Re: Message not displaying in RTV

2003-02-22 Thread Ming-Li
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 at 11:39:01 +0100 Eddie Castelli wrote:

 Unfortunately I see it very strange. you can see my Screen Shot. Is it
 this what is meant?

 www.EddieCastelli.com/pub/thebat/pic/ming-li.jpg

Has anyone looked at this but me? This is really strange. The shown
headers are correct (as far as I can tell), indicating this is the first
message I wrote in response to Spike's question.

But the content isn't. It started with something I wrote several months
ago, when I just came back to the list (the first paragraph). The rest
seems to be from several different sources. My best guess is Eddie has a
corrupted message base. Or has anyone else received the same thing? The
message in my Sent box and the one the list sent back to me certainly
doesn't look like that.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 | WinXP SP-1






 Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Message not displaying in RTV

2003-02-22 Thread Ming-Li
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 19:14:17 -0500 Allie Martin wrote:

 Go the the Viewer/Editor options. The option at the top will
 toggle the Viewer preference.

Got it. Thanks! I tried, and the message displayed just fine here in
RTV.

I'm not sure if it's related, but I have seen html (or text/html combo)
messages that display fine in the html pane, but not in the right
charset in the plain text pane, even after I've manually selected the
right encoding. These are usually Chinese messages (typically from
Lookout Express users).

Frankly, TB is a long way from East-Asian language friendly. I'm still
patiently waiting for v2, but I have to admit I've started evaluating
other options. The volume of Chinese email has been so high since I came
back to Taiwan that the pain has almost negated all the benefits TB
gives me. My wife has given up, and I'm barely hanging on.

ML As I said in the message, it's an encoding for traditional Chinese,

 But shouldn't it display in the RTV if it displays in the plain text
 viewer?

Yes, it is, here.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 | WinXP SP-1






 Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: attachments

2003-02-22 Thread Ming-Li
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 at 14:16:38 -0500 Timothy Casten wrote:

 Once you open up a attachment such as a word doc or excel file. When
 the application starts and once it is loaded, the name of the document
 takes on the bats coded numbers for that doc or excel file.

Here TB uses the original file name, but maybe it's because I let TB
store attachments in a directory, instead of with messages.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 | WinXP SP-1






 Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Ritlabs SecureBat! - bug report

2001-04-11 Thread Ming-Li

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 at 20:10:04 +0100 Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:

 This is very far from easy with SecureBat! because the folder
 names are encoded and the mailbases are encrypted. You've got to
 do some real work to find out where a particular folder is stored.

Ah-so, looks like SecureBat! goes farther (in terms of security)
than I imagined.

 They moved just fine in real time. I later had to shut down and
 restart the system (it may be Win2k, but it's still Windows and we
 all know what that means for up-time cycles). It was on reload
 that the folders turned up missing.

Sounds like it's a SecureBat!-specific problem. Maybe the beast
isn't really ready after all, and maybe that's why they haven't
release it to the general public.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/4 | Win2k Pro SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Bug: dangerously wants to connect unwantedly

2001-04-08 Thread Ming-Li

On Sat, 7 Apr 2001 at 23:20:35 +0700 tracer wrote:


 thebat will NOT write to the server and make password changes. NO
 email program does that and even CAN do that.

Unless I misunderstand you, I believe TB CAN do that. From the
Account menu ... Change POP3 password...

It doesn't work on most of the servers I'm with, for they probably
use different ways/servers to do the job. But I did successfully
change my POP password in this way with some severs.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/4 | Win2k Pro SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: potential bug - wrong display in mail dispatcher

2001-03-17 Thread Ming-Li

On Friday, March 16, 2001 at 12:02:52 +0800 Thomas wrote:

 I couldn't find anything wrong here, except maybe an unusual
 wrapping in one Received header. I doin't know whether this has
 any bearing at all.

I guess you mean the 4th "Received:" (from top), right? I checked
the exported .msg just now, and it's all in one line, no wrapping.
When posting, however, I took (copy-paste) it from within TB (after
Alt-Ctrl-K), not from the exported file, and it somehow wrapped the
line. Sorry if that mislead you.

 I will test-subscribe to that list to try out whether the same
 problem with the despatcher existsd here.

Thanks a lot!

ML --- Complete Header for the No. 4 Message from Account 2---
 [...]
ML To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Don't you say in the text that these 4 messages are the same, only on
 different servers? Why does it show "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as recipient in
 account 1?

Sorry if I didn't make it clear enough. Account 1 and 2 are
different accounts in the real sense (with different email
addresses), not just two accounts in TB of the same address. Both NY
Times and CUNY's listserv don't allow one email address to subscribe
to the same list twice. While I could change my subscription mode
(or header style) of the same address, I won't get exactly the same
message twice. To overcome that, I used two accounts on the same
server (both @Home accounts). Messages no. 2 to 4 are the same
messages sent to different accounts (in different mode or header
style). Message 1 is in fact different, thought they're both
standard "subscription confirmation requests" sent by CUNY listserv
to new subscribers.

Am I making it clearer. :-)

 Anyway, here you have Received headers, then Message-ID, and then
 another Received header. Is that RFC compliant?

I certain can say nothing about RFC compliant (could somebody jump
in here?), but I get that all the time (I mean Received headers
divided by other headers, not necessarily Message-ID).

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k Pro SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: potential bug - wrong display in mail dispatcher

2001-03-16 Thread Ming-Li
 by femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP
  id [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:19:38 -0800
Received: from mx9-sfba.mail.home.com (mx9-sfba.mail.home.com [24.0.95.240])
by h7.mail.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA27763;
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from listserv.cuny.edu (listserv.cuny.edu [128.228.100.10])
by mx9-sfba.mail.home.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2FMKaH18115;
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from listserv (listserv.cuny.edu) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT
v1.1b) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:25:04 -0500
Received: from LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU by LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
  1.8d) with spool id 7132825 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15
  Mar 2001 17:25:03 -0500
Received: from mailcity.com (209.185.123.96) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP for
  Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
  15 Mar 2001 17:25:03 -0500
Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by mailcity.com; Thu Mar 15 14:20:09
  2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en
X-Sent-Mail: off
X-Mailer: MailCity Service
X-Sender-Ip: 207.20.19.184
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Language: en
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:20:09 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Discussion of opera and related issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Michael Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Lycos Mail  (http://mail.lycos.com:80)
Subject:  Alapage Thank You
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 END No.3 Header

--- Complete Header for the No. 4 Message from Account 2---

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mh5-sfba.mail.home.com ([24.0.95.234])
  by femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP
  id 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Fri, 16 Mar 2001 03:03:37 -0800
Received: from mx5-sfba.mail.home.com (mx5-sfba.mail.home.com [24.0.95.230])
by mh5-sfba.mail.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA21532
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 03:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from content119a.lga2.nytimes.com (content119a.lga2.nytimes.com 
[208.48.26.162])
by mx5-sfba.mail.home.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2GB45b04802
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 03:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from listserv1 (listserv1.lga2.nytimes.com) by content119a.lga2.nytimes.com
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
Fri,
16 Mar 2001 5:05:38 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:  Fri, 16 Mar 2001 04:14:26 -0500
From: The New York Times Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:   International Headlines from NYTimes.com
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 END No.4 Header

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k Pro SP1
-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TB1.png
 TB2.png
 TB1a.png
 TB2a.png


Re: potential bug - wrong display in mail dispatcher

2001-03-15 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, March 14, 2001 at 02:44:08 +0800 Thomas wrote:

ML Hm, so it's only at my end. Strange, since it happens to so
ML many servers (all 7 of them). I began to suspect it's caused by
ML incompatibility between TB and DBCS-enabled systems.

