Re: [linux - bug 680798] was: Re: User Agent location
On 08/10/2012 03:50 PM, NoOp wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't disturb the UAL thread. ... Well I _thought_ I was starting a new there... apologies I'll try again. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[linux - bug 680798] - Open Dirctory (Troubleshooting Information)
Started a new thread so that we don't disturb the UAL thread - second try. NoOp: On 08/06/2012 04:43 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: And there is an easy way to find the profile. Help-Troubleshooting Information and near the top of this clicking on 'Open Directory' for 'Profile Directory'. Does not work on Linux, though. ;) Works for me: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120630 Firefox/14.0 SeaMonkey/2.11 The above works for you? It has not for me ever. I am now getting |Timestamp: 08.08.2012 00:42:34 |Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 |(NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] |Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js |Line: 555 in the error console for 'Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/2012080719 SeaMonkey/2.14a1-h' And there is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680798 Hartmut At first I thought that the error might be 64bit related, but after multiple tests between 32bit and 64bit I' stumped. Here are my results (feel free to copy them to the bug report): Firefox - Ubuntu 12.04 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 01:36:55 PM Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] nsresult: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) location: JS frame :: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js :: openProfileDirectory :: line 469 data: no] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 01:49:25 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 525 SeaMonkey - Ubuntu 12.04 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120725 Firefox/15.0 SeaMonkey/2.12 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 01:43:45 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 525 Firefox - 11.04 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 No Errors - works. SeaMonkey Ubuntu 11.04 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120630 Firefox/14.0 SeaMonkey/2.11 No Errors - works. SeaMonkey Ubuntu 11.04 - Clean test profile: No Errors - works. SeaMonkey - Ubuntu 12.04 using the ~/.mozilla/seamonkey folder from the 11.04 install User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120725 Firefox/15.0 SeaMonkey/2.12 Build identifier: 20120725204016 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 02:44:44 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 525 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 02:49:51 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 525 Firefox Ubuntu 12.04 32bit Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 No errors - works. SeaMonkey Ubuntu 12.04 32bit User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14a1 Build identifier: 20120810003003 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 03:02:24 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 555 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 03:26:40 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 525 Note: same with safe mode and a clean 'test' profile. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120801 Firefox/15.0 SeaMonkey/2.12 (b3) Build identifier: 20120801223740 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 03:40:24 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 525 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Increased crashes/instability on SM 2.11 linux x64?
On 08/09/2012 11:54 PM, Jesse Molina wrote: I am seeing much increased instability in seamonkey 2.11 on Linux, amd64 version. Can anyone else using SM linux confirm or deny? I did a memtest86+ overnight just a few days ago to check and everything came up clean. I've not experienced a crash on 32bit or 64bit linux. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey - Mozilla's Where's SeaMonkey challenge
Sort of like 'Where's Waldo'[1] ... See how many clicks pages it takes you to find the SeaMonkey pages. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ Nope. Not there. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/ Nope. Not there. SeaMonkey isn't a Product. Hint: You can indeed get to a page with SeaMonkey on it from there... see how easy it is for you to find it. When you do get to the page, SeaMonkey is spelled 'Seamonkey'. Not only do Mozilla dis SeaMonkey by hiding it three obscure pages in, but then they spell it with a lowercase 'm'. My we are a select special project group aren't we? [1] http://www.findwaldo.com/ http://waldo.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey - Mozilla's Where's SeaMonkey challenge
On 08/10/2012 07:40 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 8/10/12 7:17 PM, NoOp wrote: Sort of like 'Where's Waldo'[1] ... See how many clicks pages it takes you to find the SeaMonkey pages. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ Nope. Not there. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/ Nope. Not there. SeaMonkey isn't a Product. Hint: You can indeed get to a page with SeaMonkey on it from there... see how easy it is for you to find it. When you do get to the page, SeaMonkey is spelled 'Seamonkey'. Not only do Mozilla dis SeaMonkey by hiding it three obscure pages in, but then they spell it with a lowercase 'm'. My we are a select special project group aren't we? [1] http://www.findwaldo.com/ http://waldo.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page SeaMonkey has its own Web domain. The home page in US-English is at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/. I know that, you know that. But if a new/prospective SeaMonkey user goes to the standard Mozilla page tries to find SeaMonkey, how easy do you think it will be? There, it is spelled SeaMonkey. Well of course it is. But it is not on the Mozilla site/page. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux - bug 680798] - Open Dirctory (Troubleshooting Information)
On 08/10/2012 07:50 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: Started a new thread so that we don't disturb the UAL thread - second try. Changing a subject should be done so: new subject (was: old subject) ;) SeaMonkey Ubuntu 11.04 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120630 Firefox/14.0 SeaMonkey/2.11 No Errors - works. What did you see after clicking 'Open Directory' for 'Profile Directory' on about:support? Can you show a screenshot? I am asking this because it always failed for me and i would like to see what should be expected. Hartmut It properly opens the Nautilus (GNOME) file manager at: /home/user/.mozilla/seamonkey/default.default Nautilus is my primary file manager. https://live.gnome.org/Nautilus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey - Mozilla's Where's SeaMonkey challenge
On 08/10/2012 08:41 PM, Michael Gordon wrote: NoOp wrote: On 08/10/2012 07:40 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 8/10/12 7:17 PM, NoOp wrote: Sort of like 'Where's Waldo'[1] ... See how many clicks pages it takes you to find the SeaMonkey pages. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ Nope. Not there. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/ Nope. Not there. SeaMonkey isn't a Product. Hint: You can indeed get to a page with SeaMonkey on it from there... see how easy it is for you to find it. When you do get to the page, SeaMonkey is spelled 'Seamonkey'. Not only do Mozilla dis SeaMonkey by hiding it three obscure pages in, but then they spell it with a lowercase 'm'. My we are a select special project group aren't we? [1]http://www.findwaldo.com/ http://waldo.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page SeaMonkey has its own Web domain. The home page in US-English is at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/. I know that, you know that. But if a new/prospective SeaMonkey user goes to the standard Mozilla page tries to find SeaMonkey, how easy do you think it will be? There, it is spelled SeaMonkey. Well of course it is. But it is not on the Mozilla site/page. Try using Google as your friend. Enter SeaMonkey in lower case, upper case, or mixed case; only the letter spelling will count, and then maybe not. Michael G Are you serious? Never mind, I reckon you are. Thanks for playing anyway. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux - bug 680798] - Open Dirctory (Troubleshooting Information)
On 08/10/2012 08:44 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 08/10/2012 07:50 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: What did you see after clicking 'Open Directory' for 'Profile Directory' on about:support? Can you show a screenshot? I am asking this because it always failed for me and i would like to see what should be expected. It properly opens the Nautilus (GNOME) file manager at: /home/user/.mozilla/seamonkey/default.default Thanks. Then it seems that a desktop environment is required. Sigh. Hartmut You still want a screenshot? If so I can send to you directly. What I find interesting is that on Ubuntu 12.04, Firefox works: Firefox Ubuntu 12.04 32bit Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 No errors - works. But SeaMonkey does not: SeaMonkey Ubuntu 12.04 32bit User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14a1 Build identifier: 20120810003003 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 03:02:24 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 555 I've just replicated on another machine with 32bit Ubuntu 12.04. On all Ubuntu 11.04 systems I've tested, both Firefox and SeaMonkey work. Gary ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux - bug 680798] - Open Dirctory (Troubleshooting Information)
On 08/10/2012 07:50 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: Started a new thread so that we don't disturb the UAL thread - second try. Changing a subject should be done so: new subject (was: old subject) ;) Well yeah... and you'd think that I would even spell 'Dirctory' correct. :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux - bug 680798] - Open Dirctory (Troubleshooting Information)
On 08/10/2012 09:13 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: You still want a screenshot? If so I can send to you directly. No, i do not need it. You have given enough information. What I find interesting is that on Ubuntu 12.04, Firefox works: Firefox Ubuntu 12.04 32bit Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 No errors - works. But SeaMonkey does not: SeaMonkey Ubuntu 12.04 32bit User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14a1 Build identifier: 20120810003003 Timestamp: 08/10/2012 03:02:24 PM Error: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.reveal] Source File: chrome://global/content/aboutSupport.js Line: 555 I've just replicated on another machine with 32bit Ubuntu 12.04. On all Ubuntu 11.04 systems I've tested, both Firefox and SeaMonkey work. It seems to me that SM relies here on www.freedesktop.org. Meaning that for someone like me without a desktop environment it will be difficult. But of course there is an advantage also. I could point to mc, the midnight commander, my favorite file manager. *g* Hartmut I've also just replicated on Fedora 17. BTW: I have MC, it's just not set as my default file manager. That said, the other users with the same issue in the bug report also have desktop environments. So I'm not sure how you'd actually test without a desktop environment. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey - Mozilla's Where's SeaMonkey challenge
On 08/10/2012 09:34 PM, MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 11/08/2012 01:28, Ant told the world: On 8/10/2012 8:41 PM PT, Michael Gordon typed: Try using Google as your friend. Enter SeaMonkey in lower case, upper case, or mixed case; only the letter spelling will count, and then maybe not. Bah to search engines. We're talking about Mozilla's web site! Even http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/ doesn't list it! Does Mozilla not care about its own multiple suite product? Are they trying to kill it? :( No, they have already killed it -- back in 2005, when the Mozilla Application Suite was discontinued. Seamonkey is *not* an official Mozilla project, although they do lend us a lot of help and resources. At least previously they had an easy link to 'Projects' on the front page. Now you have to go through: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/ scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on See even more awesome software based on Mozilla technologies. to end up here: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/projects/mozilla-based/ Seems to me that if they do lend a lot of help resources, they'd be kind enough to at least make projects visible again. At least we're not alone...they've also done the same to Lightning, who do not have their own URL: https://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ The other interesting bit, is that if you are on the calendar page, and click on any 'Projects' link, you end up back here: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/ So they are purposely redirecting any 'projects' url to 'products', which of course confuses the hell out of anyone trying to find 'projects' on the site. I guess it's their site, their rules. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey - Mozilla's Where's SeaMonkey challenge
On 08/10/2012 10:51 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-08-10 10:17 PM, NoOp wrote: Sort of like 'Where's Waldo'[1] ... See how many clicks pages it takes you to find the SeaMonkey pages. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ Nope. Not there. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/ Nope. Not there. SeaMonkey isn't a Product. Hint: You can indeed get to a page with SeaMonkey on it from there... see how easy it is for you to find it. When you do get to the page, SeaMonkey is spelled 'Seamonkey'. Not only do Mozilla dis SeaMonkey by hiding it three obscure pages in, but then they spell it with a lowercase 'm'. My we are a select special project group aren't we? [1] http://www.findwaldo.com/ http://waldo.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page What Robert told you in 2009 still applies. :) http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/msg/f15eb9bbd7ba75bd Actually it does not. At that time Robert wrote: We are features well on the Our Projects page itself, and we appear on the front page if the screen is large enough (the first versions had usnot even showing up at 1280px width, which I got them to correct as space could fit that easily) and when the user scrolls the projects with the arrows. That's the most we can do. Which is considerably different than now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: spinning cursor
On 08/12/2012 04:23 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: ... I would rather have the activity notification present and stop the background activity manually when I see something running, as opposed to selecting an option which amounts to something undesirable is happening, I won't look. Generally in computing ignorance is not bliss. After checking this problem a bit, it actually may be a server issue, in that 4-5 other servers I visit which have lots of unread articles don't show this behavior. The cursor spin briefly while the network activity indicator is on, then stops without intervention on most other servers other than mozilla servers. I shall investigate more, but I post now so people can see if this matches their observations. Or simply spend time reading testing: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727414 ? As far as I know, about:config put ui.use_activity_cursor false is still a workaround, and 727414 is still a very irritating bug. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can I assign function keys?
On 08/15/2012 09:49 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Jim S wrote: I would eg like f5 to Reload and f11 Fullscreen - can I? That's what those keys already do. F5 /may/ perform a reload (certainly the screen flickers), but running Seamonkey windowed and pressing F11 does not cause it to enter fullscreen mode here : Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Philip Taylor Not sure what you mean by windowed. Both of those functions work fine for me, same build. With lightning installed, F11 opens the 'Today Pane'. F5 does reload the browser tab/window. From Help (Browser keyboard shortcuts): Page Viewing Shortcuts Command: Full Screen (toggle) Windows: F11 Mac OS: Cmd+Shift+F Linux or Unix: F11 (may depend on window manager) Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can I run Java with Seamonkey 2.11?
On 08/15/2012 02:26 PM, Craig wrote: Craig wrote: Is there some way to get Java to work with SeaMonkey? After reading the Release Notes, I can answer my own question: Linux: The Java 7 plugin does not work with SeaMonkey (bug 754622). Craig Yep. However it *does* work in Firefox, so it's a SeaMonkey only issue as far as I can tell. Note: it's helpful to include the full link when referencing a bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 [[linux] Sun Java jre1.7.0_04/_05 does not work in SeaMonkey] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [triage] Bug 783352 - Email rejected by Yahoo as abuse it is written to Sent Folder but is not sent; message has to be recomposed
On 08/17/2012 09:35 PM, Philip Chee wrote: Anyone else experience this problem? Phil Don't know... what's the link to the bug report? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Way to delete string of 50 Bookmarks
On 08/19/2012 03:36 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Rufus wrote: Export all of your Bookmarks as an .html file, edit the file. The delete all of your Bookmarks within SM, and then Import Bookmarks from the edited file. Note that using that method you will probably lose some information, namely favicons, tags and visited counts/date. The format that keeps most information is JSON (Tools/Backup), maybe even everything (actually I'm not sure about visited counts/date there). I was going to add that it might also be worthwhile looking into the 'CheckBookmark' add-on. However when looking to provide detailed information regarding the add-on, I came across the authors websit: http://www.andyhalford.com/index.html [So long Mozilla and thanks for all the fish] quote If you are here looking for any of my extensions (SyncPlaces, SortPlaces, CheckPlaces or SearchPlaces) then I'm sad to inform you that these are no longer available. Unfortunately I do not have the time or the motivation to continue to support these in light of the close-minded, short-sighted and increasingly inflexible organisation that Mozilla has become. /quote What a sad state of affairs... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SEAMONKEY AND JOINT IMAP AND POP3 ACCOUNTS
On 08/20/2012 09:49 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: hawker wrote: ... I'm also confused. I have both POP and IMAP accounts on this computer and they do just great together. I had two POP accounts then added IMAP. The only real changes I had to make was to define the SMTP server for each account and change the default account. Other than that they do all keep separate (no one in basket). If you come from Eudora days this separation may seem odd, but once you get used to it then the accounts are kept cleaner with less filtering shenanigans. That said IMAP support on Seamonkey is poor at best. Lots of bugs and issues with attachments, refreshing, hung folders, deleting, etc. Thunderbird (which I use at home) is no better. Odd. I have none of those issues with SM IMAP. You must be lucky. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=imap and for SeaMonkey: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specificorder=relevance+descbug_status=__open__product=SeaMonkeycontent=IMAPcomments=0 And of course SeaMonkey MailNews is built on Thunderbird code: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specificorder=relevance+descbug_status=__open__product=Thunderbirdcontent=IMAPcomments=0 I've just added a few IMAP accounts (normally all of my accounts are POP3), and just today was bitten by this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406929 [message was sent but copying to sent folder failed error after IMAP timeout] Account has a total of 5 test messages - all less than 10 lines of plain text, no HTML, no attachments. And with the same IMAP, I've just been hit by a bug I've not yet found an existing report for; first line of received message is missing. Might be the IMAP server as the 'Sent' on this one shows the line as sent/intact, but the received (I bcc all messages back to me another account (POP3)) does not. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[Chrome malware] was Re: Google see SM as an incompatible browser ...
On 08/23/2012 05:38 PM, Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 23/08/2012 19:09, Philip TAYLOR told the world: Ah oui, c'est vrai : j'ai aussi la meme reponse ... The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version. But I use the new Google Groups interface almost daily, and with no problems whatsoever. So perhaps Google is just spreading a little more FUD in the hopes of getting some idiots to adopt its pathetic Chr@me thing. Philip Taylor I think it's just a bad browser-sniffing script. Most of Google accepts Seamonkey as equivalent to Firefox, but Groups has always been the unwanted child, receiving even less love than Orkut... they probably overlooked this script when updating the other ones. I get the same result no matter what User Agent I spoof with...I think they're just trying to push Chrome on people and not even sniffing at all... mini-rant Not to mention they add it as crapware in just about every application download. I can't even begin to count how many times I've had to uninstall Chrome Chrome toolbar from cutomer relatives systems simply because of their bundled crapware/malware. Granted that the user is *supposed* to opt out of the addition, but we all know (at least most of us here) that most people either ignore unchecking the box, or don't know enough to do so. It wouldn't be quite so bad, but Chrome makes itself the system browser (even in linux) whether you like it or not, installs browser toolbars that you don't want, and is simply malware IMO. Someone follows a link from a word processor, Adobe Reader, et al up it pops in Chrome. They can't figure out how/why, call and you spend the next 30 minutes explaining what the issue is and eradicating the POS. In linux it's even harder to clean out. Chrome embeds itself as the primary browser, primary mime for http etc., and pollutes the system to the point that it can be difficult to eradicate if you don't know where to look. Reminds me of trying to uninstall Norton from Windows. /mini-rant ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google see SM as an incompatible browser ...
On 08/23/2012 03:04 PM, Ray_Net wrote: I have this result ; Les anciens Google Groupes vont bientôt disparaître, mais votre navigateur est incompatible http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=33864 avec la nouvelle version. The old Google groups will dissappear, but your browser is incompatible whith the new version when clicking on this newsgroup link: http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=offie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8as_umsgid=k155up$rrj$1...@speranza.aioe.org ... Not Found The requested message, k155up$rrj$1...@speranza.aioe.org, could not be found. You can visit the main page. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Need some advice
On 08/23/2012 07:02 AM, Ken wrote: I have a 93 year old stepmother living 1000 miles from where I live. She actually does amazingly well on the computer and Internet, but occasionally has problems. Sometimes it is inadvertently clicking on something, and that changing the way her browser or mail works. She is using the latest version of SeaMonkey, as am I. When she encounters a problem, I get her on the phone and while both of us are on the computer try to picture what she is encountering, and see if I can correct her problem. Listed below is her latest problem and her description of it: __ I have a question. When I am reading my new emails, the note appears, Compact Now? I just discovered if I say yes it deletes all the messages that I have read, and I did not want them deleted. In fact, I think that may have been why I lost all those emails, because I thought I was supposed to say yes, that it was a good thing to do. I have not been saying yes, but today I decided that maybe I should compact---whatever that means!!, and that is when I couldn't find the email I had just opened. Do they go to Trash? __ When I compact my folders, the email subect/title area goes blank until the compacting process is complete. My _guess_ it that this is what she may be experiencing. In her text above she cites those Emails from a previous incident where she lost her messages in ALL folders, based upon her comments. I intend to call her again tonight and walk her through the settings for her SeaMonkey Email program and see if she has something set that could explain why her messages in her INBOX were moved or deleted when she compacted her folders. I also intend to ask her if she allowed the compacting to complete before she did something else? See above. Does anyone have a possible explanation as to how messages could have been moved or deleted during the compacting of folders?? I feel confident that she did something or has set something that caused it, since I have been using SeaMonkey for years and have never experienced that type of problem. Thanks. Were I you, I'd set up remote access (VNC, RTP etc) so that you can actually log into her computer, take control of it, and troubleshoot it while on the phone with her. I do the same for several relatives couldn't imagine trying to do it otherwise - especially with an elderly person. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey not liked by Intel
On 08/23/2012 12:24 PM, sean nathan wrote: WLS wrote: On 08/19/2012 01:20 PM, WLS wrote: On 08/19/2012 01:08 PM, Russ Fineman wrote: snip Where do you change the browser ID. I went into about:config but found no parameter with the browser ID. Also the help file found nothing on searching browser id. A pointer where its at would help? Thanks Do you just want to disable Firefox compatibility, or make a change, and why? Disabling Firefox compatibility can be found in Advanced preferences, under HTTP Networking User Agent String. Just remove the check from the box. You can also install User Agent Switcher, and spoof other browsers, or create a UA of your own. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/user-agent-switcher/ It will install in SeaMonkey 2.11, just click the + Add to SeaMonkey button, then the Install Anyway button. There is an option to create your own UA with that extension. Use with caution, and backup your profile first. so, should we be asking what's wrong with the Seamonkey addons page or our build ID string when the Seamonkey addons page tells us an addon isn't available for Firefox 2.11? its mindboggling to me that our own page can't recognize its own browser... sean User Agent Switcher 0.7.3 by chrispederick The User Agent Switcher extension adds a menu and a toolbar button to switch the user agent of a browser. Add to SeaMonkey Not available for SeaMonkey 2.11 But it doesn't complain here: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/ That said, it's quite possible that the addon developer is simply tired of trying to support Mozilla (and Mozilla/non-Mozilla Projects -0 like SeaMonkey') with 'rabid release' schedules. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email Fail
On 08/26/2012 08:27 AM, FDVS wrote: Parameters for Yahoo: Username is yahoo email address IMAP server: imap.mail.yahoo.com port 993 SSL/TSL Normal Password SMTP SERVER: smpt.mail.yahoo.com port 465 SSL/TSL Normal Password Thank you for posting the info above. I am still not able to download mail to Seamonkey unless I log out of the yahoo website and then log back in. (I can always load email to the iPad with no logging in or out so I figure it must be a Seamonkey Setting) I have a Yahoo email (owned by ATT now): Yahoo email is not owned by ATT. ATT contracted with Yahoo! to provide email services. Here are my settings verbatim except for bracketed items, some settings recently adjusted by the ATT tech: Edit Mail and Newsgroup Account SettingsServer Settings Server Name - inbound.att.net Port: 995 User Name - entire email address Connection Security SSL/TLS Authentication Method: Normal Password Edit Mail and Newsgroup Account SettingsOutgoing Server (SMTP) entire email - smtp.att.yahoo.com (Default) Desription: not specified Server name: smtp.att.yahoo.com Port: 25 User Name: entire email Authentication Method: Password, transmitted insecurely Connection Security: None If you are going to use inbound.att.net, then you should use outbound.att.net for the smtp server. And the port *must* be 465: Server name: outbound.att.net Port: 465 Connection security: SSL/TLS Authentication method: Normal password User Name: u...@sbcglobal.net See: http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?cv=803sid=KB401570title=What+are+my+email+server+settings+%28i.e.%2C+POP+and+SMTP%29%3F#fbid=hDrFthVP5Ni Note at the bottom of the page: ATT's POP/SMTP settings have changed to inbound.att.net and outbound.att.net, but if you are using the old server settings (pop.att.yahoo.com and smtp.att.yahoo.com), they will continue to work. You do not have to change them at this time. I use the old settings (pop.att.yahoo.com smtp.att.yahoo.com) and they work just fine (for me). So you might want to give those a try. Particularly given forum posts like this: http://forums.att.com/t5/Email-Internet-Security/email-authentication-fails-to-inbound-att-net/td-p/3230177 If they don't make a difference, then you can always easily change back to inbound.att.net and outbound.att.net. Regardless, I very much doubt that your issue is related to SeaMonkey directly. And is more likely related to your ISP settings (or your ISP's servers). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't Signup for Mozilla Persona
On 08/26/2012 02:03 AM, Desiree wrote: When I go to https://login.persona.org/, even in Safe Mode, on Sea Monkey 2.11 on XP Pro, I get a mostly blank page and cannot see the signup button. Sometimes, I can see it just for a second, as the page loads, IF I don't blink and page loading is slower than usual. So, I think something is causing the button to disappear immediately. I have no idea what though. I have the same problem with Fx 4 and Fx 10 ESR. On IE 8, I can see the signup button, and can click on it, but then the next page where you signup shows only a red, horizontal line across the middle of the page. Opera 12.01 though loves the site and the site works perfectly on it. I see the signup button and on the next page I can signup. (Of course, I haven't signed up as all browsers I use need to work properly at the site). Works for me. Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't Signup for Mozilla Persona
On 08/27/2012 08:23 AM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2012 02:03 AM, Desiree wrote: When I go to https://login.persona.org/, even in Safe Mode, on Sea Monkey 2.11 on XP Pro, I get a mostly blank page and cannot see the signup button. Sometimes, I can see it just for a second, as the page loads, IF I don't blink and page loading is slower than usual. So, I think something is causing the button to disappear immediately. I have no idea what though. I have the same problem with Fx 4 and Fx 10 ESR. On IE 8, I can see the signup button, and can click on it, but then the next page where you signup shows only a red, horizontal line across the middle of the page. Opera 12.01 though loves the site and the site works perfectly on it. I see the signup button and on the next page I can signup. (Of course, I haven't signed up as all browsers I use need to work properly at the site). Works for me. Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Screenshots: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/528/screenshotfrom201208270.png/ http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/41/screenshotfrom201208270.png/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't Signup for Mozilla Persona
Philip TAYLOR wrote: With Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11, I see the Sign up button. But the cross-bar of the leading H of How it works is missing, and the text Take the tour almost invisible : https://picasaweb.google.com/Chaa006/ScreenCaptures03?authkey=Gv1sRgCK7Qpuuw3ZOHaw#5780907148643041394 Philip Taylor Using 2.11 and 2.12b6 linux I have no problem (see my other post with screenshot links). Just switched to Windows see the same as you (in both 2.11 and 2.12b6). If I turn off website fonts use my own it's ok in Windows. Desiree wrote: When I go to https://login.persona.org/, even in Safe Mode, on Sea Monkey 2.11 on XP Pro, I get a mostly blank page ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?
Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?
On 08/29/2012 10:02 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: NoOp wrote: Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey Unfortunately, not by us for 2.12. Getting updates generated/generating for linux64 is on our TODO list, however. Thanks for the info Justin. I'll just use a script file to update all the 64bit machines. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?
On 08/30/2012 02:34 PM, Philip TAYLOR wrote: On 08/29/2012 10:02 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Unfortunately, not by us for 2.12. Getting updates generated/generating for linux64 is on our TODO list, however. What about a native 64-bit implementation for Microsoft Windpows ? Philip Taylor What about it? See the subject? [linux -64 bit]. Start your own thread if you want to ask about Windows. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email Fail
On 08/24/2012 08:29 AM, FDVS wrote: are you saying that you can get you web mail via the SeaMonkey browser at the yahoo account above, but cannot get that mail to then download into the SeaMonkey Mail Newsgroup account. If that's the case, there used to be an extension for Netscape/Mozilla/SeaMonkey Suite that would allow you to download mail from gmail/yahoo/hotmail into the SeaMonkey e-mail account, but I cannot see it listed at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/extensions/?sort=popularpage=1, so, maybe, it was a contributed extension, or something, that hasn't been updated or is just not listed. Yes, Daniel that is correct. The mail is visible on the SM webbrowser when I visit the yahoo site but it does not reliably load into the SM mail newsgroups. It does it some of the time. When it stops (ie 4x per day) I have to go to the same website, log out, then log back in. As soon as I do so, the mail starts loading in SM Mail and Newsgroups. I don't understand what has changed, I have used SM for maybe 2 years for mail and it always loaded just fine. Think I need to reinstall SM and reset all my preferences? The tech checked the Server Name and Port, the Security Settings are SSL/TLS, the Authentication Method is Normal Password. Clear your cache, your cookies and turn off all of your add-ons extensions, then try again. I also have an sbcglobal.net account(s), plus Yahoo! pop and imap accounts. The only issue I ever have is with the imap accounts. Edit|Mail Newsgroup account settings Account name| Email address: usern...@sbcglobal.net Outgoing Server SMTP: Server Settings: Server Type: POP Mail Server Server Name: pop.att.yahoo.com Port: 995 Username: usern...@sbcglobal.net Security Settings Connection security: SSL/TLS Authentication Method: Normal password Outgoing Server (SMTP) I name the same as the email address that I'm using so that I know which outgoing server to use: usern...@sbcglobal.net - smtp.att.yahoo.com Description: not specified Server name: smtp.att.yahoo.com Port: 465 Connection security: SSL/TLS Authentication method: Normal password User Name: u...@sbcglobal.net If that is not working, you might try a new test profile set up the account in that to check. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Norton Issues and SeaMonkey
On 09/01/2012 11:56 PM, Ant wrote: The problem is that those files are very new and unknown. So Norton is supsicious of them. Also, using beta/prereleases doesn't help since they can change again soon. It is good to submit those suspicious files, but note that it will happen again. Ummm, no: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=freebl3.dll+%2B+norton https://encrypted.google.com/#hl=enoutput=searchsclient=psy-abq=freebl3.dll+%2B+nortonoq=freebl3.dll+%2B+nortongs_l=hp.3..0i30.7820.11275.0.11578.10.10.0.0.0.0.160.1262.0j10.10.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.Zki4-csTlFApbx=1bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.fp=4c5ca94259600d8cbiw=1280bih=733 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nssckbi.dll+%2B+norton+%2B+norton https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=enq=nsschbi.dll%20%2B%20norton#hl=ensclient=psy-abq=nssckbi.dll+%2B+nortonoq=nssckbi.dll+%2B+nortongs_l=serp.12...0.0.0.73302.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.Ihox-XNiAdkpbx=1bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.fp=4c5ca94259600d8cbiw=1280bih=733 Note: I wonder why it is so difficult for you to bottom post... On 9/1/2012 9:08 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed: Hey Guys, Just wanted to followup on status here So there has been a related thread about SeaMonkey 2.12 issues and Norton Antivirus. It has been reported that that specific [SeaMonkey 2.12] problem is fixed. However, I wanted to let you know that JUST NOW, when I let my Beta version of SeaMonkey 2.13 update I got the same Norton issue (based on a heuristic scan it says) for two of my SeaMonkey DLL's nsschbi.dll and freebl3.dll. It popped up a small warning in my taskbar and I had to open the Norton UI, go to History open up Options and I selected restore and exclude to get it back to working. I am still awaiting a human response to my Norton e-mail, and will likely look up a corp phone number on Wednesday if I haven't heard back by EOD tuesday to see how we can address this on their end going forward. @Justin: Send them the links that I've provided remind them that this is not the first time their (cough) anti-virus has done this. Sample from 2010: http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Norton-produces-false-alarm-after-Firefox-update-1030099.html FYI, one of the first things that I started doing years ago on my client Window machines is purge anything Symantec/Norton. None of those clients have ever been infected by a virus. @Interges (who's posts I didn't/won't see because I have all things Google Groups filtered to dev/null): see above. I recommend that in the future you look to your anti-virus vendor for explanations as to why they still can't get this right despite several years of false positives. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: GNOME shell service
On 09/03/2012 08:33 AM, Neil wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: Neil wrote: Today I checked in the remaining parts of the GNOME shell service. When those of you running Linux update tomorrow you may find that it prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client. (It can also be set as your default news and RSS client.) Nothing yet... :-( You don't seem to be running Linux. You also don't seem to be running the nightly, which is an important point that got lost in my editing. gnome-shell is an entire desktop: $ apt-cache show gnome-shell Package: gnome-shell Priority: optional Section: universe/gnome ... snipped Description-en: graphical shell for the GNOME desktop The GNOME Shell redefines user interactions with the GNOME desktop. In particular, it offers new paradigms for launching applications, accessing documents, and organizing open windows in GNOME. Later, it will introduce a new applets eco-system and offer new solutions for other desktop features, such as notifications and contacts management. The GNOME Shell is intended to replace functions handled by the GNOME Panel and by the window manager in previous versions of GNOME. The GNOME Shell has rich visual effects enabled by new graphical technologies. ... There is no such service that I'm aware of: $ ps -eH | grep gnome 2720 ?00:00:00 gnome-session 2796 ?00:00:05 gnome-settings- 2834 ?00:01:00 gnome-panel 2844 ?00:00:00 polkit-gnome-au 2850 ?00:00:00 gnome-fallback- 2918 ?00:00:00 gnome-screensav 2709 ?00:00:00 gnome-keyring-d 3064 ?00:00:04 gnome-terminal 3070 ?00:00:00 gnome-pty-helpe How about telling us what to look for and what you'd like us to test (including which version of SeaMonkey)? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: GNOME shell service
On 09/04/2012 02:50 AM, Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: There is no such service that I'm aware of: It's a service in the Gecko sense, i.e. a component of SeaMonkey that is created once and lives until shutdown. Ah. Thanks. Any references that describe this that I can read so I understand better? How about telling us what to look for and what you'd like us to test Does you may find that it prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client not suffice? Anyway, the other place you can look is in Preferences, both in the main Browser pane but also in the Mail Newsgroups pane. Note that the UI recently changed slightly too. Well, I'm not sure. You'd neglected to mention the nightly build in your OP, so I didn't know if you'd left anything off regarding testing. Does it matter if it is the 32bit version, or the 64bit version? (including which version of SeaMonkey)? I forgot to mention that you needed a nightly build, though I didn't know which version because it hadn't been created yet. (It should have been created by now.) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: GNOME shell service
On 09/04/2012 04:28 PM, NoOp wrote: On 09/04/2012 02:50 AM, Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: There is no such service that I'm aware of: It's a service in the Gecko sense, i.e. a component of SeaMonkey that is created once and lives until shutdown. Ah. Thanks. Any references that describe this that I can read so I understand better? How about telling us what to look for and what you'd like us to test Does you may find that it prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client not suffice? Anyway, the other place you can look is in Preferences, both in the main Browser pane but also in the Mail Newsgroups pane. Note that the UI recently changed slightly too. Well, I'm not sure. You'd neglected to mention the nightly build in your OP, so I didn't know if you'd left anything off regarding testing. Does it matter if it is the 32bit version, or the 64bit version? (including which version of SeaMonkey)? I forgot to mention that you needed a nightly build, though I didn't know which version because it hadn't been created yet. (It should have been created by now.) OK which one? https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/?C=M;O=D https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-aurora/?C=M;O=D Also keep in mind that you are also posting to the SeaMonkey support group... so not everyone here (mozilla.support.seamonkey) will understand what you are talking about. Heck, I follow both mozilla.support.seamonkey and mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey and I'm still not clear on *exactly* what you are looking for. Before I spend time downloading a 'nightly' and testing I at the very least need to know if you are talking about 32bit or 64bit (or if it's bit agnostic), and what version. I suppose that you could have pointed me to: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/?C=M;O=D and pointed out that the issue is between the 02-Sep build and the update will be the 04-Sep build (is that correct?). So to test, install the 02-Sep build (32 or 64 or both?), and check for updates the 04-Sep build(s) should update... and let you know if find that it prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client. seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.checksums 04-Sep-2012 01:33 2.7K [TXT] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.txt 04-Sep-2012 01:33 122 [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.tests.zip 04-Sep-2012 01:33 62M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.complete.mar 04-Sep-2012 01:33 23M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 04-Sep-2012 01:33 23M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.checksums 02-Sep-2012 02:33 2.8K [TXT] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.txt 02-Sep-2012 02:33 122 [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tests.zip 02-Sep-2012 02:33 62M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.complete.mar02-Sep-2012 02:33 27M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 02-Sep-2012 02:33 27M ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: GNOME shell service
NoOp wrote: On 09/04/2012 04:28 PM, NoOp wrote: On 09/04/2012 02:50 AM, Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: There is no such service that I'm aware of: It's a service in the Gecko sense, i.e. a component of SeaMonkey that is created once and lives until shutdown. Ah. Thanks. Any references that describe this that I can read so I understand better? How about telling us what to look for and what you'd like us to test Does you may find that it prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client not suffice? Anyway, the other place you can look is in Preferences, both in the main Browser pane but also in the Mail Newsgroups pane. Note that the UI recently changed slightly too. Well, I'm not sure. You'd neglected to mention the nightly build in your OP, so I didn't know if you'd left anything off regarding testing. Does it matter if it is the 32bit version, or the 64bit version? (including which version of SeaMonkey)? I forgot to mention that you needed a nightly build, though I didn't know which version because it hadn't been created yet. (It should have been created by now.) OK which one? https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/?C=M;O=D https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-aurora/?C=M;O=D Also keep in mind that you are also posting to the SeaMonkey support group... so not everyone here (mozilla.support.seamonkey) will understand what you are talking about. Heck, I follow both mozilla.support.seamonkey and mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey and I'm still not clear on *exactly* what you are looking for. Before I spend time downloading a 'nightly' and testing I at the very least need to know if you are talking about 32bit or 64bit (or if it's bit agnostic), and what version. I suppose that you could have pointed me to: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/?C=M;O=D and pointed out that the issue is between the 02-Sep build and the update will be the 04-Sep build (is that correct?). So to test, install the 02-Sep build (32 or 64 or both?), and check for updates the 04-Sep build(s) should update... and let you know if find that it prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client. seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.checksums 04-Sep-2012 01:33 2.7K [TXT] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.txt 04-Sep-2012 01:33 122 [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.tests.zip 04-Sep-2012 01:33 62M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.complete.mar 04-Sep-2012 01:33 23M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 04-Sep-2012 01:33 23M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.checksums 02-Sep-2012 02:33 2.8K [TXT] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.txt 02-Sep-2012 02:33 122 [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tests.zip 02-Sep-2012 02:33 62M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.complete.mar02-Sep-2012 02:33 27M [ ] seamonkey-2.15a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 02-Sep-2012 02:33 27M FWIW: I downloaded and installed the Sept 02 nightly 32 bit 2.15a1 bz2, installed, and then checked for updates. The resulting Sept 04 update does indeed ask to set SeaMonkey as the default browser and mail client. SeaMonkey (Sept 02 build) version 2.15a1 You are currently on the nightly update channel. See a list of contributors to the Mozilla Project. Read the licensing information for this product. Read the release notes for this version. See the build configuration used for this version. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:18.0) Gecko/18.0 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15a1 Build identifier: 20120902003005 SeaMonkey(Sept 03 build) version 2.15a1 You are currently on the nightly update channel. See a list of contributors to the Mozilla Project. Read the licensing information for this product. Read the release notes for this version. See the build configuration used for this version. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:18.0) Gecko/18.0 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15a1 Build identifier: 20120904003004Screenshot is here: Screenshot is here: http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/8122/screenshotfrom201209041.png ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: GNOME shell service
On 09/04/2012 06:22 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: I suppose that you could have pointed me to: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/?C=M;O=D and pointed out that the issue is between the 02-Sep build and the update will be the 04-Sep build (is that correct?). I have first seen it on my private build of SM x86_64 at hafi@i5_64 ~ $ 2pdt 1209030002 2012-09-02 15:02:00 PDT and it was not existent at hafi@i5_64 ~ $ 2pdt 1209020641 2012-09-01 21:41:00 PDT So each nightly built after 2012-09-02 15:02:00 PDT should show http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm120903.png. Oh Oh... you don't appear to be using linux :-) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/2012090502 SeaMonkey/2.15a1-h As long as '[x] Always perform...' remains checked. :) Hartmut Here is something of interest; I just performed the same experiment on a separate machine (same setup: Ubuntu 12.04 running in a VMWare Player as guest) - installing 02 Sept and updating with 04 Sept. In this instance (on this machine) I didn't receive the prompt. The experiment that I performed on the other machine where I received the prompt (see my other post) was pretty much a virgin install with only news.mozilla.org as an account. On this machine (the one where the prompt didn't occur) is pretty much a SeaMonkey mirror of my regular SM 2.12 on my daily machine. On this machine: Preferences|Browser|Set Default Browser - is greyed out. On the machine with the prompt: Preferences|Browser|Set Default Browser - is available if I click it sets the 'SeaMonkey has been set as your default browser'. Of course that is complete nonsense as my system browser is still showing Firefox as the default browser. Looks to me like the issue might be a mix of Windows code in the Linux build? Note to Neil: is there a bug report that we can see to add to? Or should we just continue on with Does you may find that it prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client not suffice?? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Maps GL
On 09/07/2012 04:46 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 9/7/12 3:30 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-09-07 9:34 AM, hawker wrote: I see Google has a new map sytem called MapsGL. When I try to use it in Seamonky 2.11 it says my browser is not supported. Under supported browsers it lists Firefox going back a ways (version 8) so Seamonkey should work as well. I understand Seamonkey now advertises itself as Firefox, so can anyone tell me why this is not working and what to do to make it work? MapsGL uses WebGL, which requires support from both the browser and your graphics card. WebGL support was added in SeaMonkey 2.1. We can get more info about your graphics card and whether or it supports WebGL if you post your Troubleshooting Information. Go to Help--Troubleshooting_Information, then click [Copy all to Clipboard]. Open a reply to this post, and go to Edit--Paste to paste the info from your Troubleshooting Information page. From US-CERT at http://www.us-cert.gov/current/archive/2011/05/19/archive.html#web_users_warned_to_turn: WebGL Security Risks added May 11, 2011 at 01:50 pm | updated May 16, 2011 at 10:20 am US-CERT is aware of reports indicating that WebGL contains multiple significant security issues. The impact of these issues includes denial of service, and cross-domain attacks. WebGL is a new web standard that is enabled by default in Firefox 4 and Google Chrome and is included in Safari. US-CERT encourages users and administrators to review the Context report and update their systems as necessary to help mitigate the risks. [Context report is at http://www.contextis.com/resources/blog/webgl/] Thus, I disabled WebGL. I have seen no notice of this vulnerability being fixed. You might want to ad this url: https://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2012/mfsa2012-62.html Title: WebGL use-after-free and memory corruption Impact: Critical Announced: August 28, 2012 Reporter: miaubiz Products: Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey Fixed in: Firefox 15 Firefox ESR 10.0.7 Thunderbird 15 Thunderbird ESR 10.0.7 SeaMonkey 2.12 Perhaps 'hawker' will consider upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.12 from 2.11 - at least for the WebGL security fix? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Default 30 days history for SM v2.12's web browser... Not automatically deleting the old history entries?
On 09/07/2012 03:39 AM, Ant wrote: Hello again. I noticed my SM v2.12's oldest history entries are from 8/5/2012 7:46 AM PDT and it is currently 9/7/2012 3:39 AM PDT. It has been already 33 days. Shouldn't my SM already deleted three days by now (8/8/2012 as the oldest entries)? Or did something break like from manually copying places.sqlite between computers and using PrefBar's ExpireHistory button (28 instead of 30 days)? I also tried exiting and relaunching SM to see if it would work. Nope. :( Is something wrong with the news server? I thought that you had these questions sorted out previously - and this appears to be a repost. What specifically from those threads didn't answer your initial question? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Browser refuses to use my script as helper app
On 09/07/2012 02:02 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote: Hi, I like to use Evince to read PDF files. If I select it (/usr/bin/evince) as helper app, it works. Now, the Evince window doesn't always open at an optimal size (*). So I wrote a script (/home/lucas/bin/evince-patched) to automatically launch then resize it. The script works like a charm when called from a terminal. But SM refuses to use it: if I set it as helper app, SM launches Acrobat ! Here's the script: --- #!/bin/bash /usr/bin/evince $@ pid=$! until wmctrl -lp |grep -q $pid do sleep 1s done winid=$(wmctrl -lp | grep $pid | cut -d' ' -f1) wmctrl -ir $winid -b add,maximized_vert wmctrl -ir $winid -e 0,-1,-1,981,-1 --- The permissions look right: ls -ld /home drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 août 14 2011 /home ls -ld /home/lucas drwxr-xr-x 93 lucas users 12288 sept. 7 10:54 /home/lucas ls -ld /home/lucas/bin drwxr-xr-x 2 lucas users 4096 sept. 7 09:48 /home/lucas/bin ls -ld /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched -rwxr-xr-x 1 lucas users 331 sept. 7 09:48 /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched You need to change the permissions. This works for me (although the window size is not ideal (for my monitor): $ ls -al evince-patched -rwxrwxr-- 1snipped 214 Sep 7 18:06 evince-patched Test link: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw4.pdf Clicking on that link evokes the shell 'evince-patched' and presents the pdf document in evince. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Browser refuses to use my script as helper app
On 09/07/2012 06:19 PM, NoOp wrote: On 09/07/2012 02:02 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote: ... The permissions look right: ls -ld /home drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 août 14 2011 /home ls -ld /home/lucas drwxr-xr-x 93 lucas users 12288 sept. 7 10:54 /home/lucas ls -ld /home/lucas/bin drwxr-xr-x 2 lucas users 4096 sept. 7 09:48 /home/lucas/bin ls -ld /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched -rwxr-xr-x 1 lucas users 331 sept. 7 09:48 /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched You need to change the permissions. This works for me (although the window size is not ideal (for my monitor): $ ls -al evince-patched -rwxrwxr-- 1snipped 214 Sep 7 18:06 evince-patched Test link: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw4.pdf Clicking on that link evokes the shell 'evince-patched' and presents the pdf document in evince. Now that I've tested this, can someone remind me where the Helper file is so that I can purge 'evince-patched' from Helper Applications? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Browser refuses to use my script as helper app
On 09/07/2012 06:55 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: Now that I've tested this, can someone remind me where the Helper file is so that I can purge 'evince-patched' from Helper Applications? Edit mimeTypes.rdf in the profile. Or rename it, if you are lazy. ;) Hartmut Thanks Hartmut. Gary ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google Maps GL
On 09/07/2012 08:23 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 9/7/12 5:42 PM, NoOp wrote: On 09/07/2012 04:46 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 9/7/12 3:30 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-09-07 9:34 AM, hawker wrote: I see Google has a new map sytem called MapsGL. When I try to use it in Seamonky 2.11 it says my browser is not supported. Under supported browsers it lists Firefox going back a ways (version 8) so Seamonkey should work as well. I understand Seamonkey now advertises itself as Firefox, so can anyone tell me why this is not working and what to do to make it work? MapsGL uses WebGL, which requires support from both the browser and your graphics card. WebGL support was added in SeaMonkey 2.1. We can get more info about your graphics card and whether or it supports WebGL if you post your Troubleshooting Information. Go to Help--Troubleshooting_Information, then click [Copy all to Clipboard]. Open a reply to this post, and go to Edit--Paste to paste the info from your Troubleshooting Information page. From US-CERT at http://www.us-cert.gov/current/archive/2011/05/19/archive.html#web_users_warned_to_turn: WebGL Security Risks added May 11, 2011 at 01:50 pm | updated May 16, 2011 at 10:20 am US-CERT is aware of reports indicating that WebGL contains multiple significant security issues. The impact of these issues includes denial of service, and cross-domain attacks. WebGL is a new web standard that is enabled by default in Firefox 4 and Google Chrome and is included in Safari. US-CERT encourages users and administrators to review the Context report and update their systems as necessary to help mitigate the risks. [Context report is at http://www.contextis.com/resources/blog/webgl/] Thus, I disabled WebGL. I have seen no notice of this vulnerability being fixed. You might want to ad this url: https://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2012/mfsa2012-62.html Title: WebGL use-after-free and memory corruption Impact: Critical Announced: August 28, 2012 Reporter: miaubiz Products: Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey Fixed in: Firefox 15 Firefox ESR 10.0.7 Thunderbird 15 Thunderbird ESR 10.0.7 SeaMonkey 2.12 Perhaps 'hawker' will consider upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.12 from 2.11 - at least for the WebGL security fix? Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory 2012-62 is not the same as the vulnerability cited by US-CERT. Not it's not. I was simply pointing you to a recent announcement regarding webGL by Mozilla and the corresponding CVE's. Advisory 2012-62 says: The first issue is a use-after-free when WebGL shaders are called after being destroyed. The second issue exposes a problem with Mesa drivers on Linux, leading to a potentially exploitable crash. It refers to two CVEs (CVE-2012-3967 and CVE-2012-3968) that were both submitted to the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures List within the past two months. The US-CERT vulnerability was reported more than a year ago and deals with denial of service through crashes and cross-domain attacks. These appear to be CVE-2011-2366 (fixed with bug #655987) and CVE-2011-2367 (fixed with bug #656752). Despite the fix of the vulnerabilities noted by US-CERT and those noted in Advisory 2012-62, there remain 214 open WebGL bugs, 29 of them Critical and 7 of them Major. Thus, I will continue to disable WebGL. I hope that you realize that CVE's et al are sponsored by the same source (US Homeland Security). http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search-results?query=mozillasearch_type=allcves=on http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search-results?query=webglsearch_type=allcves=on Further, I wasn't recommending that you keep WebGL enabled. I only have two machines that are 'new' enough to run it those are sandboxed for any testing anyway. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update Failed
On 09/08/2012 02:41 AM, Daniel wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Linux i686 on x86_64 There is no mar built for 64bit (see my [linux-64bit] 2.12 mar? thread). You'll need to download it and install: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.12 Contributed builds (other platforms) These are unofficial builds and may be configured differently than the official SeaMonkey builds. Please read their readme files for further information. Linux/x86_64 Linux/x86_64 .tar.bz2 (readme) (MD5 sum) (SHA1 sum) I run mine in a single home folder /home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey. So I copy the Linux/x86_64.tar.bz2 to /home/user/seamonkey/ move the former '/home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey' to '/home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey2.11', extract the Linux/x86_64.tar.bz2 and it extract to as the new improved /home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey. Last night, I clicked Help-Check for updates and updated my Win7 SeaMonkey installation, but tonight, when I've tried to update my Linux version (see above), I getting told the Update Failed and that it Failed (unknown reason). Then the screen says I can download SM manually from the web site. Anybody else getting this, or know how I can fix whatever problem I've got!! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update Failed
On 09/09/2012 02:58 AM, Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: On 09/08/2012 02:41 AM, Daniel wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Linux i686 on x86_64 There is no mar built for 64bit (see my [linux-64bit] 2.12 mar? thread). You'll need to download it and install: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.12 Contributed builds (other platforms) These are unofficial builds and may be configured differently than the official SeaMonkey builds. Please read their readme files for further information. Linux/x86_64 Linux/x86_64 .tar.bz2 (readme) (MD5 sum) (SHA1 sum) I run mine in a single home folder /home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey. So I copy the Linux/x86_64.tar.bz2 to /home/user/seamonkey/ move the former '/home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey' to '/home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey2.11', extract the Linux/x86_64.tar.bz2 and it extract to as the new improved /home/user/seamonkey/seamonkey. So, hang on, NoOp, are you suggesting that after I installed the full seamonkey-2.3.3.tar.bz2, any updates that I (automatically or manually) received were of the Linux i686 on x86_64 variety?? I've no clue what you are referring to regarding 2.3.3.x. If you have questions regarding 2.3.x, start a new thread. I responded to your question regarding: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 I also pointed you to a thread regarding the update issue from 2.11.x to 2.12.x 64bit. So hang on Daniel, are you suggesting that you didn't read comprehend what I wrote? Are you also suggesting that you didn't bother to read the thread I pointed you to? Here let me point it out again: Linux i686 on x86_64 There is no mar built for 64bit (see my [linux-64bit] 2.12 mar? Stop wasting everyone's time by asking nonsensical 'are you suggesting' when I clearly didn't. RTFT. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.12.1 - Any Need To Upgrade JAVA ?
On 09/11/2012 09:06 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: ... If you need Java, yes you need to update, if you don't need Java, I instead recommend you just disable it. Unless you use linux... in that case Java doesn't work: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 [[linux] Sun Java jre1.7.0_04/_05 does not work in SeaMonkey] Works in Firefox, does not work in SeaMonkey. ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux -64 bit] 2.12 mar?
On 08/30/2012 04:34 PM, David H. Durgee wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: NoOp wrote: Will a seamonkey-2.12.complete.mar be built for 64bit linux so that 64bit machines can be updated rather than having to download directly? Note: crossposted to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey Unfortunately, not by us for 2.12. Getting updates generated/generating for linux64 is on our TODO list, however. Is there a timeframe on this? I am running Linux Mint x64 here and had been depending upon Joe Lesko's PPA for updates, but that has not been updated since 8 weeks ago now. I have not considered either ubuntuzilla or the contributed build because of the note These are unofficial builds and may be configured differently than the official SeaMonkey builds. Please read their readme files for further information. Dave Dave, I've not spoken with Joe in awhile I thought that he hadn't planned to update his ppa. However I noticed that he did update the dev ppa to 2.12: https://launchpad.net/~joe-nationnet/+archive/seamonkey-dev I ran it (64 32bit) for a day didn't run into any issues, so you might want to give it a try. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Browser refuses to use my script as helper app
On 09/10/2012 03:16 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 7 septembre 2012, NoOp a écrit : You need to change the permissions. This works for me (although the window size is not ideal (for my monitor): $ ls -al evince-patched -rwxrwxr-- 1snipped 214 Sep 7 18:06 evince-patched Thanks, but that doesn't work for me (plus I wouldn't want to set +w for the group). Then I also tried 700, 754, 770, 777, 775, 744, to no avail. OK. I reset to your original (755): ls -ld /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched -rwxr-xr-x 1 lucas users 331 sept. 7 09:48 /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched $ ls -al evince-patched -rwxr-xr-x 1 .. 214 Sep 12 12:46 evince-patched and it works for me from SeaMonkey 2.12.01. Couldn't figure out why I wasn't getting a large window on the first try... forgot that I didn't have wmctrl installed on this machine. After installing wmctrl I now get the large window. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] Browser refuses to use my script as helper app
On 09/12/2012 01:02 PM, NoOp wrote: On 09/10/2012 03:16 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 7 septembre 2012, NoOp a écrit : You need to change the permissions. This works for me (although the window size is not ideal (for my monitor): $ ls -al evince-patched -rwxrwxr-- 1snipped 214 Sep 7 18:06 evince-patched Thanks, but that doesn't work for me (plus I wouldn't want to set +w for the group). Then I also tried 700, 754, 770, 777, 775, 744, to no avail. OK. I reset to your original (755): ls -ld /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched -rwxr-xr-x 1 lucas users 331 sept. 7 09:48 /home/lucas/bin/evince-patched $ ls -al evince-patched -rwxr-xr-x 1 .. 214 Sep 12 12:46 evince-patched and it works for me from SeaMonkey 2.12.01. Couldn't figure out why I wasn't getting a large window on the first try... forgot that I didn't have wmctrl installed on this machine. After installing wmctrl I now get the large window. Added note: I prefer epdfview -- opens in a full window automatically shows the index column if the pdf is indexed. Description-en: Lightweight pdf viewer based on poppler libs The aim of ePDFView is to make a simple PDF document viewer, in the lines of Evince but without using the GNOME libraries. Homepage: http://trac.emma-soft.com/epdfview/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Y U NO MAKE 64bit Windows build?
On 09/12/2012 07:51 AM, Rex wrote: I recently switched to 64-bit Windows 7 Ultimate. While I was able to replace Firefox with Waterfox and use my old profile as before, the only reference to 64bit Seamonkey I can find is this one - http://wiki.mozilla-x86-64.com/SeaMonkey:Download This looks like the initial 2.0 build from 2009 and hasn't been updated since. Are there any plans to provide official 64bit builds any time soon? No. Check the archives regarding this. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update Failed
On 09/12/2012 07:50 AM, Daniel wrote: Daniel wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Last night, I clicked Help-Check for updates and updated my Win7 SeaMonkey installation, but tonight, when I've tried to update my Linux version (see above), I getting told the Update Failed and that it Failed (unknown reason). Then the screen says I can download SM manually from the web site. Anybody else getting this, or know how I can fix whatever problem I've got!! After two days of trying, and failing to get an update, I've now downloaded the 64bit update. Not sure if it is the straight x86_64 or the i685 on x64_86 version (suspect the later) and it should be installed when I boot up again later today!! If the update fails, I've also downloaded the full version tonight, as well! Daniel, This has been explained you you previously, but I'll try to explain one more time. Apologies as I should have noticed earlier. You are running the 32bit version of SeaMonkey on a 64bit linux. Just to show you I'm posting this from the same: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120826 Firefox/15.0 SeaMonkey/2.12 about:buildconfig Build Machine sea-vm-linux32-1 Source Built from http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/rev/a347058c607a Build platform target i686-pc-linux-gnu Now I'll save this as a 'draft', enable the 64bit version and finish the post. OK, now back on SeaMonkey 2.12 from a 64bit build: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120826 Firefox/15.0 SeaMonkey/2.12 about:buildconfig Build Machine cb-seamonkey-linux64-01 Source Built from http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/rev/450143d2d810 Build platform target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu See the difference? Now, you can stay on the 32bit version - it won't hurt will work - or you can use the 64bit version. To be honest, I've not tested the 32bit on a 64bit machine to compare the differences. So I can't tell you which is better. However you *need* to understand the version that you are running is 32bit, it is *not* the 64bit version. If you want to run the 64bit version you will need to use the contributed build, and you will not, repeat *not* get any updates (notifications or otherwise). HTH Gary OT: previously Barry Edwin Gilmour (the same Fairfax photographer that recorded Neil Armstrong Buzz Aldrin moon landings on film) used to build 64bit linux directly. Unfortunately I've not seen a post by Barry in seamonkey dev since around Sept 2011... I hope he's OK. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update Failed
On 09/12/2012 07:26 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: NoOp wrote: ... OT: previously Barry Edwin Gilmour (the same Fairfax photographer that recorded Neil Armstrong Buzz Aldrin moon landings on film) used to build 64bit linux directly. Unfortunately I've not seen a post by Barry in seamonkey dev since around Sept 2011... I hope he's OK. Correction Gary! Just to update the group ~ I'm nothing special... I am not the same Fairfax photographer that recorded Neil Armstrong Buzz Aldrin moon landings on film. Ah... Well now all of your posts are suspect I will wonder if we really landed on the moon :-) Sorry about that but glad to hear that you are well. :-) Also, It's been a while since I built 64bit nightlies from source. I now simply download the 64bit Linux nightly trunk build from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/ or http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-central-trunk-linux64/ which I use in my day to day environment, as do many others in this group. I just haven't had anything worthwhile to contribute lately. HTH. Barry. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update Failed
On 09/13/2012 07:12 AM, Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: ... Now, you can stay on the 32bit version - it won't hurt will work - or you can use the 64bit version. To be honest, I've not tested the 32bit on a 64bit machine to compare the differences. So I can't tell you which is better. However you *need* to understand the version that you are running is 32bit, it is *not* the 64bit version. If you want to run the 64bit version you will need to use the contributed build, and you will not, repeat *not* get any updates (notifications or otherwise). HTH Gary ... NoOp, sometimes I am a bit thick, so thanks for sticking with me! No problem happy to help if I can. Last night, as well as doing the update for what would seem to be my 32bit Linux SM, as I said above I've also downloaded the seamonkey-2.12.1,en-us.linux-x86_64-tar-bz2 file, so if I get time (and knowledge) over the week-end, I'll delete the 32bit version and install the 64bit version. Make that install the 64bit version *then* delete the 32bit version. Actually, you can do as I do just rename the seamonkey folder to 'seamonkey32' then extract the 64bit bz2. That will create a new seamonkey folder you just run as you did the other. If it gives you problems, then name that folder to seamonkey64 and rename seamonkey32 to just plain seamonkey. Restart you're back on the 32bit. NoOp, is the Linux i686 on x64_86 version the equivalent of the Windows WOW64 version, i.e. 32bit version made to work on 64bit systems?? No. It's an actual 64bit version. ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[Linux] APT protocol registration: was Re: Another Ubuntu question (sorry)
On 09/23/2012 11:51 AM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: ... What it apparently wants to do is launch the Ubuntu Software Center to do the install. I did the changes suggested by WaltS in an earlier thread and now it's prompting me for which application it should launch. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to tell it to launch the Software Center. Chrome was able to figure it out, but I can't seem to see the settings it is using... no way to list Helper Apps that I can see in that browser. FOUND IT!! /usr/bin/software-center It's all working now. Thanks for the hints and assistance. I see you got it working. However if you change to another profile you will need to do it all again. An easy way to get around this is to add the registration in your user.js file in your profile directory. First install apturl: $ sudo apt-get install apturl Add the following to your existing user.js if you already have one, if not open gedit and paste, then save as user.js in your seamonkey profile directory (~/.mozilla/seamonkey/profile/user.js: code # register protocol: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Register_protocol#Firefox_3.5_and_above # network.protocol-handler.expose.foo - Value - false # network.protocol-handler.external.foo - Value - true # network.protocol-handler.app.foo - Value - /path/to/app pref(network.protocol-handler.expose.apt,false); pref(network.protocol-handler.external.apt,true); pref(network.protocol-handler.app.apt,/usr/bin/apturl); /code Note: the first line is all one line the first 4 lines are comments so that you'll remember where you got the information from the format. You can do the same for your non-ubuntu firefox profile(s). Remove any 'apt' that you hand installed in about:config (right click and click reset). Restart SeaMonkey/Firefox with the user.js in the profile directory. When you click on an apturl you'll be prompted for the application. Click 'browse' and 'File System' and then to /usr/bin scroll down click on 'apturl' (full path is as above: /usr/bin/apturl. Tick the box to 'always use this application' you're good to go. That way you won't need to mess with the Ubuntu software center when you click on an apt:package you'll get prompted for your password the install will proceed. Note: the Ubuntu packaged Firefox SeaMonkey include a extension called 'ubufox'. That extension (which is the first one I always disable) adds the 'apt' protocol settngs by default. You might also find this of interest (recommended by the Ubuntu apt wiki - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUrl): http://appnr.com/ be sure to see: http://blog.appnr.com/about/ http://blog.appnr.com/privacy/ I can't vouch for the site - I just found it from the wiki. I did test by installing Amarok (using SeaMonkey of course) it worked fine; goes to the ubuntu repository, downloads installs if from there. As with all applications of this type, use the apt protocol apturl at your own risk. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bugs ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why does the LA Times home page kill my SeaMonkey?
On 09/25/2012 06:07 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS: I have Java disabled in Firefox, and didn't manually create the symbolic link to the plugin for SeaMonkey, and the page loads just fine in both. In my SM Java was disabled manually but got enabled automatically after upgrading Java on my Gentoo. I am not very pleased about that. No problems browsing the site at all. I can see no problem on latimes.com with Java disabled. Hartmut I can replicate the freeze with java turned on: http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-wells-online-outage-20120925,0,1876507.story When I visit that page with java: $ java -version java version 1.7.0_07 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.2) (7u7-2.3.2a-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) OpenJDK Client VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode, sharing) turned on, SeaMonkey will freeze. Doesn't use any cpu, just freezes locks up completely. o Kill the process, start an strace restart. Turn off java before I restore the session the page loads fine no SM freeze. o Kill the process, start an strace restart. Turn on java before I restore the session SM freezes. Rinse... repeat. Same each time. Note: I'm typing this from a restored session where I've turned java off. If we could get https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 [[Bug 754622] [linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not work in SeaMonkey[ sorted out I chould test using standard (non-openjdk) java. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why does the LA Times home page kill my SeaMonkey?
On 09/26/2012 06:07 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: I can replicate the freeze with java turned on: http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-wells-online-outage-20120925,0,1876507.story It is not so easy for me. When I visit that page with java: $ java -version java version 1.7.0_07 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.2) (7u7-2.3.2a-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) OpenJDK Client VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode, sharing) turned on, SeaMonkey will freeze. Doesn't use any cpu, just freezes locks up completely. o Kill the process, start an strace restart. Turn off java before I restore the session the page loads fine no SM freeze. o Kill the process, start an strace restart. Turn on java before I restore the session SM freezes. Rinse... repeat. Same each time. Note: I'm typing this from a restored session where I've turned java off. I was reminded on freezes belonging to Java by testing the problem of this thread. But not reliable. I suspect it has to do with visiting http://www.java.com/en/download/installed.jsp and verifying my Java version before visiting latimes.com. I have now tested your link to latimes several times with Java enabled and without SM freezing. If we could get https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 [[Bug 754622] [linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not work in SeaMonkey[ sorted out I chould test using standard (non-openjdk) java. hafi@i5_64 ~ $ java -version java version 1.6.0_35 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_35-b10) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.10-b01, mixed mode) Well below 1.7.0_04 :-D Out of curiosity I reverted to openJDK 1.6: $ java -version java version 1.6.0_24 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.4) (6b24-1.11.4-1ubuntu0.12.04.1) OpenJDK Client VM (build 20.0-b12, mixed mode, sharing) And that freezes as well. I'll test next with the same version as you (sun/oracle 1.6.x direct minus openjdk) see if I get the same. Thanks for checking Hartmut. Gary I have encountered freezes caused by Java sporadic but not reliable in the past. That is the reason why am not pleased about the automatically enabling of Java by upgrading Java on my Gentoo. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why does the LA Times home page kill my SeaMonkey?
On 09/27/2012 06:07 PM, NoOp wrote: On 09/26/2012 06:07 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: ... If we could get https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 [[Bug 754622] [linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not work in SeaMonkey[ sorted out I chould test using standard (non-openjdk) java. hafi@i5_64 ~ $ java -version java version 1.6.0_35 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_35-b10) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.10-b01, mixed mode) Well below 1.7.0_04 :-D Out of curiosity I reverted to openJDK 1.6: $ java -version java version 1.6.0_24 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.4) (6b24-1.11.4-1ubuntu0.12.04.1) OpenJDK Client VM (build 20.0-b12, mixed mode, sharing) And that freezes as well. I'll test next with the same version as you (sun/oracle 1.6.x direct minus openjdk) see if I get the same. Thanks for checking Hartmut. Gary I forgot to add that there were *no* issues with the page with Firefox 15 and Java: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1 $ java -version java version 1.7.0_07 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.2) (7u7-2.3.2a-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) OpenJDK Client VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode, sharing) $ java -version java version 1.6.0_24 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.4) (6b24-1.11.4-1ubuntu0.12.04.1) OpenJDK Client VM (build 20.0-b12, mixed mode, sharing) or Java(TM) Plug-in 1.7.0_07 File: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so Version: Java plug-in for NPAPI-based browsers. $ java -version java version 1.7.0_07 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_07-b10) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 23.3-b01, mixed mode) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Linux] APT protocol registration: was Re: Another Ubuntu question (sorry)
On 09/28/2012 03:30 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Paddlefoot wrote: NoOp wrote: snip I find this whole thing chillingly unsecure. I agree. I feel a little more secure with it launching the Software Center where I can see what it is I'm installing and decide to go through with it or not. I can't say that I disagree without digging into the code and looking at wireshark. But I reckon if there were/are any serious security issues: 1) Ubuntu probablyly wouldn't allow it in their repositories: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=apturl and 2) such issue would show up on: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bugs http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/apturl.html As for the Software Center... I prefer a terminal or synaptic. Anyway, I suppose it's not mine to judge: I just provided you with the information you requested. It's up to you to determine if you want to use it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Video Problem
On 10/04/2012 03:02 PM, Bernard Mercier wrote: LR a exposé le 4/10/2012 : I think I'm having problems with Seamonkey and Flash. For example, when I try to play this http://www.fark.com/vidplayer/7364212 using Seamonkey the video freezes and does other strange things. If I click Reload the problem sometimes reoccurs. If I use the Flash replay button it seems to play ok. I've tried playing the video using IE and no problem. I seen problems with other videos. I think one may have crashed Flash recently, but I don't think I can duplicate that. Flash, 11,4,402,265 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 Build identifier: 20120909051100 I'm running XP. Suggestions? TIA LR SeaMonkey 2.12.1 on Linux. The video plays but very jerky. Nice video btw. Works for me: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 Build identifier: 20120909051705 Shockwave Flash File: /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so Version: Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SOLVED - Re: Can't Log In to www.wherever.tv with SM 2.12.1
On 10/08/2012 04:47 AM, Daniel wrote: ... Beat me by about two weeks, Arnie!! I was going to tell you of my situation with Amazon.ca of several years ago. I'd been through, selected all the stuff I wanted and wanted to pay..but the link to the cash register (Pay Now or whatever!) was to a different site (amazon.com maybe) and, as in prefs, I had selected to not show links from other locations (or similar wording), I was unable to complete my transaction. Someone here-abouts, or maybe on the old secnews server, alerted me to this setting! Just had a quick look at prefs, but could not find the setting!! Look harder, or F1(Help) and enter 'images' in the search box :-) Preferences|Privacy Security|Image Acceptance Policy ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple Chatzilla screens??
On 10/08/2012 07:26 AM, Daniel wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 08/10/2012 18:32, Daniel wrote: What I want to know, now, Philip, is how do I set either screen up to address irc.albury.net.au?? Any ideas?? I can't remember the exact syntax but it's probably /server irc.albury.net.au or if you don't care which server you connect to: /server undernet Phil Thanks for that, Philip, but, unfortunately /server irc.albury.net.au doesn't work (O.K., I know I should have put the servers name in place of /server!!) I guess I should contact my ISP and get the required information!! I'll be back!! http://www.albury.net.au/on-line/ click on: irc://irc.albury.net.au/ali and Chatzilla will open automatically connect you. To join from withn Chatzilla (assuming you've not joined as above: open Chatzilla and in the text box: /attach irc://irc.albury.net.au/ali or as Philip pointed out: /server irc.albury.net.au /join #ali Commands help: /commands /help command-name Example: /help attach [USAGE] attach irc-url [HELP] Attaches to the IRC URL specified by irc-url. If you are already attached, the view for irc-url is made current. If that view has been deleted, it is recreated. You may omit the irc:// portion of the irc-url. Examples are; /attach moznet, /attach moznet/chatzilla, and /attach irc.mozilla.org/mozbot,isnick. These may be of help: http://chatzilla.hacksrus.com/intro http://chatzilla.hacksrus.com/faq/#connect http://www.irchelp.org/ http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/faq.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java Problems
On 10/09/2012 07:47 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 10/9/12 5:51 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Tom Pamin wrote: I realize this is a SM only forum, but this question concerns both SM and IE. Does anyone know why java works fine in SM, but IE 9 doesn't recognize java? I just noticed this problem - things worked fine before. Here's a link that works fine in SM, but in IE I get a red x (both 32 and 64-bit). Can someone please try this in both browsers and see what you get? http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java Works fine in both. Java took a moment to load in IE (coffee icon), otherwise no difference. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 Build identifier: 20120909051100 IE version 9.0.8112.16421 Update versions: 9.0.10 (KB2744842) Windows 7 Pro SP1 For Windows, there are different versions of Flash between IE and Gecko-based applications; but there is only one Windows version of Java, which applies to both IE and Gecko. Well... that depends: https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_win64bit.xml http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/32-bit-and-64-bit-Windows-frequently-asked-questions ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Message Posting Does Not Wrap at 72
On 10/09/2012 10:12 AM, njoracle wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-10-09 9:39 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: Under Preferences, I have my Wrap text messages set to 72 characters. When I type the message, it does wrap. However, when I post to the NG, it does not wrap. Is there some other setting I need to change to make the 72 character wrap carry into the posting on the NG. What you're experiencing is something called format=flowed. For more info, see http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/mailnewsfaq/FormatFlowed. Many thanks. I changed both instances of format=flowed to false and that seems to have fixed the problem, both on the original message and a reply to message OhOh... watch out for Mike Easter incoming! :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cache.Trash26316
On 10/07/2012 09:05 PM, flyguy wrote: Sometimes, my profile will have a folder named Cache.Trash26316 (the number will vary), in addition to the folder named Cache. It's usually in the 0.5 GB to 1 GB range, and has 15 subfolders apparently named by in a Hex fashion: 1, 2, 3,..., D, E, F. There are usually files named _CACHE_001_, _CACHE_002_, etc, and one named _CACHE_MAP_. I can delete the folder with no apparent effects, which I usually do when I back up the folder or transfer it to my laptop. What is this folder? As I understand it, in Windows, when SM or FF experience a session crash/failure, the existing cache is written to cache.trash. This apparently was to assist in preserving the cache. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mozilla+%2B+cache.trash https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/15.0/releasenotes/buglist.html o 754575Cache.Trash* files fill up disk space https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754575 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=cache.trash You can also search on google w/'mozilla cache.trash' for more. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[linux] IMAP (sucks) + cpu
Only in that past few months have I added a few IMAP accounts. Now nearly everytime that I check one of those accounts (Get Msgs or I get over 45% cpu from SeaMonkey (User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1) and can't kill the process unless I kill all of SeaMonkey. This is just plain unacceptable; any hints on how I can troubleshoot this? Can anyone point me to related bug reports? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [linux] IMAP (sucks) + cpu
On 10/11/2012 03:22 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 9 octobre 2012, NoOp a écrit : Only in that past few months have I added a few IMAP accounts. Now nearly everytime that I check one of those accounts (Get Msgs or I get over 45% cpu from SeaMonkey (User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1) and can't kill the process unless I kill all of SeaMonkey. This is just plain unacceptable; any hints on how I can troubleshoot this? Can anyone point me to related bug reports? Did you compact folders regularly? Yes. Check what is done for deleted messages: they may be just hidden, bloating your mailbox! Ummm - emptying compacting remove deleted messages. There are only 20 messages on the server and the inbox on the account. Another account is used for testing purposes only has 1 (one) text test message. If you left your messages on the server, you can try and delete (after backup!) the files containing the messages and index, and let SM fetch them back from the server. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.13.1?..
On 10/12/2012 10:31 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Rufus wrote: ...according to this - http://www.itworld.com/software/302609/mozilla-releases-firefox-1601-address-four-vulnerabilities Firefox and Thunderbird have already released updates, but I don't find a SM 2.13.1 on the front page. Standing by... Working on it right now.. thank you for your patience. So is there any reason to do a 2.12.1 -- 2.13 upgrade? I'd wait for Edmund to finish 2.13.1: https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/seamonkey.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't update
On 10/13/2012 08:15 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Even so, why would v. 2.12.1 elicit such a dire warning? I was referring to the Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey. quoted in the original post. And the reply to that is Because it has some grave security issues that are fixed in 2.13.* - and updates should work now that 2.13.1 has been released. Robert Kaiser Robert, any idea why 720619: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720619 is still block if you are not on the security list? You are not authorized to access bug #720619. To see this bug, you must first log in to an account with the appropriate permissions. It is referenced in: https://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2012/mfsa2012-89.html References: Lack of security check for [[DefaultValue]] and https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-4193 CONFIRM:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720619 All of the other reference links work fine. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[linux] Heads up - 2.13.01 + Lightning 1.8.b1
When upgrading from 2.12.01 (Lightning version 1.7) to 2.13.01, SeaMonkey does a check for compatible add-ons. The Found Compatible Add-Ons for Lightning comes back as Lightning 1.8.b1. * Don't install 1.8b1!* Lightning 1.8b1 hassome serious bugs with adding new events (as I discovered after allowing it to get installed on several of my machines). * Instead, when you get the Found Compatible Add-Ons, *uncheck* Lightning 1.8b1. Then go to: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/lightning/ and download install Lighting 1.8. If you've already installed 1.8b1, don't use the calendar instead go to the 1.8 addon link, install 1.8 and then restart. Afterwards your calendar data should be OK. Of course it's always wise to backup prior to making any changes/updates... Note to SeaMonkey devs: please fix this so that the linux addon update doesn't point to 1.8b1. No issues found on Windows updates - those go directly to 1.8. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?
On 10/14/2012 12:18 PM, Ant wrote: Hello. Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! Does one even exist? Thank you in advance. :) Odd... you participated in this thread: Turn Off HTML5? 07/31/2012 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?
On 10/16/2012 07:53 AM, Ant wrote: On 10/16/2012 4:48 AM PT, Ann Watson typed: Have you ever used the Adblock Plus together with the Flashblock add-ons in Firefox, or do they not do the job? Ditto! Now, we need a HTML5 video blocker. :P If I recall that you use Prefbar... right? I also recall that you commented and participated in my thread: Turn Off HTML5? 07/31/2012 In that thread I gave how to create a WebM on/off button - the same as the Flash on/off button. For others that would like to read the thread open the search bar enter: Turn Off HTML5 That will take you directly to the thread. Note that Ant was the first to comment on that thread... Scroll down to: [WebM prefbar button] Re: [Solved] Re: Turn Off HTML5? and you'll find how to turn off WebM from about:config *and* how to add a WebM on/off button for Prefbar. crosspost to Firefox dropped as the thread is only in m.s.s. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problems with some sites with SM 2.13.1
On 10/16/2012 08:34 AM, William Greenwood wrote: Running Mac 10.7.5 and SM 2.13.1, The following Costco site will not load images: http://click.online.costco.com/dm?id=655F93F9FE4A9949ECEABF86887B4A4F55D4898BCCC40632 It's an issue with your addons or extensions. I have the same issue with those turned on. When I restart in safe mode, or use a new, clean test profile the page loads fine. I also was able to open in Opera Firefix 16.01 as they do not have the same addons etc., that I have in SeaMonkey. Click Help|Restart with Add-ons Disabled then try. In order to troubleshoot I'll have to turn all addons extensions off then turn back on one-by-one to figure out the one that is causing the issue. Takes a long time... so I'll let you do that instead :-) Also, cannot get either of the following two sites to load at all: http://stockcharts.com/charts/pointFigure/dynamicPF.html?$SPX http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SPXp=Db=5g=0id=0 The issue is that those charts are Java based. If I turn on Jave in Firefox or Opera they work fine. If I turn Java off in Firefox or Opera they disappear. Note: I would have tried the same in SeaMonkey were it not for: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 [Bug 754622] [linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not work in SeaMonkey Until recently I did not experience problems with these sites. I tried reverting to SM 2.12, but did not help. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?
On 10/16/2012 10:01 PM, Ant wrote: On 10/16/2012 9:07 AM PT, NoOp typed: Ditto! Now, we need a HTML5 video blocker. :P If I recall that you use Prefbar... right? I also recall that you commented and participated in my thread: Turn Off HTML5? 07/31/2012 In that thread I gave how to create a WebM on/off button - the same as the Flash on/off button. For others that would like to read the thread open the search bar enter: Turn Off HTML5 That will take you directly to the thread. Note that Ant was the first to comment on that thread... Scroll down to: [WebM prefbar button] Re: [Solved] Re: Turn Off HTML5? and you'll find how to turn off WebM from about:config *and* how to add a WebM on/off button for Prefbar. crosspost to Firefox dropped as the thread is only in m.s.s. If turning off HTML5, wouldn't that be for ALL? I just want videos only. You should have gone back and read the thread. Please do. Anyway: http://www.webmproject.org/about/faq/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebM ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Running SM 2.13.1 logs me out
On 10/16/2012 08:33 PM, Craig wrote: So I see the information on SM 2.13.1 being released, go to http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ and download it, checked the SHA1SUM, and installed it. Now, every time I run SM I am logged out of my CentOS 5.8 system. What's up with that? I had to downgrade back to 2.12.1 to be able to post this message. ... Your 2.12.1 SeaMonkey is 64bit. Did you download and install the 32bit version of 2.13.1 by mistake? The 64bit version is here: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.13.1 Near the bottom of the page: Linux/x86_64 Linux/x86_64 .tar.bz2 (readme) (MD5 sum) (SHA1 sum) How/where did you install it? Note: I typically run SeaMonkey in a home folder... the install consists of extracting the bz2 file. Can't help you with CentOS 5.8 64bit. I only have CentOS 6.3 (Final) running in a 32bit VM. SeaMonkey 2.13.1 (32bit) runs fine there. SeaMonkey 2.13.1 64bit runs fine on my debian based (Ubuntu) systems. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Mail Display Page Headings
On 10/17/2012 06:52 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: ... I also refused the Windows Live ID cookie (on principle) so maybe that is why I cannot see the picture. I was using Firefox. I fired up a different browser (IceCat), went to the link, accepted several cookies (for session only), found it left 16 of them, but I could see the screenshot. I wonder if Richard has hovered the cursor over the empty stripe to see if he gets a double-headed arrow to expand the header area. It looks collapsed to me. Interesting. Thanks for that BT. From that I discovered that PrefBar has a bug... unchecking the cookies button still allowed cookies through. Previously it would block all cookies. No idea if you use PrefBar, but I modified the item to fix that: toPref: 1+Number(!Value) fromPref: value !=0 The last allows cookies only from the originating website. To allow all cookies you just change !=0 to !=1. I'll submit a bug to Manuel leave this thread. If any questions (all) please start a new thread so that I don't continue to hijack 'Mail Display Page Headings'. :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Mail Display Page Headings
On 10/17/2012 05:50 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: NoOp wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I also refused the Windows Live ID cookie (on principle) so maybe that is why I cannot see the picture. I was using Firefox. I fired up a different browser (IceCat), went to the link, accepted several cookies (for session only), found it left 16 of them, but I could see the screenshot. Interesting. Thanks for that BT. From that I discovered that PrefBar has a bug... unchecking the cookies button still allowed cookies through. Previously it would block all cookies. No idea if you use PrefBar, but I modified the item to fix that: toPref: 1+Number(!Value) fromPref: value !=0 The last allows cookies only from the originating website. To allow all cookies you just change !=0 to !=1. I do use the PrefBar, but not for managing cookies. I just use the browser's own built-in cookie management and clear stuff out periodically. Thanks for the details, though. Filed a bug report: https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25179 [Prefbar 6.1 does not block cookies at all / as expected w.] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Running SM 2.13.1 logs me out
On 10/17/2012 07:46 PM, Craig wrote: NoOp wrote: Your 2.12.1 SeaMonkey is 64bit. Actually, it's not: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 It's the 32-bit i686 version. Ah... so it is. I should have noticed - sorry. Did you download and install the 32bit version of 2.13.1 by mistake? No, I intentionally downloaded it, as I have all my previous versions. How/where did you install it? Note: I typically run SeaMonkey in a home folder... the install consists of extracting the bz2 file. After checking the SHA1SUM, I executed: su - cd /usr/local mv seamonkey seamonkey.old tar -xf seamonkey tarball cp -a seamonkey.old/plugins seamonkey Can you try just extracting to a home folder and running to see if it exhibits the same behavior? Also, can you try in safe mode: ./seamonkey -safe-mode ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?
On 10/17/2012 10:32 AM, PhillipJones wrote: ... I was able using Chrome to here the following video in html 5 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xj8DwSuoUowfeature=g-vrecwebm-1 SeaMonkey and FF Mac no. I am missing th H264 codec I do have the h.264 Here is a sample video that works in ff17: http://www.youtube.com/embed/XlyCLbt3Thk?rel=0webm-1. I did notice Doesn't work in the latest SM. Works for me with Flash turned off and WebM[1] turned on. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.1 Build identifier: 20121011090043 [1] I was lambasted (correctly) in referring to WebM (which both those links provide) as HTML5 in my Turn Off HTML5? thread. The hierarchy, as I now think I understand it, is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5 HTML5 is a markup language for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web, and is a core technology of the Internet originally proposed by Opera Software.[2] It is the fifth revision of the HTML standard (created in 1990 and standardized as HTML4 as of 1997)[3] and, as of October 2012, is still under development. Its core aims have been to improve the language with support for the latest multimedia while keeping it easily readable by humans and consistently understood by computers and devices (web browsers, parsers, etc.). HTML5 is intended to subsume not only HTML 4, but XHTML 1 and DOM Level 2 HTML as well.[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5_video The HTML5 draft specification introduced the video element for the purpose of playing videos or movies,[1] partially replacing the object element. HTML5 video is intended by its creators to become the new standard way to show video on the web without plugins, but has been hampered by lack of agreement as to which video formats should be supported in web browsers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebM WebM is an audio-video format designed to provide royalty-free, open video compression for use with HTML5 video. The project's development is sponsored by Google Inc. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't change address book entries
On 10/20/2012 04:19 PM, Gabriel wrote: On 20/10/12 00.35, Lance Courtland ha scritto: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Windows XP Pro SP 3 Whenever I change anything in a contact in any address book, then click OK, nothing happens. I have to click 'Cancel' or close the window, to exit the contact window, and the change I made isn't saved. Anybody else notice this? Yes, the same with SM 2.12/2.13.1 on OSX :( G. Works for me: linux + 2.13.1 (3264bit) Windows7 Home Premium + 2.13.1 WinXP SP3 + 2.13.1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey Site preferences are not cleared
This has bugged me for awhile; when you 'Clear Private Data', SeaMonkey provides option check boxes for: o Browsing History o Location Bar History o Download History o Saved Form and Search History o Cache o Cookies o Offline Website Data o Saved Passwords o Authenticated settings It is missing the Firefox option: Site Preferences This, to me, is a fairly important privacy issue. If you open the data manager (Tools|Data Manager) and click on the selection drop down, select 'Preferences Only'. There you most likely will find a list of websites that you may have used the zoom feature on. If you've no domains listed, simply go to a web page, View|Zoom and select a zoom level. Now look at the 'Preferences Only' and you'll find that website listed with your browser content zoom setting. All of the above is great automatically saves your site zoom preferences... Until you wish to clear your private data. I checked one of my systems and it has visited domains/sites from 2 years ago. Doesn't seem to make much sense to be able to clear passwords, history, et al, and not be able to clear site preferences. The only way that I've found to do this is to load up the Mozilla, or any sqlite manager, and open the 'content-prefs.sqlite' file, and empty the groups, prefs, and settings tables. Note: Firefox also has an easy user way to clear reset an individual page/tab during a session without using 'Tools|Clear Recent History': View|Zoom|Reset That not only restores the page to normal zoom, but also clears the entry out of the content-prefs.sqlite database. It appears there was some knowledge about the Firefox preference that cleans this: privacy.clearOnShutdown.siteSettings a few years back when porting the Sync UL over to SeaMonkey: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576970#c29 +pref(services.sync.prefs.sync.privacy.clearOnShutdown.siteSettings, true); We don't have this, but we do have .item.urlbar I've tried adding the pref privacy.clearOnShutdown.siteSettings in SeaMonkey 2.13.1 about:config and it does not work. Ping Neil Jens: is there any workaround for this other than cleaning the content-prefs.sqlite tables directly? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Still not informed of updates
On 10/25/2012 10:38 AM, Larry S. wrote: Craig wrote: Daniel wrote: Hmmm!! Craig, I see you are posting with a Linux i686 on x86_64 version of SM (and have been all along in this thread!), which, as you suggested, is the 32bit version! So I wonder where *I* got the Linux x86_64 (that I posted above) from?? I wouldn't know the answer to that question. I do, however, have one of my own: How do you see I am posting with a Linux i686 on x86_64? I don't see any of that information from anyone in SM's newsreader. Craig In the header of your original posting (10/16), your user agent shows as: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 Larry Which is the 32bit version (it's like Daniel's 'WOW' url when he posts using Windows his current SeaMonkey linux version). Here is a 64bit SeaMonkey header: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Still not informed of updates
On 10/25/2012 06:00 PM, Craig wrote: ... All the demonstrations of what x86_64 headers look like and where to get the x86_64 software missed the point: Where does one find the headers? They are not visible in SM's newsreader. Sure they are. Expand your msg headers and they will show the User-Agent (even with View|Headers|Normal). It occurred to me, why I do not know, to type control-U. Lo and behold! There, in the text window that control-U brought up, are the headers, including one line that begins User-Agent:. That line has the information about which I was asking. Sure they are. Expand your msg headers and it will show the User-Agent (even with View|Headers|Normal). For your own UA: Help|About SeaMonkey or Help|Troubleshooting Information. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Still not informed of updates
On 10/26/2012 12:00 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Craig: NoOp wrote: Sure they are. Expand your msg headers and it will show the User-Agent (even with View|Headers|Normal). The only way I see to expand headers is View - Headers - All. Your comment implies there's another way. What is it? You may need to set the pref mailnews.headers.showUserAgent to true. Hartmut Nice catch Hartmut. Thanks. Apologies to Craig. @Craig: Hartmut is correct (as usual...). To have the normal headers show the UA: In the URL bar: about:config then enter useragent in the search bar and when mailnews.headers.showUserAgent appears, double click it to set it to true. Now when you view the headers View|Headers|Normal you will see: Subject: From: Date: Newsgroups: (if in newsgroups) or To: (if in email) User-Agent: Gary ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Running SM 2.13.1 logs me out
On 10/25/2012 08:23 PM, Craig wrote: NoOp wrote: Can you try just extracting to a home folder and running to see if it exhibits the same behavior? I extracted to my home directory and executed, cd seamonkey/ ./seamonkey` and was promptly logged out (my screen went immediately black and after a few seconds the X-Window System login screen was shown). Also, can you try in safe mode: ./seamonkey -safe-mode After logging back in, I executed, cd seamonkey/ ./seamonkey -safe-mode and was again promptly logged out. After logging back in, I even tried, cd seamonkey ./seamonkey --safe-mode in case that might be the syntax. The result, however, was the same. I was yet again promptly logged out. Something is wrong. ... Definately. The only thing that I can think of is a video or xserver-xorg issue. I had this happen with LibreOffice some time back: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38292 You'd zoom the page size and 'poof' back to the login you'd go. Turned out to a combination between LO and xserver-xorg-video drivers. Check your /var/log/xorg* and dmesg logs to see if there is any clue there. Also check the ~/.xsession-errors.old for the same. And of course http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/system-requirements. On that last note the The following distributions should provide everything needed: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (or later) I'll see if I can find an ISO for CentOS 5.8 will install it. I doubt that will result in the same issue as I don't have a spare partition to put it in, so I'll install it in a VM (VirtualBox and VMWare). However, those VM's use their own vido drivers, so even then I probably won't be able to replicate. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java and Seamonkey?
On 10/25/2012 09:15 PM, Craig wrote: Does it work again yet? If so, what does one link to one's plugins directory? Not the Oracle/Sun version. I finally gave up and went with openjdk icedtea. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Running SM 2.13.1 logs me out
On 10/27/2012 01:45 PM, NoOp wrote: On 10/25/2012 08:23 PM, Craig wrote: ... in case that might be the syntax. The result, however, was the same. I was yet again promptly logged out. Something is wrong. ... Definately. The only thing that I can think of is a video or xserver-xorg issue. I had this happen with LibreOffice some time back: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38292 You'd zoom the page size and 'poof' back to the login you'd go. Turned out to a combination between LO and xserver-xorg-video drivers. Check your /var/log/xorg* and dmesg logs to see if there is any clue there. Also check the ~/.xsession-errors.old for the same. And of course http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/system-requirements. On that last note the The following distributions should provide everything needed: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (or later) I'll see if I can find an ISO for CentOS 5.8 will install it. I doubt that will result in the same issue as I don't have a spare partition to put it in, so I'll install it in a VM (VirtualBox and VMWare). However, those VM's use their own vido drivers, so even then I probably won't be able to replicate. OK. 5.8 installed running. Note that this is a 32bit version running in VirtalBox VM, so the graphics drivers are VB's. $ lsb_release -irc Distributor ID: CentOS Release:5.8 Codename: Final $ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-308.16.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 22:01:37 EDT 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2 Build identifier: 20121026204658 Working. Again, this doesn't duplicate your 64bit install, but it's the best I can do for now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Trying to add new Helper Application
On 10/28/2012 02:17 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 10/28/12 12:54 PM, David E. Ross wrote: ... Presently, there is no user-oriented method for setting or changing helper applications in SeaMonkey or Thunderbird. For Thunderbird, see bug #708959 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708959, which addresses both protocols and MIME types. I think I might submit a parallel bug report for SeaMonkey. See bug #806240 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=806240. Thanks for that David. I voted added myself to the cc list. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Running SM 2.13.1 logs me out
On 10/29/2012 08:15 AM, Craig wrote: NoOp wrote: OK. 5.8 installed running. Note that this is a 32bit version running in VirtalBox VM, so the graphics drivers are VB's. H ... I wonder if the NVIDIA drivers I was told to install on this list awhile back are the problem. ... Could be. What card which driver? I forget if you've tried this, but if not can you download the 64bit version, extract in a home folder (like you did with the 32bit) and './seamonkey' to see if it reacts the same? http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.13.2 http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.13.2/contrib/seamonkey-2.13.2.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 BTW: the README file shows that the 64bit version was actually built on CentOS: quote *** SeaMonkey 2.13.2 for Linux x86_64 *** Built using the Mozilla 64bit Linux reference platform: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReferencePlatforms/Linux-CentOS-5.0_64-bit Using the following mozconfig: http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/file/default/seamonkey/linux64/comm-beta/release/mozconfig The used build process is documented at: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey:Release_Process:2.13.2 /quote ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Running SM 2.13.1 logs me out
On 10/29/2012 12:17 PM, NoOp wrote: ... BTW: the README file shows that the 64bit version was actually built on CentOS: quote *** SeaMonkey 2.13.2 for Linux x86_64 *** Built using the Mozilla 64bit Linux reference platform: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReferencePlatforms/Linux-CentOS-5.0_64-bit Using the following mozconfig: http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/file/default/seamonkey/linux64/comm-beta/release/mozconfig The used build process is documented at: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey:Release_Process:2.13.2 /quote Interesting... while checking out the above I went to: https://www.centos.org and on newly installed browsers (Firefox and SeaMonkey), I get: www.centos.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided. (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer) However, on my SeaMonkey Firefox's that I've had installed for years, I do not get this the site connects just fine. Odd. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Please stop e-mails to me from support list!
On 10/29/2012 04:55 PM, allanhorn wrote: I asked for help, now I can't get back in to STOP the suggestions!~ You, of course, read this when you signed up to the mailing list... right? http://www.seamonkey-project.org/community#groups mozilla.support.seamonkey Mailing List: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org subscribe/unsubscribe https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey To unsubscribe from support-seamonkey, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options enter your subscription email address: If you leave the field blank, you will be prompted for your email address ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Basic request
On 11/01/2012 10:47 AM, Gerry wrote: I enjoy using Seamonkey I like the totality of the suite. I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.I have SM 2.8 I'm encouraged to download 2.13.1 which I've done (to ///Downloads) I extract the file but then what?... I appreciate this a very basic request but I don't think I canbe the only one. Easiest way is to follow Walt's advice (somewhat modified). Create a new folder 'seamonkey': Home /seamonkey Move the bz2 download to that folder and extract there (right click in Nautilus select 'extract here'). That will create a subfolder 'seamonkey': Home /seamonkey/seamonkey To run that version of SeaMonkey, open a terminal and: $ /home/username/seamonkey/seamonkey/seamonkey Once SeaMonkey you are happy that everything is working, create a launcher: $ gedit /home/username/.local/share/applications/seamonkey.desktop Now copy paste the following into the file: [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=SeaMonkey Name[ast]=Veceru de corréu SeaMonkey Name[ca]=Client de correu SeaMonkey Name[cs]=Poštovní klient SeaMonkey Name[da]=SeaMonkey - e-post/nyhedsgruppe Name[de]=SeaMonkey-E-Mail und -Nachrichten Name[es]=Cliente de correo SeaMonkey Name[fi]=SeaMonkey-sähköposti Name[fr]=Messagerie SeaMonkey Name[gl]=Cliente de correo SeaMonkey Name[he]=SeaMonkey דוא״ל/חדשות Name[hr]=SeaMonkey e-pošta/novosti Name[hu]=SeaMonkey levelezőkliens Name[it]=Email SeaMonkey Name[ko]=SeaMonkey Name[nl]=SeaMonkey e-mail/nieuws Name[pl]=Klient poczty SeaMonkey Name[pt_BR]=Cliente de E-mail SeaMonkey Name[ru]=Почтовый клиент SeaMonkey Name[sk]=SeaMonkey - poštový klient a novin Name[sv]=E-postklienten SeaMonkey Name[ug]=SeaMonkey ئېلخەت/خەۋەر Name[zh_CN]=SeaMonkey 邮件/新闻 Name[zh_TW]=SeaMonkey 郵件 Comment=Send and receive mail with SeaMonkey Comment[ast]=Lleer y escribir corréu electrónicu Comment[ca]=Llegiu i escriviu correu Comment[cs]=Čtení a psaní pošty Comment[da]=Skriv/læs e-post/nyhedsgruppe med SeaMonkey Comment[de]=E-Mails und Nachrichten mit SeaMonkey lesen und schreiben Comment[es]=Lea y escriba correos y noticias con SeaMonkey Comment[fi]=Lue ja kirjoita sähköposteja Comment[fr]=Lire et écrire des courriels Comment[gl]=Lea e escriba correo electrónico Comment[he]=קריאה/כתיבה של דוא״ל/חדשות באמצעות SeaMonkey Comment[hr]=Čitajte/šaljite e-poštu s SeaMonkey Comment[hu]=Levelek írása és olvasása a SeaMonkeydel Comment[it]=Per leggere e scrivere email Comment[ja]=メールの読み書き Comment[ko]=SeaMonkey 메일/뉴스 읽기 및 쓰기 클라이언트 Comment[nl]=E-mail/nieuws lezen en schrijven met SeaMonkey Comment[pl]=Czytanie i wysyłanie e-maili Comment[pt_BR]=Ler e escrever suas mensagens Comment[ru]=Читайте и пишите письма Comment[sk]=Čítajte a píšte poštu, čítajte novinky pomocou programu SeaMonkey Comment[sv]=Läs och skriv e-post Comment[ug]=ئېلخەت ۋە خەۋەرلەرنى SeaMonkey دا كۆرۈش ۋە يېزىش Comment[zh_CN]=阅读邮件或新闻 Comment[zh_TW]=以 SeaMonkey 讀寫郵件或新聞 GenericName=Mail Client Exec=/home/username/seamonkey/seamonkey/seamonkey %u Terminal=false X-MultipleArgs=false Type=Application Icon=/home/username/seamonkey/seamonkey/chrome/icons/default/default48.png/default.png Categories=Application;Network;Email; MimeType=text/html;text/xml;application/xhtml+xml;application/xml;application/vnd.mozilla.xul+xml;application/rss+xml;application/rdf+xml;x-scheme-handler/mailto;x-scheme-handler/http;x-scheme-handler/https;x-scheme-handler/ftp; StartupWMClass=SeaMonkey StartupNotify=true GenericName[ast]=Client de correu GenericName[ca]=Client de correu GenericName[da]=E-postklient GenericName[de]=E-Mail-Anwendung GenericName[es]=Cliente de correo GenericName[fi]=Sähköpostiohjelma GenericName[fr]=Client de messagerie GenericName[gl]=Cliente de correo electrónico GenericName[he]=לקוח דוא״ל GenericName[hr]=Klijent e-pošte GenericName[hu]=Levelezőkliens GenericName[it]=Client email GenericName[ko]=메일 클라이언트 GenericName[nl]=E-mailprogramma GenericName[ru]=Почтовый клиент GenericName[sk]=Poštový klie GenericName[ug]=ئېلخەت دېتالى GenericName[zh_CN]=邮件新闻客户端 GenericName[zh_TW]=郵件用戶端 Be sure to change username to your actual username in the file. Save the file exit gedit. Now open Nautilus and go to where you just created the desktop file: /home/username/.local/share/applications/ click hold on the seamonkey.desktop file drag it over to your Unity launch bar, release. Note: if you have issues with the launch bar not appearing, press hold the Super key (Windows key on some keyboards). Note that I had you create the launcher in /home/username/.local/share/applications/seamonkey.desktop. The reason for that is I (and other 12.04 users) do not use Unity, I use GNOME Classic instead. By putting it in the /home/username/.local/share/applications/ the menu item will show when I open my menu. If you switch to GNOME Fallback (I think that's what it is), SeaMonkey will show up in your menu as well. Also note that I left in the multiple languages in the 'Desktop Entry'. Again, this is so that a non-english speaker can use the file as well. And
Re: How to edit HTML tags in mail?
On 11/01/2012 11:06 PM, Kjell Rilbe wrote: Hi, I often find the HTML editing in the mail client very lacking, as it seems to muck up line breaks and where various formatting starts and ends. So, I'd like to be able to switch to HTML source editing for my emails. I know there is such an editing mode in Composer, but I want to do it in my mail editor. Is there any way to do that? Kjell Ctrl-A to select all, then Insert|HTML ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to edit HTML tags in mail?
On 11/02/2012 12:03 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Ctrl-A to select all, then Insert|HTML Sorry for the noise... I missed Hartmut's earlier post that suggested the same. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Basic request
On 11/02/2012 12:13 PM, WaltS wrote: On 11/02/2012 02:42 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/01/2012 10:47 AM, Gerry wrote: I enjoy using Seamonkey I like the totality of the suite. I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.I have SM 2.8 I'm encouraged to download 2.13.1 which I've done (to ///Downloads) I extract the file but then what?... I appreciate this a very basic request but I don't think I canbe the only one. Easiest way is to follow Walt's advice (somewhat modified). Create a new folder 'seamonkey': Home /seamonkey Move the bz2 download to that folder and extract there (right click in Nautilus select 'extract here'). That will create a subfolder 'seamonkey': Home /seamonkey/seamonkey I am always mystified by that double seamonkey folder step. What is the reasoning? Until I created my applications folder all my manually installed apps would go into Home. Thus home/username/seamonkey, home/username/firefox. Now it is home/username/applications/seamonkey and so forth. I use the base folder /home/username/seamonkey to keep the bz2's in (I typically have 3 or 4 versions). That way I don't clutter up the base home folder. Sample: $ ls ~/seamonkey seamonkey seamonkey-2.11.tar.bz2 seamonkey-2.12a1.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 seamonkey-2.12a2.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 seamonkey2131 seamonkey-2.13.2.tar.bz2 It's simply a personal preference. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
[Resolved] Re: Running SM 2.13.1 logs me out
On 11/02/2012 12:05 PM, Craig wrote: ... I then downloaded and installed the latest NVIDIA driver, NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-304.60.run. Trying the 64-bit version again, it ran properly and I was not logged out. I then downloaded, installed, and tried the 32-bit version of 2.13.2 with success, even with copying my plugins directory to /usr/local/seamonkey. Excellent! ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Still not informed of updates
On 11/02/2012 12:15 PM, Craig wrote: NoOp wrote: In the URL bar: about:config then enter useragent in the search bar and when mailnews.headers.showUserAgent appears, double click it to set it to true. Now when you view the headers View|Headers|Normal you will see: Subject: From: Date: Newsgroups: (if in newsgroups) or To: (if in email) User-Agent: Gary Thank you, Harmut and Gary. That does indeed work. Now, back to my original question: Why am I not informed of updates? I did notice that Firefox has the same problem. I went to http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ to get Seamonkey 2.13.2 and noticed that the latest Firefox is 16.0.2, while I was running 15.0.1. Clicking on About Firefox and then Check for updates told me that I had the latest version. Craig I'm probably not the best to ask as I have both SeaMonkey and Firefox 'check for updates' turned off (there were issues previously with them automatically downloading even when Automatically download install was turned off). Check to see what you have checked in: Edit|Preferences|Advanced|Software Install... Firefox: Edit|Preferences|Advanced|Update ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Still not informed of updates
On 11/02/2012 01:52 PM, Craig wrote: NoOp wrote: Check to see what you have checked in: Edit|Preferences|Advanced|Software Install... Add-ons Allow websites to install add-ons and updates Automatically check for updates daily Seamonkey Automatically check for updates daily Maybe you're just an unlucky soul :-) OK. I backed this down from 2.13.2 to 2.13.1; 32bit version on a 64bit system: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.1 When I click: Help|Check for Updates I am informed that there is a securty update - 2.13.2: Update Available A security and stability update for SeaMonkey is available: SeaMonkey 2.13.2 It is strongly recommended that you apply this update for SeaMonkey as soon as possible. You know of course that you'll not get any update info with the 64bit version - you have to monitor the rss feed, this group, or the release schedule. Just to verify, I've now fired up the 64bit version to finish this post: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.1 and checking: Help|Check for Updates shows no update is available. I'll put this back to 32bit 2.13.1 enable 'check daily' and let it sit for awhile to see if there is any result. Firefox: Edit|Preferences|Advanced|Update Check for updates, but let me choose whether to install them Automatically update Search Engines Thanks, Craig ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.14b3 Released.
On 11/02/2012 08:33 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.14b3: An updated release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1] now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as HTML5, hardware acceleration and improved JavaScript speed. SeaMonkey 2.14b3 is available in 26 languages, for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. For a more complete list of major changes [2] in SeaMonkey 2.14b3, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.14b3 section of the Release Notes [3], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.14/changes [3] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.14/ It's unfortunate that you missed this one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702165 [Bug 702165 - crash [@ nsMsgQuickSearchDBView::OnSearchDone ] - .. - [@ nsMsgSearchSession::InterruptSearch] when change folders before search is finished] IMO that is a show stopper for 2.14 release. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How can I find my old e-mails and Address Book
On 11/03/2012 01:41 AM, Alex Beauroy wrote: I had Seamonkey on a PC with Vista My computer went kaput I had to change the Mothercard, the processor, in order to be able to connect to internet I upgraded to Windows 7 But I cannot find my Address Book and my Old e-mails. Is there something I should do??? Thanks in advance Best Regards @lex http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_SeaMonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.14b3 Released.
On 11/03/2012 07:31 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: ... Perhaps a dedicated channel targeted solely at those who are interested in beta- releases would be of benefit here. Maybe. AFAIK there are no plans for that right now, though. I don't even know who administers mailing lists and news groups. Someone at Mozilla, I guess. Greetings, Jens The RSS feed is (IMO) an excellent source/channel for that now. http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news-atom At least that is where I keep informed... :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Still not informed of updates
On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, NoOp wrote: ... When I click: Help|Check for Updates I am informed that there is a securty update - 2.13.2: Update Available A security and stability update for SeaMonkey is available: SeaMonkey 2.13.2 It is strongly recommended that you apply this update for SeaMonkey as soon as possible. You know of course that you'll not get any update info with the 64bit version - you have to monitor the rss feed, this group, or the release schedule. Just to verify, I've now fired up the 64bit version to finish this post: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.1 and checking: Help|Check for Updates shows no update is available. I'll put this back to 32bit 2.13.1 enable 'check daily' and let it sit for awhile to see if there is any result. ... Sorry, I forgot to follow-up. Result of the last is that I also set it to 'automatically download and install'... it did. And I remember why I purposely turned that off :-) Anyway, if you 32bit SeaMonkey 2.13.2 doesn't notifiy you of the next update holler away. Or, you could back yours down to 2.13.1 and see if it is working now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey