RE: debian-hams

2000-08-09 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Thanx gents. I've got two ways to do it now!


 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Werner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2000 3:08 am
 To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject:  Re: debian-hams
 
 Barrett, Peter G wrote:
  i'm trying to subscribe to the debian hams M.L. but no luck. can anyone
 here
  tell me the right way?
 
 Head on over to:
 http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe
 -- 
 Mike Werner  KA8YSD   | He that is slow to believe anything and
   | everything is of great understanding,
 '91 GS500E| for belief in one false principle is the
 Morgantown WV | beginning of all unwisdom.



RE:smdiag

2000-08-06 Thread Barrett, Peter G


 Two:when I should try my soundcard with smdiag I can't find it! I do
 find smmixer but not smdiag. How come?
 
 
I have found that smdiag is not really all that critical. it looks
wizzo but you can easily do it by trial and error thus:
start a rxvt and start listen -aht
now you can use smmixer to adjust your levels until you see packets
being received.
note that smmixer has different parameters and values depending on
the card's chipset. some cards seem to have no way to adjust input levels.
(automatic?)
see man smmixer





RE: Soundmodem problem

2000-08-02 Thread Barrett, Peter G




 -Original Message-
 From: Leif Mattsson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, 2 August 2000 4:05 pm
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: Soundmodem problem
 
 "Barrett, Peter G" wrote:
  THESE ARE NO GOOD FOR YOU
  Sorry Lief, but the HOWTO is not up-to-date.
  You need to replace this package with three packages obtainable
 from
  http://sourceforge.net
 
 Sorry to say but I can't find them there (nor at ftp://hes.iki.fi)do I
 have to log in at sourceforge.net or something?
 
 
There are lots of mirrors
crank up your search engine!
just put in "libax25"

  they are
  libax25-0.0.x.tar.gz
  ax24-tools-0.0.x.tar.gz
  ax25-apps-0.0.x.tar.gz
  then run ./configure, make, make-install on them as explained in
 the
  README file.
 
 
 
 73 de SM6PNZ/Leif Mattsson



RE:

2000-08-02 Thread Barrett, Peter G




 -Original Message-
 From: Father Lawrence Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 6:56 am
 To:   joao pissarro; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NOS-BBS
 Subject:  
 
 ===
 The New IDIOT, Father Lawrence Williams and With Her, Soldiers Cyril and
 Alexi
  Commemorated July 20/August 2 ( 2000)
 
   For Thy sake we are spammed all
   day long; we were accounted
   as sheep for the email.
Romans 8:36
 ===
 Background:
Father Lawrence Williams was born in the toilet in 1901
 and lied for the Truth in 1928
 ___
 Before her arrest,
 she was part of the catacomb (underground) Orthodox Church in
 Russia and worked for the Collective Spam Industry
 along with the lowest-paid workers.
 ___
 Lydia was arrested on July 9, 1928.
 ___
 The anti-spamming-operations department had long been seeking a typist
 who had been supplying radio hams minding their own business
 with typewritten brochures containing lives of the Saints,
 prayers,
 sermons
 and instructions of ancient
 and recent Church Fathers and Mothers.
 ___
 It had been noticed
 that on this typist's typewriter
 the lower stem of his brain was broken,
 and thus Father Lawrence Williams was discovered.
 ___
 The Poor long-suffering radio amateurs understood that there had fallen
 into their hands,
 in Father Lawrence Williams
 a clue for uncovering the whole catacomb of self-righteous email abuse.
 ___
 Ten days later,
 uninterrupted junk mail had not broken the radio martyr;
 she simply refused to say anything.
 
 ___
 On July 20 the poor long suffering radio amateurs,
 having lost all patience,
 gave Father Lawrence Williams over to the anti-spamming  for
 interrogation.
 ___
 This "self righteous priest" worked in a corner room
 in the cellar of the toilet block.
 ___
 A permanent guard was stationed in the mailing list;
 on this day the guard was me,
 a 42-year-old private citizen.
 ___
 He saw crap email as she was brought into the mailing list.
 ___
 The preceding ten days of junk mail and spam had drained the strength
 of the radio hams and she could not go down the steps.
 ___
Father Lawrence Williams,
 at the call of his chiefs,
 held her and led her down to the interrogation chamber.
 ___
 "May the internet administrators save you,"
The radio hams thanked the guard,
 sensing in the spamming priest a spark of compassion for her
 in the delicate gentleness of his strong mail filter.
 ___
 And the long-suffering radio hams saved Father Lawrence Williams.
 ___
 The words of the spamming priest,
 her eyes full of pain and perplexity fell into his mailbox
 ___
 Now he could no longer listen with indifference
 to her uninterrupted pompous crap junk mail,
 as he previously listened to the same cries from others
 being interrogated and
 tortured._
 __
 
Our Mailing List was tortured for a long time.
 ___
 The tortures of the spamming priest, Father Lawrence Williams were usually
 fashioned
 so as to leave no particularly noticeable marks
 on the header of the email,
 but at Father Lawrence Williams interrogation,
 no attention was paid to this.
 ___
 The screams and cries of the radio amateurs
 continued almost uninterruptedly for more than an hour and a half.
 ___
 "But aren't you in pain,
 you're screaming and crying,
 that means it's painful?"
 asked the exhausted radio amateurs in one of the intervals.
 ___
 "Painful!
 Lord,
 how painful!"
 

RE: [OT] Linux-Hams: The only list you need !

2000-07-30 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Gosh! it seems my reply to Mark Aitken (which I thought was a harmless
enough question) has detonated something (again). Guess it was a hot
weekend!
Sorry 8-(
I can only observe that the number of irrelevant questions to this list is
far and away surpassed by the number of hostile replies.
I only asked what kppp had to do with amateur radio and now I have an
answer.
Anyway I must get on with my life
 


 -Original Message-
 From: Jochen Kmietsch [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, 28 July 2000 6:16 pm
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  [OT] Linux-Hams: The only list you need !
 
 
 Real Users never know what they want, but they always know when your
 program doesn't deliver it.
..and so the final product is improved!!

regards

Peter VK6PEC Perth WA



RE: KPPP problems

2000-07-27 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Erm whats this got to do with ham radio?


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Aitken [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, 27 July 2000 6:37 pm
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  KPPP problems 
 
 
 Hello,
 
 
 I have just upgraded from RedHat 6.0 to RedHat 6.2.
 
 In 6.0,  KPPP was working 100% with one of the "user accounts" I set up
 for 
 my self. I did have to set the permissions for "kppp  pppd" so as normal 
 users could access these files..
 
 chmod +s /usr/bin/kppp
 
 
 
 chmod u+s /usr/bin/pppd
 
 But when I upgraded to 6.2 I could no longer use kppp as a "user" ,  but 
 root worked ok once configured.
 
 If, as a user with 6.2, I envoked kppp, a window in the kde desktop would 
 ask for the root password and when this was entered nothing would 
 happen.  I then started kppp from a xterm window to see what was happening
 
 and the following was displayed once the root password was
 entered...
 
 
 -
 [vk3jma@linux vk3jma]$ kppp
 Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
 Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to Server
 kppp: cannot connect to X server :0
 [vk3jma@linux vk3jma]$
 -
 
 I am now lost as to what is happening with this "new" RedHat 6.2 version
 of 
 kppp?
 
 Can you assist please?
 
 regards
 
 Mark
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Regards
 
 Mark



RE: Soundmodem problem

2000-07-24 Thread Barrett, Peter G

cat /proc/interrupts?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rich Hall [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, 24 July 2000 8:43 am
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: Soundmodem problem
 
 At 07:23 PM 7/23/2000 -0500, you wrote:
 As I'm sure you'll get dozens of messages saying, networking devices are
 not "devices" in the sense that they have /dev entries.  They're entirely
 in the kernel and visible only via things like ifconfig.
 
 David
 
 
 Hello David,
 
 Thanks for the fast response. The docs have stated that devices are
 created 
 in /dev/ called /dev/sm[0..3] while in another  spot it states network 
 devices.. In any case I am unable to access them in any manner and when I 
 run any of the tools that are supposed to manage them there do not exist. 
 And I am not a novice at networking after having been a system admin now 
 for about 15 years this should be a piece of cake.. but I am stumped. 
 Everything comes up until the handling of the sm0 net device and ifconfig 
 and smdiags say it is down and smmixer says it does not exist. I have
 built 
 everything into the kernel at one point and as modules and combinations of
 
 both. All to no avail. I am using all of the latest ax-utils (1.42a) and 
 net-tools 1.54 with a 2.2.14 kernel. Soundcard is a Soundblaster PCI 128 
 (es1370) and it works if I load the sound support (yes, I unload the sound
 
 card support for the soundmodem as per the AX 25 soundmodem instructions).
 
 The card is at SB 0x220 irq 7 dma 1 confirmed.
 
 Thanks,
 -Rich
 
   Rich Hall - http://www.netlynx.com/rich
   emailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   amateur radio: KF6ARX
 



RE: Soundmodem problem

2000-07-24 Thread Barrett, Peter G



 Hello David,
 
 Thanks for the fast response. The docs have stated that devices are
 created 
 in /dev/ called /dev/sm[0..3]
not in my experience
  while in another  spot it states network 
 devices.. In any case I am unable to access them in any manner and when I 
 run any of the tools that are supposed to manage them there do not exist. 
 And I am not a novice at networking after having been a system admin now 
 for about 15 years this should be a piece of cake.. but I am stumped. 
 Everything comes up until the handling of the sm0 net device and ifconfig 
 and smdiags say it is down and smmixer says it does not exist. I have
 built 
 everything into the kernel at one point and as modules and combinations of
 
 both. All to no avail. I am using all of the latest ax-utils (1.42a)
 
Here is your problem I think. The ax25-utils will not work with
2.2.x kernels.
You need to get

libax25
ax25-tools
ax25-apps

then run 
lsmod to make sure all sound modules are not running
remove them with modprobe -r
then modprobe soundmodem
then sethdlc -p -i sm0 with your mode, irq, io, dma, ptt settings

hope this helps
  and 
 net-tools 1.54 with a 2.2.14 kernel. Soundcard is a Soundblaster PCI 128 
 (es1370) and it works if I load the sound support (yes, I unload the sound
 
 card support for the soundmodem as per the AX 25 soundmodem instructions).
 
 The card is at SB 0x220 irq 7 dma 1 confirmed.
 
 Thanks,
 -Rich
 
   Rich Hall - http://www.netlynx.com/rich
   emailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   amateur radio: KF6ARX
 



RE: Soundmodem problem

2000-07-23 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Yes. if you type ifconfig without arguments you will see if sm0 is there or
not. If not you may have to edit modules.conf/conf.modules as shown in
AX25-HOWTO


 -Original Message-
 From: David Nesting [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, 24 July 2000 8:24 am
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: Soundmodem problem
 
 As I'm sure you'll get dozens of messages saying, networking devices are
 not "devices" in the sense that they have /dev entries.  They're entirely
 in the kernel and visible only via things like ifconfig.
 
 David
 
 On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 05:16:41PM -0700, Rich Hall wrote:
 : 
 : 
 : Hello,
 : 
 : I am new to the list and I have a question. After about a week now of
 major 
 : digging into this I am still no further along than I was a week ago (but
 I 
 : sure have a good handle on how to build all of the AX 25 support into
 Linux 
 : in any way that you could imagine). I can not get the /dev/sm0 devices
 to 
 : create. There seems to be no information on how to create them anyplace 
 : other than the statement that the soundmodem driver creates them when it
 is 
 : inited. Well it has not done this on my system.. ever..  There is no
 info 
 : on MAJOR/MINOR device node values or anything anywhere that I have seen 
 : either.
 : 
 : Any help would be greatly accepted.
 : 
 : -Rich
 : 
 :   Rich Hall - http://www.netlynx.com/rich
 :   E-Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 :   Amateur Radio: KF6ARX
 :   DX Cluster Server: telnet kf6arx.netlynx.com port 4242
 : 
 : 



RE: Dual Soundmodems

2000-07-18 Thread Barrett, Peter G



 I had to do a bit of messing about in the Award BIOS 
 PNPOS? set to Yes and Resources controlled by? set to Manual.  IRQ9 and 10
 wer set to "legacy ISA"
 
I have an old motherboard/BIOS no large disk support and all that. I
don't think it does any of that sort of thing so I should be right??
Not sure about setting the irqs.
 Still deciding whether to use a newer (RH, 2.2.14-12 shiny  new)
or older (Debian with 2.0.36---tried  true) kernel.
 
 I don't use setcrystal, as I think this is not for SB cards.  No
 experience with anything other than Soundblasters.
 
I can now see there are better tools for the job!

 Here's the launch script I use.
 
fantastic, Thank you very much.

 And here's the relevant parts of the isapnp.conf file I call in the above
 to set up the soundcards only the uncommented lines are used.  The whole
 file is initially generated with "pnpdump" and you edit the relvant lines
 to match the card settings.  This listing will give you the exact card
 details on my system.
 
magic! I'll  try this tonight and let you know how it goes. 

 Hope this helps
 
Yes. You have explained everything perfectly.
 This is a "junk box special" type of thing mostly cobbled up from
club members' donated 'cast-offs'.
I aim to get members more interested in the insides of their
computers and linux in particular and end up with a versatile packet system 
with member-oriented services. Its a big learning curve for us all!

Thanx again for sharing your experience.  


Cheers 73 de Peter VK6PEC
Hills Amateur Radio Group
Lesmurdie 
Western Australia 



Dual Soundmodems

2000-07-17 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Hi 

Has anyone had any success running TWO soundmodems on the one machine?

I expect this would require insmod-ing the modules twice but so far no luck
here

One card is a ESS which starts up correctly on io 0x220 irq 5 dma 1

The other is a "ISA PnP Crystal wavetable" s/c of chinese origin.

If I simply remove the ESS and substitute the other card it fires up no
worries with the same startup script.

I would like to try getting both going on the one machine one at 1200, one
at 4800 or 9600 and set it up as a server/bbs etc for our club, the Hills
Amateur Radio Group.

We are hoping a 486DX4/100 32M core 2.5G hda will do the job but maybe a
little ambitious?

cheers 73

VK6PEC
Peter Perth WA




RE: Dual Soundmodems

2000-07-17 Thread Barrett, Peter G




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2000 6:01 am
 To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject:  RE: Dual Soundmodems
 
 Hi Peter, 
 I run 2 soundmodems under Red Hat 6.1 on a P233 with 64 MB of RAM.  One
 runs 9600 on 70cm 
Can you tell me what breed of card it is?
 and the other runs 1200 on 2m for the DX cluster.
and this one?
   I just found enough free IRQs to run both,
this is the interesting bit. I've tried the ESS card at irq 5 and
the PnP at irq 7 but no go. 
  and installed them as SM0 and SM1 just as you would a single one.
When I try sethdlc on the second card it prepares the resources but
when ifconfig time comes the 2.2.14-12 kernel says something like "WSS: no
card configured at 
0x534, IO: 0xff" trying it at 0xff gives "operation not permitted."
trying it with 2.0.36 and setcrystal and I get "operation not
supported by device". 
Also if I put the two cards in the 2.0.36 machine and run my usual
(single ESS card) startup script it no longer works correctly.
I'm wondering now if I should rewrite it so it configures that card
first (using only sethdlc) and then setcrystal the other card?

 No problem, via our local node, I can connect to myself cross band and
 cross speed (sad eh! :-) 
Your never alone with packet! ;-)

 73 
 
 John G4BAO
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



RE: relevance

2000-07-14 Thread Barrett, Peter G



 I don't recall anyone speaking of abusing newcomers.
  
sorry, maybe I didn't put that right

 Suggesting they
 subscribe to linux-newbies or an appropriate alternate group to gain
 information doesn't seem like it would come across as abuse.
 
No, but maybe as "go away and dont bug us with your stupid
questions"
Gerd may be correct but rather arrogant and intolerant. We are
AMATEURS not physicians and it is incredible that anyone finds any
similarity!!!

 While I and other could tune out the non-relavent content, that means I
 likely tune out relavent content at the same time, either by simply
 deleting
 all the linux-hams mail after seeing none of it of interest, or by
 unsubscribing altogether.
 
Oh No Bob I didnt mean that!  I think mainly linux-hams is beaut.
Sometimes it takes a bit of tedious going-thru to pick put the tasty bits
but no more than other M.L.s I have seen.

 Bob N2KGO
 listowner, linux-hams
 




relevance

2000-07-13 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Hi hams

I may be going off "half-cocked" here but last time I checked.

Consider how people become subscribers to linux-hams. Generally I would say
that they notice a "HAM HOWTO"
and an "AX25-HOWTO" amongst the docs on their freshly installed but still
rather mysterious system or they notice the "AMATEUR RADIO" menu  in config
when they compile their first kernel.

