RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: help needed

2006-12-28 Thread Vedrana Valčić
As far as I know, fluid levels dropping can also mean that the baby is just 
getting ready to be born.

 

Vedrana

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cath nolan
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 5:06 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Fw: help needed

 

resending this and hoping it gets to the list. 

- Original Message - 

From: cath nolan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 2:10 PM

Subject: help needed

 

I have a good friend from Kununurra  who has gone to  Perth who is 9 days 
post dates and wishing desperately for a vbac. She is seeing the clinic at 
Osborne park  and has had a show and periods of niggling and sporadic 
contractions for the past few days. Has been told today to come in for 
c/section tomorrow at 0630 and the staff are refusing to to a sweep and stretch 
( even though the Reg  said to have one 1 week ago) I have advised castor oil  
and to question why tomorrow.  They have mentioned fluid levels dropping, but 
haven't done anything about that- sounds like scary medical tactics to me. Has 
anyone got any ideas, I would like to be there to do a sweep but I'm in 
Victoria.  Thanks Cath



RE: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

2006-12-23 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Radical is a good word :-) and doesn't imply crimes against humanity.

 

For example, the Association of Radical Midwives gives this explanation:

 

Why Radical? 

In the mid 70s, the majority of pregnant women in UK had labour induced by 
artificial rupture of membranes (ARM) around the date they were due. These 
initials were used when the group needed a name, using the dictionary 
definition of radical, (roots, origins, basics, etc.) which aptly described 
the basic midwifery skills which they hoped to revive.

 

Happy holidays!

 

Vedrana

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jayne/jesse
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 10:26 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 

Sorry :)  Sometimes I'm at a loss for words.  I'm been called one of those 
numerous times for my views on births/babies/breastfeeding.  It doesn't offend 
me though.  It's how I feel/live/believe.  I'd never call a breastfeeding 
counsellor or midwive one!  The ones I've met are far too good at what they do 
in getting the message across to have to resort to the way I blatantly state 
things at time.   Guess that's why I'll never be able to be either one of those 
and instead spend my life getting my fix on list like ozmid! 

 

Here's to getting the message out there that there that breast is absolutely 
perfect.

 

Jayne

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Barbara Glare  Chris Bright mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 6:38 PM

Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 

Hi,

 

I'm being far more bah humbug than I really should be for christmas!  
Sorry.  Jayne, I appreciate your sentiments, and realise we are on the same 
side.

 

But could we please not use Nazi in relation to passionate supporters 
of breastfeeding?  Most on this list put their heart and soul into birth and 
breastfeeding.  The term nazi offends me to the core.  I just can't bear it, 
and I just don't see the funny side about it.  If breastfeeding supporters use 
it, even in jest, how can we expect others not to?  (usually to deride the 
fantastic work done by breastfeeding counsellors and midwives)  What new mother 
would want to speak to a Nazi?  It turns people away from getting sound 
advice.

 

Off my soapbox now!

 

Barb

 



FW: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

2006-12-22 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Trying once again :-)

 

My experience is two years of lactational amenorrhea (one and only child). I 
did breastfeed very often in the first year, every hour or so and very often 
during the night (for a long time every two hours or even more often), 
co-sleeped, no dummies, was there with him all day long. In the second year I 
went back to work and didn't breastfeed for 9 hours, but he made it up when we 
were together. I think it was also every two hours or so during the night. I'm 
thin and weight-loss was a problem for me after giving birth, I kept losing 
weight without wanting to. But this is all anecdotal evidence.

 

Vedrana

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jayne/jesse
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 5:43 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 

Being 100% pro breastfeeding Barb, I'd like to go along with your 98%.  I have 
to agree with Janet though.  There are very real reasons why the 98% does not 
apply to all in our culture particularly.  Having 100% fully breastfed three 
babies from periods of 6 months to 11 months, not used bottles or dummies but 
did indeed co-sleep, sling baby and suckle on demand for the whole periods of 
time indicated, I became fertile at 4 months pp, 5 months pp and the last one 
was the shocker.6 weeks pp!  I was fully aware of mucous signs before 
fertility returned and pinpointed them exactly except with the last one, I 
thought my eyes were playing tricks on me and I didn't believe it until it 
happened.  So because of my experiences, I'm reluctant to spout 98% success 
rates re breastfeeding as contraception

 

I have also heard that maternal fat levels can play a part - higher levels.  
Mine was actually average to low at the times when fertility returned.  There 
was one thing that I feel triggered fertility returning and that was the point 
when my babies started to sleep for periods of 4 to 6 hours at a stretch 
through the night.

 

Regards

 

Jayne

 

 

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Janet Fraser mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 2:07 PM

Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 

I don't think it's risky or tricky, or silly for that matter. I was 
trying to be thorough in my reply and not make sweeping statements. Recently 
one of my moderators did some research on achieving fertility again while 
breastfeeding so she came up with a list which could equally be applied to 
Kylie's article. Obviously LA works a treat if you look at cultures which 
pursue child-led weaning but western culture just doesn't and therein can lie 
the problems for many people. Most people don't understand anything about bf in 
the first place, as we all know ; )

Here's the list in case you're interested, Kylie. It was for a member 
with a 2 year old who'd like to ttc but hasn't bled in 2 years and with no 
signs of bfing slowing. It's a very mixed bag of refs  but some great ones : )

 

* Feeding EBM by bottle 
(http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:1ilEf4An7dMJ:www.bfmed.org/ace-files/protocol/finalcontraceptionprotocolsent2.pdf+lactational+am
 enorrhea+fertilityhl=engl=auct=clnkcd=30 
http://www.bfmed.org/ace-files/protocol/finalcontraceptionprotocolsent2.pdf+lactational+amenorrhea+fertilityhl=engl=auct=clnkcd=30
 )
* Supplementing feeds (formula or solids)
* Increased use of pacifiers
* Feeding on schedule instead of on demand
* Increased intervals between feeds (4hrs during day, 6hrs at night)
* Waiting until bub is 6mths or older 
* Reduce time at the breast during a feed (shorter feeds, no comfort 
sucking)
* Reduce total time at the breast per day to 65 min or less (McNeilly 
AS, Glasier AF, Howie PW, Houston MJ, Cook A,Boyle H. Fertility after 
childbirth: pregnancy associated with
breast feeding. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1983 Aug;19(2):167-73., 
http://www.medela.com/NewFiles/faq/lam.html 
http://www.medela.com/NewFiles/faq/lam.html )
* Reduce night time feeds (Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Peerson JM, 
Dewey KG. Factors related to duration of postpartum amenorrhoea among USA women 
with prolonged lactation. J Biosoc Sci. 1994 Oct;26(4):517-27., 
http://www.medela.com/NewFiles/faq/lam.html 
http://www.medela.com/NewFiles/faq/lam.html )
* Stop co-sleeping, including no naps with your child during the day 
(Kippley, Sheila. Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing: How Ecological 
Breastfeeding Spaces Babies. Cincinnati: Couple to Couple League International, 
1999, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactational_Amenorrhea_Method 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactational_Amenorrhea_Method )
* Be separated from your child for more than 3 hours a day (Kippley, 
Sheila. Breastfeeding and Natural 

RE: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

2006-12-21 Thread Vedrana Valčić
You might want to search for ecological breastfeeding. This is what I found:

Exclusive breastfeeding means giving your baby nothing but milk from your 
breast; frequent nursing (including at night); pacifying the baby at your 
breast, rather than with a rubber pacifier; and feeding without a schedule. 
These behaviors will likely dry up your cervical mucus and also keep you from 
ovulating or menstruating. Sheila Kippley, co-founder of the Couple to Couple 
League, a Catholic organization that promotes Natural Family Planning, calls 
these behaviors ecological breastfeeding when the mother also takes a daily 
nap with the baby, and sleeps with the baby for easy night nursings.

but I'm sure there is more.

Vedrana

 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kylie Carberry
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 12:10 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 


I am doing a story on contraception for a pareting magazine. I want to state 
that the WHO confirmed breastfeeding as 98 per cent effective means of birth 
control for the first six months   provided the baby was fully breasfed and 
periods have not commenced. So as far as the 'fully' part goes, how is that 
interpreted. My friend thought she was fully breastfeeding, however, her twin 
boys were sleeping 8 hours at night and thus she became pregnant when they were 
four months old. So does fully mean no less than four-hourly feeds. Or should 
women just take added precautions if they are not up for any little surprises.

thanks in advance

Kylie Carberry 
Freelance Journalist 
p: +61 2 42970115 
m: +61 2 418220638 
f: +61 2 42970747

-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or 
unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

2006-12-21 Thread Vedrana Valčić
I have a friend who also wanted to get pregnant while breastfeeding so she 
gradually stopped nursing at night, got her period, got pregnant, gave birth 
and continued to breastfeed them both.

 

Vedrana

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helen and Graham
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 

I have recently met a woman who specifically gave up breastfeeding her six 
month old so she could get pregnant.  That seemed like a real shame but she was 
very keen to get pregnant ASAP.  What would ABA's advice be on this one?

 

Helen

- Original Message - 

From: Barbara Glare  Chris Bright mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 1:19 PM

Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 

Hi,

 

I don't think Lactational Amenorrhea is as risky or tricky as Janet 
said. From Breastfeeding Management (Brodribb)In 1988 the World Health 
Organisation and other interested parties formulated a concensus statement 
about the conditions under which Lactation provides an effective and safe form 
of contraception.  Known as the Bellagio Concensus, it states that if a woman 
is fully or nearly fully breastfeeding, is amenorrhoeic and is less than 6 
mnths postpartum she is 98% protected from pregnancy.

 

Since that time, studies in Australia, Chile, the Phillippines, 
Pakistan and the USA have confirmed this concensus, often showing failure rates 
of lower than the two percent quoted.  Thus, this applies in the developed as 
well as developing countries and in well nourished women.  A further conference 
in Bellagio in 1995 confirmed the original findings and concluded that.

Wheras amenorrheoea is an absolute requirement for ensuring a low risk 
of pregnancy, it might be possible to relax or break the requirement of full or 
nearly full breastfeeding.  It may also be possible to extend the duration of 
use beyond 6 mnths.

 

Kylie, please don't write an article that makes breastfeeding as a form 
or contraception seem unreliable, silly or so difficult to comply with that it 
would be impossible to use. (not that it sounds in any way like you would - but 
that is the tone often in such articles.)

 

While the 2% are very vocal when they become pregnant, my observances 
are that Lactational Amenhorrea is extremely reliable.  The thing to remember 
is that once your period is back all bets are off. (if under 6 mnths.)

 

While this whole story demonstrates that the plural of stories is not 
data I returned to full time work when my son was 6 weeks old, and remained 
amenhorreac until he was 15mths, whereupon I had one period and then got 
pregnant with my 2nd.

 

Barb

- Original Message - 

From: Kylie Carberry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:24 AM

Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as contraception

 

 if one isn't sure has got to be a good thing, hey?

Absolutely.

 thanks for that, Janet.





Kylie Carberry 
Freelance Journalist 
p: +61 2 42970115 
m: +61 2 418220638 
f: +61 2 42970747





From: Janet Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] breastfeeding as 
contraception
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:56:35 +1100

It's a complex list of stuff, not just bfing, that 
creates lactational ammenorhea, Kylie. Cosleeping, no dummies, no bottles of 
ebm, no being away from your child/ren longer than about 3 hours, and having a 
nap in the daytime with them among other things. And then ultimately each woman 
is different in her experience of menstruation recommencing. Women who use 
bfing in conjunction with knowing their own fertile signs are doubly covered 
and a barrier method now and then if one isn't sure has got to be a good thing, 
hey?

J

- Original Message - 

From: Kylie Carberry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:09 AM


RE: [ozmidwifery] A giggle for Christmas

2006-12-18 Thread Vedrana Valčić
:D

This is great!!!

Wish I could have seen it :-)!

 

Vedrana

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diane Gardner
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 10:47 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] A giggle for Christmas

 

This came through on my email today and I thought a giggle at this crazy time 
of year would help keep you all sane.

 

warm regards

Di Gardner

 

 

Went to Abigail's school Christmas concert (no proper Nativity this
year  Sad ). Each class did a little something followed by a song or 2.
Anyway, Ab's class did a Nativity scene, with Ab as Mary ( Grin How
proud was I?). A few mins into their bit Ab promptly lifted her dress 
shoved baby Jesus up it. The script then wandered away from what they'd
learnt  goes as follows

Joseph: What are you doing?
Mary: I'm feeding our baby
Shepherd: Have you got a bottle up there then?
Mary: Don't be silly he's having milk from my booby
Joseph: That's disgusting
Mary: No, that baby milk they have in Tescos is disgusting. My baby's
having proper milk
Shepherd: What's a booby?
Mary: Those sticky out bits ladies have
Shepherd: They're not boobies, they're nipples
Mary: No they're not, they're boobies
Joseph: So why can't Jesus have milk from a bottle then?
Mary: Because I haven't got a breast pump with me - you forgot to put
it on the donkey
Shepherd: Can't you ask the teacher for a bottle to feed Jesus with?
Mary: No because this is the best way to feed Jesus. Anyway bottles
haven't been invented yet  even if they were I've just had a baby so if
you think I'm faffing around Tescos to buy baby milk when I make
proper milk in my boobies you can think again

I felt a teeny bit sorry for their class teacher - she did try her best
to steer them back towards their proper lines but she was laughing so
much she didn't really stand a chance. The line about Joseph forgetting
the breast pump finished her off - she slid to the floor  couldn't get
up for laughing



RE: [ozmidwifery] testing

2006-11-08 Thread Vedrana Valčić









You can always check at http://www.mail-archive.com/ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au/maillist.html
to see if there was any mail you didnt get.



I was wondering  are there any
statistics for planned unassisted birth in low-risk pregnancies published
anywhere? Since midwives are not qualified enough to be independent in Croatia
(education at high-school level), and obstetricians are not allowed to practice
outside of where they work, some women choose to birth at home, unassisted. I wonder
if they are putting themselves and their children more at risk then if they
choose to birth in hospitals with high intervention rates. Its not black
and white, I know, but it would be interesting to see the research.



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Lisa Barrett
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006
11:51 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] testing







I was thinking the same thing Mary, it must just be quiet.





Lisa Barrett







- Original Message - 





From: Mary Murphy






To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday,
November 08, 2006 8:59 AM





Subject: [ozmidwifery]
testing









No mail for days. Is it just quiet? MM










[ozmidwifery] High-risk Lovemaking

2006-10-26 Thread Vedrana Valčić









Hillarious (on the line of Monty Python and the machine that
goes ping):



http://www.spontaneouscreation.org/SC/HighRiskLovemaking.htm



:D



Vedrana










RE: [ozmidwifery] risks for birth...

2006-10-19 Thread Vedrana Valčić









Why is it that animals birth alone and the
common opinion for women is that they NEED support during birth?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Honey Acharya
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006
11:18 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] risks
for birth...







Maybe we should start hiring Vets rather than Obstetricians
as seems to be the norm in our culture right now ;)





LOL at the thougth of telling them that you will be hiring
your vet as your caregiver when booking in at the hospital.













- Original Message - 





From: Tania Smallwood






To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Thursday, October
19, 2006 7:11 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery]
risks for birth...











My kids are watching the ABC pet show tonightQuestion 
so, whats the greatest risk when your pet is giving birth?



Straight from the spunky vets mouthTHE THING THAT PUTS
YOUR PET AT THE GREATEST RISK IS THAT PEOPLE TRY AND INTERFERE TOO MUCH 



Sighand we cant see that fantastic wood for those
dastardly trees



Tania

x



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release Date: 18/10/2006










RE: [ozmidwifery] RE: Risk

2006-10-16 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: Risk









Very interesting, thank you!



Vedrana











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Justine Caines
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006
4:18 AM
To: OzMid List
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE:
Risk





Dear All

Further to our discussion on risk

The Australian bureau of Statistics has a Mortality Atlas

It is not available free but below is a snapshot

Compare this with the Australian Mortality data for childbirth (1997-99) Yes
that is the latest data. As usual they sit on this report (quite telling
as to the importance of birthing women)

The 19971999maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was
8.2deaths per 10confinements, compared with 9.1per
10in 19941996.

JC




Mortality Atlas from the ABS

Age Standardised Death Rates (average
1997-2000)

Cause 

Males (deaths per 100,000 persons)

Females (deaths per 100,000 persons)

Malignant Neoplasms  
237.8
146.7

Ischaemic Heart Disease  
190.0
119.9 

Cerebrovascular diseases  
65.8
65.8

Chronic lower respiratory diseases  
46.6
23.2

Diabetes mellitus  
18.8
13.6

Influenza and pneumonia  
13.4
11.4

Accidents  
35.6
17.7

Motor vehicle traffic accidents  
13.1
5.5

Intentional self harm (suicide)  
21.9
5.5

Organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders 
(includes dementia)  
9.3
10.8








RE: [ozmidwifery] risk

2006-10-16 Thread Vedrana Valčić








I downloaded it from http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprint/327/7417/745.pdf.
It is great, thank you. Puts things into
perspective.



Vedrana











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006
2:20 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] risk





Visit
BMJ2003;327:745-748(27September),
doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745 Strategies to help patients understand
risks. J Paling. I have found his Palings Perspective Scale and P P
Palette very useful in explaining the degree of risk to women re screening
tests and possible outcomes of various actions. MM













Off the top of my head and without
philosophical musings, I read thousands of words in dozens of references (just
try googling health risk management) and this was the only thing
I saw about doing no harm to the patient. Most of it was
all about being blamed for harm that might be done and how to minimize being
taken to the cleaners. It was not contained in the body of the quoted article
by paul bellarmy whose article is interesting. I forget which one it was in,
but could probably find it again if needed. Thanks for the compliment. MM















What
strikes you as particularly interesting about that Mary? I'm very interested in
your perspective as you are one of the wisest women I know. 

warmly,
Carolyn












RE: [ozmidwifery] We can make a difference (long)

2006-10-16 Thread Vedrana Valčić
With bf it's also all the propaganda women are subjected to in their life. Just 
look at the wording in formula ads. Hypnotic as well, I'd say.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 4:30 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] We can make a difference (long)

MOST of the women I look after postnatally just don't
 listen or don't believe the advice they recieve - they don't trust
 their bodies.  It's like the birth experience has been owned by
 someone else, and now they are being asked to trust their body, and
 that baby knows what he's doing, wanting to be on the breast every
 hour, for example to get the milk in - and they just don't believe
 it.

I utterly agree, Jo. The entire process of childbearing and rearing no
longer belongs to women, we're bystanders at our own births a lot of the
time and tested out of our wits throughout pregnancy. The assumption in
medical birth is that pregnancy is dangerous and risky so why should bf be
any different? Bodies are measured, sampled, quantified from the moment
women step in the door and almost all without any evidence of usefulness. I
see exactly what you're saying!!! We somehow expect women will go from being
virtual science experiments in labour to bfing a baby without problems. If
we tell women their bodies don't work to birth then we're also telling them
they don't work to bf. It starts way back in the whole process, even when
we're children and our faulty female bodies are disgusting in the eyes of
most people. I struggle sometimes to find a time and place when a woman has
trusted and believed in her body to relate to the ability to birth and bf. I
often resort to talking about pooing and breathing which happen really well
without a lot of attention being paid to them. Unhindered pooing is a
popular theme in my life atm ; ) I even said VAGINA on the radio yesterday
which caused the interviewer to do a quick intake of breath hahahaha.
J

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] RE: Risk

2006-10-13 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: Risk








No luck with Jeff Richardson L.

I found this at http://www.deh.gov.au/education/publications/epa/modules/module5.html:

 

Risks Associated with Common Activities


the
annual chance of dying in a car crash if you drive the average number of
kilometres is 1 in 4,000 


a
cyclist faces an annual risk of dying from pedalling of 1 in 30,000 


smokers
who commenced smoking at age 15 and smoke one pack a day face a risk of death
from lung cancer of 1 in 800 


lifetime
risk of developing cancer in the USA is 1 in 5 


the
chance of developing skin cancer in Australia is (women) 1 in 33000 and
(men) 1 in 2 













From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006
7:42 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] RE:
Risk





Any chance of something more specific
Justine? I cant seem to find him. MM











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Justine Caines
Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006
9:23 PM
To: OzMid List
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE:
Risk





Hi Vedrana and All

I think you are referring to the work of Jeff Richardson from Monash University
in Melbourne.

Yes it is very good stuff.

Interestingly I spoke to him (some time ago) and one of his colleagues from the
Health research unit at Monash.

He understood my links between his work and obstetrics and yet would not do
anything, fearful of maintaining 
his funding (I despair!!).

I then spoke to a female colleague at his suggestion and she attacked me for
saying childbirth was essentially safe (!!!)
And then all but cried about her experience (!!). This is what we come up
against when lobbying politicians and decision makers.

You should find Jeffs work at 

www.monash.edu.au and then search for him

Kind regards

Justine 








RE: [ozmidwifery] RE: Risk

2006-10-13 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: Risk








Then there is this, along with interesting
references:



http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7470/849













From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006
4:49 PM
To:
'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] RE:
Risk





No luck with Jeff Richardson L.

I found this at http://www.deh.gov.au/education/publications/epa/modules/module5.html:



Risks Associated with Common Activities


the
annual chance of dying in a car crash if you drive the average number of
kilometres is 1 in 4,000 


a
cyclist faces an annual risk of dying from pedalling of 1 in 30,000 


smokers
who commenced smoking at age 15 and smoke one pack a day face a risk of death
from lung cancer of 1 in 800 


lifetime
risk of developing cancer in the USA is 1 in 5 


the
chance of developing skin cancer in Australia is (women) 1 in 33000 and
(men) 1 in 2 













From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006
7:42 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] RE:
Risk





Any chance of something more specific
Justine? I cant seem to find him. MM











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Justine Caines
Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006
9:23 PM
To: OzMid List
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE:
Risk





Hi Vedrana and All

I think you are referring to the work of Jeff Richardson from Monash University
in Melbourne.

Yes it is very good stuff.

Interestingly I spoke to him (some time ago) and one of his colleagues from the
Health research unit at Monash.

He understood my links between his work and obstetrics and yet would not do
anything, fearful of maintaining 
his funding (I despair!!).

I then spoke to a female colleague at his suggestion and she attacked me for
saying childbirth was essentially safe (!!!)
And then all but cried about her experience (!!). This is what we come up
against when lobbying politicians and decision makers.

You should find Jeffs work at 

www.monash.edu.au and then search for him

Kind regards

Justine 








[ozmidwifery] RE: Risk

2006-10-11 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Once again J:











From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006
9:57 AM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: Risk





Once I found an infosheet (I think it was on some Australian
web site) with great info on relative risk. It gave a list of everyday risks
(car accidents, plane accidents, thunder strike and similar things) in order
for consumers to better perceive a risk of some medical procedure. I
cant find it anywhere anymore, however. Does anyone know where I could
find it?



Vedrana










RE: [ozmidwifery] term breech trial - ECV option

2006-10-11 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: term breech trial









I like this article J: http://www.birthinternational.com/articles/andrea13.html













From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Lisa Barrett
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006
11:06 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] term breech
trial - ECV option







resending this message as it didn't seem to appear the last
time I posted it





Lisa Barrett





From: Lisa Barrett 







To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday, October
11, 2006 4:27 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
term breech trial - ECV option













Well I birthed with a woman on the weekend (and asked her
permission before posting this) She had a breech birth in the water. As
far as I'm concerned it is a normal vaginal birth and although it was a
compound presentation it was very straight forward indeed. Maybe if the
attitude of more people is that it's just a variation of normal (and it is)
then women wouldn't be so scared. Ultimately it's not up to Obs to
do it or not it's up to the women.











The thought of using ECV to put the baby into the correct
position just a choice. Just as breech position maybe the baby's choice.











Lisa Barrett













- Original Message - 





From: Honey Acharya






To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday, October
11, 2006 1:47 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
term breech trial - ECV option











Here in Townsville Qld some of the Ob's in the Townsville Hospital perform ECV's.





David Watson is particulary successful at this and I have
seen him perform a few and he seems to have the right touch and technique, the
women who had other Ob's try on them firstand then himsaid he was
much more gentle and it looked that way too. He has the woman lie on her side
slightly and rests his knee behind their back, and using ultrasound on and off
to monitor baby's position, then pushes the baby around getting them to either
do a forward somersault or backward one.











The private Ob's here
refuse to do it all together.











I noticed they are also performing the EECV trial (EarlyECV)
around 33-34 weeks?











One of the women I was with was being offerred this
optionbut declined preferring to give her baby further time to turn and
then at 37-38 weeks when baby was still in the breech position had a successful
ECV and went on to have a straightforward normal vaginal birth at 41 weeks.











Honey






















RE: [ozmidwifery] Inexperiened?

2006-10-06 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Would the ROTFL reaction to the word inexperienced
be appropriate here?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006
9:56 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery]
Inexperiened?





First time mother
- the inexperienced uterus and vagina may cause a difficult or prolonged
delivery.



This is one of the causes listed for Congenital Hip dysplasia on the Victoria better health
site. MM








RE: [ozmidwifery] intact peri

2006-10-01 Thread Vedrana Valčić









A little off-topic  when you dont
do directed pushing you do not tell a woman when to push, but do you tell her
when not to push? Or another way to
put it  does directed pushing only include telling a woman when to push,
or telling her when not to push as well?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006
4:59 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] intact
peri 





Hi Paivi, I cannot give you statistics of
homebirth as I do not have immediate access to them. I will see if we have any
stats on our service that I can access. Just in general, the main way to
protect the perineum is not to tell the woman to push, but to allow her to use
her natural open glottis pushing, an keep hands off. At home we do not do
directed pushing. I cannot speak for birth centres, but their philosophy
is much the same. Each midwife does different things, but it is not usual
to use compresses or perineal massage during birth. Is that what you have
found Jan? I wouldnt put too much weight on the Bastian research
as not all of us completed her surveys. I personally have done 3 episiotomies
in 24 yrs, but would do one if I thought necessary. Hospital midwives
will have to answer the one about epidurals. MM











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Päivi
Sent: Monday, 2 October 2006 4:54
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] intact peri








Hi all,











I am writing an article on episiotomy. I need to know what
is the % of intact perineum among homemidwifes or birth centres? This is when
the mother is having a natural birth.











Does this change if the mother has an epidural and is having
the baby in a hospital? What I mean is that how much can the hospital midwife
do to save the perineum if the mother has opted for epidural? Is it still
mainly to do with the skills of the midwife? Or is it a harder job with a
medicated mom?











Do you all practise hot compresses, perineal massage with
oil (during birth) / perineal support?











What is the % of intact peri in a waterbirth?











Many questions... Thank you for any ideas or comments.











Päivi










RE: [ozmidwifery] Contacting Caroline Flint

2006-09-23 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Thank you, Andrea!

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrea Robertson
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 6:05 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Contacting Caroline Flint 

Hi everyone,

I've been travelling frantically around the UK this past week and 
have not had time to read all the ozmid emails. However, I did pick 
up that some people were trying to reach Caroline Flint. I am sitting 
here with her now, and she says to tell you all that she has been 
having enormous trouble with her internet connections and has been 
living without email on and off for months. However, she can be 
reached on these email address (vie her office):

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I know she would love to hear from you and will be willing to help in 
whatever way she can.

Am just off to the airport now - back in my office on Monday.

Regards

Andrea

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Marketing the Midwife the Doula

2006-09-21 Thread Vedrana Valčić








I share Päivis opinion, Kelly J. If I could go, Id
want to know about effective ways to counter myths and prejudices which
originally came from people with authority and which cause people to have serious
doubts about the whole deal.











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Päivi Laukkanen
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006
9:43 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Marketing the Midwife  the Doula







Hi Kelly,











Sounds like a great idea, wish I could go... If I would be
able to make it would like to know how to do the lobbying for a good cause! One
thing I have noticed, that many midwifes or birth centres don't have a
professional looking website or a brochure to give out. This is something, what
I find essential in today's world. I have thought, that I could use my skills
and work with my sister, who is a graphic designer to come up with a template
for a birthrelated website and a template for a brochure and a business card.
You could also use your own photoes with the template. This would make it so
much easier for someone to get all the good looking material even if they don't
have the skills for that part of the business. Well, it would take me a while
to get it done, but this is just an idea I have had. 











Päivi







- Original Message - 





From: Kelly @
BellyBelly 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Thursday,
September 21, 2006 1:57 AM





Subject: [ozmidwifery]
Marketing the Midwife  the Doula









Dear all,



As you may have read in my previous emails, I have spoken to
some high profile business people of late in regards to the situation with
maternity services, particularly with lobbying to government and also marketing
the midwife and Doula to sell the idea to the public. 



The reason I spoke to these people is because I am interested in holding a conference / workshop
over a weekend for midwives and Doulas to learn about effectively
marketing themselves, improving their networking skills, communication skills
and to learn some other essential business skills which I think is badly
needed. I would also like to hold a separate session perhaps towards the end of
the conference (which wont be of interest to everyone) on lobbying to
government and other authoritative bodies in order to get effective recognition
for the things that have been lobbied for, for so long. 



While these business professionals I have spoken to wont
have the passion and understanding of what we do, for example the idea of
homebirth may not be something they would do, promote or feel safe with, their
business skills are very valid and even their views are a wake-up call as to
what the public do think when presented with such an idea, no matter how
educated they might be. Its time to get out the comfort zone and operate
a basic sales rule  you were given two ears and one mouth 
and they need to be used in that ratio.



I would now like to do some market research and ask you who
would be interested in attending, and also, what you would like to learn about
most  perhaps even if you wouldnt be able to make it, you could
offer three top things you would like to know about how you can get yourselves
out there or what you can do. I have had a great response from
the few people I have already mentioned this to, so now I would like to put
this out and ask you if you would come along and be open to some advice from
some amazing, successful business people, and look outside the square to get a
fresh insight on things that need to change, need to be improved and things
that are on the right track.



I anticipate this will either be a full day or two days,
perhaps a weekend in Melbourne in the CBD (with
a possibility in Brisbane)
so those with children can attend. I can strike up a deal with a hotel to get a
discount for those coming from interstate. Thoughts?

Best
Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Creator, BellyBelly.com.au 
Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
BellyBelly Birth Support
- http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support












RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI news article

2006-09-20 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Where can I find out more about her
marketing strategies? Midwives in Croatia would certainly appreciate info
about effective marketing strategies. I found this site: http://www.carolineflint.co.uk/news/news.htm,
but I dont know if there is something more detailed.

Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, September 20,
2006 11:11 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI
news article





The woman who best markets midwifery is
Caroline Flint in the UK.
We should copy her marketing strategies. MM











Kelly says..If we want women to accept and
value the midwife then it needs to be marketed better, it needs to be trendy
and jazzed up! Not just a choice being two sides of the fence with opposing
views as it is now. And they want to know what it will do for THEM and what
THEY will get out of it. At the moment there are very many women who do not see
birth as something that needs to be in the home or is safe in home 
thats just a fact which we have to work on.








RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI news article

2006-09-20 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Thank you J!

Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, September 20,
2006 12:31 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI
news article





Maybe contact Caroline herself through
that site? Good luck. She is a very generous person. MM











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Vedrana Valcic
Sent: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
6:11 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI
news article





Where can I find out more about her
marketing strategies? Midwives in Croatia would certainly appreciate
info about effective marketing strategies. I found this site: http://www.carolineflint.co.uk/news/news.htm,
but I dont know if there is something more detailed.

Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, September 20,
2006 11:11 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI
news article





The woman who best markets midwifery is
Caroline Flint in the UK.
We should copy her marketing strategies. MM











Kelly says..If we want women to accept and
value the midwife then it needs to be marketed better, it needs to be trendy
and jazzed up! Not just a choice being two sides of the fence with opposing
views as it is now. And they want to know what it will do for THEM and what
THEY will get out of it. At the moment there are very many women who do not see
birth as something that needs to be in the home or is safe in home 
thats just a fact which we have to work on.








RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI news article

2006-09-20 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Thanks for the other link! I havent
contacted Carolin Flint, the politician, luckily J. I just forwarded info
to our midwives and I doubt that they were that expedient.

Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006
12:27 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI
news article
Importance: High





The Caroline flint you have contacted is a
politician, not the midwife. Try putting midwife in front of the google
search. It is confusing to have two high profile people with the same
name. MM











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Vedrana Valcic
Sent: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
6:11 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI
news article





Where can I find out more about her
marketing strategies? Midwives in Croatia would certainly appreciate
info about effective marketing strategies. I found this site: http://www.carolineflint.co.uk/news/news.htm,
but I dont know if there is something more detailed.

Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, September 20,
2006 11:11 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI news
article





The woman who best markets midwifery is
Caroline Flint in the UK.
We should copy her marketing strategies. MM











Kelly says..If we want women to accept and
value the midwife then it needs to be marketed better, it needs to be trendy
and jazzed up! Not just a choice being two sides of the fence with opposing
views as it is now. And they want to know what it will do for THEM and what
THEY will get out of it. At the moment there are very many women who do not see
birth as something that needs to be in the home or is safe in home 
thats just a fact which we have to work on.








RE: [ozmidwifery] Nestle - take note of the last line -

2006-08-24 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Polman said it will take time to
get baby milk sales in China back to the previous level after the collapse that
followed Nestle's recall last year because the product exceeded government
limits on iodine content.



Ouch. I hope theyll never succeed
and I hope it will be because more mothers will get a chance to successfully
breastfeed.



Vedrana











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julie Clarke
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006
7:58 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Nestle
- take note of the last line - 





Yes Amy same thing happened to me 
had to forward it or hit reply to get the full story  weird - but
I am glad you eventually found the last line J











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of adamnamy
Sent: Thursday, 24 August 2006
12:41 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Nestle
- take note of the last line - 





This is a bit odd.



I could only read 3 paragraphs in both
your emails until I clicked reply to respond when the whole article
appearedbelow.



Anywayarent they shameless
with their aggressive marketing of a second rate product.



Amy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julie Clarke
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006
8:39 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Nestle -
take note of the last line - 





Nestle
increases first-half profits


 
  
  Source:
  
  
  VEVEY AP
  
 
 
  
  Date:
  
  
  2006-Aug-24 07:01 AM
  
 


Nestle
SA, the world's biggest food and drink company, has reported an 11 per cent
rise in first-half net profit thanks to cost cutting and internal growth
despite higher raw material prices.

The
company, which has brands such as Nescafe, Perrier and Dreyer's, said net
profit increased to 4.15 billion Swiss francs ($A4.44 billion) from 3.73 billion
francs in 2005, exceeding analyst expectations of about 4.09 billion francs.

Nestle,
which does not report quarterly earnings figures, said slow demand in Europe
was widely offset by a strong performance in emerging markets and the United States.


 
  
  
  
 

 
  
  
   
   
  
  
   
   
   
  
 
 During
 the first half of 2006 the group delivered excellent levels of growth and
 profit margin, said Chairman and Chief Executive Peter Brabeck-Letmathe.
 This was made possible by the strong performance of our food, beverage
 and nutrition business which generated 6 per cent organic growth.
 Organic
 growth is one of the company's main performance yardsticks. This
 measure, which includes price increases but not the effects of acquisitions,
 rose to 6.4 per cent, compared with 5.6 per cent in 2005. Analysts had
 expected 6.3 per cent.
 Nestle
 shares closed up 2.3 per cent at 417.75 francs on the Zurich stock exchange.
 It's
 the first time in the past few quarters Nestle has clearly surpassed consensus
 estimates in terms of organic growth and operating margin, Zuercher
 Kantonalbank analyst Patrik Schwendimann said.
 The
 company reiterated that it aims to improve the operating profit margin for the
 full year at constant currencies. It slightly upgraded its organic growth
 estimate for the full year, saying it now expects that figure to be on the
 higher end of its long-standing 5 per cent to 6 per cent target range.
 Sales
 grew 11 per cent to 47.14 billion francs from 42.47 billion francs, the
 company said. Analysts had expected 47.05 billion francs.
 Earnings
 before interest and taxes rose 14.5 per cent to 6.05 billion francs from 5.29
 billion francs.
 The
 company is considering another share buyback after the current 3 billion franc
 program, which is almost finished, Chief Financial Officer Paul Polman said in
 a conference call.
 If
 nothing extraordinary happens, there is no reason why we couldn't continue
 with buybacks, he said.
 Polman
 said that Nestle was not looking at major acquisitions at the moment. He said
 the company will pay more than 1 billion francs later this year for several
 small-sized acquisitions that were arranged in the last six months. Included
 is the purchase of the US-based weight-management company Jenny Craig for
 around $US600 million.
 Polman
 said it will take time to get baby milk sales in China back to the previous
 level after the collapse that followed Nestle's recall last year because the
 product exceeded government limits on iodine content.
 
 
 
 


[ozmidwifery] transition

2006-07-20 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Does anyone know of any good articles or books on
transition? Ive been asked for this info by one midwife in Croatia, for
their Midwifery News magazine. Thanks in advance!



Vedrana










RE: [ozmidwifery] perineal massage

2006-05-17 Thread Vedrana Valčić









No fundal pressure, no lithotomy position,
no rushing.











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Ken Ward
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006
10:30 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
perineal massage







Nice slow stretching as the head descends.
Good nutrition





-Original Message-
From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]On Behalf Of Päivi Laukkanen
Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2006 7:37
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] perineal
massage



Hi everyone,











In my store we sell an organic oil by Weleda for perineal
massage. ( almond oil, wheat germ oil, natural essential oils.) Many
women seem to think, that if they simply apply this oil, it will prevent tears.
I am planning to add some info on perineal massage on our website and also
prepare a handout to give with the oil. I would appreciate any good links on
this subject and answers to these questions:











What do you consider the main factors, when preventing tears
and episiotomies? (other than perineal massage)











Where can I find research on this subject or effectiveness
of perineal massage?











Päivi












RE: [ozmidwifery] perineal massage

2006-05-17 Thread Vedrana Valčić









As for research, I dont know if
this is still relevant:



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrievedb=PubMedlist_uids=10076134dopt=Abstract



Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;180(3 Pt 1):593-600. Related Articles, Links  



 

Randomized
controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during
pregnancy.



Labrecque
M, Eason E, Marcoux S, Lemieux F, Pinault JJ, Feldman P, Laperriere L.



Department
of Family Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.



OBJECTIVE:
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perineal massage
during pregnancy for the prevention of perineal trauma at birth.Study Design:
Pregnant women with (n = 493) and without (n = 1034) a previous vaginal birth
from 5 hospitals in the province of Quebec, Canada, participated in this
single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. All participants received oral and
written information on the prevention of perineal trauma. Women in the
experimental groups were requested to perform a 10-minute perineal massage
daily from the 34th or 35th week of pregnancy until delivery. RESULTS: Among
participants without a previous vaginal birth, 24.3% (100/411) from the
perineal massage group and 15.1% (63/417) from the control group were delivered
vaginally with an intact perineum, for a 9.2% absolute difference (95%
confidence interval 3.8%-14.6%). The incidence of delivery with an intact
perineum increased with compliance with regular practice of perineal massage
(chi2 for trend 13.2, P = 0.0003). Among women with a previous vaginal birth,
34.9% (82/235) and 32.4% (78/241) in the massage and control groups,
respectively, were delivered with an intact perineum, for an absolute
difference of 2.5% (95% confidence interval -6.0% to 11.0%). There were no
differences between the groups in the frequency of sutured vulvar and vaginal
tears, women's sense of control, and satisfaction with the delivery experience.
CONCLUSION: Perineal massage is an effective approach to increasing the chance
of delivery with an intact perineum for women with a first vaginal delivery but
not for women with a previous vaginal birth.



Publication
Types: 

Clinical
Trial 

Multicenter
Study 

Randomized
Controlled Trial 



PMID:
10076134 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of jo
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006
11:48 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
perineal massage





As she feels the burning sensation on the
peri encourage her to stop pushing and pant ha ha ha haor blow to
allow the uterus to expel the baby without added her own force to it - usually
saying stop pushing isnt enough and can be confusing - so
to start panting or blowing yourself will give her the cue to follow.



jo











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Ken Ward
Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2006 6:30
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
perineal massage







Nice slow stretching as the head descends.
Good nutrition





-Original Message-
From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]On Behalf Of Päivi Laukkanen
Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2006 7:37
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] perineal
massage



Hi everyone,











In my store we sell an organic oil by Weleda for perineal
massage. ( almond oil, wheat germ oil, natural essential oils.) Many
women seem to think, that if they simply apply this oil, it will prevent tears.
I am planning to add some info on perineal massage on our website and also
prepare a handout to give with the oil. I would appreciate any good links on
this subject and answers to these questions:











What do you consider the main factors, when preventing tears
and episiotomies? (other than perineal massage)











Where can I find research on this subject or effectiveness
of perineal massage?











Päivi












RE: [ozmidwifery] perineal massage

2006-05-17 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Then there are these:



http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/AB005123.htm



http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1121301



http://www.childbirth.org/articles/massageref.html



http://www.intermid.co.uk/cgi-bin/go.pl/library/contents.html?uid=870journal_uid=12



Antenatal perineal massage: Part 1 (64kb) 

Clare Gomme , Mary Sheridan , Susan Bewley


British Journal of Midwifery, Vol. 11,
Iss. 12, 04 Dec 2003, pp 707 - 711 

Randomized controlled trials have provided
evidence that antenatal perineal massage is effective in reducing perineal
trauma. The provision of information on antenatal perineal massage was
introduced as a new service for women and a series of training sessions were
held to teach perineal massage to midwives working in antenatal clinics. This
article includes a literature review on perineal massage and an evaluation of
the massage training. Midwives views on perineal massage and the
training they received were obtained through questionnaires and focus group
discussions. The response to perineal massage was varied, with some midwives
actively promoting the service while others had no interest in the project and
did not give information on antenatal perineal massage 

to their women. Although just under half
of all eligible women received information on perineal massage, an audit of
perineal trauma rates found a 6% reduction in perineal trauma since the
introduction of the new service.



You can try Google and type in: perineal
massage trauma.











From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:13
PM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
perineal massage





As for research, I dont know if
this is still relevant:



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrievedb=PubMedlist_uids=10076134dopt=Abstract



Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;180(3 Pt 1):593-600. Related Articles, Links 





Randomized
controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during
pregnancy.



Labrecque
M, Eason E, Marcoux S, Lemieux F, Pinault JJ, Feldman P, Laperriere L.



Department
of Family Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.



OBJECTIVE:
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perineal massage
during pregnancy for the prevention of perineal trauma at birth.Study Design:
Pregnant women with (n = 493) and without (n = 1034) a previous vaginal birth
from 5 hospitals in the province of Quebec, Canada, participated in this
single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. All participants received oral and
written information on the prevention of perineal trauma. Women in the
experimental groups were requested to perform a 10-minute perineal massage
daily from the 34th or 35th week of pregnancy until delivery. RESULTS: Among
participants without a previous vaginal birth, 24.3% (100/411) from the
perineal massage group and 15.1% (63/417) from the control group were delivered
vaginally with an intact perineum, for a 9.2% absolute difference (95%
confidence interval 3.8%-14.6%). The incidence of delivery with an intact
perineum increased with compliance with regular practice of perineal massage
(chi2 for trend 13.2, P = 0.0003). Among women with a previous vaginal birth,
34.9% (82/235) and 32.4% (78/241) in the massage and control groups,
respectively, were delivered with an intact perineum, for an absolute
difference of 2.5% (95% confidence interval -6.0% to 11.0%). There were no
differences between the groups in the frequency of sutured vulvar and vaginal
tears, women's sense of control, and satisfaction with the delivery experience.
CONCLUSION: Perineal massage is an effective approach to increasing the chance
of delivery with an intact perineum for women with a first vaginal delivery but
not for women with a previous vaginal birth.



Publication
Types: 

Clinical
Trial 

Multicenter
Study 

Randomized
Controlled Trial 



PMID:
10076134 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of jo
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006
11:48 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
perineal massage





As she feels the burning sensation on the
peri encourage her to stop pushing and pant ha ha ha haor blow to
allow the uterus to expel the baby without added her own force to it - usually
saying stop pushing isnt enough and can be confusing - so
to start panting or blowing yourself will give her the cue to follow.



jo











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Ken Ward
Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2006 6:30
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
perineal massage







Nice slow stretching as the head descends.
Good nutrition





-Original Message-
From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]On Behalf Of Päivi Laukkanen
Sent: Wednesday, 17 May

RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Could you mail me the link to the article, please? I'm surprised that such 
advice didn't come with all the extra info you just provided. I didn't know 
about the 7% and 14% birth weight loss, never researched it.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Ward
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:12 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

Got onto 'kellymom'. They are suggesting you wake baby 2/24 during the day
and 4/24 at night.  This does not sit well with me. Babies need a minium of
6 feeds in 24hrs, and can feed hourly if they want, but I don't believe
waking them is such a good idea, unless there is a reason such as poor
weight gain, jaundice, lack of wet nappies.  Kellymom also states babies
loose 7% of birth weight. They can loose double this, and one should look at
output and baby's behaviour and mum's supply before jumping in. I didn't
bother further with this site.  Maureen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 3:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question


Could it be that you came down with both mastitis and some other infection,
which your son caught?
www.kellymom.com is a great site on breastfeeding, if you want to research
further.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

My episodes of mastitis got less frequent after the first 3 months but I
probably averaged at least one mastitis every 6 months for the entire time I
was feeding (2.5yrs). Though my later mastitis were generally breast injury
induced rather than infection and easily treated with homeopathics.

At 12:36 PM +1000 25/4/06, Nicole Carver wrote:
Hi,
Normally you should breastfeed from both breasts with mastitis. The only
exception, and I may stand corrected, is strep infection. The breast is very
red, not your typical mastitis. It is very painful and you feel quite ill. I
have not seen mastitis at 22 months. It might be precipitated by something
else, as usually the feeding would be fairly trouble free at that stage, I
would imagine.
When a woman has mastitis the milk needs to be kept moving. Babies are best
for that! Expressing is really just the tip of the ice berg. A little blood
does not hurt. If the baby vomits a little blood there is no harm done.
Obviously if there is a lot it would be best to discontinue for 24 hours or
so. The breast must be emptied though, or you run the risk of abscess
formation.
Sometimes the antibiotics taken by mum will upset the babies stomach.
However, I suppose they are also protecting them to some extent.
Regards,
Nicole.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sharon
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

where i work we encourage women to express on the side that they are
infected and continue feeding on the other side until the infection clears,
the infection should be treated by antibiotics and if severe admission to
hospital for iv antibugs. if the breastmilk has blood in it we discourage
any breastfeeding whatsoever and get the mother to express all feeds until
the infection passes she then can resume b/feeding when she feels better but
ensure that the breast is always empty after feeding.
regards sharon

- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Megan  Larry
To: mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auozmidwifery
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:03 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

Can a mother pass on her infecton to her breastfeeding child when she has
mastitis?

Its just that I had what to me was obvious mastitis on Sat, quite a decent
case of it, very sore breast, redness, fever, vomiting, quite ill. Still
recovering on Monday when my breastfeeding 22 mth old developed a fever and
vomiting. This morning he is quite recovered but no doubt will need a very
quiet day still.

So, is this a coincidence, or can the child become infected too? We were
both rundown form a busy few weeks, so the rest was well needed, just wanted
it without the misery.

Thanks in advance

Megan


--
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-24 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Could it be that you came down with both mastitis and some other infection, 
which your son caught?
www.kellymom.com is a great site on breastfeeding, if you want to research 
further.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

My episodes of mastitis got less frequent after the first 3 months but I 
probably averaged at least one mastitis every 6 months for the entire time I 
was feeding (2.5yrs). Though my later mastitis were generally breast injury 
induced rather than infection and easily treated with homeopathics.

At 12:36 PM +1000 25/4/06, Nicole Carver wrote:
Hi,
Normally you should breastfeed from both breasts with mastitis. The only 
exception, and I may stand corrected, is strep infection. The breast is very 
red, not your typical mastitis. It is very painful and you feel quite ill. I 
have not seen mastitis at 22 months. It might be precipitated by something 
else, as usually the feeding would be fairly trouble free at that stage, I 
would imagine.
When a woman has mastitis the milk needs to be kept moving. Babies are best 
for that! Expressing is really just the tip of the ice berg. A little blood 
does not hurt. If the baby vomits a little blood there is no harm done. 
Obviously if there is a lot it would be best to discontinue for 24 hours or 
so. The breast must be emptied though, or you run the risk of abscess 
formation.
Sometimes the antibiotics taken by mum will upset the babies stomach. However, 
I suppose they are also protecting them to some extent.
Regards,
Nicole.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sharon
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

where i work we encourage women to express on the side that they are infected 
and continue feeding on the other side until the infection clears, the 
infection should be treated by antibiotics and if severe admission to hospital 
for iv antibugs. if the breastmilk has blood in it we discourage any 
breastfeeding whatsoever and get the mother to express all feeds until the 
infection passes she then can resume b/feeding when she feels better but 
ensure that the breast is always empty after feeding.
regards sharon

- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Megan  Larry
To: mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auozmidwifery
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:03 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

Can a mother pass on her infecton to her breastfeeding child when she has 
mastitis?

