Re: [MOPO] RON BORST/HOLLYWOOD MOVIE POSTERS

[Jeff Potokar]

Agree, Jim.

A great article on a genuine and sincere poster seller and collector.
One of the rare ones in the hobby. 

J

-From: "James Gresham" 
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Cc: 
Sent: Thursday January 30 2020 9:14:24AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] RON BORST/HOLLYWOOD MOVIE POSTERS

What a nice article on a wonderful guy.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:08 PM Rudy Franchi  wrote:

--Nice article about Ron, his shop and the world of movie posters:
 
[2]https://www.dailynews.com/2020/01/29/thrills-chills-movie-posters-meet-the-man-whose-memorabilia-shop-keeps-old-hollywood-alive/
[3]rudy

-

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
 
[4]https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
[5]  

-- 
James Gresham // CEO
Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc. [6]
18501 Henry Ct. Ray, MI 48096
Phone/Fax: 888-576-7669 (SNOW) 

-

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
 
[7]https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
[8]  

Links:
--
[1] mailto:r...@posterappraisal.com
[2]
https://www.dailynews.com/2020/01/29/thrills-chills-movie-posters-meet-the-man-whose-memorabilia-shop-keeps-old-hollywood-alive/
[3]
https://www.dailynews.com/2020/01/29/thrills-chills-movie-posters-meet-the-man-whose-memorabilia-shop-keeps-old-hollywood-alive/
[4]
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
[5]
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
[6] http://www.greshamsseasonalservices.com/
[7]
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
[8]
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1


 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Heritage Down Again?

[Jeff Potokar]

Im on a Mac and use Firefox and i was logged in as quick as it took me to click 
the buttons. Not a problem, and no error.

All good.



> On Nov 6, 2019, at 8:11 AM, Ira Rubenstein  wrote:
> 
> So weird.Works on my iPhone but not my work  laptop.Must be something 
> with both my chrome and safari browsers.   Or my office is tracking me and 
> blocking me.   :).  
> 
> Sent via mobile.Please excuse typos and autocorrects. 
> 
>> On Nov 6, 2019, at 8:05 AM, Sam Sarowitz  wrote:
>> 
>>  Works fine for me Ira.
>> 
>> Sam
>> posteritati.com 
>> 
>> 239 Centre St FL 4 | New York, NY 10013 | 212.226.2207
>> Instagram 
>> 
>>  | Twitter 
>> 
>>  | Facebook 
>> 
>>  | Pinterest 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 6, 2019, at 10:23 AM, Ira Rubenstein >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Anyone else getting this error when trying to go to the Heritage Web site?  
>>>  Or do I need to clear my cache or something….
>>> Ira
>>>  
>>>  
>>> The requested URL was rejected. Please contact our Webmaster 
>>>  
>>> for assistance.
>>> 
>>> Your support ID is: 9669705193685573176
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>>> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Mopo.O/T - Happy Halloween

[Jeff Potokar]

Sleeping IN on Halloween night (at 5;12 PM)?

I don’t get it. Why "sleep in" at almost 6 PM?

Most normal people are getting home from work, having dinner and/or getting 
ready for the little ghouls to come knocking.

Why were you wanting to be passed out?






> On Oct 31, 2019, at 5:12 PM, Tom Martin 
>  wrote:
> 
> well no trick or treaters tonight..It has rained all day and was bitter 
> cold..so i just slept in..
> so was 1st year i didn't do Halloween ..and had 2 bags of midget tootsie 
> rolls...so the kids are safe
> 
> California could have used this weather ontheFires...
> 
> On 2019-10-31 19:13, Toochis r wrote:
>> Thanks Tom!  Happy Halloween to all.  Please be careful when driving.
>> Many children are in danger during this time as they run across the
>> streets and drivers are even more distracted by their phones.
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:23 PM
>>  wrote:
>>> YOU TOO Toochis!!!
>>> hope you have a fun Halloween ! that the fires calm down and your
>>> safe!
>>> On 2019-10-30 21:12, Toochis r wrote:
 Happy Halloween Tom and all the MoPoers out there!
 On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:20 PM Tom Martin
  wrote:
> hey Folks wishing YOu all a Happy Halloween
> ! to my Friends in California
> Please stay safe with Family
> all the best
> Tom
> Hollywood dream Factory®
> I bought 2 Bags of Tootsie Rolls midgets 11.00 600 pieces
> to give out to the lil Goblins in MY hood
> they are so cute and well behaved and say Thanks ,and trick or
> treat.
> think back memories of my Youth when itwas fun to wear the 108
>>> ben
> cooper vacuum form masks and taffetta costumes..and go door to
>>> door
> and
> get Candy
> our special effects makeup was BURNT cork ..and using gelatin
> formonster effects andtonsof stage Blood..
> our biggest fear was a razor blade or pin ina apple..
> Times sure have changed
> since the 60s
> Have fun Folks
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com [1]
> [1]
>>> ___
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu 
> 
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its
> content.
 -
 To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>> 
>>> [2]
 [2]
 Links:
 --
 [1] http://www.filmfan.com  [1]
 [2]
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>> 
>>> [2]
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>> 
>> [3]
>> Links:
>> --
>> [1] http://www.filmfan.com 
>> [2] 
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-LA=1 
>> 
>> [3] https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
> 
>  ___
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: 
> lists...@listserv.american.edu 
>   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>  The author of this message is solely 
> responsible for its content.


 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Getting older and collecting movie posters. (PHOTOS.)

[Jeff Potokar]

Dave,

AS always occurs when you write, another insightful and well versed post.

I agree with you on all aspects. At the end of the day, we are nothing more 
than caretakers with items that we “own.” Barring something like a fire, 
earthquake, or the like, all of these things will outlast us, and many were 
around before we were born.

And what fantastic photos of your collection.  Thanks for the added perk to 
your post.

Jeff




> On Oct 16, 2019, at 6:39 PM, David Kusumoto  
> wrote:
> 
> * I confess I sometimes get a little depressed realizing that a life span is 
> nearing its end - vs. being in the beginning or in the middle - during heady 
> days when I cared less about the time unfurling ahead of me - and more about 
> trying to OWN everything.  
> 
> * There were "bumps" that caused me to downsize unrelated to aging - e.g., 
> wildfire evacuations and the crazy exercise of toting out my fav framed 
> one-sheets in less than ten minutes.  
> 
> * But as decades pass and I realize my nostalgia doesn't line up with the 
> nostalgia of younger generations - the urge to purge - (vs. letting your 
> survivors cherry-pick through your stuff after you're gone) - gets stronger. 
> 
> * When you've liquidated a few estates it hits some of us that we don't want 
> to put our survivors through the hassle of choosing - and then dumping things 
> they know little about - to Goodwill.
> 
> * So I think I'm like a lot of people in that what I have left today - has 
> far more sentimental value than actual $$$ value - (or almost no dollar 
> value).  Two things that pull me out of my funk: 
> 
> 1) Gifting things to younger adults who express an appreciation to own movie 
> memorabilia - thus giving them a gateway into a hobby that seems forbidden to 
> them now - and hoping that if it takes hold like it did for me - it will grab 
> them by the lapels and not peak for them - until they reach their late 40s 
> through their 50s, and...
> 
> 2) ...selling things - knowing that a future buyer will give them a good home 
> - and will cherish them for however long they can - until they themselves - 
> like I did - decide to move on.
> 
> * So while there's an element of sadness about divesting - I am in love with 
> the idea of passing things down as a means of preserving them well after I'm 
> gone.  And to feed my nostalgia - I can always look at photos of what I used 
> to own "back in the day."  (See below.)
> 
> * I never got a chance to own any $$$ horror paper - simply because I could 
> never afford it.  So I would say that my collection was likely a "mid-tiered" 
> one - representing titles I really loved.
> 
> * Another aspect of getting older and divesting - is I can now show "a little 
> bit" of what I used to own - without worrying about security issues - esp. 
> now that the "gold" is gone. My lobby card collection is also gone but I used 
> to own hundreds that aren't pictured here. -d. 
> 
> P.S. - And almost everything I collected - with the exception of Beatles 
> memorabilia and comic books - I purchased from dealers who are or were 
> members of this very MOPO group!  (With the probable exception of the late 
> Deke Richards and that couple who ran That's Entertainment" in PA - from whom 
> I scored some incredible prizes!  I can't believe I've forgotten their names. 
>  Does anyone remember who I'm talking about?)
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/9020/N4OrrP.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img921/6615/3ffRPe.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/4167/XfS18s.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2971/Mqzyz5.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img921/6813/1jYDO5.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/6757/fwkRYj.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img921/487/035wER.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/7920/g7P84B.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/5949/BQF5jL.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/273/XzUEoa.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/9947/sVa0S9.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/7400/ZMmz2Z.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img921/3397/JyNlRC.jpg 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [MOPO] Shanghai Express

[Jeff Potokar]

from emp, Channing:

http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/archiveitem/15096246.html 






> On Sep 26, 2019, at 2:03 PM, Channing Thomson  
> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have a pic of the press book poster page for Shanghai Express? I 
> don’t think Ive ever seen a 1sheet, 3sheet, 6sheet, half sheet, of insert on 
> this title and I’d like to know what they look like.
> 
> Many thanks, Channing
> Sent from my iPad
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>   ___
>  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
>   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Reminder About our MoPo Post Archive

[Jeff Potokar]

And Yahoo email accounts were hit 3-5 years ago with MOPO emails not coming 
thru… so this is not a new occurrence.




> On Sep 6, 2019, at 6:40 PM, Scott Burns  wrote:
> 
> It looks like some of the MoPo posts are getting through to a few of the 
> delivery-challenged e-mail accounts. I want to remind everyone that you can 
> always check out posts at the Mail Archive and see if you missed anything:
>  
> https://www.mail-archive.com/mopo-l@listserv.american.edu/ 
> 
>  
> Scott
> MoPo List Owner
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Interesting New Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

The only problem with this auction is that (from how their terms read), all 
items must be picked up. They don’t mail or ship anything… so that removed a 
huge # of potential buyers and bidders.

Unless I overlooked something, that is. 

Does anyone know for sure, if that’s the case?

Jeff





> On Jul 7, 2019, at 2:36 PM, Rudy Franchi  wrote:
> 
> Just ran across this online. Some nice stuff, fresh to the market. rudy
> 
> 
> https://www.auctionninja.com/clearinghouseestatesales/sales/details/armonk-ny-art-circus-movie-poster-auction-pickup-bridgeport-ct--1195.html
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>   ___
>  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
>   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Unavailable from May 23 to June 4, 2019

[Jeff Potokar]

We all know you’ll be away.

This is the third one you’ve ’sent. Please don’t send a 4th.

I think we’re all aware by now. ;)




> On Jun 4, 2019, at 8:56 AM, John E. Petty 
> <01b3cd503c31-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu> wrote:
> 
> I will be unavailable from May 23 to June 4, 2019. During that time, I will 
> not be responding to email or phone calls. After June 4, 2019, I will be 
> reviewing my emails and responding as quickly as possible to all messages.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> John E. Petty
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] QUESTION for astute MOPO members

[Jeff Potokar]

The actress is Scilla Gabel and the actor is Giacomo Rossi Stuart.






> On Jun 2, 2019, at 9:30 AM, Kirby McDaniel  wrote:
> 
> I have tried diligently to identify these two actors in this U.S. lobby card 
> from SODOM AND GOMORRAH.
> I have not seen the film recently and I don't remember who these two are.  
> Does anyone here know?  Any help would be appreciated.   Kirby McDaniel   
> MovieArt Austin
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh

[Jeff Potokar]

I would also very much recommend Mario Cueva of Lumiere Poster Restoration. His 
work is incredible and he was trained and worked with Igor Edelman:

http://www.lumiereposterrestoration.com/ 
<http://www.lumiereposterrestoration.com/>






> On Apr 18, 2019, at 6:40 AM, James Gresham  wrote:
> 
> I agree both are great choices.  
> 
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 9:37 AM mailto:evan...@mac.com>> 
> wrote:
> Poster Mountain and Studio C do excellent work, and their past issues really 
> don’t compare to those of Jaime Mendez.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 18 Apr 2019, at 13:36, James Gresham  <mailto:jamesalangres...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> There are several good choices.  Here is one I recommend: 
>> http://www.lumiereposterrestoration.com 
>> <http://www.lumiereposterrestoration.com/>
>> 
>> Mario Lumiere does great work.  
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:18 AM Toochis r > <mailto:zimorri...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Can I get some reco’s for restoration?  I used Jamie before I ever heard 
>> about the forgeries. He was great and did a beautiful job. 
>> 
>> But...I can’t risk feeling like crap because I paid someone who knowingly 
>> ripped people off. For most of us, these posters aren’t only things that 
>> people buy then discard when it doesn’t bring one joy. Like great art, movie 
>> paper is history, a connection to something deep - when you saw a movie and 
>> it meant something to you and you had the hope that feeling was shared with 
>> others in that movie theatre. It’s community. 
>> 
>> It’s the same reason why I stopped watching Woody Allen pics. I couldn’t 
>> support the creep. 
>> 
>> 
>> Toochis
>> 
>> PS - any articles on this crime so I can know what  NOT to buy so I can 
>> avoid the forgery? If it’s Universal monsters, no worry, it’s out of my 
>> league but if dealers are selling his restoration I’d rally like to know so 
>> I may avoid buying it. Thanks. 
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:21 PM Jeff Potokar > <mailto:jpotok...@ca.rr.com>> wrote:
>> Exactly, Jim.
>> 
>> How easy for those to say its not a big deal, when they aren’t the ones who 
>> got the short end of the stick.
>> 
>> Mendez was integral to that who SCAM operation. Haggard was the mastermind, 
>> but he wasn’t the artist. Without Mendez, NONE of the forgeries would ever 
>> have been born. And THAT is also a fact, not my opinion or thought on the 
>> matter.
>> 
>> Mendez created fakes and forgeries, using his artistic skill to aid and help 
>> Haggard swindle people. And his claim that “I didn’t know” is a load of 
>> crap. Unless he’s as dumb as a box of rocks, that is.
>> 
>> That anyone supports this kind of individual is beyond me. And as you said, 
>> Jim, who’s to know if he might decide to swap out a client’s WOLF MAN or 
>> INVISIBLE MAN piece, for a newly created fake? But in a way, those that use 
>> him  deserve anything like this, should it ever happen. (And yes, that is my 
>> thought on this part of the equation).
>> 
>> You lost a lot, Jim. And that is a tragedy.
>> 
>> But those that haven’t suffered at Mendez’s hands are here to sing his 
>> praises. And that is pretty pathetic.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:37 AM, James Gresham >> <mailto:jamesalangres...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Jeff is absolutely correct.  Scott, you are indifferent because you didn't 
>>> lose anything with Jaime.  Had you lost money, like at least 35 people did, 
>>> I would bet you would feel differently.  The next time Jaime is in 
>>> financial trouble, who is to say he doesn't switch out your poster?  Jaime 
>>> made literally hundreds of fakes.  Many are still in the market place 
>>> today.  Without him, there would have been no Haggard crimes.  Scott why 
>>> did Jaime make at least 6 Wolf man title cards?  He absolutely knew people 
>>> were being taken.  He did everything with cash and accounted for nothing, 
>>> so he couldn't be traced.  Does a man hire a sex offender to teach his 
>>> daughter math?  Of course not, no one would bring a sex offender into their 
>>> home.  So why open the door to a thief?  Just because he didn't steal from 
>>> you, doesn't change the fact that he is a thief.  Using him only keeps him 
>>> prospering in our hobby.  I have absolutely no respect for anyone who uses 
>>> Jaime, including people I like a lot.  There is right and wrong in our 
>>> world.  St

Re: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh

[Jeff Potokar]

Exactly, Jim.

How easy for those to say its not a big deal, when they aren’t the ones who got 
the short end of the stick.

Mendez was integral to that who SCAM operation. Haggard was the mastermind, but 
he wasn’t the artist. Without Mendez, NONE of the forgeries would ever have 
been born. And THAT is also a fact, not my opinion or thought on the matter.

Mendez created fakes and forgeries, using his artistic skill to aid and help 
Haggard swindle people. And his claim that “I didn’t know” is a load of crap. 
Unless he’s as dumb as a box of rocks, that is.

That anyone supports this kind of individual is beyond me. And as you said, 
Jim, who’s to know if he might decide to swap out a client’s WOLF MAN or 
INVISIBLE MAN piece, for a newly created fake? But in a way, those that use him 
 deserve anything like this, should it ever happen. (And yes, that is my 
thought on this part of the equation).

You lost a lot, Jim. And that is a tragedy.

But those that haven’t suffered at Mendez’s hands are here to sing his praises. 
And that is pretty pathetic.






> On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:37 AM, James Gresham  
> wrote:
> 
> Jeff is absolutely correct.  Scott, you are indifferent because you didn't 
> lose anything with Jaime.  Had you lost money, like at least 35 people did, I 
> would bet you would feel differently.  The next time Jaime is in financial 
> trouble, who is to say he doesn't switch out your poster?  Jaime made 
> literally hundreds of fakes.  Many are still in the market place today.  
> Without him, there would have been no Haggard crimes.  Scott why did Jaime 
> make at least 6 Wolf man title cards?  He absolutely knew people were being 
> taken.  He did everything with cash and accounted for nothing, so he couldn't 
> be traced.  Does a man hire a sex offender to teach his daughter math?  Of 
> course not, no one would bring a sex offender into their home.  So why open 
> the door to a thief?  Just because he didn't steal from you, doesn't change 
> the fact that he is a thief.  Using him only keeps him prospering in our 
> hobby.  I have absolutely no respect for anyone who uses Jaime, including 
> people I like a lot.  There is right and wrong in our world.  Stop supporting 
> wrong, just because it wasn't done to you.  Jim
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 2:19 PM Scott Clark  <mailto:sscottwcl...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> I am sorry you disagree Jeff. No one disputes he created the artwork that 
> later became forgeries. I’ve always agreed with Bruce’s view that Jaime only 
> crossed a line when he did further restoration work on one of the pieces that 
> found its way back to him. 
> 
> To put this into perspective, a kid in my 15 year old son’s class recreated 
> the Mona Lisa in stunning fashion. It was incredible. He won an art award for 
> his achievements, and made the local papers. However, it would only be 
> considered a forgery if someone knowingly sold it under the pretence of it 
> being the original, as Haggard did with Jaime’s artwork.  Now Haggard, I hope 
> that guy rots in hell! 
> 
> If you really want to take a stance though you should boycott eBay, Amazon 
> and/or all of the major auction houses, because they’ve all sold - and 
> continue to sell - his restored paper. :->
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> From: MoPo List  <mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>> on behalf of Jeff Potokar 
> mailto:jpotok...@ca.rr.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 7:00 pm
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh
>  
> Yes he’s good. No doubt about that.
> 
> But the facts speak for themselves.
> 
> Its has nothing to do what I think about him.
> 
> He helped perpetuate a MAJOR fraud in this hobby. Again. those are the FACTS. 
> They are Not my thoughts on him or the issue at hand.
> 
> And again..talk to those that were ripped off or taken for THOUSANDS of 
> dollars. Who cares what category one wants to play him in, or not. He still 
> was part of the Haggard scam that took $$ from many fine people.
> 
> .
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 10:53 AM, Scott Clark > <mailto:sscottwcl...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Ha! Somehow I don’t put Jaime in the same category as Bernie who defrauded 
>> people out of roughly $65 billion. He made a mistake and he continues to pay 
>> the price for it. At the same time,  I think you’d be surprised out how many 
>> collectors continue to use Jaime in silence. As for me, I could truly care 
>> less about what you or any of the others think about him. He’s very good! :>)
>> 
>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>> From: MoPo List > <mai

Re: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh

[Jeff Potokar]

Yes he’s good. No doubt about that.

But the facts speak for themselves.

Its has nothing to do what I think about him.

He helped perpetuate a MAJOR fraud in this hobby. Again. those are the FACTS. 
They are Not my thoughts on him or the issue at hand.

And again..talk to those that were ripped off or taken for THOUSANDS of 
dollars. Who cares what category one wants to play him in, or not. He still was 
part of the Haggard scam that took $$ from many fine people.

.




> On Apr 17, 2019, at 10:53 AM, Scott Clark  wrote:
> 
> Ha! Somehow I don’t put Jaime in the same category as Bernie who defrauded 
> people out of roughly $65 billion. He made a mistake and he continues to pay 
> the price for it. At the same time,  I think you’d be surprised out how many 
> collectors continue to use Jaime in silence. As for me, I could truly care 
> less about what you or any of the others think about him. He’s very good! :>)
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS 
> From: MoPo List  > on behalf of Glenn Taranto 
> mailto:exit82afi...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:38 pm
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh
>  
> Isn't that kind of like asking Bernie Madoff to be your financial advisor, 
> transgressions aside?
> 
> :>)
> 
> GT
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:35 AM Scott Clark  > wrote:
> Wow Doug, the poster and restoration look amazing. Thanks for sharing the 
> before-and-after images. Jaime did a great job of recreating the missing 
> section.  A true artist! Alleged transgressions aside, he is one of the best 
> in the restoration business in my opinion, and I will continue to use him. 
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS 
> From: MoPo List  > on behalf of Douglas B Taylor 
> mailto:douglasbtay...@hotmail.com>>
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 10:02 pm
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
> Subject: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh
>  
> Just wanted to publicly thank Jaime Mendez for his great restoration on what 
> might be the only In a Lonely Place 6sh around.
> 
>  
> 
> He took it from this…
> 
> https://burton-taylor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/In-a-Lonely-Place-6sh-Before.jpg
>  
> 
>  
> 
> To this…
> 
> https://burton-taylor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/In-a-Lonely-Place-6sh-After.jpg
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Great work, and thanks again.
> 
>  
> 
> Doug
> 
>  
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh

[Jeff Potokar]

Mendez’ “transgressions” are NOT alleged. They are fact. Read the court docs or 
talk with Jim Gresham.