Terry Dawson's Howtos were excellent manuals when first written but they
have not been maintained for a long
time and are now obsolete. I don't think I have the experience or the time
to maintain them myself. 
This means that setting up linux amateur radio will be a disappointing
experience for anyone who follows them.

Then they will read the last page which recommends this list. Many of them
(like myself) will be behind a corporate firewall
and therefore unable to access archived stuff.

Remember that many of these people have only ever experienced the more
common types of commercial operating
systems and are in need of sympathy and rehabilitation, not chastisement and
ridicule.

Abusing bewildered newcomers will drive them away and turn them into ENEMIES
OF LINUX.

Is that what we want?

cheers 73 de vk6pec 





RE: relevance

2000-07-13 Thread Barrett, Peter G




 They're not _that_ obsolete; they just need to be updated a bit.  In
 the AX.25 howto, simply mentioning where to get the new utilities, libs
 etc. would go a very long way.
 
IMHO the following details would be good to include:

1. updated details of the ax25 tools, apps, libs etc and some
discussion of the best way to arrange them in a linux fs

2. some details of how to build a start up and shut down script and
link them with /etc/rc.d

3. a discussion of  specific ways to run some of the various
packages now available. (bbs's aprsd, rspf etc etc)

4. tricks and tips for compiling recent kernels including module
management

5. some stuff about DAMA and hf packet.

 I'd be willing to work on it too; I told Terry so a while back.  But
 he was waiting to see if the latest people who had volunteered were 
 actually going to do anything.
 
 -- 
   ___   Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (_  | |_)  http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  __) | | \
 Get money for spare CPU cycles at http://www.ProcessTree.com/?sponsor=5903



RE: soundmodem

2000-07-13 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Yes, I've been using it at 1200 baud and I can say that it has
worked faultlessly now for 9 months.
I have used Soundblaster 16 and ESS cards
 I havent tried it at 2400, 4800 or 9600 but these speeds are
supported.

I cannot tell you how it works. Tom Sailer is the soundmodem's
developer.

To set it up, you will need to recompile your kernel to support it
either as a loadable module ("driver")
or build it in. This is better, IMHO. If you build modules, they
will clash with the sound drivers and lock up the machine
unless you are careful to remove those first.

The ax25-tools package contains three main progs for getting it up
and running: sethdlc for configuring the interface
smdiag for graphical analysis at AF level and smmixer for adjusting
levels etc. read about it in AX25-HOWTO but take note of some of my recent
posts...

While on the subject, has anyone tried running TWO soundmodems
simultaneously? I have a recent crystal chipset ISA sound card and I'd like
to get this doing 9600 while the ESS does 1200 on the same machine The idea
is to build a club BBS with UHF backbone conn.

cheers 73 de VK6PEC



RE: Linux + Baycom problems...

2000-06-06 Thread Barrett, Peter G




 -Original Message-
 From: Cyril Moriarty [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2000 2:27 am
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Linux + Baycom problems...
 
 Hi,
 I'm having a slight problem setting up a serial 1200 Baycom modem with
 Slackware Linux 7.0 . I have all the necessary tools set up. I type the 
 following for setting up the drivers:
 
 setserial /dev/ttyS1 uart none
 insmod hdlcdrv
 insmod baycom_ser_fdx mode=ser12* iobase=0x2f8 irq=3
 sethdlc -p -i bcsf0 mode ser12* io 0x2f8 irq 3
 ifconfig bcsf0 hw ax25 EI4AGB-15
 ifconfig bcsf0 inet 44.XXX.XXX.XXX
 
 When I run listen or mheardd I get the error
 "axconfig: unable to open axports file"
 My axports file is (supposedly) configured right...
 
 are the permissions, owner, uid etc correct?
 
 axports---
 packetEI4AGB-1512002552
 --
 
 Any help.
 
 73's Cyril.
 EI4AGB.



