[FairfieldLife] RE: Maharishi Auction Item, carved plaque
Thanks for the ride $14.99 Buy It Now BS PHOTO blv-966 Fan of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Time left: 15d 16h (Nov 16, 2013 16:15:05 PST) BS PHOTO blv-971 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Time left: 26d 06h (Nov 27, 2013 05:27:09 PST $14.99 Buy It Now Oh no shoes or sandals ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote: MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI,VINTAGE CARVED WOOD PLAQUE, TM GURU http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd
[FairfieldLife] Re: Helplessly Hoping
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the whole concert. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ Excellent. Great find. Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're still pretty super. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: This song changed my life fifty years ago. I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all. As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David always thought that it needed a third voice. So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they meet for the first time this guy from England who they really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly Hoping, which of course no one has heard before. On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had written in his head. And the rest is history. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v\ =WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
[FairfieldLife] Metta - The Value of Loving Kindness
here's a wonderful message for our times - enjoy ! http://sathyasaimemories.wordpress.com/ http://sathyasaimemories.wordpress.com/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits
Beautiful! Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism? Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as is our tradition. And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickm...@lisco.com wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM Forwarded from: Eloise Raymond eraym...@globalpeaceinitiative.org Date: October 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend. Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi. Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the universe Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m. Dalby Hall Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul Morehead Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day CELEBRATING TOTAL KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm Vidya Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30 p.m. For Sidhas – Dalby Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program badge) For Meditators – Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group meditation CELEBRATING DIPAVALI, THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives With the Maharishi Vedic Pandits performing the Mahalakshmi Puja Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m. (doors open at 12:40) Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated. Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org. Please bring your current program badge or MUM student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental Meditation program, contact the Invincible America Department 641-472-1212 or email: iad...@mum.edu.jai Guru Dev
[FairfieldLife] TM and Medicine
You reckon David Lynch and company will ever publicize any of this? Guiding Principles : o We are not going to take help from medical Drs.as medical professionals give poison. So don’t engage any medical Drs. for anything — absolutely whatever it is — even if they are in our Movement family o Raja Raam’s discovery shows us that without handling consciousness there is no hope of handling health -- there will never be total health. And we have the programs for handling consciousness. o Hold onto the fact that we are the supreme authorities on health — we know how to create perfect health — we are challenging all governments in world
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The FFL Neganauts
Thus, the Age of Science, which has sometimes seemed to take man far away from nature, has found its ultimate achievement Transcendental Meditation, a method for establishing man's mind, heart and behavior deep within the source of nature's impulses within himself. Rapidly and inevitable Transcendental Meditation is raising the scientific age to be the Age of Enlightenment. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Look, it is becoming clear that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was one of the larger cultural revolutionaries of the 20 Century who angled to bring affective broad cultural change to all humanity. In his case ranking as revolutionary, his fusing western science with old systems of human spirituality he waged a remarkable broad fronted multiple prong impact on human condition in his lifetime; a revolutionary in that he tried, expected, to affected change in the order of everything cultural through his development of and propulsion in revolutionary action a fusing the practice and thinking of the modern science of Unified Field theory with a practice of total spiritual condition of human life. His impact was as broad as it was huge in human culture everywhere. In Awe of the Revolution, -Buck in the Dome ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Michael Jackson sez: so prove it - lets see the radical change - Meditation [TM] : clinically recommended [ physicians should be recommending and prescribing as a protocol of good physician's clinical practice] meditation as primary healthcare practice by AMA. Son, this is revolutionary. We come a long way, baby. -Buck in the Dome Buck This post of yours: Dear Shit-for-Brains; This is about radical spiritual transformation looking to affect scientific revolutionary evolutionary change. We are about the revolutionary positive power for change in the transcendental deep meditation of the Unified Field. Not just some altruism. It is the application of the science of natural law, the experience of the divine of nature in the human form. -Buck is one of the best posts I've read on FFL in many years. Your salutation is the icing on the cake and really made me laugh. -K [ Buck gets to say things in a way others can't. ] ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: as to what my brains are composed of, I have no power over that - they are what the Unified Field gave me. O Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The FFL Neganauts To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 2:46 AM ..Light of the Himalayas I don't give a shit what you or he thinks or is impressed by and if you had any sense at all, you would realize one doesn't need knowledge of mantra yoga to know the deal on this, one only need know cons and con artists when one sees or hears one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: MJ writes: This is complete nonsense - Marshy said this to differentiate what he taught from what was commonly available so he could hood-wink people into believing he had a superior product. He continued to use the very same scam into his dotage with his lies about south facing entrance being inimical to human life. Those two things and every thing else in between he claimed to have the superior product - and that's what they were and are product to be sold. Dear Shit-for-Brains; This is about radical spiritual transformation looking to affect scientific revolutionary evolutionary change. We are about the revolutionary positive power for change in the transcendental deep meditation of the Unified Field. Not just some altruism. It is the application of the science of natural law, the experience of the divine of nature in the human form. -Buck ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: In 40 years of working with Maharishi it was always obvious to me that he decided things from the level of his towering intellect and his cosmic independence of thought. Suggestions which any of us might have made, whatever they were, were judged against a universal, timeless, limitless framework. The fundamental thing we need to bear in mind is that this (our) movement belongs to Maharishi, lock, stock and barrel. From the level of Brahman Consciousness he owns the knowledge and he owns the administrative policies. What a bullshit post ... It means what I want it to mean! Well it certainly is what It is. I am sorry that It is not your experience. -Buck The
[FairfieldLife] Out to Lunch
Licensed Massage Therapists (LMT)∞ LMT’s need to learn Transcendental Meditation technique first. It’s for their personal enlightenment and world peace If LMT does not want to start TM then we do not take them. We can help them with their Transcendental Meditation fee by delaying payment of ½ or 1-3 months but not for too long. ∞ 2 hours of TM and TM-Sidhi program is a must for Sidha LMTs also. Tell them that their arms will be softer. ∞ We need to find Licensed Massage Therapists. First look on your state home page for School of Massage Therapy. This will list requirements for your state. ∞ Contact Schools of Massage Therapy Training in your area. They have Placement Officers who will put up posters for you or send you resumes. These schools usually graduate a new class every three months. ∞ There is usually a State Massage Association of some kind. Be in touch with the local chapter, and get to know them. They’ll send you bulletin e-mails or give you a mailing list ∞ We should have a copy of the LMTs’ license on file. ∞ Place ads offering positions in your Spa. ∞ Raja Rogers says we should pay on average $15/hour guaranteed for 30hrs/week and if they work up to 40 hours we pay by the hour ∞ LMT’s should sign non-disclosure form Any LMT who has any experience AT ALL would laugh in someone's face who told them their meditation will make their arms softer. Massage therapy is tough work, the LMT needs strong tough arms, not soft arms. In addition any LMT worth a damn should be making at least 30 - 40 dollars an hour, unless they are fresh out of school - wonder how much the TM spas will charge the client for the hour? ∞ Ask LMT to sign on for a year at least and this will minimize training time and expense
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Helplessly Hoping
The very first 'supergroup' was Cream in 1966 with Eric Clapton, Ginger Baker and Jack Bruce, followed by Al Kooper, Mike Bloomfield and Stephen which produced the album called 'Super Sessions' in 1969. On 11/1/2013 2:53 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the whole concert. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ Excellent. Great find. Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're still pretty super. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: This song changed my life fifty years ago. I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all. As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David always thought that it needed a third voice. So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they meet for the first time this guy from England who they really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly Hoping, which of course no one has heard before. On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had written in his head. And the rest is history. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras
More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition very much. Go figure. On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote: What a fucking idiot you are. When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms. Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired ... kamya ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool. What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: emptybill: I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan? http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta/dp/8120817346/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1383220372sr=1-1keywords=Sanjukta+Gupta On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Here Here. There There. Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll. Hey Troll! Me too ... I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. It's Tantric ... asshole. It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that. Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot. You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote: You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric. I am. KMA.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Helplessly Hoping
Nailed it? Om come on. Little groove anymore. Tired bunch of retired guys turning some concert money. They sounds the same, except boring and old now. They should just leave it on the album. Sure you like the nostalgic of a life once lived. Seems these coffee shop guys did not never record with Muscle Shoals or forgot they ever did. http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/ http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/ -Buck ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the whole concert. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ Excellent. Great find. Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're still pretty super. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: This song changed my life fifty years ago. I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all. As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David always thought that it needed a third voice. So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they meet for the first time this guy from England who they really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly Hoping, which of course no one has heard before. On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had written in his head. And the rest is history. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Helplessly Hoping
Pay attention, Buck. The video Emily posted (below) of the Acoustic Concert is from more than two decades ago. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Nailed it? Om come on. Little groove anymore. Tired bunch of retired guys turning some concert money. They sounds the same, except boring and old now. They should just leave it on the album. Sure you like the nostalgic of a life once lived. Seems these coffee shop guys did not never record with Muscle Shoals or forgot they ever did. http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/ http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/ -Buck ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the whole concert. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ Excellent. Great find. Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're still pretty super. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: This song changed my life fifty years ago. I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all. As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David always thought that it needed a third voice. So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they meet for the first time this guy from England who they really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly Hoping, which of course no one has heard before. On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had written in his head. And the rest is history. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition very much. Go figure. First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the whole lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip finishes off the double entendre nicely. On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: What a fucking idiot you are. When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms. Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired ... kamya ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool. What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: emptybill: I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan? http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Here Here. There There. Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll. Hey Troll! Me too ... I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. It's Tantric ... asshole. It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that. Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot. You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote: You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric. I am. KMA.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras
You made my day, Ann! Now if we can just get emptybill to improve his disposition. LoL! On 11/1/2013 8:45 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition very much. Go figure. First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the whole lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip finishes off the double entendre nicely. On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: What a fucking idiot you are. When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms. Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired ... kamya ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool. What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: emptybill: I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan? http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta/dp/8120817346/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1383220372sr=1-1keywords=Sanjukta+Gupta On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Here Here. There There. Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll. Hey Troll! Me too ... I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. It's Tantric ... asshole. It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that. Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot. You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote: You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric. I am. KMA.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote: Beautiful! Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism? Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as is our tradition. And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. Shall we just say TM appears to embrace some cultural similarities to those recognized and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural diversity within North American living is a good thing, no? After all, what would we all do without Taco Bell? On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... mailto:dickmays@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM Forwarded from: Eloise Raymond eraymond@... mailto:eraymond@... Date: October 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend. Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi. Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the universe Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m. Dalby Hall Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul Morehead Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day CELEBRATING TOTAL KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm Vidya Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30 p.m. For Sidhas – Dalby Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program badge) For Meditators – Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group meditation CELEBRATING DIPAVALI, THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives With the Maharishi Vedic Pandits performing the Mahalakshmi Puja Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m. (doors open at 12:40) Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated. Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org. http://www.vedicpandits.org. Please bring your current program badge or MUM student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental Meditation program, contact the Invincible America Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@... mailto:iadept@... Guru Dev
[FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You made my day, Ann! Now if we can just get emptybill to improve his disposition. LoL! Perhaps someone should get a grip on his Shiva implement...that's usually good for a momentary burst of bliss. On 11/1/2013 8:45 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition very much. Go figure. First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the whole lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip finishes off the double entendre nicely. On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: What a fucking idiot you are. When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms. Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired ... kamya ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool. What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: emptybill: I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan? http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Here Here. There There. Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll. Hey Troll! Me too ... I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. It's Tantric ... asshole. It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that. Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot. You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote: You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric. I am. KMA.
Re: [FairfieldLife] NBA Finals, Game 7, as seen by a Brit
Season opener: Spurs 101, Grizzlies 94. The tiny baby is Tony Parker, San Antonio Spurs Point Guard and France's greatest athlete ever. LoL! The San Antonio Spurs' point guard spent a big chunk of his summer in Europe leading his native France to its first Euroleague Championship, knocking off Spain and Lithuania to capture the title on Sept. 22. That championship, and being named France's greatest athlete ever in a poll conducted by L'Equipe... Spurs' Tony Parker sets sights on NBA title San Antonio Express-News: http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/Spurs-Tony-Parker http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/article/Spurs-Tony-Parker-sets-sights-on-NBA-title-4945576.php The benefits of this embrace of intercontinental basketball have been clear: four championships won since 1999 with fluid movement, selfless passing and insistent defense... 'Spurs Stay Consistent by Thinking Globally' New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs-stay-consistent-by-thinking-globally.html?_r=0 On 10/29/2013 9:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*. From: emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Just another phoney, made up scandal, right? On 11/1/2013 9:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*. *From:* emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny alt
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits
Damn Ann! You nailed it! TM is the Taco Bell of meditation techniques! On Fri, 11/1/13, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:52 PM ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote: Beautiful! Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism? Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as is our tradition. And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. Shall we just say TM appears to embrace some cultural similarities to those recognized and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural diversity within North American living is a good thing, no? After all, what would we all do without Taco Bell? On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM Forwarded from: Eloise Raymond eraymond@... Date: October 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend. Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi. Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the universe Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m. Dalby Hall Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul Morehead Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day CELEBRATING TOTAL KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm Vidya Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30 p.m. For Sidhas – Dalby Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program badge) For Meditators – Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group meditation CELEBRATING DIPAVALI, THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives With the Maharishi Vedic Pandits performing the Mahalakshmi Puja Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m. (doors open at 12:40) Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated. Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org. Please bring your current program badge or MUM student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental Meditation program, contact the Invincible America Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@... Guru Dev
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com mailto:cardemais...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits
Never pass up an an opportunity to bash the TMO and the poor Hindu pandit boys! Something really hurtful must have happened to the informant MJ when he was working up there in food service. I mean, I still hate my high school math teacher, old man McCabe, but I don't carry that emotion around with me for twenty years after the fact. MJ and Barry have all the earmarks of misfits that got kicked out of the TMO, for one reason or another. Go figure. On 11/1/2013 8:52 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote: Beautiful! Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism? Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as is our tradition. And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. Shall we just say TM appears to embrace some cultural similarities to those recognized and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural diversity within North American living is a good thing, no? After all, what would we all do without Taco Bell? On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... mailto:dickmays@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM Forwarded from: Eloise Raymond eraymond@... mailto:eraymond@... Date: October 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend. Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi. Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the universe Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m. Dalby Hall Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul Morehead Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day CELEBRATING TOTAL KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm Vidya Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30 p.m. For Sidhas – Dalby Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program badge) For Meditators – Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group meditation CELEBRATING DIPAVALI, THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives With the Maharishi Vedic Pandits performing the Mahalakshmi Puja Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m. (doors open at 12:40) Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated. Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org. Please bring your current program badge or MUM student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental Meditation program, contact the Invincible America Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@... mailto:iadept@... Guru Dev
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
[FairfieldLife] RE: 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. Oh yes, this online mail article is the last word on water drinking. Her face is lookin' great but her kidneys are shot. Of course one could get the same effect from better lighting but instead I'll drink three litres of water a day and feel confident, based on this highly respected article, that my health will improve. Big apologies to Share, she was correct after all. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
[FairfieldLife] RE: Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: Never pass up an an opportunity to bash the TMO and the poor Hindu pandit boys! Something really hurtful must have happened to the informant MJ when he was working up there in food service. I mean, I still hate my high school math teacher, old man McCabe, but I don't carry that emotion around with me for twenty years after the fact. MJ and Barry have all the earmarks of misfits that got kicked out of the TMO, for one reason or another. Go figure. Maybe they refused the hot sauce. On 11/1/2013 8:52 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... mailto:mjackson74@... wrote: Beautiful! Dipavali, or Diwali, is a festival celebrated by all Hindus to commemorate Lord Rama and his wife, Sita’s return to Ayodhya after his 14-year exile. And the TMO claims this crap isn't HInduism? Ah, and we see that the sidhas get to hang with Big Bopper Bevan, whilst the lowly meditators have to make do with Keith Wallace - why create separation? Oh, I forgot, we must have a tightly stratified hierarchy as the Hindus do, as is our tradition. And the Hindu priests will be performing a Hindu sacrifice to appease the goddess of prosperity, but TM is absolutely non-religious. Shall we just say TM appears to embrace some cultural similarities to those recognized and celebrated by India. Incorporating cultural diversity within North American living is a good thing, no? After all, what would we all do without Taco Bell? On Thu, 10/31/13, Dick Mays dickmays@... mailto:dickmays@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 9:39 PM Forwarded from: Eloise Raymond eraymond@... mailto:eraymond@... Date: October 31, 2013 4:27:26 PM CDT Dipavali Celebrations including the Maharishi Vedic Pandits Dear Friends of the Maharishi Vedic Pandits,We want to make sure that you have seen the announcement about the Dipavali celebrations this weekend. Please note that the Maharishi Vedic Pandits will be coming to the Dome on Sunday afternoon. We hope you will be able to come and enjoy the auspicious celebration of Mahalakshmi. Jai Guru Dev,Eloise and SandyCELEBRATING DHANVANTARI DAY, THE DAY OF PERFECT HEALTHEnlivening the aspect of nature’s intelligence responsible for the health of the universe Friday night, November 1, 8:00 p.m. Dalby Hall Hosted by Dr. Robert Keith Wallace and Dr. Paul Morehead Maharishi’s address on Dhanvantari Day CELEBRATING TOTAL KNOWLEDGEOn this special day of Hanuman Jayanti, enlivening the value of Total Knowledge—Brahm Vidya Saturday afternoon, November 2, 1:30 p.m. For Sidhas – Dalby Hall, With Dr. Bevan Morris and Dr. Doug Birx and Dr. Linda Birx (please bring your current program badge) For Meditators – Festival Hall (upstairs in the Argiro Student Center) with Dr. Keith Wallace, featuring a special Maharishi tape followed by discussion and a group meditation CELEBRATING DIPAVALI, THE FESTIVAL OF LIGHTSEnlivening prosperity, good fortune, and happiness in our lives With the Maharishi Vedic Pandits performing the Mahalakshmi Puja Sunday afternoon, November 3, 1:00–4:30 p.m. (doors open at 12:40) Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome Bring your favorite treats for all to enjoy, also fresh flower blossoms and 2-3 whole washed organic fruits Help support the Maharishi Vedic Pandits in our community. A donation of any size is greatly appreciated. Checks are payable to BSF (Brahmananda Saraswati Foundation), online donations can be made at http://www.vedicpandits.org. http://www.vedicpandits.org. Please bring your current program badge or MUM student ID. For other practitioners of the Transcendental Meditation program, contact the Invincible America Department 641-472-1212 or email: iadept@... mailto:iadept@... Guru Dev
[FairfieldLife] RE: 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. Yes, Share is a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Just like Barry is a happy-go-lucky travel writer and you are just a guy who adores the human race but pretends not to. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. Oh yes, this online mail article is the last word on water drinking. Her face is lookin' great but her kidneys are shot. Of course one could get the same effect from better lighting but instead I'll drink three litres of water a day and feel confident, based on this highly respected article, that my health will improve. Big apologies to Share, she was correct after all. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Helplessly Hoping
They recorded the second album at Wally Heider's in San Francisco. I was there for one the sessions. On 11/01/2013 05:42 AM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote: Nailed it? Om come on. Little groove anymore. Tired bunch of retired guys turning some concert money. They sounds the same, except boring and old now. They should just leave it on the album. Sure you like the nostalgic of a life once lived. Seems these coffee shop guys did not never record with Muscle Shoals or forgot they ever did. http://www.magpictures.com/muscleshoals/ -Buck ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Yep, good memories, good memorieshere is an acoustic concert of the three of them. Just give up and listen to the whole concert. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjbq6K2ziDQ Excellent. Great find. Our friend Joe wrote on another forum that he just saw CSNY in San Francisco a few days ago, and they nailed it there, too. For some people, the bodies get older but the voices don't. The first Supergroup, and they're still pretty super. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: This song changed my life fifty years ago. I guess I'm not the only old fart who feels that way about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4pIULFGLI Still tripping on Crosby, Stills and Nash after discovering this treasure, I thought I'd post the song that started it all. As I remember the story, Steven wrote the song and taught it to David. They worked on harmonies for it, but David always thought that it needed a third voice. So they go over to Joni Mitchell's house, and there they meet for the first time this guy from England who they really only know as the voice of The Hollies. And things progress and get wild and wooly the way things got back in those days of Laurel Canyon house parties, and at some point Steven and David start to sing Helplessly Hoping, which of course no one has heard before. On the second verse, David heard Graham Nash join in, singing the *exact* third harmony part he had written in his head. And the rest is history. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGtFRsCXRcc
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway. Why would you want to keep paying money to them? I hope hey all go bankrupt. On 11/01/2013 07:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*. *From:* emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny alt
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: TM in the Tantras
