Re: Upgrading python versions?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote: Should I do a whole new install and migrate the DB? On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote: I decided to try and build pylucene again on CentOs 5.2. I kept running into problems with python2.4, so I built jcc against python2.6 (ActivePython). I eventually got it working (using openjdk-1.6 and a modern version of ant) but ReviewBoard doesn't seem to agree and I can't enable search. Since I built jcc with python2.6 and installed ReviewBoard using python2.4. this makes sense. If you can migrate to CentOS 6 your life will be easier. If you have to stay with CentOS 5, you can't upgrade Python, as in you can't replace Python 2.4 (/usr/bin/python). You can install Python 2.6 in parallel. The EPEL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL repository has a python26 package, and some dependencies you'll need like python26-distribute, python26-mysqldb, and python26-mod_wsgi. python26-distribute should provide a python26 specific version of pip/easy_install you can try to use to install Review Board. I've never tried it, but it's probably possible. Again, CentOS 6 is easier. -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Apache Setup/Configuration
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Britt doubl...@gmail.com wrote: That's when Apache crashed - when I attempted to restart it, I get the error: Syntax error on line 8 of /etc/ apache2/sites-enabled/reviewBoard: Invalid command 'WSGIPassAuthorization', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration. sudo apt-get install libapache2-mod-wsgi sudo a2enmod wsgi sudo service apache2 restart # The last two might be done by the package post install scripts. -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Migrating Review Board Database
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.comwrote: There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production. There is a 1.6 version in a test environment. Anyone have suggestions on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6 data? What will need to be done will depend on the specific version you are moving from, and what is missing/different in the database. I did a migration from a pre-1.0 to 1.5.5. Though it wasn't 0.1, if it had a version it probably would have been something like 0.9. I detailed the upgrade in this post: http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/msg/5b445e99632190ab If your old version is close enough to 1.0 you may not need to manually manipulate the database at all, just install a new site with a dump of the old database, and let the Django evolutions do their thing. If your old version is really, really old, there may be a lot of manual DB manipulation. I was pretty lucky that there was only one table missing and I could copy the whole table from a new install. -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: CentOS Installation
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Chris Tooley ch...@tooley.com wrote: during none of those times has it worked until I go in and reset all of the permissions via: cd /usr/lib/python2.4 find . -type d | xargs chmod o+rx find . -type f | xargs chmod o+r I doubt this is caused by RB, easy_install, or RHEL. Most likely there is something wrong with your umask, maybe it's getting set to a screwy setting on all your servers. The umask can be set in lots of places, your umask, root's umask, /etc/sudoers, and PAM configuration. -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Clean install of 1.6.1 serves up 404 error
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The logs keep referencing this HTTP_FORBIDDEN.html.var. This is not provided by us or by any listed config. There are at least 16 other .conf files included in the config. SUSE might have taken the idea of modular configs a little too far. My hunch is that this is somehow related to you having compiled your own Apache. Fortunately, I think he is using the version shipped with SLES 11, the settings probably came from something like httpd -V. Sandeep, Can you look at or provide the apache error logs, they are probably in /var/log/apache2. They should list what is causing the error. According to the httpd.conf provided, on SLES virtual host files belong in /etc/apache2/vhosts.d/. Try moving reviewboard.test.com.conf to /etc/apache2/vhosts.d/. -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: mod_python mandatory for reviewboard 1.6?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Sanjay Lal sklqui...@gmail.com wrote: [root ReviewBoard-1.6]# yum install mod_wsgi Loaded plugins: security http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/ReviewBoard/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found () Trying other mirror. Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: download_base. Please verify its path and try again Is it really giving an error that mentions ReviewBoard when you are trying to install an unrelated package? Did you modify anything in /etc/yum.conf or /etc/yum.repos.d? It seems like you might have put a Python pypi URL in a yum config. Do this to list the repositories: yum -v repolist I have set following http_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80 ftp_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80 secure_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80 Here is how to setup yum through a proxy: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/yum/sn-yum-proxy-server.html If a proxy is always required, it's probably best to do it in yum.conf, instead of as an environment variable. If you do the env method, don't forget to export http_proxy so it works outside your shell. If you are just playing around, maybe consider installing RB in OpenShift. That way you won't have to do any of the Linux stuff, all you have to do is git pull/push: https://github.com/openshift/reviewboard-example -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: mod_python mandatory for reviewboard 1.6?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Sanjay Lal sklqui...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is mod_python.so load module mandatory for reviewBoard 1.6? I have redhad linux 5.5, python 2.4.3 , apache 2.1.9. While building mod_python.so I was getting the error - connobject.c: 142: error: request for member next in something not a structure or union . So I got the connobject.c from On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Sanjay Lal sklqui...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to verify if I am doing things correctly - I have install reviewboard 1.6, apache 2.1.9 and all the dependencies etc. I have following conf files in /usr/local/apache2/htdocs/reviews.hsgbu.com/ conf - apache-wsgi.conf search-cron.conf settings_local.py settings_local.pyc Should I just append the contents of /usr/local/apache2/htdocs/ reviews.hsgbu.com/conf/apache-wsgi.conf to /usr/local/apache2/conf/ httpd.conf? Or I am supposed to do anything else? Are you able to start fresh, maybe with a different Linux distro? There are a few things wrong here. * You said redhad linux 5.5, I'm going to assume that is RHEL 5 or a rebuild of it like Oracle or CentOS. RHEL 5 has pretty old versions of things, like Python 2.4. You would be better off with something based on RHEL 6, like CentOS 6. RHEL 5 will work if you have to use it. * You should not compile apache from source, almost no one should. 2.1.9 is really ancient, even RHEL comes with 2.2.3 by default. Install apache with: yum groupinstall Web Server * You do not need mod_python. It would be better to use mod_wsgi. mod_wsgi is in the EPEL repository for RHEL 5, Google will tell you how to install the EPEL repository. Neither of them should be installed from source, instead do: yum install mod_python yum install mod_wsgi * In a normal install of Red Hat, you should avoid editing httpd.conf (in /etc/httpd/conf/), instead copy the virtual host configs to /etc/httpd/conf.d/. * Avoid using apachectl. Instead use: service httpd start|stop|restart|graceful OR /etc/init.d/httpd start|stop|restart|graceful Overall advice for Linux admins, do not install from source. If you find yourself about to install from source, step back, and find a package/repository. Even fairly cutting-edge things like CouchDB and Redis have packages in EPEL. Hope that helps, Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgrading from 1.0 to… well… anything
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:33 AM, insysion s.tai...@insysion.net wrote: Ok, so I made the cardinal sin of not reading everything you sent. I guess what I need to know is whether that error looks like migrating this site is the best option or whether to go with generating a new site and linking it to the old database. I'm not sure about the error. settings_local.py should tell you what DB you are using. I think a new site is the best way to go. By site I mean the directory structure and files created by 'rb-site install'. The directory structure and files of an old SVN pull are totally different than a new easy_install/rb-site created site. After creating the new site you point local settings at the old database (or better, a copy of the old database), and run 'rb-site upgrade' to evolve the database. You also need to copy any persistent data stored in the file system, from the old site to the new site, which as far as I know is only the stuff in htdocs/media/uploaded. -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgrading from 1.0 to… well… anything
I did an upgrade from pre-1.0 SVN to 1.5.5. The instructions are in a previous post: http://goo.gl/KFIiT Your steps will be a little different because you are using easy_install. And you might not have the missing table issue I had. easy_install is generally easy to get: Red Hat-based: yum install python-setuptools Debian-based: apt-get install python-setuptools Considering how old 1.0 is, the OS could be EOL'd, you might want to start on a new server. If you don't have spare servers/VMs, at least do the testing in a VM on your workstation. I would dump the database and restore it to a test database. And copy the site files to a test location. Then test doing upgrades of the test DB and files until you get it right. Then shutdown the real site, do a backup, then upgrade. -Anton On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: rb-site is provided by the ReviewBoard package, which you should install by doing easy_install -U ReviewBoard. You shouldn't need to touch the tatballs. I don't know why it was angry about setup.py, but perhaps it's just too old. Best way to back up the database is by doing an SQL dump. That varies depending on whether you're using MySQL, PostreSQL, etc. It won't be in our site directory unless you're using SQLite (which we don't recommend). -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: ReviewBoard on OpenShift Express
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: Mostly I thought it might prove interesting to those admins having setup troubles (especially on Windows) Yeah, this should be a big help to people trying to run Django apps without Linux experiences. I'm pretty excited about OpenShift (Red Hat's PaaS) and Cloud Foundry (VMware's PaaS). The open source Cloud Foundry supports Python/Django, but the hosted cloudfoundry.com doesn't yet. Thanks! Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Permissions issue
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Rohini Kumar Tharigonda rok...@gmail.com wrote: chmod -R 777 /var/www/reviewboard/ I would not recommend doing this. It is very dangerous to allow the apache user, or any untrusted user the ability to write to your web root. It means if there is a vulnerability they will be able to re-write the .wsgi and .py files, or be able to drop a php shell in htdocs. Ideally places in htdocs where apache can write, like uploaded/ would have script handlers disabled. service iptables stop I doubt this is the issue, the OP got an error on the RB web page, so web access works. I personally like firewalls. in /etc/selinux/config SELINUX=disabled SELinux can cause things like this. I didn't for me. For me the RB install with a local DB worked with SELinux. Only search and remote DB were blocked by SELinux. But SELinux is a good thing to check. The SELinux logs are in /var/log/audit. chown -R apache /var/www/reviewboard/data chown -R apache /var/www/reviewboard/ I my opinion apache should not own the whole reviewboard directory, for the security reason above. Do this instead: chown -R apache:apache /var/www/rb/htdocs/media/uploaded chown -R apache:apache /var/www/rb/data Thanks, Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Permissions issue
What Linux distro are you using? How are you starting apache? What is the path to rb (/var/www/rb)? Thanks, Anton On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:52 PM, hs_etd hblogt...@gmail.com wrote: Started from scratch but I see the same thing happening. ls -ld data returns [root@etd-rb rb]# ls -ld data drwxr-xr-x. 2 apache root 4096 Sep 9 19:46 data -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Fedora 2.6 Installation
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:00 AM, MonicaS castaneda.mon...@gmail.com wrote: This is a test server. My apache server runs as root. httpd should run as user 'apache' on Fedora. The rpm installed with yum will install it that way, don't change it, and don't install apache httpd from source. I defined that I wanted to use fastcgi. Use WSGI. I modified the httpd.conf file and I added at the end of the file the file generated from reviewboard called apache-fastcgi.conf. The config file generated by rb-site should be put in /etc/httpd/conf.d/. You very rarely have to edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, unless you really know what you are doing. What am I doing wrong? If this is testing for a real deployment, I would start over. Fedora is not a good server OS, it EOLs after 13 months and stops getting security updates. CentOS 6 is Red Hat-based and has a long life-cycle. Or use Ubuntu LTS or Debian stable. If you go with Red Hat-based, install everything from packages in yum repositories. With CentOS you can use the EPEL repository. An install on CentOS 6 would looks something like this, depending on the database and VCS you use: Install the packages: # sudo rpm -ivh http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm # sudo yum groupinstall Web Server MySQL Database # sudo yum install ReviewBoard mod_wsgi memcached python-memcached git Configure and start memcached: # sudo vi /etc/sysconfig/memcached CACHESIZE=2048 # Or however much (in MB) RAM you want memcached to use. # sudo chkconfig memcached on # sudo service memcached start Start mysqld: # sudo chkconfig mysqld on # sudo service mysqld start Create an empty database: # mysql -u root CREATE DATABASE reviewboard; GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON reviewboard.* TO 'reviewboard'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY 'yourpassword'; Create site, it will create files and load the database: # sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard Modify permission where apache has to write: # sudo chown -R apache:apache /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/uploaded # sudo chown -R apache:apache /var/www/reviewboard/data Copy the apache config: # sudo cp /var/www/reviewboard/conf/apache-wsgi.conf /etc/httpd/conf.d/reviewboard.conf Start apache: # sudo chkconfig httpd on # sudo service httpd restart I'm probably missing something, but that's pretty close to a complete install. Hope that helps, Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Installing PyLucene on Redhat
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: Could you write up your complete steps to getting PyLucene installed and working on Red Hat? I'd like to turn those steps into a tool to include with my EPEL packages. I don't have steps, but I have packages. RPMs are on S3: http://shrub.appspot.com/files.antoncohen.com/software/pylucene/ PyLucene is the only package required by Review Board. But to build PyLucene from source (e.g., rpmbuild --rebuild) you need JCC, and to build JCC you need to patch python-setuptools. The setuptools patch comes from their bug tacker [1], modified to patch against the EL6 version. I based the spec files on ones created by Felix Schwarz [2]. The SRPMs build with rpmbuild, though I haven't tried from in mock. Tested on Scientific Linux 6 with Review Board 1.5.5 from EPEL. If you are going to build these packages I recommend building on a throw-away dev machine (or in a chroot), and only installing the PyLucene package in production, that way you don't have a weird patched setuptools in production. [1] http://bugs.python.org/setuptools/issue43 [2] http://www.schwarz.eu/opensource/rpm/ Thanks, Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: 403 forbidden in Apache
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Krles antonin.nechva...@gmail.com wrote: # Direct all other requests to the fastcgi server Unless you have a specific reason for using fastcgi, I recommend using wsgi. mod_fcgid has a bunch of timeouts that make it hard to tune for an application that may take a while to run. I would redo 'rb-site install' and use mod_wsgi. Thanks, Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: upgrade 1.0-1.5
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Absolutely. What you can do is just generate a new site with rb-site after you install the eggs and reuse the existing database. I did an upgrade from pre-1.0 SVN to 1.5.5 recently, and basically did as Christian said and created a new site pointed at the old database, then upgraded it (database evolutions). One issue was that the install was so old it didn't have a siteconfig_siteconfiguration table, so that had to be added. The upgrade moved the web server from EL5 using mod_python to EL6 using mod_wsgi. Review Board was installed from EPEL, PyLucene from a package I built. Overview: * ReviewBoard and PyLucene installed from RPMs * Create a new site using local test database * Dump the siteconfig_siteconfiguration table * Drop the DB and re-create * Restore the old DB and the new siteconfig table * Do an rb-site upgrade * Copy old uploads/images * Test * Dump the local DB and restore to production cluster * Point site at production DB cluster Details: Configure and start memcached: # sudo vi /etc/sysconfig/memcached # Not needed, we have more RAM than we know what to do with CACHESIZE=1024 # sudo chkconfig memcached on # sudo service memcached start Configure and start mysqld: # sudo vi /etc/my.cnf max_allowed_packet=32M # sudo chkconfig mysqld on # sudo service mysqld start Create an empty database: # mysql -u root CREATE DATABASE rbtestdb; GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON rbtestdb.* TO 'rbtest'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY 'password'; Create site, it will create files and load the database: # sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviews Modify permission where apache has to write: # sudo chown -R apache:apache /var/www/reviews/htdocs/media/uploaded # sudo chown -R apache:apache /var/www/reviews/data Copy the apache config: # sudo cp /var/www/reviews/conf/apache-wsgi.conf /etc/httpd/conf.d/reviews.conf Start apache: # sudo chkconfig httpd on # sudo service httpd restart Dump the siteconfig_siteconfiguration table, our old database doesn't have it. # mysqldump --user=rbtest --password=password --add-drop-table rbtestdb siteconfig_siteconfiguration siteconfig.mysqldump Extract an RB backup: # tar -xvf reviewboard-backup.tar.gz Drop and re-create the database: # mysql -u root # DROP DATABASE rbtestdb; # CREATE DATABASE rbtestdb; # GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON rbtestdb.* TO 'rbtest'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY 'password'; Restore the backup database and siteconfig: # mysql -u root -h localhost -D rbtestdb --max_allowed_packet=32M reviewboard-backup.mysqldump # mysql -u root -h localhost -D rbtestdb --max_allowed_packet=32M siteconfig.mysqldump Upgrade the site, this performs database evolutions: # sudo rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews Copy images: # Copy the files in reviewboard-backup/htdocs/media/uploaded/images/ to /var/www/reviews/htdocs/media/uploaded/images/ # sudo chown -R apache:apache /var/www/reviews/htdocs/media/uploaded Probably should restart httpd and memcached at this point: # sudo service httpd restart # sudo service memcached restart Search???: # sudo mkdir -p /var/www/reviews/search-index # sudo chown apache:apache /var/www/reviews/search-index # sudo cp /var/www/reviews/conf/search-cron.conf /etc/cron.d/rb-index Should probably edit the above to run as apache # Enable Search in WebUI, with path /var/www/reviews/search-index # sudo -u apache /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/rb-site manage /var/www/reviews index -- --full Dump the database: # mysqldump --user=rbtest --password=password --add-drop-table rbtestdb rbtest-real.mysqldump Restore the database to a cluster: # mysql -u root -h cluster # CREATE DATABASE rbrealdb; # GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON rbrealdb.* TO 'rbuser'@'%' IDENTIFIED BY 'password'; # mysql -u root -h cluster -D rbrealdb --max_allowed_packet=32M rbtest-real.mysqldump Point the site at the DB cluster: # sudo vi /var/www/reviews/conf/settings_local.py # DATABASE_NAME = 'rbrealdb' # DATABASE_USER = 'rbuser' # DATABASE_PASSWORD = 'password' # DATABASE_HOST = 'cluster' # Clear browser Review Board cookies Change apache config to force SSL: # sudo vi /etc/httpd/conf.d/reviews.conf Change name/URL in WebUI: # Settings - General # Database - Sites Hope that help, Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
