 
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
wrote:

 It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
 Ravi writes has a Robin feel.

I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)

There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
replying to. 

These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
bother even trying to interact with them as if they
might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
a target. 

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
 wrote:
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ravi Chivukula
On May 15, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartax...@yahoo.com 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... 
 wrote:
 What is the lesson we can take home here? Who's right here?
 
 Well, for starters, asking someone who you regard as clueless to answer a 
 question would indicate that you do not know where to point your question.
 

Did you watch Clueless? She grows up - tada !!!

 
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread nablusoss1008


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 You are one stupid son of a bitch - most of the TM people I have known were 
 using some kind of recreational drugs before they learned TM - and you, as 
 most of my detractors here on FFL have reading comprehension problems - I 
 never said I was under the influence of drugs when I learned. 
 
 I was stoned when I had the prep lecture - I made the 14 day requirement for 
 not doing dope 


Stoned or not stoned, we only have your word for it. The level of insight you 
display here indicates you most probably never learned the technique. 
Anyway my guess is that nobody here could care less.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread wleed3
I do NOT care 4 this garbage as well.



In a message dated 05/15/13 18:08:33 Eastern Daylight Time, 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com writes:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote: 
 
 You are one stupid son of a bitch - most of the TM people I have known were 
 using some kind of recreational drugs before they learned TM - and you, as 
 most of my detractors here on FFL have reading comprehension problems - I 
 never said I was under the influence of drugs when I learned. 
 
 I was stoned when I had the prep lecture - I made the 14 day requirement for 
 not doing dope 


Stoned or not stoned, we only have your word for it. The level of insight you 
display here indicates you most probably never learned the technique. 
Anyway my guess is that nobody here could care less. 



 

To subscribe, send a message to: 
fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com 

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ 
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links 



   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ravi Chivukula
Grandpa Xeno only equivocates if it's Barry, Curtis or Share - when it's 
someone like Robin he falls down, a rapid descent from Unity Consciousness to 
Clam Consciousness - very dramatic LOL.


On May 15, 2013, at 3:00 PM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I can only repeat what I said before. You can equivocate to the moon, but it 
 doesn't change his dynamic. Comes through loud, clear and often for me.
 
 I also don't buy your, He's only an asshole when you're looking, routine. 
 Throughout my career as a hiring manager, I interviewed hundreds of people. I 
 developed a saying from such interactions; the micro is the macro. Meaning 
 that one significant spot of dirt during the interview, would sure as shit 
 turn into a mud wallow once the person was interviewed further, or god 
 forbid, on the job.
 
 You may rationalize all you want. I am simply evaluating my aggregate 
 experience of Barry. One sad old fuck, that one.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
 anartaxius@... wrote:
 
  Dr, that is not the way love flows. You do not ask for it. If you have it 
  it flows out, and whatever it comes in contact with either accepts or 
  deflects. I think it would be difficult to judge based on his interactions 
  with the strange bunch that we are on FFL. We do not know much about his 
  non-posting private life. He has a job; he has friends, he seems to like 
  where he lives and works. Our personas here, while they may reflect 'who we 
  are' in some way, are probably largely fictional and artificial compared to 
  the way we act with real people, real time. This is the place where we dump 
  our monsters of the id. This place is the toilet of spirituality. Barry 
  probably has to take a dump once in a while, and so he comes here, briefly, 
  to unload in kind. It is called reciprocity.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:
  
   Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this board.
   
   Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows to ask 
   for love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap him 
   down. Now he can barely tell the difference between his need and the 
   inevitable response. At least a slap indicates some sort of attention for 
   him. One sad old fuck, that one.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
   
Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, 
other than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here 
with a Knapp update some months back.

From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about 
how you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time 
and whom you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are 
part of the Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love 
Brigade?) 

Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their 
(the posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in 
continuing to communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to 
communicate with.

Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From 
the bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your 
advice/suggestions. What's up with that? You trying to start your own 
little forum cult?

I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. 
It seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What 
good is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate 
with, putting yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more 
us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine you don't. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
 wrote:
 
  It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what 
  Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
 
 I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
 and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
 used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
 understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
 have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
 class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
 Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
 cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)
 
 There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
 they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
 replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
 replying to. 
 
 These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
 Brigade, since you're one of the 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Jackson
The level of insight you display clearly shows you have allowed a human mind to 
become mesmerized by the likes of hucksters such as Marshy and Benjy Creme - 
maybe Maitrea will redeem you when he comes out of hiding.





 From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 6:08 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and Inner Peace
 


  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 You are one stupid son of a bitch - most of the TM people I have known were 
 using some kind of recreational drugs before they learned TM - and you, as 
 most of my detractors here on FFL have reading comprehension problems - I 
 never said I was under the influence of drugs when I learned. 
 
 I was stoned when I had the prep lecture - I made the 14 day requirement for 
 not doing dope 

Stoned or not stoned, we only have your word for it. The level of insight you 
display here indicates you most probably never learned the technique. 
Anyway my guess is that nobody here could care less.


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread doctordumbass
Yeah, I remember doing that shit, the intellect leads the heart and its all 
justification, or the reverse, where the heart leads the intellect, and its all 
undifferentiated craziness. Hard to center the needle, except by not giving a 
fuck, keeping keenest discrimination, and letting life teach the lessons, in 
the moment, and learn grace, a face of sweat at a time.   

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote:

 Grandpa Xeno only equivocates if it's Barry, Curtis or Share - when it's 
 someone like Robin he falls down, a rapid descent from Unity Consciousness to 
 Clam Consciousness - very dramatic LOL.
 
 
 On May 15, 2013, at 3:00 PM, doctordumbass@... no_re...@yahoogroups.com 
 wrote:
 
  I can only repeat what I said before. You can equivocate to the moon, but 
  it doesn't change his dynamic. Comes through loud, clear and often for me.
  
  I also don't buy your, He's only an asshole when you're looking, routine. 
  Throughout my career as a hiring manager, I interviewed hundreds of people. 
  I developed a saying from such interactions; the micro is the macro. 
  Meaning that one significant spot of dirt during the interview, would sure 
  as shit turn into a mud wallow once the person was interviewed further, or 
  god forbid, on the job.
  
  You may rationalize all you want. I am simply evaluating my aggregate 
  experience of Barry. One sad old fuck, that one.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
  anartaxius@ wrote:
  
   Dr, that is not the way love flows. You do not ask for it. If you have it 
   it flows out, and whatever it comes in contact with either accepts or 
   deflects. I think it would be difficult to judge based on his 
   interactions with the strange bunch that we are on FFL. We do not know 
   much about his non-posting private life. He has a job; he has friends, he 
   seems to like where he lives and works. Our personas here, while they may 
   reflect 'who we are' in some way, are probably largely fictional and 
   artificial compared to the way we act with real people, real time. This 
   is the place where we dump our monsters of the id. This place is the 
   toilet of spirituality. Barry probably has to take a dump once in a 
   while, and so he comes here, briefly, to unload in kind. It is called 
   reciprocity.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:
   
Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this board.

Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows to 
ask for love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap 
him down. Now he can barely tell the difference between his need and 
the inevitable response. At least a slap indicates some sort of 
attention for him. One sad old fuck, that one.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:

 Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, 
 other than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted 
 here with a Knapp update some months back.
 
 From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about 
 how you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time 
 and whom you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks 
 are part of the Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love 
 Brigade?) 
 
 Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their 
 (the posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in 
 continuing to communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to 
 communicate with.
 
 Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own 
 decisions regarding how they choose to interact with others on this 
 forum? From the bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for 
 your advice/suggestions. What's up with that? You trying to start 
 your own little forum cult?
 
 I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic 
 accusation. It seems to me that you have a bit of it going on 
 yourself with the pronouncements of who is worth communicating with 
 and who isn't. What good is it to dehumanize others and deem them 
 unworthy to communicate with, putting yourself on some higher plane? 
 It just promotes more us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine you 
 don't. 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 
  steve.sundur@ wrote:
  
   It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what 
   Ravi writes has a Robin feel.
  
  I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
  and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
  used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
  understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread seventhray27

Hey Ravi, I'm in a happy mood right now.   Can't even think about
entertaining any kind of negativity.  Sports-fan Syndrome?  Have to
think about that.  Can't say that I am that big of a sports fan.  Yes, I
do like hockey, perhaps because I often get free tickets, and my boys
both play inline hockey.  (quite a step down in prestige, and yes,
expense, from ice hockey, but fun nonetheless)

But hockey fans are a somewhat different breed of sports fan.  I mean,
players are out on the ice for about 90 seconds in a full sprint, rest
for a two or three minutes, then out for another 90 second sprint. 
Unless they get in a fight of course.

And the glass separating the fans from the players is about 5/8's of an
inch thick.




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

 Thanks Steve. This is fair enough that you think we are good writers,
steadily, stealthily trying to ferret out the truth one's not willing to
acknowledge. So I have nothing to be wary of Robin then - you made it
seem something sinister by referring to Robin and I was afraid you were
going to come up with one or more of the following -

 1) Ravi is a fundamentalist trying to use shame to control others
(Share)
 2) Ravi suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (Barry)
 3) Ravi is processing undirected anger to make up for his emptiness
(Barry)
 4) Ravi is indulging in incoherent rants (Curtis)
 5) Ravi indulges in word-salad indicative of disassociation (Curtis)

 You, my friend are in a very better shape than I imagined - clearly in
a better, healthier frame of mind - emotionally, psychologically than
Share, Barry and Curtis.

 Anyway I officially have a diagnosis for you - The Sports-fan
Syndrome. I will get to that in your other email.


 On May 15, 2013, at 5:11 AM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote:

  Hey Ravi, thanks for the question. I think Robin is a good writer. I
think you are good writer. I mean it's remarkable what proficiency you
have in a language that is not your mother tongue.
 
  But yes, I do perceive some Robin creep* in some of the
expressions you use, but more importantly, in your overall philosophy.
You know, this notion, this perceived ability to ferret out the truth of
what a person may be unwilling to acknowledge. This ability to know if
what they are saying is properly aligned with reality.
 
  * creep in verb sense, not adjective sense.
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
  
   What does this really mean Steve - clearly it's an honor to be
compared to
   Robin, especially if it is in his writing style but then we will
always be
   very different in our writing styles and I will never be emulate
him in his
   writing. You are out of your mind to even suggest that. Robin's
influence
   is in other areas, definitely an important one in my life.
  
   If there's any reason you think why I should be wary of him -
please
   summarize so we can discuss it in a conventional way.
  
  
  
   On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:11 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...:
  
**
   
   
It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what Ravi
writes has a
Robin feel.
   
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27
steve.sundur@wrote:
 

   Give me something Steve.
 
  You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.

 Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
 to anyone.

   
   
   
  
 
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ravi Chivukula
Well yeah, though I have never watched an entire game I have seen highlights on 
ESPN Sports center so I think I am aware of those aspects of Ice Hockey.

Anyway I will respond after work and you can skip it and read it tomorrow.

On May 15, 2013, at 4:59 PM, seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Hey Ravi, I'm in a happy mood right now.   Can't even think about 
 entertaining any kind of negativity.  Sports-fan Syndrome?  Have to think 
 about that.  Can't say that I am that big of a sports fan.  Yes, I do like 
 hockey, perhaps because I often get free tickets, and my boys both play 
 inline hockey.  (quite a step down in prestige, and yes, expense, from ice 
 hockey, but fun nonetheless)
 
 But hockey fans are a somewhat different breed of sports fan.  I mean, 
 players are out on the ice for about 90 seconds in a full sprint, rest for a 
 two or three minutes, then out for another 90 second sprint.  Unless they get 
 in a fight of course. 
 
 And the glass separating the fans from the players is about 5/8's of an inch 
 thick.
 
  
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
 
  Thanks Steve. This is fair enough that you think we are good writers, 
  steadily, stealthily trying to ferret out the truth one's not willing to 
  acknowledge. So I have nothing to be wary of Robin then - you made it seem 
  something sinister by referring to Robin and I was afraid you were going to 
  come up with one or more of the following - 
  
  1) Ravi is a fundamentalist trying to use shame to control others (Share)
  2) Ravi suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (Barry)
  3) Ravi is processing undirected anger to make up for his emptiness (Barry)
  4) Ravi is indulging in incoherent rants (Curtis)
  5) Ravi indulges in word-salad indicative of disassociation (Curtis)
  
  You, my friend are in a very better shape than I imagined - clearly in a 
  better, healthier frame of mind - emotionally, psychologically than Share, 
  Barry and Curtis.
  
  Anyway I officially have a diagnosis for you - The Sports-fan Syndrome. I 
  will get to that in your other email.
  
  
  On May 15, 2013, at 5:11 AM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote:
  
   Hey Ravi, thanks for the question. I think Robin is a good writer. I 
   think you are good writer. I mean it's remarkable what proficiency you 
   have in a language that is not your mother tongue.
   
   But yes, I do perceive some Robin creep* in some of the expressions you 
   use, but more importantly, in your overall philosophy. You know, this 
   notion, this perceived ability to ferret out the truth of what a person 
   may be unwilling to acknowledge. This ability to know if what they are 
   saying is properly aligned with reality.
   
   * creep in verb sense, not adjective sense.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
   
What does this really mean Steve - clearly it's an honor to be compared 
to
Robin, especially if it is in his writing style but then we will always 
be
very different in our writing styles and I will never be emulate him in 
his
writing. You are out of your mind to even suggest that. Robin's 
influence
is in other areas, definitely an important one in my life.

If there's any reason you think why I should be wary of him - please
summarize so we can discuss it in a conventional way.



On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:11 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...:

 **


 It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what Ravi writes 
 has a
 Robin feel.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 
  steve.sundur@wrote:
  
 
Give me something Steve.
  
   You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
 
  Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
  to anyone.
 

 

   
   
  
 
 
 


[FairfieldLife] Post Count Thu 16-May-13 00:15:01 UTC

2013-05-15 Thread FFL PostCount
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 05/11/13 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 05/18/13 00:00:00
523 messages as of (UTC) 05/16/13 00:08:11

44 authfriend 
44 Michael Jackson 
37 salyavin808 
32 Share Long 
31 doctordumbass
27 Ravi Chivukula 
27 Ann 
26 turquoiseb 
24 Bhairitu 
23 Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
22 nablusoss1008 
22 John 
19 Richard J. Williams 
16 seventhray27 
16 Mike Dixon 
14 card 
11 Alex Stanley 
10 Carol 
 9 sparaig 
 8 wgm4u 
 8 Buck 
 7 Rick Archer 
 6 Jason 
 5 pileated56 
 5 merlin 
 5 Yifu 
 4 raunchydog 
 4 merudanda 
 3 Goddess Ninmah 
 2 wleed3 
 2 Dick Mays 
 1 martyboi 
 1 martin.quickman 
 1 laughinggull108 
 1 halrg 
 1 feste37 
 1 azgrey 
 1 Susan 
 1 Martin A Rosenthal 
 1 FairfieldLife
 1 Arhata Osho 
Posters: 41
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread seventhray27


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

 Oh Xeno you are so clueless to how you use inane platitudes to make up
for your bias.

 You think it's just a persona of Barry, that Barry is just acting? Why
would he act in such a way that it shows him as the most emotionally,
psychologically stunted poster here on FFL? If I were just acting,
projecting a persona I wouldn't be a masochist hell bent on humiliating
myself by projecting such a persona - a persona which points to a strong
disability.

 Case in point

 Steve says I have an exceptional mind and am a very good writer.

 I myself am quite confident and secure in the knowledge of having an
exceptional mind and being a good writer.

 So here comes Barry this morning - with his Ravi being narcissistic
and a real bad writer. What do you make of it? What is his persona, his
act here? What is the lesson we can take home here? Who's right here?

I'd chalk it up to a mere difference of opinion.  Happens all the time,
and no big deal really.



 On May 15, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@...
wrote:

  Dr, that is not the way love flows. You do not ask for it. If you
have it it flows out, and whatever it comes in contact with either
accepts or deflects. I think it would be difficult to judge based on his
interactions with the strange bunch that we are on FFL. We do not know
much about his non-posting private life. He has a job; he has friends,
he seems to like where he lives and works. Our personas here, while they
may reflect 'who we are' in some way, are probably largely fictional and
artificial compared to the way we act with real people, real time. This
is the place where we dump our monsters of the id. This place is the
toilet of spirituality. Barry probably has to take a dump once in a
while, and so he comes here, briefly, to unload in kind. It is called
reciprocity.
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@
wrote:
  
   Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this
board.
  
   Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows
to ask for love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap
him down. Now he can barely tell the difference between his need and the
inevitable response. At least a slap indicates some sort of attention
for him. One sad old fuck, that one.
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol wrote:
   
Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never
have, other than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted
here with a Knapp update some months back.
   
From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once
about how you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your
time and whom you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks
are part of the Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love
Brigade?)
   
Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters
their (the posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in
continuing to communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to
communicate with.
   
Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own
decisions regarding how they choose to interact with others on this
forum? From the bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your
advice/suggestions. What's up with that? You trying to start your own
little forum cult?
   
I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic
accusation. It seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself
with the pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who
isn't. What good is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to
communicate with, putting yourself on some higher plane? It just
promotes more us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine you don't.
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote:
 
  It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what
  Ravi writes has a Robin feel.

 I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
 and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
 used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
 understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
 have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101
 class, while having skipped the How To Write Something
 Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke
 cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)

 There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
 they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
 replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
 replying to.

 These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
 Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
 bother even trying to interact with them as if they
 might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
 and 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread seventhray27

I'd recommend dropping about $300.00 for two lower bowl seats to a low
profile game with someone you like and who has a curiosity about the
game to see if it has any interest.  On the other hand, I really
wouldn't think of dropping that amount for a pro basketball game even as
a curiosity.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

 Well yeah, though I have never watched an entire game I have seen
highlights on ESPN Sports center so I think I am aware of those aspects
of Ice Hockey.

 Anyway I will respond after work and you can skip it and read it
tomorrow.

 On May 15, 2013, at 4:59 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote:

  Hey Ravi, I'm in a happy mood right now. Can't even think about
entertaining any kind of negativity. Sports-fan Syndrome? Have to think
about that. Can't say that I am that big of a sports fan. Yes, I do like
hockey, perhaps because I often get free tickets, and my boys both play
inline hockey. (quite a step down in prestige, and yes, expense, from
ice hockey, but fun nonetheless)
 
  But hockey fans are a somewhat different breed of sports fan. I
mean, players are out on the ice for about 90 seconds in a full sprint,
rest for a two or three minutes, then out for another 90 second sprint.
Unless they get in a fight of course.
 
  And the glass separating the fans from the players is about 5/8's of
an inch thick.
 
 
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
  
   Thanks Steve. This is fair enough that you think we are good
writers, steadily, stealthily trying to ferret out the truth one's not
willing to acknowledge. So I have nothing to be wary of Robin then - you
made it seem something sinister by referring to Robin and I was afraid
you were going to come up with one or more of the following -
  
   1) Ravi is a fundamentalist trying to use shame to control others
(Share)
   2) Ravi suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (Barry)
   3) Ravi is processing undirected anger to make up for his
emptiness (Barry)
   4) Ravi is indulging in incoherent rants (Curtis)
   5) Ravi indulges in word-salad indicative of disassociation
(Curtis)
  
   You, my friend are in a very better shape than I imagined -
clearly in a better, healthier frame of mind - emotionally,
psychologically than Share, Barry and Curtis.
  
   Anyway I officially have a diagnosis for you - The Sports-fan
Syndrome. I will get to that in your other email.
  
  
   On May 15, 2013, at 5:11 AM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote:
  
Hey Ravi, thanks for the question. I think Robin is a good
writer. I think you are good writer. I mean it's remarkable what
proficiency you have in a language that is not your mother tongue.
   
But yes, I do perceive some Robin creep* in some of the
expressions you use, but more importantly, in your overall philosophy.
You know, this notion, this perceived ability to ferret out the truth of
what a person may be unwilling to acknowledge. This ability to know if
what they are saying is properly aligned with reality.
   
* creep in verb sense, not adjective sense.
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

 What does this really mean Steve - clearly it's an honor to be
compared to
 Robin, especially if it is in his writing style but then we
will always be
 very different in our writing styles and I will never be
emulate him in his
 writing. You are out of your mind to even suggest that.
Robin's influence
 is in other areas, definitely an important one in my life.

 If there's any reason you think why I should be wary of him -
please
 summarize so we can discuss it in a conventional way.



 On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:11 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@:

  **
 
 
  It had a Robin feel to me Judy. Lately, much of what Ravi
writes has a
  Robin feel.
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27
steve.sundur@wrote:
   
  
 Give me something Steve.
   
You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
  
   Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
   to anyone.
  
 
 
 

   
   
  
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Why I love Paris

2013-05-15 Thread turquoiseb
You can be yourself here, and get away with it.

Salvador Dali, 1969, walking his anteater:

 
[https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/248045_605900259420553_6514\
48798_n.jpg]



[FairfieldLife] Saint Jayne Mansfield

2013-05-15 Thread Yifu
by Vicki Berndt:
http://www.laluzdejesus.com/shows/2013/Berndt/Berndt_LG_Saint-Jayne-Mansfield.jpg



[FairfieldLife] Hitler saluting troops

2013-05-15 Thread Yifu
Hitler saluting troops of the Condor Legion, returning from Spain:
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/8/78505.jpg



[FairfieldLife] Jackson, Travolta, Keitel, and Tarantino

2013-05-15 Thread Yifu
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/8/79749.jpg




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
turq, if this is what you've been working on, congratulations!  





 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:21 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
  These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
  Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
  bother even trying to interact with them as if they
  might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
  and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
  a target.
 
 I admit Barry, I find FFL rather dull without those interactions.  So I
 guess I'm a pretty guilty party.

You've definitely got a point there about FFL as a whole. :-) 
If you're having fun interacting with these folks, by all means 
continue. It stopped being even interesting for me some time ago.

 BTW, neat story about your current working assignment.

It's an interesting project. News about it arrived today, for
those (few) who might be interested:

IBM Worklight Wins SIIA CODiE Award

IBM Worklight was just announced as the winner of the 2013 CODiE Award for Best 
Mobile Development Solution by the Software and Information Industry 
Association (SIIA), the principal trade association for the software and 
digital content industries. The SIIA CODiE Award win is a prestigious honor as 
winners are reviewed and chosen by software industry executives and SIIA member 
votes.  

http://www.siia.net/codies/2013/winners_detail.asp?nID=480 



 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Susan

Wow, Barry.  NOt my area of expertise at all, but sounds as if the people who 
understand what you are all doing think it is really good.  Congrats.  Nice to 
be part of a field at its inception and then as it grows (computers etc)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, if this is what you've been working on, congratulations!  
 
 
 
 
 
  From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:21 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
  
 
 
   
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27  wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
   These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
   Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
   bother even trying to interact with them as if they
   might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
   and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
   a target.
  
  I admit Barry, I find FFL rather dull without those interactions.  So I
  guess I'm a pretty guilty party.
 
 You've definitely got a point there about FFL as a whole. :-) 
 If you're having fun interacting with these folks, by all means 
 continue. It stopped being even interesting for me some time ago.
 
  BTW, neat story about your current working assignment.
 
 It's an interesting project. News about it arrived today, for
 those (few) who might be interested:
 
 IBM Worklight Wins SIIA CODiE Award
 
 IBM Worklight was just announced as the winner of the 2013 CODiE Award for 
 Best Mobile Development Solution by the Software and Information Industry 
 Association (SIIA), the principal trade association for the software and 
 digital content industries. The SIIA CODiE Award win is a prestigious honor 
 as winners are reviewed and chosen by software industry executives and SIIA 
 member votes.  
 
 http://www.siia.net/codies/2013/winners_detail.asp?nID=480 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ann


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
 
  PS: I imagine Barry, since you most likely won't respond 
  to me directly and if my limited forum observations are 
  correct and if you choose to address anything I stated, 
  you will do so in an indirect manner with a new topic 
  and without naming names. 
 
 Nonsense. I will ignore it -- and you -- completely.

Well, not quite completely. 

Are you always so unpleasant to the human race, Barry? I mean, who made you 
King of the Grumps? My God, let's hope you are never reliant on anyone to be 
kind to you in any hour of need. I am not sure your so-called collective karma 
would exactly summon forth the angels of mercy. Watch out because fear and 
suffering can make blubbering, helpless wretches of us all - often begging for 
some human warmth and comfort in our darker hours. 

 Have a nice day.  :-)
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
  
   Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, 
   other than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here 
   with a Knapp update some months back.
   
   From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how 
   you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and 
   whom you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part 
   of the Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
   
   Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
   posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
   communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
   
   Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
   regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the 
   bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your 
   advice/suggestions.  What's up with that? You trying to start your own 
   little forum cult?
   
   I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
   seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
   pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What 
   good is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate 
   with, putting yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more 
   us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine you don't. 
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
wrote:

 It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
 Ravi writes has a Robin feel.

I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)

There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
replying to. 

These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
bother even trying to interact with them as if they
might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
a target. 

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@
 wrote:
 
Give me something Steve.
  
   You realize Ravi, that is was a common Robin refrain.
 
  Well, no, Steve, it wasn't. He never used that phrase,
  to anyone.
 

   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread Ann
It's cheaper and probably healthier to eat with your fingers. Definite 
coherence between food and body. People have been doing it for absolute ages.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Michael Jackson
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:56 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons
 
  
 
   
 
 http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
 
 You gone git one?
 
  
 
 A whole set. I wonder if this is an official TMO site? Seems not.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread Share Long
According to John Douillard, many years ago, eating with hands opens the marma 
points.  Makes sense to me.  Plus so much more fun!  





 From: Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:08 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pure Gold spoons
 


  
It's cheaper and probably healthier to eat with your fingers. Definite 
coherence between food and body. People have been doing it for absolute ages.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Michael Jackson
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:56 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons
 
 
 
 
 
 http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
 
 You gone git one?
 
 
 
 A whole set. I wonder if this is an official TMO site? Seems not.



 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ann


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
anartaxius@... wrote:

 Dr, that is not the way love flows. You do not ask for it. If you have it it 
 flows out, and whatever it comes in contact with either accepts or deflects. 
 I think it would be difficult to judge based on his interactions with the 
 strange bunch that we are on FFL. We do not know much about his non-posting 
 private life. He has a job; he has friends, he seems to like where he lives 
 and works. Our personas here, while they may reflect 'who we are' in some 
 way, are probably largely fictional and artificial compared to the way we act 
 with real people, real time. This is the place where we dump our monsters of 
 the id. This place is the toilet of spirituality. Barry probably has to take 
 a dump once in a while, and so he comes here, briefly, to unload in kind. It 
 is called reciprocity.

Oh Xeno, you are a tolerant one. And you are mistaken here. Barry is very 
consistent in how he portrays himself at FFL. You have to be reflecting 
something pretty basic to your fundamental character to be able to do that day 
after day. Accept it, this person that you tend to forever give the benefit of 
the doubt to is not some children's party clown on his free weekends nor does 
he volunteer at his local dog shelter or soup kitchen. This is a man who has 
spent almost two decades dumping on people and resisting the natural 
inclination to be a social animal in the more positive sense. If I made myself 
respond to people the way he does for just a 24 hour period I would feel 
wretched and drained.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Hey Carol, Barry is the most emotionally needy person on this board.
  
  Trouble is, his heart is so atrophied, that the only way he knows to ask 
  for love, is by making abusive comments so that others will slap him down. 
  Now he can barely tell the difference between his need and the inevitable 
  response. At least a slap indicates some sort of attention for him. One sad 
  old fuck, that one.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@ wrote:
  
   Barry, I feel sure you will not respond to me because you never have, 
   other than to accuse me (with false statements, btw) when I posted here 
   with a Knapp update some months back.
   
   From my perusals here on FFL, you have mentioned more than once about how 
   you do not interact with people whom you deem not worth your time and 
   whom you feel are just out to manipulate you. Now certain folks are part 
   of the Hate Brigade. (Does make others part of the Love Brigade?) 
   
   Then you admonish or reprimand or point out to certain posters their (the 
   posters') mistakes (or stupidity, if I recall correctly) in continuing to 
   communicate with people whom you deem not worthy to communicate with.
   
   Aren't others on this board adults and able to make their own decisions 
   regarding how they choose to interact with others on this forum? From the 
   bit I've read the people you admonish never ask for your 
   advice/suggestions.  What's up with that? You trying to start your own 
   little forum cult?
   
   I've read a few times where you throw out the narcissistic accusation. It 
   seems to me that you have a bit of it going on yourself with the 
   pronouncements of who is worth communicating with and who isn't. What 
   good is it to dehumanize others and deem them unworthy to communicate 
   with, putting yourself on some higher plane? It just promotes more 
   us/them camps. Not that you care; I imagine you don't. 
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ 
wrote:

 It had a Robin feel to me Judy.  Lately, much of what 
 Ravi writes has a Robin feel.

I can certainly see that. There is the same narcissism,
and the same tendency to take words and buzz-phrases
used by other people and parrot them as if they actually
understood what the words meant. And they both seem to
have graduated with honors from the same Bad Writing 101 
class, while having skipped the How To Write Something 
Original And/Or Creative classes, preferring to smoke 
cigarettes in the schoolyard instead. :-)

There is ALSO, I might mention, the same delight that
they take in finding someone -- ANYONE -- who will keep
replying to them on FFL, as if they were actually worth
replying to. 

These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
bother even trying to interact with them as if they
might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
a target. 

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 

[FairfieldLife] Re: ANCIENT ANTHROPOLOGY REVISED: Internet Radio, Article by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. (A

2013-05-15 Thread Ann
Oh GN, you just had to throw another one of these things into the fray, didn't 
you? I'm not chomping on it this time as tempting as it may be; although the 
last time you did this I had some fun with it.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Goddess Ninmah janetlessin@... wrote:

  ANCIENT ANTHROPOLOGY REVISED: Internet Radio, Article by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. 
 (Anthropolgy, UCLA) and Illustrations
 
 Giant gods of the ancient world and the successors they choose created 
 mind-sets that shackle us to short desperate lives.  In this internet radio 
 show, you learn how these so-called gods rocketed to Earth from a planet they 
 called Nibiru.  Nibirans stand way taller—8-12 feet tall and live way 
 longer—hundreds of thousands years– than we. These ETs from Nibiru said they 
 bred us as short term slaves and soldiers.  We killed in their names: Allah 
 (= Sumerian, Marduk or Nannar), Yahweh (sometimes = Enlil, at times Adad or 
 even Enki) and, Ishtar (Inanna)–mining expedition personnel all, all 
 Nibirans.  We Earthlings are one species, designed to serve in mines, armies, 
 businesses, schools, governments, farms, factories, and building projects for 
 ETs and the royal lines of ever-murderous hybrid rulers they begat.
 
 Click arrow for radio interview, article and illustrations
 http://worldpeaceassociation.com/2013/05/15/ancient-anthopology-revised-internet-radio-article-by-sasha-lessin-ph-d-and-illustrations/





[FairfieldLife] Pot Could Save the USA

2013-05-15 Thread John
Says Tommy Chong.  That's a lot of smoking to eliminate the national debt.

http://www.inquisitr.com/663197/tommy-chong-legalizing-marijuana-could-save-united-states/



[FairfieldLife] Re: Saint Jayne Mansfield

2013-05-15 Thread Ann
I guess that portrait was done before she lost her head.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@... wrote:

 by Vicki Berndt:
 http://www.laluzdejesus.com/shows/2013/Berndt/Berndt_LG_Saint-Jayne-Mansfield.jpg





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread Ann


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@... wrote:

 
 Wow, Barry.  NOt my area of expertise at all, but sounds as if the people who 
 understand what you are all doing think it is really good.  Congrats.  Nice 
 to be part of a field at its inception and then as it grows (computers etc)

Remember Share, he is not your friend and doesn't give a shit how many 
compliments you give him. But carry on believin'.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  turq, if this is what you've been working on, congratulations!  
  
  
  
  
  
   From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:21 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
   
  
  
    
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
bother even trying to interact with them as if they
might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
a target.
   
   I admit Barry, I find FFL rather dull without those interactions.  So I
   guess I'm a pretty guilty party.
  
  You've definitely got a point there about FFL as a whole. :-) 
  If you're having fun interacting with these folks, by all means 
  continue. It stopped being even interesting for me some time ago.
  
   BTW, neat story about your current working assignment.
  
  It's an interesting project. News about it arrived today, for
  those (few) who might be interested:
  
  IBM Worklight Wins SIIA CODiE Award
  
  IBM Worklight was just announced as the winner of the 2013 CODiE Award for 
  Best Mobile Development Solution by the Software and Information Industry 
  Association (SIIA), the principal trade association for the software and 
  digital content industries. The SIIA CODiE Award win is a prestigious honor 
  as winners are reviewed and chosen by software industry executives and SIIA 
  member votes.  
  
  http://www.siia.net/codies/2013/winners_detail.asp?nID=480 
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Saint Jayne Mansfield

2013-05-15 Thread John
Jayne Mansfield was rumored to have been involved with a satanic cult.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@... wrote:

 by Vicki Berndt:
 http://www.laluzdejesus.com/shows/2013/Berndt/Berndt_LG_Saint-Jayne-Mansfield.jpg





[FairfieldLife] Re: Saint Jayne Mansfield

2013-05-15 Thread Ann


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@... wrote:

 Jayne Mansfield was rumored to have been involved with a satanic cult.

I think it is called alcohol. Turns otherwise wonderful individuals into real 
devils sometimes.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@ wrote:
 
  by Vicki Berndt:
  http://www.laluzdejesus.com/shows/2013/Berndt/Berndt_LG_Saint-Jayne-Mansfield.jpg
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S

2013-05-15 Thread salyavin808


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote:
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
 (snip)
   God does play dice, but He can calculate the odds to infinity.
   
   Bottom line: When you're talking about God, all bets are off.
  
  I wasn't and nor was Einstein.
 
 Well, *somebody* was, and you quoted him or her.

It's a paraphrase from Einstein but when physicists say god
they just mean nature, but not in the way that Marshy meant
nature. He meant god.

 
  I will make a bet that there isn't one though.
 
 I wouldn't take the bet, because I *can't* calculate the odds
 to infinity.

Why would you need to. It's a simple Occams razor thing, if 
there is no need for something, don't invent it.

 (snip)
   CAVEAT: I have no idea if Hagelin is right. I just resist
   on principle ruling stuff out at the God level.
  
  Why? Man invented god as a way of explaining things he didn't
  understand.
 
 Sure of that, are ya?

Yup, and it's perfectly natural to find something complex
and assume that it must have been created by something more
complex. This was Darwins genius as he showed it isn't the
case where biology is concerned.

It isn't like god is a discovery as in Hey who's that over
there with the long beard? And it isn't like god is an
efficient explanation for anything which is what you want
from a theory. You can always spot a bad idea because they
raise more questions than they answer.

The reason physicists don't believe in quantum god theories 
is that they make the universe more complex where it should
be getting less complex. And it's unnecessary.

God is our vanity.
 
 I *will* bet you that there are a whole lot of things we
 will never understand. We might as well call them God.

You think there are things that can't be understood? Interesting.


 
 
  Things move on, Hagelin wants to keep us in the
  bronze age because it helps sell yagyas and golden spoons.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Pure Gold spoons

2013-05-15 Thread salyavin808


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote:

 It's cheaper and probably healthier to eat with your fingers. Definite 
 coherence between food and body. People have been doing it for absolute ages.

Until someone civilised invented cutlery!
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] 
  On Behalf Of Michael Jackson
  Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:56 PM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pure Gold spoons
  
   
  

  
  http://coherenttimes.wordpress.com/gold/
  
  You gone git one?
  
   
  
  A whole set. I wonder if this is an official TMO site? Seems not.
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Coping

2013-05-15 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@... wrote:

 Wow, Barry.  NOt my area of expertise at all, but sounds 
 as if the people who understand what you are all doing 
 think it is really good.  Congrats.  Nice to be part 
 of a field at its inception and then as it grows 
 (computers etc)
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  turq, if this is what you've been working on, congratulations!

From my point of view the product has a long way to go
before it's really as good as the SIIA thinks, but it's
gettin' there. For the record, neither IBM nor ILOG 
invented Worklight; it was designed by an Israeli
company that IBM bought. But in the time since the
acquisition (a little over a year) IBM has grown 
the product tremendously, from the nice idea, but 
poorly realized stage to the really starting to 
get there stage. 

It's simply amazing to learn how much there is TO
writing professional mobile apps, whether they be for
phones or tablet computers or whatever. It isn't just
home programmers writing Angry Birds and selling it
for $1.99 a download any more. Apps that are business-
worthy need to have full security and be as bullet-
proof as any other modern software system. Worklight
is just a development tool that makes it easier to
build those types of apps. 

Our real-life customers include banks, health care 
providers, airlines, transportation firms, etc. It's
truly amazing what these tiny computers-in-our-pockets
can do. We've got one customer whose app senses that
truck drivers are approaching the warehouse for a 
delivery (via geo-location) and has a crew waiting 
at the loading dock ready to unload the moment they
drive up. Sounds simple, but this simple change of 
procedure saved the company millions of dollars in
lost time since it's been implemented. 

As Susan says, it's fun to be part of something that
is hanging ten on waves of the future...

  
   From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:21 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Coping
   
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
These days, Steve, you're pretty much It for the Hate
Brigade, since you're one of the only people who will
bother even trying to interact with them as if they
might have something to say. I think that's magnanimous
and compassionate of you, but to them it just makes you
a target.
   
   I admit Barry, I find FFL rather dull without those 
   interactions.  So I
   guess I'm a pretty guilty party.
  
  You've definitely got a point there about FFL as a whole. :-) 
  If you're having fun interacting with these folks, by all means 
  continue. It stopped being even interesting for me some time ago.
  
   BTW, neat story about your current working assignment.
  
  It's an interesting project. News about it arrived today, for
  those (few) who might be interested:
  
  IBM Worklight Wins SIIA CODiE Award
  
  IBM Worklight was just announced as the winner of the 2013 CODiE Award for 
  Best Mobile Development Solution by the Software and Information Industry 
  Association (SIIA), the principal trade association for the software and 
  digital content industries. The SIIA CODiE Award win is a prestigious honor 
  as winners are reviewed and chosen by software industry executives and SIIA 
  member votes.  
  
  http://www.siia.net/codies/2013/winners_detail.asp?nID=480 
 





  1   2   >