Re: kern_linker.c rev. 1.75 and newer cause loading problem

2002-03-10 Thread Crist J. Clark

On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:13:25AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
 Well, I finally have narrowed the problem down to
 
 Revision 1.75 Fri Feb 22 04:14:49 2002 UTC (2 weeks, 1 day ago) by arr 
 Branch: MAIN 
 Changes since 1.74: +1295 -1271 lines
 Diff to previous 1.74 (colored)
 
 - Massive style fixup.
 
 Reviewed by: mike
 Approved by: dfr
 
 
 
 To recap:
 
 root[202] cat /boot/loader.conf
 miibus_load=YES
 if_rl_load=YES
 snd_pcm_load=YES
 snd_maestro3_load=YES
 linux_load=YES
 agp_load=YES
 hint.acpi.0.disable=1
 root[203] kldstat
 Id Refs AddressSize Name
  1   12 0xc010 262e40   kernel
  21 0xc0363000 18330linux.ko
 ^
  32 0xc037c000 15480miibus.ko
  41 0xc0392000 7798 if_rl.ko
  52 0xc039a000 1a14csnd_pcm.ko
  61 0xc03b5000 9538 snd_maestro3.ko
  71 0xc03bf000 c860 agp.ko
  81 0xcb052000 2000 blank_saver.ko
 root[204] kldload linprocfs
 kldload: can't load linprocfs: Exec format error
 root[206] tail -1 /var/log/messages
 Mar  9 10:00:27 kernel: KLD linprocfs.ko: depends on \
 linux - not available
 
 root[209] kldunload linux
 root[210] kldload linux
 root[211] kldload linprocfs
 root[213] kldstat
 Id Refs AddressSize Name
  1   15 0xc010 262e40   kernel
  32 0xc037c000 15480miibus.ko
  41 0xc0392000 7798 if_rl.ko
  52 0xc039a000 1a14csnd_pcm.ko
  61 0xc03b5000 9538 snd_maestro3.ko
  71 0xc03bf000 c860 agp.ko
  81 0xcb052000 2000 blank_saver.ko
  92 0xcb425000 14000linux.ko
 ^
 101 0xcab88000 5000 linprocfs.ko

Are you sure the same module is being loaded?

  $ find -x / -name linux.ko
-- 
Crist J. Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/| [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Robert Watson


For the past couple of months, I've been working with a set of identical
test boxes from SGI which, for some reason, stopped responding to serial
break on the serial console.  I switched to the 'alternative break' option
in LINT, and things work fine.  I assumed it was actually some issue with
that particular batch of machines, since no one else had had a problem,
and I didn't really have time to follow up.  Yesterday, I brought online
two more crash boxes via serial console, both older TeleNet servers, and
noticed that neither of them respond to serial break over the serial
console using cu.  This leads me to wonder two things: 

(1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT
(2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?

I have't had a chance to follow up on either, but was wondering if anyone
else had experienced this?  Essentially, hitting ~# in cu no longer
results in boxes dropping to the debugger.  Enabling the alternative break
and using ~^B works fine, and Ctrl-Alt-Escape works fine on the real
console.

Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Wilko Bulte

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
 
 For the past couple of months, I've been working with a set of identical
 test boxes from SGI which, for some reason, stopped responding to serial
 break on the serial console.  I switched to the 'alternative break' option
 in LINT, and things work fine.  I assumed it was actually some issue with
 that particular batch of machines, since no one else had had a problem,
 and I didn't really have time to follow up.  Yesterday, I brought online
 two more crash boxes via serial console, both older TeleNet servers, and
 noticed that neither of them respond to serial break over the serial
 console using cu.  This leads me to wonder two things: 
 
 (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT
 (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?

I had similar experiences with tip trying to break into ddb on the 
AlphaStation DS10 with -current. I thought it was just me ;-)


-- 
|   / o / /_  _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Vallo Kallaste

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT
 (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?
 
 I have't had a chance to follow up on either, but was wondering if anyone
 else had experienced this?  Essentially, hitting ~# in cu no longer
 results in boxes dropping to the debugger.  Enabling the alternative break
 and using ~^B works fine, and Ctrl-Alt-Escape works fine on the real
 console.

I've been unable to send break using -current cu to some Cisco's
which I had to configure recently. Ecu from ports did work however.
As I was -stable user some weeks ago I know that cu in -stable did
work. The other thing I noticed was that -current cu handles speed
switch differently, e.g.:
stable: cu -l /dev/cuaa1 -9600 works well
current: cu -l /dev/cuaa1 -9600 will connect to cuaa0 not
cuaa1.. -s 9600 will work however.
What I recall is that some time back uucp was shaken out of base
system and cu also, cu's functionality was folded back to tip.
Stable indeed has different tip and cu binaries, in -current there's
hard link.
-- 

Vallo Kallaste
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Mark Peek

At 4:11 PM +0100 3/10/02, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:

  For the past couple of months, I've been working with a set of identical
  test boxes from SGI which, for some reason, stopped responding to serial
  break on the serial console.  I switched to the 'alternative break' option
  in LINT, and things work fine.  I assumed it was actually some issue with
  that particular batch of machines, since no one else had had a problem,
  and I didn't really have time to follow up.  Yesterday, I brought online
  two more crash boxes via serial console, both older TeleNet servers, and
  noticed that neither of them respond to serial break over the serial
  console using cu.  This leads me to wonder two things:

  (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT
  (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?

I had similar experiences with tip trying to break into ddb on the
AlphaStation DS10 with -current. I thought it was just me ;-)

Hitting ~# in tip worked fine for me with a -current CVSup'd from 
yesterday. However, it did stump me for a second until I realized I 
was initially escaping into SSH and not tip.

Mark

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Bill Fenner



FreeBSD stash.attlabs.att.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Fri Mar  8 18:16:53 
PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STASHNOV6  i386

responds to a break from a Cisco terminal server, invoked by
/usr/ports/comms/conserver:

FreeBSD/i386 (stash.attlabs.att.com) (ttyd0)

login: Mar  9 21:35:57 stash savecore: reboot after panic: from debugger
Mar  9 21:36:02 stash savecore: reboot after panic: from debugger
lock order reversal
 1st 0xc0468a40 allproc @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:452
 2nd 0xc1423734 filedesc structure @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:457
[halt sent]
Stopped at  siointr1+0xb1:  jmp siointr1+0x1b7
db 

I don't have any directly connected ports, so can't coment on cu.

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Wilko Bulte

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 08:49:16AM -0800, Mark Peek wrote:
 At 4:11 PM +0100 3/10/02, Wilko Bulte wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
 
   For the past couple of months, I've been working with a set of identical
   test boxes from SGI which, for some reason, stopped responding to serial
   break on the serial console.  I switched to the 'alternative break' option
   in LINT, and things work fine.  I assumed it was actually some issue with
   that particular batch of machines, since no one else had had a problem,
   and I didn't really have time to follow up.  Yesterday, I brought online
   two more crash boxes via serial console, both older TeleNet servers, and
   noticed that neither of them respond to serial break over the serial
   console using cu.  This leads me to wonder two things:
 
   (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT
   (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?
 
 I had similar experiences with tip trying to break into ddb on the
 AlphaStation DS10 with -current. I thought it was just me ;-)
 
 Hitting ~# in tip worked fine for me with a -current CVSup'd from 
 yesterday. However, it did stump me for a second until I realized I 
 was initially escaping into SSH and not tip.

Let me clarify: the DS10 is running -current, the x86 that has tip running 
is on -stable. 

It could be that the DS10 was sufficiently catatonic to not react to
a break (how likely is that in the first place? I was looking at a hard
lockup). Now that I followed Drew's suggestion to

quote

I suggest reverting rev 1.61 of alpha/alpha/interrupt.c (eg, disable
interrupt thread preemption).  I'm on the west coast right now, away
from my alphas, but I had several buildworlds complete last week with
ithread preemption disabled.

Drew
/quote

I have not seen a lockup anymore. I also had to take out options SMP
in order to get the kernel link.

W/

-- 
|   / o / /_  _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: kern_linker.c rev. 1.75 and newer cause loading problem

2002-03-10 Thread Steve Kargl

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 12:35:28AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:13:25AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:

[snip]

  root[203] kldstat
  Id Refs AddressSize Name
   1   12 0xc010 262e40   kernel
   21 0xc0363000 18330linux.ko
  ^
   92 0xcb425000 14000linux.ko
  ^
 
 Are you sure the same module is being loaded?
 