Its just that I had what to me was obvious mastitis on Sat, quite a decent 
case of it, very sore breast, redness, fever, vomiting, quite ill. Still 
recovering on Monday when my breastfeeding 22 mth old developed a fever and 
vomiting. This morning he is quite recovered but no doubt will need a very 
quiet day still.

So, is this a coincidence, or can the child become infected too? We were both 
rundown form a busy few weeks, so the rest was well needed, just wanted it 
without the misery.

Thanks in advance

Megan


-- 
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] meconium staining

2006-04-23 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Title: Lactate: Creatinine ratio in babies with thin meconium staining of amniotic fluid








Could someone please interpret this for
those of us without medical background?

Babies that where not full term (36-38)
were also included in this study, and I though meconium staining for them more
indicative of perinatal asphyxia than for babies at term?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006
8:34 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] meconium
staining






 
  
  Interesting article which just showa how confused we
  are about the meaning of mec stained liquor. MM
  
  
  
  .
  
 


Lactate:
Creatinine ratio in babies with thin meconium staining of amniotic fluid

Rishi KANT Ojha
, Saroj K Singh , Sanjay Batra , V Sreenivas and Jacob M Puliyel 

BMC Pediatrics 2006, 6:13doi:10.1186/1471-2431-6-13


 
  
  Published
  
  
  
  
  
  20April2006
  
 



Abstract (provisional)


Background

ACOG states meconium
stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) as one of the historical indicators of perinatal asphyxia.
Thick meconium along with other indicators is used to identify babies with
severe intrapartum asphyxia. Lactate creatinine ratio (L: C ratio) of 0.64 or
higher in first passed urine of babies suffering severe intrapartum asphyxia
has been shown to predict Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE). Literature
review shows that meconium is passed in distress and thin meconium results from
mixing and dilution over time, which may be hours to days. Thin meconium may
thus be used as an indicator of antepartum asphyxia. We tested L: C ratios in a
group of babies born through thin and thick meconium, and for comparison, in a
group of babies without meconium at birth.

Methods

86 consecutive newborns,
36 to 42 weeks of gestation, with meconium staining of liquor, were recruited
for the study. 52 voided urine within 6 hours of birth; of these 27 had thick
meconium and 25 had thin meconium at birth. 42 others, who did not have
meconium or any other signs of asphyxia at birth provided controls. Lactate and
creatinine levels in urine were tested by standard enzymatic methods in the
three groups.

Results

Lactate values are
highest in the thin MSAF group followed by the thick MSAF and controls.
Creatinine was lowest in the thin MSAF, followed by thick MSAF and controls.
Normal babies had an average L: C ratio of 0.13 (+/- 0.09). L: C ratio was more
among thin MSAF babies (4.3 +/- 11.94) than thick MSAF babies (0.35 +/- 0.35).
Median L: C ratio was also higher in the thin MSAF group. Variation in the
values of these parameters is observed to be high in the thin MSAF group as
compared to other groups. L: C ratio was above the cutoff of 0.64 of Huang et
al in 40% of those with thin meconium. 2 of these developed signs of HIE with
convulsions (HIE Sarnat and Sarnat Stage II) during hospital stay. One had L: C
Ratio of 93 and the other of 58.6. A smaller proportion (20%) of those with
thick meconium had levels above the cutoff and 2 developed HIE and convulsions
with L: C ratio of 1.25 and 1.1 respectively. 

Conclusion

In evolving a cutoff of
L: C ratios that would be highly sensitive and specific (0.64), Huang et al
studied it in a series of babies with severe intrapartum asphyxia. Our study
shows that the specificity may not be as good if babies born through thin
meconium are also included. L: C ratios are much higher in babies with thin
meconium. It may be that
meconium alone is not a good indicator of asphyxia and the risk of HIE. However,
if the presence of meconium implies asphyxia then perhaps a higher cut-off than
0.64 is needed. L: C ratios should be tested in a larger sample that includes
babies with thin meconium, before L: C ratios can be applied universally. (my
emphasis. mm)










RE: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

2006-04-18 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Miriam,
To another Carolyn, from the mail below. Sorry if I confused you.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of safetsleep 
international
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 7:40 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

vedrana
did you intend to send this to me or another carolyn somewhere else?
rgds
miriam

- Original Message - 
From: Vedrana Valčić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push


Dear Carolyn,
I'd like to copy your mail to one web forum (mainly about pregnancy, birth, 
childhood) in Croatia. Its address is www.roda.hr/rodaphpBB2. Would that be 
OK?

Warm regards,
Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of safetsleep 
international
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:12 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

wow...'special lady'in my humble experience there are not many who have
grown to grasp this level of intellectual and experiential awareness and
intelligence ...i will be saving this email and reading it and the
references for some time...thankyou
warm regards
miram
- Original Message - 
From: Heartlogic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push


 Hello Kristen,

 From the literature, uncontrollable urges to push before full dilatation
 of the woman's cervix and descent of the baby's head are certainly
 associated with babies who are in a posterior position, that is back of
 the baby's head, the bone called the occiput, pressing against the woman's
 sacrum and putting pressure on her bowel 'prematurely'.

 That is the accepted, physical version of events. Physical interventions
 to change the baby's position include, but are not limited to:

 *position changes of all kinds mostly during labour surges,
 *such as leaning forward,
 *leaning backward,
 *opening the ischial spines with various strategies such
 *as assisting with inwards pressure on the alae of the sacrum;
 * lifting the trochanters when the woman is squatting (that takes some
 doing but is a wonderful opener)
 *lunges with one leg raised on a chair, squatting etc;
 *the flapping fish (yoga) position which is lying down on the side the
 baby's back is on, with leg and arm behind, so the person is more on their
 abdomen -  also called the recovery position; lunging as before, but with
 the woman's body leaning posteriorally into the side the baby is on to
 reduce space and encourage baby to rotate to the front.
 *Another excellent strategy is (the midwife or doctor) using the fingers
 of one hand in the woman's vagina to construct an artificial pelvic floor
 to help the baby rotate to the front. This is most useful with a greater
 degree of dilatation as the person needs to have their hand directly on
 the baby's head to put the counter pressure on (gently and firmly) for
 increased flexion and rotation of the baby's head. Of course, the woman
 needs to be informed and agree and be in a position (birth stool is great
 for this) to enable the midwife/doctor to do this.

 As we know, we are not merely physical, a bit of material, like a brick or
 plank of timber, we are a breathing, feeling, moving, social entity.  We
 are more, much more than that which can be cut or fashioned into an
 article of usefulness.

 From another point of view, examining our human self, we are an amazing
 brain and nervous system network, whose function is predominately based on
 a lifetime collection of learned patterns, concepts and expressions
 overlaying a genetic intelligence of predetermined processes and
 capabilites, such as giving birth.

 Neuroscience. neuropsychology and endocrinology now tells us that emotions
 (chemicals) are what fires the feeling/vibratory/electrical brain/nervous
 system into action (which affects/is expressed in the muscular etc
 reactions/behaviour of the whole body) and the conscious (spiritual) self,
 that bit of us that thinks in the moment and is untouchable and invisible,
 is the thinking director of the whole brain/body mind and action, This
 director is located in  the prefrontal cortex of the brain.

 From my observation and experiences, an uncontrolled urge to push is often
 associated with thought patterns such as 'wanting it over' and the
 associated emotional response (through the amygdala) is a release of a
 chemical flooding, that matchs that pattern of thought. The brain and
 nervous system gets the chemical and electrical message, for example 'to
 get it over' and the body starts the pressure before it is really ready to
 do so.

 Doing physical things can help move the woman's focus and attention from
 what is wrong to what she wants to happen. In this instance, moving from

RE: [ozmidwifery] Feeling your own cervix

2006-04-13 Thread Vedrana Valčić








You might want to check these out: http://www.mail-archive.com/ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au/msg21645.html,

http://www.joyousbirth.info/articles/cervixlearning.html

and 

http://www.mail-archive.com/ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au/msg21659.html





Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sadie
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006
3:49 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Feeling
your own cervix













Hi,





Does anyone still have the link that was on
Ozmidwifery recently about feeling for your own cervix?











I thought I'd saved it - but I hadn't.











Thanks,











Sadie










RE: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

2006-04-12 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Dear Carolyn,
I'd like to copy your mail to one web forum (mainly about pregnancy, birth, 
childhood) in Croatia. Its address is www.roda.hr/rodaphpBB2. Would that be OK?

Warm regards,
Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of safetsleep 
international
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:12 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

wow...'special lady'in my humble experience there are not many who have 
grown to grasp this level of intellectual and experiential awareness and 
intelligence ...i will be saving this email and reading it and the 
references for some time...thankyou
warm regards
miram
- Original Message - 
From: Heartlogic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push


 Hello Kristen,

 From the literature, uncontrollable urges to push before full dilatation 
 of the woman's cervix and descent of the baby's head are certainly 
 associated with babies who are in a posterior position, that is back of 
 the baby's head, the bone called the occiput, pressing against the woman's 
 sacrum and putting pressure on her bowel 'prematurely'.

 That is the accepted, physical version of events. Physical interventions 
 to change the baby's position include, but are not limited to:

 *position changes of all kinds mostly during labour surges,
 *such as leaning forward,
 *leaning backward,
 *opening the ischial spines with various strategies such
 *as assisting with inwards pressure on the alae of the sacrum;
 * lifting the trochanters when the woman is squatting (that takes some 
 doing but is a wonderful opener)
 *lunges with one leg raised on a chair, squatting etc;
 *the flapping fish (yoga) position which is lying down on the side the 
 baby's back is on, with leg and arm behind, so the person is more on their 
 abdomen -  also called the recovery position; lunging as before, but with 
 the woman's body leaning posteriorally into the side the baby is on to 
 reduce space and encourage baby to rotate to the front.
 *Another excellent strategy is (the midwife or doctor) using the fingers 
 of one hand in the woman's vagina to construct an artificial pelvic floor 
 to help the baby rotate to the front. This is most useful with a greater 
 degree of dilatation as the person needs to have their hand directly on 
 the baby's head to put the counter pressure on (gently and firmly) for 
 increased flexion and rotation of the baby's head. Of course, the woman 
 needs to be informed and agree and be in a position (birth stool is great 
 for this) to enable the midwife/doctor to do this.

 As we know, we are not merely physical, a bit of material, like a brick or 
 plank of timber, we are a breathing, feeling, moving, social entity.  We 
 are more, much more than that which can be cut or fashioned into an 
 article of usefulness.

 From another point of view, examining our human self, we are an amazing 
 brain and nervous system network, whose function is predominately based on 
 a lifetime collection of learned patterns, concepts and expressions 
 overlaying a genetic intelligence of predetermined processes and 
 capabilites, such as giving birth.

 Neuroscience. neuropsychology and endocrinology now tells us that emotions 
 (chemicals) are what fires the feeling/vibratory/electrical brain/nervous 
 system into action (which affects/is expressed in the muscular etc 
 reactions/behaviour of the whole body) and the conscious (spiritual) self, 
 that bit of us that thinks in the moment and is untouchable and invisible, 
 is the thinking director of the whole brain/body mind and action, This 
 director is located in  the prefrontal cortex of the brain.

 From my observation and experiences, an uncontrolled urge to push is often 
 associated with thought patterns such as 'wanting it over' and the 
 associated emotional response (through the amygdala) is a release of a 
 chemical flooding, that matchs that pattern of thought. The brain and 
 nervous system gets the chemical and electrical message, for example 'to 
 get it over' and the body starts the pressure before it is really ready to 
 do so.

 Doing physical things can help move the woman's focus and attention from 
 what is wrong to what she wants to happen. In this instance, moving from 
 'wanting it over' to turning the baby or the baby being born.  To help the 
 physical actions, (which, because of the neural networks throughout the 
 body, also changes the mind) the woman can be helped to say and focus on 
 what will actually help labour progress appropriately at the right time.

 Concerted and repeated efforts are necessary to change the thought 
 patterns and emotional response, especially when we are in challenging 
 situations and labour is one of the most challenging.

 If the woman can be helped to change her focus and attention from pain or 
 

RE: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

2006-04-12 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Thank you :)!
I opened a new topic at 
http://www.roda.hr/rodaphpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=23139highlight=, under the 
section Birth.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heartlogic
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:25 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

Absolutely Vedrana, if you think it would be helpful.

I am delighted to be asked. Thanks,  :-)

If you find after putting it up on the webforum, anyone would like to ask 
questions or if anything is not clear, I'm more than happy for people to 
contact me and see if I can help further.  My email address is 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

My phone number is 0418 428 430

I'm co editing a book about Birth Territory - my chapter is all about mother 
(plus father, family, midwives/other health professionals, culture etc) as 
'territory' of the fetus.  so I'm doing lots of thinking/reading/pondering 
etc about all these aspects/ideas/concepts etc.

I'm actually on time off to write as I haven't been able to get it to it 
with the work/processes/development involved with setting up and the first 
year (will be on 4th July!) of the wonderful, spectacular, normal, healthy 
physiologically enhancing birthspace of Belmont Birthing Service. What joy 
that is/has been.

So good to be able to prove/demonstrate that if a woman understands and 
welcomes the process of birth and has had an opportunity to explore what it 
all means to her;  you leave the woman and her process alone, while 
providing a loving, kind and supportive, individualised environment,  birth 
happens and happens beautifully, joyfully and with the woman in charge of 
her process.  What a difference that makes.  The midwives are ecstatic, the 
women are happy and intact and the babies are smiling and relaxed.

warmly, Carolyn


- Original Message - 
From: Vedrana Valčić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push


Dear Carolyn,
I'd like to copy your mail to one web forum (mainly about pregnancy, birth, 
childhood) in Croatia. Its address is www.roda.hr/rodaphpBB2. Would that be 
OK?

Warm regards,
Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of safetsleep 
international
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:12 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push

wow...'special lady'in my humble experience there are not many who have
grown to grasp this level of intellectual and experiential awareness and
intelligence ...i will be saving this email and reading it and the
references for some time...thankyou
warm regards
miram
- Original Message - 
From: Heartlogic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] premature urge to push


 Hello Kristen,

 From the literature, uncontrollable urges to push before full dilatation
 of the woman's cervix and descent of the baby's head are certainly
 associated with babies who are in a posterior position, that is back of
 the baby's head, the bone called the occiput, pressing against the woman's
 sacrum and putting pressure on her bowel 'prematurely'.

 That is the accepted, physical version of events. Physical interventions
 to change the baby's position include, but are not limited to:

 *position changes of all kinds mostly during labour surges,
 *such as leaning forward,
 *leaning backward,
 *opening the ischial spines with various strategies such
 *as assisting with inwards pressure on the alae of the sacrum;
 * lifting the trochanters when the woman is squatting (that takes some
 doing but is a wonderful opener)
 *lunges with one leg raised on a chair, squatting etc;
 *the flapping fish (yoga) position which is lying down on the side the
 baby's back is on, with leg and arm behind, so the person is more on their
 abdomen -  also called the recovery position; lunging as before, but with
 the woman's body leaning posteriorally into the side the baby is on to
 reduce space and encourage baby to rotate to the front.
 *Another excellent strategy is (the midwife or doctor) using the fingers
 of one hand in the woman's vagina to construct an artificial pelvic floor
 to help the baby rotate to the front. This is most useful with a greater
 degree of dilatation as the person needs to have their hand directly on
 the baby's head to put the counter pressure on (gently and firmly) for
 increased flexion and rotation of the baby's head. Of course, the woman
 needs to be informed and agree and be in a position (birth stool is great
 for this) to enable the midwife/doctor to do this.

 As we know, we are not merely physical, a bit of material, like a brick or
 plank of timber, we are a breathing, feeling, moving, social entity.  We
 are more, much more than that which can be cut or fashioned

[ozmidwifery] protest

2006-04-06 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Dear listers,

I vaguely remember reading (or hearing?) about protests in
some maternity hospitals where people went into a hospital and sat there until
the hospital policy was changed. I think it was about support persons at birth.
Can anyone point me in the right direction for more information?

A couple of us got really frustrated recently when a friend
of ours gave birth, her baby developed jaundice, had to get phototherapy and she
was not allowed to breastfeed because of a hospital policy. When she insisted
and complained that expressing breastmilk is devastating her nipples, she got
an answer that, since she is so adamant about breastfeeding and they highly
appreciate that, she would be allowed to go in and breastfeed. And she was.
Other babies were not that lucky, they get to get donated formula, obviously
their mothers where not adamant enough (duh?). So an idea of a protest came up,
so that all babies are allowed to breastfeed and that all mothers are informed of
benefits of breastfeeding jaundiced babies, and now were looking for more
info.

While Im at it, you might be interested in reading
what midwives think about giving birth in Croatia at http://www.udrugaprimalja.hr/content/view/73/49/.



Vedrana








[ozmidwifery] vazno

2006-03-24 Thread Vedrana Valčić









http://www.nmc-uk.org/aFrameDisplay.aspx?DocumentID=1446










RE: [ozmidwifery] vazno

2006-03-24 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Sorry about this, I wanted to forward it,
not to mail it back.



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:52
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] vazno





http://www.nmc-uk.org/aFrameDisplay.aspx?DocumentID=1446










FW: [ozmidwifery] Water for BF babies

2006-03-23 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Maybe it will work this time:


From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:32 AM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: FW: [ozmidwifery] Water for BF babies

1. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends breastfeeding
According to the AAP, Human milk is species-specific, and all substitute 
feeding preparations differ markedly from it, making human milk uniquely 
superior for infant feeding. Exclusive breastfeeding is the reference or 
normative model against which all alternative feeding methods must be measured 
with regard to growth, health, development, and all other short- and long-term 
outcomes. In addition, human milk-fed premature infants receive significant 
benefits with respect to host protection and improved developmental outcomes 
compared with formula-fed premature infants... Pediatricians and parents should 
be aware that exclusive breastfeeding is sufficient to support optimal growth 
and development for approximately the first 6 months of life and provides 
continuing protection against diarrhea and respiratory tract infection. 
Breastfeeding should be continued for at least the first year of life and 
beyond for as long as mutually desired by mother and child.

A.A.P. Breastfeeding Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk 
Pediatrics Vol. 115 No. 2 February 2005

(http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;115/2/496)
2. http://rehydrate.org/breastfeed/faq-exclusive-breastfeeding.htm 
FAQ SHEET 5 
Reprinted June 2004


  
Healthy newborns enter the world well hydrated and remain so if breastfed 
exclusively, day and night, even in the hottest, driest climates. Nevertheless, 
the practice of giving infants water during the first six months-the 
recommended period for exclusive breastfeeding-persists in many parts of the 
world, with dire nutritional and health consequences. This FAQ discusses these 
consequences and the role of breastfeeding in meeting an infant's water 
requirements.

 
Why is exclusive breastfeeding recommended for the first six months? 

International guidelines recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six 
months based on scientific evidence of the benefits for infant survival, 
growth, and development. Breastmilk provides all the energy and nutrients that 
an infant needs during the first six months. Exclusive breastfeeding reduces 
infant deaths caused by common childhood illnesses such as diarrhea and 
pneumonia, hastens recovery during illness, and helps space births.


Is early supplementation with water a common practice? And if so, why?

The practice of giving water and other liquids such as teas, sugar water, and 
juices to breastfed infants in the first months is widespread throughout the 
world, as illustrated in Figure 1. This practice often begins in the first 
month of life. Research conducted in the outskirts of Lima, Peru showed that 83 
percent of infants received water and teas in the first month. Studies in 
several communities of the Gambia, the Philippines, Egypt, and Guatemala 
reported that over 60 percent of newborns were given sugar water and/or teas.

The reasons given for water supplementation of infants vary across cultures. 
Some of the most common reasons are: 
* necessary for life 
* quenches thirst 
* relieves pain (from colic or earache) 
* prevents and treats colds and constipation 
* soothes fretfulness 
Cultural and religious beliefs also influence water supplementation in early 
infancy. Proverbs passed down from generation to generation advise mothers to 
give babies water. Water may be viewed as the source of life-a spiritual and 
physiological necessity. Some cultures regard the act of offering water to the 
newborn as a way of welcoming the child into the world.

The advice of health care providers also influences the use of water in many 
communities and hospitals. For example, a study in a Ghanaian city found that 
93 percent of midwives thought that water should be given to all infants 
beginning on the first day of life. In Egypt many nurses advised mothers to 
give sugar water after delivery.

  



How do breastfed babies get enough water?

Depending on temperature, humidity, and the infant's weight and level of 
activity, the average daily fluid requirement for healthy infants ranges from 
80-100 ml/kg in the first week of life to 140-160 ml/kg between 3-6 months. 
These amounts are available from breastmilk alone if breastfeeding is exclusive 
and unrestricted (on-demand day and night) for two reasons:

Breastmilk is 88 percent water. 
The water content of breastmilk consumed by an exclusively breastfed baby meets 
the water requirements for infants and provides a considerable margin of 
safety. Even though a newborn gets little water in the thick yellowish first 
milk (colostrum), no additional water is necessary because a baby is born with 
extra water. Milk with higher water content usually comes

RE: [ozmidwifery] the Devine Response!

2006-02-27 Thread Vedrana Valčić









concerned
primarily for the 
health of mother and baby and less concerned about whether or not the mother 
has a fulfilling experience in childbirth



Yeah. If baby is alive, and mommy is
alive, what else in the world could they want? Nothing else matters. Talk about
holistic care. Just forget what you wanted, all that matters is that you and
your child are alive. Youll forget about the rest the minute your child
is born.



Heard all those things (I dont want
to be rude and use another word) before.











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of diane
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006
7:21 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] the
Devine Response!







Hi All, 





Here is Miranda's response to my letter!! Im thinking about
mine... Cant really swear at her can I?











Dear Diane:
As you know Prof Tracey is not an impartial observer and I am not the only 
person who does not consider her research to be proof of anything
except 
the perfectly obvious proposition that you get better outcomes from low-risk 
births.
RE a) No one is talking about rushing to RNS, just not duplicating resources 
at Gosford and Wyong.
Ideally every woman would have a natural delivery with midwives but when 
things go wrong or she is desperate for pain relief, she and her child are 
entitled to the very best medical intervention possible.
I want women and their babies to have that choice, and I don't like to see 
the state giovernment get off the hook on their responsibiliy to provide 
that care, as happened with Camden.
I have written on this topic for ten years. I have done my research. I have 
approached the issue as an independent observer, concerned primarily for the 
health of mother and baby and less concerned about whether or not the mother 
has a fulfilling experience in childbirth or whether the supposedly 
patriarchal medical establishment has too much power.


Miranda Devine
The Sydney Morning Herald 
The Sun-Herald
201 Sussex Street
Sydney 2000
02 9282-1102










[ozmidwifery] RE: I told you so!

2006-02-26 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Now it comes to breastfeeding: http://www.thecowgoddess.com/archshow.asp?var=215

This story is just too sad and s
common, around the world, I think L.



Vedrana











From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
10:34 AM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: I told you so!





http://www.thecowgoddess.com/archshow.asp?var=214



Someone: Well, I remember what you told me,
Have a homebirth but I was too scared So I had a hospital
birth anyway. Im really glad because if I hadnt been at the
hospital my baby wouldnt have survived.

Hathor the Cowgoddess: Oh? Howd it go?

Someone: They had
to induce me two weeks early. They were worried about stuff. I ended up needing
an epidural and my labor just stopped! So I had a c-section Im
just so grateful that my baby was
okay. You know the weird part? The baby was fine, weight: fine, fluid: fine. I
dont know why they wanted to induce in the first place.

Hathor the Cowgoddess: Gulp. Remind me again, what
was your due date?

Someone: Thanksgiving. Why?

Hathor the Cowgoddess: Um No reason.








RE: [ozmidwifery] repair surgery and bf

2006-02-22 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Yes, I searched the net for some info and found out that placenta produces 
estrogen. After birth, high levels of estrogen inhibit milk production. Your 
question is quite interesting. Really, would such an operation be advisable on 
post menopausal women?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] repair surgery and bf

Actually my understanding is that estrogen levels would be FAR higher at birth 
(and presumably soon after) than once breastfeeding is established. Certainly 
my own estrogen level was post menopausal during breastfeeding. That said 
surely post menopausal women have surgery too?

At 2:57 PM +0100 21/2/06, Vedrana Valãiç wrote:
How come episiotomies heal then? Are oestrogen levels then higher than later 
on?

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Watson
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:43 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] repair surgery and bf

I'd definitely go to a plastic surgeon... an ob does baby and mum 
stuff... this seems to me like something more cosmetic ( not saying 
it like she's only getting it done for looks!!)

Jo

On 21/02/2006, at 7:21 PM, Janet Fraser wrote:

 She's been told by several Obs that the lower oestrogen in her 
 system mean
 her vagina won't heal. It sounds like a crock to me. I've seen bf 
 blamed for
 most things wrong with babies and mothers but this was a new one to 
 me.
 :(
 - Original Message -
 From: Maxine Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:15 PM
 Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] repair surgery and bf



 Maybe I am being daft but what effect do lactational hormones have on
 surgery?  I would also suggest another opinion or 2 - perhaps to a 
 plastic
 surgeon also.
 Maxine

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


-- 
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] pelvic floor information

2006-02-22 Thread Vedrana Valčić
I think there was some research that c-section does not prevent incontinence, 
as previously thought. Would that be of any help, Kylie?

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Chapman
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:25 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] pelvic floor information

Skipping isn't bad either if you don't have a trampoline on tap.

cheers
Judy

--- Megan  Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ideally we all can benefit from pelvis floor excercises,
 including men.
  
 My dad had his prostate removed recently for cancer and I told
 him to start
 and excercise his pelvic floor pre-surgery to help with his
 recovery. He
 told his specialist what I said and he thought it was an
 excellent idea.
 Interestingly my Dad noticed improvement with his weeing
 just from this
 and did have a good recovery.
  
 Anyway, just my two bits,
  
 Megan
  
 PS trampolines are an excellent way to find out how strong
 your pelvic floor
 is, or isn't as you may find out. Hehehehe
 
   _  
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Kylie Carberry
 Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2006 4:03 PM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] pelvic floor information
 
 
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 I was wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction
 with some
 research I am doing for a story on the importance of pelvic
 floor exercises.
 A lot of women are led to believe - I guess, by scalpel-happy
 OB's - that a
 weakened pelvic floor can be avoided a by having a c-section. 
 I recall,
 some time last year, reading an article disproving this
 theory, but, of
 course cannot remember where I read it.  If there is anyone
 who can help me
 out here, I would greatly appreciate if you could let me know.
  Any other
 thoughts on the topic would be welcomed also.
 
 Best wishes
 
 
 Kylie Carberry 
 Freelance Journalist 
 p: +61 2 42970115 
 m: +61 2 418220638 
 f: +61 2 42970747
 -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to
 subscribe or
 unsubscribe.
 





Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Health: Dedicated to providing current health news and information 
http://au.health.yahoo.com/
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] I told you so!

2006-02-21 Thread Vedrana Valčić









http://www.thecowgoddess.com/archshow.asp?var=214



Someone: Well, I remember what you told me, Have
a homebirth but I was too scared So I had a hospital birth
anyway. Im really glad because if I hadnt been at the hospital my
baby wouldnt have survived.

Hathor the Cowgoddess: Oh? Howd it go?

Someone: They had
to induce me two weeks early. They were worried about stuff. I ended up needing
an epidural and my labor just stopped! So I had a c-section Im
just so grateful that my baby was
okay. You know the weird part? The baby was fine, weight: fine, fluid: fine. I
dont know why they wanted to induce in the first place.

Hathor the Cowgoddess: Gulp. Remind me again, what
was your due date?

Someone: Thanksgiving. Why?

Hathor the Cowgoddess: Um No reason.








RE: [ozmidwifery] repair surgery and bf

2006-02-21 Thread Vedrana Valčić
How come episiotomies heal then? Are oestrogen levels then higher than later on?

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Watson
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:43 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] repair surgery and bf

I'd definitely go to a plastic surgeon... an ob does baby and mum  
stuff... this seems to me like something more cosmetic ( not saying  
it like she's only getting it done for looks!!)

Jo

On 21/02/2006, at 7:21 PM, Janet Fraser wrote:

 She's been told by several Obs that the lower oestrogen in her  
 system mean
 her vagina won't heal. It sounds like a crock to me. I've seen bf  
 blamed for
 most things wrong with babies and mothers but this was a new one to  
 me.
 :(
 - Original Message -
 From: Maxine Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:15 PM
 Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] repair surgery and bf



 Maybe I am being daft but what effect do lactational hormones have on
 surgery?  I would also suggest another opinion or 2 - perhaps to a  
 plastic
 surgeon also.
 Maxine

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] High babies

2006-02-19 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Sorry to bother you again, but what do OFP and HTH mean? (English is not my 
mother language, and I am not of a medical profession)

Vedrana 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 12:25 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies

Yes, that's it. I've also known a number of freebirthing mamas whose babies
were transverse at the start of labour and between cx and OFP the babies
moved down beautifully and were safely born at home.

I'm always uncomfortable with surgeons recommending surgery. Often OFP helps
transverse babies move quite perfectly.

HTH. Bicycle shorts sound weird but they seem to work!
J
- Original Message - 
From: Vedrana Valčić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] High babies


I have a friend whose baby is transverse (she's 32 weeks now) and as I was
searching the mail archives for some advice, I came up to this message. What
do you do with bicycle shorts? Just wear them and the baby turns?

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:31 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies

Bicycle shorts! Cheap, simple and hugely effective!
J
- Original Message -
From: Susan Cudlipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies


 Surely if this baby is truly stuck in a transverse position at term (and
 there has been no mention of gestation) a C/S would be necessary?
 Is she a primip or multi? How long has the baby been transverse and has
any
 attempt been made to encourage it to a more favourable position?
 sue
 The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
 nothing
 Edmund Burke
 - Original Message -
 From: Denise Hynd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 7:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies


  Dear Megan
  If it were not such a sad situation you could laugh at the patronising
  ignorance or is that arrogance and obsurdity of this Obs!
 
  Sounds like the next step is C/s for babies who have the nerve to turn
  around completely as that also stretches  the uterus!
 
  And of caourse he has not talk of the risks to mother and baby of
elective
  C/s on an arbitary date!!
  Denise Hynd
 
  Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for
the
  sake of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by
  anyone, our bodies will be handled.
 
  - Linda Hes
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Megan Woodman-Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 1:28 PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies
 
 
  Dear Sally, I am an independant midwife in Melbourne. could you please
  contact me  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I have a friend of a friend who is
  in need of a professional further opinion in regards to a transverse
baby
  and apparently a LUSCS is definitely needed (according to her OB)
because
  the uterus has been stretched in an abnormal way and she is at risk of
  uterine rupture!!
  Thanks Megan
 
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date:
22/07/2005
 
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date: 22/07/2005
 
 

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



RE: [ozmidwifery] High babies

2006-02-17 Thread Vedrana Valčić
I have a friend whose baby is transverse (she's 32 weeks now) and as I was 
searching the mail archives for some advice, I came up to this message. What do 
you do with bicycle shorts? Just wear them and the baby turns?

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:31 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies

Bicycle shorts! Cheap, simple and hugely effective!
J
- Original Message -
From: Susan Cudlipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies


 Surely if this baby is truly stuck in a transverse position at term (and
 there has been no mention of gestation) a C/S would be necessary?
 Is she a primip or multi? How long has the baby been transverse and has
any
 attempt been made to encourage it to a more favourable position?
 sue
 The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
 nothing
 Edmund Burke
 - Original Message -
 From: Denise Hynd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 7:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies


  Dear Megan
  If it were not such a sad situation you could laugh at the patronising
  ignorance or is that arrogance and obsurdity of this Obs!
 
  Sounds like the next step is C/s for babies who have the nerve to turn
  around completely as that also stretches  the uterus!
 
  And of caourse he has not talk of the risks to mother and baby of
elective
  C/s on an arbitary date!!
  Denise Hynd
 
  Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for
the
  sake of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by
  anyone, our bodies will be handled.
 
  - Linda Hes
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Megan Woodman-Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 1:28 PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] High babies
 
 
  Dear Sally, I am an independant midwife in Melbourne. could you please
  contact me  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I have a friend of a friend who is
  in need of a professional further opinion in regards to a transverse
baby
  and apparently a LUSCS is definitely needed (according to her OB)
because
  the uterus has been stretched in an abnormal way and she is at risk of
  uterine rupture!!
  Thanks Megan
 
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date:
22/07/2005
 
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date: 22/07/2005
 
 

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] fear

2006-02-06 Thread Vedrana Valčić








I think its not so much a matter of
verbalizing the fear, I think it has more to do with asking the question. When you
ask a question, a woman asks herself that question, maybe for the first time,
or at least for the first time in that situation. The right question at the
right time, followed by reassurance, or by something different to what a woman
believed until then, can lead to a crucial insight. My 2 cents J.



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Ceri  Katrina
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006
6:44 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] fear







On 05/02/2006, at 12:36 AM, Susan Cudlipp wrote: 









What is your biggest fear right now? She didn't
answer for a couple of contractions then suddenly burst out  My biggest
fear is that I won't be able to birth the baby What do you know -
lip went and baby started to appear! 











This fascinates me too. 





Is is just a matter of verbalising that fear??? I know it sounds dumb,
but most women when questioned say that they fear the pain.no denying that
it is going to hurt, so is it a matter of just verbalising it?? 







On a similar matter 





the last couple of weks, I have had 2 women simply stump me. One with
an epidural, one without. Both reached 9 then 10 cms dilation, and decided they
did not want to push. They were adament they did not want to push, that they
wanted the baby pulled out!!! Despite reasurrance that they could
do it, and that unless they were unwell or the baby distressed, they baby would
NOT be pulled out and they certainly would not be taken for a LSCS, they
continued to say No I dont want to push, I'm not going to
push it is going to hurt too much! 







They eventually had the baby when the next shift took over, but I was
wondering if anyone else had encountered this before?? 












RE: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management

2006-02-01 Thread Vedrana Valčić
My favourite is this one:

The length of uncomplicated human gestation.

Mittendorf R, Williams MA, Berkey CS, Cotter PF.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 
Massachusetts.

By retrospective exclusion of gestations with known obstetric complications, 
maternal diseases, or unreliable menstrual histories, we found that 
uncomplicated, spontaneous-labor pregnancy in private-care white mothers is 
longer than Naegele's rule predicts. For primiparas, the median duration of 
gestation from assumed ovulation to delivery was 274 days, significantly longer 
than the predicted 266 days (P = .0003). For multiparas, the median duration of 
pregnancy was 269 days, also significantly longer than the prediction (P = 
.019). Moreover, the median length of pregnancy in primiparas proved to be 
significantly longer than that for multiparas (P = .0032). Thus, this study 
suggests that when estimating a due date for private-care white patients, one 
should count back 3 months from the first day of the last menses, then add 15 
days for primiparas or 10 days for multiparas, instead of using the common 
algorithm for Naegele's rule.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wump fish
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:55 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management

Perhaps we need to get away from due dates altogether. Instead of giving 
women an edd, maybe saying that if your baby has not arrived by x date we 
can discuss various options. I agree, that when we give women a particular 
date they fix on it. As do their family and friends = lots of pressure as 
the date comes and goes. Doesn't matter how much we tell them the 38-42wk 
thing - they are aiming for that 40wk due date.


From: Janet Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:03:16 +1100

It really does and the overwhelming focus on the 40 week mark means that 
women are freaking out by 40+3 convinced they'll never go into labour and 
really upset and angry. There's no point saying term is 38-42, you're 
quite ok because they have the fear of god in them about the mythical 
40+10 which means induction.
Bloody terrible! It was so different planning a home birth and just 
floating about high on endorphins knowing no one was going to hassle me. 
Too many women, ie the majority, really miss out on this.
We need that ridiculous compulsory induction before 42 weeks to just end. 
I'm so tired of giving postdates info to women at 39 weeks who are already 
being pressured by their hospital because If you don't go into labour by x 
date we will induce you!
Who can labour with that hanging over them?
J

- Original Message -
From: Dean  Jo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:49 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management


  The issue faced by women when they go post dates has a huge impact on
  things.  I wonder if women were to celebrate and cherish the last few
  days of being pregnant instead of feeling 'fed up' - if women did not
  hear from anyone (and usually everyone) the comment of are you still
  here love? or the best one: You still here, my gawd you are huge!  If
  women were told they look beautiful, if women were given social
  'approval' to be pampered; to internalize; to value the last few days
  then perhaps more women would go into labour without that desperate fed
  up notion that makes induction more appealing.
 
  The last few weeks of a pregnancy I think are the most challenging for
  many women.  We as a society need to allow them and encourage them to
  value the last few days of holding their child close.  Birth blessings,
  women circles (where a group of females get together and celebrate the
  birthing women or even do something helpful like a cooking afternoon
  with meals for the freezer, or  housework bee to do all those jobs that
  bother expectant mums); massages; pedicures; hair appointments WHATEVER!
  Anything that says to the woman 'take your time, feel comfortable within
  yourself think positive and baby will come.'
 
  *sigh*  but instead women are fed phrases that enforce they should be
  doing something to get baby out.
 
  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date:
  1/27/2006
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 

_
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://messenger.msn.co.uk

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.

RE: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management

2006-02-01 Thread Vedrana Valčić
And this one: 
The current due-date predictor -- Naegele's Rule -- was devised in 1838 by 
Franz Carl Naegele and has been used by obstetricians around the world for more 
than 150 years. Naegele's Rule is based on the belief that human gestation is 
10 lunar cycles (nine months plus seven days), not on empirical data.

http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/961107/pregnancy.shtml

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 3:13 PM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management

My favourite is this one:

The length of uncomplicated human gestation.

Mittendorf R, Williams MA, Berkey CS, Cotter PF.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 
Massachusetts.

By retrospective exclusion of gestations with known obstetric complications, 
maternal diseases, or unreliable menstrual histories, we found that 
uncomplicated, spontaneous-labor pregnancy in private-care white mothers is 
longer than Naegele's rule predicts. For primiparas, the median duration of 
gestation from assumed ovulation to delivery was 274 days, significantly longer 
than the predicted 266 days (P = .0003). For multiparas, the median duration of 
pregnancy was 269 days, also significantly longer than the prediction (P = 
.019). Moreover, the median length of pregnancy in primiparas proved to be 
significantly longer than that for multiparas (P = .0032). Thus, this study 
suggests that when estimating a due date for private-care white patients, one 
should count back 3 months from the first day of the last menses, then add 15 
days for primiparas or 10 days for multiparas, instead of using the common 
algorithm for Naegele's rule.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wump fish
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:55 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management

Perhaps we need to get away from due dates altogether. Instead of giving 
women an edd, maybe saying that if your baby has not arrived by x date we 
can discuss various options. I agree, that when we give women a particular 
date they fix on it. As do their family and friends = lots of pressure as 
the date comes and goes. Doesn't matter how much we tell them the 38-42wk 
thing - they are aiming for that 40wk due date.


From: Janet Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:03:16 +1100

It really does and the overwhelming focus on the 40 week mark means that 
women are freaking out by 40+3 convinced they'll never go into labour and 
really upset and angry. There's no point saying term is 38-42, you're 
quite ok because they have the fear of god in them about the mythical 
40+10 which means induction.
Bloody terrible! It was so different planning a home birth and just 
floating about high on endorphins knowing no one was going to hassle me. 
Too many women, ie the majority, really miss out on this.
We need that ridiculous compulsory induction before 42 weeks to just end. 
I'm so tired of giving postdates info to women at 39 weeks who are already 
being pressured by their hospital because If you don't go into labour by x 
date we will induce you!
Who can labour with that hanging over them?
J

- Original Message -
From: Dean  Jo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:49 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Resounding failure of active labour management


  The issue faced by women when they go post dates has a huge impact on
  things.  I wonder if women were to celebrate and cherish the last few
  days of being pregnant instead of feeling 'fed up' - if women did not
  hear from anyone (and usually everyone) the comment of are you still
  here love? or the best one: You still here, my gawd you are huge!  If
  women were told they look beautiful, if women were given social
  'approval' to be pampered; to internalize; to value the last few days
  then perhaps more women would go into labour without that desperate fed
  up notion that makes induction more appealing.
 
  The last few weeks of a pregnancy I think are the most challenging for
  many women.  We as a society need to allow them and encourage them to
  value the last few days of holding their child close.  Birth blessings,
  women circles (where a group of females get together and celebrate the
  birthing women or even do something helpful like a cooking afternoon
  with meals for the freezer, or  housework bee to do all those jobs that
  bother expectant mums); massages; pedicures; hair appointments WHATEVER!
  Anything that says to the woman 'take your time, feel comfortable within
  yourself think positive and baby will come.'
 
  *sigh*  but instead women are fed

RE: [ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing rooms

2006-01-25 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Yes, shes quite a woman,
isnt she?

And this is what was happening before she
came home: http://www.nandu.hu/Magyar/Szules/HU_MW.htm



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Andrea Quanchi
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006
10:34 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Photos
of beautifull birthing rooms







I had a look at this web site and found her story at 





http://www.nandu.hu/Magyar/Szules/HU_MW3.htm 







absolutely amazing and well worth the read 





Andrea Q 





On 21/01/2006, at 4:23 AM, Vedrana Valčić wrote: 









Paivi, 





you might want to ask Andrea Noll, a
Hungarian midwife, for photos of her homebirth. You can see them at http://www.nandu.hu/English/Childbirth/chbmain.htm 





 





Vedrana 





 







From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of pinky mckay 





Sent: Thursday,
January 19, 2006 11:50 PM 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Subject: Re:
[ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing rooms 





 





Paivi, 





here are two beauiful birth centres I visited while in New Zealand
last year. Any woman is funded to go there with her own midwife.
River-ridge is a beautiful building desgned by a steiner/
anthroposophical' architect - lovely scultures in small private gardens that
can be entered from the rooms and Waterford
is more 'corporate'. Both are freestanding/ not attached to hospitals.






 





 





http://www.riverridgeeastbc.co.nz/






 





http://www.waterfordbc.co.nz/waterford/index.php?ctnt=about.php






 





 





Best wishes with your project, 





Pinky 







- Original Message - 





From: Päivi
Laukkanen 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au






Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 5:17 AM 





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing
rooms 





 





Wow, It would be more than terrific to get their story in a
local magazine. Is there any way you could hook me up with them? 





 





Päivi 







- Original Message - 





From: jesse/jayne






To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au






Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:49 PM 





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing
rooms 





 





Paivi (sorry, I can't do the accents!) 





 





I am some friends (sisters) from Finland
living in Australia that
birthed at home - in Australia
though. Isn't that strange?! 





 





Cheers, 





 





Jayne 





 





 







- Original Message - 





From: Päivi
Laukkanen 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au






Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 9:54 AM 





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing
rooms 





 





Absolutely! I plan to show hospital rooms, birthing centre
rooms and home. Unfortunately the Birthing Centre consept is not even known about
in Finland and we only have some 20 homebirths a year but I am trying to
awaken some interest by showing pictures of something we don't really associate
with birth over here... 





 





Päivi 







- Original Message - 





From: jesse/jayne






To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au






Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:09 AM 





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing
rooms 





 





Can I suggest some pictures of the most mother/baby
friendly? That would have to be ~home~ :) 





 





Cheers 





 





Jayne 





 





 







- Original Message - 





From: Päivi
Laukkanen 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au






Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:40 AM 





Subject: [ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing rooms






 





Hi everyone, 





 





I am putting together a photo gallery to display some of the
most beautiful birthing rooms in contrast of the most uncomfortable hospital
delivery rooms, with some description of where they are from.The photo
gallery will be presented in Tampere Finland
later this spring. If you work in an environment, where the birthing rooms are
really mother friendly and comfortable, or if you know some places where I
could contact to get pictures, please contact me.Unfortunately I will not
be able to go and take photoes, since I am back here in Finland. It would be great to get
some pictures from many different countries. 





 





Paivi Laukkanen 





Childbirth Educator 





Finland






 





[EMAIL PROTECTED]























RE: [ozmidwifery] Web resources for keeping boys intact

2006-01-25 Thread Vedrana Valčić








My favourite: http://www.cirp.org/library/normal/
- Normal development of the prepuce:

Birth through age 18 











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Gloria Lemay
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006
7:52 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients;
undisclosed-recipients; undisclosed-recipients; undisclosed-recipients;
@uniserve.com
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Web
resources for keeping boys intact





A few neutral medical website:
http://www.caringforkids.cps.ca/babies/Circumcision.htm
(Canadian Paediatric Society)
A summary of worldwide Medical association position papers http://www.nocirc.org/position/
http://aappolicy.aappublications.or...trics;103/3/686

Breastfeeding/Maternal Bond
http://www.cirp.org/library/birth/
(links to medical articles and positional papers)
http://www.birthpsychology.com/birthscene/circ.html

Other resources:
www.cirp.org
www.nocirc.org
http://www.jewishcircumcision.org/
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.norm-uk.org/circumcision_lost.html
http://doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/

Mothering.com also has many articles against circumcision, most recently in the
September/October 2005 issue 








RE: [ozmidwifery] Photos of beautifull birthing rooms

2006-01-20 Thread Vedrana Valčić









Paivi,

you might want to ask Andrea Noll, a Hungarian
midwife, for photos of her homebirth. You can see them at http://www.nandu.hu/English/Childbirth/chbmain.htm



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of pinky mckay
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006
11:50 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Photos
of beautifull birthing rooms







Paivi,





here are two beauiful birth centres I visited while in New Zealand
last year. Any woman is funded to go there with her own midwife.
River-ridge is a beautiful building desgned by a steiner/
anthroposophical' architect - lovely scultures in small private gardens that
can be entered from the rooms and Waterford
is more 'corporate'. Both are freestanding/ not attached to hospitals.

















http://www.riverridgeeastbc.co.nz/











http://www.waterfordbc.co.nz/waterford/index.php?ctnt=about.php

















Best wishes with your project,





Pinky







- Original Message - 





From: Päivi Laukkanen 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, January
20, 2006 5:17 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Photos of beautifull birthing rooms











Wow, It would be more than terrific to get their story in a
local magazine. Is there any way you could hook me up with them?











Päivi







- Original Message - 





From: jesse/jayne






To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Thursday, January
19, 2006 12:49 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Photos of beautifull birthing rooms











Paivi (sorry, I can't do the accents!)











I am some friends (sisters) from Finland
living in Australia that
birthed at home - in Australia
though. Isn't that strange?!











Cheers,











Jayne



















- Original Message - 





From: Päivi Laukkanen 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Thursday, January
19, 2006 9:54 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Photos of beautifull birthing rooms











Absolutely! I plan to show hospital rooms, birthing centre
rooms and home. Unfortunately the Birthing Centre consept is not even known
about in Finland and we only have some 20 homebirths a year but I am trying
to awaken some interest by showing pictures of something we don't really
associate with birth over here...











Päivi







- Original Message - 





From: jesse/jayne






To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Thursday, January
19, 2006 12:09 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Photos of beautifull birthing rooms











Can I suggest some pictures of the most mother/baby
friendly? That would have to be ~home~ :)











Cheers











Jayne



















- Original Message - 





From: Päivi Laukkanen 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Thursday, January
19, 2006 8:40 AM





Subject: [ozmidwifery]
Photos of beautifull birthing rooms











Hi everyone,











I am putting together a photo gallery to display some of the
most beautiful birthing rooms in contrast of the most uncomfortable hospital
delivery rooms, with some description of where they are from.The photo
gallery will be presented in Tampere Finland later
this spring. If you work in an environment, where the birthing rooms are really
mother friendly and comfortable, or if you know some places where I could
contact to get pictures, please contact me.Unfortunately I will not be
able to go and take photoes, since I am back here in Finland. It would be great to get
some pictures from many different countries.











Paivi Laukkanen





Childbirth Educator





Finland











[EMAIL PROTECTED]




















RE: [ozmidwifery] Peaceful birth

2005-12-06 Thread Vedrana Valčić









The photo is beautiful!

Congratulations!



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Andrea Quanchi
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005
1:42 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Peaceful birth







Congratulations to you all, Mum, Dad, Kids, midwives etc 





Andrea Q 





On 06/12/2005, at 11:05 PM, Justine Caines wrote: 









Dear All 







Heres the news and even a little pic! Thank you all so
much for your lovely wishes! 







JC 





xx 









http://au.geocities.com/homebirthau/twins.html













RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-03 Thread Vedrana Valčić









True. But you get false positives or false
negatives, correct? So there is a chance that you get prepared for a CF child,
and get a healthy one, or prepare for a healthy child and give birth to a sick
baby. But of course, theres a greater chance that a test is correct. 

Anyway, the test is out there, if the
country can afford it they might as well make it routine as long as women are not
pressured into taking it and are the last ones to make an informed decision.



Vedrana













From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Robyn Dempsey
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005
7:29 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] CF
screening







Who says that because testing is available, that you have to
terminate?





The testing allows choice.





My sister has made friends who have children with CF, they
knew they carried the gene and took the attitude  I know what to do with
CF kids, it doesn't bother me.





Once again, I read judgment.











Testing allows choice.the choice to terminate, or the
choice to prepare for a child with extra needs.











Robyn D










RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-02 Thread Vedrana Valčić








If it was me who triggered your responses 
I dont have a problem with anyone who choses to have an abortion for
whatever reason and I live my life trying not to judge anyone or anyones
choices. 



I was just trying to imagine how I would
feel if I was a sick child who read an article about how a test is available, which
wasnt there at the time I was born. Im sure Id be thinking
about how miserable my parents actually are because of me, since some would
take the test and have an abortion because of a child just like myself and
would wonder whether my mom would have had an abortion with me had she lived in
a time when a test was available. But this is just me and my thoughts.



On the other side, Im also aware that
caring for a sick child usually means giving your life as it was away, that it
requires a huge commitment as you said and that its not something anyone
would wish for, either for him/herself, or for a child.





Vedrana













From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Susan Cudlipp
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005
12:57 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] CF
screening







I agree - please don't make judgements in the case of
inherited disorders. I too carry a faulty gene (not CF)which has
affected all 3 of my children. While I love them all dearly and do not
regret their lives, I do know that I would NOT have chosen this path
willingly. I was not able to test for the first 2, did test for the 3rd,
but was informed (wrongly as it turns out) that females are not affected.





Knowing several families with CF and the battles they face
both in testing issues and in raising affected children I could not judge
anyone who did not feel that they wanted to continue with a pregnancy if the
child were to have a serious problem.











It is true that all lives are meaningful and that all
children should be valued, sadly society still has a very long way to go before
that ideal is commonplace practice. I have met with much ignorance and
discrimination regarding my kids, their lives are compromised, they will always
require care.











They have taught me much and have touched many lives, those
who take the time to know them value them deeply, however, not everyone
does. I have met many angels and many ogres!





Raising such children takes a huge commitment physically,
emotionally and financially,and you fight battles every day to make their
world a better place.











I have often cared for women who have chosen to terminate a
child with a genetic fault, as part of my job, and I pride myself on giving
them the best care I can, without judgement on their decision. I figure
they have had a hard enough time coming to that place without that. I
have also had the great joy of caring for women who have chosen to continue
regardless. With all of these I share some of my own experience so that
they will know that others have found themselves in similar circumstances.











There is no 'right' or 'wrong' answer in such
situations. People have to come to their own choice according to their
own circumstances, beliefs and consciences, then they have to find peace with
that choice, either way it is not easy.











Sue











The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men
to do nothing
Edmund Burke







- Original Message - 





From: Robyn
Dempsey 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, December
02, 2005 7:06 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery] CF
screening











My niece has cystic fibrosis. She has had over 10
hospitalizations in her 3 years of life. Her mum ( my sister) does the
physiotherapy for her every day and night. My niece has to take many
preparations as she doesn't absorb fats, which means vitamin deficiencies are
common.





My niece has a permanent pseudo infection in her lungs, this
flares up if she gets a cold, which results in a hospital stay. My sister
avoids gatherings ( family), if someone is sick. My sister has had so much time
off work because she needed to care for my niece, that she gave up work to look
after her.





My sister has decided not to have any more children, as she
feels 2 with CF would be too hard. ( being able to give to both the attention
they need). 





I'm sure she would opt for the testingdon't judge
unless you've been in the situation.











Robyn Dempsey









No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: 1/12/2005










RE: [ozmidwifery] Comments re Scotland's BF law

2005-11-24 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Hathor the Cowgoddess has a great comic on that one, I can look it up if you 
want.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoFromOz
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 12:24 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Comments re Scotland's BF law

I found a website where people can post comments about breastfeeding in 
public - ie., should it be allowed?!!!  If any one is interested, there 
are some pretty way out ideas, some even questioning that BF is 
natural... :( 

http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=1threadID=377start=0tstart=0edition=2ttl=20051124230930#paginator

Jo

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Comments re Scotland's BF law

2005-11-24 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Here it is:
http://www.thecowgoddess.com/archshow.asp?var=186

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 7:26 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Comments re Scotland's BF law

Hathor the Cowgoddess has a great comic on that one, I can look it up if you 
want.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoFromOz
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 12:24 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Comments re Scotland's BF law

I found a website where people can post comments about breastfeeding in 
public - ie., should it be allowed?!!!  If any one is interested, there 
are some pretty way out ideas, some even questioning that BF is 
natural... :( 

http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=1threadID=377start=0tstart=0edition=2ttl=20051124230930#paginator

Jo

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Breeched baby

2005-11-23 Thread Vedrana Valčić








My baby was breech and I believe it
happened for a number of reasons. First, my posture was pretty bad. Second, my
lifestyle was mainly sedentiary. Third, I had this lovely chair in which I
could lean back and relax, so I hardly spent any time leaning forward while
awake. Fourth, we were always taught to tuck put stomacks in and straighten our
backs, so my stomach was rarely relaxed and when it was, it was in the wrong
direction :). Only after giving birth did I come up to the great advice for
relaxing those muscles during birth and that was to imagine that youre
10 months pregnant. I often remember this advice when I have a period and it
really takes away the pain. And last, I was afraid  not of the birth,
but of the after birth  I didnt know if I was going to be able to
be a good mother and this was really important to me  to be a good
mother.



Anyway, I had an ECV (shining light to the
baby, talking to it and lifting my pelvis didnt do it) and it was the
less of two evils in my opinion  the only other alternative offered was
CS.



I heard later on about the moxa sticks. That
would be something Id try before ECV if I were in the same situation
again. Probably also hypnosis if it were available.



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Diane Gardner
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005
12:26 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Breeched baby







Hi Madelaine











In my experience I have found that the mothers of babies who
are breech usually have something going on in their lives or fear of something
in relation to birth. The babies have their heads close to the mum's heart for
comfort knowing that something is not right with her.











We have successfully turned many babies with hypnosis. A
study done in the USA
on 2 groups of 100 women where inthe 1st group where nothing was done 26%
of the babies turned while in the hypnosis group 84% turned. 











Babies know when you talk to them and also maybe the mum
needs some further reassurance that all is OK in her world. I have had them
commence to turn while in my office and certainly many where arms and legs are
going everyehere.











I personally do not agree with the hands on approach. Babies
are breech for a reason andI believe that ifthey don't turn by
thermselves then don't mess with nature.











regards





Diane Gardner







- Original Message - 





From: Madelaine
Akras 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Tuesday, November
22, 2005 9:54 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Breeched baby











Sonja, the lady who currently has a breech baby does have a OB or a referal to someone who will preform and
ECV. 











Madelaine







- Original Message - 





From: Sonja 
Barry 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Tuesday, November
22, 2005 9:13 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Breeched baby











do you live near an Ob who
will perform an ECV? '





Sonja




















RE: [ozmidwifery] question from Year 10 student

2005-11-09 Thread Vedrana Valčić
The fluid and equal pressure theory and the fetal circulatory system which is 
different to ours both sound logical to me. Other ideas occurred to me as well 
- if you look at the size of baby's head in comparison to the body, the 
proportion is so different than it is in an adult, all that extra blood which 
rushes to baby's head in theory is nowhere near extra blood which rushes to 
adult's head (in proportion). 
Also, even as an adult (who practises yoga for example :) ), you can do a 
headstand and stay in the position for a long time without problems.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrea Quanchi
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] question from Year 10 student

I have searched through Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Physiology 
(Blackburn  Loper) and cant find anything helpful
Andrea Q
On 08/11/2005, at 9:54 AM, wump fish wrote:

 This made me laugh. It is just the kind of question my son (year 9) 
 would come up with.

 I haven't even thought about it! I would go with the fluid and equal 
 pressure theory. Being upside down in water at an adult (try it) does 
 not result in the same pressure as being upside down outside water. 
 However, if we go with this theory - what happens when women rupture 
 their membranes. We know it has a variety of effects on labour and the 
 baby. But, does it also make it less comfortable for baby due to being 
 upside down? Just thinking aloud.

 I would love someone to find some evidence on this.

 Rachel


 From: Bowman Family [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] question from Year 10 student
 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:10:21 +1100

 I am involved in the CoreOf Life Program for Year 10 students.  It is 
 a fun and interactive program run over a double period and is about 
 the journey through pregnancy, labour birth and parenting.
 Last week when I was demonstrating positioning with doll  pelvis  
 one of the boys asked  how come the blood doesn't rush to the baby's 
 head like it does for us if we are upside down
 I didn't know the correct answer and said I would get back to him.
 It possibly is obvious but I have asked a few peers and no-one is 
 definite they have the correct answer.  I thought I would throw it 
 open to OzMidwifery for discussion.

 Linda

 _
 The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search! 
 http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Strep B screening

2005-11-04 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Here I go with links again :) :

http://www.mothering.com/articles/pregnancy_birth/birth_preparation/group-b.html

and some comments at:

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0838/is_123/ai_114242270

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:22 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Strep B screening

Here in Belgium is the same rule, with unknown status they start AB in labour. 
When labour goes to fast they will preventive give ab to the baby. Also with a 
positive test the mother has no choice and will have AB in labour. When the 
profylaxy is not compleet, the baby goes to neonatal ward and gets AB. 
A few weeks ago I had a discussion with a pediatrician. Mother laboured at home 
and wanted  to give birth in hospital. Last visit the gyn told her she was pos 
on GBS and she would have AB in labour. She discussed it with the GP who is 
also homeopath and he said she could refuse the AB. She asked me in early 
labour and I said yes, you can, but then your baby will be under attack :-)
I adviced her to call the pediatrician to ask for the protocols. I left them to 
decide what to do and went home. Within half an hour I had a very angry 
pediatrician on the line. She didn't want to discuss the thing but just to push 
her view on us. I told her that she could find the info I gave to the mother on 
their own website of obs and gyns. Her heaviest argument was that she studied 
in a university hospital (Leuven) and therefor she knew :-)

The mother gave birth at home

greetings 
Lieve

- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Mary Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag, november 4, 2005 10:17 AM
Aan: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Onderwerp: [ozmidwifery] Strep B screening

I have been told by a pregnant woman that she was reluctant to have a strep
B test at 35-37 weeks. She was informed by a doctor in the A/N clinic of our
public tertiary hospital, that if she went into labour with an unknown
status and attended the delivery suite , her baby would have to be given
IMI antibiotics until the baby's screening swabs came back 48hrs later.  She
felt that to protect the baby, she had to consent to A/N screening.  Those
who recognize the description of this hospital, is that true?  Or has this
lady been unintentionally misled?  Does this happen in any other hospitals?
Feel free to email me off line if you don't want to speak publicly.
Thanks, MM 




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] group b strep in breastmilk

2005-11-03 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Since GBS is not passed through breast milk, patients should be advised that 
breast-feeding can give the baby important antibodies and other factors to help 
protect the baby from infection. Additionally, routine hand washing is always 
advised in handling any newborn to reduce the number of germs.

http://oblink.com/display.asp?page=articles_pretermlabor_gbs_part1


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elizabeth and 
Mark Bryant
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:58 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] group b strep in breastmilk

Dear All, I am a long time reader first time writer... I am a student
midwife currently working in special care nursery. We have had an 34 week
boy with us for some time, quite unwell on and off despite antibiotic cover
and cultures negative so far. Mum is keen breastfeeder and has been doing
her utmost to get as much breastmilk into him as possible, however after
exploring lots of options we cultured her breastmilk and it came back
positive for group b strep. Just wondering if anyone had had any experience
with this, or knew what the chances of long term breastfeeding were like???
Liz

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Re:cervidil

2005-11-02 Thread Vedrana Valčić









You might want to check these three sites:

http://www.birthingnaturally.net/birthplan/intervention/cervidil.html

http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/midwivescytotec.asp

http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/midwivescytotec.asp



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Alesa Koziol
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005
1:18 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Re:cervidil







Lisa





We (Midwives) currently use prostin but there is a move
afoot for us to commence using cervidil. For lots of reasons, we are not keen
to go down this track and I am seeking info on what is currently in use around
oz so am fully armed in time for our next meeting.and I must thank
everyone who has answered this thread so far you have been most helpful. More
info always gratefully accepted:)





Cheers





Alesa













- Original Message - 





From: Lisa Barrett 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday,
November 02, 2005 7:51 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Re:cervidil











Midwives insert the cervidil there are no MO's.
Ashford is the biggest private hospital in South Australia. Induction rate is also
about 70% maybe more, for all the wrong reasons. 





What sort of results do you get with it? 





Lisa







- Original Message - 





From: Alesa
Koziol 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday,
November 02, 2005 6:47 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Re:cervidil











Thanks Lisa... do the midwives use it or is it inserted by
MO?? And which state are you in?





Cheers





Alesa







- Original Message - 





From: Lisa Barrett 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday,
November 02, 2005 4:58 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Re:cervidil











They use Cervidil at Ashford, It has quite an aggressive
action provided it's inserted correctly. It's not easy to put in however
being extremely awkward. It's almost impossible to place it in the
posterior fornix.





One Ob described it to a
patient as a tampon. I found this very amusing as it's Barbie sized!





Lisa







- Original Message - 





From: Larissa
Inns 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday,
November 02, 2005 3:58 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery]
Re:cervidil











I only know of a couple of private OB's
who use it at one of our local private hospitals. Most choose not to use it
because of the cost.





Hugs,Larissa.







My next question for the list is to ask of any sites where
Midwives are using cervidil. 





Cheers





Alesa


























[ozmidwifery] aspiration syndrome and poor technique

2005-10-18 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Andrea, 

in your diary (http://birthinternational.com.au/diary/archives/2005_10.html)
you wrote:



It is the anaesthetists who impose the restrictions
about eating and drinking in labour, even though there is no evidence to
support their rules. The research clearly states that limiting access to food
and fluids increases the likelihood of caesarean birth, and that the few
anaesthetic accidents that have occurred (aspiration syndrome) during prepping
for caesarean surgery, are due to poor technique. These few emergencies, the
result of incompetent practise, have resulted in millions of women worldwide
being denied nutrition in labour, to their detriment.



Where can I find more on this?





Vedrana












RE: [ozmidwifery] Lotus Birth

2005-10-18 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Just being curious, does anyone know what other mammals do? I suppose they cut 
the cord with their teeth, but I don't know when.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tania Smallwood
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 1:34 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Lotus Birth

Here here Belinda!  This notion that anyone has the right to allow or
disallow women to do or not do anything when it comes to their birth, is
just not cricket!

Before we start debating the semantics of lotus birth, we need to all be
going in to bat for women and their right to birth the way they need and
want to.  If this means wearing a polka dotted clown suit, or singing Dixie
at the top of her voice, (or God forbid, not cutting the cord), and that's
what she truly needs to be able to birth in her own way, then we need to
respect that!  

Now that's enough from me for tonight...

Tania
Xx

PS  I have a copy of Shivam Rachana's Lotus Birth book, very interesting,
lots of gorgeous photos, and certainly made me think twice before cutting
the cord of my babies, we ended up leaving it for a few hours and then it
just seemed right for us to cut, but I can see how and why for some families
it just seems right to leave it.  A bit like birth, if all's well, leave
well alone...



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Study: Pacifiers Reduce SIDS

2005-10-18 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Read what Hathor the Cowgoddess has to say
about it: http://www.thecowgoddess.com/archshow.asp?var=181
and http://www.thecowgoddess.com/archshow.asp?var=180




Vedrana (still laughing)











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kelly @ BellyBelly
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005
2:36 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Study:
Pacifiers Reduce SIDS





Eeek!! Another article we wish hadnt been published,
it also condemns co-sleeping published on the ninemsn news site



Pacifiers reduce
SIDS: study 

Thursday Oct 13 09:06 AEST 

Infants should be put to sleep on their backs only, not their sides, and
pacifiers can be used to help prevent sudden infant death syndrome, US
pediatricians said. 

Revised guidelines from the American
 Academy of Pediatrics
issued on Monday also discourage parents from sleeping with their infants at
all, saying babies are safer in their own cribs. 

SIDS, the sudden, unexplained death of an infant in the first year of life, is
the third leading cause of infant mortality in the United States, causing the deaths
of 2,500 infants each year. 

Campaigns to encourage parents and other caregivers to put babies to sleep on
their backs instead of their tummies slashed the death rates from SIDS, also
known as crib death or cot death, in countries such as Britain and the United States in the 1980s and
1990s. 

Studies have found that the side sleep position is unstable and increases
the chances of the infant rolling onto his or her stomach. Every caregiver
should use the back sleep position during every sleep period, the academy
said in a statement. 

Infants may be brought into bed for nursing or comforting, but should be
returned to their own crib or bassinet when the parent is ready to return to
sleep. However, there is growing evidence that room sharing (infant sleeping in
a crib in parent's bedroom) is associated with a reduced risk of SIDS. 

About the often controversial use of pacifiers, also known as dummies, the
pediatricians' group said: Research now indicates an association between
pacifier use and a reduced risk of SIDS, which is why the revised statement
recommends the use of pacifiers at nap time and bedtime throughout the first
year of life, the statement said. 

No one is entirely sure what causes SIDS. 

But lying prone, or face-down, sleeping on a soft surface, smoking during
pregnancy, overheating, late or no prenatal care, having a young mother, being
born pre-term or at a low weight all greatly raise a baby's risk. 

So the Academy recommends that babies be laid to sleep on their backs, without
a pillow, quilt, stuffed toys or other items that could interfere with
breathing. Mothers should not smoke while pregnant or afterward, rooms should
not be too hot or stuffy and if a baby likes a pacifier, let him or her have
it.



Best
Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth  Baby
Australian Little Tikes Specialists 










RE: [ozmidwifery] Infant Sleep

2005-10-17 Thread Vedrana Valčić
My advice - think hard about what is happening in his life, listen hard to what 
YOU feel is right and remember that things change with time. This will pass. 
Waking up often won't hurt him.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly @ 
BellyBelly
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 6:24 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Infant Sleep

Jo,

I hear you!!! My first born was a very wakeful sleeper and my second has
been waking often from four months - every time he is teething (i.e. now!)
he gets worse. I know lots of mums that have wakeful babies at four months
of age - so please don't feel alone!

You've really got to follow what works for you and ignore all the
conflicting advice - adopt only the bits which work for you, because as you
will know, what works for one won't necessarily work for the other. A friend
of mine desperately wanted to co-sleep with her baby but to this day at
nearly four years of age, she still wants to sleep on her own, in her
bedroom, with the light off and door shut! Much to mums dismay!

Pinky will no doubt have some great advice for you but I can recommend her
book, 100 Ways to Calm the Crying and also a fantastic book recommended to
me by my birth teacher, Rhea Dempsey, The Wonder Weeks by Frans X. Plooij
 Hetty Vanderijt - two paeds. Here is the book blurb: 

In The Wonder Weeks, you'll discover the specific dates during their first
14 months when all babies take eight major developmental leaps. And you'll
learn how to help your baby through the eight great fussy phases that mark
these leaps within a week or two. Wonder week by wonder week, you'll see how
your baby's mind is developing. Now you will know which games and toys are
best for your baby during each key week and how to encourage each leap
forward. Calendars, charts, and checklists help you track your baby's
progress - and finally make sense of his fussy behavior. This is a baby book
like no other. It will be your indispensable guide to the crucial wonder
weeks of your baby's first year.

Remember... this too will pass... :)

Best Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth  Baby
Australian Little Tikes Specialists 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoFromOz
Sent: Monday, 17 October 2005 1:57 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Infant Sleep

Hi All...

Just wondering if any of you have any thoughts on this Q/A: 
http://www.awareparenting.com/answer13.htm

The question seems to relate strongly to our situation at the moment.  
Will is waking VERY often over night.  He only seems to need feeding 
twice, as the other times he just semi-wakes and cries, and needs 
rewrapping, and dummy back in.  I counted 18 awakenings the other night, 
and I think the number came close last night.  This happens whether 
co-sleeping or puting him in his cot in our room.  He seems to go to 
sleep quite easily, but doesn't stay asleep. 

The answer suggests not giving the dummy for sleep, but letting baby 
cry-it-out, only in your arms.  It says that babies need this crying 
time to release stress of the day and once it's gone, they will sleep 
well (until they're hungry, of course).  If they don't get this crying 
time, because the parents use rocking, dummy, wrapping, whatever to calm 
them, then they need to wake often to cry, and try to release the stress. 

It's all so confusing!  I hate the idea of letting him cry, whether I'm 
holding him or not, especially when it's so easily fixed! 

Thanks for listening!

Jo (Mum to Will, 4.5 months old)

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Convenience

2005-10-12 Thread Vedrana Valčić









I guess the attachment is missing?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of FIONA AND CRAIG
RUMBLE
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005
11:24 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Convenience







Have I missed something/???





Regards 
Fiona Rumble







- Original Message - 





From: Janet
Fraser 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Wednesday, October
12, 2005 7:17 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Convenience











Oh yeah! Can we
take out full colour pages in all the major dailies with this on it? I'd like
to add a PS Bottlefeeding IS NOT more convenient than breastfeeding and has
dire consequences when it goes wrong!





J












RE: [ozmidwifery] Convenience

2005-10-12 Thread Vedrana Valčić









I kind of think that thats because
they dont have enough information, that their attitude was formed by
what the society thinks about birth and bf in general and that it is influenced
by many myths we hear while were pregnant or with a small baby.











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005
1:57 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Convenience







I often think
that, Maxine. When I meet mamas who don't want to give birth and don't want to
bf, I kinda wonder why they want children...? I didn't realise birth was
optional, yk? Apparently the old elective c-sec under a general is pretty
popular in some quarters.





J







- Original Message - 





From: Maxine Wilson






To: ozmid 





Sent: Wednesday, October
12, 2005 9:32 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery]
Convenience











I have a friend who is a breastfeeding
counsellor and I always remember her exasperation when after some frustrating
interaction with someone who wanted a convenient baby she said .. I don't
know why they just didn't get a puppy!





Maxine












RE: [ozmidwifery] Induction and third stage labour

2005-10-06 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Neither primative man nor any other contemporary mammal :).

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Chapman
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:45 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Induction and third stage labour

I think I would be tempted to say that mild jaundice is normal.
I can't see primative man cutting the cord so quickly as we do
and somehow he managed to survive and even proliferate. Where I
work we do a lot of physiological third stages, late cord
clamping and early breastfeeding and many babies have a bit of
jaundice colour but it is not pathological. We do very few SBR
blood tests. Probably helps that we don't have onsite pathology,
it has to go to the tertiary hospital so it makes one think if
one really needs to. Haven't had to use the phototherapy for
ages. 
Cheers
Judy
 
--- Nicole Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There are some who believe the higher levels of antioxidants
 caused by
 jaundice may be protective of babies, and mild jaundice 'may'
 be normal.
 Nicole.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of lisa
 chalmers
 Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:48 AM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Induction and third stage labour
 
 
 My experience of this, is that if the cords are not cut until
 they have
 finished pulsing, babies seem to develop jaundice for
 longer..(that the
 usual standards) . That makes complete sense to me, since they
 get more
 blood than babes that had cords clamped and cut quickley.
 I'm sure I read somewhere that babies are deprived of as much
 as 25% of
 their blood volume by cutting the cord.
 Nearly everyone I know that did not cut the cord, had babies
 that developed
 Jaundice. Nothing serious just yellowing.
 - Original Message -
 From: Andrea Quanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:33 AM
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Induction and third stage labour
 
 
  There are many reasons that influence whether a baby gets
 jaundiced or not
   Two of these are
  1. prematurity ( of the liver as well as dates, some babies
 livers take
  ages to be efficient enough to clear the jaundice.
 
  2. Not passing mec soon after birth. The longer the mec
 stays inside the
  more bilirubin is reabsorbed increasing the workload of the
 immature
  system.  This is usually influenced by how quickly the baby
 is able to
  feed.
 
  The thing about synt is that it is often used to augment
 labour in a woman
  who has been labouring for hours or to induce labour in a
 woman who is not
  yet ready to go into labour and the result is a tired mother
 and baby who
  often dont come together well to feed without good
 assistance. This is
  often not forthcoming in the hurry to get things cleaned up,
 the  move to
  the postnatal ward and paper work to be done.  Ask your
 friend and she
  will probably not have seen jaundice in a woman who has had
 synt but had a
  quick labour.  Most women who birth in hospitals have synt
 in some form or
  other for 3rd stage and the level of jaundice in some
 settings is very
  low.  I would suggest it may be in direct relationship to
 the length of
  time until feeding is established.
 
  I think the whole reason synt is being used is the concern
 rather than
  blaming the synt for jaundice alone.
 
  Andrea Q
  On 06/10/2005, at 2:03 AM, Belinda wrote:
 
  I have a friend who has been a ipm for many years and she
 believes that
  babies are more likely to get jaundiced when the mother has
 had synto, it
  makes sense of they get that extra unneccessary boost of
 blood.
  Belinda
 
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or
 unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or
 unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.10/119 - Release
 Date: 4/10/2005
 
 
 
 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or
 unsubscribe.
 
 
 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or
 unsubscribe.
 




 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Messenger 7.0: Free worldwide PC to PC calls 
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: Re: [ozmidwifery] Northern Rivers

2005-09-29 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Janet,
After reading your story I feel so many things...
To send you some more love across a couple of oceans is all I can think of 
right now... 

Vedrana


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:28 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: Re: [ozmidwifery] Northern Rivers

Hi Nicole,
I wrote an enormous letter including my birth story to the hospital where my
birthrape was perpetrated. It made no difference. I still have women from
that hospital joining the birth trauma group I run on a regular basis. I
don't understand why we consumers have to point out the violence in the
system to those who work in it. If a woman says no and is disregarded, she
will be traumatised. If a woman is separated from her baby and mocked by
staff, she will be traumatised. If a woman screams Get out! in the middle
of a VE because she has never experienced anything more excruciating in her
life, it is clear to the meanest intelligence that there is a problem. To me
this is like asking me to explain to my rapist that rape is bad. We know
rape is bad, we shouldn't need to be told not to do it.
The woman in those examples was me. You can read the story and complaint
letter here http://www.joyousbirth.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14
J
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?

2005-09-22 Thread Vedrana Valčić
I remember I was reading somewhere about how 40 weeks is not the mean duration 
of pregnancy, it is more, and it is different for first and subsequent 
pregnancies. I can't seem to find that article anywhere. This might be of 
interest to her, if I could just find it somewhere... It was pretty old, I 
think from the sixties last centry.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly @ 
BellyBelly
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 3:58 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?

Thank-you so much for this, have forwarded it to her... She's still going at
40w3d with no signs of anything happening as yet, appointment with the high
risk Ob tomorrow where I know there will be talk of induction / caesar...
Can you please tell me more about this balloon induction - not heard of it
before? Want to be armed with info for what's to come with the challenge
tomorrow... 

Best Regards,
 
Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth  Baby
Australian Little Tikes Specialists

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy
McCarthy-Bushby
Sent: Tuesday, 20 September 2005 5:49 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?


Hi Kelly,
The website www.birthrites.org has a page on natural induction including
information on EPO doses either orally or vaginally, nipple stimulation,
accupressure (4 fingers above the inner aspect of the ankle bone). EPO, is
great for women planning a vbac for ripening the cervix, but if she doesn't
get into labour naturally, EPO can make the cervix ripe for ARM and the
balloon induction has been safely used for vbac women with an unripe cervix.
kathy
- Original Message -
From: Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 12:05 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?


Hello everyone,

I know it's probably a bit late to try this, but I have a mum who's hoping
for a VBAC, EDD today but in order to beat a caesar (they wont induce her of
course) we're thinking of giving EPO a go to help with ripening her cervix.
I have read somewhere that 500mg tid is often used - can anyone confirm or
recommend dosage they have used? She'll ask a herbalist none the less, but
often I find they aren't well versed on specifics for preg  baby like this.
Also her BP is creeping up a little, she had pre-eclampsia with the first
but obviously done well with this pregnancy - will this still be okay with
EPO or is there something else I could recommend? I think she's actually
quite frightened having had a previous caesar hence the blood pressure
(she's had a great BP otherwise) so I am going to meet with her tomorrow to
hopefully relax her about a vaginal birth. She's told me in fewer words
she's frightened but I think she's keeping it in - will have a big chat
tomorrow.

Best Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth  Baby Australian Little
Tikes Specialists

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/101 - Release Date: 13/09/2005


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 16/09/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release Date: 20/09/2005
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?

2005-09-22 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Found it:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrievedb=PubMedlist_uids=2342739dopt=Citation

Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun;75(6):929-32. Related Articles, Links  

Comment in: 
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Oct;76(4):732-4.

The length of uncomplicated human gestation.

Mittendorf R, Williams MA, Berkey CS, Cotter PF.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 
Massachusetts.

By retrospective exclusion of gestations with known obstetric complications, 
maternal diseases, or unreliable menstrual histories, we found that 
uncomplicated, spontaneous-labor pregnancy in private-care white mothers is 
longer than Naegele's rule predicts. For primiparas, the median duration of 
gestation from assumed ovulation to delivery was 274 days, significantly longer 
than the predicted 266 days (P = .0003). For multiparas, the median duration of 
pregnancy was 269 days, also significantly longer than the prediction (P = 
.019). Moreover, the median length of pregnancy in primiparas proved to be 
significantly longer than that for multiparas (P = .0032). Thus, this study 
suggests that when estimating a due date for private-care white patients, one 
should count back 3 months from the first day of the last menses, then add 15 
days for primiparas or 10 days for multiparas, instead of using the common 
algorithm for Naegele's rule.

MeSH Terms: 
Female 
Humans 
Parity 
Pregnancy* 
Private Practice 
Retrospective Studies 
Time Factors 

PMID: 2342739 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:55 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?

I remember I was reading somewhere about how 40 weeks is not the mean duration 
of pregnancy, it is more, and it is different for first and subsequent 
pregnancies. I can't seem to find that article anywhere. This might be of 
interest to her, if I could just find it somewhere... It was pretty old, I 
think from the sixties last centry.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly @ 
BellyBelly
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 3:58 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?

Thank-you so much for this, have forwarded it to her... She's still going at
40w3d with no signs of anything happening as yet, appointment with the high
risk Ob tomorrow where I know there will be talk of induction / caesar...
Can you please tell me more about this balloon induction - not heard of it
before? Want to be armed with info for what's to come with the challenge
tomorrow... 

Best Regards,
 
Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth  Baby
Australian Little Tikes Specialists

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy
McCarthy-Bushby
Sent: Tuesday, 20 September 2005 5:49 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?


Hi Kelly,
The website www.birthrites.org has a page on natural induction including
information on EPO doses either orally or vaginally, nipple stimulation,
accupressure (4 fingers above the inner aspect of the ankle bone). EPO, is
great for women planning a vbac for ripening the cervix, but if she doesn't
get into labour naturally, EPO can make the cervix ripe for ARM and the
balloon induction has been safely used for vbac women with an unripe cervix.
kathy
- Original Message -
From: Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 12:05 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Oral EPO dose for cervix?


Hello everyone,

I know it's probably a bit late to try this, but I have a mum who's hoping
for a VBAC, EDD today but in order to beat a caesar (they wont induce her of
course) we're thinking of giving EPO a go to help with ripening her cervix.
I have read somewhere that 500mg tid is often used - can anyone confirm or
recommend dosage they have used? She'll ask a herbalist none the less, but
often I find they aren't well versed on specifics for preg  baby like this.
Also her BP is creeping up a little, she had pre-eclampsia with the first
but obviously done well with this pregnancy - will this still be okay with
EPO or is there something else I could recommend? I think she's actually
quite frightened having had a previous caesar hence the blood pressure
(she's had a great BP otherwise) so I am going to meet with her tomorrow to
hopefully relax her about a vaginal birth. She's told me in fewer words
she's frightened but I think she's keeping it in - will have a big chat
tomorrow.

Best Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth  Baby Australian Little
Tikes Specialists

RE: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!

2005-09-21 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Kind of like mother friendly childbirth
initiative (http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/steps/),
except mother becomes woman to include a midwife.
Sounds nice.



-Original Message-

From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Jennifairy

Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005
5:25 AM

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au

Subject: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led
units - warning, a bit of a rave!



ok, bear with me while I think out loud
in your general direction

well we have the 'baby friendly
hospital initiative', so how about the 'woman friendly birth centre'? I mean,
better still, 'the community' (representatives of) should really be heavily
involved in this kind of primary care health structure (physical as well as
intellectual), then it could be 'community-led birth centre'. I think
(right now this minute, subject to change without notice) that as long as we
are identifying the structure (ie the physical space, not the governing body)
with the politics of care provision (ie, who is the 'primary carer') then we
are going to have confusion. I had a bit of a look at what constitutes
'midwifery-led care'  'continuity of carer' etc, for an assignment at uni,
 these terms encompass a whole range of different models of care - its not
as clear cut as it seems!

The definitions would seem to be
consistent, but how it works out in practice 'on the coalface' (now theres a
term that seriously needs an overhaul!) varies enormously.

As I said, Im guessing that what
we'd mostly like to see is the idea of a 'woman-led' birthing culture actually
happening  that requires a shift in perception not only for Mr 
Mrs Joe Average (boy, Im just piling up the dodgy metaphors arent I?) but for
the PTB's within the 'health culture' . because that means moving away from
the whole 'doctor as God' thing that goes with relinquishing responsibility =
litigation etc, to actually believing that 'ordinary people' can take
responsibility for thier health/care... as long as the 'ordinary people' wont
or cant do that, there will be others who do,  where there is
responsibility there is power,  where there is power there are  invariably
individuals who are drawn to it.

Starhawk in her book Truth or Dare
identifies 3 kinds of power in society - power-over ( backed by force or some
other kind of control, deeply embedded in heirarchical structures, enables one
individual to make decisions that affect others..); power-within ('empowerment',
a sense of personal control  'mindfullness'..);  power-with
(influence, the power not to command, but to suggest  be listened to or
not, to work with others for a common goal..)

 Im bringing this up because
what I see is a clash of cultures, where midwives are 'traditionally' allied
with women  their self-identified needs (power-with) rather than that of
the institution which is all about heirarchy  control (power-over) because
it was spawned from a militaristic culture

So really we are talking different
languages - the language of 'power-over' is  very different to that of
'power-with'  to come back circuitously to my point (its there
somewhere!), the terms that keep being used ('midwifery-led care',
'medical-based model', even 'free-standing birthing unit') come from the
language of 'power-over' because they all identify who is 'in control', who
is in the 'power-over' position...

um, Ive just looked at the time
 Ive gotta run, thanx for bearing with me while I ramble incontinently, 
I will leave you with one of my favorite definitions - madness is when you
froth at the mouth; insanity is when you froth at the brain (sorry, has
absolutely no bearing on this conversation, completely irrelevant, but for some
reason I remembered it now - Im just a sharing kinda gal) jennifairy





  As I watched the 7.30 Report
last night, that dreadful   term midwifery led  unit kept
springing up. I have a   real problem with this term, as you can  read on
My Diary:

 

  http://www.birthinternational.com/diary/index.html

 

  Can't we do better than this?

 

  Thinking caps on please!

 

  Andrea

 

  -

  Andrea Robertson

  Birth International * ACE
Graphics * Associates in   Childbirth Education     e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  web: www.birthinternational.com

--

This mailing list is sponsored by
ACE Graphics.

Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to
subscribe or unsubscribe.












RE: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery led units

2005-09-20 Thread Vedrana Valčić









Nick, I've had 30 years of experience and the disaster can come
out of the clear blue sky in a patient who's been assessed as low risk and they
happen in a heartbeat. They happen so rapidly that they are stunning.



This is what we hear in Croatia as well. To my knowledge,
this is true when there was a previous intervention, which interfered with the
natural process. What is your opinion? What can one say to this?





-Original Message-
From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Honey Acharya
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:33 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery led units



Here's the transcript if anyone missed it

http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2005/s1463815.htm



Cheers

Honey

- Original Message - 

From: Andrea Robertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au

Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 7:48 AM

Subject: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery led units





 As I watched the 7.30 Report last night, that dreadful
term midwifery led

 unit kept springing up. I have a real problem
with this term, as you can

 read on My Diary:



 http://www.birthinternational.com/diary/index.html



 Can't we do better than this?



 Thinking caps on please!



 Andrea



 -

 Andrea Robertson

 Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in
Childbirth Education



 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 web: www.birthinternational.com





 --

 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.

 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to
subscribe or unsubscribe.





--

This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.

Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or
unsubscribe.








RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: Research mailing from the Baby Friendly Initiative

2005-09-19 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Title: Research update from the UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative









Is the loophole in British
legislation or where? Because the International Code (http://www.who.int/nut/documents/code_english.PDF)
clearly defines its scope:

 

The Code applies to
the marketing, and practices related thereto, of the

following products:
breast-milk substitutes, including infant formula; other milk

products, foods and
beverages, including bottlefed complementary foods, when

marketed or
otherwise represented to be suitable, with or without modification, for

use as a partial or
total replacement of breast milk; feeding bottles and teasts. It also

applies to their
quality and availability, and to information concerning their use..







Breast-milk
substitute means any food being marketed or otherwise

presented as a
partial or total replacement

for breast milk,
whether or not suitable for

that purpose.



Complementary
food means any food whether manufactured or locally

prepared, suitable
as a complement to

breast milk or to
infant formula, when

either become
insufficient to satisfy the

nutritional
requirements of the infant.

Such food is also
commonly called

weaning
food or breast-milk

supplement.



 



Infant
formula means a breast-milk substitute formulated

industrially in
accordance with applicable

Codex Alimentarius
standards, to satisfy

the normal
nutritional requirements of

infants up to
between four and six months

of age, and adapted
to their physiological

characteristics.
Infant formula may also

be prepared at
home, in which case it is

described as
home-prepared.













From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Denise Hynd
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005
11:29 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Fw:
Research mailing from the Baby Friendly Initiative




















- Original Message - 



From: Baby
Friendly News 





To: Denise
Hynd 





Sent: Monday, September
19, 2005 8:59 AM





Subject: Research mailing
from the Baby Friendly Initiative












 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  19
  September 2005
  
  Legal loophole allows banned formula
  advertising to mothers and babies
  
  Pregnant women and new mothers are being pressured to bottle feed their
  babies by advertising which was thought to have been outlawed ten years ago.
  
  A MORI survey
  of 1,000 new mothers and pregnant women published today by the United Nations
  Children's Fund (UNICEF UK)
  and the National Childbirth Trust (NCT) suggests that manufacturers are
  exploiting loopholes in a law banning the promotion of infant formula for
  babies. 
  
  Two thirds (60%) of those surveyed said they had seen or heard advertising
  for infant formula in the past year. Advertising of infant formula has been
  banned in the UK
  since 1995 in recognition of the importance of breastfeeding.
  
  The letter of the law banning adverts for infant formula - milk powder for
  babies which can be used from birth - has been broadly observed by
  manufacturers, say UNICEF and the NCT, but adverts for other products such as
  follow-on formula for older babies appear to be causing confusion. 
  
  When the advertising ban was introduced, it didn't cover follow-on
  formula, said Andrew Radford, Director of UNICEF UK's Baby
  Friendly Initiative. The manufacturers have since changed the way they
  package and promote their follow-on formulas so that they're almost identical
  to the regular infant formula. This means that a supposedly legal TV or
  magazine advert for a follow-on formula will also promote a company's infant
  formula.
  
  More than a third of women who had seen formula advertising said that the
  message conveyed was that infant formula is 'as good as' or 'better than'
  breastmilk. This is despite the overwhelming evidence that bottle-feeding
  carries significant health risks. The UK's Health Departments recommend
  that babies have nothing other than breastmilk for their first six months of
  life. 
  
  In England, the Government has committed to seeking stricter controls on
  advertising in its delivery plans for the 'Choosing Health' white paper [see report]. 
  
  UNICEF UK and the NCT are
  now calling for the European Commission to allow the UK to protect
  mothers and babies from all promotion of formula milks. Along with other
  members of the Baby Feeding Law Group, they are urging the EC to give all EU
  governments the flexibility to extend the advertising ban so the law does
  what it was originally intended to do. 
  
  The survey also reveals that many mothers are unclear about the distinction
  between the different types of formula milk. Of the mothers who had used
  follow-on milk, nearly one in five said they started before their baby was
  three months old, despite the product's higher mineral content, which is
  unsuitable before six months.
  
  Although some mothers may be referring to 

RE: [ozmidwifery] baby poo

2005-09-15 Thread Vedrana Valčić









http://www.kellymom.com/newman/04enough_milk.html



Handout
#4. Is My Baby Getting Enough Milk? Revised
January 2005
Written by Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC.  2005

Breastfeeding mothers frequently ask how to know
their babies are getting enough milk. The breast is not the bottle, and it is
not possible to hold the breast up to the light to see how many ounces or
millilitres of milk the baby drank. Our number obsessed society makes it
difficult for some mothers to accept not seeing exactly how much milk the baby
receives. However, there are ways of knowing that the baby is getting enough.
In the long run, weight gain is the best indication whether the baby is getting
enough, but rules about weight gain appropriate for bottle fed babies may not be appropriate
for breastfed babies.

Ways
of Knowing

1. Baby's nursing is
characteristic. A baby who is obtaining good amounts of
milk at the breast sucks in a very characteristic way. When a baby is getting
milk (he is not
getting milk just because he has the breast in his mouth and is making sucking
movements), you will see a pause at the point of his chin after he opens to the
maximum and before he closes his mouth, so that one suck is (open mouth
wide--pause--close
mouth). If you wish to demonstrate this to yourself, put your index or other
finger in your mouth and suck as if you were sucking on a straw. As you draw
in, your chin drops and stays down as long as you are drawing in. When you stop
drawing in, your chin comes back up. This same pause that is visible at the
baby's chin represents a mouthful of milk when the baby does it at the breast.
The longer
the pause, the more
the baby got. Once you know about the pause you can cut through so much of the
nonsense breastfeeding mothers are being toldlike feed the baby twenty minutes on
each side. A baby who does this type of sucking (with the pauses) for twenty
minutes straight might not even take the second side. A baby who nibbles
(doesn't drink) for 20 hours will come off the breast hungry.
The website www.thebirthden.com/Newman.html
has videos that show this pause in the babys chin.

2. Baby's bowel movements. For the
first few days after delivery, the baby passes meconium, a dark green, almost
black, substance. Meconium accumulates in the baby's gut during pregnancy. It
is passed during the first few days, and by the third day, the bowel movements
start becoming lighter, as more breastmilk is taken. Usually by the fifth day,
the bowel movements have taken on the appearance of the normal breastmilk
stool. The normal breastmilk stool is pasty to watery, mustard coloured, and
usually has little odour. However, bowel movements may vary considerably from
this description. They may be green or orange, may contain curds or mucus, or
may resemble shaving cream in consistency (from air bubbles). The variations in
colour do not mean something is wrong. A baby who is breastfeeding only, and is
starting to have bowel movements that are becoming lighter by day 3 of life, is
doing well.

Without becoming obsessive about it, monitoring
the frequency and quantity of bowel motions is one of the best ways, next to
observing the babys drinking, (see above, and videos at www.thebirthden.com/Newman.html)
of knowing if the baby is getting enough milk. After the first three to four
days, the baby should have increasing bowel movements so that by the end of the
first week he should be passing at least two to three substantial yellow stools each
day. In addition, many infants have a stained diaper with almost each feeding. A baby who is still passing meconium
on the fourth or fifth day of life, should be seen
at the clinic the same day. A baby who is passing only brown bowel movements is
probably not getting enough, but this is not very reliable. 

Some breastfed babies, after the first three to
four weeks of life, may suddenly change their stool pattern from many each day,
to one every three days or even less. Some babies have gone as long as 15 days or more
without a bowel movement. As long as the baby is otherwise well, and the stool
is the usual pasty or soft, yellow movement, this is not constipation and is of
no concern. No treatment is necessary or desirable,
because no treatment is necessary or desirable for something that is normal.

Any baby between five and 21 days of age who
does not pass at least one substantial bowel movement within a 24 hour period
should be seen at the breastfeeding clinic the same day. Generally, small,
infrequent bowel movements during this time period mean insufficient intake.
There are definitely some exceptions and everything may be fine, but it is
better to check.

3. Urination. With six soaking wet
(not just wet) diapers in a 24 hours hour period, after about 4-5 days of life,
you can be reasonably sure that the baby is getting a lot of milk (if he is
breastfeeding only).
Unfortunately, the new super dry disposable diapers often do indeed
feel dry even when full of urine, but when soaked 

RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: ] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.

2005-09-15 Thread Vedrana Valčić









Wow, thank you!



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of G Lemay
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005
1:22 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Re: ]
Friend with breach baby...told CS only options. 







There
ARE some important things with breech. This is where your anatomy and
physiology of the newborn is very important. Understanding the
circulatory system of the baby, the way the bones in the head fold over each
other and the concept of creating an airway are some important
considerations. The main rule is HANDS OFF, however, that is
not all there is to it. With breech births it's important to have a period of
45 mins from the time the woman feels like pushing till when she actively
pushes, in order to prevent the head being caught on an undilated cervix.
Once the baby is born to the umbilicus, you have 7 mins to complete the
birth. You want to avoid rushed handling but you also don't want to sit
there like a lump. The baby can be provoked to draw breath or shoot
his/her arms above the head by meddlesome handling. The body hanging (and
I especially like the all 4's position for this) is Nature's way of bringing
the back hairline to the introitus of the vulva. Sometimes, even without
stim. the arms will be up and it's important to turn the babe's hips using a
cloth and not touching the delicate organs in the belly (you can rupture organs
with your pointy little fingers when the baby's abdomen is engorged and your
adrenal is
running) so that the shoulders are antero-post diameter in the pelvis, then
reaching in and gently sweeping them down. sometimes this requires a
second demi rotation for the second arm. Once the babe's hairline is
visible, then, it's important NOT to let the crown of the head POP.
Popping can result in a fatal tear to the cerebral tentorum---a drumlike
membrane over the brain. So, at this point, you reach a finger in, get
the baby's lower jaw and gently pull the mouth and nose into sight.
Once there, the mother is told Stop all pushing. Then she can
stay like this for a very long time and all is well. You want her to
easy, easy, easy get the top of the head born so there is no pop
and you know you have an airway to that baby.

One of the guidelines that Michel Odent stresses is to watch the first stage to
tell you how the second stage will go with a breech. If you have a
smooth, progressive first stage, the second stage will follow that way.
If you're having a breech birth where the progress gets hung up or stuck and
the butt doesn't come down to the vulva on its own, you want to consider
cesarean as a safer option.
Gloria

 Vedrana Valèiæ wrote:

 Thank you, Gloria. In this article, it is said again that nothing
must  be done except flexing the head at the end and putting the
woman in  hands and knees position (or any position she feels right,
I  suppose?). Is there more to it than I'm getting. Because if
there  isn't, it sounds really simple to me. Do not interfere, just
like in  other kinds of births.



 Vedrana


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au
to subscribe or unsubscribe.








[ozmidwifery] RE: Problems with Ozmid List or not??

2005-09-13 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Well :), I forwarded all messages from the list from past 3 days to you when 
you said you weren't getting anything. There were 31 of them. I think you're 
not getting any messages from the list, I don't know why. The messages you are 
sending to the list are coming through.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: Denise Hynd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:36 PM
To: Vedrana Valčić
Cc: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Problems with Ozmid List or not??

Nothing for several days and suddenly 31 from you Vedrana Valčić 
[EMAIL PROTECTED])

and nothing from the list not even my question


What is happening ??



Denise Hynd

Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for the 
sake of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by 
anyone, our bodies will be handled.

- Linda Hes

- Original Message - 
From: Vedrana Valčić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:56 PM
Subject: FW: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s...




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lisa Barrett
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:53 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s...

Hi Tania

I too have been checking out the facts on inductions after listening to the
same Obstetrician.  The Nice guidelines say that the mortality rate
is 1 in 3000 at 37 weeks 3 in 3000 at 41 weeks and 6 in 3000 at 43 weeks.
at 40wks 58% of women have delivered
at 41wks 74% of women have delivered
at 42wks 82% of women have delivered.

Due to all of the above the conclusion they make is induction prior to 41
wks increases work load without significantly lowering perinatal mortality.
The whole document can be read on www.nice.org.uk

Also there are some interesting figures on the birthlove site below. These
figures do show the risk for primip section is doubled with induction but
the over all section rate doesn't seem to be altered.  Unless I've
misinterpreted it.
http://www.birthlove.com/free/induction.html#first

Lisa Barrett



- Original Message - 
From: Tania Smallwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 8:52 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s...


 Hi Belinda,

 Is this stat published anywhere, or just anecdotal?  A 60% section rate is
 twice the rate for the state, and I think twice the average for that
 hospital too, and having just heard a leading obstetrician there tell
 women
 that there is NO risk of an increase in c/s as a result of induction, I'm
 trying to get my head around it...

 Tania
 x

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Belinda
 Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:06 PM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s...

 Tania, at the wch the stats are - for primip women indcued before 41
 weeks there is a 60% cs rate.
 Belinda

 Tania Smallwood wrote:



 Just wondering if there are any good quality trials about IOL and
 increase of c/s?  Have just re-read Enkin, and it does state that IOL
 is not associated with an increase in caesarean section rate (but
 given that most states here are up around the 30% mark, you have to
 wonder what they are comparing that to?), but I thought something came
 out of the Uk not long ago disputing this?



 Anyone?



 Tania

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.23/99 - Release Date: 12/09/2005


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Just a thought

2005-09-09 Thread Vedrana Valčić









Marsden Wagner
talks convincingly about his conversion.



Where can I read about that?



Vedrana









From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005
11:34 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Just a
thought
















Following the post from Lynne Staff, and others who talk of
supportive (might even say sensible) obstetricians who do practice woman
friendly care. Wouldn't it be good if some of these rare creatures came out and
spoke to their less supportive colleagues about their methods, beliefs and
results.











I feel
conflicted about this because they have access to the same information as the
rest of us but are obviously motivated by different things (money perhaps???)
in the decisions they make for their clients. I think we will have much more
chance of educating women to reject their dangerous practices. Women are
sometimes more open to reflection on this stuff after a poor experience. I
doubt very much that the Obs I hear about whose standard lines are Do
this or your baby will die. have very much invested in providing
appropriate social care, yk?





Of course
anything that works has got to be good! Marsden Wagner talks convincingly about
his conversion.





J












RE: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.

2005-09-09 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Ive had one question on my mind for
quite some time - why is it said so often that delivering a breech is becoming
a lost art? Is delivering a breech that complicated?



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005
10:06 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend
with breach baby...told CS only options.







I completely
agree, Brenda. And I think anger is reasonable response to women being refused
the right to birth their baby vaginally. Maybe if more women got angry and said
no, it would stop happening. But sObs just keep pushing the limits and no one
stands up to them so now they're starting to section automatically for
posterior babies. Then what? Next time that woman wants to give birth, if she
goes to that surgeon, or even a different one, she'll be damaged goods and have
to have more surgery or be induced because she can't go over. I
can't tell you how many women have asked me for help this week alone. It's
truly shocking how many women (and babies!) are being denied the basic human
right of vaginal birth. And it's truly shocking how little consumers really
seem to comprehend of how the system works and actually believe their Obs when
they tell them total crap.





OK I'm done too.
For the moment!





: )





J







- Original Message - 





From: brendamanning 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:39 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.











Or the women could
just try saying 'NO' I don't consent to surgery, I will if needed, but
not just in case..











No consent, no
surgery! 





Stay home with a
capable MW for as long as possible  then go to the hospital ??











I'm cross with the
oBs (not that you can't tell !! Won't even give them a capital for their title
!!!)











BM



















- Original Message - 





From: Janet
Fraser 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 9:49 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.











Hi Debbie,





oddly enough I
too know 2 women in exactly this position atm. The dangers of choosing a
surgeon for the care of a perfectly normal pregnancy are becoming clear at this
point.





There's an OB at JHH that deigns to catch breech babies - Andrew
Bisits (sp?) - so perhaps he's one to try. I can't imagine agreeing to major
surgery, with it's attendant risks, but I also can't imagine trying to birth my
baby with a bunch of cranky onlookers. Women are just plain screwed in this
scenario and it drives me into a rage. I shall content myself with sharing the
info on turning breech babies I seem to have been supplying on a daily basis
this week.













One midwifes
collection of breech turning info.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechcl.html

Attending a breech birth.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechbr.html

Turning a breech.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechtn.html

Book review on breech babies.
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/reviews/breech.asp

Ina May Gaskin on catching surprise breech babies!
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/3surprisebreeches.asp











Homeopathy to turn
babies in utero.
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/turnbaby.asp











A great site on moving
breech babies.
http://www.spinningbabies.com

A Natural Breech Birth - hospital
http://www.lalecheleague.org/NB/NBMarApr01p47.html

More than you could ever hope for from the UK midwives (I love these women!)
http://www.radmid.demon.co.uk/breech.htm

About 500 birth stories with clear descriptions.
http://www.breechbabies.com/hospital_breech.htm











Here's our OFP thread
on NP.
http://www.forums.naturalparenting.com.au/showthread.php?t=4423highlight=optimal+foetal





I wonder if I
know at least one of those women?





All love and
strength to her.





J

















RE: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.

2005-09-09 Thread Vedrana Valčić








What I meant was: Is delivering a breech
that complicated that it can be called art?











From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005
1:48 PM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Friend
with breach baby...told CS only options.





Ive had one question on my mind for
quite some time - why is it said so often that delivering a breech is becoming
a lost art? Is delivering a breech that complicated?



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005
10:06 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend
with breach baby...told CS only options.







I completely agree,
Brenda. And I think anger is reasonable response to women being refused the
right to birth their baby vaginally. Maybe if more women got angry and said no,
it would stop happening. But sObs just keep pushing the limits and no one
stands up to them so now they're starting to section automatically for
posterior babies. Then what? Next time that woman wants to give birth, if she
goes to that surgeon, or even a different one, she'll be damaged goods and have
to have more surgery or be induced because she can't go over. I
can't tell you how many women have asked me for help this week alone. It's
truly shocking how many women (and babies!) are being denied the basic human
right of vaginal birth. And it's truly shocking how little consumers really
seem to comprehend of how the system works and actually believe their Obs when
they tell them total crap.





OK I'm done too.
For the moment!





: )





J







- Original Message - 





From: brendamanning 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:39 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.











Or the women could
just try saying 'NO' I don't consent to surgery, I will if needed, but
not just in case..











No consent, no
surgery! 





Stay home with a
capable MW for as long as possible  then go to the hospital ??











I'm cross with the
oBs (not that you can't tell !! Won't even give them a capital for their title
!!!)











BM



















- Original Message - 





From: Janet
Fraser 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 9:49 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.











Hi Debbie,





oddly enough I
too know 2 women in exactly this position atm. The dangers of choosing a
surgeon for the care of a perfectly normal pregnancy are becoming clear at this
point.





There's an OB at JHH that deigns to catch breech babies - Andrew
Bisits (sp?) - so perhaps he's one to try. I can't imagine agreeing to major
surgery, with it's attendant risks, but I also can't imagine trying to birth my
baby with a bunch of cranky onlookers. Women are just plain screwed in this
scenario and it drives me into a rage. I shall content myself with sharing the
info on turning breech babies I seem to have been supplying on a daily basis
this week.













One midwifes
collection of breech turning info.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechcl.html

Attending a breech birth.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechbr.html

Turning a breech.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechtn.html

Book review on breech babies.
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/reviews/breech.asp

Ina May Gaskin on catching surprise breech babies!
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/3surprisebreeches.asp











Homeopathy to turn
babies in utero.
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/turnbaby.asp











A great site on moving
breech babies.
http://www.spinningbabies.com

A Natural Breech Birth - hospital
http://www.lalecheleague.org/NB/NBMarApr01p47.html

More than you could ever hope for from the UK midwives (I love these women!)
http://www.radmid.demon.co.uk/breech.htm

About 500 birth stories with clear descriptions.
http://www.breechbabies.com/hospital_breech.htm











Here's our OFP thread
on NP.
http://www.forums.naturalparenting.com.au/showthread.php?t=4423highlight=optimal+foetal





I wonder if I
know at least one of those women?





All love and
strength to her.





J

















RE: [ozmidwifery] Just a thought

2005-09-09 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Thank you, Andrea!

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrea Robertson
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 6:11 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Just a thought

Hello Vedrana,

Marsden has written many articles -we have some on our website that you 
will find interesting.

His book Pursuing the Birth Machine  describes how the WHO came around to 
thinking that the obstetric model of care needed to be changed and the 
consensus meeting that established the standards of care set down by the 
WHO. His conversion to midwifery came about primarily through personal 
contact with midwives, mainly in Europe. As an epidemiologist he could see 
the sense in what they were saying and he set out to prove this through 
research etc. It is a great read, and has all the references etc that 
underpin the recommendations.

As the publisher of Pursuing the Birth Machine (it is 10 years old now) we 
have a few copies left at a very good price.  it is a book that everyone 
should have on their shelf, not only because of its now historical 
importance but also because the arguments are very eloquently put - a good 
example of how to tackle these arguments yourselves.

More details are available here:

http://www.acegraphics.com.au/product/ace/bk200.html

Regards,

Andrea




At 07:52 PM 9/09/2005, you wrote:
Marsden Wagner talks convincingly about his conversion.

Where can I read about that?

Vedrana


-
Andrea Robertson
Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.birthinternational.com


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: ] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.

2005-09-09 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Thank you, Gloria. In this article, it is
said again that nothing must be done except flexing the head at the end and
putting the woman in hands and knees position (or any position she feels right,
I suppose?). Is there more to it than Im getting. Because if there isnt,
it sounds really simple to me. Do not interfere, just like in other kinds of
births.



Vedrana











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Gloria Lemay
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005
6:23 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Re: ]
Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.







Don't know if this has been posted before but one of my
favourite midwives on Planet Earth is Mary Cronk of Britain. She teaches breech
courses to mws all over the British Isles.
Here's a link to an article by her on the things you need to know about this
art http://www.aims.org.uk/Journal/Vol10No3/handOffbreech.htm











Gloria in Canada







- Original Message - 





From: Vedrana
Valčić 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September
09, 2005 4:48 AM





Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.









Ive had one question on my mind for
quite some time - why is it said so often that delivering a breech is becoming
a lost art? Is delivering a breech that complicated?



Vedrana











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005
10:06 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend
with breach baby...told CS only options.







I completely
agree, Brenda. And I think anger is reasonable response to women being refused
the right to birth their baby vaginally. Maybe if more women got angry and said
no, it would stop happening. But sObs just keep pushing the limits and no one
stands up to them so now they're starting to section automatically for
posterior babies. Then what? Next time that woman wants to give birth, if she
goes to that surgeon, or even a different one, she'll be damaged goods and have
to have more surgery or be induced because she can't go over. I
can't tell you how many women have asked me for help this week alone. It's
truly shocking how many women (and babies!) are being denied the basic human
right of vaginal birth. And it's truly shocking how little consumers really
seem to comprehend of how the system works and actually believe their Obs when
they tell them total crap.





OK I'm done too.
For the moment!





: )





J







- Original Message - 





From: brendamanning 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:39 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.











Or the women could
just try saying 'NO' I don't consent to surgery, I will if needed, but
not just in case..











No consent, no
surgery! 





Stay home with a
capable MW for as long as possible  then go to the hospital ??











I'm cross with the
oBs (not that you can't tell !! Won't even give them a capital for their title
!!!)











BM



















- Original Message - 





From: Janet
Fraser 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 9:49 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Friend with breach baby...told CS only options.











Hi Debbie,





oddly enough I
too know 2 women in exactly this position atm. The dangers of choosing a
surgeon for the care of a perfectly normal pregnancy are becoming clear at this
point.





There's an OB at JHH that deigns to catch breech babies - Andrew
Bisits (sp?) - so perhaps he's one to try. I can't imagine agreeing to major
surgery, with it's attendant risks, but I also can't imagine trying to birth my
baby with a bunch of cranky onlookers. Women are just plain screwed in this
scenario and it drives me into a rage. I shall content myself with sharing the
info on turning breech babies I seem to have been supplying on a daily basis
this week.













One midwifes
collection of breech turning info.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechcl.html

Attending a breech birth.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechbr.html

Turning a breech.
http://gentlebirth.org/Midwife/breechtn.html

Book review on breech babies.
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/reviews/breech.asp

Ina May Gaskin on catching surprise breech babies!
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/3surprisebreeches.asp











Homeopathy to turn
babies in utero.
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/turnbaby.asp











A great site on moving
breech babies.
http://www.spinningbabies.com

A Natural Breech Birth - hospital
http://www.lalecheleague.org/NB/NBMarApr01p47.html

More than you could ever hope for from the UK midwives (I love these women!)
http://www.radmid.demon.co.uk/breech.htm

About 500 birth stories

RE: [ozmidwifery] US-Sad situation for maternity caregiver

2005-09-08 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Does anyone know what happened to dr. Murphy in the end?



Vedrana



-Original Message-
From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 12:27 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] US-Sad situation for maternity caregiver



There is some more
info at http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/6713890p-6601036c.html.




-Original
Message-

From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Honey Acharya

Sent: Thursday, July
21, 2005 12:07 PM

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au

Subject:
[ozmidwifery] US-Sad situation for maternity caregiver



This is a story in
the US where a doctor has had her obstetric and gynae license suspended and is
in front of the medical review board because her 8% c-sec rate is too low and
she is practicing unsafe medicine!.

You get about
$700 more than the vaginal birth. So you actually get paid more to do the
quickest, easiest thing, compared to sitting at the bedside or being in the
hospital with the patient, said Murphy.





 http://www.ktuu.com/CMS/anmviewer.asp?a=14312z=4



Of course it is only
a short article and we don't know all the details but I find it a scary
situation. Maybe she should practice as a midwife instead. A doula on another
list I am on posted it today.



Honey





--

This mailing list is
sponsored by ACE Graphics.

Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to
subscribe or unsubscribe.

--

This mailing list is
sponsored by ACE Graphics.

Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to
subscribe or unsubscribe.












RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: Breech Babies

2005-09-02 Thread Vedrana Valčić
A very interesting discussion on breech births and midwives:

http://www.radmid.demon.co.uk/breech.htm 

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miriam Hannay
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 6:10 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: Breech Babies

I totally understand, Susan about the whole fear of
breech birth. We have a couple of OBs who will 'let'
women birth a breech babe vaginally, but fully
managed, IOL, 16 gauge bores in both arms, hartmann's
up, McRoberts, episi, full extraction. To me this
seems torture. I am a second year Bmid student and
intending to go into independent practice, so am
availing myself of every extra learning opportunity
available.

A fellow student and I (my lovely partner in crime),
attended Maggie Banks' emergency skills workshop in
Melbourne recently which was SO valuable, and we feel
much more comfortable about the possibility now. 

I have a dear friend whose first 'catch' as an RM was
an undiagnosed breech at home, so it does happen. We
need to be prepared and develop the skills to handle
this situation. What a shame and potential danger it
is if these skills fall by the way.

Everyone who can should hear Maggie Banks speak, she
dispells fears and demystifies like no-one else.

Regards, Miriam (FUSA)

--- Susan Cudlipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes it was Brenda who wrote that, but I have also
 been a midwife long enough 
 to have seen many breech births - back in the UK,
 and delivered a few 
 myself.  Not all good, mostly quite 'managed' but at
 least they were mostly 
 seen as being manageable vaginally! My own elective
 C/S (nearly 21 years old 
 now!) was for primip breech, although I was given
 the choice of vaginal 
 birth, I knew just what that would entail within the
 large unit that I was 
 obliged to attend - epidural, forceps, episiotomy,
 and I chose not to go 
 there, however at that time there was no question
 that I would not be able 
 to have VBAC with the next - nowadays that is not
 so.
 
 A year or so back we had a multi with a breech who
 was lucky enough to see a 
 less interventionist OB (as you so rightly guessed
 Melissa :-)) and she 
 chose to have a vaginal birth. Of course it had to
 be induced on the 'right' 
 day, but was very straight forward. Apart from that 
 we really don't see 
 them anymore, and at least one of the few docs who
 does do them does such a 
 horrendous job that I would personally prefer a C/S
 rather than submit to 
 his handling.( you can probably guess that one too
 Mel!)
 
 It is sad that student midwives today will not learn
 these essential skills 
 within the hospital system.  Personally I feel
 confident that I can handle 
 an unexpected breech, but cannot see how the next
 generation are going to 
 cope with this, there is so much fear of what is
 really only a different 
 variety of birth, in the same way that any
 'different' presentation is. 
 Anyone who has had the pleasure of hearing Maggie
 Banks speak, watched her 
 video, or that of Michel Odent's work in Pithiers
 will know that this is 
 true
 
 Rachel, I totally empathise with how you are feeling
 having just come to 
 Australia from the UK (been here 15 years myself). 
 It was a real shock to 
 me to see how much all births are seen as being the
 doctor's property.  One 
 of my first births here was in a small hospital and
 I called the GP as per 
 protocol.  He arrived as I had the head in my hands
 and proceeded to rush 
 in, without even washing his hands and virtually
 pushed me out of the way! 
 I looked at him with horror and said quietly  I
 think I may as well finish 
 the job now don't you?  He did step back and let me
 finish.  Some years 
 later he admitted that he had learned a few things
 from me - one of which 
 was to wait for restitution before trying to deliver
 the shoulders!  They 
 were always in such a goddamn hurry to drag the baby
 out, it drove me mad.
 
  When they are faced with an 'expert' obstetrician
 (often a male authority 
  figure) telling them their baby is in danger -
 they will chose to protect 
  their child because as a mother that is their
 instinct.
 
 An example of this happened to me just this week -
 the head was well and 
 truly crowned (primip, long labour, NO fetal
 distress) but OB insisted on 
 listening to FH immediately ctx ended - it was about
 100, and he took over 
 from me to apply forceps.  I was not concerned for
 the baby as I knew there 
 had been no compromise throughout and that he would
 be born within minutes, 
 but within the system I am obliged to defer to the
 doctor's judgement, 
 whether or not I agree with it.  Believe me, I know
 well what happens when 
 one tries to argue!!
 
 I hope you maintain your own integrity and autonomy
 - it is very different 
 here to what we knew in UK, but we do need to keep
 pushing for midwifery led 
 care.   I feel that much of the problem lies with
 how we are 

RE: [ozmidwifery] Men at births

2005-09-01 Thread Vedrana Valčić








OK, I found it: Its
a combination of gob, mouth, and smacked. It means utterly
astonished, astounded.

These stories makes me so sad.

How nice that they can get some support.



Vedrana









From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005
11:02 AM
To:
'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Men at
births





What does gobsmacked mean?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005
12:45 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Men at
births







I wonder
if anyone does these or similar in Melbourne
specifically for men 











On the Joyous
Birth forums there is a private section specifically for fathers who have been present
at births which were traumatic. We also support them in planning, with their
partners,for subsequent births in a more empowered and informed way. We
have dads at Joyous Birth meetings in Melbourne, Brisbane and Sydney where they
have access to all our books, videos and the like. Many men who attend home
births, especially after experiencing how unnecessary they often are in the
hospital hierarchy, become great advocates of woman centred birth.











When I ran that
article past the dad who moderatesthat forum,he was gobsmacked that
anyone could find the normal, natural processes of birth anything other than
wondrous. He sat like a deaf mute, through fear,watching his wife scream
through repeated unwanted VEs, with the staff demanding that he help hold her
still. He was sent home at one point as her induced labour ramped up because
the hospital was having building done and she was forced to labour in one large
room with other unsupported labouring women. He saw her repeatedly jabbed in
the leg with pethidine without her knowledge or consent - it was done in the
middle of a cx and she would ask what had been given to her when she came out
of the pain. Eventually all this led to caesarean and the staff refusing both
him and his wife the chance to hold their baby for many many hours. She is
still recovering from PTSD 3 years later and after a great deal of work, they
have reclaimed their marriage and are planning a home birth. He can't wait to
actually be involved and be able to support his wife. And she can't wait to
hold her own baby as soon as it's born.











I think the
pathologising of even normal, physiological birth has led us to this sad
situation. 











We have at least
one couple who have divorced partly over the husband supporting the hospital to
pressure the wife into an unnecessary (and second!)elective
caesarean. The physical injury she sustained from that operation was terrible,
not to mention the PTSD, and she says in retrospect she didn't realise how much
his attitude would impact negatively on their marriage, let alone her birth
experience. So now she's single and dreaming of a HBA2C for her future.





J
















RE: [ozmidwifery] Men at births

2005-09-01 Thread Vedrana Valčić









What does gobsmacked mean?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005
12:45 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Men at
births







I wonder
if anyone does these or similar in Melbourne
specifically for men 











On the Joyous
Birth forums there is a private section specifically for fathers who have been
present at births which were traumatic. We also support them in planning, with
their partners,for subsequent births in a more empowered and informed
way. We have dads at Joyous Birth meetings in Melbourne, Brisbane and Sydney
where they have access to all our books, videos and the like. Many men who
attend home births, especially after experiencing how unnecessary they often
are in the hospital hierarchy, become great advocates of woman centred birth.











When I ran that
article past the dad who moderatesthat forum,he was gobsmacked that
anyone could find the normal, natural processes of birth anything other than
wondrous. He sat like a deaf mute, through fear,watching his wife scream
through repeated unwanted VEs, with the staff demanding that he help hold her
still. He was sent home at one point as her induced labour ramped up because
the hospital was having building done and she was forced to labour in one large
room with other unsupported labouring women. He saw her repeatedly jabbed in
the leg with pethidine without her knowledge or consent - it was done in the
middle of a cx and she would ask what had been given to her when she came out
of the pain. Eventually all this led to caesarean and the staff refusing both
him and his wife the chance to hold their baby for many many hours. She is
still recovering from PTSD 3 years later and after a great deal of work, they
have reclaimed their marriage and are planning a home birth. He can't wait to
actually be involved and be able to support his wife. And she can't wait to
hold her own baby as soon as it's born.











I think the
pathologising of even normal, physiological birth has led us to this sad
situation. 











We have at least
one couple who have divorced partly over the husband supporting the hospital to
pressure the wife into an unnecessary (and second!)elective
caesarean. The physical injury she sustained from that operation was terrible,
not to mention the PTSD, and she says in retrospect she didn't realise how much
his attitude would impact negatively on their marriage, let alone her birth
experience. So now she's single and dreaming of a HBA2C for her future.





J
















RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries (http://theaustralian.com.au report)

2005-08-31 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Thank you for this, Rachel. I am very interested in this subject because in 
Croatia, you become a midwife after graduating from a high school for midwives. 
There is no university-level education afterwards and I was under an impression 
that if we (women and midwives together) manage to convince our Ministry of 
Health to start educating midwives at that, higher level, a major step would be 
accomplished. Now I realize that there is much more to it.

So midwives working in the public health system in Australia don't have the 
same autonomy as do independent midwives? How about training? Is it all 
self-study after graduating from college?

Vedrana


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wump fish
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:32 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries 
(http://theaustralian.com.au report)

Even if it is the same curriculum in Australia - it is set within a 
different context.

Correct me if I am wrong (still getting to grips with the system here). A 
student midwife in Australia is 'mentored' by midwives working in the public 
health system. Because these midwives are limited in their autonomy and 
skills, the student will also be limited.

Students are also subject to the cultural and social perceptions of 
midwifery where they train. If most people perceive midwives as nurses 
working in maternity - it is difficult to develop an identity as a midwife 
(I am struggling to maintain my own professional identity).

In the UK the midwives I trained with were 'midwives', they did not also 
work as nurses, nor refer to themselves as nurses. Women in the UK called us 
midwives and had an understanding and respect for our role. During my 
practice as a team midwife - women would ring us to tell us they were 
pregnant. We would send a letter to their GP to let them know (out of 
courtesy), then provide all the woman's care until 6wks postnatal. Women 
refer to midwives as 'my midwife' and ask each other 'who is your midwife'.  
Are Australian students exposed to this kind of reciprocal relationship with 
women?

Midwifery is not just about clinical skills - it is about philosophy, 
culture, experience, politics etc etc.

Rachel



From: Vedrana ValÄ?ić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries 
(http://theaustralian.com.au report)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:13:18 +0200

This is the minimum of what European midwives have to learn, either in 3 
years of practical and theoretical studies (after 10 years of general 
school education) or in 18 months (for qualified nurses responsible for 
general care):

TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR MIDWIVES
The training programme for obtaining a diploma, certificate or other 
evidence of formal qualifications in midwifery consists of the following 
two parts:
A. THEORETICAL AND TECHNICAL INSTRUCTION
(a) General subjects
1. Basic anatomy and physiology
2. Basic pathology
3. Basic bacteriology, virology and parasitology
4. Basic biophysics, biochemistry and radiology
5. Paediatrics, with particular reference to new-born infants
6. Hygiene, health education, preventive medicine, early diagnosis of
diseases
7. Nutrition and dietetics, with particular reference to women, new-born
and young babies
8. Basic sociology and socio-medical questions
9. Basic pharmacology
10. Psychology
11. Principles and methods of teaching
12. Health and social legislation and health organization
13. Professional ethics and professional legislation
14. Sex education and family planning
15. Legal protection of mother and infant
(b) Subjects specific to the activities of midwives
1. Anatomy and physiology
2. Embryology and development of the foetus
3. Pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium
4. Gynaecological and obstetrical pathology
5. Preparation for childbirth and parenthood, including psychological
aspects
6. Preparation for delivery (including knowledge and use of technical
equipment in obstetrics)
7. Analgesia, anaesthesia and resuscitation
8. Physiology and pathology of the new-born infant
9. Care and supervision of the new-born infant
10. Psychological and social factors
B. PRACTICAL AND CLINICAL TRAINING
This training is to be dispensed under appropriate supervision:
1. Advising of pregnant women, involving at least 100 pre-natal 
examinations.
2. Supervision and care of at least 40 women in labour.
3. The student should personally carry out at least 40 deliveries; where 
this
number cannot be reached owing to the lack of available women in
labour, it may be reduced to a minimum of 30, provided that the student
participates actively in 20 further deliveries.
4. Active participation with breech deliveries. Where this is not possible
because of lack of breech deliveries practice may be in a simulated
situation.
5. Performance of episiotomy and initiation into 

RE: [ozmidwifery] BF video

2005-08-31 Thread Vedrana Valčić
I've sent it to you for Judy, because of her slow line.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Price
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:45 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF video

Judy, I've just got back from holidays and would love to be sent a copy of the 
breastfeeding video cheers Jenni  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



***
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s).  This confidentiality is not waived or 
lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is 
transmitted/received in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this 
email is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality 
if it relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in 
error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return 
email.  You should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies produced.
***

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Men at births

2005-08-31 Thread Vedrana Valčić
My husband was traumatized by my birth (and so was I). After the ob decided to 
use vaccuum extraction, he was sent out of the room and just listened to all 
what was happening. When our son (Vid) was born, he was called back into the 
room and was shocked with all the blood (they did an episiotomy), so I can 
understand the part in the article where the author writes about stress related 
to a threat to the physical integrity of oneself or others. On top of that, we 
didn't know if Vid was going to be OK (he was). 

I remember consciously postponing analyzing what happened for about two months, 
when I finally started feeling less overwhelmed with taking care of my new baby 
and had some time to think about everything and talk about it with my husband. 
I was able to get over it, talking about it with my friends who had natural 
births helped very much, but my husband still feels uneasy when we talk about 
my birth. The ob told him right after birth to get me to listen to them more 
the next time (hahaha). 

Anyway, I haven't noticed any sexual problems :), then again, he didn't get to 
see the bulging vagina ;), but I think that the reason why some men might feel 
traumatized is because women's bodies are so sexualized - just as we lost the 
link between breasts and brestfeeding and it's disturbing for some to see a 
woman's breast in a baby's mouth, maybe the link between vagina and  giving 
birth is also lost. But that's what they are for, when you really think about 
it. I am so grateful for my breasts now, I see them in a totally different way, 
it is just amazing what they can do. I suppose women who had a natural birth 
feel the same way about their reproductive organs and the whole body.

Plus, the nature never intended for women to birth in a litothomy position. I 
mean, when a woman gives birth in a different position, I guess it's not that 
easy to see the bulging part :), or is it?

I agree with what everyone else wrote about the setting, interventions, being 
an observer, energy and so on.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean  Jo
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:51 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Men at births

Personally Andrea, my hubby was far more traumatized by my second birth
-my episiotomies vbac- than my horrific cs of my first. It wasn't until
I had my third did he truly understand what I was on about.  He was mute
with the first.  Scared sh*tless with the second.  He laughed and cried
with our last.

The energy in the room really influenced how he interpreted the event.
I also, in my role of a doula, I find dads looking for some kind of
reassurance that everything is okay.  I often say, isn't it amazing what
your partners body can do?  I never say anything in the negative about
bulging vulvas or the stretched peris...just how brilliant women's
bodies are.

As a woman, I would love to expereince a birth of one of my children in
the company of just other women.  I think it would be amazing.

Amazing amazing ...why is it I use that word so often when talking about
birth!?

jo


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrea
Robertson
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 10:26 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Men at births


This is an interesting report in today's Sydney Morning Herald. I
remember 
Michel Odent talking about research done in the US that explored the
effect 
on a couple's sexual relationship when the man had been exposed to the 
birth process. Michel was advocating that women might want to retain
some 
of their sexual mystery by excluding men from the birth room. I have
been 
at births where I wondered how the father was taking the sight of a 
practitioner cutting an episiotomy.
What does everyone think about this?

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/08/30/1125302566185.html

Regards,

Andrea

-
Andrea Robertson
Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.birthinternational.com


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/85 - Release Date:
8/30/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/85 - Release Date:
8/30/2005
 
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries (http://theaustralian.com.au report)

2005-08-30 Thread Vedrana Valčić
 Obviously scary rubbish makes better news than
truthful lovely births.

I think you are SO right there.
It seems to me that viewing birth as a disaster just waiting to happen, even if 
it is a normal birth, is Dr Giltrap's problem. Plus, I'm still trying to 
understand what he meant by:
Dr Giltrap claimed Australian midwives were not as well trained as their 
European counterparts and Australian standards were often higher than those in 
Europe.

There is a resolution by EU which states how many hours of what midwives have 
to have, and I doubt that it is more than you have in Australia. 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 6:22 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries 
(http://theaustralian.com.au report)

Rachel (welcome btw!) I hear everything you're saying and I concur. It's so
transparently about a professional monopoly but their own brilliant
misinformation campaign is so entwined with our current cultural fears
around normal physiological birth that very little gets into the media to
contradict it. Of course what I really want is for them to have to answer
how all the guff they spout really stands up against the research but the
seven second soundbite only allows long enough for scare tactics, not
evidence. It's interesting to me that in many years of writing letters to
SMH and The Age, I have never had one published on birth issues. I've got
quite a track record on political issues of other kinds, but not even the
most benign letter on home birth or midwifery has made it into their
publications. Obs and midwives get published a bit but very rarely
consumers. I sent letters to every major paper plus regionals for Home Birth
Awareness Week last year, and not one was published. That's a lot of editors
making the same decision. Obviously scary rubbish makes better news than
truthful lovely births.
Food for thought!
J
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries (http://theaustralian.com.au report)

2005-08-30 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Once again, sent the last mail before it was finished, sorry.

Obviously scary rubbish makes better news than
truthful lovely births.

I think you are SO right there.
It seems to me that viewing birth as a disaster just waiting to happen, even if 
it is a normal birth, is Dr Giltrap's problem. Plus, I'm still trying to 
understand what he meant by:
Dr Giltrap claimed Australian midwives were not as well trained as their 
European counterparts and Australian standards were often higher than those in 
Europe.

There are a couple of directives by EU which address midwives, and I doubt that 
it is more than you have in Australia. Aah, but then higher standards come 
into effect, right? Anyway:

Directive 80/154/EEC concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, 
certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in midwifery and 
including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of 
establishment and freedom to provide services 

Directive 80/155/EEC concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by 
Law, Regulation or Administrative Action relating to the taking up and pursuit 
of the activities of midwives 

Decision 80/156/EEC setting up an Advisory Committee on the Training of 
Midwives 

Directive 89/594/EEC amending Directives 75/362/EEC, 77/452/EEC, 78/686/EEC, 
78/1026/EEC and 80/154/EEC relating to the mutual recognition of diplomas, 
certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications as doctors, nurses 
responsible for general care, dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons and 
midwives, together with Directives 75/363/EEC, 78/1027/EEC and 80/155/EEC 
concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or 
Administrative Action relating to the activities of doctors, veterinary 
surgeons and midwives 

Directive 2001/19/EC amending Council Directives 77/452/EEC, 77/453/EEC, 
78/686/EEC, 78/687/EEC, 78/1026/EEC, 78/1027/EEC, 80/154/EEC, 80/155/EEC, 
85/384/EEC, 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 93/16/EEC

As for dr Pesce, even if midwife care did offer just minimal benefits, I'm sure 
women would like to make the choice for themselves. And comparing lacerations 
with episiotomies, where everything, skin, muscles, nerves are cut, left me 
with my mouth open. As did the statement that there is a higher risk of 
perinatal deaths in birth centres.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:54 AM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries 
(http://theaustralian.com.au report)

 Obviously scary rubbish makes better news than
truthful lovely births.

I think you are SO right there.
It seems to me that viewing birth as a disaster just waiting to happen, even if 
it is a normal birth, is Dr Giltrap's problem. Plus, I'm still trying to 
understand what he meant by:
Dr Giltrap claimed Australian midwives were not as well trained as their 
European counterparts and Australian standards were often higher than those in 
Europe.

There is a resolution by EU which states how many hours of what midwives have 
to have, and I doubt that it is more than you have in Australia. 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Fraser
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 6:22 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries 
(http://theaustralian.com.au report)

Rachel (welcome btw!) I hear everything you're saying and I concur. It's so
transparently about a professional monopoly but their own brilliant
misinformation campaign is so entwined with our current cultural fears
around normal physiological birth that very little gets into the media to
contradict it. Of course what I really want is for them to have to answer
how all the guff they spout really stands up against the research but the
seven second soundbite only allows long enough for scare tactics, not
evidence. It's interesting to me that in many years of writing letters to
SMH and The Age, I have never had one published on birth issues. I've got
quite a track record on political issues of other kinds, but not even the
most benign letter on home birth or midwifery has made it into their
publications. Obs and midwives get published a bit but very rarely
consumers. I sent letters to every major paper plus regionals for Home Birth
Awareness Week last year, and not one was published. That's a lot of editors
making the same decision. Obviously scary rubbish makes better news than
truthful lovely births.
Food for thought!
J
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries (http://theaustralian.com.au report)

2005-08-30 Thread Vedrana Valčić
This is the minimum of what European midwives have to learn, either in 3 years 
of practical and theoretical studies (after 10 years of general school 
education) or in 18 months (for qualified nurses responsible for general care):

TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR MIDWIVES
The training programme for obtaining a diploma, certificate or other evidence 
of formal qualifications in midwifery consists of the following two parts:
A. THEORETICAL AND TECHNICAL INSTRUCTION
(a) General subjects
1. Basic anatomy and physiology
2. Basic pathology
3. Basic bacteriology, virology and parasitology
4. Basic biophysics, biochemistry and radiology
5. Paediatrics, with particular reference to new-born infants
6. Hygiene, health education, preventive medicine, early diagnosis of
diseases
7. Nutrition and dietetics, with particular reference to women, new-born
and young babies
8. Basic sociology and socio-medical questions
9. Basic pharmacology
10. Psychology
11. Principles and methods of teaching
12. Health and social legislation and health organization
13. Professional ethics and professional legislation
14. Sex education and family planning
15. Legal protection of mother and infant
(b) Subjects specific to the activities of midwives
1. Anatomy and physiology
2. Embryology and development of the foetus
3. Pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium
4. Gynaecological and obstetrical pathology
5. Preparation for childbirth and parenthood, including psychological
aspects
6. Preparation for delivery (including knowledge and use of technical
equipment in obstetrics)
7. Analgesia, anaesthesia and resuscitation
8. Physiology and pathology of the new-born infant
9. Care and supervision of the new-born infant
10. Psychological and social factors
B. PRACTICAL AND CLINICAL TRAINING
This training is to be dispensed under appropriate supervision:
1. Advising of pregnant women, involving at least 100 pre-natal examinations.
2. Supervision and care of at least 40 women in labour.
3. The student should personally carry out at least 40 deliveries; where this
number cannot be reached owing to the lack of available women in
labour, it may be reduced to a minimum of 30, provided that the student
participates actively in 20 further deliveries.
4. Active participation with breech deliveries. Where this is not possible
because of lack of breech deliveries practice may be in a simulated
situation.
5. Performance of episiotomy and initiation into suturing. Initiation shall
include theoretical instruction and clinical practice. The practice of
suturing includes suturing of the wound following an episiotomy and a
simple perineal laceration. This may be in a simulated situation if
absolutely necessary.
6. Supervision and care of 40 women at risk in pregnancy, or labour or 
postnatal period.
7. Supervision and care (including examination) of at least 100 post-natal
women and healthy new-born infants.
8. Observation and care of the new-born requiring special care including
those born pre-term, post-term, underweight or ill.
9. Care of women with pathological conditions in the fields of gynaecology
and obstetrics.
10. Initiation into care in the field of medicine and surgery. Initiation shall 
include theoretical instruction and clinical practice.

Is it different in Australia?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Chapman
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:14 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: 'Higher risk' in midwife deliveries 
(http://theaustralian.com.au report)

You are so right about many Australian Midwives being prevented
from gaining the full spectrum of skills necessary for total
care of well women. As you said the answer is to give midwives
the opportunity to learn what they should not just want OB's
want them to learn. Those midwives who work independently, in
birth centres and some in hospitals have had to actively chase
the knowledge and experience necessary to do their work
properly. It is hard work sometimes. All worth it though when
you have a satisfying birth with a woman who you have developed
a relationship with antenatally. 
Cheers
Judy

--- wump fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think there is a difference between the training and skills
 of Australian 
 mw and UK mw. But, this largely exists due to the different
 maternity 
 systems and the blocks placed on practice by the obs. Your mw
 training is 
 reliant on the experiences you are able to access. For
 example, as a direct 
 entry mw in the UK my training began in the community with a
 community 
 midwife providing midwifery-led care with a family focus. By
 the end of our 
 course we were expected to be able to provide total care for
 'normal' women 
 (including suturing).
 
 I realise that I have a limited viewpoint at present, but I
 have noticed 
 that the mainstream perception of midwives is that we are
 nurses with a mid 
 specialisation, and even refer to each other as nurses. People
 are getting a 

RE: [ozmidwifery] transition

2005-08-29 Thread Vedrana Valčić









This is what I found and liked:



http://www.birthingnaturally.net/birth/transition.html



What is Transition Like?

Not all
women have a transition, in fact 1/3 of women dont seem to have a
specific time of transition. Another 1/3 of women claim that transition was not
any more difficult than the rest of labor, and 1/3 claim it was the worst part
of labor. 

Transition
is the time that your body is completing dilation and preparing to push your
baby out. It is generally very intense with contractions right on top of each other,
and sometimes with double peaks. But it is also the shortest part of labor,
generally lasting 15 minutes to half an hour. 

You will
recognize transition by the desire to give up. This is when women claim they
just cant do it anymore. Most women begin to doubt their ability to go
on, and may seem to forget that they are in labor to give birth to a baby. This
is also the time in labor when most women ask for something to help them with
the pain. 

Transition
is also recognizable by various physical signs, which may or may not be present
at your labor. Some women get hot and cold flashes, cold sweats, nausea or
vomiting, shivering or shaking, hiccups, burping and a general inability to
feel comfortable in any position. This is the most common time for the bag of
waters to break naturally. When you begin to show these signs, it does not
matter if you are dilated to 1 or 10 centimeters, it means you are very close
to pushing your baby out. 

Many
women find that when vaginal exams are done to access cervical dilation
progress, their dilation is not uniform. Rather than dilating a centimeter
every hour or two, they will dilate to 4 or 6 or 7 and seem to stop for a few
hours. This does not mean that labor has stalled, as long as your contractions
continue to get more intense, closer together and longer simply prepare
yourself. Generally what happens is the body gets itself ready and then
suddenly dilates the rest of the way in two or three contractions! 

Even if
your caregiver is convinced that you have hours to go, do not listen. Instead
pay attention for the signs of transition. When you see them be assured that
you are nearly ready to push. Transition can happen at any point of the
cervical dilation chart. Do not depend on vaginal exams to tell you how long you
will labor; they simply are not accurate. Even if you have been given
medication to stimulate contractions, do not expect your body to conform to a
standard of dilation. You may also find yourself suddenly in transition before
your caregiver expected. 

 Copyright 2000-2004 Jennifer VanderLaan and Birthing
Naturally 
Last Update December 2003 













From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Maxine Wilson
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:35
PM
To: ozmid
Subject: [ozmidwifery] transition







Vedrana 





I vaguely remember reading something that I
found meaningful in Julia Sundin's Face to Face with Childbirth. Hope I
have the author and title correct - does anyone know? I haven't got it on
the bookshelf as it is on loan at the moment. Does anyone else remember a
transition description from it? I may be getting it confused with other
material but I thought she went into the fear and darkness elements of
transition. 





Maxine










RE: [ozmidwifery] transition

2005-08-29 Thread Vedrana Valčić








Maxine

the title and author are correct  Face
to Face with childbirth by Julia Sundin.



Vedrana











From: Vedrana Valčić 
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:52
PM
To:
'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] transition





This is what I found and liked:



http://www.birthingnaturally.net/birth/transition.html



What is Transition Like?

Not all
women have a transition, in fact 1/3 of women dont seem to have a
specific time of transition. Another 1/3 of women claim that transition was not
any more difficult than the rest of labor, and 1/3 claim it was the worst part
of labor. 

Transition
is the time that your body is completing dilation and preparing to push your
baby out. It is generally very intense with contractions right on top of each
other, and sometimes with double peaks. But it is also the shortest part of
labor, generally lasting 15 minutes to half an hour. 

You will
recognize transition by the desire to give up. This is when women claim they
just cant do it anymore. Most women begin to doubt their ability to go
on, and may seem to forget that they are in labor to give birth to a baby. This
is also the time in labor when most women ask for something to help them with
the pain. 

Transition
is also recognizable by various physical signs, which may or may not be present
at your labor. Some women get hot and cold flashes, cold sweats, nausea or
vomiting, shivering or shaking, hiccups, burping and a general inability to
feel comfortable in any position. This is the most common time for the bag of
waters to break naturally. When you begin to show these signs, it does not
matter if you are dilated to 1 or 10 centimeters, it means you are very close
to pushing your baby out. 

Many
women find that when vaginal exams are done to access cervical dilation
progress, their dilation is not uniform. Rather than dilating a centimeter
every hour or two, they will dilate to 4 or 6 or 7 and seem to stop for a few
hours. This does not mean that labor has stalled, as long as your contractions
continue to get more intense, closer together and longer simply prepare
yourself. Generally what happens is the body gets itself ready and then
suddenly dilates the rest of the way in two or three contractions! 

Even if
your caregiver is convinced that you have hours to go, do not listen. Instead
pay attention for the signs of transition. When you see them be assured that
you are nearly ready to push. Transition can happen at any point of the
cervical dilation chart. Do not depend on vaginal exams to tell you how long
you will labor; they simply are not accurate. Even if you have been given
medication to stimulate contractions, do not expect your body to conform to a
standard of dilation. You may also find yourself suddenly in transition before
your caregiver expected. 

 Copyright 2000-2004 Jennifer VanderLaan and
Birthing Naturally 
Last Update December 2003 













From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Maxine Wilson
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:35
PM
To: ozmid
Subject: [ozmidwifery] transition







Vedrana 





I vaguely remember reading something that I
found meaningful in Julia Sundin's Face to Face with Childbirth. Hope I
have the author and title correct - does anyone know? I haven't got it on
the bookshelf as it is on loan at the moment. Does anyone else remember a
transition description from it? I may be getting it confused with other
material but I thought she went into the fear and darkness elements of
transition. 





Maxine










[ozmidwifery] transition

2005-08-28 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Does anyone know where I can find a good explanation of transition during 
childbirth? What do you usually tell women about transition in childbirth 
education classes (or when asked)?

Vedrana
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Re:BF video

2005-08-27 Thread Vedrana Valčić
You're welcome!

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joy Cocks
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 8:20 AM
To: Ozmidwifery
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Re:BF video

Dear Vedrana,
Thanks so much for the video...I love it!!
Joy

Joy Cocks RN (Div 1) RM CBE IBCLC
BRIGHT Vic 3741 
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] BF video

2005-08-25 Thread Vedrana Valčić









Barb, can I mail you off the list about
breastfeeding an adopted child?



Vedrana











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Barbara Glare  Chris Bright
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005
10:50 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF
video







Hi,











I have to add my cute toddler BF story. Last night I
was invited to a meeting with a senator. Had to take the contingent - dh
working away. Guan, 2.5 pipes up Titty, mum, I want
titty I had to oblige. After I finished I pulled down my top,
and got a mum, put your bra on properly 





She's Chinese, and I'm Anglo. It's always interesting
to see people rearranging their faces so as not to notice an adopted child
breastfeeding.











Barb







- Original Message - 





From: Judy
Chapman 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Thursday, August
25, 2005 5:35 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery] BF
video











I have just been senta hilarious video (2MB). Mum doing a yoga
handstand, baby crawling and knows where the good stuff comes from... Need I
say more. 





What a laugh.





On a par with one of my bellydance mates who is still BF a 2 yr old. 10
min prior to performance it was a loud Titta, Mum, Titta and when
side one was finished Other side Mum, other side. 





God love 'em.





Cheers





Judy









Do you Yahoo!?
Messenger
7.0: Make free PC-to-PC calls to your friends overseas. You could win a holiday
to see them! 










RE: [ozmidwifery] BF video

2005-08-25 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Judy
I have the video and can send it, my line is quite fast.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Chapman
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:42 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF video

Any more takers for this one??? 
It will take a while for me on my slow line to upload. 
I will try to get on line about lunch time tomorrow to send to
those who say. 
Cheers
Judy

--- Kate /or Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ditto please
 
 Kate
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   - Original Message - 
   From: Denise Hynd 
   To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
   Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:15 PM
   Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF video
 
 
   Judy 
   can you send it to me?
   Thank you
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Denise Hynd
 
   Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in
 action, for the sake of freedom for all women to choose
 exactly how and by whom, if by anyone, our bodies will be
 handled.
 
   - Linda Hes
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Judy Chapman 
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
 Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:35 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] BF video
 
 
 I have just been sent a hilarious video (2MB). Mum doing a
 yoga handstand, baby crawling and knows where the good stuff
 comes from... Need I say more. 
 What a laugh.
 On a par with one of my bellydance mates who is still BF a
 2 yr old. 10 min prior to performance it was a loud Titta,
 Mum, Titta and when side one was finished Other side Mum,
 other side. 
 God love 'em.
 Cheers
 Judy
 
 


 Do you Yahoo!?
 Messenger 7.0: Make free PC-to-PC calls to your friends
 overseas. You could win a holiday to see them! 
 
 


 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/81 - Release
 Date: 24/08/2005
 







 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make free PC-to-PC calls to your friends overseas. You could win a holiday to 
see them! 
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/promotions/messenger/
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


  1   2   >