Re: [Gimp-user] Scripting Gimp's Hue-Saturation tool's overlap?
Thanks for the response! I was sure hoping I had overlooked something. Too bad this functionality's not available. Do you know how one would go about sending in a feature request? On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Richard Gitschlag strata_ran...@hotmail.com wrote: From: applecha...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 18:49:48 -0600 To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org Subject: [Gimp-user] Scripting Gimp's Hue-Saturation tool's overlap? Sorry if this is the wrong way to ask this question, but… I am trying to write a script which desperately needs access to the overlap function of the Hue-Saturation tool. What I've found so far is… (gimp-hue-saturation drawable hue-range hue-offset lightness saturation) Am I overlooking something obvious? Thanks so much in advance for any information you may be able to provide! I love the Gimp and thoroughly appreciate ALL developers involved in its continuous evolution into the most versatile tool I use daily!! ~Sam ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list Does not seem possible atm, sorry. But I do agree the Hue-Saturation-with-overlap functionality should be exposed to GIMP scripting just the same -- Stratadrake strata_ran...@hotmail.com Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Scripting Gimp's Hue-Saturation tool's overlap?
Thanks Kevin! I've been wracking my brain trying to figure out another way to simulate the overlap behavior, sure haven't been able to come up with anything yet. Do you have any suggestions, or know where I could look for the answer? I also need to submit a feature request to have this added to a future Gimp. On Apr 11, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca wrote: On 13-04-07 08:49 PM, Sam Bizzell wrote: I am trying to write a script which desperately needs access to the overlap function of the Hue-Saturation tool. What I've found so far is… (gimp-hue-saturation drawable hue-range hue-offset lightness saturation) Unless the overlap setting can be simulated/emulated using a second layer, there is currently no way to set overlap. It would require a new PDB call that takes the extra parameter or adding a context setting to allow overlap to be set. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful! #include disclaimer/favourite | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] The structure of exported GIMP image
I try to put an image from GIMP into an embedded system using export. The c file created has a struct with width, height, bytes per pixel (bpp) and the data of the image. The total length is width*height*bbp+1. The bpp in default to 4 by GIMP. I has tried but fail to find an explanation of how the data is arranged. Can someone point me a direction? In the very low level of pixel by pixel write to the display controller, one usually repeat image pixel height lines, and each line would have width/8 bytes times the bpp. Thus a 48x32 image, would have 24 bytes for each line and there are 32 lines. I try this rule but the image does not seem come out right. A 4-bytes bpp seems to indicated that the there are 4G (256*256*256*256) color but most embedded display can only do 64K color (256*256), I found a function by web search to convert 4 bytes to 2 bytes but not sure the formula would be correct? Is there an authoritative answer to this? Any help is appreciated. rgds, kfl. -- --- ITC (HK) Ltd. www.itnc.com Tel:+852 6913 0049 PENIT (China) Ltd. www.penit.com : Tel: +86 755 26811370 E-Mail: kflee2...@gmail.com kf...@itnc.com SKYPE: kflee2000 QQ：129929-6015 19A, Seascape Plaza, 18 Taizi Road, Shekou, Shenzhen, PROC. ACW: Alternative Class of Webspace 另类网路空间 * www.itnc.com - Hong Kong Based HQ www.penit.com - Logistic Software Developer www.jpfree.com - ACW for Japan www.twfree.com - ACW for Taiwan www.cnfree.com - ACW for China www.asiafree.net- Free Business Card Site - ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
On 13-04-11 06:33 AM, Kasim Ahmic wrote: Over at the Web List I've posted this redesign that I made from Mike Finch's mockup. http://kasimahmic.koding.com/works/GIMP/ [snip] So tell me what you guys think of it so far! It looks good but you could tighten up the design. It uses a lot of space for little information, but that may be in part that it is a sample of the appearance of the front page without the final content. The large text below the top nav bar uses a lot of space for so little text. The laptop cover on the right with the changing pictures seems a waste of space unless you have planned for something else to appear on there. The orange clickable buttons seems rather large. It is nice to see someone looking at the website and thinking of ways to improve it. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful! #include disclaimer/favourite | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Post GIMP File Management, Organizing Viewing/Simpler Alternatives Options PLEASE READ HELP!!! How Make .JPG Files More Like Tiles or Icons. Once Moved They Stay Set
