Re: Where is the right place for Biblatex redefinitions?

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Am Mittwoch, dem 28.09.2022 um 11:21 +0200 schrieb kzsta...@gmail.com:
> This may be solved by enclosing your specific settings in
> \AtEndPreamble{…}, for which you need the package etoolbox:

Or, with a reasonably new LaTeX release, use

\AddToHook{package/biblatex/after}{
...
}

which will issue the code as soon as biblatex has been loaded.

-- 
Jürgen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

RE: Where is the right place for Biblatex redefinitions?

[kzstatis]

>I need to apply some renewcommands to the standard ext-biblatex-verbose-trad3 
>style
>
>% specific settings:
>\DeclareFieldFormat{biblabeldate}{#1}
>\DeclareDelimFormat[bib]{nameyeardelim}{\addperiod\space}
>\DeclareFieldFormat{issuedate}{#1}
>\renewcommand*{\volnumdatedelim}{\addcomma\space}
>\renewcommand{\newunitpunct}{\addcomma\space}
>\renewcommand*{\locpubdelim}{\addcoma\space}
>
>If I put them in the preamble, they seem to be taken into account in the pdf, 
>but they cause a lot of error warnings (sequences of "undefined" >and "already 
>defined") and I would like to avoid that, since my document is very long and I 
>might miss other error warnings. 
>My question is: Is there a better way of inserting these lines? Before the 
>bibliography in TeX code? Or where?

When you make a pdf, LyX first exports the lyx file to latex. It places the 
\usepackage for biblatex after the document specific preamble. So when pdflatex 
sees your preamble settings, it does not know yet biblatex and its commands, 
such as biblabeldate.

This may be solved by enclosing your specific settings in \AtEndPreamble{…}, 
for which you need the package etoolbox:

\usepackage{etoolbox}
\AtEndPreamble{%
\DeclareFieldFormat{biblabeldate}{#1}
\DeclareDelimFormat[bib]{nameyeardelim}{\addperiod\space}
\DeclareFieldFormat{issuedate}{#1}
\renewcommand*{\volnumdatedelim}{\addcomma\space}
\renewcommand{\newunitpunct}{\addcomma\space}
\renewcommand*{\locpubdelim}{\addcoma\space}
}

This ensures that your specific settings are read at the very end of the 
preamble, when biblatex has already been read.

Kees


-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Where is the right place for Biblatex redefinitions?

[Mathias Girel]

Dear Lyx users,
I need to apply some renewcommands to the standard
ext-biblatex-verbose-trad3 style

% specific settings:
\DeclareFieldFormat{biblabeldate}{#1}
\DeclareDelimFormat[bib]{nameyeardelim}{\addperiod\space}
\DeclareFieldFormat{issuedate}{#1}
\renewcommand*{\volnumdatedelim}{\addcomma\space}
\renewcommand{\newunitpunct}{\addcomma\space}
\renewcommand*{\locpubdelim}{\addcoma\space}

If I put them in the preamble, they seem to be taken into account in the
pdf, but they cause a lot of error warnings (sequences of "undefined" and
"already defined") and I would like to avoid that, since my document is
very long and I might miss other error warnings.
My question is: Is there a better way of inserting these lines? Before the
bibliography in TeX code? Or where?
Thanks for your help!
Best regards
Mathias
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Where to report a lyx error

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Am Donnerstag, dem 25.08.2022 um 11:13 -0400 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> > I use lyx 2.4.0.dev (Debian) and got a lyx crash. I started with a 
> > terminal and saved the terminal output in a txt file. Where should
> > I 
> > send it to?
> > Wolfgang
> There is a bug tracker
> (https://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome). 
> It requires creating an ID (no cost). I would suggest searching first
> to 
> see if the bug has already been reported.

Alas, the bug tracker is currently broken and the persons who can fix
it are unavailable. Meanwhile, please report to lyx-devel.

-- 
Jürgen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Where to report a lyx error

[Paul A. Rubin]

On 8/25/22 02:38, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I use lyx 2.4.0.dev (Debian) and got a lyx crash. I started with a 
terminal and saved the terminal output in a txt file. Where should I 
send it to?

Wolfgang
There is a bug tracker (https://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome). 
It requires creating an ID (no cost). I would suggest searching first to 
see if the bug has already been reported.


Paul
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Where to report a lyx error

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

I use lyx 2.4.0.dev (Debian) and got a lyx crash. I started with a 
terminal and saved the terminal output in a txt file. Where should I 
send it to?

Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Directory for BibTeX style files -- where do I set it?

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 3/31/20 4:43 AM, Bernt Lie wrote:
>
> I’m using LyX 2.3.4.3 on Windows 10, with MikTeX distribution 2.9.
>
>  
>
> Lately, LyX has had problems with finding the location of *.bst styles
> in MikTeX. I had to manually browse through the MikTeX directory on my
> computer to find the directory of the relevant *.bst files. Also, the
> entire path of the directory shows up in the style field:
>
>  
>
> In documents, the Style shows up without the path (e.g., just “agsm”).
>
I believe that this is controlled by the BSTINPUTS environment variable,
though how that works on Windows and MiKTeX I do not know.

Riki


-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Directory for BibTeX style files -- where do I set it?

[Bernt Lie]

I’m using LyX 2.3.4.3 on Windows 10, with MikTeX distribution 2.9.

Lately, LyX has had problems with finding the location of *.bst styles in 
MikTeX. I had to manually browse through the MikTeX directory on my computer to 
find the directory of the relevant *.bst files. Also, the entire path of the 
directory shows up in the style field:
[cid:image002.jpg@01D60749.26083F10]

In documents, the Style shows up without the path (e.g., just “agsm”).

Question:

  1.  What is going on?
  2.  Where in LyX do I set the path for *.bst files so that LyX lists all 
styles?

[I also tried to update MikTeX, but it has one of it’s hick-ups. Tells me 
“Something went wrong”, and then ask me whether I want to se more information 
(“Yes”, “No”, etc.). When I click on “No”, the same message pops up 2 more 
times... Very annoying.]

-B
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Footnote rule appears where not wanted

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 11/11/19 4:06 PM, Richard Opheim wrote:
> I have a strange problem with footnote rules that appear when there is
> no footnote beneath them. This happens when there is a footnote in the
> left-hand column on a two-column page and a figure in the right-hand
> column. This causes a footnote rule to appear at the bottom of the
> following page, even if it's not a multicol page. (Please see attached
> example.) The unwanted rule disappears if the figure on the previous
> page is deleted.
> My question is does anyone know of a way I can have the footnote and
> the figure without the unwanted rule?

I'd ask this on the LaTeX stack exchange site. Or on comp.text.tex. It's
very much a LaTeX issue, and some guru will know the answer. (I do
believe I've heard of this problem actually.)

Riki


-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Footnote rule appears where not wanted

[Richard Opheim]

I have a strange problem with footnote rules that appear when there is no
footnote beneath them. This happens when there is a footnote in the
left-hand column on a two-column page and a figure in the right-hand
column. This causes a footnote rule to appear at the bottom of the
following page, even if it's not a multicol page. (Please see attached
example.) The unwanted rule disappears if the figure on the previous page
is deleted.
My question is does anyone know of a way I can have the footnote and the
figure without the unwanted rule?

-- 
Richard Opheim
PO box 2261
Arizona City, AZ 85123

Skype name: richard.opheim
Office: +1 (262) 724-0443
Mobile: +1 (206) 965-0564
Editing 
J-E Translation

Self-publishing 

Now available on Amazon: *The Taste of Kyoto: A Guide to Dining and
Sightseeing in the Old Capital

*by
Richard Opheim

*Sine probationem non creditis*


Congatest.lyx
Description: application/lyx
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: A relaxed editing mode where empty constructs are not removed?

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 3/21/19 10:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 21/03/2019 à 15:14, Amir Michail a écrit :
>> Not everyone needs to generate output from LyX.I find the app
>> excellent for taking notes and the .lyx files are sufficient for that
>> purpose.
>>
>> A relaxed editing mode would make LyX even more convenient to use for
>> taking notes. In particular, it’s annoying to have empty constructs
>> automatically deleted when you move the cursor away from them.
>>
>> Any chance a relaxed editing mode could be added to LyX?
>
> This is something that can be added to each layout using a local
> layout like
>
> Style Standard
>   KeepEmpty 1
> End
>
> This will only have effect on the standard style, though. The same has
> to be done for the styles you care about.

It would be easy for someone to create a module with all that stuff, and
then to activate it for 'relaxed editing mode'.

Riki

Re: A relaxed editing mode where empty constructs are not removed?

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 21/03/2019 à 15:14, Amir Michail a écrit :

Not everyone needs to generate output from LyX.I find the app excellent for 
taking notes and the .lyx files are sufficient for that purpose.

A relaxed editing mode would make LyX even more convenient to use for taking 
notes. In particular, it’s annoying to have empty constructs automatically 
deleted when you move the cursor away from them.

Any chance a relaxed editing mode could be added to LyX?


This is something that can be added to each layout using a local layout like

Style Standard
  KeepEmpty 1
End

This will only have effect on the standard style, though. The same has 
to be done for the styles you care about.


Another solution is to insert something invisible like an unbreakable 
space (Ctrl-Space) in things you want to keep empty.


JMarc

A relaxed editing mode where empty constructs are not removed?

[Amir Michail]

Not everyone needs to generate output from LyX.I find the app excellent for 
taking notes and the .lyx files are sufficient for that purpose. 

A relaxed editing mode would make LyX even more convenient to use for taking 
notes. In particular, it’s annoying to have empty constructs automatically 
deleted when you move the cursor away from them.

Any chance a relaxed editing mode could be added to LyX?

Amir

Re: Where to place a modified stdtoolbars.inc file?

[John Kane]

*The file should go into ~/.lyx/ui/, or (more generally) the ui/*

* subdirectory of whatever your LyX user directory is. *

I have not the slightest idea why but I dropped the *stdtoolbars.inc* file
back into the ~/.lyx/ui directory this morning and it worked!

Perhaps the computer  shutdown and overnight rest cured it? I have heard it
worked for Model T Fords.

Thanks for reassuring me that I was not totally clueless here and that it
was worth a second (well 15th) try.

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 22:17, Richard Kimberly Heck  wrote:

> On 2/6/19 9:18 PM, John Kane wrote:
> > I have done a clean install of Ubuntu 18.04 and am restoring some
> > software customizations. I have a modified stdtoolbars.inc file for
> > LyX that I wish to use.
> >
> > Relying on the LyX wiki and a shaky memory of the last time I did this
> > I thought that I could just create  a ui sub-directory  in my
> > ~/.zotero directory and  drop the stdtoolbars.inc file into it.
> >
> > Am I wrong or am I missing out some critical step in the process?
> > Note the stdtoolbars.inc file should work as it is simply a back-up
> > copy of the one I was using before the new OS installation.
>
> The file should go into ~/.lyx/ui/, or (more generally) the ui/
> subdirectory of whatever your LyX user directory is. Yet more generally,
> any customization goes into the same subdirectory of your user directory
> that the original file is in relative to the LyX system directory. So a
> modified cua.bind would go into ~/.lyx/bind/.
>
> Riki
>
>
>

-- 
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

Re: Where to place a modified stdtoolbars.inc file?

