RE: [NF] Input and html
Hi Virgil, How 'bout setting up some hidden input boxes, filling them with the values and reading those out in your saving routine? That way there's no labeling needed. For parsing the querystring variables: simple ASP test page: %@ Language=VBScript % % cVar1 = Request.QueryString.Item(var1) cVar2 = Request.QueryString.Item(var2) % html body var1: %=cVar1%br/ var2: %=cVar2% /body /html calling url: http://localhost/dnn/test/ASPTest.asp?var1=1234var2= Result: var1: 1234 var2: greetings, Sietse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: dinsdag 26 december 2006 5:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Input and html I've got a page that I want to grab the variables passed in the url link which are branch and unit. TO see it in acxtion, go to http://www.virgilslist.com Click on Navy Click on FF-1059 You will see a list of people in this group. Below that there are two fields in an input tag that say Do Not Change I want to grab the branch and unit and place them in those fields.. Then I want the user to fill in the rest of the fields and click the submit button which passes the variables to another page which adds them to the sql server tables.. Everythings basically working except for grabbing those two fields and then sending them on down the line. I also would like to change those two fields from a get to a say (for want of a better description), but I havent found that this is possible yet. I can grab the variables no problem, but I'm not sure how to pass them to the input tag. Anybody got any ideas ? Thanks, Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/601 - Release Date: 12/24/2006 11:31 AM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Name location of object reference counter dll
I'm relatively certain that I've seen a public domain dll that returns the number of references the fox is tracking for a native object, but I don't remember it's name, programmer, or where I can get a copy. Does this ring any bells? -Lew ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Input and html
That’s what I was trying to do, but because of the way this example program was developed, I have to put it in the code below OR figure out a better way to do it. Here is my retrieval code: --- Dim vjbBranch vjbBranch = Request.QueryString(branch) Dim vjbUnit vjbUnit = Request.QueryString(unit) --- And here is where I'm sending it to the next page to add to sql server -- form name=input action=addroster.asp method=get table border=0 width=100% tr td align=right width=50%Do Not Change:/td td width=50% input type=hidden name=vjb1 value=vjbbranch //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Do Not Change:/td td width=50% input type=hidden name=vjb2 value=vjbUnit //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%First Name:/td td width=50% input type=text name=firstname //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Last Name:/td td width=50% input type=text name=lastname //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%City:/td td width=50% input type=text name=city //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%State:/td td width=50% input type=text name=state //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Zip Code:/td td width=50% input type=text name=zipcode //td /tr /table input type=submit value=submit id=Submit1 language=javascript onclick=addroster.asp / br / /form Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sietse Wijnker Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 2:07 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Input and html Hi Virgil, How 'bout setting up some hidden input boxes, filling them with the values and reading those out in your saving routine? That way there's no labeling needed. For parsing the querystring variables: simple ASP test page: %@ Language=VBScript % % cVar1 = Request.QueryString.Item(var1) cVar2 = Request.QueryString.Item(var2) % html body var1: %=cVar1%br/ var2: %=cVar2% /body /html calling url: http://localhost/dnn/test/ASPTest.asp?var1=1234var2= Result: var1: 1234 var2: greetings, Sietse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: dinsdag 26 december 2006 5:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Input and html I've got a page that I want to grab the variables passed in the url link which are branch and unit. TO see it in acxtion, go to http://www.virgilslist.com Click on Navy Click on FF-1059 You will see a list of people in this group. Below that there are two fields in an input tag that say Do Not Change I want to grab the branch and unit and place them in those fields.. Then I want the user to fill in the rest of the fields and click the submit button which passes the variables to another page which adds them to the sql server tables.. Everythings basically working except for grabbing those two fields and then sending them on down the line. I also would like to change those two fields from a get to a say (for want of a better description), but I havent found that this is possible yet. I can grab the variables no problem, but I'm not sure how to pass them to the input tag. Anybody got any ideas ? Thanks, Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/601 - Release Date: 12/24/2006 11:31 AM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Sign of a stroke
Here is some good information: # STROKE: Remember The 1st Three Letters...S.T.R. My friend sent this to me and encouraged me to post it and spread the word. I agree. If everyone can remember something this simple, we could save some folks. Seriously.. Please read: STROKE IDENTIFICATION: During a BBQ, a friend stumbled and took a little fall - she assured everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) and just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes. They got her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food - while she appeared a bit shaken up, Ingrid went about enjoying herself the rest of the evening. Ingrid's husband called later telling everyone that his wife had been taken to the hospital - (at 6:00pm , Ingrid passed away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ. Had they known how to identify the signs of a stroke, perhaps Ingrid would be with us today. Some don't die. They end up in a helpless, hopeless condition instead. It only takes a minute to read this... A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed, and then getting the patient medically cared for within 3 hours, which is tough. RECOGNIZING A STROKE Thank God for the sense to remember the 3 steps, STR . Read and Learn! Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer severe brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke. Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions: S* Ask the individual to SMILE . T * Ask the person to TALK to SPEAK A SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently) (i.e. . It is sunny out today). R * Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS. NOTE : Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out their tongue. If the tongue is 'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other that is also an indication of a stroke. If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call 911 immediately!! and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher. A cardiologist says if everyone who gets this e-mail sends it to 10 people; you can bet that at least one life will be saved #-- Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Sign of a stroke
On Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:15 PM Leland Jackson wrote: snipped NOTE : Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out their tongue. If the tongue is 'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other that is also an indication of a stroke. If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call 911 immediately!! and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher. snipped Make sure you know all of the facts: http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/stroke.asp David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Sign of a stroke
Thanks for the information David. I will pass your link to my wife, who sent me the email. Regards, LelandJ David Crooks wrote: On Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:15 PM Leland Jackson wrote: snipped NOTE : Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out their tongue. If the tongue is 'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other that is also an indication of a stroke. If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call 911 immediately!! and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher. snipped Make sure you know all of the facts: http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/stroke.asp David L. Crooks [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
The DOJ is building a huge database that could eventually hold a dossier on every citizen in the country. Humm, this could lead to a society where there are no more secrets; no more privacy. #-- Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears Size and Scope of the Interagency Investigative Tool Worry Civil Libertarians By Dan Eggen http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/dan+eggen/ Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, December 26, 2006; Page A07 The Justice Department is building a massive database that allows state and local police officers around the country to search millions of case files from the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration and other federal law enforcement agencies, according to Justice officials. The system, known as OneDOJ, already holds approximately 1 million case records and is projected to triple in size over the next three years, Justice officials said. The files include investigative reports, criminal-history information, details of offenses, and the names, addresses and other information of criminal suspects or targets, officials said. The database is billed by its supporters as a much-needed step toward better information-sharing with local law enforcement agencies, which have long complained about a lack of cooperation from the federal government. But civil-liberties and privacy advocates say the scale and contents of such a database raise immediate privacy and civil rights concerns, in part because tens of thousands of local police officers could gain access to personal details about people who have not been arrested or charged with crimes. The little-noticed program has been coming together over the past year and a half. It already is in use in pilot projects with local police in Seattle, San Diego and a handful of other areas, officials said. About 150 separate police agencies have access, officials said. But in a memorandum sent last week to the FBI, U.S. attorneys and other senior Justice officials, Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty announced that the program will be expanded immediately to 15 additional regions and that federal authorities will accelerate . . . efforts to share information from both open and closed cases. Eventually, the department hopes, the database will be a central mechanism for sharing federal law enforcement information with local and state investigators, who now run checks individually, and often manually, with Justice's five main law enforcement agencies: the FBI, the DEA, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Bureau of Prisons and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Within three years, officials said, about 750 law enforcement agencies nationwide will have access. In an interview last week, McNulty said the goal is to broaden the pool of data available to local and state investigators beyond systems such as the National Crime Information Center, the FBI-run repository of basic criminal records used by police and sheriff's deputies around the country. By tapping into the details available in incident reports, interrogation summaries and other documents, investigators will dramatically improve their chances of closing cases, he said. The goal is that all of U.S. law enforcement will be able to look at each other's records to solve cases and protect U.S. citizens, McNulty said. With OneDOJ, we will essentially hook them up to a pipe that will take them into its records. McNulty and other Justice officials emphasize that the information available in the database already is held individually by the FBI and other federal agencies. Much information will be kept out of the system, including data about public corruption cases, classified or sensitive topics, confidential informants, administrative cases and civil rights probes involving allegations of wrongdoing by police, officials said. But civil-liberties and privacy advocates -- many of whom are already alarmed by the proliferation of federal databases -- warn that granting broad access to such a system is almost certain to invite abuse and lead to police mistakes. Barry Steinhardt, director of the Technology and Liberty Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said the main problem is one of garbage in, garbage out, because case files frequently include erroneous or unproved allegations. Raw police files or FBI reports can never be verified and can never be corrected, Steinhardt said. That is a problem with even more formal and controlled systems. The idea that they're creating another whole system that is going to be full of inaccurate information is just chilling. Steinhardt noted that in 2003, the FBI announced that it would no longer meet the Privacy Act's accuracy requirements for the National Crime Information Center, its main criminal-background-check database, which is used by 80,000 law enforcement agencies across the country.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
= Subject: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = The DOJ is building a huge database that could eventually = hold a dossier on every citizen in the country. Humm, = this could lead to a society where there are no more = secrets; no more privacy. = This means nothing these days. With the recent extension of the PATRIOT Act, no reason is needed to arrest or incarcerate anyone. Repeat, NO reason, not a one, not a scintilla of one. And forget about habeas corpus too. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Windows 98 MPREXE error
Just thought I'd throw this one to the Collective and see what might come of it... I have a few boxes around here that throw an error shortly after startup (but after login) of the 'MPREXE' variety. It's just a nuisance dialog box, and pressing a button gets past it... My research has found 'solutions' ranging from mouse drivers to erasing password files to network cards Has anyone around here run into this, and if so how'd you resolve it? -- Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - Performance that Packs. www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
It means something in the overall big picture of the War on Terrorism. The War on Terrorism is a fabricated pretext to usher in the PNAC agenda. The PNAC agenda is to ensure American and Israel will be the sole super powers of the world. The PNAC is made up of Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealots), who want to protect Israel, control the ME and its oil reserves and thus the wealth of the world, and preempt any threat to American and Israeli dominance in the world. Israel's doctrine of preemption includes targeting threats, whether they be countries or individuals, and summarily eliminating/executing them. The new DOJ database is just part of this new world order, along with the remaking of the Supreme Court, increased executive branch powers at the expense of constitution guarantees and checks and balances, and more control over the general population, at the expense of constitutional freedoms. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = The DOJ is building a huge database that could eventually = hold a dossier on every citizen in the country. Humm, = this could lead to a society where there are no more = secrets; no more privacy. = This means nothing these days. With the recent extension of the PATRIOT Act, no reason is needed to arrest or incarcerate anyone. Repeat, NO reason, not a one, not a scintilla of one. And forget about habeas corpus too. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
= Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = It means something in the overall big picture of the War on = Terrorism. The War on Terrorism is a fabricated pretext = to usher in the PNAC agenda. The PNAC agenda is to ensure = American and Israel will be the sole super powers of the = world. The PNAC is made up of Neoconservatives, (eg = Zionist War Zealots), who want to protect Israel, control = the ME and its oil reserves and thus the wealth of the = world, and preempt any threat to American and Israeli = dominance in the world. Israel's doctrine of preemption = includes targeting threats, whether they be countries or = individuals, and summarily eliminating/executing them. The = new DOJ database is just part of this new world order, along = with the remaking of the Supreme Court, increased executive = branch powers at the expense of constitution guarantees and = checks and balances, and more control over the general = population, at the expense of constitutional freedoms. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = Exactly. I agree 110% (with the exception of the Zionists who are not instigators as much as simply riding the crest of the wave as the only ME people who can be trusted over the long haul). And that is just the tip of the iceberg. So what's the big deal about adding this database to the arsenal? This is very minor and of little consequence in terms of the big picture, as is the recent election and its forthcoming impact on our representative government. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: ON KEY with barcoding
Sietse Wijnker wrote: Hi, I've worked with some barcode scanners sofar and ech of them allowed for a prefix character in the settings. Set this prefix to the on key label and the on key label should work. Regards a merry christmas, Sietse I prefer Sietse's idea of programming the scanner to use a prefix... just document what that prefix is and keep the barcode to scan it in handy for when some nimrod resets the scanner... (This happened to me a couple weeks ago so I'm still a bit testy about it... ) As an alternative maybe playing around with a form's KEYPRESS (or whatever) method... some fun logic to work out for other legit keystrokes, but I have every confidence in you to figure it out... g Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - Performance that Packs. www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
On Dec 26, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote: This means nothing these days. With the recent extension of the PATRIOT Act, no reason is needed to arrest or incarcerate anyone. Repeat, NO reason, not a one, not a scintilla of one. And forget about habeas corpus too. That's not true. American citizens have the same Constitutional protections they always have; these changes only apply to enemy combatants. Of course, all it takes to become an enemy combatant is for the government to say you are... -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
Many of President Bush's cabinet and political appointments are Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealot), that live in the US, but have dual citizenship in both the US and Israel. They are not instigators of the War on Terrorism; they created it. If we want to preserve our American heritage and freedoms, all Americans need to be educated about the dangers of the direction in which the PNAC is leading the US. We can preserve our freedom and the American way of life using the democratic vote as our weapon. If the country continues in the wrong direction, we will find ourself living under a morph democracy, which limits our choices of official we can elect to office and our freedoms. Protection of the American people and constitutional freedom are no mutually exclusive goals. Both can be achieve with the right balance. When I first moved to Abilene, Texas in 1979, city politics were control by a small group of influential Abilenians organized under the banner of Citizens For Responsible Government. Whoever this group decided to support for city council was a shoe-in. This seemed odd to me having come from Dallas, Texas, as the Citizens for Responsible Government never consulted me, or anyone else, about what was wanted by the population of Abilene as a representative to the city council. America could slip into the same trap, with a small influence group of individuals controlling who becomes our representatives in Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch. In such a democratic form of of government, the elected would be representing this small group of individual, rather than mainstream Americans. Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government official with access to detailed, sensitive information about every American at your fingertips. Information can be a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, Armed service record, and eventually DNA makeup, etc. A secret police force would be needed to maintain the database. The secret police could add to the database based on their surveillance, investigations, rumors, etc. Citizen could be encourage to add to the information in the database by reporting personal information that came to them from neighbor or aquantance, etc. You could then blackmail citizens, target groups of citizen for purposes of discrimination, abuse, or even elimination. It would be the perfect tool to insure perpetual power in government. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = It means something in the overall big picture of the War on = Terrorism. The War on Terrorism is a fabricated pretext = to usher in the PNAC agenda. The PNAC agenda is to ensure = American and Israel will be the sole super powers of the = world. The PNAC is made up of Neoconservatives, (eg = Zionist War Zealots), who want to protect Israel, control = the ME and its oil reserves and thus the wealth of the = world, and preempt any threat to American and Israeli = dominance in the world. Israel's doctrine of preemption = includes targeting threats, whether they be countries or = individuals, and summarily eliminating/executing them. The = new DOJ database is just part of this new world order, along = with the remaking of the Supreme Court, increased executive = branch powers at the expense of constitution guarantees and = checks and balances, and more control over the general = population, at the expense of constitutional freedoms. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = Exactly. I agree 110% (with the exception of the Zionists who are not instigators as much as simply riding the crest of the wave as the only ME people who can be trusted over the long haul). And that is just the tip of the iceberg. So what's the big deal about adding this database to the arsenal? This is very minor and of little consequence in terms of the big picture, as is the recent election and its forthcoming impact on our representative government. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
I bet you'd like to give those Zionists a Xyclon-B shower, wouldn't you? --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many of President Bush's cabinet and political appointments are Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealot), that live in the US, but have dual citizenship in both the US and Israel. They are not instigators of the War on Terrorism; they created it. If we want to preserve our American heritage and freedoms, all Americans need to be educated about the dangers of the direction in which the PNAC is leading the US. We can preserve our freedom and the American way of life using the democratic vote as our weapon. If the country continues in the wrong direction, we will find ourself living under a morph democracy, which limits our choices of official we can elect to office and our freedoms. Protection of the American people and constitutional freedom are no mutually exclusive goals. Both can be achieve with the right balance. When I first moved to Abilene, Texas in 1979, city politics were control by a small group of influential Abilenians organized under the banner of Citizens For Responsible Government. Whoever this group decided to support for city council was a shoe-in. This seemed odd to me having come from Dallas, Texas, as the Citizens for Responsible Government never consulted me, or anyone else, about what was wanted by the population of Abilene as a representative to the city council. America could slip into the same trap, with a small influence group of individuals controlling who becomes our representatives in Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch. In such a democratic form of of government, the elected would be representing this small group of individual, rather than mainstream Americans. Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government official with access to detailed, sensitive information about every American at your fingertips. Information can be a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, Armed service record, and eventually DNA makeup, etc. A secret police force would be needed to maintain the database. The secret police could add to the database based on their surveillance, investigations, rumors, etc. Citizen could be encourage to add to the information in the database by reporting personal information that came to them from neighbor or aquantance, etc. You could then blackmail citizens, target groups of citizen for purposes of discrimination, abuse, or even elimination. It would be the perfect tool to insure perpetual power in government. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = It means something in the overall big picture of the War on = Terrorism. The War on Terrorism is a fabricated pretext = to usher in the PNAC agenda. The PNAC agenda is to ensure = American and Israel will be the sole super powers of the = world. The PNAC is made up of Neoconservatives, (eg = Zionist War Zealots), who want to protect Israel, control = the ME and its oil reserves and thus the wealth of the = world, and preempt any threat to American and Israeli = dominance in the world. Israel's doctrine of preemption = includes targeting threats, whether they be countries or = individuals, and summarily eliminating/executing them. The = new DOJ database is just part of this new world order, along = with the remaking of the Supreme Court, increased executive = branch powers at the expense of constitution guarantees and = checks and balances, and more control over the general = population, at the expense of constitutional freedoms. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = Exactly. I agree 110% (with the exception of the Zionists who are not instigators as much as simply riding the crest of the wave as the only ME people who can be trusted over the long haul). And that is just the tip of the iceberg. So what's the big deal about adding this database to the arsenal? This is very minor and of little consequence in terms of the big picture, as is the recent election and its forthcoming impact on our representative government. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
So, you think you can kill the thread by invoking the dreaded anti-Semite label? I am not an anti-Semite; I just don't agree with the Neoconservative Doctrines. I hold all people in equally high esteem, and strive to judge people based on the content of their character; not race. I hold all human life as sacred. This is getting off on a tangent. We were talking about a secret database that hold a dossier on americans. Perhaps you have a though along those lines? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I bet you'd like to give those Zionists a Xyclon-B shower, wouldn't you? --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many of President Bush's cabinet and political appointments are Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealot), that live in the US, but have dual citizenship in both the US and Israel. They are not instigators of the War on Terrorism; they created it. If we want to preserve our American heritage and freedoms, all Americans need to be educated about the dangers of the direction in which the PNAC is leading the US. We can preserve our freedom and the American way of life using the democratic vote as our weapon. If the country continues in the wrong direction, we will find ourself living under a morph democracy, which limits our choices of official we can elect to office and our freedoms. Protection of the American people and constitutional freedom are no mutually exclusive goals. Both can be achieve with the right balance. When I first moved to Abilene, Texas in 1979, city politics were control by a small group of influential Abilenians organized under the banner of Citizens For Responsible Government. Whoever this group decided to support for city council was a shoe-in. This seemed odd to me having come from Dallas, Texas, as the Citizens for Responsible Government never consulted me, or anyone else, about what was wanted by the population of Abilene as a representative to the city council. America could slip into the same trap, with a small influence group of individuals controlling who becomes our representatives in Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch. In such a democratic form of of government, the elected would be representing this small group of individual, rather than mainstream Americans. Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government official with access to detailed, sensitive information about every American at your fingertips. Information can be a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, Armed service record, and eventually DNA makeup, etc. A secret police force would be needed to maintain the database. The secret police could add to the database based on their surveillance, investigations, rumors, etc. Citizen could be encourage to add to the information in the database by reporting personal information that came to them from neighbor or aquantance, etc. You could then blackmail citizens, target groups of citizen for purposes of discrimination, abuse, or even elimination. It would be the perfect tool to insure perpetual power in government. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = It means something in the overall big picture of the War on = Terrorism. The War on Terrorism is a fabricated pretext = to usher in the PNAC agenda. The PNAC agenda is to ensure = American and Israel will be the sole super powers of the = world. The PNAC is made up of Neoconservatives, (eg = Zionist War Zealots), who want to protect Israel, control = the ME and its oil reserves and thus the wealth of the = world, and preempt any threat to American and Israeli = dominance in the world. Israel's doctrine of preemption = includes targeting threats, whether they be countries or = individuals, and summarily eliminating/executing them. The = new DOJ database is just part of this new world order, along = with the remaking of the Supreme Court, increased executive = branch powers at the expense of constitution guarantees and = checks and balances, and more control over the general = population, at the expense of constitutional freedoms. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = Exactly. I agree 110% (with the exception of the Zionists who are not instigators as much as simply riding the crest of the wave as the only ME people who can be trusted over the long haul). And that is just the tip of the iceberg. So what's the big deal about adding this database to the arsenal? This is very minor and of little consequence in terms of the big picture, as is the recent
[NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP
Not everyone has a half-dozen computers in their office or home so that they can use a separate machine for each OS they want to work with. After all, Tom Watson of IBM once said that he couldn't imagine a need for more than five computers in the entire world. As a result, setting up a single machine to host more than one operating system is a common requirement. Unfortunately, much of the reference material out there is old or inappropriate for a dual boot of Fedora's latest release and the tried-and-true Windows XP. Here's how to get the two to co-exist nicely on the same computer with a minimum of fuss, and not too much Linux expertise either! http://www.hentzenwerke.com/wp/dualboot_fc6xp.htm Tell all of your friends. Whil ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
Oh please, people use the word Zionist when they really want to say filthy Jew --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you think you can kill the thread by invoking the dreaded anti-Semite label? I am not an anti-Semite; I just don't agree with the Neoconservative Doctrines. I hold all people in equally high esteem, and strive to judge people based on the content of their character; not race. I hold all human life as sacred. This is getting off on a tangent. We were talking about a secret database that hold a dossier on americans. Perhaps you have a though along those lines? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I bet you'd like to give those Zionists a Xyclon-B shower, wouldn't you? --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many of President Bush's cabinet and political appointments are Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealot), that live in the US, but have dual citizenship in both the US and Israel. They are not instigators of the War on Terrorism; they created it. If we want to preserve our American heritage and freedoms, all Americans need to be educated about the dangers of the direction in which the PNAC is leading the US. We can preserve our freedom and the American way of life using the democratic vote as our weapon. If the country continues in the wrong direction, we will find ourself living under a morph democracy, which limits our choices of official we can elect to office and our freedoms. Protection of the American people and constitutional freedom are no mutually exclusive goals. Both can be achieve with the right balance. When I first moved to Abilene, Texas in 1979, city politics were control by a small group of influential Abilenians organized under the banner of Citizens For Responsible Government. Whoever this group decided to support for city council was a shoe-in. This seemed odd to me having come from Dallas, Texas, as the Citizens for Responsible Government never consulted me, or anyone else, about what was wanted by the population of Abilene as a representative to the city council. America could slip into the same trap, with a small influence group of individuals controlling who becomes our representatives in Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch. In such a democratic form of of government, the elected would be representing this small group of individual, rather than mainstream Americans. Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government official with access to detailed, sensitive information about every American at your fingertips. Information can be a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, Armed service record, and eventually DNA makeup, etc. A secret police force would be needed to maintain the database. The secret police could add to the database based on their surveillance, investigations, rumors, etc. Citizen could be encourage to add to the information in the database by reporting personal information that came to them from neighbor or aquantance, etc. You could then blackmail citizens, target groups of citizen for purposes of discrimination, abuse, or even elimination. It would be the perfect tool to insure perpetual power in government. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = It means something in the overall big picture of the War on = Terrorism. The War on Terrorism is a fabricated pretext = to usher in the PNAC agenda. The PNAC agenda is to ensure = American and Israel will be the sole super powers of the = world. The PNAC is made up of Neoconservatives, (eg = Zionist War Zealots), who want to protect Israel, control = the ME and its oil reserves and thus the wealth of the = world, and preempt any threat to American and Israeli = dominance in the world. Israel's doctrine of preemption = includes targeting threats, whether they be === message truncated === ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Best wishes!
And may all your clients pay you on time. --- Malcolm Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2+ (Postfix Forth style) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
I didn't invent the word Zionist, and it really doesn't carry any negative racial overtures, as far as I can see. I'm just basically opposed to war, unless the US is unavoidable pushed into it. I'm certainly opposed to preemptive war; like PNAC could somehow see the future, and then shape it using present preemptive wars. You still haven't commented on your thinking about the huge database under ongoing construction. #-- The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 Zionism Zion*ism, n. Zion + -ism. Among the Jews, a theory, plan, or movement for colonizing their own race in Palestine, the land of Zion, or, if that is impracticable, elsewhere, either for religious or nationalizing purposes; -- called also Zion movement. -- Zion*ist, n. -- Zi`on*istic, a. Webster 1913 Suppl. # Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: Oh please, people use the word Zionist when they really want to say filthy Jew --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you think you can kill the thread by invoking the dreaded anti-Semite label? I am not an anti-Semite; I just don't agree with the Neoconservative Doctrines. I hold all people in equally high esteem, and strive to judge people based on the content of their character; not race. I hold all human life as sacred. This is getting off on a tangent. We were talking about a secret database that hold a dossier on americans. Perhaps you have a though along those lines? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I bet you'd like to give those Zionists a Xyclon-B shower, wouldn't you? --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many of President Bush's cabinet and political appointments are Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealot), that live in the US, but have dual citizenship in both the US and Israel. They are not instigators of the War on Terrorism; they created it. If we want to preserve our American heritage and freedoms, all Americans need to be educated about the dangers of the direction in which the PNAC is leading the US. We can preserve our freedom and the American way of life using the democratic vote as our weapon. If the country continues in the wrong direction, we will find ourself living under a morph democracy, which limits our choices of official we can elect to office and our freedoms. Protection of the American people and constitutional freedom are no mutually exclusive goals. Both can be achieve with the right balance. When I first moved to Abilene, Texas in 1979, city politics were control by a small group of influential Abilenians organized under the banner of Citizens For Responsible Government. Whoever this group decided to support for city council was a shoe-in. This seemed odd to me having come from Dallas, Texas, as the Citizens for Responsible Government never consulted me, or anyone else, about what was wanted by the population of Abilene as a representative to the city council. America could slip into the same trap, with a small influence group of individuals controlling who becomes our representatives in Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch. In such a democratic form of of government, the elected would be representing this small group of individual, rather than mainstream Americans. Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government official with access to detailed, sensitive information about every American at your fingertips. Information can be a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, Armed service record, and eventually DNA makeup, etc. A secret police force would be needed to maintain the database. The secret police could add to the database based on their surveillance, investigations, rumors, etc. Citizen could be encourage to add to the information in the database by reporting personal information that came to them from neighbor or aquantance, etc. You could then blackmail citizens, target groups of citizen for purposes of discrimination, abuse, or even elimination. It would be the perfect tool to insure perpetual power in government. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = It means something in the overall big picture of the War on = Terrorism. The War on Terrorism is a fabricated pretext = to usher in the PNAC agenda. The PNAC agenda is to ensure =
RE: [NF] HOWTO:Any ajax gurus out there?
I'm trying to use some ajax to keep my browsers clean, but it ain't happening. I guess I may need to use comet instead! Here's the xmlfile I'm trying to use to populate a combobox in a webpage and the xml gets returned, but I can't get the nodes to show up. From a sample I found on the internet ?xml version=1.0 standalone=yes? PLAYS PLAY TITLEWhat the Butler Saw/TITLE AUTHORJoe Orton/AUTHOR YEAR1969/YEAR /PLAY PLAY TITLEThe Ideal Husband/TITLE AUTHOROscar Wilde/AUTHOR YEAR1895/YEAR /PLAY /PLAYS What I want to happen is when the browser opens, in the body onload, I call an ajax function to grab the data, then fill an existing combobox. Here's the syntax I'm using that is actually getting the data, and will display the xml in an alert. It just won't show any of the nodes. ajaxRequest = new ActiveXObject(Microsoft.XMLHTTP); responseText= ajaxRequest.responseText; document.myForm.officials1.value = ajaxRequest.responseText; // this will fill a text box with the xml alert(ajaxRequest.responseText);//works var myrequest= ajaxRequest.responseXML; //works alert(myrequest.getElementsByTagName(PLAYS)[0].text); // doesn't work Anyone? John Harvey ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
= Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = = Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government = official with access to detailed, sensitive information = about every American at your fingertips. Information can be = a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans = by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career = choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, = Armed service record, and eventually DNA makeup, etc. A = secret police force would be needed to maintain the = database. The secret police could add to the database based = on their surveillance, investigations, rumors, etc. Citizen = could be encourage to add to the information in the database = by reporting personal information that came to them from = neighbor or aquantance, etc. You could then blackmail = citizens, target groups of citizen for purposes of = discrimination, abuse, or even elimination. It would be the = perfect tool to insure perpetual power in government. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = Sounds like someone bought J. Edgar Hoover a PC for Christmas. This is not new, Leland. We've had this type of thing since the 30's. IBM created one for the Nazi's to use to exterminate Jews and other undesirables and after that beta test, gave the whole thing to Uncle Sam. If you vote, drive, apply for a government job, or get within 10 feet of a crime, you are in the database. I am not happy about it, but I cannot understand why this has suddenly become an issue when it's been going on for 70 years (almost as long as Python!). B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Folder encryption - need recommendations
I am looking for an encryption program that will encrypt folders on an external drive like Maxtor OneTouch III (available 300gb at Costco for $139). I want AES 128 or better that does not store the password anywhere - so that it is impossible (relatively) to recover the files without the password. Also, I will want to move this drive between several computers. I will store patient information that is protected by the HIPAA law so it is very important that I make every effort to keep the data secure. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP
= Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 15:42 = To: profox@leafe.com; ProLinux Email List = Subject: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP = = Not everyone has a half-dozen computers in their office or = home so that they can use a separate machine for each OS = they want to work with. = After all, Tom Watson of IBM once said that he couldn't = imagine a need for more than five computers in the entire world. = = Whil = Whil, that's a cute story that has taken on a life of its own. I was with Tom at MIT in 1935 when he supposedly made that remark and I can tell you that he did not say that. What he said was, I don't think there is enough room on the planet for more than 4 or 5 of these things. Of course a few years later, the aliens came with transistors and integrated circuits and in no-time flat, miniaturization made the planet big enough for many, many, many, many more of these things. But that is a different story. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
If this has been going on for some many years, how do I get access to my record, if any, to verify its content is honest and correct? Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = = Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government = official with access to detailed, sensitive information = about every American at your fingertips. Information can be = a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans = by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career = choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, = Armed service record, and eventually DNA makeup, etc. A = secret police force would be needed to maintain the = database. The secret police could add to the database based = on their surveillance, investigations, rumors, etc. Citizen = could be encourage to add to the information in the database = by reporting personal information that came to them from = neighbor or aquantance, etc. You could then blackmail = citizens, target groups of citizen for purposes of = discrimination, abuse, or even elimination. It would be the = perfect tool to insure perpetual power in government. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = Sounds like someone bought J. Edgar Hoover a PC for Christmas. This is not new, Leland. We've had this type of thing since the 30's. IBM created one for the Nazi's to use to exterminate Jews and other undesirables and after that beta test, gave the whole thing to Uncle Sam. If you vote, drive, apply for a government job, or get within 10 feet of a crime, you are in the database. I am not happy about it, but I cannot understand why this has suddenly become an issue when it's been going on for 70 years (almost as long as Python!). B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
= Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = If this has been going on for some many years, how do I get = access to my record, if any, to verify its content is honest = and correct? = = Regards, = = LelandJ This is not an easy question to answer because the answer depends on your personal history. That is one of the reasons why the new JusticeOne db is going to be an improvement; you don't need to know if the person in question has a military or criminal background or what state he lives in now or previously and all kinds of things like that. Until the new db is finished, the best thing to do is contact one of these online outfits that will work-up a dossier on anyone by searching all available databases. Another way would be to do something that will force creation of a new file for you, like committing a serious crime (according to local law) and then having your attorney requesting the content. Once you have the information, if you find something that you feel is untrue or unwarranted, you will have to deal with the specific source agency to determine what evidence is required to correct the error. Just remember that there is no universally accepted definition of truth; only a preponderance of evidence for civil affairs and a reasonable doubt for criminal. I hope this helps, Leland. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Folder encryption - need recommendations
Closest that I can think of off the top of my head: http://www.truecrypt.org/ Regards Rodney -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ken.com Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 4:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Folder encryption - need recommendations I am looking for an encryption program that will encrypt folders on an external drive like Maxtor OneTouch III (available 300gb at Costco for $139). I want AES 128 or better that does not store the password anywhere - so that it is impossible (relatively) to recover the files without the password. Also, I will want to move this drive between several computers. I will store patient information that is protected by the HIPAA law so it is very important that I make every effort to keep the data secure. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Folder encryption - need recommendations
For my ftp transfers I have been using WinZip v-10 (now v-11). Not only does it compress the files, it offers some real strong encryption (not just password protection) as well. My concern is not only transmitting smaller files, but in a manner that anyone who may intercept clear text file transmission with the ftp protocol will not get anything useful without knowing the password needed to decrypt the data. There are some freeware Zip/Encrypt solutions out there, but I like using the command line options with WinZip so I can automate all of my upload/download activity for myself and client machinery. The command line option requires an add-on program, that is downloadable from WinZip for free. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ken.com Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 4:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Folder encryption - need recommendations I am looking for an encryption program that will encrypt folders on an external drive like Maxtor OneTouch III (available 300gb at Costco for $139). I want AES 128 or better that does not store the password anywhere - so that it is impossible (relatively) to recover the files without the password. Also, I will want to move this drive between several computers. I will store patient information that is protected by the HIPAA law so it is very important that I make every effort to keep the data secure. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
Are you a wise guy? Very funny. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = If this has been going on for some many years, how do I get = access to my record, if any, to verify its content is honest = and correct? = = Regards, = = LelandJ This is not an easy question to answer because the answer depends on your personal history. That is one of the reasons why the new JusticeOne db is going to be an improvement; you don't need to know if the person in question has a military or criminal background or what state he lives in now or previously and all kinds of things like that. Until the new db is finished, the best thing to do is contact one of these online outfits that will work-up a dossier on anyone by searching all available databases. Another way would be to do something that will force creation of a new file for you, like committing a serious crime (according to local law) and then having your attorney requesting the content. Once you have the information, if you find something that you feel is untrue or unwarranted, you will have to deal with the specific source agency to determine what evidence is required to correct the error. Just remember that there is no universally accepted definition of truth; only a preponderance of evidence for civil affairs and a reasonable doubt for criminal. I hope this helps, Leland. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: ON KEY with barcoding
By the way, it also provides for a perfect way to test it; just type in the prefix and key in the barcode. Handy if you don't have the barcode scanner at the dev-location Sietse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Jarvis Sent: dinsdag 26 december 2006 20:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ON KEY with barcoding Sietse Wijnker wrote: Hi, I've worked with some barcode scanners sofar and ech of them allowed for a prefix character in the settings. Set this prefix to the on key label and the on key label should work. Regards a merry christmas, Sietse I prefer Sietse's idea of programming the scanner to use a prefix... just document what that prefix is and keep the barcode to scan it in handy for when some nimrod resets the scanner... (This happened to me a couple weeks ago so I'm still a bit testy about it... ) As an alternative maybe playing around with a form's KEYPRESS (or whatever) method... some fun logic to work out for other legit keystrokes, but I have every confidence in you to figure it out... g Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - Performance that Packs. www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Input and html
Hi Virgil input type=hidden name=vjb1 value=%=vjbBranch % //td input type=hidden name=vjb2 value=%=vjbUnit % //td should do the trick Sietse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: dinsdag 26 december 2006 17:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Input and html That's what I was trying to do, but because of the way this example program was developed, I have to put it in the code below OR figure out a better way to do it. Here is my retrieval code: --- Dim vjbBranch vjbBranch = Request.QueryString(branch) Dim vjbUnit vjbUnit = Request.QueryString(unit) --- And here is where I'm sending it to the next page to add to sql server -- form name=input action=addroster.asp method=get table border=0 width=100% tr td align=right width=50%Do Not Change:/td td width=50% input type=hidden name=vjb1 value=vjbbranch //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Do Not Change:/td td width=50% input type=hidden name=vjb1 value=vjbbranch //td input type=hidden name=vjb2 value=vjbUnit //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%First Name:/td td width=50% input type=text name=firstname //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Last Name:/td td width=50% input type=text name=lastname //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%City:/td td width=50% input type=text name=city //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%State:/td td width=50% input type=text name=state //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Zip Code:/td td width=50% input type=text name=zipcode //td /tr /table input type=submit value=submit id=Submit1 language=javascript onclick=addroster.asp / br / /form Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sietse Wijnker Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 2:07 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Input and html Hi Virgil, How 'bout setting up some hidden input boxes, filling them with the values and reading those out in your saving routine? That way there's no labeling needed. For parsing the querystring variables: simple ASP test page: %@ Language=VBScript % % cVar1 = Request.QueryString.Item(var1) cVar2 = Request.QueryString.Item(var2) % html body var1: %=cVar1%br/ var2: %=cVar2% /body /html calling url: http://localhost/dnn/test/ASPTest.asp?var1=1234var2= Result: var1: 1234 var2: greetings, Sietse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: dinsdag 26 december 2006 5:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Input and html I've got a page that I want to grab the variables passed in the url link which are branch and unit. TO see it in acxtion, go to http://www.virgilslist.com Click on Navy Click on FF-1059 You will see a list of people in this group. Below that there are two fields in an input tag that say Do Not Change I want to grab the branch and unit and place them in those fields.. Then I want the user to fill in the rest of the fields and click the submit button which passes the variables to another page which adds them to the sql server tables.. Everythings basically working except for grabbing those two fields and then sending them on down the line. I also would like to change those two fields from a get to a say (for want of a better description), but I havent found that this is possible yet. I can grab the variables no problem, but I'm not sure how to pass them to the input tag. Anybody got any ideas ? Thanks, Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/601 - Release Date: 12/24/2006 11:31 AM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
= Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = Are you a wise guy? Very funny. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = No, Leland. I was totally serious when I wrote that. It reflects my best knowledge as of the time of writing. If anyone has better information, please share it with us. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP
The (*apocryphal?*) story I heard was when I was working at the U.of F. in '65: IBM did a market survey before committing to the S/360 and determined that the saturation point, the maximum world market for computers was 6,000 of them. They decided the market WAS big enough to spend the money to build the S/360... (You were with Tom in '35??? Now THAT sounds apocryphal. Edison and I didn't see you there...)... Hal Kaplan wrote: = Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 15:42 = To: profox@leafe.com; ProLinux Email List = Subject: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP = = Not everyone has a half-dozen computers in their office or = home so that they can use a separate machine for each OS = they want to work with. = After all, Tom Watson of IBM once said that he couldn't = imagine a need for more than five computers in the entire world. = = Whil = Whil, that's a cute story that has taken on a life of its own. I was with Tom at MIT in 1935 when he supposedly made that remark and I can tell you that he did not say that. What he said was, I don't think there is enough room on the planet for more than 4 or 5 of these things. Of course a few years later, the aliens came with transistors and integrated circuits and in no-time flat, miniaturization made the planet big enough for many, many, many, many more of these things. But that is a different story. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Best wishes!
Did I hear somebody say PAY ??? Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 2:41 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: Best wishes! And may all your clients pay you on time. --- Malcolm Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2+ (Postfix Forth style) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
I'll comment for him. We used to be innocent until proven guilty. We still should be and as someone that has seen how things can become NASTY when you get into the system, I'm totally against any type of stereotyping at all. I have to agree with leland, we seem, and not only for war to be in a premptive mode where if there is a chance you may fall and hurt yourself while riding your bicycle, then we're going to make a new law to ensure that you wear a helmet, pads, emergency whistle and jockstrap so that you don't hurt yourself.. Folks, we LEARN from making mistakes. If we make a mistake that kills us, well that was our lesson and that’s the way life needs to be. Sorry if that sounds cruel, but that’s life. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leland Jackson Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 3:05 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears I didn't invent the word Zionist, and it really doesn't carry any negative racial overtures, as far as I can see. I'm just basically opposed to war, unless the US is unavoidable pushed into it. I'm certainly opposed to preemptive war; like PNAC could somehow see the future, and then shape it using present preemptive wars. You still haven't commented on your thinking about the huge database under ongoing construction. #-- The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 Zionism Zion*ism, n. Zion + -ism. Among the Jews, a theory, plan, or movement for colonizing their own race in Palestine, the land of Zion, or, if that is impracticable, elsewhere, either for religious or nationalizing purposes; -- called also Zion movement. -- Zion*ist, n. -- Zi`on*istic, a. Webster 1913 Suppl. # Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: Oh please, people use the word Zionist when they really want to say filthy Jew --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you think you can kill the thread by invoking the dreaded anti-Semite label? I am not an anti-Semite; I just don't agree with the Neoconservative Doctrines. I hold all people in equally high esteem, and strive to judge people based on the content of their character; not race. I hold all human life as sacred. This is getting off on a tangent. We were talking about a secret database that hold a dossier on americans. Perhaps you have a though along those lines? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I bet you'd like to give those Zionists a Xyclon-B shower, wouldn't you? --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many of President Bush's cabinet and political appointments are Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealot), that live in the US, but have dual citizenship in both the US and Israel. They are not instigators of the War on Terrorism; they created it. If we want to preserve our American heritage and freedoms, all Americans need to be educated about the dangers of the direction in which the PNAC is leading the US. We can preserve our freedom and the American way of life using the democratic vote as our weapon. If the country continues in the wrong direction, we will find ourself living under a morph democracy, which limits our choices of official we can elect to office and our freedoms. Protection of the American people and constitutional freedom are no mutually exclusive goals. Both can be achieve with the right balance. When I first moved to Abilene, Texas in 1979, city politics were control by a small group of influential Abilenians organized under the banner of Citizens For Responsible Government. Whoever this group decided to support for city council was a shoe-in. This seemed odd to me having come from Dallas, Texas, as the Citizens for Responsible Government never consulted me, or anyone else, about what was wanted by the population of Abilene as a representative to the city council. America could slip into the same trap, with a small influence group of individuals controlling who becomes our representatives in Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch. In such a democratic form of of government, the elected would be representing this small group of individual, rather than mainstream Americans. Consider yourself as a high ranking powerful government official with access to detailed, sensitive information about every American at your fingertips. Information can be a powerful weapon. You could SQL the database of Americans by religion, race, political affiliation, income, career choice, sexual orientation, age, sex, criminal record, Armed
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
The article that appeared in the Washington Post this morning, titled Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears, should at the very least give every American concern about their privacy. I know the country needs a single source that can be consulted and help coordinate the efforts of the various branches of government like the DOD, DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, and various law enforcement agency around the country, etc, so everybody is on the same page, but such a system should not be without diligent oversight by Congress, the Supreme Court, and American people, and it should comply with the letter and spirit of the US constitution. I think the new Democratic Congress will try to bring habeas corpus back into the legal process for those suspected of being enemy combatant. I certainly hope so. After all, this is America. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = Are you a wise guy? Very funny. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = No, Leland. I was totally serious when I wrote that. It reflects my best knowledge as of the time of writing. If anyone has better information, please share it with us. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 Habeas corpus Habe*as corpus (h=ab-e*a^s k^orpu^s). L. you may have the body. (Law) A writ having for its object to bring a party before a court or judge; especially, one to inquire into the cause of a person's imprisonment or detention by another, with the view to protect the right to personal liberty; also, one to bring a prisoner into court to testify in a pending trial. --Bouvier. 1913 Webster Regards, LelandJ Leland Jackson wrote: The article that appeared in the Washington Post this morning, titled Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears, should at the very least give every American concern about their privacy. I know the country needs a single source that can be consulted and help coordinate the efforts of the various branches of government like the DOD, DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, and various law enforcement agency around the country, etc, so everybody is on the same page, but such a system should not be without diligent oversight by Congress, the Supreme Court, and American people, and it should comply with the letter and spirit of the US constitution. I think the new Democratic Congress will try to bring habeas corpus back into the legal process for those suspected of being enemy combatant. I certainly hope so. After all, this is America. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = Are you a wise guy? Very funny. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = No, Leland. I was totally serious when I wrote that. It reflects my best knowledge as of the time of writing. If anyone has better information, please share it with us. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
= Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = The article that appeared in the Washington Post this = morning, titled Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy = Fears, should at the very least give every American concern = about their privacy. I know the country needs a single = source that can be consulted and help coordinate the efforts = of the various branches of government like the DOD, DOJ, = FBI, CIA, NSA, and various law enforcement agency around the = country, etc, so everybody is on the same page, but such a = system should not be without diligent oversight by Congress, = the Supreme Court, and American people, and it should comply = with the letter and spirit of the US constitution. = = I think the new Democratic Congress will try to bring = habeas corpus = back into the legal process for those suspected of being = enemy combatant. I certainly hope so. After all, this is America. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = I hope you are right, Leland. I agree with pretty much everything you wrote about what is going on. But it is going to take more than a new Congress to get this resolved. We need to get the perps who allowed 9/11 to take place imprisoned or executed. That should clear the air just enough to give the other perps a chance to make amends before their turns at trial come to pass. After all, most of these people are plain and simply cowards who would not dare for a second to put their lives on the line for anything but have absolutely no compunctions about murdering 3,000 victims on 9/11 and then sending over 3,000 young Americans to their deaths in a war that they wanted so as to line their pockets. They will tell you the Islamic elements are to blame as they do everything possible to fan the fires of misdirected Islamic sentiments and maintain their puppets in a frenetic state. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP
= Subject: Re: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP = = The (*apocryphal?*) story I heard was when I was working at = the U.of F. = in '65: IBM did a market survey before committing to the = S/360 and determined that the saturation point, the maximum = world market for computers was 6,000 of them. They decided = the market WAS big enough to spend the money to build the S/360... = = (You were with Tom in '35??? Now THAT sounds apocryphal. = Edison and I didn't see you there...)... = That's funny, Chet because I distinctly remember seeing you there. Just a young'un as it were. My guess is that you did not see me because I was keeping a very low profile. Mr. Watson did not like to share the spotlight with anyone. Henry Ford was supposed to be there too but he got caught up in his anti-Semitism campaign and had to miss it. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
This is where you lose me and millions others lke me.. Yes, we should not be in those countries and yes we should pull our cia, etc. out of these other countries and stop trying to influence their cultures. But no, I do not for one moment believe that anybody on our side knew when and where 9/11 would happen. Sure they probably knew that the terrorists were planning something, but I don't believe they knew the who, what, when, where and why which is why ya'll don't have much credibility with me when it comes to these type of accusations. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Kaplan Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 5:29 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = The article that appeared in the Washington Post this = morning, titled Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy = Fears, should at the very least give every American concern = about their privacy. I know the country needs a single = source that can be consulted and help coordinate the efforts = of the various branches of government like the DOD, DOJ, = FBI, CIA, NSA, and various law enforcement agency around the = country, etc, so everybody is on the same page, but such a = system should not be without diligent oversight by Congress, = the Supreme Court, and American people, and it should comply = with the letter and spirit of the US constitution. = = I think the new Democratic Congress will try to bring = habeas corpus = back into the legal process for those suspected of being = enemy combatant. I certainly hope so. After all, this is America. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = I hope you are right, Leland. I agree with pretty much everything you wrote about what is going on. But it is going to take more than a new Congress to get this resolved. We need to get the perps who allowed 9/11 to take place imprisoned or executed. That should clear the air just enough to give the other perps a chance to make amends before their turns at trial come to pass. After all, most of these people are plain and simply cowards who would not dare for a second to put their lives on the line for anything but have absolutely no compunctions about murdering 3,000 victims on 9/11 and then sending over 3,000 young Americans to their deaths in a war that they wanted so as to line their pockets. They will tell you the Islamic elements are to blame as they do everything possible to fan the fires of misdirected Islamic sentiments and maintain their puppets in a frenetic state. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP
Ah, yes, you had the groucho glasses on. I remember now... I was playing bass in the Guy Lombardo Orchestra at the time...not really invited but I got paid (hmmm, more than I can make now...) Happy New Year to all... Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [NF] HOWTO: Dual boot with Fedora Core 6 and Windows XP = = The (*apocryphal?*) story I heard was when I was working at = the U.of F. = in '65: IBM did a market survey before committing to the = S/360 and determined that the saturation point, the maximum = world market for computers was 6,000 of them. They decided = the market WAS big enough to spend the money to build the S/360... = = (You were with Tom in '35??? Now THAT sounds apocryphal. = Edison and I didn't see you there...)... = That's funny, Chet because I distinctly remember seeing you there. Just a young'un as it were. My guess is that you did not see me because I was keeping a very low profile. Mr. Watson did not like to share the spotlight with anyone. Henry Ford was supposed to be there too but he got caught up in his anti-Semitism campaign and had to miss it. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Sign of a stroke
Very interesting info. Steve had a brain MRI last week because of headaches and learned that he has evidence of several small strokes from some years back. He does not even know when they happened. The joys of aging... Kristyne McDaniel www.mcstyles.com www.diabetesnme.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Input and html
Just tried that too. Didn’t work and it should according to everything I read. Thanks anyway, just got through loading my old msdn library cd's and I'll see if I can find it on the vbscript or asp sections.. Whats driving me crazy about this multilingual development is when you see something in an example and you cut and paste it and it should work and it doesn’t... Beginning to think I should buy a half interest in the wild turkey plant... Grin Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sietse Wijnker Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 4:34 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Input and html Hi Virgil input type=hidden name=vjb1 value=%=vjbBranch % //td input type=hidden name=vjb2 value=%=vjbUnit % //td should do the trick Sietse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: dinsdag 26 december 2006 17:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Input and html That's what I was trying to do, but because of the way this example program was developed, I have to put it in the code below OR figure out a better way to do it. Here is my retrieval code: --- Dim vjbBranch vjbBranch = Request.QueryString(branch) Dim vjbUnit vjbUnit = Request.QueryString(unit) --- And here is where I'm sending it to the next page to add to sql server -- form name=input action=addroster.asp method=get table border=0 width=100% tr td align=right width=50%Do Not Change:/td td width=50% input type=hidden name=vjb1 value=vjbbranch //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Do Not Change:/td td width=50% input type=hidden name=vjb1 value=vjbbranch //td input type=hidden name=vjb2 value=vjbUnit //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%First Name:/td td width=50% input type=text name=firstname //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Last Name:/td td width=50% input type=text name=lastname //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%City:/td td width=50% input type=text name=city //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%State:/td td width=50% input type=text name=state //td /tr tr td align=right width=50%Zip Code:/td td width=50% input type=text name=zipcode //td /tr /table input type=submit value=submit id=Submit1 language=javascript onclick=addroster.asp / br / /form Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sietse Wijnker Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 2:07 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Input and html Hi Virgil, How 'bout setting up some hidden input boxes, filling them with the values and reading those out in your saving routine? That way there's no labeling needed. For parsing the querystring variables: simple ASP test page: %@ Language=VBScript % % cVar1 = Request.QueryString.Item(var1) cVar2 = Request.QueryString.Item(var2) % html body var1: %=cVar1%br/ var2: %=cVar2% /body /html calling url: http://localhost/dnn/test/ASPTest.asp?var1=1234var2= Result: var1: 1234 var2: greetings, Sietse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: dinsdag 26 december 2006 5:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Input and html I've got a page that I want to grab the variables passed in the url link which are branch and unit. TO see it in acxtion, go to http://www.virgilslist.com Click on Navy Click on FF-1059 You will see a list of people in this group. Below that there are two fields in an input tag that say Do Not Change I want to grab the branch and unit and place them in those fields.. Then I want the user to fill in the rest of the fields and click the submit button which passes the variables to another page which adds them to the sql server tables.. Everythings basically working except for grabbing those two fields and then sending them on down the line. I also would like to change those two fields from a get to a say (for want of a better description), but I havent found that this is possible yet. I can grab the variables no problem, but I'm not sure how to pass them to the input tag. Anybody got any ideas ? Thanks, Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
Steinhardt noted that in 2003, the FBI announced that it would no longer meet the Privacy Act's accuracy requirements for the National Crime Information Center, its main criminal-background-check database, which is used by 80,000 law enforcement agencies across the country. That says it all about the new project. The mature database isn't accurate enough to meet legislative standards, and they're just going to multiply that level of incompetence. Sigh. -Jerry Wolper [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Swift-boating begins...
On Monday 25 December 2006 09:44, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: I don't know about that. I was born in the greatest country in the world and you were born in the third-world. I'd say he really likes me. Oh it doesn't really matter the part of the world (though I'd rather be here). What does matter is the position you're born in. I can't complain. Well sorry, I must leave you. Going to the beach with some friends. Bye! Hi Ricardo! Isn't it cold where you are? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Swift-boating begins...
On Saturday 23 December 2006 11:25, Stephen the Cook wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Yes, I'm sure Jesus would want us to let our throats be slit. I thought that Jesus went against the grain of the local leaders. He accepted sinners and tax collectors instead of shunning them. Hi Stephen! Well, yeah, but the throat slitters are the local leaders where they are throat slitting. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Swift-boating begins...
On Sunday 24 December 2006 18:19, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Dicardo certainly is Looney Tunes. So you forgot to take your pills... It's Ricardo, not Dicardo. But maybe cut and paste is too much to ask at this stage in your life. (shucks! now your boyfriend Pete is going to stand on your behalf). LOL Hi Ricardo! Sorry to disappoint you, I have to say you both lost me this time. I forget what the thread is about when you start getting s personal with each other. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Sign of a stroke
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 12:29, David Crooks wrote: On Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:15 PM Leland Jackson wrote: snipped NOTE : Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out their tongue. If the tongue is 'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other that is also an indication of a stroke. If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call 911 immediately!! and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher. snipped Make sure you know all of the facts: http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/stroke.asp Hi David! The ear and finger pricking is an acupuncture treatment for sequaelae of stroke, *after* the patient has been stabilized. There are so many acupuncture school dropouts that it is easy to get confused information. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 14:47, Leland Jackson wrote: Many of President Bush's cabinet and political appointments are Neoconservatives, (eg Zionist War Zealot) snip The PNAC agenda is to ensure = American and Israel will be the sole super powers of the = world. Hi Leland! And now the database has the information that you and Hal are conspiring against Israel and the Jews. You guys are toast. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 17:07, Hal Kaplan wrote: = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = If this has been going on for some many years, how do I get = access to my record, if any, to verify its content is honest = and correct? = = Regards, = = LelandJ This is not an easy question to answer because the answer depends on your personal history. That is one of the reasons why the new JusticeOne db is going to be an improvement; you don't need to know if the person in question has a military or criminal background or what state he lives in now or previously and all kinds of things like that. Until the new db is finished, the best thing to do is contact one of these online outfits that will work-up a dossier on anyone by searching all available databases. Another way would be to do something that will force creation of a new file for you, like committing a serious crime Hi Hal, Leland! Relax, you guys are both in it as Anti-Zionists. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 18:04, Leland Jackson wrote: The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 Habeas corpus Habe*as corpus (h=ab-e*a^s k^orpu^s). L. you may have the body. Hi Leland! So they kill you and Hal and let your lawyers have your bodies. See what you get for being anti-Zionists? Better start sucking up to Israel, pronto. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 21:10, Leland Jackson wrote: And you think you will avoid being in the database by coming down on Hal and I, but you will be in the database with lots of derogatory information, as well. You should make some interesting company. LOL Hi Leland! I am probably in it more than once. I am an acupuncturist, I was a Catholic, I am a Protestant, I am pro-Israel, I own two guns, I like girls - oh, man, I am sooo in it. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] HOWTO:Any ajax gurus out there?
On 12/26/06, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: alert(myrequest.getElementsByTagName(PLAYS)[0].text); // doesn't work try dropping the S and get Elements By Tag Name PLAY -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] HOWTO:Any ajax gurus out there?
Thanks, I finally got it worked out. I also had to change the response.header content type to application/xml. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 9:24 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] HOWTO:Any ajax gurus out there? On 12/26/06, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: alert(myrequest.getElementsByTagName(PLAYS)[0].text); // doesn't work try dropping the S and get Elements By Tag Name PLAY -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
Here is a video history of what has been going on in the ME, behind the sceens. Beware, it runs for about 1 and 1/2 hours: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1130731388742388243 When your done with that video, here is a website for you to chew on for awaile: http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/video_iraqwar.htm or http://tinyurl.com/a8pyv Regards, LelandJ Virgil Bierschwale wrote: This is where you lose me and millions others lke me.. Yes, we should not be in those countries and yes we should pull our cia, etc. out of these other countries and stop trying to influence their cultures. But no, I do not for one moment believe that anybody on our side knew when and where 9/11 would happen. Sure they probably knew that the terrorists were planning something, but I don't believe they knew the who, what, when, where and why which is why ya'll don't have much credibility with me when it comes to these type of accusations. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Kaplan Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 5:29 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = The article that appeared in the Washington Post this = morning, titled Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy = Fears, should at the very least give every American concern = about their privacy. I know the country needs a single = source that can be consulted and help coordinate the efforts = of the various branches of government like the DOD, DOJ, = FBI, CIA, NSA, and various law enforcement agency around the = country, etc, so everybody is on the same page, but such a = system should not be without diligent oversight by Congress, = the Supreme Court, and American people, and it should comply = with the letter and spirit of the US constitution. = = I think the new Democratic Congress will try to bring = habeas corpus = back into the legal process for those suspected of being = enemy combatant. I certainly hope so. After all, this is America. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = I hope you are right, Leland. I agree with pretty much everything you wrote about what is going on. But it is going to take more than a new Congress to get this resolved. We need to get the perps who allowed 9/11 to take place imprisoned or executed. That should clear the air just enough to give the other perps a chance to make amends before their turns at trial come to pass. After all, most of these people are plain and simply cowards who would not dare for a second to put their lives on the line for anything but have absolutely no compunctions about murdering 3,000 victims on 9/11 and then sending over 3,000 young Americans to their deaths in a war that they wanted so as to line their pockets. They will tell you the Islamic elements are to blame as they do everything possible to fan the fires of misdirected Islamic sentiments and maintain their puppets in a frenetic state. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears
Ed Asssner is a traitor. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a video history of what has been going on in the ME, behind the sceens. Beware, it runs for about 1 and 1/2 hours: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1130731388742388243 When your done with that video, here is a website for you to chew on for awaile: http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/video_iraqwar.htm or http://tinyurl.com/a8pyv Regards, LelandJ Virgil Bierschwale wrote: This is where you lose me and millions others lke me.. Yes, we should not be in those countries and yes we should pull our cia, etc. out of these other countries and stop trying to influence their cultures. But no, I do not for one moment believe that anybody on our side knew when and where 9/11 would happen. Sure they probably knew that the terrorists were planning something, but I don't believe they knew the who, what, when, where and why which is why ya'll don't have much credibility with me when it comes to these type of accusations. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Kaplan Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 5:29 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = Subject: Re: [OT] Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears = = The article that appeared in the Washington Post this = morning, titled Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy = Fears, should at the very least give every American concern = about their privacy. I know the country needs a single = source that can be consulted and help coordinate the efforts = of the various branches of government like the DOD, DOJ, = FBI, CIA, NSA, and various law enforcement agency around the = country, etc, so everybody is on the same page, but such a = system should not be without diligent oversight by Congress, = the Supreme Court, and American people, and it should comply = with the letter and spirit of the US constitution. = = I think the new Democratic Congress will try to bring = habeas corpus = back into the legal process for those suspected of being = enemy combatant. I certainly hope so. After all, this is America. = = Regards, = = LelandJ = I hope you are right, Leland. I agree with pretty much everything you wrote about what is going on. But it is going to take more than a new Congress to get this resolved. We need to get the perps who allowed 9/11 to take place imprisoned or executed. That should clear the air just enough to give the other perps a chance to make amends before their turns at trial come to pass. After all, most of these people are plain and simply cowards who would not dare for a second to put their lives on the line for anything but have absolutely no compunctions about murdering 3,000 victims on 9/11 and then sending over 3,000 young Americans to their deaths in a war that they wanted so as to line their pockets. They will tell you the Islamic elements are to blame as they do everything possible to fan the fires of misdirected Islamic sentiments and maintain their puppets in a frenetic state. B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