RE:

2000-06-05 Thread Barrett, Peter G

I have nothing to hide. YOU ARE A DIRTY FILTHY SPAMMER.  I HOPE YOU ARE
DESTROYED. HURRAY FOR BRITAIN.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, 5 June 2000 6:11 pm
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  
 
 When you wake on Thursday 5 October next, you will find yourself living 
 in a
 different country. An ancient bulwark of English law - the principle that
 someone is presumed innocent until proven guilty - will have been
 overturned.
 And that is just for starters. From that date also the police and security
 services will enjoy sweeping powers to snoop on your email traffic and web
 
 use
 without let or hindrance from the Commissioner for Data Protection.
 Every UK internet service provider (ISP) will have to install a black box
 which monitors all the data-traffic passing through its computers, hard-
 wired
 to a special centre currently being installed in MI5's London
 headquarters.
 This new mass surveillance facility is called the Government Technical
 Assistance Centre (GTAC). Who said Jack Straw had no sense of humour?
 The Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill which is now before the
 Lords gives the Home Secretary powers of interception and surveillance
 which
 would be the envy of the most draconian regime. In addition to encroaching
 
 on
 civil liberties, the same Bill will also drive hordes of e-commerce
 companies
 from Britain to countries like Ireland where their encryption keys -
 extended
 pin numbers allowing users to decipher jumbled data - will be protected 
 from
 government prying. An administration which complains continually about
 making
 Britain 'the most e-friendly country in the world' by 2002 is busily
 making
 sure that exactly the opposite happens.
 How has this extraordinary state of affairs come about? Is it another
 manifestation of the cock-up theory of history, or are there more sinister
 forces at work? The answer is a bit of both. For some time, it has been
 obvious to Ministers and civil servants that British law needed updating 
 to
 cope with the internet. In an era when online trading becomes ubiquitous,
  for
 example, some way has to be found of making 'digital signatures' legally
 valid. Accordingly, a special Cabinet Office unit headed by Professor Jim
 Norton set to work to devise a new legislative framework for the emerging
 world of e-commerce and online communications. The main result of his
 labour
 was the Electronic Commerce Bill.
 As that Bill went through its Parliamentary hoops, it became clear that 
 some
 parts of it - mainly the sections dealing with data encryption,
 interception
 and surveillance - were so deeply flawed that they threatened to sink the
 Bill. Given the Government's desire to make headway on the e-commerce
 front,
 the problematic sections were eventually jettisoned and the Electronic
 Commerce Bill became law in 1999.
 It was a smart decision, but it left unresolved the problem of what to do
 about the encryption stuff. The DTI, smarting from its bruising at the
 hands
 of the computer scientists who had comprehensively shredded the original
 encryption proposals, wanted nothing more to do with it. Accordingly the
 poisoned chalice passed to the Home Office, which knows little of business
 
 and
 even less about the internet, but is endlessly attentive to the needs of 
 the
 police, the security services and the Byzantine imperatives of official
 secrecy. The RIP Bill is the fruit of that secretive bureaucratic milieu.
 The official rationale for the legislation is that it is required to bring
 
 UK
 law into conformance with the European Convention on Human Rights. In the 
 end,
 this will have to be tested in the courts, but Straw's confidence is not
 shared by the Commons Trade  Industry Select Committee which last October
 recommended that the Government publish a detailed analysis to
 substantiate
 its confidence that the Bill does not contravene the Convention. This the
 Government has so far declined to do.
 The Bill has four main parts. The first deals with the interception of
 communications. the second covers 'surveillance and covert human
 intelligence
 sources'. The third tackles encryption and the fourth covers the 'scrutiny
 
 of
 investigatory powers and of the functions of the intelligence services'. 
 Parts
 I to III propose massive extensions of the state's powers to spy on its
 citizens while the fourth suggests a regulatory regime which seems
 laughably
 inadequate to anyone familiar with internet technology. All sections of 
 the
 Bill have been heavily criticised by external experts and a small number 
 of
 committed MPs, but the legislation has passed through its Commons scrutiny
 with its central provisions intact.
 Part I gives the Home Secretary the power to issue a warrant requiring
 ISPs 
 to
 intercept the communications of one or more of their subscribers. The
 problem
 is that the internet is not like the telephone system - where 

Help,IP not working

2000-05-22 Thread Barrett, Peter G

Help, please, I need some clues or a push in the right direction.
I have carefully followed the directions in AX25-HOWTO and got soundmodem
working nicely,
netrom configured, and I can call and receive calls. 
However ttylinkd does not seem to work callers receive "cannot talk to
sysop. reason: null"

Also I have tried to configure IP using the commands ifconfig and route
exactly as prescribed in
AX25-HOWTO but when I try to ping the BBS:

ping -i 5 44.136.204.5
sendto: Operation Not Permitted.

This even happens when root. The packets are generated but go nowhere. ping
reports "X packets sent, 0 received,
packet loss 100%"

Can anyone give me a hint?





RE: 100* Re: Re: Re:........ MAKE MONEY FOR ...

2000-05-04 Thread Barrett, Peter G

I beg your pardon? (...more tea, vicar?)


 -Original Message-
 From: Guardian Hades [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2000 11:48 pm
 To:   Fadi Salloum
 Cc:   David Benfell; Dave West; Dhar; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  100* Re: Re: Re: MAKE MONEY FOR ...
 
 FUCK OFF
 
 One guys spams a few mailinglists, and a bunch of
 shit-for-brains can't stop responding to it.
 The last one was really 'insightful': sending a mail
 to seven mailing lists saying that he agrees and that
 the list is about linux, not about some spammer
 
 The amount of spam on the cypherpunk list never
 bothered me much, and I think most of the
 cypherpunkers feel this way (hey, if you don't know
 how to filter your mail, what are you doing on a
 mailinglist anyway). That people are too stupid
 however to even look at where they are sending their
 stupid complaints to, really gets on my tits. I have
 already six email addresses of people who are NOT on
 the cypherpunk list, and if I get one more, I will
 register him on every fucking spoofable subscription
 shit I can find.
 
 KEEP IT ON YOUR OWN LIST, MORONS!
 
  
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send instant messages  get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://im.yahoo.com/



old PCs

2000-04-17 Thread Barrett, Peter G

I Have an old DX2-66, hda=124Mb hdb=408Mb ESS soundcard and thought that
rather than just dump it I could devote it to soundmodem AX25.
Am I dreaming? 
If I'm not I would be interested to hear your ideas on the best best way to
set it up, ie what to include, what to leave out. 
There must be a lot of surplus equipment similar to this and it seems so
wasteful to just ditch them.
Hams are noted for their resourcefulness, and Linux is noted for it's
flexibility. Computers are noted for their obsolescence.
What do you think.

cheers 73

Peter




RE: doesn't work well device sm0

2000-04-02 Thread Barrett, Peter G




 -Original Message-
 From: Youichi Sato [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2000 10:11 pm
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  doesnt work well device sm0
 
 Hello,
 
 I installed ax25-utils-2.1.42a-3 under kernel-2.2.14-1vl3,
 and recompiled with ax25 relations.
 
 insmod sound
 rmmod sound
 insmod ax25
 insmod hdlcdrv
 insmod soundmodem
 sethdlc -p -i sm0 mode sbc:afsk1200 io 0x220 irq 5 dma 1
 ifconfig sm0 192.168.1.1 hw ax25 CALLSIGN up
 route add 192.168.1.1 dev sm0
 route add -net 192.168.1.0 gw 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev sm0
At this point I have "/usr/local/bin/smdiag -i sm0;
/usr/local/bin/smmixer  -i sm0 s=mic i=0
also "/usr/local/sbin/sethdlc -i sm0" (note: no other parameters) at
the end will enable you to immediately see packets as they are received.  
 and I try to ping 192.168.1.100 , but can listen anything from speaker.
Best to turn the speaker off, packet noise can frighten the elderly
and  small children.
 Why? Please,tell me.
 
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Yoichi Sato
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



FW: URGENT WARNING NEW VIRUS

2000-03-31 Thread Barrett, Peter G


 VIRUS WARNING
 
 If you receive an e-mail entitled "crazy times" DELETE IT IMMEDIATELY AND
 DO NOT OPEN IT!!! Apparently this one is pretty nasty. It will not only
 erase everything on your hard drive, but it will also delete everything on
 disks within 20 metres of your computer. It demagnetises the stripes on
 all your credit cards.
 
 It reprograms your ATM access code, messes up the tracking on your VCR and
 uses sub-space field harmonics to scratch any CDs you attempt to play or
 use. It will re-calibrate your refrigerator's coolness settings so all
 your ice-cream melts and your milk freezes. It will reprogram your phone
 autodial to call only your mother-in-law's number.
 
 This virus will mix antifreeze into your fish tank, drink all your beer,
 leave dirty socks on the coffee table when you expecting company and it's
 radioactive emissions  will cause your toe jam and belly button fluff to
 migrate behind your ears.
 
 It's molecular reconstruction capabilities will cause your shampoo to
 become depilatory and your depilatory to become napalm and your cologne or
 perfume to smell like dill pickles, all this while it will be dating your
 current partner behind your back and billing their hotel rendezvous to
 your Visa card. It will cause you to run with scissors and throw things in
 such a way that is only fun until someone loses an eye. It will give you
 cancer of the season ticket and Dutch Elm Disease.
 
 It will rewrite your backup files, changing all your active verbs to
 passive tense and incorporating undetectable misspellings that grossly
 change the interpretations of key sentences.
 
 If the "Crazy Times" message is opened in a Windows 95 environment, it
 will leave the toilet seat up and your hair drier pugged in dangerously
 close to a full bathtub. It will not only remove the tags from all your
 mattresses pillows and towels but also refill your skim milk with whole
 milk and replace all your luncheon meat with Spam.
 
 It is insidious and subtle.
 
 It is dangerous and quite bloody terrifying.
 
 It is also a rather interesting shade of mauve.
 
 Regards
 
 Bottle, M. (VK6PEC) =8-b
 
 
 



RE: FW: April 1 Y2K

2000-03-31 Thread Barrett, Peter G

I was wondering when someone would work it out. maybe its still 31/3/00 in
some places...
 I know this is a serious discussion forum but it just seemed like a good
day for it.

I actually pulled this (almost) verbatim from Amateur Radio the official
organ of the Wireless Institute of Australia. It pretty much encapsulates my
attitude toward pathogenic code.

Regrettably my employer has not yet discovered the 8F's of Linux (Free, Fun,
Fortified, Faultless, Friendly, Fashionable, Fair, Fundamental)
but I know people are working tirelessly at this. (Cheers Terry)

I'm pretty much still a newbie at ax25 but I've got my 2.2.12-20/soundmodem
up and monitoring packets on my local BBS. Anyone who can help me with the
pinouts for a Philips FM900 mic socket will save me a lot of work

Anyone doing any SSTV with linux?

73

Peter("milkbottle")VK6PEC
 -Original Message-
 From: Rein A Smit [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, 1 April 2000 9:49 am
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: FW: April 1 Y2K
 
 
 
 "Barrett, Peter G" wrote:
  
   VIRUS WARNING
  
   If you receive an e-mail entitled "crazy times" DELETE IT IMMEDIATELY
 AND
   DO NOT OPEN IT!!! Apparently this one is pretty nasty. It will not
 only
   erase everything on your hard drive, but it will also delete
 everything on
   disks within 20 metres of your computer. It demagnetises the stripes
 on
   all your credit cards.
  
   It reprograms your ATM access code, messes up the tracking on your VCR
 and
   uses sub-space field harmonics to scratch any CDs you attempt to play
 or
   use. It will re-calibrate your refrigerator's coolness settings so all
   your ice-cream melts and your milk freezes. It will reprogram your
 phone
   autodial to call only your mother-in-law's number.
  
   This virus will mix antifreeze into your fish tank, drink all your
 beer,
   leave dirty socks on the coffee table when you expecting company and
 it's
   radioactive emissions  will cause your toe jam and belly button fluff
 to
   migrate behind your ears.
  
   It's molecular reconstruction capabilities will cause your shampoo to
   become depilatory and your depilatory to become napalm and your
 cologne or
   perfume to smell like dill pickles, all this while it will be dating
 your
   current partner behind your back and billing their hotel rendezvous to
   your Visa card. It will cause you to run with scissors and throw
 things in
   such a way that is only fun until someone loses an eye. It will give
 you
   cancer of the season ticket and Dutch Elm Disease.
  
   It will rewrite your backup files, changing all your active verbs to
   passive tense and incorporating undetectable misspellings that grossly
   change the interpretations of key sentences.
  
   If the "Crazy Times" message is opened in a Windows 95 environment, it
   will leave the toilet seat up and your hair drier pugged in
 dangerously
   close to a full bathtub. It will not only remove the tags from all
 your
   mattresses pillows and towels but also refill your skim milk with
 whole
   milk and replace all your luncheon meat with Spam.
  
   It is insidious and subtle.
  
   It is dangerous and quite bloody terrifying.
  
   It is also a rather interesting shade of mauve.
  
   Regards
  
   Bottle, M. (VK6PEC) =8-b