Re: [G3-5]Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-17 Thread Nestamicky


On Jun 16, 2009, at 11:01 PM, MaGioZal wrote:


 On 6/16/09 1:28 AM, Po-en Tsai at poen.t...@gmail.com wrote:

 Or, like me, I would switch onto my Panther 10.3 partition,  
 running Firefox
 2.04 to watch anything Flash based. It seems to work for me, and  
 Youtube works
 fine like that.

 Upgrading ram may help, with my iMac, I had 512mb ram, but  
 upgraded to 768mb,
 which sped flash up a bit.


 Well, when I run primairly Mac OS 9 here with Mozilla 1.2.1 and  
 Flash 7,
 YouTibe videos also ran very badly, too. I am a Beige G3 owner.


I made a mistake saying it was 768, I actually have the ram maxed out  
at a gig. This is really sad.



 --
 MaGioZal.
 http://magiozal.blogspot.com/



 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread nestamicky
Stephen Weber wrote:
 I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too.  You  need a 
 computer with a processor better than a  G3 or a early G4.  It's 
 because flash is a CPU hog.
Well that's fine, but my Pismo 400 runs Youtube well, way, better than 
the Ti G4.

 Stephen Weber

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, nestamicky nestami...@gmail.com 
 mailto:nestami...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any
 video site, including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible.
 Now, Dan, would rpm save me here? I'm using both the latest---non
 rpm--version of FF and Safari 3.x. Horrible video, and by that is
 meant; very jerky. Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated,
 except for the latest Safari.
 Ideas, suggestions?




 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Po-en Tsai

On 16/06/2009, at 3:24 PM, nestamicky wrote:

 Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any  
 video site, including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible.  
 Now, Dan, would rpm save me here? I'm using both the latest---non  
 rpm--version of FF and Safari 3.x. Horrible video, and by that is  
 meant; very jerky. Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except  
 for the latest Safari.
 Ideas, suggestions?

If you are just going to watch Youtube, I would suggest you get a  
Youtube downloader (Google, and it will easily be found), and watch  
the downloaded Youtube on something like VLC.

Or, like me, I would switch onto my Panther 10.3 partition, running  
Firefox 2.04 to watch anything Flash based. It seems to work for me,  
and Youtube works fine like that.

Upgrading ram may help, with my iMac, I had 512mb ram, but upgraded  
to 768mb, which sped flash up a bit.


Thanks,
Po-en Tsai

-- iMac G3 350 MHz, running OSX 10.4, 10.3 and OS 9.2.2 with 768MB  
ram. Quite speedy.





--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Kris Tilford

On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:44 PM, nestamicky wrote:

 Well that's fine, but my Pismo 400 runs Youtube well, way, better  
 than the Ti G4.

Have you tried enabling Quartz Extreme on the TiBook? If not, it might  
be worth a try, using PCI Extreme 3.1 from MacUpdate. It works fine  
under 10.4.11 on my Beige G4 upgraded with Radeon 9100. I've never  
known anyone who enabled the 8MB Radeon of the TiBook, but it is  
supported by PCI Extreme, although I think it's a slightly special  
install? I've also heard that enabling Quartz Extreme on these really  
too small VRAM Radeon's can slow down video playback even more, so it  
would be good to find some type of benchmarks beforehand, and then  
measure the difference after enabling Quartz Extreme. If it's slower,  
just uninstall PCI Extreme and revert. To be sure Quartz Extreme is  
working you can use QuartzExtreme Check 1.2.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread nestamicky
Kris Tilford wrote:
 On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Stephen Weber wrote:

   
 I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too.  You  need a  
 computer with a processor better than a  G3 or a early G4.  It's  
 because flash is a CPU hog.
 

 I've had some Pentium III PC laptops that were equivalent MHz to G3  
 and early G4 Apples. It always bothered me immensely that a 700MHz  
 PIII could play almost all video completely smoothly with an 8MB  
 Radeon video card; and a G4 PowerBook with 8MB Radeon, or G3  
 700-900MHz iBook with 16MB Radeon both completely choke on even simple  
 video, and coaxing any smooth video playback is a real chore.

 I used such a 700MHz PIII to watch the Beijing Olympics online via MS  
 Silverlight (which has no PPC Mac port), and it displayed fine on my  
 40 Samsung LCD TV. Conversely, my G4 Mini with 32MB Radeon seems to  
 stutter from time-to-time on lots of different video formats, and it's  
 running at 1.58GHz, over twice as fast as the PIII. The bus width  
 should double that speed again, so on the face I'd think the Mini was  
 minimally 4x faster CPU/Bus, with 4x the VRAM, and 2x the RAM (1GB vs  
 512MB), and yet for video playback the PIII won hands down? 

 What's the  
 deal?

   
Kris your case is sad, really sad. And I wish someone out there could 
explainwhat's the deal? I would think, being completely drunk, that 
a 1.58 ghz machine would beat a P3 machine. I do have a P3 laptop of 
similar specs like yours and never noticed this kinds of issues. And 
when I moved to the G4 from my Pismothough not completely yet---I 
thought all this kinds of problems history. I guess not.
 
   


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Kris Tilford

On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:52 PM, nestamicky wrote:

 I would think, being completely drunk, that a 1.58 ghz machine would  
 beat a P3 machine.

I may have misstated the PIII speed, I could never quite figure it  
out? It's a Compaq Presario 1710 with a 1GHz CPU, and sometimes it  
seemed to report 1GHz speed, but the specifications of the model  
seemed to top-out at 700MHz, and sometimes it reported 700MHz as the  
speed. I don't know Windows stuff at all, and didn't care, it was a  
free laptop, which I've since donated away to another (un)lucky soul  
who only knows Windows. He's having all sorts of problems (virus,  
spyware, slow connection related) and I need to get him onto a Mac  
ASAP, but don't have any spare ones that can play video, a minimal  
requirement.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread nestamicky
Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, nestamickynestami...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any video site,
 including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible. Now, Dan, would rpm
 save me here? I'm using both the latest---non rpm--version of FF and Safari
 3.x. Horrible video, and by that is meant; very jerky. Running 10.4 with 768
 ram. Fully updated, except for the latest Safari.
 Ideas, suggestions?

 
   


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Dan

At 5:52 AM -0500 6/16/2009, Kris Tilford wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:52 PM, nestamicky wrote:

  I would think, being completely drunk, that a 1.58 ghz machine would 
  beat a P3 machine.

Adobe put a lot of work into making Flash look great under Windoze. 
I think they've barely given it a thought on the Mac...

FWIW,
- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Dan

At 9:24 PM -0600 6/15/2009, nestamicky wrote:

G4 Titanium 400Mhz
Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except for the latest Safari.

It's crap on any video site, including Youtube.

Flash sucks, and it has gotten worse this past year.  Ditto for the 
more advanced codecs in QuickTime.

Now, Dan, would rpm save me here?

Doubtful.  Browser speed is moot here.  This is all about the 
plug-in's speed - Flash or QuickTime.  I think most stuff on YouTube 
is Flash but it's moving to H.264?


 From the hardware point of view, this is about sheer number crunching 
speed.  These plug-ins use very little memory or disk i/o.  They just 
need more power with which to rebuild the compressed data frames.

Some of this crunching can be off-loaded into the graphics processor 
(GPU) on the video card.  That's what technologies like Quartz 
Extreme are ultimately all about.  If your machine supports it, make 
sure it's enabled.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Stephen Weber
Dan H.264 I believe is the codec that Youtube uses for storing the files on
the server, not what plug in it's using to play the files on the web
browser.

Stephen Weber

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:


 At 9:24 PM -0600 6/15/2009, nestamicky wrote:
 
 G4 Titanium 400Mhz
 Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except for the latest Safari.

 It's crap on any video site, including Youtube.

 Flash sucks, and it has gotten worse this past year.  Ditto for the
 more advanced codecs in QuickTime.

 Now, Dan, would rpm save me here?

 Doubtful.  Browser speed is moot here.  This is all about the
 plug-in's speed - Flash or QuickTime.  I think most stuff on YouTube
 is Flash but it's moving to H.264?


  From the hardware point of view, this is about sheer number crunching
 speed.  These plug-ins use very little memory or disk i/o.  They just
 need more power with which to rebuild the compressed data frames.

 Some of this crunching can be off-loaded into the graphics processor
 (GPU) on the video card.  That's what technologies like Quartz
 Extreme are ultimately all about.  If your machine supports it, make
 sure it's enabled.

 - Dan.
 --
 - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Wallace Adrian D'Alessio

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:44 PM, nestamickynestami...@gmail.com wrote:
 Stephen Weber wrote:

 I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too.  You  need a computer
 with a processor better than a  G3 or a early G4.  It's because flash is a
 CPU hog.

 Well that's fine, but my Pismo 400 runs Youtube well, way, better than the
 Ti G4.

___


Sharing the configuration details would be a constructive  way to help
the original poster.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread Mike Baker


I replaced my 400 Mhz processor on my G4 Sawtooth with a 1.5 Ghz Mercury CPU 
with 3 MB Level 3 cache, and it has made a great deal of difference. Even with 
the standard ATI Rage 128 16 MB AGP video card. I also increased the RAM from 
896 MB to 2 GB. I would like to get a PCI card based wireless card working and 
replaced the Airport Card in it so I could run the wireless connection at 
802.11(n) when I get my new Airport Express or Extreme base station.
I did find that when I got my MacBook White Core 2 Duo 2 Ghz with 2 GB RAM 
(I've since upgraded it to 4 GB RAM) and the Nvidia GeForce 9400M video 
processor that downloads are far faster than on my iBook G3 800 Mhz with 640 MB 
RAM and 32 MB video card, so my suspicion that my slow downloads speed were due 
to my Apple Express base station running at 802.11(b) in my Internet connection 
was incorrect. The download is blazingingly fast on the MacBook and will even 
improve once I get a new Airport Express or Extreme base station.

--- On Tue, 6/16/09, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Dan dantear...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video
 To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 2:34 PM
 
 At 9:24 PM -0600 6/15/2009, nestamicky wrote:
 
 G4 Titanium 400Mhz
 Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except for
 the latest Safari.
 
 It's crap on any video site, including Youtube.
 
 Flash sucks, and it has gotten worse this past year. 
 Ditto for the 
 more advanced codecs in QuickTime.
 
 Now, Dan, would rpm save me here?
 
 Doubtful.  Browser speed is moot here.  This is
 all about the 
 plug-in's speed - Flash or QuickTime.  I think most
 stuff on YouTube 
 is Flash but it's moving to H.264?
 
 
  From the hardware point of view, this is about sheer
 number crunching 
 speed.  These plug-ins use very little memory or disk
 i/o.  They just 
 need more power with which to rebuild the compressed data
 frames.
 
 Some of this crunching can be off-loaded into the graphics
 processor 
 (GPU) on the video card.  That's what technologies
 like Quartz 
 Extreme are ultimately all about.  If your machine
 supports it, make 
 sure it's enabled.
 
 - Dan.
 -- 
 - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.
 
  
 


  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: [G3-5]Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-16 Thread MaGioZal

On 6/16/09 1:28 AM, Po-en Tsai at poen.t...@gmail.com wrote:

 Or, like me, I would switch onto my Panther 10.3 partition, running Firefox
 2.04 to watch anything Flash based. It seems to work for me, and Youtube works
 fine like that.
 
 Upgrading ram may help, with my iMac, I had 512mb ram, but upgraded to 768mb,
 which sped flash up a bit.


Well, when I run primairly Mac OS 9 here with Mozilla 1.2.1 and Flash 7,
YouTibe videos also ran very badly, too. I am a Beige G3 owner.
 




--
MaGioZal.
http://magiozal.blogspot.com/



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-15 Thread nestamicky
Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any video 
site, including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible. Now, Dan, 
would rpm save me here? I'm using both the latest---non rpm--version of 
FF and Safari 3.x. Horrible video, and by that is meant; very jerky. 
Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except for the latest Safari.
Ideas, suggestions?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-15 Thread Stephen Weber
I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too.  You  need a computer
with a processor better than a  G3 or a early G4.  It's because flash is a
CPU hog.

Stephen Weber

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, nestamicky nestami...@gmail.com wrote:

  Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any video
 site, including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible. Now, Dan, would
 rpm save me here? I'm using both the latest---non rpm--version of FF and
 Safari 3.x. Horrible video, and by that is meant; very jerky. Running 10.4
 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except for the latest Safari.
 Ideas, suggestions?

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-15 Thread Kris Tilford

On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Stephen Weber wrote:

 I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too.  You  need a  
 computer with a processor better than a  G3 or a early G4.  It's  
 because flash is a CPU hog.

