Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Anyone tried Sogo?
On 15 mrt 2011, at 15:47, Eric Shubert wrote: On 03/15/2011 07:21 AM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 03/15/2011 07:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Can sogo not use mysql for authentication? Worst case, I would think you could run them side-by-side with separate user definitions. Would just need to maintain user definitions in 2 different places. Anyone up for trying this? I'll try it out in a few days. http://andries.filmer.nl/kb/Scalable-Open-Groupware-Org-SOGo/124#Configure%20SOGo%20to%20use%20MySQL Bharath - I'm sure this would work. It's only slightly better than using ldap though, as a separate table/database appears to be required. I'd rather modify the sogo source to obtain the authentication fields/values from the vpopmail database. Should be doable, but the ease of doing so will depend on how well the code is written. Perhaps if we were able to patch an option for vpopmail into sogo, they'd include it in the package. I don't even know what language(s) sogo's written in. I'm guessing the authentication part (at least) is c/c++, but it could be something else. Would someone like to find out? Should not be to difficult to do this, even a view might do the trick.. Sogo is written in Objective-C btw.. Will do some tests soon.. JP - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Forcing TLS on port 587
I did not include the FORCE_TLS patch when doing the submission patches.
Can not remember anymore why, it is to long ago..
Quick google returns a simple solution, that always requires tls for
authentication
Maybe it is nicer to have this optional with the FORCE_TLS, but that should not
be too difficult either.
void smtp_auth(arg)
char *arg;
{
+ if (!ssl)
+ {
+ out(538 auth not available without TLS (#5.3.3)\r\n);
+ return;
+ }
int i;
char *cmd = arg;
http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/84
JP
On Feb 3, 2011, at 20:54 , Eric Shubert wrote:
I'd be very careful with this one, CJ.
You need to keep 25 open for incoming (inter-domain) mail. ;)
If QMT doesn't have the patch for the FORCE_TLS option, it'd be nice if it
did. This is something I'd also like to see on the submission instance of
qmail-smtp.
Can you round up that patch? If you can give it a try, that'd be great. If
not, please post here where to get it so someone (hopefully other than Jake)
can give it a shot to see if it clashes with any other patches we're using.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 02/03/2011 12:42 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
You could block port 25 in your iptables
On 02/03/2011 11:20 AM, Jeremy Utley wrote:
Hello everyone!
We're using a toaster installation for our primary mail server at my
company, and over the last few weeks we've been working on configuring
everyone's mail clients to use SSL for sending receiving e-mail.
Now that we have everyone converted over to use of SSL, we'd like to
stop all non-SSL access. For imap and pop3, it was quite simple, I
simply disabled the imap4 and pop3 run scripts in
/var/qmail/supervise. However, for SMTP, I haven't had much luck yet.
We'd like to force the submission port 587 to require TLS and
SMTP-Auth before a message is sent out., while leaving SMTP port 25
un-modified. I had read on another qmail site that you could do this
by use of a FORCE_TLS=1 variable in the run script, but that did not
work, so I suspect that this patch is not in the toaster packages (and
running strings against /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd seems to bear that
out). Is there any way with the toaster to enforce TLS usage, and
reject any mail that's not TLS. We'd like to stick with TLS so we
don't have to reconfigure everyone's mail clients for SMTPS, which is
deprecated at any rate.
Thanks for any help you all can give!
Jeremy
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Create New domain from existing
Hi, Easy way : add an alias to the domain ~vpopmail/bin/vaddaliasdomain Hard way : add new domain, with mysql select all from old domain table into new domain table, change paths and move the folder to the new domainname, and check all .qmail files for the domain for its paths (am sure I am forgetting some bits there) Simple said I would just add an alias.. JP On 3 okt 2009, at 07:21, a...@ikf.co.in a...@ikf.co.in wrote: Hi Everyone, I got a domain on my qmail-toaster. My Sir has taken a new domain and want to migrate all email id with email from old domain to new domain. Nothing should change i.e. Email ids, password and there emails except the domain name. How can I do the same? Is there any script available for the same? Thanks and regards, Amit
Re: [qmailtoaster] Create New domain from existing
That don't matter too much.. Squirrelmail/pop/imap will work with either domain for authenthication (u...@olddomain and u...@newdomain) Would be smart to suggest to keep the old domain anyways.. how much does it cost a year versus having someone else doing something with it your boss does not like.. JP On 3 okt 2009, at 22:10, a...@ikf.co.in wrote: Hi Eric/JP, There are around 45 users. And among 45 users 20 users check their mails from webmail. Also the old domain is getting expired in 2-3 months and I don't think my Boss will renew the domain. Regards, Amit - Original Message - From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Create New domain from existing I would do the same as JP. Each client configuration would need to change as well to reflect the changed domain name, which would be a simpler change with an alias domain. I'm not sure how Squirrel Mail might handle this though, in case there are any webmail users. Just curious, how many accounts are there? Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi, Easy way : add an alias to the domain ~vpopmail/bin/vaddaliasdomain Hard way : add new domain, with Mysql select all from old domain table into new domain table, change paths and move the folder to the new domain name, and check all .qmail files for the domain for its paths (am sure I am forgetting some bits there) Simple said I would just add an alias.. JP On 3 okt 2009, at 07:21, a...@ikf.co.in mailto:a...@ikf.co.in a...@ikf.co.in mailto:a...@ikf.co.in wrote: Hi Everyone, I got a domain on my qmail-toaster. My Sir has taken a new domain and want to migrate all email id with email from old domain to new domain. Nothing should change i.e. Email ids, password and there emails except the domain name. How can I do the same? Is there any script available for the same? Thanks and regards, Amit -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - This email was processed through IKF SPAM FILTER to filter junk messages. If you feel this message has been tagged incorrectly, you can change its category by clicking the link below. Click here http://192.168.2.90:5272/FrontController?operation=mbeuf=1_5_20091003_15993.emlchkBayesian=1pr=1mt=1ma=s to mark email as junk. Any clarification contact supp...@ikf.co.in - - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com ) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
RE: [qmailtoaster] smtpd and plain passwords
If I am not mistaken I left this out in the require auth patch, but that has been a while back so I could be wrong. It should not be to difficult to put this in though. JP -Original Message- From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com] Sent: vrijdag 10 juli 2009 23:11 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] smtpd and plain passwords I'm all cross-eyed and am having a brain dead moment. Was there an easy way to turn off PLAIN in smtpd? Or even worst-case not advertise it's capability? I figured to turn it off on pop3 you had to stop using qmail-pop3d and use courier-pop3d instead, and got that working already. Thanks, - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Creating e-mail users with VQAdmin vs. Qmailadmin
Hi, If some people would make a list of the most important bugs in qmailadmin I am sure they can be fixed.. I never use vqadmin, so I have no clue about what works or not, but I am capable of fixing it. JP On 19 mei 2009, at 19:56, Adam Glass wrote: Hi all, Although I am new to this list, I have been running a Linux user group for over a decade, and have done software development that dealt with Open Source. Perhaps another perspective could be useful. It is sad but true that nobody wants to pay for software. No matter how much we understand the amount of hard work that goes into it, businesses won't pay for it. If there are two ways to get something done and one of them is free, most businesses will choose the free route. I suspect that the number of Qmail Toaster users would drop dramatically if you had to either pay for a tool to create multiple virtual domains, or had to use the CLI to do it. Some really good - and good looking - documentation on creating virtual domains via CLI might help retain some users who would otherwise go elsewhere, but probably not many. I have worked at a software development company that tried to take the middle ground, charging for add-ons while donating to the core project (anybody remember Metro-X?). But in the end it was not commercially viable. Sorry to be negative about this, but it's what I have seen and experienced. Right now you have a graphical tool that mostly works, even if it does have bugs. It is free which means Qmail Toaster is free, so you have a large user community that advocates for you (which is how I learned about this project). The problems that come from vqadmin's bugs may be easier to live with than the effects of charging for improved software. --Adam On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Phil Leinhauser p...@teqknow.com wrote: I would normally agree with you Steve but this is a bit different. For the home users with one domain, QControl is free. For anyone running more than one domain we are most likely running commercially. QMT and MOST of the accessories are free and the service in this forum is better than most paid support systems from the big guys like IBM, Dell, MS Throwing Jake a few bucks for his tool is money WELL spent. These guys are always on top of anything and they spend considerable time with updates, patches, etc. for NOTHING! I say throw him the business. VQadmin is BROKE. That fact is noted in several places yet users still stumble upon it and cause traffic in here. Phil On May 19, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Once again, I'd like to recommend that vqadmin be dropped from QMT. The problems it has appear to outweigh the benefits it provides, especially now that qcontrol is available. Does anyone have any objections to this? I think it deserves some discussion. i have no objection per se to dropping vqadmin; however, it seems a bit disingenuous to propose QControl as the appropriate replacement, given that it's commercial software. a statement such as vqadmin is broken, so we're dropping it; you'll need to use the command-line tools to add and delete domains would, i think, do a better job of setting appropriate expectations in the minds of users who don't follow this list. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es
Re: [qmailtoaster] Creating e-mail users with VQAdmin vs. Qmailadmin
haha :) On 19 mei 2009, at 20:07, Adam Glass wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jean-Paul van de Plasse jeanp...@i-serve.nl wrote: Hi, If some people would make a list of the most important bugs in qmailadmin I am sure they can be fixed.. My vote: It is not possible to create an e-mail account when the username is two characters :-) --Adam I never use vqadmin, so I have no clue about what works or not, but I am capable of fixing it. JP On 19 mei 2009, at 19:56, Adam Glass wrote: Hi all, Although I am new to this list, I have been running a Linux user group for over a decade, and have done software development that dealt with Open Source. Perhaps another perspective could be useful. It is sad but true that nobody wants to pay for software. No matter how much we understand the amount of hard work that goes into it, businesses won't pay for it. If there are two ways to get something done and one of them is free, most businesses will choose the free route. I suspect that the number of Qmail Toaster users would drop dramatically if you had to either pay for a tool to create multiple virtual domains, or had to use the CLI to do it. Some really good - and good looking - documentation on creating virtual domains via CLI might help retain some users who would otherwise go elsewhere, but probably not many. I have worked at a software development company that tried to take the middle ground, charging for add-ons while donating to the core project (anybody remember Metro-X?). But in the end it was not commercially viable. Sorry to be negative about this, but it's what I have seen and experienced. Right now you have a graphical tool that mostly works, even if it does have bugs. It is free which means Qmail Toaster is free, so you have a large user community that advocates for you (which is how I learned about this project). The problems that come from vqadmin's bugs may be easier to live with than the effects of charging for improved software. --Adam On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Phil Leinhauser p...@teqknow.com wrote: I would normally agree with you Steve but this is a bit different. For the home users with one domain, QControl is free. For anyone running more than one domain we are most likely running commercially. QMT and MOST of the accessories are free and the service in this forum is better than most paid support systems from the big guys like IBM, Dell, MS Throwing Jake a few bucks for his tool is money WELL spent. These guys are always on top of anything and they spend considerable time with updates, patches, etc. for NOTHING! I say throw him the business. VQadmin is BROKE. That fact is noted in several places yet users still stumble upon it and cause traffic in here. Phil On May 19, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Once again, I'd like to recommend that vqadmin be dropped from QMT. The problems it has appear to outweigh the benefits it provides, especially now that qcontrol is available. Does anyone have any objections to this? I think it deserves some discussion. i have no objection per se to dropping vqadmin; however, it seems a bit disingenuous to propose QControl as the appropriate replacement, given that it's commercial software. a statement such as vqadmin is broken, so we're dropping it; you'll need to use the command-line tools to add and delete domains would, i think, do a better job of setting appropriate expectations in the minds of users who don't follow this list. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es
Re: [qmailtoaster] Creating e-mail users with VQAdmin vs. Qmailadmin
Yea I know where the bugs are.. a little mixup.. And I never needed vqadmin for anything.. But I guess it could be usefull to some.. On 19 mei 2009, at 20:12, Eric Shubert wrote: The bugs are in vqadmin, not qmailadmin. qmailadmin works fine. You're wise (or lucky?) to not use vqadmin for anything but inquiries. Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi, If some people would make a list of the most important bugs in qmailadmin I am sure they can be fixed.. I never use vqadmin, so I have no clue about what works or not, but I am capable of fixing it. JP On 19 mei 2009, at 19:56, Adam Glass wrote: Hi all, Although I am new to this list, I have been running a Linux user group for over a decade, and have done software development that dealt with Open Source. Perhaps another perspective could be useful. It is sad but true that nobody wants to pay for software. No matter how much we understand the amount of hard work that goes into it, businesses won't pay for it. If there are two ways to get something done and one of them is free, most businesses will choose the free route. I suspect that the number of Qmail Toaster users would drop dramatically if you had to either pay for a tool to create multiple virtual domains, or had to use the CLI to do it. Some really good - and good looking - documentation on creating virtual domains via CLI might help retain some users who would otherwise go elsewhere, but probably not many. I have worked at a software development company that tried to take the middle ground, charging for add-ons while donating to the core project (anybody remember Metro-X?). But in the end it was not commercially viable. Sorry to be negative about this, but it's what I have seen and experienced. Right now you have a graphical tool that mostly works, even if it does have bugs. It is free which means Qmail Toaster is free, so you have a large user community that advocates for you (which is how I learned about this project). The problems that come from vqadmin's bugs may be easier to live with than the effects of charging for improved software. --Adam On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Phil Leinhauser p...@teqknow.com mailto:p...@teqknow.com wrote: I would normally agree with you Steve but this is a bit different. For the home users with one domain, QControl is free. For anyone running more than one domain we are most likely running commercially. QMT and MOST of the accessories are free and the service in this forum is better than most paid support systems from the big guys like IBM, Dell, MS Throwing Jake a few bucks for his tool is money WELL spent. These guys are always on top of anything and they spend considerable time with updates, patches, etc. for NOTHING! I say throw him the business. VQadmin is BROKE. That fact is noted in several places yet users still stumble upon it and cause traffic in here. Phil On May 19, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Once again, I'd like to recommend that vqadmin be dropped from QMT. The problems it has appear to outweigh the benefits it provides, especially now that qcontrol is available. Does anyone have any objections to this? I think it deserves some discussion. i have no objection per se to dropping vqadmin; however, it seems a bit disingenuous to propose QControl as the appropriate replacement, given that it's commercial software. a statement such as vqadmin is broken, so we're dropping it; you'll need to use the command- line tools to add and delete domains would, i think, do a better job of setting appropriate expectations in the minds of users who don't follow this list. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com ) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today
Re: [qmailtoaster] Creating e-mail users with VQAdmin vs. Qmailadmin
Change /usr/share/toaster/htdocs/scripts/javascripts.js
Line 24
if (address.indexOf('@') 3) return false;
To
if (address.indexOf('@') 2) return false;
Not really a bug I guess..
JP
On 19 mei 2009, at 20:07, Adam Glass wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jean-Paul van de Plasse jeanp...@i-serve.nl
wrote:
Hi,
If some people would make a list of the most important bugs in
qmailadmin I am sure they can be fixed..
My vote: It is not possible to create an e-mail account when the
username is two characters :-)
--Adam
I never use vqadmin, so I have no clue about what works or not, but
I am capable of fixing it.
JP
On 19 mei 2009, at 19:56, Adam Glass wrote:
Hi all,
Although I am new to this list, I have been running a Linux user
group for over a decade, and have done software development that
dealt with Open Source. Perhaps another perspective could be useful.
It is sad but true that nobody wants to pay for software. No
matter how much we understand the amount of hard work that goes
into it, businesses won't pay for it. If there are two ways to get
something done and one of them is free, most businesses will choose
the free route.
I suspect that the number of Qmail Toaster users would drop
dramatically if you had to either pay for a tool to create multiple
virtual domains, or had to use the CLI to do it.
Some really good - and good looking - documentation on creating
virtual domains via CLI might help retain some users who would
otherwise go elsewhere, but probably not many.
I have worked at a software development company that tried to take
the middle ground, charging for add-ons while donating to the core
project (anybody remember Metro-X?). But in the end it was not
commercially viable.
Sorry to be negative about this, but it's what I have seen and
experienced. Right now you have a graphical tool that mostly
works, even if it does have bugs. It is free which means Qmail
Toaster is free, so you have a large user community that advocates
for you (which is how I learned about this project).
The problems that come from vqadmin's bugs may be easier to live
with than the effects of charging for improved software.
--Adam
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Phil Leinhauser p...@teqknow.com
wrote:
I would normally agree with you Steve but this is a bit different.
For the home users with one domain, QControl is free. For anyone
running more than one domain we are most likely running
commercially. QMT and MOST of the accessories are free and the
service in this forum is better than most paid support systems from
the big guys like IBM, Dell, MS Throwing Jake a few bucks for
his tool is money WELL spent. These guys are always on top of
anything and they spend considerable time with updates, patches,
etc. for NOTHING! I say throw him the business.
VQadmin is BROKE. That fact is noted in several places yet users
still stumble upon it and cause traffic in here.
Phil
On May 19, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Once again, I'd like to recommend that vqadmin be dropped from
QMT.
The problems it has appear to outweigh the benefits it provides,
especially now that qcontrol is available.
Does anyone have any objections to this? I think it deserves some
discussion.
i have no objection per se to dropping vqadmin; however, it seems a
bit disingenuous to propose QControl as the appropriate
replacement,
given that it's commercial software. a statement such as vqadmin
is
broken, so we're dropping it; you'll need to use the command-line
tools to add and delete domains would, i think, do a better job of
setting appropriate expectations in the minds of users who don't
follow this list.
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://five.sentenc.es
Re: [qmailtoaster] Creating e-mail users with VQAdmin vs. Qmailadmin
Not to be stubborn.. just trying to help out as I did frequently on this list a year or so ago.. Just added and removed some domains/users, mostly it just calls the command line, and also it has the same bug in regards to dir_control, the cur_users field goes whack if you delete a user. Well goes whack.. better said is that the field is not incremented when you add a user so it remains 0, and it does decrement when you delete a user, so you get int 0 - 1 =2147483647 But so far that was the only thing really wrong and that is the same with the command line tools.. I did not test setting limits or other more advanced settings, but as said, if anyone knows of real bugs that I can reproduce, I will look into it. JP On 19 mei 2009, at 21:28, Phil Leinhauser wrote: I've been burned by database corruption from VQadmin too many times. The only thing I use it for now is password lookup and QC does that. VQadmin is a look, don't touch thing as far as I'm concerned. I might think that vqadmin - even hobbled is getting a bum rap. I use CLI for domain creation . but have used vqadmin to add users and forwards ...i have not had a problem. The upside of this , for me anyway , is domain creation happens seldom and usr change happens more often. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Creating e-mail users with VQAdmin vs. Qmailadmin
Hey Jake, I do not think anyone on this list or using qmt does not apriciate the work you did and are doing.. For me it really is not about the 30$, just never needed an interface, guess I should check qcontrol maybe it will help me alot :) Anyways, as said in an other mail I am just trying to help some who are using vqadmin.. Have been active in the past with patches and helping arround on this list, been busy otherwise but figured I can still contribute some time to qmt. I do think (as u suggest) a good mailserver needs a basic tool to manage the users, so it would be good to fix vqadmin. Or to write a replacement, with some basic features. Guess I should crawl back under the stone I was the past year.. seems this all stirs up things .. Sorry for that. JP On 19 mei 2009, at 22:32, Jake Vickers wrote: Phil Leinhauser wrote: Everyone seems to think Qcontrol or VQadmin are the only ways to get domains into QMT. I personally use webmin. In the command line section I have the history of commands run and I queue up a past domain add, modify it for the new domain and kick it off. Qcontrol does a LOT more than create domains. Do you have a tool to read log files? Modify control files? Look at the Queue? Check and modify Spamassasin? and a LOT more... I feel like an infomercial... BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!! It whitens and brightens... Come on people Thanks for the plug, Phil. I was off for a bit fixing a broken laptop screen and was surprised to see this much traffic on the list. This particular topic has generated quite a stir! I think the topic covers a few different things. First and foremost is why Vqadmin is still in the package list - I guess laziness and hesitation on my part. It's always been there, so I left it there. There - I admit laziness. Hesitation to remove it also brushes on my laziness, but brings a key point to the forefront. If I remove it, what do I replace it with? I've noticed a trend in the -- we'll call it quality -- of questions posted by new users on the mailing list. If they don't have a GUI/web administration tool then they do not have the technical knowledge (or incentive) to use the system in general. I've gotten questions off-list where I have to ask, should this person even be running a server? I think for this group of people a GUI/web-GUI is a must. They will not be able to use the system otherwise. For this reason I hesitate to completely remove vqadmin. Maybe if I make it a package that is not installed by default? Really it would only be removed from the install scripts, and we would be forcing users to go out of their way to choose a web administration method or learn the CLI. What does everyone think of that? my message gets long after this point, and I do rant some, so feel free to skip it okay, I rant a lot Another stream this topic brushes on is the commercial/pay versus open source and free (not the same thing people!). I took the project over and contribute to it because I support open source. I run this particular project (and contribute to several others) because I like the idea and want to keep the spirit alive. I also run my own business, so I look at things through two different sets of glasses. Why did I make 2 different versions of QControl? Because open source doesn't generate revenue unless specifically designed to do so. Most open source projects plan on generating revenue based upon support. We have a *great* support system here in the mailing list, so commercial support is generally not needed. Donations do not work: I had the QMT-ISO domain for 2 years. In that 2 years (after 2500+ downloads, 900+ petabytes in traffic) I never received donation one. When a user was questioning why they had to pay for the download of CentQMT5, I explained exactly why I was charging for it - and they donated $10 to the QTP project. QTP is another project that had a donation box up for a couple years that only received the one donation. While I did receive some thanks from both projects, that does not cover costs. I am slimming the project down some to reduce my costs, but for a while there I was spending a couple hundred dollars a month on server space, rack space, bandwidth costs, etc. AND I was expected to provide free support on the mailing list - people actually get mad and occasionally call me names when they contact me off-list for support and I tell them for the level of support they need they must pay. From a business standpoint, this project is very much like our (United States) economy - a big hole that money was shoveled into in the hopes that it will turn out better in the future. Before I took the project over I had a good taste of what was to be expected (from the QMT-ISO and QTP projects), so this was no big shock. I charge for QControl to make some money. You won't willingly send me any money so I charge for the
RE: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
Hi All, Am so far overwhelmed by all the responses! Guess it would be interesting to separate things.. Normally I am not a great fan of a js interface like extjs, but they have made a very nice library. And it does help to get a fairly quick interface going, since all the basic components needed are already there. My idea for now is that either way the GUI goes (strict html/js) it will always need a layer to communicate with qmail. So with that in mind I think the best way now is to start working on this abstraction layer in php (working title php-qmt) That way it should be fairly easy to put an interface on top of it, ie extjs (with some ajax) and the php qmail layer. The coming days I will start thinking about the required interfaces and put that on paper for the community to review. Thanks! JP -Original Message- From: Timon Reinhard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 14 februari 2008 9:08 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster Hi! Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. [...] I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel (that is not overwritten on every update). Some weeks ago I started a qmailadmin replacement based on http://extjs.com/ (which provides a pretty cool user interface). I didn't have the time to complete it yet, but if there are any Javascript developers here, I'd be happy to work together on this. Cheers. Timon - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/too-many-connections.html [mysqld] max_connections=500 (default is 100).. JP - Original Message - From: David Campbell To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:44 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password what limits do I change, here is a copy of my /etc/my.cnf file [mysqld] datadir=/var/lib/mysql socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock # Default to using old password format for compatibility with mysql 3.x # clients (those using the mysqlclient10 compatibility package). old_passwords=1 [mysql.server] user=mysql basedir=/var/lib [mysqld_safe] err-log=/var/log/mysqld.log pid-file=/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.pid On 12/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: funny, I got mysql server limit errors when I imported my users via a shell script, I will try editing this and let you know how I go On 12/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This can happen due to too many connections to your mysql server.. You could up the limits a bit in /etc/my.cnf JP - Original Message - From: David Campbell To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:32 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password This issue never happened when we were using another mailserver though (hmailserver.com+windows svr2k3), only since switching to qmailtoaster, and I cant exactly tell people to edit their registry, these are people who barely understand the concept of pressing the start menu I just don't understand why qmailtoaster has so many problems authenticating people :( On 12/02/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Outlook password dialog box is rather annoying. If you are typing when the dialog pops-up, your password gets overwritten by whatever you are typing. Then the user will typically press the Okay button which causes the password to be overwritten. I always have the users press the Cancel button to avoid this problem. If, after correcting their password, the problem persistents then look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321652. -- From: David Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:36 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time
Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
Hi, This can happen due to too many connections to your mysql server.. You could up the limits a bit in /etc/my.cnf JP - Original Message - From: David Campbell To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:32 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password This issue never happened when we were using another mailserver though (hmailserver.com+windows svr2k3), only since switching to qmailtoaster, and I cant exactly tell people to edit their registry, these are people who barely understand the concept of pressing the start menu I just don't understand why qmailtoaster has so many problems authenticating people :( On 12/02/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Outlook password dialog box is rather annoying. If you are typing when the dialog pops-up, your password gets overwritten by whatever you are typing. Then the user will typically press the Okay button which causes the password to be overwritten. I always have the users press the Cancel button to avoid this problem. If, after correcting their password, the problem persistents then look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321652. From: David Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:36 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also would not mind hiring a designer to make the designs. The only 2 problems I have had so far that stopped me from starting are time and input.. The first one is not going to change in the near future, but somewhere down the line there always can be found some time.. Concerning the second I would like your input, what are the things people want to see in such an interface.. And are there other people capable and willing to invest some time in this? Honestly I rather see the energy that goes wasted into the thread about Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas how we can make the missing part of qmt.. I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel (that is not overwritten on every update). Regards, JP
Re: [qmailtoaster] forward existing mails
I do not have an answer for you but if you just reinject the message will also go to the other receipients the email might have. That is probably not what you want.. JP - Original Message - From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 5:01 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] forward existing mails I'm not sure if Qmail can do it but most other post offices let you add the address to the first line of the text message, then you drop them into the outbound queue. Try it on a message. It might not be exactly like that but play around with some form of moving them from inbox to delivery queue. Phil -Original message- From: Istvan Köpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:41:01 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] forward existing mails Hi, I would like to know if is possible to forward messages already in the inbox without downloading them? Istvan - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
Ok this does not help much for now, but it seems something goes wrong right
after the query to dir_control.
Guess you should check if there are differences in the entry for a domain
that works and one that does not..
JP
From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 9 december 2007 16:50
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
Thank you for you reply.
The strace out put from two different domains, one that works and one that
does not work, are shown below.
The only difference I can see is the
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Here is the last few lines of out put of the domain that does not have a
problem.
fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2468, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(6, veggiesoft.com\00089\00089\0/home/vpopm..., 4096) = 150
close(6)= 0
munmap(0x2aabf000, 4096)= 0
fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=311, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(5, +pdgproduce.com-:pdgproduce.com:..., 4096) = 311
fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 0), ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aac
write(1, domain: test123.com\n, 23domain: test123.com
) = 23
write(1, uid:89\n, 11uid:89
)= 11
write(1, gid:89\n, 11gid:89
)= 11
write(1, dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/t..., 46dir:
/home/vpopmail/domains/test123.com
) = 46
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \375\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur..., 257) = 257
read(4, \1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr..., 16384) = 1289
write(1, users: 0\n, 10users: 0
) = 10
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, :\1\0\0\3replace into dir_control ( ..., 318) = 318
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\2\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
read(5, , 4096) = 0
close(5)= 0
munmap(0x2aabf000, 4096)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\1, 5) = 5
shutdown(4, 2 /* send and receive */) = 0
close(4)= 0
exit_group(0) = ?
Here is the last few lines of out put of the domain that has a problem.
fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2468, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(6, pdgproduce.com\00089\00089\0/home/vpopm..., 4096) = 396
close(6)= 0
munmap(0x2aabf000, 4096)= 0
fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=311, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(5, +testing.com-:testing.com:..., 4096) = 311
fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 0), ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aac
write(1, domain: testing.com\n, 23domain: testing.com
) = 23
write(1, uid:89\n, 11uid:89
)= 11
write(1, gid:89\n, 11gid:89
)= 11
write(1, dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/t..., 46dir:
/home/vpopmail/domains/testing.com
) = 46
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \375\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur..., 257) = 257
read(4, \1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr..., 16384) = 1289
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 12:37:54 +0100
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
You could try a strace vdominfo
It should bail out with some more info.
JP
- Original Message -
From: James Ecker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 6:40 AM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
Thank you everyone for your help. I think I have gotten a little closer to
fixing the problem. When I run a vdominfo I get the following problem:
domain: test.com
uid:89
gid:89
dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/test.com
Segmentation fault
After looking this problem up on Google, the only solution I found was to
review the vpasswd file. Are there any other suggestions? Does anyone know
where the vpasswd file is located?
James
_
Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows
Re: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
Did you also check the table dir_control ?
JP
- Original Message -
From: James Ecker
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 8:45 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
I have looked through the two different mySQL tables, besides the obvious
there is no difference between the tables. Because there is no difference
between the two tables, I have to assume there is some other location vpopmail
is keeping track of the domains.
I have backed up the non working domain data and recreated the table manually
then restored the data, but that did not help.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:08:54 +0100
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
Ok this does not help much for now, but it seems something goes wrong right
after the query to dir_control.
Guess you should check if there are differences in the entry for a domain
that works and one that does not..
JP
From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 9 december 2007 16:50
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] VQADMIN Problem
Thank you for you reply.
The strace out put from two different domains, one that works and one that
does not work, are shown below.
The only difference I can see is the
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Here is the last few lines of out put of the domain that does not have a
problem.
fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2468, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(6, veggiesoft.com\00089\00089\0/home/vpopm..., 4096) = 150
close(6)= 0
munmap(0x2aabf000, 4096)= 0
fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=311, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(5, +pdgproduce.com-:pdgproduce.com:..., 4096) = 311
fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 0), ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aac
write(1, domain: test123.com\n, 23domain: test123.com
) = 23
write(1, uid:89\n, 11uid:89
)= 11
write(1, gid:89\n, 11gid:89
)= 11
write(1, dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/t..., 46dir:
/home/vpopmail/domains/test123.com
) = 46
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \375\0\0\0\3select cur_users, level_cur..., 257) = 257
read(4, \1\0\0\1\20F\0\0\2\3def\10vpopmail\vdir_contr..., 16384) = 1289
write(1, users: 0\n, 10users: 0
) = 10
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, :\1\0\0\3replace into dir_control ( ..., 318) = 318
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\2\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
read(5, , 4096) = 0
close(5)= 0
munmap(0x2aabf000, 4096)= 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\1, 5) = 5
shutdown(4, 2 /* send and receive */) = 0
close(4)= 0
exit_group(0) = ?
Here is the last few lines of out put of the domain that has a problem.
fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2468, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(6, pdgproduce.com\00089\00089\0/home/vpopm..., 4096) = 396
close(6)= 0
munmap(0x2aabf000, 4096)= 0
fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=311, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aabf000
read(5, +testing.com-:testing.com:..., 4096) = 311
fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 0), ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2aac
write(1, domain: testing.com\n, 23domain: testing.com
) = 23
write(1, uid:89\n, 11uid:89
)= 11
write(1, gid:89\n, 11gid:89
)= 11
write(1, dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/t..., 46dir:
/home/vpopmail/domains/testing.com
) = 46
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 1, 0) = 0
write(4, \1\0\0\0\16, 5) = 5
read(4, \7\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0, 16384) = 11
Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER dropping username with '
I think he allready figured that one out.. seeing the topic has the ' in it .. The wiki can help you here.. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Chkuser Or just disable the sender address checking by adding SENDER_NOCHECK=1 to your tcp.smtp file. JP - Original Message - From: Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 7:49 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER dropping username with ' A good start would be following proper syntax for user names - the 'apostrophe' is not a valid character in an e-mail name. Check between the 'O' and the 'Connor' That's the offending character. Harry On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Bryan Daley wrote: Hi, Does anyone know off the top of there head how to stop the following occurring... CHKUSER rejected sender: from Christine.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote anz.com:unknown:202.2.57.110 rcpt : inv alid sender address format Thanks Bryan - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] How to Block Insecure SMTP Auth
Hi Adam, This seems to work : Change the /bin/true to /bin/false in your /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run JP - Original Message - From: Adam Cantwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] How to Block Insecure SMTP Auth On 11/21/2007 6:36 AM, Igor Smitran wrote: Isn't port 25 needed for incoming mails? If you block port 25 how will some other sender out of your domain be able to send you an email? For example, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] wants to send you an email then he will come to your port 25 and deliver the email. He will not be able to do smtp auth because he is not your user. Or am i wrong? Igor Absolutely. I'm not trying to block port 25. Of course I want to allow other MTA's to connect. What I am trying to do is block unencrypted authentication requests from users trying to send outbound mail. I want to force them to have to use the SSL service I've setup on port 465. As it stands, customers could use unencrypted authentication even though I've provided a secure option. I want to make that unavailable to them. As I said, it was quite easy to do this with my qmailrocks machine. I'm just trying to figure out how to accomplish the same thing on a qmailtoaster box. Adam - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] How to Block Insecure SMTP Auth
Hi Adam, You are right about the advertising... Did see that also.. but it does make login in go wrong so to say :) Anyways there is no option now to stop this advertising from happening, I did not think this would be needed when I patched the require auth code in.. Wrong thinking it seems now.. Should be a small change to get what you want, but it requires coding.. Will try to see if I can find some time later today.. JP JP, Thanks for your suggestion. So I just tried /bin/false, and you are right in that it causes authentication to fail on port 25. However, smtpd still advertises 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5 which is verified by telnetting to port 25. This means that MUA's will still try to auth and send credentials unencrypted over the wire AFAICT. This is verified by tailing /var/log/maillog while trying to auth (I can see the connection attempts). Setting AUTH=0 on my qmailrocks machine causes smtpd to no longer advertise auth at all, and MUA's detect this and drop the connection with an error before any credentials are sent. This is the setup I am trying to replicate with QMT: to get smtpd on port 25 to not advertise auth at all. Any other ideas by anyone? Adam - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] auth disabled patch (by request of Adam Cantwell)
Hi,
Just an test release, would be nice if it goes to the development server..
I did not test it a whole lot, but it was not a complex patch..
Default authentication is enabled, to disable
put export AUTH_DISABLED=1 in your run file to disable authentication.
