Re: Some pics from the Concours d'Elegance of America at St. Johns
Congrats on a job well done! On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The Times frequently uses a few of my photos, but in a piece for the website about last Sunday's Concours America, the photo editor chose to publish all 19 that I submitted. I have to remember for future efforts that they will crop everything to the same dimension, regardless of how I framed it. No short and wide pics for the Times. This project was a struggle because our power went out a few hours after I got home from the event. I had time to render a few pics on my desktop system, but had to finish the job on my laptop at the library. Fortunately, I had those first few for reference. Not happy with the text. A ham fisted editor worked on it because the auto section chief was on vacation and the paper was short handed. But that’s life in the journalism biz. Anyway, some good looking cars from the show in the pic gallery. My favorite is the BMW streamlined sports car that opens the set. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/automobiles/st-johns-concours-celebrated-virgil-exner-designs-and-jet-age-pickups.html?ref=automobiles_r=0# -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: UNICORN
Pink unicorn? Must be extremely rare:) Doesn't look like it could fly though, was it displayed in the field? On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: From the Toyota display at the New Jersey Festival of Ballooning: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17822463size=lg Comments are invited. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Morning at the beach
Beautiful morning light! On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote: early morning expedition to a deserted beach at Bridport in Tasmania is deserted in winter https://www.flickr.com/photos/27281712@N08/14790739105/ K10D Sigma 18-125mm -- Philip Northeast www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Hotel Cota 1400
Thanks, Paul, Jack, Marco, Dan and Dave for the comments. 1400 m is the elevation of the hotel, hence the name. It was built in 1939, originally as a hospital, converted to a hotel in 1947, so your observations about the institutional/austere look are correct. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:21 AM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote: That reminds me of the movie The Grand Budapest Hotel. Cheers, Dave On Jul 31, 2014, at 9:54 am, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: A hotel with a view in the Carpathian mountains, Romania: http://500px.com/photo/78195715/hotel-cota-1400-by-attila-boros -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Some pics from the Concours d'Elegance of America at St. Johns
Interesting and informative as usual, with top-notch photo work. I guess the Times can afford the best!~ G Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats on a job well done! On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The Times frequently uses a few of my photos, but in a piece for the website about last Sunday's Concours America, the photo editor chose to publish all 19 that I submitted. I have to remember for future efforts that they will crop everything to the same dimension, regardless of how I framed it. No short and wide pics for the Times. This project was a struggle because our power went out a few hours after I got home from the event. I had time to render a few pics on my desktop system, but had to finish the job on my laptop at the library. Fortunately, I had those first few for reference. Not happy with the text. A ham fisted editor worked on it because the auto section chief was on vacation and the paper was short handed. But that’s life in the journalism biz. Anyway, some good looking cars from the show in the pic gallery. My favorite is the BMW streamlined sports car that opens the set. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/automobiles/st-johns-concours-celebrated-virgil-exner-designs-and-jet-age-pickups.html?ref=automobiles_r=0# -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: UNICORN
Thanks, Attila. The Unicorn was displayed on top of a car: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17822461 As I indicated, this was displayed in the Toyota area of the vender's midway. This particular pink unicorn is currently featured in a TV ad for Toyota; sn indulgent father is seen driving home with the unicorn atop his car. He says that any father will understand what he is doing with this enormous stuffed toy, but he also wonders where it can be kept in their house. The purpose of the pink unicorn is to draw young girls to see it, so that the sales staff can give their parents information on the latest offers on Toyota cars. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: Pink unicorn? Must be extremely rare:) Doesn't look like it could fly though, was it displayed in the field? On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: From the Toyota display at the New Jersey Festival of Ballooning: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17822463size=lg Comments are invited. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Rustic in the City
thats my kind of photo Dave On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote: On my way to work: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17823812size=lg (K-5, DA 40/2.8 LTD) Comments appreciated. Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Angry Bird
love this shot On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: Another from the New Jersey Festival of Ballooning: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17823736 Comments are invited. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Angry Bird
Thanks, David! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:39 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote: love this shot On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: Another from the New Jersey Festival of Ballooning: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17823736 Comments are invited. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO: Camera? Who needs a Camera?
Everyone was taking pictures at the Balloon Fest: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17824727 Comments are invited. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: another stupid Thunderbird question
On 7/29/2014 5:51 PM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting John sesso...@earthlink.net: I have it set as View Message Body Plain Text. Have had it that way for years. Most received messages wrap long lines to the window, but occasionally one doesn't. I don't know why. I have the same issue but it doesn't happen often enough to irritate me. Thanks. Hadn't really risen to the level of irritation yet. It happened when I was going through email cleaning up other stuff before reading PDML, so it was just a convenient time to ask. We went through something about getting format-flowed (or flowed-format?) to work a while back I figured someone here would know the answer. It seems to work most of the time, but occasionally it's like an itch you can't scratch. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Empire Parliamentary Delegation to Australia, 1926
On 7/29/2014 7:30 PM, David Mann wrote: Darren's old photo find has finally spurred me into action... Back in February I scanned a box of old glass slides (BW positives sandwiched in glass) from the Empire Parliamentary Delegation to Australia in 1926. My mother-in-law had asked me if I could do anything with them and I managed to rig something up with my medium format film scanner (Minolta Multi Pro). The slides are a strange size - about 83mm square with an image up to 70mm square (usually masked with a border). There are a handful of colour photos mixed in there which are not part of the Australia collection; those are Dufaycolor slides which are fascinating under a microscope but utterly horrible to scan. It looks like those ones were taken in NZ. I was wanting to put them online but with 72 files I wasn't really sure how best to present them. In the end I've taken a lazy approach and thrown them into a jAlbum gallery. The photos are presented in the order they were stored in the box. Note I haven't done anything about dust. http://www.multi.net.nz/empire/ The photo captions are mostly what's written on the slides, except for the number which is their position in the box. They might not be correct; being handwritten and quite small they're difficult to read. A book accompanies the slides but it's packed in a box somewhere. If it contains more info I'll update the gallery. Cheers, Dave They're fairly interesting, but I would have tried to group them chronologically/geographically. The delegation appears to be bouncing around back forth across the country. And perhaps put all the color photos in their own gallery. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On 7/30/2014 3:53 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: Which is why I don't have a facebook account nor do I post to Twitter. The way I do post at least gives me a fig leaf to hide behind if someone decides to steal my pictures, as opposed to giving them away under a websites terms of service. On 7/30/2014 12:30 PM, Attila Boros wrote: Might be of interest: http://www.nyccounsel.com/business-blogs-websites/who-owns-photos-and-videos-posted-on-facebook-or-twitter/ PDML is as much social media as I can handle. I have other reasons for shunning facebook beyond the possibility of having my photos stolen. I don't do Twitter because I don't have a smart phone I don't do texting, so I've never bothered to try to figure it out. Probably for the best that I have one less place to say something stupid that I'll regret later. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Pug Submissions
I got another question. How do you guys submit the photos that are larger than 800x600? I see them in the PUG where it says click on the image to see the original size, but it won't let me submit mine unless I shrink them down. On 7/28/2014 7:28 PM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net: I need the Pug submission url..Please! anyone. Thanks! http://pug.komkon.org/submit/ -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: UNICORN
On 31 Jul 2014, at 13:21, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Attila. The Unicorn was displayed on top of a car: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17822461 As I indicated, this was displayed in the Toyota area of the vender's midway. This particular pink unicorn is currently featured in a TV ad for Toyota; sn indulgent father is seen driving home with the unicorn atop his car. He says that any father will understand what he is doing with this enormous stuffed toy, but he also wonders where it can be kept in their house. The purpose of the pink unicorn is to draw young girls to see it, so that the sales staff can give their parents information on the latest offers on Toyota cars. When I saw it I had an immediate and compelling vision of a farmer leading a large and steaming herd of pink unicorns into a French slaughterhouse. B [...] http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17822463size=lg Comments are invited. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On 31 Jul 2014, at 17:25, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote: On 7/30/2014 3:53 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: Which is why I don't have a facebook account nor do I post to Twitter. The way I do post at least gives me a fig leaf to hide behind if someone decides to steal my pictures, as opposed to giving them away under a websites terms of service. On 7/30/2014 12:30 PM, Attila Boros wrote: Might be of interest: http://www.nyccounsel.com/business-blogs-websites/who-owns-photos-and-videos-posted-on-facebook-or-twitter/ PDML is as much social media as I can handle. I have other reasons for shunning facebook beyond the possibility of having my photos stolen. I don't do Twitter because I don't have a smart phone I don't do texting, so I've never bothered to try to figure it out. Probably for the best that I have one less place to say something stupid that I'll regret later. Saving it all for Mark? I was required to sign up to LinkedIn today in order to find something out about a consultant we'll be working with. In case you're interested, here's my account: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=359592007authType=nameauthToken=83fgtrk=miniprofile-primary-view-button_mSplash=1 B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On 7/31/2014 1:38 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: On 31 Jul 2014, at 17:25, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote: On 7/30/2014 3:53 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: Which is why I don't have a facebook account nor do I post to Twitter. The way I do post at least gives me a fig leaf to hide behind if someone decides to steal my pictures, as opposed to giving them away under a websites terms of service. On 7/30/2014 12:30 PM, Attila Boros wrote: Might be of interest: http://www.nyccounsel.com/business-blogs-websites/who-owns-photos-and-videos-posted-on-facebook-or-twitter/ PDML is as much social media as I can handle. I have other reasons for shunning facebook beyond the possibility of having my photos stolen. I don't do Twitter because I don't have a smart phone I don't do texting, so I've never bothered to try to figure it out. Probably for the best that I have one less place to say something stupid that I'll regret later. Saving it all for Mark? I was required to sign up to LinkedIn today in order to find something out about a consultant we'll be working with. In case you're interested, here's my account: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=359592007authType=nameauthToken=83fgtrk=miniprofile-primary-view-button_mSplash=1 B If it's stupid but it makes the quotations list it ain't stupid. I'm retired, I don't do LinkedIn either. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Flash for K-5IIs
I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs look like photographs. ~ Alfred Stieglitz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
Thanks, Darren. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs look like photographs. ~ Alfred Stieglitz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
On 7/31/2014 2:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola Different flashes depending on the situation. This page hasn't been updated in a while, but ... http://pttl.mattdm.org/ The AF200FG works remarkably well with the K10D K20D if you just want fill are trying to balance the flash with ambient light. I really haven't tried it with the K3 yet because the K3's built in flash does a very good job, but I expect it should work as well with the K5II as it does with the K10D K20D. I also have the AF360FGZ and AF540FGZ. I'm not as happy with the AF540FGZ as I feel I should be based on how much it costs. I think there were production quality problems with the early AF540FGZ. It didn't work as well as it should have even before I dropped it. When I talked to the Pentax Rep that time they brought the 645Z to my local independent dealer, he said they're looking to establish a new (additional) repair facility on the east coast. Once I find out where that is going to be, I think I'll send my AF540FGZ in to be serviced. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:25 PM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote: PDML is as much social media as I can handle. I have other reasons for shunning facebook beyond the possibility of having my photos stolen. I don't do Twitter because I don't have a smart phone I don't do texting, so I've never bothered to try to figure it out. Probably for the best that I have one less place to say something stupid that I'll regret later. I don't really like Facebook either, but I need it to keep in touch with some people. It's extremely popular with the young folks, for reasons I fail to understand. As for Twitter, I don't get it and don't even bother. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: I was required to sign up to LinkedIn today in order to find something out about a consultant we'll be working with. In case you're interested, here's my account: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=359592007authType=nameauthToken=83fgtrk=miniprofile-primary-view-button_mSplash=1 Wow, you must have thousands of years of experience! g -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
I’ve had good success with the Pentax AF 540FGZ flash. I have two of them and use them for everything, including outdoor fill at high-speed synch. The new Pentax flash, AF540FGZ II is supposed to be better and well matched to the newer Pentax DSLRs. Plus it’s weather resistant. I want one. But it is pricey. Paul On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On 31 Jul 2014, at 19:47, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: I was required to sign up to LinkedIn today in order to find something out about a consultant we'll be working with. In case you're interested, here's my account: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=359592007authType=nameauthToken=83fgtrk=miniprofile-primary-view-button_mSplash=1 Wow, you must have thousands of years of experience! g Yes, and I'm the only person on the whole of LinkedIn with one of my skills, so I can charge whatever I want for it! I must admit, it's quite an old picture and I'm not that young anymore, but I'm sure I'm not the only person who's flattered himself a little on LinkedIn. Anyway, here's a more recent picture, which I use on my profile at work, so people know who to look for when they want something done: http://www.britannica.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/129762-004-115a6735.jpg B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
Thanks, John, Paul and Paul. Your comments are very helpful. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Paul pentax1...@gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
Dan, I've been heavily relying on flash in what I photograph: quick dances in a dark room, fill-in flash for my child indoors and outdoors photos, some candid portraits in dynamic settings. While I have only tried Pentax AF540 with K-7, I didn't like it, and bought Metz 58 (not 2 yet), that I've been happily using ever since, with both K-7 and K-5IIs. IMHO, it works much better (but not universally perfectly, - so you have to use it smartly). I've been using it in two modes: either in A, where the flash decides when to cut itself off, or in PTTL. In most cases, I find that A mode works better, especially when I turn the main flash up, and have the front fill-in sub-flash enabled. I use PTTL often for forward-facing (typically longer-distance) shots. Also, PTTL seems to work somewhat better at the very close range (1-3 feet), maybe because camera's CPU is faster to cut off this powerhouse. I agree, however, that the buttons of Pentax AF540 are more convenient than the menues of Metz 58. Those menues are frustrating. But I choose a better functionality. Also, there were some problems (and I don't remember all the details), that Pentax AF540 didn't not keep its settings upon power-cycling, and it might not allow a manual mode. (Larry might still remember this part, - he complained about that more recently.) It looks like Metz 58-2 might have a better hotshoe mount, which is welcome, as the one in Metz 58 is becoming a bit loose after a lot of use, and may require occasional adjustment after insertion. See my earlier response about Metz 58 in this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg656989.html HTH, Igor Thu Jul 31 16:36:09 EDT 2014 Paul pentax1941 at gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmatyola at gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
Thanks, Igor. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Dan, I've been heavily relying on flash in what I photograph: quick dances in a dark room, fill-in flash for my child indoors and outdoors photos, some candid portraits in dynamic settings. While I have only tried Pentax AF540 with K-7, I didn't like it, and bought Metz 58 (not 2 yet), that I've been happily using ever since, with both K-7 and K-5IIs. IMHO, it works much better (but not universally perfectly, - so you have to use it smartly). I've been using it in two modes: either in A, where the flash decides when to cut itself off, or in PTTL. In most cases, I find that A mode works better, especially when I turn the main flash up, and have the front fill-in sub-flash enabled. I use PTTL often for forward-facing (typically longer-distance) shots. Also, PTTL seems to work somewhat better at the very close range (1-3 feet), maybe because camera's CPU is faster to cut off this powerhouse. I agree, however, that the buttons of Pentax AF540 are more convenient than the menues of Metz 58. Those menues are frustrating. But I choose a better functionality. Also, there were some problems (and I don't remember all the details), that Pentax AF540 didn't not keep its settings upon power-cycling, and it might not allow a manual mode. (Larry might still remember this part, - he complained about that more recently.) It looks like Metz 58-2 might have a better hotshoe mount, which is welcome, as the one in Metz 58 is becoming a bit loose after a lot of use, and may require occasional adjustment after insertion. See my earlier response about Metz 58 in this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg656989.html HTH, Igor Thu Jul 31 16:36:09 EDT 2014 Paul pentax1941 at gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmatyola at gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Hotel Cota 1400
Crystal clear atmosphere, I can see Dracula from here... OK, so I can't. On 7/30/2014 5:54 PM, Attila Boros wrote: A hotel with a view in the Carpathian mountains, Romania: http://500px.com/photo/78195715/hotel-cota-1400-by-attila-boros -- I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: UNICORN
It's not actually purebred Unicorn, it seems to be crossed with a Pegasus and a horse of a different color somewhere in it's ancestry. On 7/31/2014 7:11 AM, Attila Boros wrote: Pink unicorn? Must be extremely rare:) Doesn't look like it could fly though, was it displayed in the field? On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: From the Toyota display at the New Jersey Festival of Ballooning: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17822463size=lg Comments are invited. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On 7/31/2014 3:01 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: On 31 Jul 2014, at 19:47, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: I was required to sign up to LinkedIn today in order to find something out about a consultant we'll be working with. In case you're interested, here's my account: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=359592007authType=nameauthToken=83fgtrk=miniprofile-primary-view-button_mSplash=1 Wow, you must have thousands of years of experience! g Yes, and I'm the only person on the whole of LinkedIn with one of my skills, so I can charge whatever I want for it! I must admit, it's quite an old picture and I'm not that young anymore, but I'm sure I'm not the only person who's flattered himself a little on LinkedIn. Anyway, here's a more recent picture, which I use on my profile at work, so people know who to look for when they want something done: http://www.britannica.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/129762-004-115a6735.jpg B The LinkedIn page won't display anything except for a join-up/sign-in page. Fuck 'em. I won't. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Hotel Cota 1400
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:44 AM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Crystal clear atmosphere, I can see Dracula from here... OK, so I can't. Thanks, P.J. The Bran Castle is in the opposite direction, but the view is blocked by even higher mountains:) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
The older and newer 340 and 540 are easy to set but they do not have an option to remember the previous setting which is a minor nuisance. Not that big a deal given the ease of string mode etc. I don't know about the older 540 but the older 360 and both new Ii models have a manual option with various power settings. They communicate well with K-5 and K-3 models. stan Sent from my iPad On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Dan, I've been heavily relying on flash in what I photograph: quick dances in a dark room, fill-in flash for my child indoors and outdoors photos, some candid portraits in dynamic settings. While I have only tried Pentax AF540 with K-7, I didn't like it, and bought Metz 58 (not 2 yet), that I've been happily using ever since, with both K-7 and K-5IIs. IMHO, it works much better (but not universally perfectly, - so you have to use it smartly). I've been using it in two modes: either in A, where the flash decides when to cut itself off, or in PTTL. In most cases, I find that A mode works better, especially when I turn the main flash up, and have the front fill-in sub-flash enabled. I use PTTL often for forward-facing (typically longer-distance) shots. Also, PTTL seems to work somewhat better at the very close range (1-3 feet), maybe because camera's CPU is faster to cut off this powerhouse. I agree, however, that the buttons of Pentax AF540 are more convenient than the menues of Metz 58. Those menues are frustrating. But I choose a better functionality. Also, there were some problems (and I don't remember all the details), that Pentax AF540 didn't not keep its settings upon power-cycling, and it might not allow a manual mode. (Larry might still remember this part, - he complained about that more recently.) It looks like Metz 58-2 might have a better hotshoe mount, which is welcome, as the one in Metz 58 is becoming a bit loose after a lot of use, and may require occasional adjustment after insertion. See my earlier response about Metz 58 in this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg656989.html HTH, Igor Thu Jul 31 16:36:09 EDT 2014 Paul pentax1941 at gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmatyola at gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Pug Submissions
Quoting John sesso...@earthlink.net: I got another question. How do you guys submit the photos that are larger than 800x600? You can't. Well, actually you can. But only as high as 800 x 800. I see them in the PUG where it says click on the image to see the original size, but it won't let me submit mine unless I shrink them down. What we have here is a terminology problem. In PUG terminology, Original Size doesn't actually mean Original Size. Let me explain how the PUG works. Images are displayed in the gallery in a way that doesn't require vertical scrolling of the image on most desktop monitors. So, any image with a vertical dimension more than about 530 pixels gets resized for display purposes. As an example, an image of (say) 600 (h) x 800 (v) pixels will be displayed in the gallery at about 398 x 530 pixels. In such cases the Click Image to view at original size message will appear. When you click that image it will display in a separate window at the full 600 x 800 pixels. So, in PUG terminology original size means original size as submitted. Suggestions as to better terminology most welcome... -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
Quoting John sesso...@earthlink.net: On 7/31/2014 3:01 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: On 31 Jul 2014, at 19:47, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: I was required to sign up to LinkedIn today in order to find something out about a consultant we'll be working with. In case you're interested, here's my account: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=359592007authType=nameauthToken=83fgtrk=miniprofile-primary-view-button_mSplash=1 Wow, you must have thousands of years of experience! g Yes, and I'm the only person on the whole of LinkedIn with one of my skills, so I can charge whatever I want for it! I must admit, it's quite an old picture and I'm not that young anymore, but I'm sure I'm not the only person who's flattered himself a little on LinkedIn. Anyway, here's a more recent picture, which I use on my profile at work, so people know who to look for when they want something done: http://www.britannica.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/129762-004-115a6735.jpg B The LinkedIn page won't display anything except for a join-up/sign-in page. Fuck 'em. I won't. Presumably Linkedin's theory is that if you want to make use of the service (as in viewing someone's Linkedin profile), you need to sign up. Probably not an unreasonable business approach - but I agree with your last sentence, regardless... -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: another stupid Thunderbird question
on 2014-07-31 10:08 John wrote We went through something about getting format-flowed (or flowed-format?) to work a while back I figured someone here would know the answer. It seems to work most of the time, but occasionally it's like an itch you can't scratch. it's literally format=flowed, a flag in a normally-invisible email header; it's something the sender has to do, and on by default in emails TB sends on the receiving end, TB uses it to decide whether to reflow an email to fill the window; if you are not seeing the problem on this message from me, i doubt it is related to format=flowed, but you could try this in the config editor: mailnews.display.disable_format_flowed_support = true probably all that will happen will be that messages like this will display with shorter lines (unless your viewing window is really narrow) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
Thanks, Stan. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: The older and newer 340 and 540 are easy to set but they do not have an option to remember the previous setting which is a minor nuisance. Not that big a deal given the ease of string mode etc. I don't know about the older 540 but the older 360 and both new Ii models have a manual option with various power settings. They communicate well with K-5 and K-3 models. stan Sent from my iPad On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Dan, I've been heavily relying on flash in what I photograph: quick dances in a dark room, fill-in flash for my child indoors and outdoors photos, some candid portraits in dynamic settings. While I have only tried Pentax AF540 with K-7, I didn't like it, and bought Metz 58 (not 2 yet), that I've been happily using ever since, with both K-7 and K-5IIs. IMHO, it works much better (but not universally perfectly, - so you have to use it smartly). I've been using it in two modes: either in A, where the flash decides when to cut itself off, or in PTTL. In most cases, I find that A mode works better, especially when I turn the main flash up, and have the front fill-in sub-flash enabled. I use PTTL often for forward-facing (typically longer-distance) shots. Also, PTTL seems to work somewhat better at the very close range (1-3 feet), maybe because camera's CPU is faster to cut off this powerhouse. I agree, however, that the buttons of Pentax AF540 are more convenient than the menues of Metz 58. Those menues are frustrating. But I choose a better functionality. Also, there were some problems (and I don't remember all the details), that Pentax AF540 didn't not keep its settings upon power-cycling, and it might not allow a manual mode. (Larry might still remember this part, - he complained about that more recently.) It looks like Metz 58-2 might have a better hotshoe mount, which is welcome, as the one in Metz 58 is becoming a bit loose after a lot of use, and may require occasional adjustment after insertion. See my earlier response about Metz 58 in this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg656989.html HTH, Igor Thu Jul 31 16:36:09 EDT 2014 Paul pentax1941 at gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmatyola at gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
When my AF 540 died, I replaced it with a metz 58-2. For just basic flash operations, it works a lot better. My AF-540 was an unreliable piece of crap. Unreliable in that it kept breaking and unreliable in that I could never rely on it to do what I told it to. The UI of the Metz is not very good. The other problem with the Metz is that I cannot figure out how to use it as a dumb optically triggered strobe. It’ll work with the fancy ttl controls, at least in theory, I haven’t had much luck, but when I want it on a stand, triggered off my studio lights, I seem to be SOL and just need to get an external optical trigger. I’ve been looking at the yongnuo and the Midwest photo strobes lately. On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Dan, I've been heavily relying on flash in what I photograph: quick dances in a dark room, fill-in flash for my child indoors and outdoors photos, some candid portraits in dynamic settings. While I have only tried Pentax AF540 with K-7, I didn't like it, and bought Metz 58 (not 2 yet), that I've been happily using ever since, with both K-7 and K-5IIs. IMHO, it works much better (but not universally perfectly, - so you have to use it smartly). I've been using it in two modes: either in A, where the flash decides when to cut itself off, or in PTTL. In most cases, I find that A mode works better, especially when I turn the main flash up, and have the front fill-in sub-flash enabled. I use PTTL often for forward-facing (typically longer-distance) shots. Also, PTTL seems to work somewhat better at the very close range (1-3 feet), maybe because camera's CPU is faster to cut off this powerhouse. I agree, however, that the buttons of Pentax AF540 are more convenient than the menues of Metz 58. Those menues are frustrating. But I choose a better functionality. Also, there were some problems (and I don't remember all the details), that Pentax AF540 didn't not keep its settings upon power-cycling, and it might not allow a manual mode. (Larry might still remember this part, - he complained about that more recently.) It looks like Metz 58-2 might have a better hotshoe mount, which is welcome, as the one in Metz 58 is becoming a bit loose after a lot of use, and may require occasional adjustment after insertion. See my earlier response about Metz 58 in this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg656989.html HTH, Igor Thu Jul 31 16:36:09 EDT 2014 Paul pentax1941 at gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmatyola at gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: UNICORN
G Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:48 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: It's not actually purebred Unicorn, it seems to be crossed with a Pegasus and a horse of a different color somewhere in it's ancestry. On 7/31/2014 7:11 AM, Attila Boros wrote: Pink unicorn? Must be extremely rare:) Doesn't look like it could fly though, was it displayed in the field? On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: From the Toyota display at the New Jersey Festival of Ballooning: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17822463size=lg Comments are invited. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Flash for K-5IIs
Sir, buy the cheapest Chinese make PTTL Flash you can buy on Evil Bay or Amazon with FREE Shipping. You won't regret it. I have one since May 2009 - for my K20D - and still enjoying it with the K-5. I have one since 1995 for the Leica R5 and still enjoying it. All electronics are ultimately expendable, but not ones costing from Pentax. Nanhi. camp:Thornhill, Ontario. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
Thanks, Larry. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: When my AF 540 died, I replaced it with a metz 58-2. For just basic flash operations, it works a lot better. My AF-540 was an unreliable piece of crap. Unreliable in that it kept breaking and unreliable in that I could never rely on it to do what I told it to. The UI of the Metz is not very good. The other problem with the Metz is that I cannot figure out how to use it as a dumb optically triggered strobe. It’ll work with the fancy ttl controls, at least in theory, I haven’t had much luck, but when I want it on a stand, triggered off my studio lights, I seem to be SOL and just need to get an external optical trigger. I’ve been looking at the yongnuo and the Midwest photo strobes lately. On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Dan, I've been heavily relying on flash in what I photograph: quick dances in a dark room, fill-in flash for my child indoors and outdoors photos, some candid portraits in dynamic settings. While I have only tried Pentax AF540 with K-7, I didn't like it, and bought Metz 58 (not 2 yet), that I've been happily using ever since, with both K-7 and K-5IIs. IMHO, it works much better (but not universally perfectly, - so you have to use it smartly). I've been using it in two modes: either in A, where the flash decides when to cut itself off, or in PTTL. In most cases, I find that A mode works better, especially when I turn the main flash up, and have the front fill-in sub-flash enabled. I use PTTL often for forward-facing (typically longer-distance) shots. Also, PTTL seems to work somewhat better at the very close range (1-3 feet), maybe because camera's CPU is faster to cut off this powerhouse. I agree, however, that the buttons of Pentax AF540 are more convenient than the menues of Metz 58. Those menues are frustrating. But I choose a better functionality. Also, there were some problems (and I don't remember all the details), that Pentax AF540 didn't not keep its settings upon power-cycling, and it might not allow a manual mode. (Larry might still remember this part, - he complained about that more recently.) It looks like Metz 58-2 might have a better hotshoe mount, which is welcome, as the one in Metz 58 is becoming a bit loose after a lot of use, and may require occasional adjustment after insertion. See my earlier response about Metz 58 in this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg656989.html HTH, Igor Thu Jul 31 16:36:09 EDT 2014 Paul pentax1941 at gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmatyola at gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Some pics from the Concours d'Elegance of America at St. Johns
Good set. I love old cars. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting and informative as usual, with top-notch photo work. I guess the Times can afford the best!~ G Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats on a job well done! On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The Times frequently uses a few of my photos, but in a piece for the website about last Sunday's Concours America, the photo editor chose to publish all 19 that I submitted. I have to remember for future efforts that they will crop everything to the same dimension, regardless of how I framed it. No short and wide pics for the Times. This project was a struggle because our power went out a few hours after I got home from the event. I had time to render a few pics on my desktop system, but had to finish the job on my laptop at the library. Fortunately, I had those first few for reference. Not happy with the text. A ham fisted editor worked on it because the auto section chief was on vacation and the paper was short handed. But that’s life in the journalism biz. Anyway, some good looking cars from the show in the pic gallery. My favorite is the BMW streamlined sports car that opens the set. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/automobiles/st-johns-concours-celebrated-virgil-exner-designs-and-jet-age-pickups.html?ref=automobiles_r=0# -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
No experience, but Bipin's advice wouldn't cost a lot to follow. :) Forgive my ignorance of your land's naming conventions, but are you known in the U.S. as Mr. Bipin or Mr. Gupta? I know from my dealings with people from China that this is not the dumb question that it may at first seem. :) Thank you, in advance, for your kind reply. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote: Sir, buy the cheapest Chinese make PTTL Flash you can buy on Evil Bay or Amazon with FREE Shipping. You won't regret it. I have one since May 2009 - for my K20D - and still enjoying it with the K-5. I have one since 1995 for the Leica R5 and still enjoying it. All electronics are ultimately expendable, but not ones costing from Pentax. Nanhi. camp:Thornhill, Ontario. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs look like photographs. ~ Alfred Stieglitz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: Sort of fascinated by what Sony has done with the a7s
I'm not terribly interested in mirrorless cameras (although I have to admit that I love that, thanks to the mirrorless design you can use about any legacy lens on them (with the proper adapter). But after reading a petapixel article on the a7s and its potentially being the best astrophotography (low light) camera on the planet, I had to read up on it. From a marketing standpoint, what Sony has done appears to be a head scratcher. From the article: The Sony a7S is the third variation of the full-frame mirrorless a7 series of cameras that Sony has recently released. First Sony released the 24.3 megapixel a7 and 36.4 megapixel a7R, the first mirrorless cameras with full-frame 24mm x 36mm sensors. The recently released a7S seems like sort of the oddball of the three a7 variations: It has only a 12.2 megapixel sensor and at the time of this writing, it costs almost $1000 more than the a7 and $200 more than the much higher resolution a7R. But with that 12.2 megapixel sensor comes some distinct advantages, especially for low-light photography and video. 12.2 Megapixels With the a7S, it seems like you’re paying more for less. But even with a sensor resolution that is a third the resolution of the cheaper a7R, the a7S offers two things in return: sensitivity and 4K video (sort of*). The A7s has larger pixels than pretty much any consumer level full-frame digital camera. The larger pixel size means that each pixel can collect physically more light. The more light per pixel, the better the signal to noise ratio for that pixel and so that pixel will more accurately detect the incoming light than a smaller pixel would. This means that, all other things being equal, the A7s should be capable of the best per pixel signal-to-noise ratio of any production camera. - - - Can you imagine what the Pentax hoards would say if Pentax came out with a full frame camera with fewer megapixels than the flagship? This Sony camera is fewer megapixels than the PREVIOUS Pentax flagships: the K-5, K-5ii/iis That is really interesting. Frankly, I think it spells disaster from a sales/marketing standpoint but I still find it intriguing that Sony went forward with it. To segue back into PentaxLand, it is clear that Pentax is going to introduce a full frame (although still NOT at this coming Photokina). What Pentax is telegraphing (or will at Photokina) is that they are designing/developing full frame lenses again. I expect them to talk about full frame more, even if they aren't showing a prototype. The thing is that the time is right (the technology planets have aligned) for Pentax to give its users a real choice: A 24.3MP APS-C camera OR a 24.3MP full frame camera (for a lot more money). Sony makes such a sensor and it is pretty awesome. It has also been out long enough that Pentax may be able to buy it in 2014/15 at prices that make the resulting camera sellable (unlike the Sony a7s at $2500). Check out this great comparison of a 24.3MP APS-C vs a 24.3MP full frame and decide for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6EmdyBPF2w Watch the above video in HD and with fullscreen. With other manufacturers making noise on moving in on Pentax medium format land, a bang-for-the-buck full frame camera is nearly a necessity. Pentax/Ricoh is making money on their Q line of cameras (especially in the parts of the world that are not the U.S.) and that is good for Pentax/Ricoh. I'm fairly convinced that Pentax will have to say a bit about full frame at Photokina (but not want to freeze sales of existing products) and will have a 24.3MP full frame introduced in early 2015. Or maybe I'm just Charlie Brown believing that Lucy is going to actually hold the football for me to kick THIS TIME. :) -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs look like photographs. ~ Alfred Stieglitz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Sort of fascinated by what Sony has done with the a7s
Oops. Forgot to link to the Petapixel article (for those that haven't seen it): http://petapixel.com/2014/07/30/sony-a7s-astrophotography-review/ Sony manufactures the 12.2MP full frame chip. Frankly I think they HAD to develop a camera for it because third parties aren't buying it and their marketing departments want more MP from a full frame sensor. Sony was forced to eat their own dogfood but that doesn't mean it won't be a cracking good camera - if a bit pricey for my tastes. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not terribly interested in mirrorless cameras (although I have to admit that I love that, thanks to the mirrorless design you can use about any legacy lens on them (with the proper adapter). But after reading a petapixel article on the a7s and its potentially being the best astrophotography (low light) camera on the planet, I had to read up on it. From a marketing standpoint, what Sony has done appears to be a head scratcher. From the article: The Sony a7S is the third variation of the full-frame mirrorless a7 series of cameras that Sony has recently released. First Sony released the 24.3 megapixel a7 and 36.4 megapixel a7R, the first mirrorless cameras with full-frame 24mm x 36mm sensors. The recently released a7S seems like sort of the oddball of the three a7 variations: It has only a 12.2 megapixel sensor and at the time of this writing, it costs almost $1000 more than the a7 and $200 more than the much higher resolution a7R. But with that 12.2 megapixel sensor comes some distinct advantages, especially for low-light photography and video. 12.2 Megapixels With the a7S, it seems like you’re paying more for less. But even with a sensor resolution that is a third the resolution of the cheaper a7R, the a7S offers two things in return: sensitivity and 4K video (sort of*). The A7s has larger pixels than pretty much any consumer level full-frame digital camera. The larger pixel size means that each pixel can collect physically more light. The more light per pixel, the better the signal to noise ratio for that pixel and so that pixel will more accurately detect the incoming light than a smaller pixel would. This means that, all other things being equal, the A7s should be capable of the best per pixel signal-to-noise ratio of any production camera. - - - Can you imagine what the Pentax hoards would say if Pentax came out with a full frame camera with fewer megapixels than the flagship? This Sony camera is fewer megapixels than the PREVIOUS Pentax flagships: the K-5, K-5ii/iis That is really interesting. Frankly, I think it spells disaster from a sales/marketing standpoint but I still find it intriguing that Sony went forward with it. To segue back into PentaxLand, it is clear that Pentax is going to introduce a full frame (although still NOT at this coming Photokina). What Pentax is telegraphing (or will at Photokina) is that they are designing/developing full frame lenses again. I expect them to talk about full frame more, even if they aren't showing a prototype. The thing is that the time is right (the technology planets have aligned) for Pentax to give its users a real choice: A 24.3MP APS-C camera OR a 24.3MP full frame camera (for a lot more money). Sony makes such a sensor and it is pretty awesome. It has also been out long enough that Pentax may be able to buy it in 2014/15 at prices