We really need to cut emptybill some slack about this, Ann. He said his wife passed away - may she rest in peace. So, maybe that's a real tragedy, but why is he taking it out on me? I'm just trying to share information to make this group more interesting to read, unlike some others who seem to just want to wreck it. Go figure. Now he's taking care of his daughter, so I guess we can assume that he practiced tantric yoga at least once in his life. I've spent forty years investigating the tantric tradition and it's relation to TM practice and studied with three tantric teachers. It's just a shame that we can't get more substantive information about tantra out of him, instead of all the grief he has directed at me and Vaj, seeing as how we're all three Buddhists. But, he doesn't sound much like a Buddhist and his teacher seems to have mixed up the dualism of the Sankhya with the non-dualism of the Vajrayana, so I can't really figure him or his teacher out. Apparently his teacher thinks making puja to Shiva is the 'original' tantra, but everyone knows that Shiva worship came after the historical Buddha and the rise of the devotional sects in India, at the beginning of the Gupta period. Go figure. Did I tell you I attended the Kalachakra initiation with the Tibetan Dalai Lama at Los Angeles in July, 1989? As in all Vajryana practices, the Kalachakra initiation empowers the disciple to practice tantra in the service of attaining enlightenment, not for the mere acquisition of material goods or fortune from Laksmi, but to attune the mind for the acceptance of voidness. So, far from being 'empty, our Bill seems to be pretty full of himself,but maybe he's just lashing out from prolonged grief - I don't know. On 11/1/2013 8:56 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You made my day, Ann! Now if we can just get emptybill to improve his disposition. LoL! Perhaps someone should get a grip on his Shiva implement...that's usually good for a momentary burst of bliss. On 11/1/2013 8:45 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition very much. Go figure. First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the whole lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term get a grip finishes off the double entendre nicely. On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: What a fucking idiot you are. When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice for my daughter, She like him very much. He then wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms. Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. He pointed at the Lingam and said Oh - Original Tantra! That was 2005. He asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do a daily abhisheka but rather did it as desired ... kamya ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra. He even considers Sankhya to be very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool. What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. ideas might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: emptybill: I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam. So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is Vaj when we need him? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta Gupta. And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you speak any Tibetan? http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place. It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed. No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Better start watching something other than MSNBC Judy. Fox is reporting that as early as '10 the administration knew that a very high percentage of people, offered insurance in the work place ,could possibly lose theirs as well. Some 63% of small businesses as well as 45% of large businesses could be sending out cancellation letters. Possibly as high as 93 million. Possibly? Probably? Who cares, it's meant to be, to force people on to Obamacare. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Never had any problem with BCBS paying my medical bills. From: Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:52 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway. Why would you want to keep paying money to them? I hope hey all go bankrupt.On 11/01/2013 07:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*. From: mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
BTW is it just a coincidence that the employer mandate has delayed till next year? Those letters wouldn't be going out till after the elections From: Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 9:03 AM Subject: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny Better start watching something other than MSNBC Judy. Fox is reporting that as early as '10 the administration knew that a very high percentage of people, offered insurance in the work place ,could possibly lose theirs as well. Some 63% of small businesses as well as 45% of large businesses could be sending out cancellation letters. Possibly as high as 93 million. Possibly? Probably? Who cares, it's meant to be, to force people on to Obamacare. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Yes, it's weird how consistent I am in reacting negatively to people who obfuscate and lie and pretend to be someone they're not, isn't it? BTW, here's my first post to that thread: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/357343 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/357343 Not exactly one of my nastier posts. But Share didn't like being corrected one bit and proceeded to emit clouds and clouds of smelly obfuscation and toxic reality-avoidance--you know, the usual. What a surprise that she wouldn't get a friendly response. What a surprise that she would attempt to mislead us now about that thread from September. BTW, this wasn't about Share making this same point as the ditzy woman from the Daily Mail. The point in question with Share was the now-debunked myth she was promoting that if you feel thirsty, you're already dehydrated. The Daily Mail lady didn't mention that; she was just babbling about how she felt and (thought she) looked much better when she drank three liters of water a day. In fact, contrary to what she claims her doctors told her, there's no earthly reason to drink that much water, no evidence at all that it does you any good. That was the point I made in the post I linked to above (with references to recent research), the point that sent Share into her Mr. Hyde mode. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
It's probably closer to 80 million, but, it could be a lot more than that. It's been estimated that over 44 million Americans don't have medical insurance, for one reason or another, and another 38 million have less than optimum health care insurance. According to CBS News, two million people who had medical insurance have been dropped in the last month or two, so far. It's been estimated that 19 million people or 80%, who don’t have a company-hosted plan or insurance through the Medicare or Medicaid government programs may have to find new health coverage. From what I've read, only about 300 people have managed to sign up for Obamacare, so how many people does that make that now don't have adequate medical insurance? Lets do the math. 'Obamacare: More than 2 million people getting booted from existing health insurance plans' CBS News: http://www.cbsnews.com/obamacare-more-than-2-million-people-getting-booted http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57609737/obamacare-more-than-2-million-people-getting-booted-from-existing-health-insurance-plans/ 'Health Policies Canceled in Latest Hurdle for Obamacare' Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/health-policies-canceled http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-29/health-policies-canceled-in-latest-hurdle-for-obamacare.html 'Healthcare Crises' PBS: http://www.pbs.org/healthcarecrisis/uninsured.html On 11/1/2013 10:20 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?* * * *Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.* Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Maybe because if you have health insurance you won't have to declare personal bankruptcy after an illness? On 11/1/2013 10:52 AM, Bhairitu wrote: The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway. Why would you want to keep paying money to them? I hope hey all go bankrupt. On 11/01/2013 07:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*. *From:* emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny alt
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
It's nowhere near that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market. Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save them money.in the longer run). I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a very small group. We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with ACA, most people will benefit. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place. It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed. No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
This was your employer's plan? Have you ever had to pay for health insurance on your own (though you actually did with your employer's plan)? On 11/01/2013 09:08 AM, Mike Dixon wrote: Never had any problem with BCBS paying my medical bills. *From:* Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Friday, November 1, 2013 8:52 AM *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny The health insurance companies are extortionists anyway. Why would you want to keep paying money to them? I hope hey all go bankrupt.On 11/01/2013 07:35 AM, Mike Dixon wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*. *From:* mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com mailto:emptyb...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:15 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny alt
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Well, thanks, Judy, for making my case. This shouldn't be too difficult to verify. I already posted the links to some of my on-topic posts to a.m.t., so anyone can see Judy didn't respond to a single one. And, anyone can do a simple search on Usenet to see her responses to my off-topic comments: Just key in IF, judy AND willytex THEN liar ELSE troll. https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21forum/alt.meditation.transcendental On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Let's just sum up this topic: Judy is a shit heel and she is definitely weird. Anyone disagree? Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Let's hear it from the Minions, the Pips, and the Mean Girls faction. I'm sure this won't be lost on Barry. LoL! On 11/1/2013 11:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, it's weird how consistent I am in reacting negatively to people who obfuscate and lie and pretend to be someone they're not, isn't it? BTW, here's my first post to that thread: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/357343 Not exactly one of my nastier posts. But Share didn't like being corrected one bit and proceeded to emit clouds and clouds of smelly obfuscation and toxic reality-avoidance--you know, the usual. What a surprise that she wouldn't get a friendly response. What a surprise that she would attempt to mislead us now about that thread from September. BTW, this wasn't about Share making this same point as the ditzy woman from the Daily Mail. The point in question with Share was the now-debunked myth she was promoting that if you feel thirsty, you're already dehydrated. The Daily Mail lady didn't mention that; she was just babbling about how she felt and (thought she) looked much better when she drank three liters of water a day. In fact, contrary to what she claims her doctors told her, there's no earthly reason to drink that much water, no evidence at all that it does you any good. That was the point I made in the post I linked to above (with references to recent research), the point that sent Share into her Mr. Hyde mode. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Well, to start with, even if that estimate weren't ridiculously high, it's not of the entire population, as you suggested at first, but only of those who have insurance through their employers. Now, Mike, despite what Fox News tells you, the government has no control over what private employers decide to do about insurance. I would imagine there would be a huge outcry from your Tea Party types if the government told these companies they couldn't drop their employee insurance plans. The government doesn't care if people get insurance through their employers, as long as it's up to ACA standards. The government has no incentive to force people onto ACA if they already have good insurance, so that claim is obviously false. ACA is for people who don't have decent, affordable insurance. The onus is on the companies who have no compunctions about leaving their employees high and dry. The fact is, though, that these people (however many of them there will be) will be able to get affordable policies through the exchanges because of ACA (without having to worry about preexisting conditions, of course, or losing their coverage if they lose their job or quit and move away or decide to start their own business and become a job creator). ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Better start watching something other than MSNBC Judy. Fox is reporting that as early as '10 the administration knew that a very high percentage of people, offered insurance in the work place ,could possibly lose theirs as well. Some 63% of small businesses as well as 45% of large businesses could be sending out cancellation letters. Possibly as high as 93 million. Possibly? Probably? Who cares, it's meant to be, to force people on to Obamacare. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in Yahoo Neo. LoL! On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in Yahoo Neo. LoL! On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, thanks, Judy, for making my case. This shouldn't be too difficult to verify. I already posted the links to some of my on-topic posts to a.m.t., so anyone can see Judy didn't respond to a single one. And, anyone can do a simple search on Usenet to see her responses to my off-topic comments: Just key in IF, judy AND willytex THEN liar ELSE troll. https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21forum/alt.meditation.transcendental On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Your lie detector must be on the blink, Judy. Bottom line is, Obama baldly lied repeatedly, beyond doubt, and he should be impeached because of it. You are usually on top of people telling lies, but you seem to have really dropped the ball on this one. The question is, did the entire administration know it was a lie and why did they do it? Go figure. 'Joe Scarborough Finally Admits Obama Lied About ObamaCare' Newsbusters: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-bremmer/2013/10/30/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare On 11/1/2013 11:32 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: It's nowhere /near/ that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market. Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save them money.in the longer run). I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a very small group. We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with ACA, most people will benefit. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place. It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed. No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: *93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?* * * *Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.* Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
It shouldn't take a private communication for you to explain to us how you set up a 'macro' in Yahoo Neo. Don't tell me you used Microsoft Word to set the macro and then you copy and paste into the Neo text box! How do you manage all those Word docs, anyway? Are you doing this on company time? I hope you're not charging your customers for this because that wouldn't be very fair. Do you work by the hour, by the number of words you edit, or by the piece in your home office? On 11/1/2013 12:01 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in Yahoo Neo. LoL! On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Richard, don't you need to take the garbage out or sweep the driveway or something? I'm sure I was just giving Share objective feedback on her fear-based behavior of believing every Tim, Dick, and Skip who tells her what she should be doing for her health without applying any common sense or subjective interpretation. I have nothing against drinking water; I'm all for it. Just don't do it out of a throw-away plastic bottle that isn't biodegradable. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Well then, I am abstractly pleased, for them. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It's nowhere near that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market. Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save them money.in the longer run). I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a very small group. We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with ACA, most people will benefit. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place. It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed. No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
[FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=514026078688122set=a.235643249859741.53033.172006279556772type=1ref=nf There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] NBA Finals, Game 7, as seen by a Brit
Richard is 6'1 really tiny in the NBA?! Anyway, having grown up with ACC basketball, IMHO, college b ball is way more exciting than pros. On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:03 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: Season opener: Spurs 101, Grizzlies 94. The tiny baby is Tony Parker, San Antonio Spurs Point Guard and France's greatest athlete ever. LoL! The San Antonio Spurs' point guard spent a big chunk of his summer in Europe leading his native France to its first Euroleague Championship, knocking off Spain and Lithuania to capture the title on Sept. 22. That championship, and being named France's greatest athlete ever in a poll conducted by L'Equipe... Spurs' Tony Parker sets sights on NBA title San Antonio Express-News: http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/Spurs-Tony-Parker The benefits of this embrace of intercontinental basketball have been clear: four championships won since 1999 with fluid movement, selfless passing and insistent defense... 'Spurs Stay Consistent by Thinking Globally' New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs On 10/29/2013 9:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard wrote: Your lie detector must be on the blink, Judy. Bottom line is, Obama baldly lied repeatedly, beyond doubt, and he should be impeached because of it. You are usually on top of people telling lies, but you seem to have really dropped the ball on this one. The question is, did the entire administration know it was a lie and why did they do it? Go figure. 'Joe Scarborough Finally Admits Obama Lied About ObamaCare' Newsbusters: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-bremmer/2013/10/30/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare On 11/1/2013 11:32 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: It's nowhere near that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market. Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save them money.in the longer run). I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a very small group. We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with ACA, most people will benefit. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place. It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed. No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: 93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation? Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here. Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard wrote: It shouldn't take a private communication for you to explain to us how you set up a 'macro' in Yahoo Neo. Don't tell me you used Microsoft Word to set the macro and then you copy and paste into the Neo text box! How do you manage all those Word docs, anyway? Are you doing this on company time? I hope you're not charging your customers for this because that wouldn't be very fair. Do you work by the hour, by the number of words you edit, or by the piece in your home office? On 11/1/2013 12:01 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Come on Judy- tell us how you fibbed about setting a 'macro' up in Yahoo Neo. LoL! On 11/1/2013 10:22 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda
Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker! On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com wrote: There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] NBA Finals, Game 7, as seen by a Brit
Don't forget your ability to search simple answers Share - you are a vibrant, intelligent, 65-year old woman who takes excellent care of herself. You can do it. Check it out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_league_average_height,_weight,_age_and_playing_experience http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_league_average_height,_weight,_age_and_playing_experience ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard is 6'1 really tiny in the NBA?! Anyway, having grown up with ACC basketball, IMHO, college b ball is way more exciting than pros. On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:03 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Season opener: Spurs 101, Grizzlies 94. The tiny baby is Tony Parker, San Antonio Spurs Point Guard and France's greatest athlete ever. LoL! The San Antonio Spurs' point guard spent a big chunk of his summer in Europe leading his native France to its first Euroleague Championship, knocking off Spain and Lithuania to capture the title on Sept. 22. That championship, and being named France's greatest athlete ever in a poll conducted by L'Equipe... Spurs' Tony Parker sets sights on NBA title San Antonio Express-News: http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/Spurs-Tony-Parker http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/article/Spurs-Tony-Parker-sets-sights-on-NBA-title-4945576.php The benefits of this embrace of intercontinental basketball have been clear: four championships won since 1999 with fluid movement, selfless passing and insistent defense... 'Spurs Stay Consistent by Thinking Globally' New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/sports/basketball/spurs-stay-consistent-by-thinking-globally.html?_r=0 On 10/29/2013 9:32 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Dear God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYikubciDE
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...! emilymaenot wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
