Re: Is >2.40 for Linux available anywhere built with GTK2?

[Felix Miata]

Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-10-17 20:59 (UTC+0200):

> Felix Miata wrote:

>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274 creates the need.

s/creates/explains/


The latest candidate en-US build should be gtk2. Its not a final build
so backup your profile before trying it in case you need to go back but
other than a wrong internal Lightning version it should be fine.



https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/candidates/2.46-candidates/build6/


Got x86_64, 49587715 Oct  5 05:33 -0400 seamonkey-2.46.tar.bz2:

--enable-default-toolkit=cairo-gtk2

Used test profile, and only with browser so far. CZ & Mailnews todo momentarily.

Thanks very much to those responsible! :-D
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is >2.40 for Linux available anywhere built with GTK2?

[Wolfgang Steger]

Mason83 schrieb:
> On 17/10/2016 20:19, Felix Miata wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274 creates the need.
> 
> I don't think there are many alternate builds...
> 
> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/candidates/
> 
> Not sure what toolkit these were built against.

I just checked this "akalla"-build with lsof: GTK3

-- 
"No one talks peace unless he's ready to back it up with war."
"He talks of peace if it is the only way to live."
-- Colonel Green and Surak of Vulcan, "The Savage Curtain",
   stardate 5906.5.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[sean . nathan]

NFN Smith wrote:

sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote:


just a question, why bother "logging in" to their websites at all, when
Seamonkey will download via pop or imap?

i mean, i have 12 e'mail addresses all being downloaded via imap just so
i never have to spend time logging into webmail pages.


A good question

For the most part, I detest using webmail clients, and have a strong
preference for POP or IMAP.  However, I also maintain accounts with a
number of free providers, either for testing purposes, or thow-away
activity, where I generally don't care about what's delivered there. For
those kinds of accounts I really don't want to bother with setting up
POP or IMAP access, because it's rare that I want to check them, and I
don't want the distraction of having them available.

That said, I found that I make enough use of a Yahoo account that I did
set up IMAP access for that, and I check about once a day.  I use that
one just frequently enough that it's nice to not have to go through
Yahoo's login processes, although they have complained about an
inadequately secure setup, because I don't go through 2-factor
authentication.

For the mailboxes that I live in, I still prefer POP to IMAP, because it
fits my specific work flows.  However, one negative to POP is that if
there's a server-level spam folder, I have to make occasional web
checks, to inspect, to make sure that there isn't anything legitimate
that has turned up there (as well as adjusting server junk/not junk
designations).

Smith



Appreciate that response. I have always used pop access in the past, but 
have become irritated that the cox/gmail/live/or whatever servers don't 
delete their copies of the mail after I move or delete them, so I've 
been setting them all up in imap, for greater deletion control.


I generally despise the duplicative imap folders especially for gmail... 
inbox/all mail/imporant gives me 3 copies of everything incoming... 
gaaa


I gave up on yahoo as they previously made free pop access in the US 
difficult. If that has changed I may need to add those accounts back to 
Seamonkey again.


sean
--
phillip chee & tagzilla


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: No images display in 2.40 email

[bwitzed]

Hi.  I have installed 2.46 as I was told that it most stable.  The only problem 
is that the only language choice is Germsn and I cannot understand the menus.  
Would someone please provide me with an exact link to an english version of 
2.46 or other stable version.  I am mostly happy with the performance of this 
version but would like be able to use the menus.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Adrian Kalla wrote:


W dniu 10/17/2016 o 03:13 PM, Daniel pisze:



I just went to my SM browser, clicked Help->Check for updates and
was told there were no updates for my WIN7 WOW64 SM!!


What version exactly? Where downloaded from?


Select his message, do CTRL-U (view source) and you'll see his user 
agent string:


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.40

Teraz wszystko jasne?

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

[Rick Merrill]

On 10/12/2016 2:17 PM, NoOp wrote:

On 10/11/2016 9:30 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

Hi,

on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my
unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1  (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545  (Default Classic
Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my normal User Profile automatically
replaces "http" in URL by "https".