He was the one who created the forgeries and fakes on behalf of Kerry Haggard. 
Without Mendez to create these fakes, there would’ve been nothing for Haggard 
to sell, trade or swindle with.

Mendez is complicit, whether he wants to admit it or not.




> On Apr 17, 2019, at 10:35 AM, Scott Clark  wrote:
> 
> Wow Doug, the poster and restoration look amazing. Thanks for sharing the 
> before-and-after images. Jaime did a great job of recreating the missing 
> section.  A true artist! Alleged transgressions aside, he is one of the best 
> in the restoration business in my opinion, and I will continue to use him. 
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS 
> From: MoPo List  > on behalf of Douglas B Taylor 
> mailto:douglasbtay...@hotmail.com>>
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 10:02 pm
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
> Subject: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh
>  
> Just wanted to publicly thank Jaime Mendez for his great restoration on what 
> might be the only In a Lonely Place 6sh around.
>  
> He took it from this…
> https://burton-taylor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/In-a-Lonely-Place-6sh-Before.jpg
>  
> 
>  
> To this…
> https://burton-taylor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/In-a-Lonely-Place-6sh-After.jpg
>  
> 
>  
> Great work, and thanks again.
>  
> Doug
>  
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Thank you Jaime - In a Lonely Place 6sh

[Jeff Potokar]

Right on, Jim,

The guy was part of Haggard’s scam ring, and he helped to rip off collectors to 
the tune of THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of dollars.

Anyone that uses him and helps support his venture is akin to them giving him a 
big fat pass on the criminal forgeries he made.

Shame on anyone that continues to use JAIME MENDEZ for any restoration work. 

He should be restoring license plates behind bars. 

And I am not alone in this sentiment, either.



> On Apr 15, 2019, at 2:14 PM, James Gresham  wrote:
> 
>  After the entire Haggard thing, I don't know why anyone would use him.  He 
> is a dishonest man. I don't mean to sound harsh, but he and Haggard crippled 
> the horror market.  There are still fakes, that Jaime made, out there.  He 
> even made a fake 6 sheet!  Doug this isn't a personal attack on you.  I just 
> don't understand how anyone could support him.  And, he was closer to being 
> arrested, then he will ever know.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 5:02 PM Douglas B Taylor  > wrote:
> Just wanted to publicly thank Jaime Mendez for his great restoration on what 
> might be the only In a Lonely Place 6sh around.
> 
>  
> 
> He took it from this…
> 
> https://burton-taylor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/In-a-Lonely-Place-6sh-Before.jpg
>  
> 
>  
> 
> To this…
> 
> https://burton-taylor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/In-a-Lonely-Place-6sh-After.jpg
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Great work, and thanks again.
> 
>  
> 
> Doug
> 
>  
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
> 
> -- 
> James Gresham
> 
> Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc. 
> CEO // 18501 Henry Ct. Ray, MI 48096
> O: 586-677-7669 (SNOW) // F: 586-677-5669   
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Department of Justice-Haggard

[Jeff Potokar]

I didn’t see it at all, Jim (tho I was without power, internet or heat, here in 
the midwest for 26 hours, from Sun nite to Mon nite).

Hopefully someone can re-post?

Jeff






> On Feb 25, 2019, at 9:49 PM, James Gresham  wrote:
> 
> I got a notice today concerning the Haggard case.  However, I am having 
> difficulty opening the message.  Did anyone else get that and get it opened?  
> TY  Jim
> 
> -- 
> James Gresham
> 
> Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc. 
> CEO // 18501 Henry Ct. Ray, MI 48096
> O: 586-677-7669 (SNOW) // F: 586-677-5669   
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Happy New Year poster friends.

[Jeff Potokar]

The same to you, Jim. 

Here’s hoping you and your family (as well as those here on MOPO), all have a 
great and prosperous 2019, in business, work and posters. :)


Jeff





> On Dec 31, 2018, at 7:02 PM, James Gresham  wrote:
> 
> Here's wishing for peace in the coming year.  Jim
> 
> -- 
> James Gresham
> 
> Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc. 
> CEO // 18501 Henry Ct. Ray, MI 48096
> O: 586-677-7669 (SNOW) // F: 586-677-5669   
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Jaime Mendez

[Jeff Potokar]

After the Haggard fiasco, and his part in creating the fakes, why are you using 
him, anyhow?




> On Dec 5, 2018, at 1:45 PM, Douglas B Taylor  
> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know if Jaime Mendez is up and running?  He's had a six sheet of 
> mine for some time and his communication has been really spotty.  Is 
> something up?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Doug
> 
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>   ___
>  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
>   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] MOVIE POSTER TYPE FACES

[Jeff Potokar]

Really interesting clip and discussion in this clip, Rudy.

Thanks for sharing it.

Jeff





> On Jun 28, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Rudy Franchi  wrote:
> 
> Fascinating short film on the role of typography in the design of movie 
> posters.  rudy
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI4shGV1EsM 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] (MOPO) HELP - PayPal Browser Update

[Jeff Potokar]

All their email means is that everyone needs to be updated to their most 
current version of whatever browser is being used (Firefox, Safari etc).

Be sure you’re updated to the most current version, and you’re all set.


Jeff




> On Jun 9, 2018, at 9:19 AM, Zeev Drach  wrote:
> 
> Hello everybody,
>  
> I would be interested in hearing opinions regarding PayPal’s Browser Update. 
> Apparently, without it, one could no longer use PayPal after June 30.
> Is that the case? Should one do it? How difficult is the process?
>  
> Thanks in advance,
>  
> Zeev
>  
>  
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Does anyone know the story with the ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST One Sheets?? [EXTERNAL]

[Jeff Potokar]

Great info.

Thanks, Grey!


Jeff





> On May 18, 2018, at 4:44 PM, Smith, Grey - 1367  wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Todd, a good question.
> I will explain our reasoning and say that by calling the large title in lower 
> right version 1969 was obviously a mistake from some time ago.
> 1)  M rating lower left corner within artwork.  National Screen Service 
> info on right side of bottom border, then 69/241
> This would be the domestic release for the poster and with the rating 
> assuredly used in the states.
>  
> 2)  No M rating lower left corner within artwork.  National Screen 
> Service info on right side of bottom border, then 69/241
> This is believed to be the International one sheet as no ratings were used on 
> those posters generally. Some might say, well with NSS number it wouldn’t be 
> International but I suggest that it is International as during that time, 
> most domestic release posters did have a rating.
>  
> 3)  No M rating lower left corner within artwork.  No National Screen 
> Service info and No 69/241.  Instead, the title is on the right side of the 
> bottom border.
> This is a late 1970s, early 1980s reissue most likely and sold previously I 
> believe as 1969. IMDB says there was a showing in 1980, but as you know it 
> wasn’t until the early 1970s that NSS started labeling the posters with the 
> larger title in the lower right leading us to deduce this is a reissue just 
> as we know the James Bonds titles with similar markings are reissue. More 
> recently we have called this a reissue.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: MoPo List  On Behalf Of Todd
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 5:34 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Does anyone know the story with the ONCE UPON A TIME IN 
> THE WEST One Sheets?? [EXTERNAL]
>  
> you mean  'does anyone know what the real deal is when buying at heritage ? '
>  
> Not at all.  I buy from Heritage all the time.
>  
> I was just citing examples of different versions of the poster they had sold 
> and was wondering why there are at least 3 different versions and for what 
> reason as they all have the same artwork.
>  
>  
> 
> From: MoPo List  > on behalf of filip de volder 
> >
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Does anyone know the story with the ONCE UPON A TIME IN 
> THE WEST One Sheets??
>  
> you mean  'does anyone know what the real deal is when buying at heritage ? '
>  
> 
> From: MoPo List  > on behalf of Todd 
> >
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 12:03 AM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
> Subject: [MOPO] Does anyone know the story with the ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE 
> WEST One Sheets??
>  
> Does anyone know what the story is with the ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST One 
> Sheets??
>  
> I've seen at least 3 slight variations to the One Sheet.
>  
> 1) M rating lower left corner within artwork.  National Screen Service info 
> on right side of bottom border, then 69/241
>  
> 2) No M rating lower left corner within artwork.  National Screen Service 
> info on right side of bottom border, then 69/241
>  
> 3) No M rating lower left corner within artwork.  No National Screen Service 
> info and No 69/241.  Instead, the title is on the right side of the bottom 
> border.
>  
> In 2009 Heritage sold #3 as a regular One Sheet.
>  
> In 2008 Heritage sold #3 as an International One Sheet.
>  
> In 2007 Heritage sold #3 as an R-80 One Sheet.
>  
> Does anyone know what the real deal is with these One Sheets??
>  
> Thanks folks!
>  
> Best,
> Todd
>  
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
>  
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
>  
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

Re: [MOPO] MOPO-O/T BILL COSBY :(

[Jeff Potokar]

Finally —

Justice is served.



> On Apr 26, 2018, at 12:48 PM, Tom Martin 
>  wrote:
> 
> God bless Bill Cosby
> 
> 
> 
>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>  ___
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: 
> lists...@listserv.american.edu
>   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>  The author of this message is solely 
> responsible for its content.

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] GOING OUT OF BUSINESS SALE!!

[Jeff Potokar]

Good luck and all the best on whatever the next endeavor might be, Todd.

Viewing and seeing your amazing poster delights has been a pure joy over these 
years.

All the best,

Jeff






> On Mar 31, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Todd  wrote:
> 
> Dear MoPo members,
> 
> After 55 years of collecting and 39 years of selling and after giving it much 
> thought, I’ve decided to
> finally close the doors on Poster City, the business I started in 1979.
> 
> Currently, I have about 270 items on ebay with about 60 more that I will be 
> relisting tomorrow.
> 
> Check them out here:
> https://www.ebay.com/sch/toddfeiertag/m.html?item=382400534852=STRK%3AMESELX%3AIT=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562
>  
> 
> Any of the 60 items that will be relisted tomorrow can be seen here in my 
> completed items:
> https://www.ebay.com/sch/toddfeiertag/m.html?item=382419580732=item5909fbb73c%3Ag%3AKlAAAOSwacVatyLP_Complete=1=nc&_trksid=p2046732.m1684
>  
> 
> Any reasonable offers will be seriously considered.
> 
> DO NOT BID and DO NOT DO THE BUY IT NOW.
> 
> You will need to contact me directly at toddfeier...@msn.com 
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> Todd Feiertag 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] FS: This poster is 100 years old!

[Jeff Potokar]

That’s Beautiful, Kirby!!

WOW.

Jeff






> On Mar 6, 2018, at 7:24 PM, Kirby McDaniel  wrote:
> 
> THE CLODHOPPER (1917)  Produced Thomas H. Ince  $1950
> 
> Charles Ray  and  Margery Wilson
> 
> On linen, nice condition, but not perfect.  Fine Plus.
> 
> https://www.movieart.com/clodhopper-the-1917-26769/ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kirby McDaniel
> MovieArt Austin
> www.movieart.com 
> inquire post...@movieart.com 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Number 23....and Still Kicking!

[Jeff Potokar]

Congrats to you, Scott, and for being at the helm of MOPO these 23 years!

May it keep on ticking!


Jeff



> On Feb 24, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Scott Burns  wrote:
> 
> It’s February 24th folks so that means MoPo is turning 23!  The first 
> automated MoPo message was sent via American University’s listserv on 
> February 24, 1995. Who’d have thought this old dinosaur would have clunked 
> along for so many years…and who’d have thought American University would 
> still be supporting a listserv after 23 years! But thanks AU for giving us a 
> home for such a long time.
>  
> There were 11 members at the beginning… so as is my tradition here’s a shout 
> out to the original members:  
>  
> Mahtab Moayeri, Michael Danese, Rob Ellis, Donna Tschetter, Goh Kai Shen, 
> Evan Zweifel, George Nichol, Jeff Static (using his AOL name Static555), Adam 
> Ehrlich (the AU student who managed to get us on AU’s listserv), Cindy 
> Nemeth-Johannes (sadly we lost Cindy in 2008, but her husband Jay is still a 
> member), and myself. Other original members that are still subscribed are 
> Michael, Rob and Evan.
>  
> Thanks to everyone for sticking around and keeping MoPo alive.
>  
> Scott
> MoPo List Owner
>  
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

[MOPO] F/S: Altered States US International OS

[Jeff Potokar]

For sale, I have a never used, folded copy of the more elusive International, 
US one sheet for Altered States (1980). Probably the best poster image for this 
movie. And not a common poster, either. Measures 27x41 inches. Clean & crisp 
with sharp border edges.

Refection is causing the accentuated looking fold lines.

Here is the image link (as I cant do the image embed to MOPO with rr email):

https://imgur.com/yRq1j1G

The poster will be securely packaged to insure safe delivery.

Price: $290.00 plus cost of Priority Mail shipping with tracking.

I will ship to US, Canada, South America, Australia and Europe.

Please feel free to message with any questions.

Jeff

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] FOR SALE: The Bride of Frankenstein (Universal, 1935). French Grande (46.5" X 62") Joseph Koutachy Artwork.

[Jeff Potokar]

Congrats, Todd!

Jeff




> On Feb 18, 2018, at 8:14 PM, Todd  wrote:
> 
> The Bride of Frankenstein poster has now been spoken for.
> 
> Thank you.
> Todd
> 
> 
> From: Todd
> Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:51 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU ; Todd
> Subject: FOR SALE: The Bride of Frankenstein (Universal, 1935). French Grande 
> (46.5" X 62") Joseph Koutachy Artwork.
>  
> FOR SALE: 
> 
> The Bride of Frankenstein (Universal, 1935). French Grande (46.5" X 62") 
> Joseph Koutachy Artwork.
> 
> The buyer paid $35,850 at Heritage last year but is willing to take a loss 
> and would sell it for $30k.
> 
> Email me for any specific details or questions at toddfeier...@msn.com 
> 
> 
> Here's a link to the auction item itself.
> 
> https://movieposters.ha.com/itm/horror/the-bride-of-frankenstein-universal-1935-french-grande-465-x-62-joseph-koutachy-artwork/a/7162-86254.s?ic4=GalleryView-ShortDescription-071515
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Nerdiest question ever....

[Jeff Potokar]

Thanks, Todd.

Talk about a total, in-house operation!

Jeff



> On Feb 18, 2018, at 1:45 PM, Todd <toddfeier...@msn.com> wrote:
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> From what I understood, some of the larger NSS Exchanges had printing 
> facilities and distributed the posters to the other exchanges.
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
> From: Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:40 PM
> To: Todd
> Cc: mopo
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Nerdiest question ever
>  
> Todd,
> 
> Did the NSS exchanges or regional locations have actual printing plants on 
> the premises? Or was the physical printing of the posters done offsite and 
> then sent back to the exchanges, where they were then distributed from?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Todd <toddfeier...@msn.com 
>> <mailto:toddfeier...@msn.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Not a nerdy question at all.
>> 
>> I can't speak for all of the NSS Exchanges but when I had my connection with 
>> NSS in the mid to late 1970 and early 1980's, my connection was still able 
>> to get posters going back to the 1930's.
>> 
>> No Casablanca's or Frankenstein's or other possibe Classic titles, but 
>> definitely posters going all the way back to the 1930's.
>> 
>> Todd
>> 
>> 
>> From: MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
>> <mailto:mopo-l@listserv.american.edu>> on behalf of MoviePoster Collectors 
>> <moviepostercollect...@gmail.com <mailto:moviepostercollect...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:17 PM
>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@listserv.american.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Nerdiest question ever
>>  
>> Just to clarify, I know they were all printed at the exchanges and then 
>> distributed
>> 
>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 4:12 PM, MoviePoster Collectors 
>> <moviepostercollect...@gmail.com <mailto:moviepostercollect...@gmail.com>> 
>> wrote:
>> Not sure why this percolated into my brain, but did the NSS Exchanges 
>> systematically purge old posters (i.e.10+ years old) so that by the time 
>> they shut down in the mid-80s they just didn't have older posters that were 
>> not - or could not - have been rescued?
>> 
>> I heard an interview explaining that a Canadian exchange one day just tossed 
>> out its older posters. I also read that somebody visited the Atlanta (or 
>> Miami) exchange and it didn't have any older posters when it shut down.
>> 
>> If the surviving 1945-75 posters didn't originate one way or another from 
>> the exchanges, where the he[ck] did they come from? 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mel S. Hutson
>> Charlotte, NC USA
>> www.moviepostercollectors.guide <http://www.moviepostercollectors.guide/>: 
>> Movie Poster Collecting Reference and Showcase
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mel S. Hutson
>> Charlotte, NC USA
>> www.moviepostercollectors.guide <http://www.moviepostercollectors.guide/>: 
>> Movie Poster Collecting Reference and Showcase
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1>
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1>

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Nerdiest question ever....

[Jeff Potokar]

Todd,

Did the NSS exchanges or regional locations have actual printing plants on the 
premises? Or was the physical printing of the posters done offsite and then 
sent back to the exchanges, where they were then distributed from?

Thanks,

Jeff



> On Feb 18, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Todd  wrote:
> 
> Not a nerdy question at all.
> 
> I can't speak for all of the NSS Exchanges but when I had my connection with 
> NSS in the mid to late 1970 and early 1980's, my connection was still able to 
> get posters going back to the 1930's.
> 
> No Casablanca's or Frankenstein's or other possibe Classic titles, but 
> definitely posters going all the way back to the 1930's.
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
> From: MoPo List  > on behalf of MoviePoster Collectors 
> >
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:17 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Nerdiest question ever
>  
> Just to clarify, I know they were all printed at the exchanges and then 
> distributed
> 
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 4:12 PM, MoviePoster Collectors 
> > 
> wrote:
> Not sure why this percolated into my brain, but did the NSS Exchanges 
> systematically purge old posters (i.e.10+ years old) so that by the time they 
> shut down in the mid-80s they just didn't have older posters that were not - 
> or could not - have been rescued?
> 
> I heard an interview explaining that a Canadian exchange one day just tossed 
> out its older posters. I also read that somebody visited the Atlanta (or 
> Miami) exchange and it didn't have any older posters when it shut down.
> 
> If the surviving 1945-75 posters didn't originate one way or another from the 
> exchanges, where the he[ck] did they come from? 
> 
> -- 
> Mel S. Hutson
> Charlotte, NC USA
> www.moviepostercollectors.guide : 
> Movie Poster Collecting Reference and Showcase
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mel S. Hutson
> Charlotte, NC USA
> www.moviepostercollectors.guide : 
> Movie Poster Collecting Reference and Showcase
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1 
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Frankie 1951rr 30x40, 90 watchers on eBay, "comes alive" in last 15 seconds.....

[Jeff Potokar]

Congrats on the buy, Jim. It's going to a well deserved home! 

Jeff


 James Gresham <jamesalangres...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Well, I will admit, I did get the poster that started this discussion:
> 
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/R1951-FRANKENSTEIN-Boris-
> Karloff-ORIGINAL-MOVIE-POSTER-30x40-1-Sheet-Rolled-/122904356780
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:45 PM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Good researchin' guys.
> >
> > And I suppose there is a teeny weeny - maybe even smaller than DT's hands
> > - chance that somebody in this chain got it.
> >
> > Not me, BUT BUT got this rollin' in, after Poster Mountain fiddled with it:
> >
> > http://moviepostercollectors.guide/Storage/BoF-rr.jpg
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Kirby,
> >>
> >> I did a 2nd quick follow up, mentioning that same thing (the '47RR being
> >> Uni and not Realart), but that post has yet to appear on MOPO. Seems a lag
> >> from my email server to the listserv or something.
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  Kirby McDaniel <movieartaus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Interesting!  Thanks, Jeff.  But… this is Universal re-release, not
> >> Realart.
> >> >
> >> > Kirby McDaniel
> >> > MovieArt Austin
> >> >
> >> > > On Jan 25, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > emp offered the pressbook the last time in 2016 for auction.
> >> > >
> >> > > The combo 3 sheet (and one sheet) can be seen here:
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.emovieposter.com/gallery/inc/archive_image.php?id=12660434
> >> <http://www.emovieposter.com/gallery/inc/archive_image.php?id=12660434>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Jeff
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >  James Gresham <jamesalangres...@gmail.com  >> jamesalangres...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> > >> Greg that combo poster you refer to exists.  When I was researching
> >> images
> >> > >> for the new book, *What Music They Make, *I came across a picture of
> >> it.
> >> > >> Unfortunately,  someone was standing in front of it, covering a large
> >> > >> portion.  I may still have that image somewhere.  I believe it may
> >> have
> >> > >> been an R-47 3 sheet, but am not sure.  I wanted it for the book,
> >> but could
> >> > >> never locate a clean picture.  Jim Gresham
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:52 PM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> >> > >> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> I checked with Jeff Potokar, a member here and admin. of
> >> > >>> allposterforum.com, and he wrote back that the 1951 Realart press
> >> book
> >> > >>> showed that it re-released both Frankenstein and Dracula in 1951,
> >> but not
> >> > >>> as a double bill. Each movie had its own 3 sheet, OS, HS and insert.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Greg Douglass <
> >> > >>> gregdouglassgui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> ...and worth every penny. Not many of these puppies around,
> >> methinks.
> >> > >>>> By the way; about 20 years ago...shortly after Ebay began...I saw
> >> and was
> >> > >>>> bidding on a combo three-sheet of the Realart DRACULA+FRANKENSTEIN
> >> bill.
> >> > >>>> There was no picture...this is back when you had to take the
> >> photo, go to
> >> > >>>> the drug store, wait until 6 PM, bring the picture home, scan it,
> >> and crop
> >> > >>>> it as best you could...but it was described as "somewhat faded". I
> >> was
> >> > >>>> bidding on my primitive cell phone. It was at $750 when I put in a
> >> bid for
> >> > >>>> $801 at the last second. My wallet evidently spoke with my cell
> >> phone and
> >> > >>>> the phone picked

Re: [MOPO] Frankie 1951rr 30x40, 90 watchers on eBay, "comes alive" in last 15 seconds.....