The incidents of Judy calling me a troll and a liar are way too numerous to detail here. However, I must have hurt Judy's feelings pretty badly to receive all this invective for all these years. Go figure. A lot of this has to do with Judy's obvious prejudice against people from Texas - that's why she loves to call me by my email address (willytex@...). And, this kind of prejudice is not just apparent in Judy's vitriol - it's in a lot of posts by the two Barrys too. We're not too big on racial profiling down here in San Antonio since the population is 63% Hispanic. I can't think of any other reason than this for Judy's rants against me - it certainly doesn't make any sense. I guess that's why you were asking why she hates me so. It's probably all my fault that she came over here to FFL in the first place. Maybe this will help explain a few things - this one is a classic: What is the REAL reason our Judykins quit a.m.t.? It's because of the genius of willytex. Ms. Stein had been in her usual put-down manner chastising both myself and Delia because we had allegedly accused John Manning of anti-semitism in some of his posts. Willytex did his homework and reposted some past rantings of Manning's in which he was not only exposed of being anti-semitic but virtually admitted to it (and, to his credit, apologized for it and, not to his credit, promised to repent, so to speak, which he didn't). And it was none other than a past post of Judy's which told John he was being prejudiced. This was such an obvious rebuke to Judy and her foaming-at-the-mouth accusations that she was deathly afraid of being exposed. So the easiest course to take was to just quit rather than being shown to be on the wrong side of a debate. Which, for her, is worse than having a root canal without pain-killers. And, of course, it didn't help much to have someone of Delia's caliber to counter her bombastic holier-than-thou politically-correct liberalism. Author: Shemp McGurk Subject: The REAL reason Judy quit a.m.t. Forum: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: January 5, 2003 https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21topicsearchin/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex$20AND$20and$20AND$20liar$20AND$20authorname$3A%22judy$20stein%22%7Csort:date/alt.meditation.transcendental/_jRf0qepd1M On 11/1/2013 1:18 PM, sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda
We believe you, Share. Thousands wouldn't. (guffaw) Share wrote: Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker! On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer rick@... wrote: There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it! LOL ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...! emilymaenot wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Maybe because Hillary lied and tried to cover up about the Benghazi attack that killed the U.S. Ambassador, and then tried to blame it on a video? On 11/1/2013 1:29 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda
You really put down Share with this one, Judy. Good work! On 11/1/2013 1:43 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: We believe you, Share. Thousands wouldn't. (guffaw) Share wrote: Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker! On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer rick@... wrote: There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=514026078688122set=a.235643249859741.53033.172006279556772type=1ref=nf There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain unruffled. *Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best.* *Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that.* *Sometimes, when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you.* So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Richard, you and Share are too easily spoon-fed; grow on up now, it's time. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Maybe because Hillary lied and tried to cover up about the Benghazi attack that killed the U.S. Ambassador, and then tried to blame it on a video? On 11/1/2013 1:29 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
[FairfieldLife] Austerity for Americans begins today
Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient). http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair. On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years! To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it! LOL ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...! emilymaenot wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
[FairfieldLife] Old soul?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Share, I am forced to retract my statement of your intelligence, at least for today. I'm sorry. Don't hold it against me, O.K.? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair. On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years! To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it! LOL ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...! emilymaenot wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation recently and several nasty comments were posted by Judy and Emily about Share making this same point. Go figure. ...both told me I should be drinking up to three litres of liquid a day for my body to function at its best. On 10/31/2013 10:54 AM, cardemaister@... wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2480491/How-drinking-litres-water-day-took-years-face.html
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
This is all trolling, stuff Willytex (and Barry) made up. If anyone here takes either of them seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The incidents of Judy calling me a troll and a liar are way too numerous to detail here. However, I must have hurt Judy's feelings pretty badly to receive all this invective for all these years. Go figure. A lot of this has to do with Judy's obvious prejudice against people from Texas - that's why she loves to call me by my email address (willytex@...). And, this kind of prejudice is not just apparent in Judy's vitriol - it's in a lot of posts by the two Barrys too. We're not too big on racial profiling down here in San Antonio since the population is 63% Hispanic. I can't think of any other reason than this for Judy's rants against me - it certainly doesn't make any sense. I guess that's why you were asking why she hates me so. It's probably all my fault that she came over here to FFL in the first place. Maybe this will help explain a few things - this one is a classic: What is the REAL reason our Judykins quit a.m.t.? It's because of the genius of willytex. Ms. Stein had been in her usual put-down manner chastising both myself and Delia because we had allegedly accused John Manning of anti-semitism in some of his posts. Willytex did his homework and reposted some past rantings of Manning's in which he was not only exposed of being anti-semitic but virtually admitted to it (and, to his credit, apologized for it and, not to his credit, promised to repent, so to speak, which he didn't). And it was none other than a past post of Judy's which told John he was being prejudiced. This was such an obvious rebuke to Judy and her foaming-at-the-mouth accusations that she was deathly afraid of being exposed. So the easiest course to take was to just quit rather than being shown to be on the wrong side of a debate. Which, for her, is worse than having a root canal without pain-killers. And, of course, it didn't help much to have someone of Delia's caliber to counter her bombastic holier-than-thou politically-correct liberalism. Author: Shemp McGurk Subject: The REAL reason Judy quit a.m.t. Forum: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: January 5, 2003 https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21topicsearchin/alt.meditation.transcendental/willytex$20AND$20and$20AND$20liar$20AND$20authorname$3A%22judy$20stein%22%7Csort:date/alt.meditation.transcendental/_jRf0qepd1M On 11/1/2013 1:18 PM, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Yeah, I think we had this conversation
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than a faithful one who is a nobody. On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years! To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 7:21 PM Share, I am forced to retract my statement of your intelligence, at least for today. I'm sorry. Don't hold it against me, O.K.? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair. On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years! To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it! LOL ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...! emilymaenot wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that! On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:41 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote:
[FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient). http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Um, and you think we think you would vote for Hillary why, Share? You seem to have missed a step there. It doesn't surprise me even the tiniest bit, BTW, that you wouldn't vote for Hillary because she didn't divorce Bill. Share fumbled: Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair. On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years! To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it! LOL ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...! emilymaenot wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her!
[FairfieldLife] RE: Old soul?
Oh, Card, that's beautiful, thank you. Great find. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIsCs9_-LP8
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his womanizing. I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that Hillary really loves Bill. Even more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than a faithful one who is a nobody. On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years! To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 7:21 PM Share, I am forced to retract my statement of your intelligence, at least for today. I'm sorry. Don't hold it against me, O.K.? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Ha! Just proves that Emily and Judy don't know me at all. I would never vote for Hillary because IMO she acted like a door mat when she didn't divorce Bill after the Monica affair. On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years! To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it! LOL ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...! emilymaenot wrote: Why don't you think the American people would elect her? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect her! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: It is really strange behavior to say the least. Judy is a real case, and I'm not the first person to note that she can be very disagreeable. WARNING: Don't ever suggest that Hillary Clinton is not a fit candidate to be the next U.S. President! So, I probably posted hundreds of on-topic posts to a.m.t. on Usenet, (some of which I've updated and posted to FFL), over a period of about five years starting in 1999, without getting a single response from Judy. Then, in about 2001, a few days after I posted a message calling into question Judy's claim that Bush lied about the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq, I started getting all kinds of nasty messages from Judy. She went just about ape-shit, calling me a troll and a scumbag and a liar. She encouraged everyone on the list to shun me and has been doing so almost every week since then - for over ten years! Apparently Judy has some influence over the Minions, Pips and Mean Girls on FFL but she doesn't seem to be getting the best of you. Keep up the good work http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm http://www.rwilliams.us/usenet/archives.htm Has anyone else in the group noticed that Judy is picking on Share? While my beef with Judy may have some substance, Share seems like a pretty decent person who just likes to talk with people. Regardless of what Judy has said about me, I find her antagonism toward Share to be very mean-spirited. Judy really has taken a turn for the worse, in my opinion . Go figure. But, even more strange is the silence from some of the other informants posting here. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Thanks for speaking out. On 11/1/2013 9:47 AM, Share Long wrote: Yeah, Richard, that was definitely weird. Judy had always been so friendly before that!
[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Maharishi Auction Item, carved plaque
JHB initials on the carving? '84 James Butler artist? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Thanks for the ride $14.99 Buy It Now BS PHOTO blv-966 Fan of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Time left: 15d 16h (Nov 16, 2013 16:15:05 PST) BS PHOTO blv-971 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Time left: 26d 06h (Nov 27, 2013 05:27:09 PST $14.99 Buy It Now Oh no shoes or sandals ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote: MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI,VINTAGE CARVED WOOD PLAQUE, TM GURU http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd http://www.ebay.com/itm/MAHARISHI-MAHESH-YOGI-VINTAGE-CARVED-WOOD-PLAQUE-TM-GURU-/121205422333?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item1c3867f8fd
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good for them; it's none of our damn business.) We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's one we see only from a distance through the media). It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a marital problem. It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. (Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.) But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings. (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.) Share spewed: MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his womanizing. I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that Hillary really loves Bill. Even more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than a faithful one who is a nobody.
Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good for them; it's none of our damn business.) We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's one we see only from a distance through the media). It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a marital problem. It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. (Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.) But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings. (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.) Share spewed: MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his womanizing. I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that Hillary really loves Bill. Even more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than a faithful one who is a nobody.
[FairfieldLife] File - FFL Acronyms
BC - Brahman Consciousness BN - Bliss Ninny or Bliss Nazi CC - Cosmic Consciousness GC - God Consciousness MMY - Maharishi Mahesh Yogi OTP - Off the Program - a phrase used in the TM movement meaning to do something (such as see another spiritual teacher) considered in violation of Maharishi's program. POV - Point of View SBS - Swami Brahmananda Saraswati, Maharishi's master SCI Science of Creative Intelligence SOC - State of Consciousness SSRS - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (Pundit-ji) SV - Stpathya Ved (Vedic Architecture) TB - True Believer (in TM doctrines) TNB - True Non-Believer TMO - The Transcendental Meditation organization TTC TM Teacher Training Course UC - Unity Consciousness WYMS - World Youth Meditation Society later changed to World Youth Movement for the Science of Creative Intelligence was founded by Peter Hübner in Germany, as a national TM outlet competing with SIMS, Students International Meditation Society YMMV = Your Mileage may vary To subscribe, send a message to: fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: fairfieldlife-dig...@yahoogroups.com fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: fairfieldlife-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com * Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
Judy, the conspiracy theorist. On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient). http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Share tries to dig herself out of her hole: I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private life is also going to come under scrutiny. Yes, this is a recent but very unfortunate development when the private lives in question have no bearing on the ability of the public figure to carry out his or her responsibilities. That it's socially acceptable nowadays does not mean one has to engage in such scrutiny and pronounce one's opinion on it. That is not something a smart person with integrity would want to take advantage of, IMHO. My opinion is based on the observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. Share, you're only going to embarrass yourself in this discussion. In the first place, I never said it was. But more importantly, you have no idea what went on behind the observable behaviors, and thus you aren't in a position to have an opinion about whether those behaviors were appropriate. Moreover, the observable behaviors don't give you a clue as to whether Hillary was acting like a doormat or enabling Bill. Plus which, of course, you yourself said you had read that Hillary really loves Bill. So your claim to be going only by observable behaviors is self-evidently false. You are lying either to us or to yourself, or both. And you never answered my earlier question: What made you think that Emily and I would think you would vote for Hillary? On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good for them; it's none of our damn business.) We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's one we see only from a distance through the media). It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a marital problem. It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. (Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.) But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings. (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.) Share spewed: MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his womanizing. I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that Hillary really loves Bill. Even more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than a faithful one who is a nobody.
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
Er, Bhairitu... No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: Bhairitu bumbled: Judy, the conspiracy theorist. On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient). http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
Yep. One aircraft carrier costs $26.8 billion, to build and deploy. We are currently building three of them - total cost: 80.4 billion. 2012 SNAP (Food Stamps) budget: 80 billion. So, we can definitely afford a few more food stamps, balanced with cuts elsewhere. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient). http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Fair enough - your opinions, and your vote, are certainly your own, but to cast Hillary as some sort of victim, and an enabler, simply because of what was exposed, I think is short-sighted. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good for them; it's none of our damn business.) We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's one we see only from a distance through the media). It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a marital problem. It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. (Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.) But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings. (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.) Share spewed: MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his womanizing. I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that Hillary really loves Bill. Even more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than a faithful one who is a nobody.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
There's so much featherheaded crap in even Share's shorter utterances, I don't always notice all of it right away. She actually wrote this: (snip) I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! Hard to believe, eh?
[FairfieldLife] Chromebook
While Chromebooks are immune to viruses and other forms of malware, you are as tracked and 'monetized' while on a Chromebook as you are when browsing from your laptop or tablet or phone. However, there are ways to disrupt and confuse the trackers and my two favorite extensions these days are Disconnect Search (or Disconnect.me) that makes it impossible for Google to log your search activities and DoNotTrackMe which does what the name implies. Worth trying. - Amazon reviewer
Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama Says Reject Voices Warning of Tyranny
Yeah, this is stuff I'm making up. Washington - Senate Democrats voted unanimously three years ago to support the Obamacare rule that is largely responsible for some of the health insurance cancellation letters that are going out... 'Senate Democrats supported rule that led to insurance cancellations' CNN Politics: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/ http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/31/senate-democrats-supported-rule-that-lead-to-insurance-cancellations/ On 11/1/2013 1:30 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * * * *Richard wrote:* Your lie detector must be on the blink, Judy. Bottom line is, Obama baldly lied repeatedly, beyond doubt, and he should be impeached because of it. You are usually on top of people telling lies, but you seem to have really dropped the ball on this one. The question is, did the entire administration know it was a lie and why did they do it? Go figure. 'Joe Scarborough Finally Admits Obama Lied About ObamaCare' Newsbusters: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-bremmer/2013/10/30/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare On 11/1/2013 11:32 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: It's nowhere /near/ that, doc. It's only people who have individual plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of the market. Plus which, some of it is indeed bad actors, insurance companies that try to make these people believe their only option is a much more expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save them money.in the longer run). I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage, you're among a very small group. We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that with ACA, most people will benefit. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled, as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place. It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now, more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive plans, anyway. My choice, subsidized, or not, is basic insurance, with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost $12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed. No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: *93 million?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?* * * *Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.* Mike wrote: Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period. Just because the administration knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well that's just a *glitch*.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Gettin#39; off on the wheel
I added the Stephan Braun and Inertie clip to my Favourites list on YouTube. They should really make the Cyr wheel an Olympic event. Athleticism plus artistry = beauty. Bet the Greeks would have loved it. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote: I've never really understood those seekers who want to get off the wheel, meaning the endless cycle of life, death, rebirth, and karma. I've always thought that people who have this as their goal in life just never learned how much fun you can have with a wheel. This video is for them. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzAhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eBw4wxzzA
[FairfieldLife] Growing up transgendered or, confused?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Nice quote by Yogananda
Hadn't heard that story, very nice, thanks. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: You really put down Share with this one, Judy. Good work! On 11/1/2013 1:43 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: We believe you, Share. Thousands wouldn't. (guffaw) Share wrote: Rick, FFL is definitely inspiring me to become a kitten of a seeker! On Friday, November 1, 2013 12:37 PM, Rick Archer rick@... mailto:rick@... wrote: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=514026078688122set=a.235643249859741.53033.172006279556772type=1ref=nf There are two kinds of seekers: those who are like the baby monkey and those who are like the kitten. The baby monkey clings to the mother; but when she jumps, it may fall off. The little kitten is carried about by the mother cat, content wherever she places it. The kitten has complete trust in its mother. I am more like that; I give all responsibility to the Divine Mother. But to maintain that attitude takes great will. Under all circumstances — health or sickness, riches or poverty, sunshine or gray clouds — your feeling must remain unruffled. Even when you are in the coal bin of suffering you don't wonder why the Mother placed you there. You have faith that She knows best. Sometimes an apparent disaster turns into a blessing for you Gloom is but the shade of Divine Mother’s hand outstretched caressingly. Don’t forget that. Sometimes, when the Mother is going to caress you, a shadow is caused by Her hand before it touches you. So when trouble comes, don’t think that She is punishing you; Her hand overshadowing you holds some blessing as it reaches out to bring you nearer to Her. ~ Paramahansa Yogananda ...Photo: Sri Yogananda with Sri Anandamayi Ma and her husband Bholanath
[FairfieldLife] RE: Girl from the North Country
Re I can still remember the first time I heard I Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose bumps!: The Beatles' I Wanna Hold Your Hand was released in October 63. Twelve months later The Kinks released All Day and All of the Night. How short the age of innocence! Shouldn't FFLifers be drawn to TM-themed tracks? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjq9LmSO1eI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjq9LmSO1eI ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I feel so lucky to have grown up in such an amazing time for music. I can still remember the first time I heard I Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose bumps! But Motown was also wonderful during my teen years as well as the protest music.
[FairfieldLife] Post Count Sat 02-Nov-13 00:15:04 UTC
Fairfield Life Post Counter === Start Date (UTC): 10/26/13 00:00:00 End Date (UTC): 11/02/13 00:00:00 630 messages as of (UTC) 11/01/13 23:53:27 111 Richard J. Williams 77 authfriend 57 dhamiltony2k5 48 TurquoiseB 45 Share Long 37 Bhairitu 30 awoelflebater 27 s3raphita 27 Michael Jackson 21 emilymaenot 19 Richard Williams 18 wgm4u 17 sharelong60 17 emptybill 16 jr_esq 11 doctordumbass 11 cardemaister 9 Mike Dixon 5 steve.sundur 4 Steve Sundur 3 srijau 3 azgrey 3 Dick Mays 2 merudanda 2 indifferent_netizen 2 Rick Archer 2 Ann Woelfle Bater 1 yifuxero 1 punditster 1 obbajeeba 1 martin.quickman 1 laughinggull108 1 FairfieldLife Posters: 33 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times = Daylight Saving Time (Summer): US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM Standard Time (Winter): US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com
[FairfieldLife] RE: Growing up transgendered or, confused?
Thanks for posting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ
[FairfieldLife] RE: 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
None of it made any sense to me at all for all the reasons you stated and many other reasons; following Share's mind around is not a good idea for me on most days, I'm realizing. rueful smile. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: There's so much featherheaded crap in even Share's shorter utterances, I don't always notice all of it right away. She actually wrote this: (snip) I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! Hard to believe, eh?
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
BS, it was a clear attempt to distract attention that only 6 people signed up for Obamacare on the first day. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 12:30 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
I would bet that not one person on FFL is snickering at Bhairitu. But admit that I'm still amazed at how much nastiness Judy can pack into one short post. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Er, Bhairitu... No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: Bhairitu bumbled: Judy, the conspiracy theorist. On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient). http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
Sorry Share, I don't mean to get involved in your and Judy's feud but I sure am snickering with Judy on that one. From: sharelon...@yahoo.com sharelon...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 5:36 PM Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today I would bet that not one person on FFL is snickering at Bhairitu. But admit that I'm still amazed at how much nastiness Judy can pack into one short post. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Er, Bhairitu... No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: Bhairitu bumbled: Judy, the conspiracy theorist. On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... wrote: Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Girl from the North Country
Seraphita, I remember I was puttering around my bedroom when I Wanna Hold Your Hand came on the radio. My whole being kind of perked up and payed attention. It was such a different sound from any other popular music of the time. But I really liked it. My favorite Beatles song is Things We Said Today. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d-Z7vakj4s http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d-Z7vakj4s On Friday, November 1, 2013 6:53 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote: Re I can still remember the first time I heardI Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose bumps!: The Beatles' I Wanna Hold Your Hand was released in October 63. Twelve months later The Kinks released All Day and All of the Night. How short the age of innocence! Shouldn't FFLifers be drawn to TM-themed tracks? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjq9LmSO1eI ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I feel so lucky to have grown up in such an amazing time for music. I can still remember the first time I heard I Wanna Hold Your Hand. Goose bumps! But Motown was also wonderful during my teen years as well as the protest music.
RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus 10 years!
Doc, it's not just because of what was exposed. It was how she reacted to what was exposed. And that she was an enabler, allowing it to happen over and over during all those previous years and doing seemingly little to take a stand against it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Fair enough - your opinions, and your vote, are certainly your own, but to cast Hillary as some sort of victim, and an enabler, simply because of what was exposed, I think is short-sighted. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good for them; it's none of our damn business.) We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's one we see only from a distance through the media). It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a marital problem. It's fine to say, If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so. (Although obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that you don't know what it's like to be married to Bill.) But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings. (Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS the case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other things too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.) Share spewed: MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his womanizing. I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that Hillary really loves Bill. Even more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than a faithful one who is a nobody.
Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today
Mike, somehow, in the total context of your post, snickering does not sound one iota as nasty as it does in the total context of Judy's post. Maybe I'm prejudiced. On Friday, November 1, 2013 7:47 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com wrote: Sorry Share, I don't mean to get involved in your and Judy's feud but I sure am snickering with Judy on that one. From: sharelon...@yahoo.com sharelon...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 5:36 PM Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today I would bet that not one person on FFL is snickering at Bhairitu. But admit that I'm still amazed at how much nastiness Judy can pack into one short post. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Er, Bhairitu... No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: Bhairitu bumbled: Judy, the conspiracy theorist. On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... wrote: Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient).http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.