Re: Pulled out an old song..
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:01:35PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: Unless the quality of the CD has deterioated, where does the random element come from? http://www.stereophile.com/features/827/ If you start reading about the low-level details of C/DVDs and you don't have a lot of faith in math, you'll be scared to death you ever put data on an optical disc.
Re: Pulled out an old song..
On 16/06/06, Michael Coulter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:01:35PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: Unless the quality of the CD has deterioated, where does the random element come from? http://www.stereophile.com/features/827/ If you start reading about the low-level details of C/DVDs and you don't have a lot of faith in math, you'll be scared to death you ever put data on an optical disc. Jason, Thank you for the link!
Re: NFS Slow writes
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Bob Bostwick (Lists) wrote: I've narrowed the problem down. I'm running an FTP server (vsftpd) who's users home dir's are on an nfs share. If I run vstpd without mounting the nfs share (and create a user with a valid home dir) I get 21MB/s uploads. If I copy a file from the OBSD box to a dir on the NFS mount, I get 8MB/s. However if I ftp to the nfs share I get 700KB/s uploads. Downloads are fast either way, it's just the writes that seem really slow. Vsftpd is starting through inetd (but I tried standalone and it made no difference.) Is there some sort of incompatibility in doing it this way? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated First: you do not tell which version of OpenBSD you are using. Recent version DO have better NFS write performance. Look at the release notes of 3.8. Since local copies are much faster than the ftp'ed data, I would suspect that vsftd is doing writes in such a way that it really stresses nfs. You could try using another ftp server and see if the performance gets better. If that's the case, you know for sure where to look further. -Otto
Missing ipmi sensors on current
I have upgraded the kernel but not userland to 3.9-current as of a few hours ago. I do plan to update userland, I just wanted to check that the kernel would boot on the machine before I do. Bob Beck suggested testing current as it has fixes for ami/bge problems we have been experiencing. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=115024220026846w=2 http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yesnumbers=5144 After rebooting with the new kernel the ipmi card which is a Tyan Taro M3289 is no longer being configured. This was working on 3.9, dmesg is available in linked post above, 3.9-current dmesg is below. On the upside we now have a adt0 device that did not seem to exist before. Thanks for any suggestions. -- nich OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #1: Fri Jun 16 15:21:33 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/current-20060615/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC .MP real mem = 4227461120 (4128380K) avail mem = 3632005120 (3546880K) using 22937 buffers containing 422952960 bytes (413040K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf98a0 (64 entries) bios0: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M. ipmi at mainbus0 not configured mainbus0: Intel MP Specification (Version 1.1) (TYAN S2882 ) cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 246, 1991.42 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF LUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,NXE,MMXX,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 1MB 64b/line 16- way L2 cache cpu0: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative cpu0: DTLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative cpu0: apic clock running at 199MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 246, 1991.24 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF LUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,NXE,MMXX,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW cpu1: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 1MB 64b/line 16- way L2 cache cpu1: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative cpu1: DTLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative mpbios: bus 0 is type PCI mpbios: bus 1 is type PCI mpbios: bus 2 is type PCI mpbios: bus 3 is type PCI mpbios: bus 4 is type PCI mpbios: bus 5 is type ISA ioapic0 at mainbus0 apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins ioapic1 at mainbus0 apid 3 pa 0xfebff000, version 11, 4 pins ioapic2 at mainbus0 apid 4 pa 0xfebfe000, version 11, 4 pins pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 ppb0 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 AMD 8111 PCI-PCI rev 0x07 pci1 at ppb0 bus 4 ohci0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 AMD 8111 USB rev 0x0b: apic 2 int 19 (irq 9), v ersion 1.0, legacy support usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 AMD 8111 USB rev 0x0b: apic 2 int 19 (irq 9), v ersion 1.0, legacy support usb1 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered siop0 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 Symbios Logic 53c895 rev 0x02: apic 2 int 16 (i rq 10), using 4K of on-board RAM scsibus0 at siop0: 16 targets pciide0 at pci1 dev 5 function 0 CMD Technology SiI3114 SATA rev 0x02: DMA pciide0: using apic 2 int 19 (irq 9) for native-PCI interrupt vga1 at pci1 dev 6 function 0 ATI Rage XL rev 0x27 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) fxp0 at pci1 dev 8 function 0 Intel 8255x rev 0x10, i82551: apic 2 int 18 (irq 11), address 00:e0:81:41:0c:06 inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 4 pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 AMD AMD8111 LPC rev 0x05 pciide1 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 AMD 8111 IDE rev 0x03: DMA, channel 0 configu red to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility pciide1: channel 0 disabled (no drives) atapiscsi0 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus1 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: HL-DT-ST, DVDRAM GSA-4167B, DL10 SCSI0 5/cdrom r emovable cd0(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 amdiic0 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 AMD 8111 SMBus rev 0x02: SCI iic0 at amdiic0 amdpm0 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 AMD 8111 Power rev 0x05: rng active iic1 at amdpm0 lm1 at iic1 addr 0x28: W83627HF adt0 at iic1 addr 0x2e: adm1027 rev 0x60 ppb1 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 AMD 8131 PCIX rev 0x12 pci2 at ppb1 bus 3 bge0 at pci2 dev 9 function 0 Broadcom BCM5704C rev 0x03, BCM5704 A3 (0x2003): apic 3 int 0 (irq 10), address 00:e0:81:41:0c:70 brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0 bge1 at pci2 dev 9 function 1 Broadcom BCM5704C rev 0x03, BCM5704 A3 (0x2003): apic 3 int 1 (irq 5), address 00:e0:81:41:0c:71 brgphy1 at bge1 phy 1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0 aapic0 at pci0 dev 10 function 1 AMD 8131 PCIX
dmesg warning, ahc0: Illegal cable configuration!!