   $ find -x / -name linux.ko

Yes, I am sure.

kargl[204] kldconfig -r
/boot/kernel;/boot/kernel;/boot/modules;/modules
kargl[205] ls /boot/modules/
kargl[206] ls /modules/
ls: /modules/: No such file or directory
kargl[208] ls -l /boot/kernel/lin*
-rw---  1 root  wheel  15432 Mar  9 09:50 /boot/kernel/linker.hints
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  19581 Mar  9 09:50 /boot/kernel/linprocfs.ko*
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  97319 Mar  9 09:50 /boot/kernel/linux.ko*
kargl[213] find /boot -name linux\*
/boot/kernel/linux.ko -- Built at same time as 1.75
/boot/kernel.old/linux.ko -- Built at same time as 1.74
/boot/sgk/linux.ko-- not relevant see search path
/boot/kargl/linux.ko  -- not relevant see search path
kargl[214] cmp /boot/kernel/linux.ko /boot/kernel.old/linux.ko
kargl[215] cmp /boot/kernel/linprocfs.ko /boot/kernel.old/linprocfs.ko

As I said, if I backup to revision 1.74 of kern_linker.c,
then everything works.   If I use revision 1.75 or newer,
then you see the above problem.  I haven't found the actual
problem in kern_linker.c because it is a huge diff.

kargl[220] diff -u /root/kern_linker.c-1.74 /root/kern_linker.c-1.75 |wc
2956   12329  102757

-- 
Steve

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber

Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT

I can drop just fine into ddb with a serial break on my -CURRENT
AlphaPC164.  My kernel configuration has option BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER.

 (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?

Works just fine from abovementioned alpha to my sparc.
I don't have a pair of FreeBSD boxes tied together like that.

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber

Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It could be that the DS10 was sufficiently catatonic to not react to
 a break (how likely is that in the first place? I was looking at a hard
 lockup).

If you experience one of the lockups that currently plague
-CURRENT/alpha, the machine won't react to break, ctrl-alt-esc, or
anything else except HALT and RESET.

 Now that I followed Drew's suggestion to
 
 quote
 I suggest reverting rev 1.61 of alpha/alpha/interrupt.c (eg, disable
 interrupt thread preemption).
 /quote
 
 I have not seen a lockup anymore.

Neither have I, but I have only been running with it for a day, and
it has previously managed to survive for up to two days without
locking up.

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Terry Lambert

Robert Watson wrote:
 For the past couple of months, I've been working with a set of identical
 test boxes from SGI which, for some reason, stopped responding to serial
 break on the serial console.  I switched to the 'alternative break' option
 in LINT, and things work fine.  I assumed it was actually some issue with
 that particular batch of machines, since no one else had had a problem,
 and I didn't really have time to follow up.  Yesterday, I brought online
 two more crash boxes via serial console, both older TeleNet servers, and
 noticed that neither of them respond to serial break over the serial
 console using cu.  This leads me to wonder two things:
 
 (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT
 (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?
 
 I have't had a chance to follow up on either, but was wondering if anyone
 else had experienced this?  Essentially, hitting ~# in cu no longer
 results in boxes dropping to the debugger.  Enabling the alternative break
 and using ~^B works fine, and Ctrl-Alt-Escape works fine on the real
 console.

The break signal is At least 250ms of marking space (line
silence), according to the Bell 103C and 212A and B standards.

There are two ways that UNIX programs try to do this; the first
is an ioctl() for send a break; the second is to set the baud
rate to 0, and then set it back after a sufficient time.

You should check to see if both approaches (the working one and
the non-working one) are trying to use the same approach, or not.
If they aren't, it could be something as simple as the number of
loops before the baud rate is set back is wrong for your clock
speed, and the loops should be replaced with a call to nanosleep.

8-).

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



b_to_q to a clist with no reserved cblocks

2002-03-10 Thread Robert Watson


Just noticed the following for the first time today?  (a) b_to_q console
message, and (b), the truncated 'Mar' which presumably has to do with
syslogd getting killed, some buffer getting flushed, or the like.  The
b_to_q thing is what I'm wondering about.

# reboot 
Mar 10 18:36:39  reboot: rebooted by root
Mar 10 18:36:39  reboot: rebooted by root
Mar 10 18:36:39  reboot: rebooted by root
b_to_q to a clist with no reserved cblocks.
MarWaiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...stopped
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...stopped
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop...stopped

syncing disks... 
done
Uptime: 16m12s



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Wilko Bulte

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 06:15:53PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
 Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It could be that the DS10 was sufficiently catatonic to not react to
  a break (how likely is that in the first place? I was looking at a hard
  lockup).
 