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 2/6/19 9:18 PM, John Kane wrote:
> I have done a clean install of Ubuntu 18.04 and am restoring some
> software customizations. I have a modified stdtoolbars.inc file for
> LyX that I wish to use.
>
> Relying on the LyX wiki and a shaky memory of the last time I did this
> I thought that I could just create  a ui sub-directory  in my
> ~/.zotero directory and  drop the stdtoolbars.inc file into it.
>
> Am I wrong or am I missing out some critical step in the process? 
> Note the stdtoolbars.inc file should work as it is simply a back-up
> copy of the one I was using before the new OS installation.

The file should go into ~/.lyx/ui/, or (more generally) the ui/
subdirectory of whatever your LyX user directory is. Yet more generally,
any customization goes into the same subdirectory of your user directory
that the original file is in relative to the LyX system directory. So a
modified cua.bind would go into ~/.lyx/bind/.

Riki

Where to place a modified stdtoolbars.inc file?

[John Kane]

I have done a clean install of Ubuntu 18.04 and am restoring some software
customizations. I have a modified stdtoolbars.inc file for LyX that I wish
to use.

Relying on the LyX wiki and a shaky memory of the last time I did this I
thought that I could just create  a ui sub-directory  in my ~/.zotero
directory and  drop the stdtoolbars.inc file into it.

Am I wrong or am I missing out some critical step in the process?  Note the
stdtoolbars.inc file should work as it is simply a back-up copy of the one
I was using before the new OS installation.

Running LyX 2.3.2 under Ubuntu 18.04

Thanks.

-- 
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

Re: Where does LyX store "Window layouts and geometries" on Windows?

[Daniel]

On 2019-01-23 17:29, Klaus-Dieter Bauer wrote:

Hello!

I was wondering, where LyX stores information used when using the option 
"Restore Window Layouts and Geometries" in Preferences > Look & Feel > 
Document Handling. I am using Windows 10 and Lyx2.3.2-2.


I noticed that this data isn't stored in "%APPDATA%/Lyx2.3", because 
syncing this folder across machines ended up syncing other session 
information (cursor positions, opened files, ...) but not window 
layouts. Likewise, resetting this directory didn't fix the fullscreen 
bug #9703 <https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9703>, which is preserved 
across sessions. And indeed, nothing in the %APPDATA%/Lyx2.3/session 
file indicates layouts or geometries.


- Klaus


Hi,

They are stored in the Windows registry. More to be found here

https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qsettings.html#platform-specific-notes

Is that information sufficient for your purposes?

Best,
Daniel

Where does LyX store "Window layouts and geometries" on Windows?

[Klaus-Dieter Bauer]

Hello!

I was wondering, where LyX stores information used when using the option
"Restore Window Layouts and Geometries" in Preferences > Look & Feel >
Document Handling. I am using Windows 10 and Lyx2.3.2-2.

I noticed that this data isn't stored in "%APPDATA%/Lyx2.3", because
syncing this folder across machines ended up syncing other session
information (cursor positions, opened files, ...) but not window layouts.
Likewise, resetting this directory didn't fix the fullscreen bug #9703
<https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9703>, which is preserved across sessions.
And indeed, nothing in the %APPDATA%/Lyx2.3/session file indicates layouts
or geometries.

- Klaus

Re: Where is the Plain-TeX IRC channel and mailing list?

[Cris Fuhrman]

Hi Steve - I don't have a direct answer to your question about IRC, but
there is a TeX Stack Exchange, which has chat. There have been some Eplain
questions/answers in the past (I'm not a TeX expert):
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eplain

Cheers,

C. Fuhrman

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Steve Litt 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I frequently need help on plain TeX, **NOT** on LaTeX or ConTeXT. 95 %
> of the web's docs retrieved by a search on "plain tex" are really
> about LaTeX. From my research on the web, there are maybe 10 docs on
> Plain TeX or Eplain (I'm using Eplain too),  and those docs are
> insufficient to tell you how to achieve simple things.
>
> I'm sorry to have to ask this here. Twice I've asked on Freenode
> #latex, and twice nobody answered.
>
> Thanks,
>
> SteveT
>
> Steve Litt
> June 2018 featured book: Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/28
>
>
>

Where is the Plain-TeX IRC channel and mailing list?

[Steve Litt]

Hi all,

I frequently need help on plain TeX, **NOT** on LaTeX or ConTeXT. 95 %
of the web's docs retrieved by a search on "plain tex" are really
about LaTeX. From my research on the web, there are maybe 10 docs on
Plain TeX or Eplain (I'm using Eplain too),  and those docs are
insufficient to tell you how to achieve simple things.

I'm sorry to have to ask this here. Twice I've asked on Freenode
#latex, and twice nobody answered.

Thanks,

SteveT

Steve Litt 
June 2018 featured book: Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting
http://www.troubleshooters.com/28

Re: where to place callouts

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

Am 31.05.2017 um 21:19 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:

On 05/31/2017 11:38 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:

There is a program callouts

https://www.ctan.org/pkg/callouts

The pack­age en­ables to de­fine the an­no­ta­tion en­vi­ron­ment, in 
which call­outs, notes, ar­rows, and the like can be placed to 
de­scribe cer­tain parts of a pic­ture.


It contains callouts.sty and callouts.tex.

Where should I place it in my Debian tree structure in order to use 
it under lyx?


Wolfgang


I would put it in ~/texmf/tex/latex.

Paul


Thanks, Paul.
And a texhash afterward, I guess
Wolfgang

Re: where to place callouts

[Paul A. Rubin]

On 05/31/2017 11:38 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:

There is a program callouts

https://www.ctan.org/pkg/callouts

The pack­age en­ables to de­fine the an­no­ta­tion en­vi­ron­ment, in 
which call­outs, notes, ar­rows, and the like can be placed to 
de­scribe cer­tain parts of a pic­ture.


It contains callouts.sty and callouts.tex.

Where should I place it in my Debian tree structure in order to use it 
under lyx?


Wolfgang


I would put it in ~/texmf/tex/latex.

Paul

where to place callouts

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

There is a program callouts

https://www.ctan.org/pkg/callouts

The pack­age en­ables to de­fine the an­no­ta­tion en­vi­ron­ment, in 
which call­outs, notes, ar­rows, and the like can be placed to de­scribe 
cer­tain parts of a pic­ture.


It contains callouts.sty and callouts.tex.

Where should I place it in my Debian tree structure in order to use it 
under lyx?


Wolfgang

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[racoon]

On 04.10.2016 23:16, Richard Heck wrote:

On 10/04/2016 05:05 PM, racoon wrote:

On 04.10.2016 20:02, Richard Heck wrote:

On 10/04/2016 12:40 PM, racoon wrote:

Where the label is just inserted in an extra default paragraph. Apart
from looking a bit odd, it seems to work and not to create extra
spacing or so. So is this the "saver" way to insert section labels in
LyX?


You can also just put the label at the beginning of the text. If there's
no such text (if the first thing is a \subsection), then you can put it
on a blank line by itself. LaTeX will ignore the otherwise empty line.


I just noticed that LyX in a sense supports neither my (in an extra
line) nor your (at the beginning of the text). This is because LyX
does not add the "sec:" to the label and also automatically inserts
the beginning of the text rather than the heading.


I do get the "sec:" on a blank line, and even at the beginning of the
first paragraph. But you are right that the auto-fill mechanism gives
you the text from the paragraph, or no text.

It would be pretty easy to change that, I think. Have a look at
Text::getPossibleLabel. You'll see there's some fancy footwork to get
the "sec:" part to work. If you did that before filling the "text"
variable, then...well...maybe there'd be other problems, but it would
solve this problem, I think.


Yes, you are right. I get the "sec:" too. Thanks for the ref. I'll take 
a look at it.


Daniel

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[Richard Heck]

On 10/04/2016 05:05 PM, racoon wrote:
> On 04.10.2016 20:02, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 10/04/2016 12:40 PM, racoon wrote:
>>> Where the label is just inserted in an extra default paragraph. Apart
>>> from looking a bit odd, it seems to work and not to create extra
>>> spacing or so. So is this the "saver" way to insert section labels in
>>> LyX?
>>
>> You can also just put the label at the beginning of the text. If there's
>> no such text (if the first thing is a \subsection), then you can put it
>> on a blank line by itself. LaTeX will ignore the otherwise empty line.
>
> I just noticed that LyX in a sense supports neither my (in an extra
> line) nor your (at the beginning of the text). This is because LyX
> does not add the "sec:" to the label and also automatically inserts
> the beginning of the text rather than the heading.

I do get the "sec:" on a blank line, and even at the beginning of the
first paragraph. But you are right that the auto-fill mechanism gives
you the text from the paragraph, or no text.

It would be pretty easy to change that, I think. Have a look at
Text::getPossibleLabel. You'll see there's some fancy footwork to get
the "sec:" part to work. If you did that before filling the "text"
variable, then...well...maybe there'd be other problems, but it would
solve this problem, I think.

Richard

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[Richard Heck]

On 10/04/2016 04:52 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 04/10/2016 à 18:40, racoon a écrit :
>> So I looked around and saw that often the label is inserted *after* the
>> section:
>>
>> \section{Some heading}\label{sec:Some-heading}
>>
>> But I am not sure how to achieve this with LyX.
>
> This is the subject of bug #2154, still not fixed after 11 years...
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2154
>
> It is not very easy, we are not completely sure of what we want.

Yup, that's the discussion I mentioned in a different message.

Richard

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[racoon]

On 04.10.2016 20:02, Richard Heck wrote:

On 10/04/2016 12:40 PM, racoon wrote:

Where the label is just inserted in an extra default paragraph. Apart
from looking a bit odd, it seems to work and not to create extra
spacing or so. So is this the "saver" way to insert section labels in
LyX?


You can also just put the label at the beginning of the text. If there's
no such text (if the first thing is a \subsection), then you can put it
on a blank line by itself. LaTeX will ignore the otherwise empty line.


I just noticed that LyX in a sense supports neither my (in an extra 
line) nor your (at the beginning of the text). This is because LyX does 
not add the "sec:" to the label and also automatically inserts the 
beginning of the text rather than the heading.


Maybe LyX could check whether the label is referring to the section or 
not. Or more easily to implement, I guess, check whether the label is 
inserted at the beginning of a default paragraph right after the 
\subsection. This would make both of our suggestions supported.


Daniel

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 04/10/2016 à 18:40, racoon a écrit :

So I looked around and saw that often the label is inserted *after* the
section:

\section{Some heading}\label{sec:Some-heading}

But I am not sure how to achieve this with LyX.


This is the subject of bug #2154, still not fixed after 11 years...
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2154

It is not very easy, we are not completely sure of what we want.

JMarc

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[racoon]

Thanks Richard!

On 04.10.2016 20:02, Richard Heck wrote:

Yes, it can cause other problems too. The root cause is that \section is
a "moving argument". You really don't want to put anything else in
there. Though I'll confess I sometimes do.


Maybe worth changing that in the documentation files then.


You can also just put the label at the beginning of the text. If there's
no such text (if the first thing is a \subsection), then you can put it
on a blank line by itself. LaTeX will ignore the otherwise empty line.


Yes that seems a bit nicer.

Maybe LyX could automatically put labels after the \section{} when it is 
put in the same line. But I don't know whether this would have other 
undesired consequences.


Daniel

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[Michael Berger]

On 10/04/2016 06:40 PM, racoon wrote:

I used to insert section labels right after the heading:

1. Some heading[sec:Some-heading]

This is actually how it is done in the User Guide as well. However, 
this produces the following source:


\section{Some heading\label{sec:Some-heading}}

But it actually leads to problems when I tried to have uppercase 
section headings with:


\usepackage{sectsty}
\sectionfont{\MakeUppercase}

I guess the error occurs for the same reason as 
\MakeUppercase{\label{sec:Some-heading}} generates an error.


So I looked around and saw that often the label is inserted *after* 
the section:


\section{Some heading}\label{sec:Some-heading}

But I am not sure how to achieve this with LyX. So instead I did this:

1. Some heading
[sec:Some-heading]

Where the label is just inserted in an extra default paragraph. Apart 
from looking a bit odd, it seems to work and not to create extra 
spacing or so. So is this the "saver" way to insert section labels in 
LyX?


Daniel



Hi Daniel,
I am not quite sure what you mean.
But this is how I insert a section:

I type : 'New Section' as a name
With the cursor somewhere inside/before/behind that name I select: 'Section'
And I get: '3.8 Section Extra' in the appropriate format

Selecting 'Section*' would  do the same without numbering
Michael

Re: Where to insert section labels?

[Richard Heck]

On 10/04/2016 12:40 PM, racoon wrote:
> I used to insert section labels right after the heading:
>
> 1. Some heading[sec:Some-heading]
>
> This is actually how it is done in the User Guide as well. However,
> this produces the following source:
>
> \section{Some heading\label{sec:Some-heading}}
>
> But it actually leads to problems when I tried to have uppercase
> section headings with:
>
> \usepackage{sectsty}
> \sectionfont{\MakeUppercase}
>
> I guess the error occurs for the same reason as
> \MakeUppercase{\label{sec:Some-heading}} generates an error.

Yes, it can cause other problems too. The root cause is that \section is
a "moving argument". You really don't want to put anything else in
there. Though I'll confess I sometimes do.

> So I looked around and saw that often the label is inserted *after*
> the section:
>
> \section{Some heading}\label{sec:Some-heading}
>
> But I am not sure how to achieve this with LyX. So instead I did this:
>
> 1. Some heading
> [sec:Some-heading]
>
> Where the label is just inserted in an extra default paragraph. Apart
> from looking a bit odd, it seems to work and not to create extra
> spacing or so. So is this the "saver" way to insert section labels in
> LyX?

You can also just put the label at the beginning of the text. If there's
no such text (if the first thing is a \subsection), then you can put it
on a blank line by itself. LaTeX will ignore the otherwise empty line.

Richard

Where to insert section labels?

[racoon]

I used to insert section labels right after the heading:

1. Some heading[sec:Some-heading]

This is actually how it is done in the User Guide as well. However, this 
produces the following source:


\section{Some heading\label{sec:Some-heading}}

But it actually leads to problems when I tried to have uppercase section 
headings with:


\usepackage{sectsty}
\sectionfont{\MakeUppercase}

I guess the error occurs for the same reason as 
\MakeUppercase{\label{sec:Some-heading}} generates an error.


So I looked around and saw that often the label is inserted *after* the 
section:


\section{Some heading}\label{sec:Some-heading}

But I am not sure how to achieve this with LyX. So instead I did this:

1. Some heading
[sec:Some-heading]

Where the label is just inserted in an extra default paragraph. Apart 
from looking a bit odd, it seems to work and not to create extra spacing 
or so. So is this the "saver" way to insert section labels in LyX?


Daniel

Re: Where to put the index entry?

[Richard Heck]

On 07/31/2016 12:41 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 03:54:59 -0400
> Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:
>
>> On 07/31/2016 02:36 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I think I asked the question wrong before. Here's all I want to
>>> know: You have an entire subsection, about carrier pigeons, and you
>>> want it to show up in the index with its headline (subsection
>>> headline) as the beginning page and its final paragraph as the
>>> ending page. You create it with Insert=>Index_entry. The text
>>> inside the inset of the beginning entry for this subsection looks
>>> like the following:
>>>
>>> Carrier pigeons|(
>>>
>>> Where am I supposed to put that inset:
>>>
>>> A) At the very beginning of the subsection heading?
>>> B) Ad the very end of the subsection heading?
>>> C) Somewhere else?
>>>
>>> If the answer is C, could you please elaborate?  
>> I don't know for sure, but I think I'd put it at the beginning of the
>> first paragraph
>> of text in the section. It can be a bad idea to put this kind of thing
>> inside moving
>> arguments, such as section headings. The point is that the content of
>> the \section
>> macro ends up getting copied to the TOC, to page headings, etc, and
>> that can
>> cause problems.
>>
>> Richard
>>
> Thanks Richard,
>
> That sounds perfectly logical. I'm a tiny bit worried that the index' 
> beginning page number could be the first word of the first paragraph of the 
> section, which happens to be at the top of the page, so the section's heading 
> isn't visible on that page. But a look throughout my book showed not one 
> single instance of a page break after a section heading but before the 
> section's first paragraph.

This should never happen.

Richard

Re: Where to put the index entry?

[Steve Litt]

On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 03:54:59 -0400
Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:

> On 07/31/2016 02:36 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think I asked the question wrong before. Here's all I want to
> > know: You have an entire subsection, about carrier pigeons, and you
> > want it to show up in the index with its headline (subsection
> > headline) as the beginning page and its final paragraph as the
> > ending page. You create it with Insert=>Index_entry. The text
> > inside the inset of the beginning entry for this subsection looks
> > like the following:
> >
> > Carrier pigeons|(
> >
> > Where am I supposed to put that inset:
> >
> > A) At the very beginning of the subsection heading?
> > B) Ad the very end of the subsection heading?
> > C) Somewhere else?
> >
> > If the answer is C, could you please elaborate?  
> 
> I don't know for sure, but I think I'd put it at the beginning of the
> first paragraph
> of text in the section. It can be a bad idea to put this kind of thing
> inside moving
> arguments, such as section headings. The point is that the content of
> the \section
> macro ends up getting copied to the TOC, to page headings, etc, and
> that can
> cause problems.
> 
> Richard
> 

Thanks Richard,

That sounds perfectly logical. I'm a tiny bit worried that the index'
beginning page number could be the first word of the first paragraph of
the section, which happens to be at the top of the page, so the
section's heading isn't visible on that page. But a look throughout my
book showed not one single instance of a page break after a section
heading but before the section's first paragraph.

So I started putting the index entries at the beginning of the first
paragraph of the section, although I haven't gone back and "fixed" the
ones at the beginning and end of the section heading. I might do that
later.

Thanks for the advice!

SteveT

Steve Litt 
July 2016 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques
 of the Successful Technologist
http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques

Re: Where to put the index entry?

[Richard Heck]

On 07/31/2016 02:36 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think I asked the question wrong before. Here's all I want to know:
> You have an entire subsection, about carrier pigeons, and you want it
> to show up in the index with its headline (subsection headline) as the
> beginning page and its final paragraph as the ending page. You create
> it with Insert=>Index_entry. The text inside the inset of the beginning
> entry for this subsection looks like the following:
>
> Carrier pigeons|(
>
> Where am I supposed to put that inset:
>
> A) At the very beginning of the subsection heading?
> B) Ad the very end of the subsection heading?
> C) Somewhere else?
>
> If the answer is C, could you please elaborate?

I don't know for sure, but I think I'd put it at the beginning of the
first paragraph
of text in the section. It can be a bad idea to put this kind of thing
inside moving
arguments, such as section headings. The point is that the content of
the \section
macro ends up getting copied to the TOC, to page headings, etc, and that
can
cause problems.

Richard

Where to put the index entry?

[Steve Litt]

Hi all,

I think I asked the question wrong before. Here's all I want to know:
You have an entire subsection, about carrier pigeons, and you want it
to show up in the index with its headline (subsection headline) as the
beginning page and its final paragraph as the ending page. You create
it with Insert=>Index_entry. The text inside the inset of the beginning
entry for this subsection looks like the following:

Carrier pigeons|(

Where am I supposed to put that inset:

A) At the very beginning of the subsection heading?
B) Ad the very end of the subsection heading?
C) Somewhere else?

If the answer is C, could you please elaborate?

Thanks,

SteveT

Steve Litt 
July 2016 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques
 of the Successful Technologist
http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques

Re: where are my multiple index lists ?

[Michael Berger]

Hi John,
thanks for your advice.
As there was basically no response from the list I eventually asked 
Jürgen Spitzmüller for help.
By analyzing the problem Jürgen found that the link to 
'.../splitindex/splitindex.pl' does not function and that there is a 
known bug in Mageia5 (my distro) which remains unsolved.
Until now he is suggesting repairs and workarounds which, unfortunately 
to this point could not cure the difficulty.

The splitindex files on my system are all there and in the right path/place.

If there is a user out there with Mageia5 (or an earlier version) I 
would encourage her/him to try a simple LyX document with multiple 
indexes and then report back on the result.


gratefully,
Michael Berger

On 04/08/2016 01:24 PM, John Kane wrote:

I believe you need to use the
*splitidx* package.

Have a look at the User Manual 6.6.7

On 28 March 2016 at 12:42, Michael Berger > wrote:


Hi all,
I already created various single index lists with no problem but
when trying to create multiple indexes as instructed in
wiki.lyx.org/Lyx/NewInLyx20#indices

and also tried other proposals I found on the subject but I don't
see any index list(s).
What am I doing wrong?

Using Lyx 2.1.3 in Mageia5 with KDE with 'splitindex' installed.
Please see mini-example file attached.

Thanks and best regards,
Michael Berger


--
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

Re: where are my multiple index lists ?

[Michael Berger]

Hi John,
thanks for your advice.
As there was basically no response from the list I eventually asked 
Jürgen Spitzmüller for help.
By analyzing the problem Jürgen found that the link to 
'.../splitindex/splitindex.pl' does not function and that there is a 
known bug in Mageia5 (my distro) which remains unsolved.
Until now he is suggesting repairs and workarounds which, unfortunately 
to this point could not cure the difficulty.

The splitindex files on my system are all there and in the right path/place.

If there is a user out there with Mageia5 (or an earlier version) I 
would encourage her/him to try a simple LyX document with multiple 
indexes and then report back on the result.


gratefully,
Michael Berger

On 04/08/2016 01:24 PM, John Kane wrote:

I believe you need to use the
*splitidx* package.

Have a look at the User Manual 6.6.7

On 28 March 2016 at 12:42, Michael Berger > wrote:


Hi all,
I already created various single index lists with no problem but
when trying to create multiple indexes as instructed in
wiki.lyx.org/Lyx/NewInLyx20#indices

and also tried other proposals I found on the subject but I don't
see any index list(s).
What am I doing wrong?

Using Lyx 2.1.3 in Mageia5 with KDE with 'splitindex' installed.
Please see mini-example file attached.

Thanks and best regards,
Michael Berger


--
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

Re: where are my multiple index lists ?

[Michael Berger]

Hi John,
thanks for your advice.
As there was basically no response from the list I eventually asked 
Jürgen Spitzmüller for help.
By analyzing the problem Jürgen found that the link to 
'.../splitindex/splitindex.pl' does not function and that there is a 
known bug in Mageia5 (my distro) which remains unsolved.
Until now he is suggesting repairs and workarounds which, unfortunately 
to this point could not cure the difficulty.

The splitindex files on my system are all there and in the right path/place.

If there is a user out there with Mageia5 (or an earlier version) I 
would encourage her/him to try a simple LyX document with multiple 
indexes and then report back on the result.


gratefully,
Michael Berger

On 04/08/2016 01:24 PM, John Kane wrote:

I believe you need to use the
*splitidx* package.

Have a look at the User Manual 6.6.7

On 28 March 2016 at 12:42, Michael Berger > wrote:


Hi all,
I already created various single index lists with no problem but
when trying to create multiple indexes as instructed in
wiki.lyx.org/Lyx/NewInLyx20#indices

and also tried other proposals I found on the subject but I don't
see any index list(s).
What am I doing wrong?

Using Lyx 2.1.3 in Mageia5 with KDE with 'splitindex' installed.
Please see mini-example file attached.

Thanks and best regards,
Michael Berger


--
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

Re: where are my multiple index lists ?

[John Kane]

I believe you need to use the
*splitidx* package.

Have a look at the User Manual 6.6.7

On 28 March 2016 at 12:42, Michael Berger  wrote:

> Hi all,
> I already created various single index lists with no problem but when
> trying to create multiple indexes as instructed in
> wiki.lyx.org/Lyx/NewInLyx20#indices
> and also tried other proposals I found on the subject but I don't see any
> index list(s).
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> Using Lyx 2.1.3 in Mageia5 with KDE with 'splitindex' installed.
> Please see mini-example file attached.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Michael Berger
>



-- 
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

where are my multiple index lists ?

[Michael Berger]

Hi all,
I already created various single index lists with no problem but when 
trying to create multiple indexes as instructed in

wiki.lyx.org/Lyx/NewInLyx20#indices
and also tried other proposals I found on the subject but I don't see 
any index list(s).

What am I doing wrong?

Using Lyx 2.1.3 in Mageia5 with KDE with 'splitindex' installed.
Please see mini-example file attached.

Thanks and best regards,
Michael Berger


multi-indexes.lyx
Description: application/crossover-lyx

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[Nikos Alexandris]

John Kane:

> How long is the caption? I have tried a figure with an 84 word caption and
> it looks okay to me.  See attached pdf.

I am trying to visualise it.  Will report back once I have it.  For now,
I copy the figure* environment, or check it manually (Span columns).
It works and it's ok like that.

Maybe I ask for too much! Ideally, in a Tufte Book document with many full 
page-width
figures, it'll be nice to avoid the "Right click > Settings > Span
columns", or even the Copy-Paste action. Just a (custom) figure* float?

Thanks, Nikos


> It may be that very long captions such as one sees in some medical (and
> biology?) journals are just too long for a Tufte approach?

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[John Kane]

How long is the caption? I have tried a figure with an 84 word caption and
it looks okay to me.  See attached pdf.

It may be that very long captions such as one sees in some medical (and
biology?) journals are just too long for a Tufte approach?

On 24 October 2015 at 20:37, Nikos Alexandris <n...@nikosalexandris.net>
wrote:

> Nikos Alexandris:
>
> > > Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,
>
> > > the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the "float:
> > > Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this anywhere in the
> > > (Insert) menus.
>
> > > Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.
>
> John Kane:
>
> > By my reading of the example it is just
> > Insert > Float > Figure, the only difference being where the caption is
> > placed.
>
> Exactly. A long caption will not (at least, it does not do for me) fit
> nicely.
>
> Nikos
>



-- 
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada


tufte.longcap.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[Nikos Alexandris]

Sorry, that msg was meant to hit the list too!

Nikos

* Nikos Alexandris <n...@nikosalexandris.net> [2015-10-25 01:12:11 +0300]:

> 
> Nikos Alexandris:
>  
> > > Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,
> > > 
> > > the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the "float:
> > > Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this anywhere in the
> > > (Insert) menus.
> > > 
> > > Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.
> 
> Charlie:
> 
> > Not certain this is the answer because I haven't tried it. But in ERT:
> > 
> > \begin{fullwidth}
> > 
> > And between these two ERT commands place your full page float
> > 
> > \end{fullwidth}
> > 
> > Maybe that will work?
> 
> Thank you.  Not exactly. There is some problem with the caption.  I've
> tested it by using the example file.  Below the *existing* "float:
> Figure*" example, I used the "fullwidth" environment and the same
> content (as in the existing example).  It's not quite the same.
> 
> I can use an ERT for "\begin{figure*}".  But, it's not the same.  Where
> does the example box come from in LyX, I wonder!?
> 
> Thank you, Nikos

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[Nikos Alexandris]

Nikos Alexandris:

> > > > Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,
> > > > 
> > > > the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the
> > > > "float: Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this
> > > > anywhere in the (Insert) menus.
> > > > 
> > > > Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.

The "figure" becomes "figure*" by selecting the "Span columns" option in
the LyX: float dialog (Right click on "float: Figure" > Settings > Span
columns).

A "custom" float may be defined to instruct the \begin{figure*} command
directly as per the following:

--->%--
Float
Typefigure*
GuiName Figure*
Placement   p
Extension   lof
NumberWithinnone
Style   plain
ListName"List of Figures"
ListCommand listoffigures
IsPredefined true
UsesFloatPkg false
End
--%<---


In the "Customization" document, in "5.3.8 Floats" it is stated:

Type [string=””] The “type” of the new class of floats, like program or
algorithm. After the appropriate \newfloat, commands such as \begin{program} or
\end{algorithm*} will be available.  So, the above looks like a "duplication" 
(?).


So, after using the custom "figure*" float (which does work!), it is still 
possible to select "Span columns" (which is NOT pre-selected). Another star is 
added and the float becomes "figure**".


On the Span columns, the "Embedded Objects" manual states:

The option Span columns is only useful for two-column documents: If you select
it, the float will span both columns on the page instead of being confined to
just one.


How can we put all this info together and have a clean "Figure*" float for 
tufte-book?  Perhaps reword the "is only useful for two-column documents" 
sentence as well (?).

Thank you, Nikos

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[Nikos Alexandris]

Nikos Alexandris:

> > Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,

> > the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the "float:
> > Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this anywhere in the
> > (Insert) menus.

> > Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.

John Kane:

> By my reading of the example it is just
> Insert > Float > Figure, the only difference being where the caption is
> placed.

Exactly. A long caption will not (at least, it does not do for me) fit
nicely.

Nikos

Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[Nikos Alexandris]

Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,

the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the "float:
Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this anywhere in the
(Insert) menus.

Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.

Nikos

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[Charlie]

  On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:12:11 +0300 Nikos mentioned this: 
Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?. 

> 
> Nikos Alexandris:
>  
> > > Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,
> > > 
> > > the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the
> > > "float: Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this
> > > anywhere in the (Insert) menus.
> > > 
> > > Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.
> 
> Charlie:
> 
> > Not certain this is the answer because I haven't tried it. But in
> > ERT:
> > 
> > \begin{fullwidth}
> > 
> > And between these two ERT commands place your full page float
> > 
> > \end{fullwidth}
> > 
> > Maybe that will work?
> 
> Thank you.  Not exactly. There is some problem with the caption.  I've
> tested it by using the example file.  Below the *existing* "float:
> Figure*" example, I used the "fullwidth" environment and the same
> content (as in the existing example).  It's not quite the same.
> 
> I can use an ERT for "\begin{figure*}".  But, it's not the same.
> Where does the example box come from in LyX, I wonder!?
> 
> Thank you, Nikos


  From my keyboard:

   Hello Nikos,

I just checked and I'm using LyX Version 2.1.3 so it will be different
anyway.

Sorry for the noise.

Charlie


East Gippsland Wildlife Rehabilitators Inc..
   http://www.egwildlife.com.au/

-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
***

We need only travel enough to give our intellects an
airing. .Henry David Thoreau

***

Debian GNU/Linux - Magic indeed.

-

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[John Kane]

By my reading of the example it is just
Insert > Float > Figure, the only difference being where the caption is
placed.

On 24 October 2015 at 17:41, Nikos Alexandris <n...@nikosalexandris.net>
wrote:

> Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,
>
> the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the "float:
> Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this anywhere in the
> (Insert) menus.
>
> Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.
>
> Nikos
>



-- 
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada

Re: Where is float figure* in tufte-book?

[Charlie]

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 00:41:20 +0300
Nikos Alexandris  wrote:

> Dear Tufte-LaTeX users,
> 
> the example file "tufte-book.lyx" contains an example of the "float:
> Figure*", a full-width figure box.  I can't trace this anywhere in the
> (Insert) menus.
> 
> Using LyX Version 2.1.4.  Any help highly appreciated.
> 
> Nikos

Not certain this is the answer because I haven't tried it. But in ERT:

\begin{fullwidth}

And between these two ERT commands place your full page float

\end{fullwidth}

Maybe that will work?

Charlie

-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
***

However mean your life is, meet it and live it; do not shun it
and call it hard names. It is not so bad as you are. It looks
poorest when you are the richest.Henry David Thoreau

***

Debian GNU/Linux - Magic indeed.

-

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 06/05/2015 23:36, Gilles Moyse a écrit :

Hi.

Following this post
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking
for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface
configuration under Windows 7.

I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be
displayed with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files
just modified, but I could only find a file named session in my user
directory (~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in
recently opened files.


This file also contains the toolbar information.

JMarc

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Gilles Moyse]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgouttes at lyx.org writes:

 
 Le 06/05/2015 23:36, Gilles Moyse a écrit :
  Hi.
 
  Following this post
  (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking
  for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface
  configuration under Windows 7.
 
  I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be
  displayed with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files
  just modified, but I could only find a file named session in my user
  directory (~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in
  recently opened files.
 
 This file also contains the toolbar information.
 
 JMarc
 
 


Thanks a lot, this is actually the file I was looking for. Unofrtunately, it
is not easy to edit manually. Since I am trying to restore the orginal
layout of the Source and Messages panes side by side, which I cannot restore
using the mouse, I am going to try to download the lyx. conf file from the
GitHub and overwrite mine.

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 06/05/2015 23:36, Gilles Moyse a écrit :

Hi.

Following this post
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking
for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface
configuration under Windows 7.

I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be
displayed with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files
just modified, but I could only find a file named session in my user
directory (~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in
recently opened files.


This file also contains the toolbar information.

JMarc

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Gilles Moyse]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgouttes at lyx.org writes:

 
 Le 06/05/2015 23:36, Gilles Moyse a écrit :
  Hi.
 
  Following this post
  (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking
  for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface
  configuration under Windows 7.
 
  I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be
  displayed with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files
  just modified, but I could only find a file named session in my user
  directory (~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in
  recently opened files.
 
 This file also contains the toolbar information.
 
 JMarc
 
 


Thanks a lot, this is actually the file I was looking for. Unofrtunately, it
is not easy to edit manually. Since I am trying to restore the orginal
layout of the Source and Messages panes side by side, which I cannot restore
using the mouse, I am going to try to download the lyx. conf file from the
GitHub and overwrite mine.

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 06/05/2015 23:36, Gilles Moyse a écrit :

Hi.

Following this post
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking
for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface
configuration under Windows 7.

I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be
displayed with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files
just modified, but I could only find a file named "session" in my user
directory (~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in
recently opened files.


This file also contains the toolbar information.

JMarc

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Gilles Moyse]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes  lyx.org> writes:

> 
> Le 06/05/2015 23:36, Gilles Moyse a écrit :
> > Hi.
> >
> > Following this post
> > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking
> > for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface
> > configuration under Windows 7.
> >
> > I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be
> > displayed with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files
> > just modified, but I could only find a file named "session" in my user
> > directory (~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in
> > recently opened files.
> 
> This file also contains the toolbar information.
> 
> JMarc
> 
> 


Thanks a lot, this is actually the file I was looking for. Unofrtunately, it
is not easy to edit manually. Since I am trying to restore the orginal
layout of the Source and Messages panes side by side, which I cannot restore
using the mouse, I am going to try to download the lyx. conf file from the
GitHub and overwrite mine.

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Richard Heck]

On 05/06/2015 05:36 PM, Gilles Moyse wrote:

Hi.

Following this post 
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am 
looking for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user 
interface configuration under Windows 7.


Try Help About LyX. The dialog will tell you where the user directory is.

Richard

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Enrico Forestieri]

Richard Heck writes:
 
 On 05/06/2015 05:36 PM, Gilles Moyse wrote:
  Hi.
 
  Following this post 
  (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am 
  looking for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user 
  interface configuration under Windows 7.
 
 Try Help About LyX. The dialog will tell you where the user directory is.

I think he is talking about the GUI settings. Their location is OS
dependent. On Windows, the settings are stored in the system registry
in HKCU\Software\LyX, while on cygwin and unix systems in the user home dir
in ~/.config/LyX/lyx.conf. Not sure about Macs.

-- 
Enrico

Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Gilles Moyse]

Hi.

Following this post (
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking for
the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface configuration
under Windows 7.

I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be displayed
with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files just modified,
but I could only find a file named session in my user directory
(~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in recently opened
files.

Do you know where the file containing the user interface location is?

Thanks in advance,

Gilles

Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Gilles Moyse]

Hi.

Following this post (
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking for
the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface configuration
under Windows 7.

I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be displayed
with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files just modified,
but I could only find a file named session in my user directory
(~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in recently opened
files.

Do you know where the file containing the user interface location is?

Thanks in advance,

Gilles

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Richard Heck]

On 05/06/2015 05:36 PM, Gilles Moyse wrote:

Hi.

Following this post 
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am 
looking for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user 
interface configuration under Windows 7.


Try Help About LyX. The dialog will tell you where the user directory is.

Richard

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Enrico Forestieri]

Richard Heck writes:
 
 On 05/06/2015 05:36 PM, Gilles Moyse wrote:
  Hi.
 
  Following this post 
  (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am 
  looking for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user 
  interface configuration under Windows 7.
 
 Try Help About LyX. The dialog will tell you where the user directory is.

I think he is talking about the GUI settings. Their location is OS
dependent. On Windows, the settings are stored in the system registry
in HKCU\Software\LyX, while on cygwin and unix systems in the user home dir
in ~/.config/LyX/lyx.conf. Not sure about Macs.

-- 
Enrico

Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Gilles Moyse]

Hi.

Following this post (
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am looking for
the location of the file where Lyx stores my user interface configuration
under Windows 7.

I tried to find it by opening Lyx, selecting a new toolbar to be displayed
with View / Toolbar, closing Lyx and looking for the files just modified,
but I could only find a file named "session" in my user directory
(~\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.1\) containing cursor locations in recently opened
files.

Do you know where the file containing the user interface location is?

Thanks in advance,

Gilles

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Richard Heck]

On 05/06/2015 05:36 PM, Gilles Moyse wrote:

Hi.

Following this post 
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am 
looking for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user 
interface configuration under Windows 7.


Try Help> About LyX. The dialog will tell you where the user directory is.

Richard

Re: Windows 7 - Where does Lyx stores my user interface configuration?

[Enrico Forestieri]

Richard Heck writes:
> 
> On 05/06/2015 05:36 PM, Gilles Moyse wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Following this post 
> > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/84619), I am 
> > looking for the location of the file where Lyx stores my user 
> > interface configuration under Windows 7.
> 
> Try Help> About LyX. The dialog will tell you where the user directory is.

I think he is talking about the GUI settings. Their location is OS
dependent. On Windows, the settings are stored in the system registry
in HKCU\Software\LyX, while on cygwin and unix systems in the user home dir
in ~/.config/LyX/lyx.conf. Not sure about Macs.

-- 
Enrico

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

I think I've got to bottom of esint problem on Centos/RedHat.

There simply is no esint.sty available.

#  yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
base | 3.6 kB 00:00
epel/x86_64/metalink |  14 kB 00:00
extras   | 3.4 kB 00:00
pjku | 2.9 kB 00:00
updates  | 3.4 kB 00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.team-cymru.org
 * epel: kdeforge2.unl.edu
 * extras: bay.uchicago.edu
 * updates: mirror.team-cymru.org
No package tex(esint.sty) available.
Error: Nothing to do

The RedHat/Centos packagers did not include esint, on the grounds that
the particular integrals provided there are probably available
elsewhere. On Fedora, however, the full TexLive collection includes
about 3 times as much stuff, and one of the packages is the one we
need,

# rpm -qa | grep esint
texlive-esint-type1-svn15878.0-1.1EL7.noarch
texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1EL7.noarch

I got the source packaging from Fedora and built the whole TexLive
snapshot on EL7. I couldn't believe my eyes. They've split TexLive
into 5500 packages. You can see, I put them in the repo I maintain.

http://pj.freefaculty.org/EL

I did install the esint and apa6 packages, but in this test system, I
left the TeXLive that was delivered with Centos in place. LyX 2.1.2
works well in this Centos system.

I believe this may not be entirely necessary, however.  The esint
package is not truly required to compile an elementary document.
However, inside LyX, there is a switch under document / settings that
says use esint automatically. I think that doesn't work properly, it
tries to use esint even on an
ordinary integral.  If we change esint to do not load then the basic
document compiles.

I see a few other wrinkles in Centos with documents that have
bibliographies (references filled with (?) but LyX does not throw an
error). If I figure those things out, I'll let you know.


On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:12 AM, José Matos jama...@lyx.org wrote:
 On Wednesday 25 March 2015 12:51:53 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Hello, Jose.

 Am I typing this incorrectly?

 # yum install tex(esint.sty)
 bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('


 Could you try

 # yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'

 that idea is to avoid having bash interpret the parenthesis. In my case I get:

 # yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
 ...
 Package 4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-6.fc22.noarch already installed and 
 latest version
 Nothing to do

 Regards,
 --
 José Abílio



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Georg Baum]

Paul Johnson wrote:

 I believe this may not be entirely necessary, however.  The esint
 package is not truly required to compile an elementary document.
 However, inside LyX, there is a switch under document / settings that
 says use esint automatically. I think that doesn't work properly, it
 tries to use esint even on an
 ordinary integral.  If we change esint to do not load then the basic
 document compiles.

I believe that esint is only loaded when it is needed. Please note that some 
integrals compile without esint, but they do look differently. esint fixes 
some inconsistencies, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1942 for details. 
Please file a bug if esint is loaded in cases where it is not needed, i.e. 
the document compiles and does not produce inconsistent integrals without 
loading esint.


Georg

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

I think I've got to bottom of esint problem on Centos/RedHat.

There simply is no esint.sty available.

#  yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
base | 3.6 kB 00:00
epel/x86_64/metalink |  14 kB 00:00
extras   | 3.4 kB 00:00
pjku | 2.9 kB 00:00
updates  | 3.4 kB 00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.team-cymru.org
 * epel: kdeforge2.unl.edu
 * extras: bay.uchicago.edu
 * updates: mirror.team-cymru.org
No package tex(esint.sty) available.
Error: Nothing to do

The RedHat/Centos packagers did not include esint, on the grounds that
the particular integrals provided there are probably available
elsewhere. On Fedora, however, the full TexLive collection includes
about 3 times as much stuff, and one of the packages is the one we
need,

# rpm -qa | grep esint
texlive-esint-type1-svn15878.0-1.1EL7.noarch
texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1EL7.noarch

I got the source packaging from Fedora and built the whole TexLive
snapshot on EL7. I couldn't believe my eyes. They've split TexLive
into 5500 packages. You can see, I put them in the repo I maintain.

http://pj.freefaculty.org/EL

I did install the esint and apa6 packages, but in this test system, I
left the TeXLive that was delivered with Centos in place. LyX 2.1.2
works well in this Centos system.

I believe this may not be entirely necessary, however.  The esint
package is not truly required to compile an elementary document.
However, inside LyX, there is a switch under document / settings that
says use esint automatically. I think that doesn't work properly, it
tries to use esint even on an
ordinary integral.  If we change esint to do not load then the basic
document compiles.

I see a few other wrinkles in Centos with documents that have
bibliographies (references filled with (?) but LyX does not throw an
error). If I figure those things out, I'll let you know.