Hello All, I am happy to report an apparently successful install of OpenBSD 3.9 Release on an HP Kayak XU 6/300 (Intel 440LX chipset, 2x Pentium II). I am delighted to report that this is the first non-Windows OS I have used that correctly reports and configures the on-board AD1816A audio subsystem straight out of the box without any need for me to go digging around and hand-crafting exoctic configurations. This is a great result, so well done to the to the OpenBSD development team. As a consequence, I was very happy to pay up for a CD-ROM (which I received from Wim Vandeputte [kd85.com] yesterday) and support the project. As an aside, I wonder if anyone on this list can offer some insight into the following dmesg warning: ahc0: Illegal cable configuration!!. Only two connectors on the adapter may be used at a time! [Full dmesg posted below] This isn't unique to OpenBSD: I've seen similar reports in the dmesg from SuSE Linux using the 2.4.xx series kernels and also from FreeBSD version 6. It doesn't appear to affect the machine in anyway that I can tell, e.g. there are no unexpected hangs, slowdowns, disk problems, etc. The AIC-7880 wide SCSI is connnected to a single disk but there are multiple (unused) connectors on the ribbon cable which end in a terminator block. The AIC-7860 narrow SCSI is connected to a single CD-RW drive. Again, there are multiple (unused) connectors on the ribbon cable and this, too, ends in a terminator block. I have used multiple drives in the system and the same message appears. It occurs to me that there might be some issue with the disk drive itself providing SCSI termination, or some other jumper configuration error. Alternatively, doe this message imply that I can only use either the AIC-7860 or the AIC-7880 but not both? I might try unplugging the CD-RW before booting this evening. --- dmesg included --- OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC.MP) #598: Thu Mar 2 02:37:06 MST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 300 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX real mem = 536453120 (523880K) avail mem = 482435072 (471128K) using 4278 buffers containing 26927104 bytes (26296K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(a1) BIOS, date 10/28/98, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd77d apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 30102 dobusy 0 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd710/0x8f0 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdf20/192 (10 entries) pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:07:0 (Intel 82371FB ISA rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x4800 mainbus0: Intel MP Specification (Version 1.4) (HP XU/XW ) cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 1 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 66 MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 0 (application processor) cpu1: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 300 MHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX mainbus0: bus 0 is type PCI mainbus0: bus 1 is type PCI mainbus0: bus 2 is type ISA ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82443LX AGP rev 0x03 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 82443LX AGP rev 0x03 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Matrox MGA G400/G450 AGP rev 0x04 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA rev 0x01 pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 Intel 82371AB IDE rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: MATSHITA, CD-ROM CR-585, ZP18 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 0, DMA mode 1 pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled) uhci0 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 Intel 82371AB USB rev 0x01: apic 2 int 19 (irq 11) usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered piixpm0 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 Intel 82371AB Power rev 0x01: SMI iic0 at piixpm0 unknown at iic0 addr 0x2d not configured lmtemp0 at iic0 addr 0x48: lm75 ahc0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 Adaptec AIC-7880 rev 0x01: apic 2 int 16 (irq 11) ahc0: Illegal cable configuration!!. Only two connectors on the adapter may be used at a time! scsibus1 at ahc0: 16 targets sd0 at scsibus1 targ 3 lun 0: SEAGATE, ST318404LW, 0006 SCSI3 0/direct fixed sd0: 17501MB, 14384 cyl, 6 head, 415 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 35843670 sec total ahc1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 Adaptec AIC-7860 rev 0x03: apic 2 int 19 (irq 11) scsibus2 at ahc1: 8 targets cd1 at scsibus2 targ 2 lun 0: HP, CD-Writer+ 9200, 1.0e SCSI4 5/cdrom removable rl0 at
Re: Missing ipmi sensors on current
On 2006/06/16 17:54, Nicholas Young wrote: After rebooting with the new kernel the ipmi card which is a Tyan Taro M3289 is no longer being configured. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=114912246701017w=2
Re: Missing ipmi sensors on current
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:44:08AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2006/06/16 17:54, Nicholas Young wrote: After rebooting with the new kernel the ipmi card which is a Tyan Taro M3289 is no longer being configured. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=114912246701017w=2 Thanks, I had a look at cvs for ipmi.c should have checked harder. Is ipmi problematic for stable or just with the recent changes? -- Nich
Re: package dependencies
On 6/16/06, Bihlmaier Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:19:26PM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
system running gnome, when said system has no connection to
the interweb
See also: 'make print-build-depends' and 'make print-run-depends' from the
desired port directory.
These are all covered in ports(7).
I faced the same problem quite some time ago (download snapshop with a
set of packages (including their dependencies).
The problem with all above methods is that you need a current ports
tree version besides the packages as well.
What I did is to extract the information in the packages (foo.tgz) and
download the result from ftp, until no dependencies are left (it takes
care not to download stuff twice).
Here is the part getting the parsable dependencies from a .tgz file
(yes this is as very dirty hack, but resonably fast and it works):
dd if=${pkg}.tgz bs=64k count=1 2/dev/null | \
zgrep -a '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' | \
awk 'BEGIN{ FS=: } {print $3.tgz}' | \
sed 's/.*\./\*\./'
For pkg = kdebase-3.5.1p4 the output looks like this:
openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz
glib2-2.8.4.tgz
libusb-0.1.10ap1.tgz
cyrus-sasl-2.1.21p2.tgz
kdelibs-3.5.1p0.tgz
qt3-mt-3.5p4.tgz
qt3-mt-3.5p4.tgz
Regards,
ahb
Or you could set your $PKG_PATH and run:
# sudo pkg_add -vn gnome-desktop-2.10.2p1
Re: Missing ipmi sensors on current
On 2006/06/16 19:07, Nicholas Young wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:44:08AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2006/06/16 17:54, Nicholas Young wrote: After rebooting with the new kernel the ipmi card which is a Tyan Taro M3289 is no longer being configured. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=114912246701017w=2 Thanks, I had a look at cvs for ipmi.c should have checked harder. Is ipmi problematic for stable or just with the recent changes? I don't know myself, the only board I have with an ipmi card (supermicro aplus H8SSL) has it attached somewhere I can't find so I haven't used ipmi on OpenBSD yet. This reminds me, does anyone remember why the initial ASF support got backed-out from bge(4)?
Re: Pulled out an old song..
On 16/06/06, Michael Coulter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:01:35PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: Unless the quality of the CD has deterioated, where does the random element come from? http://www.stereophile.com/features/827/ If you start reading about the low-level details of C/DVDs and you don't have a lot of faith in math, you'll be scared to death you ever put data on an optical disc. Very interesting article. However, I still don't see how ripped audio might change on each ripping. The article states that E11 and E12 errors are common but that the original data is fully inferrable(sp?) and that E22 errors are usually caused by damage. I can see how audibal changes could occur if CD players use the amplitude obtained from the CD directly without first going fully digital, but otherwise... Anyway, enough idle conjecture. When I get home I'll give it a try myself and then do further research. :) vladas wrote: Jason, Thank you for the link! Thank Michael. ;) -- Jason Stubbs
libtool: link: 'format-python.lo'
I just got a new laptop and was installing OpenBSD 3.9 on it and I got a linking error when I was trying to build clisp from ports. The error is libtool: link: 'format-python.lo' is not a valid libtool object I also get the same error when I try to install some other software from ports like mozilla-firefox and others. They all seem to be related to this one problem with libtool. I was wondering if anyone has encountered this problem. Laptop is a Acer Aspire 3000 with a 1.8 sempron 3100.
Re: Pulled out an old song..
On 16/06/06, Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 16/06/06, Michael Coulter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:01:35PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: Unless the quality of the CD has deterioated, where does the random element come from? http://www.stereophile.com/features/827/ If you start reading about the low-level details of C/DVDs and you don't have a lot of faith in math, you'll be scared to death you ever put data on an optical disc. Very interesting article. However, I still don't see how ripped audio might change on each ripping. The article states that E11 and E12 errors are common but that the original data is fully inferrable(sp?) and that E22 errors are usually caused by damage. I can see how audibal changes could occur if CD players use the amplitude obtained from the CD directly without first going fully digital, but otherwise... Anyway, enough idle conjecture. When I get home I'll give it a try myself and then do further research. :) vladas wrote: Jason, Thank you for the link! Thank Michael. ;) Oh. Sorry: Thank you, Michael. -- Jason Stubbs vladas
Re: dmesg warning, ahc0: Illegal cable configuration!!
