Re: Account Tree
Good morning ~John, It was foretold that on 14-8-2002 18:20:50 GMT-0500 (which was 1:20:50 where I live) ~John wrote and spread these wise comments: snipped a bit ~ I created a shortcut to View | Split Mode | Full Account Tree ~ shortcut Alt+A and it will not pull the Account Tree back up after ~ the side has sucked it up I tried it using F12 as shortkey and it worked. Maybe you should give that try. -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.61 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera. Love has reasons which reason cannot understand. - Blaise Pascal Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: One trash can?
Hello jan, Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 4:40:23 PM, you wrote: RM Is there some easy way to use one trash can RM across multiple accounts? jr Sure. I use a common Trash can filter trash to jr it from 3 accts. Just point whatever trash jr filter you set up to the common Trash jr folder/can. You can have filters do this jr automatically or manually. I'm wondering why one would want a single trash can? Just for maintenance purposes? -- Best regards, alistsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Italian not available despite of intpack?
Hallo Vincent, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:02:09 +0200GMT (14-8-02, 3:02 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: VDE I installed The Bat! on a machine frequently used by Italian VDE users. Proudly I showed them the intpack which let us choose VDE different languages including Italian, but after restarting TB VDE there were many languages, but not Italian. There's only an Italian spell checker, no Italian interface. I don't know whether that has been different in the past, because I vaguely remember somebody complaining about the quality of TB's Italian, but that's how it is now. Ok, I went back and installed the previous (19-5-2002) language pack. That includes an Italian interface. The current (23-7-2002) pack doesn't. If you don't have an old copy yourself, you can mail me off list and I'll send it to you. But I don't know why RIT removed it. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Command Line
Hello jan, Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 7:32:11 PM, you wrote: jr Hi Daryl. jr At 12:54 PM on Tuesday, August 13, 2002 you [DF] jr wrote the following about Command Line: DF Has there been a discussion of making the DF backup feature 'driveable' from the command DF line. [...] jr How about using the /BATCH command? The batch command allows for stacking commands in a file - but I cant see any way of using the backup feature from a command line. Being able to automate the whole maintenance centre would be a welcome feature for me. At the moment I'm having to manually copy compress the mail files. -- Best regards, Darylmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Send Reply to another address (not the From address)
Hello all, I would like to realize the following: - Trigger on a certain e-mail (this is the easy part and I can manage this :) - Reply to this message but send it to another e-mail address - Of course I would like to do this automated (via template) Does anyone know a way of doing this, it doesn't seem to work with: %TOADRESS = email address or %TONAME = email address in the Reply template Thanks in advance. Regards, Erik -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
What can be the reason that I cannot subscribe tu TB-OT? Unsubscribing from my other account was successful! This is a forwarded message From : Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 07:24 Subject : Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender ===8=== Original Text of Message === This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unrouteable mail domain yahoogroops.com -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng0.kundenserver.de) by moutng0.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #2) id 17eqe8-te-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:24:40 +0200 Received: from [80.132.110.21] (helo=80.132.110.21) by mrelayng0.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #2) id 17eqe8-0002rN-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:24:40 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:24:40 +0200 From: Roland Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) Personal Reply-To: Roland Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: none X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ===8== End of Original Text of Message = -- Best regards, Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
set tbudl vacation
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Dear Roland, --- Roland Burger / Mittwoch, 14.08.2002, 10:54:28 Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender What can be the reason that I cannot subscribe tu TB-OT? Unsubscribing from my other account was successful! unrouteable mail domain yahoogroops.com - ^ | | Check your spelling -- yahoogroups.com -- best regards Eddie Powered by The Bat! v1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP (public) is available: www.EddieCastelli.com/pgpkey/ Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Send Reply to another address (not the From address)
Hi Erik, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:28:53 +0200 (MEST) GMT (Aug 14, 15:13 my local time), you [EJ] wrote: EJ I would like to realize the following: snip EJ - Reply to this message but send it to another e-mail address snip EJ it doesn't seem to work with: %TOADRESS = email address or EJ %TONAME = email address in the Reply template use: %TO=%TO=email address -- Cheers,Sudip Pokhrel Sudip Kathmandu-NP. PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu TB! v1.61 -- XP Pro 5.1 | P4-1.6GHz 256MB _.. How long a minute is depends on what side of the bathroom door you're on Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Jonathan, In a message with [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 13 Aug 2002 11:52:44 (my local time 18:52:44), you typed: forwarding it to spamcop / abuse@...). JA As for the submission to spamcop, checkout the filter listed here: Filter url info snipped. I'm beginning to get curious about this spamcop thang. Is it a service you'll have to pay for? - -- - -- /Krister mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail brought to you by The bat! V1.61, on Windows 98 4 10 build Pgp keys available here: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=get_pgp_keys -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPVodqjg5SXqDEzkLEQM3cACfcqrTIEWWrJtAGJHE8q98m0wetucAoMvp XsJqDVp0yY8PE1dazT/wHJ++ =T3tB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Italian not available despite of intpack?
Bonjour Roelof, Mercredi, le 14 août 2002 à 10h18 [GMT +0200] (ce qui correspond à 10h18 ici où j'habite), Roelof Otten =[RO] a écrit à Vincent - D. Ertner : RO doesn't. If you don't have an old copy yourself, you can mail me off RO list and I'll send it to you. But I don't know why RIT removed it. perhaps because lng file 1.5X are not fully compatible with lng file 1.6. Perhaps the solution for you is here http://ginkyo.free.fr/medias/telechargement/LNG_FR_IT_EN_14aout02.zip ;-) -- Bien à vous, \---SatorArepoTenet---/ | _ __ | | //\lexis |-|aeringer/ _ . _ |_ | | alias \__)|| )|(\/(_) | | / | /---SatorArepoTenet---\ Ma clef PGP : mailto:pgp1AROBASEginkyoPOINTorg Using The Bat! v1.61 (S/N EEB8DE89) on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 / Alexis Haeringer alias Ginkyo / Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
Hi Krister, KE I'm beginning to get curious about this spamcop thang. Is it a service KE you'll have to pay for? No, it's a free reporting service although there are some things you get with a paid account. Personally, I've never seen that reporting to Spamcop does much. Most of the big spammers are on Verio, Exodus or some Asian ISP. Verio Exodus are spam-tolerant don't do anything other than wag their fingers at their customers and say take that name off your list. 2 months later it's back on. The Asian spamhauses of course just keep pumping their crap out no matter what. Click to remove is another term for Click to verify. I have seen some small time spammers get TOSd through SpamCop and I'm sure their blacklist is worthwhile but it's not going to reduce your spam if you report things to them. IMHO. -- Tom G. http://blarp.com -- Free tech support The Bat 1.61 - Windows 2000 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: set tbudl vacation
ON Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 11:26:53 AM, you wrote: Anyone for folder templates ;-) -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= It would appear that we have reached the limits of what it is possible to achieve with computer technology, although one should be careful with such statements, as they tend to sound pretty silly in 5 years. -- John von Neumann (1949) Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
resending folder list question
Hello Peter, Have you had checked 'Leave message base intact' when deleting folders shown as 'Common folders'? If not: it's quite reasonable their disappeared. I choose the leave messages intact and deleted the common folders. Unfortunately it deleted my personal folders as well. Only empty folders are duplicated? No other? All folders are duplicated actually. If it disappears from account too again (albeit I don't know any single reason why it should), try pressing Ctrl+Alt+Shift+L at once when finished with deleting all 'outside account' folders. This should recover the folders to be shown in accounts. This did not work either. Only sent mails and trash folder remained. after restarting TheBat the folders were duplicated in the common folders and were also empty. Alaeddin Muntasser Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 11:28:20 AM, Blarp wrote: I have seen some small time spammers get TOSd through SpamCop and I'm sure their blacklist is worthwhile but it's not going to reduce your spam if you report things to them. IMHO. I would agree with this (as a paying user of SpamCop). It is probably helpful to report things to SpamCop so that open relays and proxies get identified, but I found that I had far more success at terminating spammer's accounts when I did the investigating and reporting myself. I now have a set of Kill filters that I use alongside Selective Download, so around 40 messages a day are being deleted on the server, and the remaining 1 or 2 I report via SpamCop. Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
Hi Krister, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:06:39 +0200, you wrote: JA As for the submission to spamcop, checkout the filter listed here: Filter url info snipped. I'm beginning to get curious about this spamcop thang. Is it a service you'll have to pay for? There are a range of services offered by spamcop (see www.spamcop.net for details). There is a free no frills reportting service which just allows you to report spam. If you like it enough, and wish to support it, there is a paid reporting service which gives you presidence over non-paid users. Spamcop also offers other services such as mail addresses which come pre-filtered for you. Take a look at the website, and see what the author offers. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One trash can?
Hi Greg. At 10:59 PM on Tuesday, August 13, 2002 you [GS] wrote the following about One trash can?: GS I'm probably missing something here, or just GS being stupid. [...] Neither, I'm sure. :-) GS Why have on trash can when you can set TB to GS purge on exit? GS Do you just want to check in one place before GS a purge? Exactly. I leave trash in the folder for 2 days. This gives me a chance to give it a once over before TB! purges it. My filters are in combination so that they filter out folks I know by inclusion in my AB, then obvious spam viri. Sometimes I'll get a msg from someone who is not in my AB but whom I want to answer. So I find them in the trash bin, add them to my AB then there's never another problem. Checking in one trash can is easier than checking in multiple trash cans. That's why I have it the way it is. HTH -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.61/W2K_SP3 ICQ 41116329 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?
Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 6:58:16 PM, you wrote: [snip most of long, interesting discussion] TF Am I right in assuming that you won't block Outlook, because you TF can't do *that*! ? I'm butting in here, but ... I've been working on anti spam for the last few months, and well over half the spam that comes into my box comes via Outlook or Outlook Express. It may be as high as 90%, the rest coming through hotmail and mailers of that ilk with a sprinkling of Eudora and commercial stuff I don't recognize. I have yet to see any spam come through with TB or Poco on it. The highest percentage by far comes in labeled Outlook or OE... but I'll eat my trackball if anybody ever filters on Outlook. I'm also receiving some stuff with clearly forged headers - this I know because some of it has my own address in the 'from' field ... So I'd be leery to filter on X-headers or mailers. Just my 2¢ worth ... Lynn -- 1.60q on Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One trash can?
Hello jan, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, at 08:22:36 GMT -0400 (8/14/02, 7:22 AM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jr My filters are in combination so that they jr filter out folks I know by inclusion in my AB, jr then obvious spam viri. Sometimes I'll get a jr msg from someone who is not in my AB but whom I jr want to answer. So I find them in the trash bin, jr add them to my AB then there's never another jr problem. Maybe I missed something in previous threads. Why don't you implement Known filter? With Known filter when address is not in AB email ends up in Inbox with everything else in Inbox-Known folder. Do you receive that much spam that your present configuration saves you time and effort? jr Checking in one trash can is easier than jr checking in multiple trash cans. That's why I jr have it the way it is. Makes sense. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 98 PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xB1FE63FABody=Please20send20keys Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:16:22 -0700 Lynn Turriff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ... ] The highest percentage by far comes in labeled Outlook or OE... but I'll eat my trackball if anybody ever filters on Outlook. I did in my office server. I made Outlook Filtering since last 2-years for any of /outgoing/ messages from our office staff. No one can use Outlook in my office :-) -- syafril --- Syafril Hermansyah[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One trash can?
Hi Greg. At 9:14 AM on Wednesday, August 14, 2002 you [GS] wrote the following about One trash can?: jr My filters are in combination so that they jr filter out folks I know by inclusion in my AB, jr then obvious spam viri. Sometimes I'll get a jr msg from someone who is not in my AB but whom I jr want to answer. So I find them in the trash bin, jr add them to my AB then there's never another jr problem. GS Maybe I missed something in previous threads. Again, I doubt that. :-) GS Why don't you implement Known filter? With GS Known filter when address is not in AB email GS ends up in Inbox with everything else in GS Inbox-Known folder. Essentially that's what I do. jr My filters are in combination so that they jr filter out folks I know by inclusion in my AB jr [...] Where we part company is that anyone who is $KNOWN$ that *doesn't* belong in a subject, list or personal folder ends up in $KNOWN$ or Inbox, all else goes to trash. GS Do you receive that much spam that your GS present configuration saves you time and GS effort? Depends on what you mean by a lot. Yesterday it was 44 pieces, that's about average *all* of it goes to trash. I can't remember the last time that a piece of junk ended up in $KNOWN$ or Inbox. The only time I spend is a cursory look the one trash folder as a double check before purging. There may be a more efficient way but the system works for me. However, I'm always open to better ideas. :-) HTH -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.61/W2K_SP3 ICQ 41116329 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One trash can?
Hello jan, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, at 09:54:24 GMT -0400 (8/14/02, 8:54 AM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jr My filters are in combination so that they jr filter out folks I know by inclusion in my AB jr [...] By this do you mean Continuing processing with other filters on the Options tab of the Sorting Office window? The reason I ask is really one of trying to understand what you are doing. In other words maybe I can do it better. From what I understand of TB's filters they really are all in combination to a degree because precedent is set from the highest to lowest on the list of filters created. jr Where we part company is that anyone who is jr $KNOWN$ that *doesn't* belong in a subject, list jr or personal folder ends up in $KNOWN$ or Inbox, jr all else goes to trash. I probably should read the Spam threads in more detail. I just set up Marck's SpamCop filter in Active Manual only mode, so anything in my Inbox is reviewed for Spam. If Spam Ctrl+Alt+S to generate message to SpamCop. From some of the Spam threads I've read people create filters on certain characters in the subject to filter to trash. IIRC they also use certain domain names to identify spam, and filter to trash. I don't get much spam. This is probably because in newsgroups I use a dead end email address, and because most of the mail lists that I belong you are required to be a member and have rules against spam. Either these are the reasons, or I'm just lucky. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 98 PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xB1FE63FABody=Please20send20keys Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Jakarata list thinks this is spam?
I'm confused how to figure out what the problem is here. I'm trying to post a message to a list I used to use all the time. Now, however, I keep getting the reply back below when I try to post. If it matters I'm trying to sending this through an exchange server here at work. Would appreciate any insight into what is going on... Thanks. Hi. This is the qmail-send program at nagoya.betaversion.org. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: AntiVirus: Cannot unpack message (wrong MIME format?) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 1575 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 19:29:32 - Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (63.251.56.142) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 19:29:32 - Received: (qmail 90628 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2002 19:29:03 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 90621 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 19:29:03 - Received: from unknown (HELO ?4.21.197.2?) (4.21.197.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 19:29:03 - Received: from mail.outback.com by [4.21.197.2] via smtpd (for daedalus.apache.org [63.251.56.142]) with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 19:29:08 UT Received: from rreumann.obs.outback.com ([172.16.26.38]) by outpost.obs.outback.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:27:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:27:33 -0400 From: Rick Reumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal Reply-To: Rick Reumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Validator/ RegExpression/ Validate Method question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2002 19:27:33.0527 (UTC) FILETIME=[4E70:01C24236] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N snip message -- Rick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Jakarata list thinks this is spam?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, Rick Reumann wrote... Hi. This is the qmail-send program at nagoya.betaversion.org. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: AntiVirus: Cannot unpack message (wrong MIME format?) This would suggest a problem at the other end. They appear to have a mail scanner running in conjunction with qmail, and it is unable to read into the MIME format. As for why it cannot read text/plain, I have no idea, maybe a bad installation, or a corrupt scanning service. If the problem persists, try saving the message as unix .msg somewhere, opening it up, and deleting the mime headers: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version isn't really needed unless you are encoding anything, and text/plain and 7bit are assumed unless otherwise specified according to some document somewhere (I think a W3C doc or an RFC somewhere). Once you have deleted it, import it back into TB!, and then send it, see if that helps. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPVpxXyuD6BT4/R9zEQLzSwCeKf7LUvCks6ltogeRmf25tXLswywAnij8 9+rVapRYjpnjLZLLPpzCh9vP =bhor -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One trash can?
Hi Greg. At 10:51 AM on Wednesday, August 14, 2002 you [GS] wrote the following about One trash can?: jr My filters are in combination so that they jr filter out folks I know by inclusion in my AB jr [...] GS By this do you mean Continuing processing GS with other filters on the Options tab of the GS Sorting Office window? [...] trying to GS understand what you are doing. In other words GS maybe I can do it better. Let's hope so. I'm always up for something better. To answer your question[s]: Only in 2 cases do I use 'continue filtering'. The first thing on my filter list is a filter that identifies my own outgoing msgs that come back to me, i.e. from a list server. These are filtered to a specific color so I ignore them visually, then TB! continues processing they are dropped into their appropriate group folder. Following that are all my specific filters for Mail lists, personal, etc. These filters identify those msgs drop them in their appropriate folders, i.e. TBUDL -- TB! folder, etc. Following that is my $KNOWN$ filter which identifies everything in my AB [I keep only one w a lot of groups as I find that more convenient than multiple ABs]. This is 2nd time I use continue processing. So, for example, if I get a msg from someone who does not have a folder, it passes thru the first 2 levels gets picked up by $KNOWN$ where it stays. $KNOWN$, Inbox, Hi Priority personal msgs are sent to the ticker for my attention. Following that are my spam filters which identify most junk send them to the common trash basket. If a piece of spam ends up in my Inbox I shoot that off to SPAM COP manually via a filter I constructed. Otherwise I found myself spending too much time sending off all my daily spam msgs to SPAM COP. I identify these spam filters in 2 ways: First - Those msgs that aren't addressed to me [remember all list msgs known msgs have been filtered already]. Second - by gen'l subject matter. Ex: gambling, sex, travel, earn, etc. Then I use alternative words that apply to those subjects as they came in to me before I had all these filters. Pretty soon I have a small dictionary of typical words for each subject. All of them go to the common trash can. In options, under the Message List, I set Display time for today's msgs for t [time]. Current week as set ddd,t [day time]. Anything beyond that is d mmm yy, t day, month, yr, time. In this way its very easy to identify today's spam review it -- or at worst, yeterday today's spam list. Last but not least, I have one other filter which just sits in the list for people I don't want to talk to which auto sends a reply that tells that I don't want to talk to them, that I haven't read their email that it has been deleted -- all of which is true. Currently it is only one name in it. And finally there is the anti-virus plug in that hopefully filters *all* virii to the quarantine folder where I delete it, immediately followed by a compress purge folder. GS From what I understand of TB's filters GS they really are all in combination to a degree GS because precedent is set from the highest to GS lowest on the list of filters created. Yes, this is correct that's what I've tried to do. HTH -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.61/W2K_SP3 ICQ 41116329 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Spell Checker - Change ALL function
Hi, I am using TB! 1.61 on a XP Pro machine and have done all my updates and so forth. I find that when I am replying, forwarding or a new email and open up the spell checker, the CHANGE ALL function doesn't change all. It changes that ONE misspelling and then goes onto the next misspelling. The CHANGE and CHANGE ALL function do the same thing. Thanks for any input. -- Guy Prince | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smith Co. - Richmond, California Plant Photographer / IT Specialist 1-800-234-0330 (fax) 510-232-9921 www.smithandcompany.org Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Hi Eddie, on Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:36:45 +0200 GMT (which was Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 11:36 where I live) Eddie Castelli wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: What can be the reason that I cannot subscribe tu TB-OT? Unsubscribing from my other account was successful! unrouteable mail domain yahoogroops.com - ^ | | Check your spelling -- yahoogroups.com I am ashamed! :-( This can only be, when you are only sitting on the computer! -- Best regards, Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I use The Bat! v1.62/Beta1 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 ! Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One trash can?
I'm wondering why one would want a single trash can? Just for maintenance purposes? Pretty much. So that I only have to look in one place should I need to find a trashed message. (Assuming I can't remember which account it's from). Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?
Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 6:46:21 AM, you wrote: The highest percentage by far comes in labeled Outlook or OE... but I'll eat my trackball if anybody ever filters on Outlook. SH I did in my office server. I made Outlook Filtering SH since last 2-years for any of /outgoing/ messages from SH our office staff. No one can use Outlook in my office SH :-) Oh dear .. and it's an old trackball, and kind of grubby, too!lol! Lynn -- 1.60q on Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?
Hello Lynn, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:58:08 -0700 GMT (14/08/02, 23:58 +0700 GMT), Lynn Turriff wrote: LT Oh dear .. and it's an old trackball, and kind of grubby, LT too!lol! ROTFLMAO! Enjoy your meal... -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Proofread carefully to see if you any words out. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
Hello Julian, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:18:35 +0100 GMT (14/08/02, 18:18 +0700 GMT), Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: I have seen some small time spammers get TOSd through SpamCop and I'm sure their blacklist is worthwhile but it's not going to reduce your spam if you report things to them. IMHO. JBL I would agree with this (as a paying user of SpamCop). It is probably JBL helpful to report things to SpamCop so that open relays and proxies get JBL identified, but I found that I had far more success at terminating JBL spammer's accounts when I did the investigating and reporting myself. The amount of feedbacks may be less via SpamCop than by a personal mail to the postmaster, but I think this may be because they know that SpamCop is an automated service, which just requires them to act, and it is more likely that they reply to you when you send a mail to them directly. But I think that those postmasters that act responsibly will act when they receive a spam complaint, regardless of whether they receive it via SpamCop or by a user. But what if SpamCop has received over 26,000 bounces from iasiaworks? Do you think it would sense to send a spam report directly? (BTW there is an American company behind them, even though their head office appears to be in Hong Kong.) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. On a Korean kitchen knife... Warning: Keep out of children. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Italian not available despite of intpack?
Hi Co-Batties, [14.08.2002] doesn't. If you don't have an old copy yourself, you can mail me off list and I'll send it to you. But I don't know why RIT removed it. perhaps because lng file 1.5X are not fully compatible with lng file 1.6. Perhaps the solution for you is here http://ginkyo.free.fr/medias/telechargement/LNG_FR_IT_EN_14aout02.zip ;-) Thanx a lot! -- Cheers, Vince ''' ô¿ô - Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One trash can?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Strong [GS] wrote:' GS From what I understand of TB's filters they really are all in GS combination to a degree because precedent is set from the highest GS to lowest on the list of filters created. Each message is checked for a string match starting with the filter at the top and working downwards through the filter list. As soon as a string match is found, the filter with the string match is applied *and* the message is excluded from any further string matching with filter rules further down the list!. The 'continue processing with other filters' option allows you to prevent this exclusion so that if a match is found and the matching filter actions applied to the message, the message will then continue to be processed by the other filters further down the list, provided that that the message hasn't been moved to another folder by the first matching filter. :) If the message has been moved, it cannot continue to be processed by other filters down the filter list. - -- Allie C Martin \ TB! v1.62/Beta1 Windows XP Pro List Moderator/ PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9Wp1DV8nrYCsHF+IRAomMAKCYabbhueuS6QiiFoHusu8lCsan3QCgwAAV 42quEMzvx5M+7k5H8azEMCc= =q/rU -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Hi Roland, on Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:00:32 +0200GMT (same here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : unrouteable mail domain yahoogroops.com - ^ | | Check your spelling -- yahoogroups.com RB I am ashamed! :-( Don't be. *s* This happens to everyone once in a while. I didn't see the wrong spelling in the first place neither. :-) -- Cheers Peter PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Winamp currently playing: John Mayall Peter Green - The Super-Natural Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Bug with Exclusion in Filter?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I've been working with a filter recently that adds contacts from a list to an address book group so that if they reply off list, I can reply to them, and use the same template as that used on the list (I like consistency). The problem is, I need to exclude my own email address otherwise things go rather odd when I try replying to myself on the list (ie when I correct myself). What was suggested (by Marck I think) is that I create a special group, and in the filter specify the user mustn't exist in that group, if they are not, then add them to the address book (if they are mailing to the list). The problem is this, to make this work, I decided to add an address book item to the exclusions group, and add to that item all my addresses/aliases. But as soon as I added multiple addresses in my item, the filter completely ignored the entry. Here is the details: BeginFilter Name: TheBat Address List Active: 1 Source: \\Certiflex Dimension\Inbox Target: \\Certiflex Dimension\Inbox CopyFolder: none MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AltSet:1: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AltSet:2: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actions: faAddAddress,faoContinueProcessing,faoAdvAddressOut,faoAdvNoGroups AddGroups: TB Lists AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, NoAddrGroups: Exemptions EndFilter (I've snipped out the parts I thought were unnecessary such as replytemplate, so this is my snipped down filter). I realise my filters are a little odd, and match on a header (return-path) that some people don't use, but it is working fine, and I've not had any mismatches. Now for my Address book item for me: Name: Jonathan Angliss Groups: Exemptions Addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snipped some more as I think you get the idea] Now if I remove all but the top item, the filter works fine, but if I have the other items, the filter breaks, and it adds me to the TB Lists group. Would this be a bug or a feature of the program? And do I need to go ahead and create several address book items for all my addresses? - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPVqgdSuD6BT4/R9zEQLG8QCg+Js33Yam8HZBNcu50C57bWML7m0AnAtx 9zuqnjBboNCYpY9uMNjTKDD7 =NpFI -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log window size
Hello Roelof, Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 4:06:05 PM, you wrote: RO I suppose it's avoidable, since I have no problems whatsoever on this RO matter. Neither did I one time. RO What if you don't maximize, but just enlarge the window a bit? Can't. Can't grab the bottom window ledge. RO After closing it, it should open in the same size when called the next RO time. Possibly. But hadn't had the problem before. -- Best regards, Adam Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Command Line
DF Being able to automate the whole maintenance centre would be a welcome DF feature for me. DF At the moment I'm having to manually copy compress the mail files. 'purge and compress' would be another good candidate for a new command line option. -- Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (Mar del Plata - Argentina) | Usando The Bat! 1.60c Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Repair message base
Hi, While trying to weed through my inbox today, I came across 2 messages bringing up an error message, asking if I want to repair the message base. If I click yes, theBat freezes and I have to close it using ctrl-alt-delete. I can't delete the 2 messages responsible and TB doesn't seem to be able to repair the base. I'd be happy for advice how to deal with this. I run TB v. 1.53d, OS WindowsMe (I have no choice g). -- Best regards, Susanne Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Send Reply to another address (not the From address)
On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Sudip Pokhrel stated: SP Hi Erik, SP On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:28:53 +0200 (MEST) GMT (Aug 14, 15:13 my local time), SP you [EJ] wrote: EJ I would like to realize the following: SP snip EJ - Reply to this message but send it to another e-mail address SP snip EJ it doesn't seem to work with: %TOADRESS = email address or EJ %TONAME = email address in the Reply template SP use: %TO=%TO=email address Don't forget the %REPLYTO=New Address Cheers Yall -Cricket Running TB! version 1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 on a 500mhz P-III wtih 512mb Ram Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?
On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Lynn Turriff stated: LT Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 6:46:21 AM, you wrote: The highest percentage by far comes in labeled Outlook or OE... but I'll eat my trackball if anybody ever filters on Outlook. SH I did in my office server. I made Outlook Filtering SH since last 2-years for any of /outgoing/ messages from SH our office staff. No one can use Outlook in my office SH :-) LT Oh dear .. and it's an old trackball, and kind of grubby, LT too!lol! Your trackball is still safe .. syafril is blocking OUTGOING Outlook. He is not filtering incoming. Cheers Yall -Cricket Running TB! version 1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 on a 500mhz P-III wtih 512mb Ram Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ctrl+alt+shift+L problem
I lost some folders during account/ISP changes. I tried to do a Ctrl+Alt+Shift+L to recover them but that sequence actually locked my keyboard! I had to reboot to regain control. I thought it was a fluke since my system had been running for a while so I tried again. Same results. When locked the caps lock light, scroll lock light and power light on my keyboard blink in sequence. I checked my system for any other programs that may set up system-wide key macros and there are none. The best I can figure this sequence is controlled by system hardware. Is there any other way to execute this event other than that particular key sequence? Am on a Dell with a 500Mhz Pent-3 and 512mb ram, running Windoze 2000 rev2195 ServicePack 3 -- Cheers Cricket Be adventurous, do something nude once in awhile. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?
Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 12:13:15 PM, you wrote: LT Oh dear .. and it's an old trackball, and kind of grubby, LT too!lol! C Your trackball is still safe .. syafril is blocking OUTGOING C Outlook. C He is not filtering incoming. C Cheers Yall C -Cricket What a relief! It's a decidedly unappetizing proposition - :-) Lynn -- 1.60q on Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Send Reply to another address (not the From address)
Hello Cricket, On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 at 9:17:14 PM you [C] wrote (at least in part): SP use: %TO=%TO=email address C Don't forget the %REPLYTO=New Address What for? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Basic is a high level languish. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
Hi Thomas, TF But I think that those postmasters that act responsibly will TF act when they receive a spam complaint, regardless of whether they TF receive it via SpamCop or by a user. I agree with this statement. My point was that using SpamCop does not help reduce your personal spam level for a variety of reasons, the biggest being that 90% of the spam comes from APNIC domains that don't give a s***. Plus, it seems that every time an open relay is closed, 2 more open. -- Tom G. http://blarp.com -- Free tech support The Bat 1.61 - Windows 2000 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
Hello Blarp, On Wednesday, 14. August 2002 at 15:29:15 [GMT -0700] you wrote: Hi Thomas, TF But I think that those postmasters that act responsibly will TF act when they receive a spam complaint, regardless of whether they TF receive it via SpamCop or by a user. I agree with this statement. My point was that using SpamCop does not help reduce your personal spam level for a variety of reasons, the biggest being that 90% of the spam comes from APNIC domains that don't give a s***. Plus, it seems that every time an open relay is closed, 2 more open. I tried SpamEater Pro..and it works quiet fine. But only the registered version allows multiple Pop checking. http://www.spameaterpro.com -- Ciao Thomas They have developed treatments for unknown illnesses (Ronald Reagan) Mailer: The Bat!1.62/Beta1 System: Windows 98 A PGP: PGPckt 6.58 Build: 08 | Key: 0xBB9237A9 ICQ: 121117424 (hardly ever online) HP: http://mirror.at/thebat/ Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions II
Hi Thomas, TM I tried SpamEater Pro..and it works quiet fine. But only the TM registered version allows multiple Pop checking. SpamPal is free and does multiple POP checking. -- Tom G. http://blarp.com -- Free tech support The Bat 1.61 - Windows 2000 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: ctrl+alt+shift+L problem
Hallo LC, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:28:42 -0400GMT (14-8-02, 21:28 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: L Ctrl+Alt+Shift+L to recover them but that sequence actually locked my L Is there any other way to execute this event other than that L particular key sequence? I've been checking the menu, but I can't find it. However, you can assign another hotkey to it. Go to the Shortcut Editor (AltF12 or View - Edit shortcuts) In the section 'Folder pane pop-up' you'll find the hotkey for 'Find Lost Folders' here you can alter the hotkey. I don't know why I don't see this possibility in the pop-up screen of the folder pane -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Removable drive
Wednesday, August 14, 2002 at 6:31 PM (Pacific ST) GMT -0800 Greetings TheBat! Users, Is it true that version 2.x of TheBat will have all files needed in the main directory? In other words, no need for a registry file? If this is the case it would be possible to install and run TheBat from a removable drive such as a USB key drive. Think of it... your email program and all messages in your pocket. Just plug it in at a friends house, at work or at home. Any computer with a USB port which is most of them less than three to five years old. It would be great security too since TheBat would not even reside on your computer. Take a look at http://www.usbkeydrive.com and tell me if this would be possible and how practical it would be. I think of this because of the new PocoMail Portable Edition. I hope it will work with v2 of TheBat. -- Wayne Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using TheBat! 1.61 With Windows 98se 4.10 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Send Reply to another address (not the From address)
On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Peter Palmreuther stated: C Don't forget the %REPLYTO=New Address PP What for? Because what the original posting asked for is the definition of Reply-To: - Reply to this message but send it to another e-mail address Cheers -Cricket Running TB! version 1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 on a 500mhz P-III wtih 512mb Ram Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Send Reply to another address (not the From address)
Hi Cricket, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:10:01 -0400 GMT (Aug 15, 07:55 my local time), you [C] wrote: C Don't forget the %REPLYTO=New Address PP What for? C Because what the original posting asked for is the definition of C Reply-To: No it didn't. Erik asked for a way to substitute, when replying, the default recipient's address with a new one. Read carefully: - Reply to this message but send it to another e-mail address -- Cheers,Sudip Pokhrel Sudip Kathmandu-NP. PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu TB! v1.61 -- XP Pro 5.1 | P4-1.6GHz 256MB _.. Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes. - If you can read this, you're overeducated Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bug with Exclusion in Filter?
Hello Jonathan, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:24:48 -0500 GMT (15/08/02, 01:24 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh, you filter on the bounce addresses. Another smart idea I haven't seen before. :-) JA Now for my Address book item for me: JA Addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JA[EMAIL PROTECTED] JA[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] JA Now if I remove all but the top item, the filter works fine, but if I JA have the other items, the filter breaks, Let's see. If the filter works if only the first address is in your addressbook, the filter conditions and actions should be correct. The function check whether in AB seems to choke on multiple addresses in the same AB entry. But what is this: JA AddAddrItems: afiFrom, JA DelAddrItems: afiFrom, Are you adding and deleting the From address to/from the filter at the same time? Or am I reading this wrong? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. I'm not just a gardener, I'm a Plant Manager. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Removable drive
Hello Wayne, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:46:56 -0700 GMT (15/08/02, 08:46 +0700 GMT), Wayne Black wrote: WB Is it true that version 2.x of TheBat will have all files needed in WB the main directory? In other words, no need for a registry file? I have not heard this, and frankly, I doubt it. The registry keys that TB uses are located in HK_Current_User and the very reason for this is that many people use TB on the same computer with someone else, and they use different ID's. So they most likely have different settings in their TB and use the advantages of HKCU to its full extent. WB It would be great security too since TheBat would not even reside on WB your computer. I am not sure about this. If all someone needs is to take away the USB drive, and can then plug it in any computer, it doesn't sound secure to me. I feel much safer having depend TB on my PC, over which I have more physical control than over a portable drive. The bad boy has to either sit on my own chair (he who doth that is doomed), carry the computer away (less likely than carrying a USB drive) or gain access through the internet (hacking / trojans etc) which I hope to prevent. No, I think it would be a lot less security if TB resided completely on a USB drive. Unless you lock the drive into a safe, right there with your diamond rings and the cash money the IRS doesn't know about. Ad You have a USB drive and need security for your email? Try SecureBat! Click here: www.ritlabs.com /Ad -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Send Reply to another address (not the From address)
Hello Cricket, Thank you for your answer, it's just not exactly what I was looking for (Sudib's was). To give you some background information: I receive a message from a friend from his work and want automaticaly reply to his privat mail address. So, Message in: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now I have set in my address-book a specific Reply template for this address. Message out: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (this, I wanted automated in the template) I already thanked Sudip yesterday (in an off-list message) for giving me the answer I was looking for. The answer he gave me is working fine. Again, thanks. Kind regards, Erik snip C Don't forget the %REPLYTO=New Address PP What for? Because what the original posting asked for is the definition of Reply-To: - Reply to this message but send it to another e-mail address So it _TO_ another e-mail address, not _FROM_ :) -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