I've had some Pentium III PC laptops that were equivalent MHz to G3  
and early G4 Apples. It always bothered me immensely that a 700MHz  
PIII could play almost all video completely smoothly with an 8MB  
Radeon video card; and a G4 PowerBook with 8MB Radeon, or G3  
700-900MHz iBook with 16MB Radeon both completely choke on even simple  
video, and coaxing any smooth video playback is a real chore.

I used such a 700MHz PIII to watch the Beijing Olympics online via MS  
Silverlight (which has no PPC Mac port), and it displayed fine on my  
40 Samsung LCD TV. Conversely, my G4 Mini with 32MB Radeon seems to  
stutter from time-to-time on lots of different video formats, and it's  
running at 1.58GHz, over twice as fast as the PIII. The bus width  
should double that speed again, so on the face I'd think the Mini was  
minimally 4x faster CPU/Bus, with 4x the VRAM, and 2x the RAM (1GB vs  
512MB), and yet for video playback the PIII won hands down? What's the  
deal?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: [G3-5]Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-15 Thread MaGioZal

On 6/16/09 1:08 AM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio at fluxstrin...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Assuming you need to stick with this machine my first suggestion is to
 max the RAM.
 
 You could also try adjusting caching if at all possible. You may also
 have virtual memory turned on which I believe may account for the
 jerkiness.
 
 You say it is crappy on  any  video site.  As  an experiment put IE5
 on it and look for some Windows video. That worked for my old 9600 300
 MHz.


Well, I'm here on a 266MHz G3 with 512MB of RAM and 10.4, and YouTube is
very crappy here -- I can see the video in slow motion mode and an
unsynchronized audio, even when the YouTube file is completely
buffered/downloaded.

Should it be fault of the 6MB VRAM onboard video, too?
 




--
MaGioZal.
http://fotolog.com/_magiozal/



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: [G3-5]Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-15 Thread Wallace Adrian D'Alessio

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:14 AM, MaGioZalmagio...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 6/16/09 1:08 AM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio at fluxstrin...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Assuming you need to stick with this machine my first suggestion is to
 max the RAM.

 You could also try adjusting caching if at all possible. You may also
 have virtual memory turned on which I believe may account for the
 jerkiness.

 You say it is crappy on  any  video site.  As  an experiment put IE5
 on it and look for some Windows video. That worked for my old 9600 300
 MHz.


 Well, I'm here on a 266MHz G3 with 512MB of RAM and 10.4, and YouTube is
 very crappy here -- I can see the video in slow motion mode and an
 unsynchronized audio, even when the YouTube file is completely
 buffered/downloaded.

 Should it be fault of the 6MB VRAM onboard video, too?



 __-

How much RAM free space do you have left after OS X loads? Not much is it ?

Also you could try putting a faster cpu in it unless it is soldered in.

A PCI video card may help. But maybe not.

Because you fully download before playing I assume your connection is
perhaps dial-up.

Will the machine accept a full Gig of RAM?

But 233 MHz may be just too overworked. Unless the files are quite small.

Will the file fit in RAM? I doubt it. Is virtual memory turned on ?
Probably.  Every time VM has to search for the next frames to buffer
you get a hesitation.

You might try OS 9 and find it works somewhat better. But probably not
as much as you hope.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-15 Thread M. Hammad
Good.
I just tried to make a few copies.
Already failed 2 out of 3. Lots of wasted media. Dual-layer is a real  
pain.


Mohamad


On Jun 15, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Stephen Weber wrote:

 I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too.  You  need a  
 computer with a processor better than a  G3 or a early G4.  It's  
 because flash is a CPU hog.

 Stephen Weber

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, nestamicky nestami...@gmail.com  
 wrote:
 Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any  
 video site, including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible.  
 Now, Dan, would rpm save me here? I'm using both the latest---non  
 rpm--version of FF and Safari 3.x. Horrible video, and by that is  
 meant; very jerky. Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except  
 for the latest Safari.
 Ideas, suggestions?




 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: [G3-5]Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video

2009-06-15 Thread MaGioZal

On 6/16/09 2:46 AM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio at fluxstrin...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Because you fully download before playing I assume your connection is
 perhaps dial-up.


No, it isn't -- it's a slow, 256kbps cable-modem connection...
 
 Will the machine accept a full Gig of RAM?

Close to this -- 768MB of RAM.
 
 But 233 MHz may be just too overworked. Unless the files are quite small.

In fact, the velocity of my G3's processor is 266MHz.
 




--
MaGioZal.
http://twitter.com/magiozal/



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---