that make the resulting camera sellable (unlike the Sony a7s at $2500). Check out this great comparison of a 24.3MP APS-C vs a 24.3MP full frame and decide for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6EmdyBPF2w Watch the above video in HD and with fullscreen. With other manufacturers making noise on moving in on Pentax medium format land, a bang-for-the-buck full frame camera is nearly a necessity. Pentax/Ricoh is making money on their Q line of cameras (especially in the parts of the world that are not the U.S.) and that is good for Pentax/Ricoh. I'm fairly convinced that Pentax will have to say a bit about full frame at Photokina (but not want to freeze sales of existing products) and will have a 24.3MP full frame introduced in early 2015. Or maybe I'm just Charlie Brown believing that Lucy is going to actually hold the football for me to kick THIS TIME. :) -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs look like photographs. ~ Alfred Stieglitz -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs look like photographs. ~ Alfred Stieglitz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Flash for K-5IIs
Crikey, Larry. Why use a $400 flash as a dumb optically triggered slave? You can get old Vivitar 283/285s for that purpose and they are a dime a dozen these days. Add a Vivitar Vari-Power Module (admittedly getting harder to find) and you've got oodles of flexibility on an optically fired slave. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: When my AF 540 died, I replaced it with a metz 58-2. For just basic flash operations, it works a lot better. My AF-540 was an unreliable piece of crap. Unreliable in that it kept breaking and unreliable in that I could never rely on it to do what I told it to. The UI of the Metz is not very good. The other problem with the Metz is that I cannot figure out how to use it as a dumb optically triggered strobe. It’ll work with the fancy ttl controls, at least in theory, I haven’t had much luck, but when I want it on a stand, triggered off my studio lights, I seem to be SOL and just need to get an external optical trigger. I’ve been looking at the yongnuo and the Midwest photo strobes lately. On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Dan, I've been heavily relying on flash in what I photograph: quick dances in a dark room, fill-in flash for my child indoors and outdoors photos, some candid portraits in dynamic settings. While I have only tried Pentax AF540 with K-7, I didn't like it, and bought Metz 58 (not 2 yet), that I've been happily using ever since, with both K-7 and K-5IIs. IMHO, it works much better (but not universally perfectly, - so you have to use it smartly). I've been using it in two modes: either in A, where the flash decides when to cut itself off, or in PTTL. In most cases, I find that A mode works better, especially when I turn the main flash up, and have the front fill-in sub-flash enabled. I use PTTL often for forward-facing (typically longer-distance) shots. Also, PTTL seems to work somewhat better at the very close range (1-3 feet), maybe because camera's CPU is faster to cut off this powerhouse. I agree, however, that the buttons of Pentax AF540 are more convenient than the menues of Metz 58. Those menues are frustrating. But I choose a better functionality. Also, there were some problems (and I don't remember all the details), that Pentax AF540 didn't not keep its settings upon power-cycling, and it might not allow a manual mode. (Larry might still remember this part, - he complained about that more recently.) It looks like Metz 58-2 might have a better hotshoe mount, which is welcome, as the one in Metz 58 is becoming a bit loose after a lot of use, and may require occasional adjustment after insertion. See my earlier response about Metz 58 in this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg656989.html HTH, Igor Thu Jul 31 16:36:09 EDT 2014 Paul pentax1941 at gmail.com wrote: I have both the Metz 58 and the Pentax AF540 and would pretty much concur with the Amazon review from Darren's link. Both will tilt and swivel, features that I prefer for better lighting. The Pentax is a little quicker to use since you can make most changes via buttons rather than spending time in menus. The secondary flash on the Metz is very useful for a fill light and the Metz is upgradeable via a USB cable. Either one will serve you well. The Pentax *is* pricier by about $50. -p On 7/31/2014 1:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I've never owned a modern Pentax flash. When it came time to get one, I looked at the power and features and went with the Metz 58 AF-1. I think that has been supplanted by the AF-2 now, but it still gets very decent reviews: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/744545-REG/Metz_MZ_58327PS_mecablitz_58_AF_2_TTL.html If you don't need that much power: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Metz+52+AF-1+pentaxN=0InitialSearch=yessts=maTop+Nav-Search= That being said, the first review on this page is worth reading: http://www.amazon.com/Metz-mecablitz-Digital-Pentax-Cameras/product-reviews/B004DUMU8I/ref=pd_sxp_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 Hope this helps. On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmatyola at gmail.com wrote: I have been extremely pleased with my new K-5IIs. Recently, however, my hotshoe mounted flash has be acting up, and I am thinking of replacing it. Which flash unit would you recommend for use with the K-5IIs? Thanks in advance for your advice. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to
Re: Empire Parliamentary Delegation to Australia, 1926
On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:20 am, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote: They're fairly interesting, but I would have tried to group them chronologically/geographically. The delegation appears to be bouncing around back forth across the country. And perhaps put all the color photos in their own gallery. Both good suggestions - I'd thought about both when putting the gallery together but was a bit lacking in willpower. I'll get around to it eventually. Not sure what we're going to do with the originals... will have to discuss with the mother-in-law. They should probably be in a museum somewhere. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Social media, your photos, and copyright
On Aug 1, 2014, at 5:38 am, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: I was required to sign up to LinkedIn today in order to find something out about a consultant we'll be working with. In case you're interested, here's my account: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=359592007authType=nameauthToken=83fgtrk=miniprofile-primary-view-button_mSplash=1 Asks me to log in (typical). I do have a LinkedIn account but haven't updated it for ages. I despise that site and have been thinking about removing my account or sarcastically / humorously polluting my profile. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.