Re: [Repeater-Builder] Heliax Transmission Line

2005-02-24 Thread Rick Charlotte

AND DONT FORGET GROUND KITS !

you need at least 3 .. one at top one and the bottom before the bend 
and one before it enters the building !( as per andrews) I also did 
the same but mine is only 80 ft long at 100 ft I would put one at the 
50ft mark also but that's just me and the kits cost so little and are 
sooo easy to install ( I paid $5.00 per unit on Ebay BRAND NEW so 
I bout 10 pcs as I still have over 200 ft left and no its not fore sale :) 
)

On 23 Feb 2005 at 19:14, Eric Lemmon wrote:

 
 Will,
 
 TESSCO quotes about $295 for 100 feet, and about $35 each for the
 connectors.  There are other manufacturers of 7/8 hardline, such as
 Cablewave and Eupen, that may cost less.  Be careful to measure
 EXACTLY the length you need, so that you can work a deal on a remnant
 if it becomes available.  Don't forget to include the cost of the
 special hangers, clamps, and standoffs that are part of a professional
 installation of a Heliax feedline.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 n2odw wrote:
  
  Could anybody out here give an estimate price on 100ft of the Heliax
  cable 7/8 LDFA5-50 and a good site to oder from. Thanks
  
  Will / W4WWM
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 2/18/2005
 




Rick Szajkowski VA3 RZS
Charlotte Darby VA3 CMR
Node Owners of IRLP Node 2120
147.300 + VE3 KZK
224.420 -  VE3 KZK
Peterborough Ont. Canada



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 2/18/2005





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Heliax Transmission Line

2005-02-24 Thread Joe

Hello Will,

I work for a wireless company and we routinely throw out 100 foot lengths of 
coax as scrap.  The average monopole tower is 190 feet, so less than that is 
not worth keeping.  

If I were you, I would try to find someone local to your area in the business, 
a piece that you want can be had for the price of a case of good beer.  It 
probably will include connectors.

BTW, why 7/8 cable for a 100 foot run?  1/2 inch would be more economical and 
easier to have shipped.  Depending upon frequency, there may not be much 
difference in loss on a 100 foot run.

73, Joe, K1ike

 n2odw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 =
Could anybody out here give an estimate price on 100ft of the Heliax
cable 7/8 LDFA5-50 and a good site to oder from. Thanks

Will / W4WWM










 
Yahoo! Groups Links







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Zetron 38Max Question

2005-02-24 Thread JHCCRadio






yes hold the reset down after powering up the unit for 10 seconds it 
will reset all to factory default 













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] Master II base station conversion to a repeater

2005-02-24 Thread joel_eschmann



I have a Master II base station in 6 foot cabinet. I want to convert 
it to a repeater. Is there any information available on line I can 
print out to make this conversion. I have the base station manual 
and also a repeater manual. Now this is kinda painful trying to do a 
comparison between the 2 manuals.. I have basicly stripped out the 
antenna switching hardware for the transfer and the amp is all set 
too. I have the repeater card for the rack also. Looking for some 
simple cross reference if there is one... Thanks.. Joel K9MLD










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Master II base station conversion to a repeater

2005-02-24 Thread johnmichaelwelton



http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/geindex.html

Is your first stop. I wound up putting a DB9 in the middle of the 
backplane where the hole for the audio transformer goes. Works for me 
I'm using the RC-210 controller which has a pull to ground for TX 
CTCSS. I put an SS-64 encode only board in the exciter drawer and ran 
a wire from the DB9 to their and the output goes into CG hi on the 
exciter connector pin. 

Also, go through the documentation above to set up the 10V regulator 
card for full duplex = not bad at all, just change I believe 2 
jumpers and you're all set. Don't need any other cards, pull of 
discriminator audio off the back plane.

John/N4SJW




--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, joel_eschmann 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 I have a Master II base station in 6 foot cabinet. I want to 
convert 
 it to a repeater. Is there any information available on line I can 
 print out to make this conversion. I have the base station manual 
 and also a repeater manual. Now this is kinda painful trying to do 
a 
 comparison between the 2 manuals.. I have basicly stripped out the 
 antenna switching hardware for the transfer and the amp is all set 
 too. I have the repeater card for the rack also. Looking for some 
 simple cross reference if there is one... Thanks.. Joel K9MLD







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Want to learn more about 10m and lowband repeaters

2005-02-24 Thread eaulive2002



Hi.

I have two home made repeaters on the air below 30MHz and I would love
to learn more about these when they are professionally installed and
designed.

If you could point me to technical sites talking about duplexers,
cavities, amplifiers, antennas and such, it would be greatly appreciated.

Also if you have any experience in the field and have a web site put
up, please by all means, indicate the link!

Thanks to all.

Olivier.
Santo Domingo.










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cleaning out the Shack.

2005-02-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hello Ray, how are you doing? How much are you asking for the RLC?

Please let me know.

If you want to call at 760-559-4798

Thanks,

Art

___
Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Standard RPT-10

2005-02-24 Thread Larry Kemper






I am still in need of a manual for the Standard repeater model RPT-10 
if anyone has one or a copy for sale.
 
I cut the amp deck from a 110 watt Mitrek and had to pad it down to run 65 
watts. Added a couple of fans and it has survived 45 minutes into a 
load. Just need the tuning instructions for the RPT-10 when the crystals 
get here.

Thank You

WA0VUSLarry KemperMuscatine, Iowa













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.








attachment: tech.gif

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cleaning out the Shack.

2005-02-24 Thread Ray Retzlaff

Hello Art,
i am not selling the rlc it is staying on the VV repeater. let me know 
if you are interested in anything else i will make you a good deal.

73
Ray


For Sale:



NHRC-10 repeater controller with NHRC 10-CAB cabinet and NHRC 10-DOUT 8
channel digital output board, latest firmware.  More information can be
found at www.nhrc.net/nhrc-10/index.php

Asking $500.00 Or Make Offer



NHRC-3 Repeater controller, more information can be found at
www.nhrc.net/nhrc-3/

This controller has been sitting around for many years and was working when
it was taken out and replaced by the NHRC-10 Above. This controller has the
90 seconds of voice storage.

Make Offer.



Cat-200B Repeater controller. Unit was briefly in service and worked well
but I was not happy with the command structure and replaced it with an
easier to use controller. This unit comes with the Rack Mount Enclosure.
More information can be found at  www.catauto.com/cat200.html

Make Offer





Tenma 72-585 RF Generator. Comes with power cable and bnc to alligator clip
cable. This unit is in good working order.

Make Offer.





Tektronix Oscilloscope model 2213 Duel Channel, 60 Mhz. Comes with Three
probes 2-Tektronix Probes (Unknown model numbers both work) and one B+K
Precision PR 31 and a power cord. Both the Operators manual and Service
Manual are included. This unit is in perfect working order. More Information
can be found here www.tucker.com/images/images_spec/1068.pdf

Asking $550.00 or make offer.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread Bob Dengler

At 2/23/2005 03:46 PM, you wrote:


Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has it
that one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeater
I've had all along, and now the coordinator says I have to move.

Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the change. Here is
what I have as equipment, and will it all make it there.  We are
moving from 146.925- to 145.410-, and the expense is the last thing
I needed right now.

GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver

So you'll be dropping the RX about 1.5 MHz.  Never had a problem with the 
VHF Mastr Pro RX I took down to 144.84.

Vocom Amp, tuned for 146.925
and then to top if off, I just got the phasing harness for the DB224
and it was cut right for 146.925.

The phasing harness is broad enough that you won't see a difference at the 
new freq.

My main transmitter is the (no arguements please), Maggorie HiPro
transmitter exiting 2 watts to the vocom amp.
TX RX Duplexers.

How low in frequency will the MASTR Pro go before I loose quality
sensitivity, right now, it's about .15 uv with a preamp, and
receives excellent.

It should work fine.  In fact, the preamp ahead of it will make any small 
degradation in the RX noise figure as a result of the move negligible.

   The vocom amp is model #VVC200-2ref and was
designed for the 146 Mhz range.

I'm sure the duplexers should not be a problem, other than getting
them re-tuned.  Thoughts!

I don't see any problems other than all the work involved in retuning 
everything.


What anger's me the most about this, is that the repeater owner went
straight to the coordinator, did not bother to talk with me.  I
changed the PL of the repeater.

Your user may have been getting too good of a signal into the other 
repeater's RX.  Even with everything CTCSS-protected, a user of one 
repeater can still block signals intended for the other system.


Other sad part is, the user that was getting into their system was
not getting into the main receiver, but rather a remote site.  I
wonder how tight his receiver really is, and is it a synthesized
radio, or something of quality.

If it's on-channel, it doesn't matter so long as the remote RX of the other 
system is coordinated.  A quality RX will not reject on-freq. signals 
just because they're intended for another repeater.

Bob NO6B






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Found Hallicrafters Cb manuals

2005-02-24 Thread Ted Bleiman K9MDM - MDM Radio




Will the fella who emails about the cb-5 and CB-8 manuals please make his fine self known to me. I have found them.
mdm ted
708-681-0300









Ted Bleiman K9MDM
MDM Radio Ltd - 1629-B N. 31 st Ave Melrose Park, IL 60160 708.681.0300 fax 708.681.9800 web http://www.mdmradio.com - 
Check it now!!
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread Gary Hoff






Mathew, As a former freq coordinator myself, 
it seems to me that this is a completely
illogical situation unless there is something 
I don't know. If both repeaters were 
properly
coordinated 
in the first place, and there is interference from a user 
of one getting into the
input of the other, that's what we just used 
to have to live with. It can only be prevented 
by the user himself using great care to avoid the 
other machine. If they had different PL's it would help
and should keep the remote receiver from keying up 
and feeding the other repeater. I personally
don't see how they could hold you responsible for 
this type of interference and request you change
frequencies, it appears to be a completely 
unreasonable request and seems that some coordinator is trying to take the easy 
way out at your expense. And, if there is a problem, it seems it is the 
coordinator that screwed up and not you.
Gar
- Original Message - 
From: "Mathew Quaife" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:41 
PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, 
Forced to change Freq, Need Answers
  All understood there, but the kicker is that my equipment 
did not interfere with his repeater, it was a user that is about 70 
miles away that got into one of his remote receiver's. I'm 
considering the fight of staying my grounds, and letting the coordinator 
know that if my system was the cause, fine, but a user is the culprit, 
how does that affect me. So to say, any frequency by regulations 
is allowed simplex operation, and should one decide to go off by say 
10kc's and talk and if the output of the repeater interfere's, they 
should shut the repeater off, because, in this sense of his offering's, 
is the last to come, the first to leave. I believe all the 
frequencies were simplex before they became duplex.   And 
answer is that I doubt very seriously that any of the remote receiver 
sites here in Indiana are coordinated. How could they be, in fact 
anywhere, that only reduces the 100 mile radius they attempt to maintain 
in coordinating repeaters. Also, both repeaters used the same 
131.8 PL.  Mathew   -Original 
Message- From: Bob Dengler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 11:06 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change 
Freq, Need Answers   At 2/23/2005 03:46 PM, you 
wrote:  Well it seems that I am told I have to 
change frequencies, has itthat one of my users interferred with the 
same troublesome repeaterI've had all along, and now the coordinator 
says I have to move.Not sure how well all the equipment 
will handle the change. Here iswhat I have as equipment, and will it 
all make it there. We aremoving from 146.925- to 145.410-, and 
the expense is the last thingI needed right 
now.GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver  So 
you'll be dropping the RX about 1.5 MHz. Never had a problem with the 
 VHF Mastr Pro RX I took down to 144.84. Vocom Amp, 
tuned for 146.925and then to top if off, I just got the phasing 
harness for the DB224and it was cut right for 146.925. 
 The phasing harness is broad enough that you won't see a difference at 
the  new freq. My main transmitter is the (no 
arguements please), Maggorie HiProtransmitter exiting 2 watts to the 
vocom amp.TX RX Duplexers.How low in 
frequency will the MASTR Pro go before I loose qualitysensitivity, 
right now, it's about .15 uv with a preamp, andreceives 
excellent.  It should work fine. In fact, the preamp ahead 
of it will make any small  degradation in the RX noise figure as a 
result of the move negligible.  The vocom amp is 
model #VVC200-2ref and wasdesigned for the 146 Mhz 
range.I'm sure the duplexers should not be a problem, 
other than gettingthem re-tuned. Thoughts!  I 
don't see any problems other than all the work involved in retuning  
everything.  What anger's me the most about this, is 
that the repeater owner wentstraight to the coordinator, did not 
bother to talk with me. Ichanged the PL of the 
repeater.  Your user may have been getting too good of a signal 
into the other  repeater's RX. Even with everything 
CTCSS-protected, a user of one  repeater can still block signals 
intended for the other system.  Other sad part is, 
the user that was getting into their system wasnot getting into the 
main receiver, but rather a remote site. Iwonder how tight his 
receiver really is, and is it a synthesizedradio, or something of 
quality.  If it's on-channel, it doesn't matter so long as the 
remote RX of the other  system is coordinated. A "quality" RX will 
not reject on-freq. signals  just because they're "intended" for another 
repeater.  Bob NO6B 
  Yahoo! Groups Links   
--  No virus found in 
this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 
7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 
2/22/2005  --  No virus found in this 
outgoing message. Checked by AVG 

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread Mel Farrer




Am I missing something or would a change in PL eliminate the other repeater from opening?? I have a similar situation with my repeater and while we are over a 100 miles apart and a mountain range between, occassionly is we open the PL, we can weakly hear the repeater. With the PL activated. No interference. I hope I didn't misread something. Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All understood there, but the kicker is that my equipment did not interferewith his repeater, it was a user that is about 70 miles away that got intoone of his remote receiver's. I'm considering the fight of staying mygrounds, and letting the coordinator know that if my system was the cause,fine, but a user is the culprit, how does that affect me. So to say, anyfrequency by regulations is allowed simplex operation, and should one decideto go off by say 10kc's and talk and if the output of the repeaterinterfere's, they should shut the repeater off, because, in this sense ofhis offering's, is the last to come, the first to leave. I believe all thefrequencies were simplex before they became duplex. And answer is that I doubt very seriously that any of the remote receiversites here in Indiana are coordinated. How could they be, in fact
 anywhere,that only reduces the 100 mile radius they attempt to maintain incoordinating repeaters. Also, both repeaters used the same 131.8 PL.Mathew-Original Message-From: Bob Dengler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 11:06 AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, NeedAnswersAt 2/23/2005 03:46 PM, you wrote:Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has itthat one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeaterI've had all along, and now the coordinator says I have to move.Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the change. Here iswhat I have as equipment, and will it all make it there. We aremoving from 146.925- to 145.410-, and the expense is the last thingI needed right now.GE MASTR PRO
 ER41 ReceiverSo you'll be dropping the RX about 1.5 MHz. Never had a problem with the VHF Mastr Pro RX I took down to 144.84.Vocom Amp, tuned for 146.925and then to top if off, I just got the phasing harness for the DB224and it was cut right for 146.925.The phasing harness is broad enough that you won't see a difference at the new freq.My main transmitter is the (no arguements please), Maggorie HiProtransmitter exiting 2 watts to the vocom amp.TX RX Duplexers.How low in frequency will the MASTR Pro go before I loose qualitysensitivity, right now, it's about .15 uv with a preamp, andreceives excellent.It should work fine. In fact, the preamp ahead of it will make any small degradation in the RX noise figure as a result of the move negligible. The vocom amp is model #VVC200-2ref and wasdesigned for the 146 Mhz range.I'm sure
 the duplexers should not be a problem, other than gettingthem re-tuned. Thoughts!I don't see any problems other than all the work involved in retuning everything.What anger's me the most about this, is that the repeater owner wentstraight to the coordinator, did not bother to talk with me. Ichanged the PL of the repeater.Your user may have been getting too good of a signal into the other repeater's RX. Even with everything CTCSS-protected, a user of one repeater can still block signals intended for the other system.Other sad part is, the user that was getting into their system wasnot getting into the main receiver, but rather a remote site. Iwonder how tight his receiver really is, and is it a synthesizedradio, or something of quality.If it's on-channel, it doesn't matter so long as the remote RX of the other system is coordinated. A "quality" RX will not reject
 on-freq. signals just because they're "intended" for another repeater.Bob NO6BYahoo! Groups Links-- No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005-- No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Standard RPT-10

2005-02-24 Thread Brent




Transmitter RPT-10
make sure the repeater mode is in the non rpt 
mode.


1 Connect a mic to the mic jack and depress the 
PTT
2 connect VTVM for dc between TP-2 and ground, and adjust 
L102, L103,L104 and L105 sequentially for maximum reading, Repeater 
several times
3 connect VTVM between TP-4 and ground and adjust L106 and L10 
alternately for maximum reading
4 connect VTVM between TP-5 and ground, and Adjust L106, L107, 
L108 and L109 alternately for maximum reading.
5 connect VTVM betweenTP-7 and ground, and adjust L110 
and L111 alternately for maximum reading.
6 connect the VTVM between the TP-9 and ground, and adjust 
L112 and L113 alternately for maximum reading
7 adjust C156 and C160 alternately for maximum response on the 
wattmeter.
8 Repeater Steps 6 and 7
9 set service monitor to the exact transmit frequency and set 
the transmit freq. by adjusting C21
10 Connect the 1000Hz audio output of the tone generator 
between pins 1 and 4(ground) of the mic jack and setup the FM deviation 
meter.
11 Adjust the audio level to 30mV
12 Key the Transmitter and adjust the Instantaneous dev. 
control IDC pot R142 to obtain +/- 5.5KHz dev
13 Reduce audio outputof the tone generator to 5mV and 
key the Transmitter. Verify that the Dev is 3kHz Min. If dev is less, low 
audio gain is indicated. Check the voltage levels in the audio 
circuit.
14 Increase the audio level 20dB and key the transmitter. 
Check that the Dev. does not exceed +/- 4.5 to 5 kHz.



Receiver:: 
RPT-10

Prior to alignment of the receiver, make sure RPT 
switch is in NON-Repeater mode

1 set squelch control for maximum noise (full 
counterclockwise) and the volume control to mid-position.
2 connect the dc volt meter to TP-1. Adjust L113 
and L114 for maximum voltage reading
3 Connect the dc voltmeter to TP-2 and adjust L115 
and L116 for maximum voltage reading
4 Set communications monitor (sig gen function) to 
the proper input frequency (unpopulated) and set the output to 
ZERO.
5 connect an AC voltmeter between Pins 5 and 8 of 
the control receptacle with an 8ohm, 2 watt dummy load connect in 
parallel
6 adjust L107, L108, L104, and L105 in that order, 
for maximum speaker output noise level as indicated on the ac 
voltmeter.
7 connect a 25-0-25 microammeter between tpin6 of 
J10 and ground, Pin 5
8 adjust L105 for Zero center reading on the 
microammeter. Verify that the speaker output voltmeter reading does not 
change.
9 Apply a modulated RF input signal approx. 12 dB 
SINAD
10 Adjust L105 and L104 for maximum SINAD 
Sensitivity.
11 Reduce the RF input to ZERO
12 Adjust L108 for ZERO reading on the 
microammeter.
13 set the cavity core to mid-position
14 adjust the unmodulated RF input signal for 10dB 
QS
15 Adjust L101, L102, L103 and the three 
adjustments on the receiver cavity in that order, for minimum noise level 
output. The RF signal may need to be reduced to keep the receiver at the 10dB 
quieting sensitivity level.

Following the completion of the receiver 
alignment, re-check the 20dB quieting and squelch sensitivities, and replace the 
cover(s).

Im trying to get the TP and parts placement scanned for you and maybe 
we can post this at the RPTIP web site when all complete..
Brent KF4TNP











  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Larry 
  Kemper 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:09 
  PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Standard 
  RPT-10
  
  I am still in need of a manual for the Standard repeater model 
  RPT-10 if anyone has one or a copy for sale.
   
  I cut the amp deck from a 110 watt Mitrek and had to pad it down to run 
  65 watts. Added a couple of fans and it has survived 45 minutes into a 
  load. Just need the tuning instructions for the RPT-10 when the crystals 
  get here.
  
  Thank You
  
  WA0VUSLarry KemperMuscatine, 
  Iowa
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG 
  Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 
  2/22/2005
tech.gifNo virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005


[Repeater-Builder] Re: Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread nj902


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
...it was a user that is about 70 miles away that got into one of 
his remote receiver's


It sure seems like this would be worth negotiating with the 
coordinator.  If the intent is to maintain 100 miles between 
repeaters, it would seem logical that your repeater's service area 
would extend no further than half that distance or 50 miles.  

If someone farther out is attempting to access your repeater while 
in proximity to a machine he can interfere with - that user should 
be admonished to cease  desist.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread N9LLO






In a message dated 2/24/05 2:49:11 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All understood there, but the kicker is that my equipment did not interferewith his repeater, it was a user that is about 70 miles away that got intoone of his remote receiver's. I'm considering the fight of staying mygrounds, and letting the coordinator know that if my system was the cause,fine, but a user is the culprit, how does that affect me.
If the Jay county repeater group is the one complaining they shouldn't be using 131.8 at all. 
The Indiana Repeater Council (www.ircinc.org)recommends 127.3 or 82.5 for their area.
I cant believe the IRC would tell you to move freq in this situation, this is a user problem, pretty much out of your control. I would hold my ground at least for now. 

Chris
N9LLO
927.4875
444.025
53.39
Kokomo In.


444.025














Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread Mathew Quaife

Agreed, but I do believe that changing the PL should have solved the issue,
I'm going back to the coordinator and ask if he is willing to seek a month
of trial and see if the issue is gone.  Don't want to take the thread into a
coordinating issue, just hate them expenses if I can avoid it.

Mathew


-Original Message-
From: nj902 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:41 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need
Answers



--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
...it was a user that is about 70 miles away that got into one of 
his remote receiver's


It sure seems like this would be worth negotiating with the 
coordinator.  If the intent is to maintain 100 miles between 
repeaters, it would seem logical that your repeater's service area 
would extend no further than half that distance or 50 miles.  

If someone farther out is attempting to access your repeater while 
in proximity to a machine he can interfere with - that user should 
be admonished to cease  desist.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS

2005-02-24 Thread skipp025


 Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Unless you are desperate never put more than 
 one PL decoder between the user 
 and the system transmitter.

Some times you can't help it when the options 
are limited. 

 Up to this point in the hardware the entire 
 system was carrier squelch. 

We don't have that luxury in metro locations 
like LA and SF. I'm sure the same applies to many 
of the East Coast and Mid America Metro Areas. 

Carrier Squelch links get played with... 

 The main user PL decoder (100hz) was on the 
 voter output and fed the PL decode line of the 
 repeater controller.

We experienced problems with the voter selecting 
stronger undesired csq signals, which wander around 
the bands like magic. Some of these magic signals 
are sent by undesired types with a lot of free time 
on their hands.

 This way if you came up with 100hz any RX would work.
 Later the individual link Maxtrac RXs were programmed
 for different PLs and diode OR'ed together with the main
 user PL decoder. The unique PL tones were intended for
 the repeater committee members to RX test site coverage
 with but ended up with the users using them as well.  If
 you came up with, for example, 107.2Hz only link #1 RX
 would open, or 123.0HZ brought up RX #3, but the OR'ed
 PL decode lines caused the repeater controller to see a
 PL decode signal and the system came up.  So for the
 cost of programming the Maxtracs for active-low-PL
 decode and a few diodes the system had remote system
 diagnosis... it didn't take knowing the 420mhz link
 frequencies and a scanner to determine that, for example,
 the south receiver was numb the end-user could use his
 HT with the proper unique PL tone and see how quieting
 they were.
 Mike WA6ILQ

You can do the same thing or similar test with less 
hardware and logic lines from the repeater controller 
back to the voter force select or lockout function 
with simple dtmf macro commands.  

Call me lazy... 

skipp 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: FS: Kathrein 420-449 MHz Omni Antenna

2005-02-24 Thread skipp025


Man..!

I take a day off and the killer antenna deal 
blows right on by me... 

Scala Kathrein Antennas are just killer. I use 
them in Commercial and Amateur Service all the 
time.  

I paid over $600 for the last 5 dbi version of 
this antenna and they take min 4 weeks min to 
get from Germany (where they are made) through 
Oregon/WA. 

Who ever got the antenna better be real happy. 

By the way, the mentioned band of operation is 
a special order, most often ordered for the 
Canadian Public Safety/Commercial Market and 
semi limited US Amateur purchases. 

This antenna is one of the few fiberglass models 
of this type... spec for an honest full 30MHz 
bandwidth, which actually do what the mfgr 
promises. 

Lucky Dog..! 

cheers,
skipp 


 Dennis Bridgeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 For Sale:  One (1) NEW Kathrein UHF commercial 
 grade base/repeater station antenna.
 This omni-directional Kathrein model K 75 16 
 22 1 has 7dbi gain in the 420-449 MHz range.  
 This is a 50 ohm, 70 watt, fiberglass model. 
 Type N connector at base.  $75 plus actual 
 UPS shipping.
 For more info, check out the following link:
 http://www.kathrein.de/de/mca/produkte/download/936074.pdf
 If interested, please contact off list.
 Dennis Bridgeman








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] master pro receiver to amateur service

2005-02-24 Thread skipp025



  We are moving from 146.925- to 145.410-
 GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver
 
 So you'll be dropping the RX about 1.5 MHz. Never 
 had a problem with the VHF Mastr Pro RX I took 
 down to 144.84.

Unless the Master Pro Receiver is a low vhf split 
model, you will probably have to change some of the 
caps in the crystal osc injection chain. Without the 
cap mod, standard-split Master Pro model receivers 
really poop out retuning that low in frequency with 
the factory values in place. 

 How low in frequency will the MASTR Pro go before 
 I loose quality sensitivity, right now, it's about 
 .15 uv with a preamp, and receives excellent.

skipp 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 UHF Conversion

2005-02-24 Thread va6ef



Hello Everyone;

   We an MSR 2000 on 411.8375 tx and 416.8375 Rx that we wish to get 
on 448.400 TX and 443.400 RX.. I am told that we require a Front End 
Helical Resonator for the reciever to accomplish this .. Anyone help 
me out finding this for these frequencies 

 thanks 
 Ed










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] FS: Scom 7k and ACC RC-850

2005-02-24 Thread milguy111



I have two controllers available for sale.

Pictures are on request TO SERIOUS PARTIES ONLY.

I have upgraded to LINK-COMM controllers throughout our systems...


First is a Scom 7k, with voice and phonepatch - has most recent 
firmware in it (V2.03).  This controller has the enclosure and LED 
front.  Includes the manual and I think I have the programming 
software somewhere.  Price on this one is $650.


Second is an RC-850.  This controller was in service for a long 
time.  It's in good shape (I have pictures, remember) and is fully 
functional.  Firmware is v3.52 (i think)  Must have cost a fortune 
back in the day - has the speech board, phonepatch and computer 
interface port.  Power cord is not included, but it's a standard 
molex style.  No manual either, but it's available online.  Price on 
this controller is $600.

Both items are + shipping ($18 USPS Pri mail) and are guaranteed not 
DOA.  Paypal accepted + 3%.


Please contact me off the list ---  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



thanks

doug
kc5bmj







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB

2005-02-24 Thread Mark A. Holman

probably cold medicine that stuff has side effects :-)
M. H.

- Original Message - 
From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB



 At 10:12 PM 2/22/2005 -, you wrote:

 You can have this one delivered to your door (in the US) for $180.

 ---That HAS to be a typo?

 Ken

 --
 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
 http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
 We now offer complete Kenwood TKR repeater packages!
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net





 Yahoo! Groups Links







 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Standard RPT-10

2005-02-24 Thread Larry Kemper






Brent 
Thanks for the directions that will get me started 
on the tune-up. Any idea what the pots are on the control 
board?

Thanks to Skipp also.

WA0VUSLarry KemperMuscatine, 
Iowa













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Standard RPT-10

2005-02-24 Thread Brent






R928 is the TOT
R910 next to Q907 ans c902 transmitter hang 
time
R924 Repeat audio


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Larry 
  Kemper 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 5:52 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Standard 
  RPT-10
  
  Brent 
  Thanks for the directions that will get me 
  started on the tune-up. Any idea what the pots are on the control 
  board?
  
  Thanks to Skipp also.
  
  WA0VUSLarry KemperMuscatine, 
  Iowa
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG 
  Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 
  2/22/2005













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.








No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Icom RP-220MHZ 220mhz repeater manuals

2005-02-24 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ

At 01:58 PM 2/19/05, you wrote:

Hello Group,

Im looking for Icom RP-220MHZ 220mhz repeater manuals
Im in need of both types Owners Manual and Service Manual.
PDF form would due just fine.

Thank You,

Sal
N6SPD

There is some high band and UHF info on the Icom page at
  www.repeater-builder.com - plus a link to the Icom web site
that has some manuals for download.

If you turn up anything else please consider sending me a
copy to add it to the site.

Mike WA6ILQ  





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FS: Kathrein 420-449 MHz Omni Antenna

2005-02-24 Thread Mike Perryman K5JMP

Yep,

One of the good ones..  you can get documentation and advice by calling
Scala/Katrein and asking for Mike Bach..  he is a ham and will be very
helpful.  Be sure to tell him Perryman says hey..

mike
K5JMP

-Original Message-
From: skipp025 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:34 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FS: Kathrein 420-449 MHz Omni Antenna




Man..!

I take a day off and the killer antenna deal
blows right on by me...

Scala Kathrein Antennas are just killer. I use
them in Commercial and Amateur Service all the
time.

I paid over $600 for the last 5 dbi version of
this antenna and they take min 4 weeks min to
get from Germany (where they are made) through
Oregon/WA.

Who ever got the antenna better be real happy.

By the way, the mentioned band of operation is
a special order, most often ordered for the
Canadian Public Safety/Commercial Market and
semi limited US Amateur purchases.

This antenna is one of the few fiberglass models
of this type... spec for an honest full 30MHz
bandwidth, which actually do what the mfgr
promises.

Lucky Dog..!

cheers,
skipp


 Dennis Bridgeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For Sale:  One (1) NEW Kathrein UHF commercial
 grade base/repeater station antenna.
 This omni-directional Kathrein model K 75 16
 22 1 has 7dbi gain in the 420-449 MHz range.
 This is a 50 ohm, 70 watt, fiberglass model.
 Type N connector at base.  $75 plus actual
 UPS shipping.
 For more info, check out the following link:
 http://www.kathrein.de/de/mca/produkte/download/936074.pdf
 If interested, please contact off list.
 Dennis Bridgeman









Yahoo! Groups Links













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Building a repeater from Motorola VHF portable

2005-02-24 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ

At 08:26 AM 2/19/05, you wrote:

Would a Motorola PAC RT work?

In a word, NO.

A PAC-RT is a unit designed to extend a mobile radio
to a handheld.  Picture a highway patrol officer that is
out writing a ticket - the handheld on his belt talks to
his patrol car and the PAC-RT there is hooked to his
regular mobile radio. Think of a simplex autopatch but
with an underdash or trunk mounted mobile radio in
place of the phone line.  It is a crossband* unit with
an output power of 1/10 watt ... some were 1/4 of a
watt, but not many.   There is no duplex ability at all.

* crossband: receiving and transmitting on a different band
The patrol car mobile and the officer's HT are on totally
different bands.  The PAC-RTs were built around an RF
package based on a low-end handheld, and models
were available in the 150mhz and 450 bands.

The basic idea of extending an existing mobile radio
into a mobile crossband repeater is still in wide use.
For example, here in California our highway patrol
mobiles run on hilltop repeaters with a 42-43mhz
output and a 39mhz input.  The officer's handhelds
are on high band.

Mike WA6ILQ 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Packet over voice repeater

2005-02-24 Thread Brian







Hi Robert

Once I operated packet where I could hear it but my HT did not have
enough signal for the packet system to hear it. So I setup my mobile
to crossband. The HT transmitted on UHF and the mobile transimtted on
VHF. In the parameters of the tnc there was an adjustment to delay the
audio transmission. I set the audio delay a little higher and it
worked great.

73
Brian
ka9pmm

Robert Purvis wrote:

  I'm looking for a simple way to "repeat" packets heard on a VHF frequency
and retransmit on UHF (and vice versa)

I don't want to set it up as a digipeater.  Just a simple audio,  "what goes
in one end goes out the other" audio repeater.

It would be a simple task just to hook up two radios as a cross band
repeater,  but COR-PTT response time will lop off first few bytes of data.

I have considered using a digital delay circuit to delay AF until such time
as transmitter comes up to full power,  and I've also considered a using a
pair of TNC's connected to PC comm ports,  and delaying read of receive comm
port buffer by enough time to allow transmitter to come up to full power.

But before I do anything,  I wanted to see if anyone else has had any luck
with other ideas,  before I reinvent the wheel.

Thanks in advance ...

- Original Message -
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 8:48 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Digest Number 2989


  
  
There are 16 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

  1. Re: Choosing Commercial UHF Repeater
   From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  2. Zetron 38Max Question
   From: "bretb9" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  3. Comm Spec  TP-38
   From: "Brent" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  4. Re: Zetron 38Max Question
   From: XE2SI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  5. Re: Kenwood TRK-820 info?
   From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  6. Re: Re: M2 CAS
   From: "Fred Seamans" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  7. Re: Re: M2 CAS
   From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  8. Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS
   From: "Bob" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  9. Re: Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS
   From: "Jim B." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 10. Re: Re: M2 CAS
   From: "Fred Seamans" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 11. Re: Comm Spec  TP-38
   From: "skipp025" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 12. RE: Re: Comm Spec  TP-38
   From: "Rogers, Ron" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 13. Re: tpl amps, not so broad-band
   From: "skipp025" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 14. FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB
   From: "na6df" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 15. Re: FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB
   From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 16. Re: Re: Comm Spec  TP-38
   From: "Brent" [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Message: 1
   Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:34:22 -0800
   From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Choosing Commercial UHF Repeater

Perhaps the best answer is to see what the public-safety agencies use at
sites with several dozen UHF repeaters within a few hundred meters.  In
my area of Central California, the most common repeaters are Motorola
Quantar and MTR2000, or Kenwood TKR-840.  The brand of the repeater used
is driven by the brand of mobile and portable radios being used, since a
Kenwood mobile radio will not mute quietly on a Motorola repeater, and
(except for the Professional Series radios) vice-versa.  While many GE,
Vertex, and Icom radios will mute quietly on a Kenwood repeater, that is
not a "given."

While selecting top-quality equipment is important, there is a great
deal of engineering that must go into the design of a repeater at a
dense site.  Logical placement of antennas is important; you don't want
to put your antenna right next to an antenna that has a harmonic or
subharmonic relationship to yours.

My personal preference is to use large-diameter cavity bandpass filters
on both RX and TX, double or triple ferrite circulators on TX, and
nothing but double-shielded cable or hardline throughout.  The Number
One Rule is that nothing but an on-frequency signal can get into my
receiver, and nothing but an on-frequency signal leaves my transmitter.
In an ideal world, all of the repeaters at a dense site would be
designed to follow this Rule.  Alas, such is not the case...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

mbloom0947 wrote:


  I suspect that many of the participants here have had experience
selecting UHF repeaters for high-RF applications such as at
broadcasting sites.   Which would you buy and why?  Yaesu/Vertex,
ICOM, Kenwood, or some Motorola type?   At present I am using a pair
of Moto GM300s with a RICK controller.


Yahoo! Groups Links




  





[Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR 2000 UHF Conversion

2005-02-24 Thread skipp025


Hi Ed, 

Very tempting for me to simply offer to trade you 
for a standard 450 MHz range receiver. It would 
be neat to have something down in the sub band 
range. I'll think about that... 


The first option would be to trade for a standard 
range receiver strip where possible. 

The second option would be to swap out or modify 
the low range front end, but you might also have 
to work on the injection chain. 

Moving a receiver up doesn't seem to be as hard 
as moving it down in the preselector coil 
department. 

Parts from a 450 Mitrek might work, but there 
would be a bit of work.  All things considered, 
a receiver swap or outright purchase would be 
your most practical option. 

The transmitter will possibly tune up with little 
or no mods. It's a well designed strip, with at 
least 40 MHz range band width out of the box. 

Hope that helps

cheers, 
skipp 

skipp025 at yahoo.com 

 va6ef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello Everyone;
 
 We an MSR 2000 on 411.8375 tx and 416.8375 Rx that we wish to get 
 on 448.400 TX and 443.400 RX.. I am told that we require a Front
End 
 Helical Resonator for the reciever to accomplish this .. Anyone
help 
 me out finding this for these frequencies 
 
  thanks 
  Ed







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] FS: Genuine Factory 142 - 150.8 MHz. (TLD-8272B) Micor 2M Receiver - W3KKC

2005-02-24 Thread Kevin Custer

I have for sale a genuine factory Motorola Micor receiver in the 142 - 
150.8 Megahertz split.
Great for 2 Meter or MARS Repeaters.
Complete with Factory Helical Resonator Casting and Coils, (not replica's)
Board is the rare 72 model, not a converted high-band unit.
Tested and Guaranteed.  Meets book spec sensitivity, or better.
Tested on 146.280 @ -117.5 dBm on HP 8920 Service Monitor
Will include a high-band (K1005) Channel Element (for recrystaling) if 
desired.

Quality Pictures here:
http://www.kuggie.com/temp/micor72.html

$145.00 plus actual USPS shipping to any of the 50 United States.
No packaging or handling fee will be added, you only pay the shipping.
PayPal preferred.

First response (via email) gets it.

Thanks for looking...
Kevin Custer  W3KKC
eBay ID = repeater-builder  100% good feedback rating
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedbackuserid=repeater-builder
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Helical Front end UHF

2005-02-24 Thread Brent

SPEAKING of  front ends...
I have a set of helical Resonator from a standard repeater... and it is on
467.2 rx and moving it to the 448.000
Everything else tunes up just fine, so the thought was to add about 1/4 of
same material and size wire that it is already wrapped with
so the tuning slugs wont be so far down in the cans...(not much height on
the cans themselves). and a 1/4 could it me that much that the slugs are
now out of the can.. ???
or would I want to try to move the Tap on the coil first  any thoughts.
thanks
Brent

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater Builder Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; Micor List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Motorola-User List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 8:26 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] FS: Genuine Factory 142 - 150.8 MHz. (TLD-8272B)
Micor 2M Receiver - W3KKC



 I have for sale a genuine factory Motorola Micor receiver in the 142 -
 150.8 Megahertz split.
 Great for 2 Meter or MARS Repeaters.
 Complete with Factory Helical Resonator Casting and Coils, (not replica's)
 Board is the rare 72 model, not a converted high-band unit.
 Tested and Guaranteed.  Meets book spec sensitivity, or better.
 Tested on 146.280 @ -117.5 dBm on HP 8920 Service Monitor
 Will include a high-band (K1005) Channel Element (for recrystaling) if
 desired.

 Quality Pictures here:
 http://www.kuggie.com/temp/micor72.html

 $145.00 plus actual USPS shipping to any of the 50 United States.
 No packaging or handling fee will be added, you only pay the shipping.
 PayPal preferred.

 First response (via email) gets it.

 Thanks for looking...
 Kevin Custer  W3KKC
 eBay ID = repeater-builder  100% good feedback rating

http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedbackuserid=repeater-buil
der








 Yahoo! Groups Links







 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005





-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38

2005-02-24 Thread Kevin King

How are you powering the unit?

Kevin King SCSA BSCIS
ARS KC6OVD
GMRS KAG0378
EIEIO 2722
Acworth Georgia


-Original Message-
From: Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:45 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38



Hello Skipp,

I have all known tones turned on and active..(double checked that a few
times)
It will not decode them or show them at all
it will show and decode all below 100.0  with no problem, and it does that
like it should with no delay..

but if i try the 100.0 it has to have that tone signal present for at least
3 seconds before it will show or decode it..

it is like a audio amp gone bad or some thing.. but i did swap them around
and reset the x2122 in the unit and still no difference..
I must be missing some type of failure somewhere..
Brent


- Original Message -
From: skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:48 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38




 Does the tone panel even display frequencies above
 100Hz, just not decode them?  That's a software
 problem or programing. Most other problems are
 hardware related.  Just running a test sub tone in
 from an external source will tell you mucho.

 skipp

  Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Question...
 
  Has anybody had a problem with the Communications Specialists  TP-38
 Tone
  Panel not decoding PL tones about 100.0hz
  it decodes from below 100.0 just fine and 100.0  but 100.0 is little
 slow
  decoding but above 100.0  it just does nothing..
 
  Thanks
  Brent
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.2.0 - Release Date: 2/21/2005
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]








 Yahoo! Groups Links







 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.2.0 - Release Date: 2/21/2005





-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.2.0 - Release Date: 2/21/2005

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] FS: Genuine Factory 142 - 150.8 MHz. (TLD-8272B) Micor 2M Receiver - W3KKC

2005-02-24 Thread Kevin Custer

I have for sale a genuine factory Motorola Micor receiver in the 142 -
150.8 Megahertz split.
Great for 2 Meter or MARS Repeaters.
Complete with Factory Helical Resonator Casting and Coils, (not replica's)
Board is the rare 72 model, not a converted high-band unit.
Tested and Guaranteed.  Meets book spec sensitivity, or better.
Tested on 146.280 @ -117.5 dBm on HP 8920 Service Monitor
Will include a high-band (K1005) Channel Element (for recrystaling) if
desired.

Quality Pictures here:
http://www.kuggie.com/temp/micor72.html

$145.00 plus actual USPS shipping to any of the 50 United States.
No packaging or handling fee will be added, you only pay the shipping.
PayPal preferred.

First response (via email) gets it.

Thanks for looking...
Kevin Custer  W3KKC
eBay ID = repeater-builder  100% good feedback rating
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedbackuserid=repeater-builder
 











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread Charles Miller

See Inserts,

 GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver

Should not have a problem at all with the receiver.


 Vocom Amp, tuned for 146.925

You might have to play with the amp, but it should also tune up just fine.
Use a good dummy load and minimal power to tune.



 and then to top if off, I just got the phasing harness for the DB224
 and it was cut right for 146.925.

The DB-224 will operate over a 10 MHz window. Most DB-224's are good from
140-150 MHz with the correct harness.



 My main transmitter is the (no arguements please), Maggorie HiPro
 transmitter exiting 2 watts to the vocom amp.

Follow the tuning procedure and all should be ok.



 TX RX Duplexers.

Not a problem if they are the ones for the amateur band. If you have the
proper equipment it should take about 30 minutes to retune. If the duplexer
was from the 150-160 band them you may have some problems. Give TX/RX a call
and find out what they charge to retune. Could save you time and future
problems.



 Other sad part is, the user that was getting into their system was
 not getting into the main receiver, but rather a remote site.  I
 wonder how tight his receiver really is, and is it a synthesized
 radio, or something of quality.

 Mathew

Sounds like HE has a receiver problem or your user may have a transmitter
problem. In either case I would object to moving until he can prove that HIS
receiver is not the cause of the problem. I would also check to see where
his receiver is in reference to the transmitter. I find it hard to believe
that YOU are required to move without first finding out where the problem
is. This sounds very unfair.

If the coordinator had done his job correctly he would not have placed two
repeaters in a area where the possibility of interference could happen. I
would fight this as far as I could, and request the coordinator pay for your
move.

Charles Miller
WD5EEH







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 UHF Conversion

2005-02-24 Thread Charles Miller

Ed,

If you are moving that much you are going to need more than a RX front end.

The TX might be a little problem, but should make it. 30-40 MHz.

20 MHz is the window from the factory for the RX. You are moving 30+.

Charles Miller
WD5EEH

- Original Message - 
From: va6ef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 UHF Conversion





 Hello Everyone;

We an MSR 2000 on 411.8375 tx and 416.8375 Rx that we wish to get
 on 448.400 TX and 443.400 RX.. I am told that we require a Front End
 Helical Resonator for the reciever to accomplish this .. Anyone help
 me out finding this for these frequencies

  thanks
  Ed











 Yahoo! Groups Links















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers

2005-02-24 Thread NĂ˜ATH






Matthew - I was looking at the Indianna Repeater 
council page and it
only shows the call you mention on 146.910 - not .925 
- Is it possible
the coordinators messed up and he is on the wrong 
freq?













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Helical Front end UHF

2005-02-24 Thread DCFluX

We need a little more information on the repeater you have, such as
the model number and the rough dimensions of the coils and the cavity.

I have converted a Yaseu FTC-4610 from 474 to 443MHz (With .32uV
sensitivity) by adding 1/2 of a turn to the top of the coils, perhaps
the same can be accomplished here.  Also you can try replacing the
slugs with a different material such as Brass or Aluminum to shift the
resonance, I have used brass screws on a VHF micor with good but not
perfect results.

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:55:42 -0600, Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 SPEAKING of  front ends...
 I have a set of helical Resonator from a standard repeater... and it is on
 467.2 rx and moving it to the 448.000
 Everything else tunes up just fine, so the thought was to add about 1/4 of
 same material and size wire that it is already wrapped with
 so the tuning slugs wont be so far down in the cans...(not much height on
 the cans themselves). and a 1/4 could it me that much that the slugs are
 now out of the can.. ???
 or would I want to try to move the Tap on the coil first  any thoughts.
 thanks
 Brent





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38

2005-02-24 Thread Kevin King

Reason I ask I have seen them act up when powered by the same power supply
as the repeater and it did not quite have the current for the job.


I would test it on the bench with an audio generator and O scope. I am
thinking you have something ringing in the audio/pl chain. Also drive
levels (audio could be problem)

TP-38's can be quite old. what is the age and history of the unit? when did
it work correctly last?

Kevin King SCSA BSCIS
ARS KC6OVD
GMRS KAG0378
EIEIO 2722
Acworth Georgia


-Original Message-
From: Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38



fully regulated 12vdc power supply !

- Original Message -
From: Kevin King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38



 How are you powering the unit?

 Kevin King SCSA BSCIS
 ARS KC6OVD
 GMRS KAG0378
 EIEIO 2722
 Acworth Georgia


 -Original Message-
 From: Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:45 AM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38



 Hello Skipp,

 I have all known tones turned on and active..(double checked that a few
 times)
 It will not decode them or show them at all
 it will show and decode all below 100.0  with no problem, and it does that
 like it should with no delay..

 but if i try the 100.0 it has to have that tone signal present for at
least
 3 seconds before it will show or decode it..

 it is like a audio amp gone bad or some thing.. but i did swap them around
 and reset the x2122 in the unit and still no difference..
 I must be missing some type of failure somewhere..
 Brent


 - Original Message -
 From: skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:48 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38


 
 
  Does the tone panel even display frequencies above
  100Hz, just not decode them?  That's a software
  problem or programing. Most other problems are
  hardware related.  Just running a test sub tone in
  from an external source will tell you mucho.
 
  skipp
 
   Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Question...
  
   Has anybody had a problem with the Communications Specialists  TP-38
  Tone
   Panel not decoding PL tones about 100.0hz
   it decodes from below 100.0 just fine and 100.0  but 100.0 is little
  slow
   decoding but above 100.0  it just does nothing..
  
   Thanks
   Brent
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   --
   No virus found in this outgoing message.
   Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
   Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.2.0 - Release Date: 2/21/2005
  
   ---
   [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]
 
 
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.2.0 - Release Date: 2/21/2005
 
 



 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.2.0 - Release Date: 2/21/2005

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]






 Yahoo! Groups Links














 Yahoo! Groups Links







 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005





--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]






Yahoo! Groups Links













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Helical Front end UHF

2005-02-24 Thread Brent

the front end is from a standard RPT-21
there is approx 4 complete turns of wire the size of a 1n4001 diode lead..
and well matter of fact the same material
 and it has aluminum slugs

- Original Message -
From: DCFluX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Helical Front end UHF



 We need a little more information on the repeater you have, such as
 the model number and the rough dimensions of the coils and the cavity.

 I have converted a Yaseu FTC-4610 from 474 to 443MHz (With .32uV
 sensitivity) by adding 1/2 of a turn to the top of the coils, perhaps
 the same can be accomplished here.  Also you can try replacing the
 slugs with a different material such as Brass or Aluminum to shift the
 resonance, I have used brass screws on a VHF micor with good but not
 perfect results.

 On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:55:42 -0600, Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  SPEAKING of  front ends...
  I have a set of helical Resonator from a standard repeater... and it is
on
  467.2 rx and moving it to the 448.000
  Everything else tunes up just fine, so the thought was to add about 1/4
of
  same material and size wire that it is already wrapped with
  so the tuning slugs wont be so far down in the cans...(not much height
on
  the cans themselves). and a 1/4 could it me that much that the slugs
are
  now out of the can.. ???
  or would I want to try to move the Tap on the coil first  any thoughts.
  thanks
  Brent
 





 Yahoo! Groups Links







 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005





-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 UHF Conversion

2005-02-24 Thread Charles Miller

Ed,

If you are moving that much you are going to need more than a RX front end.
You will need to change several caps and other parts to get the TX to move
that far. 10 MHz is the window from the factory. You are moving 30+.

Charles Miller
WD5EEH

- Original Message - 
From: va6ef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 UHF Conversion





 Hello Everyone;

We an MSR 2000 on 411.8375 tx and 416.8375 Rx that we wish to get
 on 448.400 TX and 443.400 RX.. I am told that we require a Front End
 Helical Resonator for the reciever to accomplish this .. Anyone help
 me out finding this for these frequencies

  thanks
  Ed











 Yahoo! Groups Links















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/