Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Hakan Falk

Mike,

Very good analysis and it describes the situation. The problem
is the currency base, which before was stable with the gold
standard. Now the currency base is the collective wealth of the
society. Rising debts and deficits should in theory mean some
adjustments downwards of the currency, but it is more complex
than that, because it now has many emotional and political
factors.

No one can afford a wholesale collapse of the US economy and
it takes time to diversify currency dependence. The best for the
world economy, would be stable Euro, dollar and yen, with little
movement between them.  The loss of prosperity in the world,
if the dollar fail, would be enormous, but the current evaluation
is based on wishful thinking rather than fundamentals. The world
is waiting out the current US administration and hope for something
better in the future. If that does not happen, then US and the world
will be in serious problems. It will also mean that Russia and China
would play much more important parts in the world economy.

Hakan


At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:
I don't see a wholesale collapse of the US economy.  I do think the
dollar will continue to slide until the country elects some Republicans
or Democrats.  I am not sure what to call the gang in power now; they
are most certainly NOT Republicans.

I'm also not sure how successful the Iranian oil bourse will be - so
they'll get Euros.  Big whoop.  All major markets are still denominated
in dollars.  Maybe they can buy nuclear thechnology from France.

Also, say what you want about the US but it is still by far the most
dynamic economy in the world.  China and India still have significant
infrastructure, corruption, pollution and transparency issues to overcome.

Don't get me wrong - the concerted effort to destroy our economic system
perpetuated by the Bush Administration will (and has) have an effect.

And whose to say China and the other Asian countries holding out debt
won't decide to trim our sails a bit.  A very small sell off would
devastating.
  From Safehaven:
The US Dollar has been the reserve currency of the world since the end
of WW2 and the Bretton Woods Agreement (July 1944). Bretton Woods
signalled the end of the British Pound as the worlds reserve currency.
The Pound was the principal currency of the world for over 100 years
from 1816 to 1933 and it was backed by gold.

But at the outset of WW1 Britain and other European countries came off
the gold standard because of the financial dislocations caused by the
war. The US$ still backed by gold slowly began to replace the faltering
British Pound but by 1933 the US joined them in coming off the gold
standard due to the deteriorating deflationary conditions of the Great
Depression. The period was also marked by the collapse in international
trade and financial flows prior To WW2.

With Britain and Europe in ruins after WW2 the way was clear for the US,
who emerged unscathed by war to assume the role as the world's reserve
currency and the king of the international financial markets. And
backing the US Dollar was once again convertibility into gold. The
Bretton Woods Agreement saw other key features such as fixed but
adjustable exchange rates against the US Dollar and the birth of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
**What will happen to the US as it is flat on its back engaged in
Afganistan, Iraq and Iran?  With Europe, China and India wait politely
as we sort it out?  I doubt it.
I don't think China is playing for second place.

But by the early 1970's growing structural imbalances amongst the
world's leading economies led to increased currency speculation, the
floating of the Pound Sterling followed by others, and deteriorating
confidence in the US Dollar. The gold standard and Bretton Woods
collapsed in 1971 and by 1973 the floating exchange rate system took
hold. Since then we have been through a roller coaster ride for the US
Dollar and numerous other currencies. The US Dollar after falling
precipitously through the 1970's regained strength in the 1980's
particularly following the election of the Reagan administration in
1980. That ended in 1985 with the Plaza Accord as the strong US Dollar
was causing structural imbalances with the growing US twin deficits of
budget and trade (sound familiar). In less then two years the US Dollar
lost half its value.

The 1990's was the decade of currency crises. The British Pound (1992),
the Mexican Peso (1994), the Asian contagion (1997) followed by Asian
Contagion II in 1998 along with the collapse of the Russian Ruble. This
led to the collapse of the giant hedge fund Long Term Capital Management
(LTCM) that required the Federal Reserve to bail the banks that were
threatened with collapse. To a lesser degree we also had the Turkish
Lira crisis and numerous currency and financial woes in Latin America
especially Argentina. And least we forget, the Canadian Dollar also fell
to new multi year lows although it was never described 

Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar/question??

2006-05-31 Thread Marylynn Schmidt
There was a post from another list that has me confused.

I trust the source so I pay attention but can not understand any possible 
reasoning here.

There are several old/closed gold mines in the U.S. that still have good 
veins with rich to very rich ore in these veins .. and the veins are 
substantial and could be easily mined.

Apparently they are plentiful enough.

These areas with closed mines are not available for purchase and/or lease 
unless the purchase reason is altered .. which is being done.

When a property is obtained and gold has been mined .. and mining activities 
have become known .. the owners are visited by federals (unidentified) 
telling them they need to close down because their activity threatens the 
economy.

This plus enough scare tactics seems to have caused this whole thing to 
become a bit more quietly approached.

I have no other information I would be willing to offer other than, because 
of the source, I believe this is actually happening.

.. any other information I have is extremely limited.

And, while I believe it's true, I find it beyond my reasoning and/or 
ability to understand.

I know I'm missing massive chunks of information here so I have no 
information links to connect it.

So, pretending that's it's true .. Is there anyone who could possibly shed 
some light on this.

What possible reason could there be?

Mary Lynn

Rev. Mary Lynn Schmidt, Ordained Minister
ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
TTouch . Reiki . Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Animal Behavior Modification . 
Shamanic Spiritual Travel . Behavior Problems . Psionic Energy Practitioner 
. Radionics . Herbs . Dowsing . Nutrition . Homeopathy . Polarity .
The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/
http://allcreatureconnections.org



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Republican / Conservative ??

2006-05-31 Thread Marylynn Schmidt
Not sure where the link came from but it suggested doing some research into 
the EXACT meaning of the term Neo-Conservative.

The White House does refer to themselves as Neo-Conservative and I .. for 
one .. never bothered to try to understand exactly what that was.

I have been reading everything google has to offer .. plus a few other 
search engines .. and it's not very pretty.

.. in reality .. George W. Bush has never lied to us.

He told us up front what he was.

The noise you hear is my hand slapping my head!!

Mary Lynn

Rev. Mary Lynn Schmidt, Ordained Minister
ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
TTouch . Reiki . Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Animal Behavior Modification . 
Shamanic Spiritual Travel . Behavior Problems . Psionic Energy Practitioner 
. Radionics . Herbs . Dowsing . Nutrition . Homeopathy . Polarity .
The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/
http://allcreatureconnections.org



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Hakan Falk

Mike,

At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:
snip
Also, say what you want about the US but it is still by far the most
dynamic economy in the world.  China and India still have significant
infrastructure, corruption, pollution and transparency issues to overcome.
snip

And US have none of those problems? LOL

Hakan  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Mike Weaver
I didn't say that.  Nor would I.  I said the US has a dynamic economy.
Our infrastructure is beginning to fall apart; the highway system is 
crumbling; the electrical grid is shaky; we have no energy policy...the 
list goes on.  But it it better than the systems in most of the world, 
except Western Europe.
There is a functioning legal system, something I think you'd be 
hard-pressed to claim about China and to some degree India.
Our corruption is better managed and on a grander scale - Halliburton.  
But you don't have to pay a bribe to get driver's license or cross a 
bridge or open a business.  Would you rather own stock in Exxon or 
Cnooc?  Well, figuratively, I wouldn't own oil stocks personally, but 
one has reasonably open books, and putatively complies with 
Sarbanes-Oxley, and one can be manipulated at the will of the government.
Despite the best efforts of the current administration, our pollution 
levels are nothing like that of China or India, and the days of major 
ecological disasters like the Three Gorges Dam are passed.
Transparency has suffered mightily under Bush, but Transparency 
International still rates the US well above China and India.

Hakan Falk wrote:

Mike,

At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:
  

snip
Also, say what you want about the US but it is still by far the most
dynamic economy in the world.  China and India still have significant
infrastructure, corruption, pollution and transparency issues to overcome.
snip



And US have none of those problems? LOL

Hakan  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] HHO for welding running your car

2006-05-31 Thread Bill Ellis
If it's all true, it's going to be interesting to see how fast this guy disappears from the face of the planet!"D. Mindock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Another water powered car, this oneby Denny Klein in Florida.  100 miles on 4 oz of water, he says. He is developing a Hummer for  the Pentagon that'll run on either water or gasoline, according to the  newscast on Faux 26 TV.http://youtube.com/watch?v=HF__Qlhtnwssearch=water%20power___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/Wildbill
Sutton.VT 
		Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Mike Weaver
I'd call it Magical Thinking.

We're still pretty much the only country in the world that can print 
money to pay its debts.  Gotta wonder if that temptation will rise...
Our economic policy is nuts.  I personally don't mind a *little* foreign 
debt, in fact I think it's good; keeps our neighbors invested in keeping 
the counrty in good shape.  Would you blow up the business of someone 
who owed you money? 

But I think borrowing a billion dollars a month to finance a war we 
can't win is crazy.

Hakan Falk wrote:

Mike,

Very good analysis and it describes the situation. The problem
is the currency base, which before was stable with the gold
standard. Now the currency base is the collective wealth of the
society. Rising debts and deficits should in theory mean some
adjustments downwards of the currency, but it is more complex
than that, because it now has many emotional and political
factors.

No one can afford a wholesale collapse of the US economy and
it takes time to diversify currency dependence. The best for the
world economy, would be stable Euro, dollar and yen, with little
movement between them.  The loss of prosperity in the world,
if the dollar fail, would be enormous, but the current evaluation
is based on wishful thinking rather than fundamentals. The world
is waiting out the current US administration and hope for something
better in the future. If that does not happen, then US and the world
will be in serious problems. It will also mean that Russia and China
would play much more important parts in the world economy.

Hakan


At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:
  

I don't see a wholesale collapse of the US economy.  I do think the
dollar will continue to slide until the country elects some Republicans
or Democrats.  I am not sure what to call the gang in power now; they
are most certainly NOT Republicans.

I'm also not sure how successful the Iranian oil bourse will be - so
they'll get Euros.  Big whoop.  All major markets are still denominated
in dollars.  Maybe they can buy nuclear thechnology from France.

Also, say what you want about the US but it is still by far the most
dynamic economy in the world.  China and India still have significant
infrastructure, corruption, pollution and transparency issues to overcome.

Don't get me wrong - the concerted effort to destroy our economic system
perpetuated by the Bush Administration will (and has) have an effect.

And whose to say China and the other Asian countries holding out debt
won't decide to trim our sails a bit.  A very small sell off would
devastating.
 From Safehaven:
The US Dollar has been the reserve currency of the world since the end
of WW2 and the Bretton Woods Agreement (July 1944). Bretton Woods
signalled the end of the British Pound as the worlds reserve currency.
The Pound was the principal currency of the world for over 100 years


from 1816 to 1933 and it was backed by gold.
  

But at the outset of WW1 Britain and other European countries came off
the gold standard because of the financial dislocations caused by the
war. The US$ still backed by gold slowly began to replace the faltering
British Pound but by 1933 the US joined them in coming off the gold
standard due to the deteriorating deflationary conditions of the Great
Depression. The period was also marked by the collapse in international
trade and financial flows prior To WW2.

With Britain and Europe in ruins after WW2 the way was clear for the US,
who emerged unscathed by war to assume the role as the world's reserve
currency and the king of the international financial markets. And
backing the US Dollar was once again convertibility into gold. The
Bretton Woods Agreement saw other key features such as fixed but
adjustable exchange rates against the US Dollar and the birth of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
**What will happen to the US as it is flat on its back engaged in
Afganistan, Iraq and Iran?  With Europe, China and India wait politely
as we sort it out?  I doubt it.
I don't think China is playing for second place.

But by the early 1970's growing structural imbalances amongst the
world's leading economies led to increased currency speculation, the
floating of the Pound Sterling followed by others, and deteriorating
confidence in the US Dollar. The gold standard and Bretton Woods
collapsed in 1971 and by 1973 the floating exchange rate system took
hold. Since then we have been through a roller coaster ride for the US
Dollar and numerous other currencies. The US Dollar after falling
precipitously through the 1970's regained strength in the 1980's
particularly following the election of the Reagan administration in
1980. That ended in 1985 with the Plaza Accord as the strong US Dollar
was causing structural imbalances with the growing US twin deficits of
budget and trade (sound familiar). In less then two years the US Dollar
lost half its value.

The 1990's was the decade of currency crises. The British Pound (1992),
the Mexican Peso 

Re: [Biofuel] Republican / Conservative ??

2006-05-31 Thread Mike Weaver
Well, Conservative USED to mean:
Pro state's rights - for instance the states were vested with the 
responsibility to manage education, MARRIAGE, policing and so on.
A fiscally sound economy - no debts, and minimal spending on social 
programs.
A strong defense, or, not having your armed forces stretched to the 
breaking point.
Little foreign entanglements.

I can't tell you what it means now...


Marylynn Schmidt wrote:

Not sure where the link came from but it suggested doing some research into 
the EXACT meaning of the term Neo-Conservative.

The White House does refer to themselves as Neo-Conservative and I .. for 
one .. never bothered to try to understand exactly what that was.

I have been reading everything google has to offer .. plus a few other 
search engines .. and it's not very pretty.

.. in reality .. George W. Bush has never lied to us.

He told us up front what he was.

The noise you hear is my hand slapping my head!!

Mary Lynn

Rev. Mary Lynn Schmidt, Ordained Minister
ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
TTouch . Reiki . Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Animal Behavior Modification . 
Shamanic Spiritual Travel . Behavior Problems . Psionic Energy Practitioner 
. Radionics . Herbs . Dowsing . Nutrition . Homeopathy . Polarity .
The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/
http://allcreatureconnections.org



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] [SPAMPROB:51%] Re: threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Chip Mefford
(editorial note; I hate word-wrap)


MK DuPree wrote:
 Joe Street asks, Is there anything we at home can do to help speed this 
 process? :)
 
 I suggest: Implore your Federal representatives to continue raising the debt 
 ceiling, 
 to continue supporting the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, to start another war 
 in 
 Iran, etc etc.  Or better, don't waste your time.  Instead, I ask you, Joe, 
 and 
 the List, how do you believe the average Joe should prepare for the 
 inevitable 
 demise of the US dollar???  I'm not trying to be facetious.  I'm asking a 
 real 
 question, seeking a real answer.  Might not like the answer, but I'd like to 

SNIP

how do you believe the average Joe should prepare for the inevitable
 demise of the US dollar??? 

A simple note;

I'm 50 years old. I've heard about the pending collapse/failure of
the US system my whole life. It's inevitable, and right around the
corner. That mindset is just simply part of me.

Yet, it doesn't happen,

Sure, it's going to happen tomorrow, but we said that yesterday,
and the day before.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar/question??

2006-05-31 Thread Mike Weaver
I'm not sure I believe that - there is quite a bit of gold mining going 
on in the US.

Newmont Mining:
At the heart of Newmont’s Eastern Nevada operations is the Carlin mine. 
The mine traces its origins to 1961, when geologists began probing the 
high desert area around the Tuscarora Mountains in search of finely 
disseminated gold. By the summer of 1963, drilling had identified a 
3-million-ounce deposit, sufficient to justify a mine even at the then 
prevailing gold price of $35 an ounce. Newmont’s first open pit mine and 
oxide mill began production in 1965.

As additional gold was discovered and new mines opened, the faulted 
terrain running northwest to southeast from the town of Carlin became 
known as the Carlin Trend, a 50-mile (80 kilometer) long, 5-mile (8 
kilometer) wide belt that contains more than 20 major gold deposits and 
is the most prolific goldfield in the Western Hemisphere. Newmont’s 
Carlin Trend operations include several surface and underground mines 
that supply ore to a variety of Nevada processing facilities.

Most of the 1,600 employees reside in Elko, Spring Creek and Carlin, 
where Newmont is the largest private employer.



Marylynn Schmidt wrote:

There was a post from another list that has me confused.

I trust the source so I pay attention but can not understand any possible 
reasoning here.

There are several old/closed gold mines in the U.S. that still have good 
veins with rich to very rich ore in these veins .. and the veins are 
substantial and could be easily mined.

Apparently they are plentiful enough.

These areas with closed mines are not available for purchase and/or lease 
unless the purchase reason is altered .. which is being done.

When a property is obtained and gold has been mined .. and mining activities 
have become known .. the owners are visited by federals (unidentified) 
telling them they need to close down because their activity threatens the 
economy.

This plus enough scare tactics seems to have caused this whole thing to 
become a bit more quietly approached.

I have no other information I would be willing to offer other than, because 
of the source, I believe this is actually happening.

.. any other information I have is extremely limited.

And, while I believe it's true, I find it beyond my reasoning and/or 
ability to understand.

I know I'm missing massive chunks of information here so I have no 
information links to connect it.

So, pretending that's it's true .. Is there anyone who could possibly shed 
some light on this.

What possible reason could there be?

Mary Lynn

Rev. Mary Lynn Schmidt, Ordained Minister
ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
TTouch . Reiki . Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Animal Behavior Modification . 
Shamanic Spiritual Travel . Behavior Problems . Psionic Energy Practitioner 
. Radionics . Herbs . Dowsing . Nutrition . Homeopathy . Polarity .
The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/
http://allcreatureconnections.org



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Keith Addison
Joe Street asks, Is there anything we at home can do to help speed 
this process? :)

I suggest: Implore your Federal representatives to continue raising 
the debt ceiling, to continue supporting the war in Iraq and 
Afghanistan, to start another war in Iran, etc etc.  Or better, 
don't waste your time.

Or better still, stop killing people so casually and go home, like 
everybody's telling you to. If you really want to go bombing the hell 
out of Iran just to fiddle with the Federal Reserve or something you 
might at least ask them first, it's only polite, it's their 
collateral after all.

Instead, I ask you, Joe, and the List, how do you believe the 
average Joe should prepare for the inevitable demise of the US 
dollar???

I don't think it's inevitable. Or at least I don't think an economic 
collapse is inevitable. Or not because of the dollar anyway. Energy 
is a more threatening issue, IMHO.

I'm not trying to be facetious.  I'm asking a real question, seeking 
a real answer.  Might not like the answer, but I'd like to hear. 
Also, Keith, how will Japan be affected?  Japan is one of the 
largest holders of US Debt.  Mike DuPree

Well, you see, there's this economic crisis here that the Japanese 
have been struggling to survive in recent years. I guess it will grow 
even more severe.

It's a strange kind of economic crisis, at first glance. For one 
thing it's not characterised by any shortage of money at any level, 
if you can picture that. Actually it seems to be impossible to 
picture it, at least in newspaper articles about the severity of the 
crisis, which usually show photographs of the stock exchange. No 
images of suffering or blighted inner cities or rust belts of dead 
factories rotting away. It's not that they hide it, it's just that 
there aren't any such things here. When interviewed, ordinary people 
say they're deeply worried that their retirement income might not be 
as much as they'd thought. It still won't leave them poor though.

There is evidence of the crisis at street level, if you know where to 
look. In the financial district in Tokyo there are coffee shops that 
are filled each day with displaced sararimen who've been retrenched. 
They get up in the morning, grab their suit and attache case and rush 
off to work as usual even though they don't have a job to go to 
anymore, because if the truth came out in the neighbourhood the sheer 
loss of social status would destroy the wife. They're not suffering 
though except existentially, they get really good pay-offs.

Another street-level indicator is how empty the shops are. There's an 
instant cure available for the sheer burden of hopelessness and 
depression that comes with trying to live through an economic crisis 
such as this one. You go shopping. It helps take your mind off 
things. When it's really serious the shops are full.

I guess they'll just go shopping Mike.

Sorry... I'm not really joking though. Sweden also has this kind of 
economic crisis sometimes, that's the envy of the world. They just 
can't see how rich they are. I laugh at Swedes about it, and they say 
yes they know, but THIS time it's real. Right. Maybe Switzerland has 
them too.

I'm not sure what Japan's economic policy is. Maybe they haven't got 
one, it's kind of hard to find an actual policy on anything in Japan. 
It doesn't seem to be how they do things here. Henry Ford invented 
the Just In Time inventory strategy of stock keeping, but it was 
Toyota who put it on the map. It's very Japanese! Maybe it describes 
Japanese economics quite well too, JIT economics. It might look like 
they haven't seen something creeping up on them but I wouldn't bank 
on it.

Japan has the world's fifth largest military budget but the military 
is just about invisible here, and they pay for it without arms 
exports. I don't think anyone else can manage that, or not easily. 
Japan is strangely invisible in many ways, but it's one of the three 
great economic powers in the world, its technological base is the 
equal of any, and whatever the economic future holds Japan is sure to 
play a major role in it. They're capable of things the West wouldn't 
imagine, they have different depths of experience to draw on, they 
keep proving it. They have a great deal to contribute.

Best

Keith


- Original Message -
From: Joe Street 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.orgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:29 AM
Subject: [SPAMPROB:51%] Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

  Is there anything we at home can do to help speed this process? :)
 
  Joe
 
  AltEnergyNetwork wrote:
 
 
   
http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=58951http://www.vheadline.c 
om/readnews.asp?id=58951 
 
 
  Threat against the US$ comes from countries such as Iran
  and Venezuela...
 
  Former Nordland University (Norway) associate professor,
   Dr. Abbas Bakhtiar writes:  On Wednesday, May 17, the
  Dow Jones plunged 214 points to 

Re: [Biofuel] Republican / Conservative ??

2006-05-31 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Mary Lynn

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Neo-conservative
Neo-conservative - SourceWatch

1 Origins of the neo-conservative movement

2 Neoconservative forums and advocates

2.1 The neoconservatives and the Bush administrations

3 Criticisms of neoconservatives from within the conservative movement

4 Neocon influence in the US media

5 SourceWatch resources

6 Integral External Links

7 Books

7.1 The history of Neoconservatism

8 Incidental Neo-conservative External Links

Best

Keith



Not sure where the link came from but it suggested doing some 
research into the EXACT meaning of the term Neo-Conservative.

The White House does refer to themselves as Neo-Conservative and I 
.. for one .. never bothered to try to understand exactly what that 
was.

I have been reading everything google has to offer .. plus a few 
other search engines .. and it's not very pretty.

.. in reality .. George W. Bush has never lied to us.

He told us up front what he was.

The noise you hear is my hand slapping my head!!

Mary Lynn

Rev. Mary Lynn Schmidt, Ordained Minister
ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
TTouch . Reiki . Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Animal Behavior 
Modification . Shamanic Spiritual Travel . Behavior Problems . 
Psionic Energy Practitioner . Radionics . Herbs . Dowsing . 
Nutrition . Homeopathy . Polarity .
The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/
http://allcreatureconnections.org


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] more goofy questions

2006-05-31 Thread Thomas Kelly
Jason  Katie,
 I'm not sure what you mean when you say clean the glycerine for 
compost.
 Many people compost the glycerine cocktail w/o any treatment. I think 
this is best done when KOH is used as the caustic rather than NaOH.
  I do separate the glycerine because I produce quite  a bit of BD these 
days. I'm concerned about pouring Kilo after Kilo of  caustic, of which 70%, 
by weight, is Potassium. Sure it's a valuable soil nutrient, but I'd like to 
control how much is added to my garden   which has done just fine on 
pre-BD compost. I also am attempting to recover methanol and have uses for 
the other components of the mix.

 I used hydrochloric acid (sold in hardware stores as muriatic acid) 
before I was able to locate phosphoric.
I did a few small test batches and got good separation.
 The difference will be the type of mineral salt that will precipitate 
out.
Ex:
Hydrochloric Acid  + Lye (NaOH) forms table salt and water
HCl   +   NaOH      NaCL (table salt)  + H2O
The table salt is not especially valuable; throw it out?

The salt falls to the bottom and you get FFAs forming a layer on top and 
the crude glycerine (+  most of the excess methanol) forming a bottom layer. 
The FFAs and the glycerine/methanol are composed of Cs, Hs, and Os.
They will decompose into CO2 and H2O. They supply nothing in the way of soil 
nutrients, but I have found that
they appear to accelerate decomposition within a compost pile   ...  not 
only a safe way to dispose of the mix, but some benefit to be gotten.

KOH (during processing) and H3PO4 (split)
is preferred because the salt produced is Potassium Phosphate  . 
valuable as fertilizer.

 The point is that different acids can be used to split the cocktail 
into FFAs and crude glycerine w. methanol. The
difference is in the salt (and its value) that is produced.

 Vinegar is an organic acid, which tend to be weak acids. It would take 
a lot of vinegar to split the cocktail.
Probably more expensive than hydrochloric and I don't see that the salt 
produced would have more value.

***By value I don't mean financial, as in sell for profit. I
dissolve some of the potassium phosphate produced by the split in water and 
add it to my compost piles. It has value as in  ...  can be put to good use.

   Sorry to get so wordy, but your goofy question is part of a subject 
that is of great interest to me.
   The splitting of the cocktail may not have the financial payoff that 
brewing BD does, but the feeling of putting to good use what others have 
called waste products  is akin to the feeling I get when I fill the 
tank(s) w. BD I brewed at home.
Best of luck to you,
 Tom

- Original Message - 
From: Jason Katie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:13 AM
Subject: [Biofuel] more goofy questions


 what other, more available acids can be used in place of phosphoric to 
 clean
 glycerine for compost? i have been reading for three hours, and i cant 
 find
 any experiments or documentation. am i not looking in the right places? 
 has
 anyone tried using vinegar? this is really bothering me. any ideas?


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Robert, Hakan

You are correct, but there is a belief over here that engaging in
war is GOOD for the economy, and further, that we're strong enough to
sustain ongoing warfare.

There's the kind of economics that can't distinguish between swords 
and ploughshares, and the kind that can. The first is a thing of the 
past with a hangover, the second is of the future, and the present.

Eco-economics has been on the table since Maggie Thatcher put it 
there by mistake in 1988. It's not going to go away, it's been 
gaining ground steadily.

It's not just we Americans who need to do this--though we are
certainly among the most gluttonous energy users on the planet--but the
entire economic structure upon which society has been built needs
reconsideration.

It's a casino, and a casino mentality. The only bit of reality in a 
casino is the fact that the game's loaded in favour of the house, but 
I don't think the guys who own Las Vegas think you could run the 
world that way. Or maybe they do, if it's the Mafia that owns Las 
Vegas, considering the grey areas you always find everywhere between 
government, big business and organised crime.

The other bit of reality is that it's sucking up the whole world like 
a vacuum cleaner and vanishing it.

Time for real economics.

The work of the economist Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen is real economics:

http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/georgescu.htm
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, 1906-1994

There's some of his work here, in the archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg30418.html
[biofuel] Energy and Economic Myths
Selections from Energy and Economic Myths by Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen

His inheritors are the ecological economists, Herman Daly, Robert 
Costanza, Michael T. Klare, Joshua Farley and many others.

More:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34131.html
[biofuel] From Here to Economy

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg30417.html
[biofuel] How Much Is Nature Worth? For You, $33 Trillion

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34130.html
[biofuel] At What Cost? - Costanza

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34129.html
[biofuel] The Wealth of Nature

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34207.html
Re: [biofuel] The Wealth of Nature

That's a good read.
 
It has to go that way, and it has been doing so, though it's not 
centre-screen. It's no more centre-screen that the growth of backyard 
biodiesel brewing round the world in the last six years, spreading 
like a weed and suitably out of control for several years now, IMHO.

It's a fair comparison because of what you say about energy. If we're 
going to have an economic collapse I think it might be an energy 
collapse more than a currency collapse. But I don't think there'll be 
an economic collapse. If you can't get yourself in shape for 
localised energy production and supply then you're headed for an 
economic collapse, but that's your problem, not everyone else's. Not 
any more, we're leaving that behind. No room for dinosaurs.

Even the US army thinks that way these days - they think they'll have 
to use localised biofuel and bioenergy sources to fight their wars to 
protect the fossil-fuel supplies. A dinosaur trying on some sheep's 
clothing.

The eco-economic view applies to a lot of areas now. Jules Pretty 
takes a conservative look at industrialised agriculture in terms of 
real cost accounting and it turns out to be costing more than it's 
worth. There's no way of putting it in the black, we'll just have to 
dump most of it. Pretty also charts a worldwide growth of sustainable 
farming, small-scale and local.

Food miles and fuel miles aren't just talk, the days are numbered 
for that kind of trade system, with carbon costs hot on its heels, 
real carbon costs, not the casino stuff they're playing with now.

Actually eco-economics does reach centre-screen. It highlights the 
externalisations of business-as-usual instead of hiding them. A lot 
of people started to see things that way after Hurricane Katrina.

The military's hardly an answer. It can do damage but it can't *win* 
anything, it's not a sword at all, just a shovel to dig your own 
grave with. And other people's too. It's hard for Americans to see it 
that way, it's all been glorified from birth. Glorified to death.

Best

Keith



Hakan Falk wrote:

 Robert,
 
 Now we are starting to get somewhere and thank you for posting a
 good and fuller description of the problem.
 

You're welcome!

 There are many problems with the US economy, one is the belief that
 they could export services to balance the lack of production. The markets
 for US services have failed to materialize. As pointed out, the cost of
 engaging in war, only worsen the situation.
 
 

You are correct, but there is a belief over here that engaging in
war is GOOD for the economy, and further, that we're strong enough to

Re: [Biofuel] bio diesel burners

2006-05-31 Thread Joe Street
Hi R.

I did burn biodiesel in my multifuel backpacking stove and it works 
beautifully once it gets lit but I had to heat the generator tube with a 
propane torch to get it hot enough to vaporize the methyl esters.

Joe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am considering making a bio diesel burner to fit into a 50 gallon gas 
 water heater that will act as my WVO drying / preheat tank. Has anybody 
 done this? I wonder if a small version of the mother earth waste oil 
 burner will work. I also thought i read somewhere on the JTF website or 
 on the mailing list that somebody burned biodiesel thru a camp stove. 
 Can anybody give me some input on this idea?
 r. allison
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Hakan Falk

Mike,

I would not take issue on pollution per facility, but pollution per
nation. US is very much larger polluter per capita than both China
and India together. US is also larger polluter in absolute terms,so
it is not surprising that US did not sign Kyoto. Even Bush said that
it would be too expensive to meet the Kyoto targets, which means
that US is way above them, otherwise it would not be that costly.
Looking at GDP levels, if anyone could afford a clean up, it is US.

I also think that the US glass house is damaged beyond repair,
with all the stone throwing that it suffered. As usual, it is more
about image, than practical realities.

Hakan

At 13:56 31/05/2006, you wrote:
I didn't say that.  Nor would I.  I said the US has a dynamic economy.
Our infrastructure is beginning to fall apart; the highway system is
crumbling; the electrical grid is shaky; we have no energy policy...the
list goes on.  But it it better than the systems in most of the world,
except Western Europe.
There is a functioning legal system, something I think you'd be
hard-pressed to claim about China and to some degree India.
Our corruption is better managed and on a grander scale - Halliburton.
But you don't have to pay a bribe to get driver's license or cross a
bridge or open a business.  Would you rather own stock in Exxon or
Cnooc?  Well, figuratively, I wouldn't own oil stocks personally, but
one has reasonably open books, and putatively complies with
Sarbanes-Oxley, and one can be manipulated at the will of the government.
Despite the best efforts of the current administration, our pollution
levels are nothing like that of China or India, and the days of major
ecological disasters like the Three Gorges Dam are passed.
Transparency has suffered mightily under Bush, but Transparency
International still rates the US well above China and India.

Hakan Falk wrote:

 Mike,
 
 At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:
 
 
 snip
 Also, say what you want about the US but it is still by far the most
 dynamic economy in the world.  China and India still have significant
 infrastructure, corruption, pollution and transparency issues to overcome.
 snip
 
 
 
 And US have none of those problems? LOL
 
 Hakan



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Joe Street
Hi Mike;

Well there is considerable uncertainty and debate about what form the 
restructuring will take but little argument that it is going to happen 
sooner or later.  The best strategy is therefore also unknown but I 
think one can still plan for some general conditions which may be 
present in any scenario.

In times of hyper inflation things are valued more in terms of what they 
are and the potentialities that they represent in terms of basic needs 
than they are in our society in present times.  Therefore anyone who can 
provide for themselves in areas of basic needs may be considered rich in 
some regards.  The ability to provide for your own food requirements can 
be very important. The ability to obtain and render water safe for 
consumption ranks right up there if you are independant with it. The 
ability to produce some energy may be an extravagance depending on the 
severity of the situation or it may mean the difference between living 
totally hand to mouth and having some extra wealth which can be used for 
special needs that have to be obtained from some external source. 
Therefore converting cash to assets that have these intrinsic value now 
before the hyperinflation hits ( if that is what is going to happen) may 
be a very wise investment.  It may be impossible to obtain these items 
during hard times due to radical changes in supply and demand.
So land, water and energy figure pretty highly in my mind in any 
doomsday scenario. I remember in 1998 when a massive ice storm left my 
parents and a huge section of eastern Ontario and Quebec without 
electricity for 14 days in the cold of January just how things changed 
in surprising ways.  I managed to buy the second last generator that was 
available to be bought in the eastern half of this country and it had to 
be shipped to me from Winnipeg Manitoba (probably 2000 km away).  There 
was no electricity anywhere, and neighborhoods were eerily silent. 
There was no trafic since gas stations were down and gas could only be 
pumped by hand but cash registers weren't working so many places would 
not even sell anything. A running generator could be heard for blocks 
and some were stolen by thieves.  In Walkerton Ontario when the 
municipal water supply became tainted with e. Coli there was a different 
form of pandemonium. Anyone who had a UV sterilizer and R.O. membrane 
like me didn't even have to bat an eye but some folks died and many 
suffer health problems ever since.
Depending on how bad things get, having some valuable assets like these 
may mean a need to defend them as in the example of the generator. I am 
starting to sound like a whacko survivalist as you sometimes see 
depicted that way. I don't have a fallout shelter or anything like that 
but I am definitely working towards ideas that will be of value in 
situations where I have to be self reliant. I want to get a methane 
digester going and some passive solar as well as PV on the roof as soon 
as I can.  I plan to do these things modestly just as I have with my BD 
setup. I don't aspire to be able to get off the grid with my current 
needs but to be able to have some small amount of power for special 
needs if the power goes out and for now it can just be a supplement to 
reduce my environmental footprint.
This post is getting long so I am going to cut it off here.

Best regards;
Joe

Cheers
Joe

MK DuPree wrote:

 Joe Street asks, Is there anything we at home can do to help speed this 
 process? :)
 I suggest: Implore your Federal representatives to continue raising the 
 debt ceiling, to continue supporting the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, to 
 start another war in Iran, etc etc.  Or better, don't waste your time.  
 Instead, I ask you, Joe, and the List, how do you believe the average 
 Joe should prepare for the inevitable demise of the US dollar???  I'm 
 not trying to be facetious.  I'm asking a real question, seeking a real 
 answer.  Might not like the answer, but I'd like to hear.  Also, Keith, 
 how will Japan be affected?  Japan is one of the largest holders of US 
 Debt.  Mike DuPree
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:29 AM
 Subject: [SPAMPROB:51%] Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar
 
   Is there anything we at home can do to help speed this process? :)
  
   Joe
  
   AltEnergyNetwork wrote:

snip

  
   But how long can this continue before the world loose
faith in the greenback, sending it crashing to
   unimaginable levels.
  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):

Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Hakan Falk

Keith,

After I finished the last email on this issue, I went to take a 
coffee and turned on CNN.

When CNN came on, I learned that Bush had decided to devaluate the 
dollar by letting it float downwards without any support. I had no 
idea about that this was happening, but I had not followed the news 
for a day or so. It confirms however that our discussions on this 
issue is very actual and now it is only to see at what level the 
dollar will stabilize. Fortunes will be lost, mostly by foreigners, 
and Bush managed to hurt his country once more, but it was long 
overdue anyway.  In reality he make the world pay for his war in 
Iraq. I had no dollar based assets, but I guess that there are many 
who are very upset.

Hakan


At 14:10 31/05/2006, you wrote:
Hi Robert, Hakan

 You are correct, but there is a belief over here that engaging in
 war is GOOD for the economy, and further, that we're strong enough to
 sustain ongoing warfare.

There's the kind of economics that can't distinguish between swords
and ploughshares, and the kind that can. The first is a thing of the
past with a hangover, the second is of the future, and the present.

Eco-economics has been on the table since Maggie Thatcher put it
there by mistake in 1988. It's not going to go away, it's been
gaining ground steadily.

 It's not just we Americans who need to do this--though we are
 certainly among the most gluttonous energy users on the planet--but the
 entire economic structure upon which society has been built needs
 reconsideration.

It's a casino, and a casino mentality. The only bit of reality in a
casino is the fact that the game's loaded in favour of the house, but
I don't think the guys who own Las Vegas think you could run the
world that way. Or maybe they do, if it's the Mafia that owns Las
Vegas, considering the grey areas you always find everywhere between
government, big business and organised crime.

The other bit of reality is that it's sucking up the whole world like
a vacuum cleaner and vanishing it.

Time for real economics.

The work of the economist Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen is real economics:

http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/georgescu.htm
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, 1906-1994

There's some of his work here, in the archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg30418.html
[biofuel] Energy and Economic Myths
Selections from Energy and Economic Myths by Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen

His inheritors are the ecological economists, Herman Daly, Robert
Costanza, Michael T. Klare, Joshua Farley and many others.

More:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34131.html
[biofuel] From Here to Economy

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg30417.html
[biofuel] How Much Is Nature Worth? For You, $33 Trillion

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34130.html
[biofuel] At What Cost? - Costanza

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34129.html
[biofuel] The Wealth of Nature

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34207.html
Re: [biofuel] The Wealth of Nature

That's a good read.

It has to go that way, and it has been doing so, though it's not
centre-screen. It's no more centre-screen that the growth of backyard
biodiesel brewing round the world in the last six years, spreading
like a weed and suitably out of control for several years now, IMHO.

It's a fair comparison because of what you say about energy. If we're
going to have an economic collapse I think it might be an energy
collapse more than a currency collapse. But I don't think there'll be
an economic collapse. If you can't get yourself in shape for
localised energy production and supply then you're headed for an
economic collapse, but that's your problem, not everyone else's. Not
any more, we're leaving that behind. No room for dinosaurs.

Even the US army thinks that way these days - they think they'll have
to use localised biofuel and bioenergy sources to fight their wars to
protect the fossil-fuel supplies. A dinosaur trying on some sheep's
clothing.

The eco-economic view applies to a lot of areas now. Jules Pretty
takes a conservative look at industrialised agriculture in terms of
real cost accounting and it turns out to be costing more than it's
worth. There's no way of putting it in the black, we'll just have to
dump most of it. Pretty also charts a worldwide growth of sustainable
farming, small-scale and local.

Food miles and fuel miles aren't just talk, the days are numbered
for that kind of trade system, with carbon costs hot on its heels,
real carbon costs, not the casino stuff they're playing with now.

Actually eco-economics does reach centre-screen. It highlights the
externalisations of business-as-usual instead of hiding them. A lot
of people started to see things that way after Hurricane Katrina.

The military's hardly an answer. It can do damage but it can't *win*
anything, it's not a sword at all, just a shovel 

[Biofuel] tropical regions expanding, climatologist say

2006-05-31 Thread AltEnergyNetwork

Tropical Regions Expanding, Climatologists Say 

 http://www.alternate-energy.net/N/news.php?detail=n1149035378.news 




Get your daily alternative energy news

Alternate Energy Resource Network
  1000+ news sources-resources
updated daily

http://www.alternate-energy.net






Next Generation Grid 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/


Tomorrow-energy 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy/


Alternative Energy Politics 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] who killed the electric car? hint: it was gassed

2006-05-31 Thread Doug Turner



They 
changed the name toThe Nohomers so they are a little harder to kept track 
of.

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John 
BealeSent: May 30, 2006 1:27 AMTo: 
biofuel@sustainablelists.orgSubject: Re: [Biofuel] who killed the 
electric car? hint: it was gassed
See, now I was taught that it 
  was the Stonecutters who held back the electric car.What about 
  that?-JohnOn May 28, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Kirk 
  McLoren wrote:
  Something even bigger than automobiles (solar thermal)was 
also killed. Mike MacCormack the senator from the state of Washington and 
former research scientist at Hanford got the "Solar Energy Demonstration 
Act" passed and I believe the aformentioned senator, also known by the 
nickname "Mr Atomic Energy", was very active in SEDAs implementation. The 
act basically placed such burdensome tests on solar products that only 
multimegadollar corporations could afford to enter the marketplace. Mr 
AtomicEnergy put an icepick into the heart of solar and to this date the 
industry has not recovered.KirkAltEnergyNetwork 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who Killed The Electric Car? Hint: It Was 
  Gassed http://www.telluridewatch.com/052606/electric.htm 
  It was among the fastest, most efficient production cars 
  everbuilt. It ran on electricity, produced no emissions 
  andcatapulted American technology to the forefront of 
  theautomotive industry. The lucky few who drove it neverwanted to 
  give it up. So why did General Motors crushits fleet of EV1 electric 
  vehicles in the Arizona desert?Local director Chris Pain’s film 
  Who Killed The Electric Car?chronicles the life and mysterious death 
  of the GM EV1,examining its cultural and economic ripple effects and 
  howthey reverberated through the halls of government and 
  bigbusiness. Inspired by his own experience with the EV1 in 1997, 
  Pain set out to solve the mystery of the car’sdisappearance from the 
  American marketplace. His firstfeature documentary as a director, 
  Chris Paine’s 90-minutefilm will be screened at Mountainfilm on Sunday 
  at the PalmTheatre at 9 p.m., followed by a question and answer 
  session.The year is 1990. California is in a pollution crisis. 
  Smogthreatens public health. Desperate for a solution, 
  theCalifornia Air Resources Board targets the source of 
  itsproblem: auto exhaust. Inspired by a recent announcementfrom 
  General Motors about an electric vehicle prototype,the Zero Emissions 
  Mandate was born. It required 2 percentof new vehicles sold in 
  California to be emission-free by1998, 10 percent by 2003. It is the 
  most radical smog-fightingmandate since the catalytic 
  converter.With a jump on the competition thanks to its 
  speed-record-breakingelectric concept car, GM launched its EV1 
  electric vehicle in1996. It was a revolutionary modern car, requiring 
  no gas, nooil changes, no mufflers, and rare brake maintenance(a 
  billion-dollar industry unto itself). A typical maintenancecheckup for 
  the EV1 consisted of replenishing the windshieldwasher fluid and a 
  tire rotation.But the fanfare surrounding the EV1’s launch 
  disappeared andthe cars followed. Was it lack of consumer demand as 
  carmakersclaimed, or were other persuasive forces at work?Fast 
  forward to six years later... The fleet is gone. EV chargingstations 
  dot the California landscape like tombstones,collecting dust and 
  spider webs. How could this happen? Didanyone bother to examine the 
  evidence? Yes, in fact, someonedid. And it was murder.The 
  electric car threatened the status quo. The truth behindits demise 
  resembles the climactic outcome of AgathaChristie’s Murder on the 
  Orient Express: multiple suspects,each taking their turn with the 
  knife.Who Killed The Electric Car? interviews and 
  investigatesautomakers, legislators, engineers, consumers and 
  carenthusiasts from Los Angeles to Detroit, to work throughmotives 
  and alibis, and to piece the complex puzzle together.The film is 
  not just about the EV1. It’s about how thisallegory for failure – 
  reflected in today’s oil pricesand air quality – can also be a shining 
  symbol of society’spotential to better itself and the world around it. 
  Whilethere’s plenty of outrage for lost time, there’s also timefor 
  renewal as technology is reborn inWho Killed The Electric 
  Car?Get your daily alternative energy 
  newsAlternate Energy Resource Network1000+ news 
  sources-resourcesupdated 
  dailyhttp://www.alternate-energy.netNext 
  Generation 
  Gridhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/Tomorrow-energyhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy/Alternative 
  Energy 
  

Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Mike Redler
I think the 5/30/06 post and attached article from AltEnergyNetwork did 
a excellent job explaining the administration's decision making process, 
the U.S. economy and how it compares to similar situations in other 
countries.

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63309.html

I also think it's possible that the weakening of the U.S. Dollar is the 
result of a concerted effort by foreign entities (governments and NGO's) 
and might be related to what Noam Chomsky describes on the last page of 
Hegemony or Survival.

For the first time, concrete alliances have been taking shape at the 
grassroots level . These are impressive developments, rich in 
opportunity. And they have had effects, in rhetorical and sometimes 
policy changes.

When he says policy changes, I read it to mean within the United 
States. However, I think that a popular movement to identify the U.S. 
government as the single biggest threat to our survival as a species, is 
coalescing in foreign policy decisions around the world. The result is 
an indication of US economic isolation with hopes of slowing military 
buildup and globalization.

(IMO) this adds to Mike Weaver's position:
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63345.html

Don't get me wrong - the concerted effort to destroy our economic 
system perpetuated by the Bush Administration will (and has) have an 
effect.

White House policy is both self destructive and antagonistic, attracting 
the attention of others to attack.

Military spending/use, energy, the environment, you name it, the U.S. 
government is enormously wasteful and destructive (not that I need to 
tell anyone in this forum) and people are taking notice. Like Keith 
wrote: Eco-economics has been on the table since Maggie Thatcher put it 
there by mistake in 1988. It's not going to go away, it's been gaining 
ground steadily.

It's about holding back the most destructive empire in human history - 
destructive for what it does and doesn't do.

Re: WMD's - how U.S. policy threatens our survival.

In addition to U.S. engagement in continuous military conflicts since 
WWII, the Bush administration has vetoed or avoided discussion on nearly 
every international effort to limit nuclear, chemical  and biological 
weapons, has militarized space in violation of past nuclear weapons 
treatise and has prompted other countries to react and build more arms. 
U.S. spending on nuclear weapons has surpassed the entire state 
department budget. The U.S. Pharmaceutical industry is helping develop 
vaccine resistant Anthrax (for example) and an arms race for biological 
weapons is already underway.


Mike

Hakan Falk wrote:
 Mike,

 I would not take issue on pollution per facility, but pollution per
 nation. US is very much larger polluter per capita than both China
 and India together. US is also larger polluter in absolute terms,so
 it is not surprising that US did not sign Kyoto. Even Bush said that
 it would be too expensive to meet the Kyoto targets, which means
 that US is way above them, otherwise it would not be that costly.
 Looking at GDP levels, if anyone could afford a clean up, it is US.

 I also think that the US glass house is damaged beyond repair,
 with all the stone throwing that it suffered. As usual, it is more
 about image, than practical realities.

 Hakan

 At 13:56 31/05/2006, you wrote:
   
 I didn't say that.  Nor would I.  I said the US has a dynamic economy.
 Our infrastructure is beginning to fall apart; the highway system is
 crumbling; the electrical grid is shaky; we have no energy policy...the
 list goes on.  But it it better than the systems in most of the world,
 except Western Europe.
 There is a functioning legal system, something I think you'd be
 hard-pressed to claim about China and to some degree India.
 Our corruption is better managed and on a grander scale - Halliburton.
 But you don't have to pay a bribe to get driver's license or cross a
 bridge or open a business.  Would you rather own stock in Exxon or
 Cnooc?  Well, figuratively, I wouldn't own oil stocks personally, but
 one has reasonably open books, and putatively complies with
 Sarbanes-Oxley, and one can be manipulated at the will of the government.
 Despite the best efforts of the current administration, our pollution
 levels are nothing like that of China or India, and the days of major
 ecological disasters like the Three Gorges Dam are passed.
 Transparency has suffered mightily under Bush, but Transparency
 International still rates the US well above China and India.

 Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 Mike,

 At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:


   
 snip
 Also, say what you want about the US but it is still by far the most
 dynamic economy in the world.  China and India still have significant
 infrastructure, corruption, pollution and transparency issues to overcome.
 snip


 
 And US have none of those problems? LOL

   


___
Biofuel 

[Biofuel] The motorcycle of the future?

2006-05-31 Thread Keith Addison
http://snipurl.com/qr29
Planx Norton

Waddya mean it doesn't work? Don't be blinded by such mere details, 
the point is it doesn't use any fuel.

Actually the mere detail is fantastic, you can spend a long time 
looking at that.

Best

Keith

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Mike R.

I think the 5/30/06 post and attached article from AltEnergyNetwork did
a excellent job explaining the administration's decision making process,
the U.S. economy and how it compares to similar situations in other
countries.

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63309.html

Yes it does, but there's been a lot more about it previously, 
especially in comments on the implications of Iran's new oil bourse, 
there are other points of view, and I think they all have to be 
assessed.

I also think it's possible that the weakening of the U.S. Dollar is the
result of a concerted effort by foreign entities (governments and NGO's)
and might be related to what Noam Chomsky describes on the last page of
Hegemony or Survival.

For the first time, concrete alliances have been taking shape at the
grassroots level . These are impressive developments, rich in
opportunity. And they have had effects, in rhetorical and sometimes
policy changes.

When he says policy changes, I read it to mean within the United
States. However, I think that a popular movement to identify the U.S.
government as the single biggest threat to our survival as a species, is
coalescing in foreign policy decisions around the world. The result is
an indication of US economic isolation with hopes of slowing military
buildup and globalization.

I think you credit them with more strategy than they deserve. I don't 
think Chomsky is talking about the same thing. He also said this, 
with the same sentence in it:

The harmful effects of the corporate globalisation project have led 
to mass popular protest and activism in the South, later joined by 
major sectors of the rich industrial societies, hence becoming harder 
to ignore. For the first time concrete alliances have been taking 
shape at a grassroots level. It is fair to say, I think, that the 
future of our endangered species may be determined in no small 
measure by how these popular forces evolve.

He means the other superpower, the Social Forum in Porto Alegre for 
example, and I'm sure the policy changes have more to do with the 
World Bank/IMF/WTO than with the US government or other governments.

(IMO) this adds to Mike Weaver's position:
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63345.html

Don't get me wrong - the concerted effort to destroy our economic
system perpetuated by the Bush Administration will (and has) have an
effect.

I think it adds to Gabriel Kolko's position and mine 18 months ago, 
and since - Vote Bush! LOL!

... But a Kerry win would still have left you with the duopoly party,
followed by business-as-usual, especially on the foreign policy
front. There's not much essential difference between the two parties'
foreign policy, eg between Clinton's and Bush's, it's mostly just the
Bushies' outrageous in-your-face style of it that's different.

I agreed with Gabriel Kolko at the time, that Bush might be the
lesser of two evils, but while Kolko was thinking of other nations
and international alliances I was thinking of the Other Superpower.

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg38234.html
[Biofuel] The Coming Elections and the Future of American Global Power
16 Sep 2004

Also this:

Gabriel Kolko -- in this writer's estimation, our most indispensable
historian -- argues in a recent piece on the Counterpunch website
that because a second Bush term would possibly intensify the
international enmity elicited by its bumbling unilateralism, it could
be preferable to a Kerry Administration:

'Kerry is neither articulate nor impressive as a candidate or as
someone who is likely to formulate an alternative to Bush's foreign
and defense policies, which have much more in common with Clinton's
than they have differences. To be critical of Bush is scarcely
justification for wishful thinking about Kerry. Since 1947, the
foreign policies of the Democrats and Republicans have been
essentially consensual on crucial issues -- bipartisan as both
parties phrase it -- but they often utilize quite different rhetoric.

'Critics of the existing foreign or domestic order will not take
over Washington this November. As dangerous as it is, Bush's
reelection may be a lesser evil because he is much more likely to
continue the destruction of the alliance system that is so crucial to
American power...'

It is becoming clear that all-too-many Kerry supporters view
November's plebiscite as an end in itself. That, if Kerry should
prevail, the reaction of a too-large proportion of his voters will be
overwhelming relief -- Whew! That was a close one! -- followed by a
repeat of Clinton-era apathy and apologetics.

Whereas, a Bush victory couldn't but propagate the amazingly diverse
and widespread lobbying and protest movement which saw the New York
Times declare public political involvement the World's second
superpower. From the unprecedented pre-war protest mobilisations, to
the hundred-plus official municipal renunciations of the PATRIOT 

Re: [Biofuel] Castorbean supply

2006-05-31 Thread bob allen
if you start growing castor beans, look out for the you may be put on a 
terrorist watch list. Ricin 
is made from castor beans.  As I recall one of the early claims of the 
discovery of a WMD cache in 
Iraq was a warehouse full of castor beans.  Never mind that the oil has 
numerous non-lethal 
commercial uses.

Jason Katie wrote:
 i have here in my grubby little mitt, twenty castor beans, ready to grow. i 
 recieved them from a flower supplier who professes to grow everything 
 organically in compost and topsoil. (www.dianesseeds.com) she deals mostly 
 in flowers, but castor plants are considered decorative so while not 
 exactly cost effective initially, 20 plants can easily offer up scores of 
 seeds. does anyone see a problem with my logic pattern? 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 
 
 


-- 
Bob Allen
http://ozarker.org/bob

Science is what we have learned about how to keep
from fooling ourselves - Richard Feynman

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Hakan Falk

Mike,

The weakening of the dollar is not a result of any concerted foreign
effort. The dollar is amazingly strong, considering that US breaks
all fundamentals. It is probably the opposite, it is a concerted
effort to try to hold the value of the dollar high, when it according
to all financial rules and fundamentals should be much lower.

I find it a little bit amazing that in the text below is an attempt to
blame other countries for allowing US to break all the rules. I would
not surprised to hear such things from children mom/dad said we
could do it and maybe I am not that surprised to hear it from US.
It is however wrong to try to find any to blame other then US itself.

I do not see that US is under any attack, it is only taking the
consequences of its own doing. I see no reason to develop any
mental feelings like being pursued over it. It is not any background
for see what they are doing to us when it should be see what we
are doing to ourselves.  On the other hand, conspiration theories
are favorite themes for Americans and they will soon find someone
who is making it to the Americans, so the Americans will make
it to themselves.

Do not misunderstand me, I like Americans very much and I also
like children very much. I wonder if there are any connections in
this. How they could elect Bush is beyond me,  but he is there.

Hakan


At 17:05 31/05/2006, you wrote:
I think the 5/30/06 post and attached article from AltEnergyNetwork did
a excellent job explaining the administration's decision making process,
the U.S. economy and how it compares to similar situations in other
countries.

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63309.html

I also think it's possible that the weakening of the U.S. Dollar is the
result of a concerted effort by foreign entities (governments and NGO's)
and might be related to what Noam Chomsky describes on the last page of
Hegemony or Survival.

For the first time, concrete alliances have been taking shape at the
grassroots level . These are impressive developments, rich in
opportunity. And they have had effects, in rhetorical and sometimes
policy changes.

When he says policy changes, I read it to mean within the United
States. However, I think that a popular movement to identify the U.S.
government as the single biggest threat to our survival as a species, is
coalescing in foreign policy decisions around the world. The result is
an indication of US economic isolation with hopes of slowing military
buildup and globalization.

(IMO) this adds to Mike Weaver's position:
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63345.html

Don't get me wrong - the concerted effort to destroy our economic
system perpetuated by the Bush Administration will (and has) have an
effect.

White House policy is both self destructive and antagonistic, attracting
the attention of others to attack.

Military spending/use, energy, the environment, you name it, the U.S.
government is enormously wasteful and destructive (not that I need to
tell anyone in this forum) and people are taking notice. Like Keith
wrote: Eco-economics has been on the table since Maggie Thatcher put it
there by mistake in 1988. It's not going to go away, it's been gaining
ground steadily.

It's about holding back the most destructive empire in human history -
destructive for what it does and doesn't do.

Re: WMD's - how U.S. policy threatens our survival.

In addition to U.S. engagement in continuous military conflicts since
WWII, the Bush administration has vetoed or avoided discussion on nearly
every international effort to limit nuclear, chemical  and biological
weapons, has militarized space in violation of past nuclear weapons
treatise and has prompted other countries to react and build more arms.
U.S. spending on nuclear weapons has surpassed the entire state
department budget. The U.S. Pharmaceutical industry is helping develop
vaccine resistant Anthrax (for example) and an arms race for biological
weapons is already underway.


Mike

Hakan Falk wrote:
  Mike,
 
  I would not take issue on pollution per facility, but pollution per
  nation. US is very much larger polluter per capita than both China
  and India together. US is also larger polluter in absolute terms,so
  it is not surprising that US did not sign Kyoto. Even Bush said that
  it would be too expensive to meet the Kyoto targets, which means
  that US is way above them, otherwise it would not be that costly.
  Looking at GDP levels, if anyone could afford a clean up, it is US.
 
  I also think that the US glass house is damaged beyond repair,
  with all the stone throwing that it suffered. As usual, it is more
  about image, than practical realities.
 
  Hakan
 
  At 13:56 31/05/2006, you wrote:
 
  I didn't say that.  Nor would I.  I said the US has a dynamic economy.
  Our infrastructure is beginning to fall apart; the highway system is
  crumbling; the electrical grid is shaky; we have no energy policy...the
  list goes on.  

[Biofuel] was ...who killed the electric car? hint: it was gassed

2006-05-31 Thread AltEnergyNetwork
Hi all,
Here are a couple of responses to who killed the electric car, 
one from an ex GM employee revealing some interesting insights
into the workings of GM,

regards
tallex


From: laura belin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


From: Marc Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Date: Sun May 28, 2006  9:15 am 
Subject: RE: [irenew] who killed the electric car? 
hint: it was gassed 
 

I worked for GM for 17 years. I got my engineering degree
 from their own corporately owned, private but fully 
accredited college; General Motors Institute (GMI).

 

The problem at GM runs deep and can be somewhat subtle.

 

As a student, I alternated work in my home division 
(Delco Products; made shock absorbers and electric motors)
 and school at GMI in Flint, Mi. I would spend 6 weeks in
 a work assignment in the plant (Dayton, Oh) and 6 weeks
 in school in Flint. I then worked a 5th year Practicum
 entirely in the plant before getting my degree.

 

My 6 weeks in the plant would always be in a different 
department. It might be Personnel, then Manufacturing, 
then Product Engineering, etc. In my 4 years I basically
 did 16 internships traveling through every department in
 my division. By the time a student graduated from GMI
 they were schooled not only in the theory of Engineering,
 they also had a complete education in the practice of how
 GM conducted its business and accomplished its goals. GMI
 grads were almost always made an offer of permanent employment 
and the conventional wisdom was that you were “set for life”.
 Many of GM’s managers came from the ranks of these GMI students.

 

That, was/is part of the problem.

 

There is a “GM way of doing things” that each GMI grad learns.
 Taking risks is discouraged. There is a lot of emphasis on 
business, management and engineering competence, but very 
little on leadership or vision. Fitting in with GM group
 think is highly encouraged. So much so that it is hard to
 get ahead any other way than to “fit in”. GM is not unique
 in that regard. Large corporations often fit this mold.

 

How does this impact the EV1 electric car experience?

 

The EV1 would have been a startling new direction for GM. It
 was only pursued at all because it was the brain child of
 the GM Chairman of the Board; Roger Smith. When a top GM 
executive pushes something new, it gets done. If that executive
 stops pushing, the fact that it is new, means that corporate
 inertia will begin to resist the change.

 

See this auto industry trade journal (Ward’s Auto World) for
 a discussion of Roger:

 

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3165/is_n7_v26/ai_10395219

 

In the article, Roger says that “…most people underestimate the
 opportunities for such a vehicle” referring to the EV1; how 
true and how prophetic. By “most people” I think that Roger 
was referring all of those carefully schooled GM executives
 and managers that were all encouraged to think the same.
 There is book called “The Car That Could” that chronicles
 the development of the EV1. It is a very interesting read.

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/067942105X/102-3430365-2309706?v=glancen=283155

 

In the end, I believe that GM simply could not make the mental
 shift to a world of electric vehicles. Many within GM probably
 felt threatened by the EV1. Low maintenance electric vehicles
 (no spark plugs, mufflers, oil changes, tune ups, minimal brake
 pad wear, etc.) means existing business lines and profits are
 threatened all over GM. Once Roger Smith retired, the vast 
momentum of GM direction began to assert itself leading eventually
 to the intentional destruction of the EV1; even so far as to the
 crushing of all of the existing vehicles. Some company will 
eventually mass produce an electric vehicle and we will all
 wonder why it took so long. It will not likely be GM.
 It could have been. It is a terrible shame for our country,
 our economy and the many GM employees that now have to sit 
by and see their once mighty corporation be slowly dismantled.

 

As a former GM employee, I feel that sadness. A few years 
following the Arab Oil Embargo of the early 70’s I submitted
 a sketch of a gas/hybrid electric power train design to my
 manager. It would have used electric motors that our division
 built. After a few days, my manager came back to me and 
kindly counseled me not to do that again for it could hurt
 my career opportunities. You see, my engineering job was
 to make factory processes more efficient …not to lead product
 design in some new direction.

 

So, now, I no longer work for GM. I do drive a diesel car 
(designed in Germany) and most of my miles are fueled by
 100% American-made BioDiesel. I can buy no such car from
 my former company.

 

Marc.

 

Marc Franke

Renewable energy advocate

Ely, Iowa

 
Date: Sun May 28, 2006  12:32 am 
Subject: Re: [irenew] who killed the electric car? hint: it was gassed  
laurabelin 
 

My husband had a high school friend who was working
for GM in the early 1990s on this 

[Biofuel] Bush cut energy efficiency budgets

2006-05-31 Thread AltEnergyNetwork

So,
I quess this is all part of Bush's master plan to wean the
country off of oil (strong sarcasm intended)
Cutting energy efficiency programs has got to be one of the most
stupid, short sighted actions this administration could take.
Unbelievable!


 http://www.postchronicle.com/news/science/article_21220975.shtml 
Bush administration cuts energy plan



Bush Administration Cuts Energy Plans
by UPI Wire
May 31, 2006

 
WASHINGTON, May 31, 2006 (UPI) -- Conservationists
 are reportedly upset by a Bush administration plan
 to reduce the budgets of several energy-efficiency
 research programs. 

Included is a U.S. Energy Department program that in
 2004 saved 122 million barrels of oil, worth about
 $9 billion, The Christian Science Monitor reported Wednesday. 

Also being subject to spending cuts is the government's
 Industrial Technologies Program that saves the United
 States $7 worth of energy for each dollar it spends,
 ITP proponents told the newspaper. 

Those projects are among about a dozen Energy Department
 efforts that will be trimmed or eliminated in a $115
 million cost-saving move. 

The reductions, designed to help the government's budget
 problems, are being implemented despite the administration's
 stated eagerness to fund research into alternative energy
sources such as wind, solar, nuclear and hydrogen power. 

This is the worst time to be cutting these programs,
 William Prindle, deputy director of the American Council
 for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a Washington think tank, 
told the Monitor. At this point in time, with high energy
 prices and pressures, you'd think maybe we'd want to invest
 in a suite of energy-efficiency programs that make a dent 
right away.



Get your daily alternative energy news

Alternate Energy Resource Network
  1000+ news sources-resources
updated daily

http://www.alternate-energy.net






Next Generation Grid 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/


Tomorrow-energy 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy/


Alternative Energy Politics 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Biodiesel to the rescue

2006-05-31 Thread Thomas Kelly



A tire on my wife's car has a slow leak. I got the 
lug nuts off, but the wheel was frozen. No WD40. No penetrating 
oil.
Biodiesel to the rescue. Spray it, wait, a few 
gentle taps 
viola ... wheel breaks free. Another happy 
customer.
 
Tom
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread MK DuPree



Thanks Keith...I agree with youthat 
energyis"a more threatening issue" regarding any 
possiblecollapse of the US $.The devaluating US dollar 
can only exacerbate this issue. 
 Very 
informative...very helpful...info on Japanese life generally. In 
everyone's own way, sounds like we're all very much alike. Mike 
DuPree

- Original Message - 


From: "Keith Addison" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:10 
AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. 
dollar
 Joe Street asks, Is there anything we at 
home can do to help speed this process? :)I 
suggest: Implore your Federal representatives to continue raising 
the debt ceiling, to continue supporting the war in Iraq and 
Afghanistan, to start another war in Iran, etc etc. Or better, 
don't waste your time.  Or better still, stop 
killing people so casually and go home, like  everybody's telling you 
to. If you really want to go bombing the hell  out of Iran just to 
fiddle with the Federal Reserve or something you  might at least ask 
them first, it's only polite, it's their  collateral after all. 
Instead, I ask you, Joe, and the List, how do you believe the 
average "Joe" should prepare for the inevitable demise of the US 
dollar???  I don't think it's inevitable. Or at 
least I don't think an economic  collapse is inevitable. Or not because 
of the dollar anyway. Energy  is a more threatening issue, IMHO. 
I'm not trying to be facetious. I'm asking a real question, 
seeking a real answer. Might not like the answer, but I'd like 
to hear. Also, Keith, how will Japan be affected? Japan is one 
of the largest holders of US Debt. Mike DuPree 
 Well, you see, there's this economic crisis here that the Japanese 
 have been struggling to survive in recent years. I guess it will grow 
 even more severe.  It's a strange kind of economic 
crisis, at first glance. For one  thing it's not characterised by any 
shortage of money at any level,  if you can picture that. Actually it 
seems to be impossible to  picture it, at least in newspaper articles 
about the severity of the  crisis, which usually show photographs of the 
stock exchange. No  images of suffering or blighted inner cities or rust 
belts of dead  factories rotting away. It's not that they hide it, it's 
just that  there aren't any such things here. When interviewed, ordinary 
people  say they're deeply worried that their retirement income might 
not be  as much as they'd thought. It still won't leave them poor 
though.  There is evidence of the crisis at street level, if you 
know where to  look. In the financial district in Tokyo there are coffee 
shops that  are filled each day with displaced sararimen who've been 
retrenched.  They get up in the morning, grab their suit and attache 
case and rush  off to work as usual even though they don't have a job to 
go to  anymore, because if the truth came out in the neighbourhood the 
sheer  loss of social status would destroy the wife. They're not 
suffering  though except existentially, they get really good 
pay-offs.  Another street-level indicator is how empty the shops 
are. There's an  instant cure available for the sheer burden of 
hopelessness and  depression that comes with trying to live through an 
economic crisis  such as this one. You go shopping. It helps take your 
mind off  things. When it's really serious the shops are full. 
 I guess they'll just go shopping Mike.  Sorry... I'm 
not really joking though. Sweden also has this kind of  economic crisis 
sometimes, that's the envy of the world. They just  can't see how rich 
they are. I laugh at Swedes about it, and they say  yes they know, but 
THIS time it's real. Right. Maybe Switzerland has  them too. 
 I'm not sure what Japan's economic policy is. Maybe they haven't got 
 one, it's kind of hard to find an actual policy on anything in Japan. 
 It doesn't seem to be how they do things here. Henry Ford invented 
 the "Just In Time" inventory strategy of stock keeping, but it was 
 Toyota who put it on the map. It's very Japanese! Maybe it describes 
 Japanese economics quite well too, JIT economics. It might look like 
 they haven't seen something creeping up on them but I wouldn't bank 
 on it.  Japan has the world's fifth largest military 
budget but the military  is just about invisible here, and they pay for 
it without arms  exports. I don't think anyone else can manage that, or 
not easily.  Japan is strangely invisible in many ways, but it's one of 
the three  great economic powers in the world, its technological base is 
the  equal of any, and whatever the economic future holds Japan is sure 
to  play a major role in it. They're capable of things the West wouldn't 
 imagine, they have different depths of experience to draw on, they 
 keep proving it. They have a great deal to contribute.  
Best  Keith  - Original Message 
-From: "Joe Street" mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 

Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread MK DuPree
Thanks Joe...can I move in??? Oh, and can I bring...???  Very helpful. 
Amazing how complicated simplifying our lives has become.  Good to have some 
guidelines.  Mike DuPree


- Original Message - 
From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar


 Hi Mike;

 Well there is considerable uncertainty and debate about what form the
 restructuring will take but little argument that it is going to happen
 sooner or later.  The best strategy is therefore also unknown but I
 think one can still plan for some general conditions which may be
 present in any scenario.

 In times of hyper inflation things are valued more in terms of what they
 are and the potentialities that they represent in terms of basic needs
 than they are in our society in present times.  Therefore anyone who can
 provide for themselves in areas of basic needs may be considered rich in
 some regards.  The ability to provide for your own food requirements can
 be very important. The ability to obtain and render water safe for
 consumption ranks right up there if you are independant with it. The
 ability to produce some energy may be an extravagance depending on the
 severity of the situation or it may mean the difference between living
 totally hand to mouth and having some extra wealth which can be used for
 special needs that have to be obtained from some external source.
 Therefore converting cash to assets that have these intrinsic value now
 before the hyperinflation hits ( if that is what is going to happen) may
 be a very wise investment.  It may be impossible to obtain these items
 during hard times due to radical changes in supply and demand.
 So land, water and energy figure pretty highly in my mind in any
 doomsday scenario. I remember in 1998 when a massive ice storm left my
 parents and a huge section of eastern Ontario and Quebec without
 electricity for 14 days in the cold of January just how things changed
 in surprising ways.  I managed to buy the second last generator that was
 available to be bought in the eastern half of this country and it had to
 be shipped to me from Winnipeg Manitoba (probably 2000 km away).  There
 was no electricity anywhere, and neighborhoods were eerily silent.
 There was no trafic since gas stations were down and gas could only be
 pumped by hand but cash registers weren't working so many places would
 not even sell anything. A running generator could be heard for blocks
 and some were stolen by thieves.  In Walkerton Ontario when the
 municipal water supply became tainted with e. Coli there was a different
 form of pandemonium. Anyone who had a UV sterilizer and R.O. membrane
 like me didn't even have to bat an eye but some folks died and many
 suffer health problems ever since.
 Depending on how bad things get, having some valuable assets like these
 may mean a need to defend them as in the example of the generator. I am
 starting to sound like a whacko survivalist as you sometimes see
 depicted that way. I don't have a fallout shelter or anything like that
 but I am definitely working towards ideas that will be of value in
 situations where I have to be self reliant. I want to get a methane
 digester going and some passive solar as well as PV on the roof as soon
 as I can.  I plan to do these things modestly just as I have with my BD
 setup. I don't aspire to be able to get off the grid with my current
 needs but to be able to have some small amount of power for special
 needs if the power goes out and for now it can just be a supplement to
 reduce my environmental footprint.
 This post is getting long so I am going to cut it off here.

 Best regards;
 Joe

 Cheers
 Joe

 MK DuPree wrote:

 Joe Street asks, Is there anything we at home can do to help speed this
 process? :)
 I suggest: Implore your Federal representatives to continue raising the
 debt ceiling, to continue supporting the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, to
 start another war in Iran, etc etc.  Or better, don't waste your time.
 Instead, I ask you, Joe, and the List, how do you believe the average
 Joe should prepare for the inevitable demise of the US dollar???  I'm
 not trying to be facetious.  I'm asking a real question, seeking a real
 answer.  Might not like the answer, but I'd like to hear.  Also, Keith,
 how will Japan be affected?  Japan is one of the largest holders of US
 Debt.  Mike DuPree

 - Original Message -
 From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:29 AM
 Subject: [SPAMPROB:51%] Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

   Is there anything we at home can do to help speed this process? :)
  
   Joe
  
   AltEnergyNetwork wrote:

 snip

  
   But how long can this continue before the world loose
faith in the greenback, sending it crashing to
   unimaginable levels.
  


 

Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread MK DuPree
Hakan...I've looked on the CNN website, thinking I might find some mention 
of this story there, but found nothing.  What day did you see this?  What 
time (Central Standard Time, USA)???  Thanks.  Mike DuPree

- Original Message - 
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] threat to U.S. dollar



 Keith,

 After I finished the last email on this issue, I went to take a
 coffee and turned on CNN.

 When CNN came on, I learned that Bush had decided to devaluate the
 dollar by letting it float downwards without any support. I had no
 idea about that this was happening, but I had not followed the news
 for a day or so. It confirms however that our discussions on this
 issue is very actual and now it is only to see at what level the
 dollar will stabilize. Fortunes will be lost, mostly by foreigners,
 and Bush managed to hurt his country once more, but it was long
 overdue anyway.  In reality he make the world pay for his war in
 Iraq. I had no dollar based assets, but I guess that there are many
 who are very upset.

 Hakan


 At 14:10 31/05/2006, you wrote:
Hi Robert, Hakan

 You are correct, but there is a belief over here that engaging in
 war is GOOD for the economy, and further, that we're strong enough to
 sustain ongoing warfare.

There's the kind of economics that can't distinguish between swords
and ploughshares, and the kind that can. The first is a thing of the
past with a hangover, the second is of the future, and the present.

Eco-economics has been on the table since Maggie Thatcher put it
there by mistake in 1988. It's not going to go away, it's been
gaining ground steadily.

 It's not just we Americans who need to do this--though we are
 certainly among the most gluttonous energy users on the planet--but the
 entire economic structure upon which society has been built needs
 reconsideration.

It's a casino, and a casino mentality. The only bit of reality in a
casino is the fact that the game's loaded in favour of the house, but
I don't think the guys who own Las Vegas think you could run the
world that way. Or maybe they do, if it's the Mafia that owns Las
Vegas, considering the grey areas you always find everywhere between
government, big business and organised crime.

The other bit of reality is that it's sucking up the whole world like
a vacuum cleaner and vanishing it.

Time for real economics.

The work of the economist Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen is real economics:

http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/georgescu.htm
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, 1906-1994

There's some of his work here, in the archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg30418.html
[biofuel] Energy and Economic Myths
Selections from Energy and Economic Myths by Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen

His inheritors are the ecological economists, Herman Daly, Robert
Costanza, Michael T. Klare, Joshua Farley and many others.

More:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34131.html
[biofuel] From Here to Economy

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg30417.html
[biofuel] How Much Is Nature Worth? For You, $33 Trillion

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34130.html
[biofuel] At What Cost? - Costanza

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34129.html
[biofuel] The Wealth of Nature

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34207.html
Re: [biofuel] The Wealth of Nature

That's a good read.

It has to go that way, and it has been doing so, though it's not
centre-screen. It's no more centre-screen that the growth of backyard
biodiesel brewing round the world in the last six years, spreading
like a weed and suitably out of control for several years now, IMHO.

It's a fair comparison because of what you say about energy. If we're
going to have an economic collapse I think it might be an energy
collapse more than a currency collapse. But I don't think there'll be
an economic collapse. If you can't get yourself in shape for
localised energy production and supply then you're headed for an
economic collapse, but that's your problem, not everyone else's. Not
any more, we're leaving that behind. No room for dinosaurs.

Even the US army thinks that way these days - they think they'll have
to use localised biofuel and bioenergy sources to fight their wars to
protect the fossil-fuel supplies. A dinosaur trying on some sheep's
clothing.

The eco-economic view applies to a lot of areas now. Jules Pretty
takes a conservative look at industrialised agriculture in terms of
real cost accounting and it turns out to be costing more than it's
worth. There's no way of putting it in the black, we'll just have to
dump most of it. Pretty also charts a worldwide growth of sustainable
farming, small-scale and local.

Food miles and fuel miles aren't just talk, the days are numbered
for that kind of trade system, with carbon costs hot 

Re: [Biofuel] Castorbean supply

2006-05-31 Thread Jason Katie
hah, let 'em. ;P
- Original Message - 
From: bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Castorbean supply


 if you start growing castor beans, look out for the you may be put on a 
 terrorist watch list. Ricin
 is made from castor beans.  As I recall one of the early claims of the 
 discovery of a WMD cache in
 Iraq was a warehouse full of castor beans.  Never mind that the oil has 
 numerous non-lethal
 commercial uses.

 Jason Katie wrote:
 i have here in my grubby little mitt, twenty castor beans, ready to grow. 
 i
 recieved them from a flower supplier who professes to grow everything
 organically in compost and topsoil. (www.dianesseeds.com) she deals 
 mostly
 in flowers, but castor plants are considered decorative so while not
 exactly cost effective initially, 20 plants can easily offer up scores of
 seeds. does anyone see a problem with my logic pattern?


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/







 -- 
 Bob Allen
 http://ozarker.org/bob

 Science is what we have learned about how to keep
 from fooling ourselves - Richard Feynman

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.0/353 - Release Date: 5/31/2006

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar/question??

2006-05-31 Thread E. C.
Marylynn;

By way of explanation, one word:  control.
For clarification, add one more word:  corporate
control.
And to refine that to bring in reality, tweak that: 
corporatocracy -- the system we live under.  The same
notion driving NAIS, and NSA databases, and ANWAR
drilling, and a massively unpopular war, etc., etc..

Not massive chunks, unless you pursue the
implications.
Follow the money.

Regards,
Allen  (E. Allen C.)


--- Marylynn Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There was a post from another list that has me
 confused.
 
 I trust the source so I pay attention but can not
 understand any possible 
 reasoning here.
 
 There are several old/closed gold mines in the U.S.
 that still have good 
 veins with rich to very rich ore in these veins ..
 and the veins are 
 substantial and could be easily mined.
 
 Apparently they are plentiful enough.
 
 These areas with closed mines are not available
 for purchase and/or lease 
 unless the purchase reason is altered .. which is
 being done.
 
 When a property is obtained and gold has been mined
 .. and mining activities 
 have become known .. the owners are visited by
 federals (unidentified) 
 telling them they need to close down because their
 activity threatens the 
 economy.
 
 This plus enough scare tactics seems to have caused
 this whole thing to 
 become a bit more quietly approached.
 
 I have no other information I would be willing to
 offer other than, because 
 of the source, I believe this is actually happening.
 
 .. any other information I have is extremely
 limited.
 
 And, while I believe it's true, I find it beyond my
 reasoning and/or 
 ability to understand.
 
 I know I'm missing massive chunks of information
 here so I have no 
 information links to connect it.
 
 So, pretending that's it's true .. Is there anyone
 who could possibly shed 
 some light on this.
 
 What possible reason could there be?
 
 Mary Lynn
 
 Rev. Mary Lynn Schmidt, Ordained Minister
 ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
 TTouch . Reiki . Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Animal
 Behavior Modification . 
 Shamanic Spiritual Travel . Behavior Problems .
 Psionic Energy Practitioner 
 . Radionics . Herbs . Dowsing . Nutrition .
 Homeopathy . Polarity .
 The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
 http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/
 http://allcreatureconnections.org
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
 archives (50,000 messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Republican / Conservative ??

2006-05-31 Thread E. C.

Marylynn;

Hooray!  You got it -- and get it!  :-)~
Now look up PNAC,  see where that takes you.  :-(~

Namaste,
Allen

--- Marylynn Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Not sure where the link came from but it suggested
 doing some research into 
 the EXACT meaning of the term Neo-Conservative.
 
 The White House does refer to themselves as
 Neo-Conservative and I .. for 
 one .. never bothered to try to understand exactly
 what that was.
 
 I have been reading everything google has to offer
 .. plus a few other 
 search engines .. and it's not very pretty.
 
 .. in reality .. George W. Bush has never lied to
 us.
 
 He told us up front what he was.
 
 The noise you hear is my hand slapping my head!!
 
 Mary Lynn
 
 Rev. Mary Lynn Schmidt, Ordained Minister
 ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
 TTouch . Reiki . Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Animal
 Behavior Modification . 
 Shamanic Spiritual Travel . Behavior Problems .
 Psionic Energy Practitioner 
 . Radionics . Herbs . Dowsing . Nutrition .
 Homeopathy . Polarity .
 The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
 http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/
 http://allcreatureconnections.org
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
 archives (50,000 messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread E. C.
Hey Mike;

What Katrina did to New Orleans wasn't an ecological
disaster?  The Corps. saw that coming 30 years ago,
but it suited the suits in Big Oil corp. suites to let
it happen, for the good of the dynamic economy -- as
we're finally beginning to realise, there's more to
dynamism than bottom lines.

As for our once-vaunted legal system, who besides
hapless grunts has paid the price for Abu Graibe, 
what about the latest Supreme Court ruling  its
effect on journalists -- predictable since the
addition of Roberts  Alito ?? --  the challenge to
Roe v. Wade is wending its way their way.  Ahhh, but
for the spin of it, we can take a Terry Schiavo case
all the way (not to mention a national election!)

Regards,
Allen  (E. Allen C.)

--- Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I didn't say that.  Nor would I.  I said the US has
 a dynamic economy.
 Our infrastructure is beginning to fall apart; the
 highway system is 
 crumbling; the electrical grid is shaky; we have no
 energy policy...the 
 list goes on.  But it it better than the systems in
 most of the world, 
 except Western Europe.
 There is a functioning legal system, something I
 think you'd be 
 hard-pressed to claim about China and to some degree
 India.
 Our corruption is better managed and on a grander
 scale - Halliburton.  
 But you don't have to pay a bribe to get driver's
 license or cross a 
 bridge or open a business.  Would you rather own
 stock in Exxon or 
 Cnooc?  Well, figuratively, I wouldn't own oil
 stocks personally, but 
 one has reasonably open books, and putatively
 complies with 
 Sarbanes-Oxley, and one can be manipulated at the
 will of the government.
 Despite the best efforts of the current
 administration, our pollution 
 levels are nothing like that of China or India, and
 the days of major 
 ecological disasters like the Three Gorges Dam are
 passed.
 Transparency has suffered mightily under Bush, but
 Transparency 
 International still rates the US well above China
 and India.
 
 Hakan Falk wrote:
 
 Mike,
 
 At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:
   
 
 snip
 Also, say what you want about the US but it is
 still by far the most
 dynamic economy in the world.  China and India
 still have significant
 infrastructure, corruption, pollution and
 transparency issues to overcome.
 snip
 
 
 
 And US have none of those problems? LOL
 
 Hakan  
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
 archives (50,000 messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
   
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
 archives (50,000 messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Mike Weaver
I was specifically addressing pollution, not ecological disaster, 
althoug arguably Katrina is similar to Three Gorges Dam.
Both were (largely) avoidable, with Katrina especially. 1.  I think 
there is a good argument to be made that global warming contributed to
the severity.  And that to FEMA, Army Corps failures and you've got a 
catastophe.  But I think 3 Gorges was completely preventable, and I 
think Lousiana
would have still been hit a major storm.  I haven't heard anything that 
Big Oil somehow planned to let a major storm flatten NO.  I think that 
was incompetence, racism and classism.

Well, Kenny Boy and Skilling got sent away, even a presidential nickname 
couldn't save them.
It's flawed, I don't deny that, but it often works.  It's legal to start 
a business in the US.  It's not in other countries.  Try Guinea - Conakry.
Heck try France, if your business fails, and many startups do, then you 
have an immediate law for fraud.  It's assumed you are a crook if your 
business fails.  How many people want to take that on?  Not a good way 
to keep the clever young people at home.  They all go to Britain.

Sciavo is over.  They're trying again with gay marriage.  I'm getting 
bored.  I'm going to email my Republican Senators and ask why they are 
allowing the federal goverment to take away power from our fair and 
sovereign state - which always regulated marriage.  Why is it now a 
Federal issue?


E. C. wrote:

Hey Mike;

What Katrina did to New Orleans wasn't an ecological
disaster?  The Corps. saw that coming 30 years ago,
but it suited the suits in Big Oil corp. suites to let
it happen, for the good of the dynamic economy -- as
we're finally beginning to realise, there's more to
dynamism than bottom lines.

As for our once-vaunted legal system, who besides
hapless grunts has paid the price for Abu Graibe, 
what about the latest Supreme Court ruling  its
effect on journalists -- predictable since the
addition of Roberts  Alito ?? --  the challenge to
Roe v. Wade is wending its way their way.  Ahhh, but
for the spin of it, we can take a Terry Schiavo case
all the way (not to mention a national election!)

Regards,
Allen  (E. Allen C.)

--- Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

I didn't say that.  Nor would I.  I said the US has
a dynamic economy.
Our infrastructure is beginning to fall apart; the
highway system is 
crumbling; the electrical grid is shaky; we have no
energy policy...the 
list goes on.  But it it better than the systems in
most of the world, 
except Western Europe.
There is a functioning legal system, something I
think you'd be 
hard-pressed to claim about China and to some degree
India.
Our corruption is better managed and on a grander
scale - Halliburton.  
But you don't have to pay a bribe to get driver's
license or cross a 
bridge or open a business.  Would you rather own
stock in Exxon or 
Cnooc?  Well, figuratively, I wouldn't own oil
stocks personally, but 
one has reasonably open books, and putatively
complies with 
Sarbanes-Oxley, and one can be manipulated at the
will of the government.
Despite the best efforts of the current
administration, our pollution 
levels are nothing like that of China or India, and
the days of major 
ecological disasters like the Three Gorges Dam are
passed.
Transparency has suffered mightily under Bush, but
Transparency 
International still rates the US well above China
and India.

Hakan Falk wrote:



Mike,

At 04:16 31/05/2006, you wrote:
 

  

snip
Also, say what you want about the US but it is


still by far the most


dynamic economy in the world.  China and India


still have significant


infrastructure, corruption, pollution and


transparency issues to overcome.


snip
   



And US have none of those problems? LOL

Hakan  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
  

archives (50,000 messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 

  

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org



http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
  

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
archives (50,000 messages):



http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
  







__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at 

Re: [Biofuel] more goofy questions

2006-05-31 Thread Jason Katie
 i did some reading at wikipedia, and KCl, being part of the final product 
in splitting crude glycerine(at least with KOH and HCl), is also used as a 
mineral fertilizer, and can be used to cut table salt (theyre about the same 
as far as toxicity goes, and it increases potassium levels and total 
electrolytes in the human body, not so bad i think) but it has many other 
uses in the medical world as antidotes to some poisons, and for food 
preparation(probably a preservative,yeech). is this an acceptible byproduct 
or should i keep looking?
- Original Message - 
From: Thomas Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] more goofy questions


 Jason  Katie,
 I'm not sure what you mean when you say clean the glycerine for
 compost.
 Many people compost the glycerine cocktail w/o any treatment. I think
 this is best done when KOH is used as the caustic rather than NaOH.
  I do separate the glycerine because I produce quite  a bit of BD 
 these
 days. I'm concerned about pouring Kilo after Kilo of  caustic, of which 
 70%,
 by weight, is Potassium. Sure it's a valuable soil nutrient, but I'd like 
 to
 control how much is added to my garden   which has done just fine on
 pre-BD compost. I also am attempting to recover methanol and have uses for
 the other components of the mix.

 I used hydrochloric acid (sold in hardware stores as muriatic acid)
 before I was able to locate phosphoric.
 I did a few small test batches and got good separation.
 The difference will be the type of mineral salt that will precipitate
 out.
 Ex:
 Hydrochloric Acid  + Lye (NaOH) forms table salt and water
 HCl   +   NaOH      NaCL (table salt)  + H2O
 The table salt is not especially valuable; throw it out?

The salt falls to the bottom and you get FFAs forming a layer on top 
 and
 the crude glycerine (+  most of the excess methanol) forming a bottom 
 layer.
 The FFAs and the glycerine/methanol are composed of Cs, Hs, and Os.
 They will decompose into CO2 and H2O. They supply nothing in the way of 
 soil
 nutrients, but I have found that
 they appear to accelerate decomposition within a compost pile   ... 
 not
 only a safe way to dispose of the mix, but some benefit to be gotten.

 KOH (during processing) and H3PO4 (split)
 is preferred because the salt produced is Potassium Phosphate  .
 valuable as fertilizer.

 The point is that different acids can be used to split the cocktail
 into FFAs and crude glycerine w. methanol. The
 difference is in the salt (and its value) that is produced.

 Vinegar is an organic acid, which tend to be weak acids. It would take
 a lot of vinegar to split the cocktail.
 Probably more expensive than hydrochloric and I don't see that the salt
 produced would have more value.

 ***By value I don't mean financial, as in sell for profit. I
 dissolve some of the potassium phosphate produced by the split in water 
 and
 add it to my compost piles. It has value as in  ...  can be put to good 
 use.

   Sorry to get so wordy, but your goofy question is part of a 
 subject
 that is of great interest to me.
   The splitting of the cocktail may not have the financial payoff that
 brewing BD does, but the feeling of putting to good use what others have
 called waste products  is akin to the feeling I get when I fill the
 tank(s) w. BD I brewed at home.
Best of luck to you,
 Tom

 - Original Message - 
 From: Jason Katie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:13 AM
 Subject: [Biofuel] more goofy questions


 what other, more available acids can be used in place of phosphoric to
 clean
 glycerine for compost? i have been reading for three hours, and i cant
 find
 any experiments or documentation. am i not looking in the right places?
 has
 anyone tried using vinegar? this is really bothering me. any ideas?


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/






 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.0/353 - Release Date: 5/31/2006

 



Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Michael Redler
Keith,You wrote: "He means the other superpower, the Social Forum in Porto Alegre for example, and I'm sure the "policy changes" have more to do with the World Bank/IMF/WTO than with the US government or other governments."It's hard to misunderstand his meaning - especially since he actually uses the term "second superpower".I wrote: "...and might be related to what Noam Chomsky describes on the last page of 'Hegemony or Survival'."What I'm saying is that events like the Social Forum mightactuallyeffectpublic policy outside (and perhaps inside) the U.S.. I wasn't trying to interpret his quote but rather, speculate and widen the scope where Chomsky'sobservation might also be true.They may "have more to do with the World Bank/IMF/WTO than with the US government or other governments." as you say. However, to what extent is that true? Does that mean that it doesn't
 effectgovernments to any meaningful degree? If so, I think I would disagree with your assessment. In fact, there are times when I cannot distinguish between the motives of the World Bank/IMF/WTO and the US government or other governments. More importantly, a successful campaign against one would certainly effect the other.Although quantifying that effect is debatable, I feel it is worth mentioning.Finally, I offer this as a contribution to thediscussion. I'm not an expert and if I were asked for an expert opinion, I would defer most economic and foreign policy matters to you. If (as you say) it's been mentioned in your previous contributions, I apologize for being redundant.Mike R.Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Hello Mike R.I
 think the 5/30/06 post and attached article from AltEnergyNetwork dida excellent job explaining the administration's decision making process,the U.S. economy and how it compares to similar situations in othercountries.http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63309.htmlYes it does, but there's been a lot more about it previously, especially in comments on the implications of Iran's new oil bourse, there are other points of view, and I think they all have to be assessed.I also think it's possible that the weakening of the U.S. Dollar is theresult of a concerted effort by foreign entities (governments and NGO's)and might be related to what Noam Chomsky describes on the last page of"Hegemony or Survival"."For the first time, concrete alliances have been taking shape at thegrassroots level . These are impressive developments, rich
 inopportunity. And they have had effects, in rhetorical and sometimespolicy changes."When he says "policy changes", I read it to mean within the UnitedStates. However, I think that a popular movement to identify the U.S.government as the single biggest threat to our survival as a species, iscoalescing in foreign policy decisions around the world. The result isan indication of US economic isolation with hopes of slowing militarybuildup and globalization.I think you credit them with more strategy than they deserve. I don't think Chomsky is talking about the same thing. He also said this, with the same sentence in it:"The harmful effects of the corporate globalisation project have led to mass popular protest and activism in the South, later joined by major sectors of the rich industrial societies, hence becoming harder to ignore. For the first time concrete alliances
 have been taking shape at a grassroots level. It is fair to say, I think, that the future of our endangered species may be determined in no small measure by how these popular forces evolve."He means the other superpower, the Social Forum in Porto Alegre for example, and I'm sure the "policy changes" have more to do with the World Bank/IMF/WTO than with the US government or other governments.(IMO) this adds to Mike Weaver's position:http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63345.html"Don't get me wrong - the concerted effort to destroy our economicsystem perpetuated by the Bush Administration will (and has) have aneffect."I think it adds to Gabriel Kolko's position and mine 18 months ago, and since - Vote Bush! LOL!... But a Kerry win would still have left you with the "duopoly" party,followed by business-as-usual, especially on the foreign
 policyfront. There's not much essential difference between the two parties'foreign policy, eg between Clinton's and Bush's, it's mostly just theBushies' outrageous in-your-face style of it that's different.I agreed with Gabriel Kolko at the time, that Bush might be thelesser of two evils, but while Kolko was thinking of other nationsand international alliances I was thinking of the Other Superpower.http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg38234.html[Biofuel] The Coming Elections and the Future of American Global Power16 Sep 2004Also this:"Gabriel Kolko -- in this writer's estimation, our most indispensablehistorian -- argues in a recent piece on the Counterpunch websitethat because a second Bush term would possibly intensify 

Re: [Biofuel] U.S. dollar

2006-05-31 Thread Michael Redler
Hakan,You wrote: "...it is a concerted effort to try to hold the value of the dollar high, when it according to all financial rules and fundamentals should be much lower."So, there are no organizations or governments attempting to defend themselves from U.S. Hegemony by trying to increase the value of currenciesother thanthe Dollar? Who's the child Hakan?You said: "I find it a little bit amazing that in the text below is an attempt toblame other countries for allowing US to break all the rules."I find it amazing too - since I didn't "blame" other countries for anything.I find itamazing that (according to you) I can "blame" someone without using the word blame, or:culpabilityfaultguiltrapresponsibility for wrongdoing or failure I didn't say any related words
 like:regretremorseself-reproachshameaccountabilityliabilitycomplicityblameworthinessreprehensiblenesssinfulnesscensurecondemnationdenunciation(courtesy: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/blame)I didn't try toexcuse the U.S. frombreaking "all the rules". However, I did say "White House policy is both self destructive and antagonistic, attracting the attention of others to attack."You also said: "I do not see that US is under any attack"That one stands on it's own merit (or lack thereof). The U.S. has so broadly alienated countries on every continent, what strategy of attack do you think is being spared - irrespective of whether or not you can "see" it?My observation/speculation was related toa growing and justifiable popular dissent against the U.S. government, occurring both inside and outside the U.S. and how it
 may be effecting policy decisions in countries around the world.It would be a ray of sunshine if you could save the small-minded personal attacks, address a specific observation (accurately) and express dissent with at least a thimble full of objectivity. I'm not even asking for respect (although it would be nice).Othersmight find ituseful to the conversation and you might find it helpful to your own credibility.Mike  Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Mike,The weakening of the dollar is not a result of any concerted foreigneffort. The dollar is amazingly strong, considering that US breaksall fundamentals. It is probably the opposite, it is a concertedeffort to try to hold the value of the dollar high, when it accordingto all financial rules and
 fundamentals should be much lower.I find it a little bit amazing that in the text below is an attempt toblame other countries for allowing US to break all the rules. I wouldnot surprised to hear such things from children "mom/dad said wecould do it" and maybe I am not that surprised to hear it from US.It is however wrong to try to find any to blame other then US itself.I do not see that US is under any attack, it is only taking theconsequences of its own doing. I see no reason to develop anymental feelings like "being pursued" over it. It is not any backgroundfor "see what they are doing to us" when it should be "see what weare doing to ourselves". On the other hand, conspiration theoriesare favorite themes for Americans and they will soon find someonewho is "making it to the Americans, so the Americans will makeit to themselves".Do not misunderstand me, I like Americans very much and I alsolike
 children very much. I wonder if there are any connections inthis. How they could elect Bush is beyond me, but he is there.HakanAt 17:05 31/05/2006, you wrote:I think the 5/30/06 post and attached article from AltEnergyNetwork dida excellent job explaining the administration's decision making process,the U.S. economy and how it compares to similar situations in othercountries.http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63309.htmlI also think it's possible that the weakening of the U.S. Dollar is theresult of a concerted effort by foreign entities (governments and NGO's)and might be related to what Noam Chomsky describes on the last page of"Hegemony or Survival"."For the first time, concrete alliances have been taking shape at thegrassroots level . These are impressive developments, rich inopportunity. And they have
 had effects, in rhetorical and sometimespolicy changes."When he says "policy changes", I read it to mean within the UnitedStates. However, I think that a popular movement to identify the U.S.government as the single biggest threat to our survival as a species, iscoalescing in foreign policy decisions around the world. The result isan indication of US economic isolation with hopes of slowing militarybuildup and globalization.(IMO) this adds to Mike Weaver's position:http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg63345.html"Don't get me wrong - the concerted effort to destroy our economicsystem perpetuated by the Bush Administration will (and has) have aneffect."White House policy is both self destructive and antagonistic, attractingthe attention of others to attack.Military spending/use, energy, the
 environment, you name it, the U.S.government is 

Re: [Biofuel] HHO for welding running your car

2006-05-31 Thread Corals
Indeed, that would be truly interesting. Keep us posted.Bill Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  If it's all true, it's going to be interesting to see how fast this guy disappears from the face of the planet!"D. Mindock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Another water powered car, this oneby Denny Klein in Florida.  100 miles on 4 oz of water, he says. He is developing a Hummer for  the Pentagon that'll run on either water or gasoline, according
 to the  newscast on Faux 26 TV.http://youtube.com/watch?v=HF__Qlhtnwssearch=water%20power___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/Wildbill  Sutton.VT Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/  __  Acutus ad Serviendum  Sharpened to Serve 
  __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] more goofy questions

2006-05-31 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Jason, Tom

KCl is muriate of potash, it's used as a fertiliser but it kills the 
soil life, very harsh form of potassium. Potassium phosphate is 
milder and has the double benefit of adding phosphorus. Quite what 
happens when you put that in the soil isn't quite so simple either.

Fertilisers don't fertilise the soil, they're not really 
fertilisers, they're just nutrients. It's an attempt to feed the 
plant direct instead of via the soil life, a bit like being on a 
drip-feed rather than eating food and letting your intestines do the 
job (the soil has often been described as an inside-out intestine).

Fertilisers aren't worth buying. But a by-product of a separate 
process that contains soil and plant nutrients can be a beneficial 
addition to a compost pile, to make real fertiliser. As Tom is 
showing.

You can use HCl to separate the by-product and add the salts to a 
compost pile with benefit, though not as much benefit as if you used 
phosphoric acid for separation.

 i did some reading at wikipedia, and KCl, being part of the final product
in splitting crude glycerine(at least with KOH and HCl), is also used as a
mineral fertilizer, and can be used to cut table salt (theyre about the same
as far as toxicity goes, and it increases potassium levels and total
electrolytes in the human body, not so bad i think) but it has many other
uses in the medical world as antidotes to some poisons, and for food
preparation(probably a preservative,yeech). is this an acceptible byproduct
or should i keep looking?
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] more goofy questions


  Jason  Katie,
  I'm not sure what you mean when you say clean the glycerine for
  compost.
  Many people compost the glycerine cocktail w/o any treatment. I think
  this is best done when KOH is used as the caustic rather than NaOH.
   I do separate the glycerine because I produce quite  a bit of BD
  these
  days. I'm concerned about pouring Kilo after Kilo of  caustic, of which
  70%,
  by weight, is Potassium. Sure it's a valuable soil nutrient, but I'd like
  to
  control how much is added to my garden 

Too much potassium is a no-no. More about that here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg47892.html
[biofuels-biz] KOH vs NaOH

But compost buffers everything, the margins for error are much wider 
when you use compost.

Best

Keith


which has done just fine on
  pre-BD compost. I also am attempting to recover methanol and have uses for
  the other components of the mix.
 
  I used hydrochloric acid (sold in hardware stores as muriatic acid)
  before I was able to locate phosphoric.
  I did a few small test batches and got good separation.
  The difference will be the type of mineral salt that will precipitate
  out.
  Ex:
  Hydrochloric Acid  + Lye (NaOH) forms table salt and water
  HCl   +   NaOH      NaCL (table salt)  + H2O
  The table salt is not especially valuable; throw it out?
 
 The salt falls to the bottom and you get FFAs forming a layer on top
  and
  the crude glycerine (+  most of the excess methanol) forming a bottom
  layer.
  The FFAs and the glycerine/methanol are composed of Cs, Hs, and Os.
  They will decompose into CO2 and H2O. They supply nothing in the way of
  soil
  nutrients, but I have found that
  they appear to accelerate decomposition within a compost pile   ...
  not
  only a safe way to dispose of the mix, but some benefit to be gotten.
 
  KOH (during processing) and H3PO4 (split)
  is preferred because the salt produced is Potassium Phosphate  .
  valuable as fertilizer.
 
  The point is that different acids can be used to split the cocktail
  into FFAs and crude glycerine w. methanol. The
  difference is in the salt (and its value) that is produced.
 
  Vinegar is an organic acid, which tend to be weak acids. It would take
  a lot of vinegar to split the cocktail.
  Probably more expensive than hydrochloric and I don't see that the salt
  produced would have more value.
 
  ***By value I don't mean financial, as in sell for profit. I
  dissolve some of the potassium phosphate produced by the split in water
  and
  add it to my compost piles. It has value as in  ...  can be put to good
  use.
 
Sorry to get so wordy, but your goofy question is part of a
  subject
  that is of great interest to me.
The splitting of the cocktail may not have the financial payoff that
  brewing BD does, but the feeling of putting to good use what others have
  called waste products  is akin to the feeling I get when I fill the
  tank(s) w. BD I brewed at home.
 Best of luck to you,
  Tom
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Jason Katie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:13 AM
  Subject: [Biofuel]