 If you experience one of the lockups that currently plague
 -CURRENT/alpha, the machine won't react to break, ctrl-alt-esc, or
 anything else except HALT and RESET.
 
  Now that I followed Drew's suggestion to
  
  quote
  I suggest reverting rev 1.61 of alpha/alpha/interrupt.c (eg, disable
  interrupt thread preemption).
  /quote
  
  I have not seen a lockup anymore.
 
 Neither have I, but I have only been running with it for a day, and
 it has previously managed to survive for up to two days without
 locking up.

Well, I had a close to 100% lockup or panic chance when I ran a make
release. I just completed a succesful buildworld, and will subsequently
run a make release.

W/

-- 
|   / o / /_  _ FreeBSD core team secretary
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Glenn Gombert

I just rebuilt -current on two development machines I use here at home, the
serial break contol-alt-escape appears to work fine on a stand-alone vox.


(1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT

 If I do a 'tip com1' from one box to the other and then do an
'control-alt-escape' it breaks into ddd just fine as well :
 
(2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?


Glenn Gombert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



slight patch to ata-all.c

2002-03-10 Thread Thierry Herbelot

Hello

[on a very recent -Current]

wtih the Werror compile flag, I can't compile src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c
on a PC with nothing more than a single IDE disk

TfH

patch enclosed

--- ata-all.c   Sun Mar 10 21:32:21 2002
+++ ata-all.c.new   Sun Mar 10 20:44:15 2002
 -274,10 +274,12 
 ataioctl(dev_t dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t addr, int32_t flag, struct thread *td)
 {
 struct ata_cmd *iocmd = (struct ata_cmd *)addr;
+#if defined(DEV_ATAPICD) || defined(DEV_ATAPIFD) || defined(DEV_ATAPIST)
 struct ata_device *atadev;
+caddr_t buf;
+#endif
 struct ata_channel *ch;
 device_t device = devclass_get_device(ata_devclass, iocmd-channel);
-caddr_t buf;
 int error, s;
 
 if (cmd != IOCATA)



Re: Call for UMA (allocator) testers.

2002-03-10 Thread Glenn Gombert

 I have the UMA patch installed on two systems here, a 500Mhz K7 system and
dual PIII SMP box, both of which have WITNESS and INVARIANTS configured in
the kernel. I will run them for the next few days, and report anything that
looks unusual in operation :)

GG.


I'd like people to test with WITNESS and INVARIANTS, although with these
options on it is somewhat slower than the original kernel.  With these
disabled it is on par.  If you have a SMP machine you will get witness
warnings if you run low on memory.  There is no real problem except that
witness doesn't understand that the condition is safe.

If you do test this patch, please send me an email so I know how many
people are using this.  If you get a lock order violation other than
acquring duplicate lock of same type please let me know.  If you get a
panic, please give me a stack trace (tr in ddb) and the output of call
uma_print_stats in the debugger if that is possible.

This has been debugged and tested over several months so it is quite
stable for me.  Hopefully it will be stable for you too. :-)

The patch and new files are available at:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/uma.tar

Untar into src/sys and apply the patch.  After you rerun config you should
be ready to compile.

Thanks,
Jeff


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Glenn Gombert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



error message

2002-03-10 Thread Thierry Herbelot

is the following message serious ?
Mar 10 21:49:17 multi kernel: witness_get: witness exhausted

is there anything special to do ?

this is on a newly cvsuped, very lightly loaded, -Current (4 minutes
after booting the machine)

TfH

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: kern_linker.c rev. 1.75 and newer cause loading problem

2002-03-10 Thread Maxim Sobolev

Should be fixed in rev.1.78.

-Maxim

On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 10:35, Crist J. Clark wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:13:25AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
  Well, I finally have narrowed the problem down to
  
  Revision 1.75 Fri Feb 22 04:14:49 2002 UTC (2 weeks, 1 day ago) by arr 
  Branch: MAIN 
  Changes since 1.74: +1295 -1271 lines
  Diff to previous 1.74 (colored)
  
  - Massive style fixup.
  