Daniel Hammett wrote: ... ahc0: Illegal cable configuration!!. Only two connectors on the adapter may be used at a time! [Full dmesg posted below] yay! :) This isn't unique to OpenBSD: I've seen similar reports in the dmesg from SuSE Linux using the 2.4.xx series kernels and also from FreeBSD version 6. It doesn't appear to affect the machine in anyway that I can tell, e.g. there are no unexpected hangs, slowdowns, disk problems, etc. The AIC-7880 wide SCSI is connnected to a single disk but there are multiple (unused) connectors on the ribbon cable which end in a terminator block. The AIC-7860 narrow SCSI is connected to a single CD-RW drive. Again, there are multiple (unused) connectors on the ribbon cable and this, too, ends in a terminator block. this isn't the issue, as that's ahc1 according to the dmesg. I have used multiple drives in the system and the same message appears. It occurs to me that there might be some issue with the disk drive itself providing SCSI termination, or some other jumper configuration error. Alternatively, doe this message imply that I can only use either the AIC-7860 or the AIC-7880 but not both? I might try unplugging the CD-RW before booting this evening. nope, again, ahc0 and ahc1 are two different devices, if it is whining about X, the problem is with X. Probably. :) As I recall, there are some variants of the Adaptec cards that use the ahc(4) driver that are kinda...curious. I think it is the 29160 (or some variant) which has both LVD U160 and a single-ended U2, plus a 50 pin connector...and the rule is, you can use two of the three connectors, but not all three at the same time. I may be misremembering this...it might involve the external connector on the spine of the card, rather than the 50 pin connector. But the rule was..only two of the connectors. And note: it's the connectors in use, not the number of devices attached. As I recall, all it can do is look for terminators. If it finds more terminators than it expects, it apparently sets a whine flag that the driver looks for. Are there any extra terminators on the system? You indicate the cable has a terminator...could the drive also be terminated? Also make sure any unused SCSI connectors are just left unconnected. Otherwise...if everything is correct, and performance is appropriate, don't worry about it...probably a quirk in implementation on this machine. I don't recall ever seeing any ability to see messages like this under Windows, so I suspect HP may have been a little sloppy about how they implemented things. Nick. --- dmesg included --- OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC.MP) #598: Thu Mar 2 02:37:06 MST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 300 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX real mem = 536453120 (523880K) avail mem = 482435072 (471128K) using 4278 buffers containing 26927104 bytes (26296K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(a1) BIOS, date 10/28/98, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd77d apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 30102 dobusy 0 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd710/0x8f0 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdf20/192 (10 entries) pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:07:0 (Intel 82371FB ISA rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x4800 mainbus0: Intel MP Specification (Version 1.4) (HP XU/XW ) cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 1 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 66 MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 0 (application processor) cpu1: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 300 MHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX mainbus0: bus 0 is type PCI mainbus0: bus 1 is type PCI mainbus0: bus 2 is type ISA ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82443LX AGP rev 0x03 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 82443LX AGP rev 0x03 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Matrox MGA G400/G450 AGP rev 0x04 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA rev 0x01 pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 Intel 82371AB IDE rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: MATSHITA, CD-ROM CR-585, ZP18 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 0, DMA mode 1 pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled) uhci0 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 Intel 82371AB USB rev 0x01: apic 2 int 19 (irq 11) usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2
Re: Pulled out an old song..
On Behalf Of Jason Stubbs Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:06 AM On 16/06/06, Michael Coulter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:01:35PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: Unless the quality of the CD has deterioated, where does the random element come from? http://www.stereophile.com/features/827/ If you start reading about the low-level details of C/DVDs and you don't have a lot of faith in math, you'll be scared to death you ever put data on an optical disc. Very interesting article. However, I still don't see how ripped audio might change on each ripping. The article states that E11 and E12 errors are common but that the original data is fully inferrable(sp?) and that E22 errors are usually caused by damage. I can see how audibal changes could occur if CD players use the amplitude obtained from the CD directly without first going fully digital, but otherwise... Anyway, enough idle conjecture. When I get home I'll give it a try myself and then do further research. :) You can get bit identical rips of audio CDs, meaning you can compare the track's CRC, hash or anything else. EAC (www.exactaudiocopy.de) is one solution but it's Windows only. I haven't ripped under OpenBSD so I have no recommendation for it. www.hydrogenaudio.org is my source of authoritative information regarding digital audio. Check it out. Regards, Daniel.
Re: NFS Slow writes
On 6/15/06, Bob Bostwick (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to setup an NFS share, and am getting horrible write performance. Reads are fast as can be expected. I've searched the archives and found several threads on the subject, but no resolutions. I've tried all possible fstab options (that I know of) but none really help with write. I'm currently using ip.addr:/nfs /test/dir nfs rw,nodev,nosuid,tcp,intr,-r=32768,-w=32768 0 0 I've found (after various tests) with with an OpenBSD (3.8) server and Linux client, that I get the best performance with: rw,noauto,soft,tcp,rsize=2048,wsize=2048 This gives out 8MB/s for both read and write with my hardware. YMMV, but one thing I did notice is that large rsize/wsize didn't necessarily translate to better performance. -- ach
Re: LostFound with PF-Tables?!?!
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 03:31:01AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: table dssh persist pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to $web_server \ port 22 flags S/SA keep state \ (max-src-conn 10, max-src-conn-rate 3/10, overload dssh flush) The problem I have is that pf did not added the table dssh after the startup. I noticed that during another dumb ssh-bruteforce today where the src. host was not blocked automaticly. What does pfctl -nf /etc/pf.conf say? Anything? wizzard $ sudo pfctl -nf /etc/pf.conf wizzard $ Kind regards, Sebastian
Re: Privilege bracketing in Solaris 10
2006/6/16, Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 30 years after VMS and 40 years after EMAS. Ivan Sutherland sure had it right with his observatiion of the great wheel of reincarnation as it applies to computing... Ask a typical cs graduate today about VMS. I'll be surprised if she even knows what it is, and I don't expect her to know about it's clustering features. You mean there are other operating systems but Linux/Unix and Windows? :-( Best Martin
Re: ftp problems with OpenBSD 3.9
Hi! On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:29:40PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: Smith wrote: how do I compile it. I know I can look at previous patches and possible figure it out but I wouldn't know if it's the proper way to do it. I have a test machine all setup and ready and my pwd is /usr/src/libexec/ftpd. Just replied privately, but since you asked publicly also, should reply for the list, in case anyone else wants to try... And since replying to you, I've tested it. It at least seems to work. Not sure it fixes your problem, however. make obj make cleandir # to be sure make depend # can sometimes make a difference in addition to # dependencies (e.g. run yacc/lex) make make install Stop and restart ftpd if you are running it as a daemon (ftpd -D), and you should be able to test... Nick. Kind regards, Hannah.