Example:
1. In Browser visit 
2. In page contents heading line
ˋclick downloads - Firmwareˊ
Expected:  opens
Actual:    will
  not open because it does not exist. So Error 404.

I see that after a short moment in URL bar "http" becomes replaced by
"https"


Many web sites are starting to do this for you. It sounds normal to me.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 (latest stable) uses NSS 3.20.1 - possible security vulnerability

[seemonkey12345]

On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 9:59:26 PM UTC+2, Ray_Net wrote:
> Lee wrote on 16/10/2016 17:45:
> > On 10/16/16, Ray_Net wrote:
> >> seemonkey wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06:
> >>> There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
> >>> version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
> >>>
> >>> There was a bugfix in NSS
> >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1245528 to solve this issue
> >>> but unfortunately it seems that this bugfix is not in 3.20.x according to
> >>> the developer entries. I didn't check the code yet if the bugfix is really
> >>> missing!
> >>>
> >>> So my question is why seamonkey uses still this outdated NSS version? It
> >>> should use at least 3.21.1 (that is in latest firefox esr /45.4.0/ and
> >>> also in latest thunderbird /45.4.0/)
> >>>
> >>> As a workaround i can copy the nss libraries from firefox esr to seamonkey
> >>> until a security release of seamonkey let's say 2.40.1 arrives. I tried
> >>> this end i can start seamonkey with newer NSS library because they're
> >>> compatible.
> >> "As a workaround i can copy the nss libraries from firefox esr to
> >> seamonkey "
> >>
> >> Could you tell us what we need (in details) to do ?
> >> I have Firefox 46.0.1 and SeaMonkey 2.40 on a windows pc.
> > Upgrade.
> >
> > The current version of Firefox is 49.0.1
> > about:support / Library Versions says the NSS* expected & in use version is 
> > 3.25
> >
> > The 'current' version of SeaMonkey is 2.40 and is missing a lot of
> > security patches.  Upgrading requires that you download & install a
> > new version of SM instead of waiting for it to upgrade automatically.
> > **where** to download the new version from is a bit of a question tho
> > :(   I'm guessing the safest bet is
> > https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/
> > if only because akalla had to pick _this_ particular build to make
> > available for downloading.  SeaMonkey 2.46 has the same 3.25
> > about:support / Library Versions for NSS* as FF.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lee
> You don't understand.
> - I hate to install a not released SM.
> - I stay with FireFox 46.0.1 because I am able with it to do "View 
> Selection Source" using my version of Firefox, because my SM 2.40 cannot 
> do it.
> - He said " It should use at least 3.21.1 (that is in latest firefox esr 
> /45.4.0/" and because my version of Firefox is greater (46.0.1) I can 
> use nss from this version to put into SM because it should be > 3.21.1.
> So the question is still open:
> How, in details,  can I use the NSS of my FireFox 46.0.1 into my SM 2.40 ?

I understand you.
In detail you must do the following. Copy these files from firefox into 
seamonkey overwriting the existing files (you have *.dll instead of *.so):
libfreebl3.chk
libfreebl3.so
libnspr4.so
libnss3.so
libnssckbi.so
libnssdbm3.chk
libnssdbm3.so
libnssutil3.so
libplc4.so
libplds4.so
libsmime3.so
libsoftokn3.chk
libsoftokn3.so
libssl3.so
I did it on linux, on windows it should be the same, please check it! I hope 
you have chk files too. However i have firefox 45.4.0 (esr) not the 46.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: mailbox problems (ongoing)

[NFN Smith]

NFN Smith wrote:



2) About an hour ago, I found that a bunch of messages have gone missing
from my inbox, and I haven't purged or deleted anything en masse
(although I was doing maintenance work and deleted a handful of messages
one at a time).


I just had this happen again.

I again recovered from backups (and knowing what to do, it went quickly).

However, when I completed my work, I went to the properties of the 
folder and clicked "Repair folder" to rebuild the index, and I had the 
same thing happen, yet again -- all messages whose send dates are not 
October (of whatever year) have disappeared.


I can recover from backups again, easily enough, but to me, I'm 
wondering if routine maintenance of compressing folders is causing this 
to happen.


I think I've seen this kind of thing happen before, where re-indexing 
causes messages to disappear.


What can I do to keep this from happening again?

Smith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is >2.40 for Linux available anywhere built with GTK2?

[Mason83]

On 17/10/2016 20:19, Felix Miata wrote:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274 creates the need.

I don't think there are many alternate builds...

https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/candidates/

Not sure what toolkit these were built against.

Regards.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is >2.40 for Linux available anywhere built with GTK2?

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

The latest candidate en-US build should be gtk2. Its not a final build 
so backup your profile before trying it in case you need to go back but 
other than a wrong internal Lightning version it should be fine.


https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/candidates/2.46-candidates/build6/

FRG

Felix Miata wrote:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274 creates the need.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: *Resolved* - Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[Jonathan N. Little]

sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>> Cruz, Jaime wrote:
>>> SamuelS wrote:
 Pat Connors wrote:
> I started getting also.
>
>> Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This
>> version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your
>> browser.



>>> WHAT solution?  He didn't provide one, he just said he was having the
>>> same issue?
>>>
>>
>> In the warning there is a "dismiss" link. Click it.
>>
> 
> one doesn't get this warning when downloading gmail via pop or imap into
> Seamonkey... going to the gmail website seems counterintuitive to me...

True, but OP said "when I go to the GMail website" where you do get that
message. Which I just confirmed it, but don't with pop...I use SeaMonkey
currently with gmail pop without issue.

-- 
Take care,

Jonathan
---
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[NFN Smith]

sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote:


just a question, why bother "logging in" to their websites at all, when
Seamonkey will download via pop or imap?

i mean, i have 12 e'mail addresses all being downloaded via imap just so
i never have to spend time logging into webmail pages.


A good question

For the most part, I detest using webmail clients, and have a strong 
preference for POP or IMAP.  However, I also maintain accounts with a 
number of free providers, either for testing purposes, or thow-away 
activity, where I generally don't care about what's delivered there. For 
those kinds of accounts I really don't want to bother with setting up 
POP or IMAP access, because it's rare that I want to check them, and I 
don't want the distraction of having them available.


That said, I found that I make enough use of a Yahoo account that I did 
set up IMAP access for that, and I check about once a day.  I use that 
one just frequently enough that it's nice to not have to go through 
Yahoo's login processes, although they have complained about an 
inadequately secure setup, because I don't go through 2-factor 
authentication.


For the mailboxes that I live in, I still prefer POP to IMAP, because it 
fits my specific work flows.  However, one negative to POP is that if 
there's a server-level spam folder, I have to make occasional web 
checks, to inspect, to make sure that there isn't anything legitimate 
that has turned up there (as well as adjusting server junk/not junk 
designations).


Smith

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Is >2.40 for Linux available anywhere built with GTK2?

[Felix Miata]

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274 creates the need.
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 (latest stable) uses NSS 3.20.1 - possible security vulnerability

[TCW]

On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:59:19 +0200, Ray_Net
 wrote:

>Lee wrote on 16/10/2016 17:45:
>> On 10/16/16, Ray_Net  wrote:
>>> seemonkey12...@gmail.com wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06:
 There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
 version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950

 There was a bugfix in NSS
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1245528 to solve this issue
 but unfortunately it seems that this bugfix is not in 3.20.x according to
 the developer entries. I didn't check the code yet if the bugfix is really
 missing!

 So my question is why seamonkey uses still this outdated NSS version? It
 should use at least 3.21.1 (that is in latest firefox esr /45.4.0/ and
 also in latest thunderbird /45.4.0/)