 FYI, I have just enabled DBCS and tried. No problem over here, at
 my Hinet account. (Or any other, for that matter.) Maybe an OS
 problem?

The good news: you're right, DBCS support isn't the problem. I took
DBCS support completely out of my system (basically returning it
back to a pure English system) and it's still the same.

The bad news: I'm at wit's end about what happens. Any theory or
wild suggestions?

Ok, just took another good look at those messages in the mail
dispatcher, and I found almost all of them come from two sources:
New York Times' news letters and a mailing list called Opera-l (it's
a mailing list about opera the art, not the software). Maybe we can
get somewhere from this finding. I'll conduct more tests and report
back tomorrow.

BTW, Does anyone also subscribe to either of these? Or is anybody on
a list hosted by CUNY (city university of N.Y.)? (Operal-l is the
only list I belong that's hosted by CUNY, so I've no idea it's
limited to that particular list or system-wide.)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k Pro SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




beta release procedure - two suggestions

2001-02-28 Thread Ming-Li

Hello All,

It happens every so often when a new beta is released that some
people would jump the gun and then crying for "what's new" if--as it
usually happens--the announcement is made after a beta release.

In the rare cases where the announcement is made _before_ the
software is put on the server, some people would rush to the beta
page (or ftp server), see nothing to download, and then rush to the
list to protest ("you announce a new beta, why isn't it there?"). I
remember it even happened once that someone downloaded a "broken"
beta because the software was in the process of uploading to the
server when he/she was downloading.

See the dilemma?

Here are my humble suggestions, one to RIT, one to my fellow
Bats(wo)men:

1. Maybe it's better for RIT folks to prepare a "what's new"
document first, and bundle it with the beta program (in the .arj
file). Then upload the software, followed by the official
announcement on the TBBETA list. Doing so guarantees the software is
on the server and ready for download when the announcement is made.
And those who scout the server often and download it before the
announcement is made could learn what's new from the accompanied
document. If RIT could do this consistently, we can also be sure a
beta version on the FTP is not an public release should there be no
accompanied document (and no subsequent announcement). Those who
choose to download such software would have no right to complain.

2. Before RIT does adopt the suggested practice, could we all please
be a little patient in waiting for announcement? Usually it's in
preparation or even on its way. (Mailing list is no instant
messaging.) Couldn't we wait just a little longer? It's not as if
who break the news (that there's a new beta) would get a candy or
something. :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.51 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: beta release procedure - two suggestions

2001-02-28 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, February 28, 2001, 6:33:07 AM, Thomas wrote:

ML It happens every so often when a new beta is released that some
ML people would jump the gun and then crying for "what's new"
ML if--as it usually happens--the announcement is made after a
ML beta release.

 The announcement *is* the beta release. Nobody should download before
 the announcement. 'Nough said.

Ok, I stand corrected for the wording. I should say "the
announcement is made after the software is put on the server.

You missed my point, though. I'm not the one who jump the gun; never
did, and never will. I'm merely trying to suggest a way that could
easily preempt such mess from happening again.

You've seen it, Maxim's announcement was only a couple of hours
later than the software had been up on the server (I'm going by the
ftp's date/time record here), and some people just couldn't wait. If
Maxim could just wait a little while, make a whatsnew.txt (of which
the content is exactly the same as the email announcement, minus the
beta link at the top) and put it into the .rar file together with
the software, wouldn't that be nice?

I know, we should just sit and wait for the announcement (I
mentioned that, too), but the fact is, some people just don't. New
users are coming in every day (I hope), and some are bound to do the
same thing. If RIT could change their practice just a little bit
(which isn't hard, IMHO, since they have to document the changes in
the announcement anyway), then we won't see this ever again. Unless
you enjoy chiding those who jump the gun each time a new beta is
out.

There are things we can only lay out the rules and enforce them when
they're breached. There are however problems that we can make some
technical adjustment and they would just go away. In this case, I
just see the latter as the better alternative.

It's, of course, up the RIT to change the procedure, and I can't say
they're wrong should they choose not to. I'm just a little tired to
see such mess happening each time a new beta is out. And it will
happen again as long as new users keep coming.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.51 Beta/1 | Win2k Pro SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: potential bug - wrong mail header

2001-02-17 Thread Ming-Li

On Saturday, February 17, 2001, 7:38:29 AM, Marck wrote:

 Now I doubt that TB inserts CR/LF pairs after each line, it must
 be somewhere on the way. I'm guessing.

I doubt that, too. But then it's hard to explain why this problem
manifests itself (to me) only when I'm using TB. (Please see my
original post and my reply to Dean.)

 FYI Nick Andriash reported exactly the same phenomenon. What's Nick's
 address? [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-). He's now working from an OperaMail
 account.

I must have missed this. (I vaguely remember Nick's trouble with
@home account about duplicated messages. I don't remember this one.)

I'll get another account if I have to, though I really hate managing
too many accounts. The problem, however, seems to point to TB's
direction. As said in my other reply, Alexander from RITLabs is
working on it, so we'll see.

So far @home is holding up well enough for me, though two days are
hardly enough for me to gain too much confidence in it, given the
amount of horror stories I've heard. Thankfully I still have a
backup of all messages on my school account's server, that makes the
risk (of using @home's email service) much more bearable.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.49e | Win2k Pro SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: A small bug / macro %TOFName

2001-01-23 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 2:05:29 AM, David wrote:

A Do you mean if a persons Christian name is 'Howard Phillip',
A that only 'Howard' would appear when using macro %TOFName ?

 Yes.

 I have a friend whose name is "Jon Paul Steven Jones". He is known
 as "Jon Paul". He does not like "Jon-Paul" and considers it wrong,
 so do I. Therefore I will not use it.

How should TB know what to use in this case, then? There's no
possibility for that, is there? TB could only takes its best guess
and the best guess is the "Jon", and you'll have to put in the right
one by yourself should it guess wrong.

If you like, you may put your friend in the Address Book, and use
the newly introduced AB-related macros to tell TB exact what it
should address a person.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.49c | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: A small bug / macro %TOFName

2001-01-23 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 8:46:11 AM, David wrote:

 Ming-Li I think that you misses the start of this thread. In the
 address book "Jon Paul Steven Jones" is put in as followes.

I did read through the thread, but I guess I didn't tread carefully
enough. Thanks for reminding me.

ML and use the newly introduced AB-related macros to tell TB exact
ML what it should address a person.

 Why not use the %TOFName macro?

Ok, so what I said still stands. To tell TB to use the first name
from the First Name field in AB, you use %ABTOFirstName. Please
check the help file for further info about the %ABnnnppp macros.

%TOFName (and its siblings) takes its input directly from the header
fields, not your address book.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.49c | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: be careful with the Mass mailing feature

2000-12-03 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, December 03, 2000, 10:33:09 AM, Thomas wrote:

MM I have following suggestion.

MM When User select contacts and hit Mass mailing + qtemplate, TB will
MM display following dialog window:

 Just open the message in the editor seems logical to me.

I concur. To me, QT is template after all, and I couldn't think of
an occasion where I want to send a template out without further
editing.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/9 | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: beta/6

2000-11-12 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, November 12, 2000, 8:31:30 AM, Juergen wrote:

 I also downloaded the Beta/6 and it shows Beta/4.

But the size is different. On the other hand: Did you see the date
of the Beta/6' exe-file?

[29.08.2000]

Please note it's *1.46* beta4, not 1.48 beta4.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/4 | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: beta/6

2000-11-12 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, November 12, 2000, 9:21:45 AM, Juergen wrote:

 Please note it's *1.46* beta4, not 1.48 beta4.

Yeah, but now it's the right version that Max uploaded.

I know. :) I tried to keep quiet but then so many people were crying
"it's beta4" without noticing it's the wrong version, :) so I
decided to point that out. I got the new one as soon as Maxim
uploaded it.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/6 | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: run external program

2000-11-09 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, November 08, 2000, 3:21:02 AM, Daniel wrote:

 I tested the filter 'run external program' and got a question
 about it.

 If you send your mail for example to notepad.exe you can edit it
 easily. So far - so good.  The problem is now, how to import it
 again. Is there another way than with /IMPORT ?

I guess not. You have to call TB with the /import command switch
from your editor (if it allows) to get it back into TB. You won't
get two instances of TB; it's just another thread of the running TB.

 If you want to import the mail to the original place, u have to
 give the account and the folder name as options to the external
 program - otherwise u don't know where the mail comes from.

Right.

 But TB! saves the exported mail to tempfile. If you change this
 tempfile, is it possible to import this file automatically to the
 origin account and folder (for example if you close notepad.exe
 the changed mail is reimported to the original place)?

I'm afraid not. It would be a nice feature to have. If you're trying
to edit your message headers before sending it out, there's a
third-party utility (IIRC, it's called X-Ray) for it. Otherwise
we'll out of luck for now. On a related note, being able to edit
received mail right in TB is a feature in great demand. But RIT has
got such a long list of wishes that we'll just have to wait and see.

 Using The Bat! 1.48 Beta/2 S/N 0D5837E3
 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5

Could you please these two line to your signature area? Well, it's
up to you, of course.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/3 | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - bug report - Message Forward and space waste

2000-11-09 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, November 09, 2000, 1:13:04 AM, Dirk wrote:

   The bug description:

 I have setup (all related settings) TB! to store Attachments
 in the Mail Body _not_ in the Attach Directory. I have setup
 this in _all_ Accounts.

Same here.

 Every Time i create a Forward, TB! save the Forwarded message
 in the Attach Directory (but save the Message in the message
 body of the created message) and _never_ delete this.

Not confirmed. Wathced the Attach directory closely and nothing
happened when creating a forwarded message (either a plain message
or a message with attachments).

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/3 | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Setup Columns

2000-11-09 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, November 09, 2000, 6:00:40 AM, wie wrote:

 How  to  change  the Setup Columns at an account or a folder and
 make it default/use to all my account/all folder ??

Right click on a folder, select Properties, check the option "Use
the account default column settings". You'll have to enable the
option for all the folders you want to use the default column
settings, since it's not checked when a new folder is created. (Yes,
the ability to set properties for several folders/accounts at a time
has been repeatedly requested.)

After that, you may adjust the column settings in any folder with
the option checked, and your change would be taken as the new
"default column settings" for that account. IOW, when you change the
column settings for a folder that uses the default column settings,
all other folders with that option on would use the new settings as
well.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/3 | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Bug with using multiple Cookies

2000-11-05 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, November 05, 2000, 6:08:26 AM, A. wrote:

 So if I define the following template:

 %Qinclude="%Cookie=""path to QT handles list"""
 %Cookie="cookie file"

 The outputting of the second %cookie macro will be affected in that it
 will take a cookie from the initial %cookie macros cookie file. A QT
 handle will therefore be seen.

Confirmed.

I also found if you switch the two lines, the QT included won't be
seen at all. I.e., only the cookie from the "cookie file" would be
there.

Another observation: if you insert another line of %cookie between
the two lines, like this:

Begin Template=
%Qinclude="%Cookie=""path to QT handles list"""
%Cookie
%Cookie="cookie file"
End Template=

then the second line would show the QT handle, but the third line
would be correct. So before RIT fixes it, this may serves as a
workaround, albeit awkward for You'll have to delete the wrong
cookie by hand.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/1 | Win2k Pro SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Thread watchers (was: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-10-11 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 6:44:22 AM, Thomas wrote:

 So it checks for each new message coming in whether this thread
 already exists somewhere in the message base and has been marked
 "ignore"? This can be awfully slow when you have thousands of
 messages, if I understand you correctly.

In Agent, no. At least I don't feel it. AFAIK, all news messages
carry full thread references in the headers (am I right?), so all
Agent has to do before retrieving new messages of a group is to
quickly scan through all the ignored threads and collect the message
IDs of the "leading messages". The leading message of a thread
doesn't have to exist. As long as there's one message in the thread
exists, you can get the message ID of the leading message from its
Reference field.

I can certainly imagine other newsreaders opting to store this
information in a permanent database. Agent chooses not to, and I
haven't feel any performance penalty yet.

For TB to implement this, it's more complicated. First of all, not
all MUAs implement the Reference field, and TB has to use the
In-Reply-To field to thread it. Simply keeping tag of the leading
message IDs won't be enough for ignore/watch-ing purposes. Also, TB
allows threading by fields other than Reference, and it allows
changing threading methods on the fly. If TB wants to do this, it
probably has to limit its application to only the "thread by
reference" context.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/7 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Thread watchers (was: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-10-11 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 8:28:08 AM, Thomas wrote:

ML In Agent, no. At least I don't feel it. AFAIK, all news
ML messages carry full thread references in the headers (am I
ML right?), so all Agent has to do before retrieving new messages
ML of a group is to quickly scan through all the ignored threads

 "Qucikly scan" through the whole message base?

The index file, not the message base. BTW, most of what I'm saying
here are my own observation through the many years of usage. I don't
have inside knowledge of how exactly Agent works, except that it
creates a data file and an index file for each group.

ML and collect the message IDs of the "leading messages". The
ML leading message of a thread doesn't have to exist.

I mean, Agent doesn't have to keep a list (virtually or physically)
a list of all the IDs of all messages in a watched/ignored thread.
It needs only the message ID of the message that starts the thread.
All follow-up messages will carry that ID in their Reference field,
so Agent could spot a new message from that thread simply by looking
at the Reference field.

 You lost me. I give up. g Maybe I should take a look at Forte's
 Agent...

That's even better. If you're serious in getting a newsreader
(haven't you got one already?), though, I would suggest you start
with Gravity or XNews, both having the same or similar capability.
After all, Agent is basically dead.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/7 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 8:35:39 AM, A. wrote:

TF In-reply-to cannot be used, unless 1.) everybody uses an email
TF client that uses the ehader, and 2.) everybody uses a different
TF ISP (just see how many people on this list alone are on GMX,
TF Hotmail, or Yahoo to make Christian's point).

 Neither solution is ideal in all instances.

Am I right that message IDs are generated by the MUA? If so, we may
suggest TB to use our whole email address, not just the domain, to
generate message IDs since the first part of an ID (before "@") may
contain letters, not just numbers. Is there any downside to this?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/7 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: LDAP Searching

2000-10-09 Thread Ming-Li

On Monday, October 09, 2000, 1:13:56 AM, Graham wrote:

 I've not tried exactly what you are doing - but the 'IS this book
 tied to an LDAP directory' option gives TB! permission to store
 all search results in this 'address book' - To do that - every
 search scrubs down the previous search results - and starts with a
 new query on the remote LDAP directory.

Have you tried to search an AB that's not associated with a LDAP
directory (i.e., your personal AB)? I tried just now and couldn't
find anything in my Personal AB, and the status field remain empty
(unlike when searching a LDAP directory there would be messages like
"connecting, searching, ..."). Is the search function for LDAP only?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/7 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: funny characters instead of message in 1.47 Beta/5

2000-10-02 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, October 01, 2000, 2:07:25 PM, Nick wrote:

 I was wondering if *you* had downloaded/installed the
 International Pack that would allow *you* to view messages written
 in a different language, providing of course that was the problem.
 ;o)

The International Pack contains only localized versions of user
interface (translated menus and such) for The Bat! and spell checker
dictionaries. It has nothing to do with reading mail in unsupported
encodings.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/5 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: MAPI Addressee Construction

2000-09-30 Thread Ming-Li

On Friday, September 29, 2000, 9:34:00 AM, bill wrote:

 One other MAPI occurrence.  I installed the tbmapi.dll through the
 /installmapi switch earlier this month.  It installed itself as
 mapi32.dll.  Fine.  When the revised tbmapi.dll was released a
 couple of days ago I installed it using the same routine.

 However, MAPI still did not work with Agent.  Upon checking the
 mapi32.dll it had *not* been overwritten by the new version of
 tbmapi.dll.  It was still the old original version.  Opened a DOS
 window and tried to copy tbmapi over mapi32.  I got a 'sharing
 violation'.  Rebooting to DOS achieved the required result.

This happens when, among other possibilities, a program tries to
call the dll and fails (hangs). The dll files remains open and thus
couldn't be overwritten.

 I wonder if any other users are having a problem with MAPI because
 the old tbmapi is not being overwritten, or perhaps it is just a
 quirk of this machine.

This may happen to anybody, and it should be added to the list of
many quirks in TB's MAPI installation that RIT needs to work out
before its official release. Generally speaking, I think it is in
itself a bad idea trying to overwrite a dll file in the directories,
and RIT would be wise to avoid this if it's at all possible. But
sometimes MS just leaves you no choice.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/5 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: MAPI tests with new DLL

2000-09-30 Thread Ming-Li

On Friday, September 29, 2000, 10:09:25 AM, Quin wrote:

 My mapistub.dll is 128kB. Both mapi32.dll and tbmapi.dll are 57kB
 which seems to indicate that TB! overwrote the original MS
 mapi32.dll.

Yup.

 (I assume I can restore that original by duplicating
 the stub file and changing one copy's name to mapi32.dll? Note
 that my assumption is a question ;-)

Yes, you can, though I don't know the benefit of doing that.

 But why would a file named tbmapi.dll overwrite on named
 mapi32.dll?

I have no idea. My best guess is the /INSTALLMAPI switch simply
copies itself into the system directory assuming you don't have mapi
support (from anybody) installed at all, which could be wrong (i.e.,
in fact one already has mapi support installed) and TB's mapi
installation killed the old one regardless.

IOW, TB's TBMAPI.DLL *should* work with the original MAPI support in
the system and make itself available as the mapi server of choice,
AND the /INSTALLMAPI switch really shouldn't be used when there's
already MS mapi32.dll in the system.

Your experience (and Curtis' and maybe some others) suggests it's
not working sometimes, and that should the kinks RIT needs to work
out.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/5 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: MAPI tests with new DLL

2000-09-30 Thread Ming-Li

On Saturday, September 30, 2000, 10:37:35 AM, Thomas wrote:

 (I assume I can restore that original by duplicating the stub
 file and changing one copy's name to mapi32.dll? Note that my
 assumption is a question ;-)

ML Yes, you can, though I don't know the benefit of doing that.

 To go back to "before TB MAPI", the resotre option.

Yup, that I know. :) I meant to say I didn't (and still don't) know
the benefit of using one version of MAPI32.DLL over the other with
TB. From what we've heard so far, on some systems, both work, while
on others only one of them works.

 I think, and I am not sure whether it's my phantasy, that
 TBMAPI.DLL contains info to the OS's MAPI system that TB exists
 and should be used for this service. The original MAPI wouldn't
 know that.

I'm not sure about that. I've never used the /INSTALLMAPI switch and
I'm sure the mapi32.dll in my windows system32 folder is still the
original MS version. Yet MAPI with TB is working, with a lone
exception.

 What other mechanics would tell the application from within which
 you invoke MAPI that it is TB that has to be used?

I would think some registry settings suffice, ideally. The
instruction on the beta page and Stefan's clarification the other
day implies the same. (Otherwise they should simply tell us to use
the /INSTALLMAPI switch no matter what.)

As an API, I think it's imperative for MS to make it somewhat open
to the extent that other email programs can also be MAPI servers
without having to passing their dll files as MS'. IOW, there should
be a way for third-party programs to plug into the mapi system. Not
that MS would care what I think, though. I won't be surprised if
they have made it difficult, if not impossible, to achieve that.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/5 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - bug report

2000-09-19 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 9:30:39 AM, Christian wrote:

 I don't print out many emails, but every now and then it happens.
 Things got better because I can print them using Message/Print,
 but not using the toolbar. I just tried stopping the printer from
 the print queue, then I printed a message from within The Bat. In
 the Queue I found the print job without a name. Printing from
 other application the print jobs have a name. I wonder if this
 could be the problem.

I've never noticed this before (well, I almost never print email).
Just tried and indeed it has no name, but it prints just fine. (I
used the Print button on the toolbar).

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.47 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Odd folder behaviour. Bug?

2000-09-17 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, September 17, 2000, 12:18:52 AM, Januk wrote:

  I have a dummy account set up in TB, and so I don't need the four
  default folders (Inbox, Outbox, Sent, Trash).  Since they can't
  be deleted, I tried making them sub folders of a fifth folder.
  TB happily let me do this, but then every time I shut down TB, I
  would get an access error message and TB would hang.  I could
  clear the error and shut down using the X button at the top
  right.  Everything returned to normal when these folders were
  promoted to top level folders again.

That's strange. I've been doing this all along. In fact, I've
deleted some of the "default folders" after dragging them into
subfolders. I did not, however, delete *ALL* such folders in a dummy
account. I would at least leave one alone--the "Trash" folder, for
I'm not sure what would happen if I delete a message in that account
when there's no Trash folder.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46c | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: MAPI strange behavior

2000-09-15 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, September 14, 2000, 7:35:55 PM, Peter wrote:

   MAPI is working really strange when I'm sending the page from
   IE..

   1. When I am trying to send page which is Russian windows-1251
   codepage it opens TB! window with Cyrillic (KOI8-R) codepage and
   with text translated from windows-1251. So the text is unreadable
   and I cannot add my own text. The attached web page is good though.

I don't know a single word and have never visited a web page in
Russian, but I did some experiment and couldn't reproduce what you
described here.

I went to your homepage by clicking on the link in your signature
and clicked on the first link under the title "Ivan Shokin's diary
(in Russian) Part II". My IE told me the encoding of the page is
"Cyrillic (Windows)", and the source said "charset=windows-1251".

I then used the "Send page by email" function and a TB message
editing window popped up. The message editing pane was full of weird
Chinese characters (the default locale of my English Win2k is
Traditional Chinese), for the default message encoding is "none". I
changed the message encoding to "Cyrillic (Windows-1251)" and those
Chinese characters turned into Russian. (Though I don't understand a
thing I tried to compare the pattern of them to the web page in IE
and they appeared identical to me.)

I could add my own text as well, though I could type only in
English.

   2. There is only part of text shown in text part window. Some of it
   is only in attached file.

Can't confirm this either.

BTW, my IE is version 5.5, if that matters.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: MAPI strange behavior

2000-09-15 Thread Ming-Li

On Friday, September 15, 2000, 8:45:55 AM, Peter wrote:

 I don't think it will work for you. The problem wirh different
 charsets in Russian is that the same characters are mapped
 differently. It is not font problem or something. It means that
 Russian "A" for example which is C0 in windows-1251 supposed to be
 changed to E0 in KOI8-R and so on.

So far I understand. It's the same with many other languages (like
Chinese).

 So in viewer when you are changing codepage TB! just puts filter
 to characters which will translate E0 to C0 and I will see "A"
 letter.

I'm not sure I understand this. Do you mean if I receive a message
written in windows-1251, and I see a letter "A" (C0x in
windows-1251), then when I change the encoding ("View | Character
set") to KOI8-R, TB would translate C0x to E0x automatically and
still show "A" to me?

It doesn't work like that here (nor should it). If I change the
codepage for a received message, I want TB to ingore the original
charaset setting in the header and show me the message in the new
codepage I desire. That's how TB would behave here.

 But if you will take text in windows-1251, put the filter
 on it and show it in the editor window you will see garbage. It
 doesn't matter what Russian codepage I will choose after it
 because it will filter the text before the sending but not change
 it on the screen.

I don't understand this, either. I've just tried again. I went to
your diary page, used the "Send Page by email" command in IE, and
changed the message encoding in TB's editing window to "Cyrillic
(windows-1251)". I then did it again, but this time I changed it to
"Cyrillic (KOI8-R)". Both showed the same text to me, and their
appeared to be the same as what I saw in IE. I then sent both of
them to myself, and they still looked the same to me, but view the
source of both in an editor would show that they're indeed in
different encoding. (The first character of the first paragraph in
your diary appears to be "B", but it's "C2x" in one message yet
"F7x" in the other.

   2. There is only part of text shown in text part window. Some
   of it is only in attached file.

ML Can't confirm this either.

 Hm... This is strange. For example on my pages I see parts of
 JavaScript text which I suppose not to see. On other pages I see
 only part of text but probably it is the same script reason so TB!
 cannot understand where is the end of the text.

Yes, I can see those JavaScript text as well. I think it's a bug
though I've no idea who should take it out (IE or TB), since I've
never used MAPI before. Is it that in MAPI a browser just dump the
source code on the email client and it's up to the latter to filter
out the scripts and html codes?

Nonetheless, I can see all the text, not just part of it, and I can
type, too.

If you like, I can send the two test messages (your diary page, one
in windows-1251, the other in KOI8-R) to you and you can see if
they're displayed properly.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, September 14, 2000, 8:18:30 AM, Steve wrote:

 Exactly my point on the flip side: what can be accomplished with
 ini can also be accomplished be registry, theoretically.

 Easily moving from one computer to another is not one of them.
 Surviving an OS reinstall (basically the same thing) or an OS
 change is another.

I'm not so sure. If the registry or an easily separable part of it
contains only application specific data (aka a superset of all
INIs), then it's also quite portable, isn't it?

 Most people lean against registry (myself included) because the
 way it's implemented in Windows, as far as I can tell.

 No, it is the registry.  A single point of failure on the
 machine.  A central repository of distributed information which
 may be used in other contexts.  I am opposed not to the
 implementation but the whole concept.

It's a trade-off, IMHO. Yes, it's a single point of failure, but
also a single point of management.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/6 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, September 14, 2000, 9:18:42 AM, Steve wrote:

 I'm not so sure. If the registry or an easily separable part of
 it contains only application specific data (aka a superset of all
 INIs), then it's also quite portable, isn't it?

 This assumes you can /find/ the data in the first place.

??? Sorry, don't get it. Do you mean it's harder to find data in
registry than in INIs?

 It's a trade-off, IMHO. Yes, it's a single point of failure, but
 also a single point of management.

 An unneeded point of management since most people cannot
 manage it.

??? Again, don't get it. Most people don't manage INIs, either. As
long as appropriate tools are available, I think people who can
manage INIs can manage the registry, too.

I think it's you who said "Tools for automation, however,are what
makes working with that data convenient." Didn't you. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/6 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Missing Filters

2000-09-12 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, September 12, 2000, 7:28:33 AM, David wrote:

 I did not have 2 exe's in diff directories I had 1 exe in the
 bat directory (most current exe) and 1 exe actually on the start
 menu.

 Having done a search reveals no additional bat files outside of
 the bat directory.

The start menu of Windows is just another directory in Windows file
system.

 My guess is that having used the new exe it 'updated' the filters.
 Then clicking on the older exe it must have messed up the
 'updated' filters.

Right, that's what I've been saying all along.

 This is the only thing that makes any sense.  Of course I don't
 understand why tb would make those kind of changes but there you
 go.

As RIT keep adding new functionality to the filters, it's only
natural to make such changes.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/5 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: BUG: Advanced filtering fails

2000-09-09 Thread Ming-Li

On Saturday, September 09, 2000, 8:33:23 AM, A. wrote:

ML You may, however, suggest RIT to include the email address part
ML in the message list virtual database, so it can be used in
ML display filters.

 Why? Hit F7 and the search tool is there in front of you. It opens
 with the appropriate folder already selected for the search. Just
 tick sender and type in the string and you're done. Hit Esc just
 like with the main window to get rid of the display.

I'm as content as you are with TB's current implementation in this
regard, I merely told John should he really want that feature, he
could send a request to RIT, which is a given right for each TB
user, though it's another matter whether RIT would implement it.

Moreover, which header fields or message attributes should be
available in the message list, and hence available as display filter
criteria, are basically a matter of preference. The search tool
could find anything for you, but it doesn't prevent you from using
the quick search, display filter, and alt-clicking, does it? While I
have no complaint about TB's current selection, I see no commanding
reason to argue that sender's email address shouldn't be included in
this group, either.

ML Of course, others may want to suggest other header fields to be
ML included as well. It would ultimately be up to RIT to decide what to
ML include and what to leave out, trying to strike the best balance
ML between memory usage, speed, convenience, and flexibility. I'm glad
ML it's not my job. :)

 I really don't see the point in mirroring a function that's already
 there. If it was more convenient I'd agree but it really isn't. The
 advanced filtering is placed among the message list display choices for
 a reason. Because it only searches for strings in the message list. The
 'quick search' does this as well.

Maybe I didn't make myself clear enough (I thought I did). I agree
that display filters only search for strings in the message list for
good reason, and I wasn't suggesting anything otherwise. I merely
stated that it's conceivable for RIT to add one more message list
column (sender's email address), and consequently put it in the
display filter.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/5 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: BUG: Message list colour editor problem.

2000-09-09 Thread Ming-Li

On Saturday, September 09, 2000, 9:35:17 AM, A. wrote:

 If you wish to change/modify the colour in one of the message list
 colours that you have defined, it can be annoyingly tedious
 because when you open the colour editor dialog, it doesn't start
 with the colour already defined. Instead it starts with black 
 all the time!

Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I can't confirm this. When I try to
edit any of the existing color group, TB always show me the current
color designation.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/5 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: CJK (again)

2000-08-29 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Thomas,

 On my monitor. I right-click on a message, choose Central
 European, and still, no umlauts are displayed but Chinese
 characters instead. My choice "Central European" is ignored. :-(

Ok, this has to do with the way C-Windows forces Chinese display on
non-DBCS-aware software. It's been much improved in Win2k, for at
least the same trick works here. My understanding is you hardly need
Chinese display, but are simply stuck with a Chinese Windows system,
right? Here's a trick: use regedit and go to the following key:

[HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\fontassoc\Associated CharSet]

and change the following entries' values as indicated:

"ANSI(00)"="no"
"OEM(FF)"="no"
"CHINESBIG5(88)"="no"

This trick will order your C-Win system not to force display
Chinese. The downside is each application has to display Chinese on
its own. In TB, it means you'll have to set the display font to a
Chinese font (like "²Ó©úÅé" in C-Win). I believe nonetheless this
downside means almost to you. :)

If you have time, you may play with the four entries in the above
mentioned registry key, setting some to yes and others to no. You'll
find different applications use different ways to display text, and
hence would be forced to display Chinese in different situations.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: CJK (again)

2000-08-28 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Thomas,

 First the good news: Since v1.45, the print template works, and
 the first letter of a word in an idented line, is now printed
 fine! :-)

Though I've never printed any email, it's good to know that.

 Secondly, I understand that v2 should be able to handle
 Double-Byte Languages correctly. High ASCII characters still
 display as Chinese characters, which is annoying,

Yes, indeed!

 as I receive a lot of mail in German language. Therefore my
 question: will one of the next betas allow me to not only chose
 the character set when viewing messages but actually use the
 character set chosen?

I'm not sure I understand you. What do you mean by "use the
character set chosen"? When printing? or for message list display?

 I am really looking forward to it.

Me too.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Account password

2000-08-03 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Michael,

 If this works... why you don't simply delete/move the .cfg-file?

Yup, you're right. That should work, too. It's just I didn't know
the .cfg file is the only thing involved and I started my problem
solving by creating a new account. (It's more a habit that I create
a new test account whenever I want to mess around.) It's like going
3 quarter of a circle and not realizing it's short the other way
round. Thanks for pointing that out.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filter problems

2000-08-03 Thread Ming-Li

Hi phil,

 I made a "Catch All Filter" for my personal use like this.

[example snipped]

Thanks, phil. If you read through the thread, however, you would
find the problem I (or Marek) have isn't to come up with a perfect
filter condition (string) that would catch all. The problem is, I
have some "munual" filters that I don't want to run when I
*re-filter* a folder. Marck suggested using a "catch-all" filter
between automatic filters and manual filters as a "stop point",
which I think is a good idea. Nevertheless, a catch-all filter has
to move messages somewhere, and I don't want messages (that fall
into the "catch-all" category) moved at all when I re-filter a
folder. Hence the problem.

Thanks anyway.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Browsing with left and rigt arrows

2000-08-02 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Darius,

 Left  and  right  arrows  seems  don't  work as it must. Browsing
 in tree with arrows  differs  in Microsoft products and TheBat
 (folder list, message list). Try to use arrows keys in Explorer
 folder tree and TheBat folder tree and will see the difference
  
"Must" is a strong word here, and I don't think TB *must* use
keyboard the same way as Microsoft. Heck, even M$ doesn't always use
keyboard the same way across all their products.

Admittedly, everyone has some preoccupation about how keyboard
should be defined in TB. The preoccupation is largely related to
software one has learned, and differs from one user to another. The
best way to solve this is to allow users to re-define keyboard
assignments, which is unfortunately not possible at this moment, and
is promised for v2.

For this specific case, I don't agree with you, either. In Explorer
folder tree pane, you need to press Right key once to expand folder
one level first, and one more time to go down one level. The first
one is equivalent to pressing the Plus key on the Num-keypad (which
works the same way in TB). In TB, pressing the Right key would
expand the folder tree one level and go down to it, which is more
convenient. Same for the Left key.

BTW, Left and Right arrow key doesn't seem to work in Explorer's
file list pane in Details view, while they work in TB's message
list. Since you mentioned message list, are you trying to suggest
RIT to disable both keys in message list?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: bad date handling

2000-08-02 Thread Ming-Li

Hi David,

 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 12:38:12 BST

This doesn't conform to standard AFAIK, for it put "year" before
"time".

 shows 3:38pm in the list.  I know that this may be caused by not fully
 RFC compliant mailers (this was sent from Hotmail), but if these
 formats are in common use, then The Bat should attempt to handle them

I agree TB should accommodate such non-conforming headers, or allow
users to edit it directly in TB (now all you can do is to export it,
edit it, and re-import it). Becky does the latter, and I miss the
feature very much.

That being said, I would also suggest you to send an email to
Hotmail and ask them to go by the standard.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Browsing with left and rigt arrows

2000-08-02 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Marck,

 Just  a  note of moderation here: a lot of non-native English
 speakers on this list (including the RIT programmers on occasion!)
 use the word "must" where "could", "should" and "aught" are
 clearly more apt. It is a matter of limited understanding and poor
 translation rather than the intention to use the imperative.

My apology. As a non-native English speaker myself, I should have
known better. Thanks for the reminder.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filter problems

2000-08-02 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Marek,

   I need to do following function:

   delete from folder (not to Trash) selected message by defined
   schortcut, but not, if is parked or flagged.

   I created following filtr:

   - String : @
   - "Actions/Delete the messag"e selected
   - "Options/Execute action set of this rule" selected
   - Schotcut - Ctrl+Shift+Alt+O
   - "Advanced/Message is unparked" selected
   - "Advanced/Message is not flagged" selected

   When I apply this filtr by pressing this schortcut on parked message,
   this message disappears in this folder. When I change folder and
   select back to previous, message is still there - cosmetic bug.

Confirmed.

   Same problem, when I uncheck options "Message is unparked" and
   "Message is not flagged" in section "Advanced.

   When I apply this filtr by pressing this schortcut on flagged
   message, this message is deleted! - section Advanced was not
   used, I think.

You're right, when applying a filter on selected messages with a
hotkey, no filtering conditions (including the search string, and
conditions in the advanced pane) would be used, IF the source folder
is the same as the destination folder, UNLESS the option "Check the
selected messages against this rule" is checked. Confusing? You bet.

And this is designed behavior, not a bug. (Speaking with a straight
face. :-| ) What happened to parked messages in your case is
accidental: parked messages can't be deleted with a filter no matter
what (before unparking it first), not because TB abides to the
condition you set.

A bit of history (from someone with a little more than 2 month's
experience):

It's long been lamented that TB's filters, with all its prowess,
couldn't be used without moving messages to a certain folder. Hence
RIT designed sort of a backdoor trick as described above. (Or it's
been there all long, I don't know.) So you may set both the source
folder and the destination folder to Inbox, and apply the filter to
other folders with a hotkey without those messages being moved to
Inbox. IOW, pressing the hotkey would simply do the designated
"actions" on selected messages, with no regard to any other
condition.

For your purpose, enable the ""Check the selected messages against
this rule" will do. Theoretically, it would make TB move the matched
messages to the destination folder (even if it's the same as the
source folder), but it won't be a problem here since TB execute the
"delete" action first, hence no messages left to move.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Cancel sending

2000-08-01 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Drunin,

 What I propose is to park message when sending is cancelled, or in
 other words, to introduce another explicit rule (first is manual
 parking) which directs 'parked/free' message state for this
 specific situation. Thus, cancelling a sending cancels all
 subsequent sendings until user frees the message. This does
 nothing with editing. Cancel just does more than cancelling an
 action. But, of course, it depends on your own preferences.

I understood what you want. I merely tried (and obviously failed) to
explain why it shouldn't be done this way. I think "Cancel" has been
well established as "cancel current action", and I don't think
attach too many consequences to it is a good idea.

Secondly, I don't agree the "Draft" flag is equivalent to the
"Parked" flag. I usually have several drafts in my Outbox, sitting
there for days at time, waiting for further revision. (My wife and I
have the habit of revising each other's mail if the intended
recipient is our mutual friends, so we go over each other's Outbox
from time to time, checking messages in "Draft" mode.) I certainly
don't want them to be confused with completed messages of which the
delivery was cancelled.

IMO, your purpose is better served by an "Offline" tool button as
suggested by others, which would stop checking/sending mail until
it's told to go "online" again. Addition option/tool button can be
arranged for people who want to halt, e.g., all checking but not
sending, or vice versa. But changing the "Draft" status is not a
good way of achieving this.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Can't send mail !!!

2000-07-31 Thread Ming-Li

Hi anderson,

   I'm trying to try (!) The Bat! v1.44 but it doesn't send my
   mail. It says:

  "Server reports error: The response is: Invalid domain name"

I purposefully changed my smtp server to an invalid name, the error
message TB reported was "Could not connect to the server", not
"Invalid domain name".

Judging from the error message, the error was given by your server.
I.e., your server refused to send your mail because of invalid
domain in maybe your From or To address.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Can't send mail !!!

2000-07-31 Thread Ming-Li

Hi anderson,

 Mind you that   when I filter the message sent (through mail
 filter software,   like XRay, for instance), everything is OK.
 Actually, it doesn't   filter anything. I use the mail filter's
 default configuration.   Thanks again.

Does XRay allow you to export/log/dump(or whatever) the message it
sends to a text file, so you can compare it to the one sent by TB?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Disaster (was Re: censored. (Sorry, Marck))

2000-07-28 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Daniel,

 Anyway, this has happened to me, and _it could happen to anybody
 else_. I would also mention that if this bug was "introduced" in
 1.45 beta, then it still exists in the final version.

In this case, could you please do us all a favor by telling us what
exactly it happened. The story SyP told and your account have some
discrepancies, (which is expected; who can tell others' story
precisely), and so far we (sorry, I) can see no full picture of what
happened. When? (Before upgrade, or after?) How? The "final version"
you mentioned is the 1.45 release version (which is what I guessed
when I saw your post), or 1.45 S/MIME, which is what you're using.
Were there other unusual things when this happened (busy HD activity
for an extended period of time, etc.)?

If there's a bug, it has to be a very unusual one, since this is the
first time we've heard this. The more detail you can give, the more
likely RIT could trace it.

I'm also very much tempted to reiterate the obvious (b* often),
but since you're probably still in a bad mood, and it can't reverse
what's happened, I'll stop here.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: BUG: no TO field after signing S/MIME + 8 bit

2000-07-20 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Thomas,

S I cannot send S/MIME signed email when high ascii is present in
S the TO: field.  After finishing the message, it just sits in the
S Outbox with no "TO:".

 Allow a non-beta question: aren't email addresses supposed to not
 contain any high-ASCII characters?

I think SyP is talking about the "real name" part of the "TO:"
field.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.45 Beta/11 under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: problem with action run external program

2000-07-14 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Marek,

 When I run file test.vbs normally from for example wincommander,
 it is started and window with entered text is displayed. But TB on
 my PC don't start it. Until beta/5 it doesn't work completely
 (nothing happens). Now (beta/7) TB display error message during
 start and shutdown me.

Sorry if I'm saying something you've already known.

It works in wincommander (or Windows Explorer) is because .vbs is
associated with Windows Scripting Host (WScript.exe), and
wincommander use the registered program (or more likey, call the
system shell) to open (execute) it. VBS file itself is just a data
file.

The "Run External Program" function in TB's filter seems to be
designed to expect applications only, not associated data files. So
you'll have to run wscript explicitly as I suggested in the previous
post. Also there's no error message at my end, unless through local
delivery, as said.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: problem with action run external program

2000-07-14 Thread Ming-Li

Hi David,

 Does  anyone  know  if  this  'feature'  will  be  enhanced to use
 the 'associates' as many window apps do.

Certainly not me.

 Now  before  there  is  a avalanche of 'oh my god .. don't make
 this a useful  program .. ' let me say that I don't want this to
 become bloat ware  as so many (I am in the process of moving
 myself and others from Eudora  to TheBat) programs have become.
 BUT if you are going to be in the  windows  environment there are
 some things (common ui principles, some  functionality  such  as
 launching  on  request) that need to be included.

I agree.

On second thought, more consideration is needed. The "run external
program" function in filter is designed to pass the message
(currently being filtered) to an external program as a temporary
file (using %1 as the parameter). To accommodate associated data
file, TB has to check to make sure no %1 is passed, or know how to
pass the parameter. I'm not good enough to know how complicated this
will be, but it seems not as straightforward as I thought.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Threading suggestions

2000-07-14 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Steve,

 Incorrect.  what TB! is this:

[example snipped]

 This is because C3 was posted after AA1 and BA1, therefore on
 a chronological order, default sort for me, when there is no
 references to tie it into the other messages, it defaults to the
 sort order, time, and sorts it in the overall list accordingly.
 To get it to do the selected behavior would mean changing the sort
 to subject which then throws new and old messages together.

Are we using the same Bat?

I just copied all messages since July 6th from my TBUDL/TBBETA
folder to a test folder and tested there, in "Thread by Reference"
View, sorted by "Received date/time".

Under the thread you started with the subject "OK, what am I
missing?", I deleted the level 4 message by Katsmeow which changed
the subject to "Newbie questions" (yes, I agree TB should start a
new thread for it). All its downstream messages (easily
distinguishable with its different subject) are still under the same
thread, except being promoted one level.

 Bingo.  In fact, recall that we don't delete messages.  We
 copy messages from the current database to the trash database and
 then, when the program shuts down we remove any messages marked
 delete in the current database. Assuming of course we have that
 option checked.  We can also force the behavior from the folder
 menu.  Gee, that's exactly what most 'nix clients do now, the
 difference is, TB! removes references to messages marked as
 deleted in the list.

Ok, so what you want is basically an option to "show deleted
messages", right? I would like that, too, plus a way to easily
undelete one.

 Put the "pointless" flagging functionality to use, Steve. Flag the
 messages you want to delete and delete them manually when you see
 fit.

 Sorry, bzzzt, wrong.  Correct answer is to remove that
 god-awful bloat. For people that want flags, here's my answer:
 Options:Message List Colors:New:Flag, define as you see fit.

I use color groups, but I still like flagging for more temporary
purposes. Because:

1. You can't assign color with one click.

2. You can hold down the Alt key and click on a flag (any flag) to
show all flagged messages in a folder, the same way to find all
messages from you by click on your name while holding down the Alt
key. You can't do that with colored messages.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: problem with action run external program

2000-07-14 Thread Ming-Li

Hi David,

 I'm  not  sure I would want a filter to automatically run
 something .. the  reason  being  losing  that  control  over what
 is started on the machine. This is one of the problems with oe ..
 viruses spread quickly if things are launched automatically.

I'm confused. Isn't it you that want TB to behave as other Windows
software does (about launching associated data file)?

Anyway, I don't see it as much a problem. If you don't any program
run automatically, don't make such a filter.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Threading suggestions

2000-07-14 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Steve,

  The expand all threads key is indeed Ctrl-(Numpad)*.

 No, it is not.  It is CNTL-*.  How that * is inputted is
 meaningless so I fail to see why people insist on denoting the
 Numpad.

Because it's Ctrl-(Numpad)*. the Ctrl-(Regular)* (i.e. Ctrl-Shift-*)
would not work. If I'm not mistaken, the scan code sent when
(Numpad)* is pressed is different from when Shift-8 is sent. Same
with some (all?) other Numpad keys.

 Ah, this is why I asked to see the original since Ming-Li
 didn't quote this part in her reply.

Ehhh, H, A, it's "his". Too bad I don't have a middle name
like "Curtis" to use. But then, it's the first time this happened to
me.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





The Bat! - bug report

2000-07-12 Thread Ming-Li

Hello The Bat! developers,

  I'm using The Bat! Version 1.45 Beta/6
  Serial Number 8645E6FE
  under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 
  and would like to report a bug

  The bug description:

  Messages with 8-bit characters in the "To:" field corrupt after
  being moved from one account where "allow 8-bit characters in
  message header" is enabled, to another account where it's not.

  
  Steps to reproduce the bug:

  1. Configure two accounts so that one has the option "allow 8-bit
  characters in message header" enabled (Acc. 1), the other has the
  same option disabled (Acc. 2).

  2. In Acc. 1, create a message and put a name with at least one
  8-bit character in the "To:" field. Save the message in the
  Outbox.

  3. Move the message to the Outbox of Acc. 2. Before sending out,
  export the message to a .msg file and examine it with a text
  editor, should find the "To:" field is garbled and the keyword
  "To:" is gone. (Note, it appears ok in the preview pane, including
  the header.)

  4. Send the message out. Despite the fact that the "To:" field is
  scrambled, it can still reach the intended address. Yet some extra
  blank lines would be introduced in the header, resulting in part
  of the header "drifting" into the message body.

  The following .msg files are attached to this report:

  0001.MSG - test message exported from Acc. 1-Outbox
  0002.MSG - test message exported from Acc. 2-Outbox
  0003.MSG - test message exported from Acc. 2-Inbox

Regards,
  Ming-Li
-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org



test message body




test message body




=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Szabolcs_P=E9ter?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

test message body







Re: The Bat! - bug report

2000-07-07 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Marck,

 Hmmm.  Win98SE,  bind  attachments  when  sending not checked,
 default encoding  Base64,  file  attachments  stored  in  message
 bodies. It's definitely happening here.

Another user (Eberhard Hafermalz) and I ran into a similar problem
in late May using TB! version 1.42f. According to the bug report I
sent the RITLabs, it occurred only when attaching .eml or .msg files
(email text files). Both Mime and UUencode methods didn't work,
while QP worked. The attachments weren't corrupt either, they just
disappeared.

That one has been fixed. I'm mentioning it only to let you know that
there might be some very obscure conditions where mail attachment
might fail. Personally I haven't met one since then, and no other
users are reporting similar bugs, which means you might run into a
rather obscure bug (potentially). To pinpoint this sort of bugs
might be time-consuming at times, but I'm sure RITLabs would be
thankful.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Graham,

 Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 06:06:14 -0400

Both of your messages are showing -0400 time zone and the wrong
time, though "06:06:14 -0400" indeed equals to "11:06:14 +0100).

That's strange, summer time is working properly here in the U.S.
(My regular time zone is -0800; now it shows -0700).

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Graham,

 Our internet e-mail gateway is in the USA (New Jersey) Can
 this account for my problems?
  
I'm not an expert (many others are more competent in answering
this), but I don't think so. AFAIK, the "Date:" field in the
header is written by your email client and it should make no
difference where your gateway is.

I just did a little experiment myself. I set my time zone to GMT
with summer time enabled, and the message I sent had the "right"
Date field as:

 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:37:35 +0100

Are you sure your computer time is set to the right time zone
(please double check in the control panel)? Are you seeing the
right time in the system tray?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! - bug report

2000-07-05 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Leif,

 It appears that the "Address(es) must be listed in the address
 book"/"The address entry must belong to groups:" is an OR
 function to the filter strings. To clarify, here is an
 example.

Sorry, not confirmed. I tried a similar one:

String: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Location: Receipient, Presence: Yes
String: test, Location: Subject, Presence: Yes
Action: Send the message to Trash
Advanced option: Address must be in the address book, Item: Sender
The address entry must belong to group: Family

When I sent myself a test message at "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", it got
trashed. When I sent to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", which is a
nickname of the same account, it landed in the Inbox untouched.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: SOT: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Tony,

   The quoting header above is all to cock and we traced this to
   the fact that, even though my PC is set to GMT, my ISP uses BST
   and that is what is causing the discrepancy.

How your ISP set its clock will affect how it adds the "Received"
time to your mail header (see the bunch of "Received:" lines at the
top of a message header). I might be wrong but I don't think it has
anything to do with the "Date:" field in your mail header. It's done
by your email client before sending it out, and I don't think your
ISP is going to change that.

   If you look at the header it says:

   On 05 July 2000 at 05:58:38 GMT -0400 (which was 10:58 where I live)

05:58:38 GMT -0400 is not 10:58 where I live, there is an hour adrift
caused by my ISP using a different time setting.

Again, the line you pointed to is done by TB! macros. TB! takes the
Date field from the message you're quoting and compute your local
time according to the time zone setting of your system.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Split window problem

2000-07-05 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Allie,

 I'm unable to adjust the preview window size in this beta
 when the preview pane is made full-width. Anyone else notice this?

No, it's working here.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Graham,

Wednesday, July 05, 2000, 4:54:45 AM, you wrote:

 Hello Ming-Li

 Yep.. just triple checked this. Time now in London (BST) is
 12:54:30 (and counting)...

Good, now see what's in your header:

 Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 12:54:45 +0100

It's correct, isn't it?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filter defunctionated

2000-07-01 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Jast,

   Just recently, about since June 28, a filter for marking my
   own messages as unread and with a color group, has stopped
   working on messages that I send through a mailing list and
   receive back again. It does work on messages I send myself.

Since it works on messages you send to yourself, the filter
setting should be fine.  To be sure, I've just created a filter
exactly as you described, and it does mark your message in both
TBBETA and TBUDL as it should.

Do you mean the problem occurs only on messages for one
particular mailing list, or any mailing list (I'm trying to
decipher what "a mailing list" mean).  If it's the former, I
would check if the list has changed its header.  Some mailing
lists would strip the original "From" information from the
header.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filter defunctionated

2000-07-01 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Jast,

 Morning Ming-Li,

Morning. Well, actually I'm just about to sleep. It's 5:30 pm
here, But I've been up since midnight.

  Nope, it happens with all messages sent to and then received
  by a mailing list, be it TBUDL, TBBETA, or various egroups
  mailing lists - no difference. None of these lists has
  changed their header, and it *should* be properly detected.
  This is what confuses me.
  
That's strange. "Your" filter is still working here. In fact, I
almost missed your message because it's marked read already. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filter defunctionated

2000-07-01 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Jast,

   - first filter in list
   - option checked: continue processing with other filters
   - actions checked: mark as read, mark with color group "own msgs"

One thing just came to mind. Maybe you want to try unckecking
the "continue processing with other filters" option, so the
messages would stay in the Inbox but should be marked as
specified. If they are properly marked in the Inbox, then the
culprit lies in some other filter(s) down below. If they're not
properly marked even in the Inbox, then that filter itself is
the culprit. In that case, I would suggest deleting it and
recreate one. Sometimes things are just weird.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: problem moving messages

2000-06-28 Thread Ming-Li

Hi István,

(Sorry if I got your name wrong, your name was not displayed
correctly on my system, probably due to conflict with my default
system language--Chinese (Taiwan), I hope it return to you as it
was)

 Then, at least as I see it, we have a pretty quirky functionality
 (message mapping) winning out over a *legitimate* requirement of a
 user to be able to back up his mails. Unless, of course, he backs up
 *all* his mail.

 This, also in my personal opinion, is sloppy functionality.

 I am not a great programmer myself, but a crew that could write a
 mailer like this ought to be able to *fully* implement "store in
 separate directory".

I beg to differ here. Maybe I started using email too long ago,
when no email client could handle attachments more than saving
them as files, I've always consider a saved attachment severed
from its original message. Be it a document from my supervisor,
or a picture from my mom, I then copy it to where it belongs,
and back it up there. If I move the message around in TB!, I
don't want its attachments to creep back into it no matter what.

Now, my idea of how TB! should handle this apparently differs
from yours and Andrew's (and maybe some others'). Someday if
RITlab decides to follow your idea and do exactly what you want,
I might voice my disagreement, but I won't say it's "sloppy
functionality", for it's not fair.

AFAIK, there is no email program (on Windows) that does what you
say.  If it's a wish, I respect it (though I disagree), but if
you make it sound like Stefan didn't do his job, then I
disagree.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: problem moving messages

2000-06-27 Thread Ming-Li

Hi SyP,

 Huh, it never occured to me that a folder can be manpped to multiple
 accounts in the same time :( Is there anybody using this feature?
 What's the point?

Hehe, I do--to have different "views" (column display, sorting
order, etc.) of the same folder. When you have to switch back
and forth between two particular settings (each of which would
take several steps to set up) for a particular folder, it's
quite handy to map it into two "virtual" folders.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org