On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:12 AM, José Matos jama...@lyx.org wrote:
 On Wednesday 25 March 2015 12:51:53 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Hello, Jose.

 Am I typing this incorrectly?

 # yum install tex(esint.sty)
 bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('


 Could you try

 # yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'

 that idea is to avoid having bash interpret the parenthesis. In my case I get:

 # yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
 ...
 Package 4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-6.fc22.noarch already installed and 
 latest version
 Nothing to do

 Regards,
 --
 José Abílio



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Georg Baum]

Paul Johnson wrote:

 I believe this may not be entirely necessary, however.  The esint
 package is not truly required to compile an elementary document.
 However, inside LyX, there is a switch under document / settings that
 says use esint automatically. I think that doesn't work properly, it
 tries to use esint even on an
 ordinary integral.  If we change esint to do not load then the basic
 document compiles.

I believe that esint is only loaded when it is needed. Please note that some 
integrals compile without esint, but they do look differently. esint fixes 
some inconsistencies, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1942 for details. 
Please file a bug if esint is loaded in cases where it is not needed, i.e. 
the document compiles and does not produce inconsistent integrals without 
loading esint.


Georg

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

I think I've got to bottom of esint problem on Centos/RedHat.

There simply is no esint.sty available.

#  yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
base | 3.6 kB 00:00
epel/x86_64/metalink |  14 kB 00:00
extras   | 3.4 kB 00:00
pjku | 2.9 kB 00:00
updates  | 3.4 kB 00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.team-cymru.org
 * epel: kdeforge2.unl.edu
 * extras: bay.uchicago.edu
 * updates: mirror.team-cymru.org
No package tex(esint.sty) available.
Error: Nothing to do

The RedHat/Centos packagers did not include esint, on the grounds that
the particular integrals provided there are probably available
elsewhere. On Fedora, however, the full TexLive collection includes
about 3 times as much stuff, and one of the packages is the one we
need,

# rpm -qa | grep esint
texlive-esint-type1-svn15878.0-1.1EL7.noarch
texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1EL7.noarch

I got the source packaging from Fedora and built the whole TexLive
snapshot on EL7. I couldn't believe my eyes. They've split TexLive
into 5500 packages. You can see, I put them in the repo I maintain.

http://pj.freefaculty.org/EL

I did install the esint and apa6 packages, but in this test system, I
left the TeXLive that was delivered with Centos in place. LyX 2.1.2
works well in this Centos system.

I believe this may not be entirely necessary, however.  The esint
package is not truly required to compile an elementary document.
However, inside LyX, there is a switch under document / settings that
says use esint automatically. I think that doesn't work properly, it
tries to use esint even on an
ordinary integral.  If we change esint to "do not load" then the basic
document compiles.

I see a few other wrinkles in Centos with documents that have
bibliographies (references filled with (?) but LyX does not throw an
error). If I figure those things out, I'll let you know.


On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:12 AM, José Matos  wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2015 12:51:53 Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Hello, Jose.
>>
>> Am I typing this incorrectly?
>>
>> # yum install tex(esint.sty)
>> bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
>>
>
> Could you try
>
> # yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
>
> that idea is to avoid having bash interpret the parenthesis. In my case I get:
>
> # yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
> ...
> Package 4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-6.fc22.noarch already installed and 
> latest version
> Nothing to do
>
> Regards,
> --
> José Abílio



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Georg Baum]

Paul Johnson wrote:

> I believe this may not be entirely necessary, however.  The esint
> package is not truly required to compile an elementary document.
> However, inside LyX, there is a switch under document / settings that
> says use esint automatically. I think that doesn't work properly, it
> tries to use esint even on an
> ordinary integral.  If we change esint to "do not load" then the basic
> document compiles.

I believe that esint is only loaded when it is needed. Please note that some 
integrals compile without esint, but they do look differently. esint fixes 
some inconsistencies, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1942 for details. 
Please file a bug if esint is loaded in cases where it is not needed, i.e. 
the document compiles and does not produce inconsistent integrals without 
loading esint.


Georg

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 25 March 2015 12:51:53 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Hello, Jose.
 
 Am I typing this incorrectly?
 
 # yum install tex(esint.sty)
 bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
 

Could you try

# yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'

that idea is to avoid having bash interpret the parenthesis. In my case I get:

# yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
...
Package 4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-6.fc22.noarch already installed and latest 
version
Nothing to do

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 25 March 2015 12:51:53 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Hello, Jose.
 
 Am I typing this incorrectly?
 
 # yum install tex(esint.sty)
 bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
 

Could you try

# yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'

that idea is to avoid having bash interpret the parenthesis. In my case I get:

# yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
...
Package 4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-6.fc22.noarch already installed and latest 
version
Nothing to do

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

Re: Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 25 March 2015 12:51:53 Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hello, Jose.
> 
> Am I typing this incorrectly?
> 
> # yum install tex(esint.sty)
> bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
> 

Could you try

# yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'

that idea is to avoid having bash interpret the parenthesis. In my case I get:

# yum install 'tex(esint.sty)'
...
Package 4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-6.fc22.noarch already installed and latest 
version
Nothing to do

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:53 AM, José Matos jama...@lyx.org wrote:
 On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

 Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that all applies to 
 RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).

 Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all the (la)tex 
 packages have been split into its package.

 If you want to install something like the previous mega packages, there are 
 several schemes available:

 $ yum list texlive-scheme*
 .
 texlive-scheme-basic.noarch
 texlive-scheme-context.noarch
 texlive-scheme-full.noarch
 texlive-scheme-gust.noarch
 texlive-scheme-medium.noarch
 texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch
 texlive-scheme-small.noarch
 texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch
 texlive-scheme-xml.noarch

 If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages. Medium 
 should be a nice compromise.

 On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
 the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
 integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

 Could you try:

 # yum install tex(esint.sty)

 And see if this works?


Hello, Jose.

Am I typing this incorrectly?

# yum install tex(esint.sty)
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('

I searched like this:

# yum provides esint.sty
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
base
  | 3.6 kB  00:00:00
epel/x86_64/metalink
  |  15 kB  00:00:00
epel
  | 4.4 kB  00:00:00
extras
  | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
pjku
  | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
updates
  | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
epel/x86_64/primary_db
  | 4.0 MB  00:00:00
(1/2): epel/x86_64/updateinfo
  | 317 kB  00:00:00
(2/2): epel/x86_64/pkgtags
  | 1.4 MB  00:00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.trouble-free.net
 * epel: mirror.oss.ou.edu
 * extras: centos-mirror.jchost.net
 * updates: mirrors.centarra.com
epel/x86_64/filelists_db
  | 6.1 MB  00:00:00
updates/7/x86_64/filelists_db
  | 3.9 MB  00:00:00
No matches found

There is a separate package for this in Fedora, texlive-esint, but not
in any EL7 repos I could find.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5907414

I'd like to build my own version of that RPM, but apparently I have to
rebuild the whole texlive package for Fedora in order to do that.  I
made the mistake once of doing that in the RHEL 5 era, may do again.

I'll keep trying, will let you know

pj



 Note that this will work for all other .sty file.

 In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
 included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
 similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their new improved
 package management system is somewhat unhelpful.

 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

 pj

 I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages in 
 Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on Redhat 
 bugzilla.

 That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum list of 
 dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.

 Regards,
 --
 José Abílio



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Robert Susmilch]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/25/2015 12:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:53 AM, José Matos jama...@lyx.org
 wrote:
 On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of
 esint.sty?
 
 Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that
 all applies to RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).
 
 Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all
 the (la)tex packages have been split into its package.
 
 If you want to install something like the previous mega packages,
 there are several schemes available:
 
 $ yum list texlive-scheme* . texlive-scheme-basic.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-context.noarch texlive-scheme-full.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-gust.noarch texlive-scheme-medium.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch texlive-scheme-small.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch texlive-scheme-xml.noarch
 
 If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages.
 Medium should be a nice compromise.
 
 On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough,
 except the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any
 documents with integrals won't compile because esint.sty is
 missing.
 
 Could you try:
 
 # yum install tex(esint.sty)
 
 And see if this works?
 
 
 Hello, Jose.
 
 Am I typing this incorrectly?
 
 # yum install tex(esint.sty) bash: syntax error near unexpected
 token `('
 
 I searched like this:
 
 # yum provides esint.sty Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks 
 base | 3.6 kB  00:00:00 epel/x86_64/metalink |  15 kB  00:00:00 
 epel | 4.4 kB  00:00:00 extras | 3.4 kB  00:00:00 pjku | 2.9 kB
 00:00:00 updates | 3.4 kB  00:00:00 epel/x86_64/primary_db | 4.0 MB
 00:00:00 (1/2): epel/x86_64/updateinfo | 317 kB  00:00:00 (2/2):
 epel/x86_64/pkgtags | 1.4 MB  00:00:00 Loading mirror speeds from
 cached hostfile * base: mirror.trouble-free.net * epel:
 mirror.oss.ou.edu * extras: centos-mirror.jchost.net * updates:
 mirrors.centarra.com epel/x86_64/filelists_db | 6.1 MB  00:00:00 
 updates/7/x86_64/filelists_db | 3.9 MB  00:00:00 No matches found
 
 There is a separate package for this in Fedora, texlive-esint, but
 not in any EL7 repos I could find.
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5907414
 
 I'd like to build my own version of that RPM, but apparently I have
 to rebuild the whole texlive package for Fedora in order to do
 that.  I made the mistake once of doing that in the RHEL 5 era, may
 do again.
 
 I'll keep trying, will let you know
 
 pj
 
 
 
 Note that this will work for all other .sty file.
 
 In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find
 esint.sty is included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm
 not finding it in similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that
 their new improved package management system is somewhat
 unhelpful.
 
 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history
 with packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in
 rpmfind.net texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the
 EL7 systems if I have to. But I can't see why this is necessary
 at all.
 
 pj
 
 I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages
 in Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on
 Redhat bugzilla.
 
 That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum
 list of dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.
 
 Regards, -- José Abílio
 
 
 

# yum whatprovides */esint.sty

Loaded plugins: langpacks
4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1.fc21.noarch : Extended set of
integrals for Computer Modern
Repo: fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/esint/esint.sty

4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1.fc21.noarch : Extended set of
integrals for Computer Modern
Repo: @fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/esint/esint.sty

- -- 
Respectfully,

Robert Susmilch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=3dxK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:53 AM, José Matos jama...@lyx.org wrote:
 On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

 Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that all applies to 
 RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).

 Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all the (la)tex 
 packages have been split into its package.

 If you want to install something like the previous mega packages, there are 
 several schemes available:

 $ yum list texlive-scheme*
 .
 texlive-scheme-basic.noarch
 texlive-scheme-context.noarch
 texlive-scheme-full.noarch
 texlive-scheme-gust.noarch
 texlive-scheme-medium.noarch
 texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch
 texlive-scheme-small.noarch
 texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch
 texlive-scheme-xml.noarch

 If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages. Medium 
 should be a nice compromise.

 On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
 the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
 integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

 Could you try:

 # yum install tex(esint.sty)

 And see if this works?


Hello, Jose.

Am I typing this incorrectly?

# yum install tex(esint.sty)
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('

I searched like this:

# yum provides esint.sty
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
base
  | 3.6 kB  00:00:00
epel/x86_64/metalink
  |  15 kB  00:00:00
epel
  | 4.4 kB  00:00:00
extras
  | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
pjku
  | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
updates
  | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
epel/x86_64/primary_db
  | 4.0 MB  00:00:00
(1/2): epel/x86_64/updateinfo
  | 317 kB  00:00:00
(2/2): epel/x86_64/pkgtags
  | 1.4 MB  00:00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.trouble-free.net
 * epel: mirror.oss.ou.edu
 * extras: centos-mirror.jchost.net
 * updates: mirrors.centarra.com
epel/x86_64/filelists_db
  | 6.1 MB  00:00:00
updates/7/x86_64/filelists_db
  | 3.9 MB  00:00:00
No matches found

There is a separate package for this in Fedora, texlive-esint, but not
in any EL7 repos I could find.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5907414

I'd like to build my own version of that RPM, but apparently I have to
rebuild the whole texlive package for Fedora in order to do that.  I
made the mistake once of doing that in the RHEL 5 era, may do again.

I'll keep trying, will let you know

pj



 Note that this will work for all other .sty file.

 In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
 included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
 similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their new improved
 package management system is somewhat unhelpful.

 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

 pj

 I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages in 
 Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on Redhat 
 bugzilla.

 That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum list of 
 dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.

 Regards,
 --
 José Abílio



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Robert Susmilch]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/25/2015 12:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:53 AM, José Matos jama...@lyx.org
 wrote:
 On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of
 esint.sty?
 
 Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that
 all applies to RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).
 
 Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all
 the (la)tex packages have been split into its package.
 
 If you want to install something like the previous mega packages,
 there are several schemes available:
 
 $ yum list texlive-scheme* . texlive-scheme-basic.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-context.noarch texlive-scheme-full.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-gust.noarch texlive-scheme-medium.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch texlive-scheme-small.noarch 
 texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch texlive-scheme-xml.noarch
 
 If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages.
 Medium should be a nice compromise.
 
 On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough,
 except the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any
 documents with integrals won't compile because esint.sty is
 missing.
 
 Could you try:
 
 # yum install tex(esint.sty)
 
 And see if this works?
 
 
 Hello, Jose.
 
 Am I typing this incorrectly?
 
 # yum install tex(esint.sty) bash: syntax error near unexpected
 token `('
 
 I searched like this:
 
 # yum provides esint.sty Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks 
 base | 3.6 kB  00:00:00 epel/x86_64/metalink |  15 kB  00:00:00 
 epel | 4.4 kB  00:00:00 extras | 3.4 kB  00:00:00 pjku | 2.9 kB
 00:00:00 updates | 3.4 kB  00:00:00 epel/x86_64/primary_db | 4.0 MB
 00:00:00 (1/2): epel/x86_64/updateinfo | 317 kB  00:00:00 (2/2):
 epel/x86_64/pkgtags | 1.4 MB  00:00:00 Loading mirror speeds from
 cached hostfile * base: mirror.trouble-free.net * epel:
 mirror.oss.ou.edu * extras: centos-mirror.jchost.net * updates:
 mirrors.centarra.com epel/x86_64/filelists_db | 6.1 MB  00:00:00 
 updates/7/x86_64/filelists_db | 3.9 MB  00:00:00 No matches found
 
 There is a separate package for this in Fedora, texlive-esint, but
 not in any EL7 repos I could find.
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5907414
 
 I'd like to build my own version of that RPM, but apparently I have
 to rebuild the whole texlive package for Fedora in order to do
 that.  I made the mistake once of doing that in the RHEL 5 era, may
 do again.
 
 I'll keep trying, will let you know
 
 pj
 
 
 
 Note that this will work for all other .sty file.
 
 In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find
 esint.sty is included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm
 not finding it in similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that
 their new improved package management system is somewhat
 unhelpful.
 
 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history
 with packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in
 rpmfind.net texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the
 EL7 systems if I have to. But I can't see why this is necessary
 at all.
 
 pj
 
 I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages
 in Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on
 Redhat bugzilla.
 
 That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum
 list of dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.
 
 Regards, -- José Abílio
 
 
 

# yum whatprovides */esint.sty

Loaded plugins: langpacks
4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1.fc21.noarch : Extended set of
integrals for Computer Modern
Repo: fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/esint/esint.sty

4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1.fc21.noarch : Extended set of
integrals for Computer Modern
Repo: @fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/esint/esint.sty

- -- 
Respectfully,

Robert Susmilch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=3dxK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:53 AM, José Matos  wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?
>
> Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that all applies to 
> RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).
>
> Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all the (la)tex 
> packages have been split into its package.
>
> If you want to install something like the previous mega packages, there are 
> several schemes available:
>
> $ yum list texlive-scheme*
> .
> texlive-scheme-basic.noarch
> texlive-scheme-context.noarch
> texlive-scheme-full.noarch
> texlive-scheme-gust.noarch
> texlive-scheme-medium.noarch
> texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch
> texlive-scheme-small.noarch
> texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch
> texlive-scheme-xml.noarch
>
> If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages. Medium 
> should be a nice compromise.
>
>> On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
>> the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
>> integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.
>
> Could you try:
>
> # yum install tex(esint.sty)
>
> And see if this works?
>

Hello, Jose.

Am I typing this incorrectly?

# yum install tex(esint.sty)
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('

I searched like this:

# yum provides esint.sty
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
base
  | 3.6 kB  00:00:00
epel/x86_64/metalink
  |  15 kB  00:00:00
epel
  | 4.4 kB  00:00:00
extras
  | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
pjku
  | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
updates
  | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
epel/x86_64/primary_db
  | 4.0 MB  00:00:00
(1/2): epel/x86_64/updateinfo
  | 317 kB  00:00:00
(2/2): epel/x86_64/pkgtags
  | 1.4 MB  00:00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.trouble-free.net
 * epel: mirror.oss.ou.edu
 * extras: centos-mirror.jchost.net
 * updates: mirrors.centarra.com
epel/x86_64/filelists_db
  | 6.1 MB  00:00:00
updates/7/x86_64/filelists_db
  | 3.9 MB  00:00:00
No matches found

There is a separate package for this in Fedora, texlive-esint, but not
in any EL7 repos I could find.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5907414

I'd like to build my own version of that RPM, but apparently I have to
rebuild the whole texlive package for Fedora in order to do that.  I
made the mistake once of doing that in the RHEL 5 era, may do again.

I'll keep trying, will let you know

pj



> Note that this will work for all other .sty file.
>
>> In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
>> included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
>> similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their "new improved"
>> package management system is somewhat unhelpful.
>>
>> I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
>> packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
>> "texlive-esint-...".  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
>> to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.
>>
>> pj
>
> I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages in 
> Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on Redhat 
> bugzilla.
>
> That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum list of 
> dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.
>
> Regards,
> --
> José Abílio



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Robert Susmilch]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/25/2015 12:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:53 AM, José Matos 
> wrote:
>> On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of
>>> esint.sty?
>> 
>> Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that
>> all applies to RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).
>> 
>> Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all
>> the (la)tex packages have been split into its package.
>> 
>> If you want to install something like the previous mega packages,
>> there are several schemes available:
>> 
>> $ yum list texlive-scheme* . texlive-scheme-basic.noarch 
>> texlive-scheme-context.noarch texlive-scheme-full.noarch 
>> texlive-scheme-gust.noarch texlive-scheme-medium.noarch 
>> texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch texlive-scheme-small.noarch 
>> texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch texlive-scheme-xml.noarch
>> 
>> If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages.
>> Medium should be a nice compromise.
>> 
>>> On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough,
>>> except the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any
>>> documents with integrals won't compile because esint.sty is
>>> missing.
>> 
>> Could you try:
>> 
>> # yum install tex(esint.sty)
>> 
>> And see if this works?
>> 
> 
> Hello, Jose.
> 
> Am I typing this incorrectly?
> 
> # yum install tex(esint.sty) bash: syntax error near unexpected
> token `('
> 
> I searched like this:
> 
> # yum provides esint.sty Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks 
> base | 3.6 kB  00:00:00 epel/x86_64/metalink |  15 kB  00:00:00 
> epel | 4.4 kB  00:00:00 extras | 3.4 kB  00:00:00 pjku | 2.9 kB
> 00:00:00 updates | 3.4 kB  00:00:00 epel/x86_64/primary_db | 4.0 MB
> 00:00:00 (1/2): epel/x86_64/updateinfo | 317 kB  00:00:00 (2/2):
> epel/x86_64/pkgtags | 1.4 MB  00:00:00 Loading mirror speeds from
> cached hostfile * base: mirror.trouble-free.net * epel:
> mirror.oss.ou.edu * extras: centos-mirror.jchost.net * updates:
> mirrors.centarra.com epel/x86_64/filelists_db | 6.1 MB  00:00:00 
> updates/7/x86_64/filelists_db | 3.9 MB  00:00:00 No matches found
> 
> There is a separate package for this in Fedora, texlive-esint, but
> not in any EL7 repos I could find.
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5907414
> 
> I'd like to build my own version of that RPM, but apparently I have
> to rebuild the whole texlive package for Fedora in order to do
> that.  I made the mistake once of doing that in the RHEL 5 era, may
> do again.
> 
> I'll keep trying, will let you know
> 
> pj
> 
> 
> 
>> Note that this will work for all other .sty file.
>> 
>>> In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find
>>> esint.sty is included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm
>>> not finding it in similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that
>>> their "new improved" package management system is somewhat
>>> unhelpful.
>>> 
>>> I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history
>>> with packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in
>>> rpmfind.net "texlive-esint-...".  I will rebuild that on the
>>> EL7 systems if I have to. But I can't see why this is necessary
>>> at all.
>>> 
>>> pj
>> 
>> I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages
>> in Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on
>> Redhat bugzilla.
>> 
>> That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum
>> list of dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.
>> 
>> Regards, -- José Abílio
> 
> 
> 

# yum whatprovides */esint.sty

Loaded plugins: langpacks
4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1.fc21.noarch : Extended set of
integrals for Computer Modern
Repo: fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/esint/esint.sty

4:texlive-esint-svn15878.1.1-1.1.fc21.noarch : Extended set of
integrals for Computer Modern
Repo: @fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/esint/esint.sty

- -- 
Respectfully,

Robert Susmilch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=3dxK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[José Matos]

On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that all applies to 
RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).

Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all the (la)tex 
packages have been split into its package.

If you want to install something like the previous mega packages, there are 
several schemes available:

$ yum list texlive-scheme*
.
texlive-scheme-basic.noarch
texlive-scheme-context.noarch
texlive-scheme-full.noarch
texlive-scheme-gust.noarch
texlive-scheme-medium.noarch
texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch
texlive-scheme-small.noarch
texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch
texlive-scheme-xml.noarch

If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages. Medium should 
be a nice compromise.

 On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
 the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
 integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

Could you try:

# yum install tex(esint.sty)

And see if this works?

Note that this will work for all other .sty file.

 In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
 included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
 similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their new improved
 package management system is somewhat unhelpful.
 
 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.
 
 pj

I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages in 
Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on Redhat bugzilla.

That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum list of 
dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[José Matos]

On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
 Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that all applies to 
RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).

Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all the (la)tex 
packages have been split into its package.

If you want to install something like the previous mega packages, there are 
several schemes available:

$ yum list texlive-scheme*
.
texlive-scheme-basic.noarch
texlive-scheme-context.noarch
texlive-scheme-full.noarch
texlive-scheme-gust.noarch
texlive-scheme-medium.noarch
texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch
texlive-scheme-small.noarch
texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch
texlive-scheme-xml.noarch

If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages. Medium should 
be a nice compromise.

 On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
 the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
 integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

Could you try:

# yum install tex(esint.sty)

And see if this works?

Note that this will work for all other .sty file.

 In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
 included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
 similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their new improved
 package management system is somewhat unhelpful.
 
 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.
 
 pj

I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages in 
Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on Redhat bugzilla.

That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum list of 
dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[José Matos]

On Saturday 21 March 2015 22:38:09 Paul Johnson wrote:
> Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

Note that I am writing this from Fedora, so I am not sure that all applies to 
RHEL/CentOS (although I suspect it does).

Since the tex installed comes from texlive that means that all the (la)tex 
packages have been split into its package.

If you want to install something like the previous mega packages, there are 
several schemes available:

$ yum list texlive-scheme*
.
texlive-scheme-basic.noarch
texlive-scheme-context.noarch
texlive-scheme-full.noarch
texlive-scheme-gust.noarch
texlive-scheme-medium.noarch
texlive-scheme-minimal.noarch
texlive-scheme-small.noarch
texlive-scheme-tetex.noarch
texlive-scheme-xml.noarch

If you install texlive-scheme full you will get all the packages. Medium should 
be a nice compromise.

> On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
> the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
> integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

Could you try:

# yum install tex(esint.sty)

And see if this works?

Note that this will work for all other .sty file.

> In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
> included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
> similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their "new improved"
> package management system is somewhat unhelpful.
> 
> I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
> packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
> "texlive-esint-...".  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
> to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.
> 
> pj

I guess that there is a missing requirement for texlive packages in 
Fedora/EPEL, if that happens again please report it here or on Redhat bugzilla.

That type of issues in on my TODO list to determine a minimum list of 
dependencies for the lyx rpms on Fedora/EPEL.

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Georg Baum]

Paul Johnson wrote:

 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

I don't know why esint.sty is not properly packaged for Red Hat, but I would 
recommend to use vanilla texlive, and not the one provided by the 
distribution. Since texlive contains an own package manager for quite some 
time this is easy to do.


Georg

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Neal Becker]

Georg Baum wrote:

 Paul Johnson wrote:
 
 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.
 
 I don't know why esint.sty is not properly packaged for Red Hat, but I
 would recommend to use vanilla texlive, and not the one provided by the
 distribution. Since texlive contains an own package manager for quite some
 time this is easy to do.
 
 
 Georg

I don't know about EL7, but on fedora 21:

rpm -qf $(locate esint.tex)
texlive-esint-type1-svn15878.0-1.1.fc21.noarch

-- 
Those who fail to understand recursion are doomed to repeat it

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Georg Baum]

Paul Johnson wrote:

 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

I don't know why esint.sty is not properly packaged for Red Hat, but I would 
recommend to use vanilla texlive, and not the one provided by the 
distribution. Since texlive contains an own package manager for quite some 
time this is easy to do.


Georg

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Neal Becker]

Georg Baum wrote:

 Paul Johnson wrote:
 
 I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
 packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
 texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
 to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.
 
 I don't know why esint.sty is not properly packaged for Red Hat, but I
 would recommend to use vanilla texlive, and not the one provided by the
 distribution. Since texlive contains an own package manager for quite some
 time this is easy to do.
 
 
 Georg

I don't know about EL7, but on fedora 21:

rpm -qf $(locate esint.tex)
texlive-esint-type1-svn15878.0-1.1.fc21.noarch

-- 
Those who fail to understand recursion are doomed to repeat it

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Georg Baum]

Paul Johnson wrote:

> I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
> packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
> "texlive-esint-...".  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
> to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

I don't know why esint.sty is not properly packaged for Red Hat, but I would 
recommend to use vanilla texlive, and not the one provided by the 
distribution. Since texlive contains an own package manager for quite some 
time this is easy to do.


Georg

Re: esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Neal Becker]

Georg Baum wrote:

> Paul Johnson wrote:
> 
>> I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
>> packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
>> "texlive-esint-...".  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
>> to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.
> 
> I don't know why esint.sty is not properly packaged for Red Hat, but I
> would recommend to use vanilla texlive, and not the one provided by the
> distribution. Since texlive contains an own package manager for quite some
> time this is easy to do.
> 
> 
> Georg

I don't know about EL7, but on fedora 21:

rpm -qf $(locate esint.tex)
texlive-esint-type1-svn15878.0-1.1.fc21.noarch

-- 
Those who fail to understand recursion are doomed to repeat it

esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their new improved
package management system is somewhat unhelpful.

I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

pj

-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their new improved
package management system is somewhat unhelpful.

I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
texlive-esint-  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

pj

-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

esint.sty in RedHat/Centos 7. Where? Why omitted?

[Paul Johnson]

Can somebody explain the problems surrounding packaging of esint.sty?

On a fresh install of RHEL 7, I find LyX 2.1 works well enough, except
the old problem about missing esint.sty re-appears. Any documents with
integrals won't compile because esint.sty is missing.

In Ubuntu systems there is no similar problem.  I find esint.sty is
included in a package texlive-latex-extra.  I'm not finding it in
similar on RedHat, but I have to admit that their "new improved"
package management system is somewhat unhelpful.

I searched long enough to see there is some peculiar history with
packaging of esint.sty. I DO find the Fedora package in rpmfind.net
"texlive-esint-...".  I will rebuild that on the EL7 systems if I have
to. But I can't see why this is necessary at all.

pj

-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science  Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504  Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org   http://quant.ku.edu

where are the .ico file?

[Renato Pontefice]

Hi,
I'm still trying to learn lyx to use it as a normal document writer.

Today, I'm wondering:
all the document (.lyx) file,has one .lco file, that let it became
interactive. Isn' t it?

Where do I search for it?

I made a search from the beginning of Lyx dir down, but I do not find them.

Do I made a wrong search?

TIA

Renato

Re: where are the .ico file?

[Charlie]

On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:12:24 +0100
Renato Pontefice renato.pontef...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm still trying to learn lyx to use it as a normal document writer.
 
 Today, I'm wondering:
 all the document (.lyx) file,has one .lco file, that let it became
 interactive. Isn' t it?
 
 Where do I search for it?
 
 I made a search from the beginning of Lyx dir down, but I do not find
 them.
 
 Do I made a wrong search?
 
 TIA
 
 Renato

On my Debian Jessie system it is located:

/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/koma-script

HTH
Charlie



-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
***

If I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good
behavior ..Henry David Thoreau

***

Debian GNU/Linux - just the best way to create magic

-

where are the .ico file?

[Renato Pontefice]

Hi,
I'm still trying to learn lyx to use it as a normal document writer.

Today, I'm wondering:
all the document (.lyx) file,has one .lco file, that let it became
interactive. Isn' t it?

Where do I search for it?

I made a search from the beginning of Lyx dir down, but I do not find them.

Do I made a wrong search?

TIA

Renato

Re: where are the .ico file?

[Charlie]

On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:12:24 +0100
Renato Pontefice renato.pontef...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm still trying to learn lyx to use it as a normal document writer.
 
 Today, I'm wondering:
 all the document (.lyx) file,has one .lco file, that let it became
 interactive. Isn' t it?
 
 Where do I search for it?
 
 I made a search from the beginning of Lyx dir down, but I do not find
 them.
 
 Do I made a wrong search?
 
 TIA
 
 Renato

On my Debian Jessie system it is located:

/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/koma-script

HTH
Charlie



-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
***

If I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good
behavior ..Henry David Thoreau

***

Debian GNU/Linux - just the best way to create magic

-

where are the .ico file?

[Renato Pontefice]

Hi,
I'm still trying to learn lyx to use it as a normal document writer.

Today, I'm wondering:
all the document (.lyx) file,has one .lco file, that let it became
interactive. Isn' t it?

Where do I search for it?

I made a search from the beginning of Lyx dir down, but I do not find them.

Do I made a wrong search?

TIA

Renato

Re: where are the .ico file?

[Charlie]

On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:12:24 +0100
Renato Pontefice <renato.pontef...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm still trying to learn lyx to use it as a normal document writer.
> 
> Today, I'm wondering:
> all the document (.lyx) file,has one .lco file, that let it became
> interactive. Isn' t it?
> 
> Where do I search for it?
> 
> I made a search from the beginning of Lyx dir down, but I do not find
> them.
> 
> Do I made a wrong search?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Renato

On my Debian Jessie system it is located:

/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/koma-script

HTH
Charlie



-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
***

If I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good
behavior ..Henry David Thoreau

***

Debian GNU/Linux - just the best way to create magic

-

Huge file takes forever to compile, not sure where the problem is

[Jacob Shapiro]

So I have this file: 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yashkes/Summaries/master/QFT2_Summary.lyx 

When I try to compile it with LyX (2.2 beta or even 2.1) I get after a 
while an error asking if I want to keep running the rendering. I tell 
it several times to keep running but nothing happens.


Could anyone perhaps help me find the problem in the file, or tell 
_how_ to find the problem in the file? 

Huge file takes forever to compile, not sure where the problem is

[Jacob Shapiro]

So I have this file: 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yashkes/Summaries/master/QFT2_Summary.lyx 

When I try to compile it with LyX (2.2 beta or even 2.1) I get after a 
while an error asking if I want to keep running the rendering. I tell 
it several times to keep running but nothing happens.


Could anyone perhaps help me find the problem in the file, or tell 
_how_ to find the problem in the file?