Re: Routing trouble with PPPoE on 3.8
2006/6/16, Srikant Tangirala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am trying to connect my obsd 3.8-stable system to internet via PPPoE ( ISDN connection-64Kbps). ppp program reports an established connection, ifconfig shows an IP address assigned to tun0 interface. But i simply can't use any program like ping, ftp or firefox to connect to any server. They say no route to host. I must be doing something stupid. Is the pf ruleset the problem? Probably not. ppp(8) is your friend. default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command pppoe: set device !/usr/sbin/pppoe -i rl0 set mtu max 1492 set mru max 1492 set speed sync disable acfcomp protocomp deny acfcomp set authname [EMAIL PROTECTED] set authkey set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR This should give you a default route(8). Best Martin
OpenHSMM-ap New OBSD Project
Folks, For the last 6 months or so, I have been working on a project to take OpenBSD 3.8 and create an appliance type interface for a Wireless Access Point. Before I get into the nitty gritty details, here is a little about the name. The name is derived from the combination of Open Source projects designed to facilitate the ideas that are put forth by the Amateur Radio Relay League High Speed Multi Media Task Force. ( http://www.arrl.org/hsmm ). This group plays an integral role in providing guidelines for creating Emergency Communications networks using Amateur Radio equipment from HF frequencies up through 5.8GHZ. The goal of the project was to create a relatively small footprint AP that could be put on a compact flash, plug it in to a Soekris single board computer (no moving parts) to be deployed on rooftops and towers. For those of you that are familiar with m0n0wall this will look very similar. After speaking with Manuel Kasper it seemed to be somewhat easy to port the m0n0wall FreeBSD code base for this effort. Visit the web page ( http://www.openhsmm.org ) for some of the initial and planned features. Keep in mind that this is an ALPHA version, not all of the functionality you see works properly. It does currently function as a basic AP with WEP. 98% of the testing so far has been with the Winstom CM-9 miniPCI card. I would appreciate constructive feedback. If you are interested in contributing to the project let me know. If you see something that needs to be fixed please send me a diff. and Yes, there are plans in the very near future for migrating the kernel to 3.9. -- CIAO - Paul Pescitelli /** Unix Advocate and creator of OpenHSMM Wire Access Point OpenBSD appliance. www.openhsmm.org /*/
Is hwinfo good enought to get hw info from win32 boxes?
I want to get hw info from win boxes before performing dedicated OpenBSD installs. Is http://www.hwinfo.com/ good enough or I should use some other tool to be more informative? P.S. Just to make myself clear - I am asking this, because I think that it might be appreciated by the devs to get not only dmesg but also hw info from the native drivers.
Re: ddos mail attack thwarted by spamd greylisting!
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-15 18:03]: On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:07:46AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: Luckily, spamd greylisting saved the day. If it wasn't for BASE/snort reporting of the portscan, I wouldn't have even bothered looking in my logs tonite, and probably would never have been aware of the thwarted attempt. Good thing they're only portscanning and mailbombing you then, and not exploiting one of the bazillions of snort overflows ;) If it was set up properly, exploiting Snort wouldn't gain anyone anything more serious than the ability to mess up Snort logs. Granted, that can be useful... It'll get you root. on a machine with the ability to see all your inbound and outbound traffic, and in 99% of the properly setup cases I've ever seen still means it can inject traffic as well. That's a big deal, imnso. Having said that, many snort runners are also having it actively poke their firewalls. which is even more fun. So I'm sorry, I guess the if it is set up properly reads to my like the people who don't have problems with Windows machines - If they are set up properly. just like I'm going to lose weight and exercise till I have an ass of hard manly steel.. it's this mythical state that hardly ever seems to be attainable in the real world under real installations. -Bob
slow realloc: alternate method?
i've got some C code that is reading from a 800 MB CSV file and allocates memory
for an array to store the data in. the method used is to read the CSV file
line-by-line and realloc additional space with each line read. having timed this
and found the realloc speed to be low when the array is large, i am aiming to
make this faster but am not sure about the best way to proceed.
the current code uses realloc in the manner suggested by the manpage:
newsize = size + 1;
time(t1); // start timing realloc
if ((newap = (int *)realloc(ap, newsize*sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
free(ap);
ap = NULL;
size = 0;
return (NULL);
}
time(t2); // stop timing realloc; start timing fscanf
as the size of ap grows, so does the time it takes to realloc the space.
an alternative to this procedure would be to scan through the CSV file to
determine how many array entries i would need, realloc it all at once, then go
back through the CSV file again to read the data into the array. i'm not
confident this is the only way to do this and would appreciate any suggestions
for speeding up this procedure.
cheers,
jake
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: an alternative to this procedure would be to scan through the CSV file to determine how many array entries i would need, realloc it all at once, then go back through the CSV file again to read the data into the array. Try starting with a reasonable number of lines, e.g. the average number of lines in most of your csv files, and doubling the buffer each time you fill it up.
Re: error clamav at 3.9
riwanlky wrote: # make install === Checking files for unrar-3.54p0 unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. Fetch http://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz. Size does not match for /usr/ports/distfiles/unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz /bin/sh: test: unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz: unexpected operator/operand *** Error code 2 Try deleting the distfile (rm /usr/ports/distfiles/unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz) and starting fresh (make clean). I just tried building this on my system again. It downloads, passes checksum and builds with no problems. -ME -- Support OpenBSD: http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
Re: ftp problems with OpenBSD 3.9
Okay, I followed Nick Holland's suggestion. First, I had setup an OpenBSD 3.9 test machine. The only configuration I did was to setup the ftpd service as described in a previous post. I tested it, the problem still persisted. Then I download src.tar.gz from the 3.8 directory on a mirror and extracted it into /usr/src. Then in /usr/src/libexec/ftpd, I did make obj, make cleandir, make depend, make, make install. Finally I rebooted. I did a test and it was successful. So it appears something did change. Does this mean I should read up sendbug and figure out how to report a bug or was this change intentional?
Re: useradd - Passwort setzen
2006/6/16, Andre Tann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Andreas Winkelmann, Freitag, 16. Juni 2006 18:30: $ man chpasswd Ah, das kannte ich noch gar nicht... Danke! man apropos apropos password Gru_ Martin
Re: failing to install RRDtool package and MRTGpackage on openBSD 3.9
Ton wrote: I am using openBSD 3.9 on several machines, i have a seperate machine for testing purpose. today i want to try to install the RRDtool and MRTGpackage from your site. Can't install gd-2.0.33p2: lib not found fontconfig.3.0 Even by looking in the dependency tree: Install xbase. most kindly Ton muller ,aka spatieman.. -ME -- Support OpenBSD: http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
Re: Hifn policy on documentation
Phil Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ultimately, I'll personally depend on crypto in software I can access for myself. I think that's your real point. Thanks for the well thought-out reply. I too would place a heck of a lot less trust in some crypto chip than something that is inspectable. What interests me among Hifn's chips are not the crypto capabilities, but the compression capabilities. Interesting. I didn't realize they did that. It looks like a safe enough use. knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: any algorithm the cards claim to implement _is_ fully documented, so you can test any output except that of the RNG against a 'known good' implementation Even if the cipherstream out of a chip is the same as the software implementation in general, what prevents the chip from switching to a trojan mode when it sees a certain data-pattern in the plaintext input stream? Sure the other side might not be able to decrypt the doctored up cipherstream, but the information would have already been leaked. Heck, if both sides use the same chip, the receiving chip could even recognize the data stream and pretend that nothing out of the ordinary were going on. Personally I don't see how a hardware chip maker can prove that the chip doesn't have a trojan without providing masks for inspection and a way to prove that those masks and only those masks were used to make the chip. Open source and all that. -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
Re: Tracking security advisories
Spruell, Darren-Perot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For sysadmins that want to know as soon as possible about issues which are deemed patch-worthy (security vulnerabilities, critical reliability issues), what is the best way to stay on top of these issues as they are resolved? The canonical source of information seems to be errta.html, which does tend to be updated quickly as the patch becomes available. To keep track of this, it requires the user to access the page and look for a new patch which may apply to him. One could also monitor commits to CVS and while reliable, it becomes a bit more difficult to pick the critical from some of the rest of it. There's also a vuxml setup for OpenBSD at http://www.vuxml.org/openbsd/index.html, which appears to be independently maintained and doesn't stay sufficiently updated to be used as an alerting mechanism. Then, as outlined in release announcements, Security patch announcements are sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. This method is preferred by a lot of people so they get some kind of proactive notification of potentially impactive problems. Patch announcements do make it to the list, some as early as 1 day after patch announcement, others 14 days after patch. The possible advantage over errata.html though is you get notified even if you've lapsed in checking out the web page. On the flip side, this requires a developer to take time and craft the message and send it, so the onus is on the project to do the work. DS What is best for one person may not necessarily be best for another. That said, it shouldn't be too hard to make fetching errata.html part of your daily crontab, running a diff on the fetch versus a cached reference, and triggering an email when there's a difference.