Download for now at
http://iserve01.i-serve.net/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.16.src.rpm
JP
--- qmail-1.03.1.3.15/qmail-smtpd.c 2007-11-22 02:39:38.0 +0100
+++ qmail-1.03/qmail-smtpd.c2007-11-22 03:01:12.0 +0100
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
int timeout = 1200;
unsigned int spfbehavior = 0;
unsigned int require_auth = 0;
+unsigned int auth_disabled = 0;
int flagauth = 0;
@@ -275,6 +276,9 @@
x = env_get(REQUIRE_AUTH);
if(x) { scan_ulong(x,u); if (u0) require_auth = 1; }
+ x = env_get(AUTH_DISABLED);
+ if(x) { scan_ulong(x,u); if (u0) auth_disabled = 1; }
+
#ifdef TLS
if (env_get(SMTPS)) { smtps = 1; tls_init(); }
else
@@ -494,11 +498,13 @@
#endif
out(\r\n250-PIPELINING\r\n250-8BITMIME\r\n);
out(250-SIZE ); out(size); out(\r\n);
+ if (!auth_disabled) {
#ifdef CRAM_MD5
- out(250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5\r\n);
+ out(250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5\r\n);
#else
- out(250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN\r\n);
+ out(250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN\r\n);
#endif
+ }
seenmail = 0; dohelo(arg);
if (bhelook) flagbarfbhelo = bmcheck(BMCHECK_BHELO);
}
@@ -980,6 +986,8 @@
{
int r;
+ if (auth_disabled) return err_noauth();
+
if (*arg) {
if (r = b64decode(arg,str_len(arg),user) == 1) return err_input();
}
@@ -1004,6 +1012,7 @@
{
int r, id = 0;
+ if (auth_disabled) return err_noauth();
if (*arg) {
if (r = b64decode(arg,str_len(arg),resp) == 1) return err_input();
}
@@ -1030,6 +1039,8 @@
int i, r;
char *s;
+ if (auth_disabled) return err_noauth();
+
s = unique; /* generate challenge
*/
s += fmt_uint(s,getpid());
*s++ = '.';
Re: [qmailtoaster] this user has no $HOME/Maildir
You said you removed all references to localhost, didnt you accidently do that here also? btw, this does lead down to mysql, since vpopmail default tries to connect to localhost, so that failed. JP - Original Message - From: Istvan Köpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:21 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] this user has no $HOME/Maildir Exactly! And it stopped working! At first I thought it was because the power failure some files might be altered, than I checked and the server didn't reboot(it is on UPS), only the internet modem rebooted. If in the /etc/host file looks like this, than the hostname --fqdn command returns unknown host. I. Jake Vickers wrote: Istvan Köpe wrote: In my case it was called localhost.localdomain and that meant the end of Qmailtoaster. And I'm positive that I didn't modify manually the /etc/hosts file. It should have looked something like this: 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] this user has no $HOME/Maildir
As long as there was a mysql connection the localhost entry was not needed.. So you could have changed this months ago.. Just when the reboot was there it showed up.. Qmailtoaster does not alter the hosts file, why would it do so.. # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost Not the 2 comment lines.. JP - Original Message - From: Istvan Köpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:40 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] this user has no $HOME/Maildir There was no room for accident because I didn't connect to the server for couple of days and the server was working just fine. This problem appeared from nowhere and it was even more frustrating that I reinstalled Qmailtoaster it and the problem persisted. I. Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: You said you removed all references to localhost, didnt you accidently do that here also? btw, this does lead down to mysql, since vpopmail default tries to connect to localhost, so that failed. JP - Original Message - From: Istvan Köpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:21 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] this user has no $HOME/Maildir Exactly! And it stopped working! At first I thought it was because the power failure some files might be altered, than I checked and the server didn't reboot(it is on UPS), only the internet modem rebooted. If in the /etc/host file looks like this, than the hostname --fqdn command returns unknown host. I. Jake Vickers wrote: Istvan Köpe wrote: In my case it was called localhost.localdomain and that meant the end of Qmailtoaster. And I'm positive that I didn't modify manually the /etc/hosts file. It should have looked something like this: 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] this user has no $HOME/Maildir
If my memory serves me correctly restarting mysql should help.. If it does not do a mysqlcheck vpopmail JP - Original Message - From: Istvan Köpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 11:17 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] this user has no $HOME/Maildir Hello everyone, After a power loss, the email server stopped working. I receive this error for every account for POP3 connection: this user has no $HOME/Maildir And I receive this error for every account for webmail connection: Error connecting to IMAP server: localhost. 111 : Connection refused I uninstalled qmail-toaster, package by package and than reinstalled it and I still have the same error. Do you have any ideas? Istvan - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] QT / Courier-IMAP and Apple's Leopard (OS X 10.5)
It really would help to know what goes wrong. Kinda difficult to even consider fixing things without that.. Some googling only shows problems with deleting emails, and a simple fix to not store trash on the server.. I do not have leopard and will not have this anytime soon I think, my mac is not fast enough.. Anyways, I do not see anyone having a dismissive attitude of things related to apple and osx.. Nor did I see this before... JP - Original Message - From: Harry Zink To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 7:19 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] QT / Courier-IMAP and Apple's Leopard (OS X 10.5) It's not a bug, as it works just fine with the Postfix server (i.e. Dovecot). It (Apple's Mail Client) also works fine with Apple's dot-Mac and OS X Mail Server(obviously), but also Google's IMAP services, Yahoo's IMAP services, and others. This hardly qualifies as a unique bug on Apple's end (particularly since their apps are standards compliant to a fault, almost). I really do feel that this kind of dismissive attitude of things related to Apple and Mac OS X is what stands in the way of pro-active, and positive development, sadly. Harry On Nov 4, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Warren Melnick wrote: My feeling is that you are right, it should be looked into, although this is the wrong forum to post bugs in the Leopard mail client. W On 11/3/07, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, of course not, which is why I carefully worded my subject line. I've used it under Tiger and its Mail Client (Mail.app v2.0) since Day One, and never had an issue. This issue only surfaced, and was reported in multiple places, since the release of Leopard 10.5 and the associated Mail Client (Mail.app v3.0). Harry On Nov 3, 2007 9:02 PM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did you notice this issue with older versions of the apple mail client? Dustin On 11/3/07, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems there's a problem between QT and Apple's Leopard Mail client, or rather he problem is between the utilized Courier-IMAP version in QmailToaster, and Apple's Mail client. Users will find themselves unable to delete files and folder under certain circumstances. I was able to replicate this. Current work-arounds don't always work, and are usually on the mail-client end - hence, not really acceptable as genuine fixes. I also tested this with a separate installation on a Postfix server, running Cirrus-IMAP, and everything works as it should (no surprise, since Apple's OS X Server also uses Cirrus). While there may be some work-arounds in the short term, personally I see a better long-term solution to be to replace Courier-IMAP with the Cirrus solution - aside from fixing this issue, it also has a smaller footprint, and much better efficiency (i.e. less load on a server with a larger n umber of users). Not sure if this has already shown up on any radar, but wanted to share a general head's up, and hoping that a solution may be forthcoming. Harry - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] ip changed mail server
Hi, Do not forget to change your mx records.. I would suggest lowering the ttl of the primary record and adding the new ip at a higher mx level now. Then when the change happens, change the ip of the primary record (and set back the ttl). That way things should go rather smooth... JP - Original Message - From: Per Qvindesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 1:08 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ip changed mail server Hello Dan, That should be a simple change of ip address, depending on new route etc but I would also make sure that you look into your /etc/resolv.conf and host to make sure that you don't miss out on something, but the whole process should not take any more then 2 minuts tops. Regards Per Qvindesland dan wrote: in very short time i have to change de ip address of mail server, ii want the dowtime to be short and for that i ask there are other changes to make in centos qmail-toaster, or simple linux box ip change? regards No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 27.10.2007 11:02 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] I hate Blackberry , 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, (#5.7.1 - chkuser)'
Btw, its not just blackberry that needs this fix.. also mails from for example ticketmaster.co.uk and some mails from paypal. So I really suggest to change this behaviour for all incoming connections.. You will not know what emails were lost and that I think is a bigger problem then the very small security problem.. qmail does not use the email address in any file, only if you would have an external program doing something with the filesystem based on the address it could give problems (imo).. If anyone does see real security implications I would like to hear them really.. JP - Original Message - From: Helmut Fritz To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 7:42 PM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] I hate Blackberry , 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, (#5.7.1 - chkuser)' understood, but if it is just one server there may be enough log entries for folks to collaborate to find it - and make appropriate entries and engage blackberry about it. i have also seen comments that say those characters are not against the rfc and other comments that say they are. if they are not, then qmail should not choke on them. if they are, blackberry should be engaged. -- From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:37 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] I hate Blackberry , 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, (#5.7.1 - chkuser)' Helmut Fritz wrote: i wonder - is there a way to id this one? or do they all masquerade as the same hostname/ip? i am thinking not, since we could then add a line for that ip and it would cover all of them. If you look at the wiki, you'll see where I did a MX lookup on their domain and started to name each server to allow the characters - this particular one was NOT listed in the MX records - it seems to be a stealth server. It may appear in the SPF records, but by that time a client was literally screaming at me on the phone, so I just fixed it with a broad stroke, albeit a blunt one. I did some testing afterwards to see if I should go back and make it look pretty (ie: do it the right way), but found no need myself.
Re: [qmailtoaster] I think i want to start over,
Wel seems your mysql is somewhat broken.. Bit hard to say based on this wat is wrong exactly. I remember you posted that mysql was installed and that it was enabled. But did you also check if it was running? /etc/rc.d/init.d/mysqld status Did you change the default mysql config (/etc/my.cnf) There the path to the socket is set (default is socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock) JP - Original Message - From: Jim Shupert, Jr. To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:27 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] I think i want to start over, W, mysql --user=vpopmail --password=SsEeCcRrEeTt --host=localhost vpopmail yields error 2002 (HY000): can't connect to local mysql server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (2) so...there is that :) - Original Message - From: Warren Melnick To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:01 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] I think i want to start over, It tells us that I can't type. --host=localhost sorry. Jake: Great to be back. I am setting up some toasters now for a new client and just about have work (BMG/Columbia house, specifically yourmusic.com) talked into running qmail instead of sendmail for our mailings. W On 10/24/07, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thnak you W for you suggestions in regrads to your 1-2-3 (1) Is mysql running. If not, be sure that the mysql-server rpm is installed and that it is running and set to run on boot i did this chkconfig --list | grep mysql mysqld 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off and this rpm -qa | grep mysql mysql-4.1.20-2.RHEL4.1.0.1 mysql-devel-4.1.20-2.RHEL4.1.0.1 mysql-server-4.1.20-2.RHEL4.1.0.1 php-mysql-4.3.9-3.22.9 libdbi-dbd-mysql-0.6.5-10.RHEL4.1 mysqlclient10-3.23.58-4.RHEL4.1 mysql-bench-4.1.20-2.RHEL4.1.0.1 so that means Yes it is there and Yes, it is running at boot - correct? (2) Is there a vpopmail database? (Check that /var/lib/mysql/vpopmail exists, is a directory and s owned by mysql:mysql) There is indeed a dir /var/lib/mysql/vpopmail and the owner is msql and the group is mysql I see lots of stuff in there named like the domains that I made w the GUI... lots of things...( it made my head hurt )... (3) Can the vpopmail user access this? Try this: mysql --user=vpopmail --password=SsEeCcRrEeTt --host-localhost vpopmail I tried that and got an unknown option --host-localhost so. what does that tell us? Thnaks again j - Original Message - From: Warren Melnick To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:05 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] I think i want to start over, Check the following: (1) Is mysql running. If not, be sure that the mysql-server rpm is installed and that it is running and set to run on boot (2) Is there a vpopmail database? (Check that /var/lib/mysql/vpopmail exists, is a directory and s owned by mysql:mysql) (3) Can the vpopmail user access this? Try this: mysql --user=vpopmail --password=SsEeCcRrEeTt --host-localhost vpopmail Most likely one (or all) of those is not working. W On 10/24/07, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Friends, I think i wish to start over with my qmail-toaster. I seem to be unable to create a domain..All seemed Ok to that point. No Auth to the back end is the error. I am using the guide of: http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/EZ-QmailToaster-CentOS-4.3.txt I am thinking about ...starting over from step 7 forward 7. Install QmailToaster Packages: wget http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/cnt40-install-script.sh sh cnt40-install-script.sh If I do that will that - blow away - the current install and allow me to proceed from there? what do you think? thanks j
Re: [qmailtoaster] I think i want to start over,
Hi, Did you check the ~vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql file to see the credentials are correct? default is : localhost|0|vpopmail|SsEeCcRrEeTt|vpopmail That you can test by doing a mysql -h localhost -u vpopmail -p and enter the password as in the file.. JP - Original Message - From: Jim Shupert, Jr. To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:48 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] I think i want to start over, Friends, I think i wish to start over with my qmail-toaster. I seem to be unable to create a domain..All seemed Ok to that point. No Auth to the back end is the error. I am using the guide of: http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/EZ-QmailToaster-CentOS-4.3.txt I am thinking about ...starting over from step 7 forward 7. Install QmailToaster Packages: wget http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/cnt40-install-script.sh sh cnt40-install-script.sh If I do that will that - blow away - the current install and allow me to proceed from there? what do you think? thanks j
Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery
No... JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery So if i disable it in chkuser_settings.h will ezmlm lists still work ? - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I now understand you ment litteral name-something, first read it different. You are right this is accepted as a valid email address, this is needed for ezmlm lists. The only way to disable is change the settings in chkuser_settings.h /* * Enables checking for EZMLM lists * this define substitutes #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_LISTS * */ #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS Would be nice to change this into a runtime option... Regards, Jean-Paul - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Catchall is set to bounce in .qmail-default like this: | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox It's default configuration. The problem is very frustrating because i get alot of SPAM on addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] So again please help ! - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:48 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Check if you enabled catchall for this domain. Regards, JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:31 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I recenty installed the latest QT and added one domain and some user accounts with qmailadmin. The format for user accounts is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that i noticed that all incoming mail for addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] are not bounced, instead are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. The smtp log shows that CHKUSER found existing recipient. How can i resolve this issue ? Thanks, Catalin L
Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery
Check if you enabled catchall for this domain. Regards, JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:31 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I recenty installed the latest QT and added one domain and some user accounts with qmailadmin. The format for user accounts is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that i noticed that all incoming mail for addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] are not bounced, instead are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. The smtp log shows that CHKUSER found existing recipient. How can i resolve this issue ? Thanks, Catalin L
Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery
Then I am probably wrong, would have to check the differences. JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:04 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Hmmm.i don't like that. Then why in older versions like 1.2.10 everything works perfect ??? - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:53 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery No... JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery So if i disable it in chkuser_settings.h will ezmlm lists still work ? - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I now understand you ment litteral name-something, first read it different. You are right this is accepted as a valid email address, this is needed for ezmlm lists. The only way to disable is change the settings in chkuser_settings.h /* * Enables checking for EZMLM lists * this define substitutes #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_LISTS * */ #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS Would be nice to change this into a runtime option... Regards, Jean-Paul - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Catchall is set to bounce in .qmail-default like this: | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox It's default configuration. The problem is very frustrating because i get alot of SPAM on addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] So again please help ! - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:48 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Check if you enabled catchall for this domain. Regards, JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:31 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I recenty installed the latest QT and added one domain and some user accounts with qmailadmin. The format for user accounts is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that i noticed that all incoming mail for addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] are not bounced, instead are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. The smtp log shows that CHKUSER found existing recipient. How can i resolve this issue ? Thanks, Catalin L
Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery
I now understand you ment litteral name-something, first read it different. You are right this is accepted as a valid email address, this is needed for ezmlm lists. The only way to disable is change the settings in chkuser_settings.h /* * Enables checking for EZMLM lists * this define substitutes #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_LISTS * */ #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS Would be nice to change this into a runtime option... Regards, Jean-Paul - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Catchall is set to bounce in .qmail-default like this: | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox It's default configuration. The problem is very frustrating because i get alot of SPAM on addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] So again please help ! - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:48 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Check if you enabled catchall for this domain. Regards, JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:31 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I recenty installed the latest QT and added one domain and some user accounts with qmailadmin. The format for user accounts is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that i noticed that all incoming mail for addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] are not bounced, instead are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. The smtp log shows that CHKUSER found existing recipient. How can i resolve this issue ? Thanks, Catalin L
Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery
Ah that I overlooked.. Glad it is fixed for you now.. Regards, JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:54 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Thank you JP for your responses. I managed to fix it by commenting #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS in chkuser_settings.h - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Then I am probably wrong, would have to check the differences. JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:04 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Hmmm.i don't like that. Then why in older versions like 1.2.10 everything works perfect ??? - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:53 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery No... JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery So if i disable it in chkuser_settings.h will ezmlm lists still work ? - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I now understand you ment litteral name-something, first read it different. You are right this is accepted as a valid email address, this is needed for ezmlm lists. The only way to disable is change the settings in chkuser_settings.h /* * Enables checking for EZMLM lists * this define substitutes #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_LISTS * */ #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS Would be nice to change this into a runtime option... Regards, Jean-Paul - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Catchall is set to bounce in .qmail-default like this: | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox It's default configuration. The problem is very frustrating because i get alot of SPAM on addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] So again please help ! - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:48 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery Check if you enabled catchall for this domain. Regards, JP - Original Message - From: Catalin Leanca To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:31 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Strange email delivery I recenty installed the latest QT and added one domain and some user accounts with qmailadmin. The format for user accounts is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that i noticed that all incoming mail for addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] are not bounced, instead are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. The smtp log shows that CHKUSER found existing recipient. How can i resolve this issue ? Thanks, Catalin L - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Need QMAIL CONSULTANT
Hi Gilbert, Just before you get into the consultant area. Change your mysql connection limits to a higer value.. in /etc/my.cnf [mysqld] max_connections=500 (Or some value like that, the default is 100).. Every imap/pop/smtp session will require a mysql connection. Regards, Jean-Paul - Original Message - From: Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:54 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Need QMAIL CONSULTANT I have need for a professional QMAIL toaster consultant. I am having a couple problems with my toaster that did not occurr during testing but are now appearing under load. I am running QMAILTOASTER on Centos5 The server is irregularly denying authentication. It usually will clear up in a few minutes but not always. A sure way to clear the problem up is to restart the MySQL service. I am not seeing any obvious errors on the system. I will need references and other documentation that would normally be needed for a business transaction. Thank you, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. Phoenix Internet (602)385-0720 (877)269-7886 x 106
Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server
This will accomplish what you are trying todo. The forward will be transparent to the user. You only use the forward to get the email on the correct server. If I read all correctly this will give you exactly what you want/need - per user option where the email will go (user on site A will be normal user, user on site B will be forward user ) - no overhead on the vpn link Just try it out I would say.. Am sure it will make your day.. JP - Original Message - From: Gabriel Lai To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 4:28 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server Hi, This is not what I'm intending to do :( I would like to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in Site B server. Not from [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward to Site B server [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help...!! - Original Message From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 11:50:05 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server If the user is in location 2 then you set a forward on the account in location 1 for their account like you would forward to hotmail or yahoo but add the host name to the front of the domain. And example: Their email address to the world would be [EMAIL PROTECTED] si I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It enters the server for that MX record which is server1. She has an account there but it’s not her’s. She picks up from server2. So her account on server1 has a forward set to forward all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If your dns is setup correctly with server2 address, then this “Should” work. -- From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 8:51 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server hi, i'm not sure how can I configure this to get tis works... any clues? DNS? SMTP Route ? - Original Message From: Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 1:38:42 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server you do not need to. just forward it to user at host.domain.com. it SHOULD work, but until you try... ;) -- From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 6:17 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server but problem is, both site A and site B are the same domain name: abc.com.my how to configure the DNS so that it understands Site A or Site B? - Original Message From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2007 5:03:15 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server They don't have to do that.. If you just forward their email to siteb.domain all else can stay the same JP - Original Message - From: Gabriel Lai To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 9:43 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server Hi Guys, Thanks for the input. I knew that subdomain/alias domains can do this job, but asking the users change the email addresses to subdomain might be a critical mass. I think copy the certain folders to Site B server would be much more effective, but I worry that the emails might be too large, and might hang the VPN tunneling... anyone have done this before?? Thanks - Original Message From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:43:13 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server I never even though about using the hostname in the forward address. That's exactly what I wanted. I'm not sure if Merak will do hostname (easy to test) but it certainly will do alias domains. Thanks LOADS!!! Gabriel, does this help you? I think I have enough info to be able to get you on the right direction. Phil -Original message- From: Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:21:22 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server Yes - at least in qmailadmin when you check the forward to box it has
Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server
You could do the same on siteB for the users that are on siteA, so that mailing between users on A and user on B will work also. So just add abc.com and server2.abc.com on siteB And add abc.com and server1.abc.com on siteB On server2 you add all users with forward to siteA that are on siteA on server1 you add all users with forward to siteB that are on siteB And their own specific users. It would be nice to have mail.abc.com point to server1.abc.com for the users on siteA and mail.abc.com point to server2.abc.com for the users on siteB You could do that with 2 dns servers or with a zone file per subnet in bind (no idea how that exactly works but I know it is possible). All users then can login with just [EMAIL PROTECTED] Leaves imo one possible issue, if people roam between the 2 locations. But I do not know if that is the case. If so that can also be solved, for example by assinging them a dns server thru dhcp based on their normal location and not on their current location. JP - Original Message - From: Gabriel Lai To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server does that means that in Site B server, I will alias [EMAIL PROTECTED] back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? if site b is server2.abc.com, how the users going to accept those emails? using [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] sorry, i'm still trying to understand. Thanks very much - Original Message From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 10:47:53 PM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server As far as the world is concerned, marys address WILL be [EMAIL PROTECTED] The ONLY person who will know the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address will be YOU. In this case, the server2 part is NOT a domain, it’s the server name. -- From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:29 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server Hi, This is not what I'm intending to do :( I would like to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in Site B server. Not from [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward to Site B server [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help...!! - Original Message From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 11:50:05 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server If the user is in location 2 then you set a forward on the account in location 1 for their account like you would forward to hotmail or yahoo but add the host name to the front of the domain. And example: Their email address to the world would be [EMAIL PROTECTED] si I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It enters the server for that MX record which is server1. She has an account there but it’s not her’s. She picks up from server2. So her account on server1 has a forward set to forward all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If your dns is setup correctly with server2 address, then this “Should” work. -- From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 8:51 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server hi, i'm not sure how can I configure this to get tis works... any clues? DNS? SMTP Route ? - Original Message From: Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 1:38:42 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server you do not need to. just forward it to user at host.domain.com. it SHOULD work, but until you try... ;) -- From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 6:17 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server but problem is, both site A and site B are the same domain name: abc.com.my how to configure the DNS so that it understands Site A or Site B? - Original Message From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2007 5:03:15 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server They don't have to do that.. If you just forward their email
Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server
They don't have to do that.. If you just forward their email to siteb.domain all else can stay the same JP - Original Message - From: Gabriel Lai To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 9:43 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server Hi Guys, Thanks for the input. I knew that subdomain/alias domains can do this job, but asking the users change the email addresses to subdomain might be a critical mass. I think copy the certain folders to Site B server would be much more effective, but I worry that the emails might be too large, and might hang the VPN tunneling... anyone have done this before?? Thanks - Original Message From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:43:13 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server I never even though about using the hostname in the forward address. That's exactly what I wanted. I'm not sure if Merak will do hostname (easy to test) but it certainly will do alias domains. Thanks LOADS!!! Gabriel, does this help you? I think I have enough info to be able to get you on the right direction. Phil -Original message- From: Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:21:22 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server Yes - at least in qmailadmin when you check the forward to box it has the option of keeping a copy locally...which you don't have to do. So it could come into the qmail server and be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You would have to specify the host's fqdn since mx records point to qmail. I am NOT sure if merak would accept it with the fqdn of the host though. I don't think qmail will, but someone else with more knowledge could respond to that point. It might be just as simple as creating an alias domain (you can in qmail) of merak.domain1.com aliases to domain1.com on merak. Hope that makes sense...and helps. -Original Message- From: Phil Leinhauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 11:50 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server That last got sent too early I'm actually looking for a similar solution. I want to make a slow migration from my current post office software. Both of my servers are in same location. Let me explain what I want to do and maybe that will help Gabriel too. I have Qmail on one machine and Merak on the other. I have about 40 domains in Merak. - If I added domain1.com to Qmail and it already had it with users in Merak. I want to duplicate the users in Qmail and I'll set the MX to send into Qmail. - On a user by user basis I want to move the users storage into Qmail to make it as transparent to them as possible. So currently say I have 4 users all in Merak for domain1.com. I want to have the same 4 users in Qmail but when mail comes in, forward the specific accounts to another host as the accounts move. I'm envisioning this in the middle of the process: Accounts in Qmail Accounts in Merak MaryMary Forward to Merak Joe Joe Stay in Qmail Fred Fred Stay in Qmail JaneJane Forward to Merak Isn't there a setting somewhere in the account properties to forward (not copy) an account to another host and NOT store it locally? I'm thinking I saw the somewhere but I can't recall now. I know I can forward the entire domain. This is why I asked a while back what the order of operations is in Qmail. If it processes smtproutes before local accounts or after. Phil -Original message- From: Gabriel Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:35:40 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server yes, that's right else it will transfer very very huge emails to another host. daily of emails is around 2GB... - Original Message From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 1:14:27 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] automtically forward emails from Primary Serverto Secondary Server Isn't there a way to have specific users emails forwarded to another host directly? This would avoid any lag
Re: [qmailtoaster] It is very urgent I will be appreciate your early response
Move the *.pem files in /var/qmail/control to a different location to disable ssl on the server side. Then qmail-smtp will not announce anymore it can do ssl. JP - Original Message - From: Ahmed Shareef To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 11:09 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] It is very urgent I will be appreciate your early response Even I have tried without SSL still the same problem Thanks On 9/2/07, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happens if you try to just do a basic smtp connection without ssl? I see that you are getting and RBL error as well. For testing purposes do this. Cp /var/qmail/control/blacklists blacklists1 This will backup your current blacklists file. Then nano –w /var/qmail/control/blacklists and remove all text in this file then hit ctl o and then ctl x that will remove all blacklists from your blacklists file thus disabling blacklist tests. Let me know what you come up with Thanks Q From: Ahmed Shareef [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 2:17 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] It is very urgent I will be appreciate your early response Could somebody help me. There is some problem with SMTP port If my client is connected to LAN (office network) every thing is fine, they are able to use port 25 and 587. But my problem is that when ever they are connecting from out side they are not able to access port 25 and 587 but they are able to telnet port 25 and 587 It is very urgent I will be appreciate your early response For more clarification my side I have two network cards in my mail server one with public IP address and other one with LAN IP address (office network) office user are configure with LAN IP address (internal IP) and firewall is disable If I configure with port 587 they are getting above error message Your server has unexpectedly terminated the connection. Possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Account: ' mail.domain.net', Server: ' mail.domain.net', Protocol: SMTP, Port: 587, Secure (SSL): Yes, Error Number: 0x800CCC0F If I configure with port 25 they are getting above error message The server does not support a SSL connection. Account: ' mail.domain. net', Server: ' mail.domain.net ', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '250 rblsmtpd.local ', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): Yes, Server Error: 250, Error Number: 0x800CCC7D Here is my tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,NOP0FCHECK=1
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail, ptr and natting firewall...
No, you really need the external/public ip to have a ptr record. Otherwise you will also have problems getting mail to other domains. JP - Original Message - From: Domenico Fortunato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 3:28 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail, ptr and natting firewall... Well... the solution is to change the domain manteiner. Ok. I can do it, but ...I thought about my problem and now I've an idea/doubt. I have no local area network dns server. In your own opinion can I solve my original problem by activating a local dns server with reverse PTR dns? Using qmail toaster djbdns can I create a dns server for the entire lan? Regards. Domenico. Jean-Paul van de Plasse ha scritto: It could be de delegated the reverse lookups to your provider, but as far as I know you can not lookup that. goodluck, JP - Original Message - From: Domenico Fortunato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail, ptr and natting firewall... The address pool 159.213.0.0/16 is assigned at Regione Toscana, but our domain manteiner is a local provider (other than Regione Toscana). I will phone Regione Toscana's tech support. Thank you for your kind reply. Regards. Domenico Jean-Paul van de Plasse ha scritto: Unless I am misreading things, the ip is allready 159.213.xx.yy And if you do a nslookup on this ip you get an error. So something is wrong in your reverse dns setup. Seems the maintainer of this block is Regione Toscana (Do a whois on the ip the get full contact info). They are the ones who should add a reverse (ptr) record. Regards, This post is similar to one of some days ago. I want to add some important details. This is my production configuration: ISP (DNS manteiner) - Firewall (public IP) - Qmailtoaster server (iptables natted private ip) qmailtoaster is based on centos5 x86_64 I obtain this error with some destination domains. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User and password not set, continuing without authentication. 200.44.aa.bb does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... 159.213.xx.yy does not have a matching IN PTR Resource Record - Giving up on 200.44.aa.bb The result of dig PTR mail.comune.follonica.gr.it is correct. In my opinion the problem is in Received header line. Below there is part of the reply message (the original mail was sent using squirrelmail) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23350 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2007 13:52:06 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 23344, pid: 23347, t: 0.0468s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.91.1/m:43 Received: from unknown (HELO 159.213.xx.yy) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@127.0.0.1) by mail.comune.follonica.gr.it with ESMTPA; 23 Aug 2007 13:52:06 - Received: from 192.168.0.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by 159.213.xx.yy with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: richiesta From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a-1.3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal 192.168.0.1 is the IP address of firewall (DMZ side) Is there a method to force Received line to 159.213.xx.yy? What's wrong? Thanks. Regards Domenico Fortunato - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] cron not working as expected
Just curious why is it set to never run? * * * * * would normally be every minute.. JP - Original Message - From: Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:44 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] cron not working as expected Basura wrote: Hi all, My qmail is the latest qmailtoaster plus ISO. I need to run the following cron as root * * * * * /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov /dev/null 21 /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov is executed perfectly at the console, but as a cronjob using crontab it doesn´t work. It's set to never run. It needs to be something like: 35 * * * * /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov What I do on my machines is create a script: #!/usr/sh # updatetime script /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov And drop it into my /etc/cron.hourly folder and make it executbale (chmod +x /etc/cron.hourly/updatetime). You shouldn't need to update the time more than once an hour. If it's getting more than a couple thousandths of a second off in an hour you either have a motherboard issue or one that has a REALLY cheap clock. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] cron not working as expected
yum install ntp service ntpd start i guess. JP - Original Message - From: Basura To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 4:23 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] cron not working as expected is ntp deamon installed with the iso dist by default? if so, how can i tell the deamon to doit every minute? thanks, I´m really desperate with the vmware server clock issue. slamp slamp escribió: well if you are concerned about time and want to update it every minute why not just run the ntp daemon? thats how i have mine setup. On 8/26/07, Basura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you are right. * * * * * is every minute. In fact, if I change the command to echo x /txt it writes a new line every minute at /txt, but the /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov /dev/null 21 dose not work. FK Jean-Paul van de Plasse escribió: Just curious why is it set to never run? * * * * * would normally be every minute.. JP - Original Message - From: Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:44 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] cron not working as expected Basura wrote: Hi all, My qmail is the latest qmailtoaster plus ISO. I need to run the following cron as root * * * * * /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov /dev/null 21 /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov is executed perfectly at the console, but as a cronjob using crontab it doesn´t work. It's set to never run. It needs to be something like: 35 * * * * /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov What I do on my machines is create a script: #!/usr/sh # updatetime script /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov And drop it into my /etc/cron.hourly folder and make it executbale (chmod +x /etc/cron.hourly/updatetime). You shouldn't need to update the time more than once an hour. If it's getting more than a couple thousandths of a second off in an hour you either have a motherboard issue or one that has a REALLY cheap clock. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail, ptr and natting firewall...
Unless I am misreading things, the ip is allready 159.213.xx.yy And if you do a nslookup on this ip you get an error. So something is wrong in your reverse dns setup. Seems the maintainer of this block is Regione Toscana (Do a whois on the ip the get full contact info). They are the ones who should add a reverse (ptr) record. Regards, Jean-Paul - Original Message - From: Domenico Fortunato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 9:44 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] qmail, ptr and natting firewall... This post is similar to one of some days ago. I want to add some important details. This is my production configuration: ISP (DNS manteiner) - Firewall (public IP) - Qmailtoaster server (iptables natted private ip) qmailtoaster is based on centos5 x86_64 I obtain this error with some destination domains. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User and password not set, continuing without authentication. 200.44.aa.bb does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... 159.213.xx.yy does not have a matching IN PTR Resource Record - Giving up on 200.44.aa.bb The result of dig PTR mail.comune.follonica.gr.it is correct. In my opinion the problem is in Received header line. Below there is part of the reply message (the original mail was sent using squirrelmail) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23350 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2007 13:52:06 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 23344, pid: 23347, t: 0.0468s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.91.1/m:43 Received: from unknown (HELO 159.213.xx.yy) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@127.0.0.1) by mail.comune.follonica.gr.it with ESMTPA; 23 Aug 2007 13:52:06 - Received: from 192.168.0.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by 159.213.xx.yy with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: richiesta From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a-1.3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal 192.168.0.1 is the IP address of firewall (DMZ side) Is there a method to force Received line to 159.213.xx.yy? What's wrong? Thanks. Regards Domenico Fortunato - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail, ptr and natting firewall...
It could be de delegated the reverse lookups to your provider, but as far as I know you can not lookup that. goodluck, JP - Original Message - From: Domenico Fortunato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail, ptr and natting firewall... The address pool 159.213.0.0/16 is assigned at Regione Toscana, but our domain manteiner is a local provider (other than Regione Toscana). I will phone Regione Toscana's tech support. Thank you for your kind reply. Regards. Domenico Jean-Paul van de Plasse ha scritto: Unless I am misreading things, the ip is allready 159.213.xx.yy And if you do a nslookup on this ip you get an error. So something is wrong in your reverse dns setup. Seems the maintainer of this block is Regione Toscana (Do a whois on the ip the get full contact info). They are the ones who should add a reverse (ptr) record. Regards, This post is similar to one of some days ago. I want to add some important details. This is my production configuration: ISP (DNS manteiner) - Firewall (public IP) - Qmailtoaster server (iptables natted private ip) qmailtoaster is based on centos5 x86_64 I obtain this error with some destination domains. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User and password not set, continuing without authentication. 200.44.aa.bb does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... 159.213.xx.yy does not have a matching IN PTR Resource Record - Giving up on 200.44.aa.bb The result of dig PTR mail.comune.follonica.gr.it is correct. In my opinion the problem is in Received header line. Below there is part of the reply message (the original mail was sent using squirrelmail) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23350 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2007 13:52:06 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 23344, pid: 23347, t: 0.0468s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.91.1/m:43 Received: from unknown (HELO 159.213.xx.yy) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@127.0.0.1) by mail.comune.follonica.gr.it with ESMTPA; 23 Aug 2007 13:52:06 - Received: from 192.168.0.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by 159.213.xx.yy with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: richiesta From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a-1.3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal 192.168.0.1 is the IP address of firewall (DMZ side) Is there a method to force Received line to 159.213.xx.yy? What's wrong? Thanks. Regards Domenico Fortunato - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] unable to send from certain ISPs... Spamhaus block?
If they use the submission port 587 it will not check for any rbl. Thats the basic idea of the submission port. JP - Original Message - From: Harry Zink To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:18 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] unable to send from certain ISPs... Spamhaus block? On Aug 24, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote: do those computers 1) send via your server (which is located in one of those problematic domains) or shall your server 2) receive mails from those machines? Yes, and yes. In case 1) I recommend to make qmail all mails forwarding to the provider's regular SMTP server. Different users and different situations (i.e. roaming users) makes this nearly impossible. In case 2) your users should better use the submission port 587 with authentication to send mails. They are, I'm still getting this issue. The problem is in case 1) that even when you whitelist those IP-Addresses, other many other recipients will not be able to receive those mail, because many providers are using the spamhouse blacklists... Easiest is how do I just disable this 'check/scan on SMTP' from qmail? I tried already to edit the /var./qmail/control/blacklists file and remove spamhaus, but that made no difference. How do I disable this feature..? --- Sun-Tzu Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, will make violent revolution inevitable.
[qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] Submission port 587
Hi, telnet localhost 587 For external connections, check if your firewall config has port 587 open. JP - Original Message - From: Basura [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 3:32 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Submission port 587 Hi all! How can I test if submisson port works? Is there a test I can do inside my server console? Have tried by changeing in my thunderbird the port 25 to 587 and it can´t get conected. Thanks - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Please it is very important
What errors do you get? Are all 3 domains listed in /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts and in /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains JP - Original Message - From: Ahmed Shareef To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:40 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Please it is very important Dear all, Please it is very important I have some problem I have install qmail in that I have add three domain but only one default domain is receives and send mails but other two domains are sending mail out side but its not receiving any mails from out side please help me Thanks
Re: [qmailtoaster] Please it is very important
Please try a qmailctl cdb and then try to mail again.. JP - Original Message - From: Ahmed Shareef To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Please it is very important yes its listed in both place getting this message 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.5.3 - chkuser) On 8/18/07, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What errors do you get? Are all 3 domains listed in /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts and in /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains JP - Original Message - From: Ahmed Shareef To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:40 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Please it is very important Dear all, Please it is very important I have some problem I have install qmail in that I have add three domain but only one default domain is receives and send mails but other two domains are sending mail out side but its not receiving any mails from out side please help me Thanks
Re: [qmailtoaster] How to configure Virtual Domains, relay domains
It really will help to check the wiki... http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com JP - Original Message - From: Ahmed Shareef To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:47 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] How to configure Virtual Domains, relay domains Hi, How to configure Virtual Domains, relay domains and how specify local user to accept relay domains emails and where specify Thanks Shareef
Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem
Yes the problem is the chkuser sender check. You need to add SENDER_NOCHECK=1 to your tcprules file, for either the mailservers from blackberry or for your default rule. JP - Original Message - From: Jeremy Towne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:56 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem This is what the bounce email shows. The following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was undeliverable. The reason for the problem: 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)' Jeremy Towne wrote: I have a user with a Blackberry problem. They can send email to anyone except there own domain from there blackberry. Outlook and webmail works just fine. delivery status div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedFinal-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] (this is fake on here) Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure) Remote-MTA: dns; [mail server IP] Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)' (delivery attempts: 0) Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp03.bis.na.blackberry.com /div I was wondering if it has anything to do with the rfc822; in front of the email address. Jeremy - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)
The latest version is allready patched to accept bare linefeeds.. JP - Original Message - From: PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:07 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?) A M wrote: 2007/8/8, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: just added the bold line into /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 3000 \ /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \ /usr/bin/recordio \ $RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21 -- AM agmsoft(at)gmail.com thanks AM, and recordio log will be at smtp log? btw could you do me a favor? please send to your toaster account from yahoomail beta interface, do u experience the same problem or not? if not can you tell me what toaster version are you using ? mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, it will be in smtp log, but beware that it take a LOT of space so turn it off as soon has you get the trouble sorted. I don't a yahoo account, but will try later on. -- AM Thank you for trying.. anyway I have try enable recordio and this is the result. it seem at the end of smtp conversation it display error 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.; @400046b9e45707125f14 tcpserver: pid 1933 from 66.196.97.80 @400046b9e45707137084 tcpserver: ok 1933 svr-m1.rpxholding.com:10.10.64.99:25 :66.196.97.80::42929 400046b9e45a07e64914 1933 220 mails.myholding.com - Welcome to Server Ver. 1.3 ESMTP 400046b9e45a19744604 1933 HELO web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com 400046b9e45a19754fa4 1933 250 mails.myholding.com - Welcome to Server Ver. 1.3 400046b9e45a2b0b7e3c 1933 MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 400046b9e45b1eaee584 1933 250 ok 400046b9e45b304e534c 1933 RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 400046b9e45b30506a74 1933 250 ok 400046b9e45c0634767c 1933 DATA 400046b9e45c063ca054 1933 354 go ahead snip @400046b9e45d0a47bc9c 1933 ___ @400046b9e45d0a47c084 1933 Building a website+ 400046b9e45d0a47d024 1933 is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you al= @400046b9e45d0a47d40c 1933 l the tools to get online. 400046b9e45d0a47d7f4 1933 http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting=20 400046b9e45d0a47d7f4 1933 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. @400046b9e45d0a4b2f6c 1933 [EOF] @400046b9e45d0a4d989c tcpserver: end 1933 status 256 I know we have discuss this and you suggest me to patch my QMT Wich version of QMT are you using? Cause I'd some prblems with some mailers without LF patch in QMT. can you give me a hint /link on how to patch my QMT? currently I am using version 1.3.13, can I know your's ? does this solve if I'm upgrade to latest qmt? # rpm -qa | grep toaster libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.13 spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.7 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.4 send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.4 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.2 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.3 qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.12-1.3.15 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.2 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.2 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.1-1.3.5 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.3 simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.5 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.4 clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.11 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 but why when I send from yahoomail-classic interface dont have the same problem ? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem
I had problems before with emails coming from ticketmaster.co.uk and some
other domains.
The chkuser settings are a bit outdated since lots of domains use strange
characters that ckuser dislikes.
And they are allowed per rfc (if i remember correctly).
Thats why I disabled the sender format check totally.
Can not risk to miss emails for this reason.
JP
- Original Message -
From: Brent Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem
I'm having the same problem with blackberry users in my domain.
I've traced the problem down to a forward slash character ('/') in the
SRS-ified To: header in messages coming from blackberry users to users in
my domain. Chkuser doesn't like this.
I was about to go through the process listed at
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Chkuser to add the forward slash to
the list of characters allowed by chkuser but altering the tcprules stuff
looks like a much easier fix.
My question is this: Is this only going to be a problem with messages
coming from na.blackberry.com mail servers? If so then the tcprules fix
makes sense. If it's going to be a general problem with domains that do
SRS then wouldn't it make more sense to change the chkuser settings to
allow forward slash and eventually make that a default in the stock
qmailtoaster install?
I've only ever seen this problem with messages coming from blackberry
users.
Thanks.
Brent Gardner
Jeremy Towne wrote:
So I want to add
na.blackberry.com:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1
Jeremy
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Yes the problem is the chkuser sender check.
You need to add SENDER_NOCHECK=1 to your tcprules file, for either the
mailservers from blackberry or for your default rule.
JP
- Original Message - From: Jeremy Towne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem
This is what the bounce email shows.
The following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid
format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)'
Jeremy Towne wrote:
I have a user with a Blackberry problem. They can send email to
anyone except there own domain from there blackberry. Outlook and
webmail works just fine.
delivery status
div class=moz-text-flowed
style=font-family: -moz-fixedFinal-Recipient:
rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] (this is fake on here)
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure)
Remote-MTA: dns; [mail server IP]
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry,
sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)' (delivery
attempts: 0)
Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp03.bis.na.blackberry.com
/div
I was wondering if it has anything to do with the rfc822; in front of
the email address.
Jeremy
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] AOL and smptroutes
There is a small patch to fix this issue, http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch This has been incorperated in later qmail-toaster releases. Sorry do not remember when or what version, but the current downloadable is patched. JP - Original Message - From: Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 3:22 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] AOL and smptroutes PakOgah wrote: Hi Jake, did you get error deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3) on your qmail send log files when try to send @aol.com ? if so, I got the same problem but with corp.ds.fedex.com lately (about these 2 weeks) everytime my users want to send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the email bounce back and I look at send log file, I got the error deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3) but from my toaster I can see the MXes and IP # host -t mx corp.ds.fedex.com ;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode. corp.ds.fedex.com mail is handled by 100 memexchfe01.corp.ds.fedex.com. corp.ds.fedex.com mail is handled by 100 memexchfe03.corp.ds.fedex.com. corp.ds.fedex.com mail is handled by 200 smtp.zmd.fedex.com. corp.ds.fedex.com mail is handled by 300 smtp.dmz.fedex.com. # host memexchfe01.corp.ds.fedex.com ;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode. memexchfe01.corp.ds.fedex.com has address 146.18.50.71 and after I ran your script the output is corp.ds.fedex.com:199.81.197.41 Yes, set a SMTP route for this domain. I have several that I have this problem with. = Hi Jake, just ignore my email above, before I want to sent the I give a shot from the result of your script and the result is below.. 07-20 23:07:12 delivery 1081: success: User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./[EMAIL PROTECTED]_199.81.197.41_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Ok:_queued_as_819934A0009/ next question is do I have to run the script daily, weekly or monthly to get the updated MX ? thx a lot!!! It depends on how often they change their MX record. AOL has been changing it daily for the last week or so, so I run it daily. sympatico.ca has not changed theirs in 2 years. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] AOL and smptroutes
The spec file has some more information.. * Fri Feb 23 2007 Nick Hemmesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.03-1.3.14 - Adapt qmail-103 big dns patch for qmailtoaster - qmailtoaster-big-dns.patch In fact the spec file is a good starting point for the patches list, that seems to be the only uptodate list. JP - Original Message - From: Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] AOL and smptroutes Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: I do not think that wiki page is very up to date.. Will try to find some time to update it. No, it's not. I was hoping that it would get updated sometime soon. I'll check the patches sometime soon myself, and try and put them in chronological order on the page. I also looked on the devel list for when the patch was added, but didn't see anything there, either. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem
Great that your issue is solved! Just wish we could track this down to the problem tho.. Any clues as to what was done leading to this? JP - Original Message - From: Dan McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:04 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem Just to update you all... I ran out of time... I finally had to un-install and re-install to get the toaster to work again. I tried several half-baked methods, but the only one that worked was to COMPLETELY uninstall qmail-toaster: I spent all night manually writing scripts and backing up data (and the active queues) Everything is working OK now Thanks to all who offered their help Dan --- Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC 2171 Wrens Way Clearwater, FL 33764 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free 727-647-7646 In Pinellas 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough 727-507-9435 Fax Only When did you do your last backup? Ask me about unattended backup solutions... to protect your business, not just your data! - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 getting blocked
If I read your first message correctly it started working again after you restarted the server. I would think this was a mysql connection problem (too many connections or mysql died). Next time it happens and you try telnet it will give you a more descriptive message. My guess is that upping the mysql connection limit somewhat will help. JP - Original Message - From: Guillermo Villasana [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 getting blocked Not much: snip @4000469d133f369fdd24 tcpserver: end 18842 status 256 @4000469d133f369fecc4 tcpserver: status: 2/200 @4000469d1340012f4e7c tcpserver: ok 18843 :200.76.107.145:110 :200.76.107.106::12042 @4000469d134002d81c7c tcpserver: ok 18844 :200.76.107.145:110 dsl-189-139-12-20.prod-infinitum.com.mx:189.139.12.20::2421 @4000469d13401d849e24 tcpserver: end 18843 status 256 @4000469d13401d84adc4 tcpserver: status: 1/200 @4000469d134034c12a44 tcpserver: end 18844 status 256 @4000469d134034c139e4 tcpserver: status: 0/200 @4000469d134421645124 tcpserver: status: 1/200 @4000469d1344216460c4 tcpserver: pid 18861 from 200.76.107.49 @4000469d13442c8c0f74 tcpserver: ok 18861 :200.76.107.145:110 :200.76.107.49::11883 @4000469d134508f3e49c tcpserver: end 18861 status 256 @4000469d134508f3f43c tcpserver: status: 0/200 @4000469d134b0feefcb4 tcpserver: status: 1/200 @4000469d134b0ff12f34 tcpserver: pid 18889 from 200.76.107.106 @4000469d134b1ad1ab54 tcpserver: ok 18889 :200.76.107.145:110 :200.76.107.106::11589 @4000469d134c06b58d5c tcpserver: end 18889 status 256 @4000469d134c06b59914 tcpserver: status: 0/200 /snip this is just an example of my log, and it is the same all the log. When it fails again I will try to connect via telnet Thanks Natalio Gatti wrote: Try to connect via telnet CLI and see why it is failing. What does your /var/log/qmail/pop3/current log says? Natalio. On 7/17/07, Guillermo Villasana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, My Pop3 is getting blocked I haven't found anything in my logs that shows what the problem is, but the pop3 server is asking the password again and again. When i restart the server the pop3 lets starts working again. Thanks Terius - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 getting blocked
/etc/my.cnf [mysqld] max_connections = 200 Default is 100. JP - Original Message - From: Guillermo Villasana [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:49 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 getting blocked I will take that into account. In the case this is the problem, do you know where I change this parameter? Thanks again Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: If I read your first message correctly it started working again after you restarted the server. I would think this was a mysql connection problem (too many connections or mysql died). Next time it happens and you try telnet it will give you a more descriptive message. My guess is that upping the mysql connection limit somewhat will help. JP - Original Message - From: Guillermo Villasana [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 getting blocked Not much: snip @4000469d133f369fdd24 tcpserver: end 18842 status 256 @4000469d133f369fecc4 tcpserver: status: 2/200 @4000469d1340012f4e7c tcpserver: ok 18843 :200.76.107.145:110 :200.76.107.106::12042 @4000469d134002d81c7c tcpserver: ok 18844 :200.76.107.145:110 dsl-189-139-12-20.prod-infinitum.com.mx:189.139.12.20::2421 @4000469d13401d849e24 tcpserver: end 18843 status 256 @4000469d13401d84adc4 tcpserver: status: 1/200 @4000469d134034c12a44 tcpserver: end 18844 status 256 @4000469d134034c139e4 tcpserver: status: 0/200 @4000469d134421645124 tcpserver: status: 1/200 @4000469d1344216460c4 tcpserver: pid 18861 from 200.76.107.49 @4000469d13442c8c0f74 tcpserver: ok 18861 :200.76.107.145:110 :200.76.107.49::11883 @4000469d134508f3e49c tcpserver: end 18861 status 256 @4000469d134508f3f43c tcpserver: status: 0/200 @4000469d134b0feefcb4 tcpserver: status: 1/200 @4000469d134b0ff12f34 tcpserver: pid 18889 from 200.76.107.106 @4000469d134b1ad1ab54 tcpserver: ok 18889 :200.76.107.145:110 :200.76.107.106::11589 @4000469d134c06b58d5c tcpserver: end 18889 status 256 @4000469d134c06b59914 tcpserver: status: 0/200 /snip this is just an example of my log, and it is the same all the log. When it fails again I will try to connect via telnet Thanks Natalio Gatti wrote: Try to connect via telnet CLI and see why it is failing. What does your /var/log/qmail/pop3/current log says? Natalio. On 7/17/07, Guillermo Villasana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, My Pop3 is getting blocked I haven't found anything in my logs that shows what the problem is, but the pop3 server is asking the password again and again. When i restart the server the pop3 lets starts working again. Thanks Terius - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem
Hey Dan, A few questions.. Are all accounts in the domain giving a bounce? When you look in the table beloning to the domain , does it look ok? Have you tried a telnet smtp session ? The mysql 2147483647 (max mysql signed int value) is not the problem if you ask me, I have severall domains with this value and never had any problems with those. JP - Original Message - From: Dan McAllister To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:57 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem Update: I enabled the vpopmail user as a shell account (changed the entry in /etc/passwd, then used su) I tried the vuserinfo command: $vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and received an identical response. I believe that this effectively shuts down the MySQL error assertion. Unless qmail-send isn't running as the correct user... but I just checked -- qmail-send is running as user qmails as intended (or at least the same as on my other servers). The saga continues, and my clients are getting louder! :( Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC 2171 Wrens Way Clearwater, FL 33764 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free 727-647-7646 In Pinellas 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough 727-507-9435 Fax Only When did you do your last backup? Ask me about unattended backup solutions... to protect your business, not just your data! Dan McAllister wrote: I'll put my responses up here this time: 1) Yes, the MySQL server is local (same machine as qmail-toaster) 2) If qmail-send is having trouble looking up names, it must be a MYSQL problem... as root, I can perform the following: # vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] name: user passwd: $1$OUEk3eHa$14lfEMjiA.tX6nuT1m5.m1 clear passwd: password comment/gecos: My User Name uid:0 gid:0 flags: 0 gecos: My User Name limits: No user limits set. dir: /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/user quota: NOQUOTA usage: NOQUOTA last auth: Tue Jul 17 10:23:51 2007 last auth ip: imap (I have removed personal data from the above snippet) Florida definitely has its share of growing pains these days... hard to fathom the folks over in Orlando letting things get so outta hand that the home of Disney World is considered to be too dangerous to raise a family! (You shoulda come to St. Pete/Clearwater! Then again, no -- I don't need the competition! :-)) Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC 2171 Wrens Way Clearwater, FL 33764 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free 727-647-7646 In Pinellas 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough 727-507-9435 Fax Only When did you do your last backup? Ask me about unattended backup solutions... to protect your business, not just your data! Jake Vickers wrote: Dan McAllister wrote: You can use recordio to see what qmail-smtp is doing, and maybe see where the break is. I've been traveling the last few days so I haven't kept up on the threads much. What OS and version? Behind a NAT firewall or public? Are just the /home and /backup dirs on NFS? Thanks. Turns out the error is now coming from qmail-send (earlier it was qmail-smtp, but the MySQL fix seems to have gotten it thru qmail-smtp and on to qmail-send. The exact error message in QMLOG send is: 2007-07-17 10:06:40.201173500 new msg 2261131 2007-07-17 10:06:40.201177500 info msg 2261131: bytes 1551 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 21254 uid 89 2007-07-17 10:06:40.211859500 starting delivery 9: msg 2261131 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-17 10:06:40.211864500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2007-07-17 10:06:40.215288500 delivery 9: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ 2007-07-17 10:06:40.215294500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2007-07-17 10:06:40.229608500 bounce msg 2261131 qp 21257 2007-07-17 10:06:40.229613500 end msg 2261131 I still missed some details, so if you put them in the email, I apologize. Was the mysql DB on a different machine? It would seem that it's having issues looking up the names in the DB at first glance. Can you turn on recordio and see what exactly is going on? I'll be away from a PC for most of the day, but I'll try and check in later. You're not that far from me. My office is in Orlando, but I'm moving to North Carolina this month. I'll still be in Orlando a couple days a month though, since that's where the bulk of my clients are right now. I realized that a few months back... so you're evacuating to NC like all the rest, eh? My parents left for NC about 10 years ago (outside of Cashiers, NC these days). So many ex-Floridians in NC, they're going to have to build a new Disney up there! :-) Aye. And they don't like Floridians up here, so I neglect to tell them I just moved from there (I'm in Burlington). I'm from
Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem
If i read his mail correctly the vuserinfo command gave the correct info.. So it did work (or did I overlook something in that email) JP - Original Message - From: Jake Vickers To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:19 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem Dan McAllister wrote: Update: I enabled the vpopmail user as a shell account (changed the entry in /etc/passwd, then used su) I tried the vuserinfo command: $vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and received an identical response. I believe that this effectively shuts down the MySQL error assertion. Unless qmail-send isn't running as the correct user... but I just checked -- qmail-send is running as user qmails as intended (or at least the same as on my other servers). The saga continues, and my clients are getting louder! :( You're onto something there That should have worked: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# su vpopmail bash-3.00$ /home/vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] name: jake passwd: $1$N4y/3gvf$UqT0OapwHml5arTMkXkHg0 clear passwd: none-of-your-business comment/gecos: Jake Vickers uid:0 gid:0 flags: 0 gecos: Jake Vickers limits: No user limits set. dir: /home/vpopmail/domains/v2gnu.com/jake quota: NOQUOTA usage: NOQUOTA last auth: Tue Jul 17 17:09:17 2007 last auth ip: 70.145.239.156 But it does have to read all of that info from mysql. Have you changed the password for vpopmail from the default or anything?
Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem
This really is getting an intresting problem.. Eh sorry for you it is just a very anoying one.. Ok next thing I would try, is a strace . strace /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd You get a lot of messages, the system calls actually. just type the same as you did in the telnet smtp session. [just to be sure an example] mail from:youremail rcpt to:afaultyemailaddress Somewhere in all those lines there should be a clue about what goes wrong. Just copy paste it in an email (remove the personal stuph) JP - Original Message - From: Dan McAllister To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:36 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem Yes, all users are bouncing... I have opened the MySQL tables in navicat and they look identical to other domains (on other servers) that DO work. I have tried a telnet session -- same result (error message is sent) I have also tried a telnet session to SUBMIT email -- and that works fine! I agree that the large value for number of users is of no consequence, although I reset it to zero already Thanks for the ideas... Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC 2171 Wrens Way Clearwater, FL 33764 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free 727-647-7646 In Pinellas 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough 727-507-9435 Fax Only When did you do your last backup? Ask me about unattended backup solutions... to protect your business, not just your data! Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hey Dan, A few questions.. Are all accounts in the domain giving a bounce? When you look in the table beloning to the domain , does it look ok? Have you tried a telnet smtp session ? The mysql 2147483647 (max mysql signed int value) is not the problem if you ask me, I have severall domains with this value and never had any problems with those. JP - Original Message - From: Dan McAllister To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:57 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain bouncing mail, vuser says user is fine -- still a problem Update: I enabled the vpopmail user as a shell account (changed the entry in /etc/passwd, then used su) I tried the vuserinfo command: $vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and received an identical response. I believe that this effectively shuts down the MySQL error assertion. Unless qmail-send isn't running as the correct user... but I just checked -- qmail-send is running as user qmails as intended (or at least the same as on my other servers). The saga continues, and my clients are getting louder! :( Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC 2171 Wrens Way Clearwater, FL 33764 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free 727-647-7646 In Pinellas 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough 727-507-9435 Fax Only When did you do your last backup? Ask me about unattended backup solutions... to protect your business, not just your data! Dan McAllister wrote: I'll put my responses up here this time: 1) Yes, the MySQL server is local (same machine as qmail-toaster) 2) If qmail-send is having trouble looking up names, it must be a MYSQL problem... as root, I can perform the following: # vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] name: user passwd: $1$OUEk3eHa$14lfEMjiA.tX6nuT1m5.m1 clear passwd: password comment/gecos: My User Name uid:0 gid:0 flags: 0 gecos: My User Name limits: No user limits set. dir: /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/user quota: NOQUOTA usage: NOQUOTA last auth: Tue Jul 17 10:23:51 2007 last auth ip: imap (I have removed personal data from the above snippet) Florida definitely has its share of growing pains these days... hard to fathom the folks over in Orlando letting things get so outta hand that the home of Disney World is considered to be too dangerous to raise a family! (You shoulda come to St. Pete/Clearwater! Then again, no -- I don't need the competition! :-)) Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC 2171 Wrens Way Clearwater, FL 33764 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free 727-647-7646 In Pinellas 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough 727-507-9435 Fax Only When did you do your last backup? Ask me about unattended backup solutions... to protect your business, not just your data! Jake Vickers wrote: Dan McAllister wrote: You can use recordio to see what qmail-smtp is doing, and maybe see where the break is. I've been traveling the last few days so I haven't kept up on the threads much. What OS and version? Behind a NAT firewall or public? Are just the /home and /backup dirs on NFS? Thanks. Turns out the error is now coming from qmail-send (earlier it was qmail-smtp, but the MySQL fix seems to have gotten
Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP AUTH
Hi, Smtp auth is supported, it only requires config on the client side. Change the smtp port to 587 and enable authentication for outgoing mailserver. You have to open 587 on your firewall. (ok ok that is server side) IMAP/POP before smtp is not supported anymore I think. JP - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:03 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] SMTP AUTH What I'm trying to achieve is open-relay but for specific users of my domain that would connect form outside. As my understanding new version of qmail-smtpd allows SMTP AUTH to do this job. Is that right? does it needs extra config? --- On Tue 05/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 03:38:19 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [qmailtoaster] SMTP AUTH Hi, I read on qmailtoaster.com that Qmail does SMTP with SMTP-AUTH, TLS, REMOTE-AUTH . I have configured already my mail server to send and receive intradomain emails and to send and receive from outside of the domain successfully. Now I want to configure a client with IMAP before SMTP to connect to the mail server from whatever place I want. I thought most settings should be by default configured on supervise/smtp/run and supervise/imap4/run scripts. It seems not to be that way because I can configure a client for IMAP and see the Inbox folder on my server but I can not send emails so I'd like someone to tell me what extra settings are needed to achieve that. Marcos -- Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! -- Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!
Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in
Hi, The difference is [EMAIL PROTECTED] versus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Either change your grant to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or change your vpopmail.mysql from localhost to mailhost2 JP - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:30 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in Hi, I have installed qmail toaster on fedora core 6.I want to use the MySql solution for relay so I did the following: I run the mysql-setup.sh script with this modifications. GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON vpopmail.* TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] identified by 'qwerty'; I guess this command creates and gives all privileges to vpopmail on db vpopmail.Right? The vpopmail database already exists with all its tables. The problem now is that when I try to log in to check if everything is ok I have the following error: # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using password: YES) Does anybody knows what is wrong here? Marcos ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in
If you try : mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail -h mailhost2 It should work. JP - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in Hi Jean Paul, I just did the change in the vpopmail.mysql file and now the contents of the file are: mailhost2|0|vpopmail|qwerty|vpopmail I stopped and started again the Mysql server with: # /etc/init.d/mysqld stop # /etc/init.d/mysqld start Then I tried again but I had the same error: # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using password: YES) Any idea? Marcos --- On Thu 04/26, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:34:12 +0200 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in Hi,brbrThe difference is [EMAIL PROTECTED] versus [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbrEither change your grant to [EMAIL PROTECTED]bror change your vpopmail.mysql from localhost to mailhost2brbrJPbrbr- Original Message - brFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brTo: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrSent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:30 PMbrSubject: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging inbrbrbrbrbrbr Hi,brbr I have installed qmail toaster on fedora core 6.I want to use the MySql br solution for relay so I did the following:brbr I run the mysql-setup.sh script with this modifications.brbr GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON vpopmail.* TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] identified by br 'qwerty';brbr I guess this command creates and gives all privileges to vpopmail on db br vpopmail.Right?brbr The vpopmail database already exists with all its tables.brbr The problem now is that when I try to log in to check if everything is ok br I have the following error:brbr # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmailbr ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using br password: YES)brbrbr Does anybody knows what is wrong here?brbr Marcosbrbrbrbr ___br Join Excite! - http://www.excite.combr The most personalized portal on the Web!brbrbrbr -br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.orgbr -br To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]br For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr brbrbr-br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.orgbr-brTo unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brFor additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in
It really is odd you get back @localhost It should always give back the hostname you are connecting too.. Please check your mysql commandline .. JP - Original Message - From: Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in Hello Mark did you change the password within mysql ? log into your mysql server and change password there or do it through mysqladmin command line [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Still same problem: # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail -h mailhost2 ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using password: YES) --- On Thu 04/26, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:19:43 +0200 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in If you try :brmysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail -h mailhost2brbrIt should work.brbrJPbrbr- Original Message - brFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brTo: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrSent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:51 PMbrSubject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging inbrbrbrbr Hi Jean Paul,brbr I just did the change in the vpopmail.mysql file and now the contents of br the file are:brbr mailhost2|0|vpopmail|qwerty|vpopmailbrbr I stopped and started again the Mysql server with:brbr # /etc/init.d/mysqld stopbr # /etc/init.d/mysqld startbrbr Then I tried again but I had the same error:brbr # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmailbr ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using br password: YES)brbr Any idea?brbr Marcosbrbrbrbr --- On Thu 04/26, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:br From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]br To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combr Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:34:12 +0200br Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging inbrbr Hi,brbrThe difference is [EMAIL PROTECTED] versus br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbrEither change your grant to br [EMAIL PROTECTED]bror change your vpopmail.mysql from localhost to br mailhost2brbrJPbrbr- Original Message - brFrom: br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brTo: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrSent: br Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:30 PMbrSubject: [qmailtoaster] mysql br vpopmail user not logging inbrbrbrbrbrbr Hi,brbr I br have installed qmail toaster on fedora core 6.I want to use the MySql br br solution for relay so I did the following:brbr I run the br mysql-setup.sh script with this modifications.brbr GRANT ALL br PRIVILEGES ON vpopmail.* TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] identified by br br 'qwerty';brbr I guess this command creates and gives all privileges br to vpopmail on db br vpopmail.Right?brbr The vpopmail database br already exists with all its tables.brbr The problem now is that when br I try to log in to check ifbr everything is ok br I have the following error:brbr # mysql -u br vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmailbr ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user br 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using br password: YES)brbrbr Does br anybody knows what is wrong here?brbr Marcosbrbrbrbr br ___br Join Excite! - br http://www.excite.combr The most personalized portal on the br Web!brbrbrbr -br br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted br http://www.vr.orgbr -br br To unsubscribe, e-mail: br [EMAIL PROTECTED]br For additional br commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr br brbrbr-br br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hostedbr http://www.vr.orgbr-brTo br unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brFor br additional commands, e-mail: br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbrbrbr ___br Join Excite! - http://www.excite.combr The most personalized portal on the Web!brbrbrbr -br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.orgbr -br To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]br For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr brbrbr-br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.orgbr-brTo unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brFor additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web
Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in
If I am not mistaken the mysql server is on a different host, hence the mailhost2. JP - Original Message - From: Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:50 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in I ment - readd it in case you did a typo and check the mysql.user table, make sure the vpopmail user has as Host mailhost2 (if that's what you want) . would be better to use locahost or add both once with TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Philip wrote: Hello Mark did you change the password within mysql ? log into your mysql server and change password there or do it through mysqladmin command line [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Still same problem: # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail -h mailhost2 ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using password: YES) --- On Thu 04/26, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:19:43 +0200 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in If you try :brmysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail -h mailhost2brbrIt should work.brbrJPbrbr- Original Message - brFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brTo: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrSent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:51 PMbrSubject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging inbrbrbrbr Hi Jean Paul,brbr I just did the change in the vpopmail.mysql file and now the contents of br the file are:brbr mailhost2|0|vpopmail|qwerty|vpopmailbrbr I stopped and started again the Mysql server with:brbr # /etc/init.d/mysqld stopbr # /etc/init.d/mysqld startbrbr Then I tried again but I had the same error:brbr # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmailbr ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using br password: YES)brbr Any idea?brbr Marcosbrbrbrbr --- On Thu 04/26, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:br From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]br To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combr Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:34:12 +0200br Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging inbrbr Hi,brbrThe difference is [EMAIL PROTECTED] versus br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbrEither change your grant to br [EMAIL PROTECTED]bror change your vpopmail.mysql from localhost to br mailhost2brbrJPbrbr- Original Message - brFrom: br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brTo: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrSent: br Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:30 PMbrSubject: [qmailtoaster] mysql br vpopmail user not logging inbrbrbrbrbrbr Hi,brbr I br have installed qmail toaster on fedora core 6.I want to use the MySql br br solution for relay so I did the following:brbr I run the br mysql-setup.sh script with this modifications.brbr GRANT ALL br PRIVILEGES ON vpopmail.* TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] identified by br br 'qwerty';brbr I guess this command creates and gives all privileges br to vpopmail on db br vpopmail.Right?brbr The vpopmail database br already exists with all its tables.brbr The problem now is that when br I try to log in to check ifbr everything is ok br I have the following error:brbr # mysql -u br vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmailbr ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user br 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using br password: YES)brbrbr Does br anybody knows what is wrong here?brbr Marcosbrbrbrbr br ___br Join Excite! - br http://www.excite.combr The most personalized portal on the br Web!brbrbrbr -br br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted br http://www.vr.orgbr -br br To unsubscribe, e-mail: br [EMAIL PROTECTED]br For additional br commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr br brbrbr-br br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hostedbr http://www.vr.orgbr-brTo br unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brFor br additional commands, e-mail: br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbrbrbr ___br Join Excite! - http://www.excite.combr The most personalized portal on the Web!brbrbrbr -br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.orgbr -br To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]br For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr brbrbr-br QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.orgbr-brTo unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brFor additional
Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in
don't forget to flush privileges; on your mysql command line. JP - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in First I'd like to ask if it is necessary to have two vpopmail users. Does it make any sense? why not only one with Host mailhost2 ? Second I changed the vpopmail user who has Host localhost to % mysql update user set Host='%' where Host='localhost'; Query OK, 3 rows affected (0.00 sec) Rows matched: 3 Changed: 3 Warnings: 0 Exited from mysql and tried again but... # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using password: YES) # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty -h mailhost2 ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'mailhost2.adacom.com' (using password: YES) # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty -h localhost ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using password: YES) --- On Thu 04/26, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Philip [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:32:47 +0200 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging in HeybrYou can have bothbrif it is a host issue ... (looks weird though) try as a testing purpose brto have % as Host for the user vpopmailbrsee if that works (if it does, the password is encrypted fine then)brbrbr[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:br Hi guys,brbrbrbr Jean Paul: Mysql db is on mailhost2, I'm working locally.brbr Philip: I did a query to mysql.user and found that I already have TWICE user vpopmail, once with Host value 'localhost' and the second with 'mailhost2' value. Should this cause any kind of conflict or as you suggest I can have both solutions? (But still not working...)brbrbrbr Marcosbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbr --- On Thu 04/26, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:brbr From: Philip [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrbr Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:50:59 +0200brbr Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging inbrbrbrbr I ment - readd it in case you did a typobrand check the mysql.user table, make sure the vpopmail user has as Host brmailhost2br(if that's what you want) . would be better to use locahost or add bothbronce with TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...brbrbrbrPhilip wrote:br Hello Markbr did you change the password within mysql ?br log into your mysql server and change password therebr or do it through mysqladmin command linebrbrbr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:br Still same problem:brbrbrbr # mysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail -h mailhost2brbr ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' br (using password: YES)brbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbr --- On Thu 04/26, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] br wrote:brbr From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbr To: br qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrbr Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:19:43 +0200brbr Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not logging inbrbrbrbr If you try :brmysql -u vpopmail -pqwerty vpopmail -h br mailhost2brbrIt should work.brbrJPbrbr- Original br Message - brFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]brTo: br qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrSent: Thursday, April 26, br 2007 12:51 PMbrSubject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user not br logging inbrbrbrbr Hi Jean Paul,brbr I just did the br change in the vpopmail.mysql file and now the contents of br the br file are:brbr mailhost2|0|vpopmail|qwerty|vpopmailbrbr I br stopped and started again the Mysql server with:brbr # br /etc/init.d/mysqld stopbr # /etc/init.d/mysqld startbrbr br Then I tried again but I had the same error:brbr # mysql -u br vpopmail -pqwerty br vpopmailbr ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for br user 'vpopmail'@'localhost' (using br password: YES)brbr Any br idea?brbr Marcosbrbrbrbr --- On Thu 04/26, br Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:br From: br Jean-Paul van de Plasse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]br To: br qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combr Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 br 12:34:12 +0200br Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql vpopmail user br not logging inbrbr Hi,brbrThe difference is br [EMAIL PROTECTED] versus br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brbrEither br change your grant to br [EMAIL PROTECTED]bror change your br vpopmail.mysql from localhost to br br mailhost2brbrJPbrbr- Original Message - brFrom: br br [EMAIL PROTECTED]brTo: br qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.combrSent: br Thursday, April br 26, 2007 12:30 PMbrSubject: [qmailtoaster] mysql br br vpopmail br user not logging inbrbrbrbrbrbr Hi,brbr I br br have installed qmail toaster on fedora core 6.I want to use the MySql br br br solution for relay so I did the following:brbr I br run the br mysql-setup.sh script with this br modifications.brbr GRANT ALL br PRIVILEGES
Re: [qmailtoaster] Sender Address Verification?
Hi, No it does not (yet). I did have intent of making this, but shortage of time got in the way. So far I did not see any other requests about this also. It is also effective on high volume servers, as long as there is some sort of caching. Many large ISP's are using this technique. JP - Original Message - From: Sergey Menshikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:49 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Sender Address Verification? Hi All, Does qmaltoaster support Sender Address Verification? This is when mail server keeps e-mail in some inbound queue after receiving it while checking sender's address via outbound SMTP. I was told this is very effective against spam on low-volume sites. Thank you! Sergey - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Fwd: QmailToaster: Update patches included in qmail toaster page : Task closed
http://www.binky.org.uk/software/qmail/012_newline Is where it came from. JP - Original Message - From: Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 10:10 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fwd: QmailToaster: Update patches included in qmail toaster page : Task closed It allows bare linefeeds, converts them to CRLF for incoming mail. Thanks, Erik On 4/4/07, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:36:13 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote: rpm -q --changelog qmail-toaster So far only bigdns and linefeed have been added. I know, but... http://www.google.com/search?q=qmail-smtpd-linefeed.patch No matches. What is this patch? Q - Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy http://www.strangecode.com/ +1 530 554 9555 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Email Sending Failed... HELP!!
Just wondering.. Wasn't there a temporary error/problem at their side? Seems one of their servers was refusing connections and the other one maybe had problems also.. If you still can not mail to the customer I would try a telnet smtp session to see what errors you are getting exactly.. Or use recordio and send a message again. JP - Original Message - From: Bill Kwok To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Email Sending Failed... HELP!! messagelabs.com seems require sender's domain with reverse dns. Does your domain has one? On 3/20/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps they're using a blocklist that has you listed? Gabriel Lai wrote: I've checked it, but I still don understand why only this domain name cannot received our email... any ideas? - Original Message From: Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:34:57 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Email Sending Failed... HELP!! Did you check www.messagelabs.com/support http://www.messagelabs.com/support and look for information? There it says: 450 Requested action aborted [7] The error message indicates a temporary error. Please try resending your message. If the problem persists, please contact your IT administrator or ISP provider. On 3/20/07, *Gabriel Lai* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've the below error message when send an email to my customer. Please help! *05:44:13*connect to mail1.messagelabs.com[193.109.254.147 http://193.109.254.147/ ]: Connection refused (port 25) *05:44:13*connect to mail1.messagelabs.com[193.109.254.147 http://193.109.254.147/ ]: Connection refused (port 25) *05:44:15*connect to mail1.messagelabs.com[212.125.75.4 http://212.125.75.4/ ]: server refused to talk to me: 450 Requested action aborted [ 7.2] 102, please visit www.messagelabs.com/support http://www.messagelabs.com/support for more details about this error message. (port 25) *05:44:15*connect to mail27.messagelabs.com[193.109.254.147 http://193.109.254.147/]: Connection refused (port 25) -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] multiply server smtp
- Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] multiply server smtp Rosilene Pagani wrote: Hi all, I have a running server (A) with qmailtoaster. For various issues, I would move the smtp service for authenticated clients in a different server (B) - mainly because the clients with dynamic ip are blocked from blacklists. In this moment I replicated the (A) vpopmail database in the second server (B). How I should setup the server (B) with qmailtoaster running only the smtp service? Many thanks, Rosilene Is it feasible to configure these clients to use port 587 for submission? The latest toaster supports port 587, which solves this problem. It is the preferred solution (port 587 is a standard). However painful it might be to switch them, it is very like more painful to maintain everything in two places. Let us know what you think. -- -Eric 'shubes' An other way (not standard) would be to strictly bind your regular smtp to an ip and the submission variant to a different ip on the same box. It would consist out of a few small changes in your run script 1) in /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run : Replace the 0 argument of tcpserver (just before smtp) with the ip for the regular (rblcheck enabled) ip 2) in /var/qmail/supervise/submisson/run : Do the same but then the second ip and change 587 to smtp This does require you have all primary mx records pointed to that specific ip. Well just a thought. JP - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect
Hi, That is how checkuser works by design.. JP - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:46 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect Good Morning , When i send a mail with differens rcpt address and some of those directions is incorrect (for example [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain is bad), the mail is not send to any of the mail address, even to that if they are correct, and in the log of smtp, /var/log/qmail/smtp/current i have: @400045d1be102ee21d04 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote VirginiaAntiv:unknown:200.40.82.218 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : invalid rcpt MX domain @400045d1be113072272c tcpserver: end 9294 status 0 @400045d1be1130724a54 tcpserver: status: 1/100 for th incorrect address appear invalid rcpt MX domain, that is correct because gmail.com.uy is incorrect, but I do not understand why does not send the mail to the mail address that are well . Any idea? THANK
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect
Sorry I should have said qmail works by design.. It is not a checkuser thing.. - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect Hi, That is how checkuser works by design.. JP - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:46 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect Good Morning , When i send a mail with differens rcpt address and some of those directions is incorrect (for example [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain is bad), the mail is not send to any of the mail address, even to that if they are correct, and in the log of smtp, /var/log/qmail/smtp/current i have: @400045d1be102ee21d04 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote VirginiaAntiv:unknown:200.40.82.218 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : invalid rcpt MX domain @400045d1be113072272c tcpserver: end 9294 status 0 @400045d1be1130724a54 tcpserver: status: 1/100 for th incorrect address appear invalid rcpt MX domain, that is correct because gmail.com.uy is incorrect, but I do not understand why does not send the mail to the mail address that are well . Any idea? THANK
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect
No, at least not without changing the source code. Or I must be wrong here. JP - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect ok, but i can change that? 2007/2/13, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry I should have said qmail works by design.. It is not a checkuser thing.. - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect Hi, That is how checkuser works by design.. JP - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:46 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect Good Morning , When i send a mail with differens rcpt address and some of those directions is incorrect (for example [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain is bad), the mail is not send to any of the mail address, even to that if they are correct, and in the log of smtp, /var/log/qmail/smtp/current i have: @400045d1be102ee21d04 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote VirginiaAntiv:unknown:200.40.82.218 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : invalid rcpt MX domain @400045d1be113072272c tcpserver: end 9294 status 0 @400045d1be1130724a54 tcpserver: status: 1/100 for th incorrect address appear invalid rcpt MX domain, that is correct because gmail.com.uy is incorrect, but I do not understand why does not send the mail to the mail address that are well . Any idea? THANK
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect
There is nothing you can try, it is not checkuser related even. It is hard coded in qmail-smtp.c You could change that ofcourse. JP - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect ok, i understood that, but changing the chkuser_wrongrcptlimit variable the problem is not fixed, then what else can i try or what value put for the variable thar you say?. 2007/2/13, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No that is a different thing. That is a limit on the number of errors in local adresses , the problem you have is on qmail-smtpd level. Sorry do not know how to explain good. - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect This don't work, in this moment i have set with 10 the value of the variable anda my test mail have only one bad address, the situation is the same, the mail is not send to any address My tcp.smtp is: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=100,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=2000,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=100,\ DKVERIFY=DEGIJKfh,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail- queue.orig,\ DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,NOP0FCHECK=1 2007/2/13, Jason P [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Check in /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp for: CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=1 Try changing that value to something a little higher. If it appears more than once, change them all. After changing that value, rebuild the cdb files and restart qmail with the following commands: Qmailctl cdb Qmailctl restart I believe that should fix your problem. Let us know! -Jason From: Claudio Mundin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:17 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect I ask you because in other server that i have with older version of qmail this don happend. I will try to find a solution, because to my when i try to send a mail with most rcpt address, this mail that to be sent to the correct directions and no, not to be sent to any. Thnk's for your help 2007/2/13, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No, at least not without changing the source code. Or I must be wrong here. JP - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect ok, but i can change that? 2007/2/13, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry I should have said qmail works by design.. It is not a checkuser thing.. - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect Hi, That is how checkuser works by design.. JP - Original Message - From: Claudio Mundin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:46 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect Good Morning , When i send a mail with differens rcpt address and some of those directions is incorrect (for example [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain is bad), the mail is not send to any of the mail address, even to that if they are correct, and in the log of smtp, /var/log/qmail/smtp/current i have: @400045d1be102ee21d04 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote VirginiaAntiv:unknown:200.40.82.218 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : invalid rcpt MX domain @400045d1be113072272c tcpserver: end 9294 status 0 @400045d1be1130724a54 tcpserver: status: 1/100 for th incorrect address appear invalid rcpt MX domain, that is correct because gmail.com.uy is incorrect, but I do not understand why does not send the mail to the mail address that are well . Any idea? THANK
Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns
Hi, I am trying to follow this, but getting somewhat confuzed really.. If I read this correctly you want an ip to resolve to multiple hostname's (one for each of your mail domains). And the reason is that providers (ie hotmail) are checking the prt record to match with the domain? Are you really sure this is happening, I know that it is checked if there is a ptr record for an ip, but not if the content matched the email domain.. This would be quite a problem otherwise, as far as I know, only one ptr per ip is allowed.. The other thing is, what makes static ip's a bad thing? JP - Original Message - From: Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:42 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns Vince Callaway wrote: I'm running several servers on dynamic IP's. The reverse DNS is not important for those. Your upstream provider should be able to provide you with a mail server you can relay through. QT is setup to do that with no issues. I am using freedns.afraid.org. I am not using a dynamic IP, it is static, I colocated because all I needed was the connection. All is working well, as is, I just wanted to be able to accomodate those large email servers and comply (even though I personally am not fond of them) with their philosophies, in particular hotmail, since many customers send to people at hotmail, just did want problems with not accepting mail because the domain is not listed as a reverse PTR. Did some research on this, and in the past it has never been a problem, but recently with all of the blacklisting, reverse dns is being checked by some of the large providers. Of course my experience with this is the provider I worked for was being spammed more than my current employer (maybe it was for other reasons, this was above and beyond virus, seems someone was pissed at them) which is 100,000 times bigger. As a side note, the place where I am colocated at I get virtually no spam (of course I use toaster and other counter measures which I do not wnat to disclose, oops this'll probably open that door(:-)). As for DNS I use http://xpertdns.com It is $6.95 a year for 1 to 5 domains. They have a web interface that is simple to use and I control everything. Their nameservers are hosted in two different parts of the country. Something I feel is important. They also support dynamic IP. I personally feel that using static IPs is just bad policy. Sometime soon I will share with this group a disaster recorvery plan I'm working on for my clients. It outlines why hosting DNS yourself and static IPs are bad. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns ALSO...
You are showing me documents about not having a total class C as a reverse, that is not a problem, I do the same. So I guess I missread your previous email, I thought you wanted ONE ip to resolve to multiple names. So a dig on 1.1.1.5 would return mail.customera.com, mail.customerb.com,mail.customerc.com (orso) Which is possible but not wanted, since the result will be randomly selected (just as a round robin A record does). If this is what you want then u got me really intrested I must admit, will that actually help getting mail to hotmail not in the spam box? I am very sure not many providers use this.. If it is not,you can get subclasses delegated by you provider, they must put the primary reverse record for your subclass in their dns to point to your dns. They should know howto this.. But I am still kinda missing the point of your question, really my attempt is to help/answer.. only currently I am missing the real question I guess.. JP - Original Message - From: Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns ALSO... This also describes what I originally was inquiring about any way, Classless Reverse DNS, described in RFC 2317, the 'technical name' eluded me at the time, but this description describes my earlier question and colocation. Mark Samples wrote: I think the key term in the portion that pertains to Multiple PTR Records, is not that it is required, but, 'perfectly legal' (i.e. not a requirement), read on for the details. IMHO the DNS as it exists is too open, i.e. it want to be everybody's buddy by giving them an out, instead of a static standard. There are many different methodologies implemented to attempt to accomodate or ever expanding internet. A lot of them are work arounds for upcoming and already exisiting problems with system, some of them really should not be leveraged at al large scale, but if you read this, you will find many providers have elected to leverage some of these, such as multiple reverse PTR's to implemented an anti-spamming or security strategy. As of now, I am not sure that MicroSlug hotmail is still doing it but they were a year or so ago, and I had many calls regarding customers not being able to send to hotmail accounts, hence that prompted the enquiry. Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi, I am trying to follow this, but getting somewhat confuzed really.. If I read this correctly you want an ip to resolve to multiple hostname's (one for each of your mail domains). And the reason is that providers (ie hotmail) are checking the prt record to match with the domain? Are you really sure this is happening, I know that it is checked if there is a ptr record for an ip, but not if the content matched the email domain.. This would be quite a problem otherwise, as far as I know, only one ptr per ip is allowed.. The other thing is, what makes static ip's a bad thing? JP - Original Message - From: Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:42 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns Vince Callaway wrote: I'm running several servers on dynamic IP's. The reverse DNS is not important for those. Your upstream provider should be able to provide you with a mail server you can relay through. QT is setup to do that with no issues. I am using freedns.afraid.org. I am not using a dynamic IP, it is static, I colocated because all I needed was the connection. All is working well, as is, I just wanted to be able to accomodate those large email servers and comply (even though I personally am not fond of them) with their philosophies, in particular hotmail, since many customers send to people at hotmail, just did want problems with not accepting mail because the domain is not listed as a reverse PTR. Did some research on this, and in the past it has never been a problem, but recently with all of the blacklisting, reverse dns is being checked by some of the large providers. Of course my experience with this is the provider I worked for was being spammed more than my current employer (maybe it was for other reasons, this was above and beyond virus, seems someone was pissed at them) which is 100,000 times bigger. As a side note, the place where I am colocated at I get virtually no spam (of course I use toaster and other counter measures which I do not wnat to disclose, oops this'll probably open that door(:-)). As for DNS I use http://xpertdns.com It is $6.95 a year for 1 to 5 domains. They have a web interface that is simple to use and I control everything. Their nameservers are hosted in two different parts of the country. Something I feel is important. They also support dynamic IP. I personally feel that using static IPs is just bad policy. Sometime soon I will share with this group a disaster recorvery
Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns
really, also quote the rest next time :) While most rDNS entries only have one PTR record, it is perfectly legal to have many different PTR records[1]. For example, if a webserver supports many virtual hosts, there can be one PTR record for each host and some versions of name server software will automatically add a PTR record for each host. Multiple PTR records can cause a couple of problems, including triggering bugs in programs that only expect there to ever be a single PTR record and, in the case of a large webserver, having hundreds of PTR records can cause the DNS packets to be much larger than normal. Perfectly legal, and can cause a couple of problems .. (jk) Anyways, You are mixing up 2 things.. Classless reverse (rfc 2317) has nothing todo with multimple ptr records.. And well if multiple ptr records help, I am intressted, but as far as my knowledge goes, the only test is if there is a ptr record at all.. JP - Original Message - From: Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns I think the key term in the portion that pertains to Multiple PTR Records, is not that it is required, but, 'perfectly legal' (i.e. not a requirement), read on for the details. IMHO the DNS as it exists is too open, i.e. it want to be everybody's buddy by giving them an out, instead of a static standard. There are many different methodologies implemented to attempt to accomodate or ever expanding internet. A lot of them are work arounds for upcoming and already exisiting problems with system, some of them really should not be leveraged at al large scale, but if you read this, you will find many providers have elected to leverage some of these, such as multiple reverse PTR's to implemented an anti-spamming or security strategy. As of now, I am not sure that MicroSlug hotmail is still doing it but they were a year or so ago, and I had many calls regarding customers not being able to send to hotmail accounts, hence that prompted the enquiry. Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi, I am trying to follow this, but getting somewhat confuzed really.. If I read this correctly you want an ip to resolve to multiple hostname's (one for each of your mail domains). And the reason is that providers (ie hotmail) are checking the prt record to match with the domain? Are you really sure this is happening, I know that it is checked if there is a ptr record for an ip, but not if the content matched the email domain.. This would be quite a problem otherwise, as far as I know, only one ptr per ip is allowed.. The other thing is, what makes static ip's a bad thing? JP - Original Message - From: Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:42 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] reverse dns Vince Callaway wrote: I'm running several servers on dynamic IP's. The reverse DNS is not important for those. Your upstream provider should be able to provide you with a mail server you can relay through. QT is setup to do that with no issues. I am using freedns.afraid.org. I am not using a dynamic IP, it is static, I colocated because all I needed was the connection. All is working well, as is, I just wanted to be able to accomodate those large email servers and comply (even though I personally am not fond of them) with their philosophies, in particular hotmail, since many customers send to people at hotmail, just did want problems with not accepting mail because the domain is not listed as a reverse PTR. Did some research on this, and in the past it has never been a problem, but recently with all of the blacklisting, reverse dns is being checked by some of the large providers. Of course my experience with this is the provider I worked for was being spammed more than my current employer (maybe it was for other reasons, this was above and beyond virus, seems someone was pissed at them) which is 100,000 times bigger. As a side note, the place where I am colocated at I get virtually no spam (of course I use toaster and other counter measures which I do not wnat to disclose, oops this'll probably open that door(:-)). As for DNS I use http://xpertdns.com It is $6.95 a year for 1 to 5 domains. They have a web interface that is simple to use and I control everything. Their nameservers are hosted in two different parts of the country. Something I feel is important. They also support dynamic IP. I personally feel that using static IPs is just bad policy. Sometime soon I will share with this group a disaster recorvery plan I'm working on for my clients. It outlines why hosting DNS yourself and static IPs are bad. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING
Btw, would be nice if this rpm can go to the devel site.. JP - Original Message - From: Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING Hello http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/TCP_Server_limits_configuration You ll find the ucspi with the limit_patch link and the infos on how to setup the variables in your cdb file Cheers -Philip Erik Espinoza wrote: Hello Rajesh, Greylisting has many issues with newer smtp firewalls and spam appliances. As they do not have much space, they usually do not retry after receiving an error 4xx. As such we are not going to be including greylisting in the QmailToaster. That said, there is info on simple greylisting here: http://www.kabewm.com/?p=19 I believe someone on this list had released a concurrency limit per ip using tcpserver, instead of global. It will probably be a part of the QmailToaster soon. Thanks, Erik On 2/9/07, 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi nowadays once every week or so we get an enormous number of spam hits which increases the number of concurrent incoming connections to around 250, causing too much load on server. reducing this figure means our clients suffer. normally concurrency incoming it is just 25 - 40 range. we are planning to use greylisting, searched and found quite a few websites providing patches a) can anybody point us to good working patch wherein we can have grey and whitelisting of ips known servers b) is there anybody who can share their experience using greylisting mechanism successfully with qmail toaster, problems faced by them if any. rajesh mahadevan - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] too slowly to send messages
Are you using the submission port, or regular smtp port? If regular smtp, check your blacklists. But even better is to start using submisson. If you allready use submission, we really need some more info. JP - Original Message - From: Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:00 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] too slowly to send messages Can it be possible, that your server does not respond to the auth requests? I'm using: iptables -A check -p tcp --dport 113 -j REJECT to fix this problem. Best regards, Johannes Weberhofer Thiago - TI - Realeza wrote: Hello All. I have a problem here... When my outlook will connect on server to send a message, this process take a long time... ~40 secondsall computers on my office happens the same... Somebody knows what happens ? Regards Thiago -- |- | weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer | information technologies, Austria | | phone : +43 (0)1 5454421 0| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | fax : +43 (0)1 5454421 19 | web : http://weberhofer.at | mobile: +43 (0)699 11998315 |--- - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood
Can you open one of the queue files (mess one) and see what the first lines say about how it got in to your queue. JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:01 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] spam flood Hello to everyone First off, Ive been using the toaster for quite a while a now, and i am very satisfied with it. So thanks to you all who mantain it, good job! Lately my queue started to be almost full with mail that comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to hosts outside my domains like yahoo.com. It is spam. Ive got domains that ends on com.br. I checked the smtp logs and i cant see how the email passed through and got on the queue for sending. It is very annoying because the valid emails got stucked there for days until delivery. I cant understand whats going on, could u help me? im using version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7. tx for the help! Guilherme - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood
This sounds a bit weird.. If you receive from the outside a message with bcc's, you should never see the other bcc's.. Kinda defeats the purpose otherwise.. So my thoughts are that the messages originate from your server. Maybe you are suffering from a webscript inject vulnerability. What user belongs to uid 7801? JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:31 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood i saw it. down below on the message there's an enourmous bcc list to several emails, mostly on yahoo.com. the To: header points to a valid user, so the email got accepted. the problem is the bcc list, how can i avoid this? tx 2007/2/8, Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED]: well, i did a qmHandle -m418285 on one and got this: //--- -- MESSAGE NUMBER 418285 -- Received: (qmail 15296 invoked by uid 7801); 8 Feb 2007 12:37:13 - Date: 8 Feb 2007 12:37:13 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: require X-Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: Hi //--- nothing that could gimme some clues :( tx for the help 2007/2/8, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can you open one of the queue files (mess one) and see what the first lines say about how it got in to your queue. JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:01 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] spam flood Hello to everyone First off, Ive been using the toaster for quite a while a now, and i am very satisfied with it. So thanks to you all who mantain it, good job! Lately my queue started to be almost full with mail that comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to hosts outside my domains like yahoo.com. It is spam. Ive got domains that ends on com.br. I checked the smtp logs and i cant see how the email passed through and got on the queue for sending. It is very annoying because the valid emails got stucked there for days until delivery. I cant understand whats going on, could u help me? im using version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7. tx for the help! Guilherme - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Disable RBL cheks for authenticated senders
eh it is.. or it was mentioned in the change log (in the spec file that is). qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13 is the version I released with that fix.. - Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Disable RBL cheks for authenticated senders Vince Callaway wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 07:15 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote: You'll probably want to turn on authentication for submission. If you don't the spammers will (if not yet, eventually) start trying/using port 587, and you'll be a target. In /var/qmail/supervise/submission/run, export REQUIRE_AUTH=1 will activate mandatory authorization. The first couple releases of qmail-toaster with submission port didn't export the variable, so it wasn't taking effect. What version did this get fixed. I can't tell. It's not mentioned in the change logs. :( I just checked all of my servers and it was already set. Make sure it has 'export' in front of it. That was the problem. It was included initially (v1.3.8), but wasn't being exported (so the spawned processes never saw it). I think I'm only one release behind. Good for you! ;) -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Disable RBL cheks for authenticated senders
Hey Eric, No problem, just slightly confuzed me for a sec :) JP - Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:26 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Disable RBL cheks for authenticated senders Sorry about that. I only checked the latest (1.3.12) stable spec. Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: eh it is.. or it was mentioned in the change log (in the spec file that is). qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13 is the version I released with that fix.. - Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Disable RBL cheks for authenticated senders Vince Callaway wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 07:15 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote: You'll probably want to turn on authentication for submission. If you don't the spammers will (if not yet, eventually) start trying/using port 587, and you'll be a target. In /var/qmail/supervise/submission/run, export REQUIRE_AUTH=1 will activate mandatory authorization. The first couple releases of qmail-toaster with submission port didn't export the variable, so it wasn't taking effect. What version did this get fixed. I can't tell. It's not mentioned in the change logs. :( I just checked all of my servers and it was already set. Make sure it has 'export' in front of it. That was the problem. It was included initially (v1.3.8), but wasn't being exported (so the spawned processes never saw it). I think I'm only one release behind. Good for you! ;) -- -Eric 'shubes' -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood
Hmm can you trace back in your apache logs what happend during the time the message(s) get inserted? Must be some sort of record of it I would think, am very curious what it is, if you really only have the qmailadmin cgi we might have a problem.. I have not heard anyone having the same problems, so I kind of doubt it is the qmailadmin cgi, but then again one must be the first.. JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:42 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood u got it right it was a qmail-injection on my apache. so, d u think it is a problem on apache itself or the qmailadmin cgi? it is the only thing that it is served on my httpd tx for the help 2007/2/8, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This sounds a bit weird.. If you receive from the outside a message with bcc's, you should never see the other bcc's.. Kinda defeats the purpose otherwise.. So my thoughts are that the messages originate from your server. Maybe you are suffering from a webscript inject vulnerability. What user belongs to uid 7801? JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:31 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood i saw it. down below on the message there's an enourmous bcc list to several emails, mostly on yahoo.com. the To: header points to a valid user, so the email got accepted. the problem is the bcc list, how can i avoid this? tx 2007/2/8, Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED]: well, i did a qmHandle -m418285 on one and got this: //--- -- MESSAGE NUMBER 418285 -- Received: (qmail 15296 invoked by uid 7801); 8 Feb 2007 12:37:13 - Date: 8 Feb 2007 12:37:13 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: require X-Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: Hi //--- nothing that could gimme some clues :( tx for the help 2007/2/8, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can you open one of the queue files (mess one) and see what the first lines say about how it got in to your queue. JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:01 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] spam flood Hello to everyone First off, Ive been using the toaster for quite a while a now, and i am very satisfied with it. So thanks to you all who mantain it, good job! Lately my queue started to be almost full with mail that comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to hosts outside my domains like yahoo.com. It is spam. Ive got domains that ends on com.br. I checked the smtp logs and i cant see how the email passed through and got on the queue for sending. It is very annoying because the valid emails got stucked there for days until delivery. I cant understand whats going on, could u help me? im using version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7. tx for the help! Guilherme - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood
Could you please mail me what you found in the logs, I am getting somewhat worried here.. JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:24 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood the problem is the qmailadmin. i checked the apache logs and saw a lot of bad stuff on it. the version installed here is qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.3 i already put it down. i will see what is happening now. how can i remove the messed emails from the queue? 2007/2/8, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hmm can you trace back in your apache logs what happend during the time the message(s) get inserted? Must be some sort of record of it I would think, am very curious what it is, if you really only have the qmailadmin cgi we might have a problem.. I have not heard anyone having the same problems, so I kind of doubt it is the qmailadmin cgi, but then again one must be the first.. JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:42 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood u got it right it was a qmail-injection on my apache. so, d u think it is a problem on apache itself or the qmailadmin cgi? it is the only thing that it is served on my httpd tx for the help 2007/2/8, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This sounds a bit weird.. If you receive from the outside a message with bcc's, you should never see the other bcc's.. Kinda defeats the purpose otherwise.. So my thoughts are that the messages originate from your server. Maybe you are suffering from a webscript inject vulnerability. What user belongs to uid 7801? JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:31 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spam flood i saw it. down below on the message there's an enourmous bcc list to several emails, mostly on yahoo.com. the To: header points to a valid user, so the email got accepted. the problem is the bcc list, how can i avoid this? tx 2007/2/8, Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED]: well, i did a qmHandle -m418285 on one and got this: //--- -- MESSAGE NUMBER 418285 -- Received: (qmail 15296 invoked by uid 7801); 8 Feb 2007 12:37:13 - Date: 8 Feb 2007 12:37:13 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: require X-Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: Hi //--- nothing that could gimme some clues :( tx for the help 2007/2/8, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can you open one of the queue files (mess one) and see what the first lines say about how it got in to your queue. JP - Original Message - From: Guilherme Bertuol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:01 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] spam flood Hello to everyone First off, Ive been using the toaster for quite a while a now, and i am very satisfied with it. So thanks to you all who mantain it, good job! Lately my queue started to be almost full with mail that comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to hosts outside my domains like yahoo.com. It is spam. Ive got domains that ends on com.br. I checked the smtp logs and i cant see how the email passed through and got on the queue for sending. It is very annoying because the valid emails got stucked there for days until delivery. I cant understand whats going on, could u help me? im using version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7. tx for the help! Guilherme - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
[qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving
Hi, I have this very strange problem some autogenerated email is not correctly deliverd. But my guess is that the content transfer encoding is causing this. However I did not manage to reproduce it in a telnet session. The recordio log shows : @400045c8a67438114f44 10070 220 i-serve.nl smtp ESMTP^M @400045c8a6750e354694 10070 EHLO [hostname]^M @400045c8a6750e3a1124 10070 250-i-serve.nl smtp^M @400045c8a6750e3a20c4 10070 250-PIPELINING^M @400045c8a6750e3a3064 10070 250-8BITMIME^M @400045c8a6750e3a4004 10070 250-SIZE 200971520^M @400045c8a6750e3a4bbc 10070 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5^M @400045c8a6751ffd338c 10070 MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=1238^M @400045c8a6752011e46c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt : sender accepted @400045c8a675201566dc 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a67531d9b9f4 10070 RCPT TO:[rcpt]^M @400045c8a675332a80cc CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt [rcpt] : found existing recipient @400045c8a675332c3e1c 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a6760952bddc 10070 DATA^M @400045c8a67609571b0c 10070 354 go ahead^M @400045c8a6761b28acc4 10070 Received: from mail pickup service by [hostname] with Microsoft SMTPSVC;^M @400045c8a6761b28c434 10070 Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b28cfec 10070 Thread-Topic: Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b28df8c 10070 thread-index: AcdKCCnbBqCmMLcpSrOtsi+m2g13lw==^M @400045c8a6761b28eb44 10070 From: [sender]^M @400045c8a6761b28fae4 10070 To: [rcpt]^M @400045c8a6761b290a84 10070 Subject:+ @400045c8a6761b29163c 10070 Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b297bcc 10070 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b298b6c 10070 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M @400045c8a6761b299b0c 10070 MIME-Version: 1.0^M @400045c8a6761b29a6c4 10070 Content-Type: text/plain^M @400045c8a6761b29b664 10070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M @400045c8a6761b29c604 10070 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000^M @400045c8a6761b29d1bc 10070 Content-Class: urn:c+ @400045c8a6761b2be4fc 10070 ontent-classes:message^M @400045c8a6761b2bf49c 10070 Importance: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c043c 10070 Priority: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c0ff4 10070 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830^M @400045c8a6761b2c1f94 10070 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2007 16:02:12.0782 (UTC) FILETIME=[29FA6CE0:01C74A08]^M @400045c8a6761b2c2f34 10070 ^M @400045c8a6761b2c3aec 10070 Beste test, @400045c8a6761b2c4a8c 10070 @400045c8a6761b2c5644 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b2c8524 10070 @400045c8a6761b30cae4 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30de6c 10070 @400045c8a6761b30ea24 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30f9c4 10070 @400045c8a6761b31057c 10070 [some other text] twee weken vóór [some text.. not complete]+ @400045c8a6761b3e8684 tcpserver: end 10070 status 256 @400045c8a6761b40a194 tcpserver: status: 2/100 Where it shows vóór it is in fact vóór I did remove (i hope) all traces to the real sender and receipient, and really hope someone can shine a light on this, since I am really in the dark here. JP
Re: [qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving
Always nice to give follow up on your own problems :) Guess this all boils down to the old crlf/barelinefeed problem. At least that is really the only way I can reproduce this. Even got myself into writing a small asp script to emulate this problem. Unless anyone has other ideas I guess I waisted my and your time with this. JP - Original Message - From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:40 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] some mail not arriving Hi, I have this very strange problem some autogenerated email is not correctly deliverd. But my guess is that the content transfer encoding is causing this. However I did not manage to reproduce it in a telnet session. The recordio log shows : @400045c8a67438114f44 10070 220 i-serve.nl smtp ESMTP^M @400045c8a6750e354694 10070 EHLO [hostname]^M @400045c8a6750e3a1124 10070 250-i-serve.nl smtp^M @400045c8a6750e3a20c4 10070 250-PIPELINING^M @400045c8a6750e3a3064 10070 250-8BITMIME^M @400045c8a6750e3a4004 10070 250-SIZE 200971520^M @400045c8a6750e3a4bbc 10070 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5^M @400045c8a6751ffd338c 10070 MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=1238^M @400045c8a6752011e46c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt : sender accepted @400045c8a675201566dc 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a67531d9b9f4 10070 RCPT TO:[rcpt]^M @400045c8a675332a80cc CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote [hostname]:unknown:[ip] rcpt [rcpt] : found existing recipient @400045c8a675332c3e1c 10070 250 ok^M @400045c8a6760952bddc 10070 DATA^M @400045c8a67609571b0c 10070 354 go ahead^M @400045c8a6761b28acc4 10070 Received: from mail pickup service by [hostname] with Microsoft SMTPSVC;^M @400045c8a6761b28c434 10070 Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b28cfec 10070 Thread-Topic: Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b28df8c 10070 thread-index: AcdKCCnbBqCmMLcpSrOtsi+m2g13lw==^M @400045c8a6761b28eb44 10070 From: [sender]^M @400045c8a6761b28fae4 10070 To: [rcpt]^M @400045c8a6761b290a84 10070 Subject:+ @400045c8a6761b29163c 10070 Inschrijving^M @400045c8a6761b297bcc 10070 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:02:12 +1300^M @400045c8a6761b298b6c 10070 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M @400045c8a6761b299b0c 10070 MIME-Version: 1.0^M @400045c8a6761b29a6c4 10070 Content-Type: text/plain^M @400045c8a6761b29b664 10070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M @400045c8a6761b29c604 10070 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000^M @400045c8a6761b29d1bc 10070 Content-Class: urn:c+ @400045c8a6761b2be4fc 10070 ontent-classes:message^M @400045c8a6761b2bf49c 10070 Importance: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c043c 10070 Priority: normal^M @400045c8a6761b2c0ff4 10070 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830^M @400045c8a6761b2c1f94 10070 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2007 16:02:12.0782 (UTC) FILETIME=[29FA6CE0:01C74A08]^M @400045c8a6761b2c2f34 10070 ^M @400045c8a6761b2c3aec 10070 Beste test, @400045c8a6761b2c4a8c 10070 @400045c8a6761b2c5644 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b2c8524 10070 @400045c8a6761b30cae4 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30de6c 10070 @400045c8a6761b30ea24 10070 [some text] @400045c8a6761b30f9c4 10070 @400045c8a6761b31057c 10070 [some other text] twee weken vóór [some text.. not complete]+ @400045c8a6761b3e8684 tcpserver: end 10070 status 256 @400045c8a6761b40a194 tcpserver: status: 2/100 Where it shows vóór it is in fact vóór I did remove (i hope) all traces to the real sender and receipient, and really hope someone can shine a light on this, since I am really in the dark here. JP
Re: [qmailtoaster] How do I use Outlook with submission?
Hi, It is no must to update the package. Like I mailed a very small and simple edit of the submissiom run script will do. /var/qmail/supervise/submission/run Or to manualy change the run script by changing the line REQUIRE_AUTH=1 to export REQUIRE_AUTH=1 JP - Original Message - From: Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:18 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] How do I use Outlook with submission? I changed the port to 587 and that seems to work. What is the recent fuss about the export REQUIRE_AUTH=1? I dont really want to update the qmail-toaster package. Scared of blowing the toaster up. Currently, my email server prevents people from sending email via outlook because of dynamic IP blacklist. I believe using submission port will get around this problem. And the recent toaster build has submission port. But I wasn't able to find any document showing how to set it up in outlook. Please give me some hint if you have successfully used submission port via outlook. Thanks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] How do I use Outlook with submission?
The outcome is that it actually makes authentication required instead of optional. JP - Original Message - From: Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:06 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] How do I use Outlook with submission? My appologies too. I see the difference in the two instruction now. /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run vs /var/qmail/supervise/submission/run What is the outcome of changing that run script? Because submission is working just fine for me right now. No, I made a mistake in my instructions. Requiring auth on the smtp port is bad and will break everything. Jean-Paul sent the correct instructions. I answered off the top of my head, without double checking. My apologies. Thanks, Erik On 2/5/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik, Are you trying to be funny? Cuz you're confusing me. =P Correction, follow Jean-Paul's instructions. Mine will ruin your system. Erik On 2/5/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Trung, Just change /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run and set REQUIRE_AUTH=1 to say export REQUIRE_AUTH=1. It's all this upgrade will do. On 2/5/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I changed the port to 587 and that seems to work. What is the recent fuss about the export REQUIRE_AUTH=1? I dont really want to update the qmail-toaster package. Scared of blowing the toaster up. Currently, my email server prevents people from sending email via outlook because of dynamic IP blacklist. I believe using submission port will get around this problem. And the recent toaster build has submission port. But I wasn't able to find any document showing how to set it up in outlook. Please give me some hint if you have successfully used submission port via outlook. Thanks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] login without email address, but ID only
I know there are patches arround that do this based on the hostname the client connected to. Plesk for example uses this. But currently qmt does not. JP - Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] login without email address, but ID only Gabriel Lai wrote: Hi All, I would like to configure the authentication of logging in without using full email address, but only user ID only. I'm hosting 2 domain names. Please comment. I don't think that's possible with virtual domains, as SMTP-AUTH has no way of knowing which domain the user wants to log in to. (How do it know?) -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] login without email address, but ID only
Just checked README.ipaliasdomains from the vpopmail package. Maybe this is enough for you since it is only 2 domains.. The vpopmail-toaster does not have this ip-alias-domains enable, so you have enable that yourself. VPOPMAIL'S IP ALIAS DOMAINS - When performing an auth in vpopmail, you would generally use the full email address as the username If many of your users are from a single domain, then you can optionally put that domain into the ~vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain file. Then if a user doesnt include a domain when they auth, the auth will be automatically performed against the domain nominated in the defaultdomain file. This system works well as most mail servers only need to have one domain nominated as a default. However what would happen if you later inherit another large domain full of users who have their email clients setup to login with just a username only? A vpopmail server can have only one default domain. It is going to be a lot of work to have to go to each email client and change it over to login with full email address. vpopmail provides a solution for this scenario : IP Alias Domains. To use IP Alias Domains, you need to bind some more IP addresses to your mail server. Then use the vipmap program to associate a particular domain to a particular IP address. Then when the auth request arrives, if it does not contain a domain, vpopmail will attach the matching domain from the IP alias table. - Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 5:53 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] login without email address, but ID only There's your answer, Gabriel. Thanks, Aldi. Gabriel, would you care to add this FAQ to the wiki? Aldi Mmm wrote: If you're talking about login using Squirrelmail, you can make a file called 'defaultdomain' in /home/vpopmail/etc, with a text of your default domain. On 2/2/07, * Jean-Paul van de Plasse* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know there are patches arround that do this based on the hostname the client connected to. Plesk for example uses this. But currently qmt does not. JP - Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] login without email address, but ID only Gabriel Lai wrote: Hi All, I would like to configure the authentication of logging in without using full email address, but only user ID only. I'm hosting 2 domain names. Please comment. I don't think that's possible with virtual domains, as SMTP-AUTH has no way of knowing which domain the user wants to log in to. (How do it know?) -- -Eric 'shubes' -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] RBLTIMEOUT
What exactly are you asking? Why would it be skipped if relayclient is set or what are you trying to accomplish. There are some docs but not about RBLTIMEOUT. RBLTIMEOUT is just a timer that limits to total seconds of runtime for rblsmtpd No matter what the result it will just handover to qmail-smtpd after the timeout. JP - Original Message - From: Buzzz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:33 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] RBLTIMEOUT Hi is the env vars RBLTIMEOUT skipped when RELAYCLIENT is set ? Are some docs about rbl on the wiki ? thx, Davide - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-AUTH
A small error in the run file of the submission port makes this port open for all! The line reads REQUIRE_AUTH=1, but this should be export REQUIRE_AUTH=1 Otherwise it will not be available in the qmail-smtpd Hopefully this can be fixed soon.. For all using submission: For now a manual fix is easy, just edit the /var/qmail/supervise/submission/run file and change that line. JP - Original Message - From: Wojciech Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:19 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-AUTH I have two interfaces: - 1.2.3.4 - incomming messages, rbl, calmav, spamassassin - 1.2.3.5 - messages from our clients, no rbl and spamassassin but REQUIRE_AUTH=1 Mailes send to outer domains by 1.2.3.5 without authorization are blocked with message client not allowed to relay and it's OK. But mails send to my domain are delivered and it's not OK because spam is incoming to client mailboxes. How block all messages but authorized? -- Tuptus System uptime: 41 years 9 months 0 weeks 5 days 7 hours 15 minuts Linux: Ponieważ za błędy w oprogramowaniu nie powinno się płacić pieniędzy. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] UPDATE qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.src.rpm URGENT
Hi, This release fixes a mistake in the run script for the submission port. I suggest everyone using the submission port to upgrade asap to this release. Or to manualy change the run script by changing the line REQUIRE_AUTH=1 to export REQUIRE_AUTH=1 For now you can download the new rpm at : http://iserve01.i-serve.net/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.src.rpm JP
Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-AUTH
You really only have to change your run script. (don't forget to restart
your toaster)
The c-code works, thats for sure.
u is the result of the scan_ulong, and if it return 0 require_auth
becomes 1.
flagauth is set when a user is authenticated (no use todo it 2 times).
JP
- Original Message -
From: Wojciech Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-AUTH
Dnia środa, 31 stycznia 2007 14:22, Jean-Paul van de Plasse napisał:
A small error in the run file of the submission port makes this port open
for all!
The line reads REQUIRE_AUTH=1, but this should be export REQUIRE_AUTH=1
Otherwise it will not be available in the qmail-smtpd
Hopefully this can be fixed soon..
For all using submission:
For now a manual fix is easy, just edit the
/var/qmail/supervise/submission/run file and change that line.
I've looked sources before send message to the list. I've make this fix
but it not fix problem.
I think that problem is in
require_auth is set in
code
x = env_get(REQUIRE_AUTH);
if(x) { scan_ulong(x,u); if (u0) require_auth = 1; }
/code
but what is u ? when u0
code
if (require_auth) if (!flagauth) { err_authfirst(); return; }
/code
When flagauth is set?
I have two interfaces:
- 1.2.3.4 - incomming messages, rbl, calmav, spamassassin
- 1.2.3.5 - messages from our clients, no rbl and spamassassin but
REQUIRE_AUTH=1
Mailes send to outer domains by 1.2.3.5 without authorization are blocked
with message client not allowed to relay and it's OK.
But mails send to my domain are delivered and it's not OK because spam
is incoming to client mailboxes. How block all messages but authorized?
--
Tuptus
System uptime: 41 years 9 months 0 weeks 5 days 9 hours 45 minuts
Nigdy nie ufaj systemowi operacyjnemu, do którego nie masz kodów źródłowych.
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-AUTH
Any news on this?
I am curious if it works correctly for you now.
JP
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-AUTH
You really only have to change your run script. (don't forget to restart
your toaster)
The c-code works, thats for sure.
u is the result of the scan_ulong, and if it return 0 require_auth
becomes 1.
flagauth is set when a user is authenticated (no use todo it 2 times).
JP
- Original Message -
From: Wojciech Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP-AUTH
Dnia środa, 31 stycznia 2007 14:22, Jean-Paul van de Plasse napisał:
A small error in the run file of the submission port makes this port open
for all!
The line reads REQUIRE_AUTH=1, but this should be export REQUIRE_AUTH=1
Otherwise it will not be available in the qmail-smtpd
Hopefully this can be fixed soon..
For all using submission:
For now a manual fix is easy, just edit the
/var/qmail/supervise/submission/run file and change that line.
I've looked sources before send message to the list. I've make this fix
but it not fix problem.
I think that problem is in
require_auth is set in
code
x = env_get(REQUIRE_AUTH);
if(x) { scan_ulong(x,u); if (u0) require_auth = 1; }
/code
but what is u ? when u0
code
if (require_auth) if (!flagauth) { err_authfirst(); return; }
/code
When flagauth is set?
I have two interfaces:
- 1.2.3.4 - incomming messages, rbl, calmav, spamassassin
- 1.2.3.5 - messages from our clients, no rbl and spamassassin but
REQUIRE_AUTH=1
Mailes send to outer domains by 1.2.3.5 without authorization are blocked
with message client not allowed to relay and it's OK.
But mails send to my domain are delivered and it's not OK because spam
is incoming to client mailboxes. How block all messages but authorized?
--
Tuptus
System uptime: 41 years 9 months 0 weeks 5 days 9 hours 45 minuts
Nigdy nie ufaj systemowi operacyjnemu, do którego nie masz kodów
źródłowych.
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATE qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.src.rpm URGENT
Ah thats the problem with only quick checking and not looking further This does not make a difference tho since default = 0.. Just looks silly :P JP - Original Message - From: Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:11 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATE qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.src.rpm URGENT On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:13:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Or to manualy change the run script by changing the line REQUIRE_AUTH=1 to export REQUIRE_AUTH=1 The smtp/run script maybe also has this but as it only has: REQUIRE_AUTH=0 Quinn - Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy http://www.strangecode.com/ +1 530 624 4410 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] one question
I think he means he wants to access his mail by using a different connector then imap/pop3. Like there is a hotmail connector in outlook over http/https. I really doubt there is anything that does this , and also I see no good reason you would want it. JP - Original Message - From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 9:39 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] one question Hey Daniel, Here is a link to a modified squirrelmail that may fit your need. http://sourceforge.net/projects/squirreloutlook/ In general this list is about the QmailToaster. We will try to help with other things, but Alexey was just letting you know that you may not find the info you seek on this list. Thanks, Erik On 1/31/07, Daniel R. Hdez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI Alexey, I use QmailToaster, sorry for this, i no wirte any more here. Thanks - Original Message - From: Alexey Loukianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Daniel R. Hdez qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:16 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] one question Greetings, Daniel. 31 ?? 2007 ?., 20:49:41 you have wrote: Exist any program that permit conect to mail server by httpmail with the client aoutlook, like to hotmail. You know, your question is a bit unrelated to QmailToaster, so I think that you will not get any valuable answer here. Well, who knows... -- Best Regards, Alexey Loukianov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Development Department, Lavtech Corp http://mnogo.ru, http://lavtech.ru - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] bad-loader-reject
It seems you have something in /var/qmail/control/badloadertypes But this file has been empty (commented) for a long time now. So make sure you run an up to date qmail-toaster. Or manually change the file and run qmailctl cdb JP - Original Message - From: Dan Herbon To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:15 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] bad-loader-reject One of our clients is attempting to send one of my employees a PDF file but it keeps getting rejected with the following message: --- qmail-smtpd: bad-loader-reject: MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- I believe this logging was recently added and I'm trying to figure out what this means.