[Jeff Potokar]

Hi Kirby,

I did a 2nd quick follow up, mentioning that same thing (the '47RR being Uni 
and not Realart), but that post has yet to appear on MOPO. Seems a lag from my 
email server to the listserv or something.

Jeff




 Kirby McDaniel <movieartaus...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Interesting!  Thanks, Jeff.  But… this is Universal re-release, not Realart.
> 
> Kirby McDaniel
> MovieArt Austin
> 
> > On Jan 25, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
> > 
> > emp offered the pressbook the last time in 2016 for auction.
> > 
> > The combo 3 sheet (and one sheet) can be seen here:
> > 
> > http://www.emovieposter.com/gallery/inc/archive_image.php?id=12660434 
> > <http://www.emovieposter.com/gallery/inc/archive_image.php?id=12660434>
> > 
> > 
> > Jeff
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  James Gresham <jamesalangres...@gmail.com 
> > <mailto:jamesalangres...@gmail.com>> wrote: 
> >> Greg that combo poster you refer to exists.  When I was researching images
> >> for the new book, *What Music They Make, *I came across a picture of it.
> >> Unfortunately,  someone was standing in front of it, covering a large
> >> portion.  I may still have that image somewhere.  I believe it may have
> >> been an R-47 3 sheet, but am not sure.  I wanted it for the book, but could
> >> never locate a clean picture.  Jim Gresham
> >> 
> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:52 PM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> >> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> I checked with Jeff Potokar, a member here and admin. of
> >>> allposterforum.com, and he wrote back that the 1951 Realart press book
> >>> showed that it re-released both Frankenstein and Dracula in 1951, but not
> >>> as a double bill. Each movie had its own 3 sheet, OS, HS and insert.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Greg Douglass <
> >>> gregdouglassgui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> ...and worth every penny. Not many of these puppies around, methinks.
> >>>> By the way; about 20 years ago...shortly after Ebay began...I saw and was
> >>>> bidding on a combo three-sheet of the Realart DRACULA+FRANKENSTEIN bill.
> >>>> There was no picture...this is back when you had to take the photo, go to
> >>>> the drug store, wait until 6 PM, bring the picture home, scan it, and 
> >>>> crop
> >>>> it as best you could...but it was described as "somewhat faded". I was
> >>>> bidding on my primitive cell phone. It was at $750 when I put in a bid 
> >>>> for
> >>>> $801 at the last second. My wallet evidently spoke with my cell phone and
> >>>> the phone picked that precise moment to take a monumental crap on me. I
> >>>> often wonder:
> >>>> Was it the real deal? Did one of you guys grab it for $750? I always
> >>>> thought of it as either "the one that got away" or a monumental scam (the
> >>>> seller had decent feedback).
> >>>> Anybody?
> >>>> Greg Douglass
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:22 AM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> >>>> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> $1600 to $5650
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/R1951-FRANKENSTEIN-Boris-Karloff-OR
> >>>>> IGINAL-MOVIE-POSTER-30x40-1-Sheet-Rolled-/122904356780
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Most-watched US MP for 10 days:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> https://www.collectorsweekly.com/posters-and-prints/movie/au
> >>>>> ctions?sort=mostWatched?sort=mostWatched
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Mel S. Hutson
> >>>>> Charlotte, NC USA
> >>>>> www.moviepostercollectors.guide: Movie Poster Collecting Reference and
> >>>>> Showcase
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> >>>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> Mel S. Hutson
> >>> Charlotte, NC USA
> >>> www.moviepostercollectors.guide: Movie Poster Collec

Re: [MOPO] Frankie 1951rr 30x40, 90 watchers on eBay, "comes alive" in last 15 seconds.....

[Jeff Potokar]

emp offered the pressbook the last time in 2016 for auction.

The combo 3 sheet (and one sheet) can be seen here:

http://www.emovieposter.com/gallery/inc/archive_image.php?id=12660434


Jeff



 James Gresham <jamesalangres...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Greg that combo poster you refer to exists.  When I was researching images
> for the new book, *What Music They Make, *I came across a picture of it.
> Unfortunately,  someone was standing in front of it, covering a large
> portion.  I may still have that image somewhere.  I believe it may have
> been an R-47 3 sheet, but am not sure.  I wanted it for the book, but could
> never locate a clean picture.  Jim Gresham
> 
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:52 PM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I checked with Jeff Potokar, a member here and admin. of
> > allposterforum.com, and he wrote back that the 1951 Realart press book
> > showed that it re-released both Frankenstein and Dracula in 1951, but not
> > as a double bill. Each movie had its own 3 sheet, OS, HS and insert.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Greg Douglass <
> > gregdouglassgui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> ...and worth every penny. Not many of these puppies around, methinks.
> >> By the way; about 20 years ago...shortly after Ebay began...I saw and was
> >> bidding on a combo three-sheet of the Realart DRACULA+FRANKENSTEIN bill.
> >> There was no picture...this is back when you had to take the photo, go to
> >> the drug store, wait until 6 PM, bring the picture home, scan it, and crop
> >> it as best you could...but it was described as "somewhat faded". I was
> >> bidding on my primitive cell phone. It was at $750 when I put in a bid for
> >> $801 at the last second. My wallet evidently spoke with my cell phone and
> >> the phone picked that precise moment to take a monumental crap on me. I
> >> often wonder:
> >> Was it the real deal? Did one of you guys grab it for $750? I always
> >> thought of it as either "the one that got away" or a monumental scam (the
> >> seller had decent feedback).
> >> Anybody?
> >> Greg Douglass
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:22 AM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> >> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> $1600 to $5650
> >>>
> >>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/R1951-FRANKENSTEIN-Boris-Karloff-OR
> >>> IGINAL-MOVIE-POSTER-30x40-1-Sheet-Rolled-/122904356780
> >>>
> >>> Most-watched US MP for 10 days:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.collectorsweekly.com/posters-and-prints/movie/au
> >>> ctions?sort=mostWatched?sort=mostWatched
> >>> --
> >>> Mel S. Hutson
> >>> Charlotte, NC USA
> >>> www.moviepostercollectors.guide: Movie Poster Collecting Reference and
> >>> Showcase
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> >>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mel S. Hutson
> > Charlotte, NC USA
> > www.moviepostercollectors.guide: Movie Poster Collecting Reference and
> > Showcase
> >
> > --
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> > https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc. <http://www.greshamsseasonalservices.com>
> President | Owner - Macomb County
> O: 586-677-SNOW | F: 586-677-5669
> 
>  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>___
>   How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
>Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Frankie 1951rr 30x40, 90 watchers on eBay, "comes alive" in last 15 seconds.....

[Jeff Potokar]

The 1947 pressbook shows the Frankenstein/Dracula combo 3 sheet as well as a 
combo OS that was done.

But it was Universal that handled the 1947 RR, not Realart.

Realart did the 1951 RR.

Jeff




 James Gresham <jamesalangres...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Greg that combo poster you refer to exists.  When I was researching images
> for the new book, *What Music They Make, *I came across a picture of it.
> Unfortunately,  someone was standing in front of it, covering a large
> portion.  I may still have that image somewhere.  I believe it may have
> been an R-47 3 sheet, but am not sure.  I wanted it for the book, but could
> never locate a clean picture.  Jim Gresham
> 
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:52 PM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I checked with Jeff Potokar, a member here and admin. of
> > allposterforum.com, and he wrote back that the 1951 Realart press book
> > showed that it re-released both Frankenstein and Dracula in 1951, but not
> > as a double bill. Each movie had its own 3 sheet, OS, HS and insert.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Greg Douglass <
> > gregdouglassgui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> ...and worth every penny. Not many of these puppies around, methinks.
> >> By the way; about 20 years ago...shortly after Ebay began...I saw and was
> >> bidding on a combo three-sheet of the Realart DRACULA+FRANKENSTEIN bill.
> >> There was no picture...this is back when you had to take the photo, go to
> >> the drug store, wait until 6 PM, bring the picture home, scan it, and crop
> >> it as best you could...but it was described as "somewhat faded". I was
> >> bidding on my primitive cell phone. It was at $750 when I put in a bid for
> >> $801 at the last second. My wallet evidently spoke with my cell phone and
> >> the phone picked that precise moment to take a monumental crap on me. I
> >> often wonder:
> >> Was it the real deal? Did one of you guys grab it for $750? I always
> >> thought of it as either "the one that got away" or a monumental scam (the
> >> seller had decent feedback).
> >> Anybody?
> >> Greg Douglass
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:22 AM, MoviePoster Collectors <
> >> moviepostercollect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> $1600 to $5650
> >>>
> >>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/R1951-FRANKENSTEIN-Boris-Karloff-OR
> >>> IGINAL-MOVIE-POSTER-30x40-1-Sheet-Rolled-/122904356780
> >>>
> >>> Most-watched US MP for 10 days:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.collectorsweekly.com/posters-and-prints/movie/au
> >>> ctions?sort=mostWatched?sort=mostWatched
> >>> --
> >>> Mel S. Hutson
> >>> Charlotte, NC USA
> >>> www.moviepostercollectors.guide: Movie Poster Collecting Reference and
> >>> Showcase
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> >>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mel S. Hutson
> > Charlotte, NC USA
> > www.moviepostercollectors.guide: Movie Poster Collecting Reference and
> > Showcase
> >
> > --
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> > https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L=1
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc. <http://www.greshamsseasonalservices.com>
> President | Owner - Macomb County
> O: 586-677-SNOW | F: 586-677-5669
> 
>  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>___
>   How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
>Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] STOLEN POSTER

[Jeff Potokar]

Walter, was this poster bought from you online?

If so, then you have a mailing address to work with too, which  
hopefully might offer some info or lead.


All eyes are posted, and I also cut and pasted your alerts to All  
Poster Forum, so that members and guests alike could also keep a  
lookout and notify you if these posters are spotted or offered:


http://www.allposterforum.com/index.php/topic,12547.0.html

Good luck in the recovery and that this "buyer" is rounded up, too.

Jeff




On Nov 21, 2017, at 9:12 PM, walter reuben wrote:


Dear Mopo'ers
A thief in Palm Springs bought an expensive Alice Faye one sheet  
from me, for 365 NIGHTS IN HOLLYWOOD.
https://walterfilm.com/country-of-origin/USA/365-nights-in- 
hollywood-1934

She bought it with a stolen credit card.
She has already started offering it to ebay sellers of movie material.
Please know that I am in the process of filing a police report and  
this poster will be listed as stolen.  Also---very few copies of  
this are known to exist, and any copy of this surfacing right this  
minute will almost certainly be the one taken from me by credit  
card fraud.

Walter Reuben


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Son of Kong

[Jeff Potokar]

Jim,

Is the lesser style you are looking for also known as the "circus"  
style 3 sh?






On Aug 9, 2017, at 1:41 PM, James Gresham wrote:

Does anyone have a good picture of the lesser style Son of Kong 3  
sheet?  Thank you so much, Jim Gresham


--
Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc.
President | Owner - Macomb County
O: 586-677-SNOW | F: 586-677-5669


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] one more test

[Jeff Potokar]

It came thru. :)


On Jul 7, 2017, at 10:50 AM, Richard Halegua Posters & Art wrote:


one more test
one more test
one more test
one more test

one more test
one more test
one more test
one more test

one more test
one more test
one more test
one more test

one more test
one more test
one more test
one more test

one more test
one more test
one more test
one more test

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
 Send a message addressed  
to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is  
solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Can someone email me

[Jeff Potokar]

Trying..

Did this come thru?



On Jul 6, 2017, at 7:35 PM, wareho...@comic-art.com wrote:


having trouble getting mopo emails with teh new server

can someone message me via Mopo & also to my email address

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
 Send a message addressed  
to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is  
solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

I recall that, Glenn.

And remember the book put out, a number of years ago, by Philip J.  
Riley.  He also did a reconstruction book of the film, also based on  
stills, shooting script etc, back in 2011.


Amazon still offers it for sale:

https://www.amazon.com/London-After-Midnight-Philip-Riley/dp/1593934823

Jeff





On Jul 1, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Glenn Taranto wrote:

A number of years ago TCM did a recreation of LONDON AFTER MIDNIGHT  
using stills. It was pretty interesting. I believe it's available  
on the Lon Chaney box set.


GT

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:
I have no doubt that if a print was found, cleaned up, restored, if  
need be, and a cool original score was written for it, that it  
would do very well on the indie and cult circuits.. and could do  
even better than that, since a copy hasnt been screened in so many  
decades.


I for one, would be thrilled to check it out, vampire teeth and  
all. And Chaney's makeup in that film is another that will forever  
be remembered.



Jeff



On Jul 1, 2017, at 5:52 PM, S Yafet wrote:

Me too.  That makeup, those expressions and those sets look  
enchanting.  We can always look past moments in our movies that  
are dull or pointless (think all the filler in Murders in the Rue  
Morgue)


Nathalie

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Jeff Potokar  
<jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
I think there is always a possibility that a print might be found  
in a foreign archive... we can only hope.


It would be great to see, even though reviews from the time  
described it as a bit dull and slow. maybe all this time later,  
were a print to be found, audiences might look past the plodding  
story line, just for the fact of seeing Lon Chaney, in motion, as  
that vampire character.


I know I'd be glued to the screen.


Jeff




On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:59 PM, S Yafet wrote:

Does anyone think that London After Midnight is lost for all time  
or that miraculously sometime a print will turn up?


Nathalie

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Paul W. Hazen <0134c196813f- 
dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu> wrote:
I didn't see any of the paper materials outside of the few framed  
ones they had on the walls but I was told almost all of the  
stills in the Browning collection were in excellent condition  
with the majority of them printed exclusively for Browning's  
review on gelatin silver double weight with some on single matte  
and gloss. I'm guessing a lot of these stills were singular and  
never seen before as a result. I think you can order a catalog  
from Profiles (or maybe find the digital version online). Some  
really unique images.


On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:



Congrats on the win, Paul.

And with the cheapest still selling for $4000.00, that truly  
says something about what the Browning Collection was all about.  
Were all the stills of the same type (double weight) and  
wonderful condition?




On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

I'm a Kubrick collector mostly so I won the "Lolita" stills  
lot. Really only needed 2 of the 10 stills but I figure I can  
turn around the others pretty easily.


They had about 250-300 stills and other items from the Browning  
collection which I think was 157 lots. Probably about 35-40  
lots on Freaks alone and I think the cheapest I saw sell for  
$4000. It was majority stills. They had a satchel that held all  
of the stills which also went for 10k+.


A lot of the Hurrell stills sold fairly high as well.

Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Potokar  
<jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote:



Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul.

I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of  
Profiles' auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of  
this material in person.


Can I ask which lot (item) you won?

And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the  
Browning Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised  
of stills?


Jeff




On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the  
phone as well. There was about 20-25 people in the back room  
where the auction was. They had about 10 or so phone banks  
set up for the phone bidders and a couple people running the  
online bidding. Was all very professional and had my own  
paddle and everything. They had a good dinner spread as well.


They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including  
all the big ones and the people that worked there were really  
friendly and answered all of my questions. I didn't see too  
much of the paper materials displayed, mostly just the props,  
but it was pretty cool seeing some of them close up.


It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't  
hesitate to sit it in on another one.


The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was  
only there

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

I have no doubt that if a print was found, cleaned up, restored, if  
need be, and a cool original score was written for it, that it would  
do very well on the indie and cult circuits.. and could do even  
better than that, since a copy hasnt been screened in so many decades.


I for one, would be thrilled to check it out, vampire teeth and all.  
And Chaney's makeup in that film is another that will forever be  
remembered.



Jeff



On Jul 1, 2017, at 5:52 PM, S Yafet wrote:

Me too.  That makeup, those expressions and those sets look  
enchanting.  We can always look past moments in our movies that are  
dull or pointless (think all the filler in Murders in the Rue Morgue)


Nathalie

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:
I think there is always a possibility that a print might be found  
in a foreign archive... we can only hope.


It would be great to see, even though reviews from the time  
described it as a bit dull and slow. maybe all this time later,  
were a print to be found, audiences might look past the plodding  
story line, just for the fact of seeing Lon Chaney, in motion, as  
that vampire character.


I know I'd be glued to the screen.


Jeff




On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:59 PM, S Yafet wrote:

Does anyone think that London After Midnight is lost for all time  
or that miraculously sometime a print will turn up?


Nathalie

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Paul W. Hazen <0134c196813f- 
dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu> wrote:
I didn't see any of the paper materials outside of the few framed  
ones they had on the walls but I was told almost all of the stills  
in the Browning collection were in excellent condition with the  
majority of them printed exclusively for Browning's review on  
gelatin silver double weight with some on single matte and gloss.  
I'm guessing a lot of these stills were singular and never seen  
before as a result. I think you can order a catalog from Profiles  
(or maybe find the digital version online). Some really unique  
images.


On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:



Congrats on the win, Paul.

And with the cheapest still selling for $4000.00, that truly says  
something about what the Browning Collection was all about. Were  
all the stills of the same type (double weight) and wonderful  
condition?




On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

I'm a Kubrick collector mostly so I won the "Lolita" stills lot.  
Really only needed 2 of the 10 stills but I figure I can turn  
around the others pretty easily.


They had about 250-300 stills and other items from the Browning  
collection which I think was 157 lots. Probably about 35-40 lots  
on Freaks alone and I think the cheapest I saw sell for $4000.  
It was majority stills. They had a satchel that held all of the  
stills which also went for 10k+.


A lot of the Hurrell stills sold fairly high as well.

Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:



Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul.

I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of  
Profiles' auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of  
this material in person.


Can I ask which lot (item) you won?

And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the  
Browning Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised  
of stills?


Jeff




On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the  
phone as well. There was about 20-25 people in the back room  
where the auction was. They had about 10 or so phone banks set  
up for the phone bidders and a couple people running the  
online bidding. Was all very professional and had my own  
paddle and everything. They had a good dinner spread as well.


They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including  
all the big ones and the people that worked there were really  
friendly and answered all of my questions. I didn't see too  
much of the paper materials displayed, mostly just the props,  
but it was pretty cool seeing some of them close up.


It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't  
hesitate to sit it in on another one.


The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was only  
there for one lot in particular - which I won) but it was no  
fault of their own, they just had a ton of bids. There were  
some guys that were there for almost 12 hours when I left  
after 4 hours.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:51 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

I guess the provenance was almost impossible to pass up.  Did  
manage to get a Browning Dracula still so I don't feel too  
bad about London After Midnight.


What's it like at their auctions?  I've always done the phone.

Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul W. Hazen  
<phazenme...@aol.com> wrote:
I was in the room during the Profiles Browning 

Re: [MOPO] FA/FS Ebay: HUGE 4TH of JULY SALE!! OVER 270 GREAT ITEMS ON EBAY!!

[Jeff Potokar]

As always, what great items you have listed, in total, Todd.

Of course, the classic UNI horror stuff is just spectacular.


Jeff




On Jul 1, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Todd wrote:


Hello MoPo,

I'm currently running a 4TH OF JULY SALE with OVER 270 GREAT ITEMS  
on ebay with many newly listed!!


Many have HUGE REDUCED PRICES!!

Many items show the reduced prices and other items already have  
reduced prices!!


AND DON'T BE SHY!!  PLEASE FEEL FREE TO MAKE AN OFFER!!

If you have a few minutes, please feel free to check them all out  
at the following link.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/toddfeiertag/m.html? 
item=151551395711=STRK%3AMESELX% 
3AIT=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562


Here's a sampling of some of the items:

BUGS BUNNY 1948 * LOONEY TUNES MERRIE MELODIES * DAFFY DUCK *  
CARTOON ONE SHEET!  WAS $799.95 NOW $399.95!!


THE TOOTH WILL OUT 1951 * THREE STOOGES * ONE SHEET * 3 STOOGES *  
NEAR MINT!!  WAS $849.95 NOW $449.95!!


DRACULA 1931 * BELA LUGOSI * 14 x 22 STORE DISPLAY POSTER *  
UNIVERSAL HORROR!!  WAS $499.95 NOW $369.95!!