Kernel Hangs; Supermicro 5015M-MR (Intel E7230)
Supermicro 5015M-MR uses Supermicro PDSMi motherboard (Intel E7230 chipset) Kernel hangs after pcibios0: PCI bus #6 is the last bus Changed pcibios flags to 1 with UKC and enabled verbose mode. Kernel then hangs during ppb probe Changed pcibios flags to 1 and disabled ppb and Kernel finished loading. Same result with bsd.mp Is there anything else I can try that will shed more light on this issue? - Jon OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #882: Thu Jun 15 12:43:50 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.78 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,CNXT-ID,CX16 real mem = 1072128000 (1047000K) avail mem = 970346496 (947604K) using 4256 buffers containing 53710848 bytes (52452K) of memory User Kernel Config UKC change pcibios 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x0 change (y/n) ? flags [0] ? 1 284 pcibios0 changed 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x1 UKC disable ppb 89 ppb* disabled UKC quit Continuing... mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(66) BIOS, date 04/17/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd470, SMBIOS rev. 2.51 @ 0x3feea000 (33 entries) bios0: Supermicro PDSMi pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd470/0xb90 pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 20 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #6 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7230 MCH rev 0x81 Intel E7230 PCIE rev 0x81 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 not configured Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 not configured Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 not configured Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 not configured uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 5 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 10 usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11 usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 10 usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3 at usb3 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 5 usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub4 at usb4 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered Intel 82801BA AGP rev 0xe1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 not configured ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x01: PM disabled pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801GB IDE rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: TEAC, CD-224E-N, 1.AA SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled) pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801GB SATA rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: ST3250623NS wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 238475MB, 488397168 sectors wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 Intel 82801GB SMBus rev 0x01: irq 10 iic0 at ichiic0 lm1 at iic0 addr 0x2d: W83627HF lm2 at iic0 addr 0x2f: W83792D rev D isa0 at ichpcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard vga0 at isa0 port 0x3b0/48 iomem 0xa/131072 wsdisplay0 at vga0 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker spkr0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 lm0 at isa0 port 0x290/8: W83627HF lm1 detached npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 biomask ff65 netmask ff65 ttymask ffe7 pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
Re: Kernel Hangs; Supermicro 5015M-MR (Intel E7230)
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:39:44AM -0800, Jon Holderith wrote: Supermicro 5015M-MR uses Supermicro PDSMi motherboard (Intel E7230 chipset) Kernel hangs after pcibios0: PCI bus #6 is the last bus Changed pcibios flags to 1 with UKC and enabled verbose mode. Kernel then hangs during ppb probe Changed pcibios flags to 1 and disabled ppb and Kernel finished loading. Same result with bsd.mp Is there anything else I can try that will shed more light on this issue? yes. flags 2 or otherwise just disable pcibios completely. OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #882: Thu Jun 15 12:43:50 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.78 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,CNXT-ID,CX16 real mem = 1072128000 (1047000K) avail mem = 970346496 (947604K) using 4256 buffers containing 53710848 bytes (52452K) of memory User Kernel Config UKC change pcibios 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x0 change (y/n) ? flags [0] ? 1 284 pcibios0 changed 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x1 UKC disable ppb 89 ppb* disabled UKC quit Continuing... mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(66) BIOS, date 04/17/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd470, SMBIOS rev. 2.51 @ 0x3feea000 (33 entries) bios0: Supermicro PDSMi pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd470/0xb90 pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 20 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #6 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7230 MCH rev 0x81 Intel E7230 PCIE rev 0x81 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 not configured Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 not configured Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 not configured Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 not configured uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 5 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 10 usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11 usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 10 usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3 at usb3 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 5 usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub4 at usb4 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered Intel 82801BA AGP rev 0xe1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 not configured ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x01: PM disabled pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801GB IDE rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: TEAC, CD-224E-N, 1.AA SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled) pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801GB SATA rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: ST3250623NS wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 238475MB, 488397168 sectors wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 Intel 82801GB SMBus rev 0x01: irq 10 iic0 at ichiic0 lm1 at iic0 addr 0x2d: W83627HF lm2 at iic0 addr 0x2f: W83792D rev D isa0 at ichpcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard vga0 at isa0 port 0x3b0/48 iomem 0xa/131072 wsdisplay0 at vga0 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker spkr0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 lm0 at isa0 port 0x290/8: W83627HF lm1 detached npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 biomask ff65 netmask ff65 ttymask ffe7 pctr: user-level cycle counter
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i've got some C code that is reading from a 800 MB CSV file and allocates
memory
for an array to store the data in. the method used is to read the CSV file
line-by-line and realloc additional space with each line read. having timed
this
and found the realloc speed to be low when the array is large, i am aiming to
make this faster but am not sure about the best way to proceed.
the current code uses realloc in the manner suggested by the manpage:
newsize = size + 1;
time(t1); // start timing realloc
if ((newap = (int *)realloc(ap, newsize*sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
free(ap);
ap = NULL;
size = 0;
return (NULL);
}
time(t2); // stop timing realloc; start timing fscanf
as the size of ap grows, so does the time it takes to realloc the space.
an alternative to this procedure would be to scan through the CSV file to
determine how many array entries i would need, realloc it all at once, then go
back through the CSV file again to read the data into the array. i'm not
confident this is the only way to do this and would appreciate any suggestions
for speeding up this procedure.
You'll have to think how this works: realloc has to copy the data to
the newly allocated region if it is not able to extend the current
region.
If you do that for each time you'll increase the allocation size and
your size increment is small, you'll do a lot of work. The way you are
doing it now has quadratic time complexity.
So make your increment larger and start with a larger size. Maybe you
can estimate the initial size based on your file size. If you'll end
up allocating a too large area, just use realloc the decrease the size
after you're done.
Also thing about other data structures: you might be better of with a
linked list or tree here, depending on what you are doing with your
data.
-Otto
Re: mount_msdos error
Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2006/06/15 16:16, Tony Abernethy wrote: nike:fred /home/fred fdisk sd1 fdisk: sysctl(machdep.bios.diskinfo): Device not configured Disk: sd1 geometry: 1980/64/32 [4055040 Sectors] Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55 Starting Ending LBA Info: #: idC H S -C H S [ start: size ] *0: 060 7 32 - 1979 56 1 [ 255: 4054530 ] DOS 32MB That does not look like ANY DOS disk I've every seen. The initial sector on the drive has the DOS partition table. (easy to find) Generally, the first stuff on the drive comes on the track immediately following that sector. this is typically after 63 sectors on hard drives, but a power of 2 (like 32 is more plausible on something electronic) (64 might work, but I'm sure SOMETHING would find a way to make 64 act like 0) Who knows what geometry it was formatted with? FAT boot sector, etc, are quite easy to spot - try dd if=/dev/sd1i count=1 | hexdump -C with reference to another FAT partition that can be mounted successfully and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table and you'll soon know if the partition table is correct. I wonder if reformatting the card might get it into some shape where it can be seen by both camera and OpenBSD...may be worth dd'ing an image of it as it currently stands before doing this, so it can be restored if necessary. Hi Stuart Tony, The output of dd if=/dev/sd1i count=1 | hexdump -C made it quite clear that it was a FAT16 partition. After doing fdisk, disklabel and newfs it is now mounting - thanks for the clue sticks :~) Fred
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:14:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i've got some C code that is reading from a 800 MB CSV file and allocates
memory
for an array to store the data in. the method used is to read the CSV file
line-by-line and realloc additional space with each line read. having timed
this
and found the realloc speed to be low when the array is large, i am aiming
to
make this faster but am not sure about the best way to proceed.
the current code uses realloc in the manner suggested by the manpage:
newsize = size + 1;
time(t1); // start timing realloc
if ((newap = (int *)realloc(ap, newsize*sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
free(ap);
ap = NULL;
size = 0;
return (NULL);
}
time(t2); // stop timing realloc; start timing fscanf
as the size of ap grows, so does the time it takes to realloc the space.
an alternative to this procedure would be to scan through the CSV file to
determine how many array entries i would need, realloc it all at once, then
go
back through the CSV file again to read the data into the array. i'm not
confident this is the only way to do this and would appreciate any
suggestions
for speeding up this procedure.
You'll have to think how this works: realloc has to copy the data to
the newly allocated region if it is not able to extend the current
region.
If you do that for each time you'll increase the allocation size and
your size increment is small, you'll do a lot of work. The way you are
doing it now has quadratic time complexity.
So make your increment larger and start with a larger size. Maybe you
can estimate the initial size based on your file size. If you'll end
up allocating a too large area, just use realloc the decrease the size
after you're done.
Also thing about other data structures: you might be better of with a
linked list or tree here, depending on what you are doing with your
data.
-Otto
Also, if the purpose of this is to load the file in memory, why not just
mmap() it in the first place ?
Re: libtool: link: 'format-python.lo'
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Roger Midmore wrote: The port that seems to be broken is gettext since all the other packages are having problems when they try to install it as a dependency. I just got a new laptop and was installing OpenBSD 3.9 on it and I got a linking error when I was trying to build clisp from ports. The error is libtool: link: 'format-python.lo' is not a valid libtool object I also get the same error when I try to install some other software from ports like mozilla-firefox and others. They all seem to be related to this one problem with libtool. I was wondering if anyone has encountered this problem. Laptop is a Acer Aspire 3000 with a 1.8 sempron 3100.
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:40:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:14:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i've got some C code that is reading from a 800 MB CSV file and allocates
memory
for an array to store the data in. the method used is to read the CSV file
line-by-line and realloc additional space with each line read. having
timed this
and found the realloc speed to be low when the array is large, i am
aiming to
make this faster but am not sure about the best way to proceed.
the current code uses realloc in the manner suggested by the manpage:
newsize = size + 1;
time(t1); // start timing realloc
if ((newap = (int *)realloc(ap, newsize*sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
free(ap);
ap = NULL;
size = 0;
return (NULL);
}
time(t2); // stop timing realloc; start timing
fscanf
as the size of ap grows, so does the time it takes to realloc the space.
an alternative to this procedure would be to scan through the CSV file to
determine how many array entries i would need, realloc it all at once,
then go
back through the CSV file again to read the data into the array. i'm not
confident this is the only way to do this and would appreciate any
suggestions
for speeding up this procedure.
You'll have to think how this works: realloc has to copy the data to
the newly allocated region if it is not able to extend the current
region.
If you do that for each time you'll increase the allocation size and
your size increment is small, you'll do a lot of work. The way you are
doing it now has quadratic time complexity.
So make your increment larger and start with a larger size. Maybe you
can estimate the initial size based on your file size. If you'll end
up allocating a too large area, just use realloc the decrease the size
after you're done.
Also thing about other data structures: you might be better of with a
linked list or tree here, depending on what you are doing with your
data.
-Otto
Also, if the purpose of this is to load the file in memory, why not just
mmap() it in the first place ?
Ooops ... I was doing two things at the same time and did not finish the
mail before sending it.
So basically, why not mmap() the file, go through the map counting \n
while replacing them by \0 until you reach end of map. allocate an
array the size of the counter and have each array entry point to where
it should in the memory map ?
Fwd: Re: error clamav at 3.9
Sorry, I just go to rarlab and get the unrarsrc, put it in the distfiles. Everything is working now. Clamav up and running. Thanks, Riwan Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:22:52 +0700 To: Michael Erdely [EMAIL PROTECTED], sonjaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: riwanlky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: error clamav at 3.9 Cc: misc@openbsd.org Hi guys, I am trying to install Clamav on 3.9. Previously I used Clamav on 3.8 and without need to make install the unarj. Manage to make install unarj. However Clamav require unrar and I got this error. # make install === Checking files for unrar-3.54p0 unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. Fetch http://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz. Size does not match for /usr/ports/distfiles/unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz /bin/sh: test: unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz: unexpected operator/operand *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/unrar (line 2106 of /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/unrar (line 1561 of /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/unrar (line 1750 of /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). Thanks and looking forward to get more information. Brgds, Riwan At 12:09 AM 5/5/2006 -0400, Michael Erdely wrote: sonjaya wrote: i try using port # cd /usr/ports/archivers/unarj/ # make install make: don't know how to make install. Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/unarj. You've got problems with your ports tree. rm -Rf /usr/ports and re-unpack ports.tar.gz. I tried on my vanilla 3.9 machine with no problems. -ME -- Support OpenBSD: http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So basically, why not mmap() the file, go through the map counting \n while replacing them by \0 until you reach end of map. allocate an array the size of the counter and have each array entry point to where it should in the memory map ? I implemented a similar technique in patch(1), minus the '\n' - '\0' replacing; patch does not use NUL terminated strings internally. But it all depends on which data is being stored: just the lines from the file, or data based on the chars found in the file. -Otto
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:17:39PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So basically, why not mmap() the file, go through the map counting \n while replacing them by \0 until you reach end of map. allocate an array the size of the counter and have each array entry point to where it should in the memory map ? I implemented a similar technique in patch(1), minus the '\n' - '\0' replacing; patch does not use NUL terminated strings internally. But it all depends on which data is being stored: just the lines from the file, or data based on the chars found in the file. -Otto Yup, I used this in (function splitfields) where the delimiter was chosen with getopt: http://etudiant.epitech.net/~veins/sort/sort.c
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
Original message Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:14:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: slow realloc: alternate method? To: Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: misc@openbsd.org So make your increment larger and start with a larger size. Maybe you can estimate the initial size based on your file size. If you'll end up allocating a too large area, just use realloc the decrease the size after you're done. Also thing about other data structures: you might be better of with a linked list or tree here, depending on what you are doing with your data. thx for all the suggestions guys. i like the idea of allocating too much space and trimming it at the end. the data is tick price data and once it's read into an array, it is searched for patterns by accessing elements in sequence. linked lists were mentioned by someone offlist.
Re: Tracking security advisories
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:47:51AM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote: For sysadmins that want to know as soon as possible about issues which are deemed patch-worthy (security vulnerabilities, critical reliability issues), what is the best way to stay on top of these issues as they are resolved? OpenBSD Journal (undeadly.org) has an OpenBSD Errata sidebar which, from what I can tell, they maintain themselves and is pretty reliable. It also has an associated RSS feed (http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=errata) that you can poll too. I have a Python script that uses the 'feedparser' library to watch after infrequently updated RSS feeds like this and send me e-mail notification, and has been working pretty good. Adam -- Adam VanderHook [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://acidos.bandwidth-junkies.net/
Re: Tracking security advisories
I'm patched, only because I pay attention to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be nice to have security-announce@ be really used. It would't be much effort to send some blurb like: new patch, check the ftp. That's all that is really required. Can anyone post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone has to step up, and that person ought to be official, lest misc@ and security-announce@ get flooded with frantic screamings of armageddon (or posting is denied to unofficial persons. I don't know the staus on that.) In all fairness, it was a simple DOS vulnerability. Not too serious. In the case that a root shell exploit is possible, you'll probably hear about it (it will be posted asap.) But speaking of fairness, I would like all patches to be treated the same. We have security-announce, and many people _expect_ it to be used for _every_ patch. Please no cracks about paranoia, I'm running low on tin- foil so my nerves are going bad. Security patch announcements are sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Travers On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:47:51 -0700 Spruell, Darren-Perot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For sysadmins that want to know as soon as possible about issues which are deemed patch-worthy (security vulnerabilities, critical reliability issues), what is the best way to stay on top of these issues as they are resolved? The canonical source of information seems to be errta.html, which does tend to be updated quickly as the patch becomes available. To keep track of this, it requires the user to access the page and look for a new patch which may apply to him. One could also monitor commits to CVS and while reliable, it becomes a bit more difficult to pick the critical from some of the rest of it. Then, as outlined in release announcements, Security patch announcements are sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. This method is preferred by a lot of people so they get some kind of proactive notification of potentially impactive problems. Patch announcements do make it to the list, some as early as 1 day after patch announcement, others 14 days after patch. The possible advantage over errata.html though is you get notified even if you've lapsed in checking out the web page. On the flip side, this requires a developer to take time and craft the message and send it, so the onus is on the project to do the work. DS
Re: Tracking security advisories
From: Travers Buda via [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip attitude I intentionally avoided in my original posting,] Security patch announcements are sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. And in fairness, announcments *are* sent to the list. Check the archives. They end up there. Some are quite immediate, others can take some time. I haven't tried to correlate urgency of a patch relative to urgency of post; I assume that serious ones make it there and I take due diligence in checking the errata page frequently. Not _my_ intention to drag this into a post to the list or else you bastards, simply wondering what's the best way to keep on top of it. Incidentally, the RSS feed works good for me. I have a reader that pops notifications on update. Timely notification via a mailing list would work equally as well. DS
Re: Tracking security advisories
2006/6/17, Spruell, Darren-Perot [EMAIL PROTECTED]: And in fairness, announcments *are* sent to the list. Check the archives. _Recently_ some have been sent. Please check the archives. Did you get any mail for fixes 1,2 5 of 3.8? The archives didn't. Best Martin
Re: Kernel Hangs; Supermicro 5015M-MR (Intel E7230)
With flags 2 it hangs at: pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x00) Disabling pcibios has the same result as flags 1 I've tried setting other flags listed in the pcibios man page. The only flag that gives me anything different is flag 20 I setup a serial console to capture the output when setting flags 20 OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 2.10 boot -c booting hd0a:/bsd: 5167328+868176 [52+265088+246821]=0x63e980 entry point at 0x200120 m [ using 512336 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ] Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 1995-2006 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.org OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #882: Thu Jun 15 12:43:50 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.77 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,CNXT-ID,CX16 real mem = 1072128000 (1047000K) avail mem = 970346496 (947604K) using 4256 buffers containing 53710848 bytes (52452K) of memory User Kernel Config UKC change pcibios 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x0 change (y/n) ? flags [0] ? 20 284 pcibios0 changed 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x14 UKC quit Continuing... mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(57) BIOS, date 04/17/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd470, SMBIOS rev. 2.51 @ 0x3feea000 (33 entries) bios0: Supermicro PDSMi pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd470/0xb90 pcibios0: config mechanism [1][x], special cycles [x][x], last bus 10 PCI bridge 0: primary 0, secondary 1, subordinate 1 PCI bridge 1: primary 2, secondary 3, subordinate 3 PCI bridge 2: primary 0, secondary 2, subordinate 3 PCI bridge 3: primary 0, secondary 4, subordinate 4 PCI bridge 4: primary 0, secondary 5, subordinate 5 PCI bridge 5: primary 0, secondary 6, subordinate 6 pcibios0: PCI bus #6 is the last bus [System BIOS Setting]--- device vendor product register space addresssize 000:00:0 8086:2778 [OK] 000:01:0 8086:2779 mickey wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:39:44AM -0800, Jon Holderith wrote: Supermicro 5015M-MR uses Supermicro PDSMi motherboard (Intel E7230 chipset) Kernel hangs after pcibios0: PCI bus #6 is the last bus Changed pcibios flags to 1 with UKC and enabled verbose mode. Kernel then hangs during ppb probe Changed pcibios flags to 1 and disabled ppb and Kernel finished loading. Same result with bsd.mp Is there anything else I can try that will shed more light on this issue? yes. flags 2 or otherwise just disable pcibios completely. OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #882: Thu Jun 15 12:43:50 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.78 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,CNXT-ID,CX16 real mem = 1072128000 (1047000K) avail mem = 970346496 (947604K) using 4256 buffers containing 53710848 bytes (52452K) of memory User Kernel Config UKC change pcibios 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x0 change (y/n) ? flags [0] ? 1 284 pcibios0 changed 284 pcibios0 at bios0 flags 0x1 UKC disable ppb 89 ppb* disabled UKC quit Continuing... mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(66) BIOS, date 04/17/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd470, SMBIOS rev. 2.51 @ 0x3feea000 (33 entries) bios0: Supermicro PDSMi pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd470/0xb90 pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 20 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #6 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7230 MCH rev 0x81 Intel E7230 PCIE rev 0x81 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 not configured Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 not configured Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 not configured Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 not configured uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 5 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 10 usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11 usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01:
Re: slow realloc: alternate method?
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:55:05AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
the current code uses realloc in the manner suggested by the manpage:
newsize = size + 1;
time(t1); // start timing realloc
if ((newap = (int *)realloc(ap, newsize*sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
free(ap);
ap = NULL;
size = 0;
return (NULL);
}
time(t2); // stop timing realloc; start timing fscanf
as the size of ap grows, so does the time it takes to realloc the space.
Growing your array by only a constant amount each iteration takes
quadratic time. By instead doubling the array size each time as
necessary, you can reduce this to (amortized) linear time. (I believe
the man page's intention was to show how to avoid leaking memory, not
how to write an efficient program.)
Alternatively, just do as others have suggested and mmap() the file and
make an extra preliminary pass.
3.9 release 1st boot: kernel: stopped at scan_smbios
Hi List, I've just installed 3.9 RELEASE on an i386 and got a kernel page fault. Booted the box from the floppy39.fs, sliced the disk, installed some sets rebooted, as per normal. I don't use this box very often and the last release I had on it was 3.6, which worked fine. Where do I go from here? 3.8? I piped the boot output from tip into a file: =07connected=0D =FC OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 2.10 =0Dbooting hd0a:/bsd: \=08|=08/=08-=08\=084966344|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-= =08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08= /=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\= =08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08= -=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|= =08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08= \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/= =08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08= |=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-= =08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08= /=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\= =08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08= -=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|= =08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08= \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/= =08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08= |=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-= =08\=08+867848 [52+255872|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|= =08/=08-=08+237161\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/= =08]=3D0x608d64 entry point at 0x100120 [ using 493460 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ] Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 1995-2006 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.o= rg OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium III (GenuineIntel 686-class, 128KB L2 cache) 635 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE= 36,MMX,FXSR,SSE real mem =3D 199729152 (195048K) avail mem =3D 175271936 (171164K) using 2463 buffers containing 10088448 bytes (9852K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 01/15/99, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfdb70 apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 30102 dobusy 0 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1 pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 9 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801AA LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 uvm_fault(0xd05c2f60, 0xdeeb8000, 0, 1) - e kernel: page fault trap, code=3D0 Stopped at scan_smbios+0xb9: cmpb$0,0(%ebx) ddb=20
Re: Tracking security advisories
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:26:16 -0700 Spruell, Darren-Perot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not _my_ intention to drag this into a post to the list or else you bastards, simply wondering what's the best way to keep on top of it. Hey, I'm in _no_ position to demand anything. How about security-announce be opened up for anyone to post to? Then when there is a patch... you get the idea. Devs won't have to post and the aggregate bitching on misc will go down. =) I'm just having a hard time understanding why security-announce is slipping. It is not inline with the attitude of OpenBSD. Do these patches even matter? Since no one with coding prowess around here seems to think so, then I could understand the lack-luster attitude to security-announce. Furthermore, many people are using security-announce as their sole notification method. These people are not just the paranoid patch-at- once type either. Please (see, I'm not demanding) either open up the list, or just delete it all togeather. It's giving people a false sense of being up-to-date or informed. Travers Travers
Re: 3.9 release 1st boot: kernel: stopped at scan_smbios
Looks like a crappy bios (pardon the redundancy,) try boot boot -c UKC disable pcibios UKC quit Travers On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:45:29 +0100 Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List, I've just installed 3.9 RELEASE on an i386 and got a kernel page fault. Booted the box from the floppy39.fs, sliced the disk, installed some sets rebooted, as per normal. I don't use this box very often and the last release I had on it was 3.6, which worked fine. Where do I go from here? 3.8? I piped the boot output from tip into a file: =07connected=0D =FC OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 2.10 =0Dbooting hd0a:/bsd: \=08|=08/=08-=08\=084966344|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/ =08-= =08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08- =08\=08|=08= /=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\= =08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08= -=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|= =08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08= \=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/= =08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08= |=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/ =08-= =08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08- =08\=08|=08= /=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\= =08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08= -=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|= =08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08= \=08|=08/=08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/= =08-=08 \=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08= |=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/ =08-= =08\=08+867848 [52+255872|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/ =08-=08\=08|= =08/=08-=08+237161\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08|=08/=08-=08\=08| =08/=08-=08\=08|=08/= =08]=3D0x608d64 entry point at 0x100120 [ using 493460 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ] Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 1995-2006 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.o= rg OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium III (GenuineIntel 686-class, 128KB L2 cache) 635 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE= 36,MMX,FXSR,SSE real mem =3D 199729152 (195048K) avail mem =3D 175271936 (171164K) using 2463 buffers containing 10088448 bytes (9852K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 01/15/99, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfdb70 apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 30102 dobusy 0 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1 pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 9 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801AA LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 uvm_fault(0xd05c2f60, 0xdeeb8000, 0, 1) - e kernel: page fault trap, code=3D0 Stopped at scan_smbios+0xb9: cmpb$0,0(%ebx) ddb=20
cruxports for OpenBSD
Hi,
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
Lets dive in deep and take a look at a Pkgfile; the description of
a port:
-
# Description: A tool for transfering files with URL syntax
# Maintainer: Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# URL: http://curl.haxx.se
# Depends:
name=curl
version=7.15.3
release=1
source=http://curl.haxx.se/download/$name-$version.tar.bz2;
build()
{
cd $name-$version
./configure \
--prefix=/usr/local \
--with-random=/dev/arandom
make
make install DESTDIR=$PKG
}
-
As you can see it contains nothing more than the bare minimum
which defines how to build and fake-install a source-code package.
If you can see why this is an advantage to you please read on:
In 2000 Per Liden started CRUX-Linux, a distro based on
simplicity. The idea for the ports system was influenced by BSD
ports, but written in sh and C++, the Pkgfiles which define how a
package should be build are nothing but simple shell-scripts.
Cruxports for OpenBSD is a port/rewrite of the CRUX ports-system
to OpenBSD, and is completely written in sh, except for a simple
parser written in C.
Now I hear you say: What's wrong with the normal ports?
Well... wrong is a big word. It's just a matter of personal
preference I think. But let me give you a list of reasons why I
prefer cruxports.
* Lightweight.
* Always the latest versions of software, no matter which
release you use.
* CRUX ports are much easier to create and maintain since the
ports are shell-based.
* Portable, anyone can read and understand a cruxport.
* Dependencies are optional.
* It's not trying to be braindead-proof.
* No checking of md5sum on uninstall of files.
* Files in /etc are installed, and maintained with a mergemaster
like application (rejmerge) in a sane and easy way.
* You can easily share your own ports with others with httpup.
* Does not conflict with other package-managers.
* You can build packages from alternative sources like
binaries or CVS.
my c4o page can be found at:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/c4o/
# Han
Re: Hifn policy on documentation
Hi all, I 've been told by people ( more than one ) off list how *uncivilized* it is to forward *private* mail publicly *even when it has some bad content*. And I have been asked to apologize publicly ( not by Hank Cohen ). Without trying to Justify my points any more I apologize doing this. I am wrong. I accept it. Sorry Hank. I know the damage is done. But I 'll make sure that it is not repeated anymore. And thank you so much for all who sent the mails of reproof and correction. Thank you for taking effort to put me in the right track. And thank you so much for all who silently put up with this misbehaviour. Kind Regards Siju On 6/14/06, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, This is the mail I got from Hifn representative for my response to his mail and clarifications in misc. This mail was sent to me privately and I am well aware of the fact that it is not good manners to make private mails public. In that way i am just going down a little bit down on that. let people see the response they get from Hifn. And Mr. Cohen, If what you sent to the list was indeed not a lie then I sincerly apologize mentioning that you were lying in my previously mail. I apologize publicly just as I mentioned it publicly. Also I would like to let you know very humbly that this may not be a very good way of treating your potential customers. Thanks for you complements any way :-) Good Luck ahead with this policy of your company and you personal behaviour. Kind regards --Siju -- Forwarded message -- From: Hank Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jun 14, 2006 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Hifn policy on documentation To: Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mr. george. I do not appreciate being accused of lying. If you choose not to use Hifn products then so be it. I have announced our policy in good faith and been treated to a barrage of insult and invective. If I were speaking on my own account I would feel free to tell you what I really think of this kind of bullshit but I cannot do so since I will always be seen as a representative of my company. You sir have the manners of a pig. And I shall surely never recommend your IT and Media services to anyone either. Having said that perhaps you can understand how much your threats are likely to have the result that you desire. Hank Cohen On my own account. -- Siju Oommen George, Network Consultant. HiFX IT MEDIA SERVICES PVT. LTD. http://www.hifx.net
