[FairfieldLife] RE: Maharishi Auction Item, carved plaque

2013-11-01 Thread merudanda
Thanks for the ride

  $14.99
Buy It Now
 

 BS PHOTO blv-966 Fan of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
Time left:
15d 16h (Nov 16, 2013 16:15:05 PST)



BS PHOTO blv-971 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
Time left:
26d 06h (Nov 27, 2013 05:27:09 PST

$14.99
Buy It Now
 Oh no shoes or sandals

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 

 

MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI,VINTAGE CARVED WOOD PLAQUE, TM GURU 

 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd
 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd


 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Helplessly Hoping

2013-11-01 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic
 concert of the three of them.  Just give up and listen to the
 whole concert.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ

Excellent. Great find.

Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw
CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed
it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but
the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're
still pretty super.


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
wrote:

  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
  This song changed my life fifty years ago.
 
  I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it:
 
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI

  Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering
 this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all.

 As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught
 it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David
 always thought that it needed a third voice.

 So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they
 meet for the first time this guy from England who they
 really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things
 progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back
 in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at
 some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly
 Hoping, which of course no one has heard before.

 On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join
 in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had
 written in his head. And the rest is history.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v\
=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc




[FairfieldLife] Metta - The Value of Loving Kindness

2013-11-01 Thread martin.quickman
here's a wonderful message for our times - enjoy !

http://sathyasaimemories.wordpress.com/ http://sathyasaimemories.wordpress.com/

Re: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits

2013-11-01 Thread Michael Jackson
Beautiful!  

Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate Lord 
Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. 

And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism?

Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the 
lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? 
Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as 
is our tradition.

And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the 
goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. 

On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickm...@lisco.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi 
Vedic Pandits
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   Forwarded
 from: Eloise
 Raymond eraym...@globalpeaceinitiative.org
 Date:
 October
 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT
 
 
 
 
 
 Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic
 Pandits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic
 Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the
 announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend.
 Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming
 to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to
 come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi.
 Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and
 SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF
 PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of
 nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the
 universe 
 
 Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m.
 
 Dalby Hall
 
 Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul
 Morehead
 Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day 
 CELEBRATING TOTAL
 KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman
 Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm
 Vidya 
 
 Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30
 p.m.
 
 For Sidhas – Dalby
 Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and
 Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program
 badge)
 For Meditators –
 Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student
 Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special
 Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group
 meditation
 CELEBRATING DIPAVALI,
 THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening
 prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives
 
 With the Maharishi
 Vedic Pandits performing the
 Mahalakshmi Puja 
 
 Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m.
 (doors open at 12:40)
 
 Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome
 
 Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh
 flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits
 Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our
 community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated.
 Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati
 Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org.
 
 Please bring your current program badge or MUM
 student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental
 Meditation program, contact the Invincible America
 Department 641-472-1212 or email: iad...@mum.edu.jai
 Guru Dev
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


[FairfieldLife] TM and Medicine

2013-11-01 Thread Michael Jackson
You reckon David Lynch and company will ever publicize any of this?

Guiding Principles
:
o
We are not going to take help from medical Drs.as medical professionals give
poison. So don’t engage any medical Drs. for anything — absolutely whatever it
is — even if they are in our Movement family
o
Raja Raam’s discovery shows us that without handling consciousness there
is no hope of handling health -- there will never be total health. And we have 
the
programs for handling consciousness.
o
Hold onto the fact that we are the supreme authorities on health — we know how 
to create perfect health — we are challenging all governments in world


RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The FFL Neganauts

2013-11-01 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Thus, the Age of Science, which has sometimes seemed to take man far away from 
nature, has found its ultimate achievement Transcendental Meditation, a method 
for establishing man's mind, heart and behavior deep within the source of 
nature's impulses within himself. Rapidly and inevitable Transcendental 
Meditation is raising the scientific age to be the Age of Enlightenment. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

  Look, it is becoming clear that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was one of the larger 
cultural revolutionaries of the 20 Century who angled to bring affective broad 
cultural change to all humanity. In his case ranking as revolutionary, his 
fusing western science with old systems of human spirituality he waged a 
remarkable broad fronted multiple prong impact on human condition in his 
lifetime; a revolutionary in that he tried, expected, to affected change in the 
order of everything cultural through his development of and propulsion in 
revolutionary action a fusing the practice and thinking of the modern science 
of Unified Field theory with a practice of total spiritual condition of human 
life. His impact was as broad as it was huge in human culture everywhere.
 In Awe of the Revolution,
 -Buck in the Dome 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

  Michael Jackson sez:
 
so prove it - lets see the radical
change -  
 
 
 Meditation [TM] : clinically recommended [ physicians should be recommending 
and prescribing as a protocol of good physician's clinical practice] meditation 
as primary healthcare practice by AMA.
 
 
 Son, this is revolutionary. We come a long way, baby.
 -Buck in the Dome   
 


  Buck
 

 This post of yours:
 
Dear Shit-for-Brains;

This is about radical spiritual transformation

looking to affect scientific revolutionary evolutionary change.

We are about the revolutionary positive power for change

in the transcendental deep meditation of the Unified Field. Not just some 
altruism.

It is the application of the science of natural law, the experience of the 
divine of nature in the human form. 

-Buck 

is one of the best posts I've read on FFL in many years. Your salutation is the 
icing on the cake and really made me laugh.

-K 

 

  [ Buck gets to say things in a way others can't. ]
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 as to what my brains are composed of, I have no power over that - they are 
what the Unified Field gave me.
 
 O
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The FFL Neganauts
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 2:46 AM
 

 
  ..Light
 of the Himalayas
 
 I
 don't give a shit what you or he thinks or is impressed
 by and if you
 had any sense at all, you would realize one doesn't need
 knowledge
 of mantra yoga to know the deal on this, one only need know
 cons and
 con artists when one sees or hears
 one. 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
  MJ
 writes:
 This
 is complete nonsense - Marshy said this to differentiate
 what he
 taught from what was commonly available so he could
 hood-wink people
 into believing he had a superior product. He continued to
 use the
 very same scam into his dotage with his lies about south
 facing
 entrance being inimical to human life. Those two things and
 every
 thing else in between he claimed to have the superior
 product - and
 that's what they were and are product to be
 sold. 
 

 
 Dear
 Shit-for-Brains;
 
 This
 is about radical spiritual
 transformation
 looking
 to affect scientific revolutionary evolutionary
 change.
 We
 are about the revolutionary positive power for
 change
 in
 the transcendental deep meditation of the Unified Field. 
 Not just
 some altruism.
 It
 is the application of the science of natural law, the
 experience of
 the divine of nature in the human form. 
 
 -Buck  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 In
 40 years of working with Maharishi it was always obvious to
 me that
 he decided things from the level of his towering intellect
 and his
 cosmic independence of thought.  Suggestions
 which any of
 us might have made, whatever they were, were judged against
 a
 universal, timeless, limitless
 framework.  
 
 
 The
 fundamental thing we need to bear in mind is that this (our)
 movement
 belongs to Maharishi, lock, stock and barrel.  From the
 level of
 Brahman Consciousness he owns the knowledge and he owns the
 administrative policies.  
 
 
 
 What
 a bullshit post ... 
 
 It means what I want it to
 mean! 
 
 
 
 
 Well
 it certainly is what It is. 
 
 I
 am sorry that It is not your
 experience.
 -Buck  
 
 
 The

[FairfieldLife] Out to Lunch

2013-11-01 Thread Michael Jackson
 Licensed Massage Therapists (LMT)∞

LMT’s need to learn Transcendental Meditation technique first. It’s for their 
personal enlightenment and world peace 

If LMT does not want to start TM then we do not take them.
We can help them with their Transcendental Meditation fee by delaying payment 
of ½ or 1-3 months but not for too long.
∞
2 hours of TM and TM-Sidhi program is a must for Sidha LMTs also. Tell them 
that their arms will be softer.
∞
We need to find Licensed Massage Therapists. First look on your state home page 
for School of Massage Therapy. This will list requirements for your state.
∞
Contact Schools of Massage Therapy Training in your area. They have Placement 
Officers who will put up posters for you or send you resumes. These schools 
usually graduate a new class every three months.
∞
There is usually a State Massage Association of some kind. Be in touch with the 
local chapter, and get to know them. They’ll send you bulletin e-mails or give 
you a mailing list
∞
We should have a copy of the LMTs’ license on file.
∞
Place ads offering positions in your Spa.
∞
Raja Rogers says we should pay on average $15/hour guaranteed for 30hrs/week 
and if they work up to 40 hours we pay by the hour
∞
LMT’s should sign non-disclosure form

Any LMT who has any experience AT ALL would laugh in someone's face who told 
them their meditation will make their arms softer. Massage therapy is tough 
work, the LMT needs strong tough arms, not soft arms.  In addition any LMT 
worth a damn should be making at least 30 - 40 dollars an hour, unless they are 
fresh out of school - wonder how much the TM spas will charge the client for 
the hour?
∞
Ask LMT to sign on for a year at least and this will minimize training time and 
expense




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Helplessly Hoping

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
The very first 'supergroup' was Cream in 1966 with Eric Clapton, Ginger 
Baker and Jack Bruce, followed by Al Kooper, Mike Bloomfield and Stephen 
which produced the album called 'Super Sessions' in 1969.


On 11/1/2013 2:53 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:

 Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic
 concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the
 whole concert.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ

Excellent. Great find.

Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw
CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed
it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but
the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're
still pretty super.


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  This song changed my life fifty years ago.
 
  I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it:
 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI


 Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering
 this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all.

 As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught
 it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David
 always thought that it needed a third voice.

 So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they
 meet for the first time this guy from England who they
 really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things
 progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back
 in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at
 some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly
 Hoping, which of course no one has heard before.

 On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join
 in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had
 written in his head. And the rest is history.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc








Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing 
puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his 
disposition very much. Go figure.


On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:




---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:

What a fucking idiot you are.


When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and 
sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then


wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got

to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down

low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam

surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms.

Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana 
Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula.



He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 
2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I 
told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired 
... kamya


ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ...

Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya 
to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen.



All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool.

What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll.

ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the 
disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living 
life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone.


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

emptybill:

 I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.


So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra
lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a
Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra

 Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated 


by Sanjukta Gupta.

And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi
Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my
interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan?


http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta

http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta/dp/8120817346/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1383220372sr=1-1keywords=Sanjukta+Gupta

On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:


Here Here. There There.
Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll.

Hey Troll! Me too ...
I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
It's Tantric ... asshole.

It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that.
Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by 
Sanjukta Gupta.


Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone
that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot.

You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims.


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... 
mailto:noozguru@... wrote:


You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric.  
I am.  KMA.









[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Helplessly Hoping

2013-11-01 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Nailed it? Om come on. Little groove anymore. Tired bunch of retired guys 
turning some concert money. They sounds the same, except boring and old now. 
They should just leave it on the album. Sure you like the nostalgic of a life 
once lived. Seems these coffee shop guys did not never record with Muscle 
Shoals or forgot they ever did.
 http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/ 
http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/
 

 -Buck 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
 
 Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic 
 concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the 
 whole concert. 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ  

 Excellent. Great find. 

Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw
CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed
it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but
the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're
still pretty super.


  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: 
  
  This song changed my life fifty years ago. 
  
  I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it: 
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI 
 
 Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering 
 this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all. 
 
 As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught 
 it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David 
 always thought that it needed a third voice. 
 
 So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they 
 meet for the first time this guy from England who they 
 really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things 
 progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back 
 in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at 
 some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly 
 Hoping, which of course no one has heard before. 
 
 On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join 
 in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had 
 written in his head. And the rest is history. 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc

 



[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Helplessly Hoping

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Pay attention, Buck. The video Emily posted (below) of the Acoustic Concert is 
from more than two decades ago. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Nailed it? Om come on. Little groove anymore. Tired bunch of retired guys 
turning some concert money. They sounds the same, except boring and old now. 
They should just leave it on the album. Sure you like the nostalgic of a life 
once lived. Seems these coffee shop guys did not never record with Muscle 
Shoals or forgot they ever did.
 http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/ 
http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/
 

 -Buck 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
 
 Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic 
 concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the 
 whole concert. 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ  

 Excellent. Great find. 

Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw
CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed
it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but
the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're
still pretty super.


  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: 
  
  This song changed my life fifty years ago. 
  
  I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it: 
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI 
 
 Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering 
 this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all. 
 
 As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught 
 it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David 
 always thought that it needed a third voice. 
 
 So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they 
 meet for the first time this guy from England who they 
 really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things 
 progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back 
 in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at 
 some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly 
 Hoping, which of course no one has heard before. 
 
 On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join 
 in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had 
 written in his head. And the rest is history. 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc

 





RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras

2013-11-01 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to 
a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition 
very much. Go figure.
 

 First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the whole 
lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip finishes off the 
double entendre nicely. 
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 

 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
 What a fucking idiot you are. 
 
 
 When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice 
for my daughter, She like him very much. He then 
 
 wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got 
 
 to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down
 low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam 
 
 surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms.
 Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and 
Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. 
 
 
 
 He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 2005. He 
asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do 
a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired ... kamya
 ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... 
 
 Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya to be 
very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. 
 
 
 
 All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool.
 
 What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. 
 
 
 ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the 
disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try 
it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone.
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
 emptybill:
  I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
 
 So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the 
same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is 
Vaj when we need him?
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra
 
  Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta 
  Gupta. 
 And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not 
even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you 
speak any Tibetan?
 
 http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta
 
 On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
   Here Here. There There. 
 Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll. 
 
 Hey Troll! Me too ...
 I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
 It's Tantric ... asshole.
 
 It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that.
 Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta 
Gupta. 
 
 Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone 
 that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot.
 
 You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims.
 
 
  
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote:
 
 You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric.  I am.  
KMA.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
You made my day, Ann! Now if we can just get emptybill to improve his 
disposition. LoL!


On 11/1/2013 8:45 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing 
puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving 
his disposition very much. Go figure.


First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the 
whole lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip 
finishes off the double entendre nicely.


On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@...
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:




---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... 
mailto:emptybill@... wrote:


What a fucking idiot you are.


When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and 
sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then


wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got

to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down

low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam

surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms.

Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana 
Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula.



He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 
2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I 
told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired 
... kamya


ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ...

Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers 
Sankhya to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen.



All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool.

What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll.

ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or 
the disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy 
living life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone.


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:


emptybill:

 I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.


So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra
lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a
Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra

 Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated 


by Sanjukta Gupta.

And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the
Laksmi Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my
interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan?


http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta

http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta/dp/8120817346/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1383220372sr=1-1keywords=Sanjukta+Gupta

On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@...
wrote:


Here Here. There There.
Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll.

Hey Troll! Me too ...
I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
It's Tantric ... asshole.

It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that.
Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by 
Sanjukta Gupta.


Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone
that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot.

You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims.


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... 
mailto:noozguru@... wrote:


You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric.  
I am.  KMA.











[FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits

2013-11-01 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:

 Beautiful! 
 
 Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate 
Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. 
 
 And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism?
 
 Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the 
lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? 
Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as 
is our tradition.
 
 And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the 
goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. 
 

 Shall we just say TM appears to embrace some cultural similarities to those 
recognized and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural diversity within 
North American living is a good thing, no? After all, what would we all do 
without Taco Bell?
 
 On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... mailto:dickmays@... wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi 
Vedic Pandits
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Forwarded
 from: Eloise
 Raymond eraymond@... mailto:eraymond@...
 Date:
 October
 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT
 
 
 
 
 
 Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic
 Pandits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic
 Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the
 announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend.
 Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming
 to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to
 come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi.
 Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and
 SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF
 PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of
 nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the
 universe 
 
 Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m.
 
 Dalby Hall
 
 Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul
 Morehead
 Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day 
 CELEBRATING TOTAL
 KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman
 Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm
 Vidya 
 
 Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30
 p.m.
 
 For Sidhas – Dalby
 Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and
 Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program
 badge)
 For Meditators –
 Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student
 Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special
 Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group
 meditation
 CELEBRATING DIPAVALI,
 THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening
 prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives
 
 With the Maharishi
 Vedic Pandits performing the
 Mahalakshmi Puja 
 
 Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m.
 (doors open at 12:40)
 
 Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome
 
 Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh
 flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits
 Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our
 community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated.
 Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati
 Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org. 
http://www.vedicpandits.org.
 
 Please bring your current program badge or MUM
 student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental
 Meditation program, contact the Invincible America
 Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@... mailto:iadept@...
 Guru Dev 
 


[FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras

2013-11-01 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 You made my day, Ann! Now if we can just get emptybill to improve his 
disposition. LoL!
 

 Perhaps someone should get a grip on his Shiva implement...that's usually good 
for a momentary burst of bliss.
 
 On 11/1/2013 8:45 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to 
a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition 
very much. Go figure.
 
 
 First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the whole 
lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip finishes off the 
double entendre nicely. 
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 

 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
 What a fucking idiot you are. 
 
 
 When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice 
for my daughter, She like him very much. He then 
 
 wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got 
 
 to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down
 low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam 
 
 surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms.
 Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and 
Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. 
 
 
 
 He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 2005. He 
asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do 
a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired ... kamya
 ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... 
 
 Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya to be 
very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. 
 
 
 
 All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool.
 
 What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. 
 
 
 ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the 
disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try 
it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone.
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
 emptybill:
  I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
 
 So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the 
same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is 
Vaj when we need him?
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra
 
  Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta 
  Gupta. 
 And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not 
even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you 
speak any Tibetan?
 
 http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta
 
 On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
   Here Here. There There. 
 Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll. 
 
 Hey Troll! Me too ...
 I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
 It's Tantric ... asshole.
 
 It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that.
 Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta 
Gupta. 
 
 Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone 
 that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot.
 
 You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims.
 
 
  
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote:
 
 You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric.  I am.  
KMA.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] NBA Finals, Game 7, as seen by a Brit

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Season opener: Spurs 101, Grizzlies 94. The tiny baby is Tony Parker, 
San Antonio Spurs Point Guard and France's greatest athlete ever. LoL!


The San Antonio Spurs' point guard spent a big chunk of his summer in 
Europe leading his native France to its first Euroleague Championship, 
knocking off Spain and Lithuania to capture the title on Sept. 22. That 
championship, and being named France's greatest athlete ever in a poll 
conducted by L'Equipe...


Spurs' Tony Parker sets sights on NBA title
San Antonio Express-News:
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/Spurs-Tony-Parker 
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/article/Spurs-Tony-Parker-sets-sights-on-NBA-title-4945576.php


The benefits of this embrace of intercontinental basketball have been 
clear: four championships won since 1999 with fluid movement, selfless 
passing and insistent defense...


'Spurs Stay Consistent by Thinking Globally'
New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs-stay-consistent-by-thinking-globally.html?_r=0


On 10/29/2013 9:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

Dear God.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE





Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Mike Dixon
Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, 
well that's just a *glitch*.


From: emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

  


Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day 
for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com wrote:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html






Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams

Just another phoney, made up scandal, right?

On 11/1/2013 9:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. 
Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would 
probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.


*From:* emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
alt





Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Share Long
Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!





On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 
  
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were 
posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.

...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid
  a day for my body to function at its best.

On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com wrote:

  
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits

2013-11-01 Thread Michael Jackson
Damn Ann! You nailed it! TM is the Taco Bell of meditation techniques!

On Fri, 11/1/13, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the 
Maharishi Vedic Pandits
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:52 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
     
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@...
 wrote:
 
 Beautiful!  
 
 
 
 Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus
 to commemorate Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to
 Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. 
 
 
 
 And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism?
 
 
 
 Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper
 Bevan, whilst the lowly meditators have to make do with
 Keith Wallace - why create separation? Oh, I forgot, we must
 have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as is
 our tradition.
 
 
 
 And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice
 to appease the goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely
 non-religious. 
 Shall we just say TM appears
 to embrace some cultural similarities to those recognized
 and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural diversity
 within North American living is a good thing, no? After all,
 what would we all do without Taco Bell?
 
 
 
  On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... wrote:
 
 
 
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations
 including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits
 
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
  Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 

 
  
 
  
 
  
 

 

 
Forwarded
 
  from: Eloise
 
  Raymond eraymond@...
 
  Date:
 
  October
 
  31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic
 
  Pandits
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic
 
  Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the
 
  announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend.
 
  Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be
 coming
 
  to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able
 to
 
  come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi.
 
  Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and
 
  SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF
 
  PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of
 
  nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the
 
  universe 
 
  
 
  Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m.
 
  
 
  Dalby Hall
 
  
 
  Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul
 
  Morehead
 
  Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day 
 
  CELEBRATING TOTAL
 
  KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman
 
  Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm
 
  Vidya 
 
  
 
  Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30
 
  p.m.
 
  
 
  For Sidhas – Dalby
 
  Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and
 
  Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program
 
  badge)
 
  For Meditators –
 
  Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student
 
  Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special
 
  Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group
 
  meditation
 
  CELEBRATING DIPAVALI,
 
  THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening
 
  prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives
 
  
 
  With the Maharishi
 
  Vedic Pandits performing the
 
  Mahalakshmi Puja 
 
  
 
  Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m.
 
  (doors open at 12:40)
 
  
 
  Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome
 
  
 
  Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh
 
  flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits
 
  Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our
 
  community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated.
 
  Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati
 
  Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org.
 
  
 
  Please bring your current program badge or MUM
 
  student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental
 
  Meditation program, contact the Invincible America
 
  Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@...
 
  Guru Dev  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and 
I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.


WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate 
to be the next U.S. President!


So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, 
(some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about 
five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from 
Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling 
into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. 
invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. 
She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a 
liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing 
so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy 
has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she 
doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work


http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm


Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? 
While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a 
pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of 
what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be 
very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my 
opinion . Go figure.


But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. 
Thanks for speaking out.




On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so 
friendly before that!




On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a 
day for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com 
mailto:cardemais...@yahoo.com wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html









Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Never pass up an an opportunity to bash the TMO and the poor Hindu 
pandit boys! Something really hurtful must have happened to the 
informant MJ when he was working up there in food service. I mean, I 
still hate my high school math teacher, old man McCabe, but I don't 
carry that emotion around with me for twenty years after the fact. MJ 
and Barry have all the earmarks of misfits that got kicked out of the 
TMO, for one reason or another. Go figure.



On 11/1/2013 8:52 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:




---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:

Beautiful!

Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to 
commemorate Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 
14-year exile.


And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism?

Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, 
whilst the lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why 
create separation? Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified 
hierarchy as the Hindus do, as is our tradition.


And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease 
the goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious.


Shall we just say TM appears to embrace some cultural similarities to 
those recognized and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural 
diversity within North American living is a good thing, no? After all, 
what would we all do without Taco Bell?



On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... mailto:dickmays@...
wrote:

Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the
Maharishi Vedic Pandits
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM


























Forwarded
from: Eloise
Raymond eraymond@... mailto:eraymond@...
Date:
October
31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT





Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic
Pandits






Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic
Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the
announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend.
Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming
to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to
come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi.
Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and
SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF
PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of
nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the
universe

Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m.

Dalby Hall

Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul
Morehead
Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day
CELEBRATING TOTAL
KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman
Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm
Vidya

Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30
p.m.

For Sidhas – Dalby
Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and
Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program
badge)
For Meditators –
Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student
Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special
Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group
meditation
CELEBRATING DIPAVALI,
THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening
prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives

With the Maharishi
Vedic Pandits performing the
Mahalakshmi Puja

Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m.
(doors open at 12:40)

Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome

Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh
flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits
Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our
community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated.
Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati
Foundation), online donations can be made at
http://www.vedicpandits.org.

Please bring your current program badge or MUM
student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental
Meditation program, contact the Invincible America
Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@... mailto:iadept@...
Guru Dev 







RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get 
this bit of ridiculous misinformation?
 

 Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.
 

Mike wrote:
 
  Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
  because the administration
  knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
  *glitch*.

 

 

 











[FairfieldLife] RE: 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 

 Oh yes, this online mail article is the last word on water drinking. Her face 
is lookin' great but her kidneys are shot. Of course one could get the same 
effect from better lighting but instead I'll drink three litres of water a day 
and feel confident, based on this highly respected article, that my health will 
improve. Big apologies to Share, she was correct after all.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


[FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits

2013-11-01 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 Never pass up an an opportunity to bash the TMO and the poor Hindu pandit 
boys! Something really hurtful must have happened to the informant MJ when he 
was working up there in food service. I mean, I still hate my high school math 
teacher, old man McCabe, but I don't carry that emotion around with me for 
twenty years after the fact. MJ and Barry have all the earmarks of misfits that 
got kicked out of the TMO, for one reason or another. Go figure.
 

 Maybe they refused the hot sauce.
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 8:52 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 

 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
mjackson74@... mailto:mjackson74@... wrote:
 
 Beautiful! 
 
 Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate 
Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. 
 
 And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism?
 
 Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the 
lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? 
Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as 
is our tradition.
 
 And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the 
goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. 
 
 
 Shall we just say TM appears to embrace some cultural similarities to those 
recognized and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural diversity within 
North American living is a good thing, no? After all, what would we all do 
without Taco Bell?
 
 On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... mailto:dickmays@... wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi 
Vedic Pandits
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Forwarded
 from: Eloise
 Raymond eraymond@... mailto:eraymond@...
 Date:
 October
 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT
 
 
 
 
 
 Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic
 Pandits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic
 Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the
 announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend.
 Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming
 to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to
 come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi.
 Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and
 SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF
 PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of
 nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the
 universe 
 
 Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m.
 
 Dalby Hall
 
 Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul
 Morehead
 Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day 
 CELEBRATING TOTAL
 KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman
 Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm
 Vidya 
 
 Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30
 p.m.
 
 For Sidhas – Dalby
 Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and
 Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program
 badge)
 For Meditators –
 Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student
 Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special
 Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group
 meditation
 CELEBRATING DIPAVALI,
 THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening
 prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives
 
 With the Maharishi
 Vedic Pandits performing the
 Mahalakshmi Puja 
 
 Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m.
 (doors open at 12:40)
 
 Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome
 
 Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh
 flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits
 Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our
 community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated.
 Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati
 Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org. 
http://www.vedicpandits.org.
 
 Please bring your current program badge or MUM
 student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental
 Meditation program, contact the Invincible America
 Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@... mailto:iadept@...
 Guru Dev 
 
 
 
 
 


[FairfieldLife] RE: 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 

 Yes, Share is a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. 
Just like Barry is a happy-go-lucky travel writer and you are just a guy who 
adores the human race but pretends not to.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 

 Oh yes, this online mail article is the last word on water drinking. Her face 
is lookin' great but her kidneys are shot. Of course one could get the same 
effect from better lighting but instead I'll drink three litres of water a day 
and feel confident, based on this highly respected article, that my health will 
improve. Big apologies to Share, she was correct after all.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Helplessly Hoping

2013-11-01 Thread Bhairitu
They recorded the second album at Wally Heider's in San Francisco.  I 
was there for one the sessions.


On 11/01/2013 05:42 AM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote:


Nailed it? Om come on. Little groove anymore. Tired bunch of retired 
guys turning some concert money. They sounds the same, except boring 
and old now. They should just leave it on the album. Sure you like the 
nostalgic of a life once lived. Seems these coffee shop guys did not 
never record with Muscle Shoals or forgot they ever did.


http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/


-Buck



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:


 Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic
 concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the
 whole concert.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ

Excellent. Great find.

Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw
CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed
it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but
the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're
still pretty super.


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  This song changed my life fifty years ago.
 
  I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it:
 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI

 Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering
 this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all.

 As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught
 it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David
 always thought that it needed a third voice.

 So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they
 meet for the first time this guy from England who they
 really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things
 progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back
 in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at
 some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly
 Hoping, which of course no one has heard before.

 On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join
 in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had
 written in his head. And the rest is history.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc







Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Bhairitu
The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway.  Why would  you 
want to keep paying money to them?  I hope hey all go bankrupt.


On 11/01/2013 07:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. 
Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would 
probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.


*From:* emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
alt





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
We really need to cut emptybill some slack about this, Ann. He said his 
wife passed away - may she rest in peace.


So, maybe that's a real tragedy, but why is he taking it out on me? I'm 
just trying to share information to make this group more interesting to 
read, unlike some others who seem to just want to wreck it. Go figure.


Now he's taking care of his daughter, so I guess we can assume that he 
practiced tantric yoga at least once in his life.


I've spent forty years investigating the tantric tradition and it's 
relation to TM practice and studied with three tantric teachers. It's 
just a shame that we can't get more substantive information about tantra 
out of him, instead of all the grief he has directed at me and Vaj, 
seeing as how we're all three Buddhists.


But, he doesn't sound much like a Buddhist and his teacher seems to have 
mixed up the dualism of the Sankhya with the non-dualism of the 
Vajrayana, so I can't really figure him or his teacher out. Apparently 
his teacher thinks making puja to Shiva is the 'original' tantra, but 
everyone knows that Shiva worship came after the historical Buddha and 
the rise of the devotional sects in India, at the beginning of the Gupta 
period. Go figure.


Did I tell you I attended the Kalachakra initiation with the Tibetan 
Dalai Lama at Los Angeles in July, 1989?


As in all Vajryana practices, the Kalachakra initiation empowers the 
disciple to practice tantra in the service of attaining enlightenment, 
not for the mere acquisition of material goods or fortune from Laksmi, 
but to attune the mind for the acceptance of voidness. So, far from 
being 'empty, our Bill seems to be pretty full of himself,but maybe he's 
just lashing out from prolonged grief - I don't know.


On 11/1/2013 8:56 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:




---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

You made my day, Ann! Now if we can just get emptybill to improve his 
disposition. LoL!


Perhaps someone should get a grip on his Shiva implement...that's 
usually good for a momentary burst of bliss.


On 11/1/2013 8:45 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@...
wrote:




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing 
puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving 
his disposition very much. Go figure.


First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the 
whole lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip 
finishes off the double entendre nicely.


On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@...
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:




---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... 
mailto:emptybill@... wrote:


What a fucking idiot you are.


When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and 
sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then


wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got

to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down

low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam

surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms.

Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana 
Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula.



He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 
2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I 
told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired 
... kamya


ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ...

Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers 
Sankhya to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to 
Dzogchen.



All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool.

What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll.

ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or 
the disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy 
living life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone.


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:


emptybill:

 I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.


So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra
lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a
Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra

 Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated 


by Sanjukta Gupta.

And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the
Laksmi Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism -
my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan?


http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta


RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread doctordumbass
OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, 
anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages 
that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. 
It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he 
signed into place.
 

 It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than 
double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My 
choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual 
deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before 
getting a dollar reimbursed.
 

 No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get 
this bit of ridiculous misinformation?
 

 Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.
 

Mike wrote:
 
  Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
  because the administration
  knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
  *glitch*.

 

 

 

 











Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Mike Dixon
Better start watching something other than MSNBC Judy.  Fox is reporting that 
as early as '10 the administration knew that a very high percentage of people, 
offered insurance in the work place ,could possibly lose theirs as well. Some 
63% of small businesses as well as 45% of large businesses could be sending out 
cancellation letters. Possibly as high as 93 million. Possibly? Probably? Who 
cares, it's meant to be, to force people on to Obamacare.


From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

  
93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get 
this bit of ridiculous misinformation?

Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.

Mike wrote:


 Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
 because the administration
 knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
 *glitch*.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Mike Dixon
Never had any problem with BCBS paying my medical bills.


From: Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

  
The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway.  Why would  you want 
to keep paying money to them?  I hope hey all go bankrupt.On 11/01/2013 07:35 
AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
  
Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, 
well that's just a *glitch*.



From: mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

  


Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Mike Dixon
BTW is it just a coincidence that the employer mandate has delayed till  next 
year? Those letters wouldn't be going out till after the elections


From: Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

  
Better start watching something other than MSNBC Judy.  Fox is reporting that 
as early as '10 the administration knew that a very high percentage of people, 
offered insurance in the work place ,could possibly lose theirs as well. Some 
63% of small businesses as well as 45% of large businesses could be sending out 
cancellation letters. Possibly as high as 93 million. Possibly? Probably? Who 
cares, it's meant to be, to force people on to Obamacare.


From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

  
93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get 
this bit of ridiculous misinformation?

Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.

Mike wrote:


 Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
 because the administration
 knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
 *glitch*.




RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Yes, it's weird how consistent I am in reacting negatively to people who 
obfuscate and lie and pretend to be someone they're not, isn't it?
 

 BTW, here's my first post to that thread:
 

 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/357343 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/357343

 

 Not exactly one of my nastier posts. But Share didn't like being corrected one 
bit and proceeded to emit clouds and clouds of smelly obfuscation and toxic 
reality-avoidance--you know, the usual. What a surprise that she wouldn't get a 
friendly response. What a surprise that she would attempt to mislead us now 
about that thread from September.
 

 BTW, this wasn't about Share making this same point as the ditzy woman from 
the Daily Mail. The point in question with Share was the now-debunked myth she 
was promoting that if you feel thirsty, you're already dehydrated. The Daily 
Mail lady didn't mention that; she was just babbling about how she felt and 
(thought she) looked much better when she drank three liters of water a day. In 
fact, contrary to what she claims her doctors told her, there's no earthly 
reason to drink that much water, no evidence at all that it does you any good.
 

 That was the point I made in the post I linked to above (with references to 
recent research), the point that sent Share into her Mr. Hyde mode.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 

 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 






Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
It's probably closer to 80 million, but, it could be a lot more than 
that. It's been estimated that over 44 million Americans don't have 
medical insurance, for one reason or another, and another 38 million 
have less than optimum health care insurance.


According to CBS News, two million people who had medical insurance have 
been dropped in the last month or two, so far. It's been estimated that 
19 million people or 80%, who don’t have a company-hosted plan or 
insurance through the Medicare or Medicaid government programs may have 
to find new health coverage.


From what I've read, only about 300 people have managed to sign up for 
Obamacare, so how many people does that make that now don't have 
adequate medical insurance? Lets do the math.


'Obamacare: More than 2 million people getting booted from existing 
health insurance plans'

CBS News:
http://www.cbsnews.com/obamacare-more-than-2-million-people-getting-booted 
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57609737/obamacare-more-than-2-million-people-getting-booted-from-existing-health-insurance-plans/


'Health Policies Canceled in Latest Hurdle for Obamacare'
Bloomberg:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/health-policies-canceled 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html


'Healthcare Crises'
PBS:
http://www.pbs.org/healthcarecrisis/uninsured.html

On 11/1/2013 10:20 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars 
did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?*


*
*

*Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.*



Mike wrote:

 Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
because the administration
 knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
*glitch*.






Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Maybe because if you have health insurance you won't have to declare 
personal bankruptcy after an illness?


On 11/1/2013 10:52 AM, Bhairitu wrote:


The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway.  Why would  
you want to keep paying money to them?  I hope hey all go bankrupt.


On 11/01/2013 07:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, 
period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million 
would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.


*From:* emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
alt







RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
It's nowhere near that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who are 
subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market.
 

 Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to 
make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than 
the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that 
meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they 
provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very 
likely save them money.in the longer run).
 

 I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting 
stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a 
very small group.
 

 We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with 
ACA, most people will benefit.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, 
anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages 
that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. 
It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he 
signed into place.
 

 It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than 
double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My 
choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual 
deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before 
getting a dollar reimbursed.
 

 No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get 
this bit of ridiculous misinformation?
 

 Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.
 

Mike wrote:
 
  Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
  because the administration
  knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
  *glitch*.

 

 

 

 













Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Bhairitu
This was your employer's plan?  Have you ever had to pay for health 
insurance on your own (though you actually did with your employer's plan)?


On 11/01/2013 09:08 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:

Never had any problem with BCBS paying my medical bills.

*From:* Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, November 1, 2013 8:52 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway.  Why would  
you want to keep paying money to them?  I hope hey all go bankrupt.On 
11/01/2013 07:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, 
period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million 
would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.


*From:* mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

*Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
alt






Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams

Well, thanks, Judy, for making my case.

This shouldn't be too difficult to verify. I already posted the links to 
some of my on-topic posts to a.m.t., so anyone can see Judy didn't 
respond to a single one. And, anyone can do a simple search on Usenet to 
see her responses to my off-topic comments:


Just key in IF, judy AND willytex THEN liar ELSE troll.

https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21forum/alt.meditation.transcendental


On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes 
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, 
and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.


WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate to be the next U.S. President!


So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, 
(some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about 
five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from 
Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling 
into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. 
invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. 
She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a 
liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been 
doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently 
Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work


http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm


Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? 
While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a 
pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of 
what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be 
very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my 
opinion . Go figure.


But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other 
informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates 
agreement. Thanks for speaking out.




On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:

Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so 
friendly before that!




On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a 
day for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html











Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Let's just sum up this topic: Judy is a shit heel and she is definitely 
weird. Anyone disagree? Where I come from, silence usually indicates 
agreement.


Let's hear it from the Minions, the Pips, and the Mean Girls faction. 
I'm sure this won't be lost on Barry. LoL!


 On 11/1/2013 11:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Yes, it's weird how consistent I am in reacting negatively to people 
who obfuscate and lie and pretend to be someone they're not, isn't it?



BTW, here's my first post to that thread:


http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/357343


Not exactly one of my nastier posts. But Share didn't like being 
corrected one bit and proceeded to emit clouds and clouds of smelly 
obfuscation and toxic reality-avoidance--you know, the usual. What a 
surprise that she wouldn't get a friendly response. What a surprise 
that she would attempt to mislead us now about that thread from September.



BTW, this wasn't about Share making this same point as the ditzy 
woman from the Daily Mail. The point in question with Share was the 
now-debunked myth she was promoting that if you feel thirsty, you're 
already dehydrated. The Daily Mail lady didn't mention that; she was 
just babbling about how she felt and (thought she) looked much better 
when she drank three liters of water a day. In fact, contrary to what 
she claims her doctors told her, there's no earthly reason to drink 
that much water, no evidence at all that it does you any good.



That was the point I made in the post I linked to above (with 
references to recent research), the point that sent Share into her Mr. 
Hyde mode.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so 
friendly before that!




On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
punditster@... wrote:
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a 
day for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@...
wrote:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html









RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Well, to start with, even if that estimate weren't ridiculously high, it's not 
of the entire population, as you suggested at first, but only of those who have 
insurance through their employers.
 

 Now, Mike, despite what Fox News tells you, the government has no control over 
what private employers decide to do about insurance. I would imagine there 
would be a huge outcry from your Tea Party types if the government told these 
companies they couldn't drop their employee insurance plans.
 

 The government doesn't care if people get insurance through their employers, 
as long as it's up to ACA standards. The government has no incentive to force 
people onto ACA if they already have good insurance, so that claim is 
obviously false. ACA is for people who don't have decent, affordable insurance.
 

 The onus is on the companies who have no compunctions about leaving their 
employees high and dry. The fact is, though, that these people (however many of 
them there will be) will be able to get affordable policies through the 
exchanges because of ACA (without having to worry about preexisting conditions, 
of course, or losing their coverage if they lose their job or quit and move 
away or decide to start their own business and become a job creator).
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Better start watching something other than MSNBC Judy.  Fox is reporting that 
as early as '10 the administration knew that a very high percentage of people, 
offered insurance in the work place ,could possibly lose theirs as well. Some 
63% of small businesses as well as 45% of large businesses could be sending out 
cancellation letters. Possibly as high as 93 million. Possibly? Probably? Who 
cares, it's meant to be, to force people on to Obamacare.

 

 
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

   93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you 
get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?
 

 Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.
 
Mike wrote:
 
  Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
  because the administration
  knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
  *glitch*.

 

 












 


 









Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in Yahoo 
Neo. LoL!


On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes 
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, 
and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.


WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate to be the next U.S. President!


So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, 
(some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about 
five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from 
Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling 
into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. 
invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. 
She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a 
liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been 
doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently 
Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work


http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm


Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? 
While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a 
pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of 
what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be 
very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my 
opinion . Go figure.


But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other 
informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates 
agreement. Thanks for speaking out.




On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:

Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so 
friendly before that!




On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a 
day for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html











RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 

  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in Yahoo Neo. 
LoL!
 
 On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 

  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Well, thanks, Judy, for making my case.
 
 This shouldn't be too difficult to verify. I already posted the links to some 
of my on-topic posts to a.m.t., so anyone can see Judy didn't respond to a 
single one. And, anyone can do a simple search on Usenet to see her responses 
to my off-topic comments:
 
 Just key in IF, judy AND willytex THEN liar ELSE troll.
 
 https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21forum/alt.meditation.transcendental
 
 On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Your lie detector must be on the blink, Judy. Bottom line is, Obama 
baldly lied repeatedly, beyond doubt, and he should be impeached because 
of it.


You are usually on top of people telling lies, but you seem to have 
really dropped the ball on this one. The question is, did the entire 
administration know it was a lie and why did they do it? Go figure.


'Joe Scarborough Finally Admits Obama Lied About ObamaCare'
Newsbusters:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare 
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-bremmer/2013/10/30/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare


On 11/1/2013 11:32 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


It's nowhere /near/ that, doc. It's only people who have individual 
plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of 
the market.



Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies 
that try to make these people believe their only option is a much more 
expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the 
companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are 
not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better 
coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save 
them money.in the longer run).



I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely 
getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, 
you're among a very small group.



We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that 
with ACA, most people will benefit.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds 
closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all 
the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as 
mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying 
- It is federal law, which he signed into place.



It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more 
than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, 
anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a 
$5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost 
$12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed.



No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


*93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars 
did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?*


*
*

*Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.*



Mike wrote:

 Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, 
period. Just
because the administration
 knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's 
just a *glitch*.







Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
It shouldn't take a private communication for you to explain to us how 
you set up a 'macro' in Yahoo Neo. Don't tell me you used Microsoft Word 
to set the macro and then you copy and paste into the Neo text box!


How do you manage all those Word docs, anyway? Are you doing this on 
company time? I hope you're not charging your customers for this because 
that wouldn't be very fair. Do you work by the hour, by the number of 
words you edit, or by the piece in your home office?


On 11/1/2013 12:01 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes 
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. *





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in 
Yahoo Neo. LoL!


On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes 
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, 
and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.


WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate to be the next U.S. President!


So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, 
(some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of 
about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response 
from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message 
calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason 
the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages 
from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a 
scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten 
years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and 
Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. 
Keep up the good work


http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm


Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? 
While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a 
pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless 
of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to 
be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in 
my opinion . Go figure.


But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other 
informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates 
agreement. Thanks for speaking out.




On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:

Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so 
friendly before that!




On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a 
day for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... 
wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html













RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
Richard, don't you need to take the garbage out or sweep the driveway or 
something?  I'm sure I was just giving Share objective feedback on her 
fear-based behavior of believing every Tim, Dick, and Skip who tells her what 
she should be doing for her health without applying any common sense or 
subjective interpretation.  I have nothing against drinking water; I'm all for 
it.  Just don't do it out of a throw-away plastic bottle that isn't 
biodegradable.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 



RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread doctordumbass
Well then, I am abstractly pleased, for them. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 It's nowhere near that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who 
are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market.
 

 Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to 
make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than 
the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that 
meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they 
provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very 
likely save them money.in the longer run).
 

 I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting 
stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a 
very small group.
 

 We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with 
ACA, most people will benefit.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, 
anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages 
that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. 
It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he 
signed into place.
 

 It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than 
double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My 
choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual 
deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before 
getting a dollar reimbursed.
 

 No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get 
this bit of ridiculous misinformation?
 

 Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.
 

Mike wrote:
 
  Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
  because the administration
  knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
  *glitch*.

 

 

 

 















[FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda

2013-11-01 Thread Rick Archer
 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=514026078688122set=a.235643249859741.53033.172006279556772type=1ref=nf
 

There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those 
who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she 
jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, 
content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I 
am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to 
maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or 
sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain 
unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why 
the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an 
apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of 
Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, 
when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before 
it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; 
Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you 
nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri 
Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread sharelong60
Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect 
her!  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] NBA Finals, Game 7, as seen by a Brit

2013-11-01 Thread Share Long
Richard is 6'1 really tiny in the NBA?!
Anyway, having grown up with ACC basketball, IMHO, college b ball is way more 
exciting than pros.





On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:03 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 
  
Season opener: Spurs 101, Grizzlies 94. The tiny baby is Tony Parker, San 
Antonio Spurs Point Guard and France's greatest athlete ever. LoL!

The San Antonio Spurs' point guard spent a big chunk of his
  summer in Europe leading his native France to its first Euroleague
  Championship, knocking off Spain and Lithuania to capture the
  title on Sept. 22. That championship, and being named France's
  greatest athlete ever in a poll conducted by L'Equipe...

Spurs' Tony Parker sets sights on NBA title
San Antonio Express-News:
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/Spurs-Tony-Parker

The benefits of this embrace of intercontinental basketball have
  been clear: four championships won since 1999 with fluid movement,
  selfless passing and insistent defense... 

'Spurs Stay Consistent by Thinking Globally'
New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs

On 10/29/2013 9:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

  
Dear God.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE 



RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
Why don't you think the American people would elect her?   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect 
her!  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.

 

 Richard wrote:
 

 Your lie detector must be on the blink, Judy. Bottom line is, Obama baldly 
lied repeatedly, beyond doubt, and he should be impeached because of it. 

 
 You are usually on top of people telling lies, but you seem to have really 
dropped the ball on this one. The question is, did the entire administration 
know it was a lie and why did they do it? Go figure.
 
 'Joe Scarborough Finally Admits Obama Lied About ObamaCare'
 Newsbusters:
 
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare
 
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-bremmer/2013/10/30/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare
 
 On 11/1/2013 11:32 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   It's nowhere near that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who 
are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market.
 
 
 Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to 
make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than 
the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that 
meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they 
provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very 
likely save them money.in the longer run).
 
 
 I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting 
stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a 
very small group.
 
 
 We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with 
ACA, most people will benefit.
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, 
anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages 
that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. 
It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he 
signed into place.
 
 
 It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than 
double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My 
choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual 
deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before 
getting a dollar reimbursed.
 
 
 No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get 
this bit of ridiculous misinformation?
 
 
 Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.
 
 
 Mike wrote:
 
  Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just 
  because the administration
  knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a 
  *glitch*.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 
 

 Richard wrote:
 

 It shouldn't take a private communication for you to explain to us how you set 
up a 'macro' in Yahoo Neo. Don't tell me you used Microsoft Word to set the 
macro and then you copy and paste into the Neo text box! 
 
 How do you manage all those Word docs, anyway? Are you doing this on company 
time? I hope you're not charging your customers for this because that wouldn't 
be very fair. Do you work by the hour, by the number of words you edit, or by 
the piece in your home office? 
 
 On 11/1/2013 12:01 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 
 
  
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in Yahoo Neo. 
LoL!
 
 On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard 
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda

2013-11-01 Thread Share Long
Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker!





On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com wrote:
 
  
There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those 
who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she 
jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, 
content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I 
am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to 
maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or 
sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain 
unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why 
the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an 
apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of 
Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, 
when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before 
it touches you. So when
 trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand overshadowing 
you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you nearer to Her. ~ 
Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri Anandamayi Ma and her 
husband Bholanath
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] NBA Finals, Game 7, as seen by a Brit

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
Don't forget your ability to search simple answers Share - you are a vibrant, 
intelligent, 65-year old woman who takes excellent care of herself.  You can do 
it.  Check it out:  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_league_average_height,_weight,_age_and_playing_experience
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_league_average_height,_weight,_age_and_playing_experience
 

  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Richard is 6'1 really tiny in the NBA?!
Anyway, having grown up with ACC basketball, IMHO, college b ball is way more 
exciting than pros.
 

 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:03 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
wrote:
 
   
 Season opener: Spurs 101, Grizzlies 94. The tiny baby is Tony Parker, San 
Antonio Spurs Point Guard and France's greatest athlete ever. LoL!
 
 The San Antonio Spurs' point guard spent a big chunk of his summer in Europe 
leading his native France to its first Euroleague Championship, knocking off 
Spain and Lithuania to capture the title on Sept. 22. That championship, and 
being named France's greatest athlete ever in a poll conducted by L'Equipe...
 
 Spurs' Tony Parker sets sights on NBA title
 San Antonio Express-News:
 http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/Spurs-Tony-Parker 
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/article/Spurs-Tony-Parker-sets-sights-on-NBA-title-4945576.php
 
 The benefits of this embrace of intercontinental basketball have been clear: 
four championships won since 1999 with fluid movement, selfless passing and 
insistent defense... 
 
 'Spurs Stay Consistent by Thinking Globally'
 New York Times:
 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs-stay-consistent-by-thinking-globally.html?_r=0
 
 On 10/29/2013 9:32 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Dear God.
 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE 
 
 
 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 






RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...!
 
emilymaenot wrote:

  Why don't you think the American people would elect her?   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect 
her!  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 







Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
The incidents of Judy calling me a troll and a liar are way too numerous 
to detail here. However, I must have hurt Judy's feelings pretty badly 
to receive all this invective for all these years. Go figure.


A lot of this has to do with Judy's obvious prejudice against people 
from Texas - that's why she loves to call me by my email address 
(willytex@...). And, this kind of prejudice is not just apparent in 
Judy's vitriol - it's in a lot of posts by the two Barrys too. We're not 
too big on racial profiling down here in San Antonio since the 
population is 63% Hispanic. I can't think of any other reason than this 
for Judy's rants against me - it certainly doesn't make any sense. I 
guess that's why you were asking why she hates me so. It's probably all 
my fault that she came over here to FFL in the first place.


Maybe this will help explain a few things - this one is a classic:

What is the REAL reason our Judykins quit a.m.t.?
It's because of the genius of willytex.

Ms. Stein had been in her usual put-down manner chastising both myself
and Delia because we had allegedly accused John Manning of
anti-semitism in some of his posts.  Willytex did his homework and
reposted some past rantings of Manning's in which he was not only
exposed of being anti-semitic but virtually admitted to it (and, to
his credit, apologized for it and, not to his credit, promised to
repent, so to speak, which he didn't). And it was none other than a
past post of Judy's which told John he was being prejudiced.

This was such an obvious rebuke to Judy and her foaming-at-the-mouth
accusations that she was deathly afraid of being exposed.  So the
easiest course to take was to just quit rather than being shown to be
on the wrong side of a debate. Which, for her, is worse than having a
root canal without pain-killers.

And, of course, it didn't help much to have someone of Delia's caliber
to counter her bombastic holier-than-thou politically-correct
liberalism.

Author: Shemp McGurk
Subject: The REAL reason Judy quit a.m.t.
Forum: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: January 5, 2003
https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21topicsearchin/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex$20AND$20and$20AND$20liar$20AND$20authorname$3A%22judy$20stein%22%7Csort:date/alt.meditation.transcendental/_jRf0qepd1M


On 11/1/2013 1:18 PM, sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:


Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever 
elect her!




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, 
and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.


WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate to be the next U.S. President!


So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, 
(some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about 
five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from 
Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling 
into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. 
invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. 
She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a 
liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been 
doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently 
Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work


http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm


Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? 
While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a 
pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of 
what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be 
very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my 
opinion . Go figure.


But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other 
informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates 
agreement. Thanks for speaking out.




On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:

Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so 
friendly before that!




On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a 
day for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:


RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
We believe you, Share. Thousands wouldn't. 
 
(guffaw)

Share wrote:

  Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker!
 

 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:
 
   
 There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those 
who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she 
jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, 
content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I 
am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to 
maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or 
sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain 
unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why 
the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an 
apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of 
Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, 
when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before 
it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; 
Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you 
nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri 
Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath

  
  
  
  
  
  
  

 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it!  LOL 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...!
 
emilymaenot wrote:

  Why don't you think the American people would elect her?   
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect 
her!  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 







Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
Maybe because Hillary lied and tried to cover up about the Benghazi 
attack that killed the U.S. Ambassador, and then tried to blame it on a 
video?


On 11/1/2013 1:29 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:


Why don't you think the American people would elect her?



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever 
elect her!




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, 
and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.


WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate to be the next U.S. President!


So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, 
(some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about 
five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from 
Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling 
into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. 
invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. 
She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a 
liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been 
doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently 
Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work


http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm


Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? 
While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a 
pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of 
what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be 
very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my 
opinion . Go figure.


But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other 
informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates 
agreement. Thanks for speaking out.




On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:

Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so 
friendly before that!




On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty 
comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same 
point. Go figure.


...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a 
day for my body to function at its best.


On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html











Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams

You really put down Share with this one, Judy. Good work!

On 11/1/2013 1:43 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


We believe you, Share. Thousands wouldn't.


(guffaw)

Share wrote:

 Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker!



On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:
There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and 
those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; 
but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried 
about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten 
has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all 
responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude 
takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches 
or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain 
unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't 
wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows 
best. Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you 
Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched 
caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, when the Mother is going to 
caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you. So 
when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand 
overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you 
nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with 
Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath. 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=514026078688122set=a.235643249859741.53033.172006279556772type=1ref=nf
There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and 
those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; 
but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried 
about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten 
has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all 
responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude 
takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches 
or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain 
unruffled. *Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't 
wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows 
best.* *Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for 
you Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched 
caressingly. Don’t forget that.* *Sometimes, when the Mother is going 
to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you.* 
So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand 
overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you 
nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with 
Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath








RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
Richard, you and Share are too easily spoon-fed; grow on up now, it's time.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Maybe because Hillary lied and tried to cover up about the Benghazi attack 
that killed the U.S. Ambassador, and then tried to blame it on a video? 
 
 On 11/1/2013 1:29 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
   Why don't you think the American people would elect her?   
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect 
her!  
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments 
were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure.
 
 ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for 
my body to function at its best.
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



[FairfieldLife] Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread Bhairitu
Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents 
seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the 
news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/

The war on the poor by the rich ramps up.  Time  to organize and go 
after the rich.  Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.



RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Share Long
Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote 
for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill 
after the Monica affair.

On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 
10 years!
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   I know...I was just teasing her because she is
 so transparent about it!  LOL  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Because
 she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As
 if...! 
 emilymaenot wrote:
 
  
 Why don't you think the American people would elect her?
    
 
  ---In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well,
 speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is
 not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the
 American people would ever elect her!  
  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 
   
 
   
   
 It
 is really strange behavior to say
   the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the
 first person to
   note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
   
 
   WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton
 is not a fit
   candidate to be the next U.S. President!
 
   
 
   So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to
 a.m.t. on
   Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to
 FFL), over a
   period of about five years starting in 1999, without
 getting a
   single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few
 days after I
   posted a message calling into question Judy's
 claim that Bush lied
   about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started
 getting all
   kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about
 ape-shit,
   calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She
 encouraged
   everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so
 almost every
   week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy
 has some
   influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL
 but she
   doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep
 up the good work
 
   
 
   http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm
 
   
 
   Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is
 picking on
   Share? While my beef with Judy may have some
 substance, Share
   seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to
 talk with
   people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I
 find her
   antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy
 really has
   taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go
 figure.
 
   
 
   But, even more strange is the silence from some of the
 other
   informants posting here. Where I come from, silence
 usually
   indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out.
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 

 
 
    
   
   
 Yeah,
   Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had
 always been
   so friendly before that!
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
   On
 Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM,
 Richard J.
 Williams punditster@...
 wrote:
 

 
   
 
    
   
 
   
  
 Yeah,
   I think we had this
 conversation
   recently and several nasty
 comments
   were posted by Judy and
 Emily about
   Share making this same
 point. Go
   figure.
 
   
 
   ...both told me I
 should be drinking
   up to three litres of
 liquid a day for
   my body to function at its
 best.
 
   
 
   On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@...
   wrote:
 
 
 
   
  
 
   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
   

[FairfieldLife] Old soul?

2013-11-01 Thread cardemaister
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
Share, I am forced to retract my statement of your intelligence, at least for 
today.  I'm sorry.  Don't hold it against me, O.K.?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote 
for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill 
after the Monica affair.
 
 On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 
10 years!
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I know...I was just teasing her because she is
 so transparent about it!  LOL  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Because
 she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As
 if...! 
 emilymaenot wrote:
 
 
 Why don't you think the American people would elect her?

 
 ---In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well,
 speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is
 not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the
 American people would ever elect her!  
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 It
 is really strange behavior to say
 the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the
 first person to
 note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton
 is not a fit
 candidate to be the next U.S. President!
 
 
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to
 a.m.t. on
 Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to
 FFL), over a
 period of about five years starting in 1999, without
 getting a
 single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few
 days after I
 posted a message calling into question Judy's
 claim that Bush lied
 about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started
 getting all
 kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about
 ape-shit,
 calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She
 encouraged
 everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so
 almost every
 week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy
 has some
 influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL
 but she
 doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep
 up the good work
 
 
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm
 
 
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is
 picking on
 Share? While my beef with Judy may have some
 substance, Share
 seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to
 talk with
 people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I
 find her
 antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy
 really has
 taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go
 figure.
 
 
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the
 other
 informants posting here. Where I come from, silence
 usually
 indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 Yeah,
 Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had
 always been
 so friendly before that!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On
 Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM,
 Richard J.
 Williams punditster@...
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 Yeah,
 I think we had this
 conversation
 recently and several nasty
 comments
 were posted by Judy and
 Emily about
 Share making this same
 point. Go
 figure.
 
 
 
 ...both told me I
 should be drinking
 up to three litres of
 liquid a day for
 my body to function at its
 best.
 
 
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@...
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
 



RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
This is all trolling, stuff Willytex (and Barry) made up. If anyone here takes 
either of them seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 The incidents of Judy calling me a troll and a liar are way too numerous to 
detail here. However, I must have hurt Judy's feelings pretty badly to receive 
all this invective for all these years. Go figure.
 
 A lot of this has to do with Judy's obvious prejudice against people from 
Texas - that's why she loves to call me by my email address (willytex@...). 
And, this kind of prejudice is not just apparent in Judy's vitriol - it's in a 
lot of posts by the two Barrys too. We're not too big on racial profiling down 
here in San Antonio since the population is 63% Hispanic. I can't think of any 
other reason than this for Judy's rants against me - it certainly doesn't make 
any sense. I guess that's why you were asking why she hates me so. It's 
probably all my fault that she came over here to FFL in the first place.
 
 Maybe this will help explain a few things - this one is a classic:
 
 What is the REAL reason our Judykins quit a.m.t.?
 It's because of the genius of willytex.
 
 Ms. Stein had been in her usual put-down manner chastising both myself
 and Delia because we had allegedly accused John Manning of
 anti-semitism in some of his posts.  Willytex did his homework and
 reposted some past rantings of Manning's in which he was not only
 exposed of being anti-semitic but virtually admitted to it (and, to
 his credit, apologized for it and, not to his credit, promised to
 repent, so to speak, which he didn't). And it was none other than a
 past post of Judy's which told John he was being prejudiced.
 
 This was such an obvious rebuke to Judy and her foaming-at-the-mouth
 accusations that she was deathly afraid of being exposed.  So the
 easiest course to take was to just quit rather than being shown to be
 on the wrong side of a debate. Which, for her, is worse than having a
 root canal without pain-killers.
 
 And, of course, it didn't help much to have someone of Delia's caliber
 to counter her bombastic holier-than-thou politically-correct
 liberalism.
 
 Author: Shemp McGurk
 Subject: The REAL reason Judy quit a.m.t.
 Forum: alt.meditation.transcendental
 Date: January 5, 2003
 https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21topicsearchin/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex$20AND$20and$20AND$20liar$20AND$20authorname$3A%22judy$20stein%22%7Csort:date/alt.meditation.transcendental/_jRf0qepd1M
 
 On 11/1/2013 1:18 PM, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote:
 
   Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit 
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect 
her!  
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm 
not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be 
the next U.S. President!
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of 
which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years 
starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 
2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim 
that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a 
troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me 
and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! 
Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL 
but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my 
beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person 
who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, 
I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure.
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants 
posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks 
for speaking out.
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly 
before that!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Yeah, I think we had this conversation 

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Michael Jackson
Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.

On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- 
minus 10 years!
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 7:21 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   Share, I am forced to retract my statement of
 your intelligence, at least for today.
  I'm sorry.  Don't hold it against me,
 O.K.?     
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Ha! Just proves
 that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never
 vote for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when
 she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair.
 
 
 
  On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@...
 emilymaenot@...
 wrote:
 
 
 
  Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of
 H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
 
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
  Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 

 
  
 
  
 
  
 

 

 
I know...I was just teasing her because she is
 
  so transparent about it!  LOL  
 
  
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
  fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
  
 
  Because
 
  she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As
 
  if...! 
 
  emilymaenot wrote:
 
  
 
   
 
  Why don't you think the American people would elect
 her?
 
     
 
  
 
   ---In
 
  FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
  fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
  
 
  Well,
 
  speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is
 
  not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the
 
  American people would ever elect her!  
 
   
 
  
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
  fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
  
 
  
 

 
  
 

 

 
  It
 
  is really strange behavior to say
 
the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the
 
  first person to
 
note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
  
 

 
  
 
WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton
 
  is not a fit
 
candidate to be the next U.S. President!
 
  
 

 
  
 
So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to
 
  a.m.t. on
 
Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted
 to
 
  FFL), over a
 
period of about five years starting in 1999, without
 
  getting a
 
single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a
 few
 
  days after I
 
posted a message calling into question Judy's
 
  claim that Bush lied
 
about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started
 
  getting all
 
kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just
 about
 
  ape-shit,
 
calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She
 
  encouraged
 
everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing
 so
 
  almost every
 
week since then - for over ten years! Apparently
 Judy
 
  has some
 
influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on
 FFL
 
  but she
 
doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep
 
  up the good work
 
  
 

 
  
 
http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm
 
  
 

 
  
 
Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is
 
  picking on
 
Share? While my beef with Judy may have some
 
  substance, Share
 
seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to
 
  talk with
 
people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I
 
  find her
 
antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited.
 Judy
 
  really has
 
taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go
 
  figure.
 
  
 

 
  
 
But, even more strange is the silence from some of
 the
 
  other
 
informants posting here. Where I come from, silence
 
  usually
 
indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out.
 
  
 

 
  
 

 
  
 

 
  
 

 
  
 
On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 

 

 
  Yeah,
 
Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had
 
  always been
 
so friendly before that!
 
  
 

 
  
 
  
 

 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 

 
On
 
  Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM,
 
  Richard J.
 
  Williams punditster@...
 
  wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
   

[FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention 
from the food stamp cuts. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents 
 seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the 
 news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).
 
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
 The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go 
 after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.



RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Um, and you think we think you would vote for Hillary why, Share? You seem to 
have missed a step there.
 

 It doesn't surprise me even the tiniest bit, BTW, that you wouldn't vote for 
Hillary because she didn't divorce Bill.
 

 Share fumbled:

  Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote 
  for Hillary because IMO she
  acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair.
 
 On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 
10 years!
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
 
I know...I was just teasing her because she is
 so transparent about it!  LOL  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Because
 she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As
 if...! 
 emilymaenot wrote:
 
 
 Why don't you think the American people would elect her?

 
 ---In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well,
 speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is
 not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the
 American people would ever elect her!  





[FairfieldLife] RE: Old soul?

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Oh, Card, that's beautiful, thank you. Great find. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8



RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread sharelong60
MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his 
womanizing. I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! And the woman was 
so young! I've read that Hillary really loves Bill. Even more reason she should 
have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.
 
 On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- 
minus 10 years!
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 7:21 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Share, I am forced to retract my statement of
 your intelligence, at least for today.
  I'm sorry.  Don't hold it against me,
 O.K.? 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Ha! Just proves
 that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never
 vote for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when
 she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair.
 
 
 
 On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@...
 emilymaenot@...
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of
 H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I know...I was just teasing her because she is
 
 so transparent about it!  LOL  
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Because
 
 she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As
 
 if...! 
 
 emilymaenot wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 Why don't you think the American people would elect
 her?
 

 
 
 
 ---In
 
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Well,
 
 speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is
 
 not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the
 
 American people would ever elect her!  
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 It
 
 is really strange behavior to say
 
 the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the
 
 first person to
 
 note that she can be very disagreeable.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton
 
 is not a fit
 
 candidate to be the next U.S. President!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to
 
 a.m.t. on
 
 Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted
 to
 
 FFL), over a
 
 period of about five years starting in 1999, without
 
 getting a
 
 single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a
 few
 
 days after I
 
 posted a message calling into question Judy's
 
 claim that Bush lied
 
 about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started
 
 getting all
 
 kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just
 about
 
 ape-shit,
 
 calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She
 
 encouraged
 
 everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing
 so
 
 almost every
 
 week since then - for over ten years! Apparently
 Judy
 
 has some
 
 influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on
 FFL
 
 but she
 
 doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep
 
 up the good work
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm 
http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is
 
 picking on
 
 Share? While my beef with Judy may have some
 
 substance, Share
 
 seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to
 
 talk with
 
 people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I
 
 find her
 
 antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited.
 Judy
 
 really has
 
 taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go
 
 figure.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 But, even more strange is the silence from some of
 the
 
 other
 
 informants posting here. Where I come from, silence
 
 usually
 
 indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Yeah,
 
 Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had
 
 always been
 
 so friendly before that!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Maharishi Auction Item, carved plaque

2013-11-01 Thread dhamiltony2k5
JHB initials on the carving?  '84   
 James Butler artist?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Thanks for the ride

  $14.99
Buy It Now
 

 BS PHOTO blv-966 Fan of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
Time left:
15d 16h (Nov 16, 2013 16:15:05 PST)



BS PHOTO blv-971 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
Time left:
26d 06h (Nov 27, 2013 05:27:09 PST

$14.99
Buy It Now
 Oh no shoes or sandals

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 

 

MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI,VINTAGE CARVED WOOD PLAQUE, TM GURU 

 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd
 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd


 




RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
 What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to 
understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two 
people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to 
tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good 
for them; it's none of our damn business.)
 

 We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, 
promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's 
one we see only from a distance through the media).
 

 It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or 
they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a 
marital problem.
 

 It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. 
(Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that 
you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.)
 

 But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this 
situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, 
you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings.
 

 (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS 
the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other 
things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.)
 

Share spewed:

  MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his 
  womanizing. I mean, that affair 
  occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that 
  Hillary really loves Bill. Even 
  more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.







Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread Share Long
I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one 
willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private 
life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the 
observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. 





On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
 What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to 
understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two 
people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to 
tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good 
for them; it's none of our damn business.)

We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, 
promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's 
one we see only from a distance through the media).

It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or 
they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a 
marital problem.

It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. (Although 
obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that you don't 
know what it's like to be married to Bill.)

But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this 
situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, 
you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings.

(Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS the 
case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other things 
too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.)


Share spewed:


 MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his 
 womanizing. I mean, that affair 
 occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that 
 Hillary really loves Bill. Even 
 more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO.  



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.




[FairfieldLife] File - FFL Acronyms

2013-11-01 Thread FairfieldLife

BC - Brahman Consciousness
BN - Bliss Ninny or Bliss Nazi
CC - Cosmic Consciousness
GC - God Consciousness
MMY - Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
OTP - Off the Program - a phrase used in the TM movement meaning to do 
something (such as see another spiritual teacher) considered in violation of 
Maharishi's program.
POV - Point of View
SBS - Swami Brahmananda Saraswati, Maharishi's master
SCI – Science of Creative Intelligence
SOC - State of Consciousness
SSRS - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (Pundit-ji)
SV - Stpathya Ved (Vedic Architecture)
TB - True Believer (in TM doctrines)
TNB - True Non-Believer
TMO - The Transcendental Meditation organization
TTC – TM Teacher Training Course
UC - Unity Consciousness
WYMS - World Youth Meditation Society later changed to World Youth Movement 
for the Science of Creative Intelligence was founded by Peter Hübner in 
Germany, as a national TM outlet competing with SIMS, Students International 
Meditation Society
YMMV = Your Mileage may vary




To subscribe, send a message to:
fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
fairfieldlife-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
fairfieldlife-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread Bhairitu

Judy, the conspiracy theorist.

On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract 
attention from the food stamp cuts.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents
seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the
news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/

The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go
after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.





RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
 Share tries to dig herself out of her hole:
 
 I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one 
  willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private 
  life 
  is also going to come under scrutiny.
 

 Yes, this is a recent but very unfortunate development when the private lives 
in question have no bearing on the ability of the public figure to carry out 
his or her responsibilities. That it's socially acceptable nowadays does not 
mean one has to engage in such scrutiny and pronounce one's opinion on it. That 
is not something a smart person with integrity would want to take advantage of, 
IMHO.
 

  My opinion is based on the observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone 
  was thinking 
  or feeling. 
 

 Share, you're only going to embarrass yourself in this discussion. In the 
first place, I never said it was. But more importantly, you have no idea what 
went on behind the observable behaviors, and thus you aren't in a position to 
have an opinion about whether those behaviors were appropriate.
 

 Moreover, the observable behaviors don't give you a clue as to whether 
Hillary was acting like a doormat or enabling Bill. Plus which, of course, 
you yourself said you had read that Hillary really loves Bill. So your 
claim to be going only by observable behaviors is self-evidently false. You 
are lying either to us or to yourself, or both.
 

 And you never answered my earlier question: What made you think that Emily and 
I would think you would vote for Hillary?
 

 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to 
understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two 
people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to 
tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good 
for them; it's none of our damn business.)
 

 We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, 
promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's 
one we see only from a distance through the media).
 

 It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or 
they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a 
marital problem.
 

 It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. 
(Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that 
you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.)
 

 But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this 
situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, 
you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings.
 

 (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS 
the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other 
things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.)
 

Share spewed:

  MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his 
  womanizing. I mean, that affair 
  occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that 
  Hillary really loves Bill. Even 
  more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.





 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
Er, Bhairitu...
 

 No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: 
 

 Bhairitu bumbled:

 
  Judy, the conspiracy theorist.
 
 On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract 
attention from the food stamp cuts. 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents 
 seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the 
 news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).
 
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
 The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go 
 after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
 
 
 
 



[FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread doctordumbass
Yep. One aircraft carrier costs $26.8 billion, to build and deploy. We are 
currently building three of them - total cost: 80.4 billion.
 

 2012 SNAP (Food Stamps) budget: 80 billion.
 

 So, we can definitely afford a few more food stamps, balanced with cuts 
elsewhere. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents 
 seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the 
 news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).
 
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
 The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go 
 after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.



RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread doctordumbass
Fair enough - your opinions, and your vote, are certainly your own, but to cast 
Hillary as some sort of victim, and an enabler, simply because of what was 
exposed, I think is short-sighted. 
  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one 
willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private 
life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the 
observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. 
 

 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to 
understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two 
people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to 
tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good 
for them; it's none of our damn business.)
 

 We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, 
promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's 
one we see only from a distance through the media).
 

 It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or 
they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a 
marital problem.
 

 It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. 
(Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that 
you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.)
 

 But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this 
situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, 
you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings.
 

 (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS 
the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other 
things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.)
 

Share spewed:

  MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his 
  womanizing. I mean, that affair 
  occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that 
  Hillary really loves Bill. Even 
  more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.





 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread authfriend
There's so much featherheaded crap in even Share's shorter utterances, I don't 
always notice all of it right away.
 

 She actually wrote this: 
 
(snip)
  I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage!
 

 Hard to believe, eh?
 

 

 



[FairfieldLife] Chromebook

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams
While Chromebooks are immune to viruses and other forms of malware, you 
are as tracked and 'monetized' while on a Chromebook as you are when 
browsing from your laptop or tablet or phone. However, there are ways to 
disrupt and confuse the trackers and my two favorite extensions these 
days are Disconnect Search (or Disconnect.me) that makes it impossible 
for Google to log your search activities and DoNotTrackMe which does 
what the name implies. Worth trying. - Amazon reviewer


Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny

2013-11-01 Thread Richard J. Williams

Yeah, this is stuff I'm making up.

Washington - Senate Democrats voted unanimously three years ago to 
support the Obamacare rule that is largely responsible for some of the 
health insurance cancellation letters that are going out...


'Senate Democrats supported rule that led to insurance cancellations'
CNN Politics:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/ 
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/31/senate-democrats-supported-rule-that-lead-to-insurance-cancellations/


On 11/1/2013 1:30 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes 
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.

*

*
*

*Richard wrote:*


Your lie detector must be on the blink, Judy. Bottom line is, Obama 
baldly lied repeatedly, beyond doubt, and he should be impeached 
because of it.



You are usually on top of people telling lies, but you seem to have 
really dropped the ball on this one. The question is, did the entire 
administration know it was a lie and why did they do it? Go figure.


'Joe Scarborough Finally Admits Obama Lied About ObamaCare'
Newsbusters:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare 
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-bremmer/2013/10/30/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare


On 11/1/2013 11:32 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

It's nowhere /near/ that, doc. It's only people who have individual 
plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of 
the market.



Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies 
that try to make these people believe their only option is a much 
more expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the 
companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are 
not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better 
coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save 
them money.in the longer run).



I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely 
getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, 
you're among a very small group.



We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that 
with ACA, most people will benefit.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds 
closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry 
all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, 
as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is 
saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place.



It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, 
more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive 
plans, anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, 
with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost 
$12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed.



No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


*93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars 
did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?*


*
*

*Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.*



Mike wrote:

 Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period.
Just because the administration
 knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's 
just
a *glitch*.









[FairfieldLife] RE: Gettin#39; off on the wheel

2013-11-01 Thread s3raphita
I added the Stephan Braun and Inertie clip to my Favourites list on YouTube.
 

 They should really make the Cyr wheel an Olympic event. 
 

 Athleticism plus artistry = beauty. Bet the Greeks would have loved it.
 

 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 I've never really understood those seekers who want to get off the wheel, 
meaning the endless cycle of life, death, rebirth, and karma. I've always 
thought that people who have this as their goal in life just never learned how 
much fun you can have with a wheel. This video is for them.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzA 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzAhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzA
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzA 



 


[FairfieldLife] Growing up transgendered or, confused?

2013-11-01 Thread wgm4u

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda

2013-11-01 Thread wgm4u
Hadn't heard that story, very nice, thanks. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 You really put down Share with this one, Judy. Good work! 
 
 On 11/1/2013 1:43 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   We believe you, Share. Thousands wouldn't. 
 
 (guffaw)
 
 Share wrote:
 
  Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker!
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer rick@... mailto:rick@... 
wrote:
 
   
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=514026078688122set=a.235643249859741.53033.172006279556772type=1ref=nf
 There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those 
who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she 
jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, 
content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I 
am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to 
maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or 
sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain 
unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why 
the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an 
apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of 
Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, 
when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before 
it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; 
Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you 
nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri 
Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



[FairfieldLife] RE: Girl from the North Country

2013-11-01 Thread s3raphita
Re I can still remember the first time I heard I Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose 
bumps!:
 

 The Beatles' I Wanna Hold Your Hand was released in October 63. 
 Twelve months later The Kinks released All Day and All of the Night.  How 
short the age of innocence!

 

 Shouldn't FFLifers be drawn to TM-themed tracks?
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjq9LmSO1eI 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjq9LmSO1eI 
 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 I feel so lucky to have grown up in such an amazing time for music.  I can 
still remember the first time I heard I Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose bumps! But 
Motown was also wonderful during my teen years as well as the protest music.  
 

 
 
 

 
 
 


 


[FairfieldLife] Post Count Sat 02-Nov-13 00:15:04 UTC

2013-11-01 Thread FFL PostCount
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 10/26/13 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 11/02/13 00:00:00
630 messages as of (UTC) 11/01/13 23:53:27

111 Richard J. Williams 
 77 authfriend
 57 dhamiltony2k5
 48 TurquoiseB 
 45 Share Long 
 37 Bhairitu 
 30 awoelflebater
 27 s3raphita
 27 Michael Jackson 
 21 emilymaenot
 19 Richard Williams 
 18 wgm4u 
 17 sharelong60
 17 emptybill
 16 jr_esq
 11 doctordumbass
 11 cardemaister
  9 Mike Dixon 
  5 steve.sundur
  4 Steve Sundur 
  3 srijau
  3 azgrey 
  3 Dick Mays 
  2 merudanda 
  2 indifferent_netizen 
  2 Rick Archer 
  2 Ann Woelfle Bater 
  1 yifuxero
  1 punditster
  1 obbajeeba 
  1 martin.quickman
  1 laughinggull108 
  1 FairfieldLife
Posters: 33
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 




[FairfieldLife] RE: Growing up transgendered or, confused?

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
Thanks for posting.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ



[FairfieldLife] RE: 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread emilymaenot
None of it made any sense to me at all for all the reasons you stated and many 
other reasons; following Share's mind around is not a good idea for me on most 
days, I'm realizing. rueful smile.   
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 There's so much featherheaded crap in even Share's shorter utterances, I don't 
always notice all of it right away.
 

 She actually wrote this: 
 
(snip)
  I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage!
 

 Hard to believe, eh?
 

 

 


 


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread Mike Dixon
BS, it was a clear attempt to distract attention that only 6 people signed up 
for Obamacare on the first day.


From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 12:30 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

  
Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention 
from the food stamp cuts. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 
Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to 
have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food 
stamp cuts that went into effect today (how 
convenient).http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/The
 war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. 
Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.


RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread sharelong60
I would bet that not one person on FFL is snickering at Bhairitu. But admit 
that I'm still amazed at how much nastiness Judy can pack into one short post.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Er, Bhairitu...
 

 No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: 
 

 Bhairitu bumbled:

 
  Judy, the conspiracy theorist.
 
 On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract 
attention from the food stamp cuts. 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents 
 seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the 
 news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).
 
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 
 The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go 
 after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
 
 
 
 





Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread Mike Dixon
Sorry Share, I don't mean to get involved in your and Judy's feud but I sure am 
snickering with Judy on that one.


From: sharelon...@yahoo.com sharelon...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

  
I would bet that not one person on FFL is snickering at Bhairitu. But admit 
that I'm still amazed at how much nastiness Judy can pack into one short post.  

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 
Er, Bhairitu...

No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: 

Bhairitu bumbled:



 Judy, the conspiracy theorist. 
On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... wrote:

  
Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract 
attention from the food stamp cuts. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote: 
Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems 
to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the 
food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how 
convenient).http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/The
 war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the 
rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Girl from the North Country

2013-11-01 Thread Share Long
Seraphita, I remember I was puttering around my bedroom when I Wanna Hold Your 
Hand came on the radio. My whole being kind of perked up and payed attention. 
It was such a different sound from any other popular music of the time. But I 
really liked it. My favorite Beatles song is Things We Said Today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d-Z7vakj4s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d-Z7vakj4s



On Friday, November 1, 2013 6:53 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com 
s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Re I can still remember the first time I heardI Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose 
bumps!:

The Beatles' I Wanna Hold Your Hand was released in October 63. 
Twelve months later The Kinks released All Day and All of the Night.  How short 
the age of innocence!


Shouldn't FFLifers be drawn to TM-themed tracks?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjq9LmSO1eI 



---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


I feel so lucky to have grown up in such an amazing time for music.  I can 
still remember the first time I heard I Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose bumps! But 
Motown was also wonderful during my teen years as well as the protest music.  







RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!

2013-11-01 Thread sharelong60
Doc, it's not just because of what was exposed. It was how she reacted to what 
was exposed. And that she was an enabler, allowing it to happen over and over 
during all those previous years and doing seemingly little to take a stand 
against it.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Fair enough - your opinions, and your vote, are certainly your own, but to 
cast Hillary as some sort of victim, and an enabler, simply because of what was 
exposed, I think is short-sighted. 
  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one 
willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private 
life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the 
observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. 
 

 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to 
understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two 
people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to 
tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good 
for them; it's none of our damn business.)
 

 We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, 
promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's 
one we see only from a distance through the media).
 

 It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or 
they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a 
marital problem.
 

 It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. 
(Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that 
you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.)
 

 But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this 
situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, 
you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings.
 

 (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS 
the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other 
things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.)
 

Share spewed:

  MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his 
  womanizing. I mean, that affair 
  occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that 
  Hillary really loves Bill. Even 
  more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.





 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 







Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

2013-11-01 Thread Share Long
Mike, somehow, in the total context of your post, snickering does not sound one 
iota as nasty as it does in the total context of Judy's post. Maybe I'm 
prejudiced.





On Friday, November 1, 2013 7:47 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Sorry Share, I don't mean to get involved in your and Judy's feud but I sure am 
snickering with Judy on that one.


From: sharelon...@yahoo.com sharelon...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

  
I would bet that not one person on FFL is snickering at Bhairitu. But admit 
that I'm still amazed at how much nastiness Judy can pack into one short post.  

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 
Er, Bhairitu...

No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: 

Bhairitu bumbled:



 
 Judy, the conspiracy theorist. 
On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... wrote:

  
Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract 
attention from the food stamp cuts. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote: 
Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems 
to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the 
food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how 
convenient).http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/
 The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the 
rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.



  1   2   >