GIMME SHELTER 1970 * MICK JAGGER * ROLLING STONES * WILDING HALF  
SUBWAY * RARE!!  WAS $1249.95 NOW $499.95!!


RUMPUS IN THE HAREM 1956 * THREE STOOGES * ONE SHEET * 3 STOOGES *  
NEAR MINT!!  WAS $649.95 NOW $349.95!!


THE WALKING DEAD 1936 * BORIS KARLOFF * RARE LOBBY CARD * CLASSIC  
HORROR!!  WAS $849.95 NOW $499.95!!


REAR WINDOW R-1959 * HITCHCOCK * JAMES STEWART * EXTREMELY RARE  
THREE SHEET!!  WAS $399.95 NOW $249.95!!


THE FLYING CAT 1951 * TOM & JERRY CARTOON 27x41 ONE SHEET *  
GORGEOUS STONE LITHO  WAS $1850 NOW $1250!!


CHANDU THE MAGICIAN 1932 * BELA LUGOSI * EDMUND LOWE * EXTREMELY  
RARE TITLE CARD  WAS $5495.95 NOW $3495.95!!


VIXEN! 1968 * RUSS MEYER * SEXPLOITATION ONE SHEET * C10 MINT  
UNUSED!!  WAS $499.95 NOW $199.95!!


DEVIL'S ISLAND 1939 * BORIS (FRANKENSTEIN) KARLOFF * 27 x 41 ONE  
SHEET!!  WAS $399.95 NOW $299.95!!


LOGAN'S RUN 1976 * SCI-FI * DELUXE ROADSHOW LOBBY SET OF 12 * C10  
MINT UNUSED WITH BINDER!!  WAS $224.95 NOW $199.95!!


THE PASSIONATE PLUMBER 1932 * BUSTER KEATON * JIMMY DURANTE * 14x17  
JUMBO LOBBY!  WAS $369.95 NOW $249.95!!


GIANT 1956 * JAMES DEAN * ELIZABETH TAYLOR * 14 x 36 INSERT *  
LOWEST PRICE  ONLY $69.95!!


THE SCARLET EMPRESS 1934 * MARLENE DIETRICH * VON STERNBERG * MINT  
HERALD * RARE!  WAS $124.95 NOW $69.95!!


THE GREAT ESCAPE 1963 * STEVE MCQUEEN * NEAR MINT THREE SHEET * HIS  
BEST FILM!!  NOW REDUCED TO $449.95!!


Plus Lots & Lots More!!  IN ALL PRICE RANGES!!

**In addition, there are many MINT UNUSED Posters and Lobby Sets I  
obtained personally almost 40 years ago when I had a connection  
with National Screen Service.



You would be hard pressed to find these same titles that are now  
almost 40 years old in this MINT UNUSED condition anywhere else!


Again, if you have a few minutes, please feel free to check them  
all out at the following link:


https://www.ebay.com/sch/toddfeiertag/m.html? 
item=151551395711=STRK%3AMESELX% 
3AIT=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l25


If the above link doesn't work, you can search by my Ebay User id:  
toddfeiertag

Thanks for looking!!

Todd Feiertag



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Helmut,

That vinyl record article is an amazing read. I never would have  
thought that old LPs, even thoroughly cleaned and "brought back to  
life" would ever bring that kind of coin.


There is a small, 2nd hand shop around the corner from me where folks  
donate all kinds of things including records, by the boatload. This  
place then sells them, with the monies going to various charitable  
organizations, so its for a good cause.


I might start looking more carefully at the 33 1/3 discs that are  
literally stacked in bins, off to the side, and being sold for $1 or  
2 dollars.


It sounds like his "album restoration" equipment cost a pretty penny,  
too ($35K).


Jeff





On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Helmut Hamm wrote:


Jim,

over the last few decades, an entirely breed of 'newly rich' has  
emerged. Investment brokers and the like make more money than they  
could ever spend, so there will be more 'world record' results  
coming in all areas. If you're making a million dollars every day,  
what's two point something millions for a fun gadget?


At least, these props are exceptional and truly rare. As a music  
lover and audiophile (in this order!!!) I recently came across this  
guy:


https://www.wired.com/2015/03/hot-stampers/

He has found enough people who pay him $500 a pop for vinyl records  
you can find in ANY Salvation Army bin for a dollar to make a very  
comfortable living for himself. In my book, this is beyond ridiculous.


In our field, prices certainly go crazy sometimes, but most of the  
top-end movie paper (and the props) are truly rare at least, and  
the best stuff will always find a buyer.


Helmut


Am 28.06.2017 um 22:41 schrieb James Gresham  
:


I always ask myself when I hear these things, "who has that kind  
of money?"  I mean that is crazy.  Of course when I lost money in  
the Haggard fraud, I did have someone tell me, "if you have that  
much money in posters, you deserve to loss it."  So, I guess its  
relative.  But to spend that much, just seems insane.  It must be  
an organization or institution?  I don't know.  But, WOW!


On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Scott Burns  
 wrote:
Thanks, didn’t realize there was a variation. On eBay, the BP is  
stated as “up to” 28%. Upon further clicking, I found this:




The actual purchase price will be the sum of the final bid price  
plus the buyer's premium of twenty four percent (24%) of the  
hammer price (discounted to 20% when full payment is made in cash  
or by valid check); or twenty eight percent (28%) if bid on and  
won through the internet. California sales tax shall automatically  
be added to the purchase price unless exempted.




How’s that for complicated? All I know is, that’s a big BP!



From: MPB Warehouse [mailto:wareho...@comic-art.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 4:02 PM
To: Scott Burns ; MoPo- 
l...@listserv.american.edu



Subject: Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction



the bidder was on the phone and that is just a 20% BP

when you use Invaluable live bidding, it is 28%


At 12:43 PM 6/28/2017, Scott Burns wrote:


Thanks for reminding me about the 28% Buyer’s Premium. Ouch.

From: MoPo List [ mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf  
Of MPB Warehouse

Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 3:32 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction


$2.3m +BP = $2.56m

they also sold the Saturday Night Fever dancefloor $1.2m

Battlestar Gallactica model collection $1.5+bp

Profiles is incredible

Oh.. the Tod Browning stills collection, probably reached $2mil



At 12:18 PM 6/28/2017, Scott Burns wrote:

Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay with  
collecting paper).




A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector, I  
wonder is this price record setting?




From the catalog:

1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components  
spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II. (TCF,  
1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to be in  
the public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the pinnacle of  
the Star Wars collecting universe. For the productions following  
Star Wars: A New Hope, to save time in meeting production  
deadlines, R2 components were reused from the previous Star Wars  
films. As filming progressed, R2 units were upgraded and  
refurbished, with outdated components being retired. This process  
has been confirmed by numerous crewmembers who worked on the Star  
Wars film franchise. This R2-D2, constructed of aluminum, steel  
and fiberglass elements, measuring 43 in. tall x 29.5 in. wide x  
20 in. deep (in current pose), was put together over many years by  
sourcing original components and assembling them as a complete R2- 
D2. The dome was one of the few hero aluminum domes made for R2  
actor Kenny Baker in the 

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Thanks..

I will look to see if the Profiles digital version is still available  
for viewing and download.



Jeff



On Jun 29, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

I didn't see any of the paper materials outside of the few framed  
ones they had on the walls but I was told almost all of the stills  
in the Browning collection were in excellent condition with the  
majority of them printed exclusively for Browning's review on  
gelatin silver double weight with some on single matte and gloss.  
I'm guessing a lot of these stills were singular and never seen  
before as a result. I think you can order a catalog from Profiles  
(or maybe find the digital version online). Some really unique images.


On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote:


Congrats on the win, Paul.

And with the cheapest still selling for $4000.00, that truly says  
something about what the Browning Collection was all about. Were  
all the stills of the same type (double weight) and wonderful  
condition?




On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

I'm a Kubrick collector mostly so I won the "Lolita" stills lot.  
Really only needed 2 of the 10 stills but I figure I can turn  
around the others pretty easily.


They had about 250-300 stills and other items from the Browning  
collection which I think was 157 lots. Probably about 35-40 lots  
on Freaks alone and I think the cheapest I saw sell for $4000. It  
was majority stills. They had a satchel that held all of the  
stills which also went for 10k+.


A lot of the Hurrell stills sold fairly high as well.

Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:



Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul.

I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of  
Profiles' auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of  
this material in person.


Can I ask which lot (item) you won?

And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the  
Browning Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised of  
stills?


Jeff




On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the  
phone as well. There was about 20-25 people in the back room  
where the auction was. They had about 10 or so phone banks set  
up for the phone bidders and a couple people running the online  
bidding. Was all very professional and had my own paddle and  
everything. They had a good dinner spread as well.


They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including  
all the big ones and the people that worked there were really  
friendly and answered all of my questions. I didn't see too  
much of the paper materials displayed, mostly just the props,  
but it was pretty cool seeing some of them close up.


It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't  
hesitate to sit it in on another one.


The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was only  
there for one lot in particular - which I won) but it was no  
fault of their own, they just had a ton of bids. There were  
some guys that were there for almost 12 hours when I left after  
4 hours.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:51 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

I guess the provenance was almost impossible to pass up.  Did  
manage to get a Browning Dracula still so I don't feel too bad  
about London After Midnight.


What's it like at their auctions?  I've always done the phone.

Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul W. Hazen  
<phazenme...@aol.com> wrote:
I was in the room during the Profiles Browning bidding session  
and was truly amazed at some of the prices the Browning stills  
were getting especially the Freaks stills which seem to be  
have been bought primarily by the same two phone bidders.  
Profiles did a great job on that acquisition and auction and  
I'm looking forward to the Debbie Reynolds auction in September.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:26 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

Wow!  Naively, I thought it would be great to have something  
of Tod Browning's from London After Midnight.  Then, I  
realized that the four stills I liked the best were climbing  
higher and higher.  Wound up at 18K.  My phone bidder helper  
guy told me I could keep one and sell the other three.   
Well,  no guarantees on something like that but I can't say I  
wasn't seriously tempted.  (I thought maybe I'd worry about  
the money later.


Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Scott Burns  
<sbu...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay  
with collecting paper).




A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop  
collector, I wonder is this price record setting?




From the catalog:

1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original  
components spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and  
Episodes I & II.

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

I think there is always a possibility that a print might be found in  
a foreign archive... we can only hope.


It would be great to see, even though reviews from the time described  
it as a bit dull and slow. maybe all this time later, were a print to  
be found, audiences might look past the plodding story line, just for  
the fact of seeing Lon Chaney, in motion, as that vampire character.


I know I'd be glued to the screen.


Jeff




On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:59 PM, S Yafet wrote:

Does anyone think that London After Midnight is lost for all time  
or that miraculously sometime a print will turn up?


Nathalie

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Paul W. Hazen <0134c196813f- 
dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu> wrote:
I didn't see any of the paper materials outside of the few framed  
ones they had on the walls but I was told almost all of the stills  
in the Browning collection were in excellent condition with the  
majority of them printed exclusively for Browning's review on  
gelatin silver double weight with some on single matte and gloss.  
I'm guessing a lot of these stills were singular and never seen  
before as a result. I think you can order a catalog from Profiles  
(or maybe find the digital version online). Some really unique images.


On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote:


Congrats on the win, Paul.

And with the cheapest still selling for $4000.00, that truly says  
something about what the Browning Collection was all about. Were  
all the stills of the same type (double weight) and wonderful  
condition?




On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

I'm a Kubrick collector mostly so I won the "Lolita" stills lot.  
Really only needed 2 of the 10 stills but I figure I can turn  
around the others pretty easily.


They had about 250-300 stills and other items from the Browning  
collection which I think was 157 lots. Probably about 35-40 lots  
on Freaks alone and I think the cheapest I saw sell for $4000. It  
was majority stills. They had a satchel that held all of the  
stills which also went for 10k+.


A lot of the Hurrell stills sold fairly high as well.

Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:



Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul.

I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of  
Profiles' auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of  
this material in person.


Can I ask which lot (item) you won?

And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the  
Browning Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised of  
stills?


Jeff




On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the  
phone as well. There was about 20-25 people in the back room  
where the auction was. They had about 10 or so phone banks set  
up for the phone bidders and a couple people running the online  
bidding. Was all very professional and had my own paddle and  
everything. They had a good dinner spread as well.


They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including  
all the big ones and the people that worked there were really  
friendly and answered all of my questions. I didn't see too  
much of the paper materials displayed, mostly just the props,  
but it was pretty cool seeing some of them close up.


It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't  
hesitate to sit it in on another one.


The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was only  
there for one lot in particular - which I won) but it was no  
fault of their own, they just had a ton of bids. There were  
some guys that were there for almost 12 hours when I left after  
4 hours.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:51 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

I guess the provenance was almost impossible to pass up.  Did  
manage to get a Browning Dracula still so I don't feel too bad  
about London After Midnight.


What's it like at their auctions?  I've always done the phone.

Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul W. Hazen  
<phazenme...@aol.com> wrote:
I was in the room during the Profiles Browning bidding session  
and was truly amazed at some of the prices the Browning stills  
were getting especially the Freaks stills which seem to be  
have been bought primarily by the same two phone bidders.  
Profiles did a great job on that acquisition and auction and  
I'm looking forward to the Debbie Reynolds auction in September.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:26 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

Wow!  Naively, I thought it would be great to have something  
of Tod Browning's from London After Midnight.  Then, I  
realized that the four stills I liked the best were climbing  
higher and higher.  Wound up at 18K.  My phone bidder helper  
guy told me I could keep one and sell the other three.   
Well,  no guarantees on something like that but I can't say I  
wasn't seriou

Re: [MOPO] I just want you all to know

[Jeff Potokar]

And what a good film GRAND HOTEL is, too.




On Jun 29, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Glenn Taranto wrote:

Dr. Otternschlag: Grand Hotel (1932)  ...always the same. People  
come, people go. Nothing ever happens.


On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Kirby McDaniel  
 wrote:

That I’m still here.  Ain’t leavin’.

Yet.

Kirby






Kirby McDaniel
WWW.MOVIEART.COM

ki...@movieart.com





To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Congrats on the win, Paul.

And with the cheapest still selling for $4000.00, that truly says  
something about what the Browning Collection was all about. Were all  
the stills of the same type (double weight) and wonderful condition?




On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

I'm a Kubrick collector mostly so I won the "Lolita" stills lot.  
Really only needed 2 of the 10 stills but I figure I can turn  
around the others pretty easily.


They had about 250-300 stills and other items from the Browning  
collection which I think was 157 lots. Probably about 35-40 lots on  
Freaks alone and I think the cheapest I saw sell for $4000. It was  
majority stills. They had a satchel that held all of the stills  
which also went for 10k+.


A lot of the Hurrell stills sold fairly high as well.

Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:



Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul.

I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of  
Profiles' auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of this  
material in person.


Can I ask which lot (item) you won?

And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the  
Browning Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised of  
stills?


Jeff




On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the phone  
as well. There was about 20-25 people in the back room where the  
auction was. They had about 10 or so phone banks set up for the  
phone bidders and a couple people running the online bidding. Was  
all very professional and had my own paddle and everything. They  
had a good dinner spread as well.


They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including all  
the big ones and the people that worked there were really  
friendly and answered all of my questions. I didn't see too much  
of the paper materials displayed, mostly just the props, but it  
was pretty cool seeing some of them close up.


It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't hesitate  
to sit it in on another one.


The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was only  
there for one lot in particular - which I won) but it was no  
fault of their own, they just had a ton of bids. There were some  
guys that were there for almost 12 hours when I left after 4 hours.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:51 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

I guess the provenance was almost impossible to pass up.  Did  
manage to get a Browning Dracula still so I don't feel too bad  
about London After Midnight.


What's it like at their auctions?  I've always done the phone.

Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul W. Hazen  
<phazenme...@aol.com> wrote:
I was in the room during the Profiles Browning bidding session  
and was truly amazed at some of the prices the Browning stills  
were getting especially the Freaks stills which seem to be have  
been bought primarily by the same two phone bidders. Profiles  
did a great job on that acquisition and auction and I'm looking  
forward to the Debbie Reynolds auction in September.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:26 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

Wow!  Naively, I thought it would be great to have something of  
Tod Browning's from London After Midnight.  Then, I realized  
that the four stills I liked the best were climbing higher and  
higher.  Wound up at 18K.  My phone bidder helper guy told me I  
could keep one and sell the other three.  Well,  no guarantees  
on something like that but I can't say I wasn't seriously  
tempted.  (I thought maybe I'd worry about the money later.


Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Scott Burns  
<sbu...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay  
with collecting paper).




A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector,  
I wonder is this price record setting?




From the catalog:

1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components  
spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II.  
(TCF, 1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to  
be in the public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the  
pinnacle of the Star Wars collecting universe. For the  
productions following Star Wars: A New Hope, to save time in  
meeting production deadlines, R2 components were reused from  
the previous Star Wars films. As filming progressed, R2 units  
were upgraded and refurbished, with outdated components being  
retired. This process has been confirmed by numerous  
crewmembers who worked on the Star Wars film franchise. This R2- 
D2, constructed of aluminum, steel and fiberglass elements,  
measuring 43 in. tall x 29.5 in. wide x 20 in. deep (in current  
pose), was put together over many years by sourcing original  
components and assembling them as a comple

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Thanks for those numbers and info, Rich.

Quite a number of pieces

And 199 still from THE UNHOLY 3.

Fantastic!!



On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Rich Halegua MPB Warehouse wrote:


Paul
there were probably 1500-2000 total stills in the Browning estate  
material
there were numerous group lots including a 120 piece lot for the  
Mystic

Unholy 3 (1925) there were 199 stills in 7 lots
London After Midnight there were a total of 161 stills..

lots of material


At 01:14 PM 6/29/2017, Paul W. Hazen wrote:
I'm a Kubrick collector mostly so I won the "Lolita" stills lot.  
Really only needed 2 of the 10 stills but I figure I can turn  
around the others pretty easily.


They had about 250-300 stills and other items from the Browning  
collection which I think was 157 lots. Probably about 35-40 lots  
on Freaks alone and I think the cheapest I saw sell for $4000. It  
was majority stills. They had a satchel that held all of the  
stills which also went for 10k+.


A lot of the Hurrell stills sold fairly high as well.

Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:



Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul.

I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of  
Profiles' auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of this  
material in person.


Can I ask which lot (item) you won?

And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the  
Browning Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised of  
stills?


Jeff




On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the phone  
as well. There was about 20-25 people in the back room where the  
auction was. They had about 10 or so phone banks set up for the  
phone bidders and a couple people running the online bidding.  
Was all very professional and had my own paddle and everything.  
They had a good dinner spread as well.


They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including  
all the big ones and the people that worked there were really  
friendly and answered all of my questions. I didn't see too much  
of the paper materials displayed, mostly just the props, but it  
was pretty cool seeing some of them close up.


It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't  
hesitate to sit it in on another one.


The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was only  
there for one lot in particular - which I won) but it was no  
fault of their own, they just had a ton of bids. There were some  
guys that were there for almost 12 hours when I left after 4 hours.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:51 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

I guess the provenance was almost impossible to pass up.  Did  
manage to get a Browning Dracula still so I don't feel too bad  
about London After Midnight.


What's it like at their auctions?  I've always done the phone.

Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul W. Hazen  
<phazenme...@aol.com> wrote:
I was in the room during the Profiles Browning bidding session  
and was truly amazed at some of the prices the Browning stills  
were getting especially the Freaks stills which seem to be have  
been bought primarily by the same two phone bidders. Profiles  
did a great job on that acquisition and auction and I'm looking  
forward to the Debbie Reynolds auction in September.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:26 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote:

Wow!  Naively, I thought it would be great to have something  
of Tod Browning's from London After Midnight.  Then, I  
realized that the four stills I liked the best were climbing  
higher and higher.  Wound up at 18K.  My phone bidder helper  
guy told me I could keep one and sell the other three.  Well,   
no guarantees on something like that but I can't say I wasn't  
seriously tempted.  (I thought maybe I'd worry about the money  
later.


Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Scott Burns  
<sbu...@columbus.rr.com > wrote:


Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll  
just stay with collecting paaper).




A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector,  
I wonder is this price record setting?




From the catalog:

1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original  
components spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and  
Episodes I & II. (TCF, 1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2  
unit is not known to be in the public domain – this R2-D2  
offering represents the pinnacle of the >Star Wars collecting  
universe. For the productions following Star Wars: A New Hope,  
to save time in meeting production deadlines, R2 components  
were reused from the previous Star Wars films. As filming  
progressed, R2 units were upgraded and refurbished, with  
outdated components being retired. This process has been  
confirmed by numerous crewmembers who worked on the Star Wars  
film franch

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul.

I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of  
Profiles' auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of this  
material in person.


Can I ask which lot (item) you won?

And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the Browning  
Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised of stills?


Jeff




On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote:

This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the phone as  
well. There was about 20-25 people in the back room where the  
auction was. They had about 10 or so phone banks set up for the  
phone bidders and a couple people running the online bidding. Was  
all very professional and had my own paddle and everything. They  
had a good dinner spread as well.


They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including all  
the big ones and the people that worked there were really friendly  
and answered all of my questions. I didn't see too much of the  
paper materials displayed, mostly just the props, but it was pretty  
cool seeing some of them close up.


It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't hesitate  
to sit it in on another one.


The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was only  
there for one lot in particular - which I won) but it was no fault  
of their own, they just had a ton of bids. There were some guys  
that were there for almost 12 hours when I left after 4 hours.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:51 PM, S Yafet  wrote:

I guess the provenance was almost impossible to pass up.  Did  
manage to get a Browning Dracula still so I don't feel too bad  
about London After Midnight.


What's it like at their auctions?  I've always done the phone.

Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul W. Hazen  
 wrote:
I was in the room during the Profiles Browning bidding session and  
was truly amazed at some of the prices the Browning stills were  
getting especially the Freaks stills which seem to be have been  
bought primarily by the same two phone bidders. Profiles did a  
great job on that acquisition and auction and I'm looking forward  
to the Debbie Reynolds auction in September.


Paul

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:26 PM, S Yafet  wrote:

Wow!  Naively, I thought it would be great to have something of  
Tod Browning's from London After Midnight.  Then, I realized that  
the four stills I liked the best were climbing higher and  
higher.  Wound up at 18K.  My phone bidder helper guy told me I  
could keep one and sell the other three.  Well,  no guarantees on  
something like that but I can't say I wasn't seriously tempted.   
(I thought maybe I'd worry about the money later.


Nathalie

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Scott Burns  
 wrote:
Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay  
with collecting paper).




A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector, I  
wonder is this price record setting?




From the catalog:

1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components  
spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II.  
(TCF, 1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to  
be in the public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the  
pinnacle of the Star Wars collecting universe. For the  
productions following Star Wars: A New Hope, to save time in  
meeting production deadlines, R2 components were reused from the  
previous Star Wars films. As filming progressed, R2 units were  
upgraded and refurbished, with outdated components being retired.  
This process has been confirmed by numerous crewmembers who  
worked on the Star Wars film franchise. This R2-D2, constructed  
of aluminum, steel and fiberglass elements, measuring 43 in. tall  
x 29.5 in. wide x 20 in. deep (in current pose), was put together  
over many years by sourcing original components and assembling  
them as a complete R2-D2. The dome was one of the few hero  
aluminum domes made for R2 actor Kenny Baker in the first film (A  
New Hope, 1977) and is the only one known in the public domain.  
It was used throughout the original trilogy as well as Episode I  
and can be screen matched by the fiber optic array to scenes in  
Return of the Jedi and Episode I. It features a handle to  
articulate the front eye from inside the unit by Kenny Baker. The  
metal “greeblies” (fine details added to make the device appear  
more complex) inserted into the front and rear of the body, and  
those on the feet, were made for A New Hope and used on R2 units  
throughout the original trilogy. The left and right legs were  
made for Empire Strikes Back and were acquired as complete items.  
One leg retains the Empire paint scheme and the other from Jedi.  
The middle and left foot were used on an original trilogy R2 and  
were used as the master pattern for 

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Very impressive.

And another item that has certainly become iconic, no doubt about it.




On Jun 28, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Rich Halegua MPB Warehouse wrote:


yes
it was Luke Skywalker's lightsaber screen used in Star Wars and ESB


At 12:54 PM 6/28/2017, Jeff Potokar wrote:
Did the description indicate which light saber this was? (whose  
character used it?)




On Jun 28, 2017, at 12:36 PM, MPB Warehouse wrote:


Light Saber
$375k+BP= $450,000.00


At 12:18 PM 6/28/2017, Scott Burns wrote:
Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay  
with collecting paper).


A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector, I  
wonder is this price record setting?


From the catalog:
1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components  
spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II.  
(TCF, 1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to  
be in the public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the  
pinnacle of the Star Wars collecting universe. For the  
productions following Star Wars: A New Hope, to save time in  
meeting production deadlines, R2 components were reused from the  
previous Star Wars films. As filming progressed, R2 units were  
upgraded and refurbished, with outdated components being  
retired. This process has been confirmed by numerous crewmembers  
who worked on the Star Wars film franchise. This R2-D2,  
constructed of aluminum, steel and fiberglass elements,  
measuring 43 in. tall x 29.5 in. wide x 20 in. deep (in current  
pose), was put together over many years by sourcing original  
components and assembling them as a complete R2-D2. The dome was  
one of the few hero aluminum domes made for R2 actor Kenny Baker  
in the first film (A New Hope, 1977) and is the only one known  
in the public domain. It was used throughout the original  
trilogy as well as Episode I and can be screen matched by the  
fiber optic array to scenes in Return of the Jedi and Episode I.  
It features a handle to articulate the front eye from inside the  
unit by Kenny Baker. The metal “greeblies” (fine details added  
to make the device appear more complex) inserted into the front  
and rear of the body, and those on the feet, were made for A New  
Hope and used on R2 units throughout the original trilogy. The  
left and right legs were made for Empire Strikes Back and were  
acquired as complete items. One leg retains the Empire paint  
scheme and the other from Jedi. The middle and left foot were  
used on an original trilogy R2 and were used as the master  
pattern for the feet created for Episode I. The right foot is  
production made for Episode I but not used. The small opening  
hatch on the back of the body was used in Episode II. The barrel  
of the body was made for Episode I and it was subsequently  
painted and detailed for this R2 unit. Given the ad hoc nature  
of production practices, any “complete” existing R2-D2 units  
from the first trilogy (in studio hands) would be a compilation  
very similar to this R2-D2 unit offered here. No internal  
mechanics or workings are present. Not merely a prop, costume  
piece or filming miniature, R2-D2 is a major, beloved character  
in the Star Wars universe. Without question, this is the finest  
piece ever offered from this incredible franchise.


One of the most instantly recognizable pieces of pop culture in  
existence.



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe? 
SUBED1=MoPo-L=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Or the little droid will end up in the grande foyer of someone's home  
in Beverly Hills, Bel Air or in the Hollywood Hills, perhaps.



On Jun 28, 2017, at 1:41 PM, James Gresham wrote:

I always ask myself when I hear these things, "who has that kind of  
money?"  I mean that is crazy.  Of course when I lost money in the  
Haggard fraud, I did have someone tell me, "if you have that much  
money in posters, you deserve to loss it."  So, I guess its  
relative.  But to spend that much, just seems insane.  It must be  
an organization or institution?  I don't know.  But, WOW!


On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Scott Burns  
 wrote:
Thanks, didn’t realize there was a variation. On eBay, the BP is  
stated as “up to” 28%. Upon further clicking, I found this:




The actual purchase price will be the sum of the final bid price  
plus the buyer's premium of twenty four percent (24%) of the hammer  
price (discounted to 20% when full payment is made in cash or by  
valid check); or twenty eight percent (28%) if bid on and won  
through the internet. California sales tax shall automatically be  
added to the purchase price unless exempted.




How’s that for complicated? All I know is, that’s a big BP!



From: MPB Warehouse [mailto:wareho...@comic-art.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 4:02 PM
To: Scott Burns ; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU


Subject: Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction



the bidder was on the phone and that is just a 20% BP

when you use Invaluable live bidding, it is 28%


At 12:43 PM 6/28/2017, Scott Burns wrote:


Thanks for reminding me about the 28% Buyer’s Premium. Ouch.

From: MoPo List [ mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of  
MPB Warehouse

Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 3:32 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction


$2.3m +BP = $2.56m

they also sold the Saturday Night Fever dancefloor $1.2m

Battlestar Gallactica model collection $1.5+bp

Profiles is incredible

Oh.. the Tod Browning stills collection, probably reached $2mil



At 12:18 PM 6/28/2017, Scott Burns wrote:

Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay with  
collecting paper).




A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector, I  
wonder is this price record setting?




From the catalog:

1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components  
spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II. (TCF,  
1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to be in the  
public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the pinnacle of the  
Star Wars collecting universe. For the productions following Star  
Wars: A New Hope, to save time in meeting production deadlines, R2  
components were reused from the previous Star Wars films. As  
filming progressed, R2 units were upgraded and refurbished, with  
outdated components being retired. This process has been confirmed  
by numerous crewmembers who worked on the Star Wars film franchise.  
This R2-D2, constructed of aluminum, steel and fiberglass elements,  
measuring 43 in. tall x 29.5 in. wide x 20 in. deep (in current  
pose), was put together over many years by sourcing original  
components and assembling them as a complete R2-D2. The dome was  
one of the few hero aluminum domes made for R2 actor Kenny Baker in  
the first film (A New Hope, 1977) and is the only one known in the  
public domain. It was used throughout the original trilogy as well  
as Episode I and can be screen matched by the fiber optic array to  
scenes in Return of the Jedi and Episode I. It features a handle to  
articulate the front eye from inside the unit by Kenny Baker. The  
metal “greeblies” (fine details added to make the device appear  
more complex) inserted into the front and rear of the body, and  
those on the feet, were made for A New Hope and used on R2 units  
throughout the original trilogy. The left and right legs were made  
for Empire Strikes Back and were acquired as complete items. One  
leg retains the Empire paint scheme and the other from Jedi. The  
middle and left foot were used on an original trilogy R2 and were  
used as the master pattern for the feet created for Episode I. The  
right foot is production made for Episode I but not used. The small  
opening hatch on the back of the body was used in Episode II. The  
barrel of the body was made for Episode I and it was subsequently  
painted and detailed for this R2 unit. Given the ad hoc nature of  
production practices, any “complete” existing R2-D2 units from the  
first trilogy (in studio hands) would be a compilation very similar  
to this R2-D2 unit offered here. No internal mechanics or workings  
are present. Not merely a prop, costume piece or filming miniature,  
R2-D2 is a major, beloved character in the Star Wars universe.  
Without question, this is the finest piece ever offered from this  

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

Did the description indicate which light saber this was? (whose  
character used it?)




On Jun 28, 2017, at 12:36 PM, MPB Warehouse wrote:


Light Saber
$375k+BP= $450,000.00


At 12:18 PM 6/28/2017, Scott Burns wrote:
Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay with  
collecting paper).


A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector, I  
wonder is this price record setting?


From the catalog:
1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components  
spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II. (TCF,  
1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to be in  
the public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the pinnacle of  
the Star Wars collecting universe. For the productions following  
Star Wars: A New Hope, to save time in meeting production  
deadlines, R2 components were reused from the previous Star Wars  
films. As filming progressed, R2 units were upgraded and  
refurbished, with outdated components being retired. This process  
has been confirmed by numerous crewmembers who worked on the Star  
Wars film franchise. This R2-D2, constructed of aluminum, steel  
and fiberglass elements, measuring 43 in. tall x 29.5 in. wide x  
20 in. deep (in current pose), was put together over many years by  
sourcing original components and assembling them as a complete R2- 
D2. The dome was one of the few hero aluminum domes made for R2  
actor Kenny Baker in the first film (A New Hope, 1977) and is the  
only one known in the public domain. It was used throughout the  
original trilogy as well as Episode I and can be screen matched by  
the fiber optic array to scenes in Return of the Jedi and Episode  
I. It features a handle to articulate the front eye from inside  
the unit by Kenny Baker. The metal “greeblies” (fine details added  
to make the device appear more complex) inserted into the front  
and rear of the body, and those on the feet, were made for A New  
Hope and used on R2 units throughout the original trilogy. The  
left and right legs were made for Empire Strikes Back and were  
acquired as complete items. One leg retains the Empire paint  
scheme and the other from Jedi. The middle and left foot were used  
on an original trilogy R2 and were used as the master pattern for  
the feet created for Episode I. The right foot is production made  
for Episode I but not used. The small opening hatch on the back of  
the body was used in Episode II. The barrel of the body was made  
for Episode I and it was subsequently painted and detailed for  
this R2 unit. Given the ad hoc nature of production practices, any  
“complete” existing R2-D2 units from the first trilogy (in studio  
hands) would be a compilation very similar to this R2-D2 unit  
offered here. No internal mechanics or workings are present. Not  
merely a prop, costume piece or filming miniature, R2-D2 is a  
major, beloved character in the Star Wars universe. Without  
question, this is the finest piece ever offered from this  
incredible franchise.


One of the most instantly recognizable pieces of pop culture in  
existence.



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] R2D2 Just Sold at Auction

[Jeff Potokar]

That is incredible! What a result. A big congrats to Profiles, too,  
that's for sure.


And to read the description about how this particular R2D2 unit was  
assembled from various other droid components made for a fascinating  
read.


What a wonderful, iconic, SW piece to own.




On Jun 28, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Scott Burns wrote:

Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay with  
collecting paper).


A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in  
History movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector, I  
wonder is this price record setting?


From the catalog:
1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components  
spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II. (TCF,  
1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to be in the  
public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the pinnacle of the  
Star Wars collecting universe. For the productions following Star  
Wars: A New Hope, to save time in meeting production deadlines, R2  
components were reused from the previous Star Wars films. As  
filming progressed, R2 units were upgraded and refurbished, with  
outdated components being retired. This process has been confirmed  
by numerous crewmembers who worked on the Star Wars film franchise.  
This R2-D2, constructed of aluminum, steel and fiberglass elements,  
measuring 43 in. tall x 29.5 in. wide x 20 in. deep (in current  
pose), was put together over many years by sourcing original  
components and assembling them as a complete R2-D2. The dome was  
one of the few hero aluminum domes made for R2 actor Kenny Baker in  
the first film (A New Hope, 1977) and is the only one known in the  
public domain. It was used throughout the original trilogy as well  
as Episode I and can be screen matched by the fiber optic array to  
scenes in Return of the Jedi and Episode I. It features a handle to  
articulate the front eye from inside the unit by Kenny Baker. The  
metal “greeblies” (fine details added to make the device appear  
more complex) inserted into the front and rear of the body, and  
those on the feet, were made for A New Hope and used on R2 units  
throughout the original trilogy. The left and right legs were made  
for Empire Strikes Back and were acquired as complete items. One  
leg retains the Empire paint scheme and the other from Jedi. The  
middle and left foot were used on an original trilogy R2 and were  
used as the master pattern for the feet created for Episode I. The  
right foot is production made for Episode I but not used. The small  
opening hatch on the back of the body was used in Episode II. The  
barrel of the body was made for Episode I and it was subsequently  
painted and detailed for this R2 unit. Given the ad hoc nature of  
production practices, any “complete” existing R2-D2 units from the  
first trilogy (in studio hands) would be a compilation very similar  
to this R2-D2 unit offered here. No internal mechanics or workings  
are present. Not merely a prop, costume piece or filming miniature,  
R2-D2 is a major, beloved character in the Star Wars universe.  
Without question, this is the finest piece ever offered from this  
incredible franchise.


One of the most instantly recognizable pieces of pop culture in  
existence.



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Universal Posters for sale

[Jeff Potokar]

Here's hoping the auction does very well, and that you're able to re- 
acquire your pieces, too, Jim.



On Jun 27, 2017, at 11:25 AM, James Gresham wrote:


The proceeds from this sale will go to the 30 some victims.

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:51 PM, James Gresham  
 wrote:
The US Marshalls office contacted the victims of the Haggard Fraud  
yesterday.  I was also contacted today by Agent Mike from the FBI.   
Mike has asked me to pass along information.  The first batch of  
authenticated posters and lobby cards is now going up for sale.


https://www.txauction.com/auctions/info/102

Above is the information.  These are real posters and lobby cards  
that were recovered by the FBI.  I plan on buying a couple of the  
items back myself.  Many were originally mine.  The sale is from  
July 13th to the 27th.  I am sure there are items for most everyone.


Here is the Great news-THERE IS NO BUYERS PREMIUM on these items.   
What you bid is what you pay.


If you have any questions feel free to email me.  Thanks, Jim Gresham

--
Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc.


President | Owner - Macomb County
O: 586-677-SNOW | F: 586-677-5669




--
Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc.


President | Owner - Macomb County
O: 586-677-SNOW | F: 586-677-5669


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] STOLEN POSTERS: FOUND!

[Jeff Potokar]

Great news and congrats on the recovery of your posters, Paolo.

Thumbs up to that.

Jeff





On Jun 18, 2017, at 4:02 PM, Paolo Zelati wrote:


Hello everybody,

I'm very happy to inform you that my 5 Italian posters that got  
stolen from me 1 year ago...have been found!


I want to thank all of you for your help and support.

I'd like to keep the details confidential but I really need to  
thank Grey Smith for his patience, his help and most of all for his  
incredibly professional behavior while dealing with such delicate  
issue...



GILDA IS COMING HOME TO DADDY!

Paolo

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Mary Tyler Moore 1936-2017

[Jeff Potokar]

Very sad indeed.

I know she had been battling diabetes for many years.

I always really enjoyed MTM and her body of work.

Both she and "her smile" will be greatly missed.

Jeff






On Jan 25, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Scott Burns wrote:


Oh no…..Mary is gone. This one really hurts.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/mary-tyler-moore-dead- 
actress-719799


Scott
MoPo List Owner

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] James Bond One Sheets on Ebay...Too Good to be True?

[Jeff Potokar]

Looks to be the RR from 1980. EMP has sold a good number of these,  
with the glossy paper, and film title, in caps, in the lower right  
corner, and missing the NSS info:


http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/film_title/DR.%2520NO/type/1sh/ 
style/R80/archive.html





On Aug 7, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Greg Douglass wrote:

Hey guys...I was doing a casual Sunday morning cruise of Ebay this  
AM and I came across some James Bond material with opening bids  
that are low bordering on "WTF?". Took a close look at the photos  
and the paper they're printed on set off some alarm bells. I don't  
recall the original posters being printed on the kind of glossy  
paper that became ubiquitous during the 1980s. Was there a  
commercial reprint done of these titles?
If they ARE the Real Deal, I probably just screwed up by alerting  
all the deep-pocketed 007 junkies on MOPO to their existence. I'll  
be bid off the face of the planet now!

Greg Douglass
http://www.ebay.com/itm/JAMES-BOND-DR-NO-1962-27-x-41-MOVIE-POSTER-/ 
201636479760?hash=item2ef2788310:g:sT4AAOSw3xJXnmWt

--
Greg Douglass
Guitarist-
Lessons, Live Shows, Touring,
& Studio Work
(760)212-3648

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] there you are, MOPO!

[Jeff Potokar]

Same here, Kirby

Some MOPO emails just arrived to me, too, from July 2nd.

So there must have been some kind of snag-hiccup.


Jeff



On Jul 5, 2016, at 8:55 AM, Kirby McDaniel wrote:


Mopolistas,

Sorry for the double-posting about the Polish posters.  I was not  
receiving a confirmation mail from MOPO, so I assumed there was  
something wrong in the outgoing mail.
However, I just got a slew of emails MOPO related at 10:48 AM - and  
both my emails were posted.


Not trying to SPAM you!

Kirby




Kirby McDaniel
MovieArt Original Film Posters
P.O. Box 4419
Austin TX 78765-4419
512 479 6680  www.movieart.com

https://www.facebook.com/movieart.austin.texas
https://plus.google.com/+MovieartAustinTX/posts
https://twitter.com/movieartaustin
https://www.pinterest.com/movieartaustin/pins/

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Cabin in the sky

[Jeff Potokar]

Yes, indeed.

:)


Jeff




On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Kirby McDaniel wrote:


The meaning of the word “misplaced” is misplaced.

Kirby

On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:


A framed 6sh IN a frame gets "misplaced" in the actual museum? To  
the point/extent that some think it was stolen? And then somehow  
re-appears a couple days later?


As Franc said, this certainly smells and has the feel of an  
attempted, inside job that maybe got "cold feet" once the alarm  
was sounded.





On Jun 18, 2016, at 9:02 AM, postermandan wrote:



Thanks for all your concerns and well wishes about Ron's rare and  
important poster, it has magically reappeared at the museum after  
being "misplaced", though as many of you wondered, it seems it  
would require a David Copperfield disappearing act for such a  
thing to occur. Again, thank you all for caring. Daniel strebin  
on behalf of Ron Finley



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1







Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Cabin in the sky

[Jeff Potokar]

A framed 6sh IN a frame gets "misplaced" in the actual museum? To the  
point/extent that some think it was stolen? And then somehow re- 
appears a couple days later?


As Franc said, this certainly smells and has the feel of an  
attempted, inside job that maybe got "cold feet" once the alarm was  
sounded.





On Jun 18, 2016, at 9:02 AM, postermandan wrote:



Thanks for all your concerns and well wishes about Ron's rare and  
important poster, it has magically reappeared at the museum after  
being "misplaced", though as many of you wondered, it seems it  
would require a David Copperfield disappearing act for such a thing  
to occur. Again, thank you all for caring. Daniel strebin on behalf  
of Ron Finley



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Lolita French 1P - Repro or Not Repro

[Jeff Potokar]

And fold-free (rolled) likely makes it "1962-free" also.  ;)



On May 31, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Kirby McDaniel wrote:

And there is an answer, which any number of experienced dealers  
could provide.  But, alas, your forum is a “dealer-free” zone.


Kirby McDaniel
www.movieart.com



On May 31, 2016, at 5:22 PM, David  wrote:

That is the question

http://vintagemoviepostersforum.com/discussion/1692/selling-large- 
original-lolita-poster-framed-in-french#latest


   Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
 ___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed  
to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
 The author of this message is  
solely responsible for its content.



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] pictured posters

[Jeff Potokar]

Look who the seller is! T Loce!

No wonder its such a crummy picture.

Is that poster even real? I mean, does he have the ability now to  
print French 1P size repros now?? lol


Jeff





On May 29, 2016, at 10:01 AM, filip de volder wrote:


ah , yes :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/GOOD-BAD-UGLY-FRENCH-47X63-MOVIE-POSTER-R74- 
EASTWOOD-/320135855264?hash=item4a89957ca0:m:mS-yySGmSDJ_zhFI6AcokuA


Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 15:19:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [MOPO] pictured posters
From: tommymb...@gmail.com
To: runbuffy...@hotmail.com

Link, Filip?

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:16 PM, filip de volder  
 wrote:
i'll avoid certain terms this time but i just don't get it ,  
besides asking 1400$ for this 70s re-release poster , how can one  
take a picture this bad ? this guy has 26946 items on ebay and  
pictures were taken in a " i couldn't care less " style on  
something that looks like an artificial bearskin   .


filip

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Realart 3 sheets

[Jeff Potokar]

Hi Jim,

Are you only meaning any  RealArt RR 3-sheets? Or also inlcuding  
those later RR 3sh put out by Universal, as well?


Jeff






On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:58 PM, James Gresham wrote:

So I recently got a Realart Ghost of Frankenstein 3 sheet and I  
love it.  I know there are some other horror titles like Invisible  
Ray, Werewolf of London and Raven out there.


Here is my question.  Are there any Realart Frankenstein, Dracula,  
Wolf Man or R 51 Mummy three sheets in existence?  Has anyone ever  
seen any of these?  Thanks, Jim


--
Gresham's Seasonal Services, Inc.


President | Owner - Macomb County
O: 586-677-SNOW | F: 586-677-5669


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Movie Poster Theft - My Friend Had a Robbery - Dealers Watch For This List

[Jeff Potokar]

Thats what I wondered too

More of a possible, inside job maybe? To know to go after these kinds  
of posters. And more so, if some were not on display and stored in  
drawers or tubes.


It is a chin scratcher, that's for sure.


Jeff




On Apr 5, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Greg Douglass wrote:


Wow! What a list of titles! That is absolutely devastating.
I am saving this email. If I hear anything at all, I'll report it.  
Given my tastes in collecting, I would be a prime target for this  
stuff.
The thief had good taste, I'll give him that . Usually, they just  
take the TV and all the electronics stuff. i had my house broken  
into 20 years ago. Posters untouched. Guitars untouched. TVs and  
stereos, all gone. Lucky me. I also had the rare pleasure of  
watching the robbers being led away in handcuffs. (There was a  
dentist who had  meth lab going in his basement who lived just up  
the street. We regularly found our mailbox opened and letters  
scattered all over the road.  The police asked us if they could use  
our back yard for surveillance. I gave them the space happily along  
with an endless supply of coffee and donuts. It was so great seeing  
those bastards being led away. And, no, i never got my things back.)
I wish Frank the best of luck. This is a rather small, close-knit  
hobby and this sounded like a well-informed thief. An inside job  
perhaps?

Best,
Greg Douglass


 Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art  wrote:

Mopo Members...

my friend Frank Beuhler had a theft from his home last week.
Frank is a great guy & I hope it comes back. Lots of good stuff here

a police report # and Frank's phone number

Case #16-2000
Frank Beuhler
(415) 710-1129

Title Size
1 Creature From the Black Lagoon half sheet (rolled)
2 Creature Walks Among Us half sheet (style B)
3 Tarantula insert
4 Earth Vs. the Flying Saucers half sheet
5 Monster and the Girl half sheet (linenbacked)
6 Blood of the Vampire one sheet
7 Phantom of the Opera one sheet
8 Kiss of the Vampire one sheet
9 Girl With the Dragon Tattoo one sheet
10 Beast From Hollow Mountain one sheet
11 King Kong vs Godzilla lobby card #6
12 Giant Leeches one sheet
13 Nosferatu 40x60
14 Empire Strikes Back 40x60
15 Congo Crossing one sheet
16 Brides of Dracula one sheet
17 Godzilla vs the Thing insert
18 Planet of the Apes insert (paperbacked)
19 King  Dinosaur one sheet
20 Misc. Lobby Cards (15 to 30 items)  lobby card
Marin Co. Sheriff Department
Case #16-2000
Frank Beuhler
(415) 710-1129

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___

  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


--
Greg Douglass
Guitarist-
Lessons, Live Shows, Touring,
& Studio Work
(760)212-3648

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Question About Lost items

[Jeff Potokar]

Im sure this parcel will arrive fine.

Delivery times can be speedy, like your other package was, or delayed.

I mailed an envelope from OH to CA over Xmas.. and it took 14 days to  
arrive. Not damaged, not the wrong address, nothing. And no  
explanation was ever found.


So flukes can happen.

And arent you able to use the tracking #, once it gets into France?  
Parcels shipped from overseas to the US, with their own tracking  
number, and once arriving here (if handled by the USPS) can still be  
tracked here in the US until the delivery happens.


If it isnt that way in the reverse, (from US to overseas), that's a  
real delivery detriment.







On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Greg Douglass wrote:


Hey guys,
I have a situation where I shipped a buyer in France two 20 X 30"  
stills from RETURN OF THE JEDI on March 18. This guy is going out  
of his mind because they haven't arrived, despite the fact that I  
sent him a scan of the original receipt from the customs form with  
the tracking number, date, and amount paid. He somehow found that  
the items made it as far as Paris.
Tracking numbers apparently do not work in France at this time, and  
I know that some items are taking a long time to reach their  
destinations due to security concerns in that country. (Although I  
sent an item to another buyer in France last week, which he  
received quickly and painlessly.) The USPS has no answers for me.
Question: is there any kind of coverage for this kind of situation  
through either Paypal or Ebay? I think I'm sunk as far as the post  
office goes, but I'm hoping that some of the more experienced  
sellers on this group can give me ideas. I'm having trouble  
convincing this guy that I'm not part of some anti-France  
conspiracy with the US Postal Service. I'm starting to get an idea  
of how this guy's mind works, and I know he's going to file a  
complaint with Ebay, which is the last thing I want.

Any ideas?
Best,
Greg Douglass
PS-I stopped selling on Ebay awhile back. NOW I remember why..
--
Greg Douglass
Guitarist-
Lessons, Live Shows, Touring,
& Studio Work
(760)212-3648

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

[MOPO] APF - Stop On By & Check Us Out

[Jeff Potokar]

Hello, to all in MOPO-ville.

We wanted to extend a hello and invite to any and all who may not know
or be aware of All Poster Forum. The forum was started back in
December of 2009, and members cover and discuss a wide range of movie
and non movie poster topics, so there is something for everyone.

Feel free to come on by and peruse a while. We can be found at:

http://www.allposterforum.com

And for any that would like to register, just send a quick email to
this address:

apfholi...@gmail.com

Tell us the User ID you would like to use, and we will take care of  
the rest!


We hope to see you.

Jeff

(On behalf of Thierry, Holiday & the rest of the APF team)

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Patty Duke 1946-2016

[Jeff Potokar]

First, it's Cathy that adores the minuet, (and second) the Ballet  
Russe and Crepe Suzette.


Come on Greg...LOLOL

(Im just jivin' ya).

:)

Jeff









On Mar 29, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Greg Douglass wrote:


"So sad; she/he wasn't that old"
I'm hearing that appended to more and more written tributes on MOPO  
and elsewhere.

None of us are "that old" untilwe are.
I toured the UK with Sam Andrew, guitarist for Big brother & the  
Holding Co., in 2014. We had a great time and a wonderful personal  
and musical rapport. We planned a two guitar tour and were making  
preparations for for it when he was struck down by a heart attack  
in January 2015. I think that's the first time I used the phrase  
"He wasn't that old" (he was 72).
The Reaper is like some white trash trailer park dwelling relative.  
When he shows up at the door, you don't want to let him in, but you  
have to because, in some macabre way,  he's kin.
Meantime, let us not dwell on our own mortality . Let us not spend  
our days ruminating on our own personal sell-by date. We know it's  
coming. Instead fill your days creating good and new things,  
finding ways to acquire that special poster, making ourselves and  
those we love happy, and honoring those great talents that brought  
us all into this wonderful little hobby.
Today's ear-worm for me is: "Patty adores a minuet, the Eiffel  
Tower, and Crepes Suzette, but Patty loves rock'n'roll, a hot dog  
makes her lose control, What a wild duet!"

RIP.
Love those personal stories, Sue. Let's all keep 'em coming!
Greg Douglass
 Susan  wrote:
She was a wonderful person.  I did a couple of films with her back  
in the 70's and 80's.  I love her performance in The Miracle  
Worker and still watch old reruns of The Patty Duke Show.  She was  
also fabulous in Valley of the Dolls.  I was just speaking about  
her a couple of days ago telling a friend about going to her home,  
at the time, in Westwood.  It was an early Sunday morning and we  
were doing a film where the lead actress was fired the day before  
and Patty was taking over the role, so we were in a rush to catch  
up.   I remember walking by a built in bookcase and there was her  
Academy Award in the corner of a shelf with a bunch of stuff  
leaning against it.  Her two sons, Sean and Mackenzie, were  
jumping up and down on the couch and, her husband at the time,  
John Astin grabbed me by the arm and said "let's make pancakes for  
everyone"it is one of my fondest memories.   So sad, she  
wasn't that old.


Sue
Hollywood Poster Frames


Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:26:40 -0400
From: s...@columbus.rr.com
Subject: [MOPO] Patty Duke 1946-2016
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Academy award winner Patty Duke died today at age 69. She won her  
Oscar for 1962’s “The Miracle Worker.”  Baby boomers will always  
remember her for her role as “identical cousins” Patty and Cathy  
Lane in “The Patty Duke Show” (1963-1966). More details at this  
link: http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/03/29/oscar- 
winning-former-child-star-patty-duke-dies-age-69/82382666/  
ScottMoPo List Owner






To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___

  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



--
Greg Douglass
Guitarist-
Lessons, Live Shows, Touring,
& Studio Work
(760)212-3648

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Patty Duke 1946-2016

[Jeff Potokar]

Very sad, indeed.

She was incredible in the Miracle Worker, and I also LOVED her TV  
show (that i saw in later re-runs). I thought the opening and theme  
song were very fun and the show was well done. That she played and  
pulled off both roles so seamlessly always impressed me, more so,  
when I was a kid.


She will be missed.

RIP, Patty and Cathy Lane.

:(



On Mar 29, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Scott Burns wrote:

Academy award winner Patty Duke died today at age 69. She won her  
Oscar for 1962’s “The Miracle Worker.”  Baby boomers will always  
remember her for her role as “identical cousins” Patty and Cathy  
Lane in “The Patty Duke Show” (1963-1966). More details at this link:


http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/03/29/oscar-winning- 
former-child-star-patty-duke-dies-age-69/82382666/


Scott
MoPo List Owner

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] FS: Hitchcock's SHADOW OF A DOUBT Insert poster

[Jeff Potokar]

Craig, Is this the same insert that sold just 3 days ago? Or a  
different copy?




Thanks.

Jeff




On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:44 PM, C Ellis wrote:


Hi MOPOers,

I have an original 1943 insert poster from Alfred Hitchcock's  
Shadow of a Doubt. It is unbacked, folded and in very good to fine  
condition. This is the same insert I have been listing on ebay over  
the past few months. If anyone is interested in buying it from me  
directly, I can sell it as low as $1300 (including postage/shipping  
anywhere in North America). I can sell it to overseas collectors as  
well, but the shipping cost will be extra.


Here is the link to the previous auction:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/SHADOW-OF-A-DOUBT-1943-Original-Insert- 
Poster-Alfred-Hitchcock-Noir-/111930104013


Thanks to all who have shown an interest!

Regards,
Craig

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Sad News

[Jeff Potokar]

I also received the private email earlier today, Sue.

Sad news indeed.

Jeff





On Mar 13, 2016, at 9:31 PM, Susan wrote:


My dear Mopo friends,

It is with great sadness that I tell you that our fellow MoPo  
member and my dear friend Richard del Belso has passed away.  He  
has been battling cancer for quite some time now.  He was a rare  
soul that doesn't come along often.  So kind and gentle, smart and  
funny.  He will be missed tremendously, not only by those of us  
that loved him but by all those he touched along the  
way...goodnight dear friend.


Sue Heim
Hollywood Poster Frames

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] FOR SALE: THE SHINING ORIGINAL VINTAGE BRITISH QUAD POSTER

[Jeff Potokar]

On all your poster sales can I ask how you have come up with your  
prices?




On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:08 PM, Dizz Russo wrote:

An Original 1980 Vintage Theatrical Folded British Quad Movie  
Poster (BQ; Quad Crown; measures 30" x 40" [76 x 102 cm])


Photobucket link below
http://i1135.photobucket.com/albums/m633/Dizz_Russo/THE%20SHINING% 
201980%2030x40%20British%20Quad%20Poster%20Stanley%20Kubrick%20Jack% 
20Nicholson%202.jpg


http://i1135.photobucket.com/albums/m633/Dizz_Russo/THE%20SHINING% 
201980%2030x40%20British%20Quad%20Poster%20Stanley%20Kubrick%20Jack% 
20Nicholson.jpg



Condition: (VF+)
-Minor edge fraying or wrinkling
-Very slight soiling, along border edge, along border edge
-Slight fold fading

Price: $180.00 OBO (Includes FREE SHIPPING ANYWHERE!!)

Please contact me with any questions or concerns.  Thank you - Dizz

PayPal link below:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s- 
xclick_button_id=Q6Q22HYLJFHP6


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] 21 Years

[Jeff Potokar]

Congrats to another year, Scott!

Bravo to you and thanks for keeping it going!

Jeff





On Feb 24, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Scott Burns wrote:

Today marks MoPo’s 21st anniversary. The first automated MoPo  
message was sent via American University’s listserv on February 24,  
1995.


There were 11 members at the beginning, and as is my annual custom,  
I recognize these MoPo pioneers:  Mahtab Moayeri, Michael Danese,  
Rob Ellis, Donna Tschetter, Goh Kai Shen, Evan Zweifel, George  
Nichol, Jeff Static (using his AOL name Static555), Adam Ehrlich,  
Cindy Nemeth-Johannes (we lost Cindy in 2008, but her husband Jay  
is still a member), and myself. In addition to Jay, Michael, Rob  
and Evan are still MoPo members.


Thanks for another year…and as long as AU keeps the listserv’s  
lights on, MoPo will carry on and we can all grow old together.


Scott
MoPo List Owner



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] For Sale: FRANKENSTEIN 1931/THE BLACK CAT 1934 Original Lobby Cards!!

[Jeff Potokar]

Those are 2 beauties, there, Todd!!




On Feb 23, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Todd wrote:


FOR SALE:

FRANKENSTEIN 1931 Original "Creation" Card
Very Fine to Very Fine+ $12k

http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30358639/view/013.JPG


THE BLACK CAT 1934 One of Only Two Scene Cards with both Karloff &  
Lugosi!
One sold at Heritage 11 years ago in 2005 for $12,362.50.   
Extremely Rare!
The small blue line and the red line are in the printing.  I've  
seen this on some other cards from THE BLACK CAT.

Very Fine $15k.

http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30358639/view/001.JPG


Email toddfeier...@msn.com for inquiries and further details.

Thank you.
Todd Feiertag



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] AW: [MOPO] Ebay-ponderings

[Jeff Potokar]

This happens OFTEN for U.S. buyers, too.

One item from a UK or German seller will be seen on the US site, then  
when clicking on the "show more items" link, there is nothing.


Ive then gone onto the ebay the seller is located in, or listing from  
and ALL the items are then visible to look at.


Why some are and arent, tho, I havent a clue.



Jeff




On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:18 AM, Wolfgang Jahn wrote:


ZERO results for me too.

See my longer email I just sent, same as Helmut says.

Wolfgang

Von: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] Im Auftrag von  
Helmut Hamm

Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 17:07
An: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Betreff: Re: [MOPO] Ebay-ponderings

That items do not show up in search results seems a common problem  
on ebay.


If you are registered outside of the US, ebay does not show you any  
items from sellers who ship to the US only. These will not show in  
any of your search results.


Yet, even if you are registered in the US or the seller ships  
worldwide, I frequently notice that I get zero results in 'Seller's  
other items', even though listings from this seller do appear in  
the 'You may also like' view. Listings from these sellers also do  
not show up in any of my searches. This is a problem that I have  
noticed for at least a year, so ebay must be aware of this.


Here's an example:

http://www.ebay.com/sch/dbd19508/m.html? 
item=191810394512=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562


I KNOW this seller has several active listings, since I'm watching  
them. Yet, when I click this link, I get zero results, same for his  
completed listings. I am logged in with an account registered to a  
US address.


Please give it a try, everybody, let me know if you get any results  
from this link.


Helmut

Am 24.02.2016 um 08:58 schrieb bqjansen :

Hi all, I kind of hate Ebay, too much work and time wasted looking  
at a bloody computer all of the time, but the times  I get over it  
I list some stuff here and there.


The point is this: a few days ago Dave promoted a few of his  
stills. he said he listed 30. As i click the link I see only 4 and  
can't find more even when i click "more by these seller". Same  
thing happened when somebody else (Tait i believe) promoted lobby  
cards for Our Gang and others. You click the link and the page is  
empty.


Has anyone else encountered this and/or has an explanation for this?

I listed 5 different lots of John Wayne photos as an experiment as  
I generally generate way less views as i used to have on my  
listings. Thought process being that if one lot has interest, the  
other wayne lots should generate something similar. After three  
days It does not.


Any thoughts?

Wim
www.movie-ink.com
http://stores.ebay.com/movieink/

   Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
 ___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   Send a message addressed to:  
lists...@listserv.american.edu

  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is  
solely responsible for its content.



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Great 6 Sheet

[Jeff Potokar]

I've worked at Universal and have seen this 6sh in person. It is a  
STUNNER!


It IS the real deal.

They also displayed it a number of years ago, when they did a  
screening of Phantom at the Universal Amphitheater.


Carla Laemmle was in attendance and actually posed for some pics next  
to this very same poster that was up on the wall.


It also makes one wonder if this copy is the same one you mention  
that your friend sold? Never know. I can't imagine there are many  
Phantom 6sh floating around out there. And Universal has quite the  
poster archive. If they didnt have a copy up until then, it could  
have made the rounds and eventually returned "home."  :)









On Feb 17, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Greg Douglass wrote:

I saw one of those "Phantom..." six sheets up close and personal.  
My poster guru, the late Chuck Vergara, called me over to his house  
in Fairfax, CA in the late 1980s-early 1990s. he had a gorgeous  
example of the "Phantom of the Opera" stone litho six sheet laid  
out on his living room floor to display it for a prospective buyer.  
It was stunning and I've always been grateful to Chuck for letting  
me see it. The buyer came over and loved the poster but he almost  
choked when Chuck quoted him the unheard of price of $2000. He  
ended up buying the poster. I don't remember who the buyer was but  
I think he may have ended up getting a decent return on his initial  
investment
Too bad the poster was completely wasted on the guys in the room.  
No poster geeks in THAT bunch!

Greg Douglass
 Ira Rubenstein  wrote:
And you say #oscarssowhite.Look at the room.   A bunch of old  
white
men and stacey snider.But the poster is awesome.If  
it¹s real.

:)




On 2/17/16, 12:51 AM, "MoPo List on behalf of Freeman Fisher"
 wrote:

John Kerry attended a meeting at Universal Studios with heads of  
all the

studios.But take a look at  what¹s hanging on the wall.

https://twitter.com/JohnKerry/status/699746890271715328/photo/1? 
ref_src=tw

src%5Etfw



Really ties the room together nicelyŠŠŠ

Freeman
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   
___

 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___

  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


--
Greg Douglass
Guitarist-
Lessons, Live Shows, Touring,
& Studio Work
(760)212-3648

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] PEE WEE'S BIG COMEBACK

[Jeff Potokar]

How did Ben Stiller get brought into a discussion of Pee Wee and  the  
mentioning of Adam Sandler?


:)





On Feb 16, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Doug Taylor wrote:

Living in Sarasota (original home of Pee Wee) I can say that he is  
rather liked around here because the location of his dastardly  
deeds has resulted in a rather profitable tour.


Regarding Ben Stiller, I haven’t seen the latest (which has been  
destroyed by the critics) but I can tell you that I hold his wife  
Christine Taylor (and her mother) in the highest regard.  They are  
acquaintances (our daughters performed in Annie together) and are  
absolutely amazingly humble and well-grounded people.  I’ve seen  
Ben (not met him) and suspect that he, personally, is also a pretty  
good person.


Regards

Doug Taylor

From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of  
Michael Greenwood

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:59 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] PEE WEE'S BIG COMEBACK

I disagree strongly.  Pee Wee's Big Adventure is terrific and an  
all time fave of mine.


The honour you speak of belongs to the reprehensible Adam Sandler.   
There is no defending him or his films.


M


From: MoPo List  on behalf of Adrian  
Cowdry <0029edc23ec7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu>

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 1:36 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] PEE WEE'S BIG COMEBACK

Pee wee should be shot - he is the worst - absolute worst person to  
be allowed on the movie screen - and that is saying a lot when you  
have Jerry Lewis and Ben Stiller around!



This Never Happened to the Other Fella

Adrian Cowdry
jboh...@aol.com


-Original Message-
From: Kirby McDaniel 
To: MoPo-L 
Sent: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:15
Subject: [MOPO] PEE WEE'S BIG COMEBACK

Mopolistas:

You may need to log-in to the New York Times to read this.  PEE  
WEE’S HOLIDAY will play on Netflix.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/14/magazine/pee-wees-big-comeback.html?

Pee-wee’s Big Comeback - The New York Times
www.nytimes.com
Pee-wee’s Big Comeback. After disappearing for nearly three  
decades, Paul Reubens’s subversive alter ego returns — and seems  
more radical than ever.


MEKA-LEKA-HI-MEKA-HINEY-HO!!!



Kirby McDaniel
MovieArt Original Film Posters
P.O. Box 4419
Austin TX 78765-4419
512 479 6680  mobile 512 589 5112
www.movieart.com
https://www.facebook.com/movieart.austin.texas
http://www.pinterest.com/movieartaustin/



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] FA: Lon Chaney, Sci-Fi, Pinocchio, Philo Vance & More

[Jeff Potokar]

I also thought the shipping prices were very high, and I'm in the US,  
in So CA.


As another example, I saw that one WC, which weighs but a few ounces  
at most, had a quote of 16.85 to mail (expedited) within the US.


Unless something is 13 oz or more, it can be shipped USPS First  
class; over that weight, it has to be mailed Priority.


As a test, I just went onto the USPS site, to mail a single WC, in a  
'large size' package. I gave the measurements of this parcel as 24" x  
18" x 1 inch thick, (since a WC is 14x22) and set the sealed parcel  
to weigh 12 oz. I also chose a zip code back in the midwest to mail  
to from my LA zip code.


Here are the price results:

USPS 2-Day Priority Mail: $7.85

USPS First Class Parcel: $4.34


I then decided to up the same parcel weight to 14 oz, but left the  
parcel dimensions the same, to see if there would be any price  
differences, with it being close to a pound in weight.


Results:

2-Day Priority Mail : $7.85

USPS Retail Ground: $7.84

So 2-Day Priority is not uber expensive. And the point isn't if one  
buys 6 items, that there is combined shipping. It's the idea that if  
someone wants only ONE item, that buyer should not be made to pay  
some kind of over the top ship fee, even if it is sent Priority.


Charge a customer what it costs, (or maybe round it up to the next  
whole dollar). That's what I have done, to keep the number simple and  
even. But an additional 100%+ markup?


Being Overcharged for shipping is a huge peeve of mine and that's why  
i felt the need to comment.


Jeff







On Feb 11, 2016, at 4:39 PM, luminita hascalovitz wrote:



Hello Zeev,

The ebay default shipping is set for PRIORITY MAIL, that is why the  
price is so high, AND the usps has raised their prices as of  
February 1st.


I always ship according to the high bidder's request, so, in case  
YOU win something, and don't want to have it shipped via Priority  
Mail, I can ship it via Air Mail and the price I charge is  
calculated according to usps.com, site everybody from all over the  
world can see.


Another thing to keep in mind is that, as stated in my  
descriptions, I combine shipping, so anything up to 8 lobby cards  
can be shipped for the price of one.


Take care,

Lumi

From: lobb...@rogers.com
To: lhascalov...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: [MOPO] FA: Lon Chaney, Sci-Fi, Pinocchio, Philo Vance  
& More

Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:53:31 -0500

Hi Lumi,

$34.30 for shipping one lobby card to Toronto?? Are you serious?

Zeev



From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of  
luminita hascalovitz

Sent: February-11-16 6:47 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: [MOPO] FA: Lon Chaney, Sci-Fi, Pinocchio, Philo Vance & More

Hi All,

Just a short message to let you know that I have over 100 vintage  
lobby cards and movie posters on eBay, including lots of horror,  
science fiction, detective titles, animation and more, all starting  
at $4.99 with no reserve.


Please have a look:

My eBay Auctions

Or search by my eBay ID: lobbies

Thanks,

Lumi

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Question on Storage Bags

[Jeff Potokar]

Hi Robert,

Can i ask why the "slipperiness factor" makes these non-usable for you?

I have similar bags that are more this way that I have used for years  
for my collection of Famous Monsters magazine. They worked fine as I  
also have the bagged mags in a storage box.


I could only see this being a problem if you planned on stacking the  
bagged pressbooks, one on top of the other, on a shelf or some such way.


Or will you keep these in some kind of storage box, too?

Best,

Jeff




On Jan 18, 2016, at 9:57 AM, MnTwister wrote:

I am starting to individually put all of my pressbooks that I deem  
valuable in plastic bags. I had ordered 1,000 poly bags from  
Uline.com and got them and they are so slippery all you have to do  
is touch the stack and they go sliding. I have purchased many  
pressbooks over the years and I have received some in plastic bags  
that were not nearly as slippery as the ones I ended up purchasing,  
in  fact they were not slippery at all when stacked on top of each  
other.


Can anyone enlighten me on where to get some of these bags that are  
not so slippery that some dealers use to send out their paper  
collectibles? Of course I would need different sizes, I have been  
using the 14" x 20" for most pressbooks up to 13 x 18 but will need  
some bigger for those extra large editions.


Thanks for your help.
Robert



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Question on Storage Bags

[Jeff Potokar]

Because you have them stacked answers my question.

Makes sense that you want something with more friction and "stick."

Jeff




On Jan 18, 2016, at 10:28 AM, MnTwister wrote:



Well, I now have almost 14,000 pressbooks and they are all on large  
shelves separated by studio and in alphabetical order, so that is  
why I need to find a bag that doesn't slide so much. I know there  
are different types of these bags but the ones I got are so  
slippery all I have to do is touch the pile of 50 or 100 pressbooks  
and they go sliding away. I don't expect to find the perfect  
resolution to this but there must be some less slippery, just  
thought someone might know if anyone is piling these on top of each  
other.


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] hollywoodposterauction.com results

[Jeff Potokar]

I was thinking the same, too, Tommy.

In looking at all the items, the LOWEST minimum reserve on ANY poster/ 
LC item was 100.00


This probably kept people away, who knew that certain items should  
sell for even less than even that min. reserve amount.


Jeff





On Nov 16, 2015, at 7:56 AM, Tommy Barr wrote:


Hi Morris,

Just had a look at the results online and there do seem to be a lot  
of posters passed. Don't you think that maybe the estimates and  
therefore the reserves were a bit on the high side?


Tommy

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Morris Everett Jr.  
 wrote:
Another successful auction #23 grossed $211,000 before after sales.  
Movie stills sales especially strong with a very low pass rate.  
Convention was only moderately successful and some dealers did  
quite poorly. Future events will probably rejoin Cinevent.
Great idea with lots of planning and heavy advertising but very  
poor local attendance. Socially great as old friends saw each other  
after several years but financially only a few benefited.
We will keep trying. The Internet and getting older does not help  
conventions.


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Maureen O'Hara has Died

[Jeff Potokar]

Gable and Loretta Young disappointments??

I couldn't disagree more.

:)

Jeff





On Nov 2, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Toochis Morin wrote:

I agree. Then you look at people like Clark Gable and Loretta Young  
and see what a disappointment they were.




Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 24, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Tom A. Pennock <002a4dff9746-dmarc- 
requ...@listserv.american.edu> wrote:


Yes, she was a class act ALL the way. I liked her so much in "The  
Parent Trap" and have that one sheet. Now I am glad I bought the  
insert from Rich from "The Quiet Man". I treasure both. Stars like  
her are the end of an era when stars were quality people to admire  
and to look up to as role models.


--Tom Pennock

In a message dated 10/24/2015 5:21:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
jpotok...@ca.rr.com writes:

She seemed like she would go on forever.

Truly a memorable and wonderful actress, from her first US  
performance in 1939's The Hunchback Of Notre Dame.


She was feisty, firey and so very talented.

RIP.



On Oct 24, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Ayling wrote:

Maureen O’Hara has passed away. She died in her sleep at age 95.  
RIP.


I enjoyed her work and was so very glad that she was recently  
given an Honorary Oscar. Evidently she particularly loved the  
music from The Quiet Man  which was scored by Victor Young and  
included adaptations of traditional Irish folk songs as well as  
singing by her and other members of the cast. Her family had been  
playing that music over and over these last few days
http://www.eonline.com/news/709887/actress-maureen-o-hara-dies- 
at-95? 
utm_source=eonline_medium=rssfeeds_campaign=imdb_topstories



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Maureen O'Hara has Died

[Jeff Potokar]

She seemed like she would go on forever.

Truly a memorable and wonderful actress, from her first US  
performance in 1939's The Hunchback Of Notre Dame.


She was feisty, firey and so very talented.

RIP.



On Oct 24, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Ayling wrote:


Maureen O’Hara has passed away. She died in her sleep at age 95. RIP.

I enjoyed her work and was so very glad that she was recently given  
an Honorary Oscar. Evidently she particularly loved the music from  
The Quiet Man  which was scored by Victor Young and included  
adaptations of traditional Irish folk songs as well as singing by  
her and other members of the cast. Her family had been playing that  
music over and over these last few days
http://www.eonline.com/news/709887/actress-maureen-o-hara-dies- 
at-95? 
utm_source=eonline_medium=rssfeeds_campaign=imdb_topstories



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] I hope this was fake.

[Jeff Potokar]

The one on ebay looks like it has the NSS info on the bottom left  
border, just below the imagery of the couple.


Heres a link to a large shot that was on ebay, as well as a link to  
an image of a copy sold on HA. Both look tho have the same info  
there. I think it really boils down to what size the ebay piece is:


http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/TqYAAOSwv0tVeHb0/s-l1600.jpg

http://dyn1.heritagestatic.com/lf?set=path%5B1%2F1%2F7%2F4%2F3% 
2F11743042%5D=url%5Bfile%3Aproduct.chain%5D


Jeff



On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Greg Douglass wrote:

Hard to tell from the photograph but it appears to me that there is  
no NSS information in the bottom border.

My guess is repro.
Take the gun away from your temple, Scott. It's OK now.
Greg Douglass
PS-Love the detailed description; the poster is "interesting" and  
that's about it.....

 Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote:

He doesn't list any dimensions to this piece. So it's really hard to
tell.




On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:27 PM, Scott Thienes wrote:


eBay item #: 171936378670

I hope this was fake and I didn't miss out on an incredible deal.
Please examine.

Sent from my iPhone

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-
L=1




 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___

  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



--
Greg Douglass
Guitarist-
Lessons, Live Shows, Touring,
& Studio Work
(760)212-3648

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] I hope this was fake.

[Jeff Potokar]

Plus the ebay images are far from clear or optimum color balanced,  
that's for sure.




On Oct 23, 2015, at 12:39 PM, Matt Johnston wrote:


Reprint for sure.

No greens/blues in the clouds, contrast to strong, shadows and  
gradients are off, skin tones on couple in the lower left are off,  
and the top/bottom shows too obvious of a transition where the  
original image (grey) was placed on a new background (white) for  
printing.

-Matt


On Oct 23, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com>  
wrote:


The one on ebay looks like it has the NSS info on the bottom left  
border, just below the imagery of the couple.


Heres a link to a large shot that was on ebay, as well as a link  
to an image of a copy sold on HA. Both look tho have the same info  
there. I think it really boils down to what size the ebay piece is:


http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/TqYAAOSwv0tVeHb0/s-l1600.jpg

http://dyn1.heritagestatic.com/lf?set=path%5B1%2F1%2F7%2F4%2F3% 
2F11743042%5D=url%5Bfile%3Aproduct.chain%5D


Jeff



On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Greg Douglass wrote:

Hard to tell from the photograph but it appears to me that there  
is no NSS information in the bottom border.

My guess is repro.
Take the gun away from your temple, Scott. It's OK now.
Greg Douglass
PS-Love the detailed description; the poster is "interesting" and  
that's about it.

---- Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
He doesn't list any dimensions to this piece. So it's really  
hard to

tell.




On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:27 PM, Scott Thienes wrote:


eBay item #: 171936378670

I hope this was fake and I didn't miss out on an incredible deal.
Please examine.

Sent from my iPhone

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-
L=1




Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   
___

 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

   The author of this message is solely responsible for its  
content.




--
Greg Douglass
Guitarist-
Lessons, Live Shows, Touring,
& Studio Work
(760)212-3648

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   
___

 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


   Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
 ___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   Send a message addressed  
to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is  
solely responsible for its content.


 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] I hope this was fake.

[Jeff Potokar]

He doesn't list any dimensions to this piece. So it's really hard to  
tell.





On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:27 PM, Scott Thienes wrote:


eBay item #: 171936378670

I hope this was fake and I didn't miss out on an incredible deal.  
Please examine.


Sent from my iPhone

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Worst packaging ever

[Jeff Potokar]

Cool!

And congrats on the sale, too, Rich.






On Oct 10, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art wrote:


rare Bob Dylan wc for Don't Look Back.

was trashed by the time I got it.. still sold for almost 200$


At 09:27 PM 10/9/2015, you wrote:

Now you have all curious, Rich.. an only known copy?

Can I ask for what film?

Jeff



On Oct 9, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Richard Halegua Comic Art wrote:


I had someone send an only known copy of a rare window card in a
bubble envelope..
it most certainly did not escape the idiocy of the seller


At 08:41 PM 10/9/2015, Scott Thienes wrote:

I received my '60 Psycho one sheet in the mail today. The sender
used a bubble envelope and simply slid the poster into it. No
cardboard, no plastic bag, nothing. Didn't  even write fragile on
the envelope. He just folded up the poster and stuck it in an
envelope.
Luckily it arrived un-damaged.

Sent from my iPhone
 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its  
content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   
___

 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
 Send a message addressed
to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is
solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Worst packaging ever

[Jeff Potokar]

And why send a WC rolled, LENGTHWISE?

UGH!

Jeff




On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:13 PM, David Kusumoto wrote:

Can't believe it's been more than five (5) years since I posted  
this, but it feels like yesterday.  Instead of shipping flat, she  
shipped it rolled.  So OK, she sends it rolled, but her idea of  
"protective tubing" was white construction paper.  Results below.   
Veteran restorer Carol Tincup (who hates me now, long story, join  
the club) - saved it for me; I later sold it. -d.



Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 05:10:57 +
From: fly...@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: Worst packaging ever
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I love your description Freeman. I cried with laughter.

From: Freeman Fisher 
To: Toochis Morin 
Cc: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Worst packaging ever

Since we’re on the always hilarious subject of bone headed, knuckle- 
dragging,  incompetents of shipping great paper,  my worst  
experience was purchasing a rare THE WOMEN half-sheet from a guy in  
South Carolina  shipping to me in LA.   After my asking him to  
remove from the frame prior to shipping,  he shipped in a single- 
ply,  already used box with no packing except one panel ONE PANEL  
of bubble wrap just laid on top which barely covered half the  
frame.  My guess is the glass shattered somewhere between his  
postoffice and the closest Guns for Christ Warehouse  whereupon  
shards of glass continued to scratch the surface image of the gals   
from East to West Coast  where on arrival it looked like an Etch-A- 
Sketch of squiggles composed by a 7 year old on a liter of Mountain  
Dew.


I tried to have someone burn down his house trailer but evidently  
it was considered a State Landmark.


freeman

On Oct 9, 2015, at 9:04 PM, Toochis Morin  wrote:

What an a-hole.

From: Scott Thienes 
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 8:41 PM
Subject: [MOPO] Worst packaging ever

I received my '60 Psycho one sheet in the mail today. The sender  
used a bubble envelope and simply slid the poster into it. No  
cardboard, no plastic bag, nothing. Didn't  even write fragile on  
the envelope. He just folded up the poster and stuck it in an  
envelope.

Luckily it arrived un-damaged.

Sent from my iPhone


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Worst packaging ever

[Jeff Potokar]

Now you have all curious, Rich.. an only known copy?

Can I ask for what film?

Jeff



On Oct 9, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Richard Halegua Comic Art wrote:

I had someone send an only known copy of a rare window card in a  
bubble envelope..

it most certainly did not escape the idiocy of the seller


At 08:41 PM 10/9/2015, Scott Thienes wrote:
I received my '60 Psycho one sheet in the mail today. The sender  
used a bubble envelope and simply slid the poster into it. No  
cardboard, no plastic bag, nothing. Didn't  even write fragile on  
the envelope. He just folded up the poster and stuck it in an  
envelope.

Luckily it arrived un-damaged.

Sent from my iPhone
 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___

  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
 Send a message addressed  
to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is  
solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] FA: James Bond is Coming!

[Jeff Potokar]

'Tis a beautiful and yet another amazing, overall offering, this  
Fall, Grey.


Congrats, to you all, once again.

Jeff




On Oct 2, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Smith, Grey - 1367 wrote:


Thanks, Rich.
Yes, we've been fortunate to get some real rarities this time
The never before seen Tarzan, 1932, is sure to be an interesting lot.
The Red Headed Woman one sheet.. and whose seen the Racing Blood  
one sheet before?
Gable's first starring role and I've never seen that it's been  
offered.
http://movieposters.ha.com/itm/sporting-blood-mgm-1931-one-sheet-27- 
x-41-/p/7113-64012.s?ic4=ListView-ShortDescription-071515




-Original Message-
From: Richard Halegua Comic Art [mailto:sa...@comic-art.com]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 5:58 PM
To: Smith, Grey - 1367 ; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] FA: James Bond is Coming!

that's a fantastic load of stuff Grey. I had just looked at some of  
the things listed and noted many rare items, not just in teh Bond  
posters


every time you run an auction it's just more rare stuff that hasn't  
been seen before like that Tarzan one sheet.. pretty


kudos

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] A Question for Japanese Poster Collectors

[Jeff Potokar]

Hey Alan,

Since a B1 is 40" in length are you are saying your poster is 120"  
long? WOW!


Or are you meaning the length, based on the 29" horizontal dimension  
of a B1?



Jeff



On Oct 1, 2015, at 2:11 PM, Alan Adler wrote:


Hi -

I have a 3 sheet - basically (3) BI’s - it is a personality 3 sheet  
of Raizo Ichikawa with samurai sword swinging for the film KIRU  
(1962) - US TITLE: DESTINY’S SON ~

Am looking for the name of this size Japanese poster.

Picture on request.

Arigatou Goziamasu

Alan Adler
Museum of Mom and Pop Culture










Please Visit Our New Website:

WWW.MUSEUMOFMOMANDPOPCULTURE.COM

And Our Ebay Store:

http://stores.ebay.com/Museum-Store-Gifts


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] A Question for Japanese Poster Collectors

[Jeff Potokar]

Alan,

On Armin's site, he refers to this size as a "horizontal 3 sheet,"  
tho no japanese name is given for this style or size.


http://posteroid.com/Poster%20Info%20Folder/Poster%20Sizes.php

And that's a sharp looking poster. Very nice!!



Jeff




On Oct 1, 2015, at 2:11 PM, Alan Adler wrote:


Hi -

I have a 3 sheet - basically (3) BI’s - it is a personality 3 sheet  
of Raizo Ichikawa with samurai sword swinging for the film KIRU  
(1962) - US TITLE: DESTINY’S SON ~

Am looking for the name of this size Japanese poster.

Picture on request.

Arigatou Goziamasu

Alan Adler
Museum of Mom and Pop Culture










Please Visit Our New Website:

WWW.MUSEUMOFMOMANDPOPCULTURE.COM

And Our Ebay Store:

http://stores.ebay.com/Museum-Store-Gifts


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] for Bette Davis fans a very rare one sheet for HELL'S HOUSE - not for sale

[Jeff Potokar]

THAT IS STUNNING.. and finally seeing a first release poster for this  
film.


Beautiful!!



On Sep 28, 2015, at 2:02 PM, David Lieberman wrote:


I thought some of you might appreciate this.


A very rare one sheet for HELL'S HOUSE.


http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/62014/hellshouse2.jpg


It belongs to one of our clients who just wanted it restored.



Again, sorry for the tease but it is not for sale.




Dave

--


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] What is all the white space for on this Subway Poster?

[Jeff Potokar]

And I wonder what the blue asterisk is for?

Just a design element?



On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Channing Thomson wrote:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/361384261930? 
ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1558.l2648


I presume maybe they used to print the theatre name and address  
there but I’ve seen others that don’t have that much white area.   
Thoughts?


Thanks, Channing Thomson

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
L=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] King Kong It Happened One Night Original Vintage Paintings

[Jeff Potokar]

Agree with Grey here..they look like locally produced pieces, based directly on 
the original poster artwork.

The IHON imagery is a bit off, imo.. especially Gable's image. It doesnt quite 
capture him totally.

Both are very colorful and tried representations of the original poster art, 
however.


Jeff





 Ken Farrell 002e32c7b660-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu wrote: 
 
  Just Kids Nostalgia is listing two pieces of original art on eBay this week. 
 
 They look spectacular, but we are not able to accurately identify this 
 artwork. 
 
 Please take a look on eBay.
 
 http://www.ebay.com/sch/justkidsnostalgia/m.html?_ipg=200_sop=3_rdc=1
 
 Hopefully one of the MOPO experts can help us with some information on these 
 two paintings. 
 
 Thanks, 
 Ken, 
 Just Kids Nostalgia
 
  
 
 
 
 
  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___
   How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
 
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
 In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
 
 The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
 

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Posterfix problem?

[Jeff Potokar]

And all one has to do is watch his restoration clips on youtube...  
check out the bullfighting poster one, to see his mother in law (i  
think she is) cram a brush filled with Elmer's glue under a fold tear  
that had pulled loose, or the Indian AVATAR 6sh mounting, where the  
lower right panel was not aligned correctly, so that the title was  
messed up in appearance, tho they retouched the letter (if i recall,  
it was the R on Avatar), to try and make it look better, after the  
fact


Thing is... it made it look worse.

And these are but 2 examples only.

Jeff






On Jul 13, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art wrote:


hasn't gotten it back yet?
old story..
here is a search of the group for comments on Posterfix. Your  
friend should read at least some of them


according to experiences noted, people who waited months  months  
to get their posters returned suffered all sorts of poor  
restoration maladies, including the poster still being damp upon  
return


Posterfix and Chris Cloutier are well noted as amongst the worst -  
if not the worst - linenbacker who ever picked up a pail of paste  
(and set the pail down on the poster they were working on)


Rich


At 10:50 PM 7/12/2015, Todd wrote:
Thanks Rich.  I don't use him  and have no need to as I already  
have a great restorer but my client asked me about him tonight as  
he already has something with him which he hasn't gotten back yet  
and was planning on sending him something else.


I just remember the name posterfix coming up on MoPo and thought I  
possibly remember hearing some problems.


Thanks again.

Best,
Todd

Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:37:49 -0700
To: toddfeier...@msn.com; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
From: sa...@comic-art.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Posterfix problem?

why invite problems?
find another reputable restorer who actually does an artist's job


At 09:39 PM 7/12/2015, Todd wrote:
I have a client who plans on sending a poster to Posterfix for  
restoration.


I thought I remember people having problems with this restorer 5  
or 6 years ago, like not getting their posters back, but I could  
be completely wrong.


I've never used this person so any input on this restorer would be  
appreciated.


Thank you.
Todd Feiertag

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1


To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] OT: Fisher, Hamill, Ford

[Jeff Potokar]

The name placards seem a little out of order too... (it was probably  
the angle of the shot).


No matter...LOL

Nice pic, regardless.





On Jul 11, 2015, at 11:54 PM, David Kusumoto wrote:

Gotta say, it was strange - more than 30 years later - seeing this  
particular cast doing some MARKETING yesterday at the convention  
being held in my own backyard.




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] Posterfix problem?

[Jeff Potokar]

He posted recently.. in the last week or so... with Summer Special  
backing jobs, to MOPO.


So he is still a member here.


Jeff






On Jul 12, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Todd wrote:

Thanks Kirby and I think he might have even left or been booted  
from MoPo.


Still, I'm wondering if he's trustworthy and if he does good work.

If not, I need to let my client know right away.

Thanks again.
Todd

From: movieartaus...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Posterfix problem?
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:41:44 -0500
To: toddfeier...@msn.com

Todd,

No, you remember correctly, I think.  Isn’t this Chris Cloutier?  I  
think he had a real quarrel with some MOPO members, if I remember  
correctly.


K.


On Jul 12, 2015, at 11:39 PM, Todd toddfeier...@msn.com wrote:

I have a client who plans on sending a poster to Posterfix for  
restoration.


I thought I remember people having problems with this restorer 5 or  
6 years ago, like not getting their posters back, but I could be  
completely wrong.


I've never used this person so any input on this restorer would be  
appreciated.


Thank you.
Todd Feiertag

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1


Kirby McDaniel
movieartaus...@gmail.com




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] current conversation on shipping at Heritage

[Jeff Potokar]

Just a guess... but I think private email replies were made public  
here on MOPO.








On Jul 11, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Ben Wadley wrote:


Hi to you all..

I have been watching this conversation slowly degenerate over the  
past few days.


I am not sure what others think but, personally I would appreciate  
it if those that feel it necessary to carry on with a slanging  
match and start using inappropriate language that all of us have to  
read , stop doing so. I belong to other forums in other industries  
and we have a ruling were we professionally respect each other and  
are forbidden to publically abuse one another regardless if we  
agree or disagree with a comment. If we do not keep to this ruling  
then the administrator of the forum boots us off. There are simply  
better ways of getting your point of view  across. If you feel you  
must get down to this level then do it privately to the person  
intended. Scott, what about stepping in here ? If not, then I feel  
Mopo has lost its way and will lose its members if this is the  
standard that is allowed to keep going forward.


Regards

Ben
All About Movies Pty Ltd (retailers of Vintage Movie Posters and  
Lobby Cards)

Website: www.allaboutmovies.com.au
Like All About Movies on Facebook: www.facebook.com/AllAboutMoviesAu
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AllAboutMovies1
Linked In Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/pub/ben-wadley/1b/221/376
Like my Disc Jockey Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ 
DiscJockeyE






To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] HA shipping costs

[Jeff Potokar]

Yet another great and insightful post, David.

Thank you.

Jeff



On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:59 PM, David Kusumoto wrote:

I find it totally unacceptable, which is why I have asked other  
MOPO members if they have had similar experiences. Why some have a  
problem with that I fail to understand. If MOPO exists to allow  
collectors to discuss matters of importance to members (and they  
don't all live in USA) and not simply for advertising sales, then  
surely the business practices of one of the hobby’s biggest players  
is a matter for discussion?
Your question, in my view, was reasonable, Tommy.  At MoPo - like  
elsewhere - there are fiefdoms of fans for this or that dealer - or  
for this or that auction house.  Unfortunately, any question that  
sounds legitimate to consumers - which also sounds like an attack  
on these disparate fiefdoms - causes some to reflexively rise to  
their defense, dishing out metaphors and analogies, mixed with the  
occasional fact or direct/indirect quote designed to challenge YOUR  
sanity, e.g., to make you appear dim-witted, dodgy or worse for  
even querying the group.


Everyone, MYSELF INCLUDED, is guilty of this from time to time, as  
we have our faves and biases about who's great, who's good and who  
we should avoid because of documented or confessed spotty service  
or bad behavior.  Even known scammers who have been dragged into  
courts or in the news media - have allies on these boards.  Just  
keep in mind that the lion's share of contributors are merchants  
peddling their goods - and to be fair, most have a lot of  
expertise, e.g., the recent discussion of The Third Man was  
especially enlightening.


But the downside of merchant dominance on public forums like MoPo  
is I can only count on one hand the number of pure consumers and  
non-full-time sellers who choose to contribute to MoPo REGULARLY.   
It's too brutal for them because they fear being attacked by paper  
cuts of sarcasm.  The vast majority of MoPo's small membership are  
customer lurkers who are being offended every week - whose  
identities I learn about via private messaging as a consumer  
advocate.  Even the marketing of goods, which is a primary service  
provided on these boards - is fraught with controversy.  If some  
forum members believe it's done too frequently - or - in the eyes  
of some, too flamboyantly - (as some felt Bruce H. did before he  
left MoPo) - this is frowned upon, esp. benchmark-based advertising  
which compares merchants with other merchants.  What's common  
everywhere in advertising is taboo here - yet the disapproval, in  
my view, is expressed most loudly - and almost entirely by  
competing merchants, not consumers. -d.


Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:54:01 +0100
From: tommymb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: HA shipping costs
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Since March 2012, I have bought a total of 182 items from HA,  
ranging in price from $16 to $621. They have obviously posted many  
packages to me in that time, and mostly without any complaint on my  
part about shipping costs. Recently, however, I have had cause to  
question the cost. The last shipment I received was initially  
invoiced to me at $147.06, which I queried. I was informed that HA  
had charged me at Fedex retail rate and not their discounted rate,  
so the invoice was reduced to $103.25. Even so, that was expensive  
for a small box of  folded posters, especially considering that  
the  previous charge from HA was for 3 packages sent together  
containing a mixture of rolled and folded  (approx. 11 folded, 3  
rolled including 1 linenbacked, 3 lobby cards) for which I was  
charged the not entirely unreasonable amount of  $122.75. I asked  
that they quote me for shipping before sending any future packages,  
and I received a quote (comparing like for like) of $221.97. That  
was for 13 folded and 1 rolled (linenbacked) poster, similar to  
that previous shipment in size but almost $100 more. I asked for a  
breakdown of the cost on 20th June but received no reply until  
yesterday, when I was sent exactly the same quote with no reference  
to my query. (As a matter of interest, the value of the posters in  
question is just over $1,000 so not, as Simon deemed to suggest,  
cheap purchases.) I buy from several other U.S. dealers and have  
found their postage costs to be reasonable, and certainly never as  
expensive as Heritage. I have been willing to pay their shipping  
charges, however, as obviously they have an attractive offer, in  
the same way most people are prepared to pay their buyers’ premium  
even though other online poster auctions don’t have one. In this  
instance, though,  I find it totally unacceptable, which is why I  
have asked other MOPO members if they have had similar experiences.  
Why some have a problem with that I fail to understand. If MOPO  
exists to allow collectors to discuss matters of importance to  
members (and they don't all live in USA) and not 

Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)

[Jeff Potokar]

Indeed, Richard.

As was discussed prior, the art of the bidll piece is not the same as  
the HA '49 copy.


The are 2 different critters.







On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Richard C Evans wrote:


I'm pretty certain they didn't reuse the original plates.
While obviously very similar, it's a different rendering.
Other than changes to text, if you look at the detail the images  
are illustrated differently throughout.
Subtle, but the variances can't be down to differences caused by  
separate print runs.





On 26 Jun 2015, at 15:31, Helmut Hamm wrote:

The same number B.L. 838 can be seen on the domestic onesheet sold  
by Heritage.


Fact remains that the distributor of the Bidll poster did not  
exist before 1955, so it seems that the original plates were  
edited and re-used for this poster. IF the Bidll poster had indeed  
been printed in 1949, it would have to show a different number, no?


Helmut

www.filmposter.net



The number at the bottom of this The Third Man UK poster  
currently listed on BIDLL is


B.L. 838


regards,
David Rew
[mob] 0402 925 158
bidll.com
for serious collectors

evan...@mac.com wrote on 26/06/2015 1:28 AM:

Phew, the cavalry arrived.

Quad is B.L. 833.

I believe rather than 49, release year for Third Man was 50.

BIDL looks to be B.L. (three figures).

Game still on.

Phew, almost waved the white flag last night after the Big Bruce  
email.



On 25 Jun 2015, at 11:44, David Rew wrote:

Just had an email back from Greg Edwards in the UK (Rare Film  
Posters), who I asked after a suggestion from John Reid and  
Vesna (from the thread on Vintage Movie Posters Forum) - I told  
him the queries and pointed him to the MoPo thread.


He kindly proved an answer very quickly, and I quote:

As the film was released in 1949 any original poster would  
have a 4 figure number in the bottom right corner which should  
start with a '9' and end in an 'A'.  If the poster is from  
1950-51 it would have a 3 figure number but with no 'A'.  From  
some time in 1952 onwards it would be a 4 figure number, also  
with no 'A'.


he also said:

The artwork is identical to the British quad.  The British  
Film Institute have a copy which I have attached for you  
(unfortunately not big enough to check the numbering).


I bet you are all rushing off to see what the BIDLL one says, I  
know and...whoops, it's my dinner time.


Talk soon.


;)


regards,
David Rew
[mob] 0402 925 158
bidll.com
for serious collectors



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe? 
SUBED1=MoPo-LA=1






To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1






To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)

[Jeff Potokar]

Well said, Helmut. Points are worth pondering.

And the omitted (deleted) production /London Film Co, logo and name  
(the text at the top of the poster) still makes no sense, were it  
from the 1st release --- international / territory release or not.


Questions, questions, that's for sure.

Jeff









On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Helmut Hamm wrote:

The same number B.L. 838 can be seen on the domestic onesheet sold  
by Heritage.


Fact remains that the distributor of the Bidll poster did not exist  
before 1955, so it seems that the original plates were edited and  
re-used for this poster. IF the Bidll poster had indeed been  
printed in 1949, it would have to show a different number, no?


Helmut

www.filmposter.net



The number at the bottom of this The Third Man UK poster currently  
listed on BIDLL is


B.L. 838


regards,
David Rew
[mob] 0402 925 158
bidll.com
for serious collectors

evan...@mac.com wrote on 26/06/2015 1:28 AM:

Phew, the cavalry arrived.

Quad is B.L. 833.

I believe rather than 49, release year for Third Man was 50.

BIDL looks to be B.L. (three figures).

Game still on.

Phew, almost waved the white flag last night after the Big Bruce  
email.



On 25 Jun 2015, at 11:44, David Rew wrote:

Just had an email back from Greg Edwards in the UK (Rare Film  
Posters), who I asked after a suggestion from John Reid and  
Vesna (from the thread on Vintage Movie Posters Forum) - I told  
him the queries and pointed him to the MoPo thread.


He kindly proved an answer very quickly, and I quote:

As the film was released in 1949 any original poster would have  
a 4 figure number in the bottom right corner which should start  
with a '9' and end in an 'A'.  If the poster is from 1950-51 it  
would have a 3 figure number but with no 'A'.  From some time in  
1952 onwards it would be a 4 figure number, also with no 'A'.


he also said:

The artwork is identical to the British quad.  The British Film  
Institute have a copy which I have attached for you  
(unfortunately not big enough to check the numbering).


I bet you are all rushing off to see what the BIDLL one says, I  
know and...whoops, it's my dinner time.


Talk soon.


;)


regards,
David Rew
[mob] 0402 925 158
bidll.com
for serious collectors



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe? 
SUBED1=MoPo-LA=1






To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo- 
LA=1





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)

[Jeff Potokar]

Well said, David K.

As was noted prior, also,.. the missing London Films logo in the  
lower right corner, is also a potential real indicator/flag that  
the bidll copy is a later RR.


There would be no reason to remove the logo of the production company  
that produced/made the film, and replace it with a distributor's name.


This, tho, has been seen on many a RR poster, COO notwithstanding.  
(Realart's later distribution of many of Universal's horror titles  
being but one example of this).






On Jun 24, 2015, at 11:13 PM, David Kusumoto wrote:

I just read the string of posts since I posted mine two days ago.   
Thanks for the public comments from Jeff Potokar and Phillipp  
Kainbacher - (and from Bruce H. via Jeff) - and from others who  
privately wrote me about this.


And Phillipp, congratulations for getting a happy resolution from  
Grey.  He's a good man.  -d.


P.S. - As for the rolled Third Man poster being offered at Bidll -  
what stands out in Bruce H.'s comments - is his opinion that a  
rolled (vs. folded) 1949 international one-sheet - seems unusual.   
I will say the colors and detail in the Bidll poster are more vivid  
than the re-issue 1950s poster I bought in 2003 that was mistakenly  
represented as original.  I think if a buyer likes the image and  
can live with everything else about it, it's still a fine poster  
from a great movie.  (See web-hosted images again below to compare.)


The Third Man 1950s international re-issue one-sheet, Heritage,  
November 2003:




The Third Man (?) international one-sheet, Bidll, June 2015:


Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:39:11 PST
From: 0015e579331a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu
Subject: Re: My history of bad luck chasing an original Third Man  
(1949).

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Yes Jeff from today's conversation.

Sent from my iPhone

Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:56:35 -0700
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: My history of bad luck chasing an original Third Man  
(1949).

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Was that offered refund a result of this 2015 conversation, Phillipp?

Good for you, if so. That's what discussion and collecting is all  
about.


Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:41:38 -0700
From: 0015e579331a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu
Subject: Re: My history of bad luck chasing an original Third Man  
(1949).

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I would like to inform that Grey has immediately offered to refund  
the money for the Third Man poster. I have been dealing with Grey  
since day one of his auctions buying and selling posters.

Philipp

Sent from my iPhone

Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:45:54 -0700
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I wrote to Bruce to ask his thoughts on this poster and discussion.  
He wrote me back and also said I could post his reply to MOPO:


Jeff


I personally think it is very likely that it is from 1955 or so.

Here is why:

IMDb only lists a handful of films from Lion International. But  
because we have auctioned a zillion English one-sheets, WE know  
that there are at least 92 from 1955 on. There is not ONE that is  
from before 1955 other than the disputed Third Man poster. 36 of  
the 92 are from exactly 1955 to 1959. When you combine this with  
the stuff MoPo members found online, I think that is pretty  
definitive.


In addition, there is the issue of the poster being unfolded.  
Again, I have sold a zillion English one-sheets, and the ONLY other  
one that was unfolded was the African Queen re-release, which is  
surprisingly similar to the Third Man re-release, because it has a  
very similar image to the English original, except it is not as  
finely detailed, and it has been found unfolded, but it has no  
printer information on it (unlike the Third Man poster in question).


I think I would have an even more definite opinion if I saw this  
poster in person. I know that studios used the same type paper for  
a number of years, and when they changed, they changed for all  
their printing. That is how you can pinpoint a poster to a specific  
handful of years, or a decade. The English one-sheets I have  
handled have remarkably similar paper. If this poster had paper  
that was at all different, that would be even more reason to be  
sure it was not from the same year.


Put it all together, and I think you certainly have far more than a  
reasonable doubt, and I would certainly auction this poster as  
undated, likely a mid-1950s re-release, likely for the  
international distribution. There is also re-release one-sheet  
which is very similar to the African Queen one (no printing on the  
bottom), and I would think both that and the African Queen are from  
the late 1950s or early 1960s.


The reason the poster was entered incorrectly in our database was  
that we never auctioned it. It is one of the tens of thousands of  
posters that Richard Allen owned

Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)

[Jeff Potokar]

No discounting at all...

all are parts/pieces of the same puzzle.



On Jun 25, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Richard C Evans wrote:

You're completely discounting Greg Edwards' input based on  
perceived logic and patterns of behaviour?


I think you'd need to explain why the number is right for first  
release (even if counter to reason) when it should from your  
standpoint be a post 55 code.


Sent from my iPhone

On 25 Jun 2015, at 18:34, Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com wrote:


Well said, David K.

As was noted prior, also,.. the missing London Films logo in the  
lower right corner, is also a potential real indicator/flag that  
the bidll copy is a later RR.


There would be no reason to remove the logo of the production  
company that produced/made the film, and replace it with a  
distributor's name.


This, tho, has been seen on many a RR poster, COO notwithstanding.  
(Realart's later distribution of many of Universal's horror titles  
being but one example of this).






On Jun 24, 2015, at 11:13 PM, David Kusumoto wrote:

I just read the string of posts since I posted mine two days  
ago.  Thanks for the public comments from Jeff Potokar and  
Phillipp Kainbacher - (and from Bruce H. via Jeff) - and from  
others who privately wrote me about this.


And Phillipp, congratulations for getting a happy resolution from  
Grey.  He's a good man.  -d.


P.S. - As for the rolled Third Man poster being offered at Bidll  
- what stands out in Bruce H.'s comments - is his opinion that a  
rolled (vs. folded) 1949 international one-sheet - seems  
unusual.  I will say the colors and detail in the Bidll poster  
are more vivid than the re-issue 1950s poster I bought in 2003  
that was mistakenly represented as original.  I think if a buyer  
likes the image and can live with everything else about it, it's  
still a fine poster from a great movie.  (See web-hosted images  
again below to compare.)


The Third Man 1950s international re-issue one-sheet, Heritage,  
November 2003:




The Third Man (?) international one-sheet, Bidll, June 2015:


Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:39:11 PST
From: 0015e579331a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu
Subject: Re: My history of bad luck chasing an original Third  
Man (1949).

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Yes Jeff from today's conversation.

Sent from my iPhone

Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:56:35 -0700
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: My history of bad luck chasing an original Third  
Man (1949).

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Was that offered refund a result of this 2015 conversation,  
Phillipp?


Good for you, if so. That's what discussion and collecting is all  
about.


Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:41:38 -0700
From: 0015e579331a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu
Subject: Re: My history of bad luck chasing an original Third  
Man (1949).

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I would like to inform that Grey has immediately offered to  
refund the money for the Third Man poster. I have been dealing  
with Grey since day one of his auctions buying and selling posters.

Philipp

Sent from my iPhone

Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:45:54 -0700
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man  
(1949)

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I wrote to Bruce to ask his thoughts on this poster and  
discussion. He wrote me back and also said I could post his reply  
to MOPO:


Jeff


I personally think it is very likely that it is from 1955 or so.

Here is why:

IMDb only lists a handful of films from Lion International. But  
because we have auctioned a zillion English one-sheets, WE know  
that there are at least 92 from 1955 on. There is not ONE that is  
from before 1955 other than the disputed Third Man poster. 36 of  
the 92 are from exactly 1955 to 1959. When you combine this with  
the stuff MoPo members found online, I think that is pretty  
definitive.


In addition, there is the issue of the poster being unfolded.  
Again, I have sold a zillion English one-sheets, and the ONLY  
other one that was unfolded was the African Queen re-release,  
which is surprisingly similar to the Third Man re-release,  
because it has a very similar image to the English original,  
except it is not as finely detailed, and it has been found  
unfolded, but it has no printer information on it (unlike the  
Third Man poster in question).


I think I would have an even more definite opinion if I saw this  
poster in person. I know that studios used the same type paper  
for a number of years, and when they changed, they changed for  
all their printing. That is how you can pinpoint a poster to a  
specific handful of years, or a decade. The English one-sheets I  
have handled have remarkably similar paper. If this poster had  
paper that was at all different, that would be even more reason  
to be sure it was not from the same year.


Put it all together, and I think you certainly have far more than  
a reasonable doubt, and I would certainly auction