 As a workaround i can copy the nss libraries from firefox esr to seamonkey
 until a security release of seamonkey let's say 2.40.1 arrives. I tried
 this end i can start seamonkey with newer NSS library because they're
 compatible.
>>> "As a workaround i can copy the nss libraries from firefox esr to
>>> seamonkey "
>>>
>>> Could you tell us what we need (in details) to do ?
>>> I have Firefox 46.0.1 and SeaMonkey 2.40 on a windows pc.
>> Upgrade.
>>
>> The current version of Firefox is 49.0.1
>> about:support / Library Versions says the NSS* expected & in use version is 
>> 3.25
>>
>> The 'current' version of SeaMonkey is 2.40 and is missing a lot of
>> security patches.  Upgrading requires that you download & install a
>> new version of SM instead of waiting for it to upgrade automatically.
>> **where** to download the new version from is a bit of a question tho
>> :(   I'm guessing the safest bet is
>> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/
>> if only because akalla had to pick _this_ particular build to make
>> available for downloading.  SeaMonkey 2.46 has the same 3.25
>> about:support / Library Versions for NSS* as FF.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lee
>You don't understand.
>- I hate to install a not released SM.
>- I stay with FireFox 46.0.1 because I am able with it to do "View 
>Selection Source" using my version of Firefox, because my SM 2.40 cannot 
>do it.
>- He said " It should use at least 3.21.1 (that is in latest firefox esr 
>/45.4.0/" and because my version of Firefox is greater (46.0.1) I can 
>use nss from this version to put into SM because it should be > 3.21.1.
>So the question is still open:
>How, in details,  can I use the NSS of my FireFox 46.0.1 into my SM 2.40 ?

The SM 2.46 builds are being made by Adrian Kalla on a personal
machine and are stable even though not publish on the official Mozilla
site and usual download places. They are build from stable code but
because the build environment has been busted for so long, it's not
working on Mozilla proper. I just updated to the SM 2.47 beta build he
made today and it has NSS 3.26.2. I didn't realize 3.27/3.27.1 went
final until I just looked. So, IMHOO, you have nothing to lose by
trying the stable build Adrian has made. You can always kick the tires
here: http://goo.gl/9R2c0i

Stable, in terms of software, is relative to how many bugs haven't
been found yet.

As for grafting DLLs, back up nss3.dll, nssckbi.dll, nssdbm3.chk,
nssdbm3.dll and mozglue.dll somewhere. Close SM. Copy the NSS DLLs
from Firefox and overwrite the ones in the SM directory. 99% of the
time you won't need mozglue.dll. Start SM. If it complains about
mozglue.dll, close SM and overwrite mozglue.dll. Start SM again. If it
won't start, copy back the backed up DLLs. Hope that helps.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[sean . nathan]

NFN Smith wrote:

Cruz, Jaime wrote:

Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This
version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your browser.

Not sure when this started happening though.




I'm seeing an uptick in sites complaining about Seamonkey, especially
mail providers.  I haven't checked Gmail recently, but I'm getting flak
from both mail.com and fastmail.

On these two, I just tested a little while ago on a "bare metal" profile
(minimal changes from defaults), and they aren't preventing me from
logging in, even if they're complaining.  However, I have my working
profile tweaked enough that I'm not able to log into either of those
sites, either in Safe Mode, or by using browser spoofing (showing
Firefox 49).

I know that with Seamonkey 2.40, the "advertise Firefox compatibility"
shows Firefox 43.0, and it may be that that's what various sites are
complaining about. I haven't checked, but it wouldn't surprise me that
those sites would be complaining about a connection a true Firefox 43.0
installation.

Smith


just a question, why bother "logging in" to their websites at all, when 
Seamonkey will download via pop or imap?


i mean, i have 12 e'mail addresses all being downloaded via imap just so 
i never have to spend time logging into webmail pages.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Getting rid of 'Restore Session'

[WaltS48]

On 10/17/2016 12:37 PM, Henrik37 wrote:
How do I permanently get rid of the 'restore session' window in V.2.39 
running on an XP-Pro PC?


Thanks, in advance, for any guidance.


Is that the one that pops up when you Quit/Exit SeaMonkey with the 
"Don't ask again" checkbox?


--
Visit Pittsburgh 
Coexist 
Windows 10
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[Ed Mullen]

On 10/16/2016 at 11:29 PM, myhrd...@gmail.com's prodigious digits fired off:

On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 7:01:47 PM UTC-5, Cruz, Jaime wrote:

Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This
version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your browser.

Not sure when this started happening though.

--
Jaime A. Cruz
President
Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club
http://www.nassauwings.org/

AMA District 34
http://www.AMADistrict34.com/
Freddy's Run
http://www.freddysrun.org/


Yes, it's fairly evident they're not reading the SeaMonkey part of the id but, 
the advertised FireFox compatibility tag.  I'm hoping that there's an update 
coming that catches SeaMonkey up to whatever update FF has had that's causing 
this nuisance bar to appear on us up top in GMail.  If I end up having to apply 
a trick again, it's going to mean making another weekend trip out of town to 
get several folks fixed too since many of my folks using SM are not tech-savvy 
at all. Very frustrating.



Don't make a trip, get Teamviewer:




--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: *Resolved* - Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[sean . nathan]

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Cruz, Jaime wrote:

SamuelS wrote:

Pat Connors wrote:

I started getting also.


Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This
version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your browser.



-- Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com


Pat - thank you, this solution worked.

Thank you again

bo1953

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



WHAT solution?  He didn't provide one, he just said he was having the
same issue?



In the warning there is a "dismiss" link. Click it.



one doesn't get this warning when downloading gmail via pop or imap into 
Seamonkey... going to the gmail website seems counterintuitive to me...


sean
--
oh tagzilla...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Getting rid of 'Restore Session'

[Henrik37]

How do I permanently get rid of the 'restore session' window in V.2.39 
running on an XP-Pro PC?


Thanks, in advance, for any guidance.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[NFN Smith]

Cruz, Jaime wrote:

Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This
version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your browser.

Not sure when this started happening though.




I'm seeing an uptick in sites complaining about Seamonkey, especially 
mail providers.  I haven't checked Gmail recently, but I'm getting flak 
from both mail.com and fastmail.


On these two, I just tested a little while ago on a "bare metal" profile 
(minimal changes from defaults), and they aren't preventing me from 
logging in, even if they're complaining.  However, I have my working 
profile tweaked enough that I'm not able to log into either of those 
sites, either in Safe Mode, or by using browser spoofing (showing 
Firefox 49).


I know that with Seamonkey 2.40, the "advertise Firefox compatibility" 
shows Firefox 43.0, and it may be that that's what various sites are 
complaining about. I haven't checked, but it wouldn't surprise me that 
those sites would be complaining about a connection a true Firefox 43.0 
installation.


Smith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: *Resolved* - Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[Jonathan N. Little]

Cruz, Jaime wrote:
> SamuelS wrote:
>> Pat Connors wrote:
>>> I started getting also.
>>>
 Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This
 version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your browser.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
>>>
>> Pat - thank you, this solution worked.
>>
>> Thank you again
>>
>> bo1953
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
> 
> WHAT solution?  He didn't provide one, he just said he was having the
> same issue?
> 

In the warning there is a "dismiss" link. Click it.

-- 
Take care,

Jonathan
---
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Adobe updated FLASH for Linux...

[WaltS48]

On 10/16/2016 5:29 PM, Mason83 wrote:

On 15/10/2016 15:00, WaltS48 wrote:


On 10/15/2016 04:23 AM, Mason83 wrote:


I thought Flash was dead?


Stop thinking and educate yourself.


That's one of the weirdest statements I've seen in a while.

Regards.



Alright Flash isn't dead and won't be for a long time.


Today we are updating the beta channel with Linux NPAPI Flash Player by moving 
it forward and in sync with the modern release branch (currently version 23).  
We have done this significant change to improve security and provide additional 
mitigation to the Linux community.



In the past, we communicated that NPAPI Linux releases would stop in 2017.  
This is no longer the case and once we have performed sufficient testing and 
received community feedback, we will release both NPAPI and PPAPI Linux builds 
with their major version numbers in sync and on a regular basis.


REF: 



Stay informed: 

--
Visit Pittsburgh 
Coexist 
Windows 10
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

[Adrian Kalla]

W dniu 10/17/2016 o 03:13 PM, Daniel pisze:
> On 17/10/2016 2:44 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote:
>>> W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze:
 Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9
 from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory:
 https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/

 (latest-comm-release-<>).

 I was just surprised that the update notice actually worked, however...
 Prior to the update I was running the 32bit version:
 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/49.0
 SeaMonkey/2.46
 and the update changed my install to 64bit. I had purposely switched
 back to 32bit because of plugin problems (Shockwave Flash is the only
 plugin that shows up in about:plugins with 64bit. Plus the 64bit update
 borked my Lightning calendar & I had to reinstall to 5.1 to get my
 calendar back. Now I have to go back and download the 32bit version &
 reinstall so that I can get my plugins to work again :-(

 Note: on the linux update all is OK as that was running 64bit and all
 the plugins work.

 I'll post back after I revert back to 32bit...
>>>
>>> Mozilla recently changed the parameters attached to the update-URL and
>>> it looks like I've configured the update server incorrectly...
>>> I hope I've fixed it now for the RELEASE branch. Please check, if the
>>> the upgrade to 64bit from 32bit still happens on Windows.
>>> If it should really work, then I'll fix it for the other branches too
>>> (please be so kind to send me an email, as I don't check the groups on a
>>> regular basis).
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Adrian,
>>
>> The new update works just fine :-)
>>
>> User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
>> Build identifier: 20161016181837
>>
> I just went to my SM browser, clicked Help->Check for updates and was
> told there were no updates for my WIN7 WOW64 SM!!
> 


What version exactly? Where downloaded from?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Blank Message Body ....??

[SamuelS]

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 2016-10-16 4:44 PM, bo1953 wrote:

I Am running SM 2.40 on W10 pro desktop. I just reloaded SM on this
system and find there are several messages with blank bodies. The
message does appear in full on my other machines though.

I did run into this situation several years back on several older
versions of SM and do not recollect how it was resolved...

Any ideas or suggestions on how to remedy this situation and display the
messages and prevent going forward?


Try this:
1. Right-click on the folder, and select "Properties".
2. Click on [Repair Folder].


CI - thank you, this solution worked.

Thank you again

bo1953

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

[Daniel]

On 17/10/2016 2:44 PM, NoOp wrote:

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote:

W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze:

Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9
from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory:
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
(latest-comm-release-<>).

I was just surprised that the update notice actually worked, however...
Prior to the update I was running the 32bit version:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
SeaMonkey/2.46
and the update changed my install to 64bit. I had purposely switched
back to 32bit because of plugin problems (Shockwave Flash is the only
plugin that shows up in about:plugins with 64bit. Plus the 64bit update
borked my Lightning calendar & I had to reinstall to 5.1 to get my
calendar back. Now I have to go back and download the 32bit version &
reinstall so that I can get my plugins to work again :-(

Note: on the linux update all is OK as that was running 64bit and all
the plugins work.

I'll post back after I revert back to 32bit...


Mozilla recently changed the parameters attached to the update-URL and
it looks like I've configured the update server incorrectly...
I hope I've fixed it now for the RELEASE branch. Please check, if the
the upgrade to 64bit from 32bit still happens on Windows.
If it should really work, then I'll fix it for the other branches too
(please be so kind to send me an email, as I don't check the groups on a
regular basis).

Best,
Adrian



Thanks Adrian,

The new update works just fine :-)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
Build identifier: 20161016181837

I just went to my SM browser, clicked Help->Check for updates and was 
told there were no updates for my WIN7 WOW64 SM!!


--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.40 Build identifier: 20160120202951

or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903203501

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: *Resolved* - Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[Cruz, Jaime]

SamuelS wrote:

Pat Connors wrote:

I started getting also.


Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This
version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your browser.



-- Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com


Pat - thank you, this solution worked.

Thank you again

bo1953

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



WHAT solution?  He didn't provide one, he just said he was having the 
same issue?


--
Jaime A. Cruz
President
Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club
http://www.nassauwings.org/

AMA District 34
http://www.AMADistrict34.com/
Freddy's Run
http://www.freddysrun.org/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and GMail

[Pat Connors]

I started getting also.

Just started seeing a message when I go to the GMail website: This 
version of Firefox is no longer supported, please upgrade your browser.



-- Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey