Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
Hi Bat Guys, In 'The Bat FAQ/Regular expression tutorial', several references are made to a 'regex tester'. I could find no links to a 'regex tester', but found the one (searching google) that gets integrated with the Bat's help dialog. I think this could be better documented? -- Thanks, (Flying The Bat! 1.53d Under Win98se) Tack. (on a PII 300Mhz with 96MB.) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Message final glitches
Hello Joyce! On Saturday, July 13, 2002 at 8:39:32 PM you wrote: 1. How do I get to stop TB from _always_ suggesting me a template (which in any case is always wrong for me?). Where do I switch it off? Can I switch it off selectively (according to address or folder?) or is it all/nothing at all? 1. Define templates that fit your needs (avoid folder templates). 2. Make a Quick Template with the %CLEAR macro in it and invoke it before you enter anything else in your new message. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.61 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Respect Yourself. (Pops Staples) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
Hello Tack ! On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 08:01:03 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 14.07.2002, 09:01 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: In 'The Bat FAQ/Regular expression tutorial', several references are made to a 'regex tester'. I could find no links to a 'regex tester', but found the one (searching google) that gets integrated with the Bat's help dialog. I think this could be better documented? Hmmm, if you mean the tutorial, there was a documentation. ,-- [ Tutorial ] | You have to download a DLL written by Dirk Heiser | | (http://www.Dirk-Heiser.de/RegExTest/RegExTest_V0.3beta.zip) | | and copy it into your TB-directory. Then, when you open the TB-help, | you will find a tabfolder called RegEx. Or, if you are using the | CHM-Version of the help (this probably applies only to the German | version), you can use this DLL by creating a link on your desktop | which opens the DLL: | | %windir%\system32\rundll32.exe your_pathregextest.dll, Run '-- But I think you mean that this is not documented in TB itself. Well, the regex tester is a private program and not an official feature of Ritlabs. Maybe Dirk might find some interest to offer it Ritlabs. Have a nice weekend -- Best regards, Gerd === Tutorial PGP and TB! and How to Use Regular Expressions in TB! at www.pro-privacy.de --- Money may be the husk of many things, but not the kernel. It buys you food, but not appetite; medicine, but not health; acquaintances, but not friends; servants, but not loyalty; days of joy, but not peace or happiness. Henrik Ibsen --- now playing: WDR2 :-) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: how to split digest mail to individual mail using the Bat ?
Hello Adhitya, On Sunday, July 14, 2002 at 10:23 GMT +0700, aliens probed Adhitya Fajar Anggoro [AFA] and found: AFA Recently a friend told me that The Bat can split digest e-mail AFA into individual mail using macro command and stuff. This is only true for MIME digests. If you have a list that does support MIME digests, you can split them with a filter. Create a filter that will move the digest message to any folder. Under the actions tab, select Run External Program and Extract Attached Files to Specified directory. The Extract option should point to some empty temporary directory. The Run option will run an import operation using TB's command-line options. The command-line would look something like: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /importu=accountname;F=folder;I=C:\Program Files\The Bat!\temp\*.msg;DEL You should be able to figure out what needs to be changed in the above using the help file. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal With these words, this page is no longer blank but is complete. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Palm Synch
Hello Joseph, Wednesday, July 10, 2002 at 19:35 GMT -0500, was when inspiration required Joseph N. [JN] to write: JN Then I periodically export that AB into vCard format, and from TB! JN import the vCard file into the TB! AB. [...] Does Organizer support the LDIF file format? If it does, then your other problems may be minimized: JN Is it more of a pain than I would like? Yes. You can import LDIF files directly into TB's address book via a command-line option /Import. Though the help file doesn't say it, you use almost exactly the same options as /Export to do the address book importing. The advantage of this is, you can make a simple batch file to do the synchronizing. Once you have a batch file, you can use Windows Scheduler or something to do the synch at whatever interval is convenient. JN Lotus Org can have group lists which do not seem to come across as JN TB! groups, Again, using undocumented flags for /Import, you can import directly into the group of choice (see /Export for details). Having said that, I remember when I transferred from Netscape, I moved my AB through the LDIF format and my groups were created in TB as well. I'm wondering if Lotus Org will work the same. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal There is no such place as the University of Wis-cosine, and if there was, the motto of their mathematics department would not be Secant ye shall find. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Undocumented Features
Hi Bat Guys, I came across some undocumented features somewhere (may have been in the FAQ), but I can't find them again. Can anyone point me in the right direction? -- Thanks, (Flying The Bat! 1.53d Under Win98se) Tack. (on a PII 300Mhz with 96MB.) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Re[2]: SMTP server report
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 14:07:00 -0500 Jonathan E. Brickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With MERCURY/32 I need to use ClickOff for autominimization, but that is a tiny inconvenience compared to the benefit. Try 3rd party dial up utility that cames with Mercury/32. See under folder /mercury/util (not remember precisely the name, sorry). -- syafril --- Syafril Hermansyah[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: SMTP server report
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 13:35:49 -0500 Jonathan E. Brickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone have a caching-only DNS server they like for Win32 ??? IIRC lot of Mercury users using DNSplus, but the better one is BIND 4.9.8 porting by Kahn (see www.isc.org), it is run under win9x too (if you're using NT or W2K, the DNS is built in). -- syafril --- Syafril Hermansyah[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: AVG and message body
Hello Marek, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 1:19:59 AM, you wrote: MM text of message is not checked by plugin, I don't really understand MM why? You can't be infected from text in message body. I pasted the eicar.com in the message body. suppose it was a real virus wouldn't it then be able to do it's nasty job from the message itself, just as it would from the attachment? (As you can see: I am no expert, but want to be well protected). -- Regards, Ochrid _ The Bat! v1.60h op Windows XP _ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 09:01, Tack wrote: In 'The Bat FAQ/Regular expression tutorial', several references are made to a 'regex tester'. I could find no links to a 'regex tester', but found the one (searching google) that gets integrated with the Bat's help dialog. Where do you find this regex tester? I've searched the help file with no luck. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
Hello Gerd, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 8:18:12 AM, you wrote: GE But I think you mean that this is not documented in TB itself. Well, GE the regex tester is a private program and not an official feature of GE Ritlabs. Maybe Dirk might find some interest to offer it Ritlabs. What I meant to say was... The Bat's help menu has a link to the 'Unofficial Faq page' at... http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html : which has a link to the 'Regular expression tutorial' at... http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Regex.html : which makes several references like Try it in the regex tester., but does not tell you where to find the regex tester. I had to perform an internet searh for regex tester where I found a newsgroup article with a link to download 'RegExTest_V0.3beta.zip'. IMHO, I think a link to download 'RegExTest_V0.3beta.zip' should be included in the tutorial. ;-) -- Thanks, (Flying The Bat! 1.53d Under Win98se) Tack. (on a PII 300Mhz with 96MB.) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tack, @14 July 2002, 10:01 +0100 Tack [T] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Gerd Ewald: GE But I think you mean that this is not documented in TB itself. Well, GE the regex tester is a private program and not an official feature of GE Ritlabs. Maybe Dirk might find some interest to offer it Ritlabs. T What I meant to say was... T The Bat's help menu has a link to the 'Unofficial Faq page' at... T http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html : which has a link to T the 'Regular expression tutorial' at... T http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Regex.html : which makes several T references like Try it in the regex tester., but does not tell you T where to find the regex tester. Yes it does! That's what Gerd said. Right there on the first page in section 3. T IMHO, I think a link to download 'RegExTest_V0.3beta.zip' should be T included in the tutorial. ;-) It is. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9MUP9OeQkq5KdzaARAuaCAJ9hDarlKrkk2zqO0IcPyiMzOWOjVgCgpjQY RTRlM+E2o1uxpIEgRBeIBww= =Gcfq -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: AVG and message body
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ochrid, @14 July 2002, 11:04 +0200 (10:04 UK time) Ochrid [O] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marek Mikus: MM text of message is not checked by plugin, I don't really understand MM why? You can't be infected from text in message body. O I pasted the eicar.com in the message body. O suppose it was a real virus wouldn't it then be able to do it's O nasty job from the message itself, just as it would from the O attachment? No. To to it's nasty job a virus needs to be in a position to be executed; to have its instructions processed by the CPU or by an interpreter. To do this, the instructions have to appear in an executable form. A message body is not executable. Never. Not by any means. It only becomes executable once the virus is removed from the message body and saved in an executable form. Then it once again becomes a risk. But the moment you do that AVG will scream. So you're safe. O (As you can see: I am no expert, but want to be well protected). Indeed you aren't and indeed you are g. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9MUUGOeQkq5KdzaARAtMOAJ9+aIrEPg67QUpawOWViOqUFuC4qgCgo4Wy Cbs4U8uQ3LPLDiEqmXwpZv8= =EfV0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marcus, @14 July 2002, 11:07 +0200 (10:07 UK time) Marcus Ohlström [MO] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In 'The Bat FAQ/Regular expression tutorial', several references are made to a 'regex tester'. I could find no links to a 'regex tester', but found the one (searching google) that gets integrated with the Bat's help dialog. MO Where do you find this regex tester? I've searched the help file with MO no luck. See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/regex.html#patterns and you will be referred to: http://www.Dirk-Heiser.de/RegExTest/RegExTest.zip BTW - if you guys were in earnest about reading the tutorial you'd have found the link! - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9MUWhOeQkq5KdzaARAk6zAKCEG1HuifMBkpFcmySwkexjfhM3GwCfWzrA A+kGmKax8Jj2k0WSnq4RwJ4= =sjdI -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: AVG and message body
Hello Marck, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:31:48 AM, you wrote: MDP Indeed you aren't and indeed you are g. Thanks for reassuring me on all accounts! -- Regards, Ochrid _ The Bat! v1.60h op Windows XP _ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Message final glitches
Hello Joyce, On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 20:39:32 +0200 GMT (14/07/02, 01:39 +0700 GMT), Joyce Sala wrote: JS 1. How do I get to stop TB from _always_ suggesting me a template JS (which in any case is always wrong for me?). Where do I switch it off? JS Can I switch it off selectively (according to address or folder?) or JS is it all/nothing at all? You can choose Folder / Properties and then Template, Reply, Forward and insert what you want. If you want nothing, I am not sure whether a blank template does what you want, but the %Clear macro should do the trick. In the address book, you can also set templates per address. Do the same as with the folders. Once you have deleted all these templates and start typing everything over and over again, you will miss them, I promise you. The templates are a powerful tool that I do not want to miss any more. JS 2. The OE and CC479 had a nice feature called follow JS conversation, where you would get specific subjects highlighted, JS regardless of sender. The color group is a permanent think and is JS appropriate for senders, but is there something similar for JS subjects? I must point out It's useless for me to work in JS threads, because anyway I deal with people (or 80% of them) who JS just don't know how to respect subject/thread definitions. How about threading by reference? View / View Threads by / References. JS 3. The delete function (both the button and the delete sub-menus) JS seem to be almost always disabled. The only way I manage to delete JS messages is to move it to trash and then tell it to empty it. It JS works for a few minutes when I first open program and then it stops. JS What am I doing wrong? I don't know. I can always delete without problems. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If I worked as much as others, I would do as little as they. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: AVG and message body
Hello Ochrid, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:04:06 +0200 GMT (14/07/02, 16:04 +0700 GMT), Ochrid wrote: O I pasted the eicar.com in the message body. O suppose it was a real virus wouldn't it then be able to do it's O nasty job from the message itself, just as it would from the O attachment? No, this is technically not possible. A virus is a program that needs to be executed in order to do harm. So far, it was necessary for the user to click on the attachment. Klez is the first virus that auto-executes due to the user-friendliness of OL/OE. Nevertheless, the malicious code is executed, and that is the very point. A virus scanner works by checking whether any known strings are found in the attachment. The scanner actually has a huge database and compares all strings it knows with the complete attachment. If it finds a match, it will raise the alarm. Those strings are usually not human-readable, as they are often part of compiled code. A string that is contained in a plain-text message cannot be executed and is therefore harmless. Even if it would match a string in the virus database: plain text is simply not executable. Therefore, it cannot do any nasty job. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. You have a right to your opinions. I just don't want to hear them. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Undocumented Features
Hello Tack, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 08:52:47 +0100 GMT (14/07/02, 14:52 +0700 GMT), Tack wrote: T I came across some undocumented features somewhere (may have been in T the FAQ), but I can't find them again. T Can anyone point me in the right direction? That appears to be difficult. If they are in the FAQ, they are documented. If they are undocumented, how can we point you? Perhaps to an undocument? ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. -- Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Filter question
Hello Jonathan, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 00:40:28 -0500 GMT (14/07/02, 12:40 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA It is more likely to be the one in the account folder as each JA account has its own set of filters, so would probably store it in JA its [account] own folder. This is absolutely correct. Sorry, I didn't point it out. You need to copy the file account.srx from the account with the filters to the account where you want the filters to be copied to. It is a good idea to back up (rename) the file account.srx in the destination directory first. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Money can't buy happiness but it can certainly rent it for a couple of hours. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: AVG and message body
Hello Thomas, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:35:21 AM, you wrote: TF On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:04:06 +0200 GMT (14/07/02, 16:04 +0700 GMT), TF Ochrid wrote: O I pasted the eicar.com in the message body. O suppose it was a real virus wouldn't it then be able to do it's O nasty job from the message itself, just as it would from the O attachment? TF No, this is technically not possible. A virus is a program that needs TF to be executed in order to do harm. So far, it was necessary for the TF user to click on the attachment. Klez is the first virus that TF auto-executes due to the user-friendliness of OL/OE. Nevertheless, TF the malicious code is executed, and that is the very point. [explanation cut] Thanks for your very clear explanation - I feel reassured. -- Regards, Ochrid _ The Bat! v1.60h op Windows XP _ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
OT: Spool 32 error
Hi Batpeople, Recently, upon starting the computer, I've been getting an error dialog titled 'Spool32' saying The program has performed illegal operation and will be shut down. Any idea what this is? I'd appreciate any help. Here are details of the error: ,- [ Begin ] - | SPOOL32 caused an invalid page fault in module SPOOL32.EXE at | 017f:00402015. `- [ End ] - -- Cheers, Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sudip Pokhrel Kathmandu-NP PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu -- Sys Info -- Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 98 4.10 (Build A ) H/W: Pentium IV 1.4 Ghz|256MB RAM|40GB HDD [IE 5.0, Opera 6.03 (default)] Hangover: The wrath of grapes Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: AVG and message body
Hello Marck Thank you for your email dated Sunday, July 14, 2002, 10:31:48 AM, in which you wrote: MDP Indeed you aren't and indeed you are g. Nicely put, Marck. You may be interested in http://www.worldwidewords.org. The weekly newsletter is a good read. -- Regards William Flying with The Bat! 1.60q www.ritlabs.com/the_bat Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Spool 32 error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @14 July 2002, 15:59 +0530 (11:29 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel [SP] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SPRecently, upon starting the computer, I've been getting an error SPdialog titled 'Spool32' saying The program has performed illegal SPoperation and will be shut down. Any idea what this is? SPI'd appreciate any help. Here are details of the error: SP ,- [ Begin ] - SP | SPOOL32 caused an invalid page fault in module SPOOL32.EXE at SP | 017f:00402015. SP `- [ End ] - This is to do with the Windows print spool mechanism and may be due to one of many things, including DLL hell, incorrectly installed printer, virus infection, bad printer driver, disk error, windows configuration error, DLL corruption, faulty RAM... the list goes on. Remedy? May be as brutal as reinstalling the OS :-(. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9MVH7OeQkq5KdzaARAnTtAJ906budcWEkMAfX3WIUQnNhSmp9FwCg2TiP L3WKFgEeRucsKBsWJmRl3Pk= =z51M -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Automatic Mail Checking.
Hi follow The Bat! users, I've been using The Bat! for about 8 months now and love it, but I still stumble across questions every now and again. 1. I'm soon going to change to a broadband connection, so I will always be on-line. Is there a way to set TB! to always be prepared to receive mails? What I mean is similar to if you were on a LAN, in that you don't have to manually check for mail every 5 minutes or so. I'd like it to be live, so it receives mail in real time, rather than when you manually check. 2. I'd also like it to do this without the mail management box coming up. At the moment I'm on dial-up so like to filter out large mails, but with an always on broadband connection, I'd want it to download everything as I receive it rather than all manually. 3. Finally, some of you may have read about TB! sometimes being slow to respond, in a similar vain, I have the same problem for checking mail. When I first log in and check, it's really fast checking the headers and then downloading, but when I check again in about 5 minutes, it takes ages just to download 3 headers and longer still to receive the mails. Why would it do this? Thanks, Chris. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Mailticker display
Hi Batpeople, I see Mailticker can be turned on/off at folder level but can it be set to notify the arrival of particular messages within a folder -- Cheers, Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sudip Pokhrel Kathmandu-NP PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu -- Sys Info -- Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 98 4.10 (Build A ) H/W: Pentium IV 1.4 Ghz|256MB RAM|40GB HDD [IE 5.0, Opera 6.03 (default)] As a computer, I find your faith in technology amusing Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Automatic Mail Checking.
Hi Chris, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:53:20 +0100 GMT (Jul 14, 16:23 my time), you [CW] wrote: CW I'd like it to be live, so it receives mail in real time, rather CW than when you manually check. Go to Account/Properties/Option and set the Mailbox checking parameters accordingly CW I'd also like it to do this without the mail management box coming CW up. Go to Options/Preferences and in General tab set Display Connection Center and/or Display MailTicker to Hide -- Cheers, Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sudip Pokhrel Kathmandu-NP PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu -- Sys Info -- Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 98 4.10 (Build A ) H/W: Pentium IV 1.4 Ghz|256MB RAM|40GB HDD [IE 5.0, Opera 6.03 (default)] If the shoe fits, get another one just like it Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Annoying error sound
Hello Thomas, Saturday, July 13, 2002, 11:45:57 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Mihai, TF On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:13:50 +0300 GMT (14/07/02, 03:13 +0700 GMT), TF Mihai wrote: M Until now, Roelof Otten aswered me but unfortunately the second answer M does not apply because I'm using a LAN connection. If I follow M his instructions TB won't get my mail beacause it wants to connect via M Dial-up. It doesn't detect that I'm connected to the internet via LAN. :( TF Options / Network Admin / Local Area Network. Yes, I agree with you, but now I'm back where I started. TB will keep annoying me with that Exclamation sound. -- Best regards, Mihaimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Annoying error sound
Hello Roelof, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:05:51 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Mihai, RO On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:13:50 +0300GMT (13-7-02, 22:13 +0200GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: M unfortunately the second answer does not apply because I'm using a M LAN connection. If I follow his instructions TB won't get my mail M beacause it wants to connect via Dial-up. It doesn't detect that M I'm connected to the internet via LAN. :( RO Have you ever considered to run your own mail server on your LAN? The RO mail clients like TB will connect to the server whether there's an RO internet connection or not. No more beeps, etc. The server can be told RO to connect only to the net on certain times or in the case of existing RO connection. Hmmm, good idea. I didn't consider that. I know how to do a local mail server, that's not a problem but I think it is to complicated for my needs. Thank you anyway for your response. -- Best regards, Mihaimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Spool 32 error
Hello Marck Thank you for your email dated Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:27:05 AM, in which you wrote: MDP Remedy? May be as brutal as reinstalling the OS :-(. Have a look at http://aumha.org and use the search facility quoting 'spool32'. Lots of answers there. -- Regards William Flying with The Bat! 1.60q www.ritlabs.com/the_bat Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
Hello Marck, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 10:27:22 AM, you wrote: T references like Try it in the regex tester., but does not tell T you where to find the regex tester. MDP Yes it does! That's what Gerd said. Right there on the first page in MDP section 3. T IMHO, I think a link to download 'RegExTest_V0.3beta.zip' should be T included in the tutorial. ;-) MDP It is. I feel a little foolish now. Perhaps I should've looked through each page, instead of searching for all instances of 'regex tester' expecting to find a link nearby. -- Thanks, (Flying The Bat! 1.53d Under Win98se) Tack. (on a PII 300Mhz with 96MB.) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Automatic Mail Checking.
Hi Sudip, On Sunday, July 14, 2002 16:47 your local time, which was 12:17 my local time, Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote; CW I'd like it to be live, so it receives mail in real time, rather CW than when you manually check. SP Go to Account/Properties/Option and set the Mailbox checking SP parameters accordingly I've tried this, but my automatic checking doesn't appear to be working anymore. See previous thread called 'TB has stopped auto checking for mail' started on 4th july. Thanks, Chris. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Undocumented Features
Hello Januk, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 9:44:55 AM, you wrote: JA Well, if they are undocumented, by definition we can't point you to JA documentation. However, there is much experience on this list, so if JA you ask us more specifically, there's a good chance that someone will JA know the function you're looking for. The feature 'Use Alt+Ins/Alt+Del to add/delete filter strings', for example, is not documented in the Bat help: it is, however, documented in some Bat FAQ under a listing entitled Undocumented Features. I was hoping someone could remind me where I had seen it. -- Thanks, (Flying The Bat! 1.53d Under Win98se) Tack. (on a PII 300Mhz with 96MB.) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello, Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 I have been using TB for about two years, but this problem is driving me crazy. I am new to the list and have spend a few hours in the archives looking but have not found my problem. I will describe the problem as best I can. I check 11 different accounts on three different servers. If I check the with F2 it logs on an gets my mail. If I use ALT F2 it check most of the account and hangs on one or the other and I have this message in the log. !7/13/2002, 17:53:19: FETCH - Server reports error. The response is: -ERR Password supplied for tereno is incorrect. The connecion box remains open. At this point things are hung up. I can't even close TB even if I delete the task and close the connection box. I have to use the windows task manager to shut down TD and reboot the computer before TB will work again. I was checking my account automatically every few minute that has been impossible for a while, the checking task pile up. I have completely uninstalled and reinstalled the TB. I will glad provide any more information need to help troble shoot this, I really like this program -- Best regards, angel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Suggestion (RegEx Tester)
On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:34, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MO Where do you find this regex tester? I've searched the help file MO with no luck. See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/regex.html#patterns and you will be referred to: http://www.Dirk-Heiser.de/RegExTest/RegExTest.zip BTW - if you guys were in earnest about reading the tutorial you'd have found the link! I did find the regex tester when Gerd Ewald first posted the regex tutorial to this list. What I asked about was Tack's statement: I could find no links to a 'regex tester', but found the one (searching google) that gets integrated with the Bat's help dialog I missinterpreted this, I thought Tack had found a regex tester integrated somewhere in the help file you get if you hit F1. I couldn't find this myself and therefore asked my question. I have followed Gerd's regex tutorial carefully (which I'm sure Gerd could verify), it's not that I'm not - as you state - in earnest about reading the tutorial. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Automatic Mail Checking.
On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 6:53 AM, you wrote: CW 1. I'm soon going to change to a broadband connection, so I will always CW be on-line. Is there a way to set TB! to always be prepared to receive CW mails? What I mean is similar to if you were on a LAN, in that you don't CW have to manually check for mail every 5 minutes or so. I'd like it to be CW live, so it receives mail in real time, rather than when you manually CW check. I do this, I have it set to 9 minutes. I think I remember reading that if you set it under 10 minutes it will stay connected and not ask for your passwords each time ( it takes a little longer to do that) CW 2. I'd also like it to do this without the mail management box coming CW up. At the moment I'm on dial-up so like to filter out large mails, but CW with an always on broadband connection, I'd want it to download CW everything as I receive it rather than all manually. mail management box? the mail center comes up every time it connects, then disappears when it is finished. On my system it stays minimized, so it never gets in my way. CW 3. Finally, some of you may have read about TB! sometimes being slow to CW respond, in a similar vain, I have the same problem for checking mail. CW When I first log in and check, it's really fast checking the headers and CW then downloading, but when I check again in about 5 minutes, it takes CW ages just to download 3 headers and longer still to receive the mails. CW Why would it do this? I have it set to delete mail on the server, so when I watch the connection center, it shows deleting mail on server, this does add a bit of time, but on cablemodem, it is negligible;) , except on Friday nights when TBUDL throws 100 messages at me! -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q/Post5/newhtml on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Undocumented Features
On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 4:44 AM, you wrote: JA If you don't like that, you can play with the Menu Navigator (next to JA the minimize button by default). That can help you locate many JA features as well. menu navigator? there is nothing next to my minimize button, or am I on the wrong line? there was nothing in the help index about menu navigator either. -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q/Post5/newhtml on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Undocumented Features
On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 14:18, Paul Cartwright wrote: menu navigator? there is nothing next to my minimize button, or am I on the wrong line? there was nothing in the help index about menu navigator either. Ritlabs had a hard time making the menu navigator look XP'ish. They didn't succeed and therefore disabled this feature for you XP guys. Try upgrading to W2K ;-) -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Filter question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote: JA Just out of curiousity, does anybody know if you can reference a JA file on a webserver to use instead of a local file in the JA selective downloads thing? Like for example: JA http://www.mydomain.com/spammers.txt? Would be good... could then JA start working on a central type of system to block more spammers, JA and pool everybody's knowledge, and experiences ;) From another machine on an LAN, yes, but not from off the internet. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0xbUsACgkQV8nrYCsHF+LyvQCgr0reMQcW2RWWHBsz2/QqEKsy UTMAnj17/Izhg/RI/+hJTsHFNlWQPu0a =BKyY -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Undocumented Features
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 8:23 AM, you wrote: menu navigator? there is nothing next to my minimize button, or am I on the wrong line? there was nothing in the help index about menu navigator either. MO Ritlabs had a hard time making the menu navigator look XP'ish. They MO didn't succeed and therefore disabled this feature for you XP guys. MO Try upgrading to W2K ;-) heh heh, I HAD w2K, but then I got a new PC that came with XP!! thanks, at least I know it isn't there! - -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q/Post5/newhtml on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPTFxIT3ZlJQqDEkFEQKjpACeJjS8Kk6TOJz9oCo8tbpLgeYMyd8AoPGX +6HgVkObO8hvgKDrc+P3Qvii =4LSO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mailticker display
Hi Sudip, on Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:37:37 +0530GMT (14.07.02, 13:07 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : SPI see Mailticker can be turned on/off at folder level but can it be SPset to notify the arrival of particular messages within a folder No. The only way to notify of particular messages is to filter them to a particular folder with mailticker on. -- Cheers Peter PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Winamp currently playing: - silence - Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Automatic Mail Checking.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris Weaven [CW] wrote: CW 1. I'm soon going to change to a broadband connection, so I will CW always be on-line. Is there a way to set TB! to always be prepared CW to receive mails? What I mean is similar to if you were on a LAN, CW in that you don't have to manually check for mail every 5 minutes CW or so. I'd like it to be live, so it receives mail in real time, CW rather than when you manually check. This cannot be done. TB! isn't a server in this sense which it would have to be in order to be receptive to mail deliveries initiated external to TB! TB! has to retrieve its mail. CW 2. I'd also like it to do this without the mail management box CW coming up. At the moment I'm on dial-up so like to filter out CW large mails, but with an always on broadband connection, I'd want CW it to download everything as I receive it rather than all CW manually. Just switch off the option to bring up the dispatcher with each mail check. It's in the account properties under Mail Management. CW 3. Finally, some of you may have read about TB! sometimes being CW slow to respond, in a similar vain, I have the same problem for CW checking mail. When I first log in and check, it's really fast CW checking the headers and then downloading, but when I check again CW in about 5 minutes, it takes ages just to download 3 headers and CW longer still to receive the mails. Why would it do this? Strange that it does. Are you running any applications that could potentially interfere with TB!'s connections? A firewall perhaps? - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0xdc8ACgkQV8nrYCsHF+JyZwCfZOT7f4qGZnue3uPLb0k5snYt Y/wAoNr66F0K+Wmb6EIvLWF2u3hnTgXE =qtuN -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Automatic Mail Checking.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote: PC I do this, I have it set to 9 minutes. I think I remember reading PC that if you set it under 10 minutes it will stay connected and not PC ask for your passwords each time ( it takes a little longer to do PC that) AFAIK, it does a password negotiation all the time. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0xepoACgkQV8nrYCsHF+L+WACbBNp7vE3ps2A9LMzIKI1TpCnz DZ4An3SInxRxGfeQWPMqs2zILocxBAHv =MNxF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[3]: SMTP server report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:18:37 AM RE: SMTP server report Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greetings Jonathan, On Saturday, July 13, 2002, 3:07:00 PM, you wrote: Jonathan With MERCURY/32 I need to use ClickOff for Jonathan autominimization, but that is a tiny inconvenience compared to the Jonathan benefit. Why? Create a desktop shortcut, move it your startup folder, right click on the program in your Startup Folder and select PROPERTIES then under RUN use the drop down arrow and select MINIMIZED. Why use a 3rd party app or solution to do what Windows can accomplish by itself? Just a thought. - -- Regards, DG Raftery Sr. PGP Key http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze2zxyn/pubring.pkr Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 9.0b1 iQA/AwUBPTF7MoltdOMeoDcuEQJghwCbBz8avBc8ClPDuVqSNNGUNpnibvkAn0HG uceo7reWOFvuKZ2OACcqNLr/ =B2Z+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: AVG and message body
Sunday, July 14, 2002, 11:24:05 AM, William wrote: WM You may be interested in http://www.worldwidewords.org. The weekly WM newsletter is a good read. Agreed. It's always an excellent read! Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Best regards, myobmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Ignore template
Hallo Adam, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:57:10 -0230GMT (12-7-02, 1:27 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: A Can you start a new message without the folder template if your main A window is on a folder? Yes, when you start a message to somebody with an Addressbook template. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
OT: Win98 or Win XP
Hi Batpeople, At home I have a stand alone PC with normal home usage. Should I stay with win98 or upgrade to XP? Can you guys elucidate a point or two on the pros and cons? Sorry if this gets too OT but I wanted to get an impartial view on the matter from the users of both the systems. Anything different running TB! under XP? Or, should I take this to TBOT? BTW, is TBOT spam free? -- Cheers, Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sudip Pokhrel Kathmandu-NP PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu -- Sys Info -- Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 98 4.10 (Build A ) H/W: Pentium IV 1.4 Ghz|256MB RAM|40GB HDD [IE 5.0, Opera 6.03 (default)] Bad spellers of the world Untie! Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Win98 or Win XP
Date: 14 July 2002, Time: 14:46 Hi Sudip, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, at 19:16:45 [GMT +0545] (14:31 where I live) you wrote: SP Hi Batpeople, SPAt home I have a stand alone PC with normal home usage. Should I SPstay with win98 or upgrade to XP? Can you guys elucidate a point SPor two on the pros and cons? Sorry if this gets too OT but I wanted SPto get an impartial view on the matter from the users of both the SPsystems. Anything different running TB! under XP? SPOr, should I take this to TBOT? BTW, is TBOT spam free? Considering the spec of your machine, I'd go to WinXp I left the 9x series behind years ago and have never ever looked back. XP is nowhere near the devil people make it out to be. I don't have blue screens or crashes at all... No I don't work for MS... But on my home server..e-smith rules! A Thought of the day : All right. Cut the haggling. Say you open at one shekel. I start at two thousand. We close about eighteen hundred. -- Adam Rykala mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=SendPGPKey www.new-wales.net [new-wales], the home of the [new-wales] project All messages both into and out of this account have been scanned with AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. However, all attachments should be scanned also with a virus checker at the receiver's end to ensure that the files are clean and free of virus infection. All messages are for the attention of the recipient only. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: how to split digest mail to individual mail using the Bat ?
e-mailnyaJanuk Aggarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --cut L Create a filter that will move the digest message to any folder. L Under the actions tab, select Run External Program and Extract L Attached Files to Specified directory. The Extract option should L point to some empty temporary directory. The Run option will run an L import operation using TB's command-line options. The command-line L would look something like: L C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /importu=accountname;F=folder;I=C:\Program Files\The L Bat!\temp\*.msg;DEL --cut If I'm not mistaken, that command is only to import messages. What I want is when I receive an e-mail in digest mode, TB split it automatically into individual e-mail. e.g: e-mail in digest mode: --- from [EMAIL PROTECTED] message 1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] subject - message 2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] subject . --- and so on in one big e-mail I want TB to split it into individual e-mail e-mail 1: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] subject e-mail 2: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you catch my imagination here ? Thank you 4 responding. Adhitya Fajar Anggoro Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: how to split digest mail to individual mail using the Bat ?
e-mailnya Thomas F [EMAIL PROTECTED] --cut AFA Recently a friend told me that The Bat can split digest e-mail into AFA individual mail using macro command and stuff. AFA It means the Bat simply split those digest into individual mail and AFA can be treated like one (simply read and reply those individual AFA instead from having to highligh the message in digest I wanna to reply and AFA press F4. L No, this is not quite correct. In fact, as a matter of policy, TB does L not allow you to change incoming mails at all. But then, if you want L to have the mails individually, why do you subscribe to digest mode? I'm still using dial up with max 33.6 kbps connection (mostly just 26.4) so digest mode really help me a lot. Cut my online time, removing those unnecessary attachment. That's why I'm happy with digest mode but hungry to find out how o split those digest to individual... Adhitya Fajar Anggoro *really like the F4 button in TB thought g Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Win98 or Win XP
On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 8:47:20 AM, Adam Rykala wrote: I left the 9x series behind years ago and have never ever looked back. XP is nowhere near the devil people make it out to be. I don't have blue screens or crashes at all... I have no complaints with XP, but you need to explore pretty specifically whether your machine can handle the conversion. I have two dell inspiron laptops and while the 8000 took to XP successfully, and pretty smoothly, Dell says that 7000 is not convertible to XP, and so I didn't take the risk of changing over. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: how to split digest mail to individual mail using the Bat ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adhitya Fajar Anggoro [AFA] wrote: AFA If I'm not mistaken, that command is only to import messages. AFA What I want is when I receive an e-mail in digest mode, TB split AFA it automatically into individual e-mail. Bursting a digest cannot be done directly with TB!. Only indirectly, and the indirect method is what Januk is indicating to you. TB!'s filtering can extract attachments from a message and place them in any folder on your system. TB!'s filtering can also be made to run an external program/command. Why not combine the two to achieve your objective? Setup a filter that will catch the MIME digest. In the action section set it up to do the following: 1) extract the message attachments to a folder on your system. You could create a temp folder. 2) run an external command: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /importu=accountname;F=folder;I=C:\Program Files\The Bat!\temp\*.msg;DEL This command will import the attachments, the messages within the digest, to the TB! folder of your choice. This is the same as Januk said, only in more words. The other thing is that if you're really receiving MIME digests which can be burst into separate messages, you may find that you don't need to do so. When you open the MIME digest, you should see that it has a attachments, each one representing a separate message. Double click on any of them to view the message. In the message view window go to the menu and select View/Message List. You'll see that you can now browse the messages as you would in a folder, replying to each as you normally would. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0xi5EACgkQV8nrYCsHF+KMEgCgyrgDMzEJ6F1MThZpGR94JUDW 2RsAoLxntsQ6dc+xRM+ZWiXUUgV33apB =jcft -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Win98 or Win XP
Date: 14 July 2002, Time: 15:55 Hi Dwight, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, at 09:29:04 [GMT -0500] (15:29 where I live) you wrote: DAC On Sunday, July 14, 2002, 8:47:20 AM, Adam Rykala wrote: I left the 9x series behind years ago and have never ever looked back. XP is nowhere near the devil people make it out to be. I don't have blue screens or crashes at all... DAC I have no complaints with XP, but you need to explore pretty DAC specifically whether your machine can handle the conversion. I have DAC two dell inspiron laptops and while the 8000 took to XP successfully, DAC and pretty smoothly, Dell says that 7000 is not convertible to XP, and DAC so I didn't take the risk of changing over. Laptops do tend to be a law amongst themselves though. I've found laptops to be the hardest machines to upgrade full stop... Desktops tend to be more general and normally upgrade fine. He's got a PIV 1.4GHz so it sounds relatively current Thought of the day : You'd think there were ENOUGH quotes, already... -- Adam Rykala mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=SendPGPKey www.new-wales.net [new-wales], the home of the [new-wales] project All messages both into and out of this account have been scanned with AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. However, all attachments should be scanned also with a virus checker at the receiver's end to ensure that the files are clean and free of virus infection. All messages are for the attention of the recipient only. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Filter question
Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:49:42 AM, you wrote: [snip] TF This is absolutely correct. Sorry, I didn't point it out. You need to TF copy the file account.srx from the account with the filters to the TF account where you want the filters to be copied to. It is a good idea TF to back up (rename) the file account.srx in the destination directory TF first. Thanks to you both .. this'll make life easier :-) Lynn 1.60h on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Win98 or Win XP
Hi Sudip, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:16:45 +0545, you wrote: Hi Batpeople, At home I have a stand alone PC with normal home usage. Should I stay with win98 or upgrade to XP? Can you guys elucidate a point or two on the pros and cons? Sorry if this gets too OT but I wanted to get an impartial view on the matter from the users of both the systems. Anything different running TB! under XP? Or, should I take this to TBOT? BTW, is TBOT spam free? I personally prefer windows 98 (if using windows) because XP has many changes that should just not have been made. Although XP is a little more stable in some cases (I managed to make it blue screen 5 times on friday night, the first time I'd managed to do it in 3 months). If you're planning on using Novell on your network (not likely if it is a home network) then stay very far away from XP until they fix their driver issue. Unfortunately there are a small number of things I cannot stand about it, but then there are some added features that are pretty good, like the ability to hide icons in your system tray (a great feature if you're not supposed to be using ICQ at work ;)). Another thing I like is XP's start menu, you have the option to set it to store your most recent/popular programs, so they are 2 clicks away (Start - Then program) instead of several clicks. I guess it is personal preference... see if you can go into a PC shop, and play about with it for a bit, and see what you think of it. Took me about 3 weeks to get used to where they'd moved everything, and some 'features' I'm still trying to get used to. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: OT: Win98 or Win XP
Hello Jonathan, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 5:18:35 PM, you wrote: JA like the ability to hide icons in your system tray (a great feature It is, but before I had XP I used a wonderful little programme from Mike Lin: http://www.mlin.net/ His tray saver is great! (I still use his Clipomatic) -- Regards, Ochrid _ The Bat! v1.60h op Windows XP _ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Filter question
Hi Allie, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 07:23:39 -0500, you wrote: From another machine on an LAN, yes, but not from off the internet. That's a shame... wonder if it'd be possible in the future. I'd guessed it'd be possible on a lan, because you can map drives, or use the \\machine name\share name\file name and windows would handle the rest. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: AVG and message body
Hi Thomas, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:35:21 +0700, you wrote: No, this is technically not possible. A virus is a program that needs to be executed in order to do harm. So far, it was necessary for the user to click on the attachment. Klez is the first virus that auto-executes due to the user-friendliness of OL/OE. Nevertheless, the malicious code is executed, and that is the very point. Technically Klez doesn't self execute itself... it creates an iframe tag (inline frame) which forces it to open as OE/OL are more than happy running frames/iframes. When Klez generates its email that it attaches itself to, it does something like this: iframe src=name of attached executable When OE/OL views it, it uses the attached file as the content of the iframe tag, and as it is an executable instead of an html page, it runs it. One of the many reasons I cannot stand HTML in emails. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
PGP use created from GnuPG
Hi, I am a newbie to The Bat! and it seems to be a valuable program for me. I have one problem, however, maybe someone can help me: I created PGP keys with GnuPG 1.0.6, which I want to use, because I published them. I installed pgp dlls from The Bat! and put the link of secring and pubring files to the GnuPG files. But The Bat! doesn't recognize those keys and wants to create their own keys. Can anyone give me a hint? Best regards, Joerg Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: PGP use created from GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Date: 14 July 2002, Time: 18:21 Hi Auktion, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, at 19:04:53 [GMT +0200] (18:04 where I live) you wrote: A Hi, I am a newbie to The Bat! and it seems to be a valuable program A for me. I have one problem, however, maybe someone can help me: A I created PGP keys with GnuPG 1.0.6, which I want to use, because I A published them. I installed pgp dlls from The Bat! and put the link of A secring and pubring files to the GnuPG files. But The Bat! doesn't A recognize those keys and wants to create their own keys. Can A anyone give me a hint? 1) Did you go to Tools - OpenPGP - Choose PGP Version and select GnuPG 2) Make sure that the path to the PGP executables is either c:\gnupg or in your path Try that - A Thought of the day : And then there was one. - -- Adam Rykala mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=SendPGPKey www.new-wales.net [new-wales], the home of the [new-wales] project All messages both into and out of this account have been scanned with AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. However, all attachments should be scanned also with a virus checker at the receiver's end to ensure that the files are clean and free of virus infection. All messages are for the attention of the recipient only. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/ Comment: Trech Gwlad, nac Arglwydd Comment: Fingerprint: 1877 137B CCB4 FD7A D137 A1B5 7D2B DC81 4F3B C1D1 iQA/AwUBPTGzXH0r3IFPO8HREQLM0ACdHyCjDWWODlPQRtDaZ/wDp9eQOzkAn28l a9EcOMbYIcYTv/1SH3AbqAyX =xAkJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello angel, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 06:42:32 -0500 GMT (14/07/02, 18:42 +0700 GMT), angel rodriguez wrote: ar I check 11 different accounts on three different servers. If I check ar the with F2 it logs on an gets my mail. If I use ALT F2 it check ar most of the account and hangs on one or the other and I have this ar message in the log. ar !7/13/2002, 17:53:19: FETCH - Server reports error. The response is: -ERR Password supplied for tereno is incorrect. This is a pretty clear error message, I would think. Is it true though? ar The connecion box remains open. At this point things are hung up. I ar can't even close TB even if I delete the task and close the connection ar box. It appears as if TB doesn't release the connection. ar I have to use the windows task manager to shut down TD and reboot ar the computer before TB will work again. Reboot the computer? In one version (don't remember whch) I had to restart TB, which was bad enough. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Ohnosecond: That minuscule fraction of time in which you realize you've just made a big mistake. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Email Accounts Down - No Error messages in TB!
Hello TBUDL, I have a few email accounts down on one domain. TB! does not show any error messages on either send or shows 0 emails to receive on test. I know that some of the accounts should be receiving email, since they are used for mail lists. I've checked a few of the mail lists' web interface and new emails have been sent. These email accounts have a web interface to access. I've access one of the web interfaces which did not show any of the previously sent test emails. I am able to successfully send and receive on other accounts. I have contacted the provider but it is most likely it will be some time before hearing back from them. I feel this is most likely a mail server problem with the provider, but any ideals to narrow or identify the problem would be appreciated? What I don't understand is why TB! does NOT provide any error messages on either send or receive of email. Any ideals that would help expedite this would be greatly appreciated? TIA! -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: AVG and message body
Hello Jonathan, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:33:34 -0500 GMT (14/07/02, 22:33 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA Technically Klez doesn't self execute itself... it creates an iframe tag (inline JA frame) which forces it to open as OE/OL are more than happy running JA frames/iframes. When Klez generates its email that it attaches itself to, it JA does something like this: Thanks, I didn't know that. I only know that I used to blame people for clicking on an attachment and thus actively infecting their computer; with Klez they don't need to click any more. All they need is to use OE/OL to open the mail. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. When you come to a fork in the road, take it! (Yogi Berra) Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: how to split digest mail to individual mail using the Bat ?
Hello Allie, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 09:32:49 -0500 GMT (14/07/02, 21:32 +0700 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: AFA If I'm not mistaken, that command is only to import messages. AFA What I want is when I receive an e-mail in digest mode, TB split AFA it automatically into individual e-mail. ACM Bursting a digest cannot be done directly with TB!. Only indirectly, ACM and the indirect method is what Januk is indicating to you. Januk's reply was based on a MIME digest, mine on a digest that just adds the messages together. Is the TB digest a MIME digest? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Exaggeration is a billion times worse than understatement. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: how to split digest mail to individual mail using the Bat ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas F [TF] wrote: ACM Bursting a digest cannot be done directly with TB!. Only ACM indirectly, and the indirect method is what Januk is indicating ACM to you. TF Januk's reply was based on a MIME digest, mine on a digest that TF just adds the messages together. Is the TB digest a MIME digest? No. However ... In the original message starting this thread Adhitya said: I'm joining lot of groups in yahoogroups using digest mode e-mail. He's referring to mail from yahoogroups. I don't know if they're MIME digests but have to assume in the interest of the discussion and the inquiry. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0xyOIACgkQV8nrYCsHF+JrlACfRQvGwPpKPyU2pjgJAevnDksw 8LsAn14wCiispas0opRE7wuYeItLskuG =y4B8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello Thomas, Yes, the error message is VERY clear and that is what makes the bells go off. The password is correct and if I reboot my computer and only check mail manually with F2 it works well. Once I go to ALT F2 I get that and thing hang up.!! TB has work well for me for a few years and I'm not ready to can it, but I need to find out what is going on. Rebooting anything is out of the question the long run. Warmly, Angel Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Sunday, July 14, 2002, 7:54:46 AM, you wrote: TF Hello angel, TF On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 06:42:32 -0500 GMT (14/07/02, 18:42 +0700 GMT), TF angel rodriguez wrote: ar I check 11 different accounts on three different servers. If I check ar the with F2 it logs on an gets my mail. If I use ALT F2 it check ar most of the account and hangs on one or the other and I have this ar message in the log. ar !7/13/2002, 17:53:19: FETCH - Server reports error. The response is: -ERR Password supplied for tereno is incorrect. TF This is a pretty clear error message, I would think. Is it true TF though? ar The connecion box remains open. At this point things are hung up. I ar can't even close TB even if I delete the task and close the connection ar box. TF It appears as if TB doesn't release the connection. ar I have to use the windows task manager to shut down TD and reboot ar the computer before TB will work again. TF Reboot the computer? In one version (don't remember whch) I had to TF restart TB, which was bad enough. -- Best regards, angelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[4]: SMTP server report
Jonathan With MERCURY/32 I need to use ClickOff for Jonathan autominimization, but that is a tiny inconvenience compared Jonathan to the benefit. Why? Create a desktop shortcut, move it your startup folder, right click on the program in your Startup Folder and select PROPERTIES then under RUN use the drop down arrow and select MINIMIZED. Why use a 3rd party app or solution to do what Windows can accomplish by itself? Just a thought. A rather good thought. I *was* using an icon called the Mercury Loader; this, when copied into the Startup folder with minimized running set, did not result in a minimized MERCURY/32. Just now, however, thinking about your suggestion, I replaced this icon with the regular Mercury for Win32 icon, also with minimized running set...and for some reason, this one does produce the desired effect. So, no more problem :) -- Jonathan E. Brickmanhttp://joshuacorps.org Live forever. If you don't know how, or aren't sure, please ask, and I will tell you. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Message final glitches
Hey Dierk, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sunday, July 14, 2002 at 3:09:50 AM. DH 2. Make a Quick Template with the %CLEAR macro in it and invoke it DH before you enter anything else in your new message. Cool tip! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! eMail v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) Your mouse has moved. Windows must now reboot. Click OK to continue. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: SMTP server report
Anyone have a caching-only DNS server they like for Win32 ??? IIRC lot of Mercury users using DNSplus, but the better one is BIND 4.9.8 porting by Kahn (see www.isc.org), it is run under win9x too (if you're using NT or W2K, the DNS is built in). I used to use the 4.9.8 port regularly; however, I found that it sometimes caused some sort of registry problems vis a vis networking when used in Win98 and especially WinME. I am now working on trying to get MaraDNS to work. It's designed for Unix and also Cygwin; I am going to see how it performs under Cygwin, and maybe try to get it to work under Mingw32. If I can do the latter, it will be very nice indeed. -- Jonathan E. Brickmanhttp://joshuacorps.org Live forever. If you don't know how, or aren't sure, please ask, and I will tell you. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hi angel. At 3:02 PM on Sunday, July 14, 2002 you wrote the following about [Trouble checking mail with ALT F2]: ar The password is correct and if I reboot my computer and ar only check mail manually with F2 it works well. Once I ar go to ALT F2 I get that and thing hang up.!! I'm wondering whether TB! is too fast for that ISP? I'm not sure why that would hang up the program completely it surely shouldn't lock up your system. I don't know if you are set to send receive in one pass but if so, try changing option to download only see how that gets handled. Also I'm supposing task manger is not available to you either. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.61/W2K_SP2 ICQ 41116329 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Auto size subject column
The, For some strange reason I turned off the option to auto-size the subject column as threads expand. Now I can't find where it is set. Can someone help me out? TIA -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! eMail v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) How do you make Windows faster ? Throw it harder Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Showing Position in Tree View, when viewing messages in extra window
Hello The Bat! ML, If I hopen an email in an extra window (eg via double click on message) and now move to the next or the previews message, the highlight bar from the tree view (or list) does not follow ... Is it possible to active this ? Or is this a planned feature ? This would be really great, especially when going through mailing lists. Cause then u always know where u are in the thread. Best regards, Clemens written with TheBat! 1.60q on Windows XP, 5 1 Build 2600 on Sunday, July 14, 2002 at 10:13:35 PM Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello Jan, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:57:08 PM, you wrote: ar The password is correct and if I reboot my computer and ar only check mail manually with F2 it works well. Once I ar go to ALT F2 I get that and thing hang up.!! JR I'm wondering whether TB! is too fast for that ISP? I'm JR not sure why that would hang up the program completely JR it surely shouldn't lock up your system. I also wondered if it was a speed issue? NO it does not lock up the system but I can't get TB to work again unless I REBOOT the system. JR I don't know if you are set to send receive in one pass JR but if so, try changing option to download only see how JR that gets handled. I will do that. JR Also I'm supposing task manger is not available to you JR either. Yes, I have the Windows task manager. What can I use it for in this situation?? Best regards, angelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Auto size subject column
Hello Tim, It was foretold that on Sunday, July 14, 2002 at 16:10 GMT -0400, Tim Musson [TM] would type: TM For some strange reason I turned off the option to auto-size the TM subject column as threads expand. Now I can't find where it is set. TM Can someone help me out? - Options - Preferences - Message List It is the first option. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal This page intentionally left unblank. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Email Accounts Down - No Error messages in TB!
Hi Greg, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:15:01 -0500, you wrote: I am able to successfully send and receive on other accounts. I have contacted the provider but it is most likely it will be some time before hearing back from them. I feel this is most likely a mail server problem with the provider, but any ideals to narrow or identify the problem would be appreciated? I have noticed sometimes (at least with 1.60c), TB! doesn't display an error message if the connection attempt times out. Unfortunately timeouts are not customizable (something on the wishlist I think). It could be a number of issues causing it, like a temporary server issue, or bad connection. What I don't understand is why TB! does NOT provide any error messages on either send or receive of email. Any ideals that would help expedite this would be greatly appreciated? TIA! As for not showing any messages about it not sending, I wouldn't know, I've never actually had any problems in that area. Does the mail leave your outbox? Or does it just pop back up on failure to send? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Re[2]: SMTP server report
Hi Jonathan, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:22:38 -0500, you wrote: I am now working on trying to get MaraDNS to work. It's designed for Unix and also Cygwin; I am going to see how it performs under Cygwin, and maybe try to get it to work under Mingw32. If I can do the latter, it will be very nice indeed. Just out of curiousity, what is wrong with your ISPs DNS servers? Why do you need to run your own servers? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: AVG and message body
Hi Thomas, On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:25:46 +0700, you wrote: Thanks, I didn't know that. I only know that I used to blame people for clicking on an attachment and thus actively infecting their computer; with Klez they don't need to click any more. All they need is to use OE/OL to open the mail. That was how I'd managed to filter the mail out before we got our mail scanner in place, and everybody's virus scanner were updated... I added a procmail (www.procmail.org) filter on the mail server to search for an iframe tag in the emails. Seeing as I've not actually seen any emails using frames, let alone iframes, I wasn't too worried about false positives ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[4]: SMTP server report
I am now working on trying to get MaraDNS to work. It's designed for Unix and also Cygwin; I am going to see how it performs under Cygwin, and maybe try to get it to work under Mingw32. If I can do the latter, it will be very nice indeed. Just out of curiousity, what is wrong with your ISPs DNS servers? Why do you need to run your own servers? Even on Cox Cablevision's broadband, sometimes the DNS response is slow. And using a modem, DNS is immensely better if one runs a caching-only nameserver on the local machine. -- Jonathan E. Brickmanhttp://joshuacorps.org Live forever. If you don't know how, or aren't sure, please ask, and I will tell you. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Re[4]: SMTP server report
Hi Jonathan, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:29:54 -0500, you wrote: Even on Cox Cablevision's broadband, sometimes the DNS response is slow. And using a modem, DNS is immensely better if one runs a caching-only nameserver on the local machine. I can understand using a caching-only DNS server, saves repeatitive lookups, hence time... but you still have to do the initial lookup. You may want to look into trying other DNS servers if your ISP is slow at responding. Which I guess is what you're doing now ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Email Accounts Down - No Error messages in TB!
Hello Jonathan, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 4:12:56 PM, you wrote: JA It could be a number of issues causing it, like a temporary server JA issue, or bad connection. I don't think it is a bad connection, because other email accounts worked on same pass. JA As for not showing any messages about it not sending, I wouldn't know, I've JA never actually had any problems in that area. Does the mail leave your outbox? JA Or does it just pop back up on failure to send? As far as TB! was concerned the log looked like everything okay. It was just like accounts that were working except on receive log indicated 0 email when there should be some. I did here back from tech support. Apparently there is a problem with mail jamming the spool. I will have to inquire because I was moved to another server back in February or March due to inconsistent mail. If I get this email back, then things working okay for now. g -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Email Accounts Down - No Error messages in TB!
Hi Greg, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:22:00 -0500, you wrote: Hello Jonathan, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 4:12:56 PM, you wrote: JA It could be a number of issues causing it, like a temporary server JA issue, or bad connection. I don't think it is a bad connection, because other email accounts worked on same pass. You mean you have multiple accounts setup in TB!, collecting from the same account on a server? As far as TB! was concerned the log looked like everything okay. It was just like accounts that were working except on receive log indicated 0 email when there should be some. Maybe it was picking up from the wrong server, where you do have 0 messages waiting...? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi angel, @14 July 2002, 15:16 -0500 (21:16 UK time) angel rodriguez [AR] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jan Rifkinson: AR I also wondered if it was a speed issue? AR NO it does not lock up the system but I can't get TB to work again AR unless I REBOOT the system. This sounds *so* much like a ZoneAlarm-puts-the-boot-in issue. Put my mind at rest. Tell me you're not using good-ole ZA. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9Mf13OeQkq5KdzaARAgeFAKDxDElo7TNsH7wB/Utaky37ylGZIwCeJxAN DBSf7lNtf6y98m5wqh22aH4= =EmaM -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Email Accounts Down - No Error messages in TB!
Hello Jonathan, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 5:29:05 PM, you wrote: JA You mean you have multiple accounts setup in TB!, collecting from JA the same account on a server? No, but close. I have multiple email accounts setup in TB! I have multiple email accounts setup on the same mail server. The relationship between TB! accounts and the mail server accounts is one to one. JA Maybe it was picking up from the wrong server, where you do have 0 messages JA waiting...? I never changed the incoming mail server in TB! account settings which have worked fine for months for each account. How could TB! pick up from wrong server when nothing changed in TB!? -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Showing Position in Tree View, when viewing messages in extra window
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Clemens, @14 July 2002, 22:15 +0200 (21:15 UK time) Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer [CS] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The Bat! Mailinglist: CS If I hopen an email in an extra window (eg via double click on CS message) and now move to the next or the previews message, the CS highlight bar from the tree view (or list) does not follow ... No, that's because (if you look at the window header) you've opened a *folder* and not a message. Turn on the message list in the folder view and you'll see the message list attached to that particular folder view. CS Is it possible to active this ? Or is this a planned feature ? No it is not. The way it works is perfect, that each folder view has its own message list and memory of which message is being viewed. CS This would be really great, especially when going through mailing CS lists. Cause then u always know where u are in the thread. Not needed when you turn on the Message list. See View | Message list. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9Mf5bOeQkq5KdzaARAvzXAKCwwCN8PTSXzrcqQ2fJZw2Lx2+69QCgwvCB yppkD41kpFW5rY48EJ9hsEo= =7P53 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello Marck, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 5:38:46 PM, you wrote: MDP This sounds *so* much like a ZoneAlarm-puts-the-boot-in issue. MDP Put my mind at rest. Tell me you're not using good-ole ZA. This is starting to sound like a good-ole broken record on this list. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Email Accounts Down - No Error messages in TB!
Hi Greg, On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:40:36 -0500, you wrote: No, but close. I have multiple email accounts setup in TB! I have multiple email accounts setup on the same mail server. The relationship between TB! accounts and the mail server accounts is one to one. Ahh... understood. I never changed the incoming mail server in TB! account settings which have worked fine for months for each account. How could TB! pick up from wrong server when nothing changed in TB!? Well you said they moved an account (maybe the offending account) to a different server. Some ISPs have mail servers setup (if large enough) to have a single collecting server, but several servers running behind it with the accounts on it. If they'd moved the account from one server to another due to load issues, the single access point might have pointed you to the wrong server for collection... just speciculation... probably something worth taking up with your ISP. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Email Accounts Down - No Error messages in TB!
Hello Jonathan, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 5:48:57 PM, you wrote: JA Well you said they moved an account (maybe the offending account) JA to a different server. Yes indeed I did. JA Some ISPs have mail servers setup (if large enough) to have a JA single collecting server, but several servers running behind it JA with the accounts on it. This one is probably large enough, since I know they have multiple servers. JA If they'd moved the account from one server to another due to load JA issues, the single access point might have pointed you to the JA wrong server for collection... just speciculation... probably JA something worth taking up with your ISP. Yes indeed! In fact I already logged into on-line support to try an add additional info on the original ticket, but support marked completed. :Þ( I'll have to add new support ticket to get answer and refer to original ticket. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello Marck, Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 NO I am not, but I just got a pavproxy.exe error and suspect that the problem just might the the Panda Anitvirus I recently purchased., I also just upgraded to TB 1.61 and the connection dialog box hanging up seems to have gone away. I will know in a bit if it is the Panda. I also upgraded that. angel Sunday, July 14, 2002, 5:38:46 PM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi angel, MDP @14 July 2002, 15:16 -0500 (21:16 UK time) angel rodriguez [AR] in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jan Rifkinson: AR I also wondered if it was a speed issue? AR NO it does not lock up the system but I can't get TB to work again AR unless I REBOOT the system. MDP This sounds *so* much like a ZoneAlarm-puts-the-boot-in issue. Put my MDP mind at rest. Tell me you're not using good-ole ZA. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[3]: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello angel, Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Well I am pretty sure that it something to do with the Panda. When the Panda is on thing screw up when the Panda is off things work like they did before!! The way they should. It may have to do with pavProxy. Does anyone have any ideas on how to get the two to work. I would hat to have to choose but if I had to choose I would choose TB! angel Sunday, July 14, 2002, 6:03:05 PM, you wrote: ar Hello Marck, ar Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP ar 5.1 Build 2600 ar NO I am not, but I just got a pavproxy.exe error and suspect that the ar problem just might the the Panda Anitvirus I recently purchased., ar I also just upgraded to TB 1.61 and the connection dialog box hanging ar up seems to have gone away. ar I will know in a bit if it is the Panda. I also upgraded that. ar angel Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, @14 July 2002, 17:46 -0500 (23:46 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: MDP This sounds *so* much like a ZoneAlarm-puts-the-boot-in issue. MDP Put my mind at rest. Tell me you're not using good-ole ZA. GS This is starting to sound like a good-ole broken record on this GS list. If ZA didn't *sometimes* interfere (and with more than just TB) for some folks, then the same answer wouldn't keep coming back, would it? Yes Greg, I get that maybe you have no problem with it... as yet g. Please try not to impede other people from recommending what has proven time and again to be a sound remedial course of action: dump ZA and put on a firewall that lets the OS work without interference. I have never let ZA near my systems because of the bad press it gets here and elsewhere. Allie, my co-moderator here, has some first rate horror stories of what it did to him. That's good enough for me. I can't afford that kind of mess. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9MgXrOeQkq5KdzaARAhgQAKCHRgf/J57wYwzLKq21fXMny7gUzwCgy1MV +8fGkrDZJSWpoSC9PFTYEnY= =5LLQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi angel, @15 July 2002, 18:09 -0500 (00:09 UK time) angel rodriguez [AR] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to angel rodriguez: AR Does anyone have any ideas on how to get the two to work. I would AR hat to have to choose but if I had to choose I would choose TB! Download the plug-in for Panda from ftp://www.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/bav/Panda.BAV, install it using the Options | Virus protection settings and turn off any mail checking options within Panda itself. That will help. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9MgaGOeQkq5KdzaARAtiiAKCUGD/Ap8LxUemW1kmvYpv9fTw64ACfR8Xu +RU0Gw/Mcu1Ferx5z0AKJQw= =OsAe -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hi angel. At 7:09 PM on Sunday, July 14, 2002 you wrote the following about [Trouble checking mail with ALT F2]: ar Well I am pretty sure that it something to do with the Panda. When ar the Panda is on thing screw up when the Panda is off things work like ar they did before!! The way they should. ar It may have to do with pavProxy. Aha! I tried Panda some time ago after reading an anti-virus report that gave it glowing comments now that I think about it, I had a similar situation as you describe. I don't remember what TB! version I was using @ the time but since it was a Panda trial I dumped it off my system. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.61/W2K_SP2 ICQ 41116329 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Auto size subject column
Hey Januk, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.60q/Post3) Educational' was used to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sunday, July 14, 2002 at 4:36:36 PM. JA - Options JA- Preferences JA - Message List JA It is the first option. Yes, I think I am blind today... Thanks! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! eMail v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) The software said it required Windows 3.1 or better so I installed Linux. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello Marck, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 6:14:50 PM, you wrote: MDP If ZA didn't *sometimes* interfere (and with more than just TB) MDP for some folks, then the same answer wouldn't keep coming back, MDP would it? I agree. IIRC the common denominator with ZA (or ZAP)and TB! is that the user has an always ON connections and auto downloads. My memory may be wrong, but I'm still on the old dial up connection and everything manual. Hopefully in the near future I will be able to upgrade this old PC and change to wide band connection. If my memory is correct, I'll probably experience the problem. g MDP Yes Greg, I get that maybe you have no problem with it... as yet MDP g. Please try not to impede other people from recommending what MDP has proven time and again to be a sound remedial course of MDP action: dump ZA and put on a firewall that lets the OS work MDP without interference. On the contrary I have had problems with ZAP see [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. It works for me now, but the quality of service is NOT going in a direction that I perceive is favorable for long term. In the newsgroup grc.security.software under subject Re: ZAP 3.0.133 comments, Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have in fact brought up the matter of conflicts with TB!. I'm pretty sure this newsgroup is visited by ZL employees, so if ZL doesn't know about problems with TB! they do now. MDP I have never let ZA near my systems because of the bad press it gets MDP here and elsewhere. Allie, my co-moderator here, has some first rate MDP horror stories of what it did to him. That's good enough for me. I MDP can't afford that kind of mess. It depends upon what press you read, see http://home.cnet.com/software/0-8668147-8-8666866-1.html?tag=top5. I've often wondered how heavy the advertising dollar weighs in these decision, or what perspective the products are being evaluated such as level of computer experience, etc. I do agree with you in that users experiences have more weight in formulating my decisions about software. This is the main reason I am a member of this mail list. g -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Strong [GS] wrote: GS I agree. IIRC the common denominator with ZA (or ZAP)and TB! is GS that the user has an always ON connections and auto downloads. Nope. My agony occurred while I still used a dial-up modem connection. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0yLeIACgkQV8nrYCsHF+LRqgCg72kX8RMd8jhcZuL0+UZcSehR aVQAn1eg4WYIlpGNgd2nezVjd8kv69Zo =FqyB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote: JR Aha! I tried Panda some time ago after reading an anti-virus JR report that gave it glowing comments now that I think about it, JR I had a similar situation as you describe. I don't remember what JR TB! version I was using @ the time but since it was a Panda trial JR I dumped it off my system. What's bugging me more is the nasty interactions often occurring and the reluctance to look in that direction as the source of the problem. We *have* to sound like a broken record since TB! in and of itself is well behaved. It will not connect beautifully and then stop after that, with the problem being cured by a system reboot or restart of TB!. If this is happening, the problem is not TB!. I had the same problem with Panda when I tested it and this is why the test period was extremely short for me. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0yLqAACgkQV8nrYCsHF+JzowCeJ7PMd6YVSXko3+5h12DxsTmr MSoAoJmI105t0xF0hGLExX7LQwp6Qdzo =FGl0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
Hello Allie, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 9:05:21 PM, you wrote: ACM Nope. My agony occurred while I still used a dial-up modem connection. I stand corrected. It is interesting that some have problems while others do not. What OS did you use at the time? Was it intermittent problem not identifiable, or otherwise? -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Strong [GS] wrote: ACM Nope. My agony occurred while I still used a dial-up modem ACM connection. GS I stand corrected. It is interesting that some have problems while GS others do not. What OS did you use at the time? Was it GS intermittent problem not identifiable, or otherwise? At the time I was running Win2k SP1. So far, all that I witnessed having the same problems as I had were running Win2k as well. It would therefore seem to be a Win2k specific problem. Note however, that not all Win2k users that use ZA have problems. Those running Win98 don't seem to have problems of the nature I've been referring to. I have no idea about XP but I'd watch out as an XP user since it's just the later version of Win2k. The problem was intermittent at first and always cured by a reboot. Sometimes I had to reboot multiple times to correct the problem. Initially the connection problems occurred only with TB!, then it progressed to involve my internet connection in general. Disabling ZA didn't help and it was this part that was most devastating in terms of the frustration. I felt that disabling the firewall should nullify any connection problems ZA would cause. Well, it didn't, and it took a while for me to realize this. I was blaming Win2k the whole time!! There's one good thing that came out of the experience. This was my sensitization to the fact that adverse software interactions are common and can be very difficult to pick up since we often blame the malfunctioning application as the direct cause of the problem. Though the application itself will usually be the cause of problems confined to use of the application itself, don't forget the lurking software interaction ESPECIALLY when others cannot reproduce the problem you're experiencing. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0yOFMACgkQV8nrYCsHF+KBzwCfbX9MQhZsL9ijgXYeU2vpiQ4X hbQAn3kMBNPh3WfiqPRpTvlCqaxmSTFX =UgJP -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Win98 or Win XP
Hello Sudip, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 8:31:45 PM, you wrote: SP Hi Batpeople, SPAt home I have a stand alone PC with normal home usage. Should I SPstay with win98 or upgrade to XP? Can you guys elucidate a point SPor two on the pros and cons? Sorry if this gets too OT but I wanted SPto get an impartial view on the matter from the users of both the SPsystems. Anything different running TB! under XP? If 98 ain't broken then don't fix it and keep it running until it either breaks (experience regular or random crashes, freezes often, etc.) or it's time to get a new computer, whatever comes first. Of course XP is much better than 98 or ME, but when migrating from an older computer you will first have to make sure you have enough memory (256 Mb I'd say) and then make sure you get new drivers for all your hardware and then you could upgrade.. This could be as easy as sitting back for half an hour drinking coffee, or it could be long nights of hell. However as you're a 'The Bat!' user you're likely to have a keen interest in computers and making them work best so you'll probably upgrade anyway. :-) I'm running XP now, though I feel that Windows 2000 was more stable, and as I turned all the cartoony features of XP off anyway it's virtually the same in functionality and appearance. For home use though I would probably stick with XP over 2000; if I was in charge of a company network then I'd go with Win 2K. Cheers, Chanchao Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Win98 or Win XP
Hello Chanchao, In Reference to your Posting on Sunday, July 14 2002 at 08:04 PM PDT, For home use though I would probably stick with XP over 2000; if I was in charge of a company network then I'd go with Win 2K. Can you not take XP Pro and design it such that all the fancy/cartoony stuff is gone set up your Networks such that most of the security holes are patched, etc? I understand that MS will not be supporting Win 2K for very much longer, so I'm curious if XP Pro can be just as secure and stable as Win 2K if you know what you are doing. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: OT: Win98 or Win XP
Hello Nick, Monday, July 15, 2002, 10:16:33 AM, you wrote: For home use though I would probably stick with XP over 2000; if I was in charge of a company network then I'd go with Win 2K. NA Can you not take XP Pro and design it such that all the fancy/cartoony NA stuff is gone set up your Networks such that most of the security NA holes are patched, etc? I understand that MS will not be supporting Win 2K NA for very much longer, so I'm curious if XP Pro can be just as secure and NA stable as Win 2K if you know what you are doing. Probably; in my case another problem could be that I'm still using Office Cheers, Chanchao Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