Hello Jay,' Jay...You told me to take a few weeks off before my head explodes, but I was challenged inspired by your posting and decided to go forward and try to answer you. I'd loved to have met your dad and his 3x5 cards. I personally have to date 250,000 cards, 3x5 inch cards. (Major space access issue). My 1st project is things to do cards, maybe 1000 cards. I want in 3 folders by priority, and move them back and forth depending on current priority. Of course each of these folders will likely have 3 sub folders A,B,C or whatever. And of course as I go many will be deleted or put in a folder called Completed Tasks or whatever. The other index cards are impossible to describe but let's call them projects...And each stack of cards is a project, and they are bound by hair bands (rubber bands break to easily). So imagine all these stacks of projects (maybe 25-400 cards in each stack), imagine all these stacks laying around everywhere on desks, in custom boxes, wherever bound together with hairbands. Every card within these batches are in a position for a reason, until I pick them up and maybe move the order around a little bit, but they are in a certain order for whatever reason, and I am used to where they are...BUT to answer your question they take up too much space and are too hard to find and access in tight quarters...And what I want is clean slate open desk space. So I simply want to one card or one project at a time put them on my pc, let's say I have a project called Handyman, in this pile of cards will be let's say 100 cards with 100 handymen or craftsmen in there and on each card detailed information written by hand by me of when we met, what job was done etc. whatever. I would of course have in my computer a folder named handyman and that is where these cards would go. So I should say that the vast majority of my cards are not things to do cards but project cards or whatever you want to call them. The things to do index cards by their very nature will require moving from folder to folder a lot (based on current priority). And I need to see them in thumbnail view of some kind and each time I visit them I do NOT want them to have moved from the way I moved positioned them in priority. The other index cards will be more or less in the same order as they are now in their respective hair band bound stacks...However there will be times when I will change the position of a card in the stack or maybe move or copy it to another completely different folder. I guess what I'm going for is imagine sitting at a large table and you have the cards spread in front of you like playing cards laying flat and you have them positioned like that except on a PC. With regards to the future, as I scan more and more cards into my pc, over the years I will develop more and more folders and catagories and sub-folders and just a bunch of folders of images of index cards contained in a lot of specifically named folders depending on the subject matter of the cards therein. I will THEN be able to locate a folder by location, name, date, subject, etc and quickly access it for reference. I need the cards to remain in order until I want to move them, like a desktop icon or a Opera browser icon. Simple interface, simple access. That done, then when I think of something I wrote or was working on 10-20 years ago instead of picking up dusty crates and boxes of index cards TRYING to find that batch of cards I just sit down at my pc or on my iphone whatever and access that old batch of 3x5 cards without getting out of my chair. By the way I'd love to brainstorm with you sometime on your big idea you mentioned below, maybe in a private chat or other conversation, ever since the big face to face, belly to belly networking craze of the late 1970's and early 1980's I have been intrigued by the collection and management and access to information. Anyway, great post, thanks for your patience and interest. Respectfully Yours, FriendlyBeginner Hi Friendly, I believe that the custom on such lists is to add new content at the bottom. That way, the whole series of messages can be read from top to bottom and be in order. [I have no idea what you are talking about when you say create the window at the top of my response in the final view? I am reading / writing these messages as ordinary textual emails, not on some website -- I don't what mechanisms others use to read / write them.] =-=-= I hate to say this when your head is about to explode, but when you said I have something very simple I want to do and need a simple solution. you may not fully comprehend what you are getting into. I agree, it _seems_ simple. But, it is not trivial. Often, in IT (information technology -- your cards represent information), seemingly the simpler the desired result, the more complex the real problem is. It seems simple to decide where and what to eat/do/go for dinner tonight. However, it is a massively
[Gimp-user] Post GIMP File Management, Organizing Viewing/Simpler Alternatives Options PLEASE READ HELP!!! How Make .JPG Files More Like Tiles or Icons. Once Moved They Stay Set
I believe you are following a pretty good path, but one so far outside the scope of GIMP that the answers you've received so far are missing your main goal. You've used GIMP very effectively to capture your cards. What I believe you want to do next is reorganize them - and to update and change your mind about the organization whenever it feels right. Jay is suggesting a data base approach - but it seems to me you just want to move things around by dragging them from one folder to another. Unless you have a way to capture the scribbles and interpret them, you most likely will find displaying your folder contents as icons and dragging them from one to another is pretty much all you can do. -- Burnie Thanks Burnie, You saiday is suggesting a data base approach - but it seems to me you just want to move things around by dragging them from one folder to another. Unless you have a way to capture the scribbles and interpret them, you most likely will find displaying your folder contents as icons and dragging them from one to another is pretty much all you can do. Yes Burnie...You said it as simply as anyone, anywhere has said it yet. But HOW do I do it, CAD package? Whatever that is, PaperPort however that works, Daminion what is this? I already have all the best reviewed photo management/viewing software already downloaded, now I just want to get started and start scanning and making these drag and drop Object? files but I need to know what to use that is the BEST until then I'm just sitting here waiting for a solution. Thanks Burnie, FriendlyBeginner -- FriendlyBeginner (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca wrote: On 13-04-11 06:33 AM, Kasim Ahmic wrote: Over at the Web List I've posted this redesign that I made from Mike Finch's mockup. http://kasimahmic.koding.com/**works/GIMP/http://kasimahmic.koding.com/works/GIMP/ [snip] So tell me what you guys think of it so far! It looks good but you could tighten up the design. It uses a lot of space for little information, but that may be in part that it is a sample of the appearance of the front page without the final content. I don't think it's that big of an issue. We live in an age of high resolution monitors. Higher resolution images would be good to take advantage of that. Personally I like the current site design (on gimp.org); primarily because I enjoy reading the GIMP news as soon as I get to the site (which I avidly check even though it's not updated very often). For me it just means more clicks to get to news. I guess I'll just depend on my RSS feed as it's not that big of a deal. However I like how Kasim emphasizes features on the front page which beckons users to try it out. The only thing I would like to see changed is the text, Play with the Tools of the Trade. I don't like that because it implies that there is no need to take GIMP seriously as a professional editing tool or that it's a free trial to play with before using the real thing. I'm tired of hearing people say GIMP isn't as good as Photoshop. They just haven't used GIMP enough. You need to unlearn Photoshop to really take advantage of GIMP. I think GIMP is already ready for the prime time just industry doesn't take the time to learn a new tool. I would like to suggest you changing that text to, Draft with the Tools of the Trade. This let's users know that it's there for the taking yet allows professionals to take it seriously as a tool to get work done. If we're really going forward with this redesign thanks for considering any of my thoughts. SAM ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Sam Gleske sam.mxra...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca wrote: It looks good but you could tighten up the design. It uses a lot of space for little information, but that may be in part that it is a sample of the appearance of the front page without the final content. I don't think it's that big of an issue. We live in an age of high resolution monitors. Higher resolution images would be good to take advantage of that. Personally I like the current site design (on gimp.org); primarily because I enjoy reading the GIMP news as soon as I get to the site (which I avidly check even though it's not updated very often). For me it just means more clicks to get to news. I guess I'll just depend on my RSS feed as it's not that big of a deal. However I like how Kasim emphasizes features on the front page which beckons users to try it out. The only thing I would like to see changed is the text, Play with the Tools of the Trade. I don't like that because it implies that there is no need to take GIMP seriously as a professional editing tool or that it's a free trial to play with before using the real thing. I'm tired of hearing people say GIMP isn't as good as Photoshop. They just haven't used GIMP enough. You need to unlearn Photoshop to really take advantage of GIMP. I think GIMP is already ready for the prime time just industry doesn't take the time to learn a new tool. I would like to suggest you changing that text to, Draft with the Tools of the Trade. This let's users know that it's there for the taking yet allows professionals to take it seriously as a tool to get work done. If we're really going forward with this redesign thanks for considering any of my thoughts. To add on to my previous statements I'd like the front page to be edited a bit more. I'll quote the previous text and then follow that with what I would like to see it say. Note: *Professional Level Photo Filters* Make your photos picture perfect with with prefessional-grade color filtering. *Play with the Tools of the Trade* GIMP comes ready with everything you need to design like a pro. - Suggested Changes *Professional Photo Filters* Make your photos picture perfect with professional-grade color filtering. *Draft with the Tools of the Trade* GIMP has a robust set of tools and can be easily extended through add-ons. - Notes On the second sentence of the first line I correct your misspelling of prefessional. Avoid the word 'comes' as it implies humans traveling (to come and go). Again emphasize that GIMP brings a lot to the table. Having a robust set of tools is good for both users and professionals a-like. Easily extending functionality through add-ons caters to real power users of the tool. I try to think of the psychology behind the advertising since the first page is something everybody sees I think this redesign will ultimately make GIMP more popular. Especially with high bit depth editing coming to the table in future versions (which I look forward to!). Thanks for taking the time Kasim to put a lot of thought into your design and asking for feedback. SAM ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Scripting Gimp's Hue-Saturation tool's overlap?
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 05:46 -0600, Sam Bizzell wrote: Thanks Kevin! I've been wracking my brain trying to figure out another way to simulate the overlap behavior, sure haven't been able to come up with anything yet. Do you have any suggestions, or know where I could look for the answer? I also need to submit a feature request to have this added to a future Gimp. Are you using gimp 2.8? On which platform? If you compile your own gimp, this would probably be reasonably easy to add. An alternative might be to see if there's a saturation argument to the rotate colours plugin. Another way is to use select by colour, perhaps, and then affect the selection, perhaps on a duplicate layer and using desaturate and layer opacity? Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:22 -0700, Tom Williams wrote: On 04/12/2013 10:41 AM, Sam Gleske wrote: We live in an age of high resolution monitors. Higher resolution images would be good to take advantage of that. High resolution monitors might be frequently installed but many people won't use them at high resolutions. The answer to this is liquid, responsive designs using CSS media queries. This approach works in all modern browsers and is compatible with older browsers (and with Web crawlers). Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
Let me just start off by saying thank you for all the feedback! One thing is missing: mobile-friendly layouts. The current site is not fantastic at mobile size, but it's more usuable than your demo. Apologies if you were already planning to take care of this. As for HTML5, I've seen my fill of browser-specific issues with HTML 4.0 and XHTML. Avoid the stuff that's still in churn (eg, canvas tag the last time I checked), and HTML5 is fine IMO, and a lot more fun to work with. To be completely honest, I purposefully avoided mobile support. Considering that GIMP is a desktop exclusive program, I figured that adding mobile support would be a waste of time. If there is enough demand for it, however, I'll attempt to add it. I think the background image of the text GIMP - The freely distributed image editor... distracts from its content. Perhaps heavily blurring it might help - if it doesn't, use something else more background-like (the same image is in the animation on the right anyway). I entirely agree with the fact that it distracts the user. That's why I asked for suggestions on its replacement. I'll try blurring the background to see how that works out. I don't think it's that big of an issue. We live in an age of high resolution monitors. Higher resolution images would be good to take advantage of that. Personally I like the current site design (on gimp.org); primarily because I enjoy reading the GIMP news as soon as I get to the site (which I avidly check even though it's not updated very often). For me it just means more clicks to get to news. I guess I'll just depend on my RSS feed as it's not that big of a deal. How about if I add a Recent News section between the body and footer? Sort of a small feed that shows the 3-5 latest articles. I'll probably also add a twitter feed (should the GIMP devs want to tweet their progress) and a latest books feed or something along those lines. I've updated the demo with this but for now it's just to show where the feeds would go. No styling has actually been added yet. To add on to my previous statements I'd like the front page to be edited a bit more. I'll quote the previous text and then follow that with what I would like to see it say. Note: *Professional Level Photo Filters * Make your photos picture perfect with with prefessional-grade color filtering. *Play with the Tools of the Trade * GIMP comes ready with everything you need to design like a pro. - Suggested Changes *Professional Photo Filters *Make your photos picture perfect with professional-grade color filtering. *Draft with the Tools of the Trade *GIMP has a robust set of tools and can be easily extended through add-ons. Thanks for this! I've replaced the text on the page with your suggestion. The answer to this is liquid, responsive designs using CSS media queries. This approach works in all modern browsers and is compatible with older browsers (and with Web crawlers). I've already tried this. hoping to make it super fluid and look amazing on all screen sizes. But with the way that Mike aligned everything, it makes it extremely difficult to make sure everything stays in place and even more so when I'm designing everything on a 1024x768 monitor. I stuck with a static design because it's easier to manage and I know it'll look the same on every display aside from those smaller than 1024x768. I'll try to make it fluid again sometime in the future. Oh and I'm not sure if you guys are thanking me for making the site or for designing it. If it's for the latter, then please know that I had no part in it's designing. That was all Mike Finch. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kasim Ahmic kasim.ah...@gmail.com wrote: How about if I add a Recent News section between the body and footer? Sort of a small feed that shows the 3-5 latest articles. I'll probably also add a twitter feed (should the GIMP devs want to tweet their progress) and a latest books feed or something along those lines. I've updated the demo with this but for now it's just to show where the feeds would go. No styling has actually been added yet. That's a pretty cool idea. Considering the space allotted for it I think only 1 article would be enough. If I see that one article has changed I would go to the news feed to read more news :). Oh and I'm not sure if you guys are thanking me for making the site or for designing it. If it's for the latter, then please know that I had no part in it's designing. That was all Mike Finch. Ah I forgot Mike Finch was the designer; nice shout out. I give props to both of you. Nice design and good conversion from template - html. One other thing I'd like to add. Your html doesn't pass the W3C Validation Service. I think we should follow the HTML5 standard. Here's a quick URL for your convenience. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fkasimahmic.koding.com%2Fworks%2FGIMP%2Fcharset=(detect+automatically)doctype=Inlinegroup=0 SAM ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
That's a pretty cool idea. Considering the space allotted for it I think only 1 article would be enough. If I see that one article has changed I would go to the news feed to read more news :). Well we'll see when we actually implement it. I'll most likely have to use PHP for that which I have next to no knowledge about so it'll have to wait until we can get someone to help me out there. One other thing I'd like to add. Your html doesn't pass the W3C Validation Service. I think we should follow the HTML5 standard. Here's a quick URL for your convenience. Thanks for pointing that out! It's all fixed now. On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sam Gleske sam.mxra...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kasim Ahmic kasim.ah...@gmail.comwrote: How about if I add a Recent News section between the body and footer? Sort of a small feed that shows the 3-5 latest articles. I'll probably also add a twitter feed (should the GIMP devs want to tweet their progress) and a latest books feed or something along those lines. I've updated the demo with this but for now it's just to show where the feeds would go. No styling has actually been added yet. That's a pretty cool idea. Considering the space allotted for it I think only 1 article would be enough. If I see that one article has changed I would go to the news feed to read more news :). Oh and I'm not sure if you guys are thanking me for making the site or for designing it. If it's for the latter, then please know that I had no part in it's designing. That was all Mike Finch. Ah I forgot Mike Finch was the designer; nice shout out. I give props to both of you. Nice design and good conversion from template - html. One other thing I'd like to add. Your html doesn't pass the W3C Validation Service. I think we should follow the HTML5 standard. Here's a quick URL for your convenience. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fkasimahmic.koding.com%2Fworks%2FGIMP%2Fcharset=(detect+automatically)doctype=Inlinegroup=0 SAM ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Kasim Ahmic kasim.ah...@gmail.com wrote: To be completely honest, I purposefully avoided mobile support. Considering that GIMP is a desktop exclusive program, I figured that adding mobile support would be a waste of time. If there is enough demand for it, however, I'll attempt to add it. I would at least have a look at adding something like bootstrap. Adding a few classes to your divs and you'd be 99% done. Most elements would then scale to fit tablets/mobile, etc. Use case A: I'm out at the bar and talking about design work. My companion mentions how all the software you need is expensive. I point out GIMP can handle quite a bit, esp when it comes to web and photos. My companion asks can it do X? I look it up on the site. Site looks bad == project looks bad. Use case B: Loss of internet connection, no local help installed, but access to web via a mobile data plan. Easy to access the docs on the phone. I doubt these cases are common, really - but using something like bootstrap or unsemantic doesn't take long and handles them nicely. Just my opinion really - I see it as a relatively small amount of effort even if the gains are small. Chris ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
I already went ahead and fixed it :P As for the CSS, I'm attempting to get it to pass W3C specs but it's proving difficult for whatever reason. I'll keep trying though. On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Sam Gleske sam.mxra...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sam Gleske sam.mxra...@gmail.com wrote: One other thing I'd like to add. Your html doesn't pass the W3C Validation Service. I think we should follow the HTML5 standard. Here's a quick URL for your convenience. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fkasimahmic.koding.com%2Fworks%2FGIMP%2Fcharset=(detect+automatically)doctype=Inlinegroup=0 I went ahead and changed your code so that it validates. I've provided both a revised validated file and a diff to show the changes. See the attached files index_validated.html and index_validated.diff. I also recommend you validating your CSS if you can (sometimes that's not always possible). http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ SAM ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 18:02 -0400, Kasim Ahmic wrote: As for the CSS, I'm attempting to get it to pass W3C specs but it's proving difficult for whatever reason. I'll keep trying though. If validator.nu or the W3C validator is complaining about prefixed properties, check with caniuse.com maybe, but the validators don't in general like prefixed properties - ignore those warnings move on with life. It *is* worth checking in the browser console (e.g. control-shift-k in firefox or chromiumuouioiouiouiuum) for CSS errors or warnings and understanding them. If it's more than that, let me know if I can help. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Site Redesign
Alright, so first off, I've made the CSS almost fully valid. It turns out that using the IE gradient filter was causing all the problems. Anyway, the only error that's coming up now is because I'm using the *::selection*selector to change the background of text when it's highlighted. Not to big of a deal so I think I'll just leave it at that. First off, this is really great work. It's awesome seeing this come to life. Thanks! The original design I did (http://d.pr/i/LYn8) was intended to work within a responsive, flexible grid- specifically, Twitter Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/). Regardless of the content being for a desktop application, there's no reason to discount the use case of someone learning about GIMP while on the bus, and visiting the site on their phone. The awesome thing about Bootstrap is that the mobile version comes in the framework for free without the need for any extra dev work. I see. Alright, I'll leave this version up for now and make changes to it as suggestions come it but I'll work on a separate one using Twitter Bootstrap. Just wanted to pop in and say thanks for all the hard work! :) Feel free to hit me directly if you have any questions/concerns. No problem! I love doing this sort of thing! And thanks, I'll keep that in mind :) On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Mike Finch i...@1sixty.com wrote: Hey guys/Kasim, First off, this is really great work. It's awesome seeing this come to life. The original design I did (http://d.pr/i/LYn8) was intended to work within a responsive, flexible grid- specifically, Twitter Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/). Regardless of the content being for a desktop application, there's no reason to discount the use case of someone learning about GIMP while on the bus, and visiting the site on their phone. The awesome thing about Bootstrap is that the mobile version comes in the framework for free without the need for any extra dev work. Regarding the background, I totally agree that a blurred, less distracting version would be more effective. Very good call. Just wanted to pop in and say thanks for all the hard work! :) Feel free to hit me directly if you have any questions/concerns. * Mike Finch // ** 1sixty.com * * Twitter // @160south * On Friday, April 12, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Chris Mohler wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Kasim Ahmic kasim.ah...@gmail.com wrote: To be completely honest, I purposefully avoided mobile support. Considering that GIMP is a desktop exclusive program, I figured that adding mobile support would be a waste of time. If there is enough demand for it, however, I'll attempt to add it. I would at least have a look at adding something like bootstrap. Adding a few classes to your divs and you'd be 99% done. Most elements would then scale to fit tablets/mobile, etc. Use case A: I'm out at the bar and talking about design work. My companion mentions how all the software you need is expensive. I point out GIMP can handle quite a bit, esp when it comes to web and photos. My companion asks can it do X? I look it up on the site. Site looks bad == project looks bad. Use case B: Loss of internet connection, no local help installed, but access to web via a mobile data plan. Easy to access the docs on the phone. I doubt these cases are common, really - but using something like bootstrap or unsemantic doesn't take long and handles them nicely. Just my opinion really - I see it as a relatively small amount of effort even if the gains are small. Chris ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Scripting Gimp's Hue-Saturation tool's overlap?
From: l...@holoweb.net To: applecha...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:26:56 -0400 CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Scripting Gimp's Hue-Saturation tool's overlap? On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 05:46 -0600, Sam Bizzell wrote: Thanks Kevin! I've been wracking my brain trying to figure out another way to simulate the overlap behavior, sure haven't been able to come up with anything yet. Do you have any suggestions, or know where I could look for the answer? I also need to submit a feature request to have this added to a future Gimp. Are you using gimp 2.8? On which platform? If you compile your own gimp, this would probably be reasonably easy to add. An alternative might be to see if there's a saturation argument to the rotate colours plugin. Another way is to use select by colour, perhaps, and then affect the selection, perhaps on a duplicate layer and using desaturate and layer opacity? Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list Select By Color does sound like the best option - calculate the threshold to based on hue, with some degree of antialiasing and/or feathering, then just do a regular Hue-Saturation adjustment on the resulting selection. Remember, the Overlap region really only affects how GIMP handles the transition from one Hue-Saturation channel to the next. Internally, GIMP maps an input pixel (in HSV space) by both of the nearest channels and then interpolates the result based how close the hue is to the exact mid-hue between channels (relative to the overlap width). Second that there should be a PDB call that allows you to specify the overlap setting. It's part of the tool's UI, it should be exposed for scripts too. -- Stratadrake strata_ran...@hotmail.com Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