  Reviewed by: mike
  Approved by: dfr
  
  
  
  To recap:
  
  root[202] cat /boot/loader.conf
  miibus_load=YES
  if_rl_load=YES
  snd_pcm_load=YES
  snd_maestro3_load=YES
  linux_load=YES
  agp_load=YES
  hint.acpi.0.disable=1
  root[203] kldstat
  Id Refs AddressSize Name
   1   12 0xc010 262e40   kernel
   21 0xc0363000 18330linux.ko
  ^
   32 0xc037c000 15480miibus.ko
   41 0xc0392000 7798 if_rl.ko
   52 0xc039a000 1a14csnd_pcm.ko
   61 0xc03b5000 9538 snd_maestro3.ko
   71 0xc03bf000 c860 agp.ko
   81 0xcb052000 2000 blank_saver.ko
  root[204] kldload linprocfs
  kldload: can't load linprocfs: Exec format error
  root[206] tail -1 /var/log/messages
  Mar  9 10:00:27 kernel: KLD linprocfs.ko: depends on \
  linux - not available
  
  root[209] kldunload linux
  root[210] kldload linux
  root[211] kldload linprocfs
  root[213] kldstat
  Id Refs AddressSize Name
   1   15 0xc010 262e40   kernel
   32 0xc037c000 15480miibus.ko
   41 0xc0392000 7798 if_rl.ko
   52 0xc039a000 1a14csnd_pcm.ko
   61 0xc03b5000 9538 snd_maestro3.ko
   71 0xc03bf000 c860 agp.ko
   81 0xcb052000 2000 blank_saver.ko
   92 0xcb425000 14000linux.ko
  ^
  101 0xcab88000 5000 linprocfs.ko
 
 Are you sure the same module is being loaded?
 
   $ find -x / -name linux.ko
 -- 
 Crist J. Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
 
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[no subject]

2002-03-10 Thread Liu Siwei

Hi, my machine is FreeBSD-current. No, PAM is in /etc/pam.d for ftpd,
telnetd ..etc. But why I can ftp to my machine on my own machine but it
doesn't allow any other machine ftp to my machine( MS client)?

Best Regard.




_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



[no subject]

2002-03-10 Thread Liu Siwei

I have installed mozilla 0.9.8 from port,(my system is current), and
jdk1.3.1 and flash plugs-in for mozilla. I get the following Error message:

Script started on Sun Mar 10 22:36:37 2002
mozilla

LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins/npflash.so 
[/usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins/npflash.so: Undefined symbol 
XtRemoveTimeOut]
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/jre/plugin/i386/ns600/libjavaplugin_oji.so 
[/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/jre/plugin/i386/ns600/libjavaplugin_oji.so: Undefined 
symbol XtShellStrings]
exit

exit

Script done on Sun Mar 10 22:36:48 2002

why?





_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Greg Lehey

On Sunday, 10 March 2002 at 10:07:07 -0500, Robert Watson wrote:

 For the past couple of months, I've been working with a set of identical
 test boxes from SGI which, for some reason, stopped responding to serial
 break on the serial console.  I switched to the 'alternative break' option
 in LINT, and things work fine.  I assumed it was actually some issue with
 that particular batch of machines, since no one else had had a problem,
 and I didn't really have time to follow up.  Yesterday, I brought online
 two more crash boxes via serial console, both older TeleNet servers, and
 noticed that neither of them respond to serial break over the serial
 console using cu.  This leads me to wonder two things:

 (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT

Yes, I think so.

 (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?

No opinion, since I haven't tried using it.

What I have observed is:

  I use the same gdb for remote serial debugging both for FreeBSD and
  Linux (ia32).  That's right, it's a FreeBSD box running FreeBSD gdb
  in both cases.  I can break to the Linux kernel, but not to the
  FreeBSD kernel.  From this, I conclude that it's a kernel issue, not
  a gdb issue.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: error message

2002-03-10 Thread Terry Lambert

Thierry Herbelot wrote:
 is the following message serious ?
 Mar 10 21:49:17 multi kernel: witness_get: witness exhausted
 
 is there anything special to do ?
 
 this is on a newly cvsuped, very lightly loaded, -Current (4 minutes
 after booting the machine)

You need to let it rest... there are so many people testing
it that it's getting tired!

8-).

Actually, you need to look at where the error message is
generated, which will tell you that it's running out of
the things returned by witness_get.  Then increase the
compile time constant that controls them, and you won't
run out any more.

In theory, the only thing that will suffer from this is
that some things will not be witnessed correctly, which
means that you could have any of the problems witness
ordinarily catches for you, but not know about them.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Bernd Walter

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 06:15:53PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
 Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It could be that the DS10 was sufficiently catatonic to not react to
  a break (how likely is that in the first place? I was looking at a hard
  lockup).
 
 If you experience one of the lockups that currently plague
 -CURRENT/alpha, the machine won't react to break, ctrl-alt-esc, or
 anything else except HALT and RESET.

My testbox (NoName) doesn't even react on halt.
But in the normal case a serial break just does what it should do.
Serial client is tip from 4.3-20010630-STABLE.
My notebook is running -current from 15th feb and tip's break also
worked always fine.
Well sending the break sequence against an ssh or not after a linebreak
are typical mistakes in usage.

-- 
B.Walter  COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Julian Elischer

serial break is different..
it is suppoesed to break into the d debugger if it receives a BREAK
(i.e framing error) in the serial port.

cu ,tip and other  such programs have an escape sequence to send a break

julian


On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Glenn Gombert wrote:

 I just rebuilt -current on two development machines I use here at home, the
 serial break contol-alt-escape appears to work fine on a stand-alone vox.
 
 
 (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT
 
  If I do a 'tip com1' from one box to the other and then do an
 'control-alt-escape' it breaks into ddd just fine as well :
  
 (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'?
 
 
 Glenn Gombert
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



== Feel Look 10 Years Younger in 10 Weeks With HGH == 30151076

2002-03-10 Thread libertyHGH301510

One more bulk email --- aren't you the least bit curious to find out
what it's about?

Well, visit  our site:

1)   http://theclinicforhgh.yeah.net


OR, read on ...


HAVE YOU HEARD OF 
HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE (HGH)???

(This product works  best for people over 35)
 
 Released by your own pituitary gland, HGH starts declining 
in your 20s, even more in your 30s and 40s, eventually resulting
in the shrinkage of major organs -- plus, all 
other symptoms related to old age.
 
 
IN THOUSANDS OF CLINICAL STUDIES, 
HGH HAS BEEN SHOWN TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING:
 
* Reduce Body Fat and Build Lean Muscle 
   WITHOUT EXERCISE!
* Enhance Sexual Performance
* Remove Wrinkles and Cellulite
* Lower Blood Pressure and Improve Cholesterol Profile
* Improve Sleep, Vision and Memory
* Restore Hair Color and Growth 
* Strengthen the Immune System
* Increase Energy and Cardiac Output
* Turn back your body's Biological Time Clock 10 - 20 years
* Live Longer AND Stronger
 
All natural and organic plant based 
 
FEEL 10 YEARS YOUNGER WITH ORAL SPRAY HGH.
GUARANTEED
 
We are the manufacturer and we sell directly to Doctors, 
Chiropractors, and consumers world wide the highest grade
 HGH Oral Spray available.  
 
 With internet marketing, we are able to save advertising 
cost and pass those savings along to you.
But you must act now.  
 
To receive more information call  us anytime (24hrs)
  TOLL FREE 1-888-248-4571
 
We must speak to you in person to qualify your usage.
 
 All of your questions will be addressed and answered in a friendly, 
no pressure manner.  Our main purpose is to provide you with
 information so you can make an educated decision.
 
 For more information call 
 
1-888-248-4571. 
 
 If you are on line write down our 
phone number and call us when you can.
 
Soon, you and your loved ones will be very glad you did.
 
Read what people are saying:
 
The effects of 6 months of GH on
lean body mass and fat were equivalent
in magnitude to the changes incurred
during 10-20 years of aging.
Dr. Daniel Rudman, MD,
New England Journal of Medicine.
 
Within four months, my body fat decreased
 form 30% down to 21%! I noticed my skin
 is more supple and my overall mental
 outlook improved significantly.
 D.W., New Jersey
 
We have been on the spray for just 3 weeks
now, and besides the tremendous energy we
both feel, my husbands allergies and spells
of depression have lifted. I am healing
extremely fast after an accident and have
lost 7 lbs. without trying!
C.B., Flagstaff. AZ
 
Thanks for reading our letter,
The HGH Staff
USA Division
 
PS:  The HGH Staff guarantees the 
highest quality and lowest price.
 
 We manufacture and ship directly to your door.
 
Call us now 1-888-248-4571

Offer expires March 20, 2002
 
***
 
===   End of message   
 
   To Qualify for a Free HGH Consultation
 
call the HGH Staff -- Today.
 
***
   The following statement is provided to be 
in compliance with commercial email laws.
 
   If you do not wish to receive further
mailings, please click reply and enter
remove in the email subject line then click send.
 
   This message is in full compliance with
U.S. Federal requirements for commercial
email under bill S.1618 Title lll, Section 301,
Paragraph (a)(2)(C) passed by the 105th U.S.
Congress and is not considered SPAM
since it includes a remove mechanism.
***
This message is not intended for residents in the
states of CA, NC, NV, RI, TN, VA  WA. 
Screening of addresses has been done to the best
of our technical ability.
 
***
 http://TheClinic.netxun.net
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: linprocfs.ko and kld loader problem?

2002-03-10 Thread Ollivier Robert

According to Steve Kargl:
 root[202] kldload linprocfs
 kldload: can't load linprocfs: Exec format error
 
 The following message is on the system console:
 
   KLD linprocfs.ko: depends on linux - not available

I'm happy to see that I'm not the only one with that problem...
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun  4 22:44:19 CEST 2000

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: gtags? htags?

2002-03-10 Thread Makoto Matsushita


julian It might be an idea if the kernel were kept separate because I
julian find that the cross-reference is good but having kernel and
julian userspace mixed up is a bit confusing..

Ok, I've separated the tour into 'kernel' part and 'userland' part
(5-current kernel is now processing).

Tour entrance is the same URL: http://snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org/tour/

-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Package set for release media

2002-03-10 Thread Murray Stokely

  Does anyone have suggestions for additional packages that should be
included on the upcoming Developer Preview snapshot that are not
already listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh?  The
only changes since the release of 4.5 have been the inclusion of samba
and the upgrade to emacs21.

  Please send suggested packages to portmgr and re; no need to flood
the list.

  Thanks,
  - Murray



msg35935/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT?

2002-03-10 Thread Bruce Evans

On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:

 work. The other thing I noticed was that -current cu handles speed
 switch differently, e.g.:
 stable: cu -l /dev/cuaa1 -9600 works well
 current: cu -l /dev/cuaa1 -9600 will connect to cuaa0 not
 cuaa1.. -s 9600 will work however.
 What I recall is that some time back uucp was shaken out of base
 system and cu also, cu's functionality was folded back to tip.
 Stable indeed has different tip and cu binaries, in -current there's
 hard link.

The -current cu is a crock of tip.  One of the bugs in it is that
cu -l /dev/foo doesn't use the default line speed for /dev/foo; it
enforces 9600.  This is bug for bug compatible with the V7 cu except
for the unusably slow speed of 9600.  For perfect brokenness, the
default speed should be 300.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: b_to_q to a clist with no reserved cblocks

2002-03-10 Thread Bruce Evans

On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Robert Watson wrote:

 Just noticed the following for the first time today?  (a) b_to_q console
 message, and (b), the truncated 'Mar' which presumably has to do with
 syslogd getting killed, some buffer getting flushed, or the like.  The
 b_to_q thing is what I'm wondering about.

 # reboot
 Mar 10 18:36:39  reboot: rebooted by root
 Mar 10 18:36:39  reboot: rebooted by root
 Mar 10 18:36:39  reboot: rebooted by root
 b_to_q to a clist with no reserved cblocks.
 MarWaiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...stopped
 Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...stopped
 Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop...stopped

 syncing disks...
 done
 Uptime: 16m12s

Truncation at Mar is caused by ttymsg() not caring that its messages
actually get written.  Many messages may be truncated.  I normally saw
several N's in a row when I debug this last November.  That meant that
several messages starting with November were truncated to N.

ttymsg() checks the result of writev() and is more careful if writev()
returns EWOULDBLOCK, but for non-synchronous ttys like serial ttys,
writev() normally just buffers the data and it takes a tcdrain() to
ensure that the data has at least been transmitted.  Unfortunately,
there is no way to determine if the data has been transmitted without
blocking, and ttymsg() doesn't want to block.  ttymsg() compounds the
error by using non-blocking mode in most cases.  When non-blocking
mode is in effect at last-close time, it tells close() to discard the
data instead of blocking.  The last-close sometimes occurs in exit()
when blocking in it is very inconvenient because it gives an unkillable
(half dead already) process.  When writev() returns EWOULDBLOCK,
ttymsg() switches to blocking mode and can generate a horde of blocked
or unkillable children.

I don't know exactly what causes the b_to_q message.  It is most likely
a race in close.  You can first-open tty's that are blocked in last-close,
and having this open succeed is very important for unblocking the close
usi9ng comcontrol /dev/foo drainwait small, but the tty system doesn't
seem to do nearly enough to